1
|
Wang Y, Liang Q, Luo J, Miao H, Qin G, Bao Y. Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Clinic: An Epidemiological Survey. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2024:1455613241301601. [PMID: 39567883 DOI: 10.1177/01455613241301601] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) has been implicated in the etiology of many laryngeal disorders and is also closely related to the occurrence and progression of a variety of throat diseases, including chronic cough, leukoplakia of the larynx, dysphonia, and even laryngeal tumors. LPRD can significantly reduce the quality of life of patients and cause substantial medical and economic burdens to the society. Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), a self-administered 9-item outcomes instrument for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR), has been widely used to screen for LPRD, but there is a lack of feasibility studies on the use of RSI for LPRD screening and alternative diagnostic tools in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics. To study the incidence, clinical characteristics, diagnostic status, and influencing factors of LPRD at OHNS clinics, RSI as an alternative diagnostic tool has also been studied. LPRD was defined as RSI > 13. Methods: Systematic collection of data by the RSI questionnaire was used to identify patients in the outpatient clinic suffering from LPRD; in addition, the personal history of participants was collected. Follow-up observation was carried out for 6 months for patients with suspected LPRD (RSI > 13), including whether they were treated with standardized anti-reflux therapy, and the questionnaire based on RSI was completed again after treatment. Results: The LPRD rate was 7.92% (94/1187) in this survey. The proportions of LPRD patients with smoking history (vs no smoking) and alcohol consumption history (vs. no alcohol consumption) were significantly higher (χ2 values: 7.025 and 4.562, and P values: .008 and .033; respectively). Smoking significantly increased the risk of LPRD (OR: 2.140, 95% CI: 1.058-4.331, P = .034). Among patients with LPRD positive, the incidence of "foreign body sensation in the throat" (symptom 8) score equal to 5 was the highest (19.15%). The severity of "excess mucus in the throat or postnasal drip" (symptom 3) contributed mostly to the total RSI score in patients with LPRD (r = .409, P < .001). ROC curve analysis showed that RSI ≥ 14 had a sensitivity of 72.9% and a specificity of 71.4% for the diagnosis of LPRD, with AUC = 0.797 (95% CI: 0.577-0.884, P < .001). Conclusions: The incidence of LPRD was high in patients we examined in OHNS clinics. We recommend that RSI can be used by otolaryngologists as a reliable tool for screening and diagnosing LPRD in OHNS clinics, which is beneficial for clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanyuan Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Qixu Liang
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Jian Luo
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Yibin, Yibin, Sichuan, China
| | - Hongbin Miao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The People's Hospital of Bishan District, Chongqing, China
| | - Gang Qin
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Yilin Bao
- Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Pop RS, Pop D, Chiperi LE, Nechita VI, Man SC, Dumitrașcu DL. Utility of the Post-Reflux Swallow-Induced Peristaltic Wave Index and Mean Nocturnal Baseline Impedance for the Diagnosis of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Phenotypes in Children. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2024; 11:773. [PMID: 39062223 PMCID: PMC11275132 DOI: 10.3390/children11070773] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2024] [Revised: 06/19/2024] [Accepted: 06/25/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
(1) Objectives: Assessment of novel impedance parameters such as the post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) have been proposed to enhance the accuracy of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) diagnosis. We aimed to evaluate the clinical value of MNBI and the PSPW index in discerning different phenotypes of GERD in children. (2) Methods: We conducted a prospective, observational study that included 49 children aged 5-18 years, referred for MII-pH monitoring due to negative endoscopy and persisting gastroesophageal reflux symptoms despite acid-suppressant treatment. The PSPW index and MNBI were assessed along with conventional metrics. (3) Results: Using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, MNBI (AUC 0.864) and the PSPW index (AUC 0.83) had very good performance in differentiating between non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) and functional phenotypes. The PSPW index (AUC 0.87) discriminated better between functional heartburn (FH) and reflux hypersensitivity (RH) compared to the MNBI (AUC 0.712). A PSPW cut-off value of 65% provided a sensitivity of 76.9% and a specificity of 90% in distinguishing FH and RH. The PSPW index (AUC 0.87) proved to have better performance than the MNBI (AUC 0.802) in differentiating between FH and non-FH patients. MNBI diagnosed FH with a sensitivity of 84% and a specificity of 80.6% at a cut-off value of 2563 Ω. (4) Conclusions: The PSPW index and MNBI are useful to distinguish between GERD phenotypes in pediatric patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radu Samuel Pop
- 3rd Department of Pediatrics, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (D.P.); (S.C.M.)
| | - Daniela Pop
- 3rd Department of Pediatrics, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (D.P.); (S.C.M.)
- 3rd Pediatric Clinic, Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Lăcrămioara Eliza Chiperi
- Department of Pediatrics, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, 540136 Târgu Mureș, Romania;
| | - Vlad-Ionuț Nechita
- Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400349 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Sorin Claudiu Man
- 3rd Department of Pediatrics, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (D.P.); (S.C.M.)
