A Benzenediamine Analog FC-99 Drives M2 Macrophage Polarization and Alleviates Lipopolysaccharide- (LPS-) Induced Liver Injury

Sepsis‑induced cardiac dysfunction and pathogenetic mechanisms (Review)

Sepsis is a manifestation of the immune and inflammatory response to infection, which may lead to multi‑organ failure. Health care advances have improved outcomes in critical illness, but it still remains the leading cause of death. Septic cardiomyopathy is heart dysfunction brought on by sepsis. Septic cardiomyopathy is a common consequence of sepsis and has a mortality rate of up to 70%. There is a lack of understanding of septic cardiomyopathy pathogenesis; knowledge of its pathogenesis and the identification of potential therapeutic targets may reduce the mortality rate of patients with sepsis and lead to clinical improvements. The present review aimed to summarize advances in the pathogenesis of cardiac dysfunction in sepsis, with a focus on mitochondrial dysfunction, metabolic changes and cell death modalities and pathways. The present review summarized diagnostic criteria and outlook for sepsis treatment, with the goal of identifying appropriate treatment methods for this disease.

PPARγ-dependent hepatic macrophage switching acts as a central hub for hUCMSC-mediated alleviation of decompensated liver cirrhosis in rats

BACKGROUND

Decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC), a terminal-stage complication of liver disease, is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with hepatopathies. Human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cell (hUCMSC) therapy has emerged as a novel treatment alternative for the treatment of DLC. However, optimized therapy protocols and the associated mechanisms are not entirely understood.

METHODS

We constructed a DLC rat model consistent with the typical clinical characteristics combined use of PB and CCL₄. Performing dynamic detection of liver morphology and function in rats for 11 weeks, various disease characteristics of DLC and the therapeutic effect of hUCMSCs on DLC in experimental rats were thoroughly investigated, according to ascites examination, histopathological, and related blood biochemical analyses. Flow cytometry analysis of rat liver, immunofluorescence, and RT-qPCR was performed to examine the changes in the liver immune microenvironment after hucMSCs treatment. We performed RNA-seq analysis of liver and primary macrophages and hUCMSCs co-culture system in vitro to explore possible signaling pathways. PPARγ antagonist, GW9662, and clodronate liposomes were used to inhibit PPAR activation and pre-exhaustion of macrophages in DLC rats' livers, respectively.

RESULTS

We found that changing the two key issues, the frequency and initial phase of hUCMSCs infusion, can affect the efficacy of hUCMSCs, and the optimal hUCMSCs treatment schedule is once every week for three weeks at the early stage of DLC progression, providing the best therapeutic effect in reducing mortality and ascites, and improving liver function in DLC rats. hUCMSCs treatment skewed the macrophage phenotype from M1-type to M2-type by activating the PPARγ signaling pathway in the liver, which was approved by primary macrophages and hUCMSCs co-culture system in vitro. Both inhibition of PPARγ activation with GW9662 and pre-exhaustion of macrophages in DLC rats' liver abolished the regulation of hUCMSCs on macrophage polarization, thus attenuating the beneficial effect of hUCMSCs treatment in DLC rats.

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrated that the optimal hUCMSCs treatment effectively inhibits the ascites formation, prolongs survival and significantly improves liver structure and function in DLC rats through the activation of the PPARγ signaling pathway within liver macrophages. Our study compared the efficacy of different hUCMSCs infusion regimens for DLC, providing new insights on cell-based therapies for regenerative medicine.

Spotlight on liver macrophages for halting liver disease progression and injury

INTRODUCTION

Over the past two decades, understanding of hepatic macrophage biology has provided astounding details of their role in the progression and regression of liver diseases. The hepatic macrophages constitute resident macrophages, Kupffer cells, and circulating bone marrow monocyte-derived macrophages, which play a diverse role in liver injury and repair. Imbalance in the macrophage population leads to pathological consequences and is responsible for the initiation and progression of acute and chronic liver injuries. Further, distinct populations of hepatic macrophages and their high heterogeneity make their complex role enigmatic. The unique features of distinct phenotypes of macrophages have provided novel biomarkers for defining the stages of liver diseases. The distinct mechanisms of hepatic macrophages polarization and recruitment have been at the fore front of research. In addition, the secretome of hepatic macrophages and their immune regulation has provided clinically relevant therapeutic targets.

AREAS COVERED

Herein we have highlighted the current understanding in the area of hepatic macrophages, and their role in the progression of liver injury.

