Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Single-Institution Retrospective Review

Treatments for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To report the outcome of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) undergoing treatment.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and CINAHL databases were searched. Inclusion criteria were women with CSP undergoing treatment. The primary outcome was successful treatment for CSP, defined as no need for additional medical or surgical strategies. Secondary outcomes were the type of additional treatment (surgical or medical), need for blood transfusion, emergency laparotomy, hysterectomy, post-treatment complications.All these outcomes were explored in women undergoing single and compound treatments for CSP. Furthermore, we performed a separate sub-group analysis only including studies which reported on the outcomes of elective treatments. Random effects meta-analyses were used to analyze the data and results reported as pooled proportions or odd ratio (OR).

RESULTS

176 studies (13431 women with CSP undergoing treatment) were included.Successful treatment after primary intervention was achieved in 86.2% (95% CI 82.3-89.7) of women with CSP undergoing treatment with ultrasound guided suction curettage, 72.4% (95% CI 64.8-79.3) with systemic MTX, 81.6% (95% CI 72.3-89.3) with local MTX, 83.9% (95% CI 66.7-95.6) with interventional radiology, 90.42% (95% CI 82.9-96.0) with hysteroscopy, 96.1% (95% CI (92.3-98.6) with laparoscopy and 92.6 with high intensity focused ultrasound (95% CI 78.2-99.6). Post-treatments complications were reported in 3.5% (95% CI 1.7-6.0) of women treated with systemic MTX, 5.9% (95% CI 0.8-15.1) with local MTX or KCl, 1.2% (95% CI 0.1-3.5) with interventional radiology, 1.4% (95% CI 0.4-2.9) with hysteroscopy, 5.5% (95% CI 0.4-25.7) with high intensity focused ultrasound and in none of the cases treated with ultrasound guided suction curettage.When considering compound treatments, successful resolution of CSP was achieved in 91.9% (95% CI 88.0-95.10) of women treated with interventional radiology followed by curettage, 83.3% (95% CI 68.8-93.8) with systemic MTX and curettage, 79.4% (95% CI 56.3-95.2) with local MTX and curettage, 96.2% (95% CI 92.3-98.7) with curettage followed by single or double balloon insertion in the uterine cavity, 98.3% (95% CI 95.9-99.7) with high intensity focused ultrasound followed by curettage, 91.1% (95% CI 3.4-97.0) with interventional radiology followed by removal of CSP with hysteroscopy, 64.3% (95% CI 13.8-99.2) with interventional radiology and systemic MTX and in 95.5% (95% CI 92.9-97.5) with curettage and hysteroscopy.When considering studies reporting a comparison between different treatments, there was no difference between systemic vs local MTX in the primary outcome. Curettage was associated with a higher chance of achieving a successful treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

A multitude of treatments for CSP have been reported in the published literature. All treatments described for CSP are apparently equally effective in treating this condition. The findings from this systematic review highlight the need for adopting a common definition and outcome reporting of CSP to better elucidate its natural history, estimate the magnitude of maternal complication after treatment and design appropriately powered RCT to elucidate the optimal treatment of CSP according to its ultrasound phenotype and gestational age at treatment, in terms of effective resolution of the condition and risk of post-intervention complications.

Obstetric outcomes in the expectant management of cesarean scar pregnancy with fetal heart activity: a single-center retrospective cohort study

Background

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a high-risk complication characterized by the implantation of a pregnancy within a cesarean scar resulting from a previous delivery. Currently, clinical indicators guiding the expectant management of patients with CSP are lacking. We thus aimed to evaluate pregnancy and neonatal outcomes among women who underwent expectant CSP management and to investigate whether sonographic signs correlated with obstetric outcomes.

Methods

We retrospective reviewed the electronic medical records and first-trimester transvaginal ultrasonography reports of consecutive patients diagnosed with CSP in the first trimester at the West China Second University Hospital from January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2022. Pregnancy outcomes (emergency surgery, blood loss, and rescue) and neonatal outcomes (gestational age at delivery, neonatal weight, and Apgar scores) were examined. A binary logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent risk factors that could predict severe complications.

Results

The final analysis included 54 patients. The mean age of the pregnant women was 34±4 years. Among the 54 patients, 14 (25.9%) did not progress to 20 weeks of gestation. Pregnancy continued beyond 20 weeks in 40 patients, with 37 live births (92.5%) and 3 stillbirths (7.5%). Moreover, 7 (17.5%) and 33 (82.5%) patients delivered before and after 34 weeks, respectively. Placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) and placenta previa were confirmed in 29 (72.5%) and 17 (42.5%) patients, respectively. Hysterectomy, emergency cesarean section, and rescue surgery were performed in 5 (12.5%), 15 (37.5%), and 22 (55.5%) patients, respectively. Patients with a visible niche were significantly more likely to have preterm labor, PAS, placenta previa, low-birth-weight newborns, higher blood loss, intraoperative rescue, blood transfusion, and first-trimester vaginal bleeding than were those without one (all P values <0.05).

Conclusions

Our study showed that expectant management of CSP to achieve live birth might be feasible. Patients with a visible niche exhibited worse outcomes, with a higher incidence of severe delivery complications.

Efficacy and safety of treatment modalities for cesarean scar pregnancy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Cesarean scar pregnancy may lead to varying degrees of complications. There are many treatment methods for it, but there are no unified or recognized treatment strategies. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aimed to observe the efficacy and safety of treatment modalities for patients with cesarean scar pregnancy.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched from their inception to January 31, 2024. In addition, relevant reviews and meta-analyses were manually searched for additional references.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Our study incorporated head-to-head trials involving a minimum of 10 women diagnosed with cesarean scar pregnancy through ultrasound imaging or magnetic resonance imaging, encompassing a detailed depiction of primary interventions and any supplementary measures. Trials with a Newcastle-Ottawa scale score <4 were excluded because of their low quality.

