Approach to Neonates and Young Infants with Fever without a Source Who Are at Risk for Severe Bacterial Infection

Occult Serious Bacterial Infections in Neonates and Infants Up to Three Months of Age with Bronchiolitis: Are Invasive Cultures Required?

(1) Background: The literature reports a low risk of serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in febrile infants presenting with bronchiolitis or respiratory syncytial virus infection, but current microbiological techniques have a higher accuracy. (2) Methods: We assessed the risk of SBIs in neonates and infants with bronchiolitis from 2021 to 2023. We also evaluated C-reactive protein, procalcitonin, and leukocyte values. (3) Results: We included 242 infants. Blood cultures (BCs) were performed in 66/242 patients, with a positivity rate of 9.1% (including one BC with Staphylococcus hominis, considered as a contaminant). The cerebrospinal fluid culture was performed in 6/242 patients, and the results were all negative. Infection markers did not discriminate infants with positive BCs from those with negative ones. (4) Conclusions: Blood cultures should be performed in neonates and young infants with bronchiolitis fever, as the sepsis risk is not negligible. Conversely, our proposed algorithm is to wait for the respiratory panel results before decision-making for a lumbar puncture. Further studies are needed to understand lumbar puncture requirements.

Prospective multicenter evaluation of adherence to the Dutch guideline for children aged 0-16 years with fever without a source-febrile illness in children (FINCH) study

Evaluation of guidelines in actual practice is a crucial step in guideline improvement. A retrospective evaluation of the Dutch guideline for children with fever without an apparent source (FWS) showed 50% adherence in young infants. We prospectively evaluated adherence to the Dutch guideline and its impact on management in current practice. Prospective observational multicenter cross-sectional study, including children 3 days to 16 years old presented for FWS at one of seven emergency departments in participating secondary and tertiary care hospitals in the Netherlands. Adherence to the Dutch FWS guideline, adapted from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline, was evaluated, and patterns in non-adherence and the impact of non-adherence on clinical outcomes and resource use were explored. Adherence to the guideline was 192/370 (52%). Adherence was lowest in patients categorized as high risk for severe infection (72/187, 39%), compared to the low-risk group (64/73, 88%). Differences in adherence were significant between risk categories (P < 0.001) but not between age categories. In case of non-adherence, less urinalysis, fewer bacterial cultures (blood, urine, and cerebral spinal fluid), and less empirical antibiotic treatment were performed (P < 0.050). Clinical outcomes were not significantly different between the non-adherence and the adherence group, particularly regarding missed severe infections.

CONCLUSIONS

We found a high non-adherence rate of 48%, which did not lead to unfavorable clinical outcomes. This substantiates the need for a critical reevaluation of the FWS guideline and its indications for bacterial cultures, viral testing, and antibiotic treatment.

WHAT IS KNOWN

• Despite the development of national guidelines, variation in practice is still substantial in the assessment of febrile children to distinguish severe infection from mild self-limiting disease. • Previous retrospective research suggests low adherence to national guidelines for febrile children in practice.

WHAT IS NEW

• In case of non-adherence to the Dutch national guideline, similar to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guideline from the United Kingdom, physicians have used fewer resources than the guideline recommended without increasing missed severe infections.

Point-of-care ultrasound in early diagnosis and monitoring of deep abscess in newborns: a case report of two cases

Objective

This study sought to analyze the value of point of care ultrasound (POCUS) in early diagnosis and monitoring of deep abscess in newborns.

Methods

Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of two newborns admitted to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) of our hospital and diagnosed with deep abscess of the newborn. Combined with literature analysis, the value of POCUS in early diagnosis and monitoring of deep abscess of the newborn was evaluated.

Results

The two newborns reported in this article were all admitted to NICU due to" "fever". POCUS was used to assist in early diagnosis of "liver abscess" and "lung abscess". Subsequently, POCUS was used to monitor lesion changes and adjust treatment plans. All patients were cured and discharged with a good prognosis.

Conclusions

Deep abscesses in newborns are very rare and often life-threatening, but apart from fever, they often have no specific clinical manifestations and are easily misdiagnosed or missed. POCUS, as a bedside auxiliary examination tool, has high accuracy, radiation free, non-invasive, and convenient, and has high diagnostic and monitoring value in early diagnosis and monitoring of deep abscess in newborns.

