Short-term CDK4/6 Inhibition Radiosensitizes Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers

Radiosensitizing effects of CDK4/6 inhibitors in hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer mediated downregulation of DNA repair mechanism and NF-κB-signaling pathway

CDK4/6 inhibitors combined with endocrine therapy prolonged survival in hormone receptor (HR)-positive and HER2-negative advanced breast cancer. We investigated whether CDK4/6 inhibitors enhance radiosensitivity and their underlying mechanisms of this subtype of breast cancer. In vitro and in vivo experiments were conducted using two HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer cell lines (MCF-7 and T-47D), CDK4/6 inhibitors (ribociclib and palbociclib) and radiotherapy (RT) to assess the biological functions and mechanisms. The radiation-enhancing effect was assessed using clonogenic assays; γH2AX and 53BP1 levels were assessed by immunofluorescence to evaluate DNA damage. The levels of phospho (p)-ERK, c-Myc, and DNA-double strand break (DSB)-related molecules, p-DNA-PKcs, Rad51, and p-ATM, were assessed by western blotting. We used an NF-κB p65 transcription factor assay kit to evaluate NF-κB activity. We evaluated the antitumor effect of the combination of RT and ribociclib through the MCF-7 orthotopic xenograft model. The synergistic effects of combining RT with ribociclib and palbociclib pretreatment were demonstrated by clonogenic assay. CDK4/6 inhibitors synergistically increased the numbers of RT-induced γH2AX and 53BP1, downregulated the expression of p-DNA-PKcs, Rad51 and p-ATM activated by RT, and reduced RT-triggering p-ERK expression, NF-κB activation, and its down-streaming gene, c-Myc. Combined ribociclib and RT reduced the growth of MCF-7 cell xenograft tumors, and downregulated the immunohistochemical expression of p-ERK, p-NF-κB p65, and c-Myc compared to that in the control group. Combining CDK4/6 inhibitors enhanced radiosensitivity of HR-positive and HER2-negative breast cancer cells at least by reducing DNA-DSB repair and weakening the activation of ERK and NF-κB signaling by RT.

MAFF confers vulnerability to cisplatin-based and ionizing radiation treatments by modulating ferroptosis and cell cycle progression in lung adenocarcinoma

AIMS

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer mortality and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) accounts for more than half of all lung cancer cases. Tumor elimination is mostly hindered by drug resistance and the mechanisms remain to be explored in LUAD.

METHODS

CRISPR screens in cell and murine models and single-cell RNA sequencing were conducted, which identified MAF bZIP transcription factor F (MAFF) as a critical factor regulating tumor growth and treatment resistance in LUAD. RNA and ChIP sequencing analyses were performed for transcriptional target expression and specific binding sites of MAFF. Functions of MAFF in inhibiting tumor growth and promoting cisplatin or irradiation efficacy were investigated using cellular and xenograft models.

RESULTS

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma and reduced MAFF expression had worse clinical outcomes. MAFF inhibited tumor cell proliferation by regulating the expression of SLC7A11, CDK6, and CDKN2C, promoting ferroptosis and preventing cell cycle progression from G1 to S. MAFF also conferred tumor cells vulnerable to cisplatin-based or ionizing radiation treatments. MAFF reduction was a final event in the acquisition of cisplatin resistance of LUAD cells. The intracellular cAMP/PKA/CREB1 pathway upregulated MAFF in response to cisplatin-based or ionizing radiation treatments.

CONCLUSIONS

MAFF suppresses tumor growth, and pharmacological agonists targeting MAFF may improve cisplatin or irradiation therapies for lung adenocarcinoma patients.

A new perspective on the proper timing of radiotherapy during CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy in patients with "bone-only" metastatic breast cancer

The vast majority of hormone positive and HER2 negative advanced breast cancers can be controlled well by endocrine therapy combined with the groundbreaking use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the metastatic first-line setting. Approximately 50%-60% of these patients have "bone-only" metastatic disease. In oligometastatic cases or if a certain number of uncontrolled lesions develop during the aforementioned therapy, ablative radiotherapy can be delivered or, in symptomatic cases, urgent irradiation is needed with palliative intent. To achieve the most effective results, parallel with good quality of life, the timing of radiotherapy must be determined precisely, taking into account that different cell cycles are involved during different treatment modalities; therefore, optimization of treatment schedules ensures longer and safer post-progression overall survival. The key question is whether the two treatment modalities are safe concurrently or whether they should be administered separately, and if so, what is the optimal sequence and why? This manuscript aims to answer this important question, with a focus on quality of life. Existing publications focus on safety and toxicity profiles, and efficacy is detailed only tangentially and minimally.

