1
|
Fernández-Pérez FJ, Fernández-Moreno N, Soria-López E, Rodriguez-González FJ, Fernández-Galeote FJ, Lifante-Oliva A, Ruíz-Hernández C, Escalante-Quijaite E, Rivas-Ruiz F. Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: A useful therapeutic tool not just in ulcerative colitis but also in Crohn's disease. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2024:S0210-5705(24)00154-7. [PMID: 38710467 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502196] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2023] [Revised: 01/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/14/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) removes neutrophils and monocytes from peripheral blood, preventing their incorporation into the inflamed tissue also influencing cytokine balance. Published therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis (UC) is more consistent than in Crohn's disease (CD). We assessed clinical efficacy of GMA in UC and CD 4 weeks after last induction session, at 3 and 12 months, sustained remission and corticosteroid-free remission. PATIENTS AND METHOD Retrospective observational study of UC and CD patients treated with GMA. Partial Disease Activity Index-DAIp in UC and Harvey-Bradshaw Index-HBI in CD assessed efficacy of Adacolumn® with induction and optional maintenance sessions. RESULTS We treated 87 patients (CD-25, UC-62), 87.3% corticosteroid-dependent (CSD), 42.5% refractory/intolerant to immunomodulators. In UC, remission and response were 32.2% and 19.3% after induction, 35.5% and 6.5% at 12 weeks and 29% and 6.5% at 52 weeks. In CD, remission rates were 60%, 52% and 40% respectively. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients (UC-41, CD-14), 68.3% of UC achieved remission or response after induction, 51.2% at 12 weeks and 46.3% at 52 weeks, and 62.3%, 64.3% and 42.9% in CD. Maintained remission was achieved by 66.6% in CD and 53.1% in UC. Up to 74.5% of patients required corticosteroids at some timepoint. Corticosteroid-free response/remission was 17.7% in UC and 24% in CD. CONCLUSIONS GMA is a good therapeutic tool for both in UC and CD patients. In corticosteroid-dependent and refractory or intolerant to INM patients it avoids biological therapy or surgery in up to 40% of them in one year.
Collapse
|
2
|
Fuxman C, Sicilia B, Linares ME, García-López S, González Sueyro R, González-Lamac Y, Zabana Y, Hinojosa J, Barreiro-de Acosta M, Balderramo D, Balfour D, Bellicoso M, Daffra P, Morelli D, Orsi M, Rausch A, Ruffinengo O, Toro M, Sambuelli A, Novillo A, Gomollón F, De Paula JA. GADECCU 2022 Guideline for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Adaptation and updating of the GETECCU 2020 Guideline. GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2023; 46 Suppl 1:S1-S56. [PMID: 36731724 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2023.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Accepted: 01/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that compromises the colon, affecting the quality of life of individuals of any age. In practice, there is a wide spectrum of clinical situations. The advances made in the physio pathogenesis of UC have allowed the development of new, more effective and safer therapeutic agents. OBJECTIVES To update and expand the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of relevant treatments for remission induction and maintenance after a mild, moderate or severe flare of UC. RECIPIENTS Gastroenterologists, coloproctologists, general practitioners, family physicians and others health professionals, interested in the treatment of UC. METHODOLOGY GADECCU authorities obtained authorization from GETECCU to adapt and update the GETECCU 2020 Guide for the treatment of UC. Prepared with GRADE methodology. A team was formed that included authors, a panel of experts, a nurse and a patient, methodological experts, and external reviewers. GRADE methodology was used with the new information. RESULTS A 118-page document was prepared with the 44 GADECCU 2022 recommendations, for different clinical situations and therapeutic options, according to levels of evidence. A section was added with the new molecules that are about to be available. CONCLUSIONS This guideline has been made in order to facilitate decision-making regarding the treatment of UC, adapting and updating the guide prepared by GETECCU in the year 2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Fuxman
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Universitario Fundación Favaloro, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Beatriz Sicilia
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Burgos, Burgos, España
| | - María Eugenia Linares
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital de Clínicas José de San Martín, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Santiago García-López
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Aragón, Zaragoza, España
| | - Ramiro González Sueyro
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Yago González-Lamac
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro, Madrid, España
| | - Yamile Zabana
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario Mútua Terrassa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBEREHD), Barcelona, España
