Patients' and bystanders' awareness of stroke and pre-hospital delay after stroke onset: perspectives for thrombolysis in West Pomerania Province, Poland

Analysis of onset-to-door time and its influencing factors in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke during the 2020 COVID-19 epidemic: a preliminary, prospective, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Pre-hospital delay in China is a serious issue with unclear relevant reasons, seriously impeding the adoption of appropriate measures. Herein, we analyzed the onset-to-door time (ODT) in Chinese patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and its influencing factors.

METHODS

We prospectively recruited 3,459 patients with AIS from nine representative tertiary general hospitals in China between January and June 2022. Patients were divided into ODT ≤ 3 h and ODT > 3 h groups. Following single-factor analysis, binary logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the risk factors leading to pre-hospital delay.

RESULTS

In total, 763 (21.83%) patients arrived at the hospital within 3 h of onset. After adjusting for confounding factors, the risk factors for ODT were residence in rural areas (odds ratio [OR]: 1.478, 95% credibility interval [CI]: 1.024-2.146) and hospital transfer (OR: 7.479, 95% CI: 2.548-32.337). The protective factors for ODT were location of onset ≤ 20 km from the first-visit hospital (OR: 0.355, 95% CI: 0.236-0.530), transportation by emergency medical services (OR: 0.346, 95% CI: 0.216-0.555), history of atrial fibrillation (OR: 0.375, 95% CI: 0.207-0.679), moderate stroke (OR: 0.644, 95% CI: 0.462-0.901), and severe stroke (OR: 0.506, 95% CI: 0.285-0.908).

CONCLUSIONS

Most patients with AIS fail to reach a hospital within the critical 3-h window. The following measures are recommended to reduce pre-hospital delays: reasonable distribution of hospitals accessible to nearby residents, minimizing interhospital transfer, paying attention to patients with mild stroke, and encouraging patients to use ambulance services. Pre-hospital delays for patients can be reduced by implementing these measures, ultimately improving the timeliness of treatment and enhancing patient prognosis. This study was carried out amid the COVID-19 pandemic, which presented challenges and constraints.

Ischemic stroke in Morocco: Prehospital delay and associated factors

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to estimate prehospital delay and to identify the factors associated with the late arrival of patients with ischemic stroke at the Souss Massa Regional Hospital Center in Morocco.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

An observational, prospective, cross-sectional study was conducted from March 2019 to September 2019 in the Souss Massa regional hospital center, which is a public hospital structure. A questionnaire was administered to patients with ischemic stroke and to bystanders (family or others), while clinical and paraclinical data were collected from medical records. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to identify the factors associated with delayed arrival at emergency department.

RESULTS

A total of 197 patients and 197 bystanders who fulfilled the criteria for the study were included. The median time from symptom onset to hospital arrival was 6hours (IQR, 4-16). Multiple regression analysis showed that illiteracy (OR 38.58; CI_95%: 3.40-437.27), waiting for symptoms to disappear (patient behavior) (OR 11.24; CI_95%: 1.57-80.45), deciding to go directly to the hospital (patient behavior) (OR 0.07; CI_95%: 0.01-0.57), bystander's knowledge that stroke is a disease requiring urgent care within a limited therapeutic window (OR 0.005; CI_95%: 0.00-0.36), and direct admission without reference (OR 0.005; CI_95%: 0.00-0.07), were independently associated with late arrival (>4.5hours) of patients with acute ischemic stroke. In addition, illiteracy (OR 24.62; CI_95%: 4.37-138.69), vertigo and disturbance of balance or coordination (OR 0.14; CI_95%: 0.03-0.73), the relative's knowledge that stroke is a disease requiring urgent care and within a limited therapeutic window (OR 0.03; CI_95%: 0.00-0.22), calling for an ambulance (relative's behavior) (OR 0.16; CI_95%: 0.03-0.80), distance between 50 and 100km (OR 10.16; CI_95%: 1.16-89.33), and direct admission without reference (OR 0.03; CI_95%: 0.00-0.14), were independently associated with late arrival (>6hours) of patients with acute ischemic stroke.

