Chloroquine-quinacrine association in resistant cutaneous lupus

Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cells Are Not Major Producers of Type 1 IFN in Cutaneous Lupus: An In-Depth Immunoprofile of Subacute and Discoid Lupus

The immunologic drivers of cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) and its clinical subtypes remain poorly understood. We sought to characterize the immune landscape of discoid lupus erythematosus and subacute CLE using multiplexed immunophenotyping. We found no significant differences in immune cell percentages between discoid lupus erythematosus and subacute CLE (P > .05) with the exception of an increase in TBK1 in discoid lupus erythematosus (P < .05). Unbiased clustering grouped subjects into 2 major clusters without respect to clinical subtype. Subjects with a history of smoking had increased percentages of neutrophils, disease activity, and endothelial granzyme B compared with nonsmokers. Despite previous assumptions, plasmacytoid dendritic cells (pDCs) did not stain for IFN-1. Skin-eluted and circulating pDCs from subjects with CLE expressed significantly less IFNα than healthy control pDCs upon toll-like receptor 7 stimulation ex vivo (P < .0001). These data suggest that discoid lupus erythematosus and subacute CLE have similar immune microenvironments in a multiplexed investigation. Our aggregated analysis of CLE revealed that smoking may modulate disease activity in CLE through neutrophils and endothelial granzyme B. Notably, our data suggest that pDCs are not the major producers of IFN-1 in CLE. Future in vitro studies to investigate the role of pDCs in CLE are needed.

Lupus erythematosus: Significance of dermatologic findings

Herein, the different skin manifestations in patients with lupus erythematosus are reviewed, and their diagnostic, pathogenic and prognostic relevance are discussed, as well as their impact on therapeutic choices. The so-called specific lesions of LE result from an autoimmune pathomechanism and they allow diagnosis of LE by simple clinicopathological correlation since the findings are characteristic. They include the classic acute, subacute and chronic variants, characterised microscopically by interface dermatitis; the dermal variants of lupus, such as tumid lupus, displaying dermal perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with mucin deposition under the microscope, and lupus profundus, in which lymphocytic lobular panniculitis progressing to hyaline fibrosis is found. Antimalarials are the treatment of choice for patients with specific LE lesions. The presence of some dermatological signs is the result of thrombotic vasculopathy. Their recognition allows the identification of lupus patients at increased cardiovascular risk and with a worse overall prognosis. Those signs include reticulated erythema on the tip of the toes, splinter hemorrhages, atrophie blanche, pseudo-Degos lesions, racemosa-type livedo, anetoderma, ulceration and necrosis. Those clinical manifestations, often subtle, must be recognised, and if present, patients should be treated with antiplatelet drugs. Finally, neutrophilic cutaneous lupus erythematosus includes a few entities that suggest that autoinflammatory mechanisms might play a key role in certain lupus manifestations. Among those entities, it is very important to diagnose neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis, which can mimic a classic lupus flare, because it is characterised by rash with joint pain, but immunosuppressants are not helpful. Dapsone is the treatment of choice.

Expert Perspective: An Evidence-Based Approach to Refractory Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is a chronic autoimmune disease that can present with a variety of skin manifestations and have a dramatic effect on a patient's quality of life. Effective treatment options for this disease are limited, and the efficacy of these treatments is often supported by low levels of evidence. This makes the treatment of refractory disease especially challenging, as it is difficult to achieve a consensus on the appropriate progression of treatment beyond first- and second-line treatment options. The treatment of refractory CLE often involves some degree of immunosuppression, which carries some risk for patients and requires a thoughtful approach to the selection of medications. Some treatments that have proven to be effective in systemic disease may not be as effective in cutaneous disease, making it difficult to extrapolate from the available evidence on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Ultimately, the increased use of objective skin measurements in SLE clinical trials is necessary to understand drug efficacy in CLE and develop new treatments for this challenging disease. Here, we provide clinical examples of the challenges involved in treating refractory CLE, examine the evidence currently available for treatment options, and provide an algorithmic approach to the treatment of refractory disease based on this evidence. Novel therapies under development for CLE are also discussed, as they may soon be part of the accepted treatment regimen for refractory CLE.

Management of cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), occurring with or without systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), is a group of inflammatory skin diseases that can be very debilitating, causing significant psychological distress, and sometimes scarring.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to comprehensively present the evidence for different treatment modalities in patients with cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus (LE).

METHODS

Medline, Embase, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched electronically from 1990 to March 2019, using keywords related to cutaneous lupus and synonyms and treatment. Articles retrieved were screened for relevance, including reference lists of retrieved reviews. We included clinical trials, observational studies or case series with ≥5 patients focussing on treatment of CLE, with or without SLE.

RESULTS

The search identified 6637 studies, of which 107 were included. Each study commonly included a heterogeneous mixture of CLE subtypes, with or without SLE. The 107 included studies investigated 11 different categories of treatment in 7343 patients. Treatments included topical calcineurin inhibitors (13 studies), sun protection (5 studies), R-salbutamol cream (2 studies), antimalarials (22 studies), synthetic DMARDs (10 studies), retinoids (2 studies), thalidomide/lenalidomide (22 studies), biologic therapies (15 studies), intravenous immune globulin (3 studies), laser (6 studies) and other therapies (7 studies). General measures to be considered include smoking cessation, sun protection measures and optimisation of vitamin D levels. Moderate evidence exists for benefit with topical CNIs, particularly as a steroid sparing agent in areas at high risk of steroid complications (e.g. facial skin). There is moderate evidence for hydroxychloroquine, which is first-line in SLE patients, limited evidence to support other synthetic DMARDs, and moderate evidence supporting thalidomide but with significant risk of toxicity. Of biologic therapies, there are moderate data to support belimumab. Limited evidence exists for other therapies.

CONCLUSION

Many management options are available for CLE, including topical, systemic and biologic therapies, with a variable balance of efficacy and toxicity. There is a paucity of high-quality clinical trial data. Further trials are required to better understand optimal management of CLE, particularly in specific subgroups.

Combined mepacrine-hydroxychloroquine treatment in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and refractory cutaneous and articular activity

Aim The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical response to combined therapy with hydroxychloroquine and mepacrine in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and refractory joint and/or skin disease. Methods Mepacrine was added to 46 systemic lupus erythematosus patients unresponsive to treatment with the following drug combinations: hydroxychloroquine + prednisone + immunosuppressive drugs ( n = 24), hydroxychloroquine + prednisone ( n = 16), hydroxychloroquine + prednisone + retinoids ( n = 2), hydroxychloroquine alone ( n = 1), hydroxychloroquine + one immunosuppressive drug ( n = 1), hydroxychloroquine + prednisone + one immunosuppressive drug + belimumab ( n = 1) or hydroxychloroquine + prednisone + belimumab ( n = 1). The outcome variable was the clinical response, either complete or partial, based on clinical judgement. The Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index (CLASI) and the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) score were additionally used. Results A total of 91% patients showed complete/partial response, with similar rates among those with joint or skin disease. In patients with cutaneous activity, a statistically significant decrease in the CLASI was seen. There also was a statistically significant decrease in the SLEDAI. The mean daily dose of prednisone decreased from 5.8 to 3.4 mg/d ( p = 0.001). Prednisone could be discontinued in 20% of patients. No serious adverse events were seen. Smoking was the only predictor of complete response. Conclusion In the setting of refractory skin and/or joint disease, the addition of mepacrine to previous therapy including hydroxychloroquine was safe and effective in reducing disease activity and decreasing prednisone doses. The fact that smokers responded better opens the door to further studying the combination of mepacrine-hydroxychloroquine as a first-line therapy in such patients.

Efficacy and comparison of antimalarials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus subtypes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The antimalarials (AMs) hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and chloroquine (CQ) have demonstrated variable cutaneous response rates in cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE).

OBJECTIVES

We sought to assess the global cutaneous response rates to HCQ and CQ, with respect to CLE subtypes, based on previously published studies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published in MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Library between 1965 and December 2015. The proportions of responders to AMs according to CLE subtypes were extracted from individual studies and pooled using random-effects or fixed models. The odds ratio (OR) was used as the measure of association to compare the response rates between CLE subtypes and AMs.

RESULTS

Among 1990 courses of treatment with AMs from 31 included studies, the overall response rate to AMs was 63% [95% confidence interval (CI) 55-70], with important statistical heterogeneity across the included studies. HCQ had a higher overall efficacy than CQ, but this was not significant (OR 1·48, 95% CI 0·98-2·23). The response rate to AMs was different between CLE subtypes, ranging from 31% (95% CI 20-44) for chilblain lupus to 91% (95% CI 87-93) for acute CLE. The response was significantly higher for acute CLE than for subacute CLE and intermittent CLE. In case of failure of monotherapy with AM, the combination of quinacrine with HCQ or CQ seemed effective, whereas too little data were available to assess the efficacy of the switch to another AM agent.

CONCLUSIONS

Wide discrepancies in cutaneous response to AMs are observed between CLE subtypes. A specific therapeutic approach considering CLE subtypes may improve CLE management.

Treatment of cutaneous lupus

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) is an autoimmune inflammatory skin disease seen in patients with or without systemic lupus erythematosus. The management of CLE includes treatment and prevention of lesions as well as routine assessment for systemic disease. Treatment options include topical and systemic therapies. Topical therapies include corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors. Systemic therapies generally fall under one of three categories: antimalarials, immunomodulators (eg, dapsone and thalidomide), and immunosuppressives (eg, methotrexate and mycophenolate). Evidence for the treatment of CLE has been limited by few prospective studies and the lack of a validated outcome measure (until recently). There is good evidence to support the use of topical steroids and calcineurin inhibitors, although most of these trials have not used placebo or vehicle controls. There have been no randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating systemic therapies in the treatment of CLE.

Response to antimalarial agents in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a prospective analysis

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate response to antimalarial agents in patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE) using activity scores from the Cutaneous Lupus Erythematosus Disease Area and Severity Index, a validated outcome measure.

DESIGN

Prospective, longitudinal cohort study.

SETTING

University cutaneous autoimmune disease clinic.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 128 patients with CLE who presented from January 2007 to July 2010 and had at least 2 visits with activity scores.

INTERVENTION

Administration of antimalarial agents.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Response was defined by a 4-point or 20% decrease in activity score. Response to initiation was determined by the difference between the scores before treatment and at the first visit at least 2 months after treatment. Response to continuation was determined by the difference between the scores at the first visit and the most recent visit while undergoing treatment.

RESULTS

Of 11 patients who initiated treatment with hydroxychloroquine, 55% were responders (n = 6), showing a decrease in median (interquartile range [IQR]) activity score from 8.0 (3.5-13.0) to 3.0 (1.8-7.3) (P = .03). Of 15 patients for whom hydroxychloroquine failed, 67% were responders to initiation of hydroxychloroquine-quinacrine therapy (n = 10), showing a decrease in median (IQR) activity score from 6.0 (4.8-8.3) to 3.0 (0.75-5.0) (P = .004). Nine of 21 patients who continued hydroxychloroquine treatment (43%), and 9 of 21 patients who continued hydroxychloroquine-quinacrine (43%) were responders, showing a decrease in median (IQR) activity score from 6.0 (1.5-9.5) to 1.0 (0.0-4.5) (P = .01) and 8.5 (4.25-17.5) to 5.0 (0.5-11.5) (P = .01), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of quinacrine with hydroxychloroquine is associated with response in patients for whom hydroxychloroquine monotherapy fails. Further reduction in disease activity can be associated with continuation of treatment with antimalarial agents.

Beyond DNA binding - a review of the potential mechanisms mediating quinacrine's therapeutic activities in parasitic infections, inflammation, and cancers

This is an in-depth review of the history of quinacrine as well as its pharmacokinetic properties and established record of safety as an FDA-approved drug. The potential uses of quinacrine as an anti-cancer agent are discussed with particular attention to its actions on nuclear proteins, the arachidonic acid pathway, and multi-drug resistance, as well as its actions on signaling proteins in the cytoplasm. In particular, quinacrine's role on the NF-κB, p53, and AKT pathways are summarized.

