Multicenter phase I/II study of docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil combination chemotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Pegfilgrastim for the management of neutropenia during neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in esophageal cancer patients

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy is a new standard for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. The optimal timing of pegfilgrastim with the DCF regimen to prevent febrile neutropenia (FN) remains controversial. The effectiveness of concomitant pegfilgrastim administration with continuous 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) infusion in the DCF regimen was therefore assessed.

METHODS

All patients who received neoadjuvant DCF for esophageal cancer were retrospectively assessed. Patients who had been scheduled to receive pegfilgrastim on days 3-5 (early group) or days 7-9 (regular group) of the DCF regimen were included. Uni- and multivariate analyses were used to assess risk factors for FN.

RESULTS

Eighty-eight patients were included in the analysis. The 26 patients in the early group received pegfilgrastim as scheduled. In the 62 patients of the regular group, 51 received pegfilgrastim at a median of 7 days after starting DCF chemotherapy. However, 11 patients in the regular group could not receive pegfilgrastim. Twenty-two patients of the regular group and 2 patients of the early group developed FN after the first session of DCF. Early administration of pegfilgrastim and grade 4 neutropenia were significantly associated with onset of FN, with multivariate analysis identifying early administration of pegfilgrastim as an independent preventive factor and grade 4 neutropenia as a risk factor, after adjusting for sex and age.

CONCLUSION

Early pegfilgrastim administration is a safe approach that reduces the incidence of FN in DCF therapy. Using pegfilgrastim with continuous 5-FU infusion in the DCF regimen represents a reasonable option to prevent FN.

Skeletal Muscle Quality and Quantity Affect Prognosis after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with a Triple Regimen of Docetaxel/Cisplatin/5-FU in Patients with Esophageal Cancer

The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the prognosis after docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) undergoing surgical resection. We retrospectively examined a total of 100 patients who received neoadjuvant DCF therapy for ESCC at our institution between 2011 and 2020. The psoas muscle index (PMI) was calculated from the psoas muscle area at the L3 vertebral level, and the intramuscular adipose tissue content (IMAC) was calculated from the mean CT value of the multifidus muscle and from four points of subcutaneous fat. The median PMI value was 6.11 cm2/m2 (range, 3.12-11.07 cm2/m2) in men and 3.65 cm2/m2 (range, 2.70-6.82 cm2/m2) in women. The median IMAC was -0.426 (range, -0.079--0.968) in men and -0.359 (range, -0.079--0.671) in women. Based on the PMI, IMAC, and other patient factors, factors associated with NAC-DCF postoperative survival were identified using multivariate Cox regression analysis. A high IMAC was significantly related to overall survival after surgery (p = 0.005, hazard ratio 2.699). A comparison of Kaplan-Meier curves showed that the 5-year survival rate was 76.5% in the low IMAC group and 42.7% in the high IMAC group (log-rank test; p = 0.001). A low IMAC was associated with good survival outcomes and was an independent prognostic factor in patients with cStage II/III ESCC who were treated with the NAC-DCF regimen and underwent surgical resection.

Impact of MRI on the post-therapeutic diagnosis of T4 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Opportunities for T4b esophageal cancer patients to receive curative surgery are increasing with the development of multidisciplinary treatments. However, the best modality to accurately diagnose infiltration to the organs surrounding T4b esophageal cancer is still unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the performance of CT and MRI in diagnosing T stage in T4b esophageal cancer, with reference to the pathological diagnosis.

METHODS

A retrospective medical records review of patients with T4b esophageal cancer patients from January 2017 to December 2021 was conducted. Among 125 patients who were treated for cT4b esophageal cancer in Osaka University Hospital, 30 patients were diagnosed with cT4b esophageal cancer by CT, ycT staging with CT (contrast-enhanced images) and MRI (T2-FSE images), and curative R0 resection was performed. Preoperative MRI staging was independently performed by two experienced radiologists. The diagnostic performance of CT and MRI were examined using McNemar's test.

RESULTS

Nineteen and 12 patients were diagnosed with ycT4b by CT and MRI, respectively. Combined T4b organ resection was performed in 15 patients. A pathological diagnosis of ypT4b was made in 11 cases. In comparison to CT, MRI showed a higher diagnostic performance, specificity (47% vs. 89%, p = 0.013), and accuracy (60% vs. 90%, p = 0.015) for CT vs. MRI.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results-with reference to the pathological diagnosis-revealed that MRI had a superior diagnostic performance to CT for diagnosing T4b esophageal cancer invading the surrounding organs. An accurate diagnosis of T4b esophageal cancer may facilitate the implementation of appropriate treatment strategies.

Long-term survival and prognostic factors associated with curative conversion surgery for ct4b esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Analysis of 200 consecutive cases

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment strategy for cT4b esophageal cancer has not been established yet. Although curative surgery is sometimes performed after induction treatments, the prognostic factor of cT4b esophageal cancer cases who underwent R0 resection remains unknown.

METHODS

A total of 200 patients with cT4b esophageal cancer who underwent R0 resection after induction treatments between 2001 and 2020 in our institute were included in the present study. The relationship between clinicopathological factors and patient survival is evaluated to identify useful prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median and 2-year overall survival were 40.1 months and 62.8%, respectively. Disease recurrence occurred in 98 (49%) patients after surgery. Compared to induction chemotherapy alone, chemoradiation-based induction treatments were associated with decreased locoregional recurrence (34.0% vs 60.8%, P = .0077) but increased pulmonary metastases (27.7% vs 9.8%, P = .0210) and dissemination (19.1% vs 3.9%, P = .0139) after surgery. Multivariate analysis of overall survival identified the preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (hazard ratio 1.7957, P = .0031), response to induction treatments (hazard ratio 2.9663, P = .0009), postoperative pneumonia (hazard ratio 2.3784, P = .0010), and pN (2-3) (hazard ratio 1.5693, P = .0355) as independent prognostic factors. Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (hazard ratio 1.6760, P = .0068) and postoperative pneumonia (hazard ratio 1.8365, P = .0200) were also independent prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival.

CONCLUSION

Curative surgery after induction therapy for cT4b esophageal cancer achieved favorable survival. Preoperative C-reactive protein/albumin ratio, postoperative pneumonia, response to induction treatments, and pN were useful prognostic factors.

Chemoradiotherapy versus triplet chemotherapy as initial therapy for T4b esophageal cancer: survival results from a multicenter randomized Phase 2 trial

BACKGROUND

We report the long-term results as primary endpoint in a multicentre randomized prospective Phase 2 trial which compared chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and triplet chemotherapy (CT) as the initial therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in T4b esophageal cancer (EC).

METHODS

Patients with T4b EC were randomly assigned to the CRT group or CT group as initial treatment. CS was performed if resectable after initial or secondary treatment. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival, analysed by intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period was 43.8 months. The 2-year survival rate was higher in the CRT group (55.1%; 95% CI: 41.1-68.3%) compared to the CT group (34.7%; 95% CI: 22.8-48.9%), although the difference was not significant (P = 0.11). Local and regional lymph node recurrence in patients undergoing R0 resection was significantly higher in the CT group compared to the CRT group (local: 30% versus 8%, respectively, P = 0.03; regional: 37% versus 8%, respectively, P = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Upfront CT was not superior to upfront CRT as induction therapy for T4b EC in terms of 2-year survival and was significantly inferior to upfront CRT in terms of local and regional control.

REGISTRATION

The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).

Low pretherapy skeletal muscle mass index is associated with an increased risk of febrile neutropenia in patients with esophageal cancer receiving docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy

PURPOSE

Docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy, a frequently prescribed regimen for esophageal cancer, is associated with a high risk of febrile neutropenia (FN). This study investigated whether a low skeletal muscle mass index (SMI) is an independent risk factor for FN.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study investigated the SMI of patients with esophageal cancer who received DCF therapy between March 2018 and July 2020. Based on the Asian sarcopenia criteria, patients were divided into two groups: high and low SMI (SMI of < 7.0 and 5.7 kg/m² for males and females, respectively). The incidence of FN was then compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients (20 and 19 in the high- and low-SMI groups, respectively) were included in this study. The incidence of FN was significantly higher in the low-SMI group (63.2% vs. 20.0%, P = 0.006). Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses revealed that a low SMI was an independent risk factor for FN (odds ratio, 7.178; 95% confidence interval, 1.272-40.507; P = 0.026). In addition, the frequency of dose reduction in DCF therapy was significantly higher in the low-SMI group (68.4% vs. 35.0%, P = 0.037).

