1
|
Boudova S, Tholey DM, Ferries-Rowe E. Hepatitis C virus detection and management after implementation of universal screening in pregnancy. AJOG GLOBAL REPORTS 2024; 4:100317. [PMID: 38435837 PMCID: PMC10905043 DOI: 10.1016/j.xagr.2024.100317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurately identifying cases of hepatitis C virus has important medical and public health consequences. In the setting of rising hepatitis C virus prevalence and highly effective treatment with direct-acting antivirals, the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine guidelines recently changed to recommend universal screening for hepatitis C virus during pregnancy. However, there is little data on the influence of this policy change on case identification and management. OBJECTIVE We aimed to examine the influence of universal hepatitis C virus screening on our patient population. Our primary objective was to determine if there was a difference in the detected hepatitis C virus prevalence after the policy change. Our secondary objectives were to determine which factors were associated with a positive test for hepatitis C virus and to examine postpartum management of pregnant patients living with hepatitis C virus, including the (1) gastroenterology referral rate, (2) treatment rate, (3) infantile hepatitis C virus screening rate, and (4) factors associated with being referred for treatment. STUDY DESIGN We conducted a single-center, retrospective cohort study of deliveries that occurred before (July 2018-June 2020) and after (July 2020-December 2021) the implementation of universal hepatitis C virus screening. Information on hepatitis C virus and HIV status, if patients were screened for hepatitis C virus, history of intravenous drug use, and basic demographic information were abstracted from the electronic medical records. A subset of patients was administered a questionnaire regarding hepatitis C virus risk factors. For all patients who tested positive for hepatitis C virus, information on if they were referred for treatment in the postpartum period and if their infant was screened for hepatitis C virus were abstracted from the electronic medical records. RESULTS A total of 8973 deliveries occurred during this study period. A total of 71 (0.79%) patients had a detectable viral load. With implementation of universal screening, hepatitis C virus screening rates increased from 5.78% to 77.25% of deliveries (P<.01). The hepatitis C virus prevalence rates before and after universal screening was implemented were 0.78% and 0.81%, respectively (P=.88). There were significant demographic shifts in our pregnant population over this time period, including a reduction in intravenous drug use. A subset of 958 patients completed a hepatitis C virus risk factor questionnaire, in addition to undergoing universal hepatitis C virus screening. Ten patients screened positive with universal screening; only 8 of these individuals would have been identified with risk-based screening. Among the patients with a detectable viral load, 67.61% were referred for treatment and 18.75% were treated. A multivariate logistic regression model indicated that intravenous drug use was associated with significantly decreased odds of being referred for treatment (odds ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.04-0.59; P=.01). At the time of our evaluation, 52 infants were at least 18 months old and thus eligible for hepatitis C virus screening. Among these infants, 8 (15.38%) were screened for hepatitis C virus, and all were negative. CONCLUSION Following the practice shift, we saw a significant increase in hepatitis C virus screening during pregnancy. However, postpartum treatment and infant screening remained low. Intravenous drug use was associated with a decreased likelihood of being referred for treatment. Pregnancy represents a unique time for hepatitis C virus case identification, although better linkage to care is needed to increase postpartum treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Boudova
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN (Drs Boudova and Ferries-Rowe)
| | - Danielle M. Tholey
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, PA (Dr Tholey)
| | - Elizabeth Ferries-Rowe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN (Drs Boudova and Ferries-Rowe)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Behnke C, Nissim O, Simerlein W, Beeker K, Tarleton JL, Lazenby GB. Quality improvement to evaluate and provide treatment for chronic hepatitis C postpartum. J Am Pharm Assoc (2003) 2021; 62:864-869. [PMID: 34975005 DOI: 10.1016/j.japh.2021.12.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 12/14/2021] [Accepted: 12/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections are increasing among reproductive age individuals. Direct acting antivirals (DAAs) can cure HCV, but the use of DAAs is not currently recommended during pregnancy and breastfeeding. Individuals with HCV commonly have inadequate prenatal and postnatal care. OBJECTIVES The purpose of our study was to demonstrate the success of a quality improvement program to increase evaluation during pregnancy and ensuring access to DAA treatment medication during the postpartum period for individuals with chronic HCV to achieve cure 12 weeks after completing therapy. The primary outcome was documented HCV cure rate compared among individuals who received immediate treatment with DAA after delivery or after weaning or a traditional approach of referral to an infectious diseases specialist or hepatologist. The secondary outcome was the proportion of infants exposed to HCV evaluated. METHODS An interdisciplinary team developed a program to increase evaluation and HCV treatment for postpartum individuals. Individuals who received prenatal care from March 2017 to May 2021 were eligible. Individuals with chronic HCV had a laboratory evaluation before delivery, and appropriate DAAs were selected for postpartum treatment. The health system specialty pharmacy dispensed DAA prescriptions immediately after delivery to those who were not breastfeeding. Individuals who did breastfeed had the option to begin treatment after weaning. Cure was defined as a sustained viral response or undetectable HCV RNA collected 12 weeks after completing DAA treatment. RESULTS We demonstrate the success of an interdisciplinary team to ensure access to therapy for the treatment of postpartum chronic HCV. Only 3 infants (25%) with mothers referred were evaluated at our institution compared with 44% of infants (n = 10) whose mothers were treated after delivery. CONCLUSION An interdisciplinary team for HCV treatment improves access to treatment therapy with DAAs leading to the cure of chronic HCV after delivery.