Outcomes and toxicity of concurrent CDK4/6 inhibitor and locoregional radiotherapy for patients with de novo metastatic breast cancer

The objective of the present study was to assess the outcomes and toxicity of patients treated with concurrent administration of CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and locoregional radiation therapy (RT), including the breast with a boost or the thoracic wall after mastectomy and the regional lymph node areas. We retrospectively analyzed data from 27 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative de novo metastatic breast cancer treated with CDK4/6i and concomitant locoregional RT in 2017/2022. Survival rates were calculated by Kaplan-Meier method. Prognostic factors were tested with log-rank test. CDK4/6i was used as the first systemic metastatic treatment for all the patients, and the median overall treatment time was 26 months. The median time from initiation of CDK4/6i to the start of RT was 10 months (IQR: 7-14 months). The median duration of concomitant CDK4/6i and RT administration was 21 days (IQR: 14.5-23 days). After a median follow-up of 19 months (IQR: 14-36 months), 1 patient died, 11/27 had distant metastases and 1 patient had local recurrence, respectively. The 1- and 3-years progression-free survival (PFS) were 61.4% (95% CI: 45.1%-83.7%) and 53.7% (35.8%-80.5%), respectively. The acute toxicities most observed during RT were neutropenia (44%) and dermatitis (37%). Dermatitis was significantly more frequent in patients with large target volumes (CTV > 911 cc and PTV > 1285 cc). CDK4/6i had to be discontinued in five patients during RT (due to toxicity in three cases and disease progression in two cases). One patient has developed grade 2 late pulmonary fibrosis. Finally, our study demonstrated that concurrent administration of locoregional RT and CDK4/6i did not induce severe late toxicity for most patients.

Safety profile of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/6 inhibitors with concurrent radiation therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) have become the standard of care for hormone receptor-positive (HR + ) and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) metastatic breast cancer, improving survival outcomes compared to endocrine therapy alone. Abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with endocrine therapy, have demonstrated significant benefits in invasive disease-free survival for high-risk HR+/HER2- early breast cancer patients. Each CDK4/6i-palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib-exhibits distinct toxicity profiles. Radiation therapy (RT) can be delivered with a palliative or ablative intent, particularly using stereotactic body radiation therapy for oligometastatic or oligoprogressive disease. However, pivotal randomized trials lack information on concomitant CDK4/6i and RT, and existing preclinical and clinical data on the potential combined toxicities are limited and conflicting. As part of a broader effort to establish international consensus recommendations for integrating RT and targeted agents in breast cancer treatment, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the safety profile of combining CDK4/6i with palliative and ablative RT in both metastatic and early breast cancer settings.

[Radiotherapy and targeted therapy for the management of breast cancer: A review]

The purpose of this study was to review the current knowledge regarding combinations of the most commonly used targeted therapies or those under development for the management of breast cancer with radiation therapy. Several studies have shown that the combination of radiation therapy and tamoxifen increased the risk of radiation-induced lung toxicity; therefore, the two modalities are generally not given concurrently. The combination of HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and radiation therapy appeared to be safe. However, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) should not be given concomitantly with brain radiation therapy because this combination may increase the risk of brain radionecrosis. The combination of radiation therapy with other new targeted therapies such as new selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERDs), lapatinib, cell cycle inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage repair seems feasible but has been mainly evaluated on retrospective or prospective studies with small numbers of patients. Moreover, there is a great heterogeneity between these studies regarding the dose and fractionation used in radiotherapy, the dosage of systemic treatments and the sequence of treatments used. Therefore, the combination of these new molecules with radiotherapy should be proposed sparingly, under close monitoring, pending the ongoing prospective studies cited in this review.