CONCLUSION

Low SMI is an independent risk factor for FN in patients with esophageal cancer receiving DCF therapy.

Pre-immunotherapy radiotherapy enhanced the efficacy of multi-line sintilimab in unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

The use of immunotherapy for the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is gradually increasing. In this retrospective study, we evaluated the efficacy and explored potential factors of prognosis in multi-line sintilimab for unresectable advanced ESCC.

Methods

All pathological specimens were available from our Department of Pathology. We performed PD-L1 immunohistochemical staining of surgical or puncture specimens from 133 patients. We evaluated the efficacy of multi-line sintilimab and found potential factors according to multivariate analysis. We assessed the relationship between radiotherapy and immunotherapy, and according to whether patients had received radiotherapy within 3 months prior to immunotherapy, we attempted to analyze differences in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

Results

A total of 133 patients were enrolled in this retrospective study between January 2019 and December 2021. The median follow-up was 16.1 months. All patients were treated with at least two cycles of sintilimab. Of all patients, a total of 74 experienced disease progression, with a median progression-free survival of 9.0 months (95% CI 7.701-10.299). We found that pre-immunotherapy radiotherapy was a possible predictor that affected the prognosis of multi-line sintilimab and that 3 months was a significant cutoff. A total of 128 patients (96.2%) had received radiotherapy prior to immunotherapy. Of those patients, 89 (66.9%) had received radiation therapy within 3 months prior to immunotherapy. PFS was considerably longer in patients who were treated within 3 months of radiotherapy than in patients who did not receive radiation therapy within 3 months of radiation therapy prior to immunotherapy (median progression-free survival 10.0 months [95% CI 8.030-11.970] vs. 5.0 months [95% CI 2.755-7.245]). Among all patients, the median overall survival was 14.9 months (95% CI 12.558-17.242). Overall survival was significantly longer in patients who had previously received radiotherapy within 3 months prior to immunotherapy than in those who had not (median overall survival 15.3 months [95% CI 13.724-16.876] vs. 12.2 months [10.001-14.399].

Conclusion

Based on this retrospective study, sintilimab is a significant option for patients with unresectable advanced ESCC who have been previously treated, and pre-immunotherapy radiotherapy within 3 months enhanced the efficacy.

Multimodal Treatment Strategies to Improve the Prognosis of Locally Advanced Thoracic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Narrative Review

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common malignancy and sixth most common cause of cancer-related death globally. Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with aortic or tracheal invasion is considered unresectable, and has an extremely poor prognosis; its standard treatment is definitive chemoradiotherapy (dCRT). In recent years, induction chemotherapy (ICT) has been reported to yield high response rates for locally advanced ESCC, and the efficacy and safety of ICT followed by conversion surgery (CS) have been investigated. Multimodal treatment, combining surgery with induction chemoradiotherapy (ICRT) or ICT, is necessary to improve ESCC prognosis. CS is generally performed for locally advanced ECC after ICRT or ICT when tumor downstaging is achieved, although its prognostic benefit remains controversial. The Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG) has conducted a three-arm phase III randomized controlled trial (JCOG1510) to confirm the superiority of DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) ICT, over conventional dCRT, among patients with initially unresectable ESCC. In recent years, researchers have reported favorable outcomes of induction therapy followed by CS and salvage surgery, after dCRT or systemic immunochemotherapy. In this review, we will describe the latest developments in the multimodal treatment including chemotherapy, CRT, surgery, and immunotherapy, which may improve oncological and survival outcomes for patients with cT4 ESCC.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio after neoadjuvant chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Studies have shown that neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by surgical resection improves the survival of patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), and that the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) nay be a prognostic biomarker in various types of cancer. Despite the noTable changes in the tumor and its microenvironment during NAC, it remains unclear how the NLR changes and which values (before or after NAC) best predict prognosis. The present study aimed to analyze changes in the NLR before and after NAC, and to determine which was a better prognostic factor. This study retrospectively analyzed 338 consecutive patients with ESCC who received NAC followed by curative resection. NLRs before (pre-NLR) and after (post-NLR) NAC were calculated, after which the impact of NAC on NLR, overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS), as well as the relationship between hematological toxicities and NLR, was evaluated. Cutoff values for pre- and post-NLR were 3.7 and 2.5, respectively. Patients with high post-NLR had a worse OS (P=0.0001) and 3-year RFS (P=0.03) than those with low post-NLR. Multivariate analysis identified high post-NLR, pN1 and clinical response as independent prognostic factors. In conclusion, post-NLR was revealed as a better prognostic factor than pre-NLR for patients receiving NAC followed by surgical resection.

Efficacy and safety of chemotherapy regimens for first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in asia: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

There is currently no consensus on the optimal chemotherapy regimen in the palliative first-line setting for East Asian patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

AREAS COVERED

We conducted a systematic review using a literature search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library without date restrictions, and abstracts from major oncology congresses. Studies meeting the following criteria were included: East Asian patients ≥18 years old with pathologically proven metastatic or locally advanced unresectable ESCC; first-line chemotherapy; reporting of overall survival, progression-free survival, duration of response, overall response rate, and/or safety; randomized controlled trials, non-randomized controlled trials, and prospective or retrospective comparative studies. In total, 39 articles were identified for the following regimens: platinum plus fluoropyrimidine (n=9), platinum plus taxane (n=16), platinum plus fluoropyrimidine plus taxane (n=7), platinum plus fluoropyrimidine plus other (n=3), irinotecan plus platinum (n=2), taxane plus fluoropyrimidine (n=1).

EXPERT OPINION

The available data supports both taxane plus platinum regimens and fluoropyrimidine plus platinum regimens in the first-line treatment of East Asian patients with ESCC. Compared with data from doublet chemotherapy studies, triplet chemotherapy appeared to improve ORR, but did not seem to prolong OS, possibly due to an increased incidence of adverse events.

Preoperative docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil treatment with pegfilgrastim on day 7 for patients with esophageal cancer: A phase II study

AIMS

The docetaxel and cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (DCF) regimen is expected to be superior to cisplatin plus 5-FU for the preoperative treatment of esophageal cancer. However, a high risk of adverse effects, including febrile neutropenia (FN), has been reported. To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim, we conducted a phase II study.

METHODS

The regimen consisted of intravenous administration of docetaxel (70 mg/m² per day) and cisplatin (70 mg/m² per day) on day 1 and a continuous infusion of 5-FU (750 mg/m² per day) on days 1-5. A single 3.6-mg dose of pegfilgrastim was given as a subcutaneous injection on day 7 of each cycle. This regimen was repeated every 3 weeks for a maximum of three cycles. The primary endpoint was the grade-2/3 histopathological response rate.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven eligible patients were enrolled and received DCF. Thirty-four patients underwent esophagectomy. Two patients received chemoradiotherapy or radiotherapy without surgery. One patient withdrew consent and ended his hospital visit. One patient received additional radiotherapy before surgery. Histopathological responses of grade 3, grade 2, grade 1b, and grade 1a were observed in two (5.4%), 14 (37.8%), 10 (27.0%), and seven (18.9%) patients, respectively, and the primary endpoint was met. Of the 37 eligible patients, 11 (29.7%) developed FN in the first cycle.

CONCLUSIONS

Since the histopathological responses were as expected, DCF with prophylactic pegfilgrastim is considered to be effective as preoperative chemotherapy. However, the prophylactic use of pegfilgrastim on day 7 was insufficient to prevent FN.

