Combined vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) blockade inhibits tumor growth in xenograft models of EGFR inhibitor resistance

A Multicenter Open-Label Randomized Phase II Study of Osimertinib With and Without Ramucirumab in Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor-Naïve EGFR-Mutant Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (RAMOSE trial)

PURPOSE

Preclinical studies demonstrated that dual inhibition of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) pathways delay the emergence of resistance to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and in trials with first-generation EGFR TKIs, the combination of EGFR VEGF pathway inhibitors prolonged progression-free survival (PFS).

METHODS

The RAMOSE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03909334, HCRN LUN-18-335) is a randomized, open-label multicenter phase II study comparing osimertinib with ramucirumab (arm A) to osimertinib (arm B) for initial treatment of metastatic EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with 2:1 random assignment. The primary end point is PFS for evaluable patients; secondary end points include objective response rates (ORRs), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival, and safety. The stratification criteria were EGFR mutation type and the presence of CNS metastasis.

RESULTS

At data cutoff on August 29, 2023, 160 patients consented, 147 patients received treatment, and 139 patients were evaluable with at least one scan. In this preplanned interim analysis, the median follow-up was 16.6 months. Among the evaluable patients, 57 PFS events occurred. The median PFS was 24.8 (A) versus 15.6 (B) months (hazard ratio, 0.55 [95% CI, 0.32 to 0.93]; log-rank P = .023), 12-month PFS rate was 76.7% (A) versus 61.9% (B; P = .026). No significant difference was observed in the ORRs and DCRs between arms. Any-grade (G) adverse events (AEs) occurred in 100% (A) and 98% (B) of patients, with no G5 treatment-related AE (TRAE), one G4 TRAE (hyponatremia, A), and 53% (A) versus 41% (B) G3 TRAEs. AE-related discontinuation occurred in 13 patients (9.7% in A and 8.7% in B). The safety profile was in line with known safety of each drug.

CONCLUSION

Ramucirumab plus osimertinib significantly prolonged PFS compared with osimertinib alone in patients with TKI-naïve EGFR-mutant NSCLC. The combination is safe and well tolerated.

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and network meta-analysis evaluates first-line treatment options for patients with EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and brain metastases. We analyzed 24 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving 2,682 patients, comparing various EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and combination therapies. Direct comparisons showed that the addition of bevacizumab or chemotherapy to first-generation (1G) EGFR-TKIs improved overall survival (OS) compared to 1G TKIs alone, with HRs of 0.704 (95% CI: 0.433-0.973) and 0.682 (95% CI: 0.464-0.899), respectively. However, third-generation (3G) TKI monotherapy did not significantly improve OS compared with 1G TKIs, with an HR of 0.855 (95% CI: 0.511-1.198). Indirect comparisons suggested that the combination of 3G TKIs with chemotherapy provided the most significant improvements in OS and progression-free survival (PFS), significantly outperforming 3G TKIs, with HRs of OS 1.69 (95% CI: 1.14-3.4) and PFS 2.13 (95% CI: 1.28-3.54). Intracranial PFS was best with 1G TKIs plus bevacizumab. Our findings suggest that 3G EGFR-TKIs in combination with chemotherapy may be the most effective strategy for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC and brain metastases, though further head-to-head trials are needed for validation.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer who progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefits of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatments in treating individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who have progressed on EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (TKIs) remain controversial. We aimed to review the literature to comprehensively investigate the individual and comparative clinical outcomes of various ICI-based treatment strategies in this population.

METHODS

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we used single-arm, pairwise, and network meta-analytical approaches. We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and relevant international conference proceedings from database inception to Jan 31, 2024, without language restrictions, to identify eligible clinical trials that assessed ICI-based treatments for individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on EGFR-TKIs. Studies considered eligible were published and unpublished phase 1, 2, or 3 clinical trials enrolling participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who had progressed after at least one EGFR-TKI treatment, and that evaluated ICI-based treatment strategies on at least one of the clinical outcomes of interest. The primary outcome analysed was progression-free survival. The protocol is registered with PROSPERO, CRD42021292626.

FINDINGS

17 single-arm trials and 15 randomised controlled trials, involving 2886 participants and seven ICI-based treatment strategies (ICI monotherapy, ICI plus chemotherapy [ICI-chemo], ICI plus antiangiogenesis [ICI-antiangio], ICI plus antiangiogenesis plus chemotherapy [ICI-antiangio-chemo], dual ICIs [ICI-ICI], dual ICIs plus chemotherapy [ICI-ICI-chemo], and ICI plus EGFR-TKI [ICI-TKI]), were included. Three of these strategies-ICI monotherapy, ICI-antiangio-chemo, and ICI-chemo-had sufficient data across the included studies to perform a pairwise meta-analysis. The pairwise meta-analysis showed that, compared with chemotherapy, ICI monotherapy led to shorter progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 1·73 [95% CI 1·30-2·29], I2=0%), whereas ICI-antiangio-chemo (HR 0·54 [0·44-0·67], I2=0%) and ICI-chemo (HR 0·77 [0·67-0·88], I2=0%) prolonged progression-free survival. The network meta-analysis showed that ICI-antiangio-chemo yielded the best progression-free survival results, with substantial benefits over ICI-chemo (HR 0·71 [95% credible interval 0·59-0·85]), ICI monotherapy (HR 0·30 [0·22-0·41]), and non-ICI treatment strategies including antiangio-chemo (HR 0·76 [0·58-1·00]) and chemotherapy alone (HR 0·54 [0·45-0·64]). ICI-antiangio-chemo was associated with higher risks of both any-grade and grade 3 or worse adverse events over ICI-chemo and chemotherapy in the network meta-analysis.

INTERPRETATION

For individuals with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC who progressed on EGFR-TKIs, ICI-antiangio-chemo was identified as the optimal treatment option. The toxicity of this treatment was acceptable but needs careful attention. ICI-chemo showed appreciably greater efficacy than the standard-of-care chemotherapy. These findings clarified the roles of ICI-based treatment strategies in this difficult-to-treat refractory population, potentially complementing recent guidelines.

FUNDING

None.

Toxicity profiles associated with EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors in non-small cell lung cancer: an epidemiological surveillance analysis of the FDA adverse event reporting system

BACKGROUND

Ongoing studies are evaluating the efficacy and toxicity profiles of combining epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) with antiangiogenic agents in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the complete toxicity profiles remain elusive.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

This study conducted an extensive pharmacovigilance analysis utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System database. The analysis focused on identifying and characterizing adverse events (AEs) associated with the concurrent use of EGFR-TKIs and antiangiogenic inhibitors in patients with NSCLC.

RESULTS

The study identified significant occurrences of AEs linked to the combination therapy, particularly impacting general disorders, skin and subcutaneous tissue conditions, and vascular disorders. Frequently reported AEs included rash, diarrhea, fatigue, nausea, decreased appetite, and anemia. Notably, the combination of EGFR-TKIs with antiangiogenic inhibitors resulted in an increased incidence of AEs across multiple organ systems compared to EGFR-TKIs alone, with some adverse effects, such as anemia, arrhythmia, and ulcerative keratitis, persisting beyond one year in a subset of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of EGFR-TKIs and antiangiogenic inhibitors in NSCLC treatment presents a distinct and substantial AE profile, often with delayed onset. This finding underscores the necessity for rigorous and ongoing monitoring protocols to mitigate potential long-term adverse effects.

