1
|
Belon AP, McKenzie E, Teare G, Nykiforuk CIJ, Nieuwendyk L, Kim MO, Lee B, Adhikari K. Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review. BMC Health Serv Res 2024; 24:128. [PMID: 38263112 PMCID: PMC10807065 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-024-10573-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/06/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death globally. CRC screening can reduce the incidence and mortality of CRC. However, socially disadvantaged groups may disproportionately benefit less from screening programs due to their limited access to healthcare. This poor access to healthcare services is further aggravated by intersecting, cumulative social factors associated with their sociocultural background and living conditions. This rapid review systematically reviewed and synthesized evidence on the effectiveness of Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) programs in increasing CRC screening in populations who do not have a regular healthcare provider or who have limited healthcare system access. METHODS We used three databases: Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, and EBSCOhost CINAHL. We searched for systematic reviews, meta-analysis, and quantitative and mixed-methods studies focusing on effectiveness of FIT programs (request or receipt of FIT kit, completion rates of FIT screening, and participation rates in follow-up colonoscopy after FIT positive results). For evidence synthesis, deductive and inductive thematic analysis was conducted. The findings were also classified using the Cochrane Methods Equity PROGRESS-PLUS framework. The quality of the included studies was assessed. RESULTS Findings from the 25 included primary studies were organized into three intervention design-focused themes. Delivery of culturally-tailored programs (e.g., use of language and interpretive services) were effective in increasing CRC screening. Regarding the method of delivery for FIT, specific strategies combined with mail-out programs (e.g., motivational screening letter) or in-person delivery (e.g., demonstration of FIT specimen collection procedure) enhanced the success of FIT programs. The follow-up reminder theme (e.g., spaced out and live reminders) were generally effective. Additionally, we found evidence of the social determinants of health affecting FIT uptake (e.g., place of residence, race/ethnicity/culture/language, gender and/or sex). CONCLUSIONS Findings from this rapid review suggest multicomponent interventions combined with tailored strategies addressing the diverse, unique needs and priorities of the population with no regular healthcare provider or limited access to the healthcare system may be more effective in increasing FIT screening. Decision-makers and practitioners should consider equity and social factors when developing resources and coordinating efforts in the delivery and implementation of FIT screening strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Paula Belon
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Emily McKenzie
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
- Health Evidence and Impact, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
| | - Gary Teare
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada
| | - Candace I J Nykiforuk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Laura Nieuwendyk
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Minji Olivia Kim
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Bernice Lee
- Centre for Healthy Communities, School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Kamala Adhikari
- Provincial Population and Public Health, Alberta Health Services, Calgary, Canada.
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Cummings School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mulcahy Symmons S, Leavy P, Heavey L, Mason Mohan C, Drury A, De Brún A. How is equity captured for colorectal, breast and cervical cancer incidence and screening in the Republic of Ireland: A review. Prev Med Rep 2023; 36:102405. [PMID: 37753379 PMCID: PMC10518567 DOI: 10.1016/j.pmedr.2023.102405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/07/2023] [Revised: 09/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/07/2023] [Indexed: 09/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Organised screening reduces the incidence and late-stage diagnosis of cancer. However, participation in screening is not consistent across populations. Variations can be measured using demographic factors on place of residence, race/ethnicity, occupation, gender/sex, religion, education, socio-economic position (SEP), and social capital (PROGRESS-Plus stratifiers). The Republic of Ireland has screening programmes for colorectal, breast, and cervical cancer but assessment of screening participation and cancer incidence is inconsistent. The review aimed to evaluate the use of stratifiers in breast, cervical and colorectal cancer incidence and screening literature, and assess variations in incidence and screening participation across subgroups in Ireland. Methods PubMed was searched systematically and grey literature was identified via Google, Google Scholar, Lenus (Irish Health Research repository), and The Irish Longitudinal Study of Aging (TILDA) in June 2022. Studies were included if they captured stratifiers alongside incidence or screening participation data of the three cancers. Results Thirty-six studies and reports were included. Place of residence, SEP, sex, and age were most frequently captured. Incidence and screening participation varied by age, place of residence, SEP, and sex. Discussion PROGRESS-Plus is a useful equity lens to review health literature. Cancer incidence and screening participation studies lacked a comprehensive equity lens resulting in difficulties in identifying inequities and non-attenders. Place of residence, SEP and ethnicity should be prioritised in monitoring inequities. Integrating unique health identifiers should improve monitoring and enable evidence-based population-specific interventions to promote screening. Collaboration with community organisations would support engagement with vulnerable populations when data is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Mulcahy Symmons
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Paul Leavy
- Centre for Health Policy and Management, School of Medicine, Trinty College Dublin, Ireland
| | - Laura Heavey
- Department of Public Health Medicine, National Screening Service, King’s Inn House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Caroline Mason Mohan
- Department of Public Health Medicine, National Screening Service, King’s Inn House, 200 Parnell Street, Dublin 1, Ireland
| | - Amanda Drury
- School of Nursing, Psychotherapy and Community Health, Dublin City University, Glasnevin, Dublin 9, Ireland
| | - Aoife De Brún
- School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
- UCD Centre for Interdisciplinary Research, Education, and Innovation in Health Systems (UCD IRIS), School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Nelson K, Carter K, Hepburn J, Hill I, Hurlow C, O'Neill C, Tang A, Harris DA. Patient and healthcare professionals' perceptions of a combined blood and faecal immunochemical test for excluding colorectal cancer diagnosis in primary care. Health Expect 2023; 26:2655-2665. [PMID: 37697688 PMCID: PMC10632655 DOI: 10.1111/hex.13796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Revised: 05/29/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/13/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To explore the perceptions of patients and healthcare professionals on Raman-faecal immunochemical test (FIT) as an alternative test for colorectal cancer exclusion in primary care. DESIGN Semi-structured interviews within a feasibility study. SETTING Patients presenting to primary care with colorectal symptoms and healthcare professionals working in primary and secondary care. PARTICIPANTS A total of 23 patients and 12 healthcare professionals. METHODS Patient participants were asked to complete a novel combined Raman-FIT test before being seen in secondary care. This study sought their opinions about the test. We also sought the views of healthcare professionals. FINDINGS Patients and healthcare professionals agreed that Raman-FIT was a suitable test to be given in primary care. It aligned with routine practice and was a simple test for most patients to complete. CONCLUSIONS Patients are willing and able to complete the Raman-FIT test in primary care. Raman-FIT may accelerate access to diagnosis with the potential to improve cancer outcomes. PATIENT AND PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT Lay members (J. H. and I. H.) with experience and knowledge of colorectal cancer and screening contributed to developing, undertaking, and disseminating all aspects of the research. They were supported to collaborate as equal members of the research team. They were involved in developing the study as coapplicants, using personal experience to ensure that the research and its methods were relevant to the patient and public needs. Both prepared participant information sheets, coanalysed data, and contributed to study reporting and dissemination through papers, conference presentations and a lay summary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kayleigh Nelson
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaWales
| | - Kym Carter
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaWales
| | - Julie Hepburn
- Public Involvement CommunityHealth and Care Research WalesCardiffWales
| | - Ian Hill
- Public Involvement CommunityHealth and Care Research WalesCardiffWales
| | - Claire Hurlow
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaWales
| | - Claire O'Neill
- Bevan CommissionSwansea University School of ManagementSwanseaWales
| | - Alethea Tang
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Morriston HospitalSwansea Bay University Health BoardSwanseaWales
| | - Dean A. Harris
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life SciencesSwansea UniversitySwanseaWales
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Morriston HospitalSwansea Bay University Health BoardSwanseaWales
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kayal G, Kerrison R, Hirst Y, von Wagner C. Patients' experience of using colonoscopy as a diagnostic test after a positive FOBT/FIT: a systematic review of the quantitative literature. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071391. [PMID: 37734900 PMCID: PMC10514644 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-071391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/23/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) and faecal immunochemical testing (FIT) are among the most used screening modalities for colorectal cancer (CRC). Colonoscopy is also widely used as a screening and diagnostic test for adults with a positive FOBT/FIT. Patient experience of colonoscopy is an important component for most CRC screening programmes. Individuals with negative experiences are less likely to engage with colonoscopy in the future and can deter others from attending colonoscopy when invited. This review synthesised data on patient experience with colonoscopy, following a positive result, to provide insights into how to improve patient experience within the English Bowel Cancer Screening Programme. METHODS MEDLINE, EMBASE and PsycINFO were searched for quantitative questionnaire studies evaluating patient-reported experience with colonoscopy, following a positive screening FOB/FIT result. The search was limited to studies published between 2000 and 2021 (ie, when the first FOBT/FIT screening programmes for CRC were introduced). Data-driven and narrative summary techniques were used to summarise the literature. RESULTS In total, six studies from the UK (n=4), Spain (n=1) and the Netherlands (n=1) were included in the review (total participants: 152 329; response rate: 68.0-79.3%). Patient experiences were categorised into three 'stages': 'pre-colonoscopy', 'during the test' and 'post-colonoscopy'. Overall, patients reported a positive experience in all six studies. Bowel preparation was the most frequently endorsed issue experienced pre-test (experienced by 10.0-41.0% of individuals, across all studies), pain and discomfort for during the test (experienced by 10.0-21.0% of participants) and abdominal pain and discomfort after the test (these were experienced by 14.8-22% of patients). CONCLUSION This review highlighted that patient-reported experiences associated with colonoscopy were generally positive. To improve the colonoscopy experience, bowel screening centres should investigate means to: make bowel preparation more acceptable, make colonoscopy less painful and reduce post-colonoscopy symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ghalia Kayal
