Frequent hSNF5/INI1 Germline Mutations in Patients with Rhabdoid Tumor

Postzygotic mosaicism of SMARCB1 variants in patients with rhabdoid tumors: A not-so-rare condition exposing to successive tumors

BACKGROUND

Rhabdoid tumors (RT) are aggressive, rare tumors predominantly affecting young children, characterized by biallelic SMARCB1 gene inactivation. While most SMARCB1 alterations are acquired de novo, a third of cases exhibit germline alterations, defining Rhabdoid Tumors Predisposition Syndrome. With the increased sensitivity of next-generation sequencing (NGS), mosaicisms in genes linked to genetic diseases are more detectable. This study focuses on exploring SMARCB1 germline alterations, notably mosaicism in blood samples of children with RT and in parents, using a custom NGS panel.

METHODS

A cohort of 280 children and 140 parents with germline analysis was studied. Germline DNA from 111 children with RT and 32 parents were reanalyzed with a custom NGS panel with 1500X average depth targeting the SMARCB1 gene to identify intragenic variants not detected with conventional low-sensitivity methods. Follow-up data was obtained for 77 patients.

RESULTS

Nine previously undetected mosaicism cases were identified, totaling 17/280 patients with a mosaic variant (6.1%) in the cohort, with variant allele frequencies between 0.9% and 33%, thus highlighting the prior underestimation of its prevalence. Follow-up data showed that 4 out of 7 survivors with mosaic variants developed distinct novel tumors, 2 sharing SMARCB1 alterations with the initial tumor, emphasizing the potential clinical impact of SMARCB1 mosaicism.

CONCLUSIONS

The hitherto underestimated rate of SMARCB1 mosaicism in RT underscores the need for optimized genetic counseling and oncological monitoring. The findings have significant medical implications, considering the dire prognosis of RT.

Late-onset tumors in rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type-1 (RTPS1) and implications for surveillance

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome type-1 (RTPS1) is characterized by germline pathogenic variants in SMARCB1 and development of INI1-deficient rhabdoid tumors in early childhood. Due to its poor prognosis, the risk of subsequent tumor development and the impact of surveillance at later ages are poorly understood. We retrospectively reviewed individuals referred to the Cancer Genetics Program at The Hospital for Sick Children for SMARCB1 genetic testing and/or surveillance for RTPS1. In addition, to explore characteristics of late-onset tumors in RTPS1, a literature review was conducted. Of eighty-three individuals (55 probands and 28 family members), 12 probands and 4 family members were genetically confirmed with RTPS1. Four pediatric probands with RTPS1 underwent surveillance. An additional three individuals, including one patient with 22q11.2 distal deletion without history of tumor, one patient with negative genetic testing results but clinically diagnosed with RTPS1, and one sibling identified through cascade testing, underwent surveillance. Three patients with RTPS1 developed tumors between the ages of 9 and 17, including malignant rhabdoid tumors (N = 3), schwannomas (N = 4), and epithelioid malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (N = 1). Three of these lesions were asymptomatically detected by surveillance. A literature review revealed 17 individuals with RTPS1 who developed INI1-deficient tumors after age five. Individuals with RTPS1 remain at elevated risk for developing INI1-deficient tumors after the peak age of rhabdoid tumor in early childhood. Extension of surveillance beyond 5 years of age could lead to improved survival and reduced morbidity for these patients, and prospective evaluation of revised approaches will be important.

Genetic Predisposition to Sarcoma: What Should Clinicians Know?

OPINION STATEMENT

Pathogenic germline variants in the setting of several associated cancer predisposition syndromes (CPS) may lead to the development of sarcoma. We would consider testing for a CPS in patients with a strong family history of cancer, multiple primary malignancies, and/or pediatric/adolescent/young adult patients diagnosed with other malignancies strongly associated with CPS. When a CPS is diagnosed in a patient with sarcoma, additional treatment considerations and imaging options for those patients are required. This applies particularly to the use of radiation therapy, ionizing radiation with diagnostic imaging, and the use of alkylating chemotherapy. As data and guidelines are currently lacking for many of these scenarios, we have adopted a shared decision-making process with patients and their families. If the best chance for cure in a patient with CPS requires utilization of radiation therapy or alkylating chemotherapy, we discuss the risks with the patient but do not omit these modalities. However, if there are treatment options that yield equivalent survival rates, yet avoid these modalities, we elect for those options. Considering staging imaging and post-therapy evaluation for sarcoma recurrence, we avoid surveillance techniques that utilize ionizing radiation when possible but do not completely omit them when their use is indicated.

Current surgical approaches to pediatric renal tumors

Pediatric renal tumors are among the most common pediatric solid malignancies. Surgical resection is a key component in the multidisciplinary therapy for children with kidney tumors. Therefore, it is imperative that surgeons caring for children with renal tumors fully understand the current standards of care in order to provide appropriate surgical expertise within this multimodal framework. Fortunately, the last 60 years of international, multidisciplinary pediatric cancer cooperative group studies have enabled high rates of cure for these patients. This review will highlight the international surgical approaches to pediatric patients with kidney cancer to help surgeons understand the key differences and similarities between the European (International Society of Pediatric Oncology) and North American (Children's Oncology Group) recommendations.

Pediatric CNS tumors and 2021 WHO classification: what do oncologists need from pathologists?

The fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (CNS), published in 2021, established new approaches to both CNS tumor nomenclature and grading, emphasizing the importance of integrated diagnoses and layered reports. This edition increased the role of molecular diagnostics in CNS tumor classification while still relying on other established approaches such as histology and immunohistochemistry. Moreover, it introduced new tumor types and subtypes based on novel diagnostic technologies such as DNA methylome profiling. Over the past decade, molecular techniques identified numerous key genetic alterations in CSN tumors, with important implications regarding the understanding of pathogenesis but also for prognosis and the development and application of effective molecularly targeted therapies. This review summarizes the major changes in the 2021 fifth edition classification of pediatric CNS tumors, highlighting for each entity the molecular alterations and other information that are relevant for diagnostic, prognostic, or therapeutic purposes and that patients' and oncologists' need from a pathology report.

Constitutional balanced translocations involving SMARCB1: A rare cause of rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome

Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome 1 (RTPS1) confers an increased risk of developing rhabdoid tumors and is caused by germline mutations in SMARCB1. RTPS1 should be evaluated in all individuals with rhabdoid tumor and is more likely in those with a young age at presentation (occasionally congenital presentation), multiple primary tumors, or a family history of rhabdoid tumor or RTPS1. Proband genetic testing is the standard method for diagnosing RTPS1. Most known RTPS1-related SMARCB1 gene mutations are copy number variants (CNVs) or single nucleotide variants/indels, but structural variant analysis (SVA) is not usually included in the molecular evaluation. Here, we report two children with RTPS1 presenting with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) who had constitutional testing showing balanced chromosome translocations involving SMARCB1. Patient 1 is a 23-year-old female diagnosed with pineal region ATRT at 7 months who was found to have a de novo, constitutional t(16;22)(p13.3;q11.2). Patient 2 is a 24-month-old male diagnosed with a posterior fossa ATRT at 14 months, with subsequent testing showing a constitutional t(5;22)(q14.1;q11.23). These structural rearrangements have not been previously reported in RTPS1. While rare, these cases suggest that structural variants should be considered in the evaluation of children with rhabdoid tumors to provide more accurate genetic counseling on the risks of developing tumors, the need for surveillance, and the risks of passing the disorder on to future children. Further research is needed to understand the prevalence, clinical features, and tumor risks associated with RTPS1-related constitutional balanced translocations.