| | - Joaquín Hinojosa
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital de Manise, Valencia, España
| | - Manuel Barreiro-de Acosta
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Hospital Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, España
| | - Domingo Balderramo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Privado Universitario de Córdoba, Instituto Universitario de Ciencias Biomédicas de Córdoba, Córdoba, Argentina
| | - Deborah Balfour
- Unidad de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, HIGEA Clínica de Gastroenterología, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Maricel Bellicoso
- Área de Gastroenterología, Inmunología Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Pamela Daffra
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Central de Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Daniela Morelli
- Departamento de Educación, Instituto de Efectividad Clínica y Sanitaria, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Marina Orsi
- Servicio de Gastroenterología Pediátrica, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Astrid Rausch
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Británico de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Orlando Ruffinengo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Provincial del Centenario, Rosario, Argentina
| | - Martín Toro
- Unidad de Enfermedades Inflamatorias, HIGEA Clínica de Gastroenterología, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Alicia Sambuelli
- Sección de Enfermedades Inflamatorias Intestinales, Hospital Bonorino Udaondo, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Abel Novillo
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Sanatorio 9 de Julio, Tucumán, Argentina.
| | - Fernando Gomollón
- Unidad de Enfermedad Inflamatoria Intestinal, Servicio de Aparato Digestivo, Instituto de Investigaciones Sanitarias de Aragón, Hospital Clínico Universitario Lozano Blesa, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestiva (CIBEREHD), Zaragoza, España
| | - Juan Andrés De Paula
- Servicio de Gastroenterología, Hospital Italiano de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ueno N, Sugiyama Y, Kobayashi Y, Murakami Y, Iwama T, Sasaki T, Kunogi T, Sakatani A, Takahashi K, Tanaka K, Serikawa S, Ando K, Kashima S, Muto M, Inaba Y, Moriichi K, Tanabe H, Okumura T, Fujiya M. Concomitant pharmacologic medications influence the clinical outcomes of granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis: A multicenter retrospective cohort study. J Clin Apher 2023. [PMID: 36636880 DOI: 10.1002/jca.22040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 09/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/27/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Granulocyte and monocyte adsorptive apheresis (GMA) with Adacolumn has been used as a remission induction therapy for patients with active ulcerative colitis (UC). Herein, we investigated the influence of concomitant medications in the remission induction of GMA in patients with active UC. METHODS This multicenter retrospective cohort study included patients with UC underwent GMA in five independent institutions in Japan from January 2011 to July 2021. Factors including concomitant medications associated with clinical remission (CR) were analyzed statistically. RESULT A total of 133 patients were included. Seventy-four patients achieved a CR after GMA. The multivariable analysis revealed that concomitant medication with 5-aminosalicylic acid, Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES), and concomitant medication with immunosuppressors (IMs) remained as predictors of CR after GMA. In the subgroup analysis in patients with MES of 2, concomitant medication with IMs was demonstrated as a significant negative factor of CR after GMA (P = .042, OR 0.354). Seventy-four patients who achieved CR after GMA were followed up for 52 weeks. In the multivariable analysis, the maintenance therapy with IMs was demonstrated as a significant positive factor of sustained CR up to 52 weeks (P = .038, OR 2.214). Furthermore, the rate of sustained CR in patients with biologics and IMs was significantly higher than that in patients with biologics only (P = .002). CONCLUSION GMA was more effective for patients with active UC that relapsed under treatment without IMs. Furthermore, the addition of IMs should be considered in patients on maintenance therapy with biologics after GMA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nobuhiro Ueno
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuya Sugiyama
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yu Kobayashi
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Yuki Murakami
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takuya Iwama
- Asahikawa City Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takahiro Sasaki
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Takehito Kunogi
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Aki Sakatani
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Keitaro Takahashi
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kazuyuki Tanaka
- Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Katsuyoshi Ando
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Shin Kashima