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Robert Kerrison
- School of Health Science, University of Surrey, Guildford, UK
| | - Yasemin Hirst
- Health Technology Assessment, University of Central Lancashire, Preston, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
van de Schootbrugge-Vandermeer HJ, Lansdorp-Vogelaar I, de Jonge L, van Vuuren AJ, Dekker E, Spaander MCW, Ramakers CRB, Nagtegaal ID, van Kemenade FJ, van Leerdam ME, Toes-Zoutendijk E. Socio-demographic and cultural factors related to non-participation in the Dutch colorectal cancer screening programme. Eur J Cancer 2023; 190:112942. [PMID: 37406529 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.112942] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2023] [Revised: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 06/08/2023] [Indexed: 07/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND High participation rates are essential for a screening programme to be beneficial. To reach non-participants in a targeted manner, insight in characteristics of non-participants is needed. We investigated demographic differences between participants and non-participants in the Dutch faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme. METHODS In this population-based cohort study, we included all invitees for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019. Participation status, birth year, and sex were extracted from the Dutch national screening information system and linked to demographic characteristics from Statistics Netherlands, including migration background, level of education, socioeconomic category, household composition, and household income. A multivariable logistic regression was used to assess the association between demographic factors and participation. RESULTS A total of 4,383,861 individuals were invited for CRC screening in 2018 and 2019, of which 3,170,349 (72.3%) participated. Individuals were less likely to participate when they were single and/or living with others (single with other residents versus couple: odds ratio [OR] 0.34, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.31-0.38), had a migration background (e.g. Moroccan migrant versus Dutch background: OR 0.43, 95% CI: 0.42-0.44), or had a low income (lowest versus highest quintile: OR 0.45, 95% CI: 0.44-0.45). Although to a lesser extent, non-participation was also significantly associated with being male, being younger, receiving social welfare benefits and having a low level of education. CONCLUSION We found that individuals who were single and/or living with others, immigrants from Morocco or individuals with low income were the least likely to participate in the Dutch CRC screening programme. Targeted interventions are needed to minimise inequities in CRC screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Iris Lansdorp-Vogelaar
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Lucie de Jonge
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Anneke J van Vuuren
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Evelien Dekker
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, AMC, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Manon C W Spaander
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Christian R B Ramakers
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iris D Nagtegaal
- Department of Pathology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Folkert J van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Monique E van Leerdam
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute - Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, the Netherlands; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Esther Toes-Zoutendijk
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Albers B, Auer R, Caci L, Nyantakyi E, Plys E, Podmore C, Riegel F, Selby K, Walder J, Clack L. Implementing organized colorectal cancer screening programs in Europe-protocol for a systematic review of determinants and strategies. Syst Rev 2023; 12:26. [PMID: 36849979 PMCID: PMC9969690 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-023-02193-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With a high mortality of 12.6% of all cancer cases, colorectal cancer (CRC) accounts for substantial burden of disease in Europe. In the past decade, more and more countries have introduced organized colorectal cancer screening programs, making systematic screening available to entire segments of a population, typically based on routine stool tests and/or colonoscopy. While the effectiveness of organized screening in reducing CRC incidence and mortality has been confirmed, studies continuously report persistent program implementation challenges. This systematic review will synthesize the literature on organized CRC screening programs. Its aim is to understand what is currently known about the barriers and facilitators that influence the implementation of these programs and about the implementation strategies used to navigate these determinants. METHODS A systematic review of primary studies of any research design will be conducted. CENTRAL, CINAHL, EMBASE, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and Scopus will be searched. Websites of (non-)government health care organizations and websites of organizations affiliated with authors of included studies will be screened for unpublished evaluation reports. Existing organized CRC screening programs will be contacted with a request to share program-specific grey literature. Two researchers will independently screen each publication in two rounds for eligibility. Included studies will focus on adult populations involved in the implementation of organized CRC screening programs and contain information about implementation determinants/ strategies. Publications will be assessed for their risk of bias. Data extraction will include study aim, design, location, setting, sample, methods, and measures; program characteristics; implementation stage, framework, determinants, strategies, and outcomes; and service and other outcome information. Findings will be synthesized narratively using the three stages of thematic synthesis. DISCUSSION With its sole focus on the implementation of organized CRC screening programs, this review will help to fill a central knowledge gap in the literature on colorectal cancer screening. Its findings can inform the decision-making in policy and practice needed to prioritize resources for establishing new and maintaining existing programs in the future. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION PROSPERO (CRD42022306580).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bianca Albers
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Reto Auer
- Institute of Primary Health Care (BIHAM), University of Bern, Mittelstrasse 43, 3012, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laura Caci
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Emanuela Nyantakyi
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ekaterina Plys
- Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 44, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Clara Podmore
- Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 44, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Franziska Riegel
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Kevin Selby
- Center for primary care and public health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Rue de Bugnon 44, 1010, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Joel Walder
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lauren Clack
- Institute for Implementation Science in Health Care (IfIS), Medical Faculty, University of Zurich, Universitätstrasse 84, 8006, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Infectious Diseases and Hospital Epidemiology, University Hospital Zurich, Rämistrasse 100, 8091, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Giannakou K, Lamnisos D. Small-Area Geographic and Socioeconomic Inequalities in Colorectal Cancer in Cyprus. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 20:341. [PMID: 36612661 PMCID: PMC9819875 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20010341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/15/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of death and morbidity worldwide. To date, the relationship between regional deprivation and CRC incidence or mortality has not been studied in the population of Cyprus. The objective of this study was to analyse the geographical variation of CRC incidence and mortality and its possible association with socioeconomic inequalities in Cyprus for the time period of 2000-2015. This is a small-area ecological study in Cyprus, with census tracts as units of spatial analysis. The incidence date, sex, age, postcode, primary site, death date in case of death, or last contact date of all alive CRC cases from 2000-2015 were obtained from the Cyprus Ministry of Health's Health Monitoring Unit. Indirect standardisation was used to calculate the sex and age Standardise Incidence Ratios (SIRs) and Standardised Mortality Ratios (SMRs) of CRC while the smoothed values of SIRs, SMRs, and Mortality to Incidence ratio (M/I ratio) were estimated using the univariate Bayesian Poisson log-linear spatial model. To evaluate the association of CRC incidence and mortality rate with socioeconomic deprivation, we included the national socioeconomic deprivation index as a covariate variable entering in the model either as a continuous variable or as a categorical variable representing quartiles of areas with increasing levels of socioeconomic deprivation. The results showed that there are geographical areas having 15% higher SIR and SMR, with most of those areas located on the east coast of the island. We found higher M/I ratio values in the rural, remote, and less dense areas of the island, while lower rates were observed in the metropolitan areas. We also discovered an inverted U-shape pattern in CRC incidence and mortality with higher rates in the areas classified in the second quartile (Q2-areas) of the socioeconomic deprivation index and lower rates in rural, remote, and less dense areas (Q4-areas). These findings provide useful information at local and national levels and inform decisions about resource allocation to geographically targeted prevention and control plans to increase CRC screening and management.
Collapse
|
8
|
Beaton D, Sharp L, Trudgill NJ, Thoufeeq M, Nicholson BD, Rogers P, Docherty J, Penman ID, Rutter M. UK endoscopy workload and workforce patterns: is there potential to increase capacity? A BSG analysis of the National Endoscopy Database. Frontline Gastroenterol 2022; 14:103-110. [PMID: 36818791 PMCID: PMC9933584 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/31/2022] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The lack of comprehensive national data on endoscopy activity and workforce hampers strategic planning. The National Endoscopy Database (NED) provides a unique opportunity to address this in the UK. We evaluated NED to inform service planning, exploring opportunities to expand capacity to meet service demands. Design Data on all procedures between 1 March 2019 and 29 February 2020 were extracted from NED. Endoscopy activity and endoscopist workforce were analysed. Results 1 639 640 procedures were analysed (oesophagogastroduodenoscopy (OGD) 693 663, colonoscopy 586 464, flexible sigmoidoscopy 335 439 and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography 23 074) from 407 sites by 4990 endoscopists. 89% of procedures were performed in NHS sites. 17% took place each weekday, 10% on Saturdays and 6% on Sundays. Training procedures accounted for 6% of total activity, over 99% of which took place in NHS sites. Median patient age was younger in the independent sector (IS) (51 vs 60 years, p<0.001). 74% of endoscopists were male. Gastroenterologists and surgeons each comprised one-third of the endoscopist workforce; non-medical endoscopists (NMEs) comprised 12% yet undertook 23% of procedures. Approximately half of endoscopists performing OGD (52%) or colonoscopies (48%) did not meet minimum annual procedure numbers. Conclusion This comprehensive analysis reveals endoscopy workload and workforce patterns for the first time across both the NHS and the IS in all four UK nations. Half of all endoscopists perform fewer than the recommended minimum annual procedure numbers: a national strategy to address this, along with expansion of the NME workforce, would increase endoscopy capacity, which could be used to exploit latent weekend capacity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Beaton
- Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK,Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | | | - Mo Thoufeeq
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals, Sheffield, UK
| | - Brian D Nicholson
- Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | | | | | - Ian D Penman
- Centre for Liver and Digestive Disorders, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Matt Rutter
- Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Stockton-on-Tees, UK,Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Implementing strategies at the workplace level to increase colorectal cancer screening uptake in Argentina: a controlled interrupted time-series study. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2022; 15:335-345. [DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-21-0465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
10
|
Novel Diagnostic Biomarkers in Colorectal Cancer. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23020852. [PMID: 35055034 PMCID: PMC8776048 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23020852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 38.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2021] [Revised: 12/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is still a leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Less than half of cases are diagnosed when the cancer is locally advanced. CRC is a heterogenous disease associated with a number of genetic or somatic mutations. Diagnostic markers are used for risk stratification and early detection, which might prolong overall survival. Nowadays, the widespread use of semi-invasive endoscopic methods and feacal blood tests characterised by suboptimal accuracy of diagnostic results has led to the detection of cases at later stages. New molecular noninvasive tests based on the detection of CRC alterations seem to be more sensitive and specific then the current methods. Therefore, research aiming at identifying molecular markers, such as DNA, RNA and proteins, would improve survival rates and contribute to the development of personalized medicine. The identification of “ideal” diagnostic biomarkers, having high sensitivity and specificity, being safe, cheap and easy to measure, remains a challenge. The purpose of this review is to discuss recent advances in novel diagnostic biomarkers for tumor tissue, blood and stool samples in CRC patients.
Collapse
|
11
|
Colorectal Cancer Screening: Have We Addressed Concerns and Needs of the Target Population? GASTROINTESTINAL DISORDERS 2021. [DOI: 10.3390/gidisord3040018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the recognized benefits of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, uptake is still suboptimal in many countries. In addressing this issue, one important element that has not received sufficient attention is population preference. Our review provides a comprehensive summary of the up-to-date evidence relative to this topic. Four OVID databases were searched: Ovid MEDLINE® ALL, Biological Abstracts, CAB Abstracts, and Global Health. Among the 742 articles generated, 154 full texts were selected for a more thorough evaluation based on predefined inclusion criteria. Finally, 83 studies were included in our review. The general population preferred either colonoscopy as the most accurate test, or fecal occult blood test (FOBT) as the least invasive for CRC screening. The emerging blood test (SEPT9) and capsule colonoscopy (nanopill), with the potential to overcome the pitfalls of the available techniques, were also favored. Gender, age, race, screening experience, education and beliefs, the perceived risk of CRC, insurance, and health status influence one’s test preference. To improve uptake, CRC screening programs should consider offering test alternatives and tailoring the content and delivery of screening information to the public’s preferences. Other logistical measures in terms of the types of bowel preparation, gender of endoscopist, stool collection device, and reward for participants can also be useful.
Collapse
|
12
|
Unanue-Arza S, Portillo I, Idígoras I, Arostegui I, Arana-Arri E. Facilitators and barriers to participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programme from the perspective of healthcare professionals: Qualitative research study. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2021; 30:e13507. [PMID: 34462982 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Revised: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE High participation determines the success of colorectal cancer screening programmes in reducing incidence and mortality. The factors that determine participation must be studied from the perspective of professionals that implement the programme. The aim was to identify factors that facilitate or hinder the participation of the invited people in the bowel cancer screening programme of the Basque Country (Spain) from professional's perspective. METHODS Qualitative design based on individual interviews and focus groups. Thirty-eight primary care professionals who implement the programme participated (administrative staff, nurses and general practitioners). Thematic analysis was performed. RESULTS Professionals show high satisfaction with the programme, and they believe firmly in its benefits. Facilitators for participation include professionals' commitment to the programme, their previous positive experiences, their optimistic attitude towards the prognosis of cancer and their trust in the health system and accessibility. Barriers include invitees' lack of independence to make decisions, fear of a positive test result and patient vulnerability and labour mobility of the health professionals. CONCLUSIONS Professionals show a high degree of involvement and identify primary care is an appropriate place to carry out disease prevention. They identify the closeness to patients, the personal attitude and the characteristics of the health system as key factors that influence participation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saloa Unanue-Arza
- Department of Nursing, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), Leioa, Spain
| | - Isabel Portillo
- Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain.,Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Isabel Idígoras
- Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain.,Biocruces Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - Inmaculada Arostegui
- Department of Applied Mathematics, Statistics and Operations Research. Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV-EHU), Leioa, Spain.,Basque Center for Applied Mathematics-BCAM, Bilbao, Spain.,Red de Investigación en Servicios Sanitarios y Enfermedades Crónicas-REDISSEC, Madrid, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Sazali MF, Rahim SSSA, Hayati F, Mohd Daud MN, Avoi R, Omar A, Atil A, Abd Rahim MA, Madrim MF, Mokti K, Ramdzan AR, Sidek Ahmad ZN, Zakaria AD, Che Ani MF, Ibrahim AF, Azhar ZI, Jeffree MS, Hassan MR. Colorectal cancer and potential predictors of never screened for faecal occult blood test: a narrative review. J Public Health Res 2021; 11. [PMID: 34351098 PMCID: PMC8859728 DOI: 10.4081/jphr.2021.2377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 06/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health threat. Therefore, CRC screening uptake has been a focus with the established precancerous lesion and the strong association of early detection with staging and survival of the disease. However, CRC screening is relatively low in many countries. This article briefly discussed the current situation of CRC, recommendations, and current uptake of CRC screening in various countries. Besides that, this article also highlights the potential factors that help to predict the CRC screening uptake worldwide. Identification of those factors could guide policymakers to develop an effective strategy to improve the CRC screening uptake and ultimately improve the health outcome of the population. Significance for public health This study highlights the public health challenge in early screening for colorectal cancer (CRC). The prevalence of never screened for faecal occult blood test is relatively high. This review dissects the issue and further discuss on the predictors, which could guide policymakers in developing strategy to improve CRC screening uptake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohd Fazeli Sazali
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Syed Sharizman Syed Abdul Rahim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Firdaus Hayati
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu.
| | - Mohd Nazri Mohd Daud
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Richard Avoi
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Azizan Omar
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Azman Atil
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Muhammad Aklil Abd Rahim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Mohd Faizal Madrim
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Khalid Mokti
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Abdul Rahman Ramdzan
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Zulkhairul Naim Sidek Ahmad
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Andee Dzulkarnaen Zakaria
- Department of General Surgery, Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kota Bharu, Kelantan.
| | - Mohd Firdaus Che Ani
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor.
| | - Aini Fahriza Ibrahim
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Sarawak, Kota Samarahan, Sarawak.
| | - Zahir Izuan Azhar
- Department of Public Health Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Teknologi MARA, Selangor.
| | - Mohammad Saffree Jeffree
- Community and Family Medicine Department, Faculty of Medicine and Health Science, Universiti Malaysia Sabah, Kota Kinabalu, Sabah.
| | - Mohd Rohaizat Hassan
- Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Bandar Tun Razak, Cheras, Kuala Lumpur.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Reich M, Buki LP. Colorectal cancer screening in Uruguay: current assessment and roadmap for the future. PSICOLOGIA-REFLEXAO E CRITICA 2021; 34:20. [PMID: 34185179 PMCID: PMC8241939 DOI: 10.1186/s41155-021-00178-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 04/25/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Cancer is a leading cause of death worldwide and is expected to remain a public health concern for years to come. Within Latin America, Uruguay has the highest colorectal cancer rates. Heeding past calls to action, in this article we provide a critical assessment of colorectal cancer needs and opportunities in Uruguay with a focus on developing a roadmap for future action. First, we provide an overview of risk factors, screening procedures and guidelines, and screening rates. Next, we provide an overview of psychosocial factors that influence colorectal cancer screening, with the goal of providing guidance for future behavioral health promotion initiatives in Uruguay. In this effort, we present four conceptual models that may be used for interventions: the ecological systems theory, informed decision-making, the health beliefs model, and the health literacy model. Subsequently, we propose using an integrated model based on the ecological systems theory and health literacy model to develop national, local, and community-based interventions to increase screening rates and lower the colorectal cancer burden in Uruguay. We close the paper with a summary and implications section, including recommendations for future research programs focused on the assessment of factors that influence screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Micaela Reich
- Universidad Católica del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.
| | - Lydia P Buki
- University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, 33146, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mosquera I, Mendizabal N, Martín U, Bacigalupe A, Aldasoro E, Portillo I. Inequalities in participation in colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review. Eur J Public Health 2021; 30:416-425. [PMID: 32361732 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/ckz236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a major public health problem due to its incidence and mortality. Screening programmes help decrease its impact on the population through early detection. However, the uneven distribution of social determinants of health can cause inequalities. The aim of this study is to identify the social inequalities in the participation in CRC screening programmes. METHODS A systematic review of the literature was carried out, searching in both health and social databases for papers published since 2000 in English, Spanish, Portuguese and French. The search strategies combined terms regarding screening, CRC, participation and social inequalities. Included papers were quantitative or qualitative primary studies analyzing gender and socioeconomic inequalities in the participation in CRC screening programmes implemented by public and private health-care providers and addressing 45- to 75-year-old population. RESULTS A total of 96 studies, described in 102 articles, were included. Most were quantitative observational studies and analyzed population-based screening programmes. They were carried out mainly in the UK (n=29) and the USA (n=18). Participation in screening programmes varied from 1.1% to 82.8% using several methods. A total of 87 studies assessed participation by sex and one focussed on men, but only two provided an analysis from a gender perspective. Although men are at a higher risk of developing CRC, they generally were less likely to participate in screening programmes. Screening attendance was higher among the least deprived areas. CONCLUSIONS Gender and socioeconomic inequalities in CRC screening participation should be addressed through the design of tailored interventions with a multidimensional focus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Mosquera
- Cirugía Computacional, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.,Department of Sociology 2, Social and Communication Sciences Faculty, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.,OPIK - Research Group on Social Determinants of Health and Demographic Change, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Nere Mendizabal
- Integración de la Prevención y Promoción de la Salud en la Práctica Clínica, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Unai Martín
- Department of Sociology 2, Social and Communication Sciences Faculty, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.,OPIK - Research Group on Social Determinants of Health and Demographic Change, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Amaia Bacigalupe
- Department of Sociology 2, Social and Communication Sciences Faculty, University of the Basque Country UPV-EHU, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain.,OPIK - Research Group on Social Determinants of Health and Demographic Change, Leioa, Bizkaia, Spain
| | - Elena Aldasoro
- Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, Office of Public Health and Addictions, Vitoria-Gasteiz, Araba, Spain
| | - Isabel Portillo
- Cirugía Computacional, Biocruces Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Bizkaia, Spain.,Osakidetza Basque Health Service, Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, Bilbao, Bizkaia, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Clarke N, Kearney PM, Gallagher P, McNamara D, O'Morain CA, Sharp L. Negative emotions and cancer fatalism are independently associated with uptake of Faecal Immunochemical Test-based colorectal cancer screening: Results from a population-based study. Prev Med 2021; 145:106430. [PMID: 33482227 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2021.106430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Although systematic colorectal cancer screening is efficacious, many programmes suffer from low uptake. Few behavioural or attitudinal factors have been identified as being associated with participation in colorectal cancer screening. We explored knowledge, beliefs about cancer, subjective health literacy, emotional attitudes to screening, and social influences among individuals invited to a population-based screening programme. Regression modelling of a cross-sectional survey of 2299 individuals (users and non-users) of a population-based Faecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) screening programme in Dublin was conducted. Questions were derived from previous theoretically-informed qualitative work and assessed using previously used and validated measures. The primary outcome variable was uptake status (User/Participation or Non-User/Non-participation); multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the odds ratios (OR) for screening participation. Stronger fatalistic beliefs independently predicted lower uptake (OR = 0.94; 95% CI 0.90-0.98; P = 0.003). Those aged <65 who disagreed that "cancer can often be cured" also had lower uptake (OR = 0.43; 95% CI 0.22-0.82: P = 0.017). Agreement that the test was disgusting and tempting fate predicted lower uptake (OR = 0.16: 95% CI 0.10-0.27: p < 0.001), while the influence of a partner on decision to be screened was associated with higher uptake (OR = 1.32; 95% CI 1.15-1.50: P < 0.001). Negative cancer-related and screening-related beliefs and emotions are associated with non-participation in FIT (-based screening). Research is warranted to explore if these negative beliefs and emotions are modifiable and, if so, whether this would improve screening uptake. The association between the influence of a partner and screening participation present a challenge around improving uptake among those not in co-habiting relationships.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Linda Sharp
- Newcastle University Centre for Cancer, Population Health Sciences Institute, Newcastle University, England, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Solís-Ibinagagoitia M, Unanue-Arza S, Díaz-Seoane M, Martínez-Indart L, Lebeña-Maluf A, Idigoras I, Bilbao I, Portillo I. Factors Related to Non-participation in the Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme. Front Public Health 2020; 8:604385. [PMID: 33363095 PMCID: PMC7760939 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2020.604385] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Despite the high participation rates in the Basque Country, colorectal cancer screening programme (Spain), there is still a part of the population that has never participated. Since it is essential to ensure equal access to health services, it is necessary to identify the determinants of health and socio-economic factors related to non-participation in the screening programme. Methods: Cross sectional descriptive study including all invited population in a complete round between 2015 and the first trimester of 2017. Health risk factors available in medical records and their control have been analyzed using univariate and multivariate analyses. Results: 515,388 people were invited at the programme with a 71.9% of fecal immunochemical test participation rate. Factors that increase the risk of non-participation are: being men (OR = 1.10, 95% CI 1.09-1.12); younger than 60 (OR = 1.18, 95% CI 1.17-1.20); smoker (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.18-1.22); hypertensive (OR = 1.14, 95% CI 1.12-1.15) and diabetic (OR = 1.40, 95% CI 1.36-1.43); having severe comorbidity (OR = 2.09, 95% CI 2.00-2.19) and very high deprivation (OR = 1.15, 95% CI 1.12-1.17), as well as making <6 appointments to Primary Care in 3 years (OR = 2.39, 95% CI 2.33-2.45). Still, the area under the curve (AUC) indicates that there are more factors related to non-participation. Conclusions: The participation in the Basque Country colorectal cancer-screening Programme is related to some risk factors controlled by Primary Care among others. Therefore, the involvement of these professionals could improve, not only the adherence to the CRC screening, but also other health styles and preventive interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - S Unanue-Arza
- Department of Nursing I, Faculty of Medicine and Nursing, University of the Basque Country UPV/EHU, Leioa, Spain
| | - M Díaz-Seoane
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, University Clinical Hospital of Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain
| | | | - A Lebeña-Maluf
- BioCruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain
| | - I Idigoras
- BioCruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.,Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain
| | - I Bilbao
- Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain
| | - I Portillo
- BioCruces-Bizkaia Health Research Institute, Barakaldo, Spain.,Basque Country Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme, Osakidetza, Basque Health Service, Bilbao, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Thulin T, Strömberg U, Holmén A, Hultcrantz R, Forsberg A. Sociodemographic changes in the population frequency of colonoscopy following the implementation of organised bowel cancer screening: An analysis of data from Swedish registers, 2006-2015. J Med Screen 2020; 28:244-251. [PMID: 32957834 PMCID: PMC8366167 DOI: 10.1177/0969141320957708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess sociodemographic changes in the population frequency of colonoscopy (PFC; number of colonoscopies per 1000 inhabitants per year) among people aged 50-74 in relation to the implementation of a regional colorectal cancer screening programme for people aged 60-69 in the Stockholm-Gotland region (RSG) in 2008. METHOD The PFC was estimated by year (2006-2015), pre- and post-implementation of colorectal cancer screening programme (2006-2007 vs. 2014-2015), age, sex, residential region, immigrant status and educational level. The data were obtained from Swedish patient and population registers. RESULTS The PFC largely increased during 2006-2015 in all six Swedish regions. The estimated increase in the pre- vs. post period PFC (ΔPFC) within the RSG was (i) greater for men than for women (5.8 vs. 4.5) and (ii) smaller for people aged 70-74 than for those aged 60-69 (5.5 vs. 9.0), while the corresponding ΔPFCs within each of the other regions were (i) not greater, or even smaller, for men and (ii) not smaller, or even larger, for elderly people aged 70-74. CONCLUSION A regional implementation of an organised colorectal cancer screening programme did not lead to a higher PFC increase in the screening relevant age group 50-74 years. Nevertheless, changes in the PFC were more pronounced for men and less pronounced for people aged 70-74 than those invited to participate in the screening programme (60-69 years), as compared with the rest of Sweden (without organised colorectal cancer screening).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Torbjörn Thulin
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
- Torbjörn Thulin, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
| | - Ulf Strömberg
- Department of Research and Development, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
- School of Public Health and Community Medicine, Institute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anders Holmén
- Department of Research and Development, Region Halland, Halmstad, Sweden
| | - Rolf Hultcrantz
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| | - Anna Forsberg
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Colorectal Cancer Survival in 50- to 69-Year-Olds after Introducing the Faecal Immunochemical Test. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:cancers12092412. [PMID: 32854370 PMCID: PMC7565457 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 08/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Population screening has improved early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC). Nonetheless, most cases are diagnosed in symptomatic patients. Faecal immunochemical testing has been recommended for assessing patients with lower gastrointestinal symptoms, but whether it improves patient survival is unknown. Our objective was to compare CRC survival in 50- to 69-year-olds between asymptomatic screen-detected patients and symptomatic patients by route to diagnosis. Methods: We identified all cases of CRC diagnosed in 50-to 69-year-olds between 2009 and 2016, in Donostialdea (Gipuzkoa, Spain). Three groups were created: 1-screen-detected CRC; 2-CRC detected in symptomatic patients after a positive faecal immunochemical test(FIT); and 3-CRC detected in symptomatic patients without a FIT or after a negative result. We analysed survival using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Results: Of 930 patients diagnosed with CRC, 433 cases were detected through screening and 497 in symptomatic patients, 7.9% after a positive FIT and 45.5% by other means. The 3-year CRC survival was significantly lower in group 3 (69.5%) than groups 1 (93%; p = 0.007) or 2 (87.5%; p = 0.02). The risk of death was lower in groups 1 (HR 0.42, 95% CI 0.30–0.58) and 2 (HR 0.51; 95% CI 0.29–0.87). Conclusion: Half of CRC cases in 50- to 69-year-olds are diagnosed outside screening. Use of the FIT as a diagnostic strategy in symptomatic patients may improve survival.
Collapse
|
20
|
Bowen DJ, Hyams T, Laurino M, Woolley T, Cohen S, Leppig KA, Jarvik G. Development of FamilyTalk: an Intervention to Support Communication and Educate Families About Colorectal Cancer Risk. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2020; 35:470-478. [PMID: 30737640 PMCID: PMC6688969 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-019-1484-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2023]
Abstract
IFamily members of individuals with colorectal cancer (CRC) may be at increased risk of developing the disease. However, the majority of CRC can be prevented through colonoscopy screening and family members may not be aware if they are recommended to pursue earlier screening because of their family history of CRC. As such, tools must be developed to effectively communicate potential changes to the recommended age for colonoscopy screening and other important CRC-related information to family members. We modified and adapted a successful intervention for families with melanoma to be appropriate for families with CRC to increase communication and screening in family members. The multistep process included the following: (1) developing a paper version of the intervention, (2) piloting the paper version among families with CRC, (3) developing the web-based version, and (4) testing the intervention for usability. Qualitative data was collected and analyzed for pilot testing. Usability testing utilized both qualitative and quantitative data. Patients with CRC liked the paper version and had multiple suggestions, including adding a better introduction, sections on genetics and family history, and clearer communication assistance. The web-based tool was well received and improved upon the linear book format with links, better section instructions, and more proactive communication tools for families. These processes produced materials that satisfied individuals from various families with assistance and support for communicating about CRC. Evaluating the effects of the tools in rigorous research projects is the next step.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Deborah J Bowen
- Department of Bioethics and Humanities, University of Washington, Box 357120, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA.
| | - Travis Hyams
- Department of Behavioral and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA
| | - Mercy Laurino
- Genetics and Cancer Prevention Programs, Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Stacey Cohen
- Division of Oncology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | | | - Gail Jarvik
- Department of Medicine, Division of Medical Genetics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Keum N, Giovannucci E. Global burden of colorectal cancer: emerging trends, risk factors and prevention strategies. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 16:713-732. [PMID: 31455888 DOI: 10.1038/s41575-019-0189-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1236] [Impact Index Per Article: 247.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Globally, colorectal cancer (CRC) is the third most commonly diagnosed malignancy and the second leading cause of cancer death. Arising through three major pathways, including adenoma-carcinoma sequence, serrated pathway and inflammatory pathway, CRC represents an aetiologically heterogeneous disease according to subtyping by tumour anatomical location or global molecular alterations. Genetic factors such as germline MLH1 and APC mutations have an aetiologic role, predisposing individuals to CRC. Yet, the majority of CRC is sporadic and largely attributable to the constellation of modifiable environmental risk factors characterizing westernization (for example, obesity, physical inactivity, poor diets, alcohol drinking and smoking). As such, the burden of CRC is shifting towards low-income and middle-income countries as they become westernized. Furthermore, the rising incidence of CRC at younger ages (before age 50 years) is an emerging trend. This Review provides a comprehensive summary of CRC epidemiology, with emphasis on modifiable lifestyle and nutritional factors, chemoprevention and screening. Overall, the optimal reduction of CRC incidence and mortality will require concerted efforts to reduce modifiable risk factors, to leverage chemoprevention research and to promote population-wide and targeted screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- NaNa Keum
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Department of Food Science and Biotechnology, Dongguk University, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Edward Giovannucci
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. .,Channing Division of Network Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. .,Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Portillo I, Arana-Arri E, Gutiérrez-Ibarluzea I, Bilbao I, Luis Hurtado J, Sarasqueta C, Idigoras I, Bujanda L. Factors related to the participation and detection of lesions in colorectal cancer screening programme-based faecal immunochemical test. Eur J Public Health 2019; 28:1143-1148. [PMID: 29982586 DOI: 10.1093/eurpub/cky109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The overall aim of this study was to describe trends in participation rates and detection of lesions in a colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme, during three rounds, using faecal immunochemical test (FIT). Methods National registers were used to collect data on invitations for CRC screening in the Basque Country (Spain) from 2009 to 2014. Information about participation, age, gender and lesions in each round were collected. Results A total of 961.533 individuals were included in the analysis; respectively, 584.950, 298.143 and 78.440 in the first, second and third rounds. The average participation rate was 68.4% (66.8, 70.4 and 72.3%, respectively by round; P < 0.001) and the positivity rate was 6.3% (7, 5.5 and 5.4%, respectively by round; P < 0.001). The participation rate increased significantly with age and was found to be higher in women versus men. A total of 15.144 advanced adenomas and 2.131 CRCs were diagnosed, leading to a detection rate of 23.9 and 3.4‰, respectively. Regarding gender, men had the highest rates in all periods and rounds. The detection rate of advanced neoplasia was lower in the regular when compared with irregular paricipants. Conclusions In a CRC screening, this organization obtained high FIT participation rates. Older participants and women were associated with a higher participation. The detection rate of lesions was higher in men, independent on age and round.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabel Portillo
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | | | - Isabel Bilbao
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Sarasqueta
- Hospital Universitario Donostia/Instituto Biodonostia, Red de Investigación en Servicios de Salud en Enfermedades Crónicas (REDISSEC), San Sebastián, Spain
| | - Isabel Idigoras
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordination Center, Bilbao, Spain
| | - Luis Bujanda
- Gastroenterology Department, Instituto Biodonostia, University of Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepaticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), San Sebastián, Spain
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Bobridge A, Price K, Gill TK, Taylor AW. Influencing Cancer Screening Participation Rates-Providing a Combined Cancer Screening Program (a 'One Stop' Shop) Could Be a Potential Answer. Front Oncol 2017; 7:308. [PMID: 29322029 PMCID: PMC5733549 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2017.00308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/28/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Participation in established cancer screening programs remains variable. Therefore, a renewed focus on how to increase screening uptake, including addressing structural barriers such as time, travel, and cost is needed. One approach could be the provision of combined cancer screening, where multiple screening tests are provided at the same time and location (essentially a ‘One Stop’ screening shop). This cohort study explored both cancer screening behavior and the acceptability of a combined screening approach. Methods Participants of the North Western Adelaide Health Study (NWAHS), South Australia were invited to participate in a questionnaire about cancer screening behaviors and the acceptability of a proposed ‘One Stop’ cancer screening shop. Data were collected from 10th August 2015 to 18th January 2016, weighted for selection probability, age, and sex and analyzed using descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analysis. Results 1,562 people, 52% female (mean age 54.1 years ± 15.2) participated. Reported screening participation was low, the highest being for Pap Smear (34.4%). Common reasons for screening participation were preventing sickness (56.1%, CI 53.2–59.0%), maintaining health (51%, CI 48–53.9%), and free program provision (30.9%, CI 28.2–33.6%). Females were less likely to state that screening is not beneficial [OR 0.37 (CI 0.21–0.66), p < 0.001] and to cite sickness prevention [OR 2.10 (CI 1.46–3.00), p < 0.001] and free program [OR 1.75 (CI 1.22–2.51), p < 0.003] as reasons for screening participation. Of those who did not participate, 34.6% (CI 30.3–39.1%) stated that there was nothing that discouraged them from participation, with 55- to 64-year olds [OR 0.24 (CI 0.07–0.74), p < 0.04] being less likely to cite this reason. 21% (CI 17.2–24.8%) thought they did not need screening, while a smaller proportion stated not having time (6.9%, CI 4.9–9.7%) and the costs associated with screening (5.2%, CI 3.5–7.7%). The majority of participants (85.3%, CI 81.9–88.2%) supported multiple screening being offered at the same time and location. Conclusion Identified screening behaviors in this study are similar to those reported in the literature. The high support for the concept of combined cancer screening demonstrates that this type of approach is acceptable to potential end users and warrants further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kay Price
- University of South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Vanaclocha-Espi M, Ibáñez J, Molina-Barceló A, Pérez E, Nolasco A, Font R, Pérez-Riquelme F, de la Vega M, Arana-Arri E, Oceja M, Espinàs JA, Portillo I, Salas D. Factors influencing participation in colorectal cancer screening programs in Spain. Prev Med 2017; 105:190-196. [PMID: 28887191 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2017.08.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2017] [Revised: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 08/16/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
To analyze the sociodemographic and organizational factors influencing participation in population-based colorectal cancer screening programs (CRCSP) in Spain, a retrospective study was conducted in a cohort of people invited to participate in the first 3 screening rounds of 6 CRCSP from 2000 to 2012. Mixed logistic regression models were used to analyze the relationship between sociodemographic and organizational factors, such as the type of fecal occult blood test (FOBT) used and the FOBT delivery type. The analysis was performed separately in groups (Initial screening-first invitation, Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders, Subsequent invitation-regular, Subsequent invitation-irregular intervals). The results showed that, in the Initial screening-first invitation group, participation was higher in women than in men in all age groups (OR 1.05 in persons aged 50-59years and OR 1.12 in those aged 60-69years). Participation was also higher when no action was required to receive the FOBT kit, independently of the type of screening (Initial screening-first invitation [OR 2.24], Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders [OR 2.14], Subsequent invitation-regular [OR 2.03], Subsequent invitation-irregular intervals [OR 9.38]) and when quantitative rather than qualitative immunological FOBT (FIT) was offered (Initial screening-first invitation [OR 0.70], Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders [OR 0.12], Subsequent invitation-regular [OR 0.20]) or guaiac testing (Initial screening-first invitation [OR 0.81], Subsequent invitation for previous never-responders [OR 0.88], Subsequent invitation-regular [OR 0.73]). In conclusion, the results of this study show that screening participation could be enhanced by inclusion of the FOBT kit with the screening invitation and the use of the quantitative FIT.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Josefa Ibáñez
- Cancer and Public Health Area, FISABIO - Public Health, Valencia, Spain; General Directorate Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain
| | | | - Elena Pérez
- Cancer and Public Health Area, FISABIO - Public Health, Valencia, Spain; General Directorate Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain
| | | | - Rebeca Font
- Catalan Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, Catalonia, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute, Bellvitge, (IDIBELL) - L'Hospitalet de LLob, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francisco Pérez-Riquelme
- General Directorate Public Health, Murcia, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute of Murcia (IMIB-Arrixaca-UMU), University Clinical Hospital "Virgen de la Arrixaca", University of Murcia, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Josep Alfons Espinàs
- Catalan Cancer Strategy, Department of Health, Catalonia, Spain; Biomedical Research Institute, Bellvitge, (IDIBELL) - L'Hospitalet de LLob, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Dolores Salas
- Cancer and Public Health Area, FISABIO - Public Health, Valencia, Spain; General Directorate Public Health, Valencian Community, Spain.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kang Y, Son H. Gender Differences in Factors Associated With Colorectal Cancer Screening: A National Cross-Sectional Study in Korea. Asia Pac J Public Health 2017; 29:495-505. [PMID: 28679285 DOI: 10.1177/1010539517718336] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The rate of and factors influencing colorectal cancer screening differs by gender. We aimed to determine the behaviors for and predict the factors influencing self-reported colorectal cancer screening in Korean adults. Secondary analysis was performed with data from the cross-sectional 2012 Community Health Survey. We examined the relationship between gender and self-reported screening using data for 115 045 adults aged ≥50 years; 62.4% of men and 65.5% of women underwent colorectal cancer screening. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, men with private insurance and who attended regular health checkups were more likely to undergo screening; men who were employed, ate salty food, were older, or smoked were less likely. Women with private insurance, who lived with a spouse, were more educated, were housewives, or attended regular health checkups were more likely, and older women were less likely to undergo screening. Therefore, gender-specific interventions are needed to encourage colorectal cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Youngmi Kang
- 1 Kyung Hee University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Heesook Son
- 2 Chung-Ang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Clarke N, McNamara D, Kearney PM, O'Morain CA, Shearer N, Sharp L. The role of area-level deprivation and gender in participation in population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening. Prev Med 2016; 93:198-203. [PMID: 27765660 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2016.10.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2016] [Revised: 09/06/2016] [Accepted: 10/13/2016] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
This study aimed to investigate the effects of sex and deprivation on participation in a population-based faecal immunochemical test (FIT) colorectal cancer screening programme. The study population included 9785 individuals invited to participate in two rounds of a population-based biennial FIT-based screening programme, in a relatively deprived area of Dublin, Ireland. Explanatory variables included in the analysis were sex, deprivation category of area of residence and age (at end of screening). The primary outcome variable modelled was participation status in both rounds combined (with "participation" defined as having taken part in either or both rounds of screening). Poisson regression with a log link and robust error variance was used to estimate relative risks (RR) for participation. As a sensitivity analysis, data were stratified by screening round. In both the univariable and multivariable models deprivation was strongly associated with participation. Increasing affluence was associated with higher participation; participation was 26% higher in people resident in the most affluent compared to the most deprived areas (multivariable RR=1.26: 95% CI 1.21-1.30). Participation was significantly lower in males (multivariable RR=0.96: 95%CI 0.95-0.97) and generally increased with increasing age (trend per age group, multivariable RR=1.02: 95%CI, 1.01-1.02). No significant interactions between the explanatory variables were found. The effects of deprivation and sex were similar by screening round. Deprivation and male gender are independently associated with lower uptake of population-based FIT colorectal cancer screening, even in a relatively deprived setting. Development of evidence-based interventions to increase uptake in these disadvantaged groups is urgently required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Patricia M Kearney
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Ireland.
| | - Colm A O'Morain
- Faculty of Health Science, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Nikki Shearer
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, England.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Bonello B, Ghanouni A, Bowyer HL, MacRae E, Atkin W, Halloran SP, Wardle J, von Wagner C. Using a hypothetical scenario to assess public preferences for colorectal surveillance following screening-detected, intermediate-risk adenomas: annual home-based stool test vs. triennial colonoscopy. BMC Gastroenterol 2016; 16:113. [PMID: 27618798 PMCID: PMC5020544 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-016-0517-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2016] [Accepted: 08/11/2016] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To assess public preferences for colorectal cancer (CRC) surveillance tests for intermediate-risk adenomas, using a hypothetical scenario. METHODS Adults aged 45-54 years without CRC were identified from three General Practices in England (two in Cumbria, one in London). A postal survey was carried out during a separate study on preferences for different first-line CRC screening modalities (non- or full-laxative computed tomographic colonography, flexible sigmoidoscopy, or colonoscopy). Individuals were allocated at random to receive a pack containing information on one first-line test, and a paragraph describing CRC surveillance recommendations for people who are diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas during screening. All participants received a description of two surveillance options: annual single-sample, home-based stool testing (consistent with Faecal Immunochemical Tests; FIT) or triennial colonoscopy. Invitees were asked to imagine they had been diagnosed with intermediate-risk adenomas, and then complete a questionnaire on their surveillance preferences. RESULTS 22.1 % (686/3,100) questionnaires were returned. 491 (15.8 %) were eligible for analysis. The majority of participants stated a surveillance preference for the stool test over colonoscopy (60.8 % vs 31.0 %; no preference: 8.1 %; no surveillance: 0.2 %). Women were more likely to prefer the stool test than men (66.7 % vs. 53.6 %; p = .011). The primary reason for preferring the stool test was that it would be done more frequently. The main reason to prefer colonoscopy was its superiority at finding polyps. CONCLUSIONS A majority of participants stated a preference for a surveillance test resembling FIT over colonoscopy. Future research should test whether this translates to greater adherence in a real surveillance setting. TRIAL REGISTRATION International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number registry, ISRCTN85697880 , prospectively registered on 25/04/2013.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernardette Bonello
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Alex Ghanouni
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Harriet L. Bowyer
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Eilidh MacRae
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Wendy Atkin
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Stephen P. Halloran
- NHS Bowel Cancer Screening Southern Programme Hub, Guildford, Surrey UK
- Royal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trust & University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey UK
| | - Jane Wardle
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| | - Christian von Wagner
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, 1-19 Torrington Place, London, WC1E 7HB UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Clarke N, Gallagher P, Kearney PM, McNamara D, Sharp L. Impact of gender on decisions to participate in faecal immunochemical test-based colorectal cancer screening: a qualitative study. Psychooncology 2016; 25:1456-1462. [PMID: 26864167 DOI: 10.1002/pon.4085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 01/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) are increasingly being used in population-based colorectal cancer-screening programmes. Uptake of FIT is lower in men than women; however, the reasons for this are not well understood. We aimed to explore gender differences in influences on decisions to participate in FIT screening. METHODS This is a qualitative study using in-depth face-to-face interviews of four groups of screening invitees (male and female screening users and male and female screening non-users), purposively sampled from the database of a population-based FIT screening programme. Recruitment continued until saturation was reached. Interviews were audio recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis using the framework approach was employed with the theoretical domains framework guiding analysis. RESULTS Forty-seven screening invitees were interviewed. Six theoretical domains influenced screening uptake: 'environmental context and resources', 'beliefs about capabilities', 'beliefs about consequences', 'emotions', 'social influences' and 'knowledge'. Male non-users were often fatalistic, less knowledgeable and misinformed about cancer and FIT screening compared with other groups. Female non-users expressed negative attitudes, beliefs and emotions towards FIT screening, cancer, social influences and the medical profession and were over-confident about their health. CONCLUSIONS Negative attitudes and emotions to screening dominated non-user decision-making but differed by gender. Opportunities to improve uptake in men and women exist. Greater national discussions on the benefits of FIT screening, and development of screening materials tackling negative attitudes and beliefs while recognising male/female differences, may improve screening uptake. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Clarke
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland.,Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Pamela Gallagher
- School of Nursing and Human Sciences, Dublin City University, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Patricia M Kearney
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
| | - Deirdre McNamara
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Trinity Centre for Health Sciences, Adelaide and Meath Hospital, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Linda Sharp
- National Cancer Registry Ireland, Cork, Ireland.,Institute of Health & Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang H, Guo M, Chen H, Zhang Y, He LY. Effects of CIK on hypoxia inducible factor-1α and T-cell subsets on colon 26 cancer xenograft mice. Oncol Lett 2016; 11:1371-1374. [PMID: 26893745 PMCID: PMC4734316 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2016.4081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2015] [Accepted: 01/07/2016] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Colorectal cancer is a common malignancy of the digestive tract with a high mortality rate. However, current treatment approaches such as radiotherapy and chemotherapy are ineffective. Thus, it is imperative to identify ways to treat recurrence and metastasis. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effects of cytokine-induced killer (CIK) cells on the hypoxia microenvironment and immune function in colon 26 cancer xenograft mice. A murine model of colon 26 carcinoma tumors were divided into CIK, normal saline (NS) and control groups. Hypoxia inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) mRNA in tumor tissue and the small intestine of mice was detected by FQ-PCR. The percentage of the CD4+, CD8+ and CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the spleen of mice was detected by flow cytometry. The tumor volume in the CIK group was smaller than that in the NS group and the difference was not significant (P>0.05). HIF-1α gene expression was present in the tumor tissue and small intestine. HIF-1α gene expression in tumor tissue was significantly higher than that in the small intestine (P<0.05), and lower in tumor tissue of the CIK group compared to the NS group (P<0.05) of xenograft mice. However, no HIF-1α expression was observed in the small intestine of healthy control mice. CD4+ T-cell percentage and CD4+/CD8+ ratio in the spleen of xenograft mice was significantly lower than that of normal mice (P<0.05). Compared to the NS group, the CD4+ T-cell percentage was higher, whereas the CD8+ T-cell percentage was lower in the CIK group (P<0.05). In conclusion, HIF-1α gene expression was present in the tumor tissue and small intestine. The immune function of colon 26 transplanted in tumor mice was decreased. Additionally, CIK improved the microenvironment of tumor hypoxia and promoted immune reconstitution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongzhen Zhang
- Department of Fifth Oncology, Hebei People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China
| | - Mingli Guo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hebei People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China
| | - Hongyao Chen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Hebei People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China
| | - Ying Zhang
- Department of Human Resources, Hebei People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China
| | - Li Ya He
- Department of Fifth Oncology, Hebei People's Hospital, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050051, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Hurtado JL, Bacigalupe A, Calvo M, Esnaola S, Mendizabal N, Portillo I, Idigoras I, Millán E, Arana-Arri E. Social inequalities in a population based colorectal cancer screening programme in the Basque Country. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:1021. [PMID: 26438240 PMCID: PMC4594998 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2370-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2015] [Accepted: 09/29/2015] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While it is known that a variety of factors (biological, behavioural and interventional) play a major role in the health of individuals and populations, the importance of the role of social determinants is less clear. The effect of social inequality on population-based screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) could limit the value of such programmes. The present study aims to determine whether such inequalities exist. METHODS Data was obtained from the population-based screening programme administered in the Autonomous Community of the Basque Country, Spain, with a target population aged 50 to 69, first invited to participate between 2009 and 2011. The magnitude of inequality was analysed using the odds ratio (taking the least disadvantaged socioeconomic quintile as the reference population), the population attributable risk and the relative index of inequality, based on the regression, which is the ratio of the rates in the most and least disadvantaged socioeconomic groups. RESULTS The target population comprised 242,394 people, with the test kit successfully sent to 95.1 % (230,510). The overall response rate was 64.3 % (67.1 in women and 61.4 % men). Among women, the highest participation was in the third quintile (71.5 %) and the lowest in the first - the least disadvantaged (65.7 %). The lowest and highest rates of people with identified lesions were in the second and fourth quintiles (14.7/1000 and 17.0/1000 respectively). Among men, the response rate was lowest in the fifth - most disadvantaged - quintile (60.2 %). The highest rate of identified lesions was in the fifth quintile; 38 % higher than the first (55.7/1000 compared to 41.0/1000). CONCLUSIONS Sex and socioeconomic group influence the rate of participation in the CRC programme and the rate of lesions found in the participants. Any public health programme is morally and ethically obliged to strive for equity and effectiveness. Improving participation of men and socially disadvantaged groups should be taken in account.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Amaia Bacigalupe
- Department of Sociology 2, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Bizkaia, Spain.
| | - Montse Calvo
- Directorate of Health Planning, Department of Health, Basque Government, Araba, Spain.
| | - Santi Esnaola
- Directorate of Health Planning, Department of Health, Basque Government, Araba, Spain.
| | | | - Isabel Portillo
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordinating Centre, Basque Health Service, Bizkaia, Spain.
| | - Isabel Idigoras
- Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Coordinating Centre, Basque Health Service, Bizkaia, Spain.
| | - Eduardo Millán
- Healthcare Services Sub-directorate, Osakidetza-Basque Health Service, Araba, Spain.
| | - Eunate Arana-Arri
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Cruces University Hospital, BioCruces Health Research Institute, 48903, Barakaldo-Bizkaia, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gordon NP, Green BB. Factors associated with use and non-use of the Fecal Immunochemical Test (FIT) kit for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Response to a 2012 outreach screening program: a survey study. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:546. [PMID: 26062732 PMCID: PMC4462185 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-1908-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2015] [Accepted: 06/04/2015] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The one-sample fecal immunochemical test (FIT) is gaining popularity for colorectal cancer (CRC) screening of average-risk people. However, uptake and annual use remain suboptimal. Methods In 2013, we mailed questionnaires to three groups of nonHispanic White, Black, and Latino Kaiser Permanente Northern California (KPNC) members ages 52–76 who received FIT kits in 2010–2012: Continuers did the FIT all 3 years; Converts in 2012, but not 2010 or 2011; and Nonusers in none of the 3 years. The questionnaires covered social influences, perceived CRC risk, reasons for using (Continuers, Converts) or avoiding using (Nonusers) the FIT, and recommendations for improving the kit. Results Continuers (n = 607, response rate 67.5 %), Converts (n = 317, response rate 35.6 %), and Nonusers (n = 215, response rate 21.1 %) did not differ in perceived risk or family history of CRC, but Nonusers were less likely than Continuers and Converts to know someone who had polyps or CRC. Continuers, Converts, and Nonusers did not differ in social network encouragement of CRC screening, but did differ in believing that it was very important that they be screened (88.3 %, 68.4 %, 47.7 %) and that their medical team thought it very important that they be screened (88.6 %, 79.9 %, 53.9 %). Approximately half of Continuers and Converts completed the FIT to please their doctor. Converts were less likely than Continuers to use the FIT to “make sure they were OK” (53.7 % vs. 72.6 %) or “protect their health” (46.1 % vs. 76.4 %). Nearly half of Converts completed the FIT out of guilt. Approximately half of FIT kit users suggested adding a disposable glove, extra paper, and wider-mouth tube to the kit. Nonusers’ reasons for not using the FIT included discomfort, disgust, or embarrassment (59.6 %); thinking it unnecessary (32.9 %); fatalism/fear (15.5 %); and thinking it too difficult to use (14.5 %), but <10 % did not want CRC screening at all. Conclusions Nonusers and irregular users of the FIT are less intrinsically motivated to get CRC screening than long-term users and more averse to preparing their stool sample. Changes to the FIT kit to address discomfort and difficulty factors might improve uptake and continued use. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-015-1908-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy P Gordon
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA, 94611, USA.
| | - Beverly B Green
- Group Health Research Institute, Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, WA, USA. greenb.@ghc.org
| |
Collapse
|