Long-term Follow-up of Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with Venetoclax in a Phase I, First-in-Human Study

Blockage of BCL-XL overcomes venetoclax resistance across BCL2+ lymphoid malignancies irrespective of BIM status

ABSTRACT

Venetoclax (VEN), a B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) inhibitor, has a promising single-agent activity in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), and large BCLs, but remissions were generally short, which call for rational drug combinations. Using a panel of 21 lymphoma and leukemia cell lines and 28 primary samples, we demonstrated strong synergy between VEN and A1155463, a BCL-XL inhibitor. Immunoprecipitation experiments and studies on clones with knockout of expression or transgenic expression of BCL-XL confirmed its key role in mediating inherent and acquired VEN resistance. Of note, the VEN and A1155463 combination was synthetically lethal even in the cell lines with lack of expression of the proapoptotic BCL2L11/BIM and in the derived clones with genetic knockout of BCL2L11/BIM. This is clinically important because BCL2L11/BIM deletion, downregulation, or sequestration results in VEN resistance. Immunoprecipitation experiments further suggested that the proapoptotic effector BAX belongs to principal mediators of the VEN and A1155463 mode of action in the BIM-deficient cells. Lastly, the efficacy of the new proapoptotic combination was confirmed in vivo on a panel of 9 patient-derived lymphoma xenografts models including MCL (n = 3), B-ALL (n = 2), T-ALL (n = 1), and diffuse large BCL (n = 3). Because continuous inhibition of BCL-XL causes thrombocytopenia, we proposed and tested an interrupted 4 days on/3 days off treatment regimen, which retained the desired antitumor synergy with manageable platelet toxicity. The proposed VEN and A1155463 combination represents an innovative chemotherapy-free regimen with significant preclinical activity across diverse BCL2+ hematologic malignancies irrespective of the BCL2L11/BIM status.

Polatuzumab vedotin, venetoclax, and an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody in relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma

The Phase 2 portion of this study evaluated safety and efficacy of polatuzumab vedotin 1.8 mg/kg and venetoclax 800 mg, plus fixed-dose obinutuzumab 1000 mg or rituximab 375 mg/m2 in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) follicular lymphoma (FL) or diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), respectively. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR)/stable disease (FL) or CR/PR (DLBCL) at end of induction (EOI; six 21-day cycles) received post-induction therapy with venetoclax and obinutuzumab or rituximab, respectively. Primary endpoint was CR rate at EOI. Safety-evaluable populations included 74 patients (FL cohort; median age 64 years; progression of disease within 24 months on first-line treatment, 25.7%; FL International Prognostic Index 3-5, 54.1%; ≥2 previous therapies, 74.3%) and 57 patients (DLBCL cohort; median age 65 years; International Prognostic Index 3-5, 54.4%; ≥2 previous therapies, 77.2%). The most common non-hematologic adverse events (mostly Grades 1-2) in the FL and DLBCL cohorts were diarrhea (55.4% and 47.4%, respectively) and nausea (47.3% and 36.8%); neutropenia was the most common Grades 3-4 toxicity (39.2% and 52.6%). Efficacy-evaluable populations included patients treated at the recommended Phase 2 dose (FL, n = 49; DLBCL, n = 48). CR rates at EOI were 59.2% (FL) and 31.3% (DLBCL); median progression-free survival was 22.8 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 14.5-not evaluable) and 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-8.1), respectively. Polatuzumab vedotin plus venetoclax and obinutuzumab/rituximab had acceptable safety in patients with R/R FL or DLBCL, with promising response rates in R/R FL, including high-risk patients.

Dismantling relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

Despite recent therapeutic advancements in the general field of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, effective treatment of relapsed or refractory (R/R) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) remains a challenge. The development of Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has revolutionized the field and these agents are now the mainstay of R/R MCL management. However, BTK inhibitors are not curative, and as they are increasingly being incorporated into frontline regimens, the shifting treatment landscape for R/R disease presents new challenges. Here we review data for commonly employed treatment strategies including BTK inhibitors, the BCL2-inhibitor venetoclax, lenalidomide-based regimens, and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. We additionally review data for promising novel agents including antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific antibodies before highlighting some emerging targeted agents that continue to bring promise for improved outcomes in R/R MCL.

Marginal zone lymphomas: a consensus practice statement from the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance

Marginal zone lymphomas (MZLs) are a rare, indolent group of non-Hodgkin lymphomas with different diagnostic, genetic and clinical features and therapeutic implications. The most common is extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue, followed by splenic MZL and nodal MZL. Patients with MZL generally have good outcomes with long survival rates but frequently have a relapsing/remitting course requiring several lines of therapy. The heterogeneous presentation and relapsing course present the clinician with several diagnostic and therapeutic challenges. This position statement presents evidence-based recommendations in the setting of Australia and New Zealand.

Real-World Evidence of Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma Patients and Treatments: A Systematic Review

Introduction

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is an incurable disease with an aggressive clinical course, and most patients eventually relapse after chemotherapy. Targeted therapies developed for relapsed/refractory MCL have been approved based on clinical trial data. However, real-world setting data are scarce and scattered.

Areas Covered

This systematic review aimed to collect, synthesize, and describe the characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with relapsed/refractory MCL after receiving a second or subsequent line of therapy in the real-world setting.

Expert Opinion

R/R MCL is clinically and biologically heterogeneous and still represents a therapeutic challenge, with high-risk and early relapsed patients remaining an unmet medical need. This systematic review is limited by the quality of the available data and the difficulty of comparing outcomes in R/R MCL due to the heterogeneity of the disease, but the results suggest that covalent BTKis should be positioned as second-line therapy, followed by CAR T-cells in BTK-i-relapsed patients. Chemo-free and combination therapies with established chemoimmunotherapy backbones in the relapsed and front-line settings have been recently developed, and front-line options are being improved to move targeted and cellular therapies to earlier lines, including front-line therapy, in elderly and younger fit patients. In the upcoming years, many new targeted agents will play an important role and will be incorporated to the routine practice as their sequence, and outcomes in unselected patients are determined.

