Validation and Safety Profile of a Novel, Noninvasive Fiducial Attachment for Stereotactic Robotic-Guided Stereoelectroencephalography: A Case Series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

We developed, tested, and validated a novel, noninvasive, Leksell G frame-based fiducial attachment, for use in stereotactic registration for stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG). Use of the device increased the number of fixed reference points available for registration, while obviating the need for additional scalp incisions. We report here on our experience and safety profile of using the device.

METHODS

We collected registration data using the fiducial device across 25 adult and pediatric patients with epilepsy consecutively undergoing robotic-guided sEEG for invasive epilepsy monitoring, treated between May 2022 and July 2023. ROSA One Brain was used for trajectory planning and electrode implantation. Postoperative clinical and radiographic data were computed and quantified, including mean registration error for all patients. Entry point, target point (TP), and angular errors were measured. Descriptive statistics and correlation coefficients for error were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-five patients underwent robotic-guided sEEG implantation (11 patients, bilateral; 10 patients, left unilateral; 4 patients, right). The mean number of electrodes per patient was 18 ± 3. The average mean registration error was 0.77 ± 0.11 mm. All patients were implanted with Ad-Tech depth electrodes. No clinically relevant complications were reported. Analysis of trajectory error was performed on 446 electrodes. The median entry point error was 1.03 mm (IQR 0.69-1.54). The median TP error was 2.26 mm (IQR 1.63-2.93). The mean angular error was 0.03 radians (IQR 0.02-0.05). There was no significant correlation between root mean square error and lead error. Root mean square error did not appreciably change over time, nor were there any significant changes in average angular, entry point, or TP error metrics.

CONCLUSION

A novel, noninvasive, Leksell G frame-based fiducial attachment was developed, tested, and validated, facilitating O-arm-based stereotactic registration for sEEG. This simple innovation maintained an excellent accuracy and safety profile for sEEG procedures in epilepsy patients, with the added advantages of providing additional reference points for stereotactic registration, without requiring additional scalp incisions.

Safety and efficacy of frameless stereotactic robot-assisted intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies versus image-guided biopsies: a bicentric comparative study

PURPOSE

User-friendly robotic assistance and image-guided tools have been developed in the past decades for intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsy. These two methods are gradually becoming well accepted and are performed at the discretion of the neurosurgical teams. However, only a few data comparing their effectiveness and safety are available.

METHODS

Population-based parallel cohorts were followed from two French university hospitals with different surgical methods and defined geographical catchment regions (September 2019 to September 2022). In center A, frameless robot-assisted stereotactic intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies were performed, while image-guided intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies were performed in center B. Pre-and postoperative clinical, radiological, and histomolecular features were retrospectively collected and compared.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty patients were included: 131 frameless robot-assisted stereotactic intraparenchymal brain lesion biopsies in center A and 119 image-guided biopsies in center B. The clinical, radiological, and histomolecular features were comparable between the two groups. The diagnostic yield (96.2% and 95.8% respectively; p = 1.000) and the overall postoperative complications rates (13% and 14%, respectively; p = 0.880) did not differ between the two groups. The mean duration of the surgical procedure was longer in the robot-assisted group (61.9 ± 25.3 min, range 23-150) than in the image-guided group (47.4 ± 11.8 min, range 25-81, p < 0.001). In the subgroup of patients with anticoagulant and/or antiplatelet therapy administered preoperatively, the intracerebral hemorrhage > 10 mm on postoperative CT scan was higher in the image-guided group (36.8%) than in the robot-assisted group (5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In our bicentric comparative study, robot-assisted stereotactic and image-guided biopsies have two main differences (shorter time but more frequent postoperative hematoma for image-guided biopsies); however, both techniques are demonstrated to be safe and efficient.