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mkuu RS, Shenkman EA, Muller KE, Huo T, Salloum RG, Cabrera R, Zarrinpar A, Thomas E, Szurek SM, Nelson DR. Do patients at high risk for Hepatitis C receive recommended testing? A retrospective cohort study of statewide Medicaid claims linked with OneFlorida clinical data. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e28316. [PMID: 34918711 PMCID: PMC8677982 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000028316] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
ABSTRACT Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is a leading risk factor for hepatocellular carcinoma.We employed a retrospective cohort study design and analyzed 2012-2018 Medicaid claims linked with electronic health records data from the OneFlorida Data Trust, a statewide data repository containing electronic health records data for 15.07 million Floridians from 11 health care systems. Only adult patients at high-risk for HCV (n = 30,113), defined by diagnosis of: HIV/AIDS (20%), substance use disorder (64%), or sexually transmitted infections (22%) were included. Logistic regression examined factors associated with meeting the recommended sequence of HCV testing.Overall, 44.1% received an HCV test. The odds of receiving an initial test were significantly higher for pregnant females (odds ratio [OR]1.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.86-2.12; P < .001) and increased with age (OR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00-1.01; P < .001).Among patients with low Charlson comorbidity index (CCI = 1), non-Hispanic (NH) black patients (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.81-0.9; P < .001) had lower odds of getting an HCV test; however, NH black patients with CCI = 10 had higher odds (OR 1.41; 95% CI 1.21-1.66; P < .001) of receiving a test. Of those who tested negative during initial testing, 17% received a second recommended test after 6 to 24 months. Medicaid-Medicare dual eligible patients, those with high CCI (OR 1.14; 95% CI 1.11-1.17; P < .001), NH blacks (OR 1.93; 95% CI 1.61-2.32; P < .001), and Hispanics (OR 1.49; 95% CI 1.08-2.06; P = .02) were significantly more likely to have received a second HCV test, while pregnant females (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.57-0.89; P = .003), had lower odds of receiving it. The majority of patients who tested positive during the initial test (97%) received subsequent testing.We observed suboptimal adherence to the recommended HCV testing among high-risk patients underscoring the need for tailored interventions aimed at successfully navigating high-risk individuals through the HCV screening process. Future interventional studies targeting multilevel factors, including patients, clinicians and health systems are needed to increase HCV screening rates for high-risk populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahma S. Mkuu
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Elizabeth A. Shenkman
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Keith E. Muller
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Tianyao Huo
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Ramzi G. Salloum
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Roniel Cabrera
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Ali Zarrinpar
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - Emmanuel Thomas
- Department of Pathology, University of Miami Health System, Miami, FL
| | - Sarah M. Szurek
- Health Outcomes & Biomedical Informatics, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| | - David R. Nelson
- Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Chaillon A, Wynn A, Kushner T, Reau N, Martin NK. Cost-effectiveness of Antenatal Rescreening Among Pregnant Women for Hepatitis C in the United States. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:e3355-e3357. [PMID: 32282879 PMCID: PMC8563211 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciaa362] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
To inform proposed changes in hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening guidelines in the United States, we assessed the cost-effectiveness of HCV antenatal rescreening for women without evidence of HCV during a prior pregnancy, using a previously published model. Universal HCV rescreening among pregnant women was cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $6000 per quality-adjusted life-year) and should be recommended nationally.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Chaillon
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Adriane Wynn
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Tatyana Kushner
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - Nancy Reau
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Natasha K Martin