Comparison of Primary and Metastatic Fumarate Hydratase-Deficient Renal Cell Carcinomas Documents Morphologic Divergence and Potential Diagnostic Pitfall With Peritoneal Mesothelioma

Fumarate hydratase (FH)-deficient renal cell carcinomas are rare neoplasms characterized by wide morphologic heterogeneity and pathogenetic mutations in the FH gene. They often show aggressive behavior with rapid diffusion to distant organs, so novel therapeutic scenarios have been explored, including EGFR inhibitors and PD-L1 expression for targeted immunotherapy. Herein, we investigated a series of 11 primary FH-deficient renal cell carcinomas and 7 distant metastases to evaluate tumor heterogeneity even in metastatic sites and estimate the specific spread rates to various organs. Furthermore, the tumors were tested for immunohistochemical PD-L1 expression and EGFR mutations. Most metastatic cases involved the abdominal lymph nodes (4/7; 57%), followed by the peritoneum (3/7; 42%), the liver (2/7; 29%), and the lungs (1/7; 14%). Six metastatic localizations were histologically documented, revealing a morphologic heterogeneous architecture often differing from that of the corresponding primary renal tumor. Peritoneal involvement morphologically resembled a benign reactive mesothelial process or primary peritoneal mesothelioma, thus advocating to perform an accurate immunohistochemical panel, including PAX8 and FH, to reach a proper diagnosis. A pure low-grade succinate dehydrogenase-looking primary FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma was also recorded. As for therapy, significant PD-L1 labeling was found in 60% of primary renal tumors, whereas none of them carried pathogenetic EGFR mutations. Our data show that FH-deficient renal cell carcinoma may be morphologically heterogeneous in metastases as well, which involve the lymph nodes, the liver, and the peritoneum more frequently than other renal tumors. Due to the high frequency of this latter (42%), pathologists should always be concerned about ruling out mesothelial-derived mimickers, and the occurrence of rarer, primary, low-grade-looking types. Finally, contrary to EGFR mutations, PD-L1 expression could be a possible predictive biomarker for the therapy of these tumors.

Mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor-targeted therapy and overcoming strategies

Tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-targeted therapy has revolutionized cancer treatment by selectively blocking specific signaling pathways crucial for tumor growth, offering improved outcomes with fewer side effects compared with conventional chemotherapy. However, despite their initial effectiveness, resistance to TKIs remains a significant challenge in clinical practice. Understanding the mechanisms underlying TKI resistance is paramount for improving patient outcomes and developing more effective treatment strategies. In this review, we explored various mechanisms contributing to TKI resistance, including on-target mechanisms and off-target mechanisms, as well as changes in the tumor histology and tumor microenvironment (intrinsic mechanisms). Additionally, we summarized current therapeutic approaches aiming at circumventing TKI resistance, including the development of next-generation TKIs and combination therapies. We also discussed emerging strategies such as the use of dual-targeted antibodies and PROteolysis Targeting Chimeras. Furthermore, we explored future directions in TKI-targeted therapy, including the methods for detecting and monitoring drug resistance during treatment, identification of novel targets, exploration of dual-acting kinase inhibitors, application of nanotechnologies in targeted therapy, and so on. Overall, this review provides a comprehensive overview of the challenges and opportunities in TKI-targeted therapy, aiming to advance our understanding of resistance mechanisms and guide the development of more effective therapeutic approaches in cancer treatment.

Adaptive resistance of tumor cells to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy: A reversible phenomenon

Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibition is an essential targeted strategy for malignant tumors, but its efficacy is severely constrained by drug resistance. The traditional view holds that the target of VEGF inhibition is endothelial cells, and thus compensatory angiogenesis is considered the main mechanism of drug resistance. In this study, we found that tumor cells themselves could develop acquired resistance to VEGF therapy, indicating an independent resistance mechanism apart from angiogenesis. Notably, this acquired resistance was temporary, disappearing completely four days after discontinuing exposure to the drug in vitro. Our findings suggest that tumor cells may also be targets of VEGF inhibition, and their response to treatment should not be overlooked in contributing to drug resistance.

Osimertinib in combination with anti-angiogenesis therapy presents a promising option for osimertinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib has become standard care for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients whereas drug resistance remains inevitable. Now we recognize that the interactions between the tumor and the tumor microenvironment (TME) also account for drug resistance. Therefore, we provide a new sight into post-osimertinib management, focusing on the alteration of TME.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study on the prognosis of different treatments after osimertinib resistance. Next, we carried out in vivo experiment to validate our findings using a humanized mouse model. Furthermore, we performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing (scRNA-seq) of tumor tissue from the above treatment groups to explore the mechanisms of TME changes.

RESULTS

Totally 111 advanced NSCLC patients have been enrolled in the retrospective study. The median PFS was 9.84 months (95% CI 7.0-12.6 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly longer than chemotherapy (P = 0.012) and osimertinib (P = 0.003). The median OS was 16.79 months (95% CI 14.97-18.61 months) in the osimertinib plus anti-angiogenesis group, significantly better than chemotherapy (P = 0.026), the chemotherapy plus osimertinib (P = 0.021), and the chemotherapy plus immunotherapy (P = 0.006). The efficacy of osimertinib plus anlotinib in the osimertinib-resistant engraft tumors (R-O+A) group was significantly more potent than the osimertinib (R-O) group (P<0.05) in vitro. The combinational therapy could significantly increase the infiltration of CD4+ T cells (P<0.05), CD25+CD4+ T cells (P<0.001), and PD-1+CD8+ T cells (P<0.05) compared to osimertinib. ScRNA-seq demonstrated that the number of CD8+ T and proliferation T cells increased, and TAM.mo was downregulated in the R-O+A group compared to the R-O group. Subtype study of T cells explained that the changes caused by combination treatment were mainly related to cytotoxic T cells. Subtype study of macrophages showed that proportion and functional changes in IL-1β.mo and CCL18.mo might be responsible for rescue osimertinib resistance by combination therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, osimertinib plus anlotinib could improve the prognosis of patients with a progressed disease on second-line osimertinib treatment, which may ascribe to increased T cell infiltration and TAM remodeling via VEGF-VEGFR blockage.

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

New clinical trial design in precision medicine: discovery, development and direction

In the era of precision medicine, it has been increasingly recognized that individuals with a certain disease are complex and different from each other. Due to the underestimation of the significant heterogeneity across participants in traditional "one-size-fits-all" trials, patient-centered trials that could provide optimal therapy customization to individuals with specific biomarkers were developed including the basket, umbrella, and platform trial designs under the master protocol framework. In recent years, the successive FDA approval of indications based on biomarker-guided master protocol designs has demonstrated that these new clinical trials are ushering in tremendous opportunities. Despite the rapid increase in the number of basket, umbrella, and platform trials, the current clinical and research understanding of these new trial designs, as compared with traditional trial designs, remains limited. The majority of the research focuses on methodologies, and there is a lack of in-depth insight concerning the underlying biological logic of these new clinical trial designs. Therefore, we provide this comprehensive review of the discovery and development of basket, umbrella, and platform trials and their underlying logic from the perspective of precision medicine. Meanwhile, we discuss future directions on the potential development of these new clinical design in view of the "Precision Pro", "Dynamic Precision", and "Intelligent Precision". This review would assist trial-related researchers to enhance the innovation and feasibility of clinical trial designs by expounding the underlying logic, which be essential to accelerate the progression of precision medicine.

Chemosensitization of non-small cell lung cancer to sorafenib via non-hydroxamate s-triazinedione-based MMP-9/10 inhibitors

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) continues to be a leading cause of cancer death. Its fatality is associated with angiogenesis and metastasis. While VEGFR inhibitors are expected to be the central pillar for halting lung cancer, several clinical reports declared their subpar activities as monotherapy. These results directed combination studies of VEGFR inhibitors, especially sorafenib (Nexavar®), with various chemotherapeutic agents. Matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) inhibitors are seldom utilized in such combinations despite the expected complementary therapeutic outcome. This could be attributed to the clinical unsuitability of MMP inhibitors from the hydroxamate family. Herein, we report new non-hydroxamate s-triazinedione-based inhibitors of MMP-9 (6b; IC50 = 0.112 μM), and MMP-10 (6e; IC50 = 0.076 μM) surpassing the hydroxamate inhibitor NNGH for chemosensitization of NSCLC to sorafenib. MMPs inhibition profiling of the hits revealed MMP-9 over -2 and MMP-10 over -13 selectivity. 6b and 6e were potent (IC50 = 0.139 and 0.136 µM), safe (SI up to 6.77) and superior to sorafenib (IC50 = 0.506 µM, SI = 6.27) against A549 cells. When combined with sorafenib, the studied MMP inhibitors enhanced its cytotoxic efficacy up to 26 folds as confirmed by CI and DRI values for 6b (CI = 0.160 and DRI = 22.175) and 6e (CI = 0.096 and DRI = 29.060). 6b and 6e exerted anti-invasive activities in A549 cells as single agents (22.66 and 39.67 %) and in sorafenib combinations (29.96 and 91.83 %) compared to untreated control. Both compounds downregulated VEGF in A549 cells by approximately 70 % when combined with sorafenib, highlighting enhanced anti-angiogenic activities. Collectively, combinations of 6b and 6e with sorafenib demonstrated synergistic NSCLC cytotoxicity with pronounced anti-invasive and anti-angiogenic activities introducing a promising start point for preclinical studies.