Conundrums in the Management of Febrile Infants under Three Months of Age and Future Research

Febrile infants under three months of age pose a diagnostic challenge to clinicians. Unlike in older children, the rates of invasive bacterial infections (IBIs), such as bacteraemia or meningitis, are high. This greater risk of IBI combined with the practical challenges of assessing young infants results in a cautious approach with many febrile infants receiving parenteral antibiotics "just in case". However, there is a range of validated tailored care guidelines that support targeted investigation and management of febrile infants, with a cohort identified as lower risk suitable for fewer invasive procedures and observation without parenteral antibiotics. This manuscript outlines five common conundrums related to the safe application of tailored-care guidelines for the assessment and management of febrile infants under three months of age. It also explores future research which aims to further refine the management of febrile infants.

Biomarkers for Serious Bacterial Infections in Febrile Children

Febrile infections in children are a common cause of presentation to the emergency department (ED). While viral infections are usually self-limiting, sometimes bacterial illnesses may lead to sepsis and severe complications. Inflammatory biomarkers such as C reactive protein (CRP) and procalcitonin are usually the first blood exams performed in the ED to differentiate bacterial and viral infections; nowadays, a better understanding of immunochemical pathways has led to the discovery of new and more specific biomarkers that could play a role in the emergency setting. The aim of this narrative review is to provide the most recent evidence on biomarkers and predictor models, combining them for serious bacterial infection (SBI) diagnosis in febrile children. Literature analysis shows that inflammatory response is a complex mechanism in which many biochemical and immunological factors contribute to the host response in SBI. CRP and procalcitonin still represent the most used biomarkers in the pediatric ED for the diagnosis of SBI. Their sensibility and sensitivity increase when combined, and for this reason, it is reasonable to take them both into consideration in the evaluation of febrile children. The potential of machine learning tools, which represent a real novelty in medical practice, in conjunction with routine clinical and biological information, may improve the accuracy of diagnosis and target therapeutic options in SBI. However, studies on this matter are not yet validated in younger populations, making their relevance in pediatric precision medicine still uncertain. More data from further research are needed to improve clinical practice and decision making using these new technologies.

Bacterial coinfection in young febrile infants with SARS-CoV-2 infection

We aimed to assess the prevalence of serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in febrile infants < 90 days of age with SARS-CoV-2 infection versus SARS-CoV-2-negative febrile infants. A retrospective cohort study was conducted in a tertiary pediatric emergency department between March 2020 and October 2022. Febrile infants < 90 days of age who underwent SARS-CoV-2 testing were included. SBIs were defined as urinary tract infection (UTI), bacteremia, and/or bacterial meningitis; bacteremia and bacterial meningitis were considered invasive bacterial infections (IBIs). SBIs rates were compared between SARS-CoV-2-positive and negative infants and stratified by age. We included 779 infants: 221 (28.4%) SARS-CoV-2-positive and 558 (71.6%) SARS-CoV-2-negative. The SBI rate in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group was 5.9% vs 22.9% in the SARS-CoV-2-negative group (p < 0.001; relative risk (RR) 0.26; [95% CI 0.15-0.44]); the most common infections were UTI (5.4% vs 22.0%; p < 0.001). The IBI rate was 0.5% in the SARS-CoV-2-positive group vs. 3.2% in the negative group (p = 0.024; RR 0.14 [95% CI 0.02-1.04]). There were no cases of bacterial meningitis in the positive infants. SARS-CoV-2-positive infants > 28 days of age had a decreased likelihood of SBI (RR 0.22 [95% CI 0.11-0.43]), with no cases of IBI identified.     Conclusions: Febrile infants < 90 days of age with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at significantly lower risk of SBIs than those who are SARS-CoV-2-negative. Nevertheless, the rate of UTI remains considerable in SARS-CoV-2-positive infants. SARS-CoV-2 detection may be relevant in considering IBI risk for well-appearing febrile infants 29-89 days of age. What is Known: • Febrile infants with laboratory-confirmed viral infections have a significantly lower risk of serious bacterial infections when compared to those without them. Data focusing on very young febrile infants with a SARS-CoV-2 infection is still limited. What is New: • Young febrile infants with SARS-CoV-2 infection are at significantly lower risk of serious bacterial infections than those who are SARS-CoV-2-negative. Nevertheless, the rate of urinary tract infection remains considerable. SARS-CoV-2 detection may be relevant in considering invasive bacterial infection risk for well-appearing febrile infants 29-89 days of age.