- 3rd Pediatric Clinic, Clinical Emergency Hospital for Children, 400217 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Dan Lucian Dumitrașcu
- 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Eiamkulbutr S, Dumrisilp T, Sanpavat A, Sintusek P. Prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with extraesophageal manifestations using combined-video, multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH study. World J Clin Pediatr 2023; 12:151-161. [PMID: 37342455 PMCID: PMC10278077 DOI: 10.5409/wjcp.v12.i3.151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2023] [Revised: 04/13/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 06/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) might be either a cause or comorbidity in children with extraesophageal problems especially as refractory respiratory symptoms, without any best methods or criterion for diagnosing it in children.
AIM To evaluate the prevalence of extraesophageal GERD using conventional and combined-video, multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH (MII-pH), and to propose novel diagnostic parameters.
METHODS The study was conducted among children suspected of extraesophageal GERD at King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital between 2019 and 2022. The children underwent conventional and/or combined-video MII-pH. The potential parameters were assessed and receiver operating characteristic was used for the significant parameters.
RESULTS Of 51 patients (52.9% males), aged 2.24 years were recruited. The common problems were cough, recurrent pneumonia, and hypersecretion. Using MII-pH, 35.3% of the children were diagnosed with GERD by reflux index (31.4%), total reflux events (3.9%), and symptom indices (9.8%) with higher symptom recorded in the GERD group (94 vs 171, P = 0.033). In the video monitoring group (n = 17), there were more symptoms recorded (120 vs 220, P = 0.062) and more GERD (11.8% vs 29.4%, P = 0.398) by symptom indices. Longest reflux time and mean nocturnal baseline impedance were significant parameters for diagnosis with receiver operating characteristic areas of 0.907 (P = 0.001) and 0.726 (P = 0.014).
CONCLUSION The prevalence of extraesophageal GERD in children was not high as expected. The diagnostic yield of symptom indices increased using video monitoring. Long reflux time and mean nocturnal baseline impedance are novel parameters that should be integrated into the GERD diagnostic criteria in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sutha Eiamkulbutr
- Department of Pediatrics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Termpong Dumrisilp
- Department of Pediatrics, Bhumibol Adulyadej Hospital, Bangkok 10220, Thailand
| | - Anapat Sanpavat
- Department of Pathology, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| | - Palittiya Sintusek
- Thai Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Immunology Research Unit, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sintusek P, Mutalib M, Thapar N. Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children: What’s new right now? World J Gastrointest Endosc 2023; 15:84-102. [PMID: 37034973 PMCID: PMC10080553 DOI: 10.4253/wjge.v15.i3.84] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Revised: 01/15/2023] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux (GER) in children is very common and refers to the involuntary passage of gastric contents into the esophagus. This is often physiological and managed conservatively. In contrast, GER disease (GERD) is a less common pathologic process causing troublesome symptoms, which may need medical management. Apart from abnormal transient relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter, other factors that play a role in the pathogenesis of GERD include defects in esophageal mucosal defense, impaired esophageal and gastric motility and clearance, as well as anatomical defects of the lower esophageal reflux barrier such as hiatal hernia. The clinical manifestations of GERD in young children are varied and nonspecific prompting the necessity for careful diagnostic evaluation. Management should be targeted to the underlying aetiopathogenesis and to limit complications of GERD. The following review focuses on up-to-date information regarding of the pathogenesis, diagnostic evaluation and management of GERD in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Palittiya Sintusek
- Thai Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Immunology Research Unit (TPGHAI), Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Pediatrics, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital and Thai Red Cross, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Mohamed Mutalib
- Department of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Pediatric and Gastroenterology Services, Evelina London Children’s Hospital, London SE1 7EH, United Kingdom
| | - Nikhil Thapar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Liver Transplant, Queensland Children’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia
- School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland 4006, Australia
- Woolworths Centre for Child Nutrition Research, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland 4101, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pediatric Laryngopharyngeal Reflux in the Last Decade: What Is New and Where to Next? J Clin Med 2023; 12:jcm12041436. [PMID: 36835970 PMCID: PMC9962831 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12041436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2022] [Revised: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laryngopharyngeal reflux may affect people of any age; still, most of the accumulated knowledge concerns adults, and evidence regarding pediatric populations remains relatively restricted. This study aims to review the most recent and emerging aspects of pediatric laryngopharyngeal reflux from the last ten years. It also attempts to identify gaps in knowledge and highlight discrepancies that future research should urgently address. METHODS An electronic search of the MEDLINE database was conducted, limited to January 2012 through December 2021. Non-English language articles, case reports, and studies that concerned a purely or predominantly adult population were excluded. The information from the articles with the most relevant contribution was initially categorized by theme and subsequently synthesized into a narrative form. RESULTS 86 articles were included, of which 27 were review articles, eight were surveys, and 51 were original articles. Our review systematically maps the research done in the last decade and provides an updated overview and the current state-of-the-art in this subject. CONCLUSIONS Despite discrepancies and heterogeneity in accumulating research, evidence gathered so far endorses a need for refining an escalating multiparameter diagnostic approach. A step-wise therapeutic plan appears to be the most reasonable management approach, starting with behavioral changes for mild to moderate, uncomplicated cases and escalating to personalized pharmacotherapy options for severe or nonresponsive cases. Surgical options could be considered in the most severe cases when potentially life-threatening symptoms persist despite maximal medical therapy. Over the past decade, the amount of available evidence has been gradually increasing; however, its strength remains low. Several aspects remain markedly under-addressed, and further adequately powered, multicenter, controlled studies with uniformity in diagnostic procedures and criteria are urgently needed.
