EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in lung adenocarcinomas: prevalence, molecular heterogeneity, and clinicopathologic characteristics

Unraveling the future: Innovative design strategies and emerging challenges in HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitors for cancer therapy

Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is a transmembrane receptor-like protein with tyrosine kinase activity that plays a vital role in processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis. The degree of malignancy of different cancers, notably breast cancer, is strongly associated with HER2 amplification, overexpression, and mutation. Currently, widely used clinical HER2 tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as lapatinib and neratinib, have several drawbacks, including susceptibility to drug resistance caused by HER2 mutations and adverse effects from insufficient HER2 selectivity. To address these issues, it is essential to create innovative HER2 TKIs with enhanced safety, effectiveness against mutations, and high selectivity. Typically, SPH5030 has advanced to phase I clinical trials for its strong suppression of four HER2 mutations. This review discusses the latest research progress in HER2 TKIs, with a focus on the structural optimization process and structure-activity relationship analysis. In particular, this study highlights promising design strategies to address these challenges, providing insightful information and inspiration for future development in this field.

A phase 2 study of mobocertinib as first-line treatment in Japanese patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

BACKGROUND

Mobocertinib is a novel, synthetic, orally administered tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits many activated forms of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), including those containing exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of mobocertinib in Japanese patients with locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations.

METHODS

This was a phase 2, open-label study. Patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations who had not had previous systemic treatment received mobocertinib 160 mg once daily. The primary endpoint was the confirmed objective response rate. A planned interim analysis was completed for the first 14 patients with a centrally confirmed EGFR ex20ins mutation, with enrollment stopped if the number of patients with an objective response was five or fewer.

RESULTS

In total, 33 patients were enrolled into the study (63.6% women; median age: 66 years). At the interim analysis, the objective response rate evaluated by a central independent review committee was 28.6% (4/14, 90% confidence interval: 10.4-54.0); therefore, enrollment was stopped for futility. In the full analysis set, the objective response rate was 18.2% (6/33, 95% confidence interval: 7.0-35.5); of the six responders, one patient (3.0%) had a complete response and five patients (15.2%) had partial responses. The most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea, paronychia, stomatitis, and nausea.

CONCLUSION

Although study enrollment was terminated early owing to futility, our results showed modest activity of mobocertinib in Japanese patients with NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutations with no additional safety concerns.

The prediction of treatment outcome in NSCLC patients harboring an EGFR exon 20 mutation using molecular modeling

INTRODUCTION

The structural effect of uncommon heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations within exon 20 (EGFRex20+) in relation to therapy response is poorly understood. This study aims to elucidate the structural alterations caused by EGFRex20+ mutations and correlate these changes with patient responses.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

We selected EGFRex20+ mutations from advanced NSCLC patients in the Position20 and AFACET studies for computational analysis. Homology models representing both inactive and active conformations of these mutations were generated using the Swiss-Model server. Molecular docking studies with EGFR-TKIs was conducted using smina, followed by Molecular Dynamic (MD) simulations performed with GROMACS. These computational findings were compared with clinical outcomes to evaluate their potential in predicting patient response.

RESULTS

Our docking studies of 29 EGFRex20+ mutations revealed that the binding energies of afatinib, osimertinib, zipalertinib, and sunvozertinib, compared to the wild type, do not significantly impact either TKI's efficacy. MD simulations for eight EGFRex20+ mutations (A763_Y764insFQEA, A767_V769dup, S768_D770dup, D770_N771insG, D770_P772dup, N771_H773dup, H773_V774insY and H773_V774delinsLM) revealed varying degrees of instability. For six variants, predicted activation based on the αC-helix stability and orientation, as well as TKI sensitivity, aligned well with clinical observations from the Position20 and AFACET studies. Two mutations (D770_N771insG and N771_H773dup) predicted as poor to moderate responders, showed minimal activation of the αC-helix region, warranting further investigation.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, MD simulations can effectively predict patient outcomes by connecting computational results with clinical data and advancing our understanding of EGFR mutations and their therapeutic responses.

Optimization of Potent, Efficacious, Selective and Blood-Brain Barrier Penetrating Inhibitors Targeting EGFR Exon20 Insertion Mutations

Herein, we report the optimization of a series of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Exon20 insertion (Ex20Ins) inhibitors using structure-based drug design (SBDD), leading to the discovery of compound 28, a potent and wild type selective molecule, which demonstrates efficacy in multiple EGFR Ex20Ins xenograft models and blood-brain barrier penetration in preclinical species. Building on our earlier discovery of an in vivo probe, SBDD was used to design a novel bicyclic core with a lower molecular weight to facilitate blood-brain barrier penetration. Further optimization including strategic linker replacement and diversification of the ring system interacting with the c-helix enabled photolytic and metabolic stability improvements. Together with refinement of molecular properties important for achieving high brain exposure, including molecular weight, H-bonding, and polarity, 28 was identified.

Discovery of flavonoid-containing compound Lupalbigenin as anti-NSCLC cancer agents via suppression of EGFR and ERK1/2 pathway

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertions (EGFR Ex20ins) driver mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is insensitive to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Therefore, it is necessary to develop more novel strategy to address the limitations of existing therapies targeting EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Lupalbigenin (LB), a flavonoid compound extracted from Derris scandens, has shown preclinical activity in lung cancer. However, the activity of LB in Ex20ins-driven tumors has not yet been elucidated. In this study, a series of stable BaF/3 cell-line that contains a high proportion (>90 %) of EGFR-eGFP Ex20ins were generated using an IL3-deprivation method. Ba/F3 cell models harboring dissimilar Ex20ins were used to characterize the antineoplastic mechanism of LB. Molecular docking confirmed that the LB could effectively bind to key target EGFR. The in vitro anticancer activity of LB was investigated in engineered Ba/F3 cells bearing diverse uncommon EGFR mutations. LB was shown to be more potent in inhibiting the viability of various uncommon EGFR-mutated cell lines. Mechanistic studies disclosed that LB repressed EGFR phosphorylation and downstream survival pathways in Ba/F3 cells expressing EGFR Ex20ins, resulting in caspase activation by activating the intrinsic apoptotic pathway. Further analyses showed that LB significantly induced G0/G1 cell cycle arrest and apoptosis in cells. LB also reduced the protein expression levels of CDK4, CDK6, CDK8, cyclin D1, cyclin A2, and Bcl2 and promoted the expression of cytochrome C, p27, and p53. In summary, we explored the possible potential targets of LB through network pharmacology and verified the target using in vitro experiments. Furthermore, our results demonstrated that LB showed potential anti-Ex20ins cancer activity through suppression of the EGFR and ERK1/2 signaling pathway in Ba/F3 cells bearing two to three amino acid insertion mutations. These findings suggested that LB might be valuable for further investigation as a potential candidate in the treatment of associated diseases.

Tumor immune microenvironment of NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions may predict efficacy of first-line ICI-combined regimen

OBJECTIVES

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with exon 20 insertion mutations (ex20ins) of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) were resistant to monotherapy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). However, recent reports have shown that the combination of ICI and chemotherapy (ICI-combined regimen) exhibited certain efficacy for NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins. The mechanisms behind this phenomenon have not been thoroughly clarified. Hence, we conducted this study tofind correlations between the tumor immune microenvironment of EGFR ex20ins and the efficacy of ICI-combined regimen.

METHODS

We performed single-cell transcriptome sequencing and multiplex immunofluorescence staining (mIF) to investigate the immune microenvironment of NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, L858R, and EGFR wild-type. We analyzed 15 treatment-naïve NSCLC samples utilizing single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq). Another 30 cases of EGFR L858R and 4 cases of wild-type were recruited to compare the immune microenvironment with that of EGFR ex20ins (28 cases) by mIF.

