S-1 monotherapy as second- or third-line chemotherapy for unresectable and recurrent esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Neoadjuvant Triplet Chemotherapy with Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus 5-Fluorouracil versus Docetaxel, Cisplatin plus S-1 for Advanced Esophageal Squamous cell Carcinoma: Propensity Score Matched Analysis

INTRODUCTION

This study examines whether neoadjuvant docetaxel, cisplatin plus S-1 (DCS) therapy is superior to docetaxel, cisplatin plus 5-fluorouracil (DCF) therapy for resectable advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with resectable advanced ESCC at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2019 underwent either neoadjuvant DCF therapy or DCS therapy, followed by radical esophagectomy. Prior to August 2014, we usually used neoadjuvant DCF therapy; we then completely transitioned to using neoadjuvant DCS therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 144 patients received one of these triplet regimens as neoadjuvant chemotherapy: DCF therapy to 67 patients and DCS therapy to 77 patients. After propensity score matching, 55 patients in each group were selected as matched cohorts. There was no significant difference between the groups in complete response (DCF = 7.3%, DCS = 9.1%) or in partial response (DCF = 45.4%, DCS = 52.7%). The pathological response rate was 23.8% for grade 2 and 18.2% for grade 3 in the DCF group, compared with 30.9% and 14.5% in the DCS group. Independent predictive factors for recurrence-free survival were poor clinical response and pathological response ≤1b. Independent prognostic factors for overall survival were poor clinical response, anastomotic leakage, and pathological response ≤1b. Duration of hospital stays in the DCS group was significantly shorter than those of the DCF group (6.0 vs. 15.0 days, p < 0.001). Expenses of drug and hospitalization for the neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the DCS group were also significantly lower than those of the DCF group (265.7 vs. 550.3 USD, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable advanced ESCC did not result in significantly higher clinical and pathological response than neoadjuvant DCF therapy. However, neoadjuvant DCS therapy for resectable ESCC required comparatively shorter hospital stays and incurred lower costs, making it an attractive therapeutic option.

A phase II study of S-1 therapy for patients with advanced and recurrent esophageal cancer resistant or intolerable to fluorouracil, platinum, and taxane therapy (OGSG 1404)

BACKGROUND

Fluorouracil (FU), platinum (PT), and taxane (TAX) therapy was the standard chemotherapy for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) before the era of anti-programmed death-1 antibodies. The aim of this phase II trial was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of S-1 monotherapy for patients with recurrent or metastatic (R/M) ESCC resistant or intolerable to FU, PT, and TAX therapy.

METHODS

Eligible patients had R/M ESCC; no prior S-1 use; were intolerant or refractory to prior FU, PT, and TAX therapy; aged ≧ 20 years; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1. S-1 was administered orally from days 1 to 28, every 6 weeks until disease progression. The primary endpoint was the disease control rate (DCR) for each patient, assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1. Secondary endpoints were overall survival, progression-free survival, time to treatment failure, response rate, and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between October 2015 and December 2017, 17 patients were recruited, and the trial was terminated because of slow accrual. The DCR was 46.7%. The response rate was 13.3%. The median progression-free survival was 2.0 months. The median time to treatment failure was 1.9 months. The median overall survival was 8.4 months, and the 1 year overall survival rate was 30.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Although this trial closed early because of slow accrual, we observed modest clinical activity with S-1 in patients with R/M ESCC who could not tolerate or whose tumors were refractory to FU, PT, and TAX therapy.