Stereotactic robot-assisted MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy thalamotomy for medically intractable Parkinson's disease tremor: technical note and preliminary effects on 2 cases

BACKGROUND

Medically intractable Parkinson's disease (PD) tremor is a common difficult clinical situation with major impact on patient's quality of life (QOL). Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an effective therapy but is not an option for many patients. Less invasive lesional brain surgery procedures, such as thalamotomy, have proven to be effective in these indications. Here, we describe the technical nuances and advantages of stereotactic robot-assisted MRI-guided laser interstitial thermal therapy (MRIg-LITT) thalamotomy for medically intractable PD tremor.

METHOD

We describe 2 patients with medically intractable PD tremor treated with stereotactic robot-assisted MRIg-LITT thalamotomy performed under general anesthesia with intraoperative electrophysiological testing. Pre and postoperative tremor scores were assessed using the Fahn-Tolosa-Marin tremor rating scale (TRS).

RESULTS

At 3-month follow-up, both patients demonstrated significant improvement in tremor symptoms subjectively and according to the TRS (75% for both). Patients also had substantial improvements in their QOL (32.54% and 38%) according to the 39-item PD questionnaire. Both patients underwent uncomplicated MRIg-LITT thalamotomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with medically intractable PD tremor who are unsuitable candidates for DBS, thalamotomy utilizing a stereotactic robot, intraoperative electrophysiological testing, and laser ablation with real-time MRI guidance may be a viable treatment option. However, further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are necessary to confirm these preliminary results.

Deep Brain Stimulation in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia

Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a phenomenon observed following the predominantly long-term use of dopamine receptor blockers (antipsychotics) widely used in psychiatry. TD is a group of involuntary, irregular hyperkinetic movements, mainly in the muscles of the face, eyelid, lips, tongue, and cheeks, and less frequently in the limbs, neck, pelvis, and trunk. In some patients, TD takes on an extremely severe form, massively disrupting functioning and, moreover, causing stigmatization and suffering. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), a method used, among others, in Parkinson's disease, is also an effective treatment for TD and often becomes a method of last resort, especially in severe, drug-resistant forms. The group of TD patients who have undergone DBS is still very limited. The procedure is relatively new in TD, so the available reliable clinical studies are few and consist mainly of case reports. Unilateral and bilateral stimulation of two sites has proven efficacy in TD treatment. Most authors describe stimulation of the globus pallidus internus (GPi); less frequent descriptions involve the subthalamic nucleus (STN). In the present paper, we provide up-to-date information on the stimulation of both mentioned brain areas. We also compare the efficacy of the two methods by comparing the two available studies that included the largest groups of patients. Although GPi stimulation is more frequently described in literature, our analysis indicates comparable results (reduction of involuntary movements) with STN DBS.

Minimally Invasive Destructive, Ablative, and Disconnective Epilepsy Surgery

Conventional epilepsy surgery performed by microsurgical dissection typically requires large cranial working windows created with high-speed drills and lengthy incisions. In the past few decades, minimally invasive techniques have been developed with smaller incisions, comparable efficacy, shorter hospitalizations, and better safety profiles. These minimally invasive alternatives utilize stereotactic, ultrasonic, radiotherapeutic, and endoscopic techniques. Although not able to completely replace conventional surgery for all etiologies of epilepsy, these minimally invasive techniques have revolutionized modern epilepsy surgery and have been an invaluable asset to the neurosurgeon's repertoire. The endoscope has allowed for surgeons to have adequate visualization during resective and disconnective epilepsy surgeries using keyhole or miniature craniotomies. Modern stereotactic techniques such as laser interstitial thermal therapy and radiofrequency ablation can be used as viable alternatives for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and can destroy lesional tissue deep areas without the approach-related morbidity of microsurgery such as with hypothalamic hamartomas. These stereotactic techniques do not preclude future surgery in the settings of treatment failure and have been used successfully after failed conventional surgery. Multiple ablation corridors can be performed in a single procedure that can be used for lesioning of large targets or to simplify treating multifocal epilepsies. These stereotactic techniques have even been used successfully to perform disconnective procedures such as hemispherotomies and corpus callosotomies. In patients unable to tolerate surgery, stereotactic radiosurgery is a minimally invasive option that can result in improved seizure control with minimal procedural risks. Advances in minimally invasive neurosurgery provide viable treatment options for drug-resistant epilepsy with quicker recovery, less injury to functional brain, and for patients that may otherwise not choose conventional surgery.

