Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease: Case Report and Review of the Literature

Hidden hearing loss in a Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A mouse model

Hidden hearing loss (HHL), a recently described auditory neuropathy characterized by normal audiometric thresholds but reduced sound-evoked cochlear compound action potentials, has been proposed to contribute to hearing difficulty in noisy environments in people with normal hearing thresholds and has become a widespread complaint. While most studies on HHL pathogenesis have focused on inner hair cell (IHC) synaptopathy, we recently showed that transient auditory nerve (AN) demyelination also causes HHL in mice. To test the effect of myelinopathy on hearing in a clinically relevant model, we studied a mouse model of Charcot-Marie-Tooth type 1A (CMT1A), the most prevalent hereditary peripheral neuropathy in humans. CMT1A mice exhibited the functional hallmarks of HHL together with disorganization of AN heminodes near the IHCs with minor loss of AN fibers. These results support the hypothesis that mild disruptions of AN myelination can cause HHL and that heminodal defects contribute to the alterations in the sound-evoked cochlear compound action potentials seen in this mouse model. Furthermore, these findings suggest that patients with CMT1A or other mild peripheral neuropathies are likely to suffer from HHL. Furthermore, these results suggest that studies of hearing in patients with CMT1A might help develop robust clinical tests for HHL, which are currently lacking.

Cochlear implantation in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: two cases with a review of the literature

PURPOSE

To report two cases of bilateral cochlear implantation (CI) in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) patients with novel mutations. Furthermore, we conducted a detailed literature review on the profile and outcomes of CI in this uncommon clinical circumstance.

CASE PRESENTATION

Case 1 involved a 25-year-old woman who was referred for sudden hearing loss (HL) in her left ear and had a 7-year history of HL in her right ear. She was diagnosed with CMT type 1 with a thymidine phosphorylase gene mutation. CI was performed on her left side because her hearing gradually worsened to deafness in both ears. At 3 months post-operation, her speech discrimination score without lip-reading improved from 0 to 100%. She underwent a second CI on her right ear 6 months after her first CI. Two years from her first operation, the speech discrimination score was 100%. Case 2 received her first CI on her right ear at the age of nine for her bilateral HL. She was diagnosed with CMT type 2 with a Twinkle mitochondrial DNA helicase gene mutation. Preoperatively, the speech discrimination score in both ear-aided conditions was 70%. At the 7-year post-operation follow-up, the speech discrimination score was 76%. A second CI was performed due to decreasing hearing ability in her left ear. The speech discrimination score showed 100% at 7 months after the second CI.

CONCLUSIONS

CI is an effective hearing rehabilitation option for CMT patients with severe-to-profound SNHL. Neuro-otologists should consider CI as a treatment option, even though hearing loss in CMT is associated with auditory neuropathy spectrum disease (ANSD).

Cochlear Implantation in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: Speech Perception and Quality of Life

OBJECTIVES

There is a limited understanding of the impact of cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), given the scarcity of reported cases. We aim to evaluate the audiological outcomes and quality of life (QoL) after CI in CMT.

METHODS

Multi-institutional, university-affiliated, tertiary-referral centers, retrospective chart review.Our cohort includes 5 patients with CMT. Patients' charts were reviewed for demographic characteristics, operation notes, and pre- and post-implantation audiology evaluation. Patients completed the Cochlear Implant Quality of Life-10 (CIQOL-10) Global questionnaire.

RESULTS

Pre-implantation, the mean pure tone average was 84.1 ± 7.2 dB, and the mean word recognition score was 2.4% in the implanted ear. AzBio sentence test was performed in quiet, revealing a mean of 4 ± 1.4% in the implanted ear. Post-implantation, PTA results were all within the mild hearing loss range (mean 33.0 ± 5.9 dB). Post-CI, AZ-Bio test results were 5%, 65%, and 74% (for 3 patients), and HINT scores were 55% and 58% (for 2 patients). The mean score of the CIQOL-10 questionnaire was 42.7 ± 10.47 (range 1-100). Patients were most satisfied with their ability to listen to the television or radio, have conversations in a quiet environment, and feel comfortable being themselves.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this is the most extensive series of CI in CMT-associated sensorineural hearing loss and auditory neuropathy. Our cohort suggests that CI is a safe and reliable method for hearing rehabilitation that can achieve good speech performance and improve QoL in CMT patients.