Comparative clinical studies of primary chemoradiotherapy versus S-1 and nedaplatin chemotherapy against stage IVb oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a multicentre open-label randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) is one of the most commonly occurring devastating tumours worldwide, including in China. To date, the standard care of patients with stage IV OSCC is systemic chemotherapy and palliative care, which results in poor prognosis. However, no consensus has been established regarding the role of radiotherapy in targeting the primary tumour in patients with stage IVa OSCC. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness of primary radiotherapy combined with S-1 and nedaplatin (NPD) chemotherapy in the patients with stage IV OSCC.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

The study is a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. A total of 180 eligible patients with stage IV OSCC will be randomised into a study group (90 patients) and a control group (90 patients). Patients in the study group will receive radiotherapy to the primary tumour at a dose of 50.4 Gy combined with 4-6 cycles of S-1 and NPD chemotherapy. In the control group, patients will only receive 4-6 cycles of S-1 and NPD chemotherapy. The primary and secondary outcomes will be measured. The differences between the two groups will be statistically analysed with regard to overall survival, the progression-free survival and safety. All outcomes will be ascertained before treatment, after treatment and after the follow-up period.The results of this study will provide evidence on the role of radiotherapy in patients with stage IV OSCC in China, which will show new options for patients with advanced oesophageal cancer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee of The First Hospital Affiliated of Zhengzhou University (approval number: SS-2018-04).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

The trial has been registered at the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR1800015765) on 1 November 2018; retrospectively registered, http://www.chictr.org.cn/index.aspx.

Systemic Therapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

With more understanding of the tumor biology, esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) and adenocarcinoma are increasingly recognized as different disease entities and are managed with different treatment approaches. Most patients with ESCC need systemic treatment at some point of their disease course, but only until recently, the progress in systemic treatment has been relatively stagnant compared with its adenocarcinoma counterpart. Platinum-based regimens remain the standard of care, while taxanes have been increasingly used upfront and in later lines of treatment. The attempts to personalize treatment for ESCC with various target therapies have been futile. Immune checkpoint inhibitors are now coming into play with promising activity and potentials to combine with different treatment modalities. The current chapter overviews the systemic treatment for ESCC and highlights the recent development.

A randomized phase II study of S-1 monotherapy versus cisplatin with vinorelbine for completely resected stage II/IIIA non-small cell lung cancer: rationale and study protocol design for the LOGIK1702 study

Background

The current standard postoperative treatment for stage II-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a regimen of platinum doublet adjuvant chemotherapy. These regimens, which are the same as for solid NSCLC tumors, often cause severe adverse reactions in the treated patients. Therefore, an effective treatment regimen with fewer side effects is needed.

Methods/design

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of S-1 monotherapy (80 mg/m² orally administrated twice daily, at day 1–14, 16 cycles) and cisplatin with vinorelbine combination therapy (cisplatin 80 mg/m² at day 1,vinorelbine 25 mg/m² at day 1, 8, 4 cycles) in patients with II/IIIA stage non-small-cell lung cancer who underwent a total resection. In addition, we will also evaluate the level of treatment side effects by assessing quality of life (QOL), work productivity and activity performance. The primary endpoint is a 2-year relapse free survival (RFS) and the second primary endpoints are 2-year overall survival (OS), rate of treatment completion, safety, work productivity and activity, and quality of adjusted life years (QALY). At the same time, we aim to obtain precise information required to perform future phase 3 randomized controlled trials. The study is designed to estimate the primary endpoint with accuracy determined as the width of its 95% confidence interval to be less than 20%. Recruitment started in May 2017 and is ongoing.

Discussion

This study has been conceived to establish a superior regimen for completely resected NSCLC based on efficacy, safety and QOL.

Trial registration

Registry number: UMIN000027435. Registered May 22, 2017.

[Clinical efficacy of anlotinib plus S-1 as a second-line therapy for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma]

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy of anlotinib plus S-1 for treatment of patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with failed first-line chemotherapy.

OBJECTIVE

Twenty-six patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients who experienced progression after first-line paclitaxel plus platinum chemotherapy in our hospital between July, 2018 and February, 2020 were enrolled in this study. The patients received oral anlotinib along with S-1 treatment (anlotinib at 12 mg once daily and S-1 at 50 mg twice daily for two weeks; 3 weeks per cycle). The objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse effects were evaluated for all the patients.