METHODS

We conducted a random-effects network meta-analysis and review for cesarean scar pregnancy. Group-level data on treatment efficacy and safety, reproductive outcomes, study design, and demographic characteristics were extracted following a predefined protocol. The quality of studies was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tools for randomized controlled trials and the Newcastle‒Ottawa scale for cohort studies and case series. The main outcomes were efficacy (initial treatment success) and safety (complications), of which summary odds ratios and the surface under the cumulative ranking curve using pairwise and network meta-analysis with random effects.

RESULTS

Seventy-three trials (7 randomized controlled trials) assessing a total of 8369 women and 17 treatment modalities were included. Network meta-analyses were rooted in data from 73 trials that reported success rates and 55 trials that reported complications. The findings indicate that laparoscopy, transvaginal resection, hysteroscopic curettage, and high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage demonstrated the highest cure rates, as evidenced by surface under the cumulative ranking curve rankings of 91.2, 88.2, 86.9, and 75.3, respectively. When compared with suction curettage, the odds ratios (95% confidence intervals) for efficacy were as follows: 6.76 (1.99-23.01) for laparoscopy, 5.92 (1.47-23.78) for transvaginal resection, 5.00 (1.99-23.78) for hysteroscopic curettage, and 3.27 (1.08-9.89) for high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage. Complications were more likely to occur after receiving uterine artery chemoembolization, suction curettage, methotrexate+hysteroscopic curettage, and systemic methotrexate; hysteroscopic curettage, high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage, and Lap were safer than the other options derived from finite evidence; and the confidence intervals of all the data were wide.

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that laparoscopy, transvaginal resection, hysteroscopic curettage, and high-intensity focused ultrasound combined with suction curettage procedures exhibit superior efficacy with reduced complications. The utilization of methotrexate (both locally guided injection and systemic administration) as a standalone medical treatment is not recommended.

Association of caesarean scar defect with risk of abnormal uterine bleeding: results from meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the association between caesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding through systematic literature review.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched based on PRISMA 2020 to include studies exploring abnormal uterine bleeding in women with caesarean scar defects. The combined relative risk (RR) of uterine bleeding, combined prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding and combined RR of intermenstrual uterine bleeding were calculated using a fixed- or random-effects model.

RESULTS

Ten studies involving 1,183 women with caesarean scar defects met the inclusion criteria for this study. Compared with women without caesarean scar defects, those with caesarean scar defects had a higher risk of abnormal uterine bleeding (RR: 3.22, 95% CI: 1.83-5.66) and intermenstrual bleeding (RR: 2.93, 95% CI: 1.91-4.50). The prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding was approximately 0.46 (95% CI: 0.27-0.64), and across populations, women with a previous caesarean section who had undergone imaging specifically for gynaecological disease had a significantly higher prevalence of abnormal uterine bleeding (0.77, 95% CI: 0.65-0.89) than those with at least one caesarean Sect. (0.25, 95% CI: 0.10-0.39).

CONCLUSION

A significant association was observed between caesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding, with the former being a risk factor for the latter. However, previous studies have differed in the definition of caesarean scar defects and abnormal uterine bleeding, and more high-quality studies are needed to further investigate the relevant definitions and study results in the future.

Prevalence, Determinants, and Management Options of Scar Site Pregnancy in Women With Previous Cesarean Section: A Study From the Al-Qassim Region

INTRODUCTION

Pregnancy located outside the uterine cavity following a cesarean section has become more prevalent in recent years due to the increase in cesarean section delivery. This study sought to investigate the prevalence, determinants, and treatment options of scar site pregnancy among women who sought maternal and child health services in a hospital in Buraydah, Al-Qassim region, Saudi Arabia.

METHODS

Utilizing a quantitative retrospective case-control design, 50 women were recruited and assigned to the two groups evenly. Demographic data and risk factors were assessed using a questionnaire, and data were analyzed using SPSS version 27 at a 95% confidence interval and presented in tables and figures.

RESULTS

Fifty-eight percent of the participants were aged 35 years and above, with 38% reporting a parity of 1-3. Logistic regression revealed that parity (odds ratio (OR) = 10.975, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.887-135.861, and p-value = 0.062), the interval between the last and present pregnancies (OR = 0.056, 95% CI = 0.005-0.668, p-value = 0.023), intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD) use in the last year (OR = 0.070, 95% CI = 0.006 -0.780, p-value = 0.031) were statistically significant in predicting cesarean scar pregnancy. Combined methotrexate and aspiration were the most prevalent treatment options for scar site pregnancy in this study.

CONCLUSION

Scar site pregnancy is a maternal health complication that affects women across all healthcare settings, and its prevalence is not clear due to underdiagnosis and underreporting. The risk of scar site pregnancy increased with an increase in the number of childbirths (parity) and the interval between the last and current pregnancies.

Early first-trimester transvaginal ultrasound screening for cesarean scar pregnancy in patients with previous cesarean delivery: analysis of the evidence

Obstetric hemorrhage is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. An important etiology of obstetric hemorrhage is placenta accreta spectrum. In the last 2 decades, there has been increased clinical experience of the devastating effect of undiagnosed, as well as late diagnosed, cases of cesarean scar pregnancy. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that cesarean scar pregnancy is an early precursor of second- and third-trimester placenta accreta spectrum. As such, cesarean scar pregnancy should be diagnosed in the early first trimester. This early diagnosis could be achieved by introducing regimented sonographic screening in pregnancies of patients with previous cesarean delivery. This opinion article evaluates the scientific and clinical basis of whether cesarean scar pregnancy, with special focus on its early first-trimester discovery, complies with the accepted requirements of a screening test. Each of the 10 classical screening criteria of Wilson and Jungner were systematically applied to evaluate if the criteria were met by cesarean scar pregnancy, to analyze if it is possible and realistic to carry out screening in a population-wide fashion.