How I use genomics and BTK inhibitors in the treatment of Waldenström macroglobulinemia

ABSTRACT

Mutations in MYD88 (95%-97%) and CXCR4 (30%-40%) are common in Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). TP53 is altered in 20% to 30% of patients with WM, particularly those previously treated. Mutated MYD88 activates hematopoietic cell kinase that drives Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) prosurvival signaling. Both nonsense and frameshift CXCR4 mutations occur in WM. Nonsense variants show greater resistance to BTK inhibitors. Covalent BTK inhibitors (cBTKi) produce major responses in 70% to 80% of patients with WM. MYD88 and CXCR4 mutation status can affect time to major response, depth of response, and/or progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with WM treated with cBTKi. The cBTKi zanubrutinib shows greater response activity and/or improved PFS in patients with WM with wild-type MYD88, mutated CXCR4, or altered TP53. Risks for adverse events, including atrial fibrillation, bleeding diathesis, and neutropenia can differ based on which BTKi is used in WM. Intolerance is also common with cBTKi, and dose reduction or switchover to another cBTKi can be considered. For patients with acquired resistance to cBTKis, newer options include pirtobrutinib or venetoclax. Combinations of BTKis with chemoimmunotherapy, CXCR4, and BCL2 antagonists are discussed. Algorithms for positioning BTKis in treatment naïve or previously treated patients with WM, based on genomics, disease characteristics, and comorbidities, are presented.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Treatment Evolution of Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Navigating the Different Entities and Biological Heterogeneity of Mantle Cell Lymphoma in 2024

Progress in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has led to significant improvement in outcomes of patients even in the real world (RW) setting albeit to a lesser degree. In parallel to the demonstration of benefit using combination therapy with rituximab plus high-dose cytarabine (R-AraC) as well as dose intensive therapy-autologous stem cell transplantation (DIT-ASCT) consolidation and maintenance, it became clear over the last 2 decades that MCL is a highly heterogenous disease at the molecular level, explaining differences observed in clinical behavior and response to therapy. While clinical prognostic factors and models have helped stratify patients with distinct outcomes, they failed to help guide therapy. The identification of molecular high-risk (HR) features, in particular, but not only, p53 aberrations (including mutations and deletions [del]), as well as complex karyotype (CK), has allowed to identify subsets of patients with poorer outcomes (median overall survival [OS] <2 years) regardless of conventional therapies used. The constant pattern of relapse seen in MCL has fueled sustained and productive efforts, with 7 novel agents approved in the United States (US), showing high and durable efficacy even in HR and chemo-refractory patients and likely curing a subset of patients in the relapsed or refractory (R/R) setting. Progress in diagnostics, in particular next-generation sequencing (NGS), which is accessible in routine practice nowadays, can help recognize patients with HR features, well beyond MIPI or Ki-67 prognostication, although the impact on decision making is still unclear. The era of integrating novel agents into our prior standard of care (SOC) has begun with a confirmed benefit, for example, ibrutinib (Ib) in the TRIANGLE study, defining the first new potential SOC in younger patients in over 30 years. Expanding on novel agents, either in combination, sequentially or to replace chemotherapy altogether, using biological doublets or triplets has led to a median progression-free survival (PFS) in excess of 72 months, certainly competitive with prior SOC and will continue to reshape the management of MCL patients. Achieving minimal residual disease negative (MRD-ve) status is becoming a new endpoint in MCL, and customizing maintenance and/or de-escalation/consolidation strategies is within reach, although it will require prospective, built-in MRD-based approaches, with the goal of eliminating subclinical disease and not simply delaying time to relapse. Taking into account the biological diversity of MCL is now feasible in routine clinical practice and has already helped recognize what not to do for HR patients (i.e., avoid intensive induction chemotherapy and/or ASCT for p53 mutated patients) as well as identify promising novel options. Ongoing and future work will help expand on these dedicated approaches, to further improve the management and outcomes of all MCL patients.

Phase 2 study of ibrutinib plus venetoclax in Japanese patients with relapsed/refractory mantle cell lymphoma

BACKGROUND

Despite high response rates to initial therapy, most patients with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) experience relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. Here, we report the efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of the Phase 2, single-arm M20-075 study (NCT04477486) of ibrutinib and venetoclax combination therapy in Japanese patients with R/R MCL.

METHODS

Patients received 560 mg ibrutinib and 400 mg venetoclax (after a 5-week ramp-up from 20 mg) once daily for up to 104 weeks. Primary endpoint was complete response (CR) rate by independent review committee (IRC). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response (DOR), undetectable minimal residual disease (uMRD) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), safety including dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) assessment in the first six patients, and pharmacokinetic parameters. Full analysis set (FAS) comprised all treated patients. Per protocol set (PPS) excluded treated patients with non-evaluable disease at baseline by IRC.

RESULTS

Thirteen patients were treated (FAS n = 13; PPS, n = 12). Median age was 71 years, patients had a median of two prior treatments. After a median follow-up of 9.6 months, IRC-assessed CR rate and ORR were both 83% (PPS). All six MRD-evaluable patients had uMRD. Median DOR, PFS, and OS were unreached. The most common Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was neutropenia (23%); 1 patient discontinued due to squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. No DLTs, tumor lysis syndrome, or deaths related to TEAEs were observed.

CONCLUSION

Ibrutinib plus venetoclax exhibited high response rates and a well-tolerated safety profile in Japanese patients with R/R MCL.

