Quantitative Anti-HBc in Liver Pathological States in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B Virus Infection

Clinical Utility of Quantitative HBV Core Antibodies for Solving Diagnostic Dilemmas

The present-day management of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection relies on constant and appropriate monitoring of viral activity, disease progression and treatment response. Traditional HBV infection biomarkers have many limitations in predicting clinical outcomes or therapy success. Quantitation of HBV core antibodies (qAnti-HBc) is a new non-invasive biomarker that can be used in solving multiple diagnostic problems. It was shown to correlate well with infection phases, level of hepatic inflammation and fibrosis, exacerbations during chronic infection and presence of occult infection. Further, the level of qAnti-HBc was recognised as predictive of spontaneous or therapy-induced HBeAg and HBsAg seroclearance, relapse after therapy discontinuation, re-infection after liver transplantation and viral reactivation upon immunosuppression. However, qAnti-HBc cannot be relied upon as a single diagnostic test to solve all dilemmas, and its diagnostic and prognostic power can be much improved when combined with other diagnostic biomarkers (HBV DNA, HBeAg, qHBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies). The availability of commercial qAnti-HBc diagnostic kits still needs to be improved. The comparison of results from different studies and definitions of universal cut-off values continue to be hindered because many methods are only semi-quantitative. The clinical utility of qAnti-HBc and the methods used for its measurement are the focus of this review.

Serum qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg predicts significant hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Quantitative hepatitis B core antibody (qAnti-HBc) level has been reported to predict significant liver inflammation in treatment-naïve chronic hepatitis B patients. However, little evidence has been revealed that qAnti-HBc alone or with other serum parameters in predicting moderate to severe hepatic inflammation in HBeAg-positive immune active patients treated with entecavir (ETV).

METHODS

A total of 142 patients with HBeAg-positive immune active hepatitis were recruited in our study. Serum liver biochemistry, qAnti-HBc, hepatitis B virus markers, and liver inflammation were evaluated during 48-week ETV treatment. The association between liver inflammation grades and serum markers was systematically analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients with moderate to severe inflammation (≥ G2) had a significantly higher level of qAnti-HBc compared with those with no to mild liver inflammation patients (< G2). The levels of qAnti-HBc and alanine transaminase (ALT) were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades, and qAnti-HBc had a better correlation than ALT, whereas HBsAg was negatively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment. After 48-week ETV treatment, no correlation was observed between hepatic inflammation grades and qAnti-HBc, ALT, or HBsAg. The combination of qAnti-HBc, ALT, and HBsAg had better performance in predicting significant liver inflammation (≥ G2) than qAnti-HBc alone or its combination with ALT.

CONCLUSION

Serum qAnti-HBc levels were positively correlated with hepatic inflammation grades before treatment, but no positive correlation between them was observed after 48-week treatment. The level of qAnti-HBc combined with ALT and HBsAg may serve as a more reliable marker for identifying significant liver inflammation before treatment in HBeAg-positive immune active patients.

Quantitative HBsAg versus HBV DNA in Predicting Significant Hepatitis Activity of HBeAg-Positive Chronic HBV Infection

(1) Background: As specialparameters in predicting significant hepatitis activity of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, the quantitative standard of HBV DNA has not been agreed and that of hepatitis B surface antigen(HBsAg) has not been formed. Our objective is to evaluate the validity of HBsAg and HBV DNA in predicting the significant hepatitis activity of HBeAg-positive patients. (2) Methods: A population of 516 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection was enrolled. Serum ALT was measured using an Abbott Architect c16000 autoanalyzer; diagnoses of liver pathological grade and stage referred to the Scheuer standard. Three levels of significant hepatitis activity were preset, which were successively “ALT ≥ 20 IU/L or Grade > G1 or Stage > S1”, “ALT ≥ 30 IU/L or Grade > G1 or Stage > S1” and “ALT ≥ 40 IU/L or Grade > G1 or Stage > S1”. (3) Results: A subpopulation of 288 patients with possible high HBV replication was selected based on locally weighted scatterplot smoothing regression curves between ALT and HBsAg, HBeAg and HBV DNA. In the subpopulation with possible high HBV replication, areas under receiver operating characteristic curves of HBsAg for predicting the three levels of significant hepatitis activity were successively 0.868, 0.839 and 0.789, which were all significantly greater than those of HBV DNA, as those were successively 0.553, 0.550 and 0.574 (p = 0.0002, p < 0.0001 and p < 0.0001). With the standard of HBsAg ≤ 4.699 log₁₀ IU/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of HBsAg for predicting the three levels of significant hepatitis activity were successively 75.81% and 81.82%, 79.23% and 78.57% and 80.82% and 67.44%. (4) Conclusion: Quantitative HBsAg instead of HBV DNA is valuable in predicting significant hepatitis activity of HBeAg-positive chronic HBV infection.

Novel Biomarkers of Hepatitis B Virus and Their Use in Chronic Hepatitis B Patient Management

Even though an approved vaccine for hepatitis B virus (HBV) is available and widely used, over 257 million individuals worldwide are living with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) who require monitoring of treatment response, viral activity, and disease progression to reduce their risk of HBV-related liver disease. There is currently a lack of predictive markers to guide clinical management and to allow treatment cessation with reduced risk of viral reactivation. Novel HBV biomarkers are in development in an effort to improve the management of people living with CHB, to predict disease outcomes of CHB, and further understand the natural history of HBV. This review focuses on novel HBV biomarkers and their use in the clinical setting, including the description of and methodology for quantification of serum HBV RNA, hepatitis B core-related antigen (HBcrAg), quantitative hepatitis B surface antigen (qHBsAg), including ultrasensitive HBsAg detection, quantitative anti-hepatitis B core antigen (qAHBc), and detection of HBV nucleic acid-related antigen (HBV-NRAg). The utility of these biomarkers in treatment-naïve and treated CHB patients in several clinical situations is further discussed. Novel HBV biomarkers have been observed to provide critical clinical information and show promise for improving patient management and our understanding of the natural history of HBV.

Chronic hepatitis B virus infection and fibrosis: novel non-invasive approaches for diagnosis and risk stratification

Despite the availability of an effective vaccination, chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is still a major health concern worldwide. Chronic HBV infection can lead to fibrosis accumulation and overtime to cirrhosis, the principal risk factor for liver failure and hepatocellular carcinoma development. Liver biopsy is still considered the gold standard for fibrosis assessment, even though it is invasive and not exempt of complications. Overtime, several non-invasive methods for the detection of liver fibrosis have been developed and gradually introduced into clinical practice. However, their main limitation is the poor performance for the detection of intermediate stages of fibrosis. Finally, novel serological biomarkers, polygenic risk scores and imaging methods have been proposed in last years as novel promising tools to correctly identify the degree of liver fibrosis and to monitor liver disease progression. In this narrative review, we provide an overview on the novel non-invasive approaches for the evaluation of liver fibrosis and risk stratification of patients with chronic hepatitis B.