Cell cycle arrest and p53 prevent ON-target megabase-scale rearrangements induced by CRISPR-Cas9

The CRISPR-Cas9 system has revolutionized our ability to precisely modify the genome and has led to gene editing in clinical applications. Comprehensive analysis of gene editing products at the targeted cut-site has revealed a complex spectrum of outcomes. ON-target genotoxicity is underestimated with standard PCR-based methods and necessitates appropriate and more sensitive detection methods. Here, we present two complementary Fluorescence-Assisted Megabase-scale Rearrangements Detection (FAMReD) systems that enable the detection, quantification, and cell sorting of edited cells with megabase-scale loss of heterozygosity (LOH). These tools reveal rare complex chromosomal rearrangements caused by Cas9-nuclease and show that LOH frequency depends on cell division rate during editing and p53 status. Cell cycle arrest during editing suppresses the occurrence of LOH without compromising editing. These data are confirmed in human stem/progenitor cells, suggesting that clinical trials should consider p53 status and cell proliferation rate during editing to limit this risk by designing safer protocols.

[Biological, preclinical and clinical aspects of the association between radiation therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors]

Several clinical studies have shown that CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) improve survival in patients with metastatic or locally advanced HR-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer (BC). The aim of this review was to synthesize the biological, preclinical and clinical aspects of the treatment of BC with CDK4/6i, with a focus on the combination of CDK4/6i and radiotherapy. The DNA damage induced after exposure of cells to ionizing radiation activates control pathways that inhibit cell progression in the G1 and G2 phases and induce a transient delay in progression in the S phase. These checkpoints are in particular mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK) 4/6 activated by cyclin D1. Several preclinical studies have shown that CDK4/6i could be used as radiosensitizers in non-small cell lung cancer, medulloblastoma, brainstem glioma and breast cancer. CDK4/6 inhibition also protected against radiation-induced intestinal toxicities by inducing redistribution of quiescent intestinal progenitor cells, making them less radiosensitive. Clinical data on the combination of CDK inhibitors and radiotherapy for both locoregional and metastatic irradiation are based on retrospective data. Nevertheless, the most optimal therapeutic sequence would be radiotherapy followed by palbociclib. Pending prospective clinical trials, the concomitant combination of the two treatments should be done under close supervision.

A Novel External Auditory Canal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Cell Line Sensitive to CDK4/6 Inhibition

OBJECTIVE

To characterize cell line CAE606 derived from a squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the external auditory canal (EAC) and to show its usefulness as a model for testing candidate therapeutic agents.

STUDY DESIGN

Preclinical translational research.

SETTING

Biomedical research institute.

METHODS

The cell line was initiated from a moderately differentiated T2N0M0 EAC SCC. We studied its histologic and genetic features as well as growth and invasion parameters. Sensitivity to cell CDK4/6 cell cycle inhibitor palbociclib was analyzed.

RESULTS

CAE606 cells expressed heavy molecular weight cytokeratin, p63, and vimentin. The population doubling time was 25.8 hours, and the cells showed fast collective cell migration in a wound-healing assay. Short tandem repeat analysis confirmed it to be derived from the primary tumor of the patient. Next-generation sequencing revealed alterations in cell cycle regulation genes, including inactivating mutations in CDKN2A and TP53 and high-level amplification of CCND1 and EGFR. CAE606 showed a strong decrease of phospo-Rb expression upon exposure to the CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib, causing significant growth inhibition with an IC₅₀ of 0.46 µM.

CONCLUSION

This is the first report of a stable EAC SCC cell line. Its genetic features make it a useful tool for preclinical testing of new therapeutic agents for EAC SCC, particularly those targeting cell cycle regulation in combination with radio- and chemotherapy or other specific signaling pathway inhibitors.

Cellular senescence in the response of HR+ breast cancer to radiotherapy and CDK4/6 inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Preclinical evidence from us and others demonstrates that the anticancer effects of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors can be enhanced with focal radiation therapy (RT), but only when RT is delivered prior to (rather than after) CDK4/6 inhibition. Depending on tumor model, cellular senescence (an irreversible proliferative arrest that is associated with the secretion of numerous bioactive factors) has been attributed beneficial or detrimental effects on response to treatment. As both RT and CDK4/6 inhibitors elicit cellular senescence, we hypothesized that a differential accumulation of senescent cells in the tumor microenvironment could explain such an observation, i.e., the inferiority of CDK4/6 inhibition with palbociclib (P) followed by RT (P→RT) as compared to RT followed by palbociclib (RT→P).

