ALK rearrangements are mutually exclusive with mutations in EGFR or KRAS: an analysis of 1,683 patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Discovery of Key Candidate Protein Biomarkers in Early-Stage Nonsmall Cell Lung Carcinoma through Quantitative Proteomics

Difficulties in early-stage diagnosis are among the factors contributing to the high mortality of nonsmall cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) patients. Unfortunately, diagnostic biomarkers are currently lacking, limiting options in the clinic. To discover proteins that have potential for biomarker applications, we performed an in-depth quantitative proteomic analysis on a cohort of Filipino early-stage NSCLC lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients. Differentially expressed proteins (DEPs) were obtained by using tandem mass tag (TMT) labeling and mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantitative proteomics. A total of 6240 quantified proteins were identified with 3155 significantly upregulated and 1248 significantly downregulated. Integration of the proteomic result with curated transcriptome data allowed the identification of 33 proteins with biomarker potential. This study also provided insights into relevant pathways in NSCLC LUAD, such as protein translation and metabolic pathways. Interestingly, all of the enzymes in the hexosamine biosynthetic pathway (HBP) are found to be upregulated, suggesting its important role in NSCLC LUAD. It is worthwhile to look at the potential of targeting the metabolic vulnerability of NSCLC LUAD as a new strategy in drug development. All MS data were deposited into ProteomeXchange with the identifier PXD050598.

Comparative analysis of alectinib and brigatinib in real-world treatment of advanced NSCLC with ALK rearrangements

Background and objectives

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) alectinib and brigatinib in the treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with ALK rearrangements based on real-world data.

Design and methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective study using the Clinical Data Warehouse from seven university hospitals affiliated with the Catholic Medical Center. Patients diagnosed with ALK-positive advanced NSCLC and treated with alectinib or brigatinib were included. Key outcomes such as time to discontinuation (TTD), duration of response (DOR), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) were analyzed.

Results

A total of 143 patients were included (107 treated with alectinib, 36 with brigatinib). Alectinib was more frequently used as a first-line treatment (71% vs 44.4% for brigatinib, p = 0.008). Prior crizotinib treatment was more frequent in the brigatinib group (52.8% vs 22.4% for alectinib, p < 0.001). The best ORR was similar between the groups (84.1% for alectinib vs 83.3% for brigatinib, p = 0.518). The median TTD was 57.8 months (95% confidence interval (CI): 29.0-86.7) for alectinib and 39.6 months (95% CI: 21.7-57.4) for brigatinib (p = 0.462). No significant differences were observed in intracranial TTD, intracranial DOR, or OS between the groups. Prior crizotinib treatment significantly shortened TTD for second-generation TKIs (p = 0.025), but the overall TKI treatment duration did not show a significant difference between patients who received frontline second-generation ALK TKIs and those who received second-generation ALK TKIs sequentially after crizotinib.

Conclusion

Alectinib and brigatinib demonstrated comparable efficacy in ALK-positive advanced NSCLC. Undergoing crizotinib followed by a second-generation TKI was not significantly different from initiating a second-generation TKI without prior crizotinib in terms of outcomes.

Efficacy and safety of brigatinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive advanced ALK+ NSCLC: Integrated analysis of the ALTA-1L and J-ALTA trials

OBJECTIVES

Brigatinib approval as a first-line anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) for advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is supported by results of a non-Japanese global phase 3 trial (ALTA-1L) and a separate phase 2 trial conducted in Japan (J-ALTA). To evaluate outcomes in a larger global patient population, we conducted an integrated analysis of pooled efficacy and safety data from ALTA-1L and J-ALTA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

ALTA-1L (NCT02737501) and J-ALTA (NCT03410108) were open-label, multicenter studies of patients with advanced or metastatic ALK+ NSCLC. ALTA-1L and an expansion cohort of J-ALTA enrolled patients who were ALK TKI naive. Patients with stable or asymptomatic brain metastases were allowed. Brigatinib 180 mg was administered once daily following 7-day lead-in at 90 mg. Primary endpoints were blinded independent review committee (IRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) in ALTA-1L and IRC-assessed 12-month PFS in the J-ALTA ALK TKI-naive cohort. Secondary endpoints included IRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), intracranial ORR, overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 169 patients were allocated to brigatinib in ALTA-1L (n = 137) or J-ALTA (n = 32). In the pooled population (median follow-up: 35.8 months), 34 % of patients were aged ≥65 years, 28 % had baseline brain metastases, and 26 % had received prior chemotherapy. Median PFS by IRC was 29.3 months (95 % CI: 23.9-44.7). Confirmed ORR was 79 % (95 % CI, 72 %-85 %). Median DOR was 38.1 months. Intracranial ORR was 66 % in patients with any brain metastases and 70 % in patients with measurable brain metastases. Three-year OS was 74 %. Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 74 % of patients, most commonly increased blood creatine phosphokinase (31 %), hypertension (18 %), and increased lipase (16 %).

CONCLUSION

Brigatinib demonstrated clinically meaningful systemic and intracranial efficacy in patients with ALK TKI-naive ALK+ NSCLC. Safety results were consistent with the known profile for brigatinib.

Genomic analysis of comprehensive next generation sequencing data to explore the criteria for MET amplification as an actionable biomarker in NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

MET amplification (METamp) can be a de novo or acquired resistance driver; however, the definition of METamp that best captures patients who may respond to targeted therapy remains debated. We explored the genomic landscape of METamp NSCLC including degree of amplification, co-drivers, amplicon size, and outcomes to MET inhibitors.

METHODS

Hybrid-capture NGS-based genomic profiling from 88,547 tissue and 12,428 liquid NSCLC samples were queried for METamp (copy number (CN) ≥ ploidy + 4, or amplification ratio (AmpRatio; [CN/sample ploidy] ≥ 3). A nationwide de-identified real-world (rw) clinico-genomic database (CGDB) of NGS results linked to deidentified, electronic health record-derived clinical data was used to assess treatment and outcomes.

RESULTS

Among 10,760 evaluable patients in CGDB, 362 (3.4%) had a METamp. In targeted therapy-naïve cases, MET AmpRatio negatively correlated with non-METex14 co-drivers (median 4.1 vs 2.9, p < 0.0001). MET AmpRatio was not significantly correlated with tumor mutational burden (p = 0.79) but was inversely correlated with amplicon size (p < 0.001). Among paired METamp tissue samples, 8/30 had METamp detected in liquid; higher tumor fraction and AmpRatio were associated with liquid detection. Among 39 METamp patients receiving MET inhibitors, longer median real-world progression free survival was observed with MET AmpRatio ≥ 3 vs < 3 (4.9 vs. 1.7mos, HR 0.53 [95 %CI:0.21-1.3]).

CONCLUSIONS

MET AmpRatio positively correlated with focal amplification and absence of co-drivers and trended with increased benefit from MET inhibitors. Further studies evaluatingcombinatorial data including MET AmpRatio, amplicon size and presence of other potential drivers, as predictive biomarkers for therapies targeting MET amplification in NSCLC are warranted.

Clinicopathological Features, Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutations and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Rearrangement-Based Survival of Patients With Advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer in a Tertiary Care Setting

Background Lung cancer is the most frequent cause of cancer-related deaths and the most common type of cancer globally. It is generally classified into two main histologic subtypes: non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC). NSCLC is the most prevalent type and is enriched with genetic and molecular diversity. This study evaluated the clinical, molecular, and demographic characteristics of patients with NSCLC, with a focus on variables involving disease stage, survival rates, and mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) genes. Methods This retrospective study included 51 adult patients aged 30 years and older. Only patients who received treatment and subsequent follow-up at our institution were included in this study. Results There were 51 patients, aged 30-84 years (mean = 59.6 ± 10.9). Out of 51 patients, 32 (64.7%) were men; 19 (37.2.5%) were either current or former smokers; 34 patients (66.7%) had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of either 0 or 1; 47 (92.2) had an adenocarcinoma; 15 (29.4%) had a bilateral lung disease; 43 (84.3%) had stage IV disease; 10 (19.6%) had a positive EGFR status; eight (15.7) had a positive ALK status; and 38 patients (73.1%) had died by the cut-off date for this study. The median survival time for the EGFR-negative patients was 15 months, as opposed to 16 months for those who were EGFR-positive. Likewise, the median survival time for both the ALK-negative and positive patients was 17 months each. Conclusion The study contributes to our understanding of NSCLC and highlights the trends of our region while acknowledging the limitations associated with molecular studies and smaller sample sizes. These findings are not aligned with global trends in NSCLC due to the above-mentioned reasons. Future prospective trials are needed to aim for larger cohorts and consider additional variables to address the complexities of NSCLC.

Discovery of Gene Fusions in Driver-Negative Cancer Samples From the National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice Screening Cohort

PURPOSE

The National Cancer Institute-Molecular Analysis for Therapy Choice (NCI-MATCH) trial was implemented to identify actionable genetic alterations across cancer types and enroll patients accordingly onto treatment arms, irrespective of tumor histology. Using multiplex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) next-generation sequencing, NCI-MATCH genotyped 5,540 patients, discovering gene fusions in 202/5,540 tumors (3.65%). This result, substantially lower than the fusion detection prevalence of 8.5% across all patients with cancer screened at Massachusetts General Hospital's (MGH) clinical laboratories, supported reanalysis of NCI-MATCH samples identified as mutations-of-interest (MOI)-negative. The assay used by NCI-MATCH requires previous knowledge of both fusion genes, cannot detect novel fusions, and may underestimate fusion-positive patients. Anchored multiplex PCR (AMP) technology permits fusion detection with knowledge of just one gene of the fusion partners.