Advances in Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review of Techniques, Clinical Outcomes, and Fertility Preservation

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare but potentially dangerous condition that occurs when an embryo implants and develops within the scar tissue from a previous cesarean section. Treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy depends on several factors, including the gestational age of the pregnancy, the presence of complications, and the individual patient's circumstances. We performed a systematic review of the published literature on management of cesarean scar pregnancy and the outcomes, complications, and effects on fertility. A systematic review of recent scientific literature published up to April 2023 in the databases PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science was performed according to the PRISMA guidelines. We used the search keywords "cesarean scar pregnancy," "methotrexate," "systemic," "chemoembolization," and "uterine artery embolization." The baseline search resulted in 413 articles. After the exclusion of 342 irrelevant articles, the abstracts and titles of the remaining 71 articles were read for potential inclusion, resulting in exclusion of a further 16 articles. Therefore, the full texts of 55 articles were investigated. Finally, 42 papers were included in the study. The main finding was that chemoembolization is more successful than systemic methotrexate therapy, and is associated with less blood loss and shorter hospital stay. Transarterial chemoembolization appears to be safe and effective method of treatment in patients with CSP and should thus be considered during multidisciplinary evaluation of these patients.

Clinical value of ultrasonic indicators in predicting the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy after pregnancy termination

BACKGROUND

To investigate the predictive value of ultrasound indicators in early pregnancy for the outcome of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after pregnancy termination.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analysed the ultrasound images of 98 CSP patients who underwent transabdominal ultrasound-guided hysteroscopic curettage during early pregnancy at Changsha Hospital for Maternal and Child Health Care between January 2017 and October 2021. Patients were equally divided into a case group and a control group. The case group included 49 CSP patients with postoperative complications, such as intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 ml or retained products of conception (RPOC). The remaining 49 CSP patients, with similar age and gestational age and with good postoperative outcomes, such as intraoperative blood loss ≤ 50 ml and no RPOC, were included in the control group. CSP was classified into three types according to the location of the gestational sac (GS) relative to the uterine cavity line (UCL) and serosal contour. Differences in ultrasound indicators between the case and control group were compared.

RESULTS

There were significant differences between the case and control groups in the mean gestational sac diameter (MGSD), residual myometrium thickness (RMT) between the GS and the bladder, blood flow around the GS at the site of the previous caesarean incision, and types of CSP (P < 0.05). The rs of each ultrasound indicator were as follows: 0.258, -0.485, 0.369, 0.350. The optimal threshold for predicting good postoperative outcomes, such as intraoperative blood loss ≤ 50 ml and no RPOC, by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis of the RMT was 2.3 mm.

CONCLUSION

Our findings show that the RMT, blood flow around the GS at the site of the previous caesarean incision, and types of CSP have a low correlation with postoperative complications, such as intraoperative blood loss ≥ 200 ml or RPOC, of early pregnancy termination in patients with CSP. To some extent, this study may be helpful for clinical prognostic prediction of patients with CSP and formulation of treatment strategies. Given the low correlation between these three indicators and postoperative complications, further studies are needed to identify indicators that can better reflect the postoperative outcomes of CSP patients.

Hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy: a randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy is a type of ectopic pregnancy in which the fertilized egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous cesarean delivery. The condition can be catastrophic if not managed on time and can lead to significant morbidity and mortality. Several approaches have been studied for the management of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy in women who opted for termination of pregnancy with no consensus on the best treatment modality reached so far.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the success rate of hysteroscopic resection vs ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation for the treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a parallel group, nonblinded, randomized clinical trial conducted at a single center in Italy. Women with singleton gestations at <8 weeks and 6 days of gestation were included in the study. Inclusion criteria were women with a cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy with positive embryonic heart activity who opted for termination of pregnancy. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either hysteroscopic resection (ie, intervention group) or ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation (ie, control group). Both groups received 50 mg/m2 of methotrexate intramuscularly at the time of randomization (day 1) and another dose at day 3. A third dose of methotrexate was planned in case of persistence of positive fetal heart activity at day 5. Participants received either ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation or hysteroscopic resection from 1 to 5 days after the last dose of methotrexate. Hysteroscopic resection was performed under spinal anesthesia using a 15 Fr bipolar mini-resectoscope. Dilation and evacuation were performed by vacuum aspiration with a Karman cannula, followed by sharp curettage, if necessary, under ultrasound guidance. The primary outcome was the success rate of the treatment protocol, defined as no further treatment required until the complete resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. Resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy was evaluated based on decline of beta-hCG and the absence of residual gestational material in the endometrial cavity. Treatment failure was defined as the necessity for further treatment required until the complete resolution of the cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy. A sample size calculation indicated that 54 participants were required to test the hypothesis RESULTS: A total of 54 women were enrolled and randomized. Number of previous cesarean deliveries ranged from 1 to 3. Overall, 10 women received a third dose of methotrexate with 7 of 27 (25.9%) participants in the hysteroscopic resection group and 3 of 27 (11.1%) in the dilation and evacuation group. The success rate was 100% (27/27) in the hysteroscopic resection group and 81.5% (22/27) in the dilation and evacuation group (relative risk, 1.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.48). Additional procedures were required in 5 cases of the control group, namely 3 hysterectomies, 1 laparotomic uterine segmental resection, and 1 hysteroscopic resection. The length of stay in the hospital was 9.0±2.9 days in the intervention group and 10.0±3.5 days in the control group (mean difference, -1.00 days; 95% confidence interval, -2.71 to 0.71). No cases of admission to intensive care unit or maternal death were reported.

CONCLUSION

Hysteroscopic resection was associated with an increased success rate in the treatment of cesarean scar ectopic pregnancy when compared with ultrasound-guided dilation and evacuation.

Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review on expectant management

A Cesarean Scar Pregnancy (CSP) is a variant of uterine ectopic pregnancy defined by full or partial implantation of the gestational sac in the scar of a previous cesarean section. The continuous increase of Cesarean Deliveries is causing a parallel increase in CSP and its complications. Considering its high morbidity, the most usual recommendation has been termination of pregnancy in the first trimester; however, several cases progress to viable births. The aim of this systematic review is to evaluate the outcome of CSP managed expectantly and understand whether sonographic signs could correlate to the outcomes. An online-based search of PubMed and Cochrane Library Databases was used to gather studies including women diagnosed with a CSP who were managed expectantly. The description of all cases was analysed by the authors in order to obtain information for each outcome. 47 studies of different types were retrieved, and the gestational outcome was available in 194 patients. Out of these, 39 patients (20,1%) had a miscarriage and 16 (8,3%) suffered foetal death. 50 patients (25,8%) had a term delivery and 81 (41,8%) patients had a preterm birth, out of which 27 (13,9%) delivered before 34 weeks of gestation. In 102 (52,6%) patients, a hysterectomy was performed. Placenta Accreta Spectrum (PAS) was a common disorder among CSP and was linked to a higher rate of complications such as foetal death, preterm birth, hysterectomy, haemorrhagic morbidity and surgical complications. Some of the analysed articles showed that sonographic signs with specific characteristics, such as type II and III CSP classification, Crossover Sign - 1, "In the niche" implantation and lower myometrial thickness could be related to worse outcomes of CSP. This article provides a good understanding of CSP as an entity that, although rare, presents with a high rate of relevant morbidity. It is also understood that pregnancies with confirmed PAS had an even higher rate of morbidity. Some sonographic signs were shown to predict the prognosis of these pregnancies and further investigation is necessary to validate one or more signs so they can be used for a more reliable counselling of women with CSP.

Other treatments for CSP

Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is an increasingly common clinical conundrum. The non-curettage surgical management of CSP can be categorised into hysteroscopic, vaginal, laparoscopic, and open removal modalities and the choice of treatment is surgeon-dependent. A systematic review of original studies reporting surgical treatment outcomes of CSP until March 2023 was conducted to evaluate the non-curettage surgical management of this highly morbid condition. A total of 60 studies of mostly weak methodological quality were identified involving 6720 CSP cases. Success rates were generally high across all treatment modalities although highest in vaginal and laparoscopic excisional approaches. Morbidity was most associated with haemorrhage although unplanned hysterectomy rates remained low across all treatment groups. Subsequent pregnancies are associated with morbidity despite being underreported and the impact of CSP treatment on future pregnancy is poorly understood. Substantive study heterogeneity precludes meta-analyses of pooled data and treatment superiority has not been demonstrated.

Scarred for life: a review of cesarean section scar pregnancy and potential pitfalls in diagnosis

Cesarean section scar pregnancy (CSSP) is defined as abnormal implantation of a gestational sac on or in a previous cesarean section scar. There is an increasing incidence of detection of CSSP, likely in part due to the growing rates of cesarean deliveries and the improved rates of detection with advancing ultrasound technology. Diagnosis of CSSP is critical due to the potentially life-threatening complications to the mother if left untreated. Pelvic ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice in the initial evaluation of suspected CSSP, with MRI potentially useful if ultrasound findings are equivocal, or if confirmation is requested prior to definitive intervention. Early and accurate diagnosis of CSSP allows for prompt management to avoid severe complications and the potential to preserve the uterus and future fertility. A combination of medical and surgical treatment strategies may be needed with specific therapy tailored to each patient. Follow-up after treatment should include serial beta-hCG levels and possible repeat imaging if there is clinical concern for complications or treatment failure. This article will provide a comprehensive review of this uncommon but important phenomenon, detailing the pathophysiology and types of CSSP, imaging presentations, potential pitfalls in diagnosis, and management options.

Single-dose methotrexate-based protocol for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy and successive pregnancy outcomes

The incidence of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) increases in recent years. Yet, the best mode of treatment and its effects on successive pregnancies is not well established. The aim of this study was to investigate the success rate of single-dose methotrexate (MTX) in the management of CSP, and the outcomes of subsequent pregnancies in a retrospective cohort study. All women who were treated for CSPs between the years 2011 and 2019 were included. Treatment included systemic MTX and ultrasound-guided needle aspiration (UGNA) in cases with active foetal heartbeat. Overall, 34 women were diagnosed with CSP, of whom 31 were treated with systemic MTX. Twelve patients (38.7%) needed additional curettage or hysteroscopy. The only identified risk factor for failure of MTX-based treatment was time interval between the previous caesarean delivery and CSP (22 vs 34 months, p = 0.04). Twelve women had a subsequent pregnancy. Five pregnancies ended in term delivery, three in preterm delivery, three in abortion and one woman had a recurrent CSP. The study conclusion is that a single dose MTX with UGNA in cases of active heartbeat is an effective mode of treatment in cases of CSP with good sequential pregnancy outcomes. Longer time interval from the previous caesarean delivery was identified as a risk factor for failure of conservative management.

Pituitrin Injection before Hysteroscopic Curettage for Treating Type I Cesarean Scar Pregnancy in Comparison with Uterine Artery Embolization: A Retrospective Study

Background

The effectiveness and safety of pituitrin injection coupled with hysteroscopy and suction curettage as treatment for type I cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) have not been studied enough in the literature, by comparing it to uterine artery embolization (UAE) followed by suction curettage we aim to determine its efficacy.

Materials and Methods

Data of 53 patients (the PIT group) with type I CSP treated with pituitrin injection combined with hysteroscopic suction curettage and 137 patients (the UAE group) with type I CSP treated with UAE followed by suction curettage were collected in retrospect. The clinical data were analyzed statistically to compare the efficacy and safety between the two groups.

Results

The PIT group had a shorter duration of postoperative vaginal bleeding, postoperative hospitalization, and overall hospitalization length (P < 0.05). The PIT group had lower overall hospitalization costs and a lower rate of adverse events than the UAE group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of treatment success rate, the average length of operation, blood loss during the procedure, time when serum β-hCG returned to normal range, and menstrual recovery time after hospital release (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

UAE and pituitrin injection followed by hysteroscopic suction curettage are good choices for type I CSP treatment. However, pituitrin injection with hysteroscopic suction curettage outperforms UAE followed by suction curettage. Thus, pituitrin injection may be an option of high priority for type I CSP.