OBJECTIVE

No complete remission (CR) was observed in the 26 patients. Partial remission (PR) was achieved in 6 cases, stable disease (SD) in 12 cases, and progressive disease (PD) occurred in 8 cases, with an ORR of 23.1% and a DCR of 69.2% in these patients. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95%CI: 2.7-6.4 months). Univariate analysis showed that the patients with moderate or high tumor differentiation had significantly longer PFS than those with low tumor differentiation (6.1 months vs 1.9 months, P < 0.05). Multivariate analysis suggested that pathological differentiation grade (HR=6.778, 95%CI: 1.997-23.012) was an independent factor for a prolonged PFS. The adverse effects in the patients included mainly fatigue, hypertension and hand-foot syndrome, mostly of grade 1 to 2.

OBJECTIVE

Patients with recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma can benefit from a second-line anlotinib plus S-1 treatment, which has relatively mild adverse effects with a good safety profile.

Irinotecan plus S-1 versus S-1 in patients with previously treated recurrent or metastatic esophageal cancer (ESWN 01): a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-labeled phase 3 trial

Background

The benefit of systemic treatments in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) which has progressed after chemotherapy is still uncertain and optimal regimens based on randomized trials have not yet been established. We aimed to compare the efficacy of irinotecan plus S-1 with S-1 monotherapy in recurrent or metastatic ESCC patients who had resistance to platinum- or taxane-based chemotherapy.

Methods

We conducted a prospective randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase 3 trial in 15 centers across China. Eligible patients were adults with histologically confirmed recurrent or metastatic ESCC, and were randomly assigned (ratio, 1:1) to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 (intravenous infusion of irinotecan [160 mg/m²] on day 1 and oral S-1 [80–120 mg] on days 1–10, repeated every 14 days) or oral S-1 monotherapy (80–120 mg/day on days 1–14, repeated every 21 days) using a central computerized minimization procedure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

Results

Between December 23, 2014 and July 25, 2016, we screened 148 patients and randomly assigned 123 patients to receive either irinotecan plus S-1 regimen (n = 61) or S-1 monotherapy (n = 62). After a median follow-up of 29.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.5–40.9 months), the median PFS was significantly longer in the irinotecan plus S-1 group than in the S-1 monotherapy group (3.8 months [95% CI 2.9–4.3 months] vs. 1.7 months [95% CI 1.4–2.7 months], hazard ratio = 0.58, 95% CI 0.38–0.86, P = 0.006). The objective response rates were 24.6% in the irinotecan plus S-1 group and 9.7% in the S-1 monotherapy group (P = 0.002). The patients in the irinotecan plus S-1 group presented with increased rates of grade 3–4 leukopenia (16.4% vs. 0%), neutropenia (14.8% vs. 1.6%), and nausea (4.9% vs. 0%). No significant difference in grade 3–4 diarrhea and no treatment-related deaths were observed in both groups.

Conclusions

The combination of irinotecan with S-1 was similarly tolerable but significantly prolonged PFS compared to S-1 monotherapy as a second- or third-line treatment in patients with recurrent or metastatic ESCC.

Clinical Trial Registration NCT02319187. Registered on December 9, 2014

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s40880-019-0359-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Phase II Study of S-1 plus Cisplatin as First-Line Therapy in Patients with Metastatic Esophageal Carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Patients with metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) need safer and more efficacious treatments. The aim of this phase II study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of S-1 plus cisplatin as first-line therapy in metastatic ESCC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

50 patients with metastatic ESCC who had not received prior systemic chemotherapy for metastatic disease were enrolled. Patients received S-1 at 40 mg/m2 divided into 2 daily doses for 14 days and cisplatin at 75 mg/m2 on day 1 or 25 mg/m2 on days 1-3 intravenously, repeated every 21 days with a maximum of 6 cycles.

RESULTS

47 patients were assessable for response and 18 patients achieved a partial response, giving an overall response rate of 38.3%. Among those who had objective responses, a large percentage (72.2%) quickly showed remarkable tumor shrinkage during the first 2 cycles. 18 (38.3%) patients had stable disease. The median progression-free survival was 5.6 months, and the median overall survival was 12.0 months. Toxicity was mild to moderate and generally tolerable.

CONCLUSION

The combination of S-1 plus cisplatin was a well-tolerated and convenient chemotherapy regimen with promising efficacy.

A retrospective clinical study of comparing paclitaxel plus S-1 versus paclitaxel plus cisplatin as the first-line treatment for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

In advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), paclitaxel plus cisplatin are considered as active and tolerable. The current clinical study was conducted to retrospectively compare the efficacy and safety of first-line paclitaxel/S-1(PS) and paclitaxel/cisplatin(TP) regimens in advanced ESCC.

RESULTS

The overall response rate of PS was slightly, but not significantly, higher (25 patients, 46%) than that of TP (23 patients, 39%, P = 0.432). Median overall survival (OS) was similar for PS and TP (11.5 months vs. 10.4 months, p = 0.37). However PS had longer median progression-free survival than TP (PFS: 5.5 months vs5.0months, p = 0.04). When compared with PS, more grade 3 or 4 adverse events were recorded for TP, including leukopenia, neutropenia, anemia, anorexia and vomiting (P < 0.05). No treatment-related deaths were recorded in either group.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 2008 and 2014, all patients diagnosed with advanced ESCC and treated with paclitaxel/S-1 or paclitaxel/cisplatin at Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University were analyzed retrospectively. One hundred and thirteen patients were included in this study. Disease control rates and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were recorded. Survival analysis was calculated by using Kaplan-Meier method.

CONCLUSIONS

The PS option improves PFS and its OS is similar to TP. Moreover, the PS regimen is an effective and safe first-line treatment for ESCC with less hematological and non-hematological toxicity.

Successful Outcome of Low-Dose S-1 Used to Treat Buccal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

This case report describes an 86-year-old woman with dormant right buccal squamous cell carcinoma who was able to maintain a reasonable quality of life after being treated with oral low-dose S-1 (80 mg/day). The treatment regimen started in April 2014 and consisted of two weeks of S-1 followed by a one-week interval. The patient remains on this regimen while maintaining her quality of life and she has been under follow-up as an outpatient for 36 months. The outcomes for this patient indicated that low-dose S-1 is a valid anticancer therapy that may help maintain quality of life for some patients with incurable or dormant cancers.

Pemetrexed plus dendritic cells as third-line therapy for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

This study was conducted to evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of pemetrexed plus dendritic cells (DCs) when administered as third-line treatment for metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). All patients in the study group had previously failed first-line treatment with 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin-based regimens, as well as second-line treatment with taxane-based regimens. A total of 31 patients were treated with pemetrexed (500 mg/m²) plus DCs on day 1, every 3 weeks. DCs were given for one cycle of 21 days. Thirty patients were evaluated for their response. No patient had a complete response, three patients (10.0%) had a partial response, ten patients (33.3%) had stable disease, and 17 patients (56.7%) had progressive disease. The overall response rate was 10.0%. The median progression-free survival (PFS) time was 2.9 months (95% CI, 2.7–3.2), and the median overall survival (OS) time was 7.1 months (95% CI, 6.4–7.9). The median PFS and OS times among patients with high and low levels of miR-143 expression in their blood serum were significantly different: median PFS times =3.2 months (95% CI, 2.9–3.4) and 2.7 months (95% CI, 2.4–3.0), respectively (P=0.017), and median OS times =7.8 months (95% CI, 6.8–8.9) and 6.3 months (95% CI, 5.3–7.3), respectively (P=0.036). No patient experienced Grade 4 toxicity. Combined third-line treatment with pemetrexed and DCs was marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced ESCC. Serum miR-143 levels are a potential biomarker for predicting the efficacy of pemetrexed plus DCs in the treatment of ESCC.