METHODS

The impact of cellular senescence on the interaction between RT and P was assessed by harnessing female INK-ATTAC mice, which express a dimerizable form of caspase 8 (CASP8) under the promoter of cyclin dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (Cdkn2a, coding for p16Ink4), as host for endogenous mammary tumors induced by the subcutaneous implantation of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, M) pellets combined with the subsequent oral administration of 7,12-dimethylbenz[a]anthracene (DMBA, D). This endogenous mouse model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis recapitulates key immunobiological aspects of human HR+ breast cancer. Mice bearing M/D-driven tumors were allocated to RT, P or their combination in the optional presence of the CASP8 dimerizer AP20187, and monitored for tumor growth, progression-free survival and overall survival. In parallel, induction of senescence in vitro, in cultured human mammary hormone receptor (HR)+ adenocarcinoma MCF7 cells, triple negative breast carcinoma MDA-MB-231 cells and mouse HR+ mammary carcinoma TS/A cells treated with RT, P or their combination, was determined by colorimetric assessment of senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity after 3 or 7 days of treatment.

RESULTS

In vivo depletion of p16Ink4-expressing (senescent) cells ameliorated the efficacy of P→RT (but not that of RT→P) in the M/D-driven model of HR+ mammary carcinogenesis. Accordingly, P→RT induced higher levels of cellular senescence than R→TP in cultured human and mouse breast cancer cell lines.

CONCLUSIONS

Pending validation in other experimental systems, these findings suggest that a program of cellular senescence in malignant cells may explain (at least partially) the inferiority of P→RT versus RT→P in preclinical models of HR+ breast cancer.

Safety of CDK4/6 inhibitors and concomitant radiation therapy in patients affected by metastatic breast cancer

PURPOSE

Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) currently represent the standard of care for the initial treatment of patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) breast cancer. The aim of our study is to evaluate the safety of the use of concomitant radiation therapy (RT) in a consecutive series of HR+/HER2- patients treated in two academic institutions with CDK4/6i in the metastatic setting.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 2017 to February 2020, we retrospectively collected and analysed data on a sequential series of patients treated with CDK4/6i, receiving RT or not, at two European institutions. Primary outcome of the study was the association between RT and any adverse events (AEs) ≥ G3. Secondary outcomes were the association between RT and any AEs (any grade), CDK4/6i dose reduction rate, and CDK4/6i treatment discontinuation rate.

RESULTS

We analysed a total of 132 consecutive women; RT was prescribed in 57 (43.2%) patients (70 irradiated lesions). The median age of the series was 52.1 years (range 32.3-78.2). Concomitant RT administration was not significantly related to higher AEs ≥ G3 (p = 0.19) and any grade AEs (p = 1.0); there was no association with RT and CDK4/6i dose reduction (p = 0.49) and discontinuation rates (p = 0.14). At a median follow-up of 18.8 months, the progression-free survival (PFS) rate was 35% and the overall survival (OS) rate was 38.7% in the whole group. The use of concomitant RT did not affect both PFS (p = 0.71) and OS rates (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Our data are encouraging regarding the safety of this combination, showing that concurrent RT did not increase severe toxicity and did not have an impact on systemic treatment conduction.

Updates in combined approaches of radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer

Breast cancer is the most prevalent non-skin cancer diagnosed in females and developing novel therapeutic strategies to improve patient outcomes is crucial. The immune system plays an integral role in the body’s response to breast cancer and modulating this immune response through immunotherapy is a promising therapeutic option. Although immune checkpoint inhibitors were recently approved for the treatment of breast cancer patients, not all patients respond to immune checkpoint inhibitors as a monotherapy, highlighting the need to better understand the biology underlying patient response. Additionally, as radiotherapy is a critical component of breast cancer treatment, understanding the interplay of radiation and immune checkpoint inhibitors will be vital as recent studies suggest that combined therapies may induce synergistic effects in preclinical models of breast cancer. This review will discuss the mechanisms supporting combined approaches with radiotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors for the treatment of breast cancer. Moreover, this review will analyze the current clinical trials examining combined approaches of radiotherapy, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and targeted therapy. Finally, this review will evaluate data regarding treatment tolerance and potential biomarkers for these emerging therapies aimed at improving breast cancer outcomes.