Current Molecular and Clinical Landscape of ATRT - The Link to Future Therapies

ATRT is a highly aggressive and rare pediatric CNS tumor of very young children. Its genetic hallmark is bi-allelic inactivation of SMARCB1 encoding INI1. Rarely SMARCA4 encoding BRG1 is affected. Up to 30% are associated with constitutional heterozygous pathogenic variants in one of the two genes, giving rise to the Rhabdoid-Tumor-Predisposition-Syndromes (RTPS) 1 and 2. Characteristic DNA methylation profiles distinguish ATRT from other SMARCB1-deficient entities. Three distinct subtypes ATRT-MYC, -TYR, and -SHH are on record. ATRT-SHH may be further divided into the subgroups ATRT-SHH1A, -SHH1B, and -SHH2. The cure of ATRT remains challenging, notwithstanding an increasing understanding of molecular pathomechanisms and genetic background. The implementation of multimodal institutional treatment protocols has improved prognosis. Regardless of treatment approaches, clinical risk factors such as age, metastases, and DNA methylation subtype affect survival probability. We provide a critical appraisal of current conventional multimodal regimens and emerging targeted treatment approaches investigated in clinical trials and entity-specific registries. Intense treatment approaches featuring radiotherapy (RT) and high-dose chemotherapy (HDCT) face the difficulty of balancing tumor control and treatment-related toxicity. Current approaches focus on minimizing radiation fields by proton beam therapy or to withhold RT in HDCT-only approaches. Still, a 40-75% relapse rate upon first-line treatment reveals the need for novel treatment strategies in primary and even more in recurrent/refractory (r/r) disease. Among targeted treatments, immune checkpoint inhibitors and epigenetically active agents appear most promising. Success remains limited in single agent approaches. We hypothesize that mechanism-informed combination therapy will enhance response, as the low mutational burden of ATRT may contribute to acquiring resistance to single targeted agents. As DNA methylation group-specific gene expression profiles appear to influence response to distinct agents, the future treatment of ATRT should respect clinical and biological heterogeneity in risk group adjusted treatment protocols.

Rhabdoid tumors in patients conceived following ART: is there an association?

STUDY QUESTION

In children affected by rhabdoid tumors (RT), are there clinical, therapeutic, and/or (epi-)genetic differences between those conceived following ART compared to those conceived without ART?

SUMMARY ANSWER

We detected a significantly elevated female predominance, and a lower median age at diagnosis, of children with RT conceived following ART (RT_ART) as compared to other children with RT.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Anecdotal evidence suggests an association of ART with RT.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a multi-institutional retrospective survey. Children with RT conceived by ART were identified in our EU-RHAB database (n = 11/311 children diagnosed between January 2010 and January 2018) and outside the EU-RHAB database (n = 3) from nine different countries. A population-representative German EU-RHAB control cohort of children with RTs conceived without ART (n = 211) (EU-RHAB control cohort) during the same time period was used as a control cohort for clinical, therapeutic, and survival analyses. The median follow-up time was 11.5 months (range 0-120 months) for children with RT_ART and 18.5 months (range 0-153 months) for the EU-RHAB control cohort.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

We analyzed 14 children with RT_ART diagnosed from January 2010 to January 2018. We examined tumors and matching blood samples for SMARCB1 mutations and copy number alterations using FISH, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, and DNA sequencing. DNA methylation profiling of tumor and/or blood samples was performed using DNA methylation arrays and compared to respective control cohorts of similar age (n = 53 tumors of children with RT conceived without ART, and n = 38 blood samples of children with no tumor born small for gestational age).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The median age at diagnosis of 14 individuals with RT_ART was 9 months (range 0-66 months), significantly lower than the median age of patients with RT (n = 211) in the EU-RHAB control cohort (16 months (range 0-253), P = 0.03). A significant female predominance was observed in the RT_ART cohort (M:F ratio: 2:12 versus 116:95 in EU-RHAB control cohort, P = 0.004). Eight of 14 RT_ART patients were diagnosed with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor, three with extracranial, extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor, one with rhabdoid tumor of the kidney and two with synchronous tumors. The location of primary tumors did not differ significantly in the EU-RHAB control cohort (P = 0.27). Six of 14 RT_ART patients presented with metastases at diagnosis. Metastatic stage was not significantly different from that within the EU-RHAB control cohort (6/14 vs 88/211, P = 1). The incidence of pathogenic germline variants was five of the 12 tested RT_ART patients and, thus, not significantly different from the EU-RHAB control cohort (5/12 versus 36/183 tested, P = 0.35). The 5-year overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) rates of RT_ART patients were 42.9 ± 13.2% and 21.4 ± 11%, respectively, and thus comparable to the EU-RHAB control cohort (OS 41.1 ± 3.5% and EFS 32.1 ± 3.3). We did not find other clinical, therapeutic, outcome factors distinguishing patients with RT_ART from children with RTs conceived without ART (EU-RHAB control cohort). DNA methylation analyses of 10 tumors (atypical teratoid RT = 6, extracranial, extrarenal malignant RT = 4) and six blood samples from RT_ART patients showed neither evidence of a general DNA methylation difference nor underlying imprinting defects, respectively, when compared to a control group (n = 53 RT samples of patients without ART, P = 0.51, n = 38 blood samples of patients born small for gestational age, P = 0.1205).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

RTs are very rare malignancies and our results are based on a small number of children with RT_ART.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This cohort of patients with RT_ART demonstrated a marked female predominance, and a rather low median age at diagnosis even for RTs. Other clinical, treatment, outcome, and molecular factors did not differ from those conceived without ART (EU-RHAB control cohort) or reported in other series, and there was no evidence for imprinting defects. Long-term survival is achievable even in cases with pathogenic germline variants, metastatic disease at diagnosis, or relapse. The female preponderance among RT_ART patients is not yet understood and needs to be evaluated, ideally in larger international series.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

M.C.F. is supported by the 'Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung' DKS 2020.10, by the 'Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft' DFG FR 1516/4-1 and by the Deutsche Krebshilfe 70113981. R.S. received grant support by Deutsche Krebshilfe 70114040 and for infrastructure by the KinderKrebsInitiative Buchholz/Holm-Seppensen. P.D.J. is supported by the Else-Kroener-Fresenius Stiftung and receives a Max-Eder scholarship from the Deutsche Krebshilfe. M.H. is supported by DFG (HA 3060/8-1) and IZKF Münster (Ha3/017/20). BB is supported by the 'Deutsche Kinderkrebsstiftung' DKS 2020.05. We declare no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumour with CDK6 amplification in a child: a case report and literature review

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumours (AT/RTs) are rare central nervous system neoplasms that frequently occur in infants and children and have a very poor prognosis. In recent years, molecular analysis of AT/RTs has shown that biallelic inactivation of SMARCB1 (INI1, SNF5, BAF47) or SMARCA4 (BRG1) frequently occurs. Here, we present a case of basal ganglia AT/RT with SMARCB1 gene deficiency and CDK6 gene amplification in a 5-year-old child. A 5-year-old boy was hospitalized due to a 1-week history of frontal and parietal headache. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) demonstrated a 3 cm × 2 cm × 1.5 cm heterogeneous enhanced mass located at the right basal ganglia that partially protruded into the right lateral ventricle. The lesion was successfully resected under electrophysiological monitoring and neuronavigation. The postoperative pathological examination implied an AT/RT diagnosis, with loss of SMARCB1 protein, SMARCB1 gene deficiency and CDK6 gene amplification. Unfortunately, the patient died due to respiratory and circulatory failure at 5 weeks after the operation. To date, standard regimens have not yet been established due to the lack of large-scale prospective studies for AT/RT. The p16-RB signalling pathway should be considered as a potential target for AT/RT treatment modalities. Apart from traditional regimens, targeted therapies, especially CDK4/6 inhibitors, are likely a promising therapeutic option for AT/RT treatment.

Recent insights into the SWI/SNF complex and the molecular mechanism of hSNF5 deficiency in rhabdoid tumors

Genetic information encoded by DNA is packaged in the nucleus using the chromatin structure. The accessibility of transcriptional elements in DNA is controlled by the dynamic structural changes of chromatin for the appropriate regulation of gene transcription. Chromatin structure is regulated by two general mechanisms, one is histone modification and the other is chromatin remodeling in an ATP-dependent manner. Switch/sucrose nonfermentable (SWI/SNF) complexes utilize the energy from ATP hydrolysis to mobilize nucleosomes and remodel the chromatin structure, contributing to conformational changes in chromatin. Recently, the inactivation of encoding genes for subunits of the SWI/SNF complexes has been documented in a series of human cancers, accounting for up to almost 20% of all human cancers. For example, human SNF5 (hSNF5), the gene that encodes a subunit of the SWI/SNF complexes, is the sole mutation target that drives malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT). Despite remarkably simple genomes, the MRT has highly malignant characteristics. As a key to understanding MRT tumorigenesis, it is necessary to fully examine the mechanism of chromatin remodeling by the SWI/SNF complexes. Herein, we review the current understanding of chromatin remodeling by focusing on SWI/SNF complexes. In addition, we describe the molecular mechanisms and influences of hSNF5 deficiency in rhabdoid tumors and the prospects for developing new therapeutic targets to overcome the epigenetic drive of cancer that is caused by abnormal chromatin remodeling.