Zygomatic implant placement using a robot-assisted flapless protocol: proof of concept

Robotic assistance can help in physically guiding the drilling trajectory during zygomatic implant positioning. A new robot-assisted strategy for a flapless zygomatic implant placement protocol is reported here. In this protocol, a preoperative computed tomography scan is used to plan the surgical path. After surface registration, the ROSA robot (Zimmer Biomet Robotics) guides several steps, which are performed with shared control. The surgeon performs the drilling and tapping, guided by the robotic arm, which is positioned according to the planned trajectory. Placement of the zygomatic implant is done manually. Immediate intraoperative 3D verification is performed by cone beam computed tomography (flat-panel detector, Medtronic O-arm II). Four zygomatic implants were placed in the case patient according to the flapless protocol, with a mean vector error of 1.78 mm (range 0.52-4.70 mm). A screw-retained temporary prosthesis was placed on the same day. No significant complications were observed. The application of this robot-assisted surgical protocol, which guarantees a very high degree of precision, may reduce inaccuracies in the positioning of zygomatic implants that could deviate from the surgeon's plan. This appears to be a potentially safe flapless surgery technique. Drill slipping on the crest or on the maxillary wall is the main source of error in this procedure, emphasizing the usefulness of the assisted surgical guidance with haptic feedback.

Robotics and cochlear implant surgery: goals and developments

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cochlear implantation (CI) is a viable option for patients with severe sensorineural hearing loss. Advances in CI have focused on minimizing cochlear trauma to improve hearing preservation outcomes, and in doing so expanding candidacy to patients with useful cochlear reserve. Robotics holds promise as a potential tool to minimize intracochlear trauma with electrode insertion, improve surgical efficiency, and reduce surgical complications. The purpose of this review is to summarize efforts and advances in the field of robotic-assisted CI.

RECENT FINDINGS

Work on robotics and CI over the past few decades has explored distinct surgical aspects, including image-based surgical planning and intraoperative guidance, minimally invasive robotic-assisted approaches mainly through percutaneous keyhole direct cochlear access, robotic electrode insertion systems, robotic manipulators, and drilling feedback control through end effector sensors. Feasibility and safety have been established and many devices are undergoing clinical trials for clinical adoption, with some having already achieved approval of national licensing bodies.

SUMMARY

Significant work has been done over the past two decades that has shown robotic-assisted CI to be feasible and safe. Wider clinical adoption can potentially result in improved hearing preservation and quality of life outcomes to more CI candidates.

Development of a miniaturized robotic guidance device for stereotactic neurosurgery

OBJECTIVE

Consistently high accuracy and a straightforward use of stereotactic guidance systems are crucial for precise stereotactic targeting and a short procedural duration. Although robotic guidance systems are widely used, currently available systems do not fully meet the requirements for a stereotactic guidance system that combines the advantages of frameless surgery and robotic technology. The authors developed and optimized a small-scale yet highly accurate guidance system that can be seamlessly integrated into an existing operating room (OR) setup due to its design. The aim of this clinical study is to outline the development of this miniature robotic guidance system and present the authors' clinical experience.

METHODS

After extensive preclinical testing of the robotic stereotactic guidance system, adaptations were implemented for robot fixation, software usability, navigation integration, and end-effector application. Development of the robotic system was then advanced in a clinical series of 150 patients between 2013 and 2019, including 111 needle biopsies, 13 catheter placements, and 26 stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode placements. During the clinical trial, constant modifications were implemented to meet the setup requirements, technical specifications, and workflow for each indication. For each application, specific setup, workflow, and median procedural accuracy were evaluated.