Collapse
|
6
|
Gao J, Luo R, Ruan B, Liu Z, Long R, Jiang C, Cheng S, Wang Y, Su L, Li P. [Consistency analysis of pepsin immunohistochemistry and pepsin test box in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux]. LIN CHUANG ER BI YAN HOU TOU JING WAI KE ZA ZHI = JOURNAL OF CLINICAL OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD, AND NECK SURGERY 2023; 37:97-102;106. [PMID: 36756822 PMCID: PMC10208864 DOI: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2023.02.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Objective:To analyze the consistency of pepsin assay kit, pepsin IHC, reflux symptom index(RSI) and reflux finding score(RFS) in the diagnosis of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease(LPRD). Methods:The clinical data of 61 inpatients with laryngeal diseases who were admitted to the Department of Otolaryngology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University from May 2020 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. The RSI and RFS scores, the Formwitz score of pepsin immunohistochemistry, and the results of pepsin detection kit were recorded. ICC group correlation coefficient and Kappa consistency analysis was used for three detection methods. Results:Among 61 patients, 30 cases were positive and 31 cases were negative for the pepsin test kit, with a positive rate of 49.18%. The positive rate of pepsin immunohistochemistry was 45.90%(28/61), and the diagnostic agreement rate between the two was 70.49%. The consistency between them was high(κ=0.409). The positive rate of RSI and RFS in diagnosing LPRD was 62.30%(38/61), and the consistency rate was 73.77% with pepsin detection kit. The consistency between them was high(κ=0.486). Taking pepsin IHC as the reference standard, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of pepsin detection kit were 71.43%(20/28), 69.70%(23/33), 66.67%(20/30) and 74.19%(23/31), respectively. Using RSI and RFS scales as reference criteria, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value of pepsin detection kit were 89.29%(25/28), 60.61%(20/33), 65.79%(25/38) and 86.96%(20/23), respectively. Analysis of correlation coefficient within ICC group: ICC value was 0.628, 95% confidence interval(0.497-0.741), the three methods have good consistency. Conclusion:The RSI and RFS scale scores were in good agreement with the pepsin test kit, and the pepsin test kit was also in good agreement with pepsin immunohistochemistry. As a non-invasive diagnostic technique, the pepsin test kit can be widely used in the diagnosis of pharyngeal reflux in combination with pepsin immunohistochemistry and RSI and RFS scale.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jingyu Gao
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Renjing Luo
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Biao Ruan
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Zhuohui Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Ruiqing Long
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Chaowu Jiang
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Sheng Cheng
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Yan Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology,First Affiliated Hospital of Kunming Medical University,Kunming,650032,China
| | - Lu Su
- Department of Otolaryngology,Kunming Yan'an Hospital
| | - Peng Li
- Department of General Surgery,Kunming Yan'an Hospital
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhen Z, Zhao T, Wang Q, Zhang J, Zhong Z. Laryngopharyngeal reflux as a potential cause of Eustachian tube dysfunction in patients with otitis media with effusion. Front Neurol 2022; 13:1024743. [PMID: 36408490 PMCID: PMC9671220 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1024743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore the association between laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD)-related symptoms and the Eustachian tube (ET) function in adult patients with otitis media with effusion (OME). MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 105 adult patients with OME were retrospectively studied. All these patients had undergone tubomanometry (TMM) test for the affected ears before treatments. The LPRD-related symptoms were all assessed by the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI) scale. RESULTS Among the 105 included patients, the numbers of subjects with only one and both two ears affected were 65 (57.1%) and 40 (42.9%), respectively. Therefore, a total of 145 affected ears were studied. For these affected ears, a linear regression analysis that included sex, age, BMI, smoking history, drinking history, RSI value, and the condition of the contralateral ear suggested that only RSI value was significantly associated with TMM value (P < 0.001), with the correlation coefficient of -0.112. Among the 9 symptoms in RSI scale, affected ears with the following symptoms (vs. affected ears without) showed significantly lower TMM values: excess throat mucus or postnasal drip, difficulty swallowing food, liquids, or pills, and sensations of something stuck in your throat or a lump in your throat (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION LPRD may disrupt ET function in adult OME patients. A higher RSI score is independently predictive for a bad ET patency in such patients and is indicative for an additional anti-reflux therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Zhen
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tingting Zhao
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital and Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Quangui Wang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junbo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Zhen Zhong