Host biomarkers and combinatorial scores for the detection of serious and invasive bacterial infection in pediatric patients with fever without source

BACKGROUND

Improved tools are required to detect bacterial infection in children with fever without source (FWS), especially when younger than 3 years old. The aim of the present study was to investigate the diagnostic accuracy of a host signature combining for the first time two viral-induced biomarkers, tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) and interferon γ-induced protein-10 (IP-10), with a bacterial-induced one, C-reactive protein (CRP), to reliably predict bacterial infection in children with fever without source (FWS) and to compare its performance to routine individual biomarkers (CRP, procalcitonin (PCT), white blood cell and absolute neutrophil counts, TRAIL, and IP-10) and to the Labscore.

METHODS

This was a prospective diagnostic accuracy study conducted in a single tertiary center in children aged less than 3 years old presenting with FWS. Reference standard etiology (bacterial or viral) was assigned by a panel of three independent experts. Diagnostic accuracy (AUC, sensitivity, specificity) of host individual biomarkers and combinatorial scores was evaluated in comparison to reference standard outcomes (expert panel adjudication and microbiological diagnosis).

RESULTS

241 patients were included. 68 of them (28%) were diagnosed with a bacterial infection and 5 (2%) with invasive bacterial infection (IBI). Labscore, ImmunoXpert, and CRP attained the highest AUC values for the detection of bacterial infection, respectively 0.854 (0.804-0.905), 0.827 (0.764-0.890), and 0.807 (0.744-0.869). Labscore and ImmunoXpert outperformed the other single biomarkers with higher sensitivity and/or specificity and showed comparable performance to one another although slightly reduced sensitivity in children < 90 days of age.

CONCLUSION

Labscore and ImmunoXpert demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for safely discriminating bacterial infection in children with FWS aged under and over 90 days, supporting their adoption in the assessment of febrile patients.

Predictors of bacteremia in febrile infants under 3 months old in the pediatric emergency department

INTRODUCTION

Fever may serve as the primary indicator of underlying infection in children admitted to the pediatric emergency department (PED), especially in high-risk young infants. This study aimed to identify early clinical factors that could help predict bacteremia in young febrile infants.

METHODS

The study included infants under 90 days of age who were admitted to the PED due to fever. Patients were divided into two groups based on the presence or absence of bacteremia and further divided into three age groups: (1) less than 30 days, (2) 30 to 59 days, and (3) 60 to 90 days. Several clinical and laboratory variables were analyzed, and logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were used to identify potential risk factors associated with bacteremia in young febrile infants.

RESULTS

A total of 498 febrile infants were included, of whom 6.4% were diagnosed with bacteremia. The bacteremia group had a higher body temperature (BT) at triage, especially in neonates, higher pulse rates at triage, longer fever subsidence time, longer hospital stays, higher neutrophil counts, and higher C-reactive protein (CRP) levels than those of the non-bacteremia group. ROC analysis showed that the best cut-off values for predicting bacteremia in infants with pyrexia were a BT of 38.7 °C, neutrophil count of 57.9%, and CRP concentration of 53.8 mg/L.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher BT at triage, increased total neutrophil count, and elevated CRP levels may be useful for identifying bacteremia in young febrile infants admitted to the PED.

Preterm and Term Infants Evaluated for Sepsis: Differences in Management and Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To describe differences in practice patterns and outcomes of young preterm versus age-matched term infants evaluated for sepsis, because evaluation and management of this group are not well defined.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective single-center study at an academic, freestanding children's hospital of previously healthy preterm and term infants aged 0 to 60 days, who presented for initial evaluation of fever and/or hypothermia from 2014 to 2019. We classified infants by gestational age as preterm (32-36 6/7 weeks) and term (37-42 weeks) and compared diagnostic evaluation, management, and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 363 preterm infants evaluated for sepsis, 336 met inclusion criteria; within the same study period, 2331 term infants were evaluated for sepsis, of which 600 were randomly selected and 554 were included. Clinicians performed inflammatory marker testing and chest x-rays more frequently in preterm infants 31% vs 25% (P = .034) and 50% vs 32% (P < .001), respectively. Preterm infants had a higher rate of bacteremia 5.9% vs 2.5% (P = .035), were hospitalized more frequently 72% vs 63% (P = .006), and required ICU level of care more often 32% vs 5% (P < .001) than term infants. They had lower rates of viral infections 33% vs 42% (P = .015) and no significant increased return visits. Febrile preterm and term infants, and older hypothermic preterm infants had relatively higher rates of serious bacterial infections. Hypothermic preterm infants had the longest hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

Preterm infants had increased rates of bacteremia and required higher level of care compared with age-matched term infants, likely reflecting their increased risk for sepsis and other concomitant morbidities associated with preterm birth.