EXPERT OPINION

It is essential to ascertain the physiological and pathological role of evolutionarily conserved distinct macrophage phenotypes in different liver diseases before viable approaches may see a clinical translation.

Polygonatum Polysaccharide Regulates Macrophage Polarization and Improves LPS-Induced Acute Lung Injury through TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB Pathway

Objective

To investigate the effects of polygonatum sibiricum polysaccharides (PSPs) on the polarization of macrophages to M1 and M2 phenotypes and their potential mechanism.

Methods

PSPs samples were prepared through water extraction and alcohol precipitation assay. The properties of PSPs were identified and analyzed by high-performance liquid chromatography, FT-IR, and NMR assay. Then, the effects of PSPs on mouse macrophage RAW264.7 viability were measured by CCK-8 assay. The cells were randomly divided into the control group, PSPs group, LPS group, and LPS + PSPs group. M1 phenotype polarization of RAW264.7 cells was induced by LPS treatment. The effects of various treatments on expression of M2 phenotype CD206, activation of TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB signal pathway, and translocation of NF-κB into the nucleus were determined by ELISA, western blot, and immunofluorescence assay, respectively. TLR4 inhibitor, TAK-242, and MAPK inhibitor, BIRB 796, were used to verify the effects of PSPs on the TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB pathway. The mice model of acute lung injury (ALI) was established and randomly divided into control group, PSPs group, LPS group, and LPS + PSPs group. Bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and lung tissue were collected to measure protein, inflammatory cells, neutrophil and macrophage cells number, and the levels of IL-6 and TNF-α in BALF. Flow cytometry and western blot assay measured the phenotypic changes of macrophages and the activation of the TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway.

Results

The concentrations of PSPs lower than 100 μg/mL showed no toxicity to RAW264.7 cells. PSPs treatment could significantly reverse the reduction of CD206 protein expression (P < 0.05) and the increase of the expression of inflammatory factor TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 (all P < 0.05), TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB signaling pathway activation (all P < 0.05), and NF-κB translocation into the nucleus induced by LPS. The effect of inhibitors TAK-242 and BIRB 796 was consistent with that of PSPs. In the mice model of ALI, PSPs treatment could reduce the total protein levels of BALF and the number of inflammatory cells level, reverse the number changes of neutrophils and macrophages, and downregulate the proinflammatory factors IL-6 and TNF-α caused by LPS (all P < 0.05). In addition, PSPs treatment could also significantly reverse the increase in the number of iNOS expressing macrophages in alveolar lavage fluid induced by LPS (P < 0.05). In contrast, CD206-expressed cells decreased (P < 0.05). PSPs could also reverse LPS-induced TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB signal pathway protein activation (all P < 0.05).

Conclusion

PSPs could suppress TLR4-MAPK/NF-κB activation induced by LPS, inhibit M1 phenotypic polarization of macrophages, and promote M2 phenotypic polarization, thus playing an anti-inflammatory role.

Polarization of Microglia and Its Therapeutic Potential in Sepsis

Sepsis is a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to infection, leaving the inflammation process without a proper resolution, leading to tissue damage and possibly sequelae. The central nervous system (CNS) is one of the first regions affected by the peripheral inflammation caused by sepsis, exposing the neurons to an environment of oxidative stress, triggering neuronal dysfunction and apoptosis. Sepsis-associated encephalopathy (SAE) is the most frequent sepsis-associated organ dysfunction, with symptoms such as deliriums, seizures, and coma, linked to increased mortality, morbidity, and cognitive disability. However, the current therapy does not avoid those patients’ symptoms, evidencing the search for a more optimal approach. Herein we focus on microglia as a prominent therapeutic target due to its multiple functions maintaining CNS homeostasis and its polarizing capabilities, stimulating and resolving neuroinflammation depending on the stimuli. Microglia polarization is a target of multiple studies involving nerve cell preservation in diseases caused or aggravated by neuroinflammation, but in sepsis, its therapeutic potential is overlooked. We highlight the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) neuroprotective properties, its role in microglia polarization and inflammation resolution, and the interaction with nuclear factor-κB (NF-κB) and mitogen-activated kinases (MAPK), making PPARγ a molecular target for sepsis-related studies to come.