Complete response to abdominal bulky lymph node recurrence in an esophageal cancer patient treated with S-1 monotherapy: A case report

Esophageal cancer is a highly lethal malignancy of the upper gastrointestinal tract. The recurrence of the cancer indicates a poor prognosis, and even salvage therapy using multi-agent combination chemotherapy, which is considered more effective than single-agent chemotherapy, is not able to achieve a sufficient response. The present study reports the case of a 74-year-old male who presented to a local hospital with dysphagia in February 2006. Upon radiographic and pathological examination, the patient was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of esophagus that was clinically staged as T3N1M1. The patient was referred to the University of Tokyo Hospital (Tokyo, Japan) for concurrent chemoradiotherapy using a radiation dose of 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, and subsequently achieved a complete response (CR). At 8 years after the initial diagnosis and subsequent treatment, the patient presented with abdominal swollen lymph nodes that were 38 mm and 22 mm in diameter. Recurrent metastasis was diagnosed. A single-agent regimen was selected due to the patient's poor performance status. This consisted of 2 cycles of oral S-1 administration twice a day for 2 consecutive weeks, followed by 2 weeks of rest (80 mg/day for 14 days/cycle). A CR was achieved following the use of S-1 administration as salvage therapy. The patient exhibited no signs of recurrence subsequent to 9 months of follow-up. Overall, the present study reports that S-1 administration shows marked effectiveness in the treatment of huge recurrent lesions. S-1 is considered as a good treatment option in patients with poor a performance status who require salvage therapy.

Irinotecan plus fluorouracil-based regimen as second or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

Background

No standard second‐line regimen exists for the treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of irinotecan and fluorouracil‐based chemotherapy as a second or third‐line regimen for advanced ESCC patients.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a cohort of 27 consecutive patients with advanced ESCC in one institute, treated with a combination of irinotecan plus fluorouracil‐based regimens after the failure of first‐line platinum‐based therapy. Nine patients were treated with 150–160 mg/m² irinotecan and 400 mg/m² fluorouracil (5‐FU) on day 1, followed by 2000 mg/m² 5‐FU during a 48‐hour infusion every two weeks. Eighteen patients received 150–160 mg/m² irinotecan on day 1 and 80–120 mg/day S‐1 on days 1–10 every two weeks. The S‐1 dose was based on the patients' body surface area.

Results

Twenty‐four of the 27 patients were assessable for response. One (3.7%) patient achieved complete response, seven (25.9%) achieved partial response, eight (29.6%) had stable disease, and eight (29.6%) had progressive disease. The median progression‐free and overall survival were 4.8 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.2–8.4) and 10.5 months (95% CI: 8.4–12.7), respectively. Grade 3 neutropenia and diarrhea were detected in four (15%) and one (4%) patient, respectively. No grade 4 toxicity was noted.

Conclusions

Our study indicates that an irinotecan plus 5‐FU‐based regimen is effective and well‐tolerated as a second or third‐line chemotherapy for patients with advanced ESCC.

Cetuximab plus pemetrexed as second-line therapy for fluorouracil-based pre-treated metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of cetuximab and pemetrexed as the second-line treatment for advanced esophageal cancer patients, who had undergone treatment with the standard cisplatin and 5-FU regimens.

METHODS

A total of 29 patients accepted this treatment. Cetuximab was administered at an initial dose of 400 mg/m(2) IV followed by weekly doses of 250 mg/m(2) IV, whereas pemetrexed 500 mg/m(2) was administered on day 1 every 3 weeks.

RESULTS

Twelve patients (41.4 %) presented PR, ten (34.5 %) had SD, and seven (24.1 %) had PD. The response rate was 41.4 %. The median PFS was 4.5 months (95 % CI 4.1-4.9), and the median OS was 9.4 months (95 % CI 8.4-10.5). The expression levels of serum miR-335 were determined, and the subsequent analysis suggested that PFS was significantly different between the patients with higher level of serum miR-335 and those with low level of serum miR-335. The former had a PFS of 4.9 months (95 % CI 4.2-5.7) and the latter 4.1 months (95 % CI 3.7-4.5) (log rank = 0.025). None of the patients experienced grade 4 toxicity. Twenty-four patients presented rash.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of cetuximab plus pemetrexed was marginally effective and well tolerated in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma as the second-line treatment.