1
|
Soto DC, Uribe-Salazar JM, Shew CJ, Sekar A, McGinty S, Dennis MY. Genomic structural variation: A complex but important driver of human evolution. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL ANTHROPOLOGY 2023; 181 Suppl 76:118-144. [PMID: 36794631 PMCID: PMC10329998 DOI: 10.1002/ajpa.24713] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2022] [Revised: 01/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
Structural variants (SVs)-including duplications, deletions, and inversions of DNA-can have significant genomic and functional impacts but are technically difficult to identify and assay compared with single-nucleotide variants. With the aid of new genomic technologies, it has become clear that SVs account for significant differences across and within species. This phenomenon is particularly well-documented for humans and other primates due to the wealth of sequence data available. In great apes, SVs affect a larger number of nucleotides than single-nucleotide variants, with many identified SVs exhibiting population and species specificity. In this review, we highlight the importance of SVs in human evolution by (1) how they have shaped great ape genomes resulting in sensitized regions associated with traits and diseases, (2) their impact on gene functions and regulation, which subsequently has played a role in natural selection, and (3) the role of gene duplications in human brain evolution. We further discuss how to incorporate SVs in research, including the strengths and limitations of various genomic approaches. Finally, we propose future considerations in integrating existing data and biospecimens with the ever-expanding SV compendium propelled by biotechnology advancements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela C. Soto
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - José M. Uribe-Salazar
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Colin J. Shew
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Aarthi Sekar
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Sean McGinty
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| | - Megan Y. Dennis
- Genome Center, MIND Institute, and Department of Biochemistry & Molecular Medicine, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
- Integrative Genetics and Genomics Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sangpakdee W, Tanomtong A, Chaveerach A, Pinthong K, Trifonov V, Loth K, Hensel C, Liehr T, Weise A, Fan X. Molecular Cytogenetic Analysis of One African and Five Asian Macaque Species Reveals Identical Karyotypes as in Mandrill. Curr Genomics 2018; 19:207-215. [PMID: 29606908 PMCID: PMC5850509 DOI: 10.2174/1389202918666170721115047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2016] [Revised: 11/17/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The question how evolution and speciation work is one of the major interests of biology. Especially, genetic including karyotypic evolution within primates is of special interest due to the close phylogenetic position of Macaca and Homo sapiens and the role as in vivo models in medical research, neuroscience, behavior, pharmacology, reproduction and Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Materials & Methods Karyotypes of five macaque species from South East Asia and of one macaque species as well as mandrill from Africa were analyzed by high resolution molecular cytogenetics to obtain new insights into karyotypic evolution of old world monkeys. Molecular cytogenetics applying human probes and probe sets was applied in chromosomes of Macaca arctoides, M. fascicularis, M. nemestrina, M. assamensis, M. sylvanus, M. mulatta and Mandrillus sphinx. Established two- to multicolor-fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) approaches were applied. Locus-specific probes, whole and partial chromosome paint probes were hybridized. Especially the FISH-banding approach multicolor-banding (MCB) as well as probes oriented towards heterochromatin turned out to be highly efficient for interspecies comparison. Conclusion Karyotypes of all seven studied species could be characterized in detail. Surprisingly, no evolutionary conserved differences were found among macaques, including mandrill. Between the seven here studied and phenotypically so different species we expected several via FISH detectable karyoypic and submicroscopic changes and were surprised to find none of them on a molecular cytogenetic level. Spatial separation, may explain the speciation and different evolution for some of them, like African M. sylvanus, Mandrillus sphinx and the South Asian macaques. However, for the partially or completely overlapping habitats of the five studied South Asian macaques the species separation process can also not be deduced to karyotypic separation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wiwat Sangpakdee
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747Jena, Germany.,Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, Khon Kaen40002, Thailand
| | - Alongkoad Tanomtong
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, Khon Kaen40002, Thailand
| | - Arunrat Chaveerach
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, Khon Kaen40002, Thailand
| | - Krit Pinthong
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747Jena, Germany.,Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Khon Kaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, Khon Kaen40002, Thailand.,Faculty of Science and Technology, Surindra Rajabhat University, 186 Moo 1, Maung District, Surin 32000, Thailand
| | - Vladimir Trifonov