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lotti F, Boscan P, Warrit K, Twedt DC. Strongly acidic gastroesophageal reflux and esophageal lumen pH before and after esophageal lavage with water or two bicarbonate concentrations in anesthetized dogs. Am J Vet Res 2022; 83:1-5. [PMID: 36074745 DOI: 10.2460/ajvr.22.05.0081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To increase acidic esophageal lumen pH in dogs that developed gastroesophageal reflux (GER) during anesthesia. We compared water and 2 different bicarbonate concentrations. ANIMALS 112 healthy, nonbrachycephalic dogs presented for ovariectomy. PROCEDURES Following standard anesthesia and surgery protocols for ovariectomy in all dogs, esophageal lumen impedance and pH were monitored using a dedicated probe. Esophageal impedance indicates the presence of GER whereas pH indicates the acidity level. Dogs with strongly acidic GER and an esophageal lumen pH value < 4.0 were included in the study, and lavage was performed with either tap water, bicarbonate 1%, or bicarbonate 2% until the pH increased to > 4.0. The effect of lavage on esophageal pH was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Wilcoxon 2 sample tests. Associations between lavage and pH changes were determined. RESULTS Of 48/112 dogs with strongly acidic GER, 33% neutralized their esophageal pH during surgery. For the 32 dogs that maintained an esophageal lumen pH value < 4, esophageal lavage with water increased the lumen pH to > 4 in 78.6% of dogs, whereas both bicarbonate concentrations increased it in 100% of the dogs to a more neutral pH (P < .0001). The dogs in the water group were more likely to regurgitate after anesthesia (36% vs 0% in both bicarbonate groups, P = .028). CLINICAL RELEVANCE Bicarbonate 1% and 2% increased esophageal lumen pH to more than 4 after strongly acidic GER. Lavage with water was mildly effective, but required large volumes and predisposed to further regurgitation after anesthesia.
Collapse
|
9
|
Wang X, Zhang J, Liu Z, Zhang C, Zou S, Li J. Investigation of Reflux Characteristics in Outpatients of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery by Age and Gender in the Chinese Population. J Voice 2022:S0892-1997(22)00226-0. [PMID: 35985897 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2022.07.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 07/25/2022] [Accepted: 07/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate the characteristics of patients with reflux diseases in the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics through the Reflux Symptom Scale-12 (RSS-12) and the Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Questionnaire (GERD-Q). METHODS All included patients completed the RSS-12 and GERD-Q scales and were considered to have LPR with an RSS-12 score >11 and GERD with a GERD-Q score >7. Data were analyzed according to genders (male and female) and age (18-40, 41-60, and >60 years). RESULTS A total of 977 patients were included. the mean RSS-12 and GERD-Q score were 11.32±21.34 and 6.31±1.21, and the positive rate of LPR and GERD were 28.76% and 8.90%, respectively. Males had a higher positive rate of LPR and GERD than females, and there were more males with LPR who also had GERD. Among those with both LPR and GERD, males had significantly higher ear-nose-throat (ENT) symptom scores such as hoarseness and excess throat mucus than females. However, females had significantly higher scores of gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, mainly indigestion and abdominal pain, and elder patients (>60 years) had higher scores of ENT, GI, respiratory symptoms, as well as the impact of symptoms on quality of life than the young patients (18-40, and 41-60 years). CONCLUSION Patients in the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics have different reflux characteristics by gender and age in the Chinese population. Males had more severe ENT-related symptoms of distress, while females had more complaints of GI symptoms. Older patients had higher scores for ENT, GI and respiratory symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaoyu Wang
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Navy Clinical College, the Fifth School of Clinical Medicine, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui Province, China
| | - Jinhong Zhang
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Zhi Liu
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Chun Zhang
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Shizhen Zou
- Department of otolaryngology, The Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital of Beijing, Beijing, 100048
| | - Jinrang Li
- Department of Otolaryngology, Sixth Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Anhui Medical University, Beijing 100048, China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Xiong X, He S, Xu F, Xu Z, Zhang X, Wang H, Liu T, Jia Y. Gastroesophageal reflux disease and salivary pepsin in patients with heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus. Dis Esophagus 2022; 35:6423537. [PMID: 34750620 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doab074] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Heterotopic gastric mucosa in the upper esophagus (HGMUE) is reported to be related to gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). This study investigated the prevalence of GERD and the use of salivary pepsin to diagnose gastroesophageal reflux, especially proximal reflux, in HGMUE patients. METHODS One hundred and fifty-three HGMUE patients and 50 healthy volunteers were studied. All subjects took a reflux symptom index questionnaire (RSI); underwent endoscopy, barium esophagogram, high-resolution manometry (HRM), and 24-hour multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH-metry (MII-pH); and salivary pepsin test. RESULTS Ninety-five (62.1%) HGMUE patients but no control subjects were diagnosed with GERD. The salivary pepsin concentration, RSI score, DeMeester score, acid exposure time (AET), total reflux episodes, proximal acidic reflux episodes, and proximal weakly acidic reflux episodes were significantly higher in the HGMUE group than in the control group (P < 0.05). The salivary pepsin test showed a sensitivity of 85.9% and specificity of 56.9% for diagnosing GERD using the optimal cut-off value of 75 ng/mL. One hundred and seven (69.9%) and 46 (30.1%) HGMUE patients were categorized as pepsin (+) and pepsin (-), respectively when 75 ng/mL was used as a cut-off value. Male sex, RSI, AET, and proximal acid reflux episodes were positive predictive factors for the occurrence of pepsin (+) in HGMUE patients. CONCLUSIONS GERD, especially GERD with proximal acid reflux and related symptoms, was common in HGMUE patients. The salivary pepsin test could be an additional useful test for testing reflux in HGMUE patients, but it will not replace the MII-pH.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xin Xiong
- Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | - Suyu He
- The Fourth Department of the Digestive Disease Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| | - Fei Xu
- Zunyi Medical University, Zunyi, China
| | | | | | - Hanmei Wang
- The Fourth Department of the Digestive Disease Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| | - Tianyu Liu
- The Endoscopy Center, Suining Central Hospital, Suining, China
| | - Yingdong Jia