Serious Bacterial Infections in Preterm Infants: Should Their Age Be "Corrected"?

Adjusting the chronological age of preterm infants according to their gestational age is a widely accepted practice in the field of neurodevelopment. It has been suggested for the assessment of preterm infants with suspected infection, but has been poorly validated. Correcting for chronological age is especially critical in infants with a chronological age above 3 months, but a corrected age below 3 months due to the differences in assessment protocols. This study assessed the difference in incidence of serious bacterial infection (SBI) according to chronological and corrected age in preterm infants. A retrospective analysis of pediatric emergency department (PED) presentations was conducted for all 448 preterm infants born in between January 2010 and August 2019. Of the 448 preterm infants, 204 (46%) presented at one of 3 PEDs in Jerusalem, Israel, during their first year of life. Overall, 141 (31.4%) presented with fever and were included in the study. The infants were divided into 3 age groups: 1-corrected age >3 months; 2-chronological age >3 months, but corrected age <3 months; 3-chronological and corrected age <3 months. SBI was diagnosed in 2.6%, 16.7%, and 33.3% of the infants in groups 1, 2 and 3, respectively; (p < 0.01, p = 0.17, p < 0.001). The incidence of SBI in the control group of 300 term infants <3 months presenting to the PED due to fever was 15.3%. Preterm infants with a corrected age <3 months are at increased risk for SBI, similarly to term infants <3 months of age. Age correction should thus be considered for preterm infants presenting with fever.

A nomogram for predicting the development of serious bacterial infections in febrile term neonates: A single medical center experience in Southern Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Serious bacterial infections (SBIs) could lead to mortality or severe long-term sequelae in neonates and infants aged <3 months. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to develop a quantitative and accurate assessment tool for predicting the risk of SBIs in febrile neonates.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled 131 febrile term neonates (aged <30 days) who were hospitalized at Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital between January 2005 and December 2020. These neonates were classified into SBI and nonbacterial infection (NBI) groups on the basis of microbiological laboratory reports. The clinical characteristics and routine blood tests of both groups at the time of admission were analyzed. Stepwise logistic regression was applied to create and validate the nomogram for SBI prediction.

RESULTS

Among the 131 febrile neonates, 38 and 93 developed SBIs and NBIs, respectively. At the time of admission, ill clinical appearance, serum myelocyte/metamyelocyte presence, C-reactive protein (CRP) > 2.5 mg/dL, and pyuria were associated with an increased risk of SBIs. Accordingly, these four factors were used to develop a nomogram for SBI prediction, which exhibited significantly high performance (area under curve = 0.848, p < 0.001) in predicting SBI risk.

CONCLUSION

We developed a nomogram combining clinical appearance, serum myelocyte/metamyelocyte presence, CRP, and pyuria for predicting SBI risk in febrile neonates. This tool can assist clinicians in making early diagnoses and delivering the appropriate treatment.

Management of Pediatric Urinary Tract Infections: A Delphi Study

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is one of the most common infectious diseases in the pediatric population and represents a major cause of antibiotic consumption and hospitalization in children. Considering the ongoing controversies on the management of pediatric UTI and the challenges due to increasing antimicrobial resistance, the aim of the present study was to evaluate the level of agreement on UTI management in pediatric age in Emilia-Romagna Region, Italy, and to assess on the basis of recent studies whether there is the need to change current recommendations used by primary care pediatricians, hospital pediatricians, and pediatric surgeons in everyday clinical practice to possibly improve outcomes. This consensus provides clear and shared indications on UTI management in pediatric age, based on the most updated literature. This work represents, in our opinion, the most complete and up-to-date collection of statements on procedures to follow for pediatric UTI, in order to guide physicians in the management of the patient, standardize approaches, and avoid abuse and misuse of antibiotics. Undoubtedly, more randomized and controlled trials are needed in the pediatric population to better define the best therapeutic management in cases with antimicrobial resistance and real usefulness of long-term antibiotic prophylaxis.