Global variation and outcomes of expectant management of CSP

The incidence of Cesarean scar pregnancies (CSPs) is rising globally. Ultrasound criteria for the diagnosis of CSPs have been described by the International Society of Ultrasound in obstetrics and gynecology and appear to be well used in various centers around the world. There is no guidance on best practices for expectant management of CSP, and there is considerable variation in how this is offered globally. Many studies have reported significant maternal morbidity in cases of CSP with fetal cardiac activity managed expectantly, largely relating to hemorrhage and cesarean hysterectomy from placenta accreta spectrum. However, high live birth rates are also reported. Literature describing the diagnosis and expectant management of CSP in low-resource settings is lacking. Expectant management in selected cases where no fetal cardiac activity is present is a reasonable option and can be associated with good maternal outcomes. Standardization in reporting different types of CSPs and correlating these with pregnancy outcomes will be an important next step in developing guidance for expectant management of this high-risk pregnancy with a high burden of complications.

Selection of Laparoscopy or Laparotomy for Treating Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A Retrospective Study

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Comparison of different treatment strategies in the management of endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy: a multicentre retrospective study

Background

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of different treatment strategies for endogenic caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients.

Methods

According to Vial’s standard, we defined endogenic-type CSP as (1) the gestational sac growing towards the uterine cavity and (2) a greater than 0.3 cm thickness of myometrial tissue at the caesarean scar. A total of 447 endogenic CSP patients out of 527 patients from 4 medical centres in China were enrolled in this study. A total of 120 patients were treated with methotrexate (MTX) followed by surgery, 106 received ultrasound-guided curettage directly and 221 received curettage combined with hysteroscopy. The clinical information and clinical outcomes of these patients were reviewed. Successful treatment was defined as (1) no additional treatment needed, (2) no retained mass of conception and (3) serum β subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level returning to a normal level within 4 weeks. The success rate was analysed based on these factors.

Result

Among 447 patients, no significant difference was observed in baseline characteristics between groups except for foetal heartbeat. The success rate was significantly different (p<0.001) among the three groups. The highest success rate of 95.9% was noted in the hysteroscopy group, and the lowest success rate of 84.0% was noted in the curettage group. In addition, the MTX group reported the longest hospital stay and highest expenses, but the curettage group showed the shortest and lowest expenses, respectively. Nevertheless, no difference in blood loss was observed between the groups.

Conclusion

The combination of curettage and hysteroscopy represents the most effective strategy. Pretreatment with MTX did not result in better clinical outcomes. Ultrasound-guided curettage directly should not be considered a first-line treatment choice for endogenic CSP patients.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-022-04633-y.

Cesarean scar pregnancy with expectant management

Aim

This study aimed to ascertain whether the lower anterior myometrial thickness (MT) between the bladder and the gestational sac in early pregnancy can be used to predict clinical outcomes in women with cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) after expectant management.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed the clinical data and early pregnancy ultrasound images of 21 patients who received expectant management for CSP. Among them, 11 patients with serious complications during pregnancy, such as intraoperative blood loss ≥1000 mL or with severe forms of morbidly adherent placenta (MAP; placenta increta or placenta percreta), were assigned to group A. The remaining 10 patients without serious complications during pregnancy were assigned to group B. The difference in MT between groups A and B was analyzed using nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test.

Results

There was a statistically significant difference in MT between the groups (U = 20.000, p = 0.013). The area under the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve was 0.818, and the optimal cut‐off value for MT was 3.3 mm.

Conclusion

Lower anterior MT around the gestational sac was correlated with severe complications, such as massive intraoperative bleeding or severe forms of MAP in patients with CSP.

Hysteroscopic resection vs dilation and evacuation for treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Background

Caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a type of ectopic pregnancy where the fertilised egg is implanted in the muscle or fibrous tissue of the scar after a previous caesarean section. Management options for women who opted for termination of CSP include sharp curettage, dilation and evacuation (D&E), excision of trophoblastic tissues, local or systemic administration of methotrexate, bilateral hypogastric artery ligation, and selective uterine artery embolisation with curettage and/or methotrexate administration. Recently hysteroscopic resection has also been proposed as an alternative option.

Objective

To compare the surgical outcome of hysteroscopic resection with dilation and evacuation (D&E) for the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Methods

Parallel-group, non-blinded, randomised clinical trial conducted at a single centre in Italy. Eligible women are those with singleton gestations at less than 9 weeks of gestation, and with thickness of myometrial layer ≥1 mm at the level of the ectopic. Inclusion criteria are women with CSP with positive embryonic/fetal heart activity who opted for termination of pregnancy. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive either hysteroscopic resection (i.e. intervention group) or D&E (i.e. control group). In both groups, 50 mg/m2 (based on DuBois formula for body surface area) of methotrexate (MTX) will be injected intramuscularly at the time of randomisation (day 1) and another dose at day 3. A third dose of MTX is planned in case of persistence of fetal heart activity on day 5. Participants will receive either D&E or hysteroscopic resection from 3 to 7 days after the last dose of MTX. A sample size of 54 women is planned.

Main Outcome Measures

The primary outcome is the success rate of the treatment protocol, defined as no requirement for further treatment until complete resolution of the CSP as demonstrated by negative beta hCG levels and absence of residual gestational material on ultrasound examination..

Study hypothesis

Hysteroscopic surgery is superior to D&E for the treatment of CSP.

What is new?

The results of the trial will provide information on the best treatment for CSP.

Evaluation of the necessity of laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect for cesarean scar pregnancy

Objective

This study aimed to determine the risk factors associated with the necessity of laparoscopic scar defect repair for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 237 patients with CSP who were treated by ultrasound-guided suction curettage and/or laparoscopy in our hospital from April 2012 to November 2019. A total of 199 of these patients underwent ultrasound-guided suction curettage without uterine scar defect repair, while 38 of these patients underwent laparoscopic resection and uterine scar defect repair. We analyzed various clinical variables and compared the efficacy of treatment between the two groups.

Results

Gestational age, the maximum transverse diameter (MTD) of the gestational sac, myometrial thickness, the operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and the duration of the hospital stay were significantly different between the two groups. Gestational age, the MTD of the gestational sac, and myometrial thickness were independent risk factors for laparoscopic repair.