- The First Department of the Digestive Disease Center, Suining, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2022; 117:27-56. [PMID: 34807007 PMCID: PMC8754510 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000001538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 346] [Impact Index Per Article: 173.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 01/30/2023]
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) continues to be among the most common diseases seen by gastroenterologists, surgeons, and primary care physicians. Our understanding of the varied presentations of GERD, enhancements in diagnostic testing, and approach to patient management have evolved. During this time, scrutiny of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) has increased considerably. Although PPIs remain the medical treatment of choice for GERD, multiple publications have raised questions about adverse events, raising doubts about the safety of long-term use and increasing concern about overprescribing of PPIs. New data regarding the potential for surgical and endoscopic interventions have emerged. In this new document, we provide updated, evidence-based recommendations and practical guidance for the evaluation and management of GERD, including pharmacologic, lifestyle, surgical, and endoscopic management. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation system was used to evaluate the evidence and the strength of recommendations. Key concepts and suggestions that as of this writing do not have sufficient evidence to grade are also provided.
Collapse
|
13
|
Lechien JR, Hans S, Simon F, Horoi M, Calvo-Henriquez C, Chiesa-Estomba CM, Mayo-Yáñez M, Bartel R, Piersiala K, Nguyen Y, Saussez S. Association Between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Media Otitis: A Systematic Review. Otol Neurotol 2021; 42:e801-e814. [PMID: 33710157 DOI: 10.1097/mao.0000000000003123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the relationship between laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) and recurrent (ROM) or chronic otitis media with effusion (COME). DATABASES PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Library. METHODS Three authors searched articles published between January 1980 and September 2020 about the association between LPR and the development of recurrent or chronic otitis media. Inclusion, exclusion, diagnostic criteria, and clinical outcome evaluation of included studies were analyzed using PRISMA criteria. The bias analysis of included studies was evaluated with the Tool to assess Risk of Bias of the CLARITY group. RESULTS Twenty-six clinical and three experimental articles met our inclusion criteria, accounting for 1,624 children and 144 adults with COME or ROM. According to the pH study type, the prevalence of LPR and gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in OM patients were 28.7% (range, 8-100%) and 40.7 (range, 18-64%), respectively. The majority of studies identified pepsin or pepsinogen in middle ear effusion, with a range of mean concentrations depending on the technique used to measure pepsin. There was an important heterogeneity between studies regarding definition of COME, ROM, and LPR, exclusion criteria, methods used to measure pepsin/pepsinogen in middle ear secretions and outcome assessments. CONCLUSION The association between LPR and OM is still unclear. Future clinical and experimental studies are needed to investigate the association between LPR and OM in both children and adults through extensive gastric content analysis in middle ear suppurations and impedance-pH monitoring considering acid, weakly acid, and alkaline reflux events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jerome R Lechien
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital (APHP), Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University
| | - Stéphane Hans
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Ambroise Paré Hospital (APHP), Paris Saclay University, Paris, France
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Foch Hospital, Paris Saclay University
| | - Francois Simon
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Pediatric Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery Department, Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Mihaela Horoi
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Christian Calvo-Henriquez
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Complex of Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela
| | - Carlos M Chiesa-Estomba
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Donostia, San Sebastian
| | - Miguel Mayo-Yáñez
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Complexo Hospitalario Universitario A Coruña (CHUAC), 15006, A Coruña, Galicia
- Clinical Research in Medicine, International Center for Doctorate and Advanced Studies (CIEDUS), Universidade de Santiago de Compostela (USC), 15782, Santiago de Compostela, Galicia
| | - Ricardo Bartel
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Hospital Universitario Mutua Terrasa, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Krzysztof Piersiala
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Division of ENT Diseases, Department of Clinical Sciences, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Yann Nguyen
- Groupe Hospitalo-Universitaire Pitié Salpêtrière, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Unit of Otology, Auditory Implants and Skull Base Surgery, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - Sven Saussez
- Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Study Group of Young-Otolaryngologists of the International Federations of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (YO-IFOS), Paris, France
- Department of Human Anatomy and Experimental Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, UMONS Research Institute for Health Sciences and Technology, University of Mons (UMons), Mons, Belgium