Current status of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Esophageal cancer is the seventh most common cancer, with an estimated 572,000 new cases, and the sixth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in 2018 with 509,000 annual worldwide deaths. Advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) is one of devastating tumors with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5% in patients with metastatic disease. Treatment options for patients with advanced ESCC are limited. Current guidelines recommend chemotherapy containing a platinum and a fluoropyrimidine agent as a first-line treatment. Recently, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), including nivolumab and pembrolizumab, have demonstrated antitumor activity and clinical efficacy in patients with advanced ESCC that is refractory or intolerant to first-line chemotherapy. ICIs are game-changers that not only transformed oncological strategy but also have a wide range of clinical potential in combination with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is still an urgent, unmet need for reliable treatment options to conquer this intractable disease.

Multicenter Randomized Phase 2 Trial Comparing Chemoradiotherapy and Docetaxel Plus 5-Fluorouracil and Cisplatin Chemotherapy as Initial Induction Therapy for Subsequent Conversion Surgery in Patients With Clinical T4b Esophageal Cancer: Short-term Results

OBJECTIVE

We conducted a multicenter randomized prospective phase 2 trial of chemoradiotherapy (CRT) versus chemotherapy (CT) as initial induction therapy for conversion surgery (CS) in clinical T4b esophageal cancer. We compared treatment effects and adverse events (AEs).

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Although induction followed by CS is potentially curative for T4b esophageal cancer, the optimal initial induction treatment is unclear.

METHODS

Ninety-nine patients with T4b esophageal cancer were randomly allocated to chemoradiotherapy (Group A, n = 49) or CT (Group B, n = 50) as initial induction treatment. CRT consisted of radiation (50.4 Gy) with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil. CT consisted of 2 cycles of docetaxel plus cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF). CRT or CT was followed by CS if resectable. If unresectable, the patient received the other treatment as secondary treatment. CS was performed if resectable after secondary treatment. The primary end point was 2-year overall survival.

RESULTS

In Group A, CS was performed in 34 (69%) and 7 patients (14%) after initial and secondary treatment. In Group B, CS was performed in 25 (50%) and 17 patients (34%) after initial and secondary treatment. The R0 resection rate after initial and secondary treatment was similar (78% vs 76%, P = 1.000). AEs including leukopenia, neutropenia, febrile neutropenia, and diarrhea were significantly more frequent in Group B. Group A had better histological complete response of the primary tumor (40% vs 17%, P = 0.028) and histological nodal status (P = 0.038).

CONCLUSION

Upfront CRT was superior to upfront CT in terms of pathological effects and AEs. The Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (s051180164).

Two versus three courses of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel for treating locally advanced esophageal cancer: short-term outcomes of a multicenter randomized phase II trial

OBJECTIVE

To compare short-term outcomes between two- vs. three courses of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to clarify the optimal treatment for esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) in a multicenter, randomized, phase II trial.

BACKGROUND

An optimal number of NAC cycles remains to be established for locally advanced ESCC.

METHODS

Patients with locally advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to either two (N = 91) or three (N = 89) courses of DCF (70 mg/m² intravenous docetaxel and 70 mg/m² intravenous cisplatin on day 1, and a continuous 700 mg/m² fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks followed by surgery. We compared the two groups for perioperative parameters, adverse events, and the response to NAC.

RESULTS

The two- and three-course groups showed similar completion rates and overall NAC dose reductions. Although the two-course group showed significantly lower overall grades 3-4 leukopenia and anemia compared to the three-course group, the two groups had similar overall toxicity rates. Postoperative complications were not significantly different between the two groups, except arrhythmia (13 vs. 0%, P = 0.0007). Only two postoperative in-hospital deaths occurred in the three-course group, due to sepsis following severe pneumonia. Compared to the two-course group, the three-course group was associated with a significantly better clinical response (42.9 vs. 65.2%, P = 0.0027) and a relatively higher rate of pathological complete response (9.1 vs. 15.3%, P = 0.212).

CONCLUSION

Both two- and three-course DCF regimens in the NAC setting seemed to be equally feasible in locally advanced ESCC patients. Additional DCF courses led to a better NAC response without increasing the incidence of adverse events or postoperative morbidity.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (Identification Number UMIN 000015788).

Randomized phase II study of docetaxel versus paclitaxel in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma refractory to fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy: OGSG1201

BACKGROUND

There is no standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) refractory to first-line fluoropyrimidine- and platinum-based chemotherapy. We therefore performed a randomized, selection-design phase II trial to compare docetaxel (DTX) and paclitaxel (PTX) in this setting.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either DTX (70 mg/m² on day 1 of each 21-day cycle) or PTX (100 mg/m² on days 1, 8, 15, 22, 29 and 36 of each 49-day cycle). The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end-points included progression-free survival (PFS), time to treatment failure (TTF), response rate (RR) and safety.

RESULTS

Seventy-eight eligible patients (N = 39 in each group) were included for efficacy analysis. OS was significantly longer in the PTX group than in the DTX group (median, 8.8 versus 7.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.62; P = 0.047). A significant benefit of PTX over DTX was also apparent in PFS (median, 4.4 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.49; P = 0.002) and TTF (median, 3.8 versus 2.1 months; HR, 0.45; P < 0.001). RR (25.6% versus 7.7%, P = 0.065) were higher in the PTX group than in the DTX group. Compared to the PTX group, neutropenia (28% versus 80%) and leukopenia (28% versus 76%) of grade ≥3 as well as febrile neutropenia (0% vs. 46%, P < 0.0001) occurred more frequently in the DTX group.

CONCLUSION

PTX showed a significantly better efficacy as well as a more manageable toxicity compared with DTX.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

UMIN000007940.

Serum IgG level is a predicting factor for the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

Despite the established oncological benefits of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell cancer, not all cases demonstrate benefit. Hence, predicting the response to chemotherapy before treatment is desirable. Some reports have shown that immune factors are related to the chemotherapy response. This study aimed to investigate the utility of serum IgG levels for predicting chemotherapy response.

Methods

Among the patients who underwent esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy at Nagoya City University Hospital between December 2012 and June 2019, 130 cases were included in this study. Response to chemotherapy and pretreatment serum IgG levels were examined in 77 cases. FP (5-fluorouracil and cisplatin) therapy or DCF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU) therapy was performed as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. DCF therapy was selected for patients aged <75 years, who could be safely administered chemotherapy based on their medical history.

Results

This study divided cases into two groups: the effective response group (PR) and ineffective response group (SD and PD). We classified 1, 37, and 39 cases as PD, PR, and SD, respectively. None of the cases were classified as CR. The effective response group had significantly lower serum IgG levels than the ineffective response group (p < 0.001). The cutoff serum IgG value was determined to be 1087 mg/dL. The low IgG group had significantly more cases who had effective response to chemotherapy compared with the high IgG group (odds ratio [OR] = 9.009; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.974–30.157; p < 0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed serum IgG level to be an independent predictor for response to chemotherapy (p = 0.001). Furthermore, cases with effective pathological response had significantly lower pretreatment serum IgG levels than those who did not (p = 0.006).

Conclusions

Our finding showed that serum IgG levels can be an independent predictor of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Trial registration

This retrospective study was approved by the review board of Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences (reception number: 60-18-0008).

MiR-27a-3p enhances the cisplatin sensitivity in hepatocellular carcinoma cells through inhibiting PI3K/Akt pathway

MicroRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in drug resistance, and it is reported that miR-27a-3p regulated the sensitivity of cisplatin in breast cancer, lung cancer and ovarian cancer. However, the relationship between miR-27a-3p and chemosensitivity of cisplatin in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was unclear, especially the underlying mechanism was unknown. In the present study, we analyzed miR-27a-3p expression levels in 372 tumor tissues and 49 adjacent tissues in HCC samples from TCGA database, and found that the miR-27a-3p was down-regulated in HCC tissues. The level of miR-27a-3p was associated with metastasis, Child–Pugh grade and race. MiR-27a-3p was regarded as a favorable prognosis indicator for HCC patients. Then, miR-27a-3p was overexpressed in HepG2 cell, and was knocked down in PLC cell. Next, we conducted a series of in vitro assays, including MTT, apoptosis and cell cycle assays to observe the biological changes. Further, inhibitor rate and apoptosis rate were detected with pre- and post-cisplatin treatment in HCC. The results showed that overexpression of miR-27a-3p repressed the cell viability, promoted apoptosis and increased the percentage of cells in G₀/G₁ phase. Importantly, overexpression of miR-27a-3p significantly increased the inhibitor rate and apoptosis rate with cisplatin intervention. Besides, we found that miR-27a-3p added cisplatin sensitivity potentially through regulating PI3K/Akt signaling pathway. Taken together, miR-27a-3p acted as a tumor suppressor gene in HCC cells, and it could be useful for modulating cisplatin sensitivity in chemotherapy.

