Efficacy and Safety of Stem Cell Combination Therapy for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Mesenchymal Stem Cell Therapy for Bone Repair of Human Hip Osteonecrosis with Bilateral Match-Control Evaluation: Impact of Tissue Source, Cell Count, Disease Stage, and Volume Size on 908 Hips

We investigated the impact of mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy on treating bilateral human hip osteonecrosis, analyzing 908 cases. This study assesses factors such as tissue source and cell count, comparing core decompression with various cell therapies. This research emphasizes bone repair according to pre-treatment conditions and the specificities of cell therapy in osteonecrosis repair, indicating a potential for improved bone repair strategies in hips without femoral head collapse. This study utilized a single-center retrospective analysis to investigate the efficacy of cellular approaches in the bone repair of osteonecrosis. It examined the impact on bone repair of tissue source (autologous bone marrow concentrate, allogeneic expanded, autologous expanded), cell quantity (from none in core decompression alone to millions in cell therapy), and osteonecrosis stage and volume. Excluding hips with femoral head collapse, it focused on patients who had bilateral hip osteonecrosis, both pre-operative and post-operative MRIs, and a follow-up of over five years. The analysis divided these patients into seven groups based on match control treatment variations in bilateral hip osteonecrosis, primarily investigating the outcomes between core decompression, washing effect, and different tissue sources of MSCs. Younger patients (<30 years) demonstrated significantly better repair volumes, particularly in stage II lesions, than older counterparts. Additionally, bone repair volume increased with the number of implanted MSCs up to 1,000,000, beyond which no additional benefits were observed. No significant difference was observed in repair outcomes between different sources of MSCs (BMAC, allogenic, or expanded cells). The study also highlighted that a 'washing effect' was beneficial, particularly for larger-volume osteonecrosis when combined with core decompression. Partial bone repair was the more frequent event observed, while total bone repair of osteonecrosis was rare. The volume and stage of osteonecrosis, alongside the number of injected cells, significantly affected treatment outcomes. In summary, this study provides comprehensive insights into the effectiveness and variables influencing the use of mesenchymal stem cells in treating human hip osteonecrosis. It emphasizes the potential of cell therapy while acknowledging the complexity and variability of results based on factors such as age, cell count, and disease stage.

Investigational regenerative medicine for non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a survey of registered clinical trials

INTRODUCTION

Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a refractory disease requiring joint replacement in young patients. Regenerative therapies have been developed.

AREAS COVERED

This study surveyed clinical trials on regenerative medicine for ONFH. We extracted clinical trials on non-traumatic ONFH from the websites of five publicly available major registries (EuropeanUnion Clinical Trials Register ([EU-CTR],ClinicalTrials.gov, Chinese ClinicalTrial Registry [ChiCTR], University Hospital Medical InformationNetwork - Clinical Trial Registry [UMIN-CTR] and Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry [ANZCTR]).The trials were classified into six categories based on purpose: surgical treatment, non-drug conservative treatment, conservative drug treatment, therapeutic strategy, diagnosis and pathogenesis, and regenerative therapy.) We extracted 169 clinical trials on ONFH. Of these, 37 were on regenerative medicine, including 29 on cell therapy. Surgical treatment was the most common treatment, followed by regenerative therapy.There were 9 clinical trials registered in the EU-CTR, with 5 on regenerative medicine; 79 trials registered on ClinicalTrials.gov, with 24 on regenerativemedicine; 54 trials registered in the ChiCTR, with 6 on regenerative medicine.

EXPERT OPINION

The focus of the joint-preserving surgery has shifted to regenerative therapy based on using cell therapy in early-stage ONFH. The global standardisation of regenerative therapy is still ongoing.