Advances in the treatment of relapsed/refractory marginal zone lymphoma

Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) is the second most common subtype of inert B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, accounting for 5-15% of non-Hodgkin's lymphoma cases. Patients with MZL have a long survival period, with a median survival of >10 years, and patients treated with a combination of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody can achieve an overall effective rate of 81%. However, 20% of patients with MZL show relapse or experience disease progression within 2 years, with a median survival of only 3-5 years. Currently, the treatment options for patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MZL are limited, underscoring the pressing need for novel therapeutic drugs. The advent of novel anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, small molecule kinase inhibitors, immunomodulators, and other therapeutic strategies has ushered in a new era in the treatment of R/R MZL. Our objective is to summarize the existing treatment strategies, including immunotherapy and the emergent targeted therapies, and to evaluate their effectiveness and safety in the management of R/R MZL. By doing so, we aim to provide a clear understanding of the therapeutic landscape for R/R MZL, and to guide future research directions toward improving the prognosis and quality of life for patients afflicted with this challenging disease.

Novel treatment for mantle cell lymphoma - impact of BTK inhibitors and beyond

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) primarily affects older adults, accounting for 3-10% of all non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) in western countries. The disease course of MCL is heterogenous; driven by clinical, cytogenetics, and molecular features that shape differences in outcomes, including proliferation index, MIPI scores, and mutational profile such as TP53 aberration. The advent of novel agents has fundamentally evolved the treatment landscape for MCL with treatment strategies that can now be more effectively tailored based on both patient- and disease-specific factors. In this review, we discuss the major classes of novel agents used for the treatment of MCL, focusing on efficacy and notable toxicities of BTK inhibitors. We further examine effective novel combination regimens and, lastly, discuss future directions for the evolution of targeted approaches for the treatment of MCL.

Beyond Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors in mantle cell lymphoma: bispecific antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, CAR T-cells, and novel agents

Mantle cell lymphoma is a B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), representing 2-6% of all NHLs and characterized by overexpression of cyclin D1. The last decade has seen the development of many novel treatment approaches in MCL, most notably the class of Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi). BTKi has shown excellent outcomes for patients with relapsed or refractory MCL and is now being studied in the first-line setting. However, patients eventually progress on BTKi due to the development of resistance. Additionally, there is an alteration in the tumor microenvironment in these patients with varying biological and therapeutic implications. Hence, it is necessary to explore novel therapeutic strategies that can be effective in those who progressed on BTKi or potentially circumvent resistance. In this review, we provide a brief overview of BTKi, then discuss the various mechanisms of BTK resistance including the role of genetic alteration, cancer stem cells, tumor microenvironment, and adaptive reprogramming bypassing the effect of BTK inhibition, and then provide a comprehensive review of current and emerging therapeutic options beyond BTKi including novel agents, CAR T cells, bispecific antibodies, and antibody-drug conjugates.

Adding venetoclax to lenalidomide and rituximab is safe and effective in patients with untreated mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare, incurable hematological malignancy with a heterogeneous presentation and clinical course. A wide variety of chemotherapy-based regimens are currently used in patients who are untreated. Over the last several years, several targeted or small-molecule therapies have shown efficacy in the relapsed/refractory setting and have since been explored in the frontline setting. Lenalidomide plus rituximab was explored in a phase 2 study of 38 patients with MCL who were untreated and ineligible to receive transplantation, in which the combination produced durable remissions. We looked to build upon this regimen by adding venetoclax to the combination. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, nonrandomized, single-arm study to evaluate this combination. We enrolled 28 unselected patients with untreated disease irrespective of age, fitness, or risk factors. Lenalidomide was dosed at 20 mg daily from days 1 to 21 of each 28-day cycle. The dose of venetoclax was determined using the time-to-event continual reassessment method. Rituximab was dosed at 375 mg/m2 weekly, starting on cycle 1, day 1 until cycle 2, day 1. No dose-limiting toxicities were noted. All patients were treated with venetoclax at the maximum tolerated dose of 400 mg daily. The most common adverse events were neutropenia and thrombocytopenia. The overall and complete response rates were 96% and 86%, respectively. In total, 86% of patients achieved minimal residual disease undetectability via next-generation sequencing. The median overall and progression-free survivals were not reached. The combination of lenalidomide, rituximab, and venetoclax is a safe and effective regimen in patients with untreated MCL. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03523975.

High karyotypic complexity is an independent prognostic factor in patients with CLL treated with venetoclax combinations

Complex karyotypes have been associated with inferior outcomes in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with chemoimmunotherapy (CIT), whereas their prognostic impact in the context of venetoclax-based treatments is still debated. In this prospective analysis on karyotype complexity in CLL, we evaluated the impact of complex (≥3 chromosomal aberrations [CAs], CKTs) and highly complex karyotypes (≥5 CAs; hCKTs) as well as specific aberrations in previously untreated patients without TP53 aberrations undergoing either CIT or time-limited venetoclax-based therapies in the phase 3 GAIA/CLL13 trial. Karyotype analyses were available for 895 of 926 patients (96.7%), of whom 153 (17%) had a CKT and 43 (5%) hCKT. In the CIT arm, CKT was associated with shorter progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.58; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.54-4.32; P < .001) and overall survival (HR, 3.25; 95% CI, 1.03-10.26; P = .044). In the pooled venetoclax arms, a multivariable analysis identified hCKTs (HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.03-3.72; P = .041), but not CKTs, as independent adverse prognosticators for PFS. The presence of translocations (unbalanced and/or balanced) was also independently associated with shorter PFSs in the venetoclax arms. CIT led to the acquisition of additional CAs (mean CAs, 2.0-3.4; from baseline to CLL progression), whereas karyotype complexity remained stable after venetoclax-based treatments (2.0, both time points). This analysis establishes highly complex karyotypes and translocations as adverse prognostic factors in the context of venetoclax-based combination treatments. The findings of this study support the incorporation of karyotyping into the standard diagnostic workup of CLL, because it identifies patients at high risk of poor treatment outcomes and thereby improves prognostication. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02950051.