Management of primary cicatricial alopecias: options for treatment

Primary cicatricial alopecias (PCAs) are a poorly understood group of disorders that result in permanent hair loss. Clinically, they are characterized not only by permanent loss of hair shafts but also of visible follicular ostia along with other visible changes in skin surface morphology, while their histopathological hallmark usually (although not always) is the replacement of follicular structures with scar-like fibrous tissue. As hair follicle neogenesis in adult human scalp skin is not yet a readily available treatment option for patients with cicatricial alopecias, the aim of treatment, currently, remains to reduce symptoms and to slow or stop PCA progression, namely the scarring process. Early treatment is the key to minimizing the extent of permanent alopecia. However, inconsistent terminology, poorly defined clinical end-points and a lack of good quality clinical trials have long made management of these conditions very challenging. As one important step towards improving the management of this under-investigated and under-serviced group of dermatoses, the current review presents evidence-based guidance for treatment, with identification of the strength of evidence, and a brief overview of clinical features of each condition. Wherever only insufficient evidence-based advice on PCA management can be given at present, this is indicated so as to highlight important gaps in our clinical knowledge that call for concerted efforts to close these in the near future.

New concepts in antimalarial use and mode of action in dermatology

Although chloroquine, hydroxychloroquine and quinacrine were originally developed for the treatment of malaria, these medications have been used to treat skin disease for over 50 years. Recent clinical data have confirmed the usefulness of these medications for the treatment of lupus erythematosus. Current research has further enhanced our understanding of the pharmacologic mechanisms of action of these drugs involving inhibition of endosomal toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling limiting B cell and dendritic cell activation. With this understanding, the use of these medications in dermatology is broadening. This article highlights the different antimalarials used within dermatology through their pharmacologic properties and mechanism of action, as well as indicating their clinical uses. In addition, contraindications, adverse effects, and possible drug interactions of antimalarials are reviewed.

Lupus erythematosus: systemic and cutaneous manifestations

Skin and joint involvements are the most commonly occurring manifestations of systemic lupus erythematosus. There are 3 forms of cutaneous lupus: chronic cutaneous (discoid) lupus, subacute cutaneous lupus, and acute cutaneous lupus. Joint manifestations are usually not associated with warmth of the joints and may be only associated with pain and swelling. Painful or swollen joints respond rapidly to small or moderate doses of corticosteroids, whereas cutaneous manifestations usually respond to antimalarial drugs. Anti-Ro is associated closely with a photosensitive rash and with subacute lupus.

The Reduction of Serum B-Lymphocyte Activating Factor levels following Quinacrine Add-On Therapy in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

B-Lymphocyte-activating factor (BAFF/BLyS) is a survival factor for B cells, belonging to the tumor necrosis ligand super family. Serum BAFF levels have been found to be elevated in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Neutralization of BAFF activity was suggested as an additional therapeutic approach in SLE. To determine the effect of add-on Quinacrine (Qn) treatment on serum BAFF levels and the effect of this treatment on SLE disease activity index (SLEDAI), antidsDNA and anticardiolipin (aCL) antibody levels, we treated 29 stable SLE patients, who were maintained on prednisolone and hydroxychloroquine and in some on azathioprine (AZT), with additional Qn (100 mg/d) with an aim to further reduce disease activity. SLEDAI, antidsDNA, aCL antibodies and serum BAFF levels were assessed before and 3 months after the addition of Qn. Three months following Qn initiation, a reduction in SLEDAI was noticed in 19/29 patients (mean 8.8 +/- 2.3 to 3.3 +/- 1.5, P = 0.009), followed by reduction or discontinuation of prednisolone in all patients and the discontinuation of AZT in five patients. Serum BAFF levels were significantly reduced in 8/12 patients (mean 6.3 +/- 0.5 to 3.0 +/- 0.56 ng/ml P = 0.0001). This reduction was found in correlation with a decrease in aCL titres. However, the decrease in SLEDAI scores and antidsDNA antibody titres was unrelated to the decrease in serum BAFF or aCL levels. We conclude that the addition of Qn to previous therapeutic regimens in active SLE is beneficial and seems to reduce SLEDAI scores, serum BAFF and aCL levels and therefore should be considered in many of our SLE patients before aggressive treatments are given.