- Department of Otolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, CHU de Bruxelles, CHU Saint-Pierre, School of Medicine, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lu G, Ding X, Xu W. Association between Laryngopharyngeal Reflux and Vocal Fold Leukoplakia. ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec 2021; 83:159-166. [PMID: 33756454 DOI: 10.1159/000512527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vocal fold leukoplakia (VFL) has a risk of malignant transformation, and the underlying mechanisms are currently unrecognized. Some clinical evidence has indicated that laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) probably plays a critical role. OBJECTIVE To explore the risk factors associated with the occurrence of VFL and to investigate the importance of LPR in VFL and its different pathological types using 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-one patients with VFL and 27 healthy volunteers were recruited. General information and LPR parameters were analyzed. RESULTS The monitoring showed that 35.8% (29/81) of patients had acidic LPR and that 43.2% (35/81) had weakly acidic LPR. Heavy drinking (odds ratio = 4.004, p = 0.037) and acidic LPR (odds ratio = 4.471, p = 0.029) were independent risk factors for the occurrence of VFL. Acidic LPR showed a strong correlation with the Reflux Finding Score (p < 0.05) in patients suspected of having LPR based on the scale score. Meanwhile, weakly acidic LPR parameters increased with the severity of pathological degrees which were higher in high-grade dysplasia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Our study confirms the importance of LPR in VFL. Heavy drinking patients with VFL, particularly those with acidic LPR, should undergo intensive treatment. Meanwhile, weakly acidic LPR may play a critical role in the pathological changes in VFL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guowei Lu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.,Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Yantai Yuhuangding Hospital of Qingdao University, Yantai, China
| | - Xiu Ding
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Wen Xu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head Neck Surgery, Beijing Tongren Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang JY, Peng T, Zhao LL, Feng GJ, Liu YL. Poor consistency between reflux symptom index and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring in laryngopharyngeal reflux diagnosis in Chinese population. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2021; 9:25. [PMID: 33553318 PMCID: PMC7859794 DOI: 10.21037/atm-20-4783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Background It is unknown whether the reflux symptom index (RSI) can replace pH monitoring as a diagnostic tool for laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) in Chinese people. The relationships between reflux parameters and LPR symptoms also require further research. Methods A total of 216 Chinese patients underwent laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring and filled out an RSI questionnaire. Laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring indicated a diagnosis of LPR for patients with 7 or more episodes of reflux or a reflex area index (RAI) of 6.3 or more. The RSI questionnaire indicated a diagnosis of LPR for patients with RSI scores of 14 or higher. Results Of the 216 patients, 85 were diagnosed with LPR as assessed by the RSI, and 72 were diagnosed with LPR through laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring. The Cohen's kappa coefficient comparing LPR diagnosis consistency between RSI score and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring was 0.133 (P=0.007). This indicated the two diagnostic methods were consistent to a low degree; the total consistency rate was only 59.7% (129/216). The sensitivity of the RSI was 48.6% (35/72), and its specificity was 82.5% (94/114). For convenience, we named the nine symptom groups in the RSI sequentially as P1-P9. P1, P2, P3, P5, P6, and P7 were all correlated with at least one reflux parameter (P<0.05), but P4, P8, and P9 were not correlated with any reflux parameters (P>0.05). A total of 72 patients were diagnosed using pH monitoring, the gold standard for LPR diagnosis. The most common symptoms of LPR were found to be P9, P3, P8, P7, and P2 in these patients. The symptoms that most seriously affected patients were P9, P8, P3, P7, and P2. Conclusions The consistency in diagnosis of LPR between the RSI and laryngopharyngeal pH monitoring was poor, meaning the RSI is not a suitable LPR initial screening tool and cannot replace pH monitoring. Additionally, reflux symptoms P4, P8, and P9 were not correlated with any reflux parameters. The most prevalent LPR symptom was P9, followed by P3, P8, P7, and P2. The most severe symptom was also P9, followed by P8, P3, P7, and P2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun-Yao Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Li-Li Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Gui-Jian Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Lan Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wu Y, Wang J, Huang Q, Peng T, Zhao L, Feng G, Liu Y. The Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Based on pH Monitoring. EAR, NOSE & THROAT JOURNAL 2020; 100:249-253. [PMID: 33170043 DOI: 10.1177/0145561320971915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Many studies on the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) were based on symptoms, but there are few research on it using reflux monitoring. This study was designed to investigate the relationship between GERD and LPR based on pH monitoring. METHODS All patients were scheduled for esophageal manometry and pH monitoring sequentially. They were stratified into 4 groups as no reflux disease, isolated GERD, isolated LPR (iLPR), and GERD combined with LPR (GERD&LPR) according to pH monitoring. RESULTS The incidence of LPR in GERD was 46.3%, while the probability of combining GERD in LPR was 52.7%. The reflux profile in the laryngopharynx showed a significant difference in the total reflux time (17.82 ± 18.4 vs 9.62 ± 9.58, P = .023) and the percentage of total reflux time (1.31% ± 1.37% vs 0.71% ± .0.73%, P = .023) between the GERD&LPR and iLPR groups. CONCLUSION Laryngopharyngeal reflux can be combined with GERD or it can exist as an independent diagnosis. In patients with GERD&LPR, the total reflux time and the percentage of reflux time in the laryngopharynx are higher than those in the iLPR group. Reflux episodes in the laryngopharynx of patients with GERD&LPR may be derived from GERD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yun Wu
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junyao Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Qing Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tao Peng
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Lili Zhao
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Guijian Feng
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yulan Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, 71185Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abstract