RESULTS

Application of the miniature robotic system was feasible in 149 of 150 cases. The setup in each procedure was successfully implemented without adding significant OR time. The workflow was seamlessly integrated into the preexisting procedure. In the course of the study, procedural accuracy was improved. For the biopsy procedure, the real target error (RTE) was reduced from a mean of 1.8 ± 1.03 mm to 1.6 ± 0.82 mm at entry (p = 0.05), and from 1.7 ± 1.12 mm to 1.6 ± 0.72 mm at target (p = 0.04). For the SEEG procedures, the RTE was reduced from a mean of 1.43 ± 0.78 mm in the first half of the procedures to 1.12 ± 0.52 mm (p = 0.002) at entry in the second half, and from 1.82 ± 1.13 mm to 1.57 ± 0.98 mm (p = 0.069) at target, respectively. No healing complications or infections were observed in any case.

CONCLUSIONS

The miniature robotic guidance device was able to prove its versatility and seamless integration into preexisting workflow by successful application in 149 stereotactic procedures. According to these data, the robot could significantly improve accuracy without adding time expenditure.

Towards a Closed-loop Neuro-Robotic Approach to DBS Electrode Implantation based on Real-Time Wrist Rigidity Evaluation

The iHandU system is a wearable device that quantitatively evaluates changes in wrist rigidity during Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) surgery, allowing clinicians to find optimal stimulation settings that reduce patient symptoms. Robotic accuracy is also especially relevant in DBS surgery, as accurate electrode placement is required to increase effectiveness and reduce side effects. The main goal of this work is to integrate the advantages of each system in a closed-loop system between an industrial robot and the iHandU system. For this purpose, a comparative analysis of a Leksell stereotactic frame and neuro-robotic system accuracies was performed using a lab-made phantom. The neuro-robotic system reached 90% of trajectories, while the stereotactic frame reached all trajectories. There are significant differences in accuracy errors between these trajectories (p < 0.0001), which can be explained by the high correlation between the neuro-robotic system errors and the distance from the trajectory to the origin of the Leksell coordinate system (ρ = 0.72). Overall accuracy is comparable to existing neuro-robotic systems, achieving a deviation of (1.0 ± 0.5) mm at the target point. The accuracy of DBS electrode positioning and stimulation parameters choice leads to better long-term clinical outcomes in Parkinson's disease patients. Our neuro-robotic system combines real-time feedback assessment of the patient's symptomatic response and automatic positioning of the DBS electrode in a specific brain area.

Accuracy of Robotic and Frame-Based Stereotactic Neurosurgery in a Phantom Model

Background

The development of robotic systems has provided an alternative to frame-based stereotactic procedures. The aim of this experimental phantom study was to compare the mechanical accuracy of the Robotic Surgery Assistant (ROSA) and the Leksell stereotactic frame by reducing clinical and procedural factors to a minimum.

Methods

To precisely compare mechanical accuracy, a stereotactic system was chosen as reference for both methods. A thin layer CT scan with an acrylic phantom fixed to the frame and a localizer enabling the software to recognize the coordinate system was performed. For each of the five phantom targets, two different trajectories were planned, resulting in 10 trajectories. A series of five repetitions was performed, each time based on a new CT scan. Hence, 50 trajectories were analyzed for each method. X-rays of the final cannula position were fused with the planning data. The coordinates of the target point and the endpoint of the robot- or frame-guided probe were visually determined using the robotic software. The target point error (TPE) was calculated applying the Euclidian distance. The depth deviation along the trajectory and the lateral deviation were separately calculated.

Results

Robotics was significantly more accurate, with an arithmetic TPE mean of 0.53 mm (95% CI 0.41–0.55 mm) compared to 0.72 mm (95% CI 0.63–0.8 mm) in stereotaxy (p < 0.05). In robotics, the mean depth deviation along the trajectory was −0.22 mm (95% CI −0.25 to −0.14 mm). The mean lateral deviation was 0.43 mm (95% CI 0.32–0.49 mm). In frame-based stereotaxy, the mean depth deviation amounted to −0.20 mm (95% CI −0.26 to −0.14 mm), the mean lateral deviation to 0.65 mm (95% CI 0.55–0.74 mm).