COVID-19 Infection in Well-Appearing 30- to 90-Day-Old Infants with Fever without a Source

Fever without a source (FWS) is common clinical status in the young infants. The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and laboratory findings of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) infection in well-appearing infants with FWS. Well-appearing febrile infants between 30 and 90 days who were evaluated as FWS in the pediatric emergency department and tested for COVID-19 were divided into two groups: COVID-19 (+) and (-). The clinical and laboratory findings of the patients were compared. The study included 95 febrile infants with FWS, and the mean age was 59.62 ± 16.82 days. The nasopharyngeal COVID-19 polymerase chain reaction test results of 29/95 (30.5%) patients were positive, while 66/95 (69.5%) were negative. The complaints of irritability and nasal congestion were found to be significantly more common in COVID-19-positive patients (p = 0.04 and p = 0.041, respectively). The hospitalization rate (p = 0.009), length of hospital stay (p = 0.026), initiation of antibiotic treatment (p < 0.001) and duration of antibiotic treatment (p = 0.036) were significantly lower in the COVID-19 (+) patients. The C-reactive protein (CRP, p < 0.001), absolute neutrophil count (ANC, p < 0.001), absolute lymphocyte count (ALC, p = 0.015), white blood cell (WBC, p < 0.001) and systemic immune-inflammation index (SII, p < 0.001) were found to be significantly lower in the COVID-19 (+) patient group. There was no significant difference between the groups in terms of neutropenia, lymphopenia or leukopenia. COVID-19 infection may present as an FWS. During the pandemic period, testing for COVID-19 among infants who were evaluated as FWS may reduce unnecessary hospitalizations and antibiotic treatments, and shorten hospital stays and duration of antibiotics.

Delays in Time-To-Antibiotics for Young Febrile Infants With Serious Bacterial Infections: A Prospective Single-Center Study

INTRODUCTION

Fear of missed serious bacterial infections (SBIs) results in many febrile young infants receiving antibiotics. We aimed to compare the time to antibiotics between infants with SBIs and those without.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We recruited febrile infants ≤ 90 days old seen in the emergency department (ED) between December 2017 and April 2021. SBI was defined as (1) urinary tract infection, (2) bacteremia or (3) bacterial meningitis. We compared the total time (median with interquartile range, IQR) from ED arrival to infusion of antibiotics, divided into (i) time from triage to decision for antibiotics and (ii) time from decision for antibiotics to administration of antibiotics.

RESULTS

We analyzed 81 and 266 infants with and without SBIs. Median age of those with and without SBIs were 44 (IQR 19-72) and 29 (IQR 7-56) days, respectively (p = 0.002). All infants with SBIs and 168/266 (63.2%) infants without SBIs received antibiotics. Among 249 infants who received antibiotics, the median total time from ED arrival to infusion of antibiotics was 277.0 (IQR 236.0-385.0) mins for infants with SBIs and 304.5 (IQR 238.5-404.0) mins for those without (p = 0.561). The median time to decision for antibiotics was 156.0 (IQR 115.0-255.0) mins and 144.0 (IQR 105.5-211.0) mins, respectively (p = 0.175). Following decision for antibiotics, infants with SBIs received antibiotics much faster compared to those without [107.0 (IQR 83.0-168.0) vs. 141.0 (94.0-209.5) mins, p = 0.017].

CONCLUSION

There was no difference in total time taken to antibiotics between infants with SBIs and without SBIs. Both recognition and administration delays were observed. While all infants with SBIs were adequately treated, more than half of the infants without SBIs received unnecessary antibiotics. This highlights the challenge in managing young febrile infants at initial presentation, and demonstrates the need to examine various aspects of care to improve the overall timeliness to antibiotics.

Transcript host-RNA signatures to discriminate bacterial and viral infections in febrile children

Traditional laboratory markers, such as white blood cell count, C-reactive protein, and procalcitonin, failed to discriminate viral and bacterial infections in children. The lack of an accurate diagnostic test has a negative impact on child's care, limiting the ability of early diagnosis and appropriate management of children. This, on the one hand, may lead to delayed recognition of sepsis and severe bacterial infections, which still represent the leading causes of child morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, this may lead to overuse of empiric antibiotic therapies, particularly for specific subgroups of patients, such as infants younger than 90 days of life or neutropenic patients. This approach has an adverse effect on costs, antibiotic resistance, and pediatric microbiota. Transcript host-RNA signatures are a new tool used to differentiate viral from bacterial infections by analyzing the transcriptional biosignatures of RNA in host leukocytes. In this systematic review, we evaluate the efficacy and the possible application of this new diagnostic method in febrile children, along with challenges in its implementation. Our review support the growing evidence that the application of these new tools can improve the characterization of the spectrum of bacterial and viral infections and optimize the use of antibiotics in children. IMPACT: Transcript host RNA signatures may allow to better characterize the spectrum of viral, bacterial, and inflammatory illnesses in febrile children and can be used with traditional diagnostic methods to determine if and when to start antibiotic therapy. This is the first review on the use of transcript RNA signatures in febrile children to distinguish viral from bacterial infections. Our review identified a wide variability of target populations and gold standards used to define sepsis and SBIs, limiting the generalization of our findings.