METHODS

Using AMP-based kits, we reprocessed 663 MOI-negative samples. 200 ng of RNA per sample were shipped from the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group-American College of Radiology Imaging Network biorepository to MGH (n = 319) and Yale University (n = 344), processed, and sequenced on the NextSeq550. Reported fusions were manually reviewed, and novel fusions orthogonally verified via reverse-transcription PCR and Sanger sequencing.

RESULTS

AMP identified 148 fusions in 142/663 MOI-negative patients (21% [95% CI, 18 to 25]), of which 28 were covered by the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay (OCA) panel but missed, while 120 were not covered by OCA. Among AMP-identified positive patients, 32 had actionable fusions, 24 contained novel fusions, and six had two fusion events. We identified fusions in 12/34 (35% [95% CI, 20 to 54]) cholangiocarcinomas and 43/109 (39% [95% CI, 30 to 49]) sarcomas.

CONCLUSION

Technology and awareness of actionable fusions have improved since the NCI-MATCH trial. With AMP-based technology, we identified 142 patients with fusions not detected during NCI-MATCH screening, many potentially actionable. These striking data underscore the need to optimize the fusion-detection capabilities of genotyping assays used in precision medicine.

Treatment of metastatic ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer: real-world outcomes in a single center study

Background

Rearrangement in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) occurs in 4-7% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. Despite improved survival with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), treatment resistance remains challenging. This retrospective study analyzed advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients, focusing on clinical aspects, treatments, resistance, and outcomes.

Methods

Patients diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2021 who received at least one ALK-TKI line at the Karolinska University Hospital, were included. We evaluated crizotinib or 2nd generation ALK-TKI effectiveness in first-line treatment and lorlatinib in subsequent lines. Overall survival (OS) was defined as from the date of advanced lung cancer diagnosis until the date of last follow-up (April 22, 2022) or the date of death from any cause. Progression-free survival (PFS), from the date of starting ALK-TKI until the date of progression, death, or last follow-up. Resistance mechanisms were assessed through re-biopsies utilizing next-generation sequencing (NGS).

Results

Out of 160 eligible patients, 10 were excluded. Median follow-up was 54.0 months from diagnosis and 45.0 months from initial ALK-TKI treatment. Crizotinib showed a median PFS of 8.0 months and a median OS of 35.0 months. Second generation ALK-TKIs demonstrated a median PFS of 52.0 months [OS was not reached (NR)]. Overall, the median OS was 65.0 months. Poor prognostic factors included male sex, thromboembolism, crizotinib treatment, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)/asthma. Rebiopsies in 18 cases revealed secondary ALK mutations in 8 patients, correlating with a shorter median PFS in subsequent ALK-TKI treatment (1.0 vs. 7.0 months).

Conclusions

This comprehensive study, spanning over a decade, provides crucial insights into the clinical characteristics, treatment patterns, and resistance mechanisms of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, where median OS exceeds 5 years. Re-biopsies during treatment are essential for advancing our understanding of resistance mechanisms and the tumor dynamics evolving during ALK-TKI therapy.

A novel double fusion of EML4-ALK and PLEKHA7-ALK contribute to rapid progression of lung adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

A 40-year-old male with EML4-ALK (E6:A20) fusion variant 3 and previously unreported PLEKHA7-ALK (P3:A20) fusion in lung adenocarcinoma exhibited resistance to alectinib and chemotherapy. Subsequent next-generation sequencing (NGS) from the plasma specimen revealed the co-existing mutation in the KEAP1 gene, which may represent an intrinsic resistance to ALK-TKI. Furthermore, the presence of double fusion PLEKHA7-ALK (P3:A20) may also have played a critical role in the resistance to alectinib. KEAP1 mutation (p.E244K) was also founded in this patient which may lead to resistance to standard chemotherapy. The patient was then treated with brigatinib, which effectively halted the rapid progression. Unfortunately, the patient deceased to uncontrollable, rapidly progressing pleural effusion and pulmonary embolism, resulting in an overall survival of 9 months. This represents the rare case of NSCLC with a double fusion of EML4-ALK and PLEKHA7-ALK, exhibiting resistance to alectinib and chemotherapy. Our case suggests that the double fusion of EML4-ALK and PLEKHA7-ALK and co-existing KEAP1 mutation may serve as an adverse prognostic factor. Additionally, brigatinib may offer a potential treatment option for lung adenocarcinoma patients with PLEKHA7-ALK (P3:A20) fusion.

RAS signaling in carcinogenesis, cancer therapy and resistance mechanisms

Variants in the RAS family (HRAS, NRAS and KRAS) are among the most common mutations found in cancer. About 19% patients with cancer harbor RAS mutations, which are typically associated with poor clinical outcomes. Over the past four decades, KRAS has long been considered an undruggable target due to the absence of suitable small-molecule binding sites within its mutant isoforms. However, recent advancements in drug design have made RAS-targeting therapies viable, particularly with the approval of direct KRASG12C inhibitors, such as sotorasib and adagrasib, for treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with KRASG12C mutations. Other KRAS-mutant inhibitors targeting KRASG12D are currently being developed for use in the clinic, particularly for treating highly refractory malignancies like pancreatic cancer. Herein, we provide an overview of RAS signaling, further detailing the roles of the RAS signaling pathway in carcinogenesis. This includes a summary of RAS mutations in human cancers and an emphasis on therapeutic approaches, as well as de novo, acquired, and adaptive resistance in various malignancies.

Venous thromboembolism is associated with increased all-cause mortality in ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Venous thromboembolic events (VTE) are often diagnosed in ALK-positive lung cancer although it has not been demonstrated how their co-occurrence affects patients' survival.

METHODS

The study included patients with ALK-positive lung cancer recognized in metastatic stage in the period 2017-2022. All received treatment with ALK inhibitors at The Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology in Warsaw. The main aim of the study was to assess overall survival (OS) in relation to VTE occurrence. The additional purpose was to define predictors of VTE and OS.

RESULTS

The study included 54 patients in median age 60 years, men were a minority (25 / 46.3%). VTE was diagnosed in 12 (22.2%) patients: 9 (16.7%) cases with pulmonary embolism (PE), 2 cases with thrombosis in vena cava superior, one case with deep vein thrombosis and thrombosis in vena cava inferior. Among patients with PE: 2 patients died directly due to the first PE episode and one due to a recurrent PE. Patients with VTE had significantly shorter overall survival (median 11.7 vs. 37.4 months, log-rank test p = 0.003). The risk of all-cause mortality was increased significantly in both: VTE (HR = 3.47; 95%CI: 1.61-7.49; p = 0.0016) or alone PE (HR = 2.41; 95%CI: 1.06-5.50; p = 0.037). The risk of VTE diagnosis was significantly increased during active treatment with crizotinib (HR = 8.72; p = 0.0004) or alectinib (HR = 21.47; p = 0.000002). Metastases to liver and baseline leukocyte count > 11 × 10⁹/L were significant predictors of VTE and OS. Khorana score ≥ 3 points predicted OS (HR = 2,66; 95%CI: 1,05-6,75; p = 0,04), but remained insignificant for VTE.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of any type of VTE or alone PE was associated with significantly worse overall survival in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer.

Impact of EML4-ALK Variants and Co-Occurring TP53 Mutations on Duration of First-Line ALK Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Treatment and Overall Survival in ALK Fusion-Positive NSCLC: Real-World Outcomes From the GuardantINFORM database

INTRODUCTION

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are first-line treatment options for ALK-positive (ALK+) NSCLC. Factors such as variant allele frequencies (VAFs), EML4-ALK fusion variant, and concurrent TP53 mutations (TP53mt) in circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may affect treatment outcomes. We evaluated their effects on time to discontinuation (TTD) of first-line treatment with next-generation ALK TKIs in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Adults with advanced or metastatic NSCLC and ctDNA-detected ALK fusion who received first-line next-generation ALK TKI monotherapy were identified in GuardantINFORM. Effects of ALK fusion VAF, EML4-ALK variants, and TP53mt detection on TTD were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 307 patients with ALK fusion in baseline ctDNA received first-line alectinib (n = 280), brigatinib (n = 15), lorlatinib (n = 9), or ceritinib (n = 3); 150 patients (49%) had ALK-fusion VAF greater than or equal to 1%. Among 232 patients with EML4-ALK fusions (v1, 50%; v3, 36%), TP53mt co-occurred with v1 in 42 (18%) and v3 in 32 (14%). Patients with VAF less than 1% versus greater than or equal to 1% had a median TTD of 32.2 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 20.7-not estimable [NE]) versus 14.7 months (10.4-19.9; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.57 [95% CI: 1.09-2.26]; p = 0.0146). Median TTD was 13.1 (9.5-19.9) versus 27.6 months (17.3-NE) in patients with versus without TP53mt detected (HR = 1.53 [1.07-2.19]; p = 0.0202) and 20.3 (14.4-NE) versus 11.5 months (7.4-31.1) in patients with v1 versus v3 (HR = 1.29 [0.83-2.01]; p = 0.2641). Patients with TP53mt and v3 had a median TTD of 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.2-31.1).

CONCLUSION

High ctDNA VAF, EML4-ALK v3, and TP53mt were associated with early discontinuation of first-line ALK TKIs.

Highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK-TKI resistance mutations by oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR)-based methods

BACKGROUND

Patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are treated with ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Although most patients benefit from ALK-TKIs, the development of resistance mutations is common and results in NSCLC recurrence. To identify ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase, highly sensitive and accurate methods for the detection of mutations are essential.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to establish highly sensitive, accurate, cost-effective, and clinically practical methods for the detection of two frequent ALK-TKI resistance mutations, ALK G1202R and L1196M, by liquid biopsy.

METHODS

The efficacy of oligoribonucleotide interference-PCR (ORNi-PCR) was examined by first optimizing experimental conditions to specifically amplify the ALK-TKI resistance mutant DNA corresponding to ALK G1202R and L1196M mutations. ORNi-PCR was then combined with droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) or real-time PCR to detect these mutations in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) extracted from NSCLC patients.

RESULTS

ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR detected 1-10 copy(s) of G1202R and L1196M DNA in model cfDNA. These mutations in patients' cfDNA were identified using ORNi-PCR-based methods, whereas conventional ddPCR failed to detect them.

CONCLUSION

ORNi-PCR followed by ddPCR/real-time PCR enables highly sensitive and accurate detection of ALK mutations by liquid biopsy. Although the clinical data are limited, our results show that these methods are potentially useful for identifying ALK-TKI-resistant NSCLC at the early recurrent phase.

Proteolysis Targeting Chimera Agents (PROTACs): New Hope for Overcoming the Resistance Mechanisms in Oncogene-Addicted Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains a disease with a poor prognosis despite the advances in therapies. NSCLC with actionable oncogenic alterations represent a subgroup of diseases for which tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have shown relevant and robust impact on prognosis, both in early and advanced stages. While the introduction of powerful TKIs increases the ratio of potentially curable patients, the disease does develop resistance over time through either secondary mutations or bypass activating tracks. Therefore, new treatment strategies are being developed to either overcome this inevitable resistance or to prevent it, and proteolysis targeting chimera agents (PROTACs) are among them. They consist of two linked molecules that bind to a target protein and an E3 ubiquitin ligase that causes ubiquitination and degradation of proteins of interest. In this paper, we review the rationale for PROTAC therapy and the current development of PROTACs for oncogene-addicted lung cancer. Moreover, we critically analyze the strengths and limitations of this promising technique that may help pave the way for future perspectives.

Patient-reported outcomes in CodeBreaK 200: Sotorasib versus docetaxel for previously treated advanced NSCLC with KRAS G12C mutation

BACKGROUND

In the CodeBreaK 200 phase III, open-label trial, sotorasib significantly improved efficacy versus docetaxel in previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) for global health status, physical functioning, dyspnea, and cough favored sotorasib over docetaxel. Here, we report sotorasib's additional impact on quality of life (QOL).

METHODS

In CodeBreaK 200, 345 patients who had progressed after prior therapy received sotorasib (960 mg orally daily) or docetaxel (75 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks). Validated questionnaires captured patients' perception of their QOL and symptom burden for key secondary and exploratory PRO endpoints, including the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) and Quality-of-life Questionnaire Lung Cancer 13 (EORTC QLQ-LC13), question GP5 from the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Tool General Form (FACT-G GP5), PRO-Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), and 5-level EuroQOL-5 dimensions (EQ-5D-5L) including visual analog scale (EQ-5D VAS). Change from baseline to week 12 was assessed with generalized estimating equations for ordinal outcomes.

RESULTS

Patients receiving sotorasib were less bothered by treatment side effects than those receiving docetaxel (odds ratio [OR] 5.7) and experienced symptoms at lower severity (pain: OR 2.9; aching muscles: OR 4.4; aching joints: OR 4.2; mouth or throat sores: OR 4.3). Further, patients' symptoms interfered less with usual/daily activities (pain: OR 3.2; aching muscles: OR 3.9; aching joints: OR 10.7). QOL remained stable with sotorasib but worsened with docetaxel (change from baseline in EQ-5D VAS score: 1.5 vs -8.4 at cycle 1 day 5 and 2.2 vs -5.8 at week 12).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving sotorasib reported less severe symptoms than those receiving docetaxel. In addition to improving clinical efficacy outcomes, sotorasib maintained QOL versus docetaxel, suggesting sotorasib may be a more tolerable treatment option for patients with pretreated, KRAS G12C-mutated advanced NSCLC.

Safety assessment of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors based on the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) database: A real-world pharmacovigilance study

OBJECTIVES

KRAS (G12C) inhibitors (sotorasib and adagrasib) have approved treatment in patients with KRAS (G12C)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The post-marketing data concerning KRAS (G12C) inhibitors remain limited, and the outcomes of relevant studies are yet to yield conclusive evidence supporting the long-term safety of KRAS (G12C) inhibitors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This investigation comprehensively assessed adverse events (AEs) attributed to KRAS (G12C) inhibitors by employing advanced data mining techniques, utilizing the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS). The dataset encompasses the period from the first quarter of 2021 to the first quarter of 2024. A disproportionality analysis was conducted to quantify the correlation between KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and AEs. The metrics employed for the evaluation of disproportionality comprise the reporting odds ratio (ROR), the proportional reporting ratio (PRR), the information component (IC), and the empirical Bayesian geometric mean (EBGM).

RESULTS

A total of 2,253 and 486 reports were identified as related to sotorasib and adagrasib, with the identification of 51 and 26 preferred terms, respectively. The most frequent AEs of sotorasib comprised diarrhoea (ROR 5.27), hepatotoxicity (ROR 38.09), alanine aminotransferase increased (ROR 17.41), aspartate aminotransferase increased (ROR 20.88), and hepatic function abnormal (ROR 19.88). The most common AEs of adagrasib included diarrhoea (ROR 4.21), nausea (ROR 3.84), vomiting (ROR 5.36), decreased appetite (ROR 4.79), and dehydration (ROR 7.00). A relatively reduced risk of hepatotoxicity but a increased risk of serious AEs in adagrasib compared to sotorasib (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Our findings would provide valued evidence for healthcare professionals to recognize AEs associated with KRAS (G12C) inhibitors and differences between sotorasib and adagrasib, and guide their clinical practice.

Returning from the afterlife? Sotorasib treatment for advanced KRAS mutant lung cancer: A case report

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is increasing in incidence worldwide, and targeted therapies are developing at a rapid pace. Furthermore, the KRAS specific gene is strongly associated with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC who have tested positive for the KRAS G12C mutation and have progressed after at least one systemic treatment are treated with sotorasib.

CASE SUMMARY

In this study, we report on an advanced NSCLC with a KRAS G12C mutation. The histological diagnosis indicates stage IVB left lung adenocarcinoma with pelvic and bone metastases, identified as cT4N2bM1c. Using circulating tumor DNA analysis, it was possible to determine the mutation abundance of the KRAS gene exon 2, c.34G>Tp.G12C, which was 32.3%. The patient was advised to take sotorasib as part of their treatment. The imaging data were compared before and after treatment. Furthermore, clinical reassessments and regular serial blood testing were conducted. We found that the patient's clinical symptoms significantly improved after receiving sotorasib medication, and there were no notable side effects, such as liver toxicity, during the treatment.

CONCLUSION

Sotorasib has shown promising clinical efficacy in patients with the KRAS G12c mutation and has no apparent toxic side effects.

TP53 and EGFR amplification are negative predictors of overall survival in patients diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer with brain metastases

Background

The discovery of driver genes such as EGFR, KRAS, and ALK, has dramatically shifted treatment patterns in patients harboring these oncogenes. However, dissemination into the central nervous system (CNS) is a severe complication. In addition, the particular anatomical structure of the CNS has made it difficult to obtain tissue specimens from brain metastases (BM) to generate a gene map, as such, potential predictive markers for survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and BM (NSCLC-BM) remain unclear.

Methods

Data from 28 patients diagnosed with NSCLC-BM between June 2019 and May 2021 at Guangdong Sanjiu Brain Hospital (Guangzhou, China), were reviewed. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) of a 168 cancer-related gene panel was available for surgically resected brain tissues from all patients. In addition, molecular characteristics and overall survival (OS) were analyzed to determine potential predictive markers.

Results

Among patients with NSCLC-BM, NGS revealed that TP53 was the most frequent mutation (61 %), with a detection rate of 39 %, closely by EGFR amplification. Additionally, CDKN2A, MYC, LRP1B, and RNF43 were frequently observed (18 %). The median OS was significantly shorter in the TP53 mutation group than in the wildtype group (14 versus undefined months, p = 0.014). Similar results were also found in the genetic alteration of EGFR amplification, suggesting that EGFR amplification was associated with worse OS (14 vs. 24 months, p = 0.039). Interestingly, NGS revealed that gene alternations such as TP53, EGFR amplification, and CDKN2A, tended to coexist and such a co-alteration panel indicated worse clinical outcomes (median OS, 5 months). In addition, the detection rate of negative survival genes, including TP53 or EGFR amplification, was much higher in tumor tissues than in plasma samples, indicating the limited predictive value of matched PLA samples.

Conclusions

Gene signatures, such as TP53 or EGFR amplification, were associated with worse survival in patients diagnosed with NSCLC-BM. These valuable findings may shed light on new strategies for the prognostic assessment of specific patient groups.