Cochlear Health and Cochlear-implant Function

The cochlear implant (CI) is widely considered to be one of the most innovative and successful neuroprosthetic treatments developed to date. Although outcomes vary, CIs are able to effectively improve hearing in nearly all recipients and can substantially improve speech understanding and quality of life for patients with significant hearing loss. A wealth of research has focused on underlying factors that contribute to success with a CI, and recent evidence suggests that the overall health of the cochlea could potentially play a larger role than previously recognized. This article defines and reviews attributes of cochlear health and describes procedures to evaluate cochlear health in humans and animal models in order to examine the effects of cochlear health on performance with a CI. Lastly, we describe how future biologic approaches can be used to preserve and/or enhance cochlear health in order to maximize performance for individual CI recipients.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth Disease With Long-Term Follow-Up on Auditory Neuropathy-After Cochlear Implantation Or Hearing Aid Use

OBJECTIVE

To study the pathophysiology of Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) with auditory neuropathy (AN) and to follow up cochlear implant or hearing aid use over the long term.

STUDY DESIGN

Clinical capsule report.

PATIENTS

Two adult CMT patients with AN.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation for case 1 and hearing aid use for case 2.

RESULT

Case 1 was a 50-year-old man who was diagnosed as having CMT at 15 years of age. He noted his hearing impairment at the age of 22. We considered that he had AN as a complication on the basis of the findings of normal distortion product otoacoustic emission and the absence of auditory brainstem response on both ears. We performed cochlear implantation for his progressive hearing loss when he was 41 years old. His postoperative discrimination scores for words and sentences in the CI-2004 test 4 years after cochlear implantation were 80% and 93%, respectively. His sound discrimination scores were 23/24 in the test with picture matching and 9/24 in that without picture matching 8 years after cochlear implantation.Case 2 was a 38-year-old woman who was neurologically diagnosed as having CMT with AN as a complication on the basis of auditory brainstem response and distortion product otoacoustic emission test findings. During 15 years of follow-up, her discrimination score decreased gradually. She is currently wearing a hearing aid.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a significant improvement in case 1 and a slight increase in hearing level in case 2. The pathoneurological findings of CMT might be either demyelination or axonal degeneration depending on the type of genetic abnormality (e.g., PMP22 and MPZ mutations). The symptoms and courses vary among patients with CMT. Therefore, the selection of an appropriate intervention for hearing loss depending on the severity and course is very important.

Cochlear Implantation Outcomes in Post Synaptic Auditory Neuropathies: A Systematic Review and Narrative Synthesis

To establish outcomes following cochlear implantation (CI) in patients with postsynaptic auditory neuropathy (AN). Systematic review and narrative synthesis. Databases searched: MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Cochrane Collection and ClinicalTrials.gov. No limits placed on language or year of publication. Review conducted in accordance with the PRISMA statement. Searches identified 98 studies in total, of which 14 met the inclusion criteria reporting outcomes in 25 patients with at least 28 CIs. Of these, 4 studies focused on Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), 3 on Brown-Vialetto-Van-Laere syndrome (BVVL), 2 on Friedreich Ataxia (FRDA), 2 on Syndromic dominant optic atrophy (DOA+), 2 on Cerebellar ataxia - areflexia - pes cavus - optic atrophy - sensorineural hearing loss (CAPOS) syndrome, and 1 on Deafness-dystonia-optic neuronopathy (DDON) syndrome. All studies were Oxford Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (OCEBM) grade IV. Overall trend was towards good post-CI outcomes with 22 of the total 25 patients displaying modest to significant benefit. Hearing outcomes following CI in postsynaptic ANs are variable but generally good with patients showing improvements in hearing thresholds and speech perception. In the future, development of a clearer stratification system into pre, post, and central AN would have clinical and academic benefits. Further research is required to understand AN pathophysiology and develop better diagnostic tools for more accurate identification of lesion sites. Multicenter longitudinal studies with standardized comprehensive outcome measures including health-related quality of life data will be key in establishing a better understanding of short and long-term post-CI outcomes.