Epidemiology of serious bacterial infection in febrile infants under 3 months of age and diagnostic management in Mayotte

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine the prevalence of serious bacterial infections (SBIs) in infants less than 90 days old presenting with fever on arrival at the emergency department (ED), and to assess the diagnostic management of febrile infants.

DESIGN

A retrospective study at Mamoudzou Hospital, Mayotte Island, French Department.

SETTING

General ED in the only pediatric hospital throughout the territory PATIENTS: We included infants less than 90 days old with a history of fever and bacterial investigation evaluated in the ED between 2016 and 2018. We excluded preterm infants (gestational age < 37 weeks) and those with known immunodeficiency or previous administration of antibiotics.

RESULTS

A total of 594 infants were included. In all, 105 infants (17.7%) were diagnosed with an SBI and 28 (4.7%) with an invasive bacterial infection of which 1.34% was meningitis. The most frequent SBI was pneumonia (n = 69, 11.6%) followed by urinary tract infection (UTI; n = 37, 6.2%). Predominant pathogens (excluding contaminants) were Escherichia coli (51.2% of the UTI cases), group B Streptococcus (62.5% of meningitis cases), and Staphylococcus aureus (61.5% of bacteremia cases). Seven infants presented with bacterial pneumonia due to Staphylococcus aureus with Panton-Valentine leucocidin (PVL) exotoxin production. Ill-appearing infants, clinical signs of SBI and complex chronic condition were associated with a risk of SBI (respective odds ratio [OR]: 4.6, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 3-6.9; OR: 4.2, 95% CI: 2.8-6.4; and OR: 3.2, 95% CI: 1.2-8.5). The median age for SBI was 42 days (5-90). Fever without source (FWS) occurred more often in infants under 21 days of age (48.5% vs. 31.3% in older infants, p < 0.001). The median duration of fever at home was 24 h (6-96). Concerning management, in infants aged under 21 days, there were more lumbar punctures (58.3% vs. 23% in older infants, p < 0.001) and more frequent initiation of empiric antibiotics (62.6% vs. 42.7%, p < 0.001). Length of stay was also longer in this age range (5 days vs. 3 days, p = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Delay in medical consultation in the case of fever, the risk of SBI regardless of age, and unusual epidemiology with many IBI due to Staphylococcus aureus with PVL exotoxin production are specific characteristics observed in our study. Knowledge of the current epidemiology of SBI in Mayotte would be useful for setting up a risk-stratified protocol in this population in the future.

Evaluation and Management of the Febrile Young Infant (<90 days old) in the Absence of Universally Accepted Criteria for the Risk of Serious Bacterial Infection (SBI)

Fever (≥38°C) in young infants (<90 days of age) represents a common clinical challenge for pediatricians in both outpatient and inpatient settings. While the majority of febrile infants will ultimately be determined to have no serious infection, serious infections when present can cause significant morbidity and mortality in affected patients. Since the evaluation and empiric treatment of presumptive serious infection has associated risks (e.g. medication side effects, stress/disruption of hospitalization, nosocomial infection, etc.) as well as substantial costs, attempts have been made to clearly define an accurate method that enables clinicians to correctly stratify which infants are at relatively low risk for serious bacterial infection (SBI) and may therefore be safely managed less aggressively. Although this topic has been extensively studied and discussed, no single protocol has been universally adopted and clinical practices continue to vary. This paper discusses multiple distinct protocols currently in use, as well as the evidence upon which they are based and the points on which the evidence is not yet definitive.

