Futibatinib, an Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced Solid Tumors Harboring FGF/FGFR Aberrations: A Phase I Dose-Expansion Study

Spectrofluorometric determination of futibatinib in human plasma and pharmaceutical formulations

Futibatinib is a powerful inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors that impedes its phosphorylation and subsequently leading to a reduction in in cell viability across various cell lines. Futibatinib was approved for initial use as an effective treatment for several diseases, including non-small cell lung cancer and breast cancer. Herein, a novel selective fluorescence probe was created for futibatinib quantification in various matrices, including pharmaceutical formulation and human plasma. The technique primarily depends on futibatinib's chemical conversion into a fluorescent product through a reaction with trimethylamine and bromoacetyl bromide. The created fluorescent probe exhibits maximum emission peak at 338 nm upon excitation at 248 nm. The method provided a low detection limit of 0.120 ng/mL and maintained a linear concentration-dependent relationship across the range of 1-200 ng/mL. High sensitivity, accuracy and precision were demonstrated for futibatinib quantification in pharmaceutical formulation and spiked plasma matrix by the method, which was validated in accordance with ICH requirements.

FGFR‑related phenotypic and functional profile of CAFs in prognostication of breast cancer (Review)

While preclinical studies consistently implicate FGFR‑signalling in breast cancer (BC) progression, clinical evidence fails to support these findings. It may be that the clinical significance of FGFR ought to be analysed in the context of the stroma, activating or repressing its function. The present review aimed to provide such a context by summarizing the existing data on the prognostic and/or predictive value of selected cancer‑associated fibroblasts (CAFs)‑related factors, that either directly or indirectly may affect FGFR‑signalling. PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) and Medline (https://www.nlm.nih.gov/medline/medline_home.html) databases were searched for the relevant literature related to the prognostic and/or predictive significance of: CAFs phenotypic markers (αSMA, S100A4/FSP‑1, PDGFR, PDPN and FAP), CAFs‑derived cognate FGFR ligands (FGF2, FGF5 and FGF17) or inducers of CAFs' paracrine activity (TGF‑β1, HDGF, PDGF, CXCL8, CCL5, CCL2, IL‑6, HH and EGF) both expressed in the tumour and circulating in the blood. A total of 68 articles were selected and thoroughly analysed. The findings consistently identified upregulation of αSMA, S100A4/FSP‑1, PDGFR, PDPN, HDGF, PDGF, CXCL8, CCL5, CCL2, IL‑6, HH and EGF as poor prognostic markers in BC, while evaluation of the prognostic value of the remaining markers varied between the studies. The data confirm an association of CAFs‑specific features with BC prognosis, suggesting that both quantitative and qualitative profiling of the stroma might be required for an assessment of the true FGFR's clinical value.

Real-Life Experience with Entrectinib in Neurotrophic Tyrosine Receptor Kinase Fusion-Positive Solid Tumors: A Multicenter Retrospective Trial

BACKGROUND

Neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) gene fusions represent rare somatic mutations in many types of cancer and have enabled the use of promising targeted therapies. In clinical studies, increased response rates to tropomyosin receptor kinase inhibitors have been demonstrated in NTRK fusion-positive cancer types; however, real-world experiences on these targeted agents are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the clinical characteristics and treatment responses of NTRK fusion-positive patients who received entrectinib treatment within the scope of an early access program in Turkey.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This multicenter, retrospective analysis involved 17 patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK fusions or rearrangements from 14 oncology centers between June 2019 and 31 March 2024. Demographic and clinical data were obtained via retrospective review of medical records with a cutoff date of 31 March 2024.

RESULTS

The median age at diagnosis of the patients in our study was 42 [interquartile range (IQR) 33-60] years. Nine different types of solid tumors were diagnosed in these patients. The most common NTRK gene rearrangements involved NTRK1 (n = 8), followed by NTRK3 (n = 7). The median duration of entrectinib usage was 6.9 (IQR 3.1-16.1) months. Dose reductions due to side effects were performed in four patients: two due to leukopenia, one due to visual disturbance, and one due to troponin elevation. Leukopenia was the most commonly observed side effect. The objective response rate (ORR) was 35.3% (95% confidence interval (CI) 14.2-62.7), with complete response (CR) achieved in four patients. The duration of response (DOR) in patients who responded after initiating entrectinib was 9.8 (95% CI 0-30.7) months, the median overall survival (mOS) in all patients was 20.8 (95% CI 0-48.5) months, and the time-to-treatment failure (TTF) was 6.4 (95% CI 0-13.5) months.

CONCLUSIONS

In this retrospective study, we aimed to obtain real-world data concerning the use of entrectinib in patients with solid tumors harboring NTRK fusion genes. Although our findings are partially similar to the results of clinical studies, prospective studies in larger patient groups with more diverse tumor types and different demographic characteristics are needed to confirm the findings.

Understanding and Overcoming Resistance to Selective FGFR inhibitors Across FGFR2-Driven Malignancies

PURPOSE

Understanding resistance to selective FGFR inhibitors is crucial to improve the clinical outcomes of patients with FGFR2-driven malignancies.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

We analyzed sequential ctDNA, +/- WES or targeted NGS on tissue biopsies from patients with tumors harboring activating FGFR2 alterations progressing on pan-FGFR-selective inhibitors, collected in the prospective UNLOCK program. FGFR2::BICC1 Ba/F3 and patient-derived xenografts (PDX) models were used for functional studies.

RESULTS

Thirty-six patients were included. In cholangiocarcinoma, at resistance to both reversible inhibitors (e.g. pemigatinib, erdafitinib) and the irreversible inhibitor futibatinib, polyclonal FGFR2 kinase domain mutations were frequent (14/27 patients). Tumors other than cholangiocarcinoma shared the same mutated FGFR2 residues, but polyclonality was rare (1/9 patients). At resistance to reversible inhibitors, 14 residues in the FGFR2 kinase domain were mutated; after futibatinib, only the molecular brake N550 and the gatekeeper V565. Off-target alterations in PI3K/mTOR and MAPK pathways were found in 11 patients, often together with on-target mutations. At progression to a first FGFR inhibitor, 12 patients received futibatinib or lirafugratinib (irreversible inhibitors), with variable clinical outcomes depending on previous resistance mechanisms. Two patients with TSC1 or PIK3CA mutations benefitted from everolimus. In cell viability assays on Ba/F3 and in pharmacologic studies on PDX, irreversible inhibitors retained better activity against FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, with lirafugratinib active against the recalcitrant V565L/F/Y.

CONCLUSIONS

At progression to FGFR inhibitors, FGFR2-driven malignancies are characterized by high intra- and inter-patient molecular heterogeneity, particularly in cholangiocarcinoma. Resistance to FGFR inhibitors can be overcome by sequential, molecularly-oriented treatment strategies across FGFR2-driven tumors.

FGFR Alterations in Thyroid Carcinoma: A Novel Class of Primary Drivers with Significant Therapeutic Implications and Secondary Molecular Events Potentially Mediating Resistance in Thyroid Malignancy

Background: Diagnostic classification of thyroid malignancy is primarily accomplished through examination of histomorphological features and may be substantiated and clarified by molecular data. Individual molecular drivers show relatively robust and specific associations with histological subtypes of thyroid malignancy, including BRAF sequence variants and kinase gene fusions in papillary thyroid carcinoma, predominantly RAS variants in follicular-patterned neoplasia, and additional "late" mutations affecting TERT promoter, TP53, and the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway in high-grade malignancies. Given the oncogenic role of FGFR, particularly FGFR1-3, the goal of this study was to explore the role of FGFR in thyroid carcinoma biology. Methods: We completed a multicenter retrospective observational study for thyroid carcinomas with pathogenic alterations in the FGFR gene family. We performed this study by querying the molecular data accumulated for thyroid carcinomas from each center. Results: Overall, 5030 sequenced thyroid malignancies were reviewed, yielding 17 tumors with FGFR alterations, including 11 where FGFR was the primary molecular driver and 6 where FGFR was a secondary pathogenic alteration, with a subset for which there was available clinical follow-up data. Of the 11 carcinomas with an FGFR driver, 9 were gene fusions involving FGFR2:VCL (4 tumors), TG::FGFR1 (3 tumors), FGFR2::CIT, and FGFR2::SHTN1, and the remaining 2 were driven by FGFR1 amplification. In the 6 tumors where a canonical driver of thyroid neoplasia was present (5 cases) or no clear primary driver was detected (1 case), sequencing detected secondary FGFR2 p.W290C, p.Y375C, and p.N549K, as well as FGFR1 p.N546K in the respective tyrosine kinase domains, some at subclonal variant allele frequencies. Conclusions: This study presents the first description of a collection of thyroid carcinomas grouped by primary driver alterations in FGFR, as well as a cohort of thyroid tumors with secondary alterations that potentially lead to tumor progression or resistance to targeted therapy. Given the availability of small molecular inhibitors targeting oncogenic FGFR, this study emphasizes the significant implications for patients from identification of FGFR alterations as they are currently under-recognized in the literature and, most importantly, have potential novel treatment options.

