Representation of Somatosensory Modalities in Pathways Ascending from the Spinal Anterolateral Funiculus to the Thalamus Demonstrated by Lesions in Man

Cold-evoked potentials in clinical practice: A head-to-head contrast with laser-evoked responses

BACKGROUND

Innocuous cooling of the skin activates cold-specific Aδ fibres, and hence, the recording of cold-evoked potentials (CEPs) may improve the objective assessment of human thermo-nociceptive function. While the feasibility of CEP recordings in healthy humans has been reported, their reliability and diagnostic use in clinical conditions have not been documented.

METHODS

Here, we report the results of CEP recordings in 60 consecutive patients with suspected neuropathic pain, compared with laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) which are the gold standard for thermo-algesic instrumental assessment.

RESULTS

CEP recording was a well-tolerated procedure, with only ~15 min of surplus in exam duration. The reproducibility and signal-to-noise ratio of CEPs were lower than those of LEPs, in particular for distal lower limbs (LLs). While laser responses were interpretable in all patients, CEPs interpretation was inconclusive in 5/60 because of artefacts or lack of response on the unaffected side. Both techniques yielded concordant results in 73% of the patients. In 12 patients, CEPs yielded abnormal values while LEPs remained within normal limits; 3 of these patients had clinical symptoms limited to cold sensations, including cold-heat transformation.

CONCLUSIONS

CEPs appear as a useful technique for exploring pain/temperature systems. Advantages are low cost of equipment and innocuity. Disadvantages are low signal-to-noise ratio for LL stimulation, and sensitivity to fatigue/habituation. Joint recording of CEPs and LEPs can increase the sensitivity of neurophysiological techniques to thin fibre- spinothalamic lesions, in particular, when abnormalities of cold perception predominate.

SIGNIFICANCE

Recording of cold-evoked potentials is a well-tolerated, inexpensive and easy-to-use procedure that can be helpful in the diagnosis of abnormalities in the thin fibre- spinothalamic pathways. Supplementing LEPs with CEPs allows consolidating the diagnosis and, for some patients suffering from symptoms limited only to cold, CEPs but not LEPs may allow the diagnosis of thin fibre pathology. Optimal CEP recording conditions are important to overcome the low signal-to-noise ratio and habituation phenomena, which are less favourable than with LEPs.

Site matters: Central neuropathic pain characteristics and somatosensory findings after brain and spinal cord lesions

BACKGROUND

It is unknown if different etiologies or lesion topographies influence central neuropathic pain (CNP) clinical manifestation.

METHODS

We explored the symptom-somatosensory profile relationships in CNP patients with different types of lesions to the central nervous system to gain insight into CNP mechanisms. We compared the CNP profile through pain descriptors, standardized bedside examination, and quantitative sensory test in two different etiologies with segregated lesion locations: the brain, central poststroke pain (CPSP, n = 39), and the spinal cord central pain due to spinal cord injury (CPSCI, n = 40) in neuromyelitis optica.

RESULTS

Results are expressed as median (25th to 75th percentiles). CPSP presented higher evoked and paroxysmal pain scores compared to CPSCI (p < 0.001), and lower cold thermal limen (5.6°C [0.0-12.9]) compared to CPSCI (20.0°C [4.2-22.9]; p = 0.004). CPSCI also had higher mechanical pain thresholds (784.5 mN [255.0-1078.0]) compared to CPSP (235.2 mN [81.4-1078.0], p = 0.006) and higher mechanical detection threshold compared to control areas (2.7 [1.5-6.2] vs. 1.0 [1.0-3.3], p = 0.007). Evoked pain scores negatively correlated with mechanical pain thresholds (r = -0.38, p < 0.001) and wind-up ratio (r = -0.57, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

CNP of different etiologies may present different pain descriptors and somatosensory profiles, which is likely due to injury site differences within the neuroaxis. This information may help better design phenotype mechanism correlations and impact trial designs for the main etiologies of CNP, namely stroke and spinal cord lesions. This study provides evidence that topography may influence pain symptoms and sensory profile. The findings suggest that CNP mechanisms might vary according to pain etiology or lesion topography, impacting future mechanism-based treatment choices.