Comparison of osimertinib plus bevacizumab against osimertinib alone in NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Frequent failures observed in some trials comparing the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab to osimertinib monotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations have brought questions.

Objectives

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of these two treatment regimens in advanced NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations.

Design

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, CNKI, Wanfang, and VIP databases were extensively searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on 14 May 2023. Two researchers independently screened the literature, assessed quality, and extracted data. The primary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR). The secondary outcomes were adverse events (AEs) and PFS stratified by patients' characteristics. STATA 17.0 software (StataCorp LLC, USA) was adopted for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of four RCTs involving 390 patients were included. Overall, the risk of bias across the studies was moderate to low. Pooled results showed that compared to osimertinib alone, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib failed to show prolongation of PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.00, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.78-1.27], OS (HR = 1.01, 95% CI: 0.73-1.41), or improvement of the ORR (risk ratio = 1.12, 95% CI: 0.90-1.38), while an increased incidence of some AEs was observed, such as nausea, oral mucositis, hypertension, and proteinuria. Notably, combination treatment did significantly prolong the PFS in the subset of smokers (HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.94). A mild trend toward PFS benefit under the combined regimen was also noted in patients with brain metastases and first-line treatment, though not reaching statistical significance.

Conclusion

Based on the available evidence, the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib could not provide additional survival benefits with higher but manageable toxicity for EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Osimertinib monotherapy remains the prioritized treatment. Further investigation is warranted.

Unmasking the enigma: A case of Fumarate Hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

Fumarate Hydratase-deficient-renal cell carcinoma (FH-dRCC) is an uncommon and extremely aggressive variant of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) resulting from inactivating mutations in the tumor suppressor gene, fumarate hydratase (FH).

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of a young male who presented with the complaint of painless hematuria. Upon workup, he was found to have a renal mass with bony metastases. The histopathology was consistent with renal cell carcinoma with features of FH-deficient variant. Germline testing showed a pathogenic mutation in the FH gene. He was started on a treatment combination of Pembrolizumab and Axitinib along with Zoledronate for bone metastasis. His response to the combination therapy was short with early progression of disease. He was switched to a second-line treatment Bevacizumab and Erlotinib, which achieved significant disease response.

DISCUSSION

Systemic therapy is the mainstay of treatment for metastatic disease. Although the novel agents approved for other subsets of RCC have been used, the responses are grim. There is no consensus on the sequence of further lines of treatment for FH-dRCC and is based on the physician's choice, availability of the drugs, cost, toxicity, and tolerance of the patient.

CONCLUSION

This case report emphasizes the occurrence, presentation, management and prognosis of FH-dRCC, which is an aggressive entity, presenting at a young age with early distant metastases, not diagnosed appropriately due to its poorly characterized cytologic features. Being an infrequent neoplasm, it is an area that warrants oncological exploration to improve outcomes in these individuals. The combination of Erlotinib and Bevacizumab provides promising outcomes in terms of progression-free survival.

Pharmacokinetics, safety, tolerability, and feasibility of apatinib in combination with gefitinib in stage IIIB-IV EGFR-mutated non-squamous NSCLC: a drug-drug interaction study

PURPOSE

Apatinib combined with gefitinib was proven to benefit advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients in first-line treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients.

METHODS

In this phase 1b, multi-center, open-label, fixed-sequence study, the drug-drug interaction of gefitinib and apatinib was evaluated when coadministered in EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Patients received single-agent apatinib 500 mg QD on days 1-4. Gefitinib 250 mg QD was given on days 5-15 and combined with apatinib 500 mg QD on days 12-15. Serial blood samples were drawn on days 4 and 15. The plasma concentrations and other pharmacokinetics parameters were measured for apatinib with and without gefitinib.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 22 patients and 20 were analyzed for pharmacokinetics. There were no distinct differences in apatinib Cmax and AUC0-τ with versus without gefitinib (geometric LSM ratio, 0.96 [90% CI 0.84-1.10] for Cmax and 1.12 [90% CI 0.96-1.30] for AUC0-τ). Similar PFS and grade of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were found between different Cmax and AUC0-τ of apatinib and gefitinib at 500 mg apatinib and 250 mg gefitinib dose levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Apatinib pharmacokinetics parameters were not significantly changed when coadministered with gefitinib. All TEAEs were manageable, and there was no need to change the dose level when combining apatinib and gefitinib (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04390984, May 18, 2020).

Sequential treatment in advanced epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors

Introduction

The clinical outcomes of sequential treatment of advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs are unclear. Thus, we aimed to analyze the outcomes of these patients.

Methods

Between January 2015 and December 2020, data for 102 advanced EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients receiving first-line bevacizumab combined with erlotinib or afatinib followed by treatments at multiple institutions were retrospectively analyzed. All patients with progressive disease (PD) after first-line therapy underwent secondary T790M mutation detection.

Results

The secondary T790M mutation positive rate of all study patients was 57.9%. First-line erlotinib use and progression-free survival (PFS) after first-line therapy > 12 months were positively associated with the T790M mutation (P <0.05). The response rates (RRs) to second-line treatments were 51.7% and 22.7% for the osimertinib and nonosimertinib groups, respectively (P = 0.001). The median PFS associated with second-line osimertinib and nonosimertinib therapy was 13.7 and 7.1 months, respectively (hazard ratio (HR) = 0.38; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.23-0.63; P< 0.001). Patients with a secondary T790M mutation receiving second-line osimertinib treatment had a median overall survival (OS) of 54.3 months, and the median OS was 31.9 months for non-T790M-mutated patients receiving second-line nonosimertinib treatments (HR = 0.36; CI: 0.21-0.62, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The majority of acquired resistance to first-line bevacizumab combined with 1st/2nd-generation EGFR-TKIs is associated with the T790M mutation. Sequential osimertinib treatment in patients with positive secondary T790M mutation is associated with better outcomes among these patients.

A randomized phase II study of afatinib alone or combined with bevacizumab for treating chemo-naïve patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations

BACKGROUND

Adding bevacizumab to first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) prolonged the progression-free survival (PFS), but limited data are available for second-generation EGFR-TKIs. AfaBev-CS is a randomized, phase II trial comparing afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone as first-line treatment.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Untreated patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR mutations (Del19 or L858R) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive either afatinib (30 mg) plus bevacizumab (AfaBev group) or afatinib (40 mg) monotherapy (Afa group). The primary endpoint was PFS. The power was >50% under the assumptions of a median PFS of 12 months for the Afa group and hazard ratio (HR) of 0.6 for the AfaBev group.

RESULTS

Between August 2017 and September 2019, 100 patients were enrolled. There was no significant difference in PFS between the groups. The median PFS was 16.3 and 16.1 months for the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively, with an HR of 0.865 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.539 to 1.388; p = 0.55). In terms of overall survival, there was no significant difference between the groups (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.39 to 1.83; p = 0.67). The overall response rate was 82.6% and 76.6% in the AfaBev and Afa groups, respectively (p = 0.61). Grade ≥ 3 diarrhea, hypertension, acneiform rash, paronychia, and stomatitis were frequently observed in the AfaBev group.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to show efficacy of AfaBev over Afa for improving PFS in untreated patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Ramucirumab Plus Erlotinib in Taiwanese Patients with Untreated, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor-Mutated, Stage IV Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in the RELAY Study

BACKGROUND

In RELAY, a randomized, double-blind, phase III trial investigating the efficacy and safety of ramucirumab+erlotinib (RAM+ERL) or ERL+placebo (PBO) in patients with untreated, stage IV, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), RAM+ERL demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) versus PBO+ERL, with no new safety signals.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this paper was to report efficacy and tolerability findings for the Taiwanese participants of RELAY.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients were randomized 1:1 to RAM+ERL or ERL+PBO. Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed PFS. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and tolerability. Data for the current analysis are reported descriptively.