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747Jena, Germany.,Institute of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Lavrentev Str. 8/2, Novosibirsk630090, Russian Federation
| | - Kristina Loth
- Serengeti-Park Hodenhagen, Am Safaripark 1, D-29693 Hodenhagen, Germany
| | | | - Thomas Liehr
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747Jena, Germany
| | - Anja Weise
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747Jena, Germany
| | - Xiaobo Fan
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Am Klinikum 1, D-07747Jena, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lowenstine LJ, McManamon R, Terio KA. Apes. PATHOLOGY OF WILDLIFE AND ZOO ANIMALS 2018. [PMCID: PMC7173580 DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-12-805306-5.00015-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
|
4
|
Fan X, Supiwong W, Weise A, Mrasek K, Kosyakova N, Tanomtong A, Pinthong K, Trifonov VA, Cioffi MDB, Grothmann P, Liehr T, Oliveira EH. Comprehensive characterization of evolutionary conserved breakpoints in four New World Monkey karyotypes compared to Chlorocebus aethiops and Homo sapiens. Heliyon 2015; 1:e00042. [PMID: 27441227 PMCID: PMC4945616 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2015.e00042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2015] [Revised: 10/20/2015] [Accepted: 10/23/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Comparative cytogenetic analysis in New World Monkeys (NWMs) using human multicolor banding (MCB) probe sets were not previously done. Here we report on an MCB based FISH-banding study complemented with selected locus-specific and heterochromatin specific probes in four NWMs and one Old World Monkey (OWM) species, i.e. in Alouatta caraya (ACA), Callithrix jacchus (CJA), Cebus apella (CAP), Saimiri sciureus (SSC), and Chlorocebus aethiops (CAE), respectively. 107 individual evolutionary conserved breakpoints (ECBs) among those species were identified and compared with those of other species in previous reports. Especially for chromosomal regions being syntenic to human chromosomes 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12 and 16 previously cryptic rearrangements could be observed. 50.4% (54/107) NWM-ECBs were colocalized with those of OWMs, 62.6% (62/99) NWM-ECBs were related with those of Hylobates lar (HLA) and 66.3% (71/107) NWM-ECBs corresponded with those known from other mammalians. Furthermore, human fragile sites were aligned with the ECBs found in the five studied species and interestingly 66.3% ECBs colocalized with those fragile sites (FS). Overall, this study presents detailed chromosomal maps of one OWM and four NWM species. This data will be helpful to further investigation on chromosome evolution in NWM and hominoids in general and is prerequisite for correct interpretation of future sequencing based genomic studies in those species.
Collapse
Key Words
- ACA, Alouatta caraya
- Atelidae
- BACs, bacterial artificial chromosomes
- CAE, Chlorocebus aethiops
- CAP, Cebus apella
- CJA, Callithrix jacchus
- Cebidae
- EC, evolutionary conserved
- ECBs, evolutionary conserved breakpoints
- Evolutionary conserved breakpoints
- Evolutionary genetics
- FISH, fluorescence in situ hybridization
- FS, fragile site
- Fragile sites
- Genetics
- HCM, heterochromatin mix
- HLA, Hylobates lar
- HSA, Homo sapiens
- HSBs, homologous syntenic blocks
- MCB, multicolor banding
- Multicolor banding
- NGS, Next-generation sequencing
- NOR, nucleolus organizer region
- NWMs, New World Monkeys
- New World Monkeys
- OWMs, Old World Monkeys
- Old World Monkeys
- SSC, Saimiri sciureus
- subCTM, sub-centromere/subtelomere-specific multicolor (FISH)
- wcp, whole human chromosome painting
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaobo Fan
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Weerayuth Supiwong
- Department of Biology Faculty of Science, KhonKaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, KhonKaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Anja Weise
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Kristin Mrasek
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Nadezda Kosyakova
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Alongkoad Tanomtong
- Department of Biology Faculty of Science, KhonKaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, KhonKaen 40002, Thailand
| | - Krit Pinthong
- Department of Biology Faculty of Science, KhonKaen University, 123 Moo 16 Mittapap Rd., Muang District, KhonKaen 40002, Thailand
| | | | - Marcelo de Bello Cioffi
- Departamento de Genética e Evolução, Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, SP, Brazil
| | - Pierre Grothmann
- Serengeti-Park Hodenhagen GmbH, Am Safaripark 1, 29693, Hodenhagen, Germany
| | - Thomas Liehr
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, D-07743 Jena, Germany
| | - Edivaldo H.C.de Oliveira