Novel Strategy Involving High-Dose Chemotherapy with Stem Cell Rescue Followed by Intrathecal Topotecan Maintenance Therapy without Whole-Brain Irradiation for Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumors

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a rare aggressive central nervous system tumor that typically affects children under three years old and has poor survival with a high risk for neurologic deficits. The primary purpose of this study was to successfully treat the disease and delay or avoid whole-brain radiotherapy for children with AT/RT. A retrospective analysis was performed for six children diagnosed with AT/RT and treated with multimodal treatment at a single institute between 2014 and 2020. Furthermore, germline SMARCB1 aberrations and MGMT methylation status of the tumors were analyzed. One patient who did not receive a modified IRS-III regimen replaced with ifosphamide, carboplatin, and etoposide (ICE) in induction chemotherapy was excluded from this analysis. Five patients who received ICE therapy were under three years old. After a surgical approach, they received intensive chemotherapy and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous peripheral blood stem cell transplantation (HDCT/autoPBSCT) followed by intrathecal topotecan maintenance therapy. Three patients underwent single HDCT/autoPBSCT, and the other two received sequential treatment. Two patients with germline SMARCB1 aberrations and metastases died of progressive AT/RT or therapy-related malignancy, while 3 with localized tumors without germline SMARCB1 aberrations remained alive. One survivor received local radiotherapy only, while the other two did not undergo radiotherapy. All three surviving patients were able to avoid whole-brain radiotherapy. Our results suggest that AT/RT patients with localized tumors without germline SMARCB1 aberrations can be rescued with multimodal therapy, including induction therapy containing ICE followed by HDCT/autoPBSCT and intrathecal topotecan maintenance therapy without radiotherapy. Further large-scale studies are necessary to confirm this hypothesis.

Identification of germline cancer predisposition variants in pediatric sarcoma patients from somatic tumor testing

Genetic predisposition is an important risk factor for cancer in children and adolescents but detailed associations of individual genetic mutations to childhood cancer are still under intense investigation. Among pediatric cancers, sarcomas can arise in the setting of cancer predisposition syndromes. The association of sarcomas with these syndromes is often missed, due to the rarity and heterogeneity of sarcomas and the limited search of cancer genetic syndromes. This study included 43 pediatric and young adult patients with different sarcoma subtypes. Tumor profiling was undertaken using the Oncomine Childhood Cancer Research Assay (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Sequencing results were reviewed for potential germline alterations in clinically relevant genes associated with cancer predisposition syndromes. Jongmans´ criteria were taken into consideration for the patient selection. Fifteen patients were selected as having potential pathogenic germline variants due to tumor sequencing that identified variants in the following genes: CDKN2A, NF1, NF2, RB1, SMARCA4, SMARCB1 and TP53. The variants found in NF1 and CDKN2A in two different patients were detected in the germline, confirming the diagnosis of a cancer predisposition syndrome. We have shown that the results of somatic testing can be used to identify those at risk of an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome.

Nervous system (NS) Tumors in Cancer Predisposition Syndromes

Genetic syndromes which develop one or more nervous system (NS) tumors as one of the manifestations can be grouped under the umbrella term of NS tumor predisposition syndromes. Understanding the underlying pathological pathways at the molecular level has led us to many radical discoveries, in understanding the mechanisms of tumorigenesis, tumor progression, interactions with the tumor microenvironment, and development of targeted therapies. Currently, at least 7-10% of all pediatric cancers are now recognized to occur in the setting of genetic predisposition to cancer or cancer predisposition syndromes. Specifically, the cancer predisposition rate in pediatric patients with NS tumors has been reported to be as high as 15%, though it can approach 50% in certain tumor types (i.e., choroid plexus carcinoma associated with Li Fraumeni Syndrome). Cancer predisposition syndromes are caused by pathogenic variation in genes that primarily function as tumor suppressors and proto-oncogenes. These variants are found in the germline or constitutional DNA. Mosaicism, however, can affect only certain tissues, resulting in varied manifestations. Increased understanding of the genetic underpinnings of cancer predisposition syndromes and the ability of clinical laboratories to offer molecular genetic testing allows for improvement in the identification of these patients. The identification of a cancer predisposition syndrome in a CNS tumor patient allows for changes to medical management to be made, including the initiation of cancer surveillance protocols. Finally, the identification of at-risk biologic relatives becomes feasible through cascade (genetic) testing. These fundamental discoveries have also broadened the horizon of novel therapeutic possibilities and have helped to be better predictors of prognosis and survival. The treatment paradigm of specific NS tumors may also vary based on the patient's cancer predisposition syndrome and may be used to guide therapy (i.e., immune checkpoint inhibitors in constitutional mismatch repair deficiency [CMMRD] predisposition syndrome) [8]. Early diagnosis of these cancer predisposition syndromes is therefore critical, in both unaffected and affected patients. Genetic counselors are uniquely trained master's level healthcare providers with a focus on the identification of hereditary disorders, including hereditary cancer, or cancer predisposition syndromes. Genetic counseling, defined as "the process of helping people understand and adapt to the medical, psychological and familial implications of genetic contributions to disease" plays a vital role in the adaptation to a genetic diagnosis and the overall management of these diseases. Cancer predisposition syndromes that increase risks for NS tumor development in childhood include classic neurocutaneous disorders like neurofibromatosis type 1 and type 2 (NF1, NF2) and tuberous sclerosis complex (TSC) type 1 and 2 (TSC1, TSC2). Li Fraumeni Syndrome, Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency, Gorlin syndrome (Nevoid Basal Cell Carcinoma), Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition syndrome, and Von Hippel-Lindau disease. Ataxia Telangiectasia will also be discussed given the profound neurological manifestations of this syndrome. In addition, there are other cancer predisposition syndromes like Cowden/PTEN Hamartoma Tumor Syndrome, DICER1 syndrome, among many others which also increase the risk of NS neoplasia and are briefly described. Herein, we discuss the NS tumor spectrum seen in the abovementioned cancer predisposition syndromes as with their respective germline genetic abnormalities and recommended surveillance guidelines when applicable. We conclude with a discussion of the importance and rationale for genetic counseling in these patients and their families.

Chromatin remodeling (SWI/SNF) complexes, cancer, and response to immunotherapy

Chromatin regulation involves four subfamilies composed of ATP-dependent multifunctional protein complexes that remodel the way DNA is packaged. The SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable (SWI/SNF) chromatin remodeling complex subfamily mediates nucleosome reorganization and hence activation/repression of critical genes. The SWI/SNF complex is composed of the BRG-/BRM-associated factor and Polybromo-associated BAF complexes, which in turn have multiple subunits. Significantly, ~20% of malignancies harbor alterations in >1 of these subunits, making the genes encoding SWI/SNF family members among the most vulnerable to genomic aberrations in cancer. ARID1A is the largest subunit of the SWI/SNF complex and is altered in ~40%–50% of ovarian clear cell cancers and ~15%–30% of cholangiocarcinomas, in addition to a variety of other malignancies. Importantly, outcome was improved after immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in patients with ARID1A-altered versuss wild-type tumors, and this result was independent of microsatellite instability or tumor mutational burden. Another subunit—PBRM1—is mutated in ~40% of clear cell renal cell carcinomas and ~12% of cholangiocarcinomas; there are contradictory reports regarding ICB responsiveness. Two other SWI/SNF subunits of interest are SMARCA4 and SMARCB1. SMARCA4 loss is the hallmark of small cell carcinoma of the ovary hypercalcemic type (and is found in a variety of other malignancies); SMARCA4 germline alterations lead to rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome-2; SMARCB1 germline alterations, rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome-1. Remarkable, although anecdotal, responses to ICB have been reported in both SMARCA4-aberrant and SMARCB1-aberrant advanced cancers. This review focuses on the role that SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling subunits play in carcinogenesis, the immune microenvironment, and in immunotherapy responsiveness.