RESULTS

In RELAY, 56 Taiwanese patients were enrolled; 26 received RAM+ERL, 30 received ERL+PBO. The demographic profile of the Taiwanese subgroup was consistent with that of the overall RELAY population. Median PFS for RAM+ERL/ERL+PBO, respectively, was 22.05 months/13.40 months (unstratified hazard ratio 0.4; 95% confidence interval 0.2-0.9); ORR was 92%/60%; median DoR was 18.2 months/12.7 months. All patients experienced one or more treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); those most commonly reported were diarrhea and dermatitis acneiform (58% each) for RAM+ERL and diarrhea (70%) and paronychia (63%) for PBO+ERL. Grade ≥  3 TEAEs were experienced by 62%/30% of RAM+ERL/PBO+ERL patients, respectively, and included dermatitis acneiform (19%/7%), hypertension (12%/7%), and pneumonia (12%/0%).

CONCLUSIONS

PFS for the Taiwanese participants of RELAY receiving RAM+ERL versus ERL+PBO was consistent with that in the overall RELAY population. These results, together with no new safety signals and a manageable safety profile, may support first-line use of RAM+ERL in Taiwanese patients with untreated EGFR-mutant stage IV NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov , NCT02411448.

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, the suggested course of action is epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Even with a high disease control rate, a majority of patients develop acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance and eventually advance. To increase the benefits of treatment, clinical trials are increasingly exploring the value of EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors as a first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutations.

METHOD

Using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, to locate published full-text articles in print or online, a thorough literature search was done from the database's inception to February 2021. Additionally, oral presentation RCTs from ESMO and ASCO were obtained. We sifted out RCTs that used EGFR-TKIs along with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. ORR, AEs, OS, and PFS were the endpoints. Review Manager version 5.4.1 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred twenty-one patients were involved in 9 RCTs. According to the results, combining EGFR-TKIs with angiogenesis inhibitors therapy prolonged PFS of advanced EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients on the whole [HR:0.65 (95%CI: 0.59~0.73, P<0.00001)]. No significant statistical difference was identified between the combination group and single drug group in OS(P=0.20) and ORR (P=0.11). There are more adverse effects when EGFR-TKIs are used in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors than when used alone.

CONCLUSION

The combination of EGFR-TKIs and angiogenesis inhibitors prolonged PFS in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, but the OS and ORR benefit was not significant, and the risk of adverse events was higher, more pronounced with hypertension and proteinuria; PFS in subgroups suggested that the combination was associated with better PFS in the smoking, liver metastasis, and no brain metastasis groups, and the included studies suggested that the smoking group , liver metastasis group, and brain metastasis group may have a potential OS benefit.

Highly Mimetic Ex Vivo Lung-Cancer Spheroid-Based Physiological Model for Clinical Precision Therapeutics

Lung cancer remains a major health problem despite the considerable research into prevention and treatment methods. Through a deeper understanding of tumors, patient-specific ex vivo spheroid models with high specificity can be used to accurately investigate the cause, metastasis, and treatment strategies for lung cancer. Biofabricate lung tumors are presented, consisting of patient-derived tumor spheroids, endothelial cells, and lung decellularized extracellular matrix, which maintain a radial oxygen gradient, as well as biophysicochemical behaviors of the native tumors for precision medicine. It is also demonstrated that the developed lung-cancer spheroid model reproduces patient responses to chemotherapeutics and targeted therapy in a co-clinical trial, with 85% accuracy, 86.7% sensitivity, and 80% specificity. RNA sequencing analysis validates that the gene expression in the spheroids replicates that in the patient's primary tumor. This model can be used as an ex vivo predictive model for personalized cancer therapy and to improve the quality of clinical care.

A real-world study of Afatinib plus ramucirumab in treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Recent reports suggested combining ramucirumab with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) to overcome EGFR resistance in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Nonetheless, evidence supporting the activity of afatinib and ramucirumab is lacking. This study investigated the survival benefits and safety profile of afatinib plus ramucirumab in patients with treatment-naïve, EGFR-mutated, metastatic NSCLC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The medical records of patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were retrospectively retrieved. Patients who received first-line sequential afatinib followed by ramucirumab and the first-line combination of afatinib plus ramucirumab were included. The Kaplan-Meier was used to estimate the progression-free survival (PFS) of all included patients, patients on sequential afatinib followed by ramucirumab (PFS1), and patients on the up-front combination of afatinib and ramucirumab (PFS2).

RESULTS

Thirty-three patients were included (25 women; median age: 63 [45-82] years). The median follow-up of the included patients was 17 months (range 6-89 months). the median PFS for the whole cohort was 71 months (95% CI 67.2-74.8) with eight events during the follow-up. The median PFS1 and PFS2 were 71 months (95 CI not defined) and 26 months (95% CI 18.6-33.4), respectively. In terms of OS, the median OS for all patients and patients on sequential treatment was not defined, while the median OS for patients on upfront combination was 30 months (95% CI 20.9-39.1). There was no significant association between EGFR mutation type and PFS1 or PFS2.

CONCLUSIONS

Afatinib plus ramucirumab could improve the PFS of patients with EGFR-positive NSCLC at a predictable safety profile. Our data also suggest a survival benefit of adding ramucirumab to afatinib in patients with uncommon mutations, which should be investigated further.

The emerging nanomedicine-based technology for non-small cell lung cancer immunotherapy: how far are we from an effective treatment

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a prominent etiology of cancer-related mortality. The heterogeneous nature of this disease impedes its accurate diagnosis and efficacious treatment. Consequently, constant advancements in research are imperative in order to comprehend its intricate nature. In addition to currently available therapies, the utilization of nanotechnology presents an opportunity to enhance the clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients. Notably, the burgeoning knowledge of the interaction between the immune system and cancer itself paves the way for developing novel, emerging immunotherapies for treating NSCLC in the early stages of the disease. It is believed that with the novel engineering avenues of nanomedicine, there is a possibility to overcome the inherent limitations derived from conventional and emerging treatments, such as off-site drug cytotoxicity, drug resistance, and administration methods. Combining nanotechnology with the convergence points of current therapies could open up new avenues for meeting the unmet needs of NSCLC treatment.

At the crossroads of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted subsets of NSCLC

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has become a paradigm of precision medicine, with the discovery of numerous disease subtypes defined by specific oncogenic driver mutations leading to the development of a range of molecularly targeted therapies. Over the past decade, rapid progress has also been made in the development of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), especially antagonistic antibodies targeting the PD-L1-PD-1 axis, for the treatment of NSCLC. Although many of the major oncogenic drivers of NSCLC are associated with intrinsic resistance to ICIs, patients with certain oncogene-driven subtypes of the disease that are highly responsive to specific targeted therapies might also derive benefit from immunotherapy. However, the development of effective immunotherapy approaches for oncogene-addicted NSCLC has been challenged by a lack of predictive biomarkers for patient selection and limited knowledge of how ICIs and oncogene-directed targeted therapies should be combined. Therefore, whether ICIs alone or with chemotherapy or even in combination with molecularly targeted agents would offer comparable benefit in the context of selected oncogenic driver alterations to that observed in the general unselected NSCLC population remains an open question. In this Review, we discuss the effects of oncogenic driver mutations on the efficacy of ICIs and the immune tumour microenvironment as well as the potential vulnerabilities that could be exploited to overcome the challenges of immunotherapy for oncogene-addicted NSCLC.

Nanotechnology - a robust tool for fighting the challenges of drug resistance in non-small cell lung cancer

Genomic and proteomic mutation analysis is the standard of care for selecting candidates for therapies with tyrosine kinase inhibitors against the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR TKI therapies) and further monitoring cancer treatment efficacy and cancer development. Acquired resistance due to various genetic aberrations is an unavoidable problem during EGFR TKI therapy, leading to the rapid exhaustion of standard molecularly targeted therapeutic options against mutant variants. Attacking multiple molecular targets within one or several signaling pathways by co-delivery of multiple agents is a viable strategy for overcoming and preventing resistance to EGFR TKIs. However, because of the difference in pharmacokinetics among agents, combined therapies may not effectively reach their targets. The obstacles regarding the simultaneous co-delivery of therapeutic agents at the site of action can be overcome using nanomedicine as a platform and nanotools as delivery agents. Precision oncology research to identify targetable biomarkers and optimize tumor homing agents, hand in hand with designing multifunctional and multistage nanocarriers that respond to the inherent heterogeneity of the tumors, may resolve the challenges of inadequate tumor localization, improve intracellular internalization, and bring advantages over conventional nanocarriers.