Inter-equipment validation of PET-based radiomics for predicting EGFR mutation statuses in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

AIM

To validate the inter-equipment generality of the radiomics based on PET images to predict the EGFR mutation status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were retrospectively collected in the departments of nuclear medicine of Heyi branch (Siemens equipment) and East branch (General Electric (GE) equipment) of the first affiliated hospital of Zhengzhou university. 5 predicting logistic regression models were established. The 1st one was trained and tested by the GE dataset; The 2nd one was trained and tested by the Siemens dataset; The 3rd one was trained and tested by the mixed dataset consisting of GE and Siemens. The 4th one was trained by GE and tested by Siemens; The 5th one was trained by Siemens and tested by GE.

RESULTS

For the 1st ∼ 5th models, the mean values of AUCs for training/testing datasets were 0.78/0.73, 0.74/0.72, 0.75/0.70, 0.74/0.65 and 0.68/0.63, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The AUCs of the models trained and tested on the datasets from the same equipment were higher than those for different equipment. The inter-equipment generality of the radiomics was not good enough in clinical practice.

Real-World Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Across Three Lines of Therapy in Patients with ALK+ NSCLC

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are standard first- and second-line treatment for advanced ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We evaluated outcomes in patients with ALK+ NSCLC receiving third-line ALK TKI versus non-ALK-directed therapy.

METHODS

Flatiron Health OncoEMR data were extracted for patients with ALK+ NSCLC initiating first-line ALK TKI between January 2015 and March 2022 followed by second-line ALK TKI and third-line ALK TKI (group A) or non-TKI therapy (group B). Time-to-treatment discontinuation (TTD) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using multivariate modelling.

RESULTS

Among patients receiving third-line ALK TKI (A, n = 85) or non-TKI therapy (B, n = 43), most received first-line crizotinib (A/B: 64%/60%) and second-line alectinib (36%/30%), ceritinib (24%/19%), or lorlatinib (15%/30%). Common third-line treatments were lorlatinib/alectinib (41%/33%) in A and immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or chemotherapy + immunotherapy (30%/28%/21%) in B. Group A versus B had longer TTD of first-line treatment (hazard ratio [HR] 0.62, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.41-0.93; p = 0.020) and second-line treatment (HR 0.50, 95% CI 0.33-0.75; p < 0.001) and longer OS from start of first-line treatment (HR 0.32, 95% CI 0.19-0.54; p < 0.001) and second-line treatment (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.66; p < 0.001). For third-line treatment, median TTD (A/B) was 6.2/2.4 months (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.37-1.00; p = 0.049) and OS was 17.6/6.5 months (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.33-0.98; p = 0.042).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients receiving third-line non-ALK-directed therapy had suboptimal outcomes on prior TKIs. Patients with longer duration of prior ALK TKI treatment appeared to benefit from third-line ALK TKIs.

Targeting ALK receptors in non-small cell lung cancer: what is the road ahead?

INTRODUCTION

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene-rearrangements are identified in about 3-5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC), and ALK-rearranged NSCLC is to be considered an oncogene-addicted cancer with peculiar clinical characteristics.

AREAS COVERED

Several ALK inhibitors have been studied and approved for use in the treatment of advanced ALK-rearranged NSCLC with reported superiority in terms of efficacy and safety profile compared with chemotherapy. Second- and third-generation ALK inhibitors (alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib) offer to NSCLC patients a clinically meaningful prolongment of survival with a very good quality of life profile. However, resistances to these agents always occur, with less satisfying options for second-line treatments. Direct comparisons among these agents are not available, and the choice among brigatinib, alectinib, and lorlatinib as first-line treatment remains challenging. Very recently, alectinib has been demonstrated to improve efficacy outcomes compared with chemotherapy also in resected stage IB-IIIA ALK-rearranged NSCLC, extending the clinical benefit offered by ALK inhibitors also to the adjuvant setting.

EXPERT OPINION

Future development of ALK inhibitors in NSCLC treatment includes the search for optimal management of acquired resistance to first-line treatments and the extension of use of ALK inhibitors also to neoadjuvant and preferably to perioperative setting.

KRAS Mutation Subtypes and Their Association with Other Driver Mutations in Oncogenic Pathways

The KRAS mutation stands out as one of the most influential oncogenic mutations, which directly regulates the hallmark features of cancer and interacts with other cancer-causing driver mutations. However, there remains a lack of precise information on their cooccurrence with mutated variants of KRAS and any correlations between KRAS and other driver mutations. To enquire about this issue, we delved into cBioPortal, TCGA, UALCAN, and Uniport studies. We aimed to unravel the complexity of KRAS and its relationships with other driver mutations. We noticed that G12D and G12V are the prevalent mutated variants of KRAS and coexist with the TP53 mutation in PAAD and CRAD, while G12C and G12V coexist with LUAD. We also noticed similar observations in the case of PIK3CA and APC mutations in CRAD. At the transcript level, a positive correlation exists between KRAS and PIK3CA and between APC and KRAS in CRAD. The existence of the co-mutation of KRAS and other driver mutations could influence the signaling pathway in the neoplastic transformation. Moreover, it has immense prognostic and predictive implications, which could help in better therapeutic management to treat cancer.

Clinical and Molecular Traits of a Novel SPECC1L-ALK Fusion in a Patient with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusions account for 5-7% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients, the therapeutic approaches for which have significantly evolved in the last few years. However, the response to target therapies remains heterogeneous, partially due to the many different ALK fusion variants reported to date. Rare fusion variants have also been discovered, but their role in influencing responses to ALK inhibitors (ALKis) remains poorly elucidated. Laboratory investigation at both the tissue and protein levels, and a molecular profile by next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed on a lung biopsy sample from one patient with poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. An in silico prediction model using ColabFold software v1.5.5 was used to model and predict the entire structure of the chimeric aberrant ALK protein. Here, we report a case of a former smoker, a 60-year-old man, diagnosed with NSCLC and undergoing ALK translocation. He received first-, second- and third-generation ALK protein inhibitors (ALKis), showing a clinical benefit for about 4 years. IHC analysis and the molecular examination of the tissue biopsy indicated a positive staining for ALK and a novel ALK gene fusion variant, involving the sperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domain 1-like (SPECC1L) gene with an unreported breakpoint in exon 7. The novel SPECCL1::ALK fusion was identified using Anchored Multiplex PCR (AMP)-NGS technology and was predicted to retain the Pkinase_Tyr domain at the carboxy-terminal region of the resulting chimeric protein. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case of an ALK-positive NSCLC patient carrying the SPECC1L exon 7 fusion breakpoint and one of the few reports about clinical outcomes related to SPECC1L::ALK fusion. The in silico hypothesized biological role of this newly identified fusion variant corroborates the observed clinical response to multiple ALKis. The molecular findings also reinforce the utility of AMP-based NGS technology as a valuable tool for the identification of rare chromosomal events that may be related to the variability of patient outcomes to different ALKis treatments.

The rapidly changing field of predictive biomarkers of non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide in both men and women, however mortality in the US and EU are recently declining in parallel with the gradual cut of smoking prevalence. Consequently, the relative frequency of adenocarcinoma increased while that of squamous and small cell carcinomas declined. During the last two decades a plethora of targeted drug therapies have appeared for the treatment of metastasizing non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). Personalized oncology aims to precisely match patients to treatments with the highest potential of success. Extensive research is done to introduce biomarkers which can predict the effectiveness of a specific targeted therapeutic approach. The EGFR signaling pathway includes several sufficient targets for the treatment of human cancers including NSCLC. Lung adenocarcinoma may harbor both activating and resistance mutations of the EGFR gene, and further, mutations of KRAS and BRAF oncogenes. Less frequent but targetable genetic alterations include ALK, ROS1, RET gene rearrangements, and various alterations of MET proto-oncogene. In addition, the importance of anti-tumor immunity and of tumor microenvironment has become evident recently. Accumulation of mutations generally trigger tumor specific immune defense, but immune protection may be upregulated as an aggressive feature. The blockade of immune checkpoints results in potential reactivation of tumor cell killing and induces significant tumor regression in various tumor types, such as lung carcinoma. Therapeutic responses to anti PD1-PD-L1 treatment may correlate with the expression of PD-L1 by tumor cells. Due to the wide range of diagnostic and predictive features in lung cancer a plenty of tests are required from a single small biopsy or cytology specimen, which is challenged by major issues of sample quantity and quality. Thus, the efficacy of biomarker testing should be warranted by standardized policy and optimal material usage. In this review we aim to discuss major targeted therapy-related biomarkers in NSCLC and testing possibilities comprehensively.

Oncogene-Driven Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers in Patients with a History of Smoking Lack Smoking-Induced Mutations

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) in nonsmokers are mostly driven by mutations in the oncogenes EGFR, ERBB2, and MET and fusions involving ALK and RET. In addition to occurring in nonsmokers, alterations in these "nonsmoking-related oncogenes" (NSRO) also occur in smokers. To better understand the clonal architecture and genomic landscape of NSRO-driven tumors in smokers compared with typical-smoking NSCLCs, we investigated genomic and transcriptomic alterations in 173 tumor sectors from 48 NSCLC patients. NSRO-driven NSCLCs in smokers and nonsmokers had similar genomic landscapes. Surprisingly, even in patients with prominent smoking histories, the mutational signature caused by tobacco smoking was essentially absent in NSRO-driven NSCLCs, which was confirmed in two large NSCLC data sets from other geographic regions. However, NSRO-driven NSCLCs in smokers had higher transcriptomic activities related to the regulation of the cell cycle. These findings suggest that, whereas the genomic landscape is similar between NSRO-driven NSCLC in smokers and nonsmokers, smoking still affects the tumor phenotype independently of genomic alterations.