Molecular Markers of Pediatric Solid Tumors—Diagnosis, Optimizing Treatments, and Determining Susceptibility: Current State and Future Directions

Advances in molecular technologies, from genomics and transcriptomics to epigenetics, are providing unprecedented insight into the molecular landscape of pediatric tumors. Multi-omics approaches provide an opportunity to identify a wide spectrum of molecular alterations that account for the initiation of the neoplastic process in children, response to treatment and disease progression. The detection of molecular markers is crucial to assist clinicians in accurate tumor diagnosis, risk stratification, disease subtyping, prediction of treatment response, and surveillance, allowing also for personalized cancer management. This review summarizes the most recent developments in genomics research and their relevance to the field of pediatric oncology with the aim of generating an overview of the most important, from the clinical perspective, molecular markers for pediatric solid tumors. We present an overview of the molecular markers selected based on therapeutic protocols, guidelines from international committees and scientific societies, and published data.

Current and Emerging Therapeutic Approaches for Extracranial Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors

Extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumors (extracranial MRT) are rare, highly aggressive malignancies affecting mainly infants and children younger than 3 years. Common anatomic sites comprise the kidneys (RTK – rhabdoid tumor of kidney) and other soft tissues (eMRT – extracranial, extrarenal malignant rhabdoid tumor). The genetic origin of these diseases is linked to biallelic pathogenic variants in the genes SMARCB1, or rarely SMARCA4, encoding subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex. Even if extracranial MRT seem to be quite homogeneous, recent epigenome analyses reveal a certain degree of epigenetic heterogeneity. Use of intensified therapies has modestly improved survival for extracranial MRT. Patients at standard risk profit from conventional therapies; most high-risk patients still experience a dismal course and often therapy resistance. Discoveries of clinical and molecular hallmarks and the exploration of experimental therapeutic approaches open exciting perspectives for clinical and molecularly stratified experimental treatment approaches. To ultimately improve the outcome of patients with extracranial MRTs, they need to be characterized and stratified clinically and molecularly. High-risk patients need novel therapeutic approaches including selective experimental agents in phase I/II clinical trials.

Case Report of Small Cell Carcinoma of the Ovary, Hypercalcemic Type (Ovarian Rhabdoid Tumor) with SMARCB1 Mutation: A Literature Review of a Rare and Aggressive Condition

Small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) is a rare and aggressive condition that is associated with the SMARCA4 mutation and has a dismal prognosis. It is generally diagnosed in young women. Here, we report a case of a young woman with SCCOHT harboring a rare molecular finding with a highly aggressive biological behavior. The patient had a somatic SMARCB1 mutation instead of an expected SMARCA4 alteration. Even though the patient was treated with high-dose chemotherapy followed by stem cell transplantation, she evolved with disease progression and died 11 months after her first symptoms appeared. We present a literature review of this rare disease and discuss the findings in the present patient in comparison to expected molecular alterations and options for SCCOHT treatment.

SMARCA4: Implications of an Altered Chromatin-Remodeling Gene for Cancer Development and Therapy

The SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex, via nucleosome topology modulation, regulates transcription. The SMARCA4 (BRG1) subunit codes for the ATPase energy engine of the SWI/SNF complex. SMARCA4 is a tumor suppressor that is aberrant in ∼5% to 7% of human malignancies. Class I SMARCA4 alterations (truncating mutations, fusions, and homozygous deletion) lead to loss of function whereas class II alterations (missense mutations) have a dominant negative/gain-of-function effect and/or loss-of function. SMARCA4 alterations typify the ultra-rare small cell carcinomas of the ovary hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) and SMARCA4-deficient thoracic and uterine sarcomas; they are also found in a subset of more common tumors, for example, lung, colon, bladder, and breast carcinomas. Germline variants in the SMARCA4 gene lead to various hereditary conditions: rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome-2 (RTPS2), characterized by loss-of-function alterations and aggressive rhabdoid tumors presenting in infants and young children; and Coffin-Siris syndrome, characterized by dominant negative/gain-of function alterations and developmental delays, microcephaly, unique facies, and hypoplastic nails of the fifth fingers or toes. A minority of rhabdoid tumors have a germline SMARCA4 variant as do >40% of women with SCCOHT. Importantly, immune checkpoint blockade has shown remarkable, albeit anecdotal, responses in SCCOHT. In addition, there is ongoing research into BET, EZH2, HDAC, CDK4/6, and FGFR inhibitors, as well as agents that might induce synthetic lethality via DNA damage repair impairment (ATR inhibitors and platinum chemotherapy), or via the exploitation of mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation inhibitors or AURKA inhibitors, in SMARCA4-aberrant cancers.

Case Report: The Emerging Role of Ring Chromosome 22 in Phelan-McDermid Syndrome With Atypical Teratoid/Rhabdoid Tumor: The First Child Treated With Growth Hormone

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (AT/RTs) in the rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndromes are most often caused by germline mutations of the SMARCB1 gene located in chromosome 22q11.2. Although rarely, it can also result from the constitutional ring chromosome 22 (r22): during mitosis the ring chromosome may lead to an increased rate of somatic mutations, resulting in rhabdoid tumor predispositions when the tumor-suppressor gene SMARCB1 is involved. Individuals with r22 may present similar features as those with Phelan-McDermid syndrome (PMDS) due to 22q13.3 deletion, including the SHANK3 gene. Despite several reports on AT/RT in children with r22 and/or PMDS have been published, the role of constitutional r22 as new oncogenic mechanism for AT/RT is still under investigation. There is not a lot of data available on therapeutic and prognostic implications of r22 in AT/RT and PMDS. Herein, we present the first case of a child with constitutional r22, PMDS and AT/RT of the brain, who is a long term survivor and is been treated with growth hormone. We also describe an unexpected adverse reaction to midazolam.

Pure Bladder Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor Successfully Treated With Partial Cystectomy, Radiation, and Chemotherapy: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Extracranial pure malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT) are aggressive tumors that carry a poor prognosis. Bladder MRTs are very rare and only 8 cases have been reported previously.

OBSERVATION

We present a case of a child with bladder MRT. Despite the aggressive nature of the bladder tumor, it was successfully treated with bladder-sparing surgery, adjuvant radiotherapy, and chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case, and review of 8 previously reported cases, suggests that bladder MRT seems to behave less aggressively when compared with other extracranial MRTs, and bladder preserving surgery should be considered when feasible.

Cancer predisposition in pediatric neuro-oncology-practical approaches and ethical considerations

A genetic predisposition to tumor development can be identified in up to 10% of pediatric patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors. For some entities, the rate of an underlying predisposition is even considerably higher. In recent years, population-based approaches have helped to further delineate the role of cancer predisposition in pediatric oncology. Investigations for cancer predisposition syndrome (CPS) can be guided by clinical signs and family history leading to directed testing of specific genes. The increasingly adopted molecular analysis of tumor and often parallel blood samples with multi-gene panel, whole-exome, or whole-genome sequencing identifies additional patients with or without clinical signs. Diagnosis of a genetic predisposition may put an additional burden on affected families. However, information on a given cancer predisposition may be critical for the patient as potentially influences treatment decisions and may offer the patient and healthy carriers the chance to take part in intensified surveillance programs aiming at early tumor detection. In this review, we discuss some of the practical and ethical challenges resulting from the widespread use of new diagnostic techniques and the most important CPS that may manifest with brain tumors in childhood.