RPRM negatively regulates ATM levels through its nuclear translocation on irradiation mediated by CDK4/6 and IPO11

How the ataxia telangiectasia mutated (ATM) protein kinase, a core protein in DNA damage response, is regulated at post-transcription level remains unclear. Here it is identified that protein Reprimo (RPRM) downregulates ATM protein levels, resulting in impaired DNA repair and enhanced cellular radiosensitivity. Mechanistically, although primarily localized in the cytoplasm, RPRM translocates to the nucleus shortly after induced by X-irradiation, interacts with ATM and promotes its nuclear export and proteasomal degradation. The RPRM nuclear translocation involves its phosphorylation at serine 98 mediated by cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6), and requires Importin-11 (IPO11). Of importance, IPO11-regulated RPRM nuclear import upon irradiation is essential for its regulation on ATM. Thus, RPRM overexpression and its phosphorylation inhibition sensitize cells to genotoxic agents such as irradiation, whereas RPRM deficiency significantly increases resistance to radiation-induced damage both in vitro and in vivo. These findings establish a crucial regulatory mechanism in which ATM is negatively modulated by RPRM.

Androgen and oestrogen receptor co-expression determines the efficacy of hormone receptor-mediated radiosensitisation in breast cancer

PURPOSE

Radiation therapy (RT) and hormone receptor (HR) inhibition are used for the treatment of HR-positive breast cancers; however, little is known about the interaction of the androgen receptor (AR) and estrogen receptor (ER) in response to RT in AR-positive, ER-positive (AR+/ER+) breast cancers. Here we assessed radiosensitisation of AR+/ER+ cell lines using pharmacologic or genetic inhibition/degradation of AR and/or ER.

METHODS

Radiosensitisation was assessed with AR antagonists (enzalutamide, apalutamide, darolutamide, seviteronel, ARD-61), ER antagonists (tamoxifen, fulvestrant) or using knockout of AR.

RESULTS

Treatment with AR antagonists or ER antagonists in combination with RT did not result in radiosensitisation changes (radiation enhancement ratios [rER]: 0.76-1.21). Fulvestrant treatment provided significant radiosensitisation of CAMA-1 and BT-474 cells (rER: 1.06-2.0) but not ZR-75-1 cells (rER: 0.9-1.11). Combining tamoxifen with enzalutamide did not alter radiosensitivity using a 1 h or 1-week pretreatment (rER: 0.95-1.14). Radiosensitivity was unchanged in AR knockout compared to Cas9 cells (rER: 1.07 ± 0.11), and no additional radiosensitisation was achieved with tamoxifen or fulvestrant compared to Cas9 cells (rER: 0.84-1.19).

CONCLUSION

While radiosensitising in AR + TNBC, AR inhibition does not modulate radiation sensitivity in AR+/ER+ breast cancer. The efficacy of ER antagonists in combination with RT may also be dependent on AR expression.

CDK4: a master regulator of the cell cycle and its role in cancer

The cell cycle is regulated in part by cyclins and their associated serine/threonine cyclin-dependent kinases, or CDKs. CDK4, in conjunction with the D-type cyclins, mediates progression through the G₁ phase when the cell prepares to initiate DNA synthesis. Although Cdk4-null mutant mice are viable and cell proliferation is not significantly affected in vitro due to compensatory roles played by other CDKs, this gene plays a key role in mammalian development and cancer. This review discusses the role that CDK4 plays in cell cycle control, normal development and tumorigenesis as well as the current status and utility of approved small molecule CDK4/6 inhibitors that are currently being used as cancer therapeutics.

Radiotherapy and CDK inhibitors: Opportunities and risks

CDK4/6 inhibitors are nowadays commonly used in metastatic HR+/HER2- breast cancer. Herein, we report a literature review regarding the benefits and risks of their combination with radiotherapy. Numerous pre-clinical studies have indeed shown a potential synergistic effect of these treatments in combination with radiotherapy in various types of cancers. On the other hand, some retrospective clinical studies have reported increased acute toxicity in case of digestive or pulmonary irradiation; therefore, it is advisable to discontinue CDK4/6 inhibitors before starting irradiation. Several prospective clinical trials are currently ongoing to assess the feasibility of this combination.

Radiotherapy with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitors: A Multi-institutional Safety and Toxicity Study

PURPOSE

To investigate radiotherapy (RT) toxicity when given with Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) compared to RT alone.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with hormonal receptor-positive and human epidermal growth factor-2 negative metastatic breast cancer treated with RT at four cancer centers in Alberta, Canada between 2016 and 2020. Toxicity in patients treated with RT within 30 days of initiating to discontinuing CDK4/6i (RT+CDK4/6i) was compared to toxicity of RT in CDK4/6i naïve patients (RT alone). The primary outcome was acute grade (G) II or higher, non-hematological toxicity within 30 days of RT. We also explored toxicity based on the timing of RT (prior, concurrent, post) in relation to CDK4/6i. Propensity score matching was applied to create comparable cohorts. A generalized linear mixed model was used to evaluate factors associated with acute toxicity.