A multicenter analysis of the outcomes with venetoclax in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma

To report the activity of venetoclax in patients with relapsed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), we identified 81 patients treated with venetoclax monotherapy (n = 50, 62%) or in combination with a Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor (BTKi) (n = 16, 20%), an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (n = 11, 14%), or other active agents at 12 US academic medical centers. Patients had high-risk disease features including Ki67 >30% (61%), blastoid/pleomorphic histology (29%), complex karyotype (34%), and TP53 alterations (49%), and received a median of 3 prior treatments including BTKis in 91%. Venetoclax alone or in combination resulted in an overall response rate (ORR) of 40% and median progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of 3.7 and 12.5 months, respectively. The receipt of ≤3 prior treatments was associated with higher odds of response to venetoclax in a univariable analysis. In a multivariable analysis, having a high-risk Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index score before receiving venetoclax and disease relapse or progression within 24 months of diagnosis were associated with inferior OS whereas the use of venetoclax in combination was associated with superior OS. Although most patients (61%) had low risk for tumor lysis syndrome (TLS), 12.3% of patients developed TLS despite the implementation of several mitigation strategies. In conclusion, venetoclax resulted in good ORR but short PFS in patients with MCL who are at high risk, and may have a better role in earlier lines of treatment and/or in conation with other active agents. TLS remains an important risk in patients with MCL who initiate treatment with venetoclax.

Inhibition of casein kinase 2 sensitizes mantle cell lymphoma to venetoclax through MCL-1 downregulation

BCL-2 family proteins are frequently aberrantly expressed in mantle cell lymphoma (MCL). Recently, the BCL-2-specific inhibitor venetoclax has been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML). In MCL, venetoclax has shown promising efficacy in early clinical trials; however, a significant subset of patients is resistant. By conducting a kinome-centered CRISPR-Cas9 knockout sensitizer screen, we identified casein kinase 2 (CK2) as a major regulator of venetoclax resistance in MCL. Interestingly, CK2 is over-expressed in MCL and high CK2 expression is associated with poor patient survival. Targeting of CK2, either by inducible short hairpin RNA (shRNA)-mediated knockdown of CK2 or by the CK2-inhibitor silmitasertib, did not affect cell viability by itself, but strongly synergized with venetoclax in both MCL cell lines and primary samples, also if combined with ibrutinib. Furthermore, targeting of CK2 reduced MCL-1 levels, which involved impaired MCL-1 translation by inhibition of eIF4F complex assembly, without affecting BCL-2 and BCL-XL expression. Combined, this results in enhanced BCL-2 dependence and, consequently, venetoclax sensitization. In cocultures, targeting of CK2 overcame stroma-mediated venetoclax resistance of MCL cells. Taken together, our findings indicate that targeting of CK2 sensitizes MCL cells to venetoclax through downregulation of MCL-1. These novel insights provide a strong rationale for combining venetoclax with CK2 inhibition as therapeutic strategy for MCL patients.

Report of consensus panel 2 from the 11th international workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia on the management of relapsed or refractory WM patients

The consensus panel 2 (CP2) of the 11th International Workshop on Waldenström's macroglobulinemia (IWWM-11) has reviewed and incorporated current data to update the recommendations for treatment approaches in patients with relapsed or refractory WM (RRWM). The key recommendations from IWWM-11 CP2 include: (1) Chemoimmunotherapy (CIT) and/or a covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase (cBTKi) strategies are important options; their use should reflect the prior upfront strategy and are subject to their availability. (2) In selecting treatment, biological age, co-morbidities and fitness are important; nature of relapse, disease phenotype and WM-related complications, patient preferences and hematopoietic reserve are also critical factors while the composition of the BM disease and mutational status (MYD88, CXCR4, TP53) should also be noted. (3) The trigger for initiating treatment in RRWM should utilize knowledge of patients' prior disease characteristics to avoid unnecessary delays. (4) Risk factors for cBTKi related toxicities (cardiovascular dysfunction, bleeding risk and concurrent medication) should be addressed when choosing cBTKi. Mutational status (MYD88, CXCR4) may influence the cBTKi efficacy, and the role of TP53 disruptions requires further study) in the event of cBTKi failure dose intensity could be up titrated subject to toxicities. Options after BTKi failure include CIT with a non-cross-reactive regimen to one previously used CIT, addition of anti-CD20 antibody to BTKi, switching to a newer cBTKi or non-covalent BTKi, proteasome inhibitors, BCL-2 inhibitors, and new anti-CD20 combinations are additional options. Clinical trial participation should be encouraged for all patients with RRWM.

Investigation of morpholine isosters for the development of a potent, selective and metabolically stable mTOR kinase inhibitor

Upregulation of mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling drives various types of cancers and neurological diseases. Rapamycin and its analogues (rapalogs) are first generation mTOR inhibitors, and selectively block mTOR complex 1 (TORC1) by an allosteric mechanism. In contrast, second generation ATP-binding site inhibitors of mTOR kinase (TORKi) target both TORC1 and TORC2. Here, we explore 3,6-dihydro-2H-pyran (DHP) and tetrahydro-2H-pyran (THP) as isosteres of the morpholine moiety to unlock a novel chemical space for TORKi generation. A library of DHP- and THP-substituted triazines was prepared, and molecular modelling provided a rational for a structure activity relationship study. Finally, compound 11b [5-(4-(3-oxa-8-azabicyclo[3.2.1]octan-8-yl)-6-(tetrahydro-2H-pyran-4-yl)-1,3,5-triazin-2-yl)-4-(difluoromethyl)pyridin-2-amine] was selected due its potency and selectivity for mTOR kinase over the structurally related class I phosphoinositide 3-kinases (PI3Ks) isoforms. 11b displayed high metabolic stability towards CYP1A1 degradation, which is of advantage in drug development. After oral administration to male Sprague Dawley rats, 11b reached high concentrations both in plasma and brain, revealing an excellent oral bioavailability. In a metabolic stability assay using human hepatocytes, 11b was more stable than PQR620, the first-in-class brain penetrant TORKi. Compound 11b also displayed dose-dependent anti-proliferative activity in splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SMZL) cell lines as single agent and when combined with BCL2 inhibition (venetoclax). Our results identify the THP-substituted triazine core as a novel scaffold for the development of metabolically stable TORKi for the treatment of chronic diseases and cancers driven by mTOR deregulation and requiring drug distribution also to the central nervous system.

Management of indolent B-cell Lymphomas: A review of approved and emerging targeted therapies

The indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas (B-NHL) comprise a heterogenous group of lymphoproliferative disorders characterized by slow growth kinetics and a relapsing/remitting course. Management has, until recently, been uniform across all indolent B-NHL subtypes. Improving insight into pathophysiological and molecular features of each disease has led to development of several targeted therapies. Consequently, each subtype must now be considered an individual entity. In this review, we consider the three commonest indolent B-NHLs: follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and Waldenstrom's macroglobulinemia and review in detail the data on approved and emerging targeted therapeutic agents for each B-NHL subtype.

Novel targeted drugs for follicular and marginal zone lymphoma: a comprehensive review

Although mostly incurable, indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL) are chronic diseases with a median overall survival approaching 20 years. In recent years, important advances in the knowledge of the biology of these lymphomas have led to the development of new drugs, mostly chemotherapy-free, with promising outcomes. With a median age of around 70 years at diagnosis, many patients with iNHL suffer from comorbid conditions that may limit treatment options. Therefore, nowadays, in the transition towards personalized medicine, several challenges lie ahead, such as identifying predictive markers for the selection of treatment, the adequate sequencing of available therapies, and the management of new and accumulated toxicities. In this review, we include a perspective on recent therapeutic advances in follicular and marginal zone lymphoma. We describe emerging data on approved and emerging novel therapies, such as targeted therapies (PI3K inhibitors, BTK inhibitors, EZH2 inhibitors), monoclonal antibodies and antibody-drug conjugates. Finally, we describe immune-directed approaches such as combinations with lenalidomide or the even more innovative bispecific T-cell engagers and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy, which can achieve a high rate of durable responses with manageable toxicities, further obviating the need for chemotherapy.

The Therapeutic Synergy of Selinexor and Venetoclax in Mantle Cell Lymphoma Through Induction of DNA Damage and Perturbation of the DNA Damage Response

Introduction: Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) can be stratified into blastoid and classical subtypes based on morphological features, with the former subtype having a poorer prognosis. Despite recent advances in targeted approaches, including multiple bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors which yield impressive clinical responses and improve prognoses, MCL remains an incurable disease with frequent relapses. Additional therapeutic interventions are therefore unmet medical needs for the management of patients with MCL. Methods: Cell viability and apoptosis assays were employed to analyze the therapeutic interaction of venetoclax combined with selinexor in MCL cells. Western blot was used to investigate the potential mechanism of action for the synergy of venetoclax in combination with selinexor in MCL cells. Results: In this study, we revealed that both blastoid and classical MCL cells were vulnerable to the cytotoxic effects of selinexor, a well-established XPO1 inhibitor, manifested by loss of cell viability and induction of cell apoptosis. Moreover, our data indicated that the addition of venetoclax to selinexor showed synergistically decreased cell viabilities and increased cell deaths in blastoid and classical MCL cells compared to each single drug treatment. Either selinexor or venetoclax treatment alone decreased MCL1 expressions and increased BAX levels in MCL cells, and these effects were further enhanced by their combined regimen. Mechanistically, our findings demonstrated that induction of DNA damage and inactivation of DNA damage response were involved in the synergistic interaction of the drug combination regimen. Conclusion: Collectively, this study might provide a potential attractive therapy option for the treatment of MCL. However, the conclusion needs additional experimental validation in in vivo models and clinical evaluations are mandatory.

Screening of predicted synergistic multi-target therapies in glioblastoma identifies new treatment strategies

Background

IDH-wildtype glioblastoma (GBM) is a highly malignant primary brain tumor with a median survival of 15 months after standard of care, which highlights the need for improved therapy. Personalized combination therapy has shown to be successful in many other tumor types and could be beneficial for GBM patients.

Methods

We performed the largest drug combination screen to date in GBM, using a high-throughput effort where we selected 90 drug combinations for their activity onto 25 patient-derived GBM cultures. 43 drug combinations were selected for interaction analysis based on their monotherapy efficacy and were tested in a short-term (3 days) as well as long-term (18 days) assay. Synergy was assessed using dose-equivalence and multiplicative survival metrics.

Results

We observed a consistent synergistic interaction for 15 out of 43 drug combinations on patient-derived GBM cultures. From these combinations, 11 out of 15 drug combinations showed a longitudinal synergistic effect on GBM cultures. The highest synergies were observed in the drug combinations Lapatinib with Thapsigargin and Lapatinib with Obatoclax Mesylate, both targeting epidermal growth factor receptor and affecting the apoptosis pathway. To further elaborate on the apoptosis cascade, we investigated other, more clinically relevant, apoptosis inducers and observed a strong synergistic effect while combining Venetoclax (BCL targeting) and AZD5991 (MCL1 targeting).

Conclusions

Overall, we have identified via a high-throughput drug screening several new treatment strategies for GBM. Moreover, an exceptionally strong synergistic interaction was discovered between kinase targeting and apoptosis induction which is suitable for further clinical evaluation as multi-targeted combination therapy.