Dissecting central post-stroke pain: a controlled symptom-psychophysical characterization

Central post-stroke pain affects up to 12% of stroke survivors and is notoriously refractory to treatment. However, stroke patients often suffer from other types of pain of non- neuropathic nature (musculoskeletal, inflammatory, complex regional) and no head-to-head comparison of their respective clinical and somatosensory profiles has been performed so far.

We compared 39 patients with definite central neuropathic post-stroke pain with two matched- control groups: 32 patients with exclusively non-neuropathic pain developed after stroke and 31 stroke patients not complaining of pain. Patients underwent deep phenotyping via a comprehensive assessment including clinical exam, questionnaires and quantitative sensory testing to dissect central post-stroke pain from chronic pain in general and stroke.

While central post-stroke pain was mostly located in the face and limbs, non-neuropathic pain was predominantly axial and located in neck, shoulders and knees (p&lt;0.05). Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory clusters burning (82.1%, n=32, p&lt;0.001), tingling (66.7%, n= 26, p&lt;0.001) and evoked by cold (64.1%, n=25, p&lt;0.001) occurred more frequently in central post-stroke pain. Hyperpathia, thermal and mechanical allodynia also occurred more commonly in this group (p&lt;0.001), which also presented higher levels of deafferentation (p&lt;0.012) with more asymmetric cold and warm detection thresholds compared to controls. In particular, cold hypoesthesia (considered when the threshold of the affected side was less than 41% of the contralateral threshold) odds ratio was 12 (95%CI: 3.8-41.6) for neuropathic pain. Additionally, cold detection threshold/ warm detection threshold ratio correlated with the presence of neuropathic pain (ρ=-0.4, p&lt; 0.001). Correlations were found between specific neuropathic pain symptom clusters and quantitative sensory testing: paroxysmal pain with cold (ρ=-0.4; p=0.008) and heat pain thresholds (ρ=0.5; p=0.003), burning pain with mechanical detection (ρ= -0.4; p=0.015) and mechanical pain thresholds (ρ=-0.4, p&lt;0.013), evoked pain with mechanical pain threshold (ρ= -0.3; p=0.047). Logistic regression showed that the combination of cold hypoesthesia on quantitative sensory testing, the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory, and the allodynia intensity on bedside examination explained 77% of the occurrence of neuropathic pain.

These findings provide insights into the clinical-psychophysics relationships in central post-stroke pain and may assist more precise distinction of neuropathic from non-neuropathic post-stroke pain in clinical practice and in future trials.

Combined Neurophysiologic and Neuroimaging Approach to Reveal the Structure-Function Paradox in Cervical Myelopathy

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To explore the so-called structure-function paradox in individuals with focal spinal lesions by means of tract-specific MRI coupled with multimodal evoked potentials and quantitative sensory testing.

METHODS

Individuals with signs and symptoms attributable to cervical myelopathy (i.e., no evidence of competing neurologic diagnoses) were recruited at the Balgrist University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland, between February 2018 and March 2019. We evaluated the relationship between the extent of structural damage within spinal nociceptive pathways (i.e., dorsal horn, spinothalamic tract, anterior commissure) assessed with atlas-based MRI and (1) the functional integrity of spinal nociceptive pathways measured with contact heat-, cold-, and pinprick-evoked potentials and (2) clinical somatosensory phenotypes assessed with quantitative sensory testing.