Management of ‘refractory’ skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus

Skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus can be subdivided into two broad categories-those lesions that, when biopsied, demonstrate an interface dermatitis and those that do not demonstrate an interface dermatitis. The skin lesions that are represented by the interface dermatitis include discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE), subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE), and acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus. Many patients with these cutaneous lesions can be managed with "standard" therapies, including sunscreens, protective clothing and behavioral alteration, and topical corticosteroids with or without an oral antimalarial agent. These standard therapies are often not used appropriately, resulting in a situation in which the patient is felt to have refractory disease. This chapter discusses these therapies and defines what is meant by refractory disease and how the author approaches these patients.

Antipaludéens de synthèse

The antimalarials, mainly chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine, derive from the quinoleine core of quinine. Their initial therapeutic indication was the treatment of malaria attacks but, because of anti-inflammatory and immuno-modulatory activities, they have been since used to treat many other pathologies, in particular dermatological ones. For some of these pathologies, lupus or porphyria cutanea tarda for example, the use of these molecules is based on obvious scientific evidence. For other pathologies (cutaneous sarcoidosis, polymyositis, polymorphous light eruption...), the data on the medical literature corroborating the daily clinical practice are extremely poor. Their toxicity is limited. Their most common toxic effects are gastrointestinal (mild nausea or diarrhea) or mucocutaneous (reversible skin or mucosal pigmentation). Their most serious and dreaded side effect, retinopathy, can be largely prevented by using amounts of APS adapted to the weight of the patients. The recommended "safe" daily dose for hydroxychloroquine is 6.5 mg per kilogramme of body weight and for chloroquine 4 mg per kilogramme of body weight. However, at 6- to 12 months intervals, follow-up eye examinations should be performed.

Optimal use of antimalarials in treating cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Antimalarials have been used to treat cutaneous and systemic lupus erythematosus (LE) for decades. Although controlled studies comparing the efficacy of antimalarials versus placebo and other treatments are generally lacking, many case reports and series support the therapeutic efficacy of these agents in treating both LE-specific and -nonspecific skin lesions. Currently, the two most frequently used antimalarial agents are chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. There may be a delay of weeks to months in the onset of therapeutic effects of antimalarials when treating LE. Smoking appears to inhibit the therapeutic efficacy of antimalarials when treating cutaneous LE. Antimalarials have been associated with a number of potentially serious adverse effects, including irreversible loss of vision. The aim of this review is to discuss the many facets of antimalarials that will help clinicians optimally utilize these agents when treating cutaneous LE.

Quinacrine added to ongoing therapeutic regimens attenuates anticardiolipin antibody production in SLE

The benefit of combining quinacrine (Qn) with hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) was previously re-evaluated by us. In our current study we observed that, in 11 active SLE patients (SLEDAI score 5-12), the addition of Qn (100 mg/day) to their existing ongoing therapeutic regimens resulted in a significant attenuation of their previously persistent anticardiolipin antibody (aCL) response. This was in comparison with a matched non-Qn treated control group composed of 14 randomly chosen aCL-positive SLE patients with a similar SLEDAI score 6-10. Prior to Qn treatment the therapeutic regimens of 12 months' duration, included in all cases HCQ (400 mg/day), in many cases prednisone (P, 10-20 mg/day) and in some additional cases immunosuppressive drugs. SLEDAI scores and aCL levels were monitored during the entire follow-up period which totaled 24 months in the study group and 15-18 months in the controls. Along with the beneficial effect of the added Qn on SLEDAI scores, aCL disappearance was documented in eight of 11 patients and remained negative during 8-12 months of follow-up (P = 0.004), compared with such a change in only three of 14 non-Qn treated aCL-positive patients (P = 0.18). We conclude that the added Qn treatment to former established therapeutic protocols may eliminate aCL response in SLE patients. Whether this agent's effect is permanent needs further elucidation.