Macrophage Polarization and Its Role in Liver Disease

Macrophages are important immune cells in innate immunity, and have remarkable heterogeneity and polarization. Under pathological conditions, in addition to the resident macrophages, other macrophages are also recruited to the diseased tissues, and polarize to various phenotypes (mainly M1 and M2) under the stimulation of various factors in the microenvironment, thus playing different roles and functions. Liver diseases are hepatic pathological changes caused by a variety of pathogenic factors (viruses, alcohol, drugs, etc.), including acute liver injury, viral hepatitis, alcoholic liver disease, metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, liver fibrosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Recent studies have shown that macrophage polarization plays an important role in the initiation and development of liver diseases. However, because both macrophage polarization and the pathogenesis of liver diseases are complex, the role and mechanism of macrophage polarization in liver diseases need to be further clarified. Therefore, the origin of hepatic macrophages, and the phenotypes and mechanisms of macrophage polarization are reviewed first in this paper. It is found that macrophage polarization involves several molecular mechanisms, mainly including TLR4/NF-κB, JAK/STATs, TGF-β/Smads, PPARγ, Notch, and miRNA signaling pathways. In addition, this paper also expounds the role and mechanism of macrophage polarization in various liver diseases, which aims to provide references for further research of macrophage polarization in liver diseases, contributing to the therapeutic strategy of ameliorating liver diseases by modulating macrophage polarization.

Recent advancement on development of drug-induced macrophage polarization in control of human diseases

Macrophages, an important part of human immune system, possess a high plasticity and heterogeneity (macrophage polarization) as classically activated macrophages (M1) and alternatively activated macrophages (M2), which exert pro-inflammatory/anti-tumor and anti-inflammatory/pro-tumor effects, respectively. Thus, drug development in induction of macrophage polarization could be used to treat different human diseases. This review summarizes the recent advancement on modulation of macrophage polarization and its related molecular mechanisms induced by a number of agents. Research on the anti-inflammatory drugs to regulate the macrophage polarization accounts for a large proportion in the field and types of diseases investigated could include atherosclerosis, enteritis, nephritis, and the nervous system and skeletal diseases, while study of the anti-tumor agents to modify macrophage polarization is a novel area of research. Future study of the molecular mechanisms by which the different agents regulate the macrophage polarization could lead to an effective control of various human diseases, including inflammation and cancers.

Novel Mechanisms for Resolution of Liver Inflammation: Therapeutic Implications

Traditional concepts have classically viewed resolution of inflammation as a passive process yet insight into the pathways by which inflammation is resolved has challenged this idea. Resolution has been revealed as a highly dynamic and active event that is essential to counteract the dysregulated inflammatory response that drives diverse disease states. Abrogation of the hepatic inflammatory response through the stimulation of proresolving mechanisms represents a new paradigm in the setting of chronic inflammatory-driven liver diseases. Elucidation of the role of different cells of the innate and adaptive immune system has highlighted the interplay between them as an important orchestrator of liver repair. A finely tuned interaction between neutrophils and macrophages has risen as revolutionary mechanism that drives the restoration of hepatic function and architecture. Specialized proresolving mediators have also been shown to act as stop signals of the inflammatory response and promote resolution as well as tissue regeneration. In this review, we discuss the discovery and understanding of the mechanisms by which inflammation is resolved and highlight novel proresolving pathways that represent promising therapeutic strategies.

Systematic approach in macrophage polarization experiments: Maintaining integrity and reproducibility using flow cytometry and sample preparation

Resolution of inflammation is an important physiological process following infection or injury. When inflammation fails to resolve, it can cause chronic inflammation, which exacerbates a myriad of diseases. Current anti-inflammatory treatment options are often inadequate to resolve inflammation, and as such, a key goal for drug discovery is to find natural products and novel compounds that can target immune resolution processes. In order to efficiently discovery new therapies, immune cell lines are often used, in conjunction with flow cytometry, to quickly and inexpensively screen potential drugs for immunomodulatory effects. However, seemingly minor or trivial differences in methodology can lead to inconsistent results across experiments and across laboratories. It was the goal of this project to examine the effects of those differences on the RAW 264.7 macrophage cell line, particularly as it relates to macrophage polarization experimentation. We found that the type of detachment method when preparing cells for flow cytometry can alter several key macrophage parameters, including markers for macrophage polarization, depending on the gating strategy used in identifying sub-populations of cells for analysis. Investigators need to incorporate best-practices in gating strategy in order to target viable cells that are not in aggregate to ensure consistent and reliable results for immunomodulatory drug discovery.