Conclusions

Gestational age, the MTD of the gestational sac, and myometrial thickness are important factors associated with the necessity for laparoscopic repair of a uterine scar defect.

Hysteroscopic treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy: A systematic review

More than 30 regimens, medical and surgical, have been described for the treatment of Cesarean Scar Pregnancies (CSPs). This study aims to collect and analyze data in the published literature regarding the hysteroscopic management of CSPs focusing on efficacy and complications. Using a protocol registered with Prospero (#CRD42021242314), the electronic databases PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Clinical-Trials.gov and the Cochrane Library were comprehensively searched, from their inception to June 2020. Medical Subject Headings terms such as caesarean ectopic, hysteroscopy and endoscopy were used for the identification of the relevant records. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed to design the present systematic review. Eligible articles assessing the role of hysteroscopy in CSP were considered the studies published in peer-reviewed journals. Any studies with less than 10 cases or articles that insufficiently detailed the treatment regimen, the outcomes, and the success rate, were excluded. Selected articles were assessed for the level of evidence, based on Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine guidelines. The methodologic quality, including the risk of bias, was evaluated with the employment of the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool. Ten out of 613 studies were included in the present review comprising 812 women with CSP treated by hysteroscopy. The treatment modalities were divided into three categories: (i) hysteroscopic resection of CSP, (ii) hysteroscopy after preoperative use of HIFU and (iii) preoperative use of UAE before hysteroscopic treatment. The overall success rate of hysteroscopic treatment on CSP cases was 91%, whereas the rate of hemorrhage or excessive vaginal bleeding (>500 mL) and the rate of hysterectomy were 1.66% and 0.28% respectively. According to the results of this systematic review, hysteroscopy appears to be a safe and effective procedure for CSP management. Current findings are primarily based on retrospective studies with poor methodological quality. Multicenter, well-designed studies are needed to draw definite conclusions.

The novel use of lauromacrogol: A respective study of ultrasound-guided sclerosant injection for cesarean scar pregnancy

AIM

To introduce the novel use of lauromacrogol for cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), and to compare the clinical efficacy and safety of curettage combined with ultrasound-guided sclerosant injection (USI) and curettage following uterine artery embolization (UAE) in the treatment of CSP.

METHODS

CSP patients undergoing curettage combined with USI (n = 72) from December 2014 to May 2020 were compared to patient with curettage following UAE (n = 72).The basic clinical findings and clinical outcomes were reviewed between the two groups.

RESULTS

For USI group, 69 patients underwent successful treatment (95.8% success rate), while the number of cured patients for the UAE group was 70 (97.2% success rate). Differences between USI group and UAE group in intraoperative blood loss (10.0 [10.0-20.0] vs. 10.0 [10.0-20.0] mL) and time for serum β human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) to reduce to normal (28.0 [21.0-40.0] vs. 28.0 [21.0-35.0] days) were not statistically significant. The hospital stay for USI group was significantly shorter than that for UAE group (4.0 [4.0-6.0] vs. 6.0 [5.0-7.0] days, respectively). Statistically significant decreases were noted in hospitalization expenses and adverse events in USI group, compared to UAE group. There was no difference in live birth rate between the two groups with fertility intentions during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

For treatment of CSP, curettage combined with USI yielded clinical results comparable to those of curettage following UAE. Curettage combined with USI was associated with lower hospitalization expenses, shorter hospital stay and less complications, and it merited an effective and safe treatment for CSP.

Cesarean scar pregnancy: Reproductive outcome after robotic laparoscopic removal with simultaneous repair of the uterine defect

OBJECTIVE

To describe perioperative adverse events, fertility and obstetric outcome, following a robot assisted laparoscopic approach for treating Cesarean scar pregnancies (CSP).

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case series of 14 consecutive women with a CSP and a wish for and attempts towards subsequent pregnancies, having undergone minimal invasive surgical treatment at two tertiary referral Swedish centers (Dep's of Obstetrics and Gynecology Skåne University Hospital, Lund, and Södersjukhuset, Stockholm) between 2008 and 2019. The surgery was performed by temporary intraoperative occlusion of the uterine blood supply, removal of the CSP and repair of the niche, by the use of robot assisted laparoscopy (Da Vinci surgical robot, Intuitive Surgical, Sunnyvale, CA).

RESULTS

All surgeries were uneventful with a median bleeding of 75 mL. One woman had a postoperative Clavien-Dindo complication grade IIIa (hysteroscopic resection of an isthmic synechiae). During follow up nine women (64 %) conceived naturally; eight of these had an uneventful pregnancy and a full-term Cesarean delivery and one had recurrent CSP and Cesarean with simultaneous hysterectomy in gestational week 33.

CONCLUSION

A robotic removal of a CSP with simultaneous repair of the defect is a feasible option with acceptable reproductive outcome and should be considered when counseling women with a wish for future childbirth in cases of a live CSP and a thin, or absent, myometrium in the niche. A temporary intraoperative occlusion of the uterine blood supply may be useful in cases of live pregnancies and/or high serum β-hCG levels.

Scar Pregnancy and Extrauterine Implants

Cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) is a rare occurrence consisting in the implantation of the embryo within the myometrium of a prior cesarean delivery scar. The CSP could be a dangerous condition for women because of the related complications such as placenta previa or accreta, uterine rupture, and hemorrhage. Therefore, early diagnosis and rapid treatment are crucial. Extrauterine implants or ectopic pregnancy (EP) consists in the implantation of an embryo in a site other than the endometrium of the uterine cavity. It occurs in 1%-2% of all reported pregnancies. The most common extrauterine location is the fallopian tube, which represents 96% of cases. The diagnosis of CSP and EP is based on history, clinical examination, levels of serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG), and ultrasonography findings. In last 20 years, new treatments were developed, varying from medical management, minimally invasive surgical approach and local treatment including systemic or local infusion of metotrexate (MTX), and uterine artery embolization (UAE). UAE has been used widely to control hemorrhage and preserve the uterus and it is considered an affective adjuvant treatment of CSP and EP, especially associated with other therapies.