Does the Expression of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) and Bcl-2 Have a Prognostic Significance in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer?

Lung cancer is the most common cause of mortality from malignant tumors worldwide. The five-year survival rate for people with advanced stages varies considerably, from 35.4% to 6.9%. The angiogenic potential of bcl2 is not well known, nor is the way in which tumor cells with excessive bcl2 expression affect VEGF production. Hypothetically, given that tumor growth, progression and metastasis are dependent on angiogenesis, the antiapoptotic effect is expected to form a link between these two molecules. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between bcl-2 and VEGF expression, clinicopathological features and survival in 216 patients with advanced NSCLC. Archival tumor tissues were examined by immunohistochemistry for the expression of bcl-2 and VEGF. Immunoreactivity for bcl-2 was observed in 41.4% of NSCLCs, 51% of squamous and 34.8% of adenocarcinomas-expressed Bcl-2. There was an inverse correlation of mononuclear stromal reaction and bcl-2 expression in adenocarcinoma (p < 0.0005). A total of 71.8% NSCLCs were VEGF positive, 56% of squamous and 82.2% of adenocarcinomas. High level of VEGF expression was significantly associated with histology type (p = 0.043), low histology grade (p = 0.014), clinical stage IV (p = 0.018), smoking history (p = 0.008) and EGFR mutations (p = 0.026). There was an inverse correlation in the expression of Bcl-2 and VEGF in NSCLC patients (p = 0.039, r = -0.163). Two-year survival of patients with unresectable NSCLC was 39.3%, and 50% of patients were alive at 17 months. Our results demonstrated no difference in survival for patients in advanced NSCLC grouped by bcl-2 and VEGF status. Additionally, we observed an inverse correlation in the expression of Bcl-2 and VEGF in NSCLC and mononuclear reaction and bcl-2 expression in adenocarcinomas.

CPSF4 promotes tumor-initiating phenotype by enhancing VEGF/NRP2/TAZ signaling in lung cancer

Lung cancer is the leading cause of malignant tumor-related deaths worldwide. The presence of tumor-initiating cells in lung cancer leads to tumor recurrence, metastasis, and resistance to conventional treatment. Cleavage and polyadenylation specificity factor 4 (CPSF4) activation in tumor cells contributes to the poor prognosis of lung cancer. However, the precise biological functions and molecular mechanisms of CPSF4 in the regulation of tumor-initiating cells remain unclear. We demonstrated that CPSF4 promotes tumor-initiating phenotype and confers chemoresistance to paclitaxel both in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, we showed that CPSF4 binds to the promoters of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and neuropilin-2 (NRP2) and activated their transcription. In addition, we showed that CPSF4/VEGF/NRP2-mediated tumor-initiating phenotype and chemoresistance through TAZ induction. Furthermore, analysis of clinical data revealed that lung cancer patients with high CPSF4 expression exhibit high expression levels of VEGF, NRP2, and TAZ and that expression of these proteins are positively correlated with poor prognosis. Importantly, selective inhibition of VEGF, NRP2, or TAZ markedly suppressed CPSF4-mediated tumor-initiating phenotype and chemoresistance. Our findings reveal the mechanism of CPSF4 modulating tumor-initiating phenotype and chemoresistance in lung cancer and indicate that the CPSF4-VEGF-NRP2-TAZ signaling pathway may be a prognosis marker and therapeutic target in lung cancer.

[Efficacy of Osimertinib Combined with Bevacizumab in Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Acquired EGFR T790M Mutation]

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib is a third-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) capable of overcoming non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR T790M mutation. Although the addition of bevacizumab to 1st generation EGFR-TKIs confers a significant improvement in progression-free survival (PFS) in treatment-naive EGFR mutant NSCLC patients, osimertinib plus bevacizumab combination failed to show prolongation in the phase 2 study WJOG8715L. Data of such combination in Chinese patients are still lacking. This study aimed to explore the efficacy of the addition of bevacizumab to osimertinib as second-line therapy in real-world data, and to evaluate the role of anti-angiogenesis plus osimertinib combination therapeutic strategies in pretreated Chinese NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR T790M mutation.

METHODS

A total of 42 advanced NSCLC patients with acquired EGFR T790M mutation after prior EGFR-TKIs treatment were collected between January 2020 to August 2021, with 16 cases treated with osimertinib plus bevacizumab and 26 cases treated with osimertinib. The treatment effect of patients were analyzed.

RESULTS

The objective response rate (ORR) in combination group and osimertinib group were 43.8% and 50.0% respectively (P=0.694). No statistically significant difference in median PFS (14.0 mon vs 13.0 mon, P=0.797) and overall survival (OS) (29.0 mon vs 26.0 mon, P=0.544) between the combination group and osimertinib group were observed. Prior history of bevacizumab was identified as an independent predictor of PFS (P=0.045) and OS (P=0.023).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated that adding bevacizumab to osimertinib could not show advantages in PFS and OS in pretreated NSCLC patients harboring EGFR T790M-mutation.

Efficacy and safety of original EGFR-TKI combined with bevacizumab in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR-mutation experiencing gradual progression after EGFR-TKI treatment: a single-arm study

Background

Keeping on original epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment is the standard treatment for gradual progression EGFR-positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Angiogenic pathway can lead to EGFR-TKI resistance, but the effectiveness of combination strategies in this group is still controversial. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of the original EGFR-TKI combined with bevacizumab in advanced and metastatic lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring EGFR-mutation who experience gradual progression in a real-world setting.

Methods

From June 2019 to December 2021, a total of 35 metastatic EGFR positive NSCLC patients experienced gradual progression after EGFR-TKI treatments and received original TKI combined with bevacizumab were identified at Chongqing University Cancer Hospital, China. All patients were confirmed EGFR positive by rebiopsy before treatment. Patients were treated with EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab (15 mg/kg Q3W) after gradual progression until rapid progression or intolerable toxicity. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival 1 (PFS1, period from the beginning of EGFR-TKI treatment to the rapid progression of the disease), PFS2 (period from the beginning of EGFR-TKI combined with bevacizumab treatment to the rapid progression of the disease), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events of the combined treatment were collected and analyzed.

Results

A total of 33 patients could participate the efficacy evaluation. Median PFS1 and PFS2 were 20.5 and 8 months, respectively; DCR was 93.94%; median OS was immature. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards model showed that smoking status [hazard ratio (HR) =3.692, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.450-9.404, P=0.006], combined EGFR T790M mutation or rare mutation (HR =2.480, 95% CI: 1.073-5.729, P=0.034), and malignant pleural effusion (HR =3.707, 95% CI: 1.460-9.414, P=0.006) were independent risk factors for PFS2. The most common treatment-related adverse events greater than grade 3 included hypertension (23.7%), proteinuria (8.3%), and increased alanine aminotransferase (ALT; 4.1%) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST; 2.9%).

Conclusions

Continuous original TKI combined with bevacizumab showed partly favorable efficacy and safety and may represent a therapeutic option for metastatic EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients experiencing gradual progression after EGFR-TKI treatment.

Osimertinib and Bevacizumab Cotreatment for Untreated EGFR-Mutated NSCLC With Malignant Pleural or Pericardial Effusion (SPIRAL II): A Single-Arm, Open-Label, Phase 2 Clinical Trial

Introduction

First-line treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC with erlotinib plus antiangiogenic inhibitor exhibits promising results. However, the efficacy of this combination has not been fully investigated. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC complicated with malignant pleural or pericardial effusion (MPE) for whom combination therapy may be particularly effective.

Methods

This single-arm, open-label, phase 2 study aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of the bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) and osimertinib (80 mg) combination in the first-line setting for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE. The primary end point of this study was 1-year progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary end points were objective response rate, PFS, overall survival, drainage-free survival without the need for thoracic or pericardial drainage, and safety.

Results

Between January 2019 and August 2020, a total of 31 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enrolled from Japan in the study. The median PFS was 8.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 5.3-11.3), the 1-year PFS was 32.1% (80% CI: 21.4-43.3), and the objective response rate was 74.2% (95% CI: 56.8-86.3). The median overall survival was not reached. The median drainage-free survival was 18.4 months (95% CI: 10.3-not estimable). Anorexia was the most common grade 3 or higher adverse event (four patients, 12.9%), followed by fatigue and dyspnea (three patients, 9.7%). No treatment-related deaths were recorded.