Esophageal symptoms are common and may indicate the presence of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), structural processes, motor dysfunction, behavioral conditions, or functional disorders. Esophageal physiologic tests are often performed when initial endoscopic evaluation is unrevealing, especially when symptoms persist despite empiric management. Commonly used esophageal physiologic tests include esophageal manometry, ambulatory reflux monitoring, and barium esophagram. Functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) has recently been approved for the evaluation of esophageal pressure and dimensions using volumetric distension of a catheter-mounted balloon and as an adjunctive test for the evaluation of symptoms suggestive of motor dysfunction. Targeted utilization of esophageal physiologic tests can lead to definitive diagnosis of esophageal disorders but can also help rule out organic disorders while making a diagnosis of functional esophageal disorders. Esophageal physiologic tests can evaluate obstructive symptoms (dysphagia and regurgitation), typical and atypical GERD symptoms, and behavioral symptoms (belching and rumination). Certain parameters from esophageal physiologic tests can help guide the management of GERD and predict outcomes. In this ACG clinical guideline, we used the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation process to describe performance characteristics and clinical value of esophageal physiologic tests and provide recommendations for their utilization in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
|
18
|
Reflux and dental disorders in the pediatric population: A systematic review. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 136:110166. [PMID: 32535495 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2020.110166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 05/30/2020] [Accepted: 05/30/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the role of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) or gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in the development of dental disorders in pediatric population. METHODS PubMed, Scopus Cochrane database were assessed for subject headings using the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) recommendations. Relevant studies published between January 1990 and January 2020 describing the association between reflux and dental disorders in children were retrieved. Three authors reviewed the LPR diagnosis method; inclusion criteria and outcomes. The bias analysis was performed through the tools of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine evidence levels. RESULTS The electronic search identified 126 publications, of which 11 clinical studies and 2 basic science researches met our inclusion criteria. There is an important heterogeneity between studies about diagnostic method and clinical outcome evaluation. All studies based the reflux diagnosis on GERD criteria. No author considered hypopharyngeal nonacid reflux episodes through hypopharyngeal-esophageal intraluminal multichannel impedance pH monitoring (HEMII-pH). The results of studies support a higher prevalence of dental erosion in children with GERD compared with healthy individuals. Controversial findings were found about the potential association between reflux and caries, and the modification of both saliva composition and production in reflux children. CONCLUSION The association between reflux and dental disorder is still uncertain. Future studies considering pharyngeal acid and nonacid reflux episodes through HEMII-pH are needed to confirm this hypothesis. The pepsin detection in saliva would be an additional way for detecting LPR in children with dental disorders.
Collapse
|
19
|
Xiao S, Li J, Zheng H, Yan Y, Li X, Zhang L, Lv Q, Zhang J, Zeng L, Gao X, Chen X, Yang H, Zhao C, Zhang J, Lu H, Luo X, Wang G, Yi H, Ye J, Lin Z, Tian L, Zhang J, Chen T, Yu A, Liu Z, Ren X, Yang X, Zhang S, Cui X, Li G, Wan G, Lin C, Chen H, Deng A, Tang X, Zhang Q, Tao Z, Shi L, Zhou J, Qin G, Zhuang P, Huangfu H, Yang J, Zhou G, Li H, Wu W, Li J, Li S, Lou G, Fang H, Ma J, Shan C, Zhou X, Tang L, Zhou F, Fan Y, Zhang Y, Li Y, Li M, Dou C, Chen Z, Lei G, Li J, Gao Z, Huang Y, Ma X, Liu Z, Liang G, He J, Zhao H, Song B, Chen M, Yang X, Ma Z, Ren J. An epidemiological survey of laryngopharyngeal reflux disease at the otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery clinics in China. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2020; 277:2829-2838. [PMID: 32449029 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-020-06045-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/09/2020] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Using the Reflux Symptom Index (RSI), this nationwide study aimed to investigate the incidence, diagnostic status, risk factors, and common symptoms of adult laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD) at otorhinolaryngology-head and neck surgery (OHNS) clinics in China. METHODS This multicenter cross-sectional survey began at the different institutions ranged from July to October 2017, and the duration was 12 months. A total of 90,440 eligible patients were finally enrolled from 72 medical institutions in China. All these patients completed the questionnaire based on RSI. In this study, LPRD was defined as RSI > 13. RESULTS There were 9182 with LPRD among the 90,440 eligible participants (10.15%). However, only 1294 had a history of LPRD diagnosis among those with LPRD (14.09%). There were regional differences in the frequency of LPRD (P < 0.001). The proportions of patients with LPRD in males (vs. females), middle- and old-aged patients (vs. young), with current smoking history (vs. no smoking), and current drinking history (vs. no drinking) were significantly higher (all P < 0.001). Middle and old age, current smoking, and drinking history were independent predictors of LPRD (all P < 0.001, OR 1.240, 1.261, and 1.481, respectively). "Sensations of something stuck in throat or a lump in throat", "clearing throat", and "excess throat mucus or postnasal drip" were the most frequent clinical symptoms in patients with LPRD. CONCLUSIONS LPRD has a high incidence at the OHNS clinics in China. However, the diagnostic status of this disease is not optimistic. Older age, smoking, and drinking history were risk factors for LPRD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shuifang Xiao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8# Xishiku Street, Western District, Beijing, 100034, China.
