Differential Expression of Protease-Activated Receptors 1, 2, and 4 on Human Endothelial Cells from Different Vascular Sites

Protease-activated receptors in health and disease

Proteases are signaling molecules that specifically control cellular functions by cleaving protease-activated receptors (PARs). The four known PARs are members of the large family of G protein-coupled receptors. These transmembrane receptors control most physiological and pathological processes and are the target of a large proportion of therapeutic drugs. Signaling proteases include enzymes from the circulation; from immune, inflammatory epithelial, and cancer cells; as well as from commensal and pathogenic bacteria. Advances in our understanding of the structure and function of PARs provide insights into how diverse proteases activate these receptors to regulate physiological and pathological processes in most tissues and organ systems. The realization that proteases and PARs are key mediators of disease, coupled with advances in understanding the atomic level structure of PARs and their mechanisms of signaling in subcellular microdomains, has spurred the development of antagonists, some of which have advanced to the clinic. Herein we review the discovery, structure, and function of this receptor system, highlight the contribution of PARs to homeostatic control, and discuss the potential of PAR antagonists for the treatment of major diseases.

Molecular Dambusters: What Is Behind Hyperpermeability in Bradykinin-Mediated Angioedema?

In the last few decades, a substantial body of evidence underlined the pivotal role of bradykinin in certain types of angioedema. The formation and breakdown of bradykinin has been studied thoroughly; however, numerous questions remained open regarding the triggering, course, and termination of angioedema attacks. Recently, it became clear that vascular endothelial cells have an integrative role in the regulation of vessel permeability. Apart from bradykinin, a great number of factors of different origin, structure, and mechanism of action are capable of modifying the integrity of vascular endothelium, and thus, may participate in the regulation of angioedema formation. Our aim in this review is to describe the most important permeability factors and the molecular mechanisms how they act on endothelial cells. Based on endothelial cell function, we also attempt to explain some of the challenging findings regarding bradykinin-mediated angioedema, where the function of bradykinin itself cannot account for the pathophysiology. By deciphering the complex scenario of vascular permeability regulation and edema formation, we may gain better scientific tools to be able to predict and treat not only bradykinin-mediated but other types of angioedema as well.

Thrombin-Induced Responses via Protease-Activated Receptor 1 Blocked by the Endothelium on Isolated Porcine Retinal Arterioles

PURPOSE

Thrombin, a serine protease, causes organ-specific responses to vessels. However, the mechanism by which thrombin affects the retinal microcirculation remains unclear. We examined the effects of thrombin on the retinal microvasculature and signaling mechanisms.

METHODS

Porcine retinal arterioles were isolated, cannulated, and pressurized (55 cmH₂O) without flow in this in vitro study. Videomicroscopy techniques recorded changes in diameter in the retinal arterioles in response to thrombin at concentrations ranging from 0.001 to 20 mU/ml.

RESULTS

Extraluminal administration of thrombin induced concentration-dependent vascular responses, that is, vasoconstriction at low concentrations less than 5 mU/ml and vasorelaxation with high concentrations greater than 5 mU/ml. However, intraluminal administration of thrombin (5 mU/m) did not constrict the retinal arterioles; in denuded vessels, intraluminal administration constricted the retinal arterioles. Thrombin-induced vasoconstriction was significantly (p < 0.01) suppressed by pretreatment with a protein kinase C (PKC) inhibitor and a protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 inhibitor but not by PAR-2 and PAR-4 inhibitors or denudation. A rho kinase (ROCK) inhibitor also suppressed thrombin-induced vasoconstriction (5 mU/ml) compared with sodium nitroprusside. Endothelial denudation and pretreatment with an endothelial nitric oxide (NO) synthase inhibitor suppressed vasorelaxation caused by a high concentration of thrombin.

CONCLUSIONS

A low concentration of thrombin causes vasoconstriction of smooth muscles via PAR-1, PKC, and ROCK, and a high concentration of thrombin possibly causes vasorelaxation of the retinal arterioles via nitric oxide synthase activation in the endothelium. The vascular endothelium might block signaling of thrombin-induced vasoconstriction in the retinal arterioles when administered intraluminally.

The role of the tissue factor pathway in haemostasis and beyond

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of tissue factor (TF) in the initiation of the blood coagulation network leading to generation of a fibrin clot has been well defined over the past 50 years. Although much is known about this sequence of events and its regulation, many important questions remain unresolved. More recently, a complex role for TF in cellular processes independent of fibrin generation has emerged. This review summarizes some of the advances in this field.

RECENT FINDINGS

TF is the cellular receptor and cofactor for factor VII/VIIa; however, controversy still surrounds expression of TF within the vasculature, the role of circulating microvesicle pools of TF and mechanisms of 'encryption' of TF activity. However, there have been significant advances in the role of TF-initiated cell signalling. Lastly, an alternatively spliced TF transcript has been identified and some insights into its role in cancer cell metastasis/proliferation have been elucidated.

SUMMARY

Understanding of TF structure function has increased substantially; however, multiple controversies still surround some aspects of its regulation. TF has emerged as a pivotal player in orchestrating not only fibrin generation but wound repair. Derangement of these repair processes contributes significantly to the pathophysiology of a number of disease processes.

Complement-activation fragment C4a mediates effector functions by binding as untethered agonist to protease-activated receptors 1 and 4

C4a is a small protein released from complement component C4 upon activation of the complement system's classical and lectin pathways, which are important constituents of innate immune surveillance. Despite the structural similarity between C4a and well-described anaphylatoxins C3a and C5a, the binding partner and biological function of C4a have remained elusive. Using a cell-based reporter assay, we screened C4a against a panel of both known and orphan G protein-coupled receptors and now provide evidence that C4a is a ligand for protease-activated receptor (PAR)1 and PAR4. Whereas C4a showed no activity toward known anaphylatoxin receptors, it acted as an agonist for both PAR1 and PAR4 with nanomolar activity. In human endothelial cells, ERK activation by C4a was mediated through both PAR1 and PAR4 in a Gα_i-independent signaling pathway. Like other PAR1 activators, C4a induced calcium mobilization through the PAR1/Gα_q/PLCβ signaling axis. Moreover, C4a increased stress fiber formation and enhanced endothelial permeability, both of which were reduced by PAR1 antagonists. In sum, our study identifies C4a as an untethered agonist for PAR1 and PAR4 with effects on cellular activation and endothelial permeability, thereby revealing another instance of cross-talk between the complement system and other host defense pathways.

Potential role of the Slit/Robo signal pathway in angiogenesis

Intensive investigations on angiogenesis and vasculogenesis have increased our understanding of molecular mechanisms of blood vessel formation during pathologic and developmental conditions. However, endothelial cells (ECs), the main component of vasculature, are heterogeneous, as revealed by our phenotypic and molecular biological studies in the laboratory, and it is still hard to adequately understand the molecular mechanisms of angiogenesis and vasculogenesis. Indeed, there are several major ligand/receptor signal pathways: VEGF/VEGFR, Jagged-1/Notch, Wnt ligand/frizzled receptor, and ephrin/Eph; each of which having distinct and independent roles during vascular formation. In this review, we focus on the angiogenic effect of the Slit and Robo signal pathway that was formally known as neuronal axon guidance. Among the existing vascular signals, this pathway is the most recently found ligand/receptor vascular signal, and may play important physiological roles as other major receptor/ligand signals do. Here, we briefly address: (1) the background of Slit and Robo families; (2) expression patterns of Slit and Robo; (3) functional roles of the Slit/Robo pathway in vascular formation; and (4) confronting tasks of this novel vascular pathway in the near future. Together, a summary of these data suggest the essential role of the Slit/Robo pathway in angiogenesis, and may explain why multiple vascular signals exist in heterogenic endothelial cells.

Expression, function and cooperating partners of protease-activated receptor type 3 in vascular endothelial cells and B lymphocytes studied with specific monoclonal antibody

Receptor-specific antibodies can both prevent ligand-receptor interaction and initiate receptor signaling. Previously we generated monoclonal antibody 8E8 (mAb 8E8) against protease-activated receptor type 3 (PAR3) which inhibited proliferation of B cell hybridoma. Here we used mAb 8E8 and PAR1-specific polyclonal antibody to reveal the functions and cooperating partners of PAR3 in endothelial cells and in B lymphocytes. MAb 8E8 or PAR1 agonist peptide stimulated IL-6 and IL-8 production and VCAM-1 expression in HPMEC-ST1.6R cells. PAR1 antibody stimulated only VCAM-1 expression, while ICAM-1 expression was stimulated with mAB 8E8 or PAR3 peptide. MAb 8E8 stimulated weak mitogenic response, while PAR1 antibody inhibited it in normal but not in malignant B lymphocytes. Sandwich ELISA assay demonstrated the interaction of PAR3 with PAR1 in malignant cell lines and with IgM in normal B lymphocytes. It is concluded that PAR3 cooperates with PAR1 to mediate the effect of thrombin on cytokine production and VCAM-1 expression in endothelial cells and on cell proliferation in malignant B cells. ICAM-1 expression in endothelial cells requires PAR3 without PAR1. The inhibitory effect of thrombin in normal B lymphocytes is mediated by PAR1 alone, while mitogenic and pro-survival signaling in B lymphocytes is provided through PAR3 in cooperation with BCR.

Heterotrimeric G proteins, focal adhesion kinase, and endothelial barrier function

Ligands by binding to G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) stimulate dissociation of heterotrimeric G proteins into Gα and Gβγ subunits. Released Gα and Gβγ subunits induce discrete signaling cues that differentially regulate focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activity and endothelial barrier function. Activation of G proteins downstream of receptors such as protease activated receptor 1 (PAR1) and histamine receptors rapidly increases endothelial permeability which reverses naturally within the following 1-2 h. However, activation of G proteins coupled to the sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor 1 (S1P1) signal cues that enhance basal barrier endothelial function and restore endothelial barrier function following the increase in endothelial permeability by edemagenic agents. Intriguingly, both PAR1 and S1P1 activation stimulates FAK activity, which associates with alteration in endothelial barrier function by these agonists. In this review, we focus on the role of the G protein subunits downstream of PAR1 and S1P1 in regulating FAK activity and endothelial barrier function.

Complement protease MASP-1 activates human endothelial cells: PAR4 activation is a link between complement and endothelial function

Activation of the complement system can induce and enhance inflammatory reaction. Mannose-binding lectin-associated serine protease-1 (MASP-1) is an abundant protease of the complement lectin pathway; however, its physiological function is unclear. In this study, we demonstrate for the first time that MASP-1 is able to activate Ca(2+) signaling, NF-kappaB, and p38 MAPK pathways in cultured HUVECs. Activation was initiated by MASP-1 only; the related protease, MASP-2, had no such effect. The phenomenon was dependent on the proteolytic activity of MASP-1, suggesting modulation of endothelial cell function through a protease-activated receptor (PAR). Using synthetic peptide substrates representing the protease-sensitive regions of PARs, we were able to demonstrate that PAR4 is a target of MASP-1. The presence of functionally active PAR4 in HUVECs was demonstrated using PAR4 agonist peptide and mRNA quantification. Finally, we showed that the amount of membrane-bound intact PAR4 decreases after MASP-1 treatment. All of these results provide a novel link between the regulation of endothelial cell function and complement system activation, and they suggest that MASP-1-induced PAR4 activation could contribute to the development of the inflammatory reaction.

Thrombin-mediated increases in cytosolic [Ca2+] involve different mechanisms in human pulmonary artery smooth muscle and endothelial cells

Thrombin is a procoagulant inflammatory agonist that can disrupt the endothelium-lumen barrier in the lung by causing contraction of endothelial cells and promote pulmonary cell proliferation. Both contraction and proliferation require increases in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](cyt)). In this study, we compared the effect of thrombin on Ca(2+) signaling in human pulmonary artery smooth muscle (PASMC) and endothelial (PAEC) cells. Thrombin increased the [Ca(2+)](cyt) in both cell types; however, the transient response was significantly higher and recovered quicker in the PASMC, suggesting different mechanisms may contribute to thrombin-mediated increases in [Ca(2+)](cyt) in these cell types. Depletion of intracellular stores with cyclopiazonic acid (CPA) in the absence of extracellular Ca(2+) induced calcium transients representative of those observed in response to thrombin in both cell types. Interestingly, CPA pretreatment significantly attenuated thrombin-induced Ca(2+) release in PASMC; this attenuation was not apparent in PAEC, indicating that a PAEC-specific mechanism was targeted by thrombin. Treatment with a combination of CPA, caffeine, and ryanodine also failed to abolish the thrombin-induced Ca(2+) transient in PAEC. Notably, thrombin-induced receptor-mediated calcium influx was still observed in PASMC after CPA pretreatment in the presence of extracellular Ca(2+). Ca(2+) oscillations were triggered by thrombin in PASMC resulting from a balance of extracellular Ca(2+) influx and Ca(2+) reuptake by the sarcoplasmic reticulum. The data show that thrombin induces increases in intracellular calcium in PASMC and PAEC with a distinct CPA-, caffeine-, and ryanodine-insensitive release existing only in PAEC. Furthermore, a dynamic balance between Ca(2+) influx, intracellular Ca(2+) release, and reuptake underlie the Ca(2+) transients evoked by thrombin in some PASMC. Understanding of such mechanisms will provide an important insight into thrombin-mediated vascular injury during hypertension.

PAR-2 activation and LPS synergistically enhance inflammatory signaling in airway epithelial cells by raising PAR expression level and interleukin-8 release

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are involved in the contribution of airway epithelial cells to the development of inflammation by release of pro- and anti-inflammatory mediators. Here, we evaluated in epithelial cells the influence of LPS and continuous PAR activation on PAR expression level and the release of the proinflammatory chemokine IL-8. We studied primary human small airway epithelial cells and two airway epithelial cell lines, A549 and HBE cells. LPS specifically upregulated expression of PAR-2 but not of PAR-1. Exposure of epithelial cells to PAR-1 or PAR-2 agonists increased the PAR-1 expression level. The PAR-2 agonist exhibited higher potency than PAR-1 activators. However, the combined exposure of epithelial cells to LPS and PAR agonists abrogated the PAR-1 upregulation. The PAR-2 expression level was also upregulated after exposure to PAR-1 or PAR-2 agonists. This elevation was higher than the effect of PAR agonists on the PAR-1 level. In contrast to the PAR-1 level, the PAR-2 level remained elevated under concomitant stimulation with LPS and PAR-2 agonist. Furthermore, activation of PAR-2, but not of PAR-1, caused production of IL-8 from the epithelial cells. Interestingly, both in the epithelial cell line and in primary epithelial cells, there was a potentiation of the stimulation of the IL-8 synthesis and release by PAR-2 agonist together with LPS. In summary, these results underline the important role of PAR-2 in human lung epithelial cells. Moreover, our study shows an intricate interplay between LPS and PAR agonists in affecting PAR regulation and IL-8 production.

A novel therapeutic target in various lung diseases: Airway proteases and protease-activated receptors

Protease-activated receptors (PAR), which are G protein-coupled receptors, have 4 members, PAR-1 to PAR-4. PARs are activated by proteolysis of a peptide bond at the N-terminal domain of the receptor. PARs are widely distributed throughout the airways. Their activity is modulated by airway proteases of endogenous and exogenous origin, which can either activate or disable the receptors. The regulation of PAR activity by proteases is important under pathological conditions when the activity of proteases is increased. Moreover, various inflammatory mediators, such as cytokines, growth factors, or prostanoids, alter the PAR expression level. Elevated PAR levels are observed in various lung disorders, and their significance in the development of pathological situations in the lung is currently intensively investigated. Consequences of PAR activation can be either beneficial or deleterious, depending on the PAR subtype. PAR-1 has been shown to be an important player in the development of pulmonary fibrosis. Thus, PAR-1 represents an exciting target for clinical intervention in fibrotic diseases. PAR-2 contributes to allergic airway inflammation. However, the question whether the impact of PAR-2 is beneficial or deleterious is still under intensive discussion. Therefore, precise information concerning the participation of PAR-2 in various lesions is required. Moreover, it is necessary to generate selective PAR- and organ-targeted approaches for treating the diseases. A thorough understanding of PAR-induced cellular events and the consequences of receptor blockade may help in the development of novel therapeutic strategies targeted to prevent lung destruction and to avoid deterioration of conditions of patients with inflammatory or fibrotic lung diseases.

Phenotypic Heterogeneity of the Endothelium

Endothelial cells, which form the inner cellular lining of blood vessels and lymphatics, display remarkable heterogeneity in structure and function. This is the first of a 2-part review focused on phenotypic heterogeneity of blood vessel endothelium. This review provides an historical perspective of our understanding of endothelial heterogeneity, discusses the scope of phenotypic diversity across the vascular tree, and addresses proximate and evolutionary mechanisms of endothelial cell heterogeneity. The overall goal is to underscore the importance of phenotypic heterogeneity as a core property of the endothelium.

Direct Vascular Effects of Protease-Activated Receptor Type 1 Agonism In Vivo in Humans

Background— Protease-activated receptor type 1 (PAR-1) has been proposed as the principal thrombin receptor in humans, although its actions in vivo have not been defined. The aim of the present study was to determine the direct vascular actions of PAR-1 agonism in humans.

Methods and Results— Dorsal hand vein diameter was measured by the Aellig technique in 14 healthy volunteers during local intravenous SFLLRN (PAR-1 agonist; 0.05 to 15 nmol/min) and SLIGKV (PAR-2 agonist; 1.6 to 160 nmol/min) infusions. The venous effects of SFLLRN were further assessed in the presence or absence of norepinephrine or the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa antagonist tirofiban. Forearm blood flow was measured by venous occlusion plethysmography in 16 volunteers during infusion of SFLLRN (1 to 50 nmol/min), SLIGKV (160 to 800 nmol/min), and the endothelium-dependent vasodilator bradykinin (100 to 1000 pmol/min). Platelet-monocyte binding (a sensitive measure of platelet activation) and plasma tissue plasminogen activator (tPA), plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1, and von Willebrand factor concentrations were measured at intervals throughout the study. SFLLRN caused dose-dependent venoconstriction ( P <0.001) that was unaffected by norepinephrine or tirofiban co-infusion. In forearm resistance vessels, SFLLRN increased forearm blood flow ( P <0.001), tPA release ( P <0.001), and platelet-monocyte binding ( P <0.0001) without affecting plasma plasminogen-activator inhibitor 1 or von Willebrand factor concentrations. SLIGKV caused venous ( P <0.001) and arterial ( P <0.01) dilatation without tPA release.

Conclusions— We have demonstrated that PAR-1 agonism causes platelet activation, venous constriction, arterial dilatation, and tPA release in vivo in humans. These unique and contrasting effects provide important insights into the physiological and pathophysiological role of thrombin in the human venous and arterial circulations.

Prognostic Role of Protease-Activated Receptors 1 and 4 in Resected Stage IB Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Protease-activated receptor (PAR)-1 and PAR-4 are involved in extracellular matrix invasion and angiogenesis.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A series of 60 resected stage IB non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs), including 30 adenocarcinomas (ADCs) and 30 squamous cell carcinomas (SCCs), were processed by immunohistochemistry with antibodies to PAR-1, PAR-4, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and CD34.

RESULTS

Protease-activated receptor-1 was expressed in 37 cases (62%) and PAR-4 in 39 (65%). Adenocarcinomas were significantly more positive than SCC for PAR-1 (17 vs. 8 cases) and PAR-4 (10 vs. 5 cases). Vascular endothelial growth factor was expressed in 42 cases (70%): 22 ADC and 20 SCC. A significant correlation emerged between PAR-1 and/or PAR-4 expression and VEGF but not with microvessel density. Median follow-up was 38 months; actuarial 5-year survival was 43%. At univariate analysis, 3-year survival was shorter in patients expressing PAR-4 versus negative cases (29% vs. 60%; P = 0.002). In 46 patients expressing PAR-1 and/or PAR-4, 3-year survival was 30% versus 68% in 14 patients with no PAR expression (P = 0.002). A trend toward shorter 3-year survival was seen in PAR-1-positive versus PAR-1-negative cases (34% vs. 46%; P = 0.06). Multivariate analysis identified expression of PAR-1 and/or PAR-4 as an independent prognostic factor for reduced survival in resected stage IB NSCLC.

CONCLUSION

Expression of PAR-1 and PAR-4 in early-stage NSCLC could be included in a molecular algorithm for the selection of patients eligible for adjuvant studies.

A role for proteinase-activated receptor 2 and PKC-epsilon in thrombin-mediated induction of decay-accelerating factor on human endothelial cells

Thrombin, an important mediator of thrombosis and inflammation, may also enhance vascular cytoprotection. Thus thrombin induces expression of the complement-inhibitory protein decay-accelerating factor (DAF) in human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs), thus increasing protection against complement-mediated injury. Using PKC isozyme-specific peptide antagonists and adenoviral constructs, we have shown in the present study that PKC-epsilon is the primary isozyme involved in DAF induction by thrombin. Experiments with proteinase-activated receptor-1 (PAR1) and PAR2 activating peptides (APs) showed that DAF expression induced by PAR1-AP was PKC-alpha-dependent; in contrast, PAR2-AP induction of DAF required activation of PKC-epsilon. PAR1-AP and PAR2-AP in combination exerted an additive effect on DAF protein expression, which was equivalent to that observed with thrombin alone. These data implied a specific role for PAR2 in DAF induction, which was supported by the observation that upregulation of endothelial cell (EC) PAR2-enhanced DAF induction by thrombin. ERK1/2, p38, and JNK MAPK were also involved in thrombin-induced DAF upregulation, with evidence of interdependence between ERK1/2 and JNK. A role for transactivation of PAR2 by PAR1 was suggested by partial inhibition of thrombin-induced DAF expression by the PAR1 signaling antagonists BMS-200261 and SCH79797, whereas inhibition of thrombin-induced cleavage of PAR1 by specific MAbs or hirudin completely abrogated the response. Together, these data imply that the predominant pathway for thrombin-induced DAF expression involves transactivation of PAR2 by PAR1 and signaling via PKC-epsilon/MAPK. This may represent an important, novel pathway for endothelial cytoprotection during inflammation and angiogenesis and suggests that PAR2 may play a central role in some thrombin-induced responses.

Activation of PAR4 Induces a Distinct Actin Fiber Formation via p38 MAPK in Human Lung Endothelial Cells

Protease-activated receptors (PARs) are multifunctional G protein–coupled receptors. Among the four existing PARs, PAR4 is preferentially expressed in the human lung tissue. However, the function of PAR4 has not been defined in the lung endothelial cells. Because PAR1-mediated cellular effects are deeply related to the morphological changes, we focused on the actin fiber and p38 mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signaling involved in actin polymerization to elucidate the role of PAR4. RT-PCR and Western blot analyses identified PAR4 expression in human pulmonary artery endothelial cells and in human microvascular endothelial cells from lung. We then examined the changes in actin fibers in endothelial cells treated with PAR4-activating peptide. PAR1-activating peptide was used for comparison. Activation of PAR4 and PAR1 by their corresponding peptides induced actin fiber formation; however, the actin filaments were broadly bundled in PAR4 as compared with the ringlike actin filaments in PAR1 activation. Correspondingly, the magnitude of p38 MAPK phosphorylation was different between cells treated with PAR4 and PAR1, with PAR4-activating peptide showing a significantly higher sensitivity to p38 MAPK inhibitor, SB203580. Taken together, these results demonstrate that activation of PAR4 results in the formation of actin fiber distinct from that by PAR1 activation, suggesting PAR4 may play specific roles in the lung endothelial cells.