Mechanical properties of trabeculae and osteocyte morphology change significantly in different areas of the necrotic femoral head

Background: Osteonecrosis of the femoral head is a complex hip ailment. The precise changes in bone tissue during the disease's onset remain unclear. It is vital to assess both the quantity and quality of the trabecular state in a necrotic femoral head. Aim: This study aims to identify and compare the ultrastructural changes in osteocyte morphology and nanomechanical characteristics within various regions of necrotic femoral heads. Methods: Between December 2016 and May 2023, we gathered ten necrotic femoral heads from patients and five femoral heads from cadavers. The samples from the necrotic femoral heads were categorized into three areas: necrotic, sclerotic, and normal. Our assessment methods encompassed hematoxylin and eosin staining, sclerostin (SOST) immunohistochemistry, micro-computed tomography, nanoindentation, and acid-etched scanning electron microscopy. These techniques enabled us to examine the SOST expression, trabecular microstructure, micromechanical properties of trabeculae, and modifications in osteocyte morphology at the ultrastructural level. Results: The protein level of SOST was found to be lower in the sclerotic area. In the necrotic area, decreased values of bone volume fraction, trabecular thickness, and trabecular number and an increased value of trabecular separation were found. Conversely, in the sclerotic area, higher mean values of bone volume fraction, trabecular number, and trabecular thickness and lower trabecular separation indicated significant changes in the structural characteristics of trabeculae. Compared with the healthy area, the elastic modulus and hardness in the sclerotic area were significantly higher than those in the necrotic, normal, and control areas, while those in necrotic areas were significantly lower than those in the healthy area. The number of osteocytes tended to increase in the sclerotic area with more canalicular cells compared to the healthy area and control group. Conclusion: These results imply that the stress distribution within the sclerotic area could potentially lead to enhanced trabecular quality and quantity. This effect is also reflected in the increased count of osteocytes and their canaliculars. It is plausible that the sclerotic trabecular bone plays a pivotal role in the repair of necrotic femoral heads.

Prognosis of hip osteonecrosis after cell therapy with a calculator and artificial intelligence: ten year collapse-free survival prediction on three thousand and twenty one hips

PURPOSE

Several reports have identified prognostic factors for hip osteonecrosis treated with cell therapy, but no study investigated the accuracy of artificial intelligence method such as machine learning and artificial neural network (ANN) to predict the efficiency of the treatment. We determined the benefit of cell therapy compared with core decompression or natural evolution, and developed machine-learning algorithms for predicting ten year collapse-free survival in hip osteonecrosis treated with cell therapy. Using the best algorithm, we propose a calculator for "prognosis hip osteonecrosis cell therapy (PHOCT)" accessible for clinical use.

METHODS

A total of 3145 patients with 5261 osteonecroses without collapses were included in this study, comprising 1321 (42%) men and 1824 (58%) women, with a median age of 34 (12-62) years. Cell therapy was the treatment for 3021 hips, core decompression alone for 1374 hips, while absence of treatment was the control group of 764 hips. First, logistic regression and binary logistic regression analysis were performed to compare results of the three groups at ten years. Then an artificial neural network model was developed for ten year collapse-free survival after cell therapy. The models' performances were compared. The algorithms were assessed by calibration, and performance, and with c-statistic as measure of discrimination. It ranges from 0.5 to 1.0, with 1.0 being perfect discrimination and 0.5 poor (no better than chance at making a prediction).

RESULTS

Among the 3021 hips with cell therapy, 1964 hips (65%) were collapse-free survival at ten years, versus 453 (33%) among those 1374 treated with core decompression alone, and versus 115 (15%) among 764 hips with natural evolution. We analyzed factors influencing the prediction of collapse-free period with classical statistics and artificial intelligence among hips with cell therapy. After selecting variables, a machine learning algorithm created a prognosis osteonecrosis cell therapy calculator (POCT). This calculator proved to have good accuracy on validation in these series of 3021 hip osteonecroses treated with cell therapy. The algorithm had a c-statistic of 0.871 suggesting good-to-excellent discrimination when all the osteonecroses were mixed. The c-statistics were calculated separately for subpopulations of categorical osteonecroses. It retained good accuracy, but underestimated ten year survival in some subgroups, suggesting that specific calculators could be useful for some subgroups. This study highlights the importance of multimodal evaluation of patient parameters and shows the degree to which the outcome is modified by some decisions that are within a surgeon's control, as the number of cells to aspirate, the choice of injecting in both the osteonecrosis and the healthy bone, the choice between unilateral or bilateral injection, and the possibility to do a repeat injection.

CONCLUSION

Many disease conditions and the heterogeneities of patients are causes of variation of outcome after cell therapy for osteonecrosis. Predicting therapeutic effectiveness with a calculator allows a good discrimination to target patients who are most likely to benefit from this intervention.