Conclusions

Osimertinib and bevacizumab combination in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC with MPE were safe but did not effectively increase PFS when compared with the inferred value from previous literature.

Mechanisms of EGFR-TKI-Induced Apoptosis and Strategies Targeting Apoptosis in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Homeostasis is achieved by balancing cell survival and death. In cancer cells, especially those carrying driver mutations, the processes and signals that promote apoptosis are inhibited, facilitating the survival and proliferation of these dysregulated cells. Apoptosis induction is an important mechanism underlying the therapeutic efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the mechanisms by which EGFR-TKIs induce apoptosis have not been fully elucidated. A deeper understanding of the apoptotic pathways induced by EGFR-TKIs is essential for the developing novel strategies to overcome resistance to EGFR-TKIs or to enhance the initial efficacy through therapeutic synergistic combinations. Recently, therapeutic strategies targeting apoptosis have been developed for cancer. Here, we review the state of knowledge on EGFR-TKI-induced apoptotic pathways and discuss the therapeutic strategies for enhancing EGFR-TKI efficiency. We highlight the great progress achieved with third-generation EGFR-TKIs. In particular, combination therapies of EGFR-TKIs with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor/receptor inhibitors or chemotherapy have emerged as promising therapeutic strategies for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Nevertheless, further breakthroughs are needed to yield an appropriate standard care for patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, which requires gaining a deeper understanding of cancer cell dynamics in response to EGFR-TKIs.

Pseudo-progression with osimertinib after definitive chemoradiation in unresectable epidermal growth factor receptor mutation positive of stage III non-small cell lung cancer: A case report

Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs) have been widely used in the treatment of locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The phenomenon of pseudoprogression in targeted therapy in EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients is rare. Here, we reported an EGFR-mutation-positive lung adenocarcinoma patient who was admitted to a hospital for cough and chest distress accompanied by shortness of breath. He underwent four cycles of chemotherapy with pemetrexed combined with carboplatin and concurrent radiotherapy in the third and fourth cycles. Then, he was treated by osimertinib maintenance therapy. After 11.5 months of osimertinib treatment, he was assessed to progressive disease by computed tomography. He underwent fiber bronchoscopy, and the biopsy pathology showed extensive necrosis without tumor cells. Until now, the patient has continued on osimertinib for 7 months without relapse or metastasis. As far as we know, we are the first to report pseudoprogression in osimertinib maintenance after definitive chemoradiation. This study reminds the clinicians to distinguish pseudoprogression from osimertinib-induced progression and avoid abandoning effective treatments.

[Research Progress of Angiogenesis Inhibitors Plus EGFR-TKI in EGFR-mutated Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer]

Lung cancer is one of the leading causes of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) have become the standard treatment for EGFR-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Unfortunately, drug resistance is inevitable in most cases. EGFR-TKI combined with angiogenesis inhibitors is a treatment scheme being explored to delay the therapeutic resistance, which is called "A+T treatment". Several clinical trials have demonstrated that the A+T treatment can improve the progression free survival (PFS) of the NSCLC patients. However, compared to EGFR-TKI monotherapy, the benefits of the A+T treatment based on different EGFR-TKIs, as well as its safety and exploration prospects are still unclear. Therefore, we reviewed the literature related to all three generations EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors, and summarized the mechanism, benefit, safety, optimal target population of A+T treatment.
.

RELAY, ramucirumab plus erlotinib versus placebo plus erlotinib in untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: exposure-response relationship

PURPOSE

In RELAY, ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM + ERL) improved progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Here, we present the exposure-response relationship of RAM from RELAY.

METHODS

Patients received ERL (150 mg/day) with either RAM (10 mg/kg) or placebo (PBO + ERL) every 2 weeks (Q2W). A population pharmacokinetic model predicted RAM minimum concentration after first dose (Cmin,1), and at steady state (Cmin,ss), which were used to evaluate correlation between RAM exposure and efficacy and safety. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression analyses were utilized to evaluate exposure-efficacy by Cmin,1 quartile. Exposure-safety was evaluated by assessing incidence rates for safety parameters by Cmin,ss quartile, with ordered categorical analysis used for ALT/AST only.

RESULTS

Analyses included 216 patients treated with RAM + ERL and 225 patients treated with PBO + ERL. Adjusting for significant baseline covariates, no exposure-efficacy relationship was identified in RELAY: PFS hazard ratio (mean, 95% confidence intervals) for the Cmin,1 quartiles were 0.67 (0.45-0.99), 0.77 (0.53-1.12), 0.57 (0.38-0.84), and 0.50 (0.33-0.76). No apparent exposure-safety relationship was observed for selected safety endpoints, including Grade ≥ 3 hypertension, diarrhea, and dermatitis acneiform, and any grade hypertension, any grade and Grade ≥ 3 proteinuria, and any grade ALT/AST increased within liver failure/liver injury.

CONCLUSIONS

No association was observed between RAM exposure and response, suggesting that the RELAY regimen of RAM 10 mg/kg Q2W with ERL is an optimized, efficacious, and safe first-line treatment for patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02411448.

Comparison of afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab in untreated stage IIIB/IV epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patients: a multicenter clinical analysis study

Background:

Although bevacizumab in combination with afatinib or erlotinib is an effective and safe first-line therapy for advanced epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), there are very few clinical data comparing afatinib and erlotinib combined with bevacizumab. We performed a retrospective multicenter analysis for the comparison of two combination therapies.

Methods:

Between May 2015 and October 2020, data of 135 stage IIIB/IV EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients receiving first-line afatinib or erlotinib combined with bevacizumab combination therapy in Linkou, Keelung, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals were retrieved and retrospectively analyzed.

Results:

In all, 67 patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab, and 68 patients received erlotinib plus bevacizumab. Afatinib combined with bevacizumab had an objective response rate (ORR) of 82.1% and a disease control rate (DCR) of 97.0%, and the ORR and DCR were 83.8 and 95.6%, respectively, in the erlotinib combined with bevacizumab group (p = 0.798 and p = 1.000). The median progression-free survival was 20.7 and 20.3 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.02; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.891–1.953; p = 0.167). The overall survival was 41.9 and 51.0 months for the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and erlotinib plus bevacizumab group, respectively (HR = 1.42; 95% CI, 0.829–2.436; p = 0.201). The secondary EGFR-T790M mutation rates after disease progression were 44% in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group and 58.8% in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p = 0.165). Skin toxicity was the most frequent treatment-related adverse event (AE) in both treatment groups. Diarrhea, an AE, occurred significantly more frequently in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group than in the erlotinib plus bevacizumab group (p < 0.05).

Conclusion:

Afatinib combined with bevacizumab was equally as effective as erlotinib combined with bevacizumab for untreated advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Prospective clinical studies that explore bevacizumab combined with afatinib or erlotinib for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC are warranted.

Targeting strategies in the treatment of fumarate hydratase deficient renal cell carcinoma

Fumarate hydratase (FH) - deficient renal cell carcinoma (FHdRCC) is a rare aggressive subtype of RCC caused by a germline or sporadic loss-of-function mutation in the FH gene. Here, we summarize how FH deficiency results in the accumulation of fumarate, which in turn leads to activation of hypoxia-inducible factor (HIF) through inhibition of prolyl hydroxylases. HIF promotes tumorigenesis by orchestrating a metabolic switch to glycolysis even under normoxia, a phenomenon well-known as the Warburg effect. HIF activates the transcription of many genes, including vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF). Crosstalk between HIF and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has also been described as a tumor-promoting mechanism. In this review we discuss therapeutic options for FHdRCC with a focus on anti-angiogenesis and EGFR-blockade. We also address potential targets that arise within the metabolic escape routes taken by FH-deficient cells for cell growth and survival.