RESULTS

Sixteen individuals (mean age 61 years) with either degenerative (n = 13) or posttraumatic (n = 3) cervical myelopathy participated in the study. Most individuals presented with mild myelopathy (modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association score >15; n = 13). A total of 71% of individuals presented with structural damage within spinal nociceptive pathways on MRI. However, 50% of these individuals presented with complete functional sparing (i.e., normal contact heat-, cold-, and pinprick-evoked potentials). The extent of structural damage within spinal nociceptive pathways was not associated with functional integrity of thermal (heat: p = 0.57; cold: p = 0.49) and mechano-nociceptive pathways (p = 0.83) or with the clinical somatosensory phenotype (heat: p = 0.16; cold: p = 0.37; mechanical: p = 0.73). The amount of structural damage to the spinothalamic tract did not correlate with spinothalamic conduction velocity (p > 0.05; ρ = -0.11).

DISCUSSION

Our findings provide neurophysiologic evidence to substantiate that structural damage in the spinal cord does not equate to functional somatosensory deficits. This study recognizes the pronounced structure-function paradox in cervical myelopathies and underlines the inevitable need for a multimodal phenotyping approach to reveal the eloquence of lesions within somatosensory pathways.

Central encoding of the strength of intranasal chemosensory trigeminal stimuli in a human experimental pain setting

An important measure in pain research is the intensity of nociceptive stimuli and their cortical representation. However, there is evidence of different cerebral representations of nociceptive stimuli, including the fact that cortical areas recruited during processing of intranasal nociceptive chemical stimuli included those outside the traditional trigeminal areas. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the major cerebral representations of stimulus intensity associated with intranasal chemical trigeminal stimulation. Trigeminal stimulation was achieved with carbon dioxide presented to the nasal mucosa. Using a single-blinded, randomized crossover design, 24 subjects received nociceptive stimuli with two different stimulation paradigms, depending on the just noticeable differences in the stimulus strengths applied. Stimulus-related brain activations were recorded using functional magnetic resonance imaging with event-related design. Brain activations increased significantly with increasing stimulus intensity, with the largest cluster at the right Rolandic operculum and a global maximum in a smaller cluster at the left lower frontal orbital lobe. Region of interest analyses additionally supported an activation pattern correlated with the stimulus intensity at the piriform cortex as an area of special interest with the trigeminal input. The results support the piriform cortex, in addition to the secondary somatosensory cortex, as a major area of interest for stimulus strength-related brain activation in pain models using trigeminal stimuli. This makes both areas a primary objective to be observed in human experimental pain settings where trigeminal input is used to study effects of analgesics.

Thermal-Tactile Integration in Object Temperature Perception

The brain consistently faces a challenge of whether and how to combine the available information sources to estimate the properties of an object explored by hand. While object perception is an inference process involving multisensory inputs, thermal referral (TR) is an illusion demonstrating how the interaction between thermal and tactile systems can lead to deviations from physical reality-when observers touch three stimulators simultaneously with the middle three fingers of one hand but only the outer two stimulators are heated (or cooled), thermal uniformity is perceived across three fingers. Here, we used TR of warmth to examine the thermal-tactile interaction in object temperature perception. We show that TR is consistent with precision-weighted averaging of thermal sensation across tactile locations. Furthermore, we show that prolonged contact with TR stimulation results in adaptation to the local variations of veridical temperatures instead of the thermal uniformity perceived across three fingers. Our results illuminate the flexibility of processing that underlies thermal-tactile interactions and serve as a basis for thermal display design.

Somatosensory deficits

The analysis and interpretation of somatosensory information are performed by a complex network of brain areas located mainly in the parietal cortex. Somatosensory deficits are therefore a common impairment following lesions of the parietal lobe. This chapter summarizes the clinical presentation, examination, prognosis, and therapy of sensory deficits, along with current knowledge about the anatomy and function of the somatosensory system. We start by reviewing how somatosensory signals are transmitted to and processed by the parietal lobe, along with the anatomic and functional features of the somatosensory system. In this context, we highlight the importance of the thalamus for processing somatosensory information in the parietal lobe. We discuss typical patterns of somatosensory deficits, their clinical examination, and how they can be differentiated through a careful neurologic examination that allows the investigator to deduce the location and size of the underlying lesion. In the context of adaption and rehabilitation of somatosensory functions, we delineate the importance of somatosensory information for motor performance and the prognostic evaluation of somatosensory deficits. Finally, we review current rehabilitation approaches for directing cortical reorganization in the appropriate direction and highlight some challenging questions that are unexplored in the field.