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | | | - Yuhei Inaba
- Asahikawa City Hospital, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Kentaro Moriichi
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hiroki Tanabe
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Toshikatsu Okumura
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Mikihiro Fujiya
- Division of Metabolism and Biosystemic Science, Gastroenterology, and Hematology/Oncology, Department of Medicine, Asahikawa Medical University, Asahikawa, Hokkaido, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Iizuka M, Etou T, Sagara S. Efficacy of cytapheresis in patients with ulcerative colitis showing insufficient or lost response to biologic therapy. World J Gastroenterol 2022; 28:4959-4972. [PMID: 36160647 PMCID: PMC9494931 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v28.i34.4959] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Revised: 07/16/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
For the optimal management of refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), secondary loss of response (LOR) and primary non-response to biologics is a critical issue. This article aimed to summarize the current literature on the use of cytapheresis (CAP) in patients with UC showing a poor response or LOR to biologics and discuss its advantages and limitations. Further, we summarized the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing insufficient response to thiopurines or immunomodulators (IM). Eight studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC with inadequate responses to thiopurines or IM. There were no significant differences in the rate of remission and steroid-free remission between patients exposed or not exposed to thiopurines or IM. Three studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in patients with UC showing an insufficient response to biologic therapies. Mean remission rates of biologics exposed or unexposed patients were 29.4 % and 44.2%, respectively. Fourteen studies evaluated the efficacy of CAP in combination with biologics in patients with inflammatory bowel disease showing a poor response or LOR to biologics. The rates of remission/response and steroid-free remission in patients with UC ranged 32%-69% (mean: 48.0%, median: 42.9%) and 9%-75% (mean: 40.7%, median: 38%), respectively. CAP had the same effectiveness for remission induction with or without prior failure on thiopurines or IM but showed little benefit in patients with UC refractory to biologics. Although heterogeneity existed in the efficacy of the combination therapy with CAP and biologics, these combination therapies induced clinical remission/response and steroid-free remission in more than 40% of patients with UC refractory to biologics on average. Given the excellent safety profile of CAP, this combination therapy can be an alternative therapeutic strategy for UC refractory to biologics. Extensive prospective studies are needed to understand the efficacy of combination therapy with CAP and biologics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Iizuka
- Akita Health Care Center, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-0001, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-1495, Japan
| | - Takeshi Etou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-1495, Japan
| | - Shiho Sagara
- Akita Health Care Center, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-0001, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kiss S, Németh D, Hegyi P, Földi M, Szakács Z, Erőss B, Tinusz B, Hegyi PJ, Sarlós P, Alizadeh H. Granulocyte and monocyte apheresis as an adjunctive therapy to induce and maintain clinical remission in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open 2021; 11:e042374. [PMID: 34011580 PMCID: PMC8137160 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-042374] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The goal of treatment in ulcerative colitis (UC) is to induce and maintain remission. The addition of granulocyte and monocyte apheresis (GMA) to conventional therapy may be a promising therapeutic alternative. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety profile of GMA as an adjunctive therapy. DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS We searched four databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) for randomised or minimised controlled trials which discussed the impact of additional GMA therapy on clinical remission induction and clinical remission maintenance compared with conventional therapy alone. Primary outcomes were clinical remission induction and maintenance, secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and steroid-sparing effect. ORs with 95% CIs were calculated. Trial Sequential Analyses were performed to adjusts for the risk of random errors in meta-analyses. RESULTS A total of 11 studies were eligible for meta-analysis. GMA was clearly demonstrated to induce and maintain clinical remission more effectively than conventional therapy alone (598 patients: OR: 1.93, 95% CI 1.28 to 2.91, p=0.002, I2=0.0% for induction; 71 patients: OR: 8.34, 95% CI 2.64 to 26.32, p<0.001, I2=0.0% for maintenance). There was no statistically significant difference in the number of AEs (OR: 0.27, 95% CI 0.05 to 1.50, p=0.135, I2=84.2%). CONCLUSION GMA appears to be more effective as an adjunctive treatment in inducing and maintaining remission in patients with UC than conventional therapy alone. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42019134050.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Szabolcs Kiss