A multifunctional nanotheranostic agent potentiates erlotinib to EGFR wild-type non-small cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), such as Erlotinib, have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with mutated EGFR. However, the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs in wild-type (wt) EGFR tumours has been shown to be marginal. Methods that can sensitize Erlotinib to EGFR wild-type NSCLC remain rare. Herein, we developed a multifunctional superparamagnetic nanotheranostic agent as a novel strategy to potentiate Erlotinib to EGFR-wt NSCLCs. Our results demonstrate that the nanoparticles can co-escort Erlotinib and a vascular epithermal growth factor (VEGF) inhibitor, Bevacizumab (Bev), to EGFR-wt tumours. The nanotheranostic agent exhibits remarkable effects as an inhibitor of EGFR-wt tumour growth. Moreover, Bev normalizes the tumour embedded vessels, further promoting the therapeutic efficacy of Erlotinib. In addition, the tumour engagement of the nanoparticles and the vascular normalization could be tracked by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Collectively, our study, for the first time, demonstrated that elaborated nanoparticles could be employed as a robust tool to potentiate Erlotinib to EGFR-wt NSCLC, paving the way for imaging-guided nanotheranostics for refractory NSCLCs expressing EGFR wild-type genes.

•

A Erlotinib-based nanoagent shows remarkable efficacy to inhibit EGFR-wt NSCLCs.

•

Erlotinib and Bevacizumab show synergistic effects in inhibit EGFR-wt NSCLC.

•

MRI was used to track the tumour engagement of the Erlotinib-based nanoagent.

Acquired Resistance to Osimertinib in EGFR-Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: How Do We Overcome It?

Osimertinib is currently the preferred first-line therapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with common epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation and the standard second-line therapy in T790M-positive patients in progression to previous EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Osimertinib is a highly effective treatment that shows a high response rate and long-lasting disease control. However, a resistance to the treatment inevitably develops among patients. Understanding the secondary mechanisms of resistance and the possible therapeutic options available is crucial to define the best management of patients in progression to osimertinib. We provide a comprehensive review of the emerging molecular resistance mechanism in EGFR-mutated NSCLC pre-treated with osimertinib and its future treatment applications.

Impact of Smoking Status in Combination Treatment with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Anti-Angiogenic Agents in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Susceptible EGFR Mutations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor susceptible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and are treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with chemotherapy. However, developed EGFR-TKI resistance limits PFS improvements. Currently, combination treatment with EGFR-TKIs and anti-angiogenic agents is considered a beneficial regimen for advanced-stage NSCLC harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. However, several trials reported osimertinib plus bevacizumab failed to show superior efficacy over osimertinib alone. However, subgroup analysis showed significantly longer PFS among patients with a history of smoking over those who never smoked. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the smoking status impact. At the end of the process, a total of 2068 patients from 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, combination EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent treatment showed significantly better PFS among patients with a smoking history (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48-0.73). Erlotinib-based combination therapy showed positive PFS benefits regardless of smoking status (HR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.41-0.71 for ever smoker, HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.54-0.87 for never smoker). Combination therapy prolonged PFS significantly regardless of ethnicity (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.93 for Asian RCTs, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.74 for global and non-Asian RCTs). PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022304198).

Addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib as first-line treatment of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer. The BEVERLY multicenter randomized phase III trial

INTRODUCTION

Adding bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged PFS of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC in the Japanese JO25567 trial, but limited data were available in non-Asian patients. BEVERLY is an Italian, multicenter, randomized phase III investigating the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib as first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.

METHODS

Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib alone. Investigator-assessed PFS (IA-PFS) and blinded-independent centrally-reviewed PFS (BICR-PFS) were co-primary endpoints. With 80% power in detecting a 0.60 HR and 2-sided α error 0.05, 126 events out of 160 patients were needed. The trial was registered as NCT02633189 and EudraCT 2015-002235-17.

RESULTS

From Apr 11, 2016 to Feb 27, 2019, 160 pts were randomized to erlotinib+bevacizumab (80) or erlotinib alone (80). At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, median IA-PFS was 15.4 months (95%CI:12.2-18.6) with erlotinib+bevacizumab and 9.6 months (95%CI:8.2-10.6) with erlotinib (HR 0.66; 95%CI: 0.47-0.92). BICR-PFS analysis confirmed this result. A statistically significant interaction with treatment effect was found for smoking habit (P=0.0323), PFS prolongation being clinically significant only among current or previous smokers. Hypertension (grade≥3: 24% vs 5%), skin rash (grade≥3: 31% vs 14%), thromboembolic events (any grade: 11% vs 4%), and proteinuria (any grade: 23% vs 6%) were more frequent with the combination.

CONCLUSION

The addition of bevacizumab to first-line erlotinib prolonged PFS in Italian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC; toxicity was increased with the combination but without unexpected safety issues.

Efficacy of osimertinib in epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer patients with pleural effusion

Background

Osimertinib is a standard first-line treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. Although malignant pleural effusion (PE) is a common clinical problem in NSCLC, information about the efficacy of osimertinib in patients with PE is limited, especially regarding its efficacy in EGFR T790M-negative patients with PE remains unclear.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations who were treated with osimertinib in our institution between May 2016 and December 2020.

Results

A total of 63 patients with EGFR mutated NSCLC were treated with osimertinib; 33 (12 with PE) had no EGFR T790M mutation, while 30 (12 with PE) had EGFR T790M mutation. In EGFR T790M-negative NSCLC, the progression-free survival (PFS) of the patients with PE was comparable to that of the patients without PE (median PFS 19.8 vs. 19.8 months, p = 0.693). In EGFR T790M- positive NSCLC, the PFS and overall survival (OS) of the patients with PE were significantly shorter than those of the patients without PE (median PFS 16.8 vs. 8.3 months, p = 0.003; median OS 44.9 vs. 14.2 months, p = 0.007). In the multivariate analysis, the presence of PE was independently associated with shorter PFS and OS in EGFR T790M-positive NSCLC patients, but not EGFR T790M-negative patients.

Conclusions

These data suggest the efficacy of osimertinib may differ between EGFR T790M-positive and -negative NSCLC patients with PE.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09701-2.

Image-guided drug delivery of nanotheranostics for targeted lung cancer therapy

Enormous efforts have been made to integrate various therapeutic interventions into multifunctional nanoplatforms, resulting in the advance of nanomedicine. Image-guided drug delivery plays a pivotal role in this field by providing specific targeting as well as image navigation for disease prognosis. Methods: We demonstrate image-guided surgery and drug delivery for the treatment of lung cancer using nanotheranostic H-dots loaded with gefitinib and genistein. Results: The surgical margin for lung tumors is determined by image guidance for precise tumor resection, while targeted anti-cancer drugs function simultaneously for synergistic combination therapy. Compared to conventional chemotherapies, H-dot complexes could improve the therapeutic efficacy of drugs while reducing the risk of adverse effects and drug resistance owing to their ideal biodistribution profiles, high targetability, low nonspecific tissue uptake, and fast renal excretion. Conclusions: These H-dot complexes have unlocked a unique framework for integrating multiple therapeutic and diagnostic modalities into one nanoplatform.

Combination of Bevacizumab and Osimertinib in Patients with EGFR T790M-Mutated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Osimertinib may improve the prognosis of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, to date, the efficacy and safety of osimertinib plus bevacizumab have not been elucidated.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to investigate the additional effect of bevacizumab plus osimertinib compared with osimertinib alone in NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation.

METHODS

In this study, 32 patients received osimertinib alone, while 20 patients received osimertinib plus bevacizumab. The median follow-up was 12 months. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were estimated and adverse events (AEs) were compared.

RESULTS

The overall response rate (ORR) was higher in the combination group than in the osimertinib-alone group (70.0% vs. 43.8%), and the OS (12.8% ± 7.7% vs. 45.4% ± 12.0%; p = 0.038) and PFS (37.3% ± 11.9% vs. 55.3% ± 14.3%; p = 0.045) were also significantly improved in patients who underwent osimertinib plus bevacizumab. Furthermore, the incidence of hypertension was significantly higher in the combination arm when compared with osimertinib alone (p = 0.003), and the number of other AEs were not significantly increased by adding bevacizumab (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Concomitant use of bevacizumab and osimertinib in NSCLC patients with EGFR T790M mutation may have potential therapeutic effect than osimertinib alone. Further studies with a larger number of patients are warranted to confirm results of this study.