Adoptive γδT-cell transfer alone or combined with chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND AIMS

After therapy with platinum, 5-fluorouracil and taxane, no further recommended therapy is available for recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (r/mEC). Here the authors report two phase 1 trials of adoptive γδT-cell therapy, one for treatment-refractory r/mEC (γδT-monotherapy-P1, UMIN000001419) and the other for r/mEC with no prior systemic therapy (DCF-γδT-P1, UMIN000008097).

METHODS

For γδT-monotherapy-P1, patients received four weekly and four biweekly injections of autologous γδT cells. For DCF-γδT-P1, patients received docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (60 mg/m²) and cisplatin (60 mg/m²) on day 1 and continuous injection of 5-fluorouracil (600 mg/m²/day) on days 1-5 of each 28-day cycle; additionally, they received autologous γδT-cell injections on day 15 and day 22 of each cycle.

RESULTS

Twenty-six patients were enrolled for γδT-monotherapy-P1. No severe adverse events were associated with γδT-cell therapy. Median overall survival was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 4.3-10.0), and median progression-free survival was 2.4 months (95% CI, 1.7-2.8). Eighteen patients received DCF-γδT-P1. All treatment-related adverse events were associated with DCF chemotherapy, not γδT injection. Median overall survival was 13.4 months (95% CI, 6.7-not reached), and median progression-free survival was 4.0 months (95% CI, 2.5-5.7). The response rate and disease control rate were 39% and 78%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of γδT-cell immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy was safe and feasible for r/mEC patients. Although the authors failed to demonstrate any clinical benefit of γδT-monotherapy-P1, survival benefits were observed in the DCF-γδT-P1 trial.

Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial comparing neoadjuvant Adriamycin, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil vs docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil followed by surgery for esophageal cancer (OGSG1003)

AIM

The aim is to report the long-term outcomes of preoperative cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) vs Adriamycin (ACF) for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Previously, this trial showed that DCF is associated with prolonged recurrence-free survival (RFS).

METHODS

Patients were randomly assigned to two cycles of ACF (35 mg/m2 of Adriamycin, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 7 days) every 4 weeks or DCF (70 mg/m2 of docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin intravenously on day 1, and 700 mg/m2 of fluorouracil infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks, followed by surgery. The primary endpoint was RFS. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between October 2011 and October 2013, 162 patients at 10 institutions were enrolled in the study, 162 of whom were eligible and randomly assigned to the two groups. The median follow-up for surviving patients was 69.8 months. The 5-year RFS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (59.9% vs 40.7%, hazard ratio [HR] 0.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.35-0.86; P = .009) and the 5-year OS was significantly better in the DCF group than in the ACF group (63.5% vs 49.4%, HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.96; P = .03). The benefit of DCF chemotherapy on survival was significantly greater in the subgroups with more advanced clinical T and N stage.

CONCLUSIONS

Cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel are associated with better RFS and OS than ACF in resectable ESCC patients.

Development of chemotherapeutics for unresectable advanced esophageal cancer

INTRODUCTION

The prognosis of unresectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) has gradually improved due to efforts for the development of systemic chemotherapy or concurrent chemoradiotherapy.

AREAS COVERED

Chemotherapeutic agents such as cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents, and immune checkpoint inhibitors, sometimes used with irradiation, lead in the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC. Here, we review the latest treatment strategies for unresectable advanced ESCC and discuss future perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapeutic agents will be part of the treatment of unresectable advanced ESCC in the near future. However, definitive predictive biomarkers to determine good patient candidates remain unclear for immunotherapy in patients with ESCC. Further research is warranted to identify those biomarkers working individually and in combination. Moreover, genome-based therapeutics enable individualized and patient-specific treatment. The development of molecular-targeted drugs against actionable or druggable genes is in progress.

Controlling lymph node micrometastases by neoadjuvant chemotherapy affects the prognosis in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical significance of micrometastases after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the difference in controlling micrometastases using different NAC regimens in resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

We analyzed patients with ESCC who underwent esophagectomy with lymph node dissection after NAC with Adriamycin + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (ACF) or docetaxel + cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil (DCF). Micrometastasis was defined as a single isolated cancer cell or cluster of cancer cells on the cervical, recurrent nerve, or abdominal LNs as shown by immunohistochemical staining with anti-cytokeratin antibody (AE1/AE3). The associations between micrometastases, recurrence, prognosis, and regimen differences were investigated.

RESULTS

One hundred and one cases (ACF group: 51 cases; DCF group: 50 cases) were analyzed. Micrometastases occurred in 24 patients (23.8%): 17/51 (33.3%) in the ACF group and 7/50 (13.5%) in the DCF group (p = 0.0403). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates for patients without (n = 77) and with (n = 24) micrometastases were 62 and 32%, respectively, (hazard ratio, 2.158; 95% confidence interval, 1.170-3.980; stratified log-rank test, p = 0.0115). A multivariate analysis showed that stage pN1 or higher and micrometastases were significant risk factors affecting RFS.

CONCLUSION

In resectable advanced ESCC, controlling micrometastases in the LNs after NAC varied by regimen and may be associated with preventing ESCC recurrence.

Tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy in the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion

Combined tracheal resection and anterior mediastinal tracheostomy (AMT) for esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion is a challenging treatment because of its high morbidity and the lack of evidence regarding long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to assess the short- and long-term outcomes of AMT as part of the multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. This retrospective study included 27 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion who underwent combined tracheal resection and AMT in their multidisciplinary treatment for esophageal cancer. We evaluated postoperative complications, body weight loss, and survival and examined the prognostic value of preoperative factors. All patients underwent chemotherapy and/or chemoradiotherapy as prior treatment. R0 resection was achieved in all cases. Clavien-Dindo grade I or greater complications occurred in 17 patients (63%), and grade III or greater complications occurred in 12 (44%). Overall in-hospital mortality was 4%, with one patient dying on postoperative day 48 when the brachiocephalic artery ruptured from tracheal compression. The 30- and 90-day mortality rates were 0% and 4%, respectively. Median weight change in patients without recurrence in the year after surgery was -1.7% (-9.6-21%). All of these patients received nutrition by oral intake and were living independently at home without public assistance. The 3- and 5-year disease-free survival rates were 25.9% and 18.5%, respectively; 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 38.6% and 25.7%, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified response to prior treatment as an independent prognostic factor in these patients. Combined tracheal resection and AMT may be adapted as part of the multidisciplinary treatment of esophageal cancer with tracheal invasion. Improving AMT safety and optimizing patient selection may improve prognosis among patients with this cancer.

A phase I study of docetaxel/oxaliplatin/S-1 (DOS) combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction

BACKGROUND

The optimal dose of each drug used in the docetaxel, oxaliplatin, and S-1 (DOS) chemotherapy remains to be clarified for the Japanese population. The purpose of this study was to determine a recommended dose for a combination neoadjuvant DOS chemotherapy for Japanese patients with locally advanced adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG).

METHODS

Patients with cT3 or more advanced AEG without distant metastasis were eligible for this study. The planned dosages of docetaxel (mg/m², day 1), oxaliplatin (mg/m², day 1), and S-1 (mg/day, days 1-14) were: 50/100/80-120 at level 1, and 60/100/80-120 at level 2, respectively. The treatment cycle was repeated every 3 weeks, and patients were assessed for response to the treatment after 2 and 3 cycles. This study was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trial Registry (UMIN 000022210).

RESULTS

We enrolled 12 patients with locally advanced AEG in this study. At dose level 1, one of the six patients experienced dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) of grade 3 diarrhea and grade 3 febrile neutropenia. Two of the next six patients also experienced DLT of need for more than 2-week delay of the start of the second cycle due to adverse events at dose level 2. Based on these results, level 2 was considered the recommended dose for this regimen.

CONCLUSION

Recommended doses of docetaxel (mg/m²), oxaliplatin (mg/m²), and S-1 (mg/day) were 60/100/80-120. This chemotherapy scheme showed good preliminary efficacy with acceptable toxicity warranting a further phase II trial to investigate the efficacy of this regimen.

Early administration of pegfilgrastim for esophageal cancer treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil: A phase II study

Preoperative or induction chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, plus 5‐fluorouracil (DCF) is a promising regimen for advanced esophageal cancer. However, the DCF regimen is associated with a high risk of severe neutropenia or febrile neutropenia (FN). However, the current guidelines fail to recommend an optimal dosing schedule of pegfilgrastim along with the DCF regimen to prevent FN. In the present study, we assessed the efficacy and safety of giving pegfilgrastim early on day 3 during DCF therapy for esophageal cancer. In this single‐arm phase II study, patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus were recruited. They were treated with the DCF therapy on days 1‐5, with pegfilgrastim given on day 3. Primary endpoint was the occurrence of grade 4 neutropenia. Secondary endpoints included the incidence of FN, grade 3 neutropenia, dose delays/reductions, antitumor effect, and safety. Between July 2016 and December 2018, 23 patients were enrolled. The incidence of grade 4 neutropenia was 8.7% (95% confidence interval 1.1%‐28.0%). No patient experienced FN. Of the 19 patients who received two cycles of DCF, one required a dose reduction/treatment delay due to hematological toxicity in the second treatment cycle. No serious adverse events, considered relevant to pegfilgrastim, were observed. This is the first prospective study that showed an efficacious dosing schedule of pegfilgrastim for preventing hematological toxicity during DCF therapy. The results might be generalized to other similar regimens where continuous infusions of 5‐fluorouracil are used.

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: chemotherapy, molecular-targeting therapy and immunotherapy

Systemic treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) mainly consists of cytotoxic agents, aiming to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. Cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil have been considered standard treatment for several decades. Efforts to develop more effective treatment have led to clinical trials testing triplet, irinotecan-based, oxaliplatin-based and paclitaxel-based regimens. Molecular-targeting agents, mainly anti-EGFR inhibitors including gefitinib, panitumumab and nimotuzumab, have been investigated; however, no molecular-targeting agents demonstrate the clinical utility in Phase 3 trials so far. Negative results from Phase 3 trials testing gefitinib and panitumumab suggest the importance of identifying predictive biomarkers of responses to molecular-targeting agents. On the basis of results from Phase 3 trials testing PD-1 inhibitors, nivolumab and pembrolizumab, are anticipated to be the standard treatment for patients with ESCC. Dual immune checkpoint inhibition and immunotherapy in combination with cytotoxic agents are under study. Recent advances in next-generation sequencing technologies provide comprehensive catalogues of genetic alterations in ESCC which may lead to therapeutic breakthroughs in a personalized manner. Here, we review the existing clinical data and discuss future perspectives with a focus on the systemic treatment of advanced ESCC.

Oral cryotherapy for prophylaxis of oral mucositis caused by docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil chemotherapy for esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

Chemotherapy, including preoperative chemotherapy, plays an important role in the treatment of esophageal cancer. However, although docetaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil (DCF) therapy has a powerful antitumor effect, the associated adverse events make it difficult to maintain the patient's general condition. Oral mucositis is an important adverse effect of chemotherapy, and its severity, frequency, and impact on patient quality of life should not be underestimated. This study evaluated the role of oral cryotherapy for prophylaxis of oral mucositis caused by DCF therapy.

METHODS

We retrospectively examined the incidence and severity of adverse events, including mucositis, in 72 patients with esophageal cancer treated with DCF. Fifty-eight patients received cryotherapy during docetaxel administration and 14 received no cryotherapy.

RESULTS

The incidence of mucositis of all grades and grade 3 was significantly lower in the cryotherapy group compared with the no-cryotherapy group (24.1% vs. 71.4%, P < 0.001 and 0% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.001, respectively). The incidence of anorexia of all grades and grade 3 was also significantly lower in the cryotherapy group (22.4% vs. 57.1%, P = 0.037 and 0% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.010, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive oral cryotherapy is effective for the prophylaxis and relief of oral mucositis and anorexia caused by chemotherapy.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective nonrandomized trial for short-term outcomes

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) significantly extends survival in advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), but the short-term outcomes for cT4 ESCC remain controversial. Many NAC regimens have been previously reported, although no study has reported a regimen of irinotecan and nedaplatin for cT4 potential resectable ESCC. We evaluated the short-term outcomes of NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC. A total of 51 patients with cT4 potentially resectable ESCC were eligible for this study. Twenty of these patients underwent NAC, and the other 31 patients underwent surgery alone. The toxicities and response of NAC were evaluated. The clinicopathologic characteristics, responses, toxicities, surgical outcomes, postoperative complications, and survival time between the two groups were analyzed. No significant differences were found in clinicopathologic characteristics between the groups (P > 0.05). The response rate of NAC was 75% (15/20). The differences in the long-axis diameter of the tumor and cT stage between pre- and post-NAC were significant (P < 0.05). Twenty-four toxic events occurred in 11 patients of the NAC group, and 20/24 of these were mild. The R0 resection rates in the NAC group and the surgery alone group were 85% and 64.5%, with no statistically significant difference (P > 0.05). Differences in the pathological T stage and pathological tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) stage were significant (P < 0.05). The overall survival (OS) time and mortality in the NAC group versus the surgery alone group were 31.57 ± 3.06 months versus 15.24 ± 1.46 months and 25% versus 61.3%, respectively. The differences in OS and mortality were significant (P < 0.05). The NAC group and R0 resection were significant and independent predictors of positive prognosis. NAC with irinotecan and nedaplatin in a single cycle followed by esophagectomy on cT4 resectable ESCC as a new NAC is safe and effective.

Triplet chemotherapy with docetaxel, cisplatin and S-1 for unresectable advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus: phase I/II trial results

Background

Although triplet regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU (DCF) reportedly yields high response rates for metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE), it has severe toxicity. In our previous phase II trial, grade 3/4 toxicities of neutropenia occurred in 68.8% of the patients. Development of chemotherapeutic regimen that does not impair quality of life of the patients with metastatic SCCE is therefore needed. A novel chemotherapeutic regimen combining docetaxel, cisplatin, and alternate-day administration of S-1 (modified DCS) may be associated with reduction of severe adverse effects.

Methods

This study is a single center phase I/II trial of chemotherapy using modified DCS regimen for patients with recurrent/unresectable SCCE. The phase I trial adopts a ‘3 + 3 patient cohort’, dose-escalating study design. In the phase II trial, the primary endpoint is evaluation of the overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints are evaluation of drug-related toxicity, overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

In the phase I trial, the recommended dose for docetaxel, cisplatin, and S-1 were 40 mg/m² (day 1), 50 mg/m² (day 1), and 80 mg/m²/day, respectively. In the phase II trial (n = 50), the ORR was 54 %. The median OS and PFS were 10 and 4 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events included neutropenia (26%), leukopenia (14%), anorexia (10%) and febrile neutropenia (6%).

Conclusion

The modified DCS therapy for patients with advanced SCCE is feasible and safe in both chemotherapeutic and perioperative periods.

Registration number: UMIN000016364.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and fluorouracil for resectable esophageal cancer: A phase II study

Cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil is regarded as standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in Japan, but the prognosis remains poor. We have previously described how definitive chemoradiotherapy with docetaxel, nedaplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DNF) led to a very high response rate and promising survival times. We therefore undertook a phase II trial to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of neoadjuvant DNF. The study included patients with clinical stage Ib-III ESCC. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. docetaxel (30 mg/m2 ) and nedaplatin (50 mg/m2 ) on days 1 and 8, and a continuous infusion of 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 /day) on days 1-5 and 8-12, every 3 weeks. After three courses of chemotherapy, esophagectomy was carried out. The primary end-point was the completion rate of the protocol treatment. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled (cStage Ib/II/III, 2/3/23) and all received at least two cycles of chemotherapy. Twenty-five patients underwent surgery, all of whom achieved an R0 resection, leading to a completion rate of 89.3%. The overall response rate was 87.0%. A pathological complete response was confirmed in eight (32.0%) cases. Grade 3/4 adverse events included leukopenia (32.1%), neutropenia (39.3%), febrile neutropenia (10.7%), thrombocytopenia (10.7%), and diarrhea (14.3%), but were manageable. Treatment-related deaths and major surgical complications did not occur. Estimated 2-year progression-free and overall survival rates were 70.4% and 77.2%, respectively. Thus, DNF therapy was well tolerated and deemed feasible, with a strong tumor response in a neoadjuvant setting for ESCC. This trial is registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network (UMIN ID: 000014305).

Phase II Trial of 5-Fluorouracil, Docetaxel, and Nedaplatin (UDON) Combination Therapy for Recurrent or Metastatic Esophageal Cancer

LESSONS LEARNED

The 5-fluorouracil, docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) regimen was well tolerated and showed promising antitumor activity in terms of both objective response rate and survival for patients with advanced or recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in the first-line setting.UDON may be an optimal treatment option for patients with advanced esophageal cancer who are unfit for docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimens.The high response rate as well as the rapid and marked tumor shrinkage associated with UDON suggest that further evaluation of this regimen in the neoadjuvant setting is warranted.

BACKGROUND

A phase II study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 5-fluorouracil (5-FU), docetaxel, and nedaplatin (UDON) combination therapy for untreated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer.

METHODS

Patients received intravenous nedaplatin (90 mg/m²) on day 1, docetaxel (35 mg/m²) on days 1 and 15, and 5-fluorouracil (800 mg/m²) on days 1-5 of a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint was response rate, with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), dysphagia score, and adverse events.

RESULTS

Between March 2015 and July 2017, 23 patients were enrolled. Of 22 evaluable patients, 16 and 4 individuals experienced a partial response and stable disease, respectively, yielding a response rate of 72.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49.8%-89.3%) and disease control rate of 90.9% (95% CI, 70.8%-98.9%). Median OS and PFS were 11.2 months (95% CI, 9.1 months to not reached) and 6.0 months (95% CI, 2.5-10.6 months), respectively. Eleven (64.7%) of the 17 patients with a primary lesion showed amelioration of dysphagia after treatment. Frequent adverse events of grade 3 or 4 included neutropenia (87.0%) and leukopenia (39.1%). Febrile neutropenia was observed in two patients (8.7%).

CONCLUSION

This phase II study demonstrated promising antitumor activity and good tolerability of UDON.

Recent advancements in esophageal cancer treatment in Japan

The 11th edition of the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer (EC) was published in 2017. Some correction was made in the depth of tumor invasion to be consistent with the TNM classification by the Union for International Cancer Control (UICC). With regard to surgery, short-term safety and long-term effectiveness under thoracotomy/video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery are expected to be proven by the Japan Clinical Oncology Group (JCOG)1409 study. Results of nutritional management and countermeasures for adverse events not only during the perioperative period but also during EC chemotherapy were reported. From now on, the pursuit of low invasiveness and radicality is desired. Esophageal surgery is also expected to be safe at all institutions. To determine the optimal modality of preoperative treatment and a novel chemo(radio)therapy regimen for patients with distant metastasis, the results of the ongoing JCOG1109 and 0807 studies are being released. The effect of the addition of molecular targeted drugs on chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiation has not yet improved overall survival. Immune checkpoint inhibitor drugs could offer a potential new treatment approach for patients with treatment-refractory advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC). The Cancer Genome Atlas Research Network reported the results of a comprehensive genome analysis and molecular analysis of SCC and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Further differentiation of SCC and adenocarcinoma by molecular characterization analysis may be useful for the development of clinical trials and targeted drug therapies as precision medicine. The era of ultimate minimally invasive surgery and personalized treatment has begun. Large, prospective studies will be required to confirm the value of these advancements.

Utility of initial induction chemotherapy with 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) for T4 esophageal cancer: a propensity score-matched analysis

Although no consensus is available on the treatment of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) invading adjacent organs (T4), establishing effective induction treatments is crucial to altering an unresectable status and achieving curative resection. Here, we evaluated the efficacy of chemotherapy using 5-fluorouracil, cisplatin, and docetaxel (DCF) as the initial induction treatment for T4 ESCC. Fifty patients without distant metastasis who underwent initial induction chemotherapy using DCF for T4 ESCC were propensity score-matched with 50 patients who underwent radiotherapy concurrent with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (CRT). In the DCF group, 24 (48.0%) patients underwent surgery, achieving a 64% clinical response rate compared to 72.0% for induction CRT. CRT was also performed in another 24 (48.0%) patients in the DCF group in whom surgical resection was not indicated. The DCF group had significantly higher overall resectability than the CRT group (78.0% vs. 48.0%, P = 0.0017). The esophageal perforation rate during induction treatments was significantly lower in the DCF group than the CRT group (4.0% vs. 18.0%, P = 0.0205). Prognosis was significantly better in the DCF group than the CRT group (5-year cancer-specific survival 42.1% vs. 22.2%, P = 0.0146). Thus, induction DCF chemotherapy in patients with T4 ESCC reduced esophageal perforation and increased overall resectability, leading to better survival than CRT alone. Therefore, DCF chemotherapy may be an effective and safe option for initial induction treatment of T4 ESCC.

Prognostic significance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells and PD-L1 expression in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Programmed death-1 receptor (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1) play an integral role in regulating the immune response against cancer. This study investigated the prognostic significance of PD-L1 expression on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells (TILs) in the tumor microenvironment in Chinese patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Archival formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded ESCC samples from treatment-naïve patients with ESCC after surgery or by diagnostic endoscopic biopsy were collected between 2004 and 2014. Expression of PD-L1 in ESCC tumor specimens was assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and the degree of TIL infiltration was evaluated by examining hematoxylin and eosin-stained (H&E) specimens. PD-L1+ as defined as ≥1% of tumor cell membranes showing ≥1+ intensity. In 428 patients, specimens from 341 (79.7%) were PD-L1+. In the definitive treatment group (patients who received curative esophagectomy or definitive [chemo-]radiation therapy), PD-L1 positivity was associated with a significantly shorter DFS and OS. In the palliative chemotherapy group exhibited, neither PFS nor OS correlated significantly with PD-L1 expression. PD-L1 expression was positively associated with TIL density. In 17 paired tumor tissues collected before and after treatment, an increase in PD-L1 expression was associated with disease progression, whereas a decrease in PD-L1 expression was associated with response to chemotherapy or disease control. So, PD-L1 expression was associated with a significantly worse prognosis in patients with ESCC. These observations suggest that PD-L1 may play a critical role in ESCC cancer progression and provide a rationale for developing PD-L1 inhibitors for treatment of a subset of ESCC patients.

Prognoses of advanced esophago-gastric junction cancer may be modified by thoracotomy and splenectomy

Globally, the incidence of esophago-gastric junction (EGJ) cancer is rapidly increasing. However, the proposed strategies for the treatment of these types of cancer are so diverse that there is no established consensus on the optimal treatment. The aim of the present study was to identify independent prognostic factors to delineate the optimal strategies for the treatment of EGJ cancer. The medical records of 150 patients with EGJ cancer who underwent curative surgery at the Kitasato University were retrospectively reviewed. The median follow-up period was 48 months. The patients with tumors that were classified as post-treatment primary tumor stage 3 [(y)pT3] or higher had a 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) rate of 53%, whereas those with tumors that were classified as (y)pT0-2 had a 5-year DSS rate of 90%. Therefore, prognostic analysis was restricted to those tumors that were designated (y)pT3 or higher. A multivariate Cox's proportional hazards model identified the following independent prognostic factors that negatively influenced the DSS: i) Presence of tumors classified as post-treatment regional lymph node stage 1-3 [(y)pN1-3] [hazard ratio (HR), 3.62; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.39-12.36]; ii) not undergoing treatment with splenectomy (HR, 2.40; 95% CI, 1.15-5.15); and iii) undergoing treatment with thoracotomy (HR, 2.07; 95% CI, 1.02-4.23). In patients with (y)pN0 tumors, the DSS rate was significantly improved for those who underwent splenectomy than for those who did not (P=0.024). In patients with (y)pN1-3 tumors, the DSS rate was significantly worse for those who underwent thoracotomy compared with those who did not (P=0.004). Splenectomy and thoracotomy may critically affect prognosis in locally advanced EGJ cancer that are classified as (y)pN0 and (y)pN1-3, respectively. Surgical treatments require optimization in order to improve prognoses in advanced EGJ cancer.