RESULTS

We observed that cell components, function and interactions varied between EGFR ex20ins, L858R, and wild-type NSCLC.We discovered similar T cell and CD8+ T cell distributions among groups but found noninferior or even better T cell activation in ex20ins patients. Infiltrating CD8+ FOXP3- T cells were significantly lower in the tumor region of EGFR ex20ins compared to wild-type. T cells from the ex20ins group had a greater tendency to promote cancer cell inflammation and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) compared to wild-type group. For macrophages, there were more M2-like macrophages in ex20ins patients. M1-like macrophages in ex20ins group produced fewer antitumor cytokines than in other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The immune microenvironment of EGFR ex20ins is more suppressive than that of L858R and wild-type, suggesting that ICI monotherapy may not be sufficient for these patients. ICI-combined regimen might be a treatment option for EGFR ex20ins due to tumor-promoting inflammation and noninferior T cell functions in the immune microenvironment.

Current clinical practice and physicians' insights on Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer habouring epidermal growth factor receptor 20 insertion mutation

BACKGROUND

The present study aimed to investigate physicians' perspectives on the diagnosis and treatment decisions for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (exon20ins) mutations in a real-world setting in China using an online questionnaire.

METHODS

This study was performed via the CAPTRA-Lung collaboration between December 9, 2022 and March 6, 2023. The questionnaire was distributed digitally to physicians around China and was comprised of three sections: basic characteristics of surveyed physicians, diagnosis and treatment status of NSCLC patients with the EGFR exon20ins-mutation, and physicians' perspectives on treatment options. Physicians who treat more than 10 patients with advanced NSCLC every month and who have treated patients with advanced EGFR exon20ins-mutant NSCLC in the past six months were involved in this study.

RESULTS

A total of 53,729 questionnaires were distributed and 390 valid ones were collected. The EGFR mutation test was performed in 80.9% and 59.9% of patients receiving first-line or second-line therapy and beyond (hereinafter "second-line")therapy, respectively. In terms of treatment options, chemotherapy plus antiangiogenic therapy was the most common treatment option (30.0% of patients in first-line settings; 25.0% of patients in second-line settings), and a certain proportion of patients received novel EGFR exon20ins-targeted agents (including tyrosine kinase inhibitors [TKIs] and bispecific antibodies) in first- or second-line settings, which accounted for 11.9% and 15.7% of all treated patients, respectively. Additionally, physicians reported the highest satisfaction score for the efficacy and safety of targeted agents. Most physicians believed that EGFR exon20ins-targeted TKIs represented the most promising treatment option (80.2% in first-line treatment and 73.3% in second-line treatment). Among several novel agents under study, sunvozertinib has received the highest recognition for efficacy and safety.

CONCLUSIONS

This study investigated the current diagnosis and treatment status and physicians' perspective, of patients with EGFR exon20ins-mutant NSCLC. The results highlight significant unmet clinical needs in this subgroup of patients. EGFR exon20ins-targeted TKIs were recognized as the most promising treatment regimen and may benefit more patients considering their awareness and acceptance of targeted therapy.

A phase II study of osimertinib in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion: A multicenter trial of the Korean Cancer Study Group (LU17-19)

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions account for up to 10% of all EGFR mutations. Clinical outcomes in patients receiving approved EGFR exon 20 insertion-specific inhibitors have been variable. Although osimertinib has demonstrated antitumor activity in clinical trials, its clinical efficacy and translational potential remain to be determined in non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion.

METHODS

In this multicenter phase II study, patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions for whom the standard chemotherapy failed received 80 mg osimertinib once daily. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) as defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. The secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety profile.

RESULTS

Among 15 patients enrolled at stage 1, the best response was most commonly disease stabilization (73.3 %), which did not meet the stage 1 threshold (objective response ≥ 2/15). As of data cutoff, two patients remained on the treatment. The median PFS and OS were 3.8 (95 % confidence interval [CI] = 1.7-5.5) months and 6.5 (95 % CI = 3.9-not reached) months, respectively. Adverse events (≥grade 3) were anemia, hypercalcemia, and pneumonia (13.3 % each), and asthenia, femur fracture, increased alkaline phosphate, hyperkalemia, bone pain, and azotemia (6.7 % each). Pre-existing EGFR C797S mutation detected in plasma limited the efficacy of osimertinib.

CONCLUSION

Osimertinib at 80 mg once daily had limited efficacy and mostly showed disease stabilization with an acceptable safety profile in advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertions.

CLINICALTRIALS

govIdentifier: NCT03414814.

A phase 1 study to assess the absolute bioavailability, mass balance, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]-mobocertinib, an oral inhibitor of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, in healthy participants

Mobocertinib (TAK-788) is a first-in-class oral epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor that received accelerated approval for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. This phase 1, 2-period, study was conducted to assess the absolute bioavailability of mobocertinib (Period 1), as well as mass balance, pharmacokinetics, metabolism, and excretion of [14C]-mobocertinib (Period 2) in healthy adult males. In Period 1, participants received a single oral capsule dose of 160 mg mobocertinib, followed by a 15-minute intravenous infusion of 50 µg (~ 2 µCi) [14C]-mobocertinib administered from 3.75 to 4 h after the capsule dose. In Period 2, a single oral dose of 160 mg (~ 100 µCi) [14C]-mobocertinib was administered as an oral solution. The geometric mean absolute bioavailability of mobocertinib was determined to be 36.7%. After oral administration of [14C]-mobocertinib, mobocertinib and its active metabolites, AP32960 and AP32914, were minor components in plasma, accounting for only 0.275% of total plasma radioactivity as the majority of mobocertinib-related material was covalently bound to plasma proteins. The geometric mean percentage of the administered radioactive dose recovered in the urine and feces was 3.57% and 76.0%, respectively. Only 0.39% of the oral dose of [14C]-mobocertinib was recovered in the urine as mobocertinib; thus, indicating that renal excretion of unchanged drug was a very minor pathway of elimination. In both treatment periods, mobocertinib was generally safe and well-tolerated as all adverse events were Grade 1 in severity. (Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03811834. Registration date January 22, 2019).

[Chinese Expert Consensus on the Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment of Non‑small Cell Lung Cancer with EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations (2024 Edition)]

The standard clinical practice of managing the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations was elaborated in Chinese expert consensus on non‑small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations (2023 edition), and this rare subset has gradually attracted attention recently. With the deepening of treatment area exploration and the approval of new targeted drugs, there are more options for the diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins positive NSCLC patients. Therefore, based on the previous version of consensus, the expert panel has updated this consensus on the standardized clinical diagnosis and treatment of EGFR ex20ins mutation NSCLC through reference to literature and clinical data, and combined with the experts' own clinical experience. The updated recommendations includes disease congnition, testing methods, therapy and recent relevant clinical trials for NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation, in order to provide better medication reference for clinical physicians.
.

Discovery and Optimization of Potent, Efficacious and Selective Inhibitors Targeting EGFR Exon20 Insertion Mutations

Herein, we report the identification and optimization of a series of potent inhibitors of EGFR Exon20 insertions with significant selectivity over wild-type EGFR. A strategically designed HTS campaign, multiple iterations of structure-based drug design (SBDD), and tactical linker replacement led to a potent and wild-type selective series of molecules and ultimately the discovery of 36. Compound 36 is a potent and selective inhibitor of EGFR Exon20 insertions and has demonstrated encouraging efficacy in NSCLC EGFR CRISPR-engineered H2073 xenografts that carry an SVD Exon20 insertion and reduced efficacy in a H2073 wild-type EGFR xenograft model compared to CLN-081 (5), indicating that 36 may have lower EGFR wild-type associated toxicity.

Multinational proficiency tests for EGFR exon 20 insertions reveal that the assay design matters

Insertion mutations in exon 20 of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR exon20ins) are rare, heterogeneous alterations observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). With a few exceptions, they are associated with primary resistance to established EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). As patients carrying EGFR exon20ins may be eligible for treatment with novel therapeutics-the bispecific antibody amivantamab, the TKI mobocertinib, or potential future innovations-they need to be identified reliably in clinical practice for which quality-based routine genetic testing is crucial. Spearheaded by the German Quality Assurance Initiative Pathology two international proficiency tests were run, assessing the performance of 104 participating institutes detecting EGFR exon20ins in tissue and/or plasma samples. EGFR exon20ins were most reliably identified using next-generation sequencing (NGS). Interestingly, success rates of institutes using commercially available mutation-/allele-specific quantitative (q)PCR were below 30% for tissue samples and 0% for plasma samples. Most of these mutation-/allele-specific (q)PCR assays are not designed to detect the whole spectrum of EGFR exon20ins mutations leading to false negative results. These data suggest that NGS is a suitable method to detect EGFR exon20ins in various types of patient samples and is superior to the detection spectrum of commercially available assays.