| | - Jinrang Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Sixth Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, 6# Fucheng Road, Haidian District, Beijing, 100048, China.
| | - Hongliang Zheng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, 168# Changhai Street, Yangpu District, Shanghai, 200433, China.
| | - Yan Yan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xiangping Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Lihong Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Quiping Lv
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, China-Japan Friendship Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Junbo Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Peking University First Hospital, 8# Xishiku Street, Western District, Beijing, 100034, China
| | - Lin Zeng
- Research Center of Clinical Epidemiology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Xia Gao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xiong Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Hui Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Chen Zhao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Jian Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China
| | - Honghua Lu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Xianyang Luo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Guangke Wang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Hongliang Yi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Sixth People's Hospital of Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jin Ye
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenqun Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hainan Provincial People's Hospital, Hiakou, Hainan, China
| | - Linli Tian
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Jingjing Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Peking University Shenzhen Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ting Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Aimin Yu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Clinical Medical School, Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Zhaohui Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Zunyi Medical College, Zunyi, Guizhou, China
| | - Xiaoyong Ren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Xinming Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Siyi Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Xiaobo Cui
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Inner Mongolia Medical University, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Gelin Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
| | - Guanglun Wan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Anhui Provincial Hospital, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Chang Lin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China
| | - Hui Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Chengdu First People's Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, China
| | - Anchun Deng
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiabing Tang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wuxi People's Hospital, Wuxi, Jiangsu, China
| | - Qingfeng Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Dalian Central Hospital, Dalian, Liaoning, China
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Shenzhen University General Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhenfeng Tao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Bethune International Peace Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Li Shi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Xijing Hospital, Air Force Military Medical University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China
| | - Jianyong Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Jiangmen Central Hospital, Jiangmen, Guangdong, China
| | - Gang Qin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, Sichuan, China
| | - Peiyun Zhuang
- Department of Voice, Zhongshan Hospital, Xiamen University, Xiamen, Fujian, China
| | - Hui Huangfu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Hospital of Shanxi Medical University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China
| | - Jianming Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, Anhui, China
| | - Guojin Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Huijun Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Harbin Medical University, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Wei Wu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, PLA Strategic Support Force Characteristic Medical Center, Beijing, China
| | - Julan Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sichuan Provincial Corps Hospital, Chinese People's Armed Police Force, Leshan, Sichuan, China
| | - Shuhua Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, Liaoning, China
| | - Guangming Lou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First Hospital of Longyan City, Longyan, Fujian, China
| | - Hongyan Fang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chongqing General Hospital, Chongqing, China
| | - Jiangang Ma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Chunguang Shan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China
| | - Xuejun Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical College, Haikou, Hainan, China
| | - Liang Tang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The People's Hospital of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Fang Zhou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Changsha Central Hospital, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - Yunping Fan
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Yanping Zhang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The 8th Medical Center of Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yujie Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Zhengzhou Central Hospital, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Meisheng Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The First People's Hospital of Shangqiu City, Shangqiu, Henan, China
| | - Chunqiang Dou
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Linfen People's Hospital, Linfen, Shanxi, China
| | - Zhiling Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Hangzhou Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Gang Lei
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chongqing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Chongqing, China
| | - Jingbo Li
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Henan Provincial Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Zhengzhou, Henan, China
| | - Zhiguang Gao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Heilongjiang Provincial Hospital, Harbin, Heilongjiang, China
| | - Yongwang Huang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Second Hospital of Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China
| | - Xinchun Ma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Qinghai University, Xining, Qinghai, China
| | - Zhijun Liu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Chizhou People's Hospital, Chizhou, Anhui, China
| | - Gengtian Liang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Wuhan Third Hospital, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Jian He
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, Gansu, China
| | - Hua Zhao
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Xinjiang Military Command General Hospital, Urumqi, Xinjiang, China
| | - Bailong Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Chifeng College, Chifeng, Inner Mongolia, China
| | - Meijun Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The People's Hospital of Dazu District, Chongqing, China
| | - Xiangli Yang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Tianjin Union Medical Center, Tianjin, China
| | - Zuopeng Ma
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Qinghai Red Cross Hospital, Xining, Qinghai, China
| | - Jinlong Ren
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Fenyang Hospital, Shanxi Province, Fenyang, Shanxi, China
| |
Collapse
|