The effect of an elemental diet on oral mucositis of esophageal cancer patients treated with DCF chemotherapy: a multi-center prospective feasibility study (EPOC study)

PURPOSE

Oral mucositis (OM) is one of the most uncomfortable adverse events experienced by cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Previous reports have revealed that the oral administration of an elemental diet (ED) may prevent OM. However, the incidence of OM has not been accurately determined by specialized diagnostic methods and the effects of an ED on OM remain unclear. We investigated the dose that could feasibly be administered and its effects with regard to the suppression of OM in esophageal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.

METHODS

We performed a prospective multi-center feasibility study of the administration of an ED (160 g/day) with 2 cycles of docetaxel/cisplatin/5-FU (DCF) chemotherapy. We assessed compliance to the ED for 49 days and the incidence of OM according to the amount of the ED that was orally administered. The incidence of OM was graded by a dental specialist who was experienced in dental oncology using a central OM review system.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 20 patients (70%) were able to complete the orally administered ED (160 g/day) during the course of chemotherapy. Three patients (15%) could not take the ED orally for 9, 14, and 21 days, respectively, while 1 patient (5%) took the ED orally at an average dose of 80 g/day for 35 days. The remaining 2 patients (10%) could not take the 80 g/day dose for 11 and 12 days, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥ 2 OM in the ED completion group (15.4%, 2 of 13 patients) was significantly lower than that in the non-completion group (66.7%, 4 of 6 patients) (p = 0.046).

CONCLUSIONS

An ED might be a one of the test treatment to reduce the incidence of OM in esophageal cancer patients treated with DCF and should be evaluated in further randomized study.

CLINICAL TRIAL

The date of submission: Dec 08th, 2017.

Phase I/II Trial of Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and S-1 for Unresectable Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Esophagus

Our previous trial with a docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) regimen showed high response rates in metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE). The observed increased toxicity of the DCF regimen, however, was clinically harmful. S-1, an oral anticancer drug, has been approved as a combination therapy for SCCE, and alternate-day regimen with S-1 has shown lower levels of toxicity. This prospective single-center phase I/II trial examines the efficacy and toxicity of a combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and an alternate-day regimen of S-1 (modified DCS) for patients with metastatic SCCE. We use a two-stage design. Phase I is undertaken to determine the maximum tolerated dose and the recommended dose. The phase I trial adopts a three-patient cohort with escalating dose study design. In the phase II trial, the primary endpoint is the assessment of the overall response rate (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1). The secondary endpoints are the evaluation of drug-related toxicity (National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 4.0), overall survival, and progression-free survival. Fifty patients with metastatic SCCE participate in the phase II section. This study protocol is the first to test the effects of the modified DCS regimen for metastatic SCCE.

The Presence of Serum p53 Antibody Predicts the Pathological Tumor Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (DCF) in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (DCF) is a candidate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) regimen for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Although the efficacy and safety of DCF have been reported, the markers that predict the patient's response are still unknown. The aim of this study was to identify the predictive markers for a response to NAC with DCF in patients with ESCC.

METHODS

A total of 79 patients who received preoperative DCF followed by esophagectomy between August 2008 and December 2014 were enrolled in this study. All of the patients completed 2 preoperative courses of DCF. The clinical and pathological responses to DCF were investigated, and the associations between the pathological response, the clinicopathological factors and the prognosis were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

Among the 79 patients, the pathological response to DCF (evaluated according to the Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer) was grade 3 (complete pathological response) in 7 patients (8.9 %), grade 2 in 13 patients (16.5 %), grade 1b in 8 patients (10.1 %) and grade 1a in 51 patients (64.6 %). A good pathological response (grade 2-3) was significantly associated with both favorable disease-free survival (P = 0.0051) and favorable cancer-specific survival (P = 0.0366). A multivariate analysis revealed that a good clinical response (HR 13.743, 95 % CI 2.455-76.917) and the presence of serum p53 antibody before treatment (HR 3.987, 95 % CI 1.103-14.416) were independent predictors of good pathological response.

CONCLUSIONS

The presence of serum p53 antibody can be used as a novel, noninvasive predictor of the pathological tumor response to NAC with DCF in ESCC patients.

Importance of positron emission tomography for assessing the response of primary and metastatic lesions to induction treatments in T4 esophageal cancer

BACKGROUND

There is no consensus strategy for treatment of T4 esophageal cancer, and because of this, a better evaluation of treatment response is crucial to establish personalized therapies. This study aimed to establish a useful system for evaluating treatment response in T4 esophageal cancer.

METHODS

This study included 130 patients with cT4 esophageal cancer without distant metastasis who underwent ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography before and after a series of induction treatments comprising chemoradiation or chemotherapy. We evaluated the maximal standardized uptake value and treatment response.

RESULTS

The mean ± standard deviation of standardized uptake value in the primary tumor before and after induction treatments were 13.8 ± 4.4 and 5.4 ± 4.1, respectively, and the mean standardized uptake value decrease was 58.4%. The most significant difference in survival between positron emission tomography-primary tumor responders and nonresponders was at a decrease of 60% standardized uptake value, based on every 10% stepwise cutoff analysis (2-year cause-specific survival: 60.2 vs 23.5%; hazard ratio = 2.705; P < .0001). With this cutoff value, the resectability (P = .0307), pathologic response (P = .0004), and pT stage (P < .0001) were associated with positron emission tomography-primary tumor response. Univariate analysis of 2-year cause-specific survival indicated a correlation between cause-specific survival and clinical stages according to TNM classification, esophageal perforation, positron emission tomography-primary tumor response, lymph node status evaluated by positron emission tomography before and after induction treatments, and operative resection. Multivariate analysis further identified positron emission tomography-primary tumor response (hazard ratio = 2.354; P = .0107), lymph node status evaluated by positron emission tomography after induction treatments (hazard ratio = 1.966; P = .0089), and operative resection (hazard ratio = 2.012; P = .0245) as independent prognostic predictors.

CONCLUSION

Positron emission tomography evaluation of the response of primary and metastatic lesions to induction treatments is important to formulate treatment strategies for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Retrospective Analysis of the Risk Factors for Grade IV Neutropenia in Oesophageal Cancer Patients Treated with a Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Regimen

BACKGROUND

Previous Japanese trials of the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimen for oesophageal cancer have demonstrated that a large proportion of patients also develop grade IV neutropenia. Our aim was to examine the risk factors for neutropenia in patients treated with this regimen.

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed the risk factors for developing grade IV neutropenia in 66 patients with oesophageal cancer using a multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

After administering the docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil regimen, 49 patients (74.2%) developed grade IV neutropenia. Grade IV neutropenia was significantly associated with platelet count (p < 0.01), alanine transaminase level (p = 0.05), and proton-pump inhibitor administration (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis confirmed a platelet count of 290 × 103/μL as the optimal diagnostic cut-off value for grade IV neutropenia. The receiver operating characteristic area for grade IV neutropenia was increased by including patients that were administered a proton-pump inhibitor and alanine transaminase level (updated model; sensitivity and specificity, 75.5 and 88.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that a platelet count is the most significant predictor of grade IV neutropenia.