Discovery and characterization of novel FGFR1 inhibitors in triple-negative breast cancer via hybrid virtual screening and molecular dynamics simulations

The overexpression of FGFR1 is thought to significantly contribute to the progression of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), impacting aspects such as tumorigenesis, growth, metastasis, and drug resistance. Consequently, the pursuit of effective inhibitors for FGFR1 is a key area of research interest. In response to this need, our study developed a hybrid virtual screening method. Utilizing KarmaDock, an innovative algorithm that blends deep learning with molecular docking, alongside Schrödinger's Residue Scanning. This strategy led us to identify compound 6, which demonstrated promising FGFR1 inhibitory activity, evidenced by an IC50 value of approximately 0.24 nM in the HTRF bioassay. Further evaluation revealed that this compound also inhibits the FGFR1 V561M variant with an IC50 value around 1.24 nM. Our subsequent investigations demonstrate that Compound 6 robustly suppresses the migration and invasion capacities of TNBC cell lines, through the downregulation of p-FGFR1 and modulation of EMT markers, highlighting its promise as a potent anti-metastatic therapeutic agent. Additionally, our use of molecular dynamics simulations provided a deeper understanding of the compound's specific binding interactions with FGFR1.

Analytic validation of an FGFR -focused cell-free DNA liquid biopsy assay (FGFR-Dx)

Commercial liquid biopsy assays are routinely used by oncologists to monitor disease response and resistance to therapy. Additionally, in cases where tumor tissue is not available, clinicians may rely on cell-free DNA (cfDNA) testing as a surrogate for comprehensive tumor testing. While some gene rearrangements are well detected, current commercial liquid biopsy assays exhibit low sensitivity for fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR ) rearrangements. FGFRs are altered in ∼2.5% of all cancers, including FGFR2 rearrangements in 10% of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and FGFR3 point mutations and rearrangements in 10-15% of urothelial carcinoma. Therefore, we developed and analytically validated FGFR-Dx, an FGFR -focused cfDNA assay with improved sensitivity for FGFR rearrangements. FGFR-Dx comprehensively targets the introns in FGFR1-3 previously shown to be involved in gene fusions as well as all coding exons. Custom FGFR synthetic reference standards representing both single nucleotide variants (SNVs) and gene rearrangements were utilized at a range of variant frequencies and revealed a detection limit of 0.5% with sensitivities of 97.2% and 92.9% for SNVs and rearrangements, respectively. Furthermore, FGFR-Dx detected rearrangements and identified the intronic breakpoints from cfDNA collected from 13 of 15 patients with known FGFR fusions.

New therapeutic target molecules for gastric and gastroesophageal junction cancer

Molecularly targeted therapy for receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs) has faced limitations in gastric and gastroesophageal junction (G/GEJ) cancer except for HER2-targeted agents, possibly due to inappropriate assay selection that has hindered identification of sensitive patients, in addition to coexisting genetic abnormalities as well as intratumoral heterogeneity. Immunohistochemistry of RTKs has, thus, proved largely unsuccessful for patient selection, and detection of RTK gene amplification as a true oncogenic driver is problematic given the small numbers of affected individuals. FGFR2 amplification is associated with poor prognosis in G/GEJ cancer, and immunohistochemistry of the FGFR2b protein isoform has proved effective for the detection of such FGFR2-dependent tumors. Phase III and Ib/III trials of the FGFR2-targeted antibody bemarituzumab for G/GEJ cancer overexpressing FGFR2b are ongoing based on the promising result in a phase II trial, especially in cases with an FGFR2b positivity of ≥ 10%. Challenges to EGFR- and MET-targeted therapies are being tackled with antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) and bispecific antibodies. CLDN18.2 is expressed in some G/GEJ tumors but lacks oncogenic driver potential, and the CLDN18.2-targeted antibody zolbetuximab prolonged the survival of CLDN18.2-positive G/GEJ cancer patients in phase III trials. Antibody-drug conjugates and ADCs that target CLDN18.2 are also being pursued for treatment of such patients. Similarly, targeting of nondriver molecules such as DKK1, TROP2, and CEACAM5 is under investigation in early-stage clinical trials. This shift in focus from target molecules with driver potential to markers for precise drug delivery should increase the number of possible targets in G/GEJ cancer.

A phase I drug-drug interaction study to assess the effect of futibatinib on P-gp and BCRP substrates and of P-gp inhibition on the pharmacokinetics of futibatinib

Futibatinib, an inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4, is approved for the treatment of patients with advanced cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. In this phase I drug-drug interaction study, the effects of futibatinib on P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) substrates, and of P-gp inhibition on futibatinib pharmacokinetics (PK) were investigated in healthy adults aged 18-55 years. In part 1, 20 participants received digoxin (P-gp substrate) and rosuvastatin (BCRP substrate). Following a ≥10-day washout, futibatinib was administered for 7 days, with digoxin and rosuvastatin coadministered on the third day. In part 2, 24 participants received futibatinib. Following a ≥3-day washout, quinidine (P-gp inhibitor) was administered for 4 days, with futibatinib coadministered on day 4. Blood samples were collected predose and for 24 (futibatinib), 72 (rosuvastatin), and 120 h (digoxin) postdose. Urine samples (digoxin) were collected predose and for 120 h postdose. PK parameters were compared between treatments using analysis of variance. Coadministration with futibatinib had no effect on the PK of digoxin and rosuvastatin, and coadministration with quinidine had minimal effects on the PK of futibatinib. Differences in Cmax and AUC with and without futibatinib and quinidine, respectively, were <20%. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were diarrhea (80%) and increased blood phosphorous (75%) in part 1 and prolonged electrocardiogram QT interval (38%) in part 2. The data show that futibatinib has no clinically meaningful effects on the PK of P-gp or BCRP substrates and that the effect of P-gp inhibition on futibatinib PK is not clinically relevant.

Erdafitinib in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors: an open-label, single-arm, phase IIa trial

BACKGROUND

FGFR genomic aberrations occur in approximately 5-10% of human cancers. Erdafitinib has previously demonstrated efficacy and safety in FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors, such as gliomas, thoracic, gastrointestinal, gynecological, and other rare cancers. However, its efficacy and safety in Asian patients remain largely unknown. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase IIa study of erdafitinib to evaluate its efficacy in Asian patients with FGFR-altered advanced cholangiocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients with pathologically/cytologically confirmed, advanced, or refractory tumors who met molecular and study eligibility criteria received oral erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with an option for pharmacodynamically guided up-titration to 9 mg on a 28-day cycle, except for four NSCLC patients who received erdafitinib 10 mg (7 days on/7 days off) as they were recruited before the protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics.

RESULTS

Thirty-five patients (cholangiocarcinoma: 22; NSCLC: 12; esophageal cancer: 1) were enrolled. At data cutoff (November 19, 2021), the objective response rate for patients with cholangiocarcinoma was 40.9% (95% CI, 20.7-63.6); the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.7) and median overall survival was 40.2 months (95% CI, 12.4-not estimable). No patient with RET/FGFR-altered NSCLC achieved objective response and the disease control rate was 25.0% (95% CI, 5.5-57.2%), with three patients with stable disease. The single patient with esophageal cancer achieved partial response. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, and grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (62.9%) patients. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event (all-grade, 85.7%).

CONCLUSIONS

Erdafitinib demonstrated efficacy in a population of Asian patients in selected advanced solid tumors, particularly in those with advanced FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma. Treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02699606); study registration (first posted): 04/03/2016.

Emerging Therapeutic Targets and Future Directions in Advanced Gastric Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Metastatic gastric cancer (GC) still represents a critical clinical challenge, with limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. Most patients are diagnosed at advanced stages, limiting the chances of surgery and cure. The identification of molecular targets and the possibility of combining immune checkpoint inhibitors with chemotherapy have recently reshaped the therapeutic landscape of metastatic gastric cancer. The new classification of gastric cancer, mainly based on immunologic and molecular criteria such as programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), microsatellite instability (MSI), and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), has made it possible to identify and differentiate patients who may benefit from immunotherapy, targeted therapy, or chemotherapy alone. All relevant and available molecular and immunological targets in clinical practice for the systemic treatment of this disease are presented. Particular attention is given to possible future approaches, including circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) for therapeutic monitoring, new targeting agents against molecular pathways such as fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) and MET, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells, and cancer vaccines. This review aims to provide a comprehensive understanding of current targets in advanced gastric cancer and to offer valuable insights into future directions of research and clinical practice in this challenging disease.

Management of intrahepatic and perihilar cholangiocarcinomas: Guidelines of the French Association for the Study of the Liver (AFEF)

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is the second most common malignant primary liver cancer. iCCA may develop on an underlying chronic liver disease and its incidence is growing in relation with the epidemics of obesity and metabolic diseases. In contrast, perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA) may follow a history of chronic inflammatory diseases of the biliary tract. The initial management of CCAs is often complex and requires multidisciplinary expertise. The French Association for the Study of the Liver wished to organize guidelines in order to summarize the best evidence available about several key points in iCCA and pCCA. These guidelines have been elaborated based on the level of evidence available in the literature and each recommendation has been analysed, discussed and voted by the panel of experts. They describe the epidemiology of CCA as well as how patients with iCCA or pCCA should be managed from diagnosis to treatment. The most recent developments of personalized medicine and use of targeted therapies are also highlighted.

Open-label, dose-escalation FIGHT-101 study of pemigatinib combined with targeted therapy, chemotherapy, or immunotherapy in patients with advanced malignancies

BACKGROUND

Pemigatinib is an oral, potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor. FIGHT-101, a three-part, open-label, first-in-human, phase I/II study (NCT02393248), evaluated pemigatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parts 1 and 2, pemigatinib monotherapy had a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in FGFR-altered tumors. Part 3 (pemigatinib combination therapies) results are presented here.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received 9, 13.5, or 20 mg oral once-daily pemigatinib on continuous or intermittent schedules with gemcitabine and cisplatin (pemi/gem/cis), docetaxel (pemi/doc), trastuzumab (pemi/tras), pembrolizumab (pemi/pembro), or retifanlimab (pemi/reti) irrespective of whether the tumor was confirmed as FGFR altered. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed tumor objective response rates (ORRs) and pharmacokinetics (PK).

RESULTS

Of 65 enrolled patients (pemi/gem/cis, n = 8; pemi/doc, n = 7; pemi/tras, n = 6; pemi/pembro, n = 26; pemi/reti, n = 18), all discontinued. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally consistent with individual drug AEs. Serious and grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 0%-85.7% and 33.3%-100.0% of patients across treatment groups, respectively. All pemigatinib combinations demonstrated steady-state PK comparable to monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic effects in all pemigatinib combinations, except pemi/gem/cis, were consistent with monotherapy. Less inhibition of FGFR2α phosphorylation was observed with this combination. ORRs (95% confidence interval) were 37.5% [8.5% to 75.5% (pemi/gem/cis)], 14.3% [0.4% to 57.9% (pemi/doc)], 0% (pemi/tras), 26.9% [11.6% to 47.8% (pemi/pembro)], and 11.1% [1.4% to 34.7% (pemi/reti)]. All groups had instances of tumor shrinkage. ORRs in assessable patients with FGFR rearrangements and mutations were 50% and 33%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pemigatinib combination therapy showed no unexpected toxicities. PK and pharmacodynamics were mostly consistent with pemigatinib monotherapy. Pemi/gem/cis (37.5%) and pemi/pembro (26.9%) had the highest ORR; most responders had FGFR alterations.

State-of-the-art and trends in fibroblast growth factor receptor-directed therapies in gastro-intestinal malignancies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review is timely and relevant due to the increasing recognition of the significance of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family in cancer biology. Understanding the role of FGFRs and their dysregulation in various cancers is crucial for developing targeted therapies and improving patient outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

The review highlights the importance of the FGFR family in cellular processes such as growth, proliferation, and survival. It discusses how abnormalities in FGFR2, including overexpression, gene amplification, and other genetic alterations, contribute to cancer progression, particularly in gastro-intestinal cancers. The paper also emphasizes the promising results of FGFR-targeted therapies, especially tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in certain cancers such as cholangiocarcinoma and oesophagogastric cancers.

SUMMARY

The findings underscore the potential of FGFR-targeted therapies in treating cancers with FGFR dysregulation. However, the review also addresses the challenges associated with these therapies, including toxicities and mechanisms of resistance. Understanding these complexities is essential for optimizing the efficacy of FGFR-targeted treatments and improving patient outcomes in clinical practice and research efforts.

Agnostic drug development revisited

The advent of molecular profiling and the generalization of next generation sequencing in oncology has enabled the identification of patients who could benefit from targeted agents. Since the tumor-agnostic approval of pembrolizumab for patients with MSI-High tumors in 2017, different molecularly-guided therapeutics have been awarded approvals and progressively incorporated in the treatment landscape across multiple tumor types. As the number of tumor-agnostic targets considered druggable expands in the clinic, novel challenges will reshape the drug development field involving all the stakeholders in oncology. In this review, we provide an overview of current tumor-agnostic approvals and discuss promising candidate therapeutics for tumor-agnostic designation and challenges for their broad implementation.

Integrating Molecular Insights into Biliary Tract Cancer Management: A Review of Personalized Therapeutic Strategies

Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are rare and aggressive malignancies with an increasing incidence and poor prognosis. The standard systemic treatment for BTCs has evolved to include immune checkpoint inhibitors associated with gemcitabine-cisplatin as first-line therapies. However, survival rates remain low, highlighting the critical need for personalized treatment strategies based on molecular profiling. Currently, significant advancements have been made in the molecular characterization of BTCs, where genetic alterations, such as IDH1 mutations and FGFR2 fusions, provide targets for therapy. Molecular profiling is crucial early in the management process to identify potential candidates for clinical trials and guide treatment strategy. The integration of these molecular insights into clinical practice has allowed for the development of targeted therapies, although many of them are still in the phase 2 trial stage without definitive survival benefits demonstrated in phase 3 trials. This integration of comprehensive molecular profile insights with traditional treatment approaches offers a new horizon in the personalized medicine landscape for BTCs, with the aim of significantly improving patient outcomes through precision oncology.

Landscape of targeted therapies for advanced urothelial carcinoma

Bladder cancer (BC) is the tenth most common malignancy globally. Urothelial carcinoma (UC) is a major type of BC, and advanced UC (aUC) is associated with poor clinical outcomes and limited survival rates. Current options for aUC treatment mainly include chemotherapy and immunotherapy. These options have moderate efficacy and modest impact on overall survival and thus highlight the need for novel therapeutic approaches. aUC patients harbor a high tumor mutation burden and abundant molecular alterations, which are the basis for targeted therapies. Erdafitinib is currently the only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved targeted therapy for aUC. Many potential targeted therapeutics aiming at other molecular alterations are under investigation. This review summarizes the current understanding of molecular alterations associated with aUC targeted therapy. It also comprehensively discusses the related interventions for treatment in clinical research and the potential of using novel targeted drugs in combination therapy.

Progress and prospects of biomarker-based targeted therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced gastric cancer

Gastric cancer and gastroesophageal junction cancer represent the leading cause of tumor-related death worldwide. Although advances in immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy have expanded treatment options, they have not significantly altered the prognosis for patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. A minority of patients, particularly those with PD-L1-positive, HER-2-positive, or MSI-high tumors, may benefit more from immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or HER-2-directed therapies in advanced stages. However, for those lacking specific targets and unique molecular features, conventional chemotherapy remains the only recommended effective and durable regimen. In this review, we summarize the roles of various signaling pathways and further investigate the available targets. Then, the current results of phase II/III clinical trials in advanced gastric cancer, along with the superiorities and limitations of the existing biomarkers, are specifically discussed. Finally, we will offer our insights in precision treatment pattern when encountering the substantial challenges.

Prolonged Clinical Benefit with Futibatinib in a Patient with FGFR Inhibitor-Pretreated FGFR2 Fusion-Positive Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Case Report

Multiple FGFR inhibitors have demonstrated significant activity in pretreated advanced FGFR2 fusion-positive intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The irreversible pan-FGFR inhibitor futibatinib has the potential to overcome acquired resistance to ATP-competitive FGFR inhibitors in a subset of patients. We present a case of prolonged clinical benefit using FGFR inhibitors sequentially, initially an ATP-competitive inhibitor followed by futibatinib upon progression, for a total of 36 months of FGFR-targeting therapy. This case supports sequential FGFR-targeting therapies for FGFR2 fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma, with futibatinib acting as rescue therapy after failure of ATP-competitive inhibitors.

Small molecule anticancer drugs approved during 2021-2022: Synthesis and clinical applications

Drugs have structural homology across similar biological targets. Small molecule drugs have the efficacy to target specific molecular targets within the cancer cells with enhanced cell membrane permeability, oral administration, selectivity, and specific affinity. The objective of this review is to highlight the clinical importance and synthetic routes of new small molecule oncology drugs approved by the FDA during the period 2021-2022. These marketed drugs are listed based on the month and year of approval in chronological order. We believed that an in-depth insight into the synthetic approaches for the construction of these chemical entities would enhance the ability to develop new drugs more efficiently.

Pemigatinib in previously treated solid tumors with activating FGFR1-FGFR3 alterations: phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket trial

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations drive oncogenesis in multiple tumor types. Here we studied pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral FGFR1-FGFR3 inhibitor, in the phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket study of FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) in cohorts A (fusions/rearrangements, n = 49) and B (activating non-kinase domain mutations, n = 32). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival in cohorts A and B, and safety. Exploratory end points included ORR of cohort C (kinase domain mutations, potentially pathogenic variants of unknown significance, n = 26) and analysis of co-alterations associated with resistance and response. ORRs for cohorts A, B and C were 26.5% (13/49), 9.4% (3/32) and 3.8% (1/26), respectively. Tumors with no approved FGFR inhibitors or those with alterations not previously confirmed to be sensitive to FGFR inhibition had objective responses. In cohorts A and B, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 and 3.7 months, median duration of response was 7.8 and 6.9 months and median overall survival was 17.5 and 11.4 months, respectively. Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (84%) and stomatitis (53%). TP53 co-mutations were associated with lack of response and BAP1 alterations with higher response rates. FGFR1-FGFR3 gatekeeper and molecular brake mutations led to acquired resistance. New therapeutic areas for FGFR inhibition and drug failure mechanisms were identified across tumor types. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03822117 .

Basket Trials: Past, Present, and Future

Large-scale tumor molecular profiling has revealed that diverse cancer histologies are driven by common pathways with unifying biomarkers that can be exploited therapeutically. Disease-agnostic basket trials have been increasingly utilized to test biomarker-driven therapies across cancer types. These trials have led to drug approvals and improved the lives of patients while simultaneously advancing our understanding of cancer biology. This review focuses on the practicalities of implementing basket trials, with an emphasis on molecularly targeted trials. We examine the biologic subtleties of genomic biomarker and patient selection, discuss previous successes in drug development facilitated by basket trials, describe certain novel targets and drugs, and emphasize practical considerations for participant recruitment and study design. This review also highlights strategies for aiding patient access to basket trials. As basket trials become more common, steps to ensure equitable implementation of these studies will be critical for molecularly targeted drug development.

Clinical Developments and Challenges in Treating FGFR2-Driven Gastric Cancer

Recent advances in the treatment of gastric cancer (GC) with chemotherapy, immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted therapies have yielded some improvement in survival outcomes; however, metastatic GC remains a lethal malignancy and amongst the leading causes of cancer-related mortality worldwide. Importantly, the ongoing molecular characterisation of GCs continues to uncover potentially actionable molecular targets. Among these, aberrant FGFR2-driven signalling, predominantly arising from FGFR2 amplification, occurs in approximately 3-11% of GCs. However, whilst several inhibitors of FGFR have been clinically tested to-date, there are currently no approved FGFR-directed therapies for GC. In this review, we summarise the significance of FGFR2 as an actionable therapeutic target in GC, examine the recent pre-clinical and clinical data supporting the use of small-molecule inhibitors, antibody-based therapies, as well as novel approaches such as proteolysis-targeting chimeras (PROTACs) for targeting FGFR2 in these tumours, and discuss the ongoing challenges and opportunities associated with their clinical development.

Insights for clinical management from the real-life data of the centralized West of Scotland biliary cancer clinic

BACKGROUND

With the increasing of novel therapeutics for the treatment of Biliary Tract Cancers (BTC), and the need to assess their socio-economic impacts for national licence approvals, it is as important as ever to have real-life data in national populations.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We performed an audit of the first 2 year-activity (Sep 2019-Sep 2021) of the centralized West-of-Scotland-BTC clinic. 122 patients accessed the service, including 68% with cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), 27% with gallbladder cancer (GBC), and 5% with ampulla of Vater carcinoma with biliary phenotype (AVC). Median age at diagnosis was 66 (28-84), with 30% of newly diagnosed patients being younger than 60 years-old. Thirty-five cases (29%) underwent surgery, followed by adjuvant-chemotherapy in 66%. 60% had recurrent disease (80% with distant relapse). Sixty-four patients (58%) started first-line Systemic-AntiCancer-Treatment (SACT). Of these, 37% received second line SACT, the majority of which had iCCA and GBC. Thirty-% of those who progressed received third line SACT.

CONCLUSIONS

About 30% of BTC were eligible for curative surgery. Fifty-eight and twenty% of the overall cohort of advanced BTC patients received first and second line SACT. Our data suggest that reflex genomic profiling may not be cost-effective until molecularly driven strategies are limited to second line setting.

The Irreversible FGFR Inhibitor KIN-3248 Overcomes FGFR2 Kinase Domain Mutations

PURPOSE

FGFR2 and FGFR3 show oncogenic activation in many cancer types, often through chromosomal fusion or extracellular domain mutation. FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations are most prevalent in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and bladder cancers, respectively, and multiple selective reversible and covalent pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have been approved in these contexts. However, resistance, often due to acquired secondary mutations in the FGFR2/3 kinase domain, limits efficacy. Resistance is typically polyclonal, involving a spectrum of different mutations that most frequently affect the molecular brake and gatekeeper residues (N550 and V565 in FGFR2).

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Here, we characterize the activity of the next-generation covalent FGFR inhibitor, KIN-3248, in preclinical models of FGFR2 fusion+ ICC harboring a series of secondary kinase domain mutations, in vitro and in vivo. We also test select FGFR3 alleles in bladder cancer models.

RESULTS

KIN-3248 exhibits potent selectivity for FGFR1-3 and retains activity against various FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, in addition to being effective against FGFR3 V555M and N540K mutations. Notably, KIN-3248 activity extends to the FGFR2 V565F gatekeeper mutation, which causes profound resistance to currently approved FGFR inhibitors. Combination treatment with EGFR or MEK inhibitors potentiates KIN-3248 efficacy in vivo, including in models harboring FGFR2 kinase domain mutations.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, KIN-3248 is a novel FGFR1-4 inhibitor whose distinct activity profile against FGFR kinase domain mutations highlights its potential for the treatment of ICC and other FGFR-driven cancers.

How to incorporate new agents into precise medicine for cholangiocarcinoma?

Cholangiocarcinoma, a rare and aggressive form of cancer originating from the bile ducts in the liver, poses a significant challenge for treatment. However, the emergence of precision medicine has brought newfound hope for more effective therapies. Several precision medicine approaches have demonstrated promise in the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. One such approach is targeted therapy, which involves utilizing drugs that specifically target the genetic mutations or alterations present in the tumor cells. In the case of cholangiocarcinoma, mutations in the IDH1 and IDH2 genes are frequently observed. Immunotherapy is another precision medicine approach being explored for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Immune checkpoint inhibitors like pembrolizumab and nivolumab can be used to bolster the body's immune response against cancer cells. While the response to immunotherapy can vary among individuals, studies have shown promising results, particularly in patients with high levels of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes or microsatellite instability. Moreover, molecular profiling of cholangiocarcinoma tumors can play a crucial role in identifying potential targets for precision medicine. Through advanced next-generation sequencing techniques, specific gene alterations or dysregulations in pathways can be identified, potentially guiding treatment decisions. This personalized approach enables tailored treatment plans based on the unique genetic characteristics of each patient's tumor. In conclusion, the advent of precision medicine has opened up new avenues for the treatment of cholangiocarcinoma. Targeted therapy and immunotherapy have exhibited promising results, and further molecular profiling is expected to uncover additional therapeutic options. Such advancements represent a significant step forward in the quest to enhance outcomes for individuals affected by cholangiocarcinoma.

Biliary tract cancers: French national clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (TNCD, SNFGE, FFCD, UNICANCER, GERCOR, SFCD, SFED, AFEF, SFRO, SFP, SFR, ACABi, ACHBPT)

INTRODUCTION

This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines of the management of biliary tract cancers (BTC) (intrahepatic, perihilar and distal cholangiocarcinomas, and gallbladder carcinomas) published in September 2023, available on the website of the French Society of Gastroenterology (SNFGE) (www.tncd.org).

METHODS

This collaborative work was conducted under the auspices of French medical and surgical societies involved in the management of BTC. Recommendations were graded in three categories (A, B and C) according to the level of scientific evidence until August 2023.

RESULTS

BTC diagnosis and staging is mainly based on enhanced computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and (endoscopic) ultrasound-guided biopsy. Treatment strategy depends on BTC subtype and disease stage. Surgery followed by adjuvant capecitabine is recommended for localised disease. No neoadjuvant treatment is validated to date. Cisplatin-gemcitabine chemotherapy combined to the anti-PD-L1 inhibitor durvalumab is the first-line standard of care for advanced disease. Early systematic tumour molecular profiling is recommended to screen for actionable alterations (IDH1 mutations, FGFR2 rearrangements, HER2 amplification, BRAFV600E mutation, MSI/dMMR status, etc.) and guide subsequent lines of treatment. In the absence of actionable alterations, FOLFOX chemotherapy is the only second-line standard-of-care. No third-line chemotherapy standard is validated to date.

CONCLUSION

These guidelines are intended to provide a personalised therapeutic strategy for daily clinical practice. Each individual BTC case should be discussed by a multidisciplinary team.

[Personalized medicine in oncology]

Due to the considerable technological progress in molecular and genetic diagnostics as well as increasing insights into the molecular pathogenesis of diseases, there has been a fundamental paradigm shift in the past two decades from a "one-size-fits-all approach" to personalized, molecularly informed treatment strategies. Personalized medicine or precision medicine focuses on the genetic, physiological, molecular, and biochemical differences between individuals and considers their effects on the development, prevention, and treatment of diseases. As a pioneer of personalized medicine, the field of oncology is particularly noteworthy, where personalized diagnostics and treatment have led to lasting change in the treatment of cancer patients in recent years. In this article, the significant change towards personalized treatment concepts, especially in the field of personalized oncology, will be discussed and examined in more detail.

Exploring FGFR signaling inhibition as a promising approach in breast cancer treatment

As our grasp of cancer genomics deepens, we are steadily progressing towards the domain of precision medicine, where targeted therapy stands out as a revolutionary breakthrough in the landscape of cancer therapeutics. The fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) pathway has been unveiled as a fundamental instigator in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying breast carcinoma, paving the way for the exhilarating development of precision-targeted therapeutics. In the pursuit of exploring inhibitors that specifically target the FGFR signaling pathways, a multitude of kinase inhibitors targeting FGFR has been assiduously engineered to address the heterogeneous landscape of human malignancies. This review offers an exhaustive exploration of aberrations within the FGFR pathway and their functional implications in breast cancer. Additionally, we delve into cutting-edge therapeutic approaches for the treatment of breast cancer patients bearing FGFR alterations and the management of toxicity associated with FGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, our contemplation of the evolution of cutting-edge FGFR inhibitors foresees their potential to spearhead innovative therapeutic approaches in the ongoing combat against cancer.

A Phase I Study of KIN-3248, an Irreversible Small-molecule Pan-FGFR Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced FGFR2/3-driven Solid Tumors

PURPOSE

Despite efficacy of approved FGFR inhibitors, emergence of polyclonal secondary mutations in the FGFR kinase domain leads to acquired resistance. KIN-3248 is a selective, irreversible, orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor of FGFR1-4 that blocks both primary oncogenic and secondary kinase domain resistance FGFR alterations.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

A first-in-human, phase I study of KIN-3248 was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR2 and/or FGFR3 gene alterations (NCT05242822). The primary objective was determination of MTD/recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary and exploratory objectives included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and molecular response by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) clearance.

RESULTS

Fifty-four patients received doses ranging from 5 to 50 mg orally daily across six cohorts. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (48.1%), gastric (9.3%), and urothelial (7.4%) were the most common tumors. Tumors harbored FGFR2 (68.5%) or FGFR3 (31.5%) alterations-23 (42.6%) received prior FGFR inhibitors. One dose-limiting toxicity (hypersensitivity) occurred in cohort 1 (5 mg). Treatment-related, adverse events included hyperphosphatemia, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The MTD/RP2D was not established. Exposure was dose proportional and concordant with hyperphosphatemia. Five partial responses were observed; 4 in FGFR inhibitor naïve and 1 in FGFR pretreated patients. Pretreatment ctDNA profiling confirmed FGFR2/3 alterations in 63.3% of cases and clearance at cycle 2 associated with radiographic response.

CONCLUSION

The trial was terminated early for commercial considerations; therefore, RP2D was not established. Preliminary clinical data suggest that KIN-3248 is a safe, oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor with favorable pharmacokinetic parameters, though further dose escalation was required to nominate the MTD/RP2D.

SIGNIFICANCE

KIN-3248 was a rationally designed, next generation selective FGFR inhibitor, that was effective in interfering with both FGFR wild-type and mutant signaling. Clinical data indicate that KIN-3248 is safe with a signal of antitumor activity. Translational science support the mechanism of action in that serum phosphate was proportional with exposure, paired biopsies suggested phospho-ERK inhibition (a downstream target of FGFR2/3), and ctDNA clearance may act as a RECIST response surrogate.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for grade 2 gliomas (2023)

The 2021 World Health Organization (WHO) classification has updated the definition of grade 2 gliomas and the presence of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutation has been deemed the cornerstone of diagnosis. Though slow-growing and having a low proliferative index, grade 2 gliomas are incurable by surgery and complementary treatments are vital to improving prognosis. This guideline provides recommendations on the multidisciplinary treatment of grade 2 astrocytomas and oligodendrogliomas based on the best evidence available.

Primary Results of Patients with Genitourinary Malignancies Presented at a Molecular Tumor Board

INTRODUCTION

Personalized medicine poses great opportunities and challenges. While the therapeutic landscape markedly expands, descriptions about status, clinical implementation and real-world benefits of precision oncology and molecular tumor boards (MTB) remain sparse, particularly in the field of genitourinary (GU) cancer. Hence, this study characterized urological MTB cases to better understand the potential role of MTB in uro-oncology.

METHODS

We analyzed patients with complete data sets being reviewed at an MTB from January 2019 to October 2022, focusing on results of molecular analysis and treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

We evaluated 102 patients with GU cancer with a mean patient age of 61.7 years. Prostate cancer (PCa) was the most frequent entity with 52.9% (54/102), followed by bladder cancer (18.6%, 19/102) and renal cell carcinoma (14.7%, 15/102). On average, case presentation at MTB took place 54.9 months after initial diagnosis and after 2.7 previous lines of therapy. During the study period, 49.0% (50/102) of patients deceased. Additional MTB-based treatment recommendations were achieved in a majority of 68.6% (70/102) of patients, with a recommendation for targeted therapy in 64.3% (45/70) of these patients. Only 6.7% (3/45) of patients - due to different reasons - received the recommended MTB-based therapy though, with 33% (1/3) of patients reaching disease control. Throughout the MTB study period, GU cancer case presentations and treatment recommendations increased, while the time interval between initial presentation and final therapy recommendation were decreasing over time.

CONCLUSION

Presentation of uro-oncological patients at the MTB is a highly valuable measure for clinical decision-making. Prospectively, earlier presentation of patients at the MTB and changing legislative issues regarding comprehensive molecular testing and targeted treatment approval might further improve patients' benefits from comprehensive molecular diagnostics.

Safety Profile and Adverse Event Management for Futibatinib, An Irreversible FGFR1-4 Inhibitor: Pooled Safety Analysis of 469 Patients

PURPOSE

Futibatinib, a covalently-binding inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)1-4 gained approval for the treatment of refractory, advanced intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) harboring an FGFR2 fusion/other rearrangement. An integrated analysis was performed to evaluate safety and provide guidance on the management of futibatinib-associated adverse events (AEs) in patients with unresectable/metastatic tumors, including iCCA.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from three global phase I or II studies of futibatinib (NCT02052778; JapicCTI-142552) were pooled. AEs were graded per NCI CTCAE v4.03, where applicable. Safety was analyzed for patients receiving any futibatinib starting dose (overall population) and in those receiving the approved starting dose of 20 mg once every day.

RESULTS

In total, 469 patients with one of 33 known tumor types were analyzed, including 318 patients who received futibatinib 20 mg every day. AEs of clinical interest (AECI; any grade/grade ≥3) in the overall population included hyperphosphatemia (82%/19%), nail disorders (27%/1%), hepatic AEs (27%/11%), stomatitis (19%/3%), palmar-plantar erythrodysesthesia syndrome (PPES; 13%/3%), rash (9%/0%), retinal disorders (8%/0%), and cataract (4%/1%). Median time to onset of grade ≥3 AECIs ranged from 9 days (hyperphosphatemia) to 125 days (cataract). Grade ≥3 hyperphosphatemia, hepatic AEs, PPES, and nail disorders resolved to grade ≤2 within a median of 7, 7, 8, and 28 days, respectively. Discontinuations due to treatment-related AEs were rare (2%), and no treatment-related deaths occurred. AE management included phosphate-lowering medication and dose adjustments.

CONCLUSIONS

Futibatinib showed a consistent and manageable safety profile across patients with various tumor types. AECIs were mostly reversible with appropriate clinical management.

Mechanistic insights and the clinical prospects of targeted therapies for glioblastoma: a comprehensive review

Glioblastoma (GBM) is a fatal brain tumour that is traditionally diagnosed based on histological features. Recent molecular profiling studies have reshaped the World Health Organization approach in the classification of central nervous system tumours to include more pathogenetic hallmarks. These studies have revealed that multiple oncogenic pathways are dysregulated, which contributes to the aggressiveness and resistance of GBM. Such findings have shed light on the molecular vulnerability of GBM and have shifted the disease management paradigm from chemotherapy to targeted therapies. Targeted drugs have been developed to inhibit oncogenic targets in GBM, including receptors involved in the angiogenic axis, the signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3), the PI3K/AKT/mTOR signalling pathway, the ubiquitination-proteasome pathway, as well as IDH1/2 pathway. While certain targeted drugs showed promising results in vivo, the translatability of such preclinical achievements in GBM remains a barrier. We also discuss the recent developments and clinical assessments of targeted drugs, as well as the prospects of cell-based therapies and combinatorial therapy as novel ways to target GBM. Targeted treatments have demonstrated preclinical efficacy over chemotherapy as an alternative or adjuvant to the current standard of care for GBM, but their clinical efficacy remains hindered by challenges such as blood-brain barrier penetrance of the drugs. The development of combinatorial targeted therapies is expected to improve therapeutic efficacy and overcome drug resistance.

Targeted Therapy for Highly Desmoplastic and Immunosuppressive Tumor Microenvironment of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is a highly lethal malignancy with a very poor prognosis. Despite advancements in treatment strategies, PDAC remains recalcitrant to therapies because patients are often diagnosed at an advanced stage. The advanced stage of PDAC is characterized by metastasis, which typically renders it unresectable by surgery or untreatable by chemotherapy. The tumor microenvironment (TME) of PDAC comprises highly proliferative myofibroblast-like cells and hosts the intense deposition of a extracellular matrix component that forms dense fibrous connective tissue, a process called the desmoplastic reaction. In desmoplastic TMEs, the incessant aberration of signaling pathways contributes to immunosuppression by suppressing antitumor immunity. This feature offers a protective barrier that impedes the targeted delivery of drugs. In addition, the efficacy of immunotherapy is compromised because of the immune cold TME of PDAC. Targeted therapy approaches towards stromal and immunosuppressive TMEs are challenging. In this review, we discuss cellular and non-cellular TME components that contain actionable targets for drug development. We also highlight findings from preclinical studies and provide updates about the efficacies of new investigational drugs in clinical trials.

Hyperglycemia activates FGFR1 via TLR4/c-Src pathway to induce inflammatory cardiomyopathy in diabetes

Protein tyrosine kinases (RTKs) modulate a wide range of pathophysiological events in several non-malignant disorders, including diabetic complications. To find new targets driving the development of diabetic cardiomyopathy (DCM), we profiled an RTKs phosphorylation array in diabetic mouse hearts and identified increased phosphorylated fibroblast growth factor receptor 1 (p-FGFR1) levels in cardiomyocytes, indicating that FGFR1 may contribute to the pathogenesis of DCM. Using primary cardiomyocytes and H9C2 cell lines, we discovered that high-concentration glucose (HG) transactivates FGFR1 kinase domain through toll-like receptor 4 (TLR4) and c-Src, independent of FGF ligands. Knocking down the levels of either TLR4 or c-Src prevents HG-activated FGFR1 in cardiomyocytes. RNA-sequencing analysis indicates that the elevated FGFR1 activity induces pro-inflammatory responses via MAPKs-NFκB signaling pathway in HG-challenged cardiomyocytes, which further results in fibrosis and hypertrophy. We then generated cardiomyocyte-specific FGFR1 knockout mice and showed that a lack of FGFR1 in cardiomyocytes prevents diabetes-induced cardiac inflammation and preserves cardiac function in mice. Pharmacological inhibition of FGFR1 by a selective inhibitor, AZD4547, also prevents cardiac inflammation, fibrosis, and dysfunction in both type 1 and type 2 diabetic mice. These studies have identified FGFR1 as a new player in driving DCM and support further testing of FGFR1 inhibitors for possible cardioprotective benefits.

Pancreatic cancer biomarkers: A pathway to advance in personalized treatment selection

Pancreatic cancer is one of the tumors with the worst prognosis, and unlike other cancers, few advances have been made in recent years. The only curative option is surgery, but only 15-20% of patients are candidates, with a high risk of relapse. In advanced pancreatic cancer there are few first-line treatment options and no validated biomarkers for better treatment selection. The development of targeted therapies in pancreatic cancer is increasingly feasible due to tumor-agnostic treatments, such as PARP inhibitors in patients with BRCA1, BRCA2 or PALB2 alterations or immunotherapies in patients with high microsatellite instability/tumor mutational burden. In addition, other therapeutic molecules have been developed for patients with KRAS G12C mutation or fusions in NTRK or NRG1. Consequently, there has been a growing interest in biomarkers that may help guide targeted therapy in pancreatic cancer. Therefore, this review aims to offer an updated perspective on biomarkers with therapeutic potential in pancreatic cancer.

FGFR-targeted therapeutics: clinical activity, mechanisms of resistance and new directions

Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signalling via FGF receptors (FGFR1-4) orchestrates fetal development and contributes to tissue and whole-body homeostasis, but can also promote tumorigenesis. Various agents, including pan-FGFR inhibitors (erdafitinib and futibatinib), FGFR1/2/3 inhibitors (infigratinib and pemigatinib), as well as a range of more-specific agents, have been developed and several have entered clinical use. Erdafitinib is approved for patients with urothelial carcinoma harbouring FGFR2/3 alterations, and futibatinib and pemigatinib are approved for patients with cholangiocarcinoma harbouring FGFR2 fusions and/or rearrangements. Clinical benefit from these agents is in part limited by hyperphosphataemia owing to off-target inhibition of FGFR1 as well as the emergence of resistance mutations in FGFR genes, activation of bypass signalling pathways, concurrent TP53 alterations and possibly epithelial-mesenchymal transition-related isoform switching. The next generation of small-molecule inhibitors, such as lirafugratinib and LOXO-435, and the FGFR2-specific antibody bemarituzumab are expected to have a reduced risk of hyperphosphataemia and the ability to overcome certain resistance mutations. In this Review, we describe the development and current clinical role of FGFR inhibitors and provide perspective on future research directions including expansion of the therapeutic indications for use of FGFR inhibitors, combination of these agents with immune-checkpoint inhibitors and the application of novel technologies, such as artificial intelligence.

Precision Oncology in Hepatopancreatobiliary Cancer Surgery

Advances in technology have allowed for the characterization of tumors at the genomic, transcriptomic, and proteomic levels. There are well-established targets for biliary tract cancers, with exciting new targets emerging in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma and potential targets in hepatocellular carcinoma. Taken together, these data suggest an important role for molecular profiling for personalizing cancer therapy in advanced disease and need for design of novel neoadjuvant studies to leverage these novel therapeutics perioperatively in the surgical patient.

Genetic/Epigenetic Alteration and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Intrahepatic Cholangiocarcinoma: Transforming the Immune Microenvironment with Molecular-Targeted Agents

Background

Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, leading to limited treatment options and a poor prognosis. So far, standard systemic therapy for advanced iCCA has been a combination of gemcitabine and cisplatin. However, recent advancements in the understanding of the molecular characteristics of iCCA have opened new possibilities for molecular-targeted therapies and immunotherapy.

Summary

Reportedly, 9-36% of iCCA cases have an inflamed tumor immune microenvironment (TME) based on the immune gene expression signature, which is characterized by the presence of immune cells involved in anti-tumor immune responses. The majority of iCCA cases have a non-inflamed TME with a lack of effector T cells, rendering immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) ineffective in these cases. Interestingly, alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR2) gene and IDH1/2 gene mutations are often observed in the non-inflamed TME in iCCA. Several mechanisms have been reported for the role of driver mutations on the establishment of TME unique for iCCA. For example, IDH1/2 mutations, which cause an increase in DNA methylation, are associated with the downregulation and hypermethylation of antigen processing and presentation machinery, which may contribute to the establishment of a non-inflamed TME. Therefore, inhibitors targeting IDH1/2 may restore the DNA methylation and expression status of molecules involved in antigen presentation, potentially improving the efficacy of ICIs. FGFR inhibitors may also have the potential to modulate immunosuppressive TME by inhibitingthe suppressor of cytokine signaling 1 and activating the interferon-γ signaling as a consequence of inhibition of the FGFR signal. From this perspective, understanding the molecular characteristics of iCCA, including the TME and driver mutations, is essential for the effective application of ICIs and molecular-targeted therapies.

Key Messages

Combination approaches that target both the tumor and immune system hold promise for improving the outcomes of patients with iCCA. Further research and clinical trials are needed to validate these approaches and optimize the treatment strategies for iCCA.

A comprehensive overview of selective and novel fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as a potential anticancer modality

The arrival of comprehensive genome sequencing has accelerated the understanding of genetically aberrant advanced cancers and target identification for possible cancer treatment. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene alterations are frequent findings in various rare and advanced cancers refractive to mainstay chemo-therapy or surgical interventions. Several FGFR inhibitors have been developed for addressing these genetically altered FGFR-harboring malignancies, and some have performed well in clinical trials. In contrast, others are still being investigated in different phases of clinical trials. FDA has approved four anticancer agents such as erdafitinib, pemigatinib, infigratinib, and futibatinib, for clinical use in oncogenic FGFR-driven malignancies. These include cholangiocarcinoma, urothelial carcinoma, and myeloid/lymphoid malignancies. Pemigatinib is the only FGFR inhibitor globally approved (USA, EU, and Japan) and available as a targeted therapy for two types of cancer, including FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangements harboring cholangiocarcinoma and relapsed/refractory myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms with FGFR1 rearrangements. Myeloid/lymphoid neoplasm is the latest area of application added to the therapeutic armamentarium of FGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, futibatinib is the first-in-class covalent or irreversible pan-FGFR inhibitor that has received FDA approval for locally advanced or metastatic intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 gene aberrations. This review highlights the current clinical progress concerning the safety and efficacy of all the approved FGFR-TKIs (tyrosine kinase inhibitors) and their ongoing investigations in clinical trials for other oncogenic FGFR-driven malignancies.

FGFR1/2/3-rearranged carcinoma of the head and neck: expanded histological spectrum crossing path with high-risk HPV in the sinonasal tract

AIMS

Oncogenic FGFR1/2/3 rearrangements are found in various cancers. Reported cases in head and neck (HN) are mainly squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs) with FGFR3::TACC3 fusions, a subset of which also harbour high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV). However, the knowledge of the clinicopathological spectrum of FGFR-rearranged head and neck carcinomas (FHNC) is limited.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A retrospective MSK-fusion clinical sequencing cohort 2016-23 was searched to identify malignant tumours in the HN region harbouring FGFR1/2/3 fusion. FHNC were characterised by histological examination, immunohistochemistry and molecular analysis. Electronic medical records were reviewed. Three FHNC were identified. Two cases (cases 1 and 2) involved sinonasal tract and were high-grade carcinomas with squamous, basaloid, glandular and/or ductal-myoepithelial features. Case 1 arose in a 79-year-old man and harboured FGFR2::KIF1A fusion. Case 2 arose in a 58-year-old man, appeared as HPV-related multiphenotypic sinonasal carcinoma (HMSC), and was positive for FGFR2::TACC2 fusion and concurrent high-risk HPV, non-type 16/18. Case 3 was FGFR3::TACC3 fusion-positive keratinising SCCs arising in the parotid of a 60-year-old man. All three cases presented at stage T4. Clinical follow-up was available in two cases; case 1 remained disease-free for 41 months post-treatment and case 3 died of disease 2 months after the diagnosis.

CONCLUSIONS

FHNC include a morphological spectrum of carcinomas with squamous features and may occur in different HN locations, such as parotid gland and the sinonasal tract. Sinonasal cases can harbour FGFR2 rearrangement with or without associated high-risk HPV. Timely recognition of FHNC could help select patients potentially amenable to targeted therapy with FGFR inhibitors. Further studies are needed (1) to determine if FGFR2 rearranged/HPV-positive sinonasal carcinomas are biologically distinct from HMSC, and (2) to elucidate the biological and clinical significance of FGFR2 rearrangement in the context of high-risk HPV.

Impact of tissue-agnostic approvals on management of primary brain tumors

Novel tissue-agnostic therapeutics targeting driver mutations in tumor cells have been recently approved by FDA, driven by basket trials that have demonstrated their efficacy and safety across diverse tumor histology. However, the relative rarity of primary brain tumors (PBTs) has limited their representation in early trials of tissue-agnostic medications. Thus, consensus continues to evolve regarding utility of tissue-agnostic medications in routine practice for PBTs, a diverse group of neoplasms characterized by limited treatment options and unfavorable prognoses. We describe current and potential impact of tissue-agnostic approvals on management of PBTs. We discuss data from clinical trials for PBTs regarding tissue-agnostic targets, including BRAFV600E, neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusions, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-High), mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR), and high tumor mutational burden (TMB-H), in context of challenges in managing PBTs. Described are additional tissue-agnostic targets that hold promise for benefiting patients with PBTs, including RET fusion, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), ERBB2/HER2, and KRASG12C, and TP53Y220C.

Activated FGFR2 signalling as a biomarker for selection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma patients candidate to FGFR targeted therapies

FGFR inhibitors have been developed to inhibit FGFR activation and signal transduction; notwithstanding, currently the selection of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) patients for these drugs only relies on the detection of FGFR2 genetic alterations (GAs) in tumor tissues or circulating tumor DNAs, without concomitant assessment of FGFR2 signalling status. Accordingly, we performed multi-omic analyses of FGFR2 genes and FGFR2 signalling molecules in the tissue samples from 36 iCCA naïve patients. Gain-of-function FGFR2 GAs were detected in 7 patients, including missense mutations (n = 3; p.F276C, p.C382R and p.Y375C), translocations (n = 1) and copy number gain (n = 4; CNV ≥ 4). In contrast, among 29 patients with wild-type FGFR2, 4 cases showed activation of FGFR2 signalling, as they expressed the FGFR2 ligand FGF10 and phosphorylated FGFR2/FRS2α proteins; the remaining 25 cases resulted negative for activated FGFR2 signalling, as they lacked FGFR2 (n = 8) or phosphorylated FRS2α (n = 17) expression. Overall, we found that activation of FGFR2 signalling occurs not only in iCCA naïve patients with FGFR2 GAs, but also in a subgroup carrying wild-type FGFR2. This last finding entails that also this setting of patients could benefit from FGFR targeted therapies, widening indication of these drugs for iCCA patients beyond current approval. Future clinical studies are therefore encouraged to confirm this hypothesis.

Synthesis and Evaluation of Novel 99mTc-Labeled FGFR2-Targeting Peptides

To develop radiolabeled FGFR2-targeting probes for visualizing fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) expression levels in the tumor microenvironment, four novel 99mTc-labeled FGFR2-targeting peptides ([99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-1, [99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-2, [99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-3, and [99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-4) with different amino acid linkers between the targeted peptide moiety and the 99mTc chelating group were designed and synthesized. The in vitro cellular inhibition, internalization, and efflux results demonstrated that the four 99mTc complexes exhibited FGFR2-specific binding and prolonged cellular retention in DU145 human prostate cancer cells, which indicated that modification from the glycine side (N-terminal) of CH02 was feasible. Among them, [99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-1 exhibited the highest in vitro cellular uptake and in vivo tumor uptake at 30 min postinjection, and tumor uptake could be significantly inhibited by the competitor CH02 (53% inhibited, p < 0.05), suggesting the tumor-specific targeting ability of [99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-1. The DU145-xenografted tumor lesions were clearly visualized by single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)/CT at 30 min postinjection of [99mTc]Tc-FGFR2-1, highlighting its potential as a SPECT imaging probe for tumor FGFR2 detection.

Pemigatinib for metastatic or surgically unresectable urothelial carcinoma with FGF/FGFR genomic alterations: final results from FIGHT-201

BACKGROUND

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) alterations are oncogenic drivers of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Pemigatinib is a selective, oral inhibitor of FGFR1-3 with antitumor activity. We report the efficacy and safety of pemigatinib in the open-label, single-arm, phase II study of previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 alterations (FIGHT-201; NCT02872714).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients ≥18 years old with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements (cohort A) and other FGF/FGFR alterations (cohort B) were included. Patients received pemigatinib 13.5 mg once daily continuously (CD) or intermittently (ID) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was centrally confirmed objective response rate (ORR) as per RECIST v1.1 in cohort A-CD. Secondary endpoints included ORR in cohorts A-ID and B, duration of response (DOR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety.