RESULTS

132 patients (220 RT sites) in the RT+CDK4/6i and 53 patients (93 RT sites) in RT alone were eligible. The rate of acute GII or higher non-hematological toxicity was 11.5% vs. 7%, respectively (p=0.439), and acute GIII or higher non-hematological toxicity was 3.7% vs. 0%, respectively (p=0.151). Acute toxicity in RT+CDK4/6i group was mainly observed when RT was given concurrently (67%) with most of the GIII toxicity recorded. After propensity score matching, the association of acute toxicity with RT+CDK4/6i vs. RT alone was not significant on multivariable analysis, Odds Ratio 3.13 (95% confidence interval: 0.74 - 13.2; p=0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

We did not observe a significant association between CDK4/6i use and acute, GII or higher, non-hematological toxicity, in women with metastatic breast cancer receiving palliative RT. Given the findings of GIII toxicity, caution is advised whenever CDK4/6i is given concurrently with RT.

Gilteritinib Enhances Anti-Tumor Efficacy of CDK4/6 Inhibitor, Abemaciclib in Lung Cancer Cells

Abemaciclib is a cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Preclinical studies suggest that abemaciclib has the potential for lung cancer treatment. However, several clinical trials demonstrate that monotherapy with abemaciclib has no obvious superiority than erlotinib to treat lung cancer patients, limiting its therapeutic options for lung cancer treatment. Here, we show that the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drug, gilteritinib, enhances the cytotoxicity of abemaciclib through inducing apoptosis and senescence in lung cancer cells. Interestingly, abemaciclib in combination with gilteritinib leads to excessive accumulation of vacuoles in lung cancer cells. Mechanistically, combined abemaciclib and gilteritinib induces complete inactivation of AKT and retinoblastoma (Rb) pathways in lung cancer cells. In addition, RNA-sequencing data demonstrate that combination of abemaciclib and gilteritinib treatment induces G2 phase cell-cycle arrest, inhibits DNA replication, and leads to reduction in homologous recombination associated gene expressions. Of note, abemaciclib-resistant lung cancer cells are more sensitive to gilteritinib treatment. In a mouse xenograft model, combined abemaciclib and gilteritinib is more effective than either drug alone in suppressing tumor growth and appears to be well tolerated. Together, our findings support the combination of abemaciclib with gilteritinib as an effective strategy for the treatment of lung cancer, suggesting further evaluation of their efficacy is needed in a clinical trial.

Estrogen receptor inhibition mediates radiosensitization of ER-positive breast cancer models

Endocrine therapy (ET) is an effective first-line therapy for women with estrogen receptor-positive (ER + ) breast cancers. While both ionizing radiation (RT) and ET are used for the treatment of women with ER+ breast cancer, the most effective sequencing of therapy and the effect of ET on tumor radiosensitization remains unclear. Here we sought to understand the effects of inhibiting estrogen receptor (ER) signaling in combination with RT in multiple preclinical ER+ breast cancer models. Clonogenic survival assays were performed using variable pre- and post-treatment conditions to assess radiosensitization with estradiol, estrogen deprivation, tamoxifen, fulvestrant, or AZD9496 in ER+ breast cancer cell lines. Estrogen stimulation was radioprotective (radiation enhancement ratios [rER]: 0.51–0.82). Conversely, when given one hour prior to RT, ER inhibition or estrogen depletion radiosensitized ER+ MCF-7 and T47D cells (tamoxifen rER: 1.50–1.60, fulvestrant rER: 1.76–2.81, AZD9496 rER: 1.33–1.48, estrogen depletion rER: 1.47–1.51). Combination treatment resulted in an increase in double-strand DNA (dsDNA) breaks as a result of inhibition of non-homologous end joining-mediated dsDNA break repair with no effect on homologous recombination. Treatment with tamoxifen or fulvestrant in combination with RT also increased the number of senescent cells but did not affect apoptosis or cell cycle distribution. Using an MCF-7 xenograft model, concurrent treatment with tamoxifen and RT was synergistic and resulted in a significant decrease in tumor volume and a delay in time to tumor doubling without significant toxicity. These findings provide preclinical evidence that concurrent treatment with ET and RT may be an effective radiosensitization strategy.