Expression Ratios of the Antiapoptotic BCL2 Family Members Dictate the Selective Addiction of Kaposi's Sarcoma-Associated Herpesvirus-Transformed Primary Effusion Lymphoma Cell Lines to MCL1

Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus (KSHV) causes several malignancies in people living with HIV, including primary effusion lymphoma (PEL). PEL cell lines exhibit oncogene addictions to both viral and cellular genes. Using CRISPR screens, we previously identified cellular oncogene addictions in PEL cell lines, including MCL1. MCL1 is a member of the BCL2 family, which functions to prevent intrinsic apoptosis and has been implicated in several cancers. Despite the overlapping functions of the BCL2 family members, PEL cells are dependent only on MCL1, suggesting that MCL1 may have nonredundant functions. To investigate why PEL cells exhibit selective addiction to MCL1, we inactivated the intrinsic apoptosis pathway by engineering BAX/BAK1 double knockout cells. In this context, PEL cells become resistant to MCL1 knockdown or MCL1 inactivation by the MCL1 inhibitor S63845, indicating that the main function of MCL1 in PEL cells is to prevent BAX/BAK1-mediated apoptosis. The selective requirement to MCL1 is due to MCL1 being expressed in excess over the BCL2 family. Ectopic expression of several BCL2 family proteins, as well as the KSHV BCL2 homolog, significantly decreased basal caspase 3/7 activity and buffered against staurosporine-induced apoptosis. Finally, overexpressed BCL2 family members can functionally substitute for MCL1, when it is inhibited by S63845. Together, our data indicate that the expression levels of the BCL2 family likely explain why PEL tumor cells are highly addicted to MCL1. Importantly, our results suggest that caution should be taken when considering MCL1 inhibitors as a monotherapy regimen for PEL because resistance can develop easily. IMPORTANCE Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is caused by Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus. We showed previously that PEL cell lines require the antiapoptotic protein MCL1 for survival but not the other BCL2 family proteins. This selective dependence on MCL1 is unexpected as the BCL2 family functions similarly in preventing intrinsic apoptosis. Recently, new roles for MCL1 not shared with the BCL2 family have emerged. Here, we show that noncanonical functions of MCL1 are unlikely essential. Instead, MCL1 functions mainly to prevent apoptosis. The specific requirement to MCL1 is due to MCL1 being expressed in excess over the BCL2 family. Consistent with this model, shifting these expression ratios changes the requirement away from MCL1 and toward the dominant BCL2 family gene. Together, our results indicate that although MCL1 is an attractive chemotherapeutic target to treat PEL, careful consideration must be taken, as resistance to MCL1-specific inhibitors easily develops through BCL2 family overexpression.

Sensitivity of canine hematological cancers to BH3 mimetics

BACKGROUND

Inhibition of antiapoptotic B-cell lymphoma 2 (BCL2) proteins by small molecule Bcl-2 homology 3 (BH3) mimetics causes rapid induction of apoptosis of human hematological cancers in vitro and in vivo.

OBJECTIVES

Assess in vitro sensitivity of non-neoplastic lymphocytes and primary hematological cancer cells from dogs to venetoclax (VEN) or the dual BCL2/ B-cell lymphoma-extra-large (BCLxL) inhibitor, navitoclax (NAV), and evaluate the association between BCL2 protein expression and VEN sensitivity.

ANIMALS

Nine client-owned dogs without cancer and 18 client-owned dogs with hematological cancer.

METHODS

Prospective, nonrandomized noncontrolled study. Lymphocytes isolated from peripheral blood, lymph node, or bone marrow from dogs were incubated with BH3 mimetics for 24 hours. Viable cells were counted using flow cytometry and half maximal effective concentration (EC₅₀ ) was calculated. BCL2 protein from whole cell lysates was assessed via immunoblots.

RESULTS

Nodal B and T lymphocytes were more sensitive to VEN than circulating lymphocytes (P = .02). Neoplastic T lymphocytes were sensitive to VEN (mean EC₅₀  ± SD = 0.023 ± 0.018 μM), whereas most non-indolent B cell cancers were resistant to killing by VEN (mean EC₅₀  ± SD = 288 ± 700 μM). Unclassified leukemias showed variable sensitivity to VEN (mean EC₅₀  ± SD = 0.49 ± 0.66 μM). Detection of BCL2 protein was not associated with VEN sensitivity.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

Neoplastic canine T lymphocytes are sensitive to VEN in vitro. Quantification of BCL2 protein alone is insufficient to predict sensitivity to VEN.

SOHO State of the Art Updates and Next Questions: Targeted therapies and emerging novel treatment approaches for Waldenström Macroglobulinemia

Waldenström Macroglobulinemia (WM) is a rare hematologic malignancy characterized by the presence of lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma cells involving the bone marrow and production of a monoclonal IgM paraprotein. Recurrent somatic mutations in MYD88^L265P and CXCR4 have been reported in 90% to 95% and 30% to 40% of patients with WM, respectively. Standard treatment regimens combine the anti-CD20 antibody rituximab with alkylating agents (eg, bendamustine, cyclophosphamide), nucleoside analogs (eg, fludarabine, cladribine), or proteasome inhibitors (eg, bortezomib, carfilzomib, and ixazomib). Covalent BTK inhibitors (eg, ibrutinib, acalabrutinib, zanubrutinib) have shown to be safe and highly effective in patients with WM. Novel and promising agents in this disease include next-generation covalent BTK inhibitors (eg, tirabrutinib, orelabrutinib), non-covalent BTK inhibitors (eg, pirtobrutinib, ARQ531), BCL-2 antagonists (eg, venetoclax), and CXCR4-targeted agents (eg, mavorixafor, ulocuplumab), among others. Future studies will focus on developing fixed-duration combinations regimens with these novel agents aimed at increasing durable responses while minimizing toxicity and cost.