RESULTS

Overall, 260 patients were enrolled and treated (A-CD, n = 101; A-ID, n = 103; B, n = 44; unconfirmed FGF/FGFR status, n = 12). All discontinued treatment, most commonly due to progressive disease (68.5%). ORR [95% confidence interval (CI)] in cohorts A-CD and A-ID was 17.8% (10.9% to 26.7%) and 23.3% (15.5% to 32.7%), respectively. Among patients with the most common FGFR3 mutation (S249C; n = 107), ORR was similar between cohorts (A-CD, 23.9%; A-ID, 24.6%). In cohorts A-CD/A-ID, median (95% CI) DOR was 6.2 (4.1-8.3)/6.2 (4.6-8.0) months, PFS was 4.0 (3.5-4.2)/4.3 (3.9-6.1) months, and OS was 6.8 (5.3-9.1)/8.9 (7.5-15.2) months. Pemigatinib had limited clinical activity among patients in cohort B. Of 36 patients with samples available at progression, 6 patients had 8 acquired FGFR3 secondary resistance mutations (V555M/L, n = 3; V553M, n = 1; N540K/S, n = 2; M528I, n = 2). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events overall were diarrhea (44.6%) and alopecia, stomatitis, and hyperphosphatemia (42.7% each).

CONCLUSIONS

Pemigatinib was generally well tolerated and demonstrated clinical activity in previously treated, unresectable or metastatic UC with FGFR3 mutations or fusions/rearrangements.

Convergent MAPK pathway alterations mediate acquired resistance to FGFR inhibitors in FGFR2 fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma

BACKGROUND & AIMS

There is a knowledge gap in understanding mechanisms of resistance to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors (FGFRi) and a need for novel therapeutic strategies to overcome it. We investigated mechanisms of acquired resistance to FGFRi in patients with FGFR2-fusion-positive cholangiocarcinoma (CCA).

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients who received FGFRi therapy and underwent tumor and/or cell-free DNA analysis, before and after treatment, was performed. Longitudinal circulating tumor DNA samples from a cohort of patients in the phase I trial of futibatinib (NCT02052778) were assessed. FGFR2-BICC1 fusion cell lines were developed and secondary acquired resistance mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway were introduced to assess their effect on sensitivity to FGFRi in vitro.

RESULTS

On retrospective analysis of 17 patients with repeat sequencing following FGFRi treatment, new FGFR2 mutations were detected in 11 (64.7%) and new alterations in MAPK pathway genes in nine (52.9%) patients, with seven (41.2%) patients developing new alterations in both the FGFR2 and MAPK pathways. In serially collected plasma samples, a patient treated with an irreversible FGFRi tested positive for previously undetected BRAF V600E, NRAS Q61K, NRAS G12C, NRAS G13D and KRAS G12K mutations upon progression. Introduction of a FGFR2-BICC1 fusion into biliary tract cells in vitro sensitized the cells to FGFRi, while concomitant KRAS G12D or BRAF V600E conferred resistance. MEK inhibition was synergistic with FGFRi in vitro. In an in vivo animal model, the combination had antitumor activity in FGFR2 fusions but was not able to overcome KRAS-mediated FGFRi resistance.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings suggest convergent genomic evolution in the MAPK pathway may be a potential mechanism of acquired resistance to FGFRi.

CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER

NCT02052778.

IMPACT AND IMPLICATIONS

We evaluated tumors and plasma from patients who previously received inhibitors of fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), an important receptor that plays a role in cancer cell growth, especially in tumors with abnormalities in this gene, such as FGFR fusions, where the FGFR gene is fused to another gene, leading to activation of cancer cell growth. We found that patients treated with FGFR inhibitors may develop mutations in other genes such as KRAS, and this can confer resistance to FGFR inhibitors. These findings have several implications for patients with FGFR2 fusion-positive tumors and provide mechanistic insight into emerging MAPK pathway alterations which may serve as a therapeutic vulnerability in the setting of acquired resistance to FGFRi.

Is There Room for Liposomal Irinotecan in Biliary Tract Cancer? A Meta-analysis of Randomised Trials

AIMS

The combination of 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin (5-FU/LV) plus oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) is widely acknowledged as the standard regimen for second-line treatment in patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. Nanoliposomal irinotecan (nal-IRI) has demonstrated its activity in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Recent studies have investigated the activity of nal-IRI in combination with 5-FU/LV for biliary tract cancer. However, the results have been contradictory. We conducted a meta-analysis to assess survival outcomes and response rates in randomised trials investigating the activity of nal-IRI in previously treated biliary tract cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We systematically collected potentially relevant findings from PubMed/Medline, the Cochrane library and EMBASE. Abstracts presented at major international oncological meetings were also reviewed. We extracted hazard ratios and 95% confidence intervals for progression-free survival and overall survival, as well as odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals for objective response rate. The outcomes of the accessible randomised studies evaluating the activity of nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV were analysed.

RESULTS

The combination therapy exhibited a statistically significant decrease in the risk of progression (hazard ratio 0.70; 95% confidence interval 0.50-0.97) when compared with 5-FU/LV alone. Additionally, the dual regimen yielded longer overall survival and a higher objective response rate.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that nal-IRI plus 5-FU/LV had a superior activity in comparison with 5-FU/LV. Further investigations are required to elucidate the role of nal-IRI in this setting and to identify subgroups of patients who could derive the greatest benefit from its administration.

Ocular toxicities of fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors: A review

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors are an emerging class of small molecule targeted cancer drugs with promising therapeutic possibilities for a wide variety of malignancies. While ocular adverse events from FGFR inhibitors are reported in clinical trials, subsequent case studies continue to reveal new toxicities. Disease pathology affecting multiple parts of the eye has been reported, but the ocular surface and the retina are the most commonly encountered areas affected by FGFR inhibitors, manifesting as dry eye and FGFR inhibitor-associated retinopathy, respectively. Corneal thinning and melt is a rare but serious and potentially vision-threatening complication of FGFR inhibitor toxicity. Similarities between toxicities observed from other targeted cancer therapy drugs and FGFR inhibitors may help us understand underlying pathophysiological changes. The management of these adverse events requires close ophthalmologic follow-up and may require discontinuation of the offending agents in some cases.

Pharmacological Profile of Novel Anti-cancer Drugs Approved by USFDA in 2022: A Review

BACKGROUND

For any drug molecule, it is mandatory to pass the drug approval process of the concerned regulatory authority, before being marketed. The Food and Drug Administration (FDA), throughout the year, approves several new drugs for safety and efficacy. In addition to new drug approvals, FDA also works on improving access to generic drugs, aimed to lower the cost of drugs for patients and improve access to treatments. In the year 2022 twelve new drug therapies were approved for managing varying cancers.

METHODS

This manuscript is focused to describe the pharmacological aspects including therapeutic uses, mechanisms of actions, pharmacokinetics, adverse effects, doses, indication for special cases, contraindications, etc., of novel FDA-approved anticancer drug therapies in the year 2022.

RESULT

FDA has approved about 29% (11 out of 37) novel drug therapies for varying types of cancers such as lung cancer, breast cancer, prostate cancer, melanoma, leukemia, etc. The Center for Drug Evaluation and Research CDER has reported that 90% of these anticancer drugs (e.g. Adagrasib, Futibatinib, Mirvetuximabsoravtansinegynx, Mosunetuzumab-axb, Nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw, Olutasidenib, Pacritinib, Tebentafusp-tebn, Teclistamab-cqyv, and Tremelimumab-actl) as orphan drugs and recommended to treat rare or uncommon cancers such as non-small cell lung cancer, metastatic intrahepatic cholangio-carcinoma, epithelial ovarian cancer, follicular lymphoma, metastatic melanoma, metastatic uveal melanoma, etc. CDER has identified six anticancer drugs (e.g. Lutetium (177Lu)vipivotidetetraxetan, Mirvetuximabsoravtansine- gynx, Mosunetuzumab-axb, Nivolumab and relatlimab-rmbw, Tebentafusp-tebn, Teclistamab-cqyv) as first-in-class drugs i.e. drugs having different mechanisms of action from the already existing ones. The newly approved anticancer drugs shall provide more efficient treatment options for cancer patients. Three FDA-approved anticancer drugs in the year 2023 are also briefly described in the manuscript.

CONCLUSION

This manuscript, describing the pharmacological aspects of eleven anticancer novel drug therapies approved by the FDA, shall serve as a helpful document for cancer patients, concerned academicians, researchers, and clinicians, especially oncologists.