The use of intra-operative ultrasound in gynecological surgery: a review

Ultrasound is a readily available, safe and portable imaging modality that is widely applied in gynecology. However, there is limited guidance for its use intra-operatively especially with complex gynecological procedures. This narrative review examines the existing literature published on the use of intraoperative ultrasound (IOUS) in benign gynecology and in gynecological oncology. We searched for the following terms: ‘intraoperative,’ ‘ultrasonography,’ ‘gynecology’ and ‘oncology’ using Pubmed/Medline. IOUS can minimize complications and facilitate difficult benign gynecological procedures. There is also a role for its use in gynecological oncology surgery and fertility-sparing surgery. The use of IOUS in gynecological surgery is an emerging field which improves visualization in the surgical field and aids completion of minimally invasive techniques.

Ultrasound (US) is a portable and safe imaging method that uses high frequency sound waves to visualize structures within the body. While most US examinations are done outside the body there is an emerging field which uses US devices within the body during surgery to aid complex procedures. This review examines the published literature on this technique in benign gynecology and in gynecological oncology. This review demonstrates the use of intraoperative US improves visualization and minimizes surgical complications.

Evaluation of treatment of previous cesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Previous caesarean scar pregnancy is one type of ectopic pregnancy in myometrium and fibrous tissue of previous caesarean scar. One of the therapeutic methods of this type of ectopic pregnancy is treatment with methotrexate. Given various findings on the treatment of caesarean scar pregnancy with methotrexate and lack of global report in this regard, we aimed to achieve a global report on the treatment of CSP with methotrexate through related literature review and analysis of the results of the studies, to enable more precise planning to reduce complications of CSP.

METHOD

This review study extracted information through searching national and international databases of SID،, Embase, ScienceDirect, ، Scopus, ، PubMed, Web of Science (ISI) between 2003 and January 2020. To perform the meta-analysis, random-effects model and heterogeneity of the studies with I² index were investigated. Data were sanalysed using Comprehensive Meta-Analysis version 2.

RESULTS

In total, 26 articles with a sample size of 600 individuals were enrolled in the meta-analysis. According to the results of the study, the mean level of β-hCG was 28,744.98 ± 4425.1 mIU/ml before the intervention and was 23,836.78 ± 4533.1 mIU/ml after the intervention. The mean intraoperative blood loss (ml) was 4.8 ± 3.76 ml, mean hospital stay (days) was 11.7 ± 1.2 days, mean time for serum-hCG normalization (days) was 41.6 ± 3.2 days, success was 90.7% (95% CI: 86.7-93.5%), and complication was 9% (95% CI: 6.3-12.8%).

CONCLUSION

The results of the current study show methotrexate significantly reduces β-hCG levels and can be effective in treating caesarean scar pregnancy and its complications.

A comparison between laparoscopy and hysteroscopy approach in treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of laparoscopy and hysteroscopy for the treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) and analyze the clinical factors associated with successful selection for hysteroscopic or laparoscopic treatment of CSP.We retrospectively studied 112 cases of CSP that were treated by laparoscopy and/or hysteroscopy in our hospital from December 2014 to December 2017. In total, 72 of these patients underwent ultrasound-guided curettage and hysteroscopic resection without uterine scar defect repair. Fourty of these patients underwent laparoscopic resection and repair of the uterine scar defect. We analyzed the different clinical variables between the 2 groups and identified the clinical factors which could predict the need for the laparoscopic repair of uterine scar defect. Results showed that laparoscopy and hysteroscopy were safe ways to treat CSP, and no patient underwent hysterectomy. The β-hCG level in both of the 2 groups decreased to normal 4 to 8 weeks after surgery. There were significant differences between the hysteroscopy group and laparoscopy uterine scar repair group in terms of days of amenorrhea, gestational sac diameter, myometrial thickness, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization duration (P < .05). Logistic regression analysis showed that the days of amenorrhea, gestational sac diameter and myometrial thickness were independent risk factors for CSP treated by minimally invasive surgery, which were also shown by ROC curve analysis to be predictors of the need for the repair of the uterine scar defect, with optimal cutoffs of 52.50 days, 3.25 cm, and 2.05 mm, respectively; and the areas under their corresponding ROC were 0.721, 0.851, and 0.927, respectively.We conclude that laparoscopy and hysteroscopy are safe and efficient minimally invasive procedures for the treatment of CSP. The days of amenorrhea, gestational sac diameter and myometrial thickness may be key factors associated with successful selection for hysteroscopic or laparoscopic treatment of CSP.

Management of Non-Tubal Ectopic Pregnancies: A Single Center Experience

Non-tubal ectopic pregnancies (NT-EPs) are rare but potentially life-threatening conditions. The incidence ranges are between 5-8.3% of all ectopic pregnancies. For this retrospective observational study, 16 patients with NT-EP and treated from January 2014 to May 2020 were recruited. Demographic details, symptoms, Beta human chorionic gonadotrophin (β-hCG) levels, ultrasound findings, management and treatment outcomes were presented. In hemodynamically stable patients, diagnosis was made using ultrasounds and β-hCG levels. Laparoscopy was essential to identify and remove the ectopic pregnancy in clinical unstable patients. A radical laparoscopic approach was chosen in one case of cervical pregnancy diagnosed late in the first trimester. Medical treatment and minimally invasive procedure, alone or combined, resulted in effective strategies in asymptomatic women with an early diagnosis of NT-EP. We report cases of cervical pregnancies successfully treated by hysteroscopy alone or combined with medical treatment, the first case of scar pregnancy treated by mini-reseptoscope and curettage and the fifth case of interstitial pregnancy treated with Methotrexate and Mifepristone. In this manuscript we report a single center experience in the management of NT-EPs with the aim of outlining the importance of the early diagnosis for a minimally invasive treatment in order to reduce maternal morbidity and mortality and preserve future fertility.

Type II caesarean scar pregnancy management by ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection in combination with suction curettage: A case report

INTRODUCTION

The implantation of a gestational sac within the scar of a previous caesarean delivery is defined as caesarean scar pregnancy (CSP), which is classified into two types: CSP I and CSP II. CSP II is life threatening, and no clear consensus for CSP II management exists.