Update in Diagnosis and Management of Primary Cutaneous B-Cell Lymphomas

Primary cutaneous lymphomas are a rare group of diseases, with an estimated incidence of 0.5-1 case per 100,000 people per year. Primary cutaneous B-cell lymphomas (pCBCLs) represent 25-30% of all primary cutaneous lymphomas. There are three main subtypes of pCBCL: primary cutaneous marginal zone lymphoma, primary cutaneous follicle center lymphoma, and primary cutaneous diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, leg type. Cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have a broad spectrum of clinical presentations, which makes diagnostic and therapeutic strategies challenging. To date, treatment recommendations for cutaneous B-cell lymphomas have been largely based on small retrospective studies and institutional experience. Recently, the pharmacotherapeutic landscape has expanded to include drugs that may modify the underlying disease pathology of pCBCLs, representing new therapeutic modalities for this rare group of diseases. Novel therapies used for other systemic B-cell lymphomas show promise for the treatment of pCBCLs and are being increasingly considered. These new therapies are divided into five main groups: monoclonal antibodies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, small-molecule inhibitors, bispecific T-cell engaging, and chimeric antigen receptor T cell. In this review, we discuss the clinical, histopathological, molecular, and cytogenetic features of the most common pCBCL subtypes with a focus on current and innovative therapeutic developments in their management. These emerging treatment strategies for B-cell lymphomas and cutaneous B-cell lymphomas may represent novel first-line options for the management of these rare diseases.

Tipping the balance: toward rational combination therapies to overcome venetoclax resistance in mantle cell lymphoma

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), an aggressive, but incurable B-cell lymphoma, is genetically characterized by the t(11;14) translocation, resulting in the overexpression of Cyclin D1. In addition, deregulation of the B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) family proteins BCL-2, B-cell lymphoma-extra large (BCL-X_L), and myeloid cell leukemia-1 (MCL-1) is highly common in MCL. This renders these BCL-2 family members attractive targets for therapy; indeed, the BCL-2 inhibitor venetoclax (ABT-199), which already received FDA approval for the treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) and acute myeloid leukemia (AML), shows promising results in early clinical trials for MCL. However, a significant subset of patients show primary resistance or will develop resistance upon prolonged treatment. Here, we describe the underlying mechanisms of venetoclax resistance in MCL, such as upregulation of BCL-X_L or MCL-1, and the recent (clinical) progress in the development of inhibitors for these BCL-2 family members, followed by the transcriptional and (post-)translational (dys)regulation of the BCL-2 family proteins, including the role of the lymphoid organ microenvironment. Based upon these insights, we discuss how rational combinations of venetoclax with other therapies can be exploited to prevent or overcome venetoclax resistance and improve MCL patient outcome.

Clinical experiences with venetoclax and other pro-apoptotic agents in lymphoid malignancies: lessons from monotherapy and chemotherapy combination

BH3-mimetics are a novel drug class of small molecule inhibitors of BCL2 family proteins which restore apoptosis in malignant cells. The only currently approved BH3-mimetic, the selective BCL2 inhibitor venetoclax, is highly efficacious in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and has rapidly advanced to an approved standard of care in frontline and relapsed disease in combination with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies. In this context, tumour lysis syndrome and myelosuppression are the most commonly encountered toxicities and are readily manageable with established protocols. Venetoclax is active in other lymphoid malignancies including several B cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, acute lymphoblastic leukemia and multiple myeloma, with the highest intrinsic sensitivity observed in mantle cell lymphoma and Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia. Venetoclax combination with standard regimens in follicular lymphoma, multiple myeloma and aggressive B cell neoplasms has shown some promise, but further studies are required to optimize dose and scheduling to mitigate increased myelosuppression and infection risk, and to find validated biomarkers of venetoclax sensitivity. Future research will focus on overcoming venetoclax resistance, targeting other BCL2 family members and the rational design of synergistic combinations.

An Extended Prognostic Index of the ISSWM Score Based on Thyroid Complications in Waldenström Macroglobulinemia/Lymphoplasmacytoid Lymphoma

Waldenström macroglobulinemia/lymphoplasmacytoid lymphoma (WM/LPL) is a rare lymphoproliferative neoplasm characterized by clonally related lymphocytes, lymphoplasmacytic cells, and plasma cell proliferation. WM/LPL patients commonly present with elevated immunoglobulin, predominantly immunoglobulin M (IgM). Previous studies reported that thyroid dysfunction was associated with the development and progression of solid tumors. However, only limited information is available on the correlation between thyroid complications and lymphoid malignancies. The aim of our study was to explore the prognostic significance of thyroid complications in WM/LPL. Herein, 13.3% of WM/LPL patients were diagnosed with thyroid complications, which were significantly associated with unfavorable progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse treatment response. Co-existing thyroid disease was significantly related to alleviated serum IgM levels, providing an answer to practical problems. Furthermore, the presence of thyroid complications was identified as an independent prognostic indicator for PFS in WM/LPL. Incorporating the ISSWM score with thyroid complications was superior to ISSWM alone in risk stratification and prognostic prediction. Furthermore, subgroup analyses of WM/LPL patients revealed that subclinical hypothyroidism predicted undesirable outcomes at the early stage. These results were also supported by independent microarray dataset analyses. In conclusion, the primary strength of this study is that it provides robust real-world evidence on the prognostic role of thyroid complications, highlighting further clinical concerns in the management of WM/LPL patients.

SAKK 35/15: a phase 1 trial of obinutuzumab in combination with venetoclax in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma

This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability and preliminary efficacy of obinutuzumab in combination with venetoclax in patients with previously untreated grade 1-3a follicular lymphoma in need of systemic therapy. Two dose levels of venetoclax were evaluated with an expansion cohort at the recommended phase 2 dose. Twenty-five patients were enrolled. The recommended phase 2 dose was venetoclax 800mg once daily continuously for 6 cycles starting on day 2 of cycle 1 with obinutuzumab 1000mg on days 1,8,15 of cycle 1 and on day 1 of cycles 2-6, followed by obinutuzumab maintenance every 2 months for two years. Only one patient had a dose-limiting toxicity consisting of grade 4 thrombocytopenia after the first obinutuzumab infusion. Neutropenia was the most common adverse event of grade ≥3 at least possibly attributed to study treatment. Twenty-four patients were evaluable for response after cycle 6 by CT and 19 by PET/CT: overall and complete response rates were 87.5% (95% CI, 67.6-97.3%) and 25% (95% CI, 9.8-46.7%) in the CT evaluated patients and 84.2% (95% CI, 60.4-96.6%) and 68.4% (95% CI, 43.4-87.4%) respectively in the PET/CT evaluated patients. One-year progression-free survival was 77.8% (95% CI, 54.6-90.1%) and 79% (95% CI, 47.9-92.7%) for CT and PET/CT evaluable patients, respectively, while progression-free survival at 30 months was 73.2% (95% CI, 49.8%, 87.0%) as assessed by CT and 79.0% (95% CI, 47.9%, 92.7%) by PET/CT. Despite the activity observed our results do not support further development of the combination in this patient population. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02877550.