Pain syndromes and the parietal lobe

Pain was considered to be integrated subcortically during most of the 20^th century, and it was not until 1956 that focal injury to the parietal opercular-insular cortex was shown to produce selective loss of pain senses. The parietal operculum and adjacent posterior insula are the main recipients of spinothalamic afferents in primates. The innermost operculum appears functionally associated with the posterior insula and can be segregated histologically, somatotopically and neurochemically from the more lateral S2 areas. The Posterior Insula and Medial Operculum (PIMO) encompass functional networks essential to initiate cortical nociceptive processing. Destruction of this region selectively abates pain sensations; direct stimulation generates acute pain, and epileptic foci trigger painful seizures. Lesions of the PIMO have also high potential to develop central pain with dissociated loss of pain and temperature. The PIMO region behaves as a somatosensory area on its own, which handles phylogenetically old somesthetic capabilities based on thinly myelinated or unmyelinated inputs. It integrates spinothalamic-driven information - not only nociceptive but also innocuous heat and cold, crude touch, itch, and possibly viscero-somatic interoception. Conversely, proprioception, graphesthesia or stereognosis are not processed in this area but in S1 cortices. Given its anatomo-functional properties, thalamic connections, and tight relations with limbic and multisensory cortices, the region comprising the inner parietal operculum and posterior insula appears to contain a third somatosensory cortex contributing to the spinothalamic attributes of the final perceptual experience.

Material recognition based on thermal cues: Mechanisms and applications

Some materials feel colder to the touch than others, and we can use this difference in perceived coldness for material recognition. This review focuses on the mechanisms underlying material recognition based on thermal cues. It provides an overview of the physical, perceptual, and cognitive processes involved in material recognition. It also describes engineering domains in which material recognition based on thermal cues have been applied. This includes haptic interfaces that seek to reproduce the sensations associated with contact in virtual environments and tactile sensors aim for automatic material recognition. The review concludes by considering the contributions of this line of research in both science and engineering.

The effect of acupuncture needle combination on central pain processing--an fMRI study

Background

Empirical acupuncture treatment paradigm for acute pain utilizing Tendinomuscular Meridians (TMM) calls for the stimulation of Ting Points (TPs) and Gathering point(GP). This study aims to compare the supraspinal neuronal mechanisms associated with both TPs and GP needling (EA3), and TPs needling alone (EA2) with fMRI.

Results

A significant (P < 0.01) difference between pre-scan (heat Pain) HP, and post-EA HP VAS scores in both paradigms was noted (n = 11). The post-EA HP VAS score was significantly (P < 0.05) lower with EA3 comparing to EA2 Within-group random effect analysis indicated that EA3+HP>EA3 (condition EA3+HP subtracted by condition EA3) appeared to exert a significant degree of activity suppression in the affective supraspinal regions including the IPL, anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) and the insular cortex (IN). This level of suppression was not observed in the EA2+HP>EA2 (condition EA2+HP subtracted by condition EA2) within-group random effect analysis Between-group random effect analysis indicated that EA3 induced a significantly (P < 0.01, cluster size threshold 150) higher degree of deactivation than EA2 in several pain related supraspinal regions including the right prefrontal cortex, rostral anterior cingulate (rACC), medial cingulate cortex, left inferior frontal lobe and posterior cerebellum. The 2-factor ANOVA in those regions indicated both rACC and posterior cerebellum had a significant (P < 0.01) needle effect, and the right prefrontal area showed a significant (P < 0.01) HP effect. However, a significant interaction between the two factors was only found in the right prefrontal lobe. Granger causality analysis showed EA3 induced a much higher degree of inference among HP related supraspinal somatosensory, affective and modulatory components than EA2. Deactivation pattern at the medullary-pontine area casted a direct inference on the deactivation pattern of secondary somatosensory cortices which also affected the deactivation of the IN.