CONCLUSION

Patient behavior, bystander knowledge and direct admission to the competent hospital for stroke care are modifiable factors potentially useful for reducing onset-to-door time, and thereby increasing the implementation rates of acute stroke therapies.

Contribution of Onset-to-Alarm Time to Prehospital Delay in Patients with Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability. Tissue plasminogen activator (tPA) improves the clinical outcome when administered properly; however, the most important factor to receive tPA is time. The main reason for late hospital arrival is a considerable delay in onset-to-alarm time (OAT), comprising more than 50% of the onset-to-door time.

AIMS

To identify the factors associated with a delay in OAT and evaluate its contribution to onset-to-door time in ischemic stroke patients.

METHODS

Prospective cohort of stroke patients admitted to the UANL University Hospital. OAT was defined as the time from identification of stroke symptoms to the decision to seek medical attention.

RESULTS

A total of 189 patients were included. Mean age was 61 ± 13 years, 62% were men. One-hundred and one patients had a short OAT, but only 20.9% arrived during the first 3 hours after stroke onset. Being employed (P = 0032; odds ratio [OR] 2.784, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.091-7.104), attributing symptoms to stroke (P = 0016; OR 3.348, 95% CI 1.254-8.936), and perceiving stroke symptoms as severe (P = 0031;OR 2.428, 95% CI 1.083-5.445) were associated with a shorter OAT.

CONCLUSIONS

OAT consumes a considerable amount of the onset-to-door time. It is necessary to increase stroke knowledge and emphasize the severity of stroke, regardless of the severity of its clinical manifestations to reduce the prehospital delay, especially in countries with limited access to treatment with an extended time frame.

If Time Is Brain Where Is the Improvement in Prehospital Time after Stroke?

Despite the availability of thrombolytic and endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke, many patients are ineligible due to delayed hospital arrival. The identification of factors related to either early or delayed hospital arrival may reveal potential targets of intervention to reduce prehospital delay and improve access to time-critical thrombolysis and clot retrieval therapy. Here, we have reviewed studies reporting on factors associated with either early or delayed hospital arrival after stroke, together with an analysis of stroke onset to hospital arrival times. Much effort in the stroke treatment community has been devoted to reducing door-to-needle times with encouraging improvements. However, this review has revealed that the median onset-to-door times and the percentage of stroke patients arriving before the logistically critical 3 h have shown little improvement in the past two decades. Major factors affecting prehospital time were related to emergency medical pathways, stroke symptomatology, patient and bystander behavior, patient health characteristics, and stroke treatment awareness. Interventions addressing these factors may prove effective in reducing prehospital delay, allowing prompt diagnosis, which in turn may increase the rates and/or efficacy of acute treatments such as thrombolysis and clot retrieval therapy and thereby improve stroke outcomes.

If Time Is Brain Where Is the Improvement in Prehospital Time after Stroke?

Despite the availability of thrombolytic and endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke, many patients are ineligible due to delayed hospital arrival. The identification of factors related to either early or delayed hospital arrival may reveal potential targets of intervention to reduce prehospital delay and improve access to time-critical thrombolysis and clot retrieval therapy. Here, we have reviewed studies reporting on factors associated with either early or delayed hospital arrival after stroke, together with an analysis of stroke onset to hospital arrival times. Much effort in the stroke treatment community has been devoted to reducing door-to-needle times with encouraging improvements. However, this review has revealed that the median onset-to-door times and the percentage of stroke patients arriving before the logistically critical 3 h have shown little improvement in the past two decades. Major factors affecting prehospital time were related to emergency medical pathways, stroke symptomatology, patient and bystander behavior, patient health characteristics, and stroke treatment awareness. Interventions addressing these factors may prove effective in reducing prehospital delay, allowing prompt diagnosis, which in turn may increase the rates and/or efficacy of acute treatments such as thrombolysis and clot retrieval therapy and thereby improve stroke outcomes.