SIGNIFICANCE

Non-small cell lung cancers driven by nonsmoking-related oncogenes do not harbor genomic scars caused by smoking regardless of smoking history, indicating that the impact of smoking on these tumors is mainly nongenomic.

Comparing Genomic Profiles of ALK Fusion-Positive and ALK Fusion-Negative Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer Patients

Background  Anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ) fusion events account for 3 to 7% of genetic alterations in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to explore the landscape of ALK fusion-positive and ALK fusion-negative in a large cohort of NSCLC patients. Methods  The formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded specimens of NSCLC patients who underwent next-generation sequencing from 2020 to 2023 in Yinfeng Gene Technology Co., Ltd. Clinical laboratory were included in this study. Results  In the current study, a total of 180 (3.20%) patients tested positive for ALK fusions in 5,622 NSCLC samples. Within the ALK -positive cohort, a total of 228 ALK fusions were identified. Furthermore, five novel ALK fusion partners, including DAB1-ALK , KCMF1-ALK , KIF13A-ALK , LOC643770-ALK , and XDH-ALK were identified. In cases with ALK fusion-positive, TP53 alterations were the most prevalent (26.3%), followed by CDKN2A (8.4%), epidermal growth factor receptor ( EGFR , 5.6%), and ALK (5.6%). By contrast, EGFR alterations were most prevalent (51%) in patients with ALK fusion-negative NSCLC, followed by TP53 (42.7%), KRAS (11.6%), and CDKN2A (11.3%). A total of 10 cases where ALK fusion co-occurred with EGFR mutations were also identified. Notably, the ALK fusion positivity rate was higher in younger patients ( p  < 0.0001) and in female patients ( p  = 0.0429). Additionally, positive ALK test results were more prevalent in patients with high programmed death-ligand 1 expression, especially when applying a 50% cutoff. Conclusions  Collectively, these findings offer valuable genomic insights that could inform the personalized clinical care of patients with NSCLC harboring ALK fusions within the context of precision medicine.

Clinical characteristic and survival outcomes of patients with advanced NSCLC according to KRAS mutational status in the French real-life ESME cohort

PURPOSE

The RAS/MEK signaling pathway is essential in carcinogenesis and frequently altered in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), notably by KRAS mutations (KRASm) that affect 25%-30% of non-squamous NSCLC. This study aims to explore the impact of KRASm subtypes on disease phenotype and survival outcomes.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of the French Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics database for advanced or metastatic lung cancer from 2011 to 2021. Patient demographics, histology, KRASm status, treatment strategies, and outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 10 177 assessable patients for KRAS status, 17.6% had KRAS p.G12C mutation, 22.6% had KRAS non-p.G12C mutation, and 59.8% were KRASwt. KRASm patients were more often smokers (96.3%) compared with KRASwt (85.8%). A higher proportion of programmed death-ligand 1 ≥50% was found for KRASm patients: 43.5% versus 38.0% (P < 0.01). KRASm correlated with poorer outcomes. First-line median progression-free survival was shorter in the KRASm than the KRASwt cohort: 4.0 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 3.7-4.3 months] versus 5.1 months (95% CI 4.8-5.3 months), P < 0.001. First-line overall survival was shorter for KRASm than KRASwt patients: 12.6 months (95% CI 11.6-13.6 months) versus 15.4 months (95% CI 14.6-16.2 months), P = 0.012. First-line chemoimmunotherapy offered better overall survival in KRAS p.G12C (48.8 months) compared with KRAS non-p.G12C (24.0 months) and KRASwt (22.5 months) patients. Second-line overall survival with immunotherapy was superior in the KRAS p.G12C subgroup: 12.6 months (95% CI 8.1-18.6 months) compared with 9.4 months (95% CI 8.0-11.4 months) for KRAS non-p.G12C and 9.6 months (8.4-11.0 months) for KRASwt patients.

CONCLUSION

We highlighted distinct clinical profiles and survival outcomes according to KRASm subtypes. Notably KRAS p.G12C mutations may provide increased sensitivity to immunotherapy, suggesting potential therapeutic implications for sequencing or combination of therapies. Further research on the impact of emerging KRAS specific inhibitors are warranted in real-world cohorts.

Targeting KRASG12C in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Current Standards and Developments

Among the most common molecular alterations detected in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are mutations in Kristen Rat Sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS). KRAS mutant NSCLC is a heterogenous group of diseases, different from other oncogene-driven tumors in terms of biology and response to therapies. Despite efforts to develop drugs aimed at inhibiting KRAS or its signaling pathways, KRAS had remained undruggable for decades. The discovery of a small pocket in the binding switch II region of KRASG12C has revolutionized the treatment of KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC patients. Sotorasib and adagrasib, direct KRASG12C inhibitors, have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and other regulatory agencies for patients with previously treated KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC, and these advances have become practice changing. However, first-line treatment in KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC does not differ from NSCLC without actionable driver genomic alterations. Treatment with KRASG12C inhibitors is not curative and patients develop progressive disease, so understanding associated mechanisms of drug resistance is key. New KRASG12C inhibitors and several combination therapy strategies, including with immune checkpoint inhibitors, are being studied in clinical trials. The aim of this review is to explore the clinical impact of KRAS, and outline different treatment approaches, focusing on the novel treatment of KRASG12C-mutated NSCLC.

Prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in nonsmall-cell lung cancer: A 2023 update on current development, evidence, and recommendation

BACKGROUND

Since the publication of the original work in 2014, significant progress has been made in the characterization of genomic alterations that drive oncogenic addiction of nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and how the immune system can leverage non-oncogenic pathways to modulate therapeutic outcomes. This update evaluates and validates the recent and emerging data for prognostic and predictive biomarkers with therapeutic targets in NSCLC.

DATA SOURCES

We performed a literature search from January 2015 to October 2023 using the keywords non-small cell lung cancer, clinical practice guidelines, gene mutations, genomic assay, immune cancer therapy, circulating tumor DNA, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, and targeted therapies.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

We identified, reviewed, and evaluated relevant clinical trials, meta-analyses, seminal articles, and published clinical practice guidelines in the English language.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Regulatory-approved targeted therapies include those somatic gene alterations of EGFR ("classic" mutations, exon 20 insertion, and rare EGFR mutations), ALK, ROS1, BRAF V600, RET, MET, NTRK, HER2, and KRAS G12C. Data for immunotherapy and circulating tumor DNA in next-generation sequencing are considered emerging, whereas the predictive role for PIK3CA gene mutation is insufficient.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in sequencing and other genomic technologies have led to identifying novel oncogenic drivers, novel resistance mechanisms, and co-occurring mutations that characterize NSCLC, creating further therapeutic opportunities. The benefits associated with immunotherapy in the perioperative setting hold initial promise, with their long-term results awaiting.

Updated overall survival and circulating tumor DNA analysis of ensartinib for crizotinib-refractory ALK-positive NSCLC from a phase II study

BACKGROUND

The initial phase II stuty (NCT03215693) demonstrated that ensartinib has shown clinical activity in patients with advanced crizotinib-refractory, anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Herein, we reported the updated data on overall survival (OS) and molecular profiling from the initial phase II study.

METHODS

In this study, 180 patients received 225 mg of ensartinib orally once daily until disease progression, death or withdrawal. OS was estimated by Kaplan‒Meier methods with two-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Next-generation sequencing was employed to explore prognostic biomarkers based on plasma samples collected at baseline and after initiating ensartinib. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) was detected to dynamically monitor the genomic alternations during treatment and indicate the existence of molecular residual disease, facilitating improvement of clinical management.

RESULTS

At the data cut-off date (August 31, 2022), with a median follow-up time of 53.2 months, 97 of 180 (53.9%) patients had died. The median OS was 42.8 months (95% CI: 29.3-53.2 months). A total of 333 plasma samples from 168 patients were included for ctDNA analysis. An inferior OS correlated significantly with baseline ALK or tumor protein 53 (TP53) mutation. In addition, patients with concurrent TP53 mutations had shorter OS than those without concurrent TP53 mutations. High ctDNA levels evaluated by variant allele frequency (VAF) and haploid genome equivalents per milliliter of plasma (hGE/mL) at baseline were associated with poor OS. Additionally, patients with ctDNA clearance at 6 weeks and slow ascent growth had dramatically longer OS than those with ctDNA residual and fast ascent growth, respectively. Furthermore, patients who had a lower tumor burden, as evaluated by the diameter of target lesions, had a longer OS. Multivariate Cox regression analysis further uncovered the independent prognostic values of bone metastases, higher hGE, and elevated ALK mutation abundance at 6 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Ensartinib led to a favorable OS in patients with advanced, crizotinib-resistant, and ALK-positive NSCLC. Quantification of ctDNA levels also provided valuable prognostic information for risk stratification.

Distinction of ALK fusion gene- and EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer with tumor markers

BACKGROUND

It is difficult to predict gene mutations individually based on clinical background alone. Tumor markers may help to predict each gene mutation. Identifying tumor markers that can predict gene mutation will facilitate timely genetic testing and intervention.