Natural History and Real-World Treatment Outcomes for Patients With NSCLC Having EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation: An International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer-American Society of Clinical Oncology CancerLinQ Study

Introduction

EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations account for approximately 10% of EGFR mutations in lung adenocarcinoma. Patients with ex20ins mutation do not respond to standard EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy. In this work, we analyzed the characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes in this subgroup of patients with NSCLC.

Methods

The American Society of Clinical Oncology CancerLinQ Discovery data set was queried to identify patients with initial diagnosis of NSCLC between the years 1995 and 2018 and with EGFR ex20ins mutations. Data were extracted on patient demographics, tumor characteristics, treatments, and outcomes, and compared using chi-square and analysis of variance. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to compare overall survival with log-rank tests. All analyses were performed using Python 3.6 (Python Software Foundation).

Results

A total of 357 patients were eligible. Patient characteristics include a median age of 68 years comprising female sex of 54%, White race of 63%, and Black race of 9%. Approximately 62% of total patients had stage 4 disease, and 30% of all patients had brain metastasis. There were 54% of patients who were treated with chemotherapy and 15% with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). In patients with brain metastasis, 16% were treated with ICI, 18% with targeted therapy, and 59% with chemotherapy. The median survival of the entire group was 23.8 months. Among patients with stage 4 disease (n = 222): 51% were women, 64% were white, 37% had brain metastasis, 18% were treated with ICI, 14% had targeted therapy, and 60% were treated with chemotherapy. Stage 4 patients treated with targeted therapy had better survival compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy (20.6 versus 16.1 mo, p = 0.02). Univariate and multivariate analyses suggested favorable outcomes for patients treated with immunotherapy.

Conclusions

EGFR ex20ins mutation represents a unique subset of NSCLC; it is associated with a higher propensity for brain metastases and a relatively modest overall survival. Novel treatment approaches are urgently needed to improve patient outcomes.

Novel EGFR mutations in diffuse midline gliomas using cost-effective strategies: A report of 2 cases

Background

Diffuse midline gliomas (DMGs) are malignant tumors predominantly affecting children, often leading to poor outcomes. The 2021 World Health Organization classification identifies 3 subtypes of DMGs, all characterized by the loss of H3K27 trimethylation. Here, we report 2 cases of DMG with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations within exon 20, contributing to the understanding of the molecular complexity of these pediatric brain tumors.

Methods

An economical immunohistochemical panel was designed to aid in the diagnosis of most DMGs in resource-constrained regions. Sanger sequencing was employed to identify rare EGFR mutations in exon 20 of 2 cases.

Results

Molecular analyses of 2 cases of DMG revealed novel EGFR mutations within exon 20. These mutations were identified using cost-effective diagnostic approaches. The presence of EGFR mutations expands the molecular landscape of DMGs and highlights the genetic heterogeneity within this tumor entity.

Conclusions

These findings underscore the molecular heterogeneity of DMGs and the significance of identifying novel mutations, such as EGFR mutations in exon 20. Further research into the molecular mechanisms underlying DMGs is warranted to advance therapeutic strategies and improve outcomes for pediatric patients.

Molecular Testing in Lung Cancer: Recommendations and Update

Adoption of molecular testing in lung cancer is increasing. Molecular testing for staging and prediction of response for targeted therapy remain the main indications, and although utilization of blood-based testing for tumor is growing, the use of the diagnostic cytology and tissue specimens is equally important. The pathologist needs to optimize reflex testing, incorporate stage-based algorithms, and understand types of tests for timely and complete assessment in the majority of cases. When tissue is limited, testing should capture the most frequent alterations to maximize the yield of what are largely mutually exclusive alterations, avoiding the need for repeat biopsy.

Comprehensive analysis of next generation sequencing and ARMS-PCR for detecting EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations in Chinese non-small cell lung cancer patients

Background

Amivantamab (JNJ-372) and mobocertinib (TAK-788) have been reported to have favorable therapeutic effect for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations. Thus, accurate detection of EGFR ex20ins mutations is crucial for subsequent individualized therapy. The aim of this study was to compare the two common methods of next generation sequencing (NGS) and amplification refractory mutation system polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) for detecting EGFR ex20ins mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed EGFR mutations, especially for ex20ins, in 3,606 NSCLC patients detected by NGS and 1,785 patients by ARMS.

Results

Among the 3,606 NGS patients, a total of 2,077 EGFR mutations and 95 EGFR ex20ins were identified, accounting for 57.6% and 2.6%, respectively. While 48.4% of EGFR mutations and 1.1% of ex20ins were detected in 1,785 ARMS patients, which were significantly lower than those of NGS (P<0.01). Thirty-four unique ex20ins variants were identified by NGS, and eight of them was reported for the first time. However, ARMS was designed to detect only several known EGFR ex20ins variants, and even did not include the most common variants in Chinese NSCLC patients.

Conclusions

NGS is more advantageous and strongly recommended for the detection of EGFR ex20ins mutations. Considering the fast and cost-effective ARMS detection method, it is suggested that the primers design should be updated according to the characteristics of EGFR ex20ins mutations in Chinese NSCLC patients.

Targeted Therapies for EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutation in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) frequently harbors mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), with exon 20 insertions comprising 1-10% of these mutations. EGFR exon 20 insertions are less responsive to conventional tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), leading to the development of targeted agents. This review explores key therapeutic agents, such as Amivantamab, Mobocertinib, Poziotinib, Zipalertinib, and Sunvozertinib, which have shown promise in treating NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions. Amivantamab, a bispecific antibody-targeting EGFR and c-MET, demonstrates significant efficacy, particularly when combined with chemotherapy. Mobocertinib, a TKI, selectively targets EGFR exon 20 mutations but faces limitations in efficacy. Poziotinib, another oral TKI, shows mixed results due to mutation-specific responses. Zipalertinib and Sunvozertinib have emerged as potent TKIs with promising clinical data. Despite these advances, challenges in overcoming resistance mutations and improving central nervous system penetration remain. Future research should focus on optimizing first-line combination therapies and enhancing diagnostic strategies for comprehensive mutation profiling.

First-in-human phase I study of BEBT-109 in previously treated EGFR exon 20 insertion-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

BEBT-109 is an oral pan-mutant-selective inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) that demonstrated promising antitumor potency in preclinical models.

METHODS

This first-in-human study was a single-arm, open-label, two-stage study. Phase Ia dose-escalation study evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of BEBT-109 in 11 patients with EGFR T790M-mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC). Phase Ib dose-expansion study evaluated the safety and efficacy of BEBT-109 in 18 patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins)-mutated treatment-refractory aNSCLC. The primary outcomes were adverse events and antitumor activity. Clinical trial registration number CTR20192575.

FINDINGS

The phase Ia study demonstrated no dose-limiting toxicity, no observation of the maximum tolerated dose, and no new safety signals with BEBT-109 in the dose range of 20-180 mg/d, suggesting that BEBT-109 had an acceptable safety profile among patients with EGFR T790M-mutated aNSCLC. Plasma pharmacokinetics of BEBT-109 showed a dose-proportional increase in the area under the curve and maximal concentration, with no significant drug accumulation. The dose-expansion study demonstrated that BEBT-109 treatment was tolerable across the three dose levels. The three most common treatment-related adverse events were diarrhea (100%; 22.2% ≥Grade 3), rash (66.7%; 5.6% ≥Grade 3), and anemia (61.1%; 0% ≥Grade 3). The objective response rate was 44.4% (8 of 18). Median progression-free survival was 8.0 months (95% confidence intervals, 1.33-14.67).

CONCLUSION

Preliminary findings showed that BEBT-109 had an acceptable safety profile and favorable antitumor activity in patients with refractory EGFR ex20ins-mutated aNSCLC.

FUNDING

National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Current status and breakthroughs in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Recently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged as effective treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This progress has been facilitated by the rapid development of diagnostic and therapeutic technologies and the continuous research and development of new drugs, leading to a new era in precision medicine for NSCLC. This is a breakthrough for patients with common mutations in the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in NSCLC. Consequently, the use of targeted drugs has significantly improved survival. Nevertheless, certain rare genetic mutations are referred to as EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations, which differ in structure from conventional EGFR gene mutations, namely, exon 19 deletion mutations (19-Del) and exon 21 point mutations. Owing to their distinct structural characteristics, patients harboring these EGFR ex20ins mutations are unresponsive to traditional tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. This particular group of patients did not fall within the scope of their applicability. However, the activating A763_Y764insFQEA mutation elicits a more pronounced response than mutations in the near and far regions of the C-helix immediately following it and should, therefore, be treated differently. Currently, there is a lack of effective treatments for EGFR ex20ins mutations NSCLC. The efficacy of chemotherapy has been relatively favorable, whereas the effectiveness of immunotherapy remains ambiguous owing to inadequate clinical data. In addition, the efficacy of the first- and second-generation targeted drugs remains limited. However, third-generation and novel targeted drugs have proven to be effective. Although novel EGFR-TKIs are expected to treat EGFR ex20ins mutations in patients with NSCLC, they face many challenges. The main focus of this review is on emerging therapies that target NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins and highlight major ongoing clinical trials while also providing an overview of the associated challenges and research advancements in this area.

Clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung cancer harboring EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions in the near-loop and far-loop: Results from LC-SCRUM-Asia

OBJECTIVES

In this study, we explored the clinical outcomes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with EGFR Exon20 in-frame insertions (Exon20ins), and the impact of the location of Exon20ins on these clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The efficacies of current systemic therapies in NSCLC patients harboring Exon20ins were investigated using a large-scale clinico-genomic database of LC-SCRUM-Asia, and compared with that of amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial.

RESULTS

Of the 11,397 patients enrolled in LC-SCRUM-Asia, Exon20ins were detected in 189 patients (1.7 %). Treatment with classical EGFR tyrosine-kinase inhibitors (classical TKIs) was associated with a significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins as compared with Exon19 deletions and L858R. Post platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) were associated with a shorter PFS than with docetaxel in patients with Exon20ins (HR [95 % CI]; TKIs vs docetaxel, 2.16 [1.35-3.46]; ICIs vs docetaxel, 1.49 [1.21-1.84]). Patients treated with amivantamab in the CHRYSALIS trial showed a risk reduction in PFS and overall survival as compared with LC-SCRUM-Asia patients treated with docetaxel, classical TKIs, or ICIs. Among the 189 patients, Exon20ins were classified as near-loop or far-loop insertions in 115 (61 %) and 56 (30 %) patients, respectively. Treatment with osimertinib was associated with a longer PFS in patients with Exon20ins in near-loop as compared with far-loop (median, 5.6 vs. 2.0 months; HR [95 % CI], 0.22 [0.07-0.64]).

CONCLUSIONS

After platinum-based chemotherapy, classical TKIs and ICIs are less effective in NSCLC patients with Exon20ins, and amivantamab may be a promising targeted therapy. There is a possibility that the location of Exon20ins has an impact on the efficacy of TKIs.

Amivantamab: A Novel Advance in the Treatment of Non-small Cell Lung Cancer

Amivantamab is a fully human bispecific monoclonal antibody indicated for treating patients with specifically large cell lung cancer. Its dosage is based on the patient's initial body weight and is administered via intravenous infusion after dilution. Therefore, this drug is given as a strategy due to the great need for a molecule targeting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and the mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET), as acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) was observed in the treatment of large cell lung cancer. This article encompasses a review of the benefits of amivantamab for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This drug is the first therapy directed against this specific mutation, and unlike others, it could bind to two genetic receptors, whereas antibodies, in general, are directed toward a single receptor.

The association of EGFR amplification with aberrant exon 20 insertion report using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2

Determining the exact type of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutation in lung cancer has become important. We found that not all ex20ins mutations reported by cobas EGFR test v2 could be validated by Sanger sequencing even using surgical specimens with high tumor contents. This study aimed to validate the ex20ins results reported by the cobas test and to determine whether there were clinicopathological factors associated with aberrant cobas ex20ins report. In total, 123 cobas-reported cases with ex20ins were retrospectively collected and validated by Sanger sequencing and Idylla assay. Clinicopathological features between ex20ins cobas+/Sanger+ group (n = 71) and cobas+/Sanger- group (n = 52) were compared. The Idylla assay detected ex20ins in 82.6% of cobas+/Sanger+ cases but only in 4.9% of cobas+/Sanger- cases. The cobas+/Sanger- group was significantly associated with higher tumor contents, poorly differentiated patterns, tumor necrosis, and a lower internal control cycle threshold value reported by the Idylla which suggesting the presence of increased EGFR gene copy numbers. EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) revealed the majority of cobas+/Sanger- group had EGFR high copy number gain (16%) or amplification (76%) according to the Colorado criteria. Among cases reported to have concomitant classic EGFR and ex20ins mutations by the cobas, the classic EGFR mutations were all detected by Sanger sequencing and Idylla, while the ex20ins mutations were undetected by Sanger sequencing (0%) or rarely reported by Idylla assay (3%). FISH revealed high EGFR copy number gain (17.9%) and amplification (79.5%) in cases reported having concomitant classic EGFR and ex20ins mutations by the cobas. This study demonstrated an unusually high frequency of EGFR amplification in cases with aberrant cobas ex20ins report which could not be validated by Sanger sequencing or Idylla assay. Ex20ins reported by the cobas test should be validated using other methods especially those reported having concomitant ex20ins and classic EGFR mutations.

Discovery of Novel 5,6-Dihydro-4H-pyrido[2,3,4-de]quinazoline Irreversible Inhibitors Targeting Both Wild-Type and A775_G776insYVMA Mutated HER2 Kinases

HER2 mutations were seen in 4% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Most of these mutations (90%) occur as an insertion mutation within the exon 20 frame, leading to the downstream activation of the PI3K-AKT and RAS/MAPK pathways. However, no targeted therapies have yet been approved worldwide. Here a novel series of highly potent HER2 inhibitors with a pyrido[2,3,4-de]quinazoline core were designed and developed. The derivatives with the pyrido[2,3,4-de]quinazoline core displayed superior efficacy of antiproliferation in BaF3 cells harboring HER2insYVMA mutation compared with afatinib and neratinib. Rat studies showed that 8a and 9a with the newly developed core have good pharmacokinetic properties with an oral bioavailability of 41.7 and 42.0%, respectively. Oral administration of 4a and 10e (30 mg/kg, QD) displayed significant antitumor efficacy in an in vivo xenograft model. We proposed promising strategies for the development of HER2insYVMA mutant inhibitors in this study.

The study of primary and acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib to improve the outcome of EGFR-mutated advanced Non-small cell lung cancer patients: the challenge is open for new therapeutic strategies

The development of targeted therapy in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has radically changed their clinical perspectives. Current first-line standard treatment for advanced disease is commonly considered third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), osimertinib. The study of primary and acquired resistance to front-line osimertinib is one of the main burning issues to further improve patients' outcome. Great heterogeneity has been depicted in terms of duration of clinical benefit and pattern of progression and this might be related to molecular factors including subtypes of EGFR mutations and concomitant genetic alterations. Acquired resistance can be categorized into two main classes: EGFR-dependent and EGFR-independent mechanisms and specific pattern of progression to first-line osimertinib have been demonstrated. The purpose of the manuscript is to provide a comprehensive overview of literature about molecular resistance mechanisms to first-line osimertinib, from a clinical perspective and therefore in relationship to emerging therapeutic approaches.

Current management of uncommon EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are frequently implicated in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Though these typically involve exon 19 in-frame deletions or L858R mutations in exon 21, uncommon EGFR mutations comprise 10-15 % of all EGFR mutations. These most frequently include G719X mutations in exon 18, L861Q mutations in exon 21, S768I mutations in exon 20, and in-frame insertions and/or duplications in exon 20. It is crucial to understand these distinct variants and their specific responses to active treatment options to optimize care. In this review, we discuss these uncommon mutations in depth and dissect the current literature regarding their treatment outcomes and subsequent evidence-based management guidelines.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of amivantamab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 insertions

Objective

Amivantamab plus chemotherapy has been proved to be an efficient treatment strategy for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions. The aim of this study was to conduct the cost-effectiveness analysis of amivantamab-chemotherapy compared with chemotherapy alone in NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations.

Methods

We constructed a Markov model based on the data derived from the PAPILLON trial. We evaluated the cost, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER). One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to evaluate the influence of different parameters on this model.

Results

Compared with chemotherapy alone, amivantamab combined with chemotherapy treatment gained an incremental effectiveness of 0.473 QALYs and an incremental cost of $361,950.952, which resulted in an ICER of $765,224/QALY. The ICER was much higher than the willingness-to-pay threshold of 15,0000/QALY. One-way sensitivity analysis revealed that amivantamab cost was the leading influential factor in the model.

Conclusions

Compared with chemotherapy alone, amivantamab plus chemotherapy is not a cost-effective first-line treatment choice for NSCLC patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions. The costly price of amivantamab is one of the major reasons for the high cost of this combined treatment strategy. Therefore, it is imperative to take into account the high cost of amivantamab in the subsequent clinical application and strive to attain a relative equilibrium between its significant clinical benefit and economic encumbrance.

Cutting-Edge Therapies for Lung Cancer

Lung cancer remains a formidable global health challenge that necessitates inventive strategies to improve its therapeutic outcomes. The conventional treatments, including surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation, have demonstrated limitations in achieving sustained responses. Therefore, exploring novel approaches encompasses a range of interventions that show promise in enhancing the outcomes for patients with advanced or refractory cases of lung cancer. These groundbreaking interventions can potentially overcome cancer resistance and offer personalized solutions. Despite the rapid evolution of emerging lung cancer therapies, persistent challenges such as resistance, toxicity, and patient selection underscore the need for continued development. Consequently, the landscape of lung cancer therapy is transforming with the introduction of precision medicine, immunotherapy, and innovative therapeutic modalities. Additionally, a multifaceted approach involving combination therapies integrating targeted agents, immunotherapies, or traditional cytotoxic treatments addresses the heterogeneity of lung cancer while minimizing its adverse effects. This review provides a brief overview of the latest emerging therapies that are reshaping the landscape of lung cancer treatment. As these novel treatments progress through clinical trials are integrated into standard care, the potential for more effective, targeted, and personalized lung cancer therapies comes into focus, instilling renewed hope for patients facing challenging diagnoses.

The state of the art of EGFR exon 20 insertions in non-small cell lung cancer: Diagnosis and future perspectives

Insertions in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 (Ex20Ins) are the third most incident mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The hypervariable nature of these driver mutations hinders their identification by traditional polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based methods, requiring a comprehensive sequencing approach to detect all possible insertions. The prognosis of patients with EGFR Ex20Ins is similar to those with wild-type NSCLC, since no targeted drugs are approved in the first-line setting, and platinum-based chemotherapy is currently the front-line treatment. However, the new generation of drugs currently being tested in first and post-platinum settings will likely change the management of this entity. Here, we summarize the latest data on EGFR Ex20Ins molecular characteristics, patient profile, identification challenges, and emerging therapies to help lung clinicians face a growing treatment landscape.

Mobocertinib: Mechanism of action, clinical, and translational science

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations represent ~6%-12% of all EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases. First-, second-, and third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have limited clinical activity against EGFR ex20ins mutations. Mobocertinib is a first-in-class oral EGFR TKI that selectively targets in-frame EGFR ex20ins mutations in NSCLC; accelerated approval in the United States was granted for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins mutations whose disease has progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Accelerated approval was based on the results from the three-part, open-label, multicenter, pivotal phase I/II nonrandomized clinical trial (NCT02716116) that enrolled 114 patients with locally advanced or metastatic EGFR ex20ins mutation-positive NSCLC who were previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy and received mobocertinib at the recommended dosage of 160 mg once daily. At the November 1, 2021, data cutoff date, the confirmed objective response rate per independent review committee (IRC) was 28%, median duration of response was 15.8 months, median progression-free survival per IRC was 7.3 months, and median overall survival was 20.2 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were gastrointestinal- and skin-related. The phase III EXCLAIM-2 study evaluated mobocertinib versus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for locally advanced or metastatic EGFR ex20ins-positive NSCLC; however, the primary end point was not met, resulting in initiating voluntary withdrawal of mobocertinib worldwide. This mini-review article summarizes the mechanism of action, pharmacokinetic characteristics, key clinical trials, and clinical efficacy and safety data for mobocertinib.

Sunvozertinib for patients in China with platinum-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer and EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (WU-KONG6): single-arm, open-label, multicentre, phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

Sunvozertinib is an oral, irreversible, and selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor that has a favourable safety profile and encouraging antitumour activity, as shown in phase 1 studies of patients with heavily pretreated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation (exon20ins). We aimed to assess the antitumour efficacy of sunvozertinib in patients with platinum-pretreated locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR exon20ins.

METHODS

WU-KONG6 is a single-group, open-label, multicentre phase 2 trial of sunvozertinib monotherapy, conducted across 37 medical centres in China. We enrolled adult patients with pathologically or cytologically confirmed locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC whose tumour tissue carried an EGFR exon20ins mutation. All patients had received at least one line of previous systemic therapy, with at least one line containing platinum-based chemotherapy. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR), as assessed by the independent review committee. The ORR was defined as the percentage of patients who achieved complete or partial response, confirmed by two separate assessments with at least 4-week time interval, until disease progression or initiation of any new anti-cancer therapy. Enrolled patients received sunvozertinib 300 mg once daily until meeting discontinuation criteria per the protocol. Patients who received at least one dose of treatment and were evaluable for efficacy analysis were included in the primary analysis, and all patients who received at least one dose of treatment were included in the safety analysis. This study is registered with ChinaDrugTrials.org, CTR20211009, and ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05712902, and efficacy and safety follow-up are ongoing.

FINDINGS

Between July 19, 2021, and May 6, 2022, 104 patients were enrolled. At data cutoff (Oct 17, 2022), the last enrolled patient had been followed up for about 6 months. Among 97 patients evaluable for efficacy analysis, 59 (61%) patients achieved tumour response, with a confirmed ORR of 61% (95% CI 50-71). All tumour responses were partial responses. Tumour responses were observed irrespective of age, sex, smoking history, EGFR exon20ins subtypes, brain metastasis at baseline, previous lines of therapy, and history of onco-immunotherapy. In total, 19 death events occurred over a median follow-up period of 7·6 months (IQR 6·1-9·4). Sunvozertinib was well tolerated at 300 mg once daily. The most common grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events were blood creatine phosphokinase increased (18 [17%] of 104), diarrhoea (eight [8%]), and anaemia (six [6%]). The most common serious treatment-related adverse events were interstitial lung disease (five [5%] of 104), anaemia (three [3%]), vomiting (two [2%]), nausea (two [2%]) and pneumonia (two [2%]).

INTERPRETATION

In this phase 2 study, sunvozertinib demonstrated antitumour efficacy in patients with platinum-based chemotherapy pretreated NSCLC with EGFR exon20ins, with a manageable safety profile. A multinational randomised, phase 3 study of sunvozertinib versus platinum-doublet chemotherapy in EGFR exon20ins NSCLC is ongoing (NCT05668988).

FUNDING

Dizal Pharmaceutical.

Transcription factor ZNF263 enhances EGFR-targeted therapeutic response and reduces residual disease in lung adenocarcinoma

EGF receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have achieved clinical success in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, tumors often show profound but transient initial response and then gain resistance. We identify transcription factor ZNF263 as being significantly decreased in osimertinib-resistant or drug-tolerant persister LUAD cells and clinical residual tumors. ZNF263 overexpression improves the initial response of cells and delays the formation of persister cells with osimertinib treatment. We further show that ZNF263 binds and recruits DNMT1 to the EGFR gene promoter, suppressing EGFR transcription with DNA hypermethylation. ZNF263 interacts with nuclear EGFR, impairing the EGFR-STAT5 interaction to enhance AURKA expression. Overexpressing ZNF263 also makes tumor cells with wild-type EGFR expression or refractory EGFR mutations more susceptible to EGFR inhibition. More importantly, lentivirus or adeno-associated virus (AAV)-mediated ZNF263 overexpression synergistically suppresses tumor growth and regrowth with osimertinib treatment in xenograft animal models. These findings suggest that enhancing ZNF263 may achieve complete response in LUAD with EGFR-targeted therapies.

Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Preliminary Efficacy of YK-029A in Treatment-Naive Patients With Advanced NSCLC Harboring EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations: A Phase 1 Trial

INTRODUCTION

Treatment options for treatment-naive patients with advanced NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations are limited. This study evaluated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of YK-029A, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, and the preliminary efficacy of YK-029A in treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutation.

METHODS

This multicenter, dose-escalation, and dose-expansion phase 1 clinical trial enrolled patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations. During the dose-escalation phase, YK-029A was orally administered using the traditional 3+3 principle at 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 mg/d. In the dose-expansion phase, treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations were enrolled and administered YK-029A 200 mg/d. The primary end point was safety and tolerability.

RESULTS

The safety analysis included 108 patients. No dose-limiting toxicity was observed, and the maximum tolerated dose was not reached. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were anemia (50.9%), diarrhea (49.1%), and rash (34.3%). There was minimal drug accumulation after multiple doses. A total of 28 treatment-naive patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations were enrolled in the dose-expansion and 26 were included in the efficacy analysis. According to the independent review committee evaluation, the objective response rate was 73.1% (95% confidence interval: 52.21%-88.43%), and the disease control rate was 92.3% (95% confidence interval: 74.87%-99.05%).

CONCLUSIONS

YK-029A was found to have manageable safety and be tolerable in patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations and have promising antitumor activity in untreated patients with EGFR ex20ins mutations.

Lung cancer in patients who have never smoked - an emerging disease

Lung cancer is the most common cause of cancer-related deaths globally. Although smoking-related lung cancers continue to account for the majority of diagnoses, smoking rates have been decreasing for several decades. Lung cancer in individuals who have never smoked (LCINS) is estimated to be the fifth most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide in 2023, preferentially occurring in women and Asian populations. As smoking rates continue to decline, understanding the aetiology and features of this disease, which necessitate unique diagnostic and treatment paradigms, will be imperative. New data have provided important insights into the molecular and genomic characteristics of LCINS, which are distinct from those of smoking-associated lung cancers and directly affect treatment decisions and outcomes. Herein, we review the emerging data regarding the aetiology and features of LCINS, particularly the genetic and environmental underpinnings of this disease as well as their implications for treatment. In addition, we outline the unique diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms of LCINS and discuss future directions in identifying individuals at high risk of this disease for potential screening efforts.

Clinical Validation of the Unparalleled Sensitivity of the Novel Allele-Discriminating Priming System Technology-Based EGFR Mutation Assay in Patients with Operable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

PURPOSE

Recently, we developed allele-discriminating priming system (ADPS) technology. This method increases the sensitivity of conventional quantitative polymerase chain reaction up to 100 folds, with limit of detection, 0.01%, with reinforced specificity. This prospective study aimed to develop and validate the accuracy of ADPS epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Mutation Test Kit using clinical specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In total 189 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumor tissues resected from patients with non-small cell lung cancer were used to perform a comparative evaluation of the ADPS EGFR Mutation Test Kit versus the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2, which is the current gold standard. When the two methods had inconsistent results, next-generation sequencing-based CancerSCAN was utilized as a referee.

RESULTS

The overall agreement of the two methods was 97.4% (93.9%-99.1%); the positive percent agreement, 95.0% (88.7%-98.4%); and the negative percent agreement, 100.0% (95.9%-100.0%). EGFR mutations were detected at a frequency of 50.3% using the ADPS EGFR Mutation Test Kit and 52.9% using the cobas EGFR Mutation Test v2. There were 10 discrepant mutation calls between the two methods. CancerSCAN reproduced eight ADPS results. In two cases, mutant allele fraction was ultra-low at 0.02% and 0.06%, which are significantly below the limit of detection of the cobas assay and CancerSCAN. Based on the EGFR genotyping by ADPS, the treatment options could be switched in five patients.

CONCLUSION

The highly sensitive and specific ADPS EGFR Mutation Test Kit would be useful in detecting the patients who have lung cancer with EGFR mutation, and can benefit from the EGFR targeted therapy.

Real world treatment patterns, healthcare resource use and costs in patients with advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer by EGFR mutation type

AIMS

This study described treatment patterns, healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs among advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (a/mNSCLC) patients with different epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation types.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study leveraged NeoGenomics NeoNucleus linked with IQVIA PharMetrics Plus between 01 January 2016 to 30 April 2021 (study period). Patients with evidence of a/mNSCLC between 01 July 2016 to 31 March 2021 (selection window) with EGFR test results indicating exon 19 deletion (exon19del), exon 21 L858R (L858R), or exon 20 insertion (exon20i) mutations were included; date of first observed evidence of a/mNSCLC was the index date. Treatment patterns, all-cause HRU and costs during ≥1 month follow-up were reported for each cohort (exon19del, L858R, and exon20i).

RESULTS

A total of 106 exon19del, 75 L858R, and 13 exon20i patients met the study criteria. The prevalence of hospitalization was highest in the exon20i cohort (76.9%), followed by L858R (62.7%) and exon19del (55.7%) cohorts. A higher proportion of patients had evidence of hospice/end-of-life care in the exon20i (30.8%) and L858R (29.3%) cohorts relative to the exon19del cohort (22.6%). The exon20i cohort had higher median total healthcare costs per patient per month ($27,069) relative to exon19del ($17,482) and L858R ($17,763). EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) were the most frequently observed treatment type for exon19del and L858R cohorts, while chemotherapy was the most observed treatment in exon20i cohort.

LIMITATIONS

The sample size for the study cohorts was small, thus no statistical comparisons were conducted.

CONCLUSIONS

This is one of the first real-world studies to describe HRU and costs among a/mNSCLC patients by specific EGFR mutation type. HRU and costs varied between EGFR mutation types and were highest among exon20i cohort, potentially reflecting higher disease burden and unmet need among patients with this mutation.

Treatment preferences among Japanese patients and physicians for epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Evidence is limited on preferences of Japanese patients and physicians in treatment for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several oral or intravenous novel agents for EGFR exon 20 insertions are under development. The aim of our study was to investigate which attributes of novel treatments influenced selection of oral or intravenous agents among treated patients and treating physicians in Japan.

METHODS

The study was designed by board-certified oncologists, patient representatives, and analytics specialists. Eligible participants completed an online survey with a discrete choice experiment presenting two treatment profiles described by attributes: mode of administration (oral or intravenous); frequency of administration; overall response rate (ORR); average progression-free survival (PFS); chance of experiencing severe side effects (SEs); mild-moderate gastrointestinal SEs; mild-moderate skin-related SEs; and patient out-of-pocket costs.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients (all self-reported EGFR-mutant) and 74 physicians participated from December 2021 to August 2022. All attributes being equal, there was greater preference for oral administration. However, there was greater preference for intravenous over oral, when ORR and PFS improved by 10% and 1 month, and severe SEs reduced by 10%. Physicians exhibited greater preference for PFS compared to patients (p < 0.01). Ranked order of attribute importance was as follows: (1) PFS; (2) ORR; (3) severe SEs, expressed by patients and physicians alike.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study revealed Japanese physician and patient preferences in treatment options for EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Compared to the strong preference for a more efficacious drug, the preference of oral versus intravenous revealed a smaller impact.

Pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoepithelial carcinoma - morphology, molecular characteristics and differential diagnosis

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) comprises one of the major groups of non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung, and is subtyped into keratinising, non-keratinising and basaloid SCC. SCC can readily be diagnosed using histomorphology alone in keratinising SCC. Confirmatory immunohistochemical analyses should always be applied in non-keratinising and basaloid tumours to exclude differential diagnoses, most prominently adenocarcinoma and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, which may have important therapeutic consequences. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification 2015, the diagnosis of SCC can be rendered in resections of morphologically ambiguous tumours with squamous immunophenotype. In biopsies and cytology preparations in the same setting the current guidelines propose a diagnosis of 'non-small-cell carcinoma, favour SCC' in TTF1-negative and p40-positive tumours to acknowledge a possible sampling bias and restrict extended immunohistochemical evaluation in order to preserve tissue for molecular testing. Most SCC feature a molecular 'tobacco-smoke signature' with enrichment in GG > TT mutations, in line with the strong epidemiological association of SCC with smoking. Targetable mutations are extremely rare but they do occur, in particular in younger and non- or light-smoking patients, warranting molecular investigations. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma (LEC) is a poorly differentiated SCC with a syncytial growth pattern and a usually prominent lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate and frequent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) association. In this review, we describe the morphological and molecular characteristics of SCC and LEC and discuss the most pertinent differential diagnoses.

Evaluating the Clinical Characteristics and Prognosis of Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Exon 20 Insertions

BACKGROUND

Epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 insertion (EGFR ex20ins), an uncommon mutation in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), can induce poor patient response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKI). However, the clinical features and prognosis of patients with EGFR ex20ins are not clearly understood. This study investigated the clinical characteristics and prognosis of advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins.

METHODS

Advanced NSCLC patients treated at Fujian Cancer Hospital were consecutively recruited from June 1, 2014 to December 20, 2021 and retrospectively examined. EGFR ex20ins was identified by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) or next-generation sequencing (NGS). The clinical characteristics, treatment methods, and patient outcomes were retrieved from the hospital database. The progression-free survival (PFS)  and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

RESULTS

Fourteen mutation subtypes of EGFR ex20ins were identified in the 24 enrolled patients, with EGFR ex20ins mutation more prevalent in non-smoking women. A763_Y764insFQEA and A767_V769dup (12.5% for both) were the most common mutation subtypes. Notably, no significant differences in PFS and OS were found between the first-line targeted therapy group [PFS: 257 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 116-397 days; OS: not reached] and chemotherapy-based combination therapy group (PFS: 182 days, 95% CI: 156-207 days; OS: 998 days, 95% CI: 674-1321 days). TP53 mutation was the commonest concomitant mutation (62%), followed by EGFR amplification (25%). Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy improved the prognosis of patients with high PD-L1 expression.

CONCLUSION

For NSCLC patients with EGFR ex20ins, limited therapeutic benefits can be gleaned from either EGFR-TKIs or chemotherapy-based combination therapy.

Secondary Mutations of the EGFR Gene That Confer Resistance to Mobocertinib in EGFR Exon 20 Insertion

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 10% of mutations in the EGFR gene in NSCLC are in-frame insertions in exon 20 (X20ins). These tumors usually do not respond to conventional EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Several novel EGFR TKIs active for X20ins are in clinical development, including mobocertinib, which was recently approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration. However, acquired resistance during treatment with these TKIs still occurs as in the case of EGFR TKIs of earlier generations.

METHODS

We chronically exposed murine pro-B-cell line cells transduced with the five most common X20ins (A763_Y764insFQEA, V769_D770insASV, D770_N771insSVD, H773_V774insNPH and H773_V774insH) to mobocertinib in the presence of N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea and searched for secondary EGFR mutations. We evaluated the efficacies of several EGFR X20ins inhibitors, including zipalertinib and sunvozertinib, against cells with acquired resistant mutations.

RESULTS

All secondary mutations resulting in acquired resistance to mobocertinib were exclusively C797S in insFQEA and insSVD. However, in the case of other X20ins (insASV, insNPH, and insH), T790M or C797S secondary mutations contributed to acquired resistance to mobocertinib. The emergence of T790M was more frequent in cells treated with lower drug concentrations. Sunvozertinib exhibited good activity against resistant cells with T790M. Cells with C797S were refractory to all EGFR TKIs, except for erlotinib, which was active for insFQEA with C797S.

CONCLUSIONS

T790M or C797S, depending on the original X20ins mutations, conferred acquired resistance to mobocertinib. Sunvozertinib may be the treatment of choice for patients with tumors resistant to mobocertinib because of T790M.

Amivantamab compared with real-world therapies in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer EGFR Exon 20 insertion mutations after platinum-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

In the single-arm CHRYSALIS trial, advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion (Exon 20ins) showed durable responses to amivantamab, an EGFR-MET bispecific antibody targeting tumors with EGFR Exon 20ins. This study compared the effectiveness of amivantamab to real-world systemic anti-cancer therapies in Japan.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

External control patients were selected by applying CHRYSALIS eligibility to Japanese patients from LC-SCRUM-Asia. External control patients were included for every qualifying line of therapy after platinum-based chemotherapy. Propensity score weighting was applied to external control patients to adjust for differences in baseline characteristics. Outcomes were compared between external control patients, and all and Asian-only CHRYSALIS patients using weighted Cox proportional hazards regression models for progression-free survival (PFS), time to next therapy (TTNT), and overall survival (OS), and generalized estimating equations with repeated measurements for overall response rate (ORR).

RESULTS

One hundred fifteen CHRYSALIS and 94 external control patients were identified. Compared to external control patients, amivantamab-treated patients had significantly longer OS (median OS 19.88 vs 14.09 months, HR [95% CI] 0.59 [0.40-0.88]), PFS (median PFS 6.74 vs 4.73 months, HR 0.59 [0.45-0.78]), TTNT (median TTNT 12.16 vs 5.09 months, HR 0.39 [0.29-0.53]), and significantly higher ORR (41.7% vs 14.1%). Analyses of amivantamab-treated Asian patients (n = 61) showed similar clinical benefits.

CONCLUSION

In the absence of clinical evidence from randomized clinical trials, this study reflects the benefit of amivantamab after platinum-based chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring EGFR Exon 20ins, compared to current real-world therapies.

Amivantamab plus Chemotherapy in NSCLC with EGFR Exon 20 Insertions

BACKGROUND

Amivantamab has been approved for the treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertions who have had disease progression during or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Phase 1 data showed the safety and antitumor activity of amivantamab plus carboplatin-pemetrexed (chemotherapy). Additional data on this combination therapy are needed.

METHODS

In this phase 3, international, randomized trial, we assigned in a 1:1 ratio patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions who had not received previous systemic therapy to receive intravenous amivantamab plus chemotherapy (amivantamab-chemotherapy) or chemotherapy alone. The primary outcome was progression-free survival according to blinded independent central review. Patients in the chemotherapy group who had disease progression were allowed to cross over to receive amivantamab monotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 308 patients underwent randomization (153 to receive amivantamab-chemotherapy and 155 to receive chemotherapy alone). Progression-free survival was significantly longer in the amivantamab-chemotherapy group than in the chemotherapy group (median, 11.4 months and 6.7 months, respectively; hazard ratio for disease progression or death, 0.40; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.53; P<0.001). At 18 months, progression-free survival was reported in 31% of the patients in the amivantamab-chemotherapy group and in 3% in the chemotherapy group; a complete or partial response at data cutoff was reported in 73% and 47%, respectively (rate ratio, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.32 to 1.68; P<0.001). In the interim overall survival analysis (33% maturity), the hazard ratio for death for amivantamab-chemotherapy as compared with chemotherapy was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.42 to 1.09; P = 0.11). The predominant adverse events associated with amivantamab-chemotherapy were reversible hematologic and EGFR-related toxic effects; 7% of patients discontinued amivantamab owing to adverse reactions.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of amivantamab-chemotherapy resulted in superior efficacy as compared with chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment of patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; PAPILLON ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04538664.).

Epidemiological characteristics and therapeutic advances of EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer

The third most prevalent type of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation, EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins), involves 2%-12% of all cases of EGFR-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Approximately 90% of the mutations occur within the loop structure region, and the most frequently reported subtypes are A767_V769dup and S768_D770dup, which together account for almost 50% of instances. Apart from the unique subtype of A763_Y764insFQEA, NSCLCs with EGFRex20ins are resistant to approved EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and are also insensitive to chemotherapy or immunotherapy. A new modality of treatment for NSCLC patients with EGFRx20ins has been established with the approval of mobocertinib and amivantamab. There are also numerous novel targeted treatments for NSCLC with EGFRex20ins in development, which are anticipated to improve this patient population's survival even further. This review provides a reference for the clinical management of these patients by summarizing the most recent epidemiological, and clinicopathological characteristics, diagnostic techniques, and therapeutic advances of EGFRex20ins in NSCLC.

A comprehensive overview of the heterogeneity of EGFR exon 20 variants in NSCLC and (pre)clinical activity to currently available treatments

Activating EGFR mutations are commonly observed in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). About 4-10 % of all activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are heterogenous in-frame deletion and/or insertion mutations clustering within exon 20 (EGFRex20+). NSCLC patients with EGFRex20+ mutations are treated as a single disease entity, irrespective of the type and location of the mutation. Here, we provide a comprehensive assessment of the literature reporting both in vitro and clinical drug sensitivity across different EGFRex20+ mutations. The activating A763_Y764insFQEA mutation has a better tumor response in comparison with mutations in the near- and far regions directly following the C-helix and should therefore be treated differently. For other EGFRex20+ mutations marked differences in treatment responses have been reported indicating the need for a classification beyond the exon-based classification. A further classification can be achieved using a structure-function modeling approach and experimental data using patient-derived cell lines. The detailed overview of TKI responses for each EGFRex20+ mutation can assist treating physicians to select the most optimal drug for individual NSCLC patients.

EGFR exon20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical implications and recent advances in targeted therapies

The advent of targeted therapies for oncogenic mutations has led to a major paradigm shift in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular targets, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations in the region of exons 18 through 21 are the most common oncogenic driver in NSCLC. Classical activating mutations, such as in-frame deletions in exon 19 and point mutations in exon 21 (L858R), are strong predictors for good clinical response to the approved EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, low frequency mutations occurring within exon 20 (ex20ins) have poorer responses to first/second generation EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins are known to have poorer prognosis than those with other EGFR-TKI sensitive mutations, leading to unmet clinical need of novel specific therapeutic options. Rapid changes in molecular diagnostics identifying specific causes have hastened the translation of diagnostic recommendations into clinical practice. Emergence of treatment strategies targeting EGFR ex20ins, such as newer EGFR-TKIs with increased specificity and novel approaches using bispecific monoclonal antibodies, may hold promising therapeutic options in the near future. In this review, we describe the structural, molecular characteristics, and detection strategies of EGFR ex20ins mutations and summarize the latest clinical data on approved treatments and emerging therapies for patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. Further, we will discuss the response heterogeneity of ex20ins mutations to new drugs and acquired drug resistance mechanisms.

Concomitant EGFR Mutations and ALK Rearrangements in Lung Adenocarcinoma Treated With Osimertinib

Lung cancer is the third most common cancer in addition to being the cancer responsible for the most annual deaths in the United States, comprising 15% of all diagnosed cancers, and 28% of all cancer deaths in 2020. Major advances in survival are because of gene sequencing and the advent of targeted biological therapy. The prevalence of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations coexisting with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements is quite low. However, the clinical relevance and effective treatment of these cancers require further investigation. This case series describes two patients diagnosed with stage IV adenocarcinoma with coexisting EGFR and ALK rearrangements. In Case 1, a 73-year-old male presented with worsening ataxia and headaches. In Case 2, a 64-year-old female presented with worsening dyspnea. Molecular studies revealed ALK gene fusion and the L861Q EGFR mutation in Case 1 and L858R EGFR mutation and ALK gene fusion in Case 2. Both patients received a gamma knife and an EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), osimertinib. In one of the cases, following the discovery of new brain metastases, the dose of osimertinib was increased from 80 to 160 mg. The patient passed away nine months after beginning EGFR-TKI treatment, one month after increasing the dose. The second patient experienced a significant interval reduction in the size of enhancing metastasis in both the right frontal and left parietal lobe after four months of EGFR-TKI treatment. The cases of coexisting EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements are quite rare, and treatment can be challenging. Here, EGFR-TKI had a mixed response among our patients.

An in vitro model and the underlying pathways of sinonasal inverted papilloma development

Recently, the specific association between Sinonasal inverted papilloma (SIP) and EGFR exon 20 mutations has been reported. To investigate the link between specific EGFR mutations and SIP development, we established organotypic raft culture system using nasal polyp-derived immortalized NP2 (iNP2) cells expressing EGFR exon 20 mutants or an exon 19 mutant, and SIP-derived iIP4 cells harboring P772_H773insPYNP mutation. In the raft culture, iIP4 cells showed the inverted growth pattern characteristic to SIP. Interestingly, iNP2 cells expressing EGFR exon 20 duplication mutants, S768_D770dup and N771_H773dup, but not of EGFR exon 19 mutant, E746_A750del, showed the inverted growth pattern. Enhanced activation of the PI3K/AKT signaling pathway was observed in iNP2_S768_D770dup and iIP4 cells, while increased MAPK signaling was found in iNP2_N771_H773dup. Increased cell migration and invasion were found in all cells carrying EGFR mutations when compared to iNP2 cells, and this effect was inhibited by either PI3K or MEK inhibitor. Notably, iNP2 cells expressing the N771_H773dup mutant showed the highest migration and invasion abilities. These results suggest that specific mutations in EGFR exon 20 play a crucial role in SIP development, partially though hyper-activation of the PI3K/AKT and MAPK signaling pathways. This study presents the first in vitro model for SIP development, which could facilitate further investigations into SIP pathogenesis and preclinical studies for new therapeutic agents.

Real-World Response and Outcomes in Patients With NSCLC With EGFR Exon 20 Insertion Mutations

Introduction

This study describes treatment patterns and outcomes in patients with NSCLC with EGFR exon 20 insertions (EGFRex20ins) in the United States.

Methods

The Flatiron Health electronic health record database was used to select three cohorts among patients diagnosed with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins (January 1, 2011-February 29, 2020): (1) first-line (1L) or patients receiving 1L therapy after documented EGFRex20ins; (2) second or later-line (≥2L) or patients receiving ≥2L therapy after documented EGFRex20ins; and (3) ≥2L postplatinum trial-aligned, or ≥2L patients previously treated with platinum chemotherapy whose baseline characteristics aligned with key eligibility criteria (initiating new treatment after documented EGFRex20ins and ≥1 previous treatment excluding mobocertinib or amivantamab) of the mobocertinib trial NCT02716116. Real-world end points were confirmed overall response rate, overall survival, and progression-free survival.

Results

Of 237 patients with EGFRex20ins-mutated NSCLC, 129 and 114 patients were included in the 1L and ≥2L cohorts, respectively. In 1L patients, platinum chemotherapy plus nonplatinum chemotherapy (31.0%) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (28.7%) were the most common regimens. In ≥2L patients, immuno-oncology monotherapy (28.1%) and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (17.5%) were the most common index treatments. For any 1L, ≥2L, and ≥2L postplatinum trial-aligned patients, the confirmed overall response rate was 18.6%, 9.6%, and 14.0%, respectively; the median overall survival was 17.0, 13.6, and 11.5 months; the median progression-free survival was 5.2, 3.7, and 3.3 months, respectively.

Conclusions

The outcomes for patients with NSCLC with EGFRex20ins were poor. This real-world study provides a benchmark on treatment outcomes in this patient population and highlights the unmet need for improved therapeutic options.

Structural Mechanism and Inhibitors Targeting EGFR Exon 20 Insertion (Ex20ins) Mutations

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) targeted therapy is one of the most important and effective strategies to combat EGFR mutant nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, a substantial number of patients bearing EGFR exon 20 insertion (Ex20ins) mutations respond poorly to common EGFR targeted therapies. This clinical need remained unmet until recently, when the EGFR Ex20ins mutation inhibitor mobocertinib was approved by the FDA. Despite this progress, the structural mechanisms of EGFR Ex20ins mutation resistance and characterization of inhibitor binding modes have not been systematically summarized. Herein, we analyze the structural mechanisms for ligand binding and resistance and summarize recent developments for the reported inhibitors of EGFR Ex20ins mutations. Furthermore, this Perspective aims to provide insights for the design of the next generation of EGFR Ex20ins inhibitors.