SMARCA4-deficient rhabdoid tumours show intermediate molecular features between SMARCB1-deficient rhabdoid tumours and small cell carcinomas of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type

Extracranial rhabdoid tumours (ECRTs) are an aggressive malignancy of infancy and early childhood. The vast majority of cases demonstrate inactivation of SMARCB1 (ECRTSMARCB1 ) on a background of a remarkably stable genome, a low mutational burden, and no other recurrent mutations. Rarely, ECRTs can harbour the alternative inactivation of SMARCA4 (ECRTSMARCA4 ) instead of SMARCB1. However, very few ECRTSMARCA4 cases have been published to date, and a systematic characterization of ECRTSMARCA4 is missing from the literature. In this study, we report the clinical, pathological, and genomic features of additional cases of ECRTSMARCA4 and show that they are comparable to those of ECRTSMARCB1. We also assess whether ECRTSMARCB1 , ECRTSMARCA4 , and small cell carcinomas of the ovary, hypercalcaemic type (SCCOHT) represent distinct or overlapping entities at a molecular level. Using DNA methylation and transcriptomics-based tumour classification approaches, we demonstrate that ECRTSMARCA4 display molecular features intermediate between SCCOHT and ECRTSMARCB1 ; however, ECRTSMARCA4 appear to be more closely related to SCCOHT by DNA methylation. Conversely, both transcriptomics and DNA methylation show a larger gap between SCCOHT and ECRTSMARCB1 , potentially supporting their continuous separate classification. Lastly, we show that ECRTSMARCA4 display concomitant lack of SMARCA4 (BRG1) and SMARCA2 (BRM) expression at the protein level, similar to what is seen in SCCOHT. Overall, these results expand our knowledge on this rare tumour type and explore the similarities and differences among entities from the 'rhabdoid tumour' spectrum. © 2021 The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Optical genome mapping identifies a germline retrotransposon insertion in SMARCB1 in two siblings with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors

In a subset of pediatric cancers, a germline cancer predisposition is highly suspected based on clinical and pathological findings, but genetic evidence is lacking, which hampers genetic counseling and predictive testing in the families involved. We describe a family with two siblings born from healthy parents who were both neonatally diagnosed with atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT). This rare and aggressive pediatric tumor is associated with biallelic inactivation of SMARCB1, and in 30% of the cases, a predisposing germline mutation is involved. Whereas the tumors of both siblings showed loss of expression of SMARCB1 and acquired homozygosity of the locus, whole exome and whole genome sequencing failed to identify germline or somatic SMARCB1 pathogenic mutations. We therefore hypothesized that the insertion of a pathogenic repeat‐rich structure might hamper its detection, and we performed optical genome mapping (OGM) as an alternative strategy to identify structural variation in this locus. Using this approach, an insertion of ~2.8 kb within intron 2 of SMARCB1 was detected. Long‐range PCR covering this region remained unsuccessful, but PacBio HiFi genome sequencing identified this insertion to be a SINE‐VNTR‐Alu, subfamily E (SVA‐E) retrotransposon element, which was present in a mosaic state in the mother. This SVA‐E insertion disrupts correct splicing of the gene, resulting in loss of a functional allele. This case demonstrates the power of OGM and long‐read sequencing to identify genomic variations in high‐risk cancer‐predisposing genes that are refractory to detection with standard techniques, thereby completing the clinical and molecular diagnosis of such complex cases and greatly improving counseling and surveillance of the families involved. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

Characteristics and Outcomes in Pediatric Non-Central Nervous System Malignant Rhabdoid Tumors: A Report from the National Cancer Database

BACKGROUND

Pediatric non-central nervous system (CNS) malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRTs) are rare and aggressive malignancies without standard treatment strategies. The National Cancer Database (NCDB) was utilized to describe the incidence, characteristics, treatment strategies, and outcomes in pediatric patients.

METHODS

Patients <18 years of age and diagnosed with non-CNS MRTs were analyzed from the NCDB from 2004 to 2014. Log-rank tests compared differences in Kaplan-Meier survival distributions. Univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression models identified predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

Overall, 202 patients were identified. Soft tissue tumors were most common and metastatic disease was present at diagnosis in 34.2% of patients. The 1- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 48.8% and 35.9%, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that age <1 year and the presence of metastasis were negative prognostic indicators (p = 0.058). The 1- and 5-year OS rates were 59.9% and 46.5%, respectively, for patients who received surgical intervention (n = 143) compared with 12.3% and 7.4%, respectively, for those treated nonoperatively (n = 59; p < 0.01). Surgical resection was associated with improved outcomes on univariate analysis, although it was no longer an independent predictor of survival on multivariate analysis (p = 0.18). In the cohort of surgical patients, the presence of residual disease trended towards clinically significant worse outcomes (p = 0.13).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with non-CNS MRTs who were diagnosed in infancy and had metastatic disease had worse survival outcomes. Although surgical resection was associated with improved survival in non-CNS MRTs, it was not independently associated with survival on multivariate analysis. Efforts to improve survival may instead depend on improving chemotherapeutic strategies and developing targeted therapies.

Primary Adrenal Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor in a 14-Year-Old Female: A Case Report and Literature Review

Malignant rhabdoid tumor (MRT) is a rare, SWItch/sucrose nonfermentable-related matrix-associated actin-dependent regulator of chromatin subfamily B member 1 (SMARCB1)-deficient, aggressive tumor, occurring predominantly in children below 3 years of age. Primary adrenal MRT is extremely rare, with only 3 cases reported in the literature. A previously healthy 14-year-old female presented with left upper quadrant/epigastric abdominal pain. Imaging studies revealed an 8.0 × 8.0 × 6.5 cm, heterogeneous, partially enhancing mass along the superior margin of the left kidney encasing the adrenal gland. Surgical resection of the tumor revealed a hypercellular heterogeneous neoplasm arising from the adrenal gland. It was composed predominantly of primitive small round blue cells with focal true rosettes and areas of vague glandular epithelial differentiation and chondroid differentiation. Classic rhabdoid-type cytoplasmic inclusions were focally present. Mitoses, tumor necrosis, and hemorrhage were readily seen. Tumor cells showed complete loss of SMARCB1 (INI1) nuclear staining, demonstrated strong, and diffuse positivity for glypican 3, patchy positivity for CD99, cytokeratin, Sal-like protein 4, Lin-28 homolog A, epithelial membrane antigen, and S100. Molecular studies revealed biallelic frameshift mutations in the SMARCB1 gene (c.673delG and c.683dupT) without pathogenic copy number aberrations. The histologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings support a diagnosis of MRT. The unusual age, location, and mutations of this case expand the clinicopathologic and molecular spectrum of MRT.

An analysis of the diagnosis, clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival outcomes of 36 extracranial malignant rhabdoid tumor patients

BACKGROUND

Extracranial malignant Rhabdoid tumors (eMRTs) are rare but aggressive lesions in young children. This work aimed to review and analyze the diagnosis, clinical characteristics, treatment, and survival of eMRTs so as to summarize experience for future therapy.

METHODS

A total of 36 eMRT cases were treated between January 2008 and August 2019 according to Shanghai Children's Medical Center (SCMC) multimodal protocol of mixed surgery, radiation and chemotherapy involving vincristine, carboplatin, doxorubicin, etoposide, cyclophosphamide and ifosfamide. We collected information including: age at diagnosis, tumor location, disease stage, therapy, outcomes, etc. Overall survival (OS) and event free survival (EFS) were calculated and risk factors for survival were analyzed.

RESULTS

The patients had a median age of 1.80 years at diagnosis (range, 1.4 m-13.42 years), and were followed up for 9.17 months in median (range, 4 d-11.14 y). A total of 16 patients achieved complete remission (CR), and 7 survived without reoccurrence till December 2019. The 3-year EFS was 17.4% (95% CI: 11.0-23.8%) with a 3-year OS of 23.4% (95% CI: 15.8-31.0%). Recurrence was found only in children younger than the median age (1.80 y). Localized staging (Log Rank P=0.039 for OS and P=0.021) and older age (Log Rank P=0.016 for OS and P=0.002 for EFS) were associated with improved outcome. Younger age (Cox regression, OS, OR =2.610, 95% CI: 1.147-5.937, P=0.022; EFS, OR =3.401, 95% CI: 1.495-7.752, P=0.004) were independent risk factors for death and recurrence.

CONCLUSIONS

Those eMRTs treated according to SCMC protocol turned out to have poor outcomes. Higher staging at diagnosis and reoccurrence in younger patients remain major threats to the prognosis.

Frequent breakpoints of focal deletion and uniparental disomy in 22q11.1 or 11.2 segmental duplication region reveal distinct tumorigenesis in rhabdoid tumor of the kidney

SMARCB1 is mutated in most rhabdoid tumors (RTs) developing in the kidney (RTK) and various other organs. Focal deletions found in patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome show breakpoints within clusters of segmental duplications (SDs), and those in some RTs show breakpoints in the 22q11-q12 region. SDs are known to cause focal deletion mediated by non-allelic homologous recombination. The present study identified SMARCB1 alterations in all 30 RTKs, using SNP array CGH, MLPA, and sequence analyses. Twenty-eight tumors had a total of 51 breakpoints forming focal 22q deletion and/or uniparental disomy (22qUPD), and the other two had compound mutation with no breakpoints in 22q. Twenty-four (47.1%) of the 51 breakpoints were within SDs, and occurred in 16 (53.3%) of the 30 tumors. The association of breakpoints with SDs was found not only in focal deletion, but also in 22qUPD, indicating that SDs mediate the first and second hits (focal deletion) and the second hit (22qUPD) of SMARCB1 alteration. Of the 51 breakpoints, 14 were recurrent, and 10 of the 14 were within SDs, suggesting the presence of hotspots in the 22q11.2 region. One recurrent breakpoint outside SDs resided in SMARCB1, suggesting inactivation of the gene by out-of-frame fusion. The association between SDs and focal deletion has been reported in two other types of cancer. RTKs may be the third example of SD-associated tumors. Thus, the present study indicated that RTKs exploit genomic instability in the 22q11.1-11.2 SDs region, and 22qUPD caused by mitotic recombination may also be mediated by SDs.

What Every Neuropathologist Needs to Know: Practical Aspects and Pitfalls in Molecular Diagnosis of Brain Tumors

Molecular testing has become part of the routine diagnostic workup of brain tumors after the implementation of integrated histomolecular diagnoses in the 2016 WHO classification update. It is important for every neuropathologist to be aware of practical preanalytical, analytical, and postanalytical factors that impact the performance and interpretation of molecular tests. Prior to testing, optimizing tumor purity and tumor amount increases the ability of the molecular test to detect the genetic alteration of interest. Recognizing basic molecular testing platform analytical characteristics allows selection of the optimal platform for each clinicopathological scenario. Finally, postanalytical considerations to properly interpret molecular test results include understanding the clinical significance of the detected genetic alteration, recognizing that detected clinically significant genetic alterations are occasionally germline constitutional rather than somatic tumor-specific, and being cognizant that recommended and commonly used genetic nomenclature may differ. Potential pitfalls in brain tumor molecular diagnosis are also discussed.

Advancing biology-based therapeutic approaches for atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors

Atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a rare, highly malignant central nervous system cancer arising in infants and younger children, historically considered to be homogeneous, monogenic, and incurable. Recent use of intensified therapies has modestly improved survival for ATRT; however, a majority of patients will still succumb to their disease. While ATRTs almost universally exhibit loss of SMARCB1 (BAF47/INI1/SNF5), recent whole genome, transcriptome, and epigenomic analyses of large cohorts reveal previously underappreciated molecular heterogeneity. These discoveries provide novel insights into how SMARCB1 loss drives oncogenesis and confer specific therapeutic vulnerabilities, raising exciting prospects for molecularly stratified treatment for patients with ATRT.

SWI/SNF-deficient neoplasms of the genitourinary tract

Since the discovery of association of SMARCB1 mutations with malignant rhabdoid tumors and renal medullary carcinoma, mutations in genes of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex have been increasingly identified across a diverse spectrum of neoplasms. As a group, SWI/SNF complex subunit mutations are now recognized to be the second most frequent type of mutations across tumors. SMARCB1 mutations were originally reported in malignant rhabdoid tumors of the kidney and thought to be pathognomonic for this tumor. However, more broadly, recognition of typical rhabdoid cytomorphology and SMARCB1 mutations beyond rhabdoid tumors has changed our understanding of the pathobiology of these tumors. While mutations of SWI/SNF complex are diagnostic of rhabdoid tumors and renal medullary carcinoma, their clinical relevance extends to potential prognostic and predictive utility in other tumors as well. Beyond SMARCB1, the PBRM1 and ARID1A genes are the most frequently altered members of the SWI/SNF complex in genitourinary neoplasms, especially in clear cell renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma. In this review, we provide an overview of alterations in the SWI/SNF complex encountered in genitourinary neoplasms and discuss their increasing clinical importance.

Embryonal Tumors of the Central Nervous System: The WHO 2016 Classification and New Insights

Central nervous system tumors comprise 26% of cancer in children, representing the most frequent solid neoplasms. Embryonal tumors comprise 15% of them, and they are defined as "small round blue cells" in which morphology is reminiscent of the developing embryonic nervous system. They are the most common high-grade central nervous system neoplasms. Over the years, molecular research has been improving our knowledge concerning these neoplasms, stressing the need for tumor reclassification. Indeed, the revised 2016 fourth edition of the World Health Organization classification introduced genetic parameters in the classification. Specific molecular signatures allow a more accurate risk assessment, leading to proper therapeutic approach and potentially improved prognosis. Holding this new approach, medulloblastoma is noteworthy. The present classification combines the previous histologic classification with a new genetic definition in WNT-activated, sonic hedgehog-activated and non-WNT/non-sonic hedgehog. Molecular data are also a defining feature in the diagnosis of atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and embryonal tumors with multilayered rosettes. However, there are still embryonal tumors that challenge the present World Health Organization classification, and new molecular data have been underlining the need for novel tumor entities. Likewise, recent research has been highlighting heterogeneity in recognized entities. How to translate these molecular developments into routine clinical practice is still a major challenge.

Age of diagnosis clinically differentiates atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors diagnosed below age of 3 years: a database study

BACKGROUND

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is a rare and largely pediatric diagnosis, with poor survival. Diagnosis below the age of 3 years is characteristically seen as a poor prognostic sign. However, elucidating if clinical differences exist within this niche age group has never been attempted before. Correspondingly, we sought to characterize clinical profile of ATRT diagnoses before the age of 3 years based on separate ages of diagnosis.

METHODS

All pediatric ATRT patients aged < 3 years in the US National Cancer Database (NCDB) between 2005 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Age groups were divided based on diagnoses at ages 0-1 years in group 1, 1-2 years in group 2, and 2-3 years in group 3. Data were summarized, and overall survival (OS) was modeled using Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 354 ATRT diagnoses were made before the age of 3 years, with surgery used in 316 (89%) cases, chemotherapy in 242 (68%) cases, and radiation therapy in 118 (33%) cases. In terms of diagnosis age, there were 153 (43%) in group 1, 137 (39%) in group 2, and 64 (18%) in group 3. With respect to OS, median value was 9.9 months in group 1, 28.4 months in group 2, and 15.9 months in group 3. Upon multivariate analysis, receiving radiation therapy was the only parameter shared amongst all three groups as independently prognostic of longer OS (HR 0.53, P = 0.01 in group 1; HR 0.34, P < 0.01 in group 2; HR 0.31, P < 0.01 in group 3). In group 1, surgery (HR 0.47, P < 0.01) and chemotherapy (HR 0.44, P < 0.01) were also independently prognostic of longer OS. In group 3, multiple socioeconomic parameters were identified to independently predict longer OS. There were no additional predictive parameters identified in group 2.

CONCLUSION

Although ATRT diagnosed before the age of 3 is typically viewed a poor prognostic age category, our findings demonstrate that the clinical profile of this pediatric niche is highly heterogeneous based on age of diagnosis. Survival of only those diagnosed between 0 and 1 years is independently prognosticated by all three treatment modalities; patients diagnosed between 1 and 2 years trend towards longest survival, and socioeconomic parameters are most influential in those diagnosed between 2 and 3 years.

Embryonal tumors of the central nervous system

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review aims to give an update on histopathological, molecular and clinical features of central nervous system (CNS) 'embryonal' tumors.

RECENT FINDINGS

The taxonomy of previously called 'CNS primitive neuroectodermal tumor' (CNS PNET) has been deeply modified since the discovery of specific molecular profiles for each various sub-entity of these rare, mainly pediatric, tumors. The term 'embryonal tumors' now refers to medulloblastomas, atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors (AT/RT) and other rare entities, defined by their specific histopathological features together with expression-based or methylation-based profiling; specific gene mutations or fusions characterize some tumor types. In addition, the compilation of large series of molecular data has allowed to dissecting several of these tumor types in molecular subgroups, increasing the number of tumor entities, and leading to an amazingly complex nosology of rare-to-extremely rare malignancies. This rarity precludes from having strong evidence-based therapeutic recommendations, although international efforts are conducted to define the best treatment strategies.