METHODS

We selected 134 cases of advanced or recurrent ALK-positive and 172 cases of advanced or recurrent EGFR-positive lung cancer from our clinical database. The cutoff values for the tumor markers were defined as 5.0 ng/mL or higher for carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) and 3.5 ng/mL or higher for soluble fragment of cytokeratin 19 (CYFRA21-1) in accordance with the institutional standards. A positive CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio was defined as 0.7 or higher.

RESULTS

The CEA-positivity rate was 49% for ALK-positive lung cancers and 73% for EGFR-positive lung cancers, which was significantly different (p < 0.001). The CYFRA21-1 positivity rate was significantly higher in ALK-positive lung cancer (36%) compared with EGFR-positive lung cancer (23%) (p = 0.034). The median CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio was 0.395 for the ALK group, which was significantly higher compared with 0.098 for the EGFR group (p < 0.001). These trends were similar when excluding histology other than adenocarcinoma. The median time-to-treatment failure (TTF) for initial tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy was 308 days for the high CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio group and 617 days for the low CYFRA21-1:CEA ratio group for ALK-positive lung cancer (p = 0.100).

CONCLUSIONS

A higher proportion of patients with ALK-positive lung cancer were CYFRA21-1 positive and had higher CYFRA21-1:CEA ratios compared with EGFR-positive lung cancer patients.

Lorlatinib as a first-line treatment of adult patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small cell lung cancer: Α cost-effectiveness analysis in Greece

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of lorlatinib compared to 1st generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) TKI crizotinib, and 2nd generation TKIs alectinib and brigatinib, for previously untreated patients with ALK+ advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (aNSCLC).

METHODS

A partitioned survival model was locally adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a lifetime horizon. Clinical, safety and utility data were extracted from literature. Direct medical costs reflecting the year 2023 were included in the analysis (€). Model outcomes were patients' life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs).

RESULTS

Total cost per patient with lorlatinib, alectinib, crizotinib, and brigatinib was estimated to be €188,205, €183,343, €75,028, and €145,454 respectively. Lorlatinib appeared to yield more LYs and QALYs gained versus alectinib, crizotinib, and brigatinib. Hence, lorlatinib resulted in ICERs of €4,315 per LY gained and €4,422 per QALY gained compared to alectinib, €34,032 per LY gained and €48,256 per QALY gained versus crizotinib and €16,587 per LY gained and €26,271 per QALY gained compared to brigatinib.

CONCLUSION

Lorlatinib provides substantial clinical benefit and appears to be a cost - effective treatment option compared to 1st and 2nd generation TKIs for previously untreated patients with ALK+ aNCSLC in Greece.

Concomitant double-fusion of PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK reveals favorable alectinib sensitivity in lung adenocarcinoma: a case report and literature review

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene fusion is a classic driver mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, ALK double-fusion variants in NSCLC have rarely been reported. In this study, we reported a case with extremely uncommon ALK double-fusion variants. A 32-year-old female diagnosed with lung adenocarcinoma, who had developed multiple intrapulmonary and brain metastases, experienced worsening of her condition despite undergoing prior chemotherapy. Subsequent testing using next-generation sequencing (NGS) detected the presence of PLEKHA7-ALK and INPP5D-ALK double-fusion. The prescription of alectinib revealed potent efficacy and resulted in an increase in the survival rate. This case presented two uncommon and concomitant ALK fusion partners in NSCLC; more importantly, the INPP5D-ALK subtype has not been reported, therefore this study broadens the spectrum of ALK double-fusion variants and provides insight into the use of ALK inhibitors for the treatment of NSCLC in patients with double ALK fusions.

Cost-effectiveness of first-line versus second-line use of brigatinib followed by lorlatinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer

Background

The ALTA-1 L trial and EXP-3B arm of NCT01970865 trial found that both brigatinib and lorlatinib showed durable and robust responses in treating ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. However, brigatinib and lorlatinib treatments are costly and need indefinite administration until the disease progression. Thus, it remains uncertain whether using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy is cost-effective compared to reserving these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy.

Methods

We used a Markov model to assess clinical outcomes and healthcare costs of treating ALK-positive NSCLC individuals with brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy versus a strategy of reserving these drugs until progression after chemotherapy. Transition probabilities were estimated using parametric survival modeling based on multiple clinical trials. The drug acquisition costs, adverse events costs, administration costs were extracted from published studies before and publicly available data. We calculated lifetime direct healthcare costs, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios from the perspective of a United States payer.

Results

Our base-case analysis indicated that the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of using first-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib compared with second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib is $-400,722.09/QALY which meant that second-line brigatinib followed by lorlatinib had less costs and better outcomes. Univariate sensitivity analysis indicated the results were most sensitive to the cost of brigatinib. Probability sensitivity analysis revealed that using brigatinib followed by lorlatinib before chemotherapy had a 0% probability of cost-effectiveness versus delaying these two drugs until progression after chemotherapy at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses conducted revealed the robustness of this result, as incremental cost-effectiveness ratios never exceeded the willingness-to-pay threshold.

Conclusion

Using brigatinib as first-line treatment followed by lorlatinib for ALK-positive NSCLC may not be cost-effective given current pricing from the perspective of a United States payer. Delaying brigatinib followed by lorlatinib until subsequent lines of treatment may be a reasonable strategy that could limit healthcare costs without affecting clinical outcomes. More mature data are needed to better estimate cost-effectiveness in this setting.

Frequency and functional characterization of fusion genes in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung

INTRODUCTION

In contrast to lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), targetable genetic alterations are less frequently detected in squamous cell carcinoma of the lung (LUSC). Over the last years, gene fusions have become promising targets in many solid cancers. Here, we analysed a cohort of LUSC, identified recurrent fusion genes and functionally characterised these tumour genomes.

METHODS

A subset of 1608 squamous cell carcinomas of the lung was analysed by means of the FusionPlex® Lung Panel to identify potentially targetable gene fusions using targeted next-generation sequencing. Cases harbouring recurrent gene fusions were further analysed using FISH, Cytoscan HD arrays and cell culture experiments.

RESULTS

We found both, known and novel gene fusions in about 3 % of the cases. Known fusions occurring in lung cancer included ALK::EML4, EGFRvIII, EZR::ROS1 and FGFR3::TACC. We further identified recurrent gene fusions of currently unknown biological function, involving EGFR::VSTM2A and NSD3::FGFR1 and showed that the occurrence of the EGFR::VSTM2A fusion is accompanied by high-level amplification of EGFR. Our analyses further revealed that the genomes of these LUSC patients are chromosomally unstable, which leads us to believe that such non-actionable genomic rearrangements may be a result of "chromosomal chaos" most probably not representing exclusive cancer-driving genes in this cancer entity.

CONCLUSIONS

We emphasise that caution should be taken when novel fusions are found and that the appearance of new gene fusions should always be interpreted in the molecular context of the respective disease.

Treatment of lung cancer by acupuncture combined with medicine based on pathophysiological mechanism: A review

Lung cancer is one of the most frequently diagnosed cancers in the world. There are an estimated 2.2 million new cases and 1.79 million deaths each year. Over the past 2 decades, our understanding of disease biology, the use of predictive biomarkers, and improvements in therapeutic approaches have made significant progress and transformed the outcomes of many patients. Treatment is determined by the subtype and stage of the cancer; however, the effect of personalized treatment remains unsatisfactory. The use of Chinese medicines has attracted increasing attention worldwide. Chinese medicine treatment of lung cancer has few side effects, which can effectively prolong the survival expectation of patients and improve their quality of life, and has attracted increasing attention. Based on the pathophysiological mechanism of lung cancer reported in modern medical research, this article explores the efficacy and safety of acupuncture combined with medicine in the treatment of lung cancer.

Concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement between immunohistochemistry and next-generation sequencing

BACKGROUND

Although various companion diagnostic tests of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement are approved, few reports have assessed the concordance of ALK fusion gene-rearrangement in two companion diagnostic tests: next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing and immunohistochemistry (IHC).

METHODS

The samples evaluated for gene alterations using NGS testing between May 2019 and November 2021 were included in this study. The inclusion criteria were as follows: samples were diagnosed with non-small cell lung cancer; the results of the NGS analysis were informative; and samples had residual specimens for IHC. We performed IHC on the residual specimens and retrospectively collected sample characteristics from medical records.

RESULTS

A total of 185 samples were analyzed using NGS. Twenty-six samples were excluded because of failure to analyze gene alterations using NGS, no residual samples, and inadequate IHC. We analyzed 159 samples. The major histological type was adenocarcinoma (115 samples). The number of surgical and transbronchial lung biopsy specimens was 59 and 56, respectively. ALK fusion gene-rearrangement was detected in four samples using NGS, and five were detected using IHC. The sensitivity and specificity of IHC referred to by NGS were 75.0% and 98.7%, respectively. The concordance rate between IHC and NGS was 98.1%. ALK rearrangement was detected in two patients using IHC but not using NGS. In addition, ALK rearrangement was detected in one patient using NGS but not using IHC.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that IHC and NGS might be complementary tests. In patients suspected of harboring ALK fusion gene-rearrangement, it should be analyzed using another diagnostic method.

Predictive value of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics for EGFR mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the value of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics in predicting EGFR gene mutations in non-small cell lung cancer by meta-analysis.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and CNKI databases were searched from the earliest available date to June 30, 2023. The meta-analysis was performed using the Stata 15.0 software. The methodological quality and risk of bias of included studies were assessed using the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 and Radiomics Quality Score criteria. The possible causes of heterogeneity were analyzed by meta-regression.

