1
|
Scaglioni G, Chiereghin A, Bazzani C, Mezzetti F, Cavazza N. Psychosocial Predictors of Colorectal Cancer Screening Intention: An Experiment on the Invitation Letter. Int J Behav Med 2023; 30:867-877. [PMID: 36515798 DOI: 10.1007/s12529-022-10142-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Italy, attendance rates for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening are suboptimal. The present work analysed cognitive and emotional predictors of CRC screening intention and tested an intervention on a real invitation letter to improve CRC screening intention, both directly and in interaction with the predictors of our model. METHODS Our model included variables from the theory of planned behaviour and the emotional barriers to bowel screening scale. We applied six changes to an invitation letter used in Italy to avoid the repetition of words like 'faeces', 'blood', or 'occult' and reduce the prompting of disgust. The 228 participants were randomly assigned to a between-participants design (original letter vs. manipulated letter). RESULTS Disgust hindered CRC screening intention, while embarrassment, fear, and subjective norms (i.e., perception of the social pressures to attend CRC screening) were not associated with intention to screen. More positive attitudes towards CRC screening were associated with a higher intention to screen. The positive association between perceived behavioural control and CRC screening intention was stronger for participants who read the letter with fewer (vs. more) references to bodily waste. Letter manipulation did not affect intention to screen. CONCLUSIONS The disgust associated with faecal matter is a critical factor in determining CRC screening attendance, and it should be acknowledged as such in public policies. Until new screening tests avoiding the activation of this emotional reaction are concretely available, public campaigns should improve CRC screening participation by boosting both positive attitudes towards screening and patients' perceived behavioural control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Scaglioni
- Department of Humanities, Social Sciences, and Cultural Industries, University of Parma, Borgo Carissimi 10, 43121, Parma, Italy.
| | - Angela Chiereghin
- Governance of Screening Programs Unit, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Via Montebello 6, 40121, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carmen Bazzani
- Governance of Screening Programs Unit, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Via Montebello 6, 40121, Bologna, Italy
| | - Francesca Mezzetti
- Governance of Screening Programs Unit, Local Health Authority of Bologna, Via Montebello 6, 40121, Bologna, Italy
| | - Nicoletta Cavazza
- Department of Communication and Economics, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Viale Antonio Allegri 9, 42121, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chand BR, Phillipson L, Ha T. Factors influencing organised faecal occult blood test screening participation in culturally and linguistically diverse populations: a scoping review. Public Health 2023; 219:67-72. [PMID: 37120935 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2023.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 05/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the literature examining factors influencing participation in organised faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening programmes in culturally and linguistically diverse populations. This article addresses gaps in the literature by providing a mixed methods review of the multilevel influences on FOBT screening in culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) populations. This review was guided by the question "What are the factors influencing participation in organised FOBT screening programs in CALD populations?" STUDY DESIGN Scoping review. METHODS A scoping review methodology was used to summarise the available evidence. A thematic analysis of the included studies was undertaken to identify factors influencing organised FOBT screening participation in CALD populations from the literature. RESULTS FOBT screening participation was lower by ethnicity, religion, birthplace and language spoken. Barriers to screening included, faecal aversion, fatalism, fear of cancer, language and literacy barriers, difficulty accessing translated materials and low colorectal screening knowledge and awareness. CALD populations also had lower perceived benefits, susceptibility and cues to action, higher perceived barriers and greater perceived external health locus control than non-CALD populations. Facilitators of screening included positive attitudes to screening, general practitioner recommendations and social support. Group education sessions and narrative-based screening information were found to increase screening participation. CONCLUSION This review highlights the range of interrelated factors influencing participation in organised FOBT screening programmes in CALD populations and proposes multicomponent interventions to address low screening uptake. Features of successful community-level interventions should be explored further. Narratives show promise for engaging CALD populations. Accessibility of screening information should be addressed at the system level. Leveraging the general practitioner relationship in promoting FOBT screening programmes may also be an effective strategy to target 'hard-to-reach' populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B R Chand
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia.