Anti-angiogenesis revisited: reshaping the treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Although anti-angiogenic agents have been of limited use in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) until recently, further roles for the use of angiogenesis inhibition have emerged in the era of targeted therapy and immune checkpoint blockade. Given the shared common downstream signals of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) with their complementary roles in tumorigenesis and tumor angiogenesis, the dual inhibition of EGFR and VEGF pathways represents a rational strategy to maximize clinical efficacy and overcome resistance in the treatment of EGFR-mutant NSCLC. VEGF-driven angiogenesis is a potent driver of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME), with the recruited immunosuppressive cells driving angiogenesis, highlighting the interplay between the tumor vasculature and the anticancer immunity. Anti-angiogenic therapy can normalize the tumor vasculature and reprogram the TME from immunosuppressive into immunosupportive. Intensive research is under way to utilize the anti-angiogenic combination therapy to its full potential in diverse clinical settings in urgent unmet needs for the treatment of NSCLC. In this review, we present an overview of tumor angiogenesis and summarize the scientific background and preclinical and clinical evidence of anti-angiogenic therapy in combination with target therapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of NSCLC.

Targeting Acquired and Intrinsic Resistance Mechanisms in Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutant Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Over the past 2 decades, rapid advances in molecular profiling and the development of targeted therapies have dramatically improved the clinical course of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene are found in about a third of patients with advanced NSCLC, and the approval of first-generation EGFR targeted kinase inhibitors significantly improved survival when compared with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (PBC), the previous standard of care. Inevitably, selective pressure from first-generation EGFR inhibitors led to acquired resistance mechanisms, such as the T790M mutation. The advent of third-generation EGFR inhibitors (e.g., osimertinib) successfully overcame the T790M resistance mechanism, and osimertinib subsequently became the first-line therapy for EGFR mutant NSCLC. Currently, research in EGFR mutant NSCLC is primarily focused on targeting resistance mechanisms to osimertinib. Over the past several years, many important acquired and intrinsic mechanisms of resistance to osimertinib have been identified. Acquired resistance mechanisms include C797X, mesenchymal epithelial transition factor (MET) amplification, HER2/HER3 amplification, phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) pathway mutations, RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway mutations, cell-cycle gene alterations, oncogenic fusions, and histologic transformations. An important intrinsic resistance mechanism to osimertinib is the EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation, which is sensitive to the newly Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved tyrosine kinase inhibitor mobocertinib and the EGFR/MET bispecific antibody amivantamab. This review article aims to (1) summarize the advances in the treatment of EGFR mutant NSCLC, (2) delineate known resistance mechanisms to the current first-line therapy, osimertinib, and (3) describe the development of targeted drugs that aim to overcome these resistance mechanisms.

Efficacy and Safety of Gefitinib Plus Anlotinib for Patients with EGFR Positive Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Exploratory Study

Objective

This study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of gefitinib plus anlotinib for patients with EGFR positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a first-line setting.

Methods

A total of 36 patients with previously-untreated EGFR positive advanced NSCLC were included in this study retrospectively. All patients were administered with gefitinib plus anlotinib combination therapy. The efficacy of the patients was evaluated with the change of target lesion using imaging evidence according to RECIST 1.1 criteria and all the patients were followed up regularly. Adverse reactions were collected and documented during the combination administration. Univariate analysis according to the baseline characteristic subgroup was implemented using Log rank test and multivariate analysis was adjusted by Cox regression analysis.

Results

All the 36 patients included in our study were available for efficacy and safety analysis. Best overall response of the patients during gefitinib plus anlotinib administration suggested that partial response was observed in 30 patients, stable disease was noted in five patients, and progressive disease was found in one patient, which yielded an objective response rate (ORR) of 83.3% (95% CI=67.2–93.6%) and a disease control rate (DCR) of 97.2% (95% CI=85.5–99.9%). Prognostic data indicated that the median progression-free survival (PFS) of the 36 patients with NSCLC was 15.2 months (95% CI=8.15–22.26). Furthermore, the median overall survival (OS) of the 36 patients was 35.9 months (95% CI=22.77–49.03). Additionally, the most common adverse reactions of the patients with NSCLC were diarrhea (63.9%), fatigue (58.3%), hypertension (50.0%), rash (44.4%), and nausea and vomiting (41.7%). Furthermore, ECOG performance status was associated with PFS of gefitinib plus anlotinib combination therapy in baseline characteristic subgroup analysis.

Conclusion

Gefitinib plus anlotinib regimen demonstrated encouraging efficacy and an acceptable safety profile for patients with previously untreated EGFR positive NSCLC preliminarily. The conclusion should be validated in prospective clinical trials subsequently.

Development of Dual Inhibitors Targeting Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor in Cancer Therapy

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is of great significance in mediating cell signaling transduction and tumor behaviors. Currently, third-generation inhibitors of EGFR, especially osimertinib, are at the clinical frontier for the treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Regrettably, the rapidly developing drug resistance caused by EGFR mutations and the compensatory mechanism have largely limited their clinical efficacy. Given the synergistic effect between EGFR and other compensatory targets during tumorigenesis and tumor development, EGFR dual-target inhibitors are promising for their reduced risk of drug resistance, higher efficacy, lower dosage, and fewer adverse events than those of single-target inhibitors. Hence, we present the synergistic mechanism underlying the role of EGFR dual-target inhibitors against drug resistance, their structure-activity relationships, and their therapeutic potential. Most importantly, we emphasize the optimal target combinations and design strategies for EGFR dual-target inhibitors and provide some perspectives on new challenges and future directions in this field.

The different overall survival between single-agent EGFR-TKI treatment and with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer patients with brain metastasis

Comparison of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) monotherapy or with bevacizumab in real-world non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients was lacking. 310 patients of advanced NSCLC with common EGFR mutation receiving first-generation EGFR-TKI monotherapy or with bevacizumab were included and propensity-score matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analysed. Patients receiving EGFR-TKI and bevacizumab were significantly younger, had better performance status and with high incidence of brain metastasis (55.8%). In the propensity-score matched cohort, PFS (13.5 vs. 13.7 months; log-rank p = 0.700) was similar between the two groups. The OS (61.3 vs. 34.2 months; log-rank p = 0.010) and risk reduction of death (HR 0.42 [95% CI 0.20–0.85]; p = 0.017) were significantly improved in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group. Analysis of treatment by brain metastasis status demonstrated EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab in patients with brain metastasis was associated with significant OS benefit compared to other groups (log-rank p = 0.030) and these patients had lower early-CNS and early-systemic progressions. The secondary T790M did not significantly differ between EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab and EGFR-TKI monotherapy groups (66.7% vs. 75.0%, p = 0.460). Forty-one (31.1%) and 31 (23.5%) patients received subsequent osimertinib and chemotherapy, respectively. The post-progression OS of osimertinib and chemotherapy were 22.1 and 44.9 months in EGFR-TKI plus bevacizumab group and were 10.0 and 14.1 months in EGFR-TKI monotherpay group, respectively. First-generation EGFR-TKI with bevacizumab improved treatment efficacy in real-world patients of NSCLC with EGFR mutation. Patients with brain metastasis received additional OS benefit from this treatment.

RELAY+: Exploratory Study of Ramucirumab Plus Gefitinib in Untreated Patients With Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR)-Mutated Metastatic Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Introduction

Ramucirumab (RAM) plus erlotinib was found to have superior progression-free survival (PFS) versus placebo plus erlotinib in untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC in the global phase 3 RELAY study. RELAY+ was an open-label, two-period, single-arm, exploratory study of RAM plus gefitinib (GEF; period 1) and RAM plus osimertinib (period 2) in East Asia (NCT02411448).

Methods

Period 1 evaluated RAM (10 mg/kg) plus GEF (250 mg/d) in patients with untreated EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Period 2 evaluated RAM plus osimertinib (80 mg/d) in patients with disease progression who acquired T790M mutation in period 1. Exploratory end points included 1-year PFS rate (primary), other efficacy parameters, safety, and biomarker analyses of plasma (baseline, on-treatment, follow-up) using next-generation sequencing.

Results

From December 2017 to August 2018, a total of 82 patients were enrolled and started treatment (period 1, RAM + GEF). The 1-year PFS rate was 62.9% (95% confidence interval: 50.3–73.1). Treatment-emergent adverse events of grade three or higher were reported with RAM plus GEF in 60 of 82 patients (73.2%; five patients [6.1%] grade four). There were two deaths owing to adverse events that occurred (acute cardiac failure, congestive cardiac failure). T790M rate at disease progression in plasma was 81.0% (13 of 16 patients).

Conclusions

RELAY+ was found to have a favorable benefit–risk profile for RAM plus GEF in first-line treatment of East Asian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC.