1
|
Zhang S, Yang L, Xu W, Wang Y, Han L, Zhao G, Cai T. Predicting the risk of lung cancer using machine learning: A large study based on UK Biobank. Medicine (Baltimore) 2024; 103:e37879. [PMID: 38640268 PMCID: PMC11029993 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000037879] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 02/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/21/2024] Open
Abstract
In response to the high incidence and poor prognosis of lung cancer, this study tends to develop a generalizable lung-cancer prediction model by using machine learning to define high-risk groups and realize the early identification and prevention of lung cancer. We included 467,888 participants from UK Biobank, using lung cancer incidence as an outcome variable, including 49 previously known high-risk factors and less studied or unstudied predictors. We developed multivariate prediction models using multiple machine learning models, namely logistic regression, naïve Bayes, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting models. The performance of the models was evaluated by calculating the areas under their receiver operating characteristic curves, Brier loss, log loss, precision, recall, and F1 scores. The Shapley additive explanations interpreter was used to visualize the models. Three were ultimately 4299 cases of lung cancer that were diagnosed in our sample. The model containing all the predictors had good predictive power, and the extreme gradient boosting model had the best performance with an area under curve of 0.998. New important predictive factors for lung cancer were also identified, namely hip circumference, waist circumference, number of cigarettes previously smoked daily, neuroticism score, age, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second. The predictive model established by incorporating novel predictive factors can be of value in the early identification of lung cancer. It may be helpful in stratifying individuals and selecting those at higher risk for inclusion in screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Siqi Zhang
- The Second School of Clinical Medicine, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Liangwei Yang
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Weiwen Xu
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Yue Wang
- School of Public Health, Medical College of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Liyuan Han
- Center for Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Epidemiology and Translational Medicine, Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China
| | - Guofang Zhao
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Ningbo No. 2 Hospital, Ningbo, China
| | - Ting Cai
- Center for Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Epidemiology and Translational Medicine, Ningbo Institute of Life and Health Industry, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Ningbo, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Xue F, Sui X, Han W, Song W, Jiang J. Personalised follow-up and management schema for patients with screen-detected pulmonary nodules: A dynamic modelling study. Pulmonology 2024:S2531-0437(24)00040-0. [PMID: 38614860 DOI: 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2023] [Revised: 02/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/29/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selecting the time target for follow-up testing in lung cancer screening is challenging. We aim to devise dynamic, personalized lung cancer screening schema for patients with pulmonary nodules detected through low-dose computed tomography. METHODS We developed and validated dynamic models using data of pulmonary nodule patients (aged 55-74 years) from the National Lung Screening Trial. We predicted patient-specific risk profiles at baseline (R0) and updated the risk evaluation results in repeated screening rounds (R1 and R2). We used risk cutoffs to optimize time-dependent sensitivity at an early decision point (3 months) and time-dependent specificity at a late decision point (1 year). RESULTS In validation, area under receiver operating characteristic curve for predicting 12-month lung cancer onset was 0.867 (95 % confidence interval: 0.827-0.894) and 0.807 (0.765-0.948) at R0 and R1-R2, respectively. The personalized schema, compared with National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guideline and Lung-RADS, yielded lower rates of delayed diagnosis (1.7% vs. 1.7% vs. 6.9 %) and over-testing (4.9% vs. 5.6% vs. 5.6 %) at R0, and lower rates of delayed diagnosis (0.0% vs. 18.2% vs. 18.2 %) and over-testing (2.6% vs. 8.3% vs. 7.3 %) at R2. Earlier test recommendation among cancer patients was more frequent using the personalized schema (vs. NCCN: 29.8% vs. 20.9 %, p = 0.0065; vs. Lung-RADS: 33.2% vs. 22.8 %, p = 0.0025), especially for women, patients aged ≥65 years, and part-solid or non-solid nodules. CONCLUSIONS The personalized schema is easy-to-implement and more accurate compared with rule-based protocols. The results highlight value of personalized approaches in realizing efficient nodule management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Wang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College. No. 5 Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China; Peking University People's Hospital, Peking University Hepatology Institute, Beijing Key Laboratory of Hepatitis C and Immunotherapy for Liver Diseases. No. 11 Xizhimen South Street, Beijing, China
| | - F Xue
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College. No. 5 Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - X Sui
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. No.1 Shuaifuyuan Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - W Han
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College. No. 5 Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - W Song
- Department of Radiology, Peking Union Medical College Hospital. No.1 Shuaifuyuan Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China
| | - J Jiang
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, School of Basic Medicine, Peking Union Medical College. No. 5 Dongdansantiao Street, Dongcheng District, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Antonicelli A, Muriana P, Favaro G, Mangiameli G, Lanza E, Profili M, Bianchi F, Fina E, Ferrante G, Ghislandi S, Pistillo D, Finocchiaro G, Condorelli G, Lembo R, Novellis P, Dieci E, De Santis S, Veronesi G. The Smokers Health Multiple ACtions (SMAC-1) Trial: Study Design and Results of the Baseline Round. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:417. [PMID: 38254906 PMCID: PMC10814085 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020417] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2023] [Revised: 01/13/2024] [Accepted: 01/15/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer screening with low-dose helical computed tomography (LDCT) reduces mortality in high-risk subjects. Cigarette smoking is linked to up to 90% of lung cancer deaths. Even more so, it is a key risk factor for many other cancers and cardiovascular and pulmonary diseases. The Smokers health Multiple ACtions (SMAC-1) trial aimed to demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of an integrated program based on the early detection of smoking-related thoraco-cardiovascular diseases in high-risk subjects, combined with primary prevention. A new multi-component screening design was utilized to strengthen the framework on conventional lung cancer screening programs. We report here the study design and the results from our baseline round, focusing on oncological findings. METHODS High-risk subjects were defined as being >55 years of age and active smokers or formers who had quit within 15 years (>30 pack/y). A PLCOm2012 threshold >2% was chosen. Subject outreach was streamlined through media campaign and general practitioners' engagement. Eligible subjects, upon written informed consent, underwent a psychology consultation, blood sample collection, self-evaluation questionnaire, spirometry, and LDCT scan. Blood samples were analyzed for pentraxin-3 protein levels, interleukins, microRNA, and circulating tumor cells. Cardiovascular risk assessment and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scoring were performed. Direct and indirect costs were analyzed focusing on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio per quality-adjusted life years gained in different scenarios. Personalized screening time-intervals were determined using the "Maisonneuve risk re-calculation model", and a threshold <0.6% was chosen for the biennial round. RESULTS In total, 3228 subjects were willing to be enrolled. Out of 1654 eligible subjects, 1112 participated. The mean age was 64 years (M/F 62/38%), with a mean PLCOm2012 of 5.6%. Former and active smokers represented 23% and 77% of the subjects, respectively. At least one nodule was identified in 348 subjects. LDCTs showed no clinically significant findings in 762 subjects (69%); thus, they were referred for annual/biennial LDCTs based on the Maisonneuve risk (mean value = 0.44%). Lung nodule active surveillance was indicated for 122 subjects (11%). Forty-four subjects with baseline suspicious nodules underwent a PET-FDG and twenty-seven a CT-guided lung biopsy. Finally, a total of 32 cancers were diagnosed, of which 30 were lung cancers (2.7%) and 2 were extrapulmonary cancers (malignant pleural mesothelioma and thymoma). Finally, 25 subjects underwent lung surgery (2.25%). Importantly, there were zero false positives and two false negatives with CT-guided biopsy, of which the patients were operated on with no stage shift. The final pathology included lung adenocarcinomas (69%), squamous cell carcinomas (10%), and others (21%). Pathological staging showed 14 stage I (47%) and 16 stage II-IV (53%) cancers. CONCLUSIONS LDCTs continue to confirm their efficacy in safely detecting early-stage lung cancer in high-risk subjects, with a negligible risk of false-positive results. Re-calculating the risk of developing lung cancer after baseline LDCTs with the Maisonneuve model allows us to optimize time intervals to subsequent screening. The Smokers health Multiple ACtions (SMAC-1) trial offers solid support for policy assessments by policymakers. We trust that this will help in developing guidelines for the large-scale implementation of lung cancer screening, paving the way for better outcomes for lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Antonicelli
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, School of Thoracic Surgery, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.A.); (G.V.)
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.N.); (E.D.); (S.D.S.)
| | - Piergiorgio Muriana
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.N.); (E.D.); (S.D.S.)
| | - Giovanni Favaro
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, IRCCS Istituto Oncologico Veneto (IOV), 35128 Padua, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Mangiameli
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (G.M.); (E.F.)
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (E.L.); (G.F.); (G.C.)
| | - Ezio Lanza
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (E.L.); (G.F.); (G.C.)
- Department of Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Rozzano, Italy;
| | - Manuel Profili
- Department of Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, 20089 Rozzano, Italy;
| | - Fabrizio Bianchi
- Unit of Cancer Biomarkers, Fondazione IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza, 71013 San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy;
| | - Emanuela Fina
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy; (G.M.); (E.F.)
| | - Giuseppe Ferrante
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (E.L.); (G.F.); (G.C.)
- Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Simone Ghislandi
- CERGAS and Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy;
| | - Daniela Pistillo
- Center for Biological Resources, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy;
| | - Giovanna Finocchiaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Humanitas Cancer Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy;
| | - Gianluigi Condorelli
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy; (E.L.); (G.F.); (G.C.)
- Cardio Center, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, 20089 Rozzano, Italy
| | - Rosalba Lembo
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Section of Biostatistics, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.N.); (E.D.); (S.D.S.)
| | - Elisa Dieci
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.N.); (E.D.); (S.D.S.)
| | - Simona De Santis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.N.); (E.D.); (S.D.S.)
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, School of Thoracic Surgery, Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (A.A.); (G.V.)
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy; (P.N.); (E.D.); (S.D.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Susai CJ, Velotta JB, Sakoda LC. Clinical Adjuncts to Lung Cancer Screening: A Narrative Review. Thorac Surg Clin 2023; 33:421-432. [PMID: 37806744 PMCID: PMC10926946 DOI: 10.1016/j.thorsurg.2023.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/10/2023]
Abstract
The updated US Preventive Services Task Force guidelines on lung cancer screening have significantly expanded the population of screening eligible adults, among whom the balance of benefits and harms associated with lung cancer screening vary considerably. Clinical adjuncts are additional information and tools that can guide decision-making to optimally screen individuals who are most likely to benefit. Proposed adjuncts include integration of clinical history, risk prediction models, shared-decision-making tools, and biomarker tests at key steps in the screening process. Although evidence regarding their clinical utility and implementation is still evolving, they carry significant promise in optimizing screening effectiveness and efficiency for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia J Susai
- UCSF East Bay General Surgery, 1411 East 31st Street QIC 22134, Oakland, CA 94612, USA
| | - Jeffrey B Velotta
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 3600 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94611, USA
| | - Lori C Sakoda
- Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Northern California, 2000 Broadway, Oakland, CA 94612, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Several randomized and observational studies on lung cancer screening held in Europe significantly contributed to the knowledge on low-dose computed tomography screening targets in high-risk individuals with smoking history and older than 50 years. In particular, steps forward have been made in the field of risk modeling, screening interval, diagnostic protocol with volumetry, optimization, overdiagnosis estimation, oncological outcome, oncological risk due to radiation exposure, recruitment, and communication strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piergiorgio Muriana
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Francesca Rossetti
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Via Olgettina 60, Milan 20132, Italy; School of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Via Olgettina 48, Milan 20132, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
陈 睿, 王 静, 王 硕, 唐 思, 索 晨. [Construction of a Risk Prediction Model for Lung Cancer Based on Lifestyle Behaviors in the UK Biobank Large-Scale Population Cohort]. SICHUAN DA XUE XUE BAO. YI XUE BAN = JOURNAL OF SICHUAN UNIVERSITY. MEDICAL SCIENCE EDITION 2023; 54:892-898. [PMID: 37866943 PMCID: PMC10579072 DOI: 10.12182/20230960209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Indexed: 10/24/2023]
Abstract
Objective To identify the risk factors related to lifestyle behaviors that affect the incidence of lung cancer, to build a lung cancer risk prediction model to identify, in the population, individuals who are at high risk, and to facilitate the early detection of lung cancer. Methods The data used in the study were obtained from the UK Biobank, a database that contains information collected from 502 389 participants between March 2006 and October 2010. Based on domestic and international guidelines for lung cancer screening and high-quality research literature on lung cancer risk factors, high-risk population identification criteria were determined. Univariate Cox regression was performed to screen for risk factors of lung cancer and a multifactor lung cancer risk prediction model was constructed using Cox proportional hazards regression. Based on the comparison of Akaike information criterion and Schoenfeld residual test results, the optimal fitted model assuming proportional hazards was selected. The multiple factor Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to consider the survival time and the population was randomly divided into a training set and a validation set by a ratio of 7:3. The model was built using the training set and the performance of the model was internally validated using the validation set. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve ( AUC) was used to evaluate the efficacy of the model. The population was categorized into low-risk, moderate-risk, and high-risk groups based on the probability of occurrence of 0% to <25%, 25% to <75%, and 75% to 100%. The respective proportions of affected individuals in each risk group were calculated. Results The study eventually covered 453 558 individuals, and out of the cumulative follow-up of 5 505 402 person-years, a total of 2 330 cases of lung cancer were diagnosed. Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to identify 10 independent variables as predictors of lung cancer, including age, body mass index (BMI), education, income, physical activity, smoking status, alcohol consumption frequency, fresh fruit intake, family history of cancer, and tobacco exposure, and a model was established accordingly. Internal validation results showed that 8 independent variables (all the 10 independent variables screened out except for BMI and fresh fruit intake) were significant influencing factors of lung cancer ( P<0.05). The AUC of the training set for predicting lung cancer occurrence at one year, five years, and ten years were 0.825, 0.785, and 0.777, respectively. The AUC of the validation set for predicting lung cancer occurrence at one year, five years, and ten years were 0.857, 0.782, and 0.765, respectively. 68.38% of the individuals who might develop lung cancer in the future could be identified by screening the high-risk population. Conclusion We established, in this study, a model for predicting lung cancer risks associated with lifestyle behaviors of a large population. Showing good performance in discriminatory ability, the model can be used as a tool for developing standardized screening strategies for lung cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- 睿琳 陈
- 复旦大学公共卫生学院 流行病学教研室 (上海 200032)Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - 静茹 王
- 复旦大学公共卫生学院 流行病学教研室 (上海 200032)Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - 硕 王
- 复旦大学公共卫生学院 流行病学教研室 (上海 200032)Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - 思琦 唐
- 复旦大学公共卫生学院 流行病学教研室 (上海 200032)Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
| | - 晨 索
- 复旦大学公共卫生学院 流行病学教研室 (上海 200032)Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety of Ministry of Education, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- 上海市重大传染病和生物安全研究院 (上海 200032)Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai 200032, China
- 复旦大学泰州健康科学研究院 (泰州 225316)Fudan University Taizhou Institute of Health Sciences, Taizhou 225316, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Guo L, Meng Q, Zheng L, Chen Q, Liu Y, Xu H, Kang R, Zhang L, Liu S, Sun X, Zhang S. Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Nomogram in Nonsmoking Chinese Women: Retrospective Cross-sectional Cohort Study. JMIR Public Health Surveill 2023; 9:e41640. [PMID: 36607729 PMCID: PMC9862335 DOI: 10.2196/41640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is believed that smoking is not the cause of approximately 53% of lung cancers diagnosed in women globally. OBJECTIVE The study aimed to develop and validate a simple and noninvasive model that could assess and stratify lung cancer risk in nonsmoking Chinese women. METHODS Based on the population-based Cancer Screening Program in Urban China, this retrospective, cross-sectional cohort study was carried out with a vast population base and an immense number of participants. The training set and the validation set were both constructed using a random distribution of the data. Following the identification of associated risk factors by multivariable Cox regression analysis, a predictive nomogram was developed. Discrimination (area under the curve) and calibration were further performed to assess the validation of risk prediction nomogram in the training set, which was then validated in the validation set. RESULTS In sum, 151,834 individuals signed up to take part in the survey. Both the training set (n=75,917) and the validation set (n=75,917) were comprised of randomly selected participants. Potential predictors for lung cancer included age, history of chronic respiratory disease, first-degree family history of lung cancer, menopause, and history of benign breast disease. We displayed 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year lung cancer risk-predicting nomograms using these 5 factors. In the training set, the 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year lung cancer risk areas under the curve were 0.762, 0.718, and 0.703, respectively. In the validation set, the model showed a moderate predictive discrimination. CONCLUSIONS We designed and validated a simple and noninvasive lung cancer risk model for nonsmoking women. This model can be applied to identify and triage people at high risk for developing lung cancers among nonsmoking women.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanwei Guo
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qingcheng Meng
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Liyang Zheng
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qiong Chen
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yin Liu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Huifang Xu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Ruihua Kang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Luyao Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shuzheng Liu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xibin Sun
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shaokai Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University & Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Yang X, Wisselink HJ, Vliegenthart R, Heuvelmans MA, Groen HJM, Vonder M, Dorrius MD, de Bock GH. Association between Chest CT-defined Emphysema and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Radiology 2022; 304:322-330. [PMID: 35503012 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.212904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Background Given the different methods of assessing emphysema, controversy exists as to whether it is associated with lung cancer. Purpose To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the association between chest CT-defined emphysema and the presence of lung cancer. Materials and Methods The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched up to July 15, 2021, to identify studies on the association between emphysema assessed visually or quantitatively with CT and lung cancer. Associations were determined by emphysema severity (trace, mild, or moderate to severe, assessed visually and quantitatively) and subtype (centrilobular and paraseptal, assessed visually). Overall and stratified pooled odds ratios (ORs) with their 95% CIs were obtained. Results Of the 3343 screened studies, 21 studies (107 082 patients) with 26 subsets were included. The overall pooled ORs for lung cancer given the presence of emphysema were 2.3 (95% CI: 2.0, 2.6; I2 = 35%; 19 subsets) and 1.02 (95% CI: 1.01, 1.02; six subsets) per 1% increase in low attenuation area. Studies with visual (pooled OR, 2.3; 95% CI: 1.9, 2.6; I2 = 48%; 12 subsets) and quantitative (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.8, 2.8; I2 = 3.7%; eight subsets) assessments yielded comparable results for the dichotomous assessment. Based on six studies (1716 patients), the pooled ORs for lung cancer increased with emphysema severity and were higher for visual assessment (2.5, 3.7, and 4.5 for trace, mild, and moderate to severe, respectively) than for quantitative assessment (1.9, 2.2, and 2.5) based on point estimates. Compared with no emphysema, only centrilobular emphysema (three studies) was associated with lung cancer (pooled OR, 2.2; 95% CI: 1.5, 3.2; P < .001). Conclusion Both visual and quantitative CT assessments of emphysema were associated with a higher odds of lung cancer, which also increased with emphysema severity. Regarding subtype, only centrilobular emphysema was significantly associated with lung cancer. Clinical trial registration no. CRD42021262163 © RSNA, 2022 See also the editorial by Hunsaker in this issue. Online supplemental material is available for this article.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofei Yang
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hendrik Joost Wisselink
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Vonder
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Monique D Dorrius
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Geertruida H de Bock
- From the Departments of Epidemiology (X.Y., M.A.H., M.V., M.D.D., G.H.d.B.), Radiology (H.J.W., R.V., M.D.D.), and Pulmonary Diseases (H.J.M.G.), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9700 RB Groningen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pérez-Morales J, Lu H, Mu W, Tunali I, Kutuk T, Eschrich SA, Balagurunathan Y, Gillies RJ, Schabath MB. Volume doubling time and radiomic features predict tumor behavior of screen-detected lung cancers. Cancer Biomark 2022; 33:489-501. [DOI: 10.3233/cbm-210194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Image-based biomarkers could have translational implications by characterizing tumor behavior of lung cancers diagnosed during lung cancer screening. In this study, peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics and volume doubling time (VDT) were used to identify high-risk subsets of lung patients diagnosed in lung cancer screening that are associated with poor survival outcomes. METHODS: Data and images were acquired from the National Lung Screening Trial. VDT was calculated between two consequent screening intervals approximately 1 year apart; peritumoral and intratumoral radiomics were extracted from the baseline screen. Overall survival (OS) was the main endpoint. Classification and Regression Tree analyses identified the most predictive covariates to classify patient outcomes. RESULTS: Decision tree analysis stratified patients into three risk-groups (low, intermediate, and high) based on VDT and one radiomic feature (compactness). High-risk patients had extremely poor survival outcomes (hazard ratio [HR] = 8.15; 25% 5-year OS) versus low-risk patients (HR = 1.00; 83.3% 5-year OS). Among early-stage lung cancers, high-risk patients had poor survival outcomes (HR = 9.07; 44.4% 5-year OS) versus the low-risk group (HR = 1.00; 90.9% 5-year OS). For VDT, the decision tree analysis identified a novel cut-point of 279 days and using this cut-point VDT alone discriminated between aggressive (HR = 4.18; 45% 5-year OS) versus indolent/low-risk cancers (HR = 1.00; 82.8% 5-year OS). CONCLUSION: We utilized peritumoral and intratumoral radiomic features and VDT to generate a model that identify a high-risk group of screen-detected lung cancers associated with poor survival outcomes. These vulnerable subset of screen-detected lung cancers may be candidates for more aggressive surveillance/follow-up and treatment, such as adjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaileene Pérez-Morales
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Hong Lu
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Wei Mu
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Ilke Tunali
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Tugce Kutuk
- Department of Radiation Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Steven A. Eschrich
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Yoganand Balagurunathan
- Department of Bioinformatics and Biostatistics, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Robert J. Gillies
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| | - Matthew B. Schabath
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Garau N, Orro A, Summers P, De Maria L, Bertolotti R, Bassis D, Minotti M, De Fiori E, Baroni G, Paganelli C, Rampinelli C. Integrating Biological and Radiological Data in a Structured Repository: a Data Model Applied to the COSMOS Case Study. J Digit Imaging 2022; 35:970-982. [PMID: 35296941 PMCID: PMC9485502 DOI: 10.1007/s10278-022-00615-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Revised: 02/17/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Integrating the information coming from biological samples with digital data, such as medical images, has gained prominence with the advent of precision medicine. Research in this field faces an ever-increasing amount of data to manage and, as a consequence, the need to structure these data in a functional and standardized fashion to promote and facilitate cooperation among institutions. Inspired by the Minimum Information About BIobank data Sharing (MIABIS), we propose an extended data model which aims to standardize data collections where both biological and digital samples are involved. In the proposed model, strong emphasis is given to the cause-effect relationships among factors as these are frequently encountered in clinical workflows. To test the data model in a realistic context, we consider the Continuous Observation of SMOking Subjects (COSMOS) dataset as case study, consisting of 10 consecutive years of lung cancer screening and follow-up on more than 5000 subjects. The structure of the COSMOS database, implemented to facilitate the process of data retrieval, is therefore presented along with a description of data that we hope to share in a public repository for lung cancer screening research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Garau
- Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Informazione E Bioingegneria, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy. .,Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Alessandro Orro
- Institute for Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council (ITB-CNR), Segrate, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenza De Maria
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Bertolotti
- Division of Data Management, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Danny Bassis
- School of Medicine, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Minotti
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Elvio De Fiori
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Informazione E Bioingegneria, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento Di Elettronica, Informazione E Bioingegneria, Politecnico Di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Guo LW, Lyu ZY, Meng QC, Zheng LY, Chen Q, Liu Y, Xu HF, Kang RH, Zhang LY, Cao XQ, Liu SZ, Sun XB, Zhang JG, Zhang SK. Construction and Validation of a Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model for Non-Smokers in China. Front Oncol 2022; 11:766939. [PMID: 35059311 PMCID: PMC8764453 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.766939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 12/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background About 15% of lung cancers in men and 53% in women are not attributable to smoking worldwide. The aim was to develop and validate a simple and non-invasive model which could assess and stratify lung cancer risk in non-smokers in China. Methods A large-sample size, population-based study was conducted under the framework of the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC). Data on the lung cancer screening in Henan province, China, from October 2013 to October 2019 were used and randomly divided into the training and validation sets. Related risk factors were identified through multivariable Cox regression analysis, followed by establishment of risk prediction nomogram. Discrimination [area under the curve (AUC)] and calibration were further performed to assess the validation of risk prediction nomogram in the training set, and then validated by the validation set. Results A total of 214,764 eligible subjects were included, with a mean age of 55.19 years. Subjects were randomly divided into the training (107,382) and validation (107,382) sets. Elder age, being male, a low education level, family history of lung cancer, history of tuberculosis, and without a history of hyperlipidemia were the independent risk factors for lung cancer. Using these six variables, we plotted 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year lung cancer risk prediction nomogram. The AUC was 0.753, 0.752, and 0.755 for the 1-, 3- and 5-year lung cancer risk in the training set, respectively. In the validation set, the model showed a moderate predictive discrimination, with the AUC was 0.668, 0.678, and 0.685 for the 1-, 3- and 5-year lung cancer risk. Conclusions We developed and validated a simple and non-invasive lung cancer risk model in non-smokers. This model can be applied to identify and triage patients at high risk for developing lung cancers in non-smokers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan-Wei Guo
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Zhang-Yan Lyu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin’s Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Qing-Cheng Meng
- Department of Radiology, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Li-Yang Zheng
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Qiong Chen
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Yin Liu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Hui-Fang Xu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Rui-Hua Kang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Lu-Yao Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xiao-Qin Cao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shu-Zheng Liu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Xi-Bin Sun
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Jian-Gong Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
| | - Shao-Kai Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, Henan Cancer Hospital, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China
- *Correspondence: Shao-Kai Zhang,
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Guo LW, Lyu ZY, Meng QC, Zheng LY, Chen Q, Liu Y, Xu HF, Kang RH, Zhang LY, Cao XQ, Liu SZ, Sun XB, Zhang JG, Zhang SK. A risk prediction model for selecting high-risk population for computed tomography lung cancer screening in China. Lung Cancer 2021; 163:27-34. [PMID: 34894456 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.11.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2021] [Revised: 11/18/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Two large randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have demonstrated that low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening reduces lung cancer mortality. Risk-prediction models have been proved to select individuals for lung cancer screening effectively. With the focus on established risk factors for lung cancer routinely available in general cancer screening settings, we aimed to develop and internally validated a risk prediction model for lung cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS Using data from the Cancer Screening Program in Urban China (CanSPUC) in Henan province, China between 2013 and 2019, we conducted a prospective cohort study consisting of 282,254 participants including 126,445 males and 155,809 females. Detailed questionnaire, physical assessment and follow-up were completed for all participants. Using Cox proportional risk regression analysis, we developed the Henan Lung Cancer Risk Models based on simplified questionnaire. Model discrimination was evaluated by concordance statistics (C-statistics), and model calibration was evaluated by the bootstrap sampling, respectively. RESULTS By 2020, a total of 589 lung cancer cases occurred in the follow-up yielding an incident density of 64.91/100,000 person-years (pyrs). Age, gender, smoking, history of tuberculosis and history of emphysema were included into the model. The C-index of the model for 1-year lung cancer risk was 0.766 and 0.741 in the training set and validation set, respectively. In stratified analysis, the model showed better predictive power in males, younger participants, and former or current smoking participants. The model calibrated well across the deciles of predicted risk in both the overall population and all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS We developed and internally validated a simple risk prediction model for lung cancer, which may be useful to identify high-risk individuals for more intensive screening for cancer prevention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lan-Wei Guo
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Zhang-Yan Lyu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy of Tianjin, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Molecular Cancer Epidemiology of Tianjin, Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer Prevention and Therapy of the Ministry of Education, Tianjin, China
| | - Qing-Cheng Meng
- Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Li-Yang Zheng
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Qiong Chen
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Yin Liu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Hui-Fang Xu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Rui-Hua Kang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Lu-Yao Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Xiao-Qin Cao
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Shu-Zheng Liu
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Xi-Bin Sun
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Jian-Gong Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China
| | - Shao-Kai Zhang
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, Henan Engineering Research Center of Cancer Prevention and Control, Henan International Joint Laboratory of Cancer Prevention, The Affiliated Cancer Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Henan Cancer Hospital, Zhengzhou 450008, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Novellis P, Cominesi SR, Rossetti F, Mondoni M, Gregorc V, Veronesi G. Lung cancer screening: who pays? Who receives? The European perspectives. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2395-2406. [PMID: 34164287 PMCID: PMC8182705 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide, and its early detection is critical to achieving a curative treatment and to reducing mortality. Low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) is a highly sensitive technique for detecting noninvasive small lung tumors in high-risk populations. We here analyze the current status of lung cancer screening (LCS) from a European point of view. With economic burden of health care in most European countries resting on the state, it is important to reduce costs of screening and improve its effectiveness. Current cost-effectiveness analyses on LCS have indicated a favorable economic profile. The most recently published analysis reported an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €3,297 per 1 life-year gained adjusted for the quality of life (QALY) and €2,944 per life-year gained, demonstrating a 90% probability of ICER being below €15,000 and a 98.1% probability of being below €25,000. Different risk models have been used to identify the target population; among these, the PLCOM2012 in particular allows for the selection of the population to be screened with high sensitivity. Risk models should also be employed to define screening intervals, which can reduce the general number of LDCT scans after the baseline round. Future perspectives of screening in a European scenario are related to the will of the policy makers to implement policy on a large scale and to improve the effectiveness of a broad screening of smoking-related disease, including cardiovascular prevention, by measuring coronary calcium score on LDCT. The employment of artificial intelligence (AI) in imaging interpretation, the use of liquid biopsies for the characterization of CT-detected undetermined nodules, and less invasive, personalized surgical treatments, will improve the effectiveness of LCS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierluigi Novellis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Francesca Rossetti
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Michele Mondoni
- Department of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Respiratory Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Vanesa Gregorc
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.,Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Pinsky PF, Lau YK, Doubeni CA. Potential Disparities by Sex and Race or Ethnicity in Lung Cancer Screening Eligibility Rates. Chest 2021; 160:341-350. [PMID: 33545164 DOI: 10.1016/j.chest.2021.01.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2020] [Revised: 01/04/2021] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Criteria for low-dose CT scan lung cancer screening vary across guidelines. Knowledge of the eligible pool across demographic groups can enable policy and programmatic decision-making, particularly for disproportionately affected populations. RESEARCH QUESTION What are the eligibility rates for low-dose CT scan screening according to sex and race or ethnicity and how do these rates relate to corresponding lung cancer incidence rates? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS This was a cross-sectional study using data from the 2015 National Health Interview Survey adult and cancer control supplement files. In addition to eligibility rates, the ratio of the eligibility rate to the lung cancer incidence rate in a given population group (eligibility to incidence [E-I] ratio) also was determined. Guidelines assessed were: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, National Comprehensive Cancer Network, and US Preventive Services Task Force current or with expansion of age and smoking or quit thresholds. We also assessed a risk model (PLCOM2012 risk model). RESULTS Total numbers eligible based on current guidelines ranged from 8.3 to 13.3 million, representing 8.3% to 13.4% of the US population 50 to 80 years of age, and up to 17.5 million with expanded criteria. Overall eligibility rates on average were about 10 percentage points higher for men than women. For both men and women, and both overall and among ever smokers, non-Hispanic Whites had the highest eligibility rates across all guidelines, followed generally by non-Hispanic Blacks, and then Asians and Hispanics. Among both men and women, non-Hispanic Whites had the highest E-I ratios across all guidelines; non-Hispanic Black men had higher lung cancer incidence, but 30% to 50% lower E-I ratios, than non-Hispanic White men. INTERPRETATION Screening eligibility rates vary widely across guidelines, with disparities evident in E-I ratios, including among non-Hispanic Black men, despite higher lung cancer burden. Consideration of smoking duration in risk assessment criteria may address current disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul F Pinsky
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD.
| | - Yan Kwan Lau
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Chyke A Doubeni
- Department of Family Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN; Center for Health Equity and Community Engagement Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Rodríguez M, Ajona D, Seijo LM, Sanz J, Valencia K, Corral J, Mesa-Guzmán M, Pío R, Calvo A, Lozano MD, Zulueta JJ, Montuenga LM. Molecular biomarkers in early stage lung cancer. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:1165-1185. [PMID: 33718054 PMCID: PMC7947407 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Low dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening, together with the recent advances in targeted and immunotherapies, have shown to improve non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) survival. Furthermore, screening has increased the number of early stage-detected tumors, allowing for surgical resection and multimodality treatments when needed. The need for improved sensitivity and specificity of NSCLC screening has led to increased interest in combining clinical and radiological data with molecular data. The development of biomarkers is poised to refine inclusion criteria for LDCT screening programs. Biomarkers may also be useful to better characterize the risk of indeterminate nodules found in the course of screening or to refine prognosis and help in the management of screening detected tumors. The clinical implications of these biomarkers are still being investigated and whether or not biomarkers will be included in further decision-making algorithms in the context of screening and early lung cancer management still needs to be determined. However, it seems clear that there is much room for improvement even in early stage lung cancer disease-free survival (DFS) rates; thus, biomarkers may be the key to refine risk-stratification and treatment of these patients. Clinicians’ capacity to register, integrate, and analyze all the available data in both high risk individuals and early stage NSCLC patients will lead to a better understanding of the disease’s mechanisms, and will have a direct impact in diagnosis, treatment, and follow up of these patients. In this review, we aim to summarize all the available data regarding the role of biomarkers in LDCT screening and early stage NSCLC from a multidisciplinary perspective. We have highlighted clinical implications, the need to combine risk stratification, clinical data, radiomics, molecular information and artificial intelligence in order to improve clinical decision-making, especially regarding early diagnostics and adjuvant therapy. We also discuss current and future perspectives for biomarker implementation in routine clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- María Rodríguez
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Daniel Ajona
- Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis M Seijo
- Department of Pulmonology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Madrid, Spain
| | - Julián Sanz
- Department of Pathology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Karmele Valencia
- Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Jesús Corral
- Department of Oncology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | - Miguel Mesa-Guzmán
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Rubén Pío
- Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alfonso Calvo
- Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, Schools of Medicine and Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - María D Lozano
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, Schools of Medicine and Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Javier J Zulueta
- Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pulmonology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Luis M Montuenga
- Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.,Navarra Institute for Health Research (IdISNA), Pamplona, Spain.,Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer (CIBERONC), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, Schools of Medicine and Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Abstract
Robust evidence exists in support of lung cancer (LC) screening with low-dose computed tomography in patients at high risk of developing LC; however, judicious patient selection is necessary to obtain optimal benefit while minimizing harm. Several professional societies have published recommendations regarding patient selection criteria for screening. Multiple risk prediction models that include additional patient-specific risk factors have since been developed to more accurately predict risk of developing LC. Implementation of a new screening program requires thorough multidisciplinary planning and maintenance. Multisociety guidelines highlight 9 principal components to implement and maintain a successful program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nina A Thomas
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB Suite 816, MSC 630, Charleston, SC 29425, USA
| | - Nichole T Tanner
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, 96 Jonathan Lucas Street, CSB Suite 816, MSC 630, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; Health Equity and Rural Outreach Innovation Center (HEROIC), Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Hospital, 109 Bee Street, Charleston, SC 29401, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Toumazis I, Bastani M, Han SS, Plevritis SK. Risk-Based lung cancer screening: A systematic review. Lung Cancer 2020; 147:154-186. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2020] [Revised: 07/03/2020] [Accepted: 07/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
18
|
Veronesi G, Baldwin DR, Henschke CI, Ghislandi S, Iavicoli S, Oudkerk M, De Koning HJ, Shemesh J, Field JK, Zulueta JJ, Horgan D, Fiestas Navarrete L, Infante MV, Novellis P, Murray RL, Peled N, Rampinelli C, Rocco G, Rzyman W, Scagliotti GV, Tammemagi MC, Bertolaccini L, Triphuridet N, Yip R, Rossi A, Senan S, Ferrante G, Brain K, van der Aalst C, Bonomo L, Consonni D, Van Meerbeeck JP, Maisonneuve P, Novello S, Devaraj A, Saghir Z, Pelosi G. Recommendations for Implementing Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Europe. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1672. [PMID: 32599792 PMCID: PMC7352874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12061672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2020] [Revised: 06/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was demonstrated in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to reduce mortality from the disease. European mortality data has recently become available from the Nelson randomised controlled trial, which confirmed lung cancer mortality reductions by 26% in men and 39-61% in women. Recent studies in Europe and the USA also showed positive results in screening workers exposed to asbestos. All European experts attending the "Initiative for European Lung Screening (IELS)"-a large international group of physicians and other experts concerned with lung cancer-agreed that LDCT-LCS should be implemented in Europe. However, the economic impact of LDCT-LCS and guidelines for its effective and safe implementation still need to be formulated. To this purpose, the IELS was asked to prepare recommendations to implement LCS and examine outstanding issues. A subgroup carried out a comprehensive literature review on LDCT-LCS and presented findings at a meeting held in Milan in November 2018. The present recommendations reflect that consensus was reached.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Veronesi
- Faculty of Medicine and Surgery—Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, 20132 Milan, Italy;
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - David R. Baldwin
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, David Evans Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK;
| | - Claudia I. Henschke
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (C.I.H.); (N.T.); (R.Y.)
| | - Simone Ghislandi
- Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (L.F.N.)
| | - Sergio Iavicoli
- Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Italian Workers’ Compensation Authority (INAIL), 00078 Rome, Italy;
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9712 CP Groningen, The Netherlands;
| | - Harry J. De Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC—University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.D.K.); (C.v.d.A.)
| | - Joseph Shemesh
- The Grace Ballas Cardiac Research Unit, Sheba Medical Center, Affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, 52621 Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel;
| | - John K. Field
- Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, The University of Liverpool, Liverpool L69 3BX, UK;
| | - Javier J. Zulueta
- Department of Pulmonology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, 31008 Pamplona, Spain;
- Visiongate Inc., Phoenix, AZ 85044, USA
| | - Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine (EAPM), Avenue de l’Armée Legerlaan 10, 1040 Brussels, Belgium;
| | - Lucia Fiestas Navarrete
- Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, 20136 Milan, Italy; (S.G.); (L.F.N.)
| | | | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, 20132 Milan, Italy;
| | - Rachael L. Murray
- Division of Epidemiology and Public Health, UK Centre for Tobacco and Alcohol Studies, Clinical Sciences Building, City Hospital, University of Nottingham, Nottingham NG5 1PB, UK;
| | - Nir Peled
- The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center & Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center & Ben-Gurion University, 84101 Beer-Sheva, Israel;
| | - Cristiano Rampinelli
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Gaetano Rocco
- Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA;
| | - Witold Rzyman
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Gdańsk, 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland;
| | | | - Martin C. Tammemagi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, 1812 Sir Isaac Brock Way, St Catharines, ON L2S 3A1, Canada;
| | - Luca Bertolaccini
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Natthaya Triphuridet
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (C.I.H.); (N.T.); (R.Y.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Public Health, Chulabhorn Royal Academy, HRH Princess Chulabhorn College of Medical Science, Bangkok 10210, Thailand
| | - Rowena Yip
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA; (C.I.H.); (N.T.); (R.Y.)
| | - Alexia Rossi
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20090 Pieve Emanuele (MI), Italy;
| | - Suresh Senan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, VU location, De Boelelaan 1117, Postbox 7057, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands;
| | - Giuseppe Ferrante
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center IRCCS, 20089 Rozzano (MI), Italy;
| | - Kate Brain
- Division of Population Medicine, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff CF14 4YS, UK;
| | - Carlijn van der Aalst
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC—University Medical Centre Rotterdam, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands; (H.J.D.K.); (C.v.d.A.)
| | - Lorenzo Bonomo
- Department of Bioimaging and Radiological Sciences, Catholic University, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Dario Consonni
- Epidemiology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Ca’ Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 20122 Milan, Italy;
| | - Jan P. Van Meerbeeck
- Thoracic Oncology, Antwerp University Hospital and Ghent University, 2650 Edegem, Belgium;
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, 20141 Milan, Italy;
| | - Silvia Novello
- Department of Oncology, University of Torino, 10124 Torino, Italy; (G.V.S.); (S.N.)
| | - Anand Devaraj
- Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital, London SW3 6NP, UK;
| | - Zaigham Saghir
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Herlev-Gentofte University Hospital, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark;
| | - Giuseppe Pelosi
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, 20122 Milan, Italy
- Inter-Hospital Pathology Division, IRCCS MultiMedica, 20138 Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Recommendations for Implementing Lung Cancer Screening with Low-Dose Computed Tomography in Europe. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:0. [PMID: 32599792 PMCID: PMC7352874 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12060000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Lung cancer screening (LCS) with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) was demonstrated in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) to reduce mortality from the disease. European mortality data has recently become available from the Nelson randomised controlled trial, which confirmed lung cancer mortality reductions by 26% in men and 39-61% in women. Recent studies in Europe and the USA also showed positive results in screening workers exposed to asbestos. All European experts attending the "Initiative for European Lung Screening (IELS)"-a large international group of physicians and other experts concerned with lung cancer-agreed that LDCT-LCS should be implemented in Europe. However, the economic impact of LDCT-LCS and guidelines for its effective and safe implementation still need to be formulated. To this purpose, the IELS was asked to prepare recommendations to implement LCS and examine outstanding issues. A subgroup carried out a comprehensive literature review on LDCT-LCS and presented findings at a meeting held in Milan in November 2018. The present recommendations reflect that consensus was reached.
Collapse
|
20
|
Garau N, Paganelli C, Summers P, Choi W, Alam S, Lu W, Fanciullo C, Bellomi M, Baroni G, Rampinelli C. External validation of radiomics-based predictive models in low-dose CT screening for early lung cancer diagnosis. Med Phys 2020; 47:4125-4136. [PMID: 32488865 DOI: 10.1002/mp.14308] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2019] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 05/23/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Low-dose CT screening allows early lung cancer detection, but is affected by frequent false positive results, inter/intra observer variation and uncertain diagnoses of lung nodules. Radiomics-based models have recently been introduced to overcome these issues, but limitations in demonstrating their generalizability on independent datasets are slowing their introduction to clinic. The aim of this study is to evaluate two radiomics-based models to classify malignant pulmonary nodules in low-dose CT screening, and to externally validate them on an independent cohort. The effect of a radiomics features harmonization technique is also investigated to evaluate its impact on the classification of lung nodules from a multicenter data. METHODS Pulmonary nodules from two independent cohorts were considered in this study; the first cohort (110 subjects, 113 nodules) was used to train prediction models, and the second cohort (72 nodules) to externally validate them. Literature-based radiomics features were extracted and, after feature selection, used as predictive variables in models for malignancy identification. An in-house prediction model based on artificial neural network (ANN) was implemented and evaluated, along with an alternative model from the literature, based on a support vector machine (SVM) classifier coupled with a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). External validation was performed on the second cohort to evaluate models' generalization ability. Additionally, the impact of the Combat harmonization method was investigated to compensate for multicenter datasets variabilities. A new training of the models based on harmonized features was performed on the first cohort, then tested separately on the harmonized and non-harmonized features of the second cohort. RESULTS Preliminary results showed a good accuracy of the investigated models in distinguishing benign from malignant pulmonary nodules with both sets of radiomics features (i.e., non-harmonized and harmonized). The performance of the models, quantified in terms of Area Under the Curve (AUC), was > 0.89 in the training set and > 0.82 in the external validation set for all the investigated scenarios, outperforming the clinical standard (AUC of 0.76). Slightly higher performance was observed for the SVM-LASSO model than the ANN in the external dataset, although they did not result significantly different. For both harmonized and non-harmonized features, no statistical difference was found between Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves related to training and test set for both models. CONCLUSIONS Although no significant improvements were observed when applying the Combat harmonization method, both in-house and literature-based models were able to classify lung nodules with good generalization to an independent dataset, thus showing their potential as tools for clinical decision-making in lung cancer screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Noemi Garau
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Chiara Paganelli
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy
| | - Paul Summers
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Wookjin Choi
- Department of Engineering and Computer Science, Virginia State University, Petersburg, VA, USA
| | - Sadegh Alam
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Wei Lu
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Cristiana Fanciullo
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Division of Radiology, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Guido Baroni
- Dipartimento di Elettronica, Informazione e Bioingegneria, Politecnico di Milano, Milano, Italy.,Bioengineering Unit, CNAO Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Lyu Z, Li N, Chen S, Wang G, Tan F, Feng X, Li X, Wen Y, Yang Z, Wang Y, Li J, Chen H, Lin C, Ren J, Shi J, Wu S, Dai M, He J. Risk prediction model for lung cancer incorporating metabolic markers: Development and internal validation in a Chinese population. Cancer Med 2020; 9:3983-3994. [PMID: 32253829 PMCID: PMC7286442 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.3025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 03/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low-dose computed tomography screening has been proved to reduce lung cancer mortality, however, the issues of high false-positive rate and overdiagnosis remain unsolved. Risk prediction models for lung cancer that could accurately identify high-risk populations may help to increase efficiency. We thus sought to develop a risk prediction model for lung cancer incorporating epidemiological and metabolic markers in a Chinese population. METHODS During 2006 and 2015, a total of 122 497 people were observed prospectively for lung cancer incidence with the total person-years of 976 663. Stepwise multivariable-adjusted logistic regressions with Pentry = .15 and Pstay = .20 were conducted to select the candidate variables including demographics and metabolic markers such as high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) into the prediction model. We used the C-statistic to evaluate discrimination, and Hosmer-Lemeshow tests for calibration. Tenfold cross-validation was conducted for internal validation to assess the model's stability. RESULTS A total of 984 lung cancer cases were identified during the follow-up. The epidemiological model including age, gender, smoking status, alcohol intake status, coal dust exposure status, and body mass index generated a C-statistic of 0.731. The full model additionally included hsCRP and LDL-C showed significantly better discrimination (C-statistic = 0.735, P = .033). In stratified analysis, the full model showed better predictive power in terms of C-statistic in younger participants (<50 years, 0.709), females (0.726), and former or current smokers (0.742). The model calibrated well across the deciles of predicted risk in both the overall population (PHL = .689) and all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS We developed and internally validated an easy-to-use risk prediction model for lung cancer among the Chinese population that could provide guidance for screening and surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhangyan Lyu
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Ni Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shuohua Chen
- Department of Oncology, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Gang Wang
- Health Department of Kailuan (Group), Tangshan, China
| | - Fengwei Tan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xiaoshuang Feng
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Xin Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yan Wen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhuoyu Yang
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Yalong Wang
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiang Li
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Hongda Chen
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Chunqing Lin
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jiansong Ren
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jufang Shi
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Shouling Wu
- Department of Oncology, Kailuan General Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Min Dai
- Office of Cancer Screening, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Jie He
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Veronesi G, Navone N, Novellis P, Dieci E, Toschi L, Velutti L, Solinas M, Vanni E, Alloisio M, Ghislandi S. Favorable incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for lung cancer screening in Italy. Lung Cancer 2020; 143:73-79. [PMID: 32234647 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2020.03.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2019] [Revised: 03/10/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Lung cancer detection by low-dose computed tomographic screening reduces mortality. However, it is essential to assess cost-effectiveness. We present a cost-effectiveness analysis of screening in Italians at high risk of lung cancer, from the point of view of the Italian tax-payer. MATERIALS AND METHODS We used a decision model to estimate the cost-effectiveness of annual screening for 5 years in smokers (≥30 pack-years) of 55-79 years. Patients diagnosed in the COSMOS study were the screening arm; patients diagnosed and treated for lung cancer in the Lombardy Region, Italy, constituted the usual care arm. Treatment costs were extracted from our hospital database. Lung cancer survival in screened patients was adjusted for 2-year lead-time bias. Life-years and quality-adjusted life-years were estimated by stage at diagnosis, from which incremental cost-effectiveness ratios per life-year and quality-adjusted life-year gained were estimated. RESULTS Base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were 3297 and 2944 euro per quality-adjusted life-year and life-year gained, respectively. Deterministic sensitivity analysis indicated that these values were particularly sensitive to lung cancer prevalence, screening sensitivity and specificity, screening cost, and treatment costs for stage I and IV disease. From the probabilistic sensitivity analysis incremental cost-effectiveness ratios had a 98 % probability of being <25,000 euro (widely-accepted threshold) and a 55 % probability of being <5000 euro. CONCLUSIONS Low-dose computed tomographic screening is associated with an incremental cost of 2944 euro per life-year gained in high risk population, implying that screening can be introduced in Italy at contained cost, saving the lives of many lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Veronesi
- School of Medicine, Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy; Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy.
| | - Niccolò Navone
- CERGAS and Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Dieci
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Toschi
- Department of Oncology & Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Laura Velutti
- Department of Oncology & Hematology, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Michela Solinas
- Thoracic Surgery Unit, New Hospital of Legnano, ASST Ovest (Milan), Italy
| | - Elena Vanni
- Business Operating Officer, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy; Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Marco Alloisio
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano (Milan), Italy; Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano (Milan), Italy
| | - Simone Ghislandi
- CERGAS and Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Maisonneuve P, Iavicoli S, Veronesi G. Response to comment on: "Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in people with workplace exposure to asbestos". Lung Cancer 2019; 136:151-152. [PMID: 31405531 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.07.032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2019] [Accepted: 07/31/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Sergio Iavicoli
- Italian National Insurance Institute for Workplace Injuries (INAIL), Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Nemesure B, Clouston S, Albano D, Kuperberg S, Bilfinger TV. Will That Pulmonary Nodule Become Cancerous? A Risk Prediction Model for Incident Lung Cancer. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 2019; 12:463-470. [PMID: 31248853 DOI: 10.1158/1940-6207.capr-18-0500] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2018] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/13/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This prospective investigation derived a prediction model for identifying risk of incident lung cancer among patients with visible lung nodules identified on computed tomography (CT). Among 2,924 eligible patients referred for evaluation of a pulmonary nodule to the Stony Brook Lung Cancer Evaluation Center between January 1, 2002 and December 31, 2015, 171 developed incident lung cancer during the observation period. Cox proportional hazard models were used to model time until disease onset. The sample was randomly divided into discovery (n = 1,469) and replication (n = 1,455) samples. In the replication sample, concordance was computed to indicate predictive accuracy and risk scores were calculated using the linear predictions. Youden index was used to identify high-risk versus low-risk patients and cumulative lung cancer incidence was examined for high-risk and low-risk groups. Multivariable analyses identified a combination of clinical and radiologic predictors for incident lung cancer including ln-age, ln-pack-years smoking, a history of cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and several radiologic markers including spiculation, ground glass opacity, and nodule size. The final model reliably detected patients who developed lung cancer in the replication sample (C = 0.86, sensitivity/specificity = 0.73/0.81). Cumulative incidence of lung cancer was elevated in high-risk versus low-risk groups [HR = 14.34; 95% confidence interval (CI), 8.17-25.18]. Quantification of reliable risk scores has high clinical utility, enabling physicians to better stratify treatment protocols to manage patient care. The final model is among the first tools developed to predict incident lung cancer in patients presenting with a concerning pulmonary nodule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Nemesure
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.
| | - Sean Clouston
- Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York.,Program in Public Health, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | - Denise Albano
- Department of Surgery, Stony Brook Medicine, Stony Brook, New York
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Lu H, Mu W, Balagurunathan Y, Qi J, Abdalah MA, Garcia AL, Ye Z, Gillies RJ, Schabath MB. Multi-window CT based Radiomic signatures in differentiating indolent versus aggressive lung cancers in the National Lung Screening Trial: a retrospective study. Cancer Imaging 2019; 19:45. [PMID: 31253194 PMCID: PMC6599273 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-019-0232-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Accepted: 06/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Background We retrospectively evaluated the capability of radiomic features to predict tumor growth in lung cancer screening and compared the performance of multi-window radiomic features and single window radiomic features. Methods One hundred fifty lung nodules among 114 screen-detected, incident lung cancer patients from the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) were investigated. Volume double time (VDT) was calculated as the difference between continuous two scans and used to define indolent and aggressive lung cancers. Lung nodules were semi-automatically segmented using lung and mediastinal windows separately, and subtracting the mediastinal window region from the lung window region generated the difference region. 364 radiomic features were separately exacted from nodules using the lung window, the mediastinal window and the difference region. Multivariable models were conducted to identify the most predictive features in predicting tumor growth. Clinical information was also obtained from the database. Results Based on our definition, 26% of the cases were indolent lung cancer. The tumor growth pattern could be predicted by radiomic models constructed using features obtained in the lung window, the difference region, and by combining features obtained in both the lung window and difference regions with areas under the receiver operator characteristic (AUROCs) of 0.799, 0.819, and 0.846, respectively. The multi-window feature model showed better performance compared to single window features (P < 0.001). Incorporating clinical factors into the multi-window feature models showed improvement, yielding an accuracy of 84.67% and AUROC of 0.855 for distinguishing indolent from aggressive disease. Conclusions Multi-window CT based radiomics features are valuable predictors of indolent lung cancers and out performed single CT window setting. Combining clinical information improved predicting performance. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s40644-019-0232-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hong Lu
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.,Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Wei Mu
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Yoganand Balagurunathan
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Jin Qi
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.,Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Mahmoud A Abdalah
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Alberto L Garcia
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Zhaoxiang Ye
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center of Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huanhuxi Road, Hexi District, Tianjin, 300060, China.
| | - Robert J Gillies
- Department of Cancer Physiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA.
| | - Matthew B Schabath
- Department of Epidemiology, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang X, Zhang Y, Hao S, Zheng L, Liao J, Ye C, Xia M, Wang O, Liu M, Weng CH, Duong SQ, Jin B, Alfreds ST, Stearns F, Kanov L, Sylvester KG, Widen E, McElhinney DB, Ling XB. Prediction of the 1-Year Risk of Incident Lung Cancer: Prospective Study Using Electronic Health Records from the State of Maine. J Med Internet Res 2019; 21:e13260. [PMID: 31099339 PMCID: PMC6542253 DOI: 10.2196/13260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2018] [Revised: 04/18/2019] [Accepted: 04/23/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. Early detection of individuals at risk of lung cancer is critical to reduce the mortality rate. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to develop and validate a prospective risk prediction model to identify patients at risk of new incident lung cancer within the next 1 year in the general population. METHODS Data from individual patient electronic health records (EHRs) were extracted from the Maine Health Information Exchange network. The study population consisted of patients with at least one EHR between April 1, 2016, and March 31, 2018, who had no history of lung cancer. A retrospective cohort (N=873,598) and a prospective cohort (N=836,659) were formed for model construction and validation. An Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) algorithm was adopted to build the model. It assigned a score to each individual to quantify the probability of a new incident lung cancer diagnosis from October 1, 2016, to September 31, 2017. The model was trained with the clinical profile in the retrospective cohort from the preceding 6 months and validated with the prospective cohort to predict the risk of incident lung cancer from April 1, 2017, to March 31, 2018. RESULTS The model had an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881 (95% CI 0.873-0.889) in the prospective cohort. Two thresholds of 0.0045 and 0.01 were applied to the predictive scores to stratify the population into low-, medium-, and high-risk categories. The incidence of lung cancer in the high-risk category (579/53,922, 1.07%) was 7.7 times higher than that in the overall cohort (1167/836,659, 0.14%). Age, a history of pulmonary diseases and other chronic diseases, medications for mental disorders, and social disparities were found to be associated with new incident lung cancer. CONCLUSIONS We retrospectively developed and prospectively validated an accurate risk prediction model of new incident lung cancer occurring in the next 1 year. Through statistical learning from the statewide EHR data in the preceding 6 months, our model was able to identify statewide high-risk patients, which will benefit the population health through establishment of preventive interventions or more intensive surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaofang Wang
- Shandong Provincial Key Laboratory of Network Based Intelligent Computing, University of Jinan, Jinan, China.,Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Yan Zhang
- Department of Oncology, The First Hospital of Shijiazhuang, Shijiazhuang, China
| | - Shiying Hao
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Betty Irene Moore Children's Heart Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Le Zheng
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Betty Irene Moore Children's Heart Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Jiayu Liao
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Riverside, CA, United States.,West China-California Multiomics Research Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China
| | - Chengyin Ye
- Department of Health Management, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Minjie Xia
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Oliver Wang
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Modi Liu
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Ching Ho Weng
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Son Q Duong
- Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Bo Jin
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | | | - Frank Stearns
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Laura Kanov
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Karl G Sylvester
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
| | - Eric Widen
- Healthcare Business Intelligence Solutions Inc, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Doff B McElhinney
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Betty Irene Moore Children's Heart Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| | - Xuefeng B Ling
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States.,Clinical and Translational Research Program, Betty Irene Moore Children's Heart Center, Lucile Packard Children's Hospital, Palo Alto, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Marcus MW, Duffy SW, Devaraj A, Green BA, Oudkerk M, Baldwin D, Field J. Probability of cancer in lung nodules using sequential volumetric screening up to 12 months: the UKLS trial. Thorax 2019; 74:761-767. [PMID: 31028232 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212263] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2018] [Revised: 01/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/11/2019] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Estimation of the clinical probability of malignancy in patients with pulmonary nodules will facilitate early diagnosis, determine optimum patient management strategies and reduce overall costs. METHODS Data from the UK Lung Cancer Screening trial were analysed. Multivariable logistic regression models were used to identify independent predictors and to develop a parsimonious model to estimate the probability of lung cancer in lung nodules detected at baseline and at 3-month and 12-month repeat screening. RESULTS Of 1994 participants who underwent CT scan, 1013 participants had a total of 5063 lung nodules and 52 (2.6%) of the participants developed lung cancer during a median follow-up of 4 years. Covariates that predict lung cancer in our model included female gender, asthma, bronchitis, asbestos exposure, history of cancer, early and late onset of family history of lung cancer, smoking duration, FVC, nodule type (pure ground-glass and part-solid) and volume as measured by semiautomated volumetry. The final model incorporating all predictors had excellent discrimination: area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC 0.885, 95% CI 0.880 to 0.889). Internal validation suggested that the model will discriminate well when applied to new data (optimism-corrected AUC 0.882, 95% CI 0.848 to 0.907). The risk model had a good calibration (goodness-of-fit χ[8] 8.13, p=0.42). CONCLUSIONS Our model may be used in estimating the probability of lung cancer in nodules detected at baseline and at 3 months and 12 months from baseline, allowing more efficient stratification of follow-up in population-based lung cancer screening programmes. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER 78513845.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael W Marcus
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Stephen W Duffy
- Barts and London, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, London, UK
| | - Anand Devaraj
- Department of Radiology, Royal Brompton Hospital London, London, UK
| | - Beverley A Green
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging (CMI), University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | | | - John Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sato S, Nakamura M, Shimizu Y, Goto T, Koike T, Ishikawa H, Tsuchida M. The impact of emphysema on surgical outcomes of early-stage lung cancer: a retrospective study. BMC Pulm Med 2019; 19:73. [PMID: 30947705 PMCID: PMC6449985 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-019-0839-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2018] [Accepted: 03/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The presence of emphysema on computed tomography (CT) is associated with an increased frequency of lung cancer, but the postoperative outcomes of patients with pulmonary emphysema are not well known. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the extent of emphysema and long-term outcomes, as well as mortality and postoperative complications, in early-stage lung cancer patients after pulmonary resection. METHODS The clinical records of 566 consecutive lung cancer patients who underwent pulmonary resection in our department were retrospectively reviewed. Among these, the data sets of 364 pathological stage I patients were available. The associations between the extent of lung emphysema and long-term outcomes and postoperative complications were investigated. Emphysema was assessed on the basis of semiquantitative CT. Surgery-related complications of Grade ≥ II according to the Clavien-Dindo classification were included in this study. RESULTS Emphysema was present in 63 patients. The overall survival and relapse-free survival of the non-emphysema and emphysema groups at 5 years were 89.0 and 61.3% (P < 0.001), respectively, and 81.0 and 51.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, significant prognostic factors were emphysema, higher smoking index, and higher histologic grade (p < 0.05). Significant risk factors for poor recurrence-free survival were emphysema, higher smoking index, higher histologic grade, and presence of pleural invasion (P < 0.05). Regarding Grade ≥ II postoperative complications, pneumonia and supraventricular tachycardia were more frequent in the emphysema group than in the non-emphysema group (P = 0.003 and P = 0.021, respectively). CONCLUSION The presence of emphysema affects the long-term outcomes and the development of postoperative complications in early-stage lung cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seijiro Sato
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan.
| | - Masaya Nakamura
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
| | - Yuki Shimizu
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
| | - Tatsuya Goto
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
| | - Terumoto Koike
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
| | - Hiroyuki Ishikawa
- Department of Radiology and Radiation Oncology, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Masanori Tsuchida
- Division of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, 1-757 Asahimachi-dori, Chuo-ku, Niigata-shi, Niigata, 951-8510, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Raghu VK, Zhao W, Pu J, Leader JK, Wang R, Herman J, Yuan JM, Benos PV, Wilson DO. Feasibility of lung cancer prediction from low-dose CT scan and smoking factors using causal models. Thorax 2019; 74:643-649. [PMID: 30862725 PMCID: PMC6585306 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2018-212638] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 01/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Low-dose CT (LDCT) is currently used in lung cancer screening of high-risk populations for early lung cancer diagnosis. However, 96% of individuals with detected nodules are false positives. Methods In order to develop an efficient early lung cancer predictor from clinical, demographic and LDCT features, we studied a total of 218 subjects with lung cancer or benign nodules. Probabilistic graphical models (PGMs) were used to integrate demographics, clinical data and LDCT features from 92 subjects (training cohort) from the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study cohort. Results Learnt PGMs identified three variables directly (causally) linked to malignant nodules and the largest benign nodule and used them to build the Lung Cancer Causal Model (LCCM), which was validated in a separate cohort of 126 subjects. Nodule and vessel numbers and years since the subject quit smoking were sufficient to discriminate malignant from benign nodules. Comparison with existing predictors in the training and validation cohorts showed that (1) incorporating LDCT scan features greatly enhances predictive accuracy; and (2) LCCM improves cancer detection over existing methods, including the Brock parsimonious model (p<0.001). Notably, the number of surrounding vessels, a feature not previously used in predictive models, significantly improves predictive efficiency. Based on the validation cohort results, LCCM is able to identify 30% of the benign nodules without risk of misclassifying cancer nodules. Discussion LCCM shows promise as a lung cancer predictor as it is significantly improved over existing models. Validated in a larger, prospective study, it may help reduce unnecessary follow-up visits and procedures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vineet K Raghu
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA.,Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Wei Zhao
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.,Current affiliation: Department of Respiratory Medicine, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Jiantao Pu
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Joseph K Leader
- Department of Radiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Renwei Wang
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - James Herman
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Jian-Min Yuan
- Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, UPMC Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - Panayiotis V Benos
- Department of Computational and Systems Biology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA .,Department of Computer Science, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| | - David O Wilson
- Division of Pulmonary, Allergy and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maisonneuve P, Rampinelli C, Bertolotti R, Misotti A, Lococo F, Casiraghi M, Spaggiari L, Bellomi M, Novellis P, Solinas M, Dieci E, Alloisio M, Fontana L, Persechino B, Iavicoli S, Veronesi G. Low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer in people with workplace exposure to asbestos. Lung Cancer 2019; 131:23-30. [PMID: 31027694 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2019.03.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Revised: 02/15/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Smoking is the main risk factor for lung cancer, but environmental and occupational exposure to carcinogens also increase lung cancer risk. We assessed whether extending low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) screening to persons with occupational exposure to asbestos may be an effective way reducing lung cancer mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a nested case-control study within the COSMOS screening program, assessing past asbestos exposure with a questionnaire. LDCT scans of asbestos-exposed participants were reviewed to assess the presence of pulmonary, interstitial and pleural alterations in comparison to matched unexposed controls. We also performed an exhaustive review, with meta-analysis, of the literature on LDCT screening in asbestos-exposed persons. RESULTS Exposure to asbestos, initially self-reported by 9.8% of COSMOS participants, was confirmed in 216 of 544 assessable cases, corresponding to 2.6% of the screened population. LDCT of asbestos-exposed persons had significantly more pleural plaques, diaphragmatic pleural thickening and pleural calcifications, but similar frequency of parenchymal and interstitial alterations to unexposed persons. From 16 papers, including this study, overall lung cancer detection rates at baseline were 0.81% (95% CI 0.50-1.19) in asbestos-exposed persons, 0.94% (95% CI 0.47-1.53) in asbestos-exposed smokers (12 studies), and 0.11% (95% CI 0.00-0.43) in asbestos-exposed non-smokers (9 studies). CONCLUSION Persons occupationally exposed to asbestos should be monitored to gather more information about risks. Although LDCT screening is effective in the early detection lung cancer in asbestos-exposed smokers, our data suggest that screening of asbestos-exposed persons with no additional risk factors for cancer does is not viable due to the low detection rate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy.
| | - Cristiano Rampinelli
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaella Bertolotti
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Data Management, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandro Misotti
- Dietetics and Clinical Nutrition, Hospital of Melegnano, ASST Melegnano-Martesana, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo Lococo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Monica Casiraghi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, IEO, European Institute of Oncology IRCSS, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Michela Solinas
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa Dieci
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Alloisio
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy; Department of Biomedical Science, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Fontana
- Italian National Insurance Institute for Workplace Injuries (INAIL), Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Rome, Italy
| | - Benedetta Persechino
- Italian National Insurance Institute for Workplace Injuries (INAIL), Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Iavicoli
- Italian National Insurance Institute for Workplace Injuries (INAIL), Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Epidemiology and Hygiene, Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Tammemägi MC, ten Haaf K, Toumazis I, Kong CY, Han SS, Jeon J, Commins J, Riley T, Meza R. Development and Validation of a Multivariable Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Model That Includes Low-Dose Computed Tomography Screening Results: A Secondary Analysis of Data From the National Lung Screening Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2019; 2:e190204. [PMID: 30821827 PMCID: PMC6484623 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.0204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 57] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Low-dose computed tomography lung cancer screening is most effective when applied to high-risk individuals. OBJECTIVES To develop and validate a risk prediction model that incorporates low-dose computed tomography screening results. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A logistic regression risk model was developed in National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) Lung Screening Study (LSS) data and was validated in NLST American College of Radiology Imaging Network (ACRIN) data. The NLST was a randomized clinical trial that recruited participants between August 2002 and April 2004, with follow-up to December 31, 2009. This secondary analysis of data from the NLST took place between August 10, 2013, and November 1, 2018. Included were LSS (n = 14 576) and ACRIN (n = 7653) participants who had 3 screens, adequate follow-up, and complete predictor information. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Incident lung cancers occurring 1 to 4 years after the third screen (202 LSS and 96 ACRIN). Predictors included scores from the validated PLCOm2012 risk model and Lung CT Screening Reporting & Data System (Lung-RADS) screening results. RESULTS Overall, the mean (SD) age of 22 229 participants was 61.3 (5.0) years, 59.3% were male, and 90.9% were of non-Hispanic white race/ethnicity. During follow-up, 298 lung cancers were diagnosed in 22 229 individuals (1.3%). Eight result combinations were pooled into 4 groups based on similar associations. Adjusted for PLCOm2012 risks, compared with participants with 3 negative screens, participants with 1 positive screen and last negative had an odds ratio (OR) of 1.93 (95% CI, 1.34-2.76), and participants with 2 positive screens with last negative or 2 negative screens with last positive had an OR of 2.66 (95% CI, 1.60-4.43); when 2 or more screens were positive with last positive, the OR was 8.97 (95% CI, 5.76-13.97). In ACRIN validation data, the model that included PLCOm2012 scores and screening results (PLCO2012results) demonstrated significantly greater discrimination (area under the curve, 0.761; 95% CI, 0.716-0.799) than when screening results were excluded (PLCOm2012) (area under the curve, 0.687; 95% CI, 0.645-0.728) (P < .001). In ACRIN validation data, PLCO2012results demonstrated good calibration. Individuals who had initial negative scans but elevated PLCOm2012 six-year risks of at least 2.6% did not have risks decline below the 1.5% screening eligibility criterion when subsequent screens were negative. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE According to this analysis, some individuals with elevated risk scores who have negative initial screens remain at elevated risks, warranting annual screening. Positive screens seem to increase baseline risk scores and may identify high-risk individuals for continued screening and enrollment into clinical trials. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00047385.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin C. Tammemägi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Kevin ten Haaf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Iakovos Toumazis
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
| | - Summer S. Han
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California
| | - Jihyoun Jeon
- School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| | - John Commins
- Information Management Systems, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Thomas Riley
- Information Management Systems, Rockville, Maryland
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Biswas A, Mehta HJ, Folch EE. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and lung cancer: inter-relationships. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2019; 24:152-160. [PMID: 29210751 DOI: 10.1097/mcp.0000000000000451] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a well established risk factor for lung cancer. Newer studies reveal a myriad of other mechanisms, some proven and some putative, which may contribute to their association. RECENT FINDINGS There is an ever-growing bundle of evidence that suggests a close association between persistent chronic inflammation and lung cancer. A few potential targets of genetic susceptibility locus for COPD and lung cancer have been suggested. Better characterization of immune dysregulation and identification of signaling pathways may assist the development of strategies to reduce risk of developing lung cancer in patients with COPD. Current lung cancer screening strategies may exclude some patients at high risk of having lung cancer. Prospective studies indicate that a screening criterion that includes variables reflecting the severity of COPD may increase the sensitivity of the screening program and reduce 'over-diagnosis bias' of indolent lung cancers. Examples of such variables include the emphysema score generated from computed tomography scans and diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide derived from lung function tests. SUMMARY A better understanding of the inter-relationship between lung cancer pathogenesis and COPD has been described recently. Improving lung cancer screening strategies by incorporating markers of COPD severity has recently been proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abhishek Biswas
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Florida, Florida
| | - Hiren J Mehta
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Florida, Florida
| | - Erik E Folch
- Complex Chest Disease Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Seijo LM, Peled N, Ajona D, Boeri M, Field JK, Sozzi G, Pio R, Zulueta JJ, Spira A, Massion PP, Mazzone PJ, Montuenga LM. Biomarkers in Lung Cancer Screening: Achievements, Promises, and Challenges. J Thorac Oncol 2018; 14:343-357. [PMID: 30529598 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.11.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 290] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/13/2018] [Revised: 11/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The present review is an update of the research and development efforts regarding the use of molecular biomarkers in the lung cancer screening setting. The two main unmet clinical needs, namely, the refinement of risk to improve the selection of individuals undergoing screening and the characterization of undetermined nodules found during the computed tomography-based screening process are the object of the biomarkers described in the present review. We first propose some principles to optimize lung cancer biomarker discovery projects. Then, we summarize the discovery and developmental status of currently promising molecular candidates, such as autoantibodies, complement fragments, microRNAs, circulating tumor DNA, DNA methylation, blood protein profiling, or RNA airway or nasal signatures. We also mention other emerging biomarkers or new technologies to follow, such as exhaled breath biomarkers, metabolomics, sputum cell imaging, genetic predisposition studies, and the integration of next-generation sequencing into study of circulating DNA. We also underline the importance of integrating different molecular technologies together with imaging, radiomics, and artificial intelligence. We list a number of completed, ongoing, or planned trials to show the clinical utility of molecular biomarkers. Finally, we comment on future research challenges in the field of biomarkers in the context of lung cancer screening and propose a design of a trial to test the clinical utility of one or several candidate biomarkers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luis M Seijo
- Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain; CIBERES, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Madrid, Spain
| | - Nir Peled
- Oncology Division, The Legacy Heritage Oncology Center and Dr. Larry Norton Institute, Soroka Medical Center and Ben-Gurion University, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Daniel Ajona
- Solid Tumors Program, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Mattia Boeri
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - John K Field
- The Roy Castle Lung Cancer Research Programme, Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom
| | - Gabriella Sozzi
- Department of Experimental Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ruben Pio
- Solid Tumors Program, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain; Department of Biochemistry and Genetics, School of Sciences, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Javier J Zulueta
- Department of Pulmonology, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain; Visiongate Inc., Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Avrum Spira
- Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | - Luis M Montuenga
- Solid Tumors Program, Centro de Investigación Médica Aplicada, Pamplona, Spain; Navarra Institute for Health Research, Pamplona, Spain; CIBERONC, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Cáncer, Madrid, Spain; Department of Pathology, Anatomy and Physiology, School of Medicine, University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Welch LS, Dement JM, Cranford K, Shorter J, Quinn PS, Madtes DK, Ringen K. Early detection of lung cancer in a population at high risk due to occupation and smoking. Occup Environ Med 2018; 76:137-142. [PMID: 30415231 DOI: 10.1136/oemed-2018-105431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2018] [Revised: 09/10/2018] [Accepted: 09/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The US National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) recommends two pathways for eligibility for Early Lung Cancer Detection (ELCD) programmes. Option 2 includes individuals with occupational exposures to lung carcinogens, in combination with a lesser requirement on smoking. Our objective was to determine if this algorithm resulted in a similar prevalence of lung cancer as has been found using smoking risk alone, and if so to present an approach for lung cancer screening in high-risk worker populations. METHODS We enrolled 1260 former workers meeting NCCN criteria, with modifications to account for occupational exposures in an ELCD programme. RESULTS At baseline, 1.6% had a lung cancer diagnosed, a rate similar to the National Lung Cancer Screening Trial (NLST). Among NLST participants, 59% were current smokers at the time of baseline scan or had quit smoking fewer than 15 years prior to baseline; all had a minimum of 30 pack-years of smoking. Among our population, only 24.5% were current smokers and 40.1% of our participants had smoked fewer than 30 pack-years; only 43.5% would meet entry criteria for the NLST. The most likely explanation for the high prevalence of screen-detected lung cancers in the face of a reduced risk from smoking is the addition of occupational risk factors for lung cancer. CONCLUSION Occupational exposures to lung carcinogens should be incorporated into criteria used for ELCD programmes, using the algorithm developed by NCCN or with an individualised risk assessment; current risk assessment tools can be modified to incorporate occupational risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura S Welch
- Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - John M Dement
- Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kim Cranford
- Zenith American Solutions, Inc, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Janet Shorter
- Zenith American Solutions, Inc, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Patricia S Quinn
- Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| | - David K Madtes
- Clinical Research Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA.,Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Washington, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Knut Ringen
- Center for Construction Research and Training, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Veronesi G, Zulueta JJ, Maisonneuve P, Henschke C. At last we can go ahead with low-dose CT screening for lung cancer in Europe. Lung Cancer 2018; 123:176-177. [PMID: 30017427 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2018] [Revised: 07/05/2018] [Accepted: 07/09/2018] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Milano, Italy.
| | - Javier J Zulueta
- Pulmonary Medicine Service, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, University of Navarra School of Medicine, Navarra, Spain
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Henschke
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
A recent position statement by a group of European experts reviewed the current evidence for low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening, based on the outcomes and screening performance of the published randomized trials and identified actions needed for eventual future implementation. After the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) outcome publication, guidelines changed in USA and Canada, but there are still problems in real-world screening practice. In Europe any decision was postponed to the publication of the European randomized trial outcomes and recommendations continue to discourage screening for lung cancer in all member countries. The NELSON randomized controlled trial (RCT), the largest one in Europe, outcome results are still waited, whereas the MILD, DANTE, DLSCT and ITALUNG (all with small sample size) RCTs have published mortality and incidence data with adequate follow up. The implementation of an organized screening in Europe is conditioned by a health technology assessment process at European level. According with the European policy, confirmed in the recent European Cancer Code [2015], screening is transferred in current public-health practice according with evidence-based recommendations and based on organized, usually population-based, programs. Guidelines, standard indicators of performance, training of dedicated radiologists and professionals and a comprehensive quality assurance system is requested in European countries to implement nationally a public health screening program. Waiting the NELSON randomized trial results, key issues as modality for selection of high risk subjects and recruitment, integration of screening and smoking cessation, optimal screening regimen and related research on biomarkers should be assessed, discussed and reviewed. Informed decision making, promotion of primary prevention and integration of screening and smoking cessation are all essential components of a comprehensive risk reduction policy. The path to an Evidence-based screening practice is narrow and, in the absence of a well-established decision-making process, the risk of a spontaneous, uncontrolled use of LDCT screening or, on the other side, an oversight of the screening opportunity is high.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugenio Paci
- Epidemiologist, ISPO - Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Masiero M, Lucchiari C, Mazzocco K, Veronesi G, Maisonneuve P, Jemos C, Salè EO, Spina S, Bertolotti R, Pravettoni G. E-cigarettes May Support Smokers With High Smoking-Related Risk Awareness to Stop Smoking in the Short Run: Preliminary Results by Randomized Controlled Trial. Nicotine Tob Res 2018; 21:119-126. [DOI: 10.1093/ntr/nty047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2018] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marianna Masiero
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Ketti Mazzocco
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- European Institute of Oncology, Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Milan, Italy
| | - Costantino Jemos
- European Institute of Oncology, Division of Pharmacy, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Stefania Spina
- Humanitas Research Hospital, Division of Thoracic and General Surgery, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Gabriella Pravettoni
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
- Applied Research Division for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Schreuder A, Schaefer-Prokop CM, Scholten ET, Jacobs C, Prokop M, van Ginneken B. Lung cancer risk to personalise annual and biennial follow-up computed tomography screening. Thorax 2018; 73:thoraxjnl-2017-211107. [PMID: 29602813 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2017-211107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2017] [Revised: 03/06/2018] [Accepted: 03/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND All lung cancer CT screening trials used fixed follow-up intervals, which may not be optimal. We developed new lung cancer risk models for personalising screening intervals to 1 year or 2 years, and compared these with existing models. METHODS We included participants in the CT arm of the National Lung Screening Trial (2002-2010) who underwent a baseline scan and a first annual follow-up scan and were not diagnosed with lung cancer in the first year. True and false positives and the area under the curve of each model were calculated. Internal validation was performed using bootstrapping. RESULTS Data from 24 542 participants were included in the analysis. The accuracy was 0.785, 0.693, 0.697, 0.666 and 0.727 for the polynomial, patient characteristics, diameter, Patz and PanCan models, respectively. Of the 24 542 participants included, 174 (0.71%) were diagnosed with lung cancer between the first and the second annual follow-ups. Using the polynomial model, 2558 (10.4%, 95% CI 10.0% to 10.8%), 7544 (30.7%, 30.2% to 31.3%), 10 947 (44.6%, 44.0% to 45.2%), 16 710 (68.1%, 67.5% to 68.7%) and 20 023 (81.6%, 81.1% to 92.1%) of the 24 368 participants who did not develop lung cancer in the year following the first follow-up screening round could have safely skipped it, at the expense of delayed diagnosis of 0 (0.0%, 0.0% to 2.7%), 8 (4.6%, 2.2% to 9.2%), 17 (9.8%, 6.0% to 15.4%), 44 (25.3%, 19.2% to 32.5%) and 70 (40.2%, 33.0% to 47.9%) of the 174 lung cancers, respectively. CONCLUSIONS The polynomial model, using both patient characteristics and baseline scan morphology, was significantly superior in assigning participants to 1-year or 2-year screening intervals. Implementing personalised follow-up intervals would enable hundreds of participants to skip a screening round per lung cancer diagnosis delayed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anton Schreuder
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelia M Schaefer-Prokop
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology, Meander Medisch Centrum, Amersfoort, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst T Scholten
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Colin Jacobs
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Mathias Prokop
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Bram van Ginneken
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Diagnostic Image Analysis Group, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
- Fraunhofer MEVIS, Bremen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Charvat H, Sasazuki S, Shimazu T, Budhathoki S, Inoue M, Iwasaki M, Sawada N, Yamaji T, Tsugane S. Development of a risk prediction model for lung cancer: The Japan Public Health Center-based Prospective Study. Cancer Sci 2018; 109:854-862. [PMID: 29345859 PMCID: PMC5834815 DOI: 10.1111/cas.13509] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2017] [Revised: 12/28/2017] [Accepted: 01/08/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Although the impact of tobacco consumption on the occurrence of lung cancer is well‐established, risk estimation could be improved by risk prediction models that consider various smoking habits, such as quantity, duration, and time since quitting. We constructed a risk prediction model using a population of 59 161 individuals from the Japan Public Health Center (JPHC) Study Cohort II. A parametric survival model was used to assess the impact of age, gender, and smoking‐related factors (cumulative smoking intensity measured in pack‐years, age at initiation, and time since cessation). Ten‐year cumulative probability of lung cancer occurrence estimates were calculated with consideration of the competing risk of death from other causes. Finally, the model was externally validated using 47 501 individuals from JPHC Study Cohort I. A total of 1210 cases of lung cancer occurred during 986 408 person‐years of follow‐up. We found a dose‐dependent effect of tobacco consumption with hazard ratios for current smokers ranging from 3.78 (2.00‐7.16) for cumulative consumption ≤15 pack‐years to 15.80 (9.67‐25.79) for >75 pack‐years. Risk decreased with time since cessation. Ten‐year cumulative probability of lung cancer occurrence estimates ranged from 0.04% to 11.14% in men and 0.07% to 6.55% in women. The model showed good predictive performance regarding discrimination (cross‐validated c‐index = 0.793) and calibration (cross‐validated χ2 = 6.60; P‐value = .58). The model still showed good discrimination in the external validation population (c‐index = 0.772). In conclusion, we developed a prediction model to estimate the probability of developing lung cancer based on age, gender, and tobacco consumption. This model appears useful in encouraging high‐risk individuals to quit smoking and undergo increased surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hadrien Charvat
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shizuka Sasazuki
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taichi Shimazu
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Sanjeev Budhathoki
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Manami Inoue
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Motoki Iwasaki
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Norie Sawada
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Taiki Yamaji
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shoichiro Tsugane
- Epidemiology and Prevention Group, Center for Public Health Sciences, National Cancer Center, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Field JK, Zulueta J, Veronesi G, Oudkerk M, Baldwin DR, Holst Pedersen J, Paci E, Horgan D, de Koning HJ. EU Policy on Lung Cancer CT Screening 2017. Biomed Hub 2017; 2:154-161. [PMID: 31988945 PMCID: PMC6945926 DOI: 10.1159/000479810] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2017] [Accepted: 07/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lung cancer kills more Europeans than any other cancer. In 2013, 269,000 citizens of the EU-28 died from this disease. Lung cancer CT screening has the potential to detect lung cancer at an early stage and improve mortality. All of the randomised controlled trials and cohort low-dose CT (LDCT) screening trials across the world have identified very early stage disease (∼70%); the majority of these LDCT trial patients were suitable for surgical interventions and had a good clinical outcome. The 10-year survival in CT screen-detected cancer was shown to be even higher than the 5-year survival for early stage disease in clinical practice at 88%. METHODS Setting up of an EU Commission expert group can be done under Article 168(2) of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union, to develop policy and recommendation for Lung cancer CT screening. The Expert Group would undertake: (a) assist the Commission in the drawing up policy documents, including guidelines and recommendations; (b) advise the Commission in the implementation of Union actions on screening and suggest improvements to the measures taken; (c) advise the Commission in the monitoring, evaluation and dissemination of the results of measures taken at Union and national level. RESULTS This EU Expert Group on lung cancer screening should be set up by the EU Commission to support the implementation and suggest recommendations for the lung cancer screening policy by 2019/2020. CONCLUSION Reduce lung cancer in Europe by undertaking a well-organised lung cancer CT screening programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- John K. Field
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Javier Zulueta
- University Clinic of Navarra, University of Navarra School of Medicine, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Clinic and Research Centre, Milan, Italy
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- Center for Medical Imaging EB 45, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - David R. Baldwin
- Respiratory Medicine Unit, David Evans Research Centre, Nottingham University Hospitals, City Campus, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jesper Holst Pedersen
- Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery RT, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Eugenio Paci
- ISPO Cancer Research and Prevention Institute Tuscany Region, Florence, Italy
| | - Denis Horgan
- European Alliance for Personalised Medicine, Brussels, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Powrózek T, Mlak R, Dziedzic M, Małecka-Massalska T, Sagan D. Analysis of primary-miRNA-3662 and its mature form may improve detection of the lung adenocarcinoma. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2017; 143:1941-1946. [PMID: 28540403 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-017-2444-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2017] [Accepted: 05/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Because of the alarming data concerning lung cancer morbidity and mortality, investigation of new molecular markers allowing early cancer detection is desirable. In the present study, we investigated the potential role of miRNA-3662 precursor (pri-miRNA-3662) as potential novel diagnostic marker of lung adenocarcinoma (AC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Expression of miRNA-3662 and pri-miRNA-3662 was analyzed in 56 fresh-frozen tissues of non-small cell lung cancer and corresponding adjacent non-cancerous tissues using (NCT) qRT-PCR. Using receiver operating curves (ROC) analysis, the diagnostic accuracy of both studied markers for AC detection was assessed. RESULTS miRNA-3662 and its precursor were significantly overexpressed in AC compared to squamous-cell carcinoma (SCC) and NCT. Combined analysis of pri-miRNA-3662 and mature miRNA-3662 allowed to distinguish AC tissue from SCC with sensitivity of 96% and specificity of 85.7% (AUC = 0.963), and SCC from non-cancerous tissue with 92% sensitivity and 92% specificity (AUC = 0.979). CONCLUSIONS miRNA-3662 and its precursor are potentially involved in AC development. pri-miRNA seem to be novel interesting group of potential cancer biomarkers, because they demonstrate high diagnostic accuracy for tumor detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomasz Powrózek
- Department of Human Physiology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11, 20-080, Lublin, Poland.
| | - Radosław Mlak
- Department of Human Physiology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11, 20-080, Lublin, Poland
| | - Marcin Dziedzic
- Department of Laboratory Diagnostic, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| | - Teresa Małecka-Massalska
- Department of Human Physiology, Medical University of Lublin, Radziwiłłowska 11, 20-080, Lublin, Poland
| | - Dariusz Sagan
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
ten Haaf K, Jeon J, Tammemägi MC, Han SS, Kong CY, Plevritis SK, Feuer EJ, de Koning HJ, Steyerberg EW, Meza R. Risk prediction models for selection of lung cancer screening candidates: A retrospective validation study. PLoS Med 2017; 14:e1002277. [PMID: 28376113 PMCID: PMC5380315 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 186] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2016] [Accepted: 02/27/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selection of candidates for lung cancer screening based on individual risk has been proposed as an alternative to criteria based on age and cumulative smoking exposure (pack-years). Nine previously established risk models were assessed for their ability to identify those most likely to develop or die from lung cancer. All models considered age and various aspects of smoking exposure (smoking status, smoking duration, cigarettes per day, pack-years smoked, time since smoking cessation) as risk predictors. In addition, some models considered factors such as gender, race, ethnicity, education, body mass index, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, emphysema, personal history of cancer, personal history of pneumonia, and family history of lung cancer. METHODS AND FINDINGS Retrospective analyses were performed on 53,452 National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) participants (1,925 lung cancer cases and 884 lung cancer deaths) and 80,672 Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian Cancer Screening Trial (PLCO) ever-smoking participants (1,463 lung cancer cases and 915 lung cancer deaths). Six-year lung cancer incidence and mortality risk predictions were assessed for (1) calibration (graphically) by comparing the agreement between the predicted and the observed risks, (2) discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve [AUC]) between individuals with and without lung cancer (death), and (3) clinical usefulness (net benefit in decision curve analysis) by identifying risk thresholds at which applying risk-based eligibility would improve lung cancer screening efficacy. To further assess performance, risk model sensitivities and specificities in the PLCO were compared to those based on the NLST eligibility criteria. Calibration was satisfactory, but discrimination ranged widely (AUCs from 0.61 to 0.81). The models outperformed the NLST eligibility criteria over a substantial range of risk thresholds in decision curve analysis, with a higher sensitivity for all models and a slightly higher specificity for some models. The PLCOm2012, Bach, and Two-Stage Clonal Expansion incidence models had the best overall performance, with AUCs >0.68 in the NLST and >0.77 in the PLCO. These three models had the highest sensitivity and specificity for predicting 6-y lung cancer incidence in the PLCO chest radiography arm, with sensitivities >79.8% and specificities >62.3%. In contrast, the NLST eligibility criteria yielded a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 62.2%. Limitations of this study include the lack of identification of optimal risk thresholds, as this requires additional information on the long-term benefits (e.g., life-years gained and mortality reduction) and harms (e.g., overdiagnosis) of risk-based screening strategies using these models. In addition, information on some predictor variables included in the risk prediction models was not available. CONCLUSIONS Selection of individuals for lung cancer screening using individual risk is superior to selection criteria based on age and pack-years alone. The benefits, harms, and feasibility of implementing lung cancer screening policies based on risk prediction models should be assessed and compared with those of current recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin ten Haaf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
- * E-mail: (KtH); (RM)
| | - Jihyoun Jeon
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Martin C. Tammemägi
- Department of Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
| | - Summer S. Han
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America
- Department of Medicine, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America
| | - Chung Yin Kong
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America
| | - Sylvia K. Plevritis
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, California, United States of America
| | - Eric J. Feuer
- Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, United States of America
| | - Harry J. de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ewout W. Steyerberg
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Rafael Meza
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- * E-mail: (KtH); (RM)
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Yousaf-Khan U, van der Aalst C, de Jong PA, Heuvelmans M, Scholten E, Walter J, Nackaerts K, Groen H, Vliegenthart R, Ten Haaf K, Oudkerk M, de Koning H. Risk stratification based on screening history: the NELSON lung cancer screening study. Thorax 2017; 72:819-824. [PMID: 28360223 DOI: 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2016-209892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2016] [Revised: 02/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Debate about the optimal lung cancer screening strategy is ongoing. In this study, previous screening history of the Dutch-Belgian Lung Cancer Screening trial (NELSON) is investigated on if it predicts the screening outcome (test result and lung cancer risk) of the final screening round. METHODS 15 792 participants were randomised (1:1) of which 7900 randomised into a screening group. CT screening took place at baseline, and after 1, 2 and 2.5 years. Initially, three screening outcomes were possible: negative, indeterminate or positive scan result. Probability for screening outcome in the fourth round was calculated for subgroups of participants. RESULTS Based on results of the first three rounds, three subgroups were identified: (1) those with exclusively negative results (n=3856; 73.0%); (2) those with ≥1 indeterminate result, but never a positive result (n=1342; 25.5%); and (3) with ≥1 positive result (n=81; 1.5%). Group 1 had the highest probability for having a negative scan result in round 4 (97.2% vs 94.8% and 90.1%, respectively, p<0.001), and the lowest risk for detecting lung cancer in round 4 (0.6% vs 1.6%, p=0.001). 'Smoked pack-years' and 'screening history' significantly predicted the fourth round test result. The third round results implied that the risk for detecting lung cancer (after an interval of 2.5 years) was 0.6% for those with negative results compared with 3.7% of those with indeterminate results. CONCLUSIONS Previous CT lung cancer screening results provides an opportunity for further risk stratifications of those who undergo lung cancer screening. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER Results, ISRCTN63545820.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Uraujh Yousaf-Khan
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Carlijn van der Aalst
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Pim A de Jong
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Heuvelmans
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Ernst Scholten
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Radiology, Kennemer Gasthuis, Haarlem, The Netherlands
| | - Joan Walter
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kristiaan Nackaerts
- Department of Pulmonary Medicine, KU leuven, University Hospital Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Harry Groen
- Department of Pulmonary Diseases, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Rozemarijn Vliegenthart
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Ten Haaf
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging-North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Harry de Koning
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus Medical Center, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Veronesi G, Colombo P, Novellis P, Crepaldi A, Lutman RF, Dieci E, Profili M, Siracusano L, Alloisio M. Pilot study on use of home telephoning to identify and recruit high-risk individuals for lung cancer screening. Lung Cancer 2017; 105:39-41. [PMID: 28236983 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2017.01.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2016] [Accepted: 01/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Widespread lung cancer screening with low-dose computed tomography is urgently needed in Europe to identify lung cancers early and reduce lung cancer deaths. The most effective method of identifying high-risk individuals and recruiting them for screening has not been determined. In the present pilot study we investigated direct telephoning to families as a way of identifying high risk individuals and recruiting them to a screening/smoking cessation program, that avoided the selection bias of voluntary screening. Families in the province of Milan, Italy, were contacted by telephone at their homes and asked about family members over 50 years who were heavy smokers (30 or more pack-years). Persons meeting these criteria were contacted and asked to participate in the program. Those who agreed were given an appointment to undergo screening and receive smoking cessation counseling. Among the 1000 contacted families, involving 2300 persons, 44 (1.9%) were eligible for LDCT screening, and 12 (27%) of these participated in the program. The cost of this recruitment strategy pilot study was around 150 euro per screened subject. We obtained useful information on the proportion of the general population eligible for lung cancer screening and the proportion of those who responded. However the cost of home telephone calling is probably too high to be practicable as a method of recruiting high risk persons for screening. Alternative recruitment methods, possibly involving family physicians practitioners, need to be investigated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy.
| | - Paolo Colombo
- Research Unit, Doxa, Via Panizza 7, 20144 Milano, Italy
| | - Pierluigi Novellis
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | | | | | - Elisa Dieci
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Manuel Profili
- Division of Radiology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Licia Siracusano
- Division of Oncology, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| | - Marco Alloisio
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, MI, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rampinelli C, De Marco P, Origgi D, Maisonneuve P, Casiraghi M, Veronesi G, Spaggiari L, Bellomi M. Exposure to low dose computed tomography for lung cancer screening and risk of cancer: secondary analysis of trial data and risk-benefit analysis. BMJ 2017; 356:j347. [PMID: 28179230 PMCID: PMC5421449 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.j347] [Citation(s) in RCA: 166] [Impact Index Per Article: 23.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Objective To estimate the cumulative radiation exposure and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence associated with lung cancer screening using annual low dose computed tomography (CT).Design Secondary analysis of data from a lung cancer screening trial and risk-benefit analysis.Setting 10 year, non-randomised, single centre, low dose CT, lung cancer screening trial (COSMOS study) which took place in Milan, Italy in 2004-15 (enrolment in 2004-05). Secondary analysis took place in 2015-16.Participants High risk asymptomatic smokers aged 50 and older, who were current or former smokers (≥20 pack years), and had no history of cancer in the previous five years.Main outcome measures Cumulative radiation exposure from low dose CT and positron emission tomography (PET) CT scans, calculated by dosimetry software; and lifetime attributable risk of cancer incidence, calculated from the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII (BEIR VII) report.Results Over 10 years, 5203 participants (3439 men, 1764 women) underwent 42 228 low dose CT and 635 PET CT scans. The median cumulative effective dose at the 10th year of screening was 9.3 mSv for men and 13.0 mSv for women. According to participants' age and sex, the lifetime attributable risk of lung cancer and major cancers after 10 years of CT screening ranged from 5.5 to 1.4 per 10 000 people screened, and from 8.1 to 2.6 per 10 000 people screened, respectively. In women aged 50-54, the lifetime attributable risk of lung cancer and major cancers was about fourfold and threefold higher than for men aged 65 and older, respectively. The numbers of lung cancer and major cancer cases induced by 10 years of screening in our cohort were 1.5 and 2.4, respectively, which corresponded to an additional risk of induced major cancers of 0.05% (2.4/5203). 259 lung cancers were diagnosed in 10 years of screening; one radiation induced major cancer would be expected for every 108 (259/2.4) lung cancers detected through screening.Conclusion Radiation exposure and cancer risk from low dose CT screening for lung cancer, even if non-negligible, can be considered acceptable in light of the substantial mortality reduction associated with screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiano Rampinelli
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Paolo De Marco
- Medical Physics School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniela Origgi
- Division of Medical Physics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Patrick Maisonneuve
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Monica Casiraghi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Giulia Veronesi
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Humanitas Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spaggiari
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Massimo Bellomi
- Department of Medical Imaging and Radiation Sciences, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hematology-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Heuvelmans MA, Groen HJM, Oudkerk M. Early lung cancer detection by low-dose CT screening: therapeutic implications. Expert Rev Respir Med 2016; 11:89-100. [DOI: 10.1080/17476348.2017.1276445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marjolein A Heuvelmans
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging – North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Medisch Spectrum Twente, Department of Pulmonology, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Harry J M Groen
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Matthijs Oudkerk
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Center for Medical Imaging – North East Netherlands, Groningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Shen S, Han SX, Petousis P, Weiss RE, Meng F, Bui AAT, Hsu W. A Bayesian model for estimating multi-state disease progression. Comput Biol Med 2016; 81:111-120. [PMID: 28038345 DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2016] [Revised: 11/15/2016] [Accepted: 12/18/2016] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
A growing number of individuals who are considered at high risk of cancer are now routinely undergoing population screening. However, noted harms such as radiation exposure, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment underscore the need for better temporal models that predict who should be screened and at what frequency. The mean sojourn time (MST), an average duration period when a tumor can be detected by imaging but with no observable clinical symptoms, is a critical variable for formulating screening policy. Estimation of MST has been long studied using continuous Markov model (CMM) with Maximum likelihood estimation (MLE). However, a lot of traditional methods assume no observation error of the imaging data, which is unlikely and can bias the estimation of the MST. In addition, the MLE may not be stably estimated when data is sparse. Addressing these shortcomings, we present a probabilistic modeling approach for periodic cancer screening data. We first model the cancer state transition using a three state CMM model, while simultaneously considering observation error. We then jointly estimate the MST and observation error within a Bayesian framework. We also consider the inclusion of covariates to estimate individualized rates of disease progression. Our approach is demonstrated on participants who underwent chest x-ray screening in the National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) and validated using posterior predictive p-values and Pearson's chi-square test. Our model demonstrates more accurate and sensible estimates of MST in comparison to MLE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiwen Shen
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Simon X Han
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Panayiotis Petousis
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robert E Weiss
- Department of Biostatistics, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Frank Meng
- Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alex A T Bui
- Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - William Hsu
- Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Lung Cancer Risk Prediction Using Common SNPs Located in GWAS-Identified Susceptibility Regions. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 10:1538-45. [PMID: 26352532 DOI: 10.1097/jto.0000000000000666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have consistently identified specific lung cancer susceptibility regions. We evaluated the lung cancer-predictive performance of single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in these regions. METHODS Lung cancer cases (N = 778) and controls (N = 1166) were genotyped for 77 SNPs located in GWAS-identified lung cancer susceptibility regions. Variable selection and model development used stepwise logistic regression and decision-tree analyses. In a subset nested in the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study, change in area under the receiver operator characteristic curve and net reclassification improvement were used to compare predictions made by risk factor models with and without genetic variables. RESULTS Variable selection and model development kept two SNPs in each of three GWAS regions, rs2736100 and rs7727912 in 5p15.33, rs805297 and rs1802127 in 6p21.33, and rs8034191 and rs12440014 in 15q25.1. The ratio of cases to controls was three times higher among subjects with a high-risk genotype in every one as opposed to none of the three GWAS regions (odds ratio, 3.14; 95% confidence interval, 2.02-4.88; adjusted for sex, age, and pack-years). Adding a three-level classified count of GWAS regions with high-risk genotypes to an age and smoking risk factor-only model improved lung cancer prediction by a small amount: area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.725 versus 0.717 (p = 0.056); overall net reclassification improvement was 0.052 across low-, intermediate-, and high- 6-year lung cancer risk categories (<3.0%, 3.0%-4.9%, ≥ 5.0%). CONCLUSION Specifying genotypes for SNPs in three GWAS-identified susceptibility regions improved lung cancer prediction, but probably by an extent too small to affect disease control practice.
Collapse
|
49
|
Veronesi G, Novellis P, Voulaz E, Alloisio M. Early detection and early treatment of lung cancer: risks and benefits. J Thorac Dis 2016; 8:E1060-E1062. [PMID: 27747063 DOI: 10.21037/jtd.2016.08.76] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Giulia Veronesi
- Thoracic Surgery Division, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Emanuele Voulaz
- Thoracic Surgery Division, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marco Alloisio
- Thoracic Surgery Division, Humanitas Cancer Center, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Petousis P, Han SX, Aberle D, Bui AAT. Prediction of lung cancer incidence on the low-dose computed tomography arm of the National Lung Screening Trial: A dynamic Bayesian network. Artif Intell Med 2016; 72:42-55. [PMID: 27664507 PMCID: PMC5082434 DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2016.07.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 07/25/2016] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Identifying high-risk lung cancer individuals at an early disease stage is the most effective way of improving survival. The landmark National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) demonstrated the utility of low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) imaging to reduce mortality (relative to X-ray screening). As a result of the NLST and other studies, imaging-based lung cancer screening programs are now being implemented. However, LDCT interpretation results in a high number of false positives. A set of dynamic Bayesian networks (DBN) were designed and evaluated to provide insight into how longitudinal data can be used to help inform lung cancer screening decisions. METHODS The LDCT arm of the NLST dataset was used to build and explore five DBNs for high-risk individuals. Three of these DBNs were built using a backward construction process, and two using structure learning methods. All models employ demographics, smoking status, cancer history, family lung cancer history, exposure risk factors, comorbidities related to lung cancer, and LDCT screening outcome information. Given the uncertainty arising from lung cancer screening, a cancer state-space model based on lung cancer staging was utilized to characterize the cancer status of an individual over time. The models were evaluated on balanced training and test sets of cancer and non-cancer cases to deal with data imbalance and overfitting. RESULTS Results were comparable to expert decisions. The average area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) for the three intervention points of the NLST trial was higher than 0.75 for all models. Evaluation of the models on the complete LDCT arm of the NLST dataset (N=25,486) demonstrated satisfactory generalization. Consensus of predictions over similar cases is reported in concordance statistics between the models' and the physicians' predictions. The models' predictive ability with respect to missing data was also evaluated with the sample of cases that missed the second screening exam of the trial (N=417). The DBNs outperformed comparison models such as logistic regression and naïve Bayes. CONCLUSION The lung cancer screening DBNs demonstrated high discrimination and predictive power with the majority of cancer and non-cancer cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Panayiotis Petousis
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Simon X Han
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Denise Aberle
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Alex A T Bui
- Department of Bioengineering, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Medical Imaging Informatics (MII) Group, Department of Radiological Sciences, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|