| | - L Phillipson
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia
| | - T Ha
- School of Health and Society, University of Wollongong, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Champion VL, Paskett ED, Stump TE, Biederman EB, Vachon E, Katz ML, Rawl SM, Baltic RD, Kettler CD, Seiber EE, Xu WY, Monahan PO. Comparative Effectiveness of 2 Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening Among Women in the Rural US: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2023; 6:e2311004. [PMID: 37115541 PMCID: PMC10148202 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.11004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Importance Women living in rural areas have lower rates of breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening compared with women living in urban settings. Objective To assess the comparative effectiveness of (1) a mailed, tailored digital video disc (DVD) intervention; (2) a DVD intervention plus telephonic patient navigation (DVD/PN); and (3) usual care with simultaneously increased adherence to any breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening that was not up to date at baseline and to assess cost-effectiveness. Design, Setting, and Participants This randomized clinical trial recruited and followed up women from rural Indiana and Ohio (community based) who were not up to date on any or all recommended cancer screenings. Participants were randomly assigned between November 28, 2016, and July 1, 2019, to 1 of 3 study groups (DVD, DVD/PN, or usual care). Statistical analyses were completed between August and December 2021 and between March and September 2022. Intervention The DVD interactively assessed and provided messages for health beliefs, including risk of developing the targeted cancers and barriers, benefits, and self-efficacy for obtaining the needed screenings. Patient navigators counseled women on barriers to obtaining screenings. The intervention simultaneously supported obtaining screening for all or any tests outside of guidelines at baseline. Main Outcomes and Measures Receipt of any or all needed cancer screenings from baseline through 12 months, including breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer, and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Binary logistic regression was used to compare the randomized groups on being up to date for all and any screenings at 12 months. Results The sample included 963 women aged 50 to 74 years (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [6.3] years). The DVD group had nearly twice the odds of those in the usual care group of obtaining all needed screenings (odds ratio [OR], 1.84; 95% CI, 1.02-3.43; P = .048), and the odds were nearly 6 times greater for DVD/PN vs usual care (OR, 5.69; 95% CI, 3.24-10.5; P < .001). The DVD/PN intervention (but not DVD alone) was significantly more effective than usual care (OR, 4.01; 95% CI, 2.60-6.28; P < .001) for promoting at least 1 (ie, any) of the needed screenings at 12 months. Cost-effectiveness per woman who was up to date was $14 462 in the DVD group and $10 638 in the DVD/PN group. Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial of rural women who were not up to date with at least 1 of the recommended cancer screenings (breast, cervical, or colorectal), an intervention designed to simultaneously increase adherence to any or all of the 3 cancer screening tests was more effective than usual care, available at relatively modest costs, and able to be remotely delivered, demonstrating great potential for implementing an evidence-based intervention in remote areas of the midwestern US. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02795104.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria L. Champion
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
| | - Electra D. Paskett
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Timothy E. Stump
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | | | - Eric Vachon
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Mira L. Katz
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus
- Division of Health Behavior and Health Promotion, College of Public Health, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Susan M. Rawl
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
| | - Ryan D. Baltic
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Carla D. Kettler
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| | - Eric E. Seiber
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Wendy Y. Xu
- Division of Health Services Management and Policy, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Patrick O. Monahan
- Indiana University Melvin and Bren Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis
- Department of Biostatistics and Health Data Science, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vachon E, Robb BW, Haggstrom DA. Impact of a Personal Health Record Intervention Upon Surveillance Among Colorectal Cancer Survivors: Feasibility Study. JMIR Cancer 2022; 8:e34851. [PMID: 35969424 PMCID: PMC9412760 DOI: 10.2196/34851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2021] [Revised: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 07/20/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There are currently an estimated 1.5 million individuals living in the United States with colorectal cancer (CRC), and although the 5-year survival rate has increased, survivors are at risk for recurrence, particularly within the first 2-3 years after treatment. National guidelines recommend continued surveillance after resection to identify recurrence early on. Adherence among survivors ranges from 23% to 94%. Novel interventions are needed to increase CRC survivors' knowledge and confidence in managing their cancer and thus to increase adherence to follow-up surveillance. OBJECTIVE The objective of this study is to develop and test the feasibility and efficacy of a stand-alone, web-based personal health record (PHR) to increase surveillance adherence among CRC survivors, with patient beliefs about surveillance as secondary outcomes. METHODS A pre- and postintervention feasibility trial was conducted testing the efficacy of the colorectal cancer survivor (CRCS)-PHR, which had been previously developed using an iterative, user-centered design approach. RESULTS The average age of the sample was 58 (SD 9.9) years, with 57% (16/28) male and the majority married (20/28, 71%) and employed full-time (15/28, 54%). We observed a significant increase in adherence to colonoscopy (before: 11/21, 52% vs after: 18/21, 86%; P=.005) and CEA (14/21, 67% vs 20/21, 95%; P=.01), as well as a slight increase in CT scans (14/21, 67% vs 18/21, 86%; P=.10). The only significant impact on secondary outcome (patient beliefs) was benefits of CEA test (P=.04), as most of the beliefs were high at baseline. CONCLUSIONS This feasibility study lays the groundwork for continued development of the CRCS-PHR to increase CRC surveillance. Patient-centered technologies, such as the CRCS-PHR, represent an important potential approach to improving the receipt of guideline-concordant care and follow-up surveillance, and not just for CRC survivors. Researchers should continue to develop patient-centered health technologies with clinician implementation in mind to increase patient self-efficacy and surveillance adherence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eric Vachon
- School of Nursing, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - Bruce W Robb
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| | - David A Haggstrom
- Center for Health Services Research, Regenstrief Institute, Indianapolis, IN, United States
- Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, School of Medicine, Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, United States
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abraham S, Foreman N, Sidat Z, Sandhu P, Marrone D, Headley C, Akroyd C, Nicholson S, Brown K, Thomas A, Howells LM, Walter HS. Inequalities in cancer screening, prevention and service engagement between UK ethnic minority groups. BRITISH JOURNAL OF NURSING (MARK ALLEN PUBLISHING) 2022; 31:S14-S24. [PMID: 35648663 DOI: 10.12968/bjon.2022.31.10.s14] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