Conclusions

While both EA2 and EA3 induced a significant degree of deactivation in the human brain regions related to pain processing, the addition of GP stimulation further exerts an inhibitory effect on the ascending spinoreticular pain pathway. Therefore, different needling position as mandated in different empirical acupuncture treatment paradigms may play a different role in modulating pain related neuronal functions.

Supraspinal characterization of the thermal grill illusion with fMRI

Background

Simultaneous presentation of non-noxious warm (40°C) and cold (20°C) stimuli in an interlacing fashion results in a transient hot burning noxious sensation (matched at 46°C) known as the thermal grill (TG) illusion. Functional magnetic resonance imaging and psychophysical assessments were utilized to compare the supraspinal events related to the spatial summation effect of three TG presentations: 20°C/20°C (G2020), 20°C/40°C (G2040) and 40°C/40°C (G4040) with corresponding matched thermode stimuli: 20°C (P20), 46°C (P46) and 40°C (P40) and hot pain (HP) stimuli.

Results

For G2040, the hot burning sensation was only noted during the initial off-line assessment. In comparison to P40, G4040 resulted in an equally enhanced response from all supraspinal regions associated with both pain sensory/discriminatory and noxious modulatory response. In comparison to P20, G2020 presentation resulted in a much earlier diminished/sedative response leading to a statistically significantly (P < 0.01) higher degree of deactivation in modulatory supraspinal areas activated by G4040. Granger Causality Analysis showed that while thalamic activation in HP may cast activation inference in all hot pain related somatosensory, affective and modulatory areas, similar activation in G2040 and G2020 resulted in deactivation inference in the corresponding areas.

Conclusions

In short, the transient TG sensation is caused by a dissociated state derived from non-noxious warm and cold spatial summation interaction. The observed central dissociated state may share some parallels in certain chronic neuropathic pain states.

The analgesic effect of electroacupuncture on acute thermal pain perception--a central neural correlate study with fMRI

BACKGROUND

Electrical acupuncture (EA) has been utilized in acute pain management. However, the neuronal mechanisms that lead to the analgesic effect are still not well defined. The current study assessed the intensity [optimal EA (OI-EA) vs. minimal EA (MI-EA)] effect of non-noxious EA on supraspinal regions related to noxious heat pain (HP) stimulation utilizing an EA treatment protocol for acute pain and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) with correlation in behavioral changes. Subjects underwent five fMRI scanning paradigms: one with heat pain (HP), two with OI-EA and MI-EA, and two with OI-EA and HP, and MI-EA and HP.

RESULTS

While HP resulted in activations (excitatory effect) in supraspinal areas known for pain processing and perception, EA paradigms primarily resulted in deactivations (suppressive effect) in most of these corresponding areas. In addition, OI-EA resulted in a more robust supraspinal sedative effect in comparison to MI-EA. As a result, OI-EA is more effective than MI-EA in suppressing the excitatory effect of HP in supraspinal areas related to both pain processing and perception.

CONCLUSION

Intensities of EA plays an important role in modulating central pain perception.

[Studies on cerebral processing of pain using functional imaging : Somatosensory, emotional, cognitive, autonomic and motor aspects]

Functional neuroimaging methods such as positron emission tomography (PET) or functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) provide fascinating insights into the cerebral processing of pain. Neuroimaging studies have shown that no clearly defined "pain centre" exists. Rather, an entire network of brain regions is involved in the processing of nociceptive information, which leads to the subjective impression of "pain". Sophisticated study designs nowadays permit the characterisation of different components of pain processing. In this review, we summarise neuroimaging studies, which contributed to the characterisation of these different aspects of cerebral pain processing, such as somatosensory (discrimination of different stimulus modalities, noxious vs non-noxious, summation), emotional, cognitive (attention, anticipation, distraction), vegetative (homeostasis) and motor aspects.