Results

A total of 17 studies involving 3763 non-small cell lung cancer patients were finally included. We analyzed 17 training cohorts and 10 validation cohorts independently. Within the training cohort, the application of 18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics in predicting EGFR mutations in NSCLC demonstrated a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.70-0.81) and a specificity of 0.78 (95% CI: 0.74-0.82), accompanied by a positive likelihood ratio of 3.5 (95% CI:3.0-4.2), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.31 (95% CI: 0.24-0.39), a diagnostic odds ratio of 11.0 (95% CI: 8.0-16.0), and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.84 (95% CI: 0.80-0.87). In the validation cohort, the values included a sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.67-0.83), a specificity of 0.75 (95% CI: 0.68-0.80), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.0 (95% CI:2.4-3.8), a negative likelihood ratio of 0.32 (95% CI: 0.24-0.44), a diagnostic odds ratio of 9 (95% CI: 6-15), and an AUC of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.78-0.85). The average Radiomics Quality Score (RQS) across studies was 10.47 ± 4.72. Meta-regression analysis identifies the application of deep learning and regions as sources of heterogeneity.

Conclusion

18F-FDG PET/CT radiomics may be useful in predicting mutation status of the EGFR gene in non-small cell lung cancer.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO, identifier CRD42022385364.

Benefits of Implementing Reflex Genomic Analysis for Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Molecular biomarker analysis is standard of care in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Pathologist-driven reflex testing protocols are one approach to initiating this analysis. Two years after insourcing genomic analysis at our institution, a reflex testing protocol for advanced NSCLC was initiated.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the records of 578 NSCLC biopsies was performed to assess the impact of 3 genomic testing workflows (send-out, in-house clinician-ordered, and in-house reflex) on time to initiation of molecular testing [initiation time (IT)], reporting time (RT), proportion of test failures, and test ordering practices. The proportion of test failures by test methodology was also assessed.

RESULTS

IT was lowest for reflex protocol orders (mean weekdays: 30.0 send-out, 27.4 in-house clinician-ordered, 0.95 reflex). Test failure was highest for send-out testing (31.7% vs. 10% each for in-house clinician-ordered and reflex). RT remained consistent across the 3 workflows (mean weekdays: 11.1 send-out, 11.9 in-house clinician-ordered, and 11.4 reflex). Guideline-congruent molecular testing increased upon insourcing genomic analysis and again upon implementing reflex testing with a reduction in nonbiomarker informed care (58.8% send-out, 19.5% in-house clinician-ordered, 11.5% reflex).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of reflex in-house genomic analysis for advanced NSCLC ensured consistency in RT and significantly decreased IT and proportion of test failures. Insourcing genomic analysis and thoughtful care pathway design improve equitable access to molecular biomarker analysis and mitigate nonbiomarker informed cancer care in NSCLC.

MET Fusions in NSCLC: Clinicopathologic Features and Response to MET Inhibition

INTRODUCTION

MET fusions have been described only rarely in NSCLC. Thus, data on patient characteristics and treatment response are limited. We here report histopathologic data, patient demographics, and treatment outcome including response to MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in MET fusion-positive NSCLC.

METHODS

Patients with NSCLC and MET fusions were identified mostly by RNA sequencing within the routine molecular screening program of the national Network Genomic Medicine, Germany.

RESULTS

We describe a cohort of nine patients harboring MET fusions. Among these nine patients, two patients had been reported earlier. The overall frequency was 0.29% (95% confidence interval: 0.15-0.55). The tumors were exclusively adenocarcinoma. The cohort was heterogeneous in terms of age, sex, or smoking status. We saw five different fusion partner genes (KIF5B, TRIM4, ST7, PRKAR2B, and CAPZA2) and several different breakpoints. Four patients were treated with a MET TKI leading to two partial responses, one stable disease, and one progressive disease. One patient had a BRAF V600E mutation as acquired resistance mechanism.

CONCLUSIONS

MET fusions are very rare oncogenic driver events in NSCLC and predominantly seem in adenocarcinomas. They are heterogeneous in terms of fusion partners and breakpoints. Patients with MET fusion can benefit from MET TKI therapy.

The landscape of actionable genomic alterations in lung adenocarcinomas in India

Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD), the most prevalent form of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), remains a leading cause of cancer-related death globally, including in India, with a 5-year survival rate below 10%. Despite these grim statistics, recent advances in the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for identifying genetic alterations and the emergence of targeted therapies have opened new possibilities for personalized treatment based on distinct molecular signatures. To understand the molecular pattern of NSCLC, a retrospective study was conducted with 53 Indian LUAD patient samples, using a targeted NGS panel of 46 cancer-relevant oncogenes to identify clinically relevant variants. Pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants were detected in 94% of the 53 cases. Non-synonymous mutations, rearrangements, copy number alterations, insertions, and deletions of functional relevance were observed in 31 out of 46 genes. The most frequently mutated genes included TP53 (52.8%) and EGFR (50.9%), followed by RET, PIK3CA and ERBB2; some patients had multiple alterations in the same gene. Gender-based enrichment analysis indicated that ALK and IDH2 alterations were more prevalent in females, while TP53 and PTEN were more common in males. No significant correlation was found between mutations and other clinicopathological attributes, such as age, stage, and subtype. A higher prevalence of EGFR, RET, PIK3CA, ERBB2 and ALK mutations were observed compared to previous LUAD genetic studies coupled with a lower frequency of KRAS mutations. Clinically actionable variants were annotated using OncoKB and categorized into the four therapeutic levels based on their clinical evidence. Seventy-nine percent of cases had at least one clinically actionable alteration. Most patients (39.6%) had the highest level of actionability (Level 1) wherein an FDA-approved drug is available specifically for the observed mutation in lung cancer patients. EGFR Exon19 in-frame deletions and EGFR L858R were the most frequent among targetable variants (20.7%). These findings emphasize the importance of a selective NGS panel in enabling personalized medicine approaches by identifying actionable molecular alterations and informing the choice of targeted therapy for more effective treatment options in Indian NSCLC patients.

Clinicopathological features and prognostic significance of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with signet ring cell components: meta-analysis and SEER analysis

Pulmonary adenocarcinoma is a common type of lung cancer that has been on the rise in recent years. Signet ring cell components (SRCC) can be present in various patterns of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, including papillary, acinar, and solid patterns. "Signet ring cell carcinoma" is a distinct subtype in the 2014 WHO classification of lung neoplasms, subsequent WHO classifications in 2015 and 2021 have deemed signet ring cells as accompanying morphological features with no clinical significance. The prognostic and clinical implications of SRCC in pulmonary adenocarcinoma remain controversial. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to investigate the clinicopathological features and prognostic factors of SRCC in pulmonary adenocarcinoma. We conducted a comprehensive search in PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science to identify studies that examined the clinicopathological features and prognostic implications of pulmonary adenocarcinoma with SRCC. We used both fixed- and random-effects models to analyze the data and calculate the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Additionally, we explored the prognostic significance of SRCC in pulmonary adenocarcinoma using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Our meta-analysis included 29 studies with pulmonary adenocarcinoma and SRCC components. The results showed that pulmonary adenocarcinoma with SRCC was associated with larger tumor size (OR = 1.99; 95% CI, 1.62-2.44, p < 0.001), advanced overall stage (OR = 5.18, 95% CI, 3.28-8.17, p < 0.00001) and lymph node stage (OR = 5.79, 95% CI, 1.96-17.09, p = 0.001), and worse overall survival (OS) compared to those without SRCC (HR = 1.80, 95% CI, 1.50-2.16, p < 0.00001). Analysis using the SEER dataset confirmed these findings. Our meta-analysis provides evidence that pulmonary adenocarcinoma with SRCC is associated with distinct clinicopathological features and a poorer prognosis. These findings have important implications for the management and treatment of patients. However, further studies are needed to validate these findings and explore the significance of SRCC in various subtypes of pulmonary adenocarcinoma.

A novel intergenic (between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1)-ALK fusion responds to alectinib in lung adenocarcinoma

OBJECTIVES

The wide implementation of next generation sequencing (NGS) technology has led to the identification of a greater number of uncommon partners of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion. The clinical significance of the intergenic-ALK fusion was deemed limited due to the ambiguous functional partner. Herein, we reported a case of lung adenocarcinoma harboring a novel intergenic (between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1)-ALK fusion which is sensitive to alectinib.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Hematoxylin-eosin staining (HE), immunohistochemistry (IHC), and DNA-based next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on a 168-gene panel were performed on the biopsy sample.

RESULTS

A 50-year-old Chinese male patient diagnosed with stage IVA adenocarcinoma of the upper lobe of the right lung. A novel ALK fusion, resulting from the intergenic region between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1 fusing with intron 19 of ALK, was unveiled by NGS analysis. Furthermore, positive expression of ALK was confirmed through IHC analysis. The patient was administered alectinib at a dose of 600 mg twice daily as first-line therapy, and partial response was assessed. To date, the progression-free survival (PFS) has exceeded 14 months without any observed serious toxicities.

CONCLUSION

To the best of our knowledge, this represents the inaugural report of a patient harboring a novel intergenic-ALK fusion with a breakpoint situated between REG3A and CTNNA2-AS1, who exhibited favorable response to alectinib. This case warrants further investigation and offers valuable insights into the response of this novel intergenic-ALK fusion to alectinib.