Review of chemotherapeutic approaches for operable and inoperable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

The predominant histological types of esophageal cancer are adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma. Since these two histological types present as different diseases in terms of their epidemiology, pathologenesis, and tumor biology, separate therapeutic approaches should be developed against each type. While surgical resection remains the dominant therapeutic intervention for patients with operable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), their high rates of tumor recurrence have prompted investigation of multimodality therapies that combine surgery with chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and chemoradiotherapy. In Japan, preoperative chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP) plus 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) followed by radical esophagectomy has been accepted as the standard therapeutic approach for resactable clinical Stage II/III ESCC. Similarly, the CDDP and 5-FU regimen has been accepted as the first-line treatment for metastatic and unresectable ESCCs in Japan. Thus, in Japan chemotherapy is an indispensable component of therapy for both resectable and unresectable ESCCs. This review discusses the current knowledge, rationale, and available data regarding chemotherapy for resectable and unresectable ESCCs.

Phase I/II study of divided-dose docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus

Squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus (SCCE) has a poor prognosis compared with other gastrointestinal cancers. Many patients present with locoregional unresectable or metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. For these patients with metastatic esophageal cancer, chemotherapy is generally indicated. The aim of this phase I/II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combined use of docetaxel, cisplatin (CDDP) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU)(DCF) in patients with recurrent/metastatic SCCE. This study adopted divided doses of docetaxel and CDDP in order to reduce the toxicities of the treatment. The dose of docetaxel was escalated using the following protocol in the phase I stage: level 1, 30 mg/m2; level 2, 35 mg/m2 and level 3, 40 mg/m2, which was intravenously infused for 2 hours on days 1 and 8. CDDP was administered at a dose of 12 mg/m2 infused for 4 hours on days 1-5. The 5-FU was administered at a dose of 600 mg/m2 continuously infused from day 1 to 5. This regimen was repeated every 4 weeks. The study subjects were nine patients (phase I) and 48 patients (phase II). The recommended dose was determined as level 3 in phase I. In the phase II stage, the overall response rate was 62.5%, with a complete response rate of 12.5%. The median progression-free survival was 6 months, and the median overall survival was 13 months. Grade 3/4 toxicities of leukopenia, neutropenia and febrile neutropenia occurred in 64.6%, 68.8% and 14.6% of the patients, while grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicities were relatively rare. No treatment-related death was recorded. This modified DCF regimen with divided doses can be a tolerable and useful regimen of definitive chemotherapy for unresectable SCCE because of its high efficacy, although adequate care for severe neutropenia must be administered.

Multicenter randomized phase II study of cisplatin and fluorouracil plus docetaxel (DCF) compared with cisplatin and fluorouracil plus Adriamycin (ACF) as preoperative chemotherapy for resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OGSG1003)

BACKGROUND

This phase II trial evaluated the efficacy of cisplatin and fluorouracil (CF)-based combination neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the outcome of patients with resectable locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). We compared the recurrence-free survival (RFS) associated with CF plus Adriamycin (ACF) with that associated with CF plus docetaxel (DCF) to select an alternative regimen in a new phase III trial investigating the optimal neoadjuvant treatment of patients with ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable advanced ESCC were randomly assigned to either ACF (Adriamycin 35 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, fluorouracil 700 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 7 days) every 4 weeks or DCF (docetaxel 70 mg/m2, cisplatin 70 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1, fluorouracil 700 mg/m2 continuous infusion for 5 days) every 3 weeks. Surgery was scheduled after completion of two cycles of chemotherapy. The primary end point was RFS, analyzed by the intention-to-treat.

RESULTS

Between October 2011 and October 2013, 162 patients at 10 institutions were enrolled in the study, all of whom were eligible and randomly assigned to the two groups (81 to the ACF group and 81 to the DCF group). The R0 resection rates for the ACF and DCF groups were equivalent (95.9% versus 96.2%, P = 0.93). The 2-year RFS and overall survival rates for DCF versus ACF were 64.1% versus 42.9% (hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.33-0.83, P = 0.0057) and 78.6% versus 65.4% (P = 0.08), respectively.

CONCLUSION

Compared with ACF, DCF chemotherapy was associated with prolonged RFS for patients with resectable advanced ESCC. Thus, DCF chemotherapy has potential as a standard neoadjuvant therapy for resectable ESCC.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry of Japan (identification number UMIN000004555/000004616).

Phase I Dose-Escalation Study of Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and 5-Fluorouracil Combination Chemotherapy in Patients With Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

A dose-escalation study of docetaxel (DOC), cisplatin (CDDP), and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU; DCF combination regimen) was performed to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), recommended dose (RD) and dose-limiting toxicities (DLT) in advanced esophageal carcinoma. Eighteen patients with esophageal carcinoma were enrolled and received DCF combination therapy at different dose levels. DLTs included febrile neutropenia and oral mucositis. DLT occurred in 2 out of 6 patients at level 2 and 3. The study proceeded to level 4, according to the protocol. The level 4 dose was defined as the MTD and the level 3 dose was defined as the RD. The RD for DCF combination chemotherapy for advanced esophageal carcinoma in the present study was 70 mg/m(2) DOC plus 70 mg/m(2) CDDP on day 1 plus 700 mg/m(2) 5-FU on days 1-5 at 4-week intervals. This regimen was tolerable and highly active. A phase II study has been started.

Improvement of cisplatin-related renal dysfunction by synthetic ghrelin: a prospective randomised phase II trial

Background:

Ghrelin, a 28-amino acid peptide predominantly produced by the stomach, exerts powerful renal protective effects by increasing levels of insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of ghrelin on the incidence of renal dysfunction in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Methods:

Forty patients with oesophageal cancer receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy were assigned to either the ghrelin group (n=20), which received ghrelin (0.5 μg kg⁻¹ h⁻¹) for 5 days, or a placebo group (n=20). The primary endpoint was serum creatinine. Secondary endpoints were serum cystatin C, chemotherapy-related adverse events, changes in serum ghrelin-related hormone levels, correlation between markers of renal injury and hormone concentrations, and effects on the second cycle of chemotherapy.

Results:

Blood acyl ghrelin, total ghrelin, and IGF-1 concentrations on day 4 were significantly higher in the ghrelin group. The renal dysfunction, serum creatinine and cystatin C levels, dose reduction, and delay in the initiation of the second cycle of chemotherapy were lower in the ghrelin group than in the control group. Serum creatinine levels were significantly correlated with serum IGF-1 levels.

Conclusion:

Continuous synthetic ghrelin administration during cisplatin-based chemotherapy attenuated renal dysfunction and harmful effects on subsequent chemotherapy, possibly by increasing IGF-1 levels.

Negative influence of programmed death-1-ligands on the survival of esophageal cancer patients treated with chemotherapy

The programmed death‐1/programmed death‐1 ligands (PD‐1/PD‐L) pathway plays an important role in immunological tumor evasion. However, the clinical significance of the PD‐L (L1 and L2) expression in esophageal cancer treated with chemotherapy has not been fully investigated. We examined the expression of PD‐L of the primary tumors obtained from 180 esophageal cancer patients who underwent radical resection with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) using immunohistochemical staining. The relationship between the expression patterns and clinico‐pathological characteristics was examined. In the present study, 53 patients (29.4%) and 88 patients (48.3%) were classified into positive for PD‐L1 and PD‐L2 expression, respectively. In all the patients examined, overall survival rates of the patients with tumors positive for PD‐L1 or PD‐L2 were significantly worse than those with tumors negative for PD‐L1 or PD‐L2 (P = 0.0010 and P = 0.0237, respectively). However, subgroup analysis showed that these tendencies are only found in the patients treated with NAC, and not in those without NAC. The patients with positive PD‐L1 expression had a significantly higher rate of NAC history (P = 0.0139), but those with positive PD‐L2 expression did not have a significantly high rate of NAC history (P = 0.6127). There is no significant relationship between PD‐L1 expression and response to chemotherapy (P = 0.3118), but patients with positive PD‐L2 expression had significantly inferior responses to chemotherapy (P = 0.0034). The PD‐1/PD‐L pathway might be an immunological mechanism associated with the long‐term effectiveness of chemotherapy in esophageal cancer patients. Further investigation into the roles of PD‐1 pathway in chemotherapy could lead to the development of better treatment options for this disease.