Cochlear implantation in patient with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease

Two patients with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder (ANSD) considered to be associated with Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) are reported. In case 1, a 23-year-old man presented with progressive bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) from 10 years of age and was diagnosed with ANSD. He was later diagnosed with CMT by neurological testing. In case 2, a 16-year-old girl, the younger sister of the patient in case 1, presented with progressive SNHL with similar auditory findings since 6 years of age as those of her brother. Both cases underwent bilateral cochlear implantation. In case 1, the maximum discrimination score improved to 45% 24 months after the first side of cochlear implantation from 5% before the surgery. In case 2, the score was 5% 10 months after cochlear implant (CI) surgery from 0% before the surgery. CI treatment for CMT patients has been considered difficult because of both failure in synchronization of nerve conduction due to demyelination and axonal failure of the auditory nerve. Though slower progress compared to the average subset of patients receiving CI was seen, significant improvement was gradually observed in the present patients after bilateral cochlear implantations. CI is thus a viable option for rehabilitation of SNHL in CMT patients.

Hearing loss in inherited peripheral neuropathies: Molecular diagnosis by NGS in a French series

Background

The most common inherited peripheral neuropathy is Charcot‐Marie‐Tooth disease (CMT), with a prevalence of 1/2500. Other symptoms can be associated to the condition, such as hearing loss. Currently, no global hearing impairment assessment has been determined, and the physiopathology is not well known.

Methods

The aim of the study was to analyze among a French series of 3,412 patients with inherited peripheral neuropathy (IPN), the ones who also suffer from hearing loss, to establish phenotype‐genotype correlations. An NGS strategy for IPN one side and nonsyndromic hearing loss (NSHL) on the other side, were performed.

Results

Hearing loss (HL) was present in only 44 patients (1.30%). The clinical data of 27 patients were usable. Demyelinating neuropathy was diagnosed in 15 cases and axonal neuropathy in 12 cases. HL varied from mild to profound. Five cases of auditory neuropathy were noticed. Diagnosis was made for 60% of these patients. Seven novel pathogenic variants were discovered in five different genes: PRPS1; MPZ; SH3TC2; NEFL; and ABHD12. Two patients with PMP22 variant, had also an additional variant in COCH and MYH14 respectively. No pathogenic variant was found at the DFNB1 locus. Genotype‐phenotype correlations do exist, especially with SH3TC2, PRPS1, ABHD12, NEFL, and TRPV4.

Conclusion

Involvement of PMP22 is not enough to explain hearing loss in patients suffering from IPN. HL can be due to cochlear impairment and/or auditory nerve dysfunction. HL is certainly underdiagnosed, and should be evaluated in every patient suffering from IPN.

Charcot-Marie-Tooth: From Molecules to Therapy

Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMT) is the most prevalent category of inherited neuropathy. The most common inheritance pattern is autosomal dominant, though there also are X-linked and autosomal recessive subtypes. In addition to a variety of inheritance patterns, there are a myriad of genes associated with CMT, reflecting the heterogeneity of this disorder. Next generation sequencing (NGS) has expanded and simplified the diagnostic yield of genes/molecules underlying and/or associated with CMT, which is of paramount importance in providing a substrate for current and future targeted disease-modifying treatment options. Considerable research attention for disease-modifying therapy has been geared towards the most commonly encountered genetic mutations (PMP22, GJB1, MPZ, and MFN2). In this review, we highlight the clinical background, molecular understanding, and therapeutic investigations of these CMT subtypes, while also discussing therapeutic research pertinent to the remaining less common CMT subtypes.