SUMMARY

Embryonal tumors now correspond to molecularly well defined entities, which deserve further international collaborations to specify their biology and the appropriate burden of treatment, in order to minimize the long-term side-effects of treatment of these overall rare and severe diseases of childhood.

Rhabdoid Tumor Predisposition Syndrome: From Clinical Suspicion to General Management

Rhabdoid tumors are rare aggressive malignancies in infants and young children with a poor prognosis. The most common anatomic localizations are the central nervous system, the kidneys, and other soft tissues. Rhabdoid tumors share germline and somatic mutations in SMARCB1 or, more rarely, SMARCA4, members of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodeling complex. Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS) is a condition characterized by a high risk of developing rhabdoid tumors, among other features. RTPS1 is characterized by pathogenic variants in the SMARCB1 gene, while RTPS2 has variants in SMARCA4. Interestingly, germline variants of SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 have been identified also in patients with Coffin-Siris syndrome. Children with RTPS typically present with tumors before 1 year of age and in a high percentage of cases develop synchronous or multifocal tumors with aggressive clinical features. The diagnosis of RTPS should be considered in patients with rhabdoid tumors, especially if they have multiple primary tumors and/or in individuals with a family history. Because germline mutations result in an increased risk of carriers developing rhabdoid tumors, genetic counseling, and surveillance for all family members with this condition is recommended.

Genetic syndromes predisposing to pediatric brain tumors

The application of high-throughput sequencing approaches including paired tumor/normal sampling with therapeutic intent has demonstrated that 8%-19% of pediatric CNS tumor patients harbor a germline alteration in a classical tumor predisposition gene (NF1, P53). In addition, large-scale germline sequencing studies in unselected cohorts of pediatric neuro-oncology patients have demonstrated novel candidate tumor predisposition genes (ELP1 alterations in sonic hedgehog medulloblastoma). Therefore, the possibility of an underlying tumor predisposition syndrome (TPS) should be considered in all pediatric patients diagnosed with a CNS tumor which carries critical implications including accurate prognostication, selection of optimal therapy, screening, risk reduction, and family planning. The Pediatric Cancer Working Group of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) recently published consensus screening recommendations for children with the most common TPS. In this review, we provide an overview of the most relevant as well as recently identified TPS associated with the most frequently encountered pediatric CNS tumors with an emphasis on pathogenesis, genetic testing, clinical features, and treatment implications.

Current recommendations for clinical surveillance and genetic testing in rhabdoid tumor predisposition: a report from the SIOPE Host Genome Working Group

The rhabdoid tumor (RT) predisposition syndromes 1 and 2 (RTPS1 and 2) are rare genetic conditions rendering young children vulnerable to an increased risk of RT, malignant neoplasms affecting the kidney, miscellaneous soft-part tissues, the liver and the central nervous system (Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumors, ATRT). Both, RTPS1&2 are due to pathogenic variants (PV) in genes encoding constituents of the BAF chromatin remodeling complex, i.e. SMARCB1 (RTPS1) and SMARCA4 (RTPS2). In contrast to other genetic disorders related to PVs in SMARCB1 and SMARCA4 such as Coffin-Siris Syndrome, RTPS1&2 are characterized by a predominance of truncating PVs, terminating transcription thus explaining a specific cancer risk. The penetrance of RTPS1 early in life is high and associated with a poor survival. However, few unaffected carriers may be encountered. Beyond RT, the tumor spectrum may be larger than initially suspected, and cancer surveillance offered to unaffected carriers (siblings or parents) and long-term survivors of RT is still a matter of discussion. RTPS2 exposes female carriers to an ill-defined risk of small cell carcinoma of the ovaries, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT), which may appear in prepubertal females. RT surveillance protocols for these rare families have not been established. To address unresolved issues in the care of individuals with RTPS and to propose appropriate surveillance guidelines in childhood, the SIOPe Host Genome working group invited pediatric oncologists and geneticists to contribute to an expert meeting. The current manuscript summarizes conclusions of the panel discussion, including consented statements as well as non-evidence-based proposals for validation in the future.

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) with SMARCA4 mutation are molecularly distinct from SMARCB1-deficient cases

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors (ATRTs) are very aggressive childhood malignancies of the central nervous system. The underlying genetic cause are inactivating bi-allelic mutations in SMARCB1 or (rarely) in SMARCA4. ATRT-SMARCA4 have been associated with a higher frequency of germline mutations, younger age, and an inferior prognosis in comparison to SMARCB1 mutated cases. Based on their DNA methylation profiles and transcriptomics, SMARCB1 mutated ATRTs have been divided into three distinct molecular subgroups: ATRT-TYR, ATRT-SHH, and ATRT-MYC. These subgroups differ in terms of age at diagnosis, tumor location, type of SMARCB1 alterations, and overall survival. ATRT-SMARCA4 are, however, less well understood, and it remains unknown, whether they belong to one of the described ATRT subgroups. Here, we examined 14 ATRT-SMARCA4 by global DNA methylation analyses. We show that they form a separate group segregating from SMARCB1 mutated ATRTs and from other SMARCA4-deficient tumors like small cell carcinoma of the ovary, hypercalcemic type (SCCOHT) or SMARCA4 mutated extra-cranial malignant rhabdoid tumors. In contrast, medulloblastoma (MB) samples with heterozygous SMARCA4 mutations do not group separately, but with established MB subgroups. RNA sequencing of ATRT-SMARCA4 confirmed the clustering results based on DNA methylation profiling and displayed an absence of typical signature genes upregulated in SMARCB1 deleted ATRT. In summary, our results suggest that, in line with previous clinical observations, ATRT-SMARCA4 should be regarded as a distinct molecular subgroup.

Predisposition to cancer in children and adolescents

Childhood malignancies are rarely related to known environmental exposures, and it has become increasingly evident that inherited genetic factors play a substantial causal role. Large-scale sequencing studies have shown that approximately 10% of children with cancer have an underlying cancer predisposition syndrome. The number of recognised cancer predisposition syndromes and cancer predisposition genes are constantly growing. Imaging and laboratory technologies are improving, and knowledge of the range of tumours and risk of malignancy associated with cancer predisposition syndromes is increasing over time. Consequently, surveillance measures need to be constantly adjusted to address these new findings. Management recommendations for individuals with pathogenic germline variants in cancer predisposition genes need to be established through international collaborative studies, addressing issues such as genetic counselling, cancer prevention, cancer surveillance, cancer therapy, psychological support, and social-ethical issues. This Review represents the work by a group of experts from the European Society for Paediatric Oncology (SIOPE) and aims to summarise the current knowledge and define future research needs in this evolving field.

SWI/SNF-deficient thoraco-pulmonary neoplasms

The SWI/SNF complexes are major regulators of gene expression and their alterations occur in a large array of cancers both of epithelial and mesenchymal lineages. Malignant rhabdoid tumors were the first malignancies linked to deregulation of these complexes with the involvement of SMARCB1 in their development but genetic alterations affect all subunits in other malignancies. In the chest and lung regions, SMARCA4 (BRG1) is the most frequently altered subunit and is involved in the pathogenesis of two subtypes of tumors, including bona fide carcinomas (SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung cancers) but also undifferentiated tumors that harbor an undifferentiated phenotype close to those of malignant rhabdoid tumors (SMARCA4-undifferentiated tumors). Although their histogenesis is yet to be fully understood, these tumors are associated with distinct clinical and pathological features even though some overlapping features have been reported in rare cases. SMARCA4 deficiency is easily asserted by immunohistochemistry that show the loss of nuclear expression of the protein in the nuclei of tumor cells. These tumors are commonly associated with high-grade cytological features, rhabdoid cytomorphology, solid architecture and extensive necrosis. The typical immunohistochemical signature of SMARCA4-UT combines co-inactivation of SMARCA2 (BRM) and the overexpression of SOX2 and SALL4. No specific therapeutic strategies have been so far developed for SMARCA4-deficient neoplasms. SMARCB1 subunit is involved in the development of several SMARCB1-deficient sarcomas on top of malignant rhabdoid tumors that may develop in the thorax. Malignant rhabdoid tumors affect mostly children of less than 5y. The differential diagnosis includes epithelioid sarcomas, malignant myoepithelial tumors or myoepithelial carcinomas, extra-skeletal myxoid chondrosarcomas and synovial sarcomas.

Rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome with renal tumor 10 years after brain tumor

We report a case of rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome with a renal tumor developing 10 years after a brain tumor, which demonstrated an unexpectedly favorable outcome. A 2-year-old boy underwent gross total resection of a brain tumor located in the fourth ventricle, and received adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy. At the age of 11 years, a renal tumor was found and nephrectomy was performed. He is currently alive without evidence of disease over 2 years without postoperative therapy. Histologically, rhabdoid cells were observed in both brain and renal tumors. Loss of SMARCB1 (also known as INI1) expression was found in the nucleus of both tumor cells. Genetic testing revealed pathogenic variants of SMARCB1 exon 5 in the renal tumor and SMARCB1 exon 9 in the brain tumor. In addition, heterozygous deletion of 22q11.21-q11.23 containing the SMARCB1 locus was shared by both tumors and this deletion was identified in normal peripheral blood. Considering the histopathological and genetic findings, our case was considered to be rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor and late-onset rhabdoid tumor of the kidney.

Congenital presentation of synchronous Atypical Teratoid Rhabdoid Tumor and Malignant Rhabdoid Tumor of the urinary bladder in a term infant

Atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumor (AT/RT) is a rare central nervous system (CNS) tumor diagnosed primarily in infants and usually portends a poor prognosis. Despite being the most common embryonal tumor in children less than 1 year old, diagnosis is difficult to make based on clinical findings or imaging alone. A complete diagnosis of AT/RT requires identification of loss of integrase interactor 1 (INI1) protein or the SWI/SNF-related, matrix-associated, actin-dependent regulator of chromatin, subfamily b, member 1 (SMARCB1) gene, in its most common presentation. Moreover, their presentation with other primary rhabdoid tumors in the body raises significant suspicion for rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome (RTPS). We report a case of a one-month-old infant admitted for worsening emesis and failure to thrive, who was later found to have brain and bladder masses on radiologic imaging. Autopsy with subsequent immunoprofile and molecular testing were crucial in establishing the absence of INI1 nuclear expression and possible homozygous deletion of SMARCB1 in the urinary bladder tumor tissue. Sequencing of the peripheral blood demonstrated probable single copy loss at the SMARCB1 locus. The constellation of findings in tumor and peripheral blood sequencing suggested the possibility of germline single copy SMARCB1 loss, followed by somatic loss of the remaining SMARCB1 allele due to copy neutral loss-of-heterozygosity. Such a sequence of genetic events has been described in malignant rhabdoid tumors (MRT). Dedicated germline testing of this patient’s family members could yield answers as to whether rhabdoid tumor predisposition syndrome will continue to have implications for the patient’s family.

Loss of SMARCB1 expression in colon carcinoma

SMARCB1 is a tumor suppressor gene, which is part of SWI/SNF complex involved in transcriptional regulation. Recently, loss of SMARCB1 expression has been reported in gastrointestinal carcinomas. Our purpose was to evaluate the incidence and prognostic value of SMARCB1 loss in colon carcinoma (CC). Patients with stage III CC (n= 1695), and a second cohort of 23 patients with poorly differentiated CC were analyzed. Immunohistochemistry for SMARCB1 was performed on tissue microarrays, and cases with loss of expression were controlled on whole sections. Loss of SMARCB1 was compared with the clinico-pathological and molecular characteristics, and the prognostic value was evaluated. Loss of SMARCB1 was identified in 12 of 1695 (0.7%) patients with stage III CC. Whole section controls showed a complete loss in only one of these cases, corresponding to a medullary carcinoma. SMARCB1 loss was not associated with histological grade, tumor size nor survival. In the cohort of poorly differentiated CC, we detected 2/23 (8.7%) cases with loss of SMARCB1; one was rhabdoid while the other had medullary and mucinous histology. These 2 cases were deficient for MisMatched Repair (dMMR) and mutated for BRAF. SMARCB1 loss is rare in stage III CC, but appears more frequent in poorly differentiated CC.

Proteasome inhibition as a therapeutic approach in atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors

Background

Atypical teratoid/thabdoid tumor (AT/RT) remains a difficult-to-treat tumor with a 5-year overall survival rate of 15%–45%. Proteasome inhibition has recently been opened as an avenue for cancer treatment with the FDA approval of bortezomib (BTZ) in 2003 and carfilzomib (CFZ) in 2012. The aim of this study was to identify and characterize a pre-approved targeted therapy with potential for clinical trials in AT/RT.

Methods

We performed a drug screen using a panel of 134 FDA-approved drugs in 3 AT/RT cell lines. Follow-on in vitro studies used 6 cell lines and patient-derived short-term cultures to characterize selected drug interactions with AT/RT. In vivo efficacy was evaluated using patient derived xenografts in an intracranial murine model.

Results

BTZ and CFZ are highly effective in vitro, producing some of the strongest growth-inhibition responses of the evaluated 134-drug panel. Marizomib (MRZ), a proteasome inhibitor known to pass the blood–brain barrier (BBB), also strongly inhibits AT/RT proteasomes and generates rapid cell death at clinically achievable doses in established cell lines and freshly patient-derived tumor lines. MRZ also significantly extends survival in an intracranial mouse model of AT/RT.

Conclusions

MRZ is a newer proteasome inhibitor that has been shown to cross the BBB and is already in phase II clinical trials for adult high-grade glioma (NCT NCT02330562 and NCT02903069). MRZ strongly inhibits AT/RT cell growth both in vitro and in vivo via a moderately well-characterized mechanism and has direct translational potential for patients with AT/RT.

The SWI/SNF complex in cancer - biology, biomarkers and therapy

Cancer genome-sequencing studies have revealed a remarkably high prevalence of mutations in genes encoding subunits of the SWI/SNF chromatin-remodelling complexes, with nearly 25% of all cancers harbouring aberrations in one or more of these genes. A role for such aberrations in tumorigenesis is evidenced by cancer predisposition in both carriers of germline loss-of-function mutations and genetically engineered mouse models with inactivation of any of several SWI/SNF subunits. Whereas many of the most frequently mutated oncogenes and tumour-suppressor genes have been studied for several decades, the cancer-promoting role of mutations in SWI/SNF genes has been recognized only more recently, and thus comparatively less is known about these alterations. Consequently, increasing research interest is being focused on understanding the prognostic and, in particular, the potential therapeutic implications of mutations in genes encoding SWI/SNF subunits. Herein, we review the burgeoning data on the mechanisms by which mutations affecting SWI/SNF complexes promote cancer and describe promising emerging opportunities for targeted therapy, including immunotherapy with immune-checkpoint inhibitors, presented by these mutations. We also highlight ongoing clinical trials open specifically to patients with cancers harbouring mutations in certain SWI/SNF genes.

Effect of early radiotherapy initiation and high-dose chemotherapy on the prognosis of pediatric atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumors in different age groups

PURPOSE

The optimal treatment strategy for pediatric atypical teratoid rhabdoid tumor (ATRT) is inconclusive. This study evaluated the prognostic value of early radiotherapy (RT) and high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem cell rescue (HDC/ASCR) in pediatric ATRT.

METHODS

This pooled analysis included ATRT patients treated at our institution and from other studies who were identified by a search of the PubMed electronic database. The effect of patient demographics and treatment profiles on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Cox regression.

RESULTS

Overall, 34 patients from our institution and 436 patients from 35 published studies were included. In multivariable analysis, patients with gross total resection (GTR), early RT (time to RT interval < 2 months), and HDC/ASCR had both better PFS [hazard ratio (HR) 0.46, p[Formula: see text] 0.001; HR 0.64, p = 0.011; and HR 0.51, p = 0.005, respectively] and OS (HR 0.55, p = 0.002; HR 0.48, p = 0.004; and HR 0.42, p < 0.001, respectively). For patients aged < 3 years, both RT and HDC/ASCR were significant favorable factors for PFS (HR 0.32 and 0.46, respectively) and OS (HR 0.40 and 0.36, respectively), while early RT was not prognostic. For patients aged ≥ 3 years, early RT was significantly associated with better PFS (HR 0.51) and HDC/ASCR did not affect PFS, and neither was related to OS.

CONCLUSION

Both early RT initiation and HDC/ASCR were important components in the treatment of pediatric ATRT. However, the optimal treatment strategies might differ by age.