More people in the UK are living with cancer than ever before. With an increasingly ethnically diverse population, greater emphasis must be placed on understanding factors influencing cancer outcomes. This review seeks to explore UK-specific variations in engagement with cancer services in minority ethnic groups and describe successful interventions. The authors wish to highlight that, despite improvement to engagement and education strategies, inequalities still persist and work to improve cancer outcomes across our communities still needs to be prioritised. There are many reasons why cancer healthcare inequities exist for minority communities, reported on a spectrum ranging from cultural beliefs and awareness, through to racism. Strategies that successfully enhanced engagement included language support; culturally-sensitive reminders; community-based health workers and targeted outreach. Focusing on the diverse city of Leicester the authors describe how healthcare providers, researchers and community champions have worked collectively, delivering targeted community-based strategies to improve awareness and access to cancer services.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shalin Abraham
- F2 Academic Foundation Doctor, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Nalini Foreman
- Quality Assistant, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Zahirah Sidat
- Senior Research Practitioner, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Pavandeep Sandhu
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Domenic Marrone
- Research Technician, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Catherine Headley
- Senior Cancer Services Manager, Leicester City Clinical Commissioning Group, Leicester
| | - Carol Akroyd
- Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care Equality and Diversity Theme Manager, Centre for Ethnic Health Research, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Sarah Nicholson
- Hope Clinical Trials Facility Manager/Cancer, Haematology, Urology, Gastroenterology, General Surgery Research Lead, Hope Clinical Trials Facility, University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester
| | - Karen Brown
- Professor in Translational Cancer Research, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Anne Thomas
- Professor of Cancer Therapeutics, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Lynne M Howells
- Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre Translational Research Manager, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| | - Harriet S Walter
- Associate Professor of Medical Oncology, Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Marlow LAV, Nemec M, Vlaev I, Waller J. Testing the content for a targeted age-relevant intervention to promote cervical screening uptake in women aged 50-64 years. Br J Health Psychol 2022; 27:623-644. [PMID: 34339562 DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12552] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2020] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Low uptake of cervical screening in women in their 50s and 60s leaves them at elevated risk of cancer in older age. An age-targeted intervention could be an effective way to motivate older women to attend cervical screening. Our primary objective was to test the impact of different candidate messages on cervical screening intention strength. DESIGN A cross-sectional online survey with randomized exposure to different candidate messages. METHODS Women aged 50-64 years who were not intending to be screened when next invited were recruited through an online panel. Those meeting the inclusion criteria (n = 825) were randomized to one of three groups: (1) control group, (2) intervention group 1, (3) intervention group 2. Each intervention group saw three candidate messages. These included a descriptive social norms message, a diagram illustrating the likelihood of each possible screening outcome, a response efficacy message, a risk reduction message and an acknowledgement of the potential for screening discomfort. We tested age-targeted versions (vs. generic) of some messages. The primary outcome was screening intention strength. RESULTS After adjusting for baseline intention, social norms (p = .425), outcome expectancy (p = .367), risk reduction (p = .090), response efficacy (p = .136) and discomfort acknowledgement messages (p = .181) had no effect on intention strength. Age-targeted messages did not result in greater intention than generic ones. CONCLUSIONS There was no evidence that a single message used to convey social norms, outcome expectancy, risk reduction or response efficacy had an impact on intention strength for older women who did not plan to be screened in future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura A V Marlow
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Martin Nemec
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Robb KA. The integrated screening action model (I-SAM): A theory-based approach to inform intervention development. Prev Med Rep 2021; 23:101427. [PMID: 34189020 PMCID: PMC8220376 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2021.101427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Screening can reduce deaths if the people invited participate. However, good uptake is hard to achieve, and our current approaches are failing to engage the most vulnerable. A coherent model of screening behaviour to guide our understanding and intervention development is yet to be established. The present aim was to propose an Integrated Screening Action Model (I-SAM) to improve screening access. The I-SAM synthesises existing models of health behaviour and empirical evidence. The I-SAM was developed following: i) an appraisal of the predominant models used within the screening literature; ii) the integration of the latest knowledge on behaviour change; with iii) the empirical literature, to inform the development of a theory-based approach to intervention development. There are three key aspects to the I-SAM: i) a sequence of stages that people pass through in engaging in screening behaviour (based on the Precaution Adoption Process Model); ii) screening behaviour is shaped by the interaction between participant and environmental influences (drawing from the Access Framework); and iii) targets for intervention should focus on the sources of behaviour - 'capability', 'opportunity', and 'motivation' (based on the COM-B Model). The I-SAM proposes an integrated model to support our understanding of screening behaviour and to identify targets for intervention. It will be an iterative process to test and refine the I-SAM and establish its value in supporting effective interventions to improve screening for all.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn A. Robb
- Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 0XH, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Sazali MF, Rahim SSSA, Hayati F, Mohd Daud MN, Avoi R, Omar A, Atil A, Abd Rahim MA, Madrim MF, Mokti K, Ramdzan AR, Sidek Ahmad ZN, Zakaria AD, Che Ani MF, Ibrahim AF, Azhar ZI, Jeffree MS, Hassan MR. Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: a narrative review. J Public Health Res 2021; 11. [PMID: 34351098 PMCID: PMC8859728 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health threat. Therefore, CRC screening uptake has been a focus with the established precancerous lesion and the strong association of early detection with staging and survival of the disease. However, CRC screening is relatively low in many countries. This article briefly discussed the current situation of CRC, recommendations, and current uptake of CRC screening in various countries. Besides that, this article also highlights the potential factors that help to predict the CRC screening uptake worldwide. Identification of those factors could guide policymakers to develop an effective strategy to improve the CRC screening uptake and ultimately improve the health outcome of the population. Significance for public health This study highlights the public health challenge in early screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). The prevalence of never screened for faecal occult blood test is relatively high. This review dissects the issue and further discuss on the predictors, which could guide policymakers in developing strategy to improve CRC screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Fazeli Sazali
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.
| | - Mohd Nazri Mohd Daud
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Richard Avoi
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Azizan Omar
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Azman Atil
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Mohd Faizal Madrim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Khalid Mokti
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Abdul Rahman Ramdzan
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Zulkhairul Naim Sidek Ahmad
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan.
| | - Mohd Firdaus Che Ani
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor.
| | - Aini Fahriza Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak.
| | - Zahir Izuan Azhar
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor.
| | - Mohammad Saffree Jeffree
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sazali MF, Syed Abdul Rahim SS, Avoi R, Hassan MR, Hayati F, Azhar ZI, Jeffree MS, Lukman KA, Tha NO, Sajali H, Atil A, Abd Rahim MA. Factors of Never Screened with Faecal Occult Blood Test in Public Primary Care Facilities. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2021; 22:163-169. [PMID: 33507695 PMCID: PMC8184202 DOI: 10.31557/apjcp.2021.22.1.163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a major public health threat. In the effort to reduce CRC incidence and mortality, faecal occult blood test (FOBT) is currently the screening tools used for early detection of CRC. However, the uptake of FOBT screening is less than promising. This study aims to identify the prevalence and predictors of Never Screened with FOBT (NS-FOBT). METHODS A cross sectional study was conducted in five health clinics under Kota Kinabalu district, Sabah, Malaysia Borneo involving 162 attendees with age of 50 years old and above. A validated self-administered questionnaire was used to collect the data. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine the predictors of NS-FOBT. RESULTS The prevalence of NS-FOBT was 85.8% (n=139). Important predictors of NS-FOBT were age (aOR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.855, 0.995; p=0.035), Bumiputera ethnicity (vs Non Bumiputera; aOR: 4.285; 95% CI: 1.384, 13.263; p=0.012), knowledge score (aOR: 0.921; 95% CI: 0.856, 0.99; p=0.027), and attitude score (aOR: 0.801; 95% CI: 0.702, 0.913; p=0.001). CONCLUSION There is high prevalence of NS-FOBT. Age, ethnicity, knowledge, and attitude were important predictors of NS-FOBT. Strategies are needed to improve FOBT screening rate among the public. Socio-culturally tailored health promotion strategies as well as strengthening the communication, collaboration, and education to enhance the role of family physician is vital in improving the CRC prevention and care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Fazeli Sazali
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Richard Avoi
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
- Department of Community Health, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Malaysia.
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Malaysia.
| | - Zahir Izuan Azhar
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Malaysia.
| | - Mohammad Saffree Jeffree
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Khamisah Awang Lukman
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Naing Oo Tha
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Helmy Sajali
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Azman Atil
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| | - Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim
- Department of Community Health and Family Medicine, Faculty Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Malaysia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Campbell C, Douglas A, Williams L, Cezard G, Brewster DH, Buchanan D, Robb K, Stanners G, Weller D, Steele RJ, Steiner M, Bhopal R. Are there ethnic and religious variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening? A retrospective cohort study among 1.7 million people in Scotland. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e037011. [PMID: 33033017 PMCID: PMC7542953 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Revised: 07/01/2020] [Accepted: 08/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Cancer screening should be equitably accessed by all populations. Uptake of colorectal cancer screening was examined using the Scottish Health and Ethnicity Linkage Study that links the Scottish Census 2001 to health data by individual-level self-reported ethnicity and religion. SETTING Data on 1.7 million individuals in two rounds of the Scottish Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (2007-2013) were linked to the 2001 Census using the Scottish Community Health Index number. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE Uptake of colorectal cancer screening, reported as age-adjusted risk ratios (RRs) by ethnic group and religion were calculated for men and women with 95% CI. RESULTS In the first, incidence screening round, compared with white Scottish men, Other White British (RR 109.6, 95% CI 108.8 to 110.3) and Chinese (107.2, 95% CI 102.8 to 111.8) men had higher uptake. In contrast, men of all South Asian groups had lower uptake (Indian RR 80.5, 95% CI 76.1 to 85.1; Pakistani RR 65.9, 95% CI 62.7 to 69.3; Bangladeshi RR 76.6, 95% CI 63.9 to 91.9; Other South Asian RR 88.6, 95% CI 81.8 to 96.1). Comparable patterns were seen among women in all ethnic groups, for example, Pakistani (RR 55.5, 95% CI 52.5 to 58.8). Variation in uptake was also observed by religion, with lower rates among Hindu (RR (95%CI): 78.4 (71.8 to 85.6)), Muslim (69.5 (66.7 to 72.3)) and Sikh (73.4 (67.1 to 80.3)) men compared with the reference population (Church of Scotland), with similar variation among women: lower rates were also seen among those who reported being Jewish, Roman Catholic or with no religion. CONCLUSIONS There are important variations in uptake of bowel cancer screening by ethnic group and religion in Scotland, for both sexes, that require further research and targeted interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Anne Douglas
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Linda Williams
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Geneviève Cezard
- Population and Health research group, School of Geography and Sustainable Development, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, UK
| | | | | | - Kathryn Robb
- Institute of Health & Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - David Weller
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Robert Jc Steele
- Surgery and Molecular Oncology, University of Dundee, Dundee, UK
| | - Markus Steiner
- School of Medicine, Department of Child Health, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Raj Bhopal
- Usher Institute, The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mirzaei-Alavijeh M, Schaafsma D, Karami-Matin B, Jalilian F. Socio-cognitive determinants of colorectal cancer screening uptake: An application of intervention mapping approach. Med J Islam Repub Iran 2019; 33:80. [PMID: 31696074 PMCID: PMC6825394 DOI: 10.34171/mjiri.33.80] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Fecal occult blood test (FOBT) is one of the common screening tests for colorectal cancer. This study was designed to determine the socio-cognitive determinants related to FOBT uptake for colorectal cancer screening based on intervention mapping (IM). Methods: A total of 500 individuals aged over 50 years were randomly selected to participate in this study in Kermanshah, Iran, in 2016. Data were collected by interviews based on a questionnaire and analyzed by SPSS16 using bivariate correlation, linear, and logistic regression models. Results: Of the 500 respondents, 468 (93.6%) signed the consent form and voluntarily participated in the study. Almost 11.1% of the participants had a history of FOBT uptake. Socio-cognitive variables accounted for 38% of the variation in the outcome measure of the intention to uptake FOBT. Perceived self-efficacy (OR = 3.345 & 95% CI: 1.342, 8.339), perceived susceptibility (OR = 2.204& 95% CI: 1.320, 3.680), attitude (OR = 1.674& 95% CI: 1.270, 2.137), and perceived severity (OR = 1.457& 95% CI: 0.954, 2.224) were the strongest predictors of fecal occult blood test uptake. Conclusion: IM-based analysis of behavior may provide insights to design interventions for modifying individuals’ beliefs about the usefulness of FOBT uptake to prevent colorectal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehdi Mirzaei-Alavijeh
- Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Dilana Schaafsma
- Fontys University of Applied Sciences, Eindhoven, the Netherlands
| | - Behzad Karami-Matin
- Research Center for Environmental Determinants of Health, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| | - Farzad Jalilian
- Social Development & Health Promotion Research Center, Health Institute, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stoffel ST, Goodwin M, Sieverding M, Vlaev I, von Wagner C. Testing verbal quantifiers for social norms messages in cancer screening: evidence from an online experiment. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:658. [PMID: 31142300 PMCID: PMC6542069 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6997-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2019] [Accepted: 05/16/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Studies have shown that presenting correct information about group norms to correct misperceptions of norms can influence health behaviours. In two online studies we investigated how different ways of communicating the current uptake of 43% of the English Bowel Scope Screening (BSS) programme affects intention among disinclined men and women. METHODS In the first study, 202 participants were asked to interpret eight quantifiers for 43% uptake ('few', 'many', 'a considerable number', 'a large number', 'a great number', 'a lot', 'numerous' and 'nearly half') and to indicate how misleading they perceived each of them to be. In the second study, with 1245 participants, we compared the motivational impact of two quantifiers ('a large number' and 'nearly half' which were associated with the highest perceived uptake (48.9%) and considered least misleading in study 1 respectively) with a control message that did not contain any information on uptake, and a message which communicated actual uptake as a proportion (43%). RESULTS While we found that both verbal quantifiers increased screening intentions compared with the control group (from 7.8 to 12.5%, aOR 1.72; 95%CI 1.00-2.96 in the case of 'a large number' and 14.3%, aOR 2.02; 95%CI 1.20-3.38 for 'nearly half'), simply communicating that 43% do the test, however, had no impact on intentions (9.9% vs. 7.8% aOR 1.25; 95%CI 0.73-2.16). CONCLUSION Verbal quantifiers can be used to improve the perception of low uptake figures and avoid a demotivating effect.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandro T Stoffel
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Maria Goodwin
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK
| | - Monika Sieverding
- Institute of Psychology, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, 69117, Germany
| | - Ivo Vlaev
- Warwick Business School, University of Warwick, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sarma EA, Silver MI, Kobrin SC, Marcus PM, Ferrer RA. Cancer screening: health impact, prevalence, correlates, and interventions. Psychol Health 2019; 34:1036-1072. [DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1584673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth A. Sarma
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Michelle I. Silver
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah C. Kobrin
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Pamela M. Marcus
- Healthcare Delivery Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| | - Rebecca A. Ferrer
- Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Rockville, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Attitudes towards faecal immunochemical testing in patients at increased risk of colorectal cancer: an online survey of GPs in England. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e757-e764. [PMID: 30297435 PMCID: PMC6193787 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x699413] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2018] [Accepted: 07/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is increasing interest in using a quantitative faecal immunochemical test (FIT) to rule out colorectal cancer (CRC) in patients with high-risk symptoms in primary care. AIM This study aimed to investigate GPs' attitudes and willingness to use a FIT over an urgent 2-week wait (2WW) referral. DESIGN AND SETTING A cross-sectional online survey involving 1024 GPs working across England. METHOD Logistic regression models were used to explore the likelihood of GPs using a FIT instead of a 2WW referral, and reported using odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). RESULTS Just over one-third of GPs (n = 365) preferred to use a FIT as a rule-out test over a 2WW referral. GPs were more willing if they were: aged 36-45 years (OR 1.59 [95% CI = 1.04 to 2.44]); 46-55 years (OR 1.99 [95% CI = 1.14 to 3.47]); thought a FIT was highly accurate (OR 1.63 [95% CI = 1.16 to 2.29]); thought patients would benefit compared with having a colonoscopy (OR 2.02 [95% CI = 1.46 to 2.79]); and were highly confident about discussing the benefits of a FIT (OR 2.14 [95% CI = 1.46 to 3.16]). GPs were less willing if they had had >10 urgent referrals in the past year (OR 0.62 [95% CI = 0.40 to 0.94]) and thought that longer consultations would be needed (OR 0.61 [95% CI = 0.44 to 0.83]). CONCLUSION The study findings suggest that the acceptability of using a FIT as a rule-out test in primary care is currently low, with less than half of GPs who perceived the test to be accurate preferring it over colonoscopy. Any potential guideline changes recommending a FIT in patients with high-risk symptoms, instead of urgent referral to rule out CRC, are likely to require intensive supporting educational outreach to increase GP confidence in the accuracy and application of a FIT in this context.
Collapse
|
15
|
Khashij S, Jalilian F, Vaezi M, Jalilian M, Gharibnavaz H, Ahmadi-Jouybari T, Naghibifar Z, Karami H. Measuring Beliefs Related to Colorectal Cancer Screening Behavior among Iranian Middle-Aged and Elderly: a Psychometric Study. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev 2018; 19:2211-2216. [PMID: 30139227 PMCID: PMC6171398 DOI: 10.22034/apjcp.2018.19.8.2211] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The annual fecal occult blood test is a very important method for colorectal cancer early detection through screening.
Our aim was to assess psychometrics of instrument measuring beliefs related to fecal occult blood test uptake among
Iranian middle-aged and elderly, based on the theory of planned behavior. This cross-sectional study was performed on
150 middle-aged and elderly who were randomly selected to participate voluntarily in Kermanshah, in the west of Iran.
The studied constructs included attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, and behavior intention. Data
were analyzed with SPSS software (ver. 21.0). The mean age of the respondents was 59.1 years [SD: 6.73], in the range
from 50 to 73. All of the loads of the exploratory factorial analysis were larger than 0.4. KMO was calculated as 0.756.
Overall, four factors under investigation accounted for 82% of the variance in the hypothesized model. Cronbach’s
alpha for the measured constructs of attitude, subjective norms, perceived behavior control, and behavior intention
were 0.92, 0.88, 0.70 and 0.88, respectively. Our findings indicated the final scale to be adequately reliable and valid for
measurement of these constructs for prediction of fecal occult blood test uptake among Iranian middle-aged and elderly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva Khashij
- Clinical Research Development Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Kermanshah University of Medical Sciences, Kermanshah, Iran.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Stafford M, von Wagner C, Perman S, Taylor J, Kuh D, Sheringham J. Social connectedness and engagement in preventive health services: an analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. LANCET PUBLIC HEALTH 2018; 3:e438-e446. [PMID: 30143472 PMCID: PMC6123501 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(18)30141-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2018] [Revised: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 07/12/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evidence of the possible health benefits of social connectedness is increasing. We aimed to examine poor social connectedness as a possible barrier to participation in preventive health services among older people (aged 53-69 years). METHODS We analysed data from a prospective cohort study of 5362 socially stratified births from the Medical Research Council National Survey of Health and Development enrolled in England, Scotland, and Wales in March 1946. At ages 68-69 years, participants reported participation in blood pressure and cholesterol measurement, eyesight and dental check-ups, influenza immunisation, and bowel and breast cancer screening. Our primary outcome measure summed participation across all these tests and services at ages 68-69 years. We tested associations between structural and functional social connectedness from ages 53 years to 69 years and total count of participation in these preventive services in Poisson models controlling for sex, education, occupational class, employment, chronic illnesses, and general practitioner consultations for health problems. FINDINGS 940 (44%) of 2132 participants attended all preventive services within the recommended timeframes. At ages 68-69 years, being unmarried or not cohabiting (incident rate ratio [IRR] 1·33, 95% CI 1·20-1·47) and small personal social networks (IRR 1·51, 1·32-1·71) were independently associated with non-participation in more services, with associations consistent across most services. High social relationship quality at ages 68-69 years (IRR 0·91, 95% CI 0·87-0·95) and increasing social relationship quality from ages 53 years to 69 years (IRR 0·93, 0·89-0·97) were associated with low risk of non-participation. INTERPRETATION Individuals with poor social connectedness appear to be at greater risk of not engaging in the full range of preventive services than individuals with good social connectedness. Improvement of access to social contacts and networks in older ages is already recommended for the maintenance of good mental health. This study suggests that social connectedness could also improve participation in a wide range of preventive health services, and hence could improve use of the health-care system and population health. FUNDING UK Medical Research Council.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mai Stafford
- The Health Foundation, London, UK; MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Perman
- Screening Quality Assurance Service, Public Health England, London, UK
| | - Jayne Taylor
- London Borough of Hackney & City of London Corporation, Hackney Service Centre, London, UK
| | - Diana Kuh
- MRC Unit for Lifelong Health and Ageing, University College London, London, UK
| | - Jessica Sheringham
- National Institute for Health Research Collaborations for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care North Thames, Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Gabel P, Kirkegaard P, Larsen MB, Edwards A, Andersen B. Developing a Self-Administered Decision Aid for Fecal Immunochemical Test-Based Colorectal Cancer Screening Tailored to Citizens With Lower Educational Attainment: Qualitative Study. JMIR Form Res 2018; 2:e9. [PMID: 30684402 PMCID: PMC6334704 DOI: 10.2196/formative.9696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2017] [Revised: 03/15/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2018] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Citizens with lower educational attainments (EA) take up colorectal cancer screening to a lesser degree, and more seldom read and understand conventional screening information than citizens with average EAs. The information needs of citizens with lower EA are diverse, however, with preferences ranging from wanting clear recommendations to seeking detailed information about screening. Decision aids have been developed to support citizens with lower EA in making informed decisions about colorectal cancer screening participation, but none embrace diverse information needs. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop a self-administered decision aid for participation in fecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening. The decision aid should be tailored to citizens with lower EA and should embrace diverse information needs. METHODS The Web-based decision aid was developed according to an international development framework, with specific steps for designing, alpha testing, peer reviewing, and beta testing the decision aid. In the design phase, a prototype of the decision aid was developed based on previous studies about the information needs of lower EA citizens and the International Patient Decision Aid Standards guidelines. Alpha testing was conducted using focus group interviews and email correspondence. Peer review was conducted using email correspondence. Both tests included both lower EA citizens and health care professionals. The beta testing was conducted using telephone interviews with citizens with lower EA. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS The developed decision aid presented information in steps, allowing citizens to read as much or as little as wanted. Values clarification questions were included after each section of information, and answers were summarized in a "choice-indicator" on the last page, guiding the citizens toward a decision about screening participation. Statistics were presented in both natural frequencies, absolute risk formats and graphically. The citizens easily and intuitively navigated around the final version of the decision aid and stated that they felt encouraged to think about the benefits and harms of colorectal cancer screening without being overloaded with information. They found the decision aid easy to understand and the text of suitable length. The health care professionals agreed with the citizens on most parts; however, concerns were raised about the length and readability of the text. CONCLUSIONS We have developed a self-administered decision aid presenting information in steps. We involved both citizens and health care professionals to target the decision aid for citizens with lower EA. This decision aid represents a new way of communicating detailed information and may be able to enhance informed choices about colorectal cancer screening participation among citizens with lower EA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pernille Gabel
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Pia Kirkegaard
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Mette Bach Larsen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark
| | - Adrian Edwards
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark.,Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Berit Andersen
- Department of Public Health Programmes, Randers Regional Hospital, Central Denmark Region, Randers NØ, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Kiviniemi MT, Klasko-Foster LB, Erwin DO, Jandorf L. Decision-making and socioeconomic disparities in colonoscopy screening in African Americans. Health Psychol 2018; 37:481-490. [PMID: 29595298 PMCID: PMC5920714 DOI: 10.1037/hea0000603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Socioeconomic status (SES) disparities in colorectal cancer screening are persistent. Lower education and income are both associated with lower screening rates. Both cognitive (e.g., perceived barriers) and affective (e.g., disgust, fear) decision-making constructs are known determinants of colorectal cancer screening behavior. This study tests the hypotheses that SES may be related to decision-making constructs and that this SES-decision-making construct relation may contribute to explaining the SES-screening behavior disparity. METHOD Surveys assessing perceived benefits and barriers to screening, self-efficacy, positive and negative affective associations with colonoscopy, fear of colonoscopy, colorectal cancer knowledge, past screening behavior, and demographics including education and income were completed by 2,015 African American participants ages 50 and older. Both univariable and multivariable relations of SES to decision-making constructs were examined, as were univariable and multivariable models of the indirect effect of SES on screening via decision-making constructs. RESULTS Socioeconomic status was related to both screening compliance and the decision-making constructs. Bootstrap modeling of the indirect effect showed that the total effect of the SES-screening behavior relation included an indirect effect via social cognitive decision-making constructs. CONCLUSION These findings suggest that cognitive and affective decision-making constructs account for at least some of the SES disparities in colorectal cancer screening behavior. As such, more research is needed to explore the intra individual-level influences of disparities in colorectal cancer screening. In addition, work is needed to develop effective intervention approaches to address the relation of SES to decision-making constructs. (PsycINFO Database Record
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Deborah O Erwin
- Office of Cancer Health Disparities Research, Roswell Park Cancer Institute
| | - Lina Jandorf
- Department of Oncological Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
de Klerk CM, Gupta S, Dekker E, Essink-Bot ML. Socioeconomic and ethnic inequities within organised colorectal cancer screening programmes worldwide. Gut 2018; 67:679-687. [PMID: 28073892 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2016] [Revised: 12/14/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programmes can reduce CRC mortality. However, the implementation of a screening programme may create or exacerbate socioeconomic and ethnic health inequities if participation varies by subgroup. We determined which organised programmes characterise participation inequities by socioeconomic and ethnic subgroups, and assessed the variation in subgroup participation among programmes collecting group-specific data. DESIGN Employing a literature review and survey among leaders of national or regional screening programmes, this study identified published and unpublished data on participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity. We assessed programmes offering faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) for screening. Primary outcome was screening participation rate. RESULTS Across 24 organised FOBT-screening programmes meeting the inclusion criteria, participation rates ranged from 21% to 73%. Most programmes (13/24, 54%) did not collect data on participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity. Among the 11 programmes with data on participation by socioeconomic status, 90% (28/31 publications) reported lower participation among lower socioeconomic groups. Differences across socioeconomic gradients were moderate (66% vs 71%) to severe (35% vs 61%). Only six programmes reported participation results by ethnicity. Ethnic differences were moderate, though only limited data were available for evaluation. CONCLUSIONS Across organised CRC screening programmes worldwide, variation in participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity is often not assessed. However, when measured, marked disparities in participation by socioeconomic status have been observed. Limited data were available to assess inequities by ethnicity. To avoid exacerbating health inequities, screening programmes should systematically monitor participation by socioeconomic status and ethnicity, and investigate and address determinants of low participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C M de Klerk
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Gupta
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California, USA
| | - E Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M L Essink-Bot
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hagger MS, Trost N, Keech JJ, Chan DK, Hamilton K. Predicting sugar consumption: Application of an integrated dual-process, dual-phase model. Appetite 2017; 116:147-156. [DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.04.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 99] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2017] [Revised: 04/16/2017] [Accepted: 04/27/2017] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
21
|
Weller D. The growing number of cancer survivors in western countries: How can our health systems best meet their needs? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2017; 26. [DOI: 10.1111/ecc.12731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- D. Weller
- Centre for Population Health Sciences; University of Edinburgh; Edinburgh UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Dalton ARH. Incomplete diagnostic follow-up after a positive colorectal cancer screening test: a systematic review. J Public Health (Oxf) 2017; 40:e46-e58. [DOI: 10.1093/pubmed/fdw147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2016] [Accepted: 12/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
|
23
|
Molokwu JC, Shokar N, Dwivedi A. Impact of Targeted Education on Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge and Psychosocial Attitudes in a Predominantly Hispanic Population. FAMILY & COMMUNITY HEALTH 2017; 40:298-305. [PMID: 28820784 DOI: 10.1097/fch.0000000000000165] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality, with screening behavior found to be influenced by knowledge and other psychosocial attitudes. We recruited 784 participants 50 to 70 years of age. The intervention arm received a culturally sensitive, literacy-appropriate educational intervention by a promotora. Surveys were completed at baseline and 6 months post. Our intervention significantly increased knowledge at 6 months when compared with control (0.74 vs 0.18, P < .0001). We also report increase in perceived susceptibility to colorectal cancer and perceived benefits of colorectal cancer screening while decreasing sense of fatalism. Perceived barriers to screening did significantly increase.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jennifer C Molokwu
- Departments of Family and Community Medicine (Drs Molokwu and Shokar) and Biomedical Sciences (Dr Dwivedi), Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center El Paso, El Paso, Texas
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Shahidi N, Cheung WY. Colorectal cancer screening: Opportunities to improve uptake, outcomes, and disparities. World J Gastrointest Endosc 2016; 8:733-740. [PMID: 28042387 PMCID: PMC5159671 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v8.i20.733] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2016] [Revised: 09/05/2016] [Accepted: 09/18/2016] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer screening has become a standard of care in industrialized nations for those 50 to 75 years of age, along with selected high-risk populations. While colorectal cancer screening has been shown to reduce both the incidence and mortality of colorectal cancer, it is a complex multi-disciplinary process with a number of important steps that require optimization before tangible improvements in outcomes are possible. For both opportunistic and programmatic colorectal cancer screening, poor participant uptake remains an ongoing concern. Furthermore, current screening modalities (such as the guaiac based fecal occult blood test, fecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy) may be used or performed suboptimally, which can lead to missed neoplastic lesions and unnecessary endoscopic evaluations. The latter poses the risk of adverse events, such as perforation and post-polypectomy bleeding, as well as financial impacts to the healthcare system. Moreover, ongoing disparities in colorectal cancer screening persist among marginalized populations, including specific ethnic minorities (African Americans, Hispanics, Asians, Indigenous groups), immigrants, and those who are economically disenfranchised. Given this context, we aimed to review the current literature on these important areas pertaining to colorectal cancer screening, particularly focusing on the guaiac based fecal occult blood test, the fecal immunochemical test and colonoscopy.
Collapse
|