RB expression confers sensitivity to CDK4/6 inhibitor-mediated radiosensitization across breast cancer subtypes

Standard radiation therapy (RT) does not reliably provide locoregional control for women with multinode-positive breast cancer and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). We hypothesized that CDK4/6 inhibition (CDK4/6i) would increase the radiosensitivity not only of estrogen receptor–positive (ER⁺) cells, but also of TNBC that expresses retinoblastoma (RB) protein. We found that CDK4/6i radiosensitized RB WT TNBC (n = 4, radiation enhancement ratio [rER]: 1.49–2.22) but failed to radiosensitize RB-null TNBC (n = 3, rER: 0.84–1.00). RB expression predicted response to CDK4/6i + RT (R² = 0.84), and radiosensitization was lost in ER⁺/TNBC cells (rER: 0.88–1.13) after RB1 knockdown in isogenic and nonisogenic models. CDK4/6i suppressed homologous recombination (HR) in RB WT cells but not in RB-null cells or isogenic models of RB1 loss; HR competency was rescued with RB reexpression. Radiosensitization was independent of nonhomologous end joining and the known effects of CDK4/6i on cell cycle arrest. Mechanistically, RB and RAD51 interact in vitro to promote HR repair. CDK4/6i produced RB-dependent radiosensitization in TNBC xenografts but not in isogenic RB1-null xenografts. Our data provide the preclinical rationale for a clinical trial expanding the use of CDK4/6i + RT to difficult-to-control RB-intact breast cancers (including TNBC) and nominate RB status as a predictive biomarker of therapeutic efficacy.

Combination of Modern Radiotherapy and New Targeted Treatments for Breast Cancer Management

Simple Summary

Since the introduction of hormone therapy for the treatment of breast cancer (BC) three decades ago, many new targeted therapies have been developed. Some of them are currently used, such as HER2 inhibitors, while others are still under development, such as cell cycle (CDK) inhibitors, immune checkpoint (PD1/PDL1) inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage (PARP) repair. Besides this, radiation therapy (RT) is commonly used either as adjuvant treatment for early BC after breast conservative surgery or in palliative intent for the treatment of metastatic sites. Our research has shown that the combinations of the most commonly used targeted treatments and RT were feasible with a few toxicities. Nevertheless, most of the knowledge on this subject is based on retrospective studies and a small number of patients and care should be taken in this setting until these results would be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.

Abstract

Background: The objective of the present study was to review the essential knowledge about the combinations of the most commonly used or under development targeted treatments and radiation therapy (RT). Methods: Preclinical and clinical studies investigating this combination were extensively reviewed. Results: Several studies showed that the combination of RT and tamoxifen increased the risk of radiation-induced pulmonary toxicity; therefore, both modalities should not be given concomitantly. The combination of HER2 inhibitors (trastuzumab, pertuzumab) and RT seems to be safe. However, trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) should not be administered concurrently with brain RT since this combination could increase the risk of brain radionecrosis. The combination of RT and other new target treatments such as selective estrogen receptor degradants, lapatinib, cell cycle inhibitors, immune checkpoint inhibitors, or molecules acting on DNA damage repair seems feasible but was essentially evaluated on retrospective or prospective studies with a small number of patients. Furthermore, there is considerable heterogeneity among these studies regarding the dose and fractionation of radiation, the dosage of drugs, and the sequence of treatments used. Conclusions: The combination of RT with most targeted therapies for BC appears to be well-tolerated, but these results need to be confirmed in prospective randomized studies.

Radiotherapy and radiosensitization in breast cancer: Molecular targets and clinical applications

Relatively poor survival outcomes are observed in advanced or metastatic breast cancer, where local control of the primary or metastatic disease may be achieved by surgical resection, local ablative and radiation therapies. Radioresistance, poses a major challenge in achieving durable oncologic outcomes, mandating development of novel management strategies. Although multimodality approaches that combine radiotherapy with chemotherapy, or systemic agents, are utilized for radiosensitization and treatment of various malignancies, this approach has not yet found its clinical application in breast cancer. Some agents for breast cancer treatment can serve as radiosensitizers, creating an opportunity to enhance effects of radiation while providing systemic disease control. Hence, combination of radiotherapy with radiosensitizing agents have the potential to improve oncologic outcomes in advanced or metastatic breast cancer. This review discusses molecular targets for radiosensitization and novel systemic agents that have potential for clinical use as radiosensitizers in breast cancer.