- Faculdade de Ciências Naturais, ICEN, Universidade Federal do Pará, Campus Universitário do Guamá, 66075-110 Belém-PA, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kosyakova N, Hamid AB, Chaveerach A, Pinthong K, Siripiyasing P, Supiwong W, Romanenko S, Trifonov V, Fan X. Generation of multicolor banding probes for chromosomes of different species. Mol Cytogenet 2013; 6:6. [PMID: 23374863 PMCID: PMC3575270 DOI: 10.1186/1755-8166-6-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2012] [Accepted: 12/14/2012] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The multicolor banding (MCB/mBAND) technique provides a unique opportunity to characterize intrachromosomal rearrangements and to determine chromosomal breakpoints. Until recently, MCB probes have only been available for human and some murine chromosomes. Generation of MCB probes for chromosomes of other species, useful and required in many cytogenetics research fields, was limited by technical difficulties. MCB probes are established by chromosome microdissection followed by whole genomic DNA amplification. However, unambiguous identification of the target chromosome is required for MCB-probe establishment. Previously proposed protocols suggested G-banding staining or preliminary FISH with whole chromosome paints (WCP) as methods to identify the chromosome of interest. Results Here we present a complete workflow for MCB probe generation for those cases and species where chromosome morphology is too challenging to recognize target chromosomes by conventional methods and where WCP probes are not available. The workflow was successfully applied for murine chromosomes that are difficult to identify unambiguously. Additionally, we showed that glass-needle based microdissection enables establishment of a whole set of WCP paints by microdissection of individual chromosomes of a single metaphase Conclusions The present method can be applied for generation of whole or region-specific DNA probes for species, where karyotyping of G-banded chromosomes is challenging due to similar chromosome morphology and/or chromosome banding patterns.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadezda Kosyakova
- Jena University Hospital, Friedrich Schiller University, Institute of Human Genetics, Kollegiengasse 10, Jena, D-07743, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ventura M, Catacchio CR, Sajjadian S, Vives L, Sudmant PH, Marques-Bonet T, Graves TA, Wilson RK, Eichler EE. The evolution of African great ape subtelomeric heterochromatin and the fusion of human chromosome 2. Genome Res 2012; 22:1036-49. [PMID: 22419167 PMCID: PMC3371704 DOI: 10.1101/gr.136556.111] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Chimpanzee and gorilla chromosomes differ from human chromosomes by the presence of large blocks of subterminal heterochromatin thought to be composed primarily of arrays of tandem satellite sequence. We explore their sequence composition and organization and show a complex organization composed of specific sets of segmental duplications that have hyperexpanded in concert with the formation of subterminal satellites. These regions are highly copy number polymorphic between and within species, and copy number differences involving hundreds of copies can be accurately estimated by assaying read-depth of next-generation sequencing data sets. Phylogenetic and comparative genomic analyses suggest that the structures have arisen largely independently in the two lineages with the exception of a few seed sequences present in the common ancestor of humans and African apes. We propose a model where an ancestral human-chimpanzee pericentric inversion and the ancestral chromosome 2 fusion both predisposed and protected the chimpanzee and human genomes, respectively, to the formation of subtelomeric heterochromatin. Our findings highlight the complex interplay between duplicated sequences and chromosomal rearrangements that rapidly alter the cytogenetic landscape in a short period of evolutionary time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Ventura
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Zhang W, Friebe B, Gill BS, Jiang J. Centromere inactivation and epigenetic modifications of a plant chromosome with three functional centromeres. Chromosoma 2010; 119:553-63. [PMID: 20499078 DOI: 10.1007/s00412-010-0278-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2010] [Revised: 05/07/2010] [Accepted: 05/08/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
A chromosome with two functional centromeres is cytologically unstable and can only be stabilized when one of the two centromeres becomes inactivated via poorly understood mechanisms. Here, we report a transmissible chromosome with multiple centromeres in wheat. This chromosome encompassed one large and two small domains containing the centromeric histone CENH3. The two small centromeres are in a close vicinity and often fused as a single centromere on metaphase chromosomes. This fused centromere contained approximately 30% of the CENH3 compared to the large centromere. An intact tricentric chromosome was transmitted to about 70% of the progenies, which was likely a consequence of the dominating pulling capacity of the large centromere during anaphases of meiosis. The tricentric chromosome showed characteristics typical to dicentric chromosomes, including chromosome breaks and centromere inactivation. Remarkably, inactivation was always associated with the small centromeres, indicating that small centromeres are less likely to survive than large ones in dicentric chromosomes. The inactivation of the small centromeres also coincided with changes of specific histone modifications, including H3K27me2 and H3K27me3, of the pericentromeric chromatin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wenli Zhang
