1
|
Tai TS, Tsai CF, Yang HY. Thyroid cancer risk in women after hysterectomy: A nationwide cohort study. Maturitas 2024; 185:107980. [PMID: 38555761 DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2024.107980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2023] [Revised: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/24/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Hysterectomy is commonly performed for benign uterine pathologies but there is some controversy over whether it is associated with an increased risk of thyroid cancer. This study examines the associations of hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thyroid cancer incidence in Taiwan. METHODS We analyzed data from a nationwide health insurance claims database and identified 29,577 women aged ≥30 years who underwent hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy between 2000 and 2016. Propensity score-matching analyses were performed at ratios of 1:1 for the hysterectomy and no-hysterectomy groups, to reduce selection bias. We monitored thyroid cancer occurrence in both groups until 2017. Cox regression was used to calculate hazard ratios with 95 % confidence intervals and determine thyroid cancer risk in women who underwent hysterectomy. RESULTS The study comprised 29,577 patients who underwent any hysterectomy and 29,577 participants who did not. The mean follow-up period was 10.03 ± 4.92 years. Patients who underwent hysterectomy had higher thyroid cancer incidence (4.72 per 10,000 person-years) than those who did not (3.06 per 10,000 person-years) and a greater risk of any thyroid cancer (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.40; 95 % confidence interval = 1.08-1.82). However, there was no association between hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and thyroid cancer incidence (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS Our findings suggest that women who undergo hysterectomy are at a higher risk of developing thyroid cancer than those who do not.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsai-Sung Tai
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Internal Medicine, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City 60002, Taiwan
| | - Ching-Fang Tsai
- Clinical Data Center, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City 60002, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Yi Yang
- Clinical Data Center, Ditmanson Medical Foundation Chia-Yi Christian Hospital, Chiayi City 60002, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hassan H, Allen I, Sofianopoulou E, Walburga Y, Turnbull C, Eccles DM, Tischkowitz M, Pharoah P, Antoniou AC. Long-term outcomes of hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2024; 230:44-57. [PMID: 37364803 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.06.043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/28/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to provide an up-to-date systematic review of "the long-term outcomes of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy at the time of hysterectomy" and perform a meta-analysis for the reported associations. DATA SOURCES Our study updated a previous systematic review by searching the literature using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase for publications between January 2015 and August 2022. STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA Our study included studies of women who had a hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy vs women who had a hysterectomy with ovarian conservation or no surgery. METHODS The quality of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations. Adjusted hazard ratios were extracted and combined to obtain fixed effect estimates. RESULTS Compared with hysterectomy or no surgery, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in young women was associated with decreased risk of breast cancer (hazard ratio, 0.78; 95% confidence interval, 0.73-0.84) but with an increased risk of colorectal cancer (hazard ratio, 1.27; 95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.47). In addition, it was associated with an increased risk of total cardiovascular diseases, coronary heart disease, and stroke with hazard ratios of 1.18 (95% confidence interval, 1.11-1.25), 1.17 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.25), and 1.20 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-1.31), respectively. Compared with no surgery, hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy before the age of 50 years was associated with an increased risk of hyperlipidemia (hazard ratio, 1.44; 95% confidence interval, 1.25-1.65), diabetes mellitus (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.24), hypertension (hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 1.06-1.20), dementia (hazard ratio, 1.70; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-2.69), and depression (hazard ratio, 1.39; 95% confidence interval, 1.22-1.60). The evidence on the association with all-cause mortality in young women showed substantial heterogeneity between the studies (I2=85%; P<.01). CONCLUSION Hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy was associated with multiple long-term outcomes. The benefits of the addition of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to hysterectomy should be balanced against the risks.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hend Hassan
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.
| | - Isaac Allen
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Eleni Sofianopoulou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Yvonne Walburga
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Clare Turnbull
- Translational Genetics Team, Division of Genetics and Epidemiology, Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom
| | - Diana M Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Marc Tischkowitz
- Department of Medical Genetics, National Institute for Health Research, Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Antonis C Antoniou
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Center for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Fabiani R, Rosignoli P, Giacchetta I, Chiavarini M. Hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis. GLOBAL EPIDEMIOLOGY 2023; 6:100122. [PMID: 37860218 PMCID: PMC10582318 DOI: 10.1016/j.gloepi.2023.100122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Revised: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Incidence rates of thyroid cancer have increased. Recent studies findings suggest that women who underwent a hysterectomy have an elevated relative risk of thyroid cancer. The aim of our meta-analysis is to summarize the evidence about the association between hysterectomy and thyroid cancer risk. Methods PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus database were searched for studies published up to 5 September 2023. The PRISMA statement was followed. Heterogeneity was explored with Q statistic and the I2 statistic. Publication bias was assessed with Begg's and Egger's tests. Results Sixteen studies met the criteria. The pooled analysis showed a significantly 64% increment of thyroid cancer risk in association with any hysterectomy (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.48-1.81; I2 = 28.68%, p = 0.156). Hysterectomy without oophorectomy was a stronger predictor of risk than hysterectomy with oophorectomy. The pooled analysis of data regarding hysterectomy without oophorectomy showed a statistically significant increment of thyroid cancer risk by 59%. Hysterectomy with oophorectomy was associated with an increase of thyroid cancer risk of 39% (OR 1.39, 95% CI 1.16-1.67; I2 = 42.10%, p = 0.049). Significant publication bias was not detected. Conclusions Our findings help with decision making around these surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Fabiani
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia 06122, Italy
| | - Patrizia Rosignoli
- Department of Chemistry, Biology and Biotechnology, University of Perugia, Perugia 06122, Italy
| | - Irene Giacchetta
- School of Specialization in Hygiene and Preventive Medicine, University of Perugia, Perugia 06132, Italy
| | - Manuela Chiavarini
- Department of Biomedical Sciences and Public Health, Section of Hygiene, Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Polytechnic University of the Marche Region, 60121 Ancona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang H, Nam SY, Jo J. Effect of chronic viral hepatitis and metabolic factors on renal cancer risk in a large cohort in Republic of Korea. Prev Med 2023; 175:107714. [PMID: 37758123 DOI: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2023.107714] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2023] [Revised: 09/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/23/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE We investigated the association between hepatic and metabolic factors and renal cancer risk. METHODS This population-based cohort study included cancer-free individuals who underwent general health evaluation (January to December 2010) at the Korean National Health Insurance Service and followed-up through 2017. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI), determined by adjusted Cox regression analysis were used to investigate the effect of variables on renal cancer risk. RESULTS Among 4,518,704 subjects, 6531 patients developed renal cancer. Adjusted analyses of epidemiological factors and BMI (body mass index) (Model I) showed serum high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) ≥60 mg/dL (adjusted HR [aHR] 0.88, 95% CI, 0.81-0.95) reduced renal cancer risk comparing to low HDL-C, whereas hepatitis B virus (HBV) antigen (aHR 1.41, 95% CI 1.19-1.68) and chronic HBV infection (aHR 1.65, 95% CI 1.26-2.17) increased its risk. Higher BMI increased renal cancer risk in dose-dependent manner (P for trend <0.001). This association persisted after adjustment for epidemiological factors and waist circumference (Model II). Sex-specific analyses showed similar effect of HBV antigen and chronic HBV infection in both sexes. Normal (50-59 mg/dL in women) or high (≥60 mg/dL in men) HDL-C reduced renal cancer risk. Alcohol consumption increased kidney cancer risk in age ≥ 60 years, but it had no association with renal cancer in age < 60 years. CONCLUSIONS High serum HDL-C levels reduced and HBV antigen and chronic HBV infection increased renal cancer risk across different adjusted analysis models. This effect of low HDL-C and chronic HBV infection persisted in sex-based subanalysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hoyoung Wang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Su Youn Nam
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National U-653rsity Hospital, Buk-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
| | - Junwoo Jo
- Department of Statistics, Kyungpook National University, Buk-gu, Daegu, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yu L, Yu P, Lu Y. Is hysterectomy associated with kidney cancer risk? A meta-analysis of cohort studies. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1181112. [PMID: 37546408 PMCID: PMC10397505 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1181112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2023] [Accepted: 07/03/2023] [Indexed: 08/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Emerging evidence have suggested a potential relationship between hysterectomy and risk of kidney cancer with inconsistent results. We aimed to investigate the association of hysterectomy with kidney cancer risk based on a meta-analysis of all available cohort studies. Methods A comprehensive literature search was performed in the PubMed and Embase database, covering all the papers published by September 2022. The pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were estimated using a DerSimonian and Laird random effects model. Results Overall, our meta-analysis included 10 cohorts from 9 studies with approximately 240 million participants. The pooled RR with its 95% CI showed a significantly positive association between hysterectomy and risk of kidney cancer (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.19-1.41). No obvious heterogeneity was observed across the studies (P = 0.206 for heterogeneity; I2 = 25.9%). Conclusion Findings from this meta-analysis of cohort studies indicated that hysterectomy was positively associated with subsequent kidney cancer risk. Further large prospective studies with long-term follow-up are warranted to verify these findings.
Collapse
|
6
|
Clasen JL, Mabunda R, Heath AK, Kaaks R, Katzke V, Schulze MB, Birukov A, Tagliabue G, Chiodini P, Tumino R, Milani L, Braaten T, Gram I, Lukic M, Luján‐Barroso L, Rodriguez‐Barranco M, Chirlaque M, Ardanaz E, Amiano P, Manjer J, Huss L, Ljungberg B, Travis R, Smith‐Byrne K, Gunter M, Johansson M, Rinaldi S, Weiderpass E, Riboli E, Cross AJ, Muller DC. Reproductive and hormonal factors and risk of renal cell carcinoma among women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition. Cancer Med 2023; 12:15588-15600. [PMID: 37269199 PMCID: PMC10417104 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/15/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is twice as common among men compared with women, and hormonal factors have been suggested to partially explain this difference. There is currently little evidence on the roles of reproductive and hormonal risk factors in RCC aetiology. MATERIALS & METHODS We investigated associations of age at menarche and age at menopause, pregnancy-related factors, hysterectomy and ovariectomy and exogenous hormone use with RCC risk among 298,042 women in the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer and Nutrition (EPIC) study. RESULTS During 15 years of follow-up, 438 RCC cases were identified. Parous women had higher rates of RCC compared with nulliparous women (HR = 1.71, 95% CI 1.18, 2.46), and women who were older at age of first pregnancy had lower rates of RCC (30 years + vs. <20 years HR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.34, 0.82). Additionally, we identified a positive association for hysterectomy (HR = 1.43 95% CI 1.09, 1.86) and bilateral ovariectomy (HR = 1.67, 95% CI 1.13, 2.47), but not unilateral ovariectomy (HR = 0.99, 95% CI 0.61, 1.62) with RCC risk. No clear associations were found for age at menarche, age at menopause or exogenous hormone use. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that parity and reproductive organ surgeries may play a role in RCC aetiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna L. Clasen
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Rita Mabunda
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Alicia K. Heath
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Rudolf Kaaks
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Verena Katzke
- Division of Cancer EpidemiologyGerman Cancer research Center (DKFZ)HeidelbergGermany
| | - Matthias B. Schulze
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam‐RehbrueckeNuthetalGermany
- Institute of Nutritional Science, University of PotsdamNuthetalGermany
| | - Anna Birukov
- German Institute of Human Nutrition Potsdam‐RehbrueckeNuthetalGermany
- German Center for Diabetes Research (DZD)Muenchen‐NeuherbergGermany
- Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public HealthBostonMassachusettsUnited States
| | | | - Paolo Chiodini
- Medical Statistics UnitUniversity L. VanvitelliNaplesItaly
| | - Rosario Tumino
- Hyblean Association for Epidemiological Research (AIRE ‐ONLUS)RagusaItaly
| | - Lorenzo Milani
- Department of Clinical and Biological SciencesUniversity of TurinTurinItaly
| | - Tonje Braaten
- Department of Community MedicineUiT The Arctic University of Norway
| | - Inger Gram
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community MedicineUniversity of Tromsø, The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Marko Lukic
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Community MedicineUniversity of Tromsø, The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
| | - Leila Luján‐Barroso
- Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO‐IDIBELL), Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Unit of Nutrition and CancerL'Hospitalet de LlobregatSpain
| | - Miguel Rodriguez‐Barranco
- Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública (EASP)GranadaSpain
- Instituto de Investigación Biosanitaria ibs.GRANADAGranadaSpain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
| | - María‐Dolores Chirlaque
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Department of Epidemiology, Regional Health Council, IMIB‐ArrixacaMurcia UniversityMurciaSpain
| | - Eva Ardanaz
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Navarra Public Health InstitutePamplonaSpain
- IdiSNA, Navarra Institute for Health ResearchPamplonaSpain
| | - Pilar Amiano
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP)MadridSpain
- Ministry of Health of the Basque Government, Sub Directorate for Public Health and Addictions of GipuzkoaSan SebastianSpain
- Biodonostia Health Research InstituteEpidemiology of Chronic and Communicable Diseases GroupSan SebastiánSpain
| | - Jonas Manjer
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
| | - Linnea Huss
- Department of Clinical Sciences MalmöLund UniversityMalmöSweden
- Department of SurgeryHelsingborg HospitalHelsingborgSweden
| | - Börje Ljungberg
- Department of Surgical and perioperative sciences, Urology and AndrologyUmeå UniversitySweden
| | - Ruth Travis
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Karl Smith‐Byrne
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUK
| | - Marc Gunter
- International Agency for Research on CancerLyonFrance
| | | | | | | | - Elio Riboli
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - Amanda J. Cross
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| | - David C. Muller
- Department of Epidemiology and BiostatisticsSchool of Public Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public HealthMRC‐PHE Centre for Environment and Health, Imperial College LondonLondonUK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schouten LJ, van de Pol J, Kviatkovsky MJ, van den Brandt PA. Reproductive and external hormonal factors and the risk of renal cell cancer in the Netherlands Cohort Study. Cancer Epidemiol 2022; 79:102171. [DOI: 10.1016/j.canep.2022.102171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 04/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
|
8
|
Huo N, Smith CY, Gazzuola Rocca L, Rocca WA, Mielke MM. Risk of de novo cancer after premenopausal bilateral oophorectomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2022; 226:539.e1-539.e16. [PMID: 34774521 PMCID: PMC8983439 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.10.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2021] [Revised: 10/29/2021] [Accepted: 10/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hysterectomy is one of the most frequent gynecologic surgeries in the United States. Women undergoing hysterectomy are commonly offered bilateral oophorectomy for ovarian and breast cancer prevention. Although bilateral oophorectomy may dramatically reduce the risk of gynecologic cancers, some studies suggested that bilateral oophorectomy may be associated with an increased risk of other types of cancer, such as lung cancer and colorectal cancer. However, the results are conflicting. OBJECTIVE To study the association between bilateral oophorectomy and the risk of subsequent cancer of any type. STUDY DESIGN This population-based cohort study included all premenopausal women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy for a nonmalignant indication before the age of 50, between January 1, 1988 and December 31, 2007 in Olmsted County, Minnesota, and a random sample of age-matched (±1 year) referent women who did not undergo bilateral oophorectomy. Women with cancer before oophorectomy (or index date) or within 6 months after the index date were excluded. Time-to-event analyses were performed to assess the risk of de novo cancer. Cancer diagnosis and type were confirmed using medical record review. RESULTS Over a median follow-up of 18 years, the risk of any cancer did not significantly differ between the 1562 women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before natural menopause and the 1610 referent women (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.82; 95% confidence interval, 0.66-1.03). However, women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy had a decreased risk of gynecologic cancers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% confidence interval, 0.06-0.34) but not of nongynecologic cancers (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.99; 95% confidence interval, 0.78-1.26). In particular, the risk of breast cancer, gastrointestinal cancer, and lung cancer did not differ between these 2 cohorts. Use of estrogen therapy through the age of 50 years in women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy did not modify the results. CONCLUSION Women who underwent bilateral oophorectomy before menopause have a reduced risk of gynecologic cancer but not of other types of cancer including breast cancer. Women at average risk of ovarian cancer should not consider bilateral oophorectomy for the prevention of breast cancer or other nongynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nan Huo
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Carin Y Smith
- Division of Clinical Trials and Biostatistics, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Liliana Gazzuola Rocca
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Walter A Rocca
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic Specialized Research Center of Excellence on Sex Differences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Michelle M Mielke
- Division of Epidemiology, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Department of Neurology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota; Mayo Clinic Specialized Research Center of Excellence on Sex Differences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Demakakos P, Steptoe A, Mishra GD. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with increased risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy: A national retrospective cohort study of women in England. BJOG 2022; 129:1481-1489. [PMID: 34978369 PMCID: PMC9250543 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.17088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Objective To examine the associations between adverse childhood experiences (ACE) and the risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in a national sample of women in England. Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting A stratified random sample of households across England. Population 2648 women aged ≥55 years in 2007 from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing (ELSA) were included in the bilateral oophorectomy analyses and 2622 in the hysterectomy analyses. Methods Logistic and multinomial logistic regression analyses of the associations between categories of the ACE summary score (0, 1, 2, ≥3 ACE), eight individual ACE, and hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Results 615 women had undergone hysterectomy and 259 women bilateral oophorectomy. We found graded associations between the summary ACE score and risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. In the fully adjusted model, compared with women with no ACE, those with ≥3 ACE had double the odds of hysterectomy (odds ratio [OR] 2.01, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.30–3.11) and more than double the odds of bilateral oophorectomy (OR 2.61, 95% CI 1.54–4.42). The exclusion of women with cancer history made the associations stronger, especially in women who underwent hysterectomy at age <40 years or bilateral oophorectomy at age ≤44 years. Several individual ACE were positively associated with both outcomes. Conclusions ACE are associated with increased risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy. Individual‐level covariates did not explain these associations. Our findings highlight the importance of a life course approach to understanding surgical menopause and add to our knowledge of the societal and public health impact of ACE. Tweetable abstract Adverse childhood experiences are associated with increased risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in a national sample of women in England. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with increased risk of hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy in a national sample of women in England. Linked article: This article is commented on by Walter A. Rocca, pp. 1491–1492 in this issue. To view this minicommentary visit https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17105.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panayotes Demakakos
- Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Andrew Steptoe
- Department of Behavioural Sciences and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Gita D Mishra
- School of Population Health, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Peired AJ, Campi R, Angelotti ML, Antonelli G, Conte C, Lazzeri E, Becherucci F, Calistri L, Serni S, Romagnani P. Sex and Gender Differences in Kidney Cancer: Clinical and Experimental Evidence. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13184588. [PMID: 34572815 PMCID: PMC8466874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13184588] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Revised: 09/07/2021] [Accepted: 09/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Kidney cancer is a frequent malignant tumor that accounts for approximately 5% of all cancer incidences. It affects both males and females, but males are twice as likely to develop kidney cancer than females. Evidence shows that this discrepancy takes root in individual differences, such as genetics or pathologies that affect the patient. It is then reflected in the clinical characteristics of the tumors, as males have larger and more aggressive tumors. Understanding the sex- and gender-based differences in kidney cancer is essential to be able to offer patients individualized medicine that would better cover their needs in terms of prevention, diagnosis and treatment. Abstract Sex and gender disparities have been reported for different types of non-reproductive cancers. Males are two times more likely to develop kidney cancer than females and have a higher death rate. These differences can be explained by looking at genetics and genomics, as well as other risk factors such as hypertension and obesity, lifestyle, and female sex hormones. Examination of the hormonal signaling pathways bring further insights into sex-related differences. Sex and gender-based disparities can be observed at the diagnostic, histological and treatment levels, leading to significant outcome difference. This review summarizes the current knowledge about sex and gender-related differences in the clinical presentation of patients with kidney cancer and the possible biological mechanisms that could explain these observations. Underlying sex-based differences may contribute to the development of sex-specific prognostic and diagnostic tools and the improvement of personalized therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Julie Peired
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (R.C.); (S.S.)
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Maria Lucia Angelotti
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Giulia Antonelli
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Carolina Conte
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Elena Lazzeri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Francesca Becherucci
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children’s University Hospital, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| | - Linda Calistri
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
| | - Sergio Serni
- Unit of Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50134 Florence, Italy; (R.C.); (S.S.)
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy
| | - Paola Romagnani
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “Mario Serio”, University of Florence, Viale Morgagni 50, 50134 Florence, Italy; (M.L.A.); (G.A.); (C.C.); (E.L.); (L.C.); (P.R.)
- Nephrology and Dialysis Unit, Meyer Children’s University Hospital, Viale Pieraccini 24, 50139 Florence, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|