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bushman ET, Subramani L, Sanjanwala A, Dionne-Odom J, Franco R, Owen J, Subramaniam A. Pragmatic Experience with Risk-based versus Universal Hepatitis C Screening in Pregnancy: Detection of Infection and Postpartum Linkage to Care. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38:1109-1116. [PMID: 33934324 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1728827] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Despite the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) recommending universal hepatitis C virus (HCV) screening in pregnancy Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) continue to endorse risk-based screening for HCV in pregnancy. We hypothesized that universal screening is associated with increased HCV diagnosis and postpartum linkage to HCV care compared with risk-based screening. STUDY DESIGN This retrospective cohort study included pregnant women screened for HCV at a single tertiary-care center. We defined two cohorts: women managed with risk-based (January 2014-October 2016) or universal HCV screening (November 2016-December 2018). Screening was performed with ELISA antibody testing and viremia confirmed with HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) polymerase chain reaction (PCR). Primary outcomes were the rate of HCV screen positivity and postpartum linkage to care. RESULTS From 2014 to 2018, 16,489 women delivered at our institution, of whom 166 screened positive for HCV. A total of 7,039 pregnant women were screened for HCV: 266 with risk-based and 6,773 with universal screening; 29% (76/266) were positive HCV antibody screening (HCVAb + ) in the risk-based cohort and 1.3% (90/6,773) in the universal cohort. HCVAb+ women in the risk-based cohort were more likely to have a positive drug screen. Only 69% (62/90) of HCVAb+ women in the universal cohort met the criteria for risk-based testing. Of the remaining 28 women, 6 (21%) had active viremia (HCV RNA+). Of the 166 HCVAb+ women, 64% (103/166) were HCV RNA+-51 of 266 (19%) in the risk-based and 52 of 6,773 (0.8%) in the universal cohort. Of HCVAb+ women, 75% (125/166) were referred postpartum for HCV evaluation and 27% (34/125) were linked to care. Only 9% (10/103) of women with viremia initiated treatment within 1 year of delivery. CONCLUSION Universal HCV screening in pregnancy identified an additional 31% of HCVAb+ women compared with risk-based screening. Given low rates of HCV follow-up and treatment regardless of screening modality, further studies are needed to address barriers to postpartum linkage to care. KEY POINTS · Ideal screening for HCV in pregnancy is unknown.. · We explore screening strategies in pregnancy to linkage to HCV care.. · Regardless of screening strategy there is low rates of postpartum linkage to HCV care..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elisa T Bushman
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Lakshmi Subramani
- University of Alabama Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Aalok Sanjanwala
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Jodie Dionne-Odom
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Ricardo Franco
- Department of Medicine, University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - John Owen
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Akila Subramaniam
- Center for Women's Reproductive Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Andes A, Ellenberg K, Vakos A, Collins J, Fryer K. Hepatitis C Virus in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review of the Literature. Am J Perinatol 2021; 38:e1-e13. [PMID: 32323289 DOI: 10.1055/s-0040-1709672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to systematically review the literature to summarize recent demographic characteristics of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection during pregnancy and the efficacy of risk-based versus universal screening. STUDY DESIGN PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched to identify relevant studies. Studies that recognized hepatitis C as a primary or secondary outcome, with pregnant women as the population and written in English, were included. Studies were excluded if they were abstracts only, written in foreign language, or published prior to 1992. Two researchers independently screened all the studies by titles, abstracts, and full text. Conflicts were settled by a third researcher. RESULTS A total of 698 studies were identified with 78 fitting inclusion criteria. In total, 69 epidemiologic and 9 comparison studies were found. Identified risk factors for HCV infection include intravenous or illicit drug use, sexually transmitted coinfection, high-risk behaviors in the partners, high parity, and history of miscarriages or abortions. Demographic characteristics associated with HCV include non-Hispanic white race, American Indian or Alaskan Native ethnicity, and increasing age. Providers may fail to adequately screen for each risk factor, and up to two-thirds of women with a known risk factor are not screened under current guidelines. Finally, up to 27% of HCV+ women have no identifiable risk factors for infection. CONCLUSION There is evidence that risk-based screening fails to identify a large proportion of HCV positive women in pregnancy and that pregnant women with HCV risk factors and consistent with current screening guidelines fail to be tested. We urge for the adoption of universal screening to identify these women and offer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Andes
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kerry Ellenberg
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Amanda Vakos
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - James Collins
- Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Kimberly Fryer
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Morsani College of Medicine, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Hepatitis C Virus Antibody Screening in a Cohort of Pregnant Women: Identifying Seroprevalence and Risk Factors. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136:427. [PMID: 32732756 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Prasad M, Saade G, Hughes B. In Reply. Obstet Gynecol 2020; 136:427-428. [PMID: 32732757 PMCID: PMC9040923 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Mona Prasad
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - George Saade
- University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, Texas
| | | |
Collapse
|