- Department of Horticulture, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Trifonov VA, Kosyakova N, Romanenko SA, Stanyon R, Graphodatsky AS, Liehr T. New insights into the karyotypic evolution in muroid rodents revealed by multicolor banding applying murine probes. Chromosome Res 2010; 18:265-75. [PMID: 20127166 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-010-9110-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/24/2009] [Accepted: 01/05/2010] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Muroid rodents are composed of a wide range of species characterized by extensive karyotypic evolution. Even if this group includes such important laboratory animal models as domestic mouse (Mus musculus), Norway rat (Rattus norvegicus), Chinese hamster (Cricetulus griseus), and golden hamster (Mesocricetus auratus), comparative cytogenetic studies between rodents are difficult due to the characteristic rapid karyotypic evolution. Molecular cytogenetic methods can help resolve problems of comparing muroid chromosomes. Here, we used cross-species comparative multicolour banding with probes obtained from mouse chromosomes 3, 6, 18, and 19 to study the karyotypes of nine muroid species from the three subfamilies Murinae, Cricetinae, and Arvicolinae. Results from multicolour banding with these murine probes (mcb) allowed us to improve the comparative homology maps between these species and to obtain new insights into their karyotypic evolution. We identified evolutionary conserved chromosomal breakpoints and revealed four previously unrecognized homologous segments, four inversions, and 14 evolutionary new centromeres in the nine muroid species studied. We found Mus apomorphic rearrangements, not seen in other muroids, and defined several subfamily specific chromosome breaks, characteristic for Arvicolinae and Cricetinae. We show that mcb libraries are an effective tool both for the cytogenetic characterisation of important laboratory models such as the rat and hamster as well as elucidating the complex phylogenomics relationships of muroids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vladimir A Trifonov
- Molecular and Cellular Biology Department, Institute of Chemical Biology and Fundamental Medicine, Scapital VE, Cyrillic RAS, Novosibirsk, Russia.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Marques-Bonet T, Ryder OA, Eichler EE. Sequencing primate genomes: what have we learned? Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet 2009; 10:355-86. [PMID: 19630567 DOI: 10.1146/annurev.genom.9.081307.164420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
We summarize the progress in whole-genome sequencing and analyses of primate genomes. These emerging genome datasets have broadened our understanding of primate genome evolution revealing unexpected and complex patterns of evolutionary change. This includes the characterization of genome structural variation, episodic changes in the repeat landscape, differences in gene expression, new models regarding speciation, and the ephemeral nature of the recombination landscape. The functional characterization of genomic differences important in primate speciation and adaptation remains a significant challenge. Limited access to biological materials, the lack of detailed phenotypic data and the endangered status of many critical primate species have significantly attenuated research into the genetic basis of primate evolution. Next-generation sequencing technologies promise to greatly expand the number of available primate genome sequences; however, such draft genome sequences will likely miss critical genetic differences within complex genomic regions unless dedicated efforts are put forward to understand the full spectrum of genetic variation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Marques-Bonet
- Department of Genome Sciences, University of Washington and the Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Seattle, Washington 98105, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
In 1992 the Japanese macaque was the first species for which the homology of the entire karyotype was established by cross-species chromosome painting. Today, there are chromosome painting data on more than 50 species of primates. Although chromosome painting is a rapid and economical method for tracking translocations, it has limited utility for revealing intrachromosomal rearrangements. Fortunately, the use of BAC-FISH in the last few years has allowed remarkable progress in determining marker order along primate chromosomes and there are now marker order data on an array of primate species for a good number of chromosomes. These data reveal inversions, but also show that centromeres of many orthologous chromosomes are embedded in different genomic contexts. Even if the mechanisms of neocentromere formation and progression are just beginning to be understood, it is clear that these phenomena had a significant impact on shaping the primate genome and are fundamental to our understanding of genome evolution. In this report we complete and integrate the dataset of BAC-FISH marker order for human syntenies 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 21, 22 and the X. These results allowed us to develop hypotheses about the content, marker order and centromere position in ancestral karyotypes at five major branching points on the primate evolutionary tree: ancestral primate, ancestral anthropoid, ancestral platyrrhine, ancestral catarrhine and ancestral hominoid. Current models suggest that between-species structural rearrangements are often intimately related to speciation. Comparative primate cytogenetics has become an important tool for elucidating the phylogeny and the taxonomy of primates. It has become increasingly apparent that molecular cytogenetic data in the future can be fruitfully combined with whole-genome assemblies to advance our understanding of primate genome evolution as well as the mechanisms and processes that have led to the origin of the human genome.