Antimalarials in cutaneous lupus erythematosus: mechanisms of therapeutic benefit

Antimalarials are arguably the best modality currently available for treating patients with cutaneous lupus erythematosus (LE). Although antimalarials have been used for decades in treating cutaneous LE, the precise mechanisms by which they provide therapeutic benefit are not well defined. The putative mechanisms by which antimalarials might provide therapeutic benefit to patients with cutaneous LE include a number of interrelated anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive effects that include photoprotection, lysosomal stabilization, suppression of antigen presentation, and inhibition of prostaglandin and cytokine synthesis. If we had a more precise understanding of how antimalarials provide therapeutic benefit in cutaneous LE we might gain better insight into the pathogenic mechanisms of LE and ways of developing better therapies for afflicted patients.

Management of skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus

Skin disease in patients with lupus erythematosus may be subdivided into two broad categories - those represented by a 'specific' histopathology, the interface dermatitis, and those with changes that are not specific to lupus erythematosus, for example, vasculitis, mucin infiltration, etc. The specific skin lesions that are most common are discoid lupus erythematosus (DLE) and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (SCLE). Evaluation will allow the treating physician to assign a prognosis. Cutaneous lesions can generally be managed with standard therapies. Patients with discoid LE and subacute cutaneous LE are generally photosensitive, and therefore sunscreens, protective clothing and behavioural alteration should be discussed with all patients. Topical corticosteroids are a standard form of therapy, but 'newer' agents such as retinoids, calcipotriene and tacrolimus might be effective. Antimalarial agents are generally effective. Attempts to reduce or stop smoking may aid in the control of cutaneous LE. The choice of alternative therapy is personal, and discussions of the risks and benefits should be carefully documented.

Treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

The treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is mainly based on a number of "traditional" drugs such as corticosteroids, antimalarials, azathioprine and cyclophosphamide. However, this scenario is rapidly changing due to the introduction of new compounds. Some of these new agents have been successfully used in other diseases, while others are being specifically designed to interfere with the immune abnormalities seen in SLE. As our knowledge on the mechanisms of immune response increases, new drugs that can interfere with T and B cell interaction and activation, production of anti-dsDNA autoantibodies, immune-complexes deposition and cytokine activation have been developed and some of these are now under investigation in SLE. Although initial data regarding their safety and efficacy are encouraging, caution must be taken before these drugs are considered as the treatment of choice for specific SLE manifestations. Specifically, controlled clinical trials with sufficient number of patients are necessary. If the promising results already available are confirmed, the use of these drugs might represent the keystone in the future management of SLE and other autoimmune diseases.

Cutaneous lupus erythematosus

Lupus erythematosus (LE) has many different clinical manifestations including a variety of cutaneous findings. Some of the cutaneous manifestations are not specific for LE, such as photosensitivity reactions, oral ulcers, alopecia, urticaria, vasculitis, vesiculo-bullous lesions, acral changes, cutaneous mucinoses, and cutaneous calcinosis. Other findings are specific for LE in that they are found only in patients who have lupus erythematosus. These LE-specific disorders include acute cutaneous LE, subacute cutaneous LE, and several forms of chronic cutaneous LE, including discoid LE. Skin biopsies are often helpful in differentiating LE-specific skin lesions from other disorders that can mimic them. Photoprotective measures and a number of drugs are useful in treating cutaneous LE.

Antimalarials

Antimalarial medications have become the parenteral drugs of choice for treating the cutaneous manifestations of lupus erythematosus. The immune-modulating activity of these agents makes them useful in a variety of other dermatoses. With prudent dosage and monitoring, these agents can be used safely and effectively in the treatment and management of dermatologic disease.

Dermatologic lupus: Hopkins Lupus Cohort

Dermatologic manifestations are among the most common signs of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The Hopkins Lupus Cohort study is a prospective study in which patients with SLE are seen on a quarterly basis for measurement of disease activity, laboratory tests, and assessment of morbidity and quality of life. This cohort has allowed unique insights into the epidemiologic factors of SLE, the presentation of dermatologic lupus, and morbidity, all of which are presented in this report. In addition, the dermatologic signs of antiphospholipid antibody syndrome (APS) are reviewed. Approaches to treatment of dermatologic lupus and APS are discussed.