Mantle cell lymphoma in 2022-A comprehensive update on molecular pathogenesis, risk stratification, clinical approach, and current and novel treatments

The field of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) has witnessed remarkable progress due to relentless advances in molecular pathogenesis, prognostication, and newer treatments. MCL consists of a spectrum of clinical subtypes. Rarely, atypical cyclin D1-negative MCL and in situ MCL neoplasia are identified. Prognostication of MCL is further refined by identifying somatic mutations (such as TP53, NSD2, KMT2D), methylation status, chromatin organization pattern, SOX-11 expression, minimal residual disease (MRD), and genomic clusters. Lymphoid tissue microenvironment studies demonstrated the role of B-cell receptor signaling, nuclear factor kappa B (NF-kB), colony-stimulating factor (CSF)-1, the CD70-SOX-11 axis. Molecular mechanism of resistance, mutation dynamics, and pathogenic pathways (B-cell receptor (BCR), oxidative phosphorylation, and MYC) were identified in mediating resistance to various treatments (bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors [ibrutinib, acalabrutinib]. Treatment options range from conventional chemoimmunotherapy and stem cell transplantation (SCT) to targeted therapies against BTK (covalent and noncovalent), Bcl2, ROR1, cellular therapy such as anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor therapy (CAR-T), and most recently bispecific antibodies against CD19 and CD20. MCL patients frequently relapse. Complex pathogenesis and the management of patients with progression after treatment with BTK/Bcl2 inhibitors and CAR-T (triple-resistant MCL) remain a challenge. Next-generation clinical trials incorporating newer agents and concurrent translational and molecular investigations are ongoing.

The New Treatment Methods for Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma in Pediatric Patients

One of the most common cancer malignancies is non-Hodgkin lymphoma, whose incidence is nearly 3% of all 36 cancers combined. It is the fourth highest cancer occurrence in children and accounts for 7% of cancers in patients under 20 years of age. Today, the survivability of individuals diagnosed with non-Hodgkin lymphoma varies by about 70%. Chemotherapy, radiation, stem cell transplantation, and immunotherapy have been the main methods of treatment, which have improved outcomes for many oncological patients. However, there is still the need for creation of novel medications for those who are treatment resistant. Additionally, more effective drugs are necessary. This review gathers the latest findings on non-Hodgkin lymphoma treatment options for pediatric patients. Attention will be focused on the most prominent therapies such as monoclonal antibodies, antibody–drug conjugates, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and others.

Relapsed/Refractory Mantle Cell Lymphoma: Beyond BTK Inhibitors

Mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is a rare mature B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) with historically poor outcomes. Virtually all patients will eventually experience refractory or relapsed (R/R) disease, with a virulent course of resistance and serial relapses, making treatment challenging. The available therapies for R/R MCL are not curative with conventional therapy, their goal being to palliate and prolong survival. A variety of agents approved for R/R MCL, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors (BTKi), changed the treatment landscape of R/R MCL. In the pre-BTKi era, the median progression-free survival (PFS) in R/R disease was 4-9 months. With the introduction of ibrutinib, the median PFS improved to 13-14.6 months. Despite these impressive results, the duration of response is limited, and resistance to BTKi inevitably develops in a subset of patients. Outcomes after progression on BTKi are extremely poor, with a median overall survival (OS) of 6 to 10 months. Certain therapies, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, have shown promising results after BTKi failure. The preferred combination and sequencing of therapies beyond BTKi remain unestablished and are currently being investigated. In this review, we describe the current evidence for the available treatment of R/R MCL after progression on BTKi.

Targeted Agents in the Treatment of Indolent B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphomas

Targeted therapies continue to change the landscape of lymphoma treatment, resulting in improved therapy options and patient outcomes. Numerous agents are now approved for use in the indolent lymphomas and many others under development demonstrate significant promise. In this article, we review the landscape of targeted agents that apply to the indolent lymphomas, predominantly follicular lymphoma, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinaemia and marginal zone lymphoma. The review covers small molecule inhibitors, immunomodulators and targeted immunotherapies, as well as presenting emerging and promising combination therapies.

Prospects in the management of patients with follicular lymphoma beyond first-line therapy

The management of patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma has evolved markedly in the last decade, with the availability of new classes of agents (phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, immunomodulators, epigenetic therapies, and chimeric antigen receptor T cells) supplementing the multiple approaches already available (cytotoxic agents, anti-CD20 antibodies, radiation therapy, radioimmunotherapy, and autologous and allogeneic transplants). The diversity of clinical scenarios, the flood of data derived from phase II studies, and the lack of randomized studies comparing treatment strategies preclude firm recommendations and require personalized decisions. Patients with early progression require specific attention given the risk of histological transformation and their lower response to standard therapies. In sequencing therapies, one must consider prior treatment regimens and the potential need for future lines of therapy. Careful evaluation of risks and expected benefits of available options, which vary depending on location and socioeconomics, should be undertaken, and should incorporate the patient's goals. Preserving quality of life for these patients is essential, given the likelihood of years to decades of survival and the possibility of multiple lines of therapy. The current landscape is likely to continue evolving rapidly with other effective agents emerging (notably bispecific antibodies and other targeted therapies), and multiple combinations being evaluated. It is hoped that new treatments under development will achieve longer progression-free intervals and minimize toxicity. A better understanding of disease biology and the mechanisms of these different agents should provide further insights to select the optimal therapy at each stage of disease.