Collapse
|
11
|
Musilova P, Kubickova S, Zrnova E, Horin P, Vahala J, Rubes J. Karyotypic relationships among Equus grevyi, Equus burchelli and domestic horse defined using horse chromosome arm-specific probes. Chromosome Res 2007; 15:807-13. [PMID: 17874215 DOI: 10.1007/s10577-007-1164-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2007] [Revised: 06/26/2007] [Accepted: 06/26/2007] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
Using laser microdissection we prepared a set of horse chromosome arm-specific probes. Most of the probes were generated from horse chromosomes, some of them were derived from Equus zebra hartmannae. The set of probes were hybridized onto E. grevyi chromosomes in order to establish a genome-wide chromosomal correspondence between this zebra and horse. The use of arm-specific probes provided us with more information on the mutual arrangement of the genomes than we could obtain by means of whole-chromosome paints generated by flow sorting, even if we used reciprocal painting with probe sets from both species. By comparison of our results and results of comparative mapping in E. burchelli, we also established the chromosomal correspondence between E. grevyi and E. burchelli, providing evidence for a very close karyotypic relationship between these two zebra species. Establishment of the comparative map for E. grevyi contributes to the knowledge of the karyotypic phylogeny in the Equidae family.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Musilova
- Department of Genetics and Reproduction, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
|
13
|
Kehrer-Sawatzki H, Cooper DN. Understanding the recent evolution of the human genome: insights from human-chimpanzee genome comparisons. Hum Mutat 2007; 28:99-130. [PMID: 17024666 DOI: 10.1002/humu.20420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 94] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The sequencing of the chimpanzee genome and the comparison with its human counterpart have begun to reveal the spectrum of genetic changes that has accompanied human evolution. In addition to gross karyotypic rearrangements such as the fusion that formed human chromosome 2 and the human-specific pericentric inversions of chromosomes 1 and 18, there is considerable submicroscopic structural variation involving deletions, duplications, and inversions. Lineage-specific segmental duplications, detected by array comparative genomic hybridization and direct sequence comparison, have made a very significant contribution to this structural divergence, which is at least three-fold greater than that due to nucleotide substitutions. Since structural genomic changes may have given rise to irreversible functional differences between the diverging species, their detailed analysis could help to identify the biological processes that have accompanied speciation. To this end, interspecies comparisons have revealed numerous human-specific gains and losses of genes as well as changes in gene expression. The very considerable structural diversity (polymorphism) evident within both lineages has, however, hampered the analysis of the structural divergence between the human and chimpanzee genomes. The concomitant evaluation of genetic divergence and diversity at the nucleotide level has nevertheless served to identify many genes that have evolved under positive selection and may thus have been involved in the development of human lineage-specific traits. Genes that display signs of weak negative selection have also been identified and could represent candidate loci for complex genomic disorders. Here, we review recent progress in comparing the human and chimpanzee genomes and discuss how the differences detected have improved our understanding of the evolution of the human genome.
Collapse
|
14
|
Liehr T, Starke H, Heller A, Kosyakova N, Mrasek K, Gross M, Karst C, Steinhaeuser U, Hunstig F, Fickelscher I, Kuechler A, Trifonov V, Romanenko SA, Weise A. Multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) applied to FISH-banding. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 114:240-4. [PMID: 16954660 DOI: 10.1159/000094207] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2005] [Accepted: 09/13/2005] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
During the last decade not only multicolor fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using whole chromosome paints as probes, but also numerous chromosome banding techniques based on FISH have been developed for the human and for the murine genome. This review focuses on such FISH-banding techniques, which were recently defined as 'any kind of FISH technique, which provide the possibility to characterize simultaneously several chromosomal subregions smaller than a chromosome arm. FISH-banding methods fitting that definition may have quite different characteristics, but share the ability to produce a DNA-specific chromosomal banding'. While the standard chromosome banding techniques like GTG lead to a protein-related black and white banding pattern, FISH-banding techniques are DNA-specific, more colorful and, thus, more informative. For some, even high-resolution FISH-banding techniques the development is complete and they can be used for whole genome hybridizations in one step. Other FISH-banding methods are only available for selected chromosomes and/or are still under development. FISH-banding methods have successfully been applied in research in evolution- and radiation-biology, as well as in studies on the nuclear architecture. Moreover, their suitability for diagnostic purposes has been proven in prenatal, postnatal and tumor cytogenetics, indicating that they are an important tool with the potential to partly replace the conventional banding techniques in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Liehr