[Fever of unknown origin]

Fieber unklarer Genese wird diagnostiziert, wenn das Fieber (meist definiert als Körpertemperatur ≥ 38,3 °C, gemessen rektal oder am Trommelfell) länger dauert als erwartet, also nach 5 bis 10 Tagen. Die Ursachensuche kann sich schwierig gestalten und bedarf der erhöhten Aufmerksamkeit des erfahrenen Allgemeinpädiaters in Zusammenarbeit mit pädiatrischen Infektiologen, Rheumatologen und Onkologen, der Pflege, Radiologen und anderen. In etwa der Hälfte der Fälle findet sich am Ende doch eine Infektion; weitere Ursachen sind primär entzündliche oder onkologische sowie nichtentzündliche Erkrankungen. Einzelne Ursachen mit der Gefahr des schweren Verlaufs müssen sofort behandelt werden. Ansonsten gibt es ein klares Primat der Diagnostik, die klug geplant und sowohl zielstrebig als auch breit durchgeführt wird. Anamnese, physikalischer Befund, Laborbestimmungen, apparative Diagnostik, bildgebende und histologische Untersuchungen können zur Diagnose beitragen. Die Eltern sind durch die Ungewissheit hindurchzuführen, und dem Kind sollte die Situation möglichst erleichtert werden. Es kommen auch Spontanheilungen vor. Die probatorische Gabe von Antibiotika führt selten zur Besserung. Nach weitgehendem Ausschluss von Infektion, Malignom und zunehmendem Leiden unter dem Fieber selbst, können bei hoher Entzündungsaktivität, unter dem Verdacht auf einen hyperergen Status und nach ausführlicher Aufklärung Glukokortikoide angesetzt werden. Das Management des Fiebers unklarer Genese ist eine der großen Herausforderungen der Pädiatrie.

Catheter-obtained, Enterococcus and Proteus positive urine cultures may represent mostly contamination or asymptomatic bacteriuria in infants <90 days

BACKGROUND

Urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis in infants is often made by a positive urine culture result, regardless of urine dipstick findings.

AIM

To assess parameters that may affect positive urine culture results interpretation in infants, including dipstick performance, obtainment method, bacteria type, age and laboratory results.

METHODS

A retrospective, cohort study. Infants <90 days with urine dipstick and culture obtained through subrapubic aspiration (SPA) or catheter, 2015-2016, were included.

RESULTS

Overall, 19% (129/678) of cultures were positive. The dipstick sensitivity was 51% for all cultures; 66%, 47%, 15% and 10% for Escherichia coli (n= 71), Klebsiella (n= 19), Enterococcus (n= 34) and Proteus (n= 10), respectively (p<.001). Sensitivity was higher in SPA vs. catheter for all cultures (67% vs. 43%); E. coli (78% vs. 59%); and Klebsiella (88% vs. 18%). For Enterococcus, dipstick sensitivity was low in both SPA and catheter (0-16%). All Proteus episodes were catheter obtained. Positive culture with negative dipstick and Enterococcus episodes had lower C-reactive protein levels, and higher proportion of mixed infection compared with positive dipstick and E. coli episodes.

CONCLUSIONS

Urine cultures in infants should be obtained by SPA, since catheter-obtained, Enterococcus and Proteus positive cultures may represent contamination or asymptomatic bacteriuria, rather than true UTI.

Fever without source as the first manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection in infants less than 90 days old

Fever without source (FWS) in infants is a frequent cause of consultation at the emergency department, and the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 could affect the approach to those infants. The aim of this study is to define the clinical characteristics and rates of bacterial coinfections of infants < 90 days with FWS as the first manifestation of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This is a cross-sectional study of infants under 90 days of age with FWS and positive SARS-CoV2 PCR in nasopharyngeal swab/aspirate, attended at the emergency departments of 49 Spanish hospitals (EPICO-AEP cohort) from March 1 to June 26, 2020. Three hundred and thirty-three children with COVID-19 were included in EPICO-AEP. A total of 67/336 (20%) were infants less than 90 days old, and 27/67(40%) presented with FWS. Blood cultures were performed in 24/27(89%) and were negative in all but one (4%) who presented a Streptococcus mitis bacteremia. Urine culture was performed in 26/27(97%) children and was negative in all, except in two (7%) patients. Lumbar puncture was performed in 6/27(22%) cases, with no growth of bacteria. Two children had bacterial coinfections: 1 had UTI and bacteremia, and 1 had UTI. C-reactive was protein over 20 mg/L in two children (one with bacterial coinfection), and procalcitonin was normal in all. One child was admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit because of apnea episodes. No patients died.Conclusion: FWS was frequent in infants under 90 days of age with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Standardized markers to rule out bacterial infections remain useful in this population, and the outcome is generally good. What is Known: • Fever without source (FWS) in infants is a common cause of consultation at the emergency department, and young infants have a higher risk of serious bacterial infections (SBI). • The emergence of the new coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 could affect the approach to young infants with FWS in the emergency department. management of those children is a challenge because information about bacterial coinfection and prognosis is scarce. What is New: • SARS-CoV-2 infection should be ruled out in young infants (< 90 days of age) with FWS in areas with community transmission. • Bacterial coinfection rarely coexists in those infants. • Inflammatory markers were not increased in children without bacterial coinfection. • Outcome is good in most patients.