Targeting DNA repair pathway in cancer: Mechanisms and clinical application

Over the last decades, the growing understanding on DNA damage response (DDR) pathways has broadened the therapeutic landscape in oncology. It is becoming increasingly clear that the genomic instability of cells resulted from deficient DNA damage response contributes to the occurrence of cancer. One the other hand, these defects could also be exploited as a therapeutic opportunity, which is preferentially more deleterious in tumor cells than in normal cells. An expanding repertoire of DDR-targeting agents has rapidly expanded to inhibitors of multiple members involved in DDR pathways, including PARP, ATM, ATR, CHK1, WEE1, and DNA-PK. In this review, we sought to summarize the complex network of DNA repair machinery in cancer cells and discuss the underlying mechanism for the application of DDR inhibitors in cancer. With the past preclinical evidence and ongoing clinical trials, we also provide an overview of the history and current landscape of DDR inhibitors in cancer treatment, with special focus on the combination of DDR-targeted therapies with other cancer treatment strategies.

Inhibition of CDK4/6 as Therapeutic Approach for Ovarian Cancer Patients: Current Evidences and Future Perspectives

Simple Summary

Altered regulation of the cell cycle is a hallmark of cancer. The recent clinical success of the inhibitors of CDK4 and CDK6 has convincingly demonstrated that targeting cell cycle components may represent an effective anti-cancer strategy, at least in some cancer types. However, possible applications of CDK4/6 inhibitors in patients with ovarian cancer is still under evaluation. Here, we describe the possible biological role of CDK4 and CDK6 complexes in ovarian cancer and provide the rationale for the use of CDK4/6 inhibitors in this pathology, alone or in combination with other drugs. This review, coupling basic, preclinical and clinical research studies, could be of great translational value for investigators attempting to design new clinical trials for the better management of ovarian cancer patients.

Abstract

Alterations in components of the cell-cycle machinery are present in essentially all tumor types. In particular, molecular alterations resulting in dysregulation of the G1 to S phase transition have been observed in almost all human tumors, including ovarian cancer. These alterations have been identified as potential therapeutic targets in several cancer types, thereby stimulating the development of small molecule inhibitors of the cyclin dependent kinases. Among these, CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors confirmed in clinical trials that CDKs might indeed represent valid therapeutic targets in, at least some, types of cancer. CDK4 and CDK6 inhibitors are now used in clinic for the treatment of patients with estrogen receptor positive metastatic breast cancer and their clinical use is being tested in many other cancer types, alone or in combination with other agents. Here, we review the role of CDK4 and CDK6 complexes in ovarian cancer and propose the possible use of their inhibitors in the treatment of ovarian cancer patients with different types and stages of disease.

Radiotherapy Delivered before CDK4/6 Inhibitors Mediates Superior Therapeutic Effects in ER+ Breast Cancer

PURPOSE

Recent preclinical data suggest that cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibition may be harnessed to sensitize estrogen receptor-positive (ER⁺) breast cancer to radiotherapy. However, these findings were obtained in human ER⁺ breast cancer cell lines exposed to subclinical doses of CDK4/6 inhibitors with limited attention to treatment schedule. We investigated the activity of radiotherapy combined with the prototypic CDK4/6 inhibitor palbociclib placing emphasis on therapeutic schedule.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We combined radiotherapy and palbociclib in various doses and therapeutic schedules in human and mouse models of ER⁺ and ER-negative (ER^-) breast cancer, including an immunocompetent mouse model that recapitulates key features of human luminal B breast cancer in women. We assessed proliferation, cell death, cell-cycle control, and clonogenic survival in vitro, as well as tumor growth, overall survival, and metastatic dissemination in vivo.

RESULTS

Radiotherapy and palbociclib employed as standalone agents had partial cytostatic effects in vitro, correlating with suboptimal tumor control in vivo. However, while palbociclib delivered before focal radiotherapy provided minimal benefits as compared with either treatment alone, delivering focal radiotherapy before palbociclib mediated superior therapeutic effects, even in the absence of p53. Such superiority manifested in vitro with enhanced cytostasis and loss of clonogenic potential, as well as in vivo with improved local and systemic tumor control.

CONCLUSIONS

Our preclinical findings demonstrate that radiotherapy delivered before CDK4/6 inhibitors mediates superior antineoplastic effects compared with alternative treatment schedules, calling into question the design of clinical trials administering CDK4/6 inhibitors before radiotherapy in women with ER⁺ breast cancer.