- Institute of Human Genetics and Anthropology, Friedrich Schiller University, Jena, Germany.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kakazu N, Abe T. Multicolor banding technique, spectral color banding (SCAN): new development and applications. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 114:250-6. [PMID: 16954662 DOI: 10.1159/000094209] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2006] [Accepted: 03/27/2006] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Conventional banding techniques can characterize chromosomal aberrations associated with tumors and congenital diseases with considerable precision. However, chromosomal aberrations that have been overlooked or are difficult to analyze even by skilled cytogeneticists were also often noted. Following the introduction of multicolor karyotyping such as spectral karyotyping (SKY) and multiplex-fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH), it is possible to identify this kind of cryptic or complex aberration comprehensively by a single analysis. To date, multicolor karyotyping techniques have been established as useful tools for cytogenetic analysis. However, since this technique depends on whole chromosome painting probes, it involves limitations in that the origin of aberrant segments can be identified only in units of chromosomes. To overcome these limitations, we have recently developed spectral color banding (SCAN) as a new multicolor banding technique based on the SKY methodology. This new technique may be deemed as an ideal chromosome banding technique since it allows representation of a multicolor banding pattern matching the corresponding G-banding pattern. We applied this technique to the analysis of chromosomal aberrations in tumors that had not been fully characterized by G-banding or SKY and found it capable of (1) detecting intrachromosomal aberrations; (2) identifying the origin of aberrant segments in units of bands; and (3) precisely determining the breakpoints of complex rearrangements. We also demonstrated that SCAN is expected to allow cytogenetic analysis with a constant adequate resolution close to the 400-band level regardless of the degree of chromosome condensation. As compared to the conventional SKY analysis, SCAN has remarkably higher accuracy for a particular chromosome, allowing analysis in units of bands instead of in units of chromosomes and is hence promising as a means of cytogenetic analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- N Kakazu
- Department of Molecular-Targeting Cancer Prevention, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine, Kyoto, Japan.
| | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Müller S, Wienberg J. Multicolor chromosome bar codes. Cytogenet Genome Res 2006; 114:245-9. [PMID: 16954661 DOI: 10.1159/000094208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2005] [Accepted: 04/03/2006] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
Chromosome bar codes are multicolor banding patterns produced by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) with differentially labeled and pooled sub-regional DNA probes. These molecular cytogenetic tools facilitate chromosome identification and the delineation of both inter- and intra-chromosomal rearrangements. We present an overview of the various conceptual approaches which can be largely divided into two classes: Simple bar codes designed for chromosome identification and complex bar codes for high resolution aberration screening of entire karyotypes. We address the issue of color redundancy and how to overcome this limitation by complementation of bar codes with whole chromosome painting probes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Müller
- Institute for Anthropology and Human Genetics, Department of Biology II, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Szamalek JM, Goidts V, Cooper DN, Hameister H, Kehrer-Sawatzki H. Characterization of the human lineage-specific pericentric inversion that distinguishes human chromosome 1 from the homologous chromosomes of the great apes. Hum Genet 2006; 120:126-38. [PMID: 16775709 DOI: 10.1007/s00439-006-0209-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2006] [Accepted: 05/16/2006] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
The human and chimpanzee genomes are distinguishable in terms of ten gross karyotypic differences including nine pericentric inversions and a chromosomal fusion. Seven of these large pericentric inversions are chimpanzee-specific whereas two of them, involving human chromosomes 1 and 18, were fixed in the human lineage after the divergence of humans and chimpanzees. We have performed detailed molecular and computational characterization of the breakpoint regions of the human-specific inversion of chromosome 1. FISH analysis and sequence comparisons together revealed that the pericentromeric region of HSA 1 contains numerous segmental duplications that display a high degree of sequence similarity between both chromosomal arms. Detailed analysis of these regions has allowed us to refine the p-arm breakpoint region to a 154.2 kb interval at 1p11.2 and the q-arm breakpoint region to a 562.6 kb interval at 1q21.1. Both breakpoint regions contain human-specific segmental duplications arranged in inverted orientation. We therefore propose that the pericentric inversion of HSA 1 was mediated by intra-chromosomal non-homologous recombination between these highly homologous segmental duplications that had themselves arisen only recently in the human lineage by duplicative transposition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justyna M Szamalek
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Albert-Einstein-Allee 11, 89081 Ulm, Germany
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|