Fever Without an Apparent Source in Young Infants: A Multicenter Retrospective Evaluation of Adherence to the Dutch Guidelines

BACKGROUND

The Dutch fever without an apparent source (FWS) guidelines were published to timely recognize and treat serious infections. We determined the adherence to the Dutch FWS guidelines and the percentage of serious infections in infants younger than 3 months of age. Second, we identified which clinical criteria, diagnostic tests, and management were associated with nonadherence to the guidelines.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in 2 Dutch teaching hospitals. We assessed the charts of all infants with FWS who presented at the emergency departments from September 30, 2017, to October 1, 2019. Diagnostic and therapeutic decisions were compared with the recommendations, as published in the Dutch guidelines. Infants were categorized into the nonadherence group in case 1 or more recommendations were not adhered to.

RESULTS

Data on 231 infants were studied; 51.5% of the cases adhered to the Dutch guidelines and 16.0% suffered from a serious infection. The percentage of infants with a serious infection was higher in the adherence compared with the nonadherence group. We observed no relevant differences in clinical outcomes. Univariate regression analysis showed that an abnormal white blood cell count was associated with nonadherence (OR 0.4, P = 0.049). Not obtaining a urine and blood culture and not starting intravenous antibiotic treatment were the most frequent reasons for nonadherence to the guidelines.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study indicates that there was nonadherence in a large proportion of FWS cases. The guidelines may need to be adjusted to increase adherence.

Adjunctive therapy to treat neonatal sepsis

Introduction: Neonatal sepsis (NS) is a very severe condition that causes significant morbidity and mortality.Areas covered: To overcome the limits of antibiotic therapy and improve NS outcomes, measures chosen among those theoretically able to improve host defenses or positively interfere with deleterious immune responses could be suggested. This paper discusses the mechanisms of action of these measures, whether their efficacy in prophylaxis justifies use in NS therapy and their impact.Expert opinion: NS remains a relevant problem despite the availability of antibiotics effective against the most common agents and the introduction of effective preventive measures such as group B Streptococcus prenatal screening and intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis. This explains why attempts to introduce new prophylactic and therapeutic measures have been made. Unfortunately, none of the measures suggested and tested to date can be considered a definitive advance. It is highly likely that in the future, new measures will be proposed according to the increase in the knowledge of the characteristics of immune system function in preterm infants and the methods to modulate unproper immune responses.

The impact of global budgeting in Taiwan on inpatients with unexplained fever

Unexplained fever is one of the most common and difficult diagnostic problems faced daily by clinicians. This study evaluated the differences in health service utilization, health care expenditures, and quality of care provided to patients with unexplained fever before and after global budget (GB) implementation in Taiwan.The National Health Insurance Research Database was used for analyzing the health care expenditures and quality of care before and after implementation of the GB system. Patients diagnosed as having unexplained fever during 2000-2001 were recruited; their 2000-2001 and 2004-2005 data were considered baseline and postintervention data, respectively.Data of 259 patients with unexplained fever were analyzed. The mean lengths of stay (LOSs) before and after GB system implementation were 4.22 ± 0.35 days and 5.29 ± 0.70 days, respectively. The mean costs of different health care expenditures before and after implementation of the GB system were as follows: the mean diagnostic, drug, therapy, and total costs increased respectively from New Taiwan Dollar (NT$) 1440.05 ± NT$97.43, NT$3249.90 ± NT$1108.27, NT$421.03 ± NT$100.03, and NT$13,866.77 ± NT$2,114.95 before GB system implementation to NT$2224.34 ± NT$238.36, NT$4272.31 ± NT$1466.90, NT$2217.03 ± NT$672.20, and NT$22,856.41 ± NT$4,196.28 after implementation. The mean rates of revisiting the emergency department within 3 days and readmission within 14 days increased respectively from 10.5% ± 2.7% and 8.3% ± 2.4% before implementation to 6.3% ± 2.2% and 4.0% ± 1.7% after implementation.GB significantly increased LOS and incremental total costs for patients with unexplained fever; but improved the quality of care.