PATIENT CONCERNS

A 31-year-old woman, gravida 1, para 1, with a previous caesarean delivery due to macrosomia, presented with an estimated 45 days of amenorrhea. The patient presented to the emergency department with vaginal bleeding for 1 day and no abdominal pain.

DIAGNOSES

An ultrasound examination was performed demonstrating a viable fetus that was embedded in the caesarean scar area and was bulging through the wall of the uterus into the bladder without contact with the uterine cavity or cervical canal. A diagnosis of type II caesarean scar pregnancy was made.

INTERVENTIONS

Local lauromacrogol was used to reduce the gestational sac blood supply. Suction curettage was performed under the guidance of abdominal ultrasound 24 h later, and the amount of bleeding was 20 mL. The response to the treatment was monitored by serial beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG).

OUTCOMES

Patient was followed up with β-hCG weekly levels which became <10 mIU/mL after 4 weeks of treatment.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound-guided local lauromacrogol injection combined with suction curettage may be a safer and novel therapeutic method.

Successful treatment of cesarean scar pregnancy with transvaginal injection of absolute ethanol around the gestation sac via ultrasound

Background

This study aims to evaluate the curative effect and complications in cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) patients treated with a transvaginal injection of absolute ethanol (AE) around the gestation sac (GS) under ultrasound guidance.

Methods

This retrospective clinical investigation analyzed 26 CSP patients treated at the Affiliated Hospital of Guilin Medical University in Guilin, Guangxi, China, between January 1, 2018 and January 30, 2019. Outcomes and complications were analyzed following treatment with AE.

Results

Out of the entire group, 20 patients were successfully treated with a single AE injection, while the remaining six patients required two or three repeat injections. In 21 patients, the serum beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-hCG) level was reduced to > 50% 1 day after a single AE injection; in 19 patients, the serum β-hCG level was reduced to > 80% 4 days after a single AE injection. In all patients, the average time for serum β-hCG to reduce to normal levels (< 3.0 mIU/mL) was 36.50 ± 12.54 days. The overall cure rate of CSP by AE injection was 100%. Average length of hospitalization was 6.73 ± 3.66 days, with Patient 2 having the longest hospitalization at 17 days, and Patient 3 the shortest at 2 days. No adverse effects on hematopoietic, hepatic or renal function were observed in the short term.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that transvaginal injection of AE around the gestation sac under ultrasound guidance had good clinical effects, fewer complications, and merit as a novel treatment for CSP. However, larger multi-center trials are needed to confirm the safety and effectiveness of this treatment.

The risk of abnormal placentation and hemorrhage in subsequent pregnancy following primary elective cesarean delivery

Objective: We aimed to evaluate the relationship between mode of first delivery with subsequent placenta previa, placenta accreta/increta, and significant postpartum hemorrhage (PPH).Method: This retrospective cohort study included women with two consecutive singleton deliveries between 2007 and 2017 at our institution if the women were nulliparous and delivered at term at the time of first delivery. The first pregnancy delivery mode was classified as (1) vaginal delivery, (2) antepartum cesarean delivery (CD) without labor, or (3) intrapartum CD after the onset of labor. Within these three groups, rates of placenta previa, placenta accreta/increta, and significant PPH at the time of the second delivery were compared. Significant PPH was defined as hemorrhage requiring a blood transfusion.Results: A total of 8208 women were analyzed. Most first deliveries were vaginal (n = 5210, 63.5%), followed by antepartum CD (n = 2432, 29.6%) and intrapartum CD (n = 566, 6.9%). The incidence of placenta previa in subsequent deliveries differed by previous delivery mode: vaginal, 0.9%; antepartum CD, 2.0%; intrapartum CD, 1.6% (p < .001). Similar differences were also observed with respect to placenta accreta/increta (0.5 versus 1.5 versus 0.9%, p < .001) and PPH (0.6 versus 1.2 versus 0.4%, p = .017). Compared to the previous vaginal delivery group, the antepartum CD group had increased risks of placenta previa (aORs 2.02, 95% CI 1.35-3.05), placenta accreta/increta (aOR 2.52; 95% CI 1.53-4.14) and PPH (aOR 1.78, 95% CI 1.14-2.98) in subsequent pregnancies. However, the previous intrapartum CD was not significantly associated with increased risks of these complications.Conclusion: Previous antepartum CD was associated with two-fold increased risks of placenta previa, placenta accreta/increta, and significant PPH in the second delivery compared to women with a prior vaginal delivery. The increased risks of subsequent abnormal placentation following primary antepartum CD may be important for counseling concerning nonmedically indicated elective cesarean.Condensation: Previous antepartum cesarean delivery (CD) was associated with two-fold increased risks of placenta previa, placenta accreta/increta, and significant PPH in the second delivery.

Selective Reduction of a Heterotopic Cesarean Scar Pregnancy Complicated by Septic Abortion

Background

Heterotopic pregnancy involving the implantation of an ectopic pregnancy into a prior cesarean scar with a concurrent intrauterine pregnancy is a rare and potentially life-threatening condition with minimal information in the literature to guide treatment and management options.

Case

A 40-year-old G5P3103 at 12 weeks and 3 days with a history of two cesarean deliveries was diagnosed with a live heterotopic pregnancy containing a cesarean scar ectopic and an intrauterine pregnancy. After selective reduction of the cesarean scar gestation with potassium chloride (KCl), the patient presented ten days later to the emergency department with septic abortion and sepsis. The patient underwent bilateral uterine artery embolization followed by ultrasound guided uterine evacuation with dilation and curettage, which was complicated by intraoperative hemorrhage and persistent bacteremia. The patient had resolution of her bacteremia after total abdominal hysterectomy.

Conclusion

Conservative management of uterine infection resulting from selective reduction of a heterotopic pregnancy cesarean scar pregnancy may be considered; however, severe septicemia and persistent bacteremia may necessitate definitive surgical management.