Effect of High-Fat Food on the Pharmacokinetic Profile and Safety of SAF-189s, an ALK/ROS1 Inhibitor, in Healthy Chinese Adults

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

This study was conducted to investigate the effect of high-fat meals on the pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety profile of SAF-189s, a novel ALK/ROS1 inhibitor.

METHODS

This was a single-center, phase I, open-label, crossover study in which healthy adults (≥18 years) were randomized (1:1) to two sequences of SAF-189s administration (fasted-fed or fed-fasted) separated by a 14-day washout. After a ≥10-h overnight fast, volunteers received SAF-189s 160 mg orally in a fasted state or 30 min after a high-fat, high-calorie meal. Similarity of pharmacokinetic parameters was concluded if the 90% CI for the geometric mean ratio (GMR) between the fed and fasted group fell within the predefined range of 0.80-1.25.

RESULTS

In total, 24 subjects were enrolled and 23 completed the study. SAF-189s maximum plasma concentration (Cmax; GMR: 109.1% [90% CI 103.1-115.4]) was comparable under fed (high-fat meal, n = 24) versus fasted (n = 23) conditions, with no effect on area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to t (AUC0-t; GMR: 105.1% [90% CI 100.3-110.2]) and AUC from time 0 to infinity (AUC0-∞; GMR: 105.5% [90% CI, 100.6-110.6]). In both groups, the median time to maximum plasma concentration (tmax) was around 6 h and mean plasma half-life (t½) was around 35 h. Fed administration led to a lower incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs; 29.2% vs 54.2%), including gastrointestinal disorders (4.2% vs 41.7%) and headache (0.0% vs 12.5%), versus fasted administration.

CONCLUSIONS

A high-fat meal had minimal effect on the pharmacokinetic profile of SAF-189s compared with a fasted state following a single dose of 160 mg. Administration with a high-fat meal led to a lower incidence of TEAEs.

Brigatinib Versus Alectinib in ALK-Positive NSCLC After Disease Progression on Crizotinib: Results of Phase 3 ALTA-3 Trial

INTRODUCTION

This open-label, phase 3 trial (ALTA-3; NCT03596866) compared efficacy and safety of brigatinib versus alectinib for ALK+ NSCLC after disease progression on crizotinib.

METHODS

Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC that progressed on crizotinib were randomized 1:1 to brigatinib 180 mg once daily (7-d lead-in, 90 mg) or alectinib 600 mg twice daily, aiming to test superiority. The primary end point was blinded independent review committee-assessed progression-free survival (PFS). Interim analysis for efficacy and futility was planned at approximately 70% of 164 expected PFS events.

RESULTS

The population (N = 248; brigatinib, n = 125; alectinib, n = 123) was notable for long median duration of prior crizotinib (16.0-16.8 mo) and low rate of ALK fusion in baseline circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA; 78 of 232 [34%]). Median blinded independent review committee-assessed PFS was 19.3 months with brigatinib and 19.2 months with alectinib (hazard ratio = 0.97 [95% confidence interval: 0.66-1.42], p = 0.8672]). The study met futility criterion. Overall survival was immature (41 events [17%]). Exploratory analyses pooled across the treatment groups revealed median PFS of 11.1 versus 22.5 months in patients with versus without ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion at baseline (hazard ratio: 0.48 [95% confidence interval: 0.32-0.71]). Treatment-related adverse events in more than 30% of patients (brigatinib, alectinib) were elevated levels of blood creatine phosphokinase (70%, 29%), aspartate aminotransferase (53%, 38%), and alanine aminotransferase (40%, 36%).

CONCLUSIONS

Brigatinib was not superior to alectinib for PFS in crizotinib-pretreated ALK+ NSCLC. Safety was consistent with the well-established and unique profiles of each drug. The low proportion of patients with ctDNA-detectable ALK fusion may account for prolonged PFS with both drugs in ALTA-3.

Clinical outcomes of ALK+ non-small cell lung cancer in Denmark

BACKGROUND

Real-world clinical outcomes of anaplastic lymphoma kinase positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients vary. This study aimed to investigate the treatment and clinical outcomes of all ALK+ NSCLC patients in Denmark in the period 2011-2018, regardless of disease stage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A national pathology database with complete coverage was used to identify ALK+ NSCLC patients diagnosed between 2011 and 2018. Clinical data were obtained through retrospective chart reviews. Overall survival (OS) and duration of treatment (DOT) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methodologies.

RESULTS

A total of 209 ALK+ NSCLC patients were included. The cohort had a slight overrepresentation of female patients (56.5%) with a mean age of 61.6 years. Most patients were adenocarcinoma cases (97%) and presented with an ECOG performance status of 0-1 (79%). Stage IIIb-IVb patients comprised 70% of the cohort. The use of ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line treatment increased over time, with the 1st generation ALK-TKI crizotinib being the predominant treatment in the 1st line. In 1st line treatment, 2nd generation ALK-TKIs had a median DOT more than twice the median DOT of crizotinib (25.1 and 9.1 months, respectively). The median OS for the entire cohort was 44.0 months. Patients with stage I-IIIA disease had a median OS that had not been reached, while those with stage IIIb-IVb disease had a median OS of 31.8 months. Patients with stage IIIb-IVb disease receiving an ALK-TKI as 1st line treatment had a median OS of 42.5 months with immature follow-up. Brain metastases at diagnosis or choice of 1st line treatment did not statistically significantly impact OS.

CONCLUSION

This study gives insights into the treatment and outcome of ALK+ NSCLC patients in Denmark and provides a real-world confirmation of the superior disease control provided by 2nd generation ALK-TKIs as compared to the 1st generation ALK-TKI crizotinib.

Clinical Pathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Multigene Co-Mutations in Elderly Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis

Background

With the development and wide application of next-generation sequencing (NGS), multiple-gene mutations related to lung cancer are detected using this technology. Notably, even multigene concomitant mutations (co-mutations), which occur at a relatively low incidence, can be detected more effectively using NGS. It is well-known that the percentages of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the elderly lung cancer population are also gradually increasing, while its prognosis is hard and the quality of long-term survival is poor. This study aimed at investigating the common clinicopathologic features of multigene co-mutations for better evaluating the prognosis of elderly NSCLC patients.

Methods

A total of 464 NSCLC patients were divided into 3 groups according to the types of gene mutation, whose clinical data were retrospectively analyzed.

Results

In total, 38.36% (178/464) of NSCLC patients were in the nonmutation group, 50% in the single-gene mutation group, and 11.64% in the multigene co-mutation group. Nonmutation, single-gene mutation, and co-mutation groups were all prone to occur in male adenocarcinoma patients (P < .05). EGFR gene mutation rates were the highest in the single-gene mutation and co-mutation groups (54.31% and 24.35%). In the co-mutation group, the incidence of EGFR/PIK3CA, LK/KRAS, and EGFR/MET co-mutations was the highest (16.67%, 11.11%, and 7.41%). ALK/HER2/MET, EGFR/HER2/MET, and EGFR/HER2/MET/ROS1 multiple-gene co-mutations were, respectively, found in 1 case, and the multigene co-mutation patients commonly had a worse median progression-free survival (PFS) than that of single-gene mutation (7.13 vs 12.34 months, P = .013).

Conclusion

With the application of NGS, the detectable rates of gene co-mutation are increasingly high in elderly patients with NSCLC, which mainly occurs in male adenocarcinoma patients commonly with poor PFS. It will be critically necessary to conduct multigene detections by NGS for directing targeted therapy of elderly NSCLC patients.

Current Status of Cancer Genomics and Imaging Phenotypes: What Radiologists Need to Know

Ongoing discoveries in cancer genomics and epigenomics have revolutionized clinical oncology and precision health care. This knowledge provides unprecedented insights into tumor biology and heterogeneity within a single tumor, among primary and metastatic lesions, and among patients with the same histologic type of cancer. Large-scale genomic sequencing studies also sparked the development of new tumor classifications, biomarkers, and targeted therapies. Because of the central role of imaging in cancer diagnosis and therapy, radiologists need to be familiar with the basic concepts of genomics, which are now becoming the new norm in oncologic clinical practice. By incorporating these concepts into clinical practice, radiologists can make their imaging interpretations more meaningful and specific, facilitate multidisciplinary clinical dialogue and interventions, and provide better patient-centric care. This review article highlights basic concepts of genomics and epigenomics, reviews the most common genetic alterations in cancer, and discusses the implications of these concepts on imaging by organ system in a case-based manner. This information will help stimulate new innovations in imaging research, accelerate the development and validation of new imaging biomarkers, and motivate efforts to bring new molecular and functional imaging methods to clinical radiology. Keywords: Oncology, Cancer Genomics, Epignomics, Radiogenomics, Imaging Markers Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2023.

Exploiting signaling rewiring in cancer cells with co-existing oncogenic drivers

The development of tailored therapies designed to specifically target driver oncogenes has initiated a revolutionary era in cancer biology. The availability of a growing number of selective inhibitors has generated novel experimental and clinical paradigms. These represent an opportunity and a challenge for researchers and clinicians to delve deeper into the intricate dynamics of cancer development and response to treatment. By directly inhibiting key driver oncogenes involved in tumor initiation and progression, scientists have an unprecedented opportunity to conduct longitudinal and clonal evolutionary studies of how cancer cells adapt, rewire, and exploit conflictive or overlapping signaling dependencies in response to treatment in vitro and in vivo. This challenge has to be progressively resolved to discover more effective and personalized cancer therapies.