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Dávid Németh
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Péter Hegyi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Mária Földi
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Zsolt Szakács
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
- Division of Haematology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Bálint Erőss
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- János Szentágothai Research Centre, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Benedek Tinusz
- Division of Geriatric Medicine, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Péter Jenő Hegyi
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Patrícia Sarlós
- Institute for Translational Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
- Division of Gastroenterology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| | - Hussain Alizadeh
- Doctoral School of Clinical Medicine, University of Szeged, Szeged, Hungary
- Division of Haematology, First Department of Medicine, University of Pécs Medical School, Pécs, Hungary
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Iizuka M, Etou T, Shimodaira Y, Hatakeyama T, Sagara S. Cytapheresis re-induces high-rate steroid-free remission in patients with steroid-dependent and steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. World J Gastroenterol 2021; 27:1194-1212. [PMID: 33828394 PMCID: PMC8006096 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v27.i12.1194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/11/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is a crucial issue for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis (UC), including steroid-dependent and steroid-refractory patients, to achieve and maintain steroid-free remission. However, clinical studies focused on the achievement of steroid-free remission in refractory UC patients are insufficient. Cytapheresis (CAP) is a non-pharmacological extracorporeal therapy that is effective for active UC with fewer adverse effects. This study comprised UC patients treated with CAP and suggested the efficacy of CAP for refractory UC patients.
AIM To clarify the efficacy of CAP in achieving steroid-free remission in refractory UC patients.
METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the collected data from 55 patients with refractory UC treated with CAP. We analyzed the following points: (1) Efficacy of the first course of CAP; (2) Efficacy of the second, third, and fourth courses of CAP in patients who experienced relapses during the observation period; (3) Efficacy of CAP in colonic mucosa; and (4) Long-term efficacy of CAP. Clinical efficacy was evaluated using Lichtiger’s clinical activity index or Sutherland index (disease activity index). Mucosal healing was evaluated using Mayo endoscopic subscore. The primary and secondary endpoints were the rate of achievement of steroid-free remission and the rate of sustained steroid-free remission, respectively. Statistical analysis was performed using the paired t-test and chi-squared test.
RESULTS The rates of clinical remission, steroid-free remission, and poor effectiveness after CAP were 69.1%, 45.5%, and 30.9%, respectively. There were no significant differences in rate of steroid-free remission between patients with steroid-dependent and steroid-refractory UC. The mean disease activity index and Lichtiger’s clinical activity index scores were significantly decreased after CAP (P < 0.0001). The rates of steroid-free remission after the second, third, and fourth courses of CAP in patients who achieved steroid-free remission after the first course of CAP were 83.3%, 83.3%, and 60%, respectively. Mucosal healing was observed in all patients who achieved steroid-free remission after the first course of CAP. The rates of sustained steroid-free remission were 68.0%, 60.0%, and 56.0% at 12, 24, and 36 mo after the CAP. Nine patients (36%) had maintained steroid-free remission throughout the observation period.
CONCLUSION Our results suggest that CAP effectively induces and maintains steroid-free remission in refractory UC and re-induces steroid-free remission in patients achieving steroid-free remission after the first course of CAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masahiro Iizuka
- Akita Health Care Center, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-0001, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-1495, Japan
| | - Takeshi Etou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-1495, Japan
| | - Yosuke Shimodaira
- Department of Gastroenterology and Neurology, Akita University Graduate School of Medicine, Akita 010-8543, Japan
| | - Takashi Hatakeyama
- Department of Nephrology, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-1495, Japan
| | - Shiho Sagara
- Akita Health Care Center, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Akita 010-0001, Japan
| |
Collapse
|