Cerebral Activation to Intranasal Chemosensory Trigeminal Stimulation

Although numerous functional magnetic resonance imaging (FMRI) studies have been performed on the processing of olfactory information, the intranasal trigeminal system so far has not received much attention. In the present study, we sought to delineate the neural correlates of trigeminal stimulation using carbon dioxide (CO(2)) presented to the left or right nostril. Fifteen right-handed men underwent FMRI using single runs of 3 conditions (CO(2) in the right and the left nostrils and an olfactory stimulant-phenyl ethyl alcohol-in the right nostril). As expected, olfactory activations were located in the orbitofrontal cortex (OFC), amygdala, and rostral insula. For trigeminal stimulation, activations were found in "trigeminal" and "olfactory" regions including the pre- and postcentral gyrus, the cerebellum, the ventrolateral thalamus, the insula, the contralateral piriform cortex, and the OFC. Left compared with right side stimulations resulted in stronger cerebellar and brain stem activations; right versus left stimulation resulted in stronger activations of the superior temporal sulcus and OFC. These results suggest a trigeminal processing system that taps into similar cortical regions and yet is separate from that of the olfactory system. The overlapping pattern of cortical activation for trigeminal and olfactory stimuli is assumed to be due to the intimate connections in the processing of information from the 2 major intranasal chemosensory systems.

Somatic Sensation and the Insular-Opercular Cortex: Relationship to Central Pain

We report 5 stroke patients with lesions affecting the insula and parietal operculum sparing the postcentral gyrus (somatosensory cortical area SI); 3 had spontaneous central poststroke pain (CPSP) and 2 did not. All were imaged and underwent quantitative sensory threshold tests, though not all modalities were tested in all subjects. Tactile thresholds were unaltered in all. The patients with CPSP exhibited greatly elevated thresholds for mechanical pain (skinfold pinch), sharpness and thermal sensations; the pain-free patients had distinctly lesser elevations of their skinfold pinch and innocuous and noxious thermal thresholds, and no sharpness deficit. It is therefore suggested that, in the case of similar cortical lesions, the presence or absence of spontaneous pain either modifies the thresholds for some innocuous modalities, or that the degree of deficit of some innocuous modalities determines whether or not central pain occurs.

Central Representation of Somatic Sensations in the Parietal Operculum (SII) and Insula

Four subjects with small restricted cerebral cortical infarcts have been examined. One had a lesion confined to the parietal operculum (SII), while in the second the SII lesion also encroached on the posterior insula; in the third subject, both banks of the sylvian fissure and the dorsal insula were involved, while in the fourth the lesion involved the upper bank of the sylvian fissure. In all cases, the postcentral gyrus (SI) was intact. Subjects 1 and 2 had mild spontaneous pain, but subjects 3 and 4 had never had spontaneous pain. In the affected areas, none could feel mechanical (skinfold pinch) pain. The 2 subjects with spontaneous pain could not discriminate sharpness (pinprick), but this was unimpaired in the third and fourth subjects. Warmth, cold, and heat pain were impaired in the 2 subjects with spontaneous pain, but not in those without; however warm-cold difference was greater in the affected regions of all subjects. The possibility must nevertheless be considered that the presence of central pain in some way alters the cortical mechanisms for the perception of thermal stimuli. Certainly, as we had earlier observed, spontaneous pain only occurs when there is interference with thermal sensation. Functional MRI (fMRI) studies following thermal stimulation in subjects 1 and 2 showed these areas, particularly SII, to be concerned with the reception of innocuous and noxious thermal stimuli, mechanical (skinfold pinch) pain and sharpness (pinprick), implying that SI is principally concerned with the reception of low-intensity mechanical stimuli, although it was activated in 1 of our fMRI-studied subjects by innocuous cooling.