Pre-hospital delay and its associated factors in first-ever stroke registered in communities from three cities in China

This study aimed to explore pre-hospital delay and its associated factors in first-ever stroke registered in communities from three cities in China. The rates of delay greater than or equal to 2 hours were calculated and factors associated with delays were determined by non-conditional binary logistic regression, after adjusting for different explanatory factors. Among the 403 cases of stroke with an accurate documented time of prehospital delay, the median time (interquartile range) was 4.00 (1.50–14.00) hours. Among the 544 cases of stroke with an estimated time range of prehospital delay, 24.8% of patients were transferred to the emergency department or hospital within 2 hours, only 16.9% of patients with stroke were aware that the initial symptom represented a stroke, only 18.8% used the emergency medical service and one-third of the stroke cases were not identified by ambulance doctors. In the multivariate analyses, 8 variables or sub-variables were identified. In conclusion, prehospital delay of stroke was common in communities. Thus, intervention measures in communities should focus on education about the early identification of stroke and appropriate emergency medical service (EMS) use, as well as the development of organized stroke care.

Early Emergency Medical Service Calls for Stroke: Was the Long-Term Education Program Based on the Experience of West Pomerania Successful?

BACKGROUND

Our objectives are to investigate whether the percentage of early emergency calls for stroke had increased and to assess current factors determining the time of deciding to seek medical help in the event of early stroke symptoms.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data concerning the decision to call for medical help in relation to observed stroke symptoms. Group I comprised 287 people who made the decision to call emergency medical service (EMS) in the first 10 minutes after observing stroke symptoms. Group II included 275 people who called EMS after that time. Data from the current database (2013-2014) were compared with relevant data from the period 2003-2005.

RESULTS

In 2013-2014, awareness of stroke signs was 2.5 times greater than in 2003-2005. Among the groups of early and delayed EMS calls during 2003-2005 and 2013-2014, there were no significant differences in the number of people who suspected stroke. Advanced patient age, young caller age, hemiparesis, facial weakness, and the severity of neurological deficit were independent factors that correlated strongly with an early EMS call, whereas feelings of numbness and dizziness correlated significantly with delayed EMS calls.

CONCLUSIONS

In the West Pomeranian community, general knowledge of stroke is not a significant factor when making appropriate decisions at the onset of stroke symptoms. The education campaign regarding the initial symptoms of stroke and the possible fatal consequences appears to have been ineffective.

Efficacy of cerebral thrombolysis in an extended 'time window'

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Cerebral systemic thrombolysis (i.v. thrombolysis) with tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is the only proven medical therapy for ischaemic stroke. The use of i.v. thrombolysis up to 4·5 h from stroke onset was approved in certain countries in 2008, but its safety and efficacy have not been fully determined to date.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the long-term outcome and complication rate of i.v. thrombolysis performed in the extended 'time window'.

METHODS

The study included 403 ischaemic stroke patients consecutively treated with i.v. thrombolysis from 2006 to 2012 at three comprehensive stroke centres in Poland. The long-term outcome and the haemorrhagic complications' (HC) rate were compared between subgroups of patients treated within 3 vs. 3-4·5 h from stroke onset.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

About 132 (32·75%) patients were treated between 3 and 4·5 h from stroke onset. Neurological deficits tended to be more severe in patients treated ≤3 than in those treated 3-4·5 h (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, NIHSS 12 vs.10 points; P = 0·053); however, the ratio of patients with a favourable outcome (mRS 0-2 points) and mortality did not differ between the two groups (53·9 vs. 58·3, P = 0·39 and 17·7 vs. 21·2, P = 0·39, respectively). The rate of HC also did not differ between the two groups (18·8% vs. 15·1%, P = 0·46).

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

The efficacy of i.v. thrombolysis routinely performed in an extended 'time window' is not reduced when compared to procedures performed within 3 h from symptom onset.

Factors associated with early hospital arrival in acute ischemic stroke patients

Early diagnosis and treatment in acute ischemic stroke are crucial in terms of survival and disability. Many stroke patients remain disabled because of the treatment delay. The purpose of this study was to investigate the factors associated with the early hospital arrival in acute ischemic stroke patients. 113 patients diagnosed with acute ischemic stroke were included in this prospective study performed at the Karadeniz Technical University Medical Faculty Hospital. Patients' characteristics and patients' and relatives' emotional and behavioral reactions were compared between early (within 3 h) and late (after 3 h) arrival groups. 72.6 % of patients arrived at hospital within 3 h from symptoms onset. Univariate analysis revealed that history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.04) and coronary heart disease (p = 0.02), sudden onset of symptoms (p = 0.001), loss of consciousness (p = 0.03), recognizing symptoms as stroke (p = 0.01), seeking immediate medical attention (p < 0.001), feelings of fear and panic (p = 0.001), arriving at hospital by ambulance having called the emergency medical services (p = 0.04) and National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score (p = 0.001) were associated with hospital arrival within 3 h. A multivariate regression model demonstrated that recognizing symptoms as stroke (OR, 3.4; 95 % CI, 1.2-9.3) and atrial fibrillation (OR, 4.3; 95 % CI, 1.1-15.7) were independent factors associated with early arrival. The role in early arrival at hospital of recognizing symptoms as stroke and seeking immediate medical attention with transportation by ambulance emphasize the importance of public awareness concerning recognizing the symptoms of stroke and accessing emergency medical assistance.

Time to hospital admission and start of treatment in patients with ischemic stroke in northern Italy and predictors of delay

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Early treatment (i.e. thrombolysis) is crucial for a successful care of ischemic stroke. In the management of stroke, two phases are crucial: the pre-hospital and the in-hospital interval. This work investigated factors influencing pre- and in-hospital delay in a large geographic area of Northern Italy.

METHODS

Enrolled were patients presenting with ischemic stroke in four administrative districts of Northern Italy (Como, Lecco, Sondrio and Varese) over a 4-month period. Pre-hospital time and in-hospital time with single management steps were recorded prospectively. Age, gender, recruiting hospital, EMS transport and triage codes, clinical severity and thrombolytic treatment were also recorded. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors predicting pre- and in-hospital delay were performed.

RESULTS

Median pre-hospital time and in-hospital time were, respectively, 120 min (interquartile range, IQR 62-271) and 150 min (IQR 80-214). Pre-hospital time was halved in patients hospitalized via EMS (p<0.001) and clinically more severe (p<0.001). At multivariate analysis, transport code was associated with delay at any time (p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

EMS use and transport code predicted treatment delay in patients with ischemic stroke. A more intensive use of EMS and high urgency codes could help increase the number of stroke patients treated appropriately.

Pre-hospital delays and intravenous thrombolysis in urban and rural areas

INTRODUCTION

It is crucial to understand the reasons behind pre- and in-hospital delays to improve nationwide access to effective treatment for acute stroke.

AIMS

To evaluate the pre- and in-hospital delays and to compare the intravenous (IV) thrombolysis rates in the urban and rural areas of the Province of Pomerania, Poland.

MATERIALS & METHODS

We evaluated the medical records of 2134 patients treated in the stroke units (SUs) and consecutively reported to the Pomeranian Stroke Register from June 2006-December 2007.

RESULTS

The time of ischaemic stroke onset was known in 488 (59%) of the 834 urban patients and in 744 (70%) of the 1063 rural patients (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who called the emergency medical services with a delay of >45 min was similar in both locations: urban, 314/488 (64.3%) vs rural, 490/744 (65.8%). Although the proportion of patients who reached the emergency room within 3 h was higher in the rural areas (29.0% vs 24.3%; P = 0.02), only 4.2% of these patients received IV thrombolysis compared with 23.1% in the urban areas (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients who did not seek any kind of professional medical help prior to admission was lower in the rural areas (29/744 (3.9%) vs urban 50/488 (10.2%)) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pre-hospital delays reduced the number of patients eligible for IV thrombolysis in both rural and urban areas. The low proportion of patients treated with IV thrombolysis in rural SUs may be attributed to ineffective in-hospital procedures.

Predictors of early arrival at the emergency department in acute ischaemic stroke

BACKGROUND

A requirement of an effective acute stroke service is the early arrival of patients to the hospital emergency department (ED). This will allow the possible use of thrombolytic therapy or other acute interventions within a limited time window.

AIMS

We investigated the predictors of early arrival in a single hospital serving a mixed urban and rural catchment area.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all case notes for 1 year was performed.

RESULTS

Of 105 acute strokes, 91 were cerebral infarcts and a total of 71 cases presenting initially to the ED had timing available for analysis. 39.4% presented within 3 h, and 12.7% were potentially suitable for thrombolysis. Those living closer to the hospital were not more likely to arrive within 3 h (Z = -0.411, p = 0.68). Presenting directly to the hospital by emergency services (or private transport) was significantly associated with early arrival in a univariate comparison (p < 0.001), and in a multivariate model.

CONCLUSION

The only independent predictor of early arrival to the ED is direct presentation. Improved public education of the importance of recognition of stroke symptoms and rapid contact with the emergency services will improve the early attendance following acute stroke, allowing increased use of acute stroke treatments.

Early identification and delay to treatment in myocardial infarction and stroke: differences and similarities

Background

The two major complications of atherosclerosis are acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and acute ischemic stroke. Both are life-threatening conditions characterised by the abrupt cessation of blood flow to respective organs, resulting in an infarction. Depending on the extent of the infarction, loss of organ function varies considerably.

In both conditions, it is possible to limit the extent of infarction with early intervention. In both conditions, minutes count.

This article aims to describe differences and similarities with regard to the way patients, bystanders and health care providers act in the acute phase of the two diseases with the emphasis on the pre-hospital phase.

Method

A literature search was performed on the PubMed, Embase (Ovid SP) and Cochrane Library databases.

Results

In both conditions, symptoms vary considerably. Patients appear to suspect AMI more frequently than stroke and, in the former, there is a gender gap (men suspect AMI more frequently than women).

With regard to detection of AMI and stroke at dispatch centre and in Emergency Medical Service (EMS) there is room for improvement in both conditions. The use of EMS appears to be higher in stroke but the overall delay to hospital admission is shorter in AMI. In both conditions, the fast track concept has been shown to influence the delay to treatment considerably.

In terms of diagnostic evaluation by the EMS, more supported instruments are available in AMI than in stroke. Knowledge of the importance of early treatment has been reported to influence delays in both AMI and stroke.

Conclusion

Both in AMI and stroke minutes count and therefore the fast track concept has been introduced. Time to treatment still appears to be longer in stroke than in AMI. In the future improvement in the early detection as well as further shortening to start of treatment will be in focus in both conditions. A collaboration between cardiologists and neurologists and also between pre-hospital and in-hospital care might be fruitful.

A comprehensive review of prehospital and in-hospital delay times in acute stroke care

The purpose of this study was to systematically review and summarize prehospital and in-hospital stroke evaluation and treatment delay times. We identified 123 unique peer-reviewed studies published from 1981 to 2007 of prehospital and in-hospital delay time for evaluation and treatment of patients with stroke, transient ischemic attack, or stroke-like symptoms. Based on studies of 65 different population groups, the weighted Poisson regression indicated a 6.0% annual decline (P<0.001) in hours/year for prehospital delay, defined from symptom onset to emergency department arrival. For in-hospital delay, the weighted Poisson regression models indicated no meaningful changes in delay time from emergency department arrival to emergency department evaluation (3.1%, P=0.49 based on 12 population groups). There was a 10.2% annual decline in hours/year from emergency department arrival to neurology evaluation or notification (P=0.23 based on 16 population groups) and a 10.7% annual decline in hours/year for delay time from emergency department arrival to initiation of computed tomography (P=0.11 based on 23 population groups). Only one study reported on times from arrival to computed tomography scan interpretation, two studies on arrival to drug administration, and no studies on arrival to transfer to an in-patient setting, precluding generalizations. Prehospital delay continues to contribute the largest proportion of delay time. The next decade provides opportunities to establish more effective community-based interventions worldwide. It will be crucial to have effective stroke surveillance systems in place to better understand and improve both prehospital and in-hospital delays for acute stroke care.