Conclusion

Both the robotic and frame-based approach proved accurate. The robotic procedure showed significantly higher accuracy. For both methods, procedural factors occurring during surgery might have a more relevant impact on overall accuracy.

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies for lesions of the brainstem-a series of 103 consecutive biopsies

PURPOSE

Targeted treatment for brainstem lesions requires above all a precise histopathological and molecular diagnosis. In the current technological era, robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies represent an accurate and safe procedure for tissue diagnosis. We present our center's experience in frameless robot-assisted biopsies for brainstem lesions.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of all patients benefitting from a frameless robot-guided stereotactic biopsy at our University Hospital, from 2001 to 2017. Patients consented to the use of data and/or images. The NeuroMate® robot (Renishaw™, UK) was used. We report on lesion location, trajectory strategy, histopathological diagnosis and procedure safety.

RESULTS

Our series encompasses 96 patients (103 biopsies) treated during a 17 years period. Mean age at biopsy: 34.0 years (range 1-78). Most common location: pons (62.1%). Transcerebellar approach: 61 procedures (59.2%). Most common diagnoses: diffuse glioma (67.0%), metastases (7.8%) and lymphoma (6.8%). Non conclusive diagnosis: 10 cases (9.7%). After second biopsy this decreased to 4 cases (4.1%). Overall biopsy diagnostic yield: 95.8%. Permanent disability was recorded in 3 patients (2.9%, all adults), while transient complications in 17 patients (17.7%). Four cases of intra-tumoral hematoma were recorded (one case with rapid decline and fatal issue). Adjuvant targeted treatment was performed in 72.9% of patients. Mean follow-up (in the Neurosurgery Department): 2.2 years.

CONCLUSION

Frameless robot-assisted stereotactic biopsies can provide the initial platform towards a safe and accurate management for brainstem lesions, offering a high diagnostic yield with low permanent morbidity.

Robotics, automation, active electrode arrays, and new devices for cochlear implantation: A contemporary review

In the last two decades, cochlear implant surgery has evolved into a minimally invasive, hearing preservation surgical technique. The devices used during surgery have benefited from technological advances that have allowed modification and possible improvement of the surgical technique. Robotics has recently gained popularity in otology as an effective tool to overcome the surgeon's limitations such as tremor, drift and accurate force control feedback in laboratory testing. Cochlear implantation benefits from robotic assistance in several steps during the surgical procedure: (i) during the approach to the middle ear by automated mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy or through a tunnel from the postauricular skin to the middle ear (i.e. direct cochlear access); (ii) a minimally invasive cochleostomy by a robot-assisted drilling tool; (iii) alignment of the correct insertion axis on the basal cochlear turn; (iv) insertion of the electrode array with a motorized insertion tool. In recent years, the development of bone-attached parallel robots and image-guided surgical robotic systems has allowed the first successful cochlear implantation procedures in patients via a single hole drilled tunnel. Several other robotic systems, new materials, sensing technologies applied to the electrodes, and smart devices have been developed, tested in experimental models and finally some have been used in patients with the aim of reducing trauma in cochleostomy, and permitting slow and more accurate insertion of the electrodes. Despite the promising results in laboratory tests in terms of minimal invasiveness, reduced trauma and better hearing preservation, so far, no clinical benefits on residual hearing preservation or better speech performance have been demonstrated. Before these devices can become the standard approach for cochlear implantation, several points still need to be addressed, primarily cost and duration of the procedure. One can hope that improvement in the cost/benefit ratio will expand the technology to every cochlear implantation procedure. Laboratory research and clinical studies on patients should continue with the aim of making intracochlear implant insertion an atraumatic and reversible gesture for total preservation of the inner ear structure and physiology.

A novel technique for fence-post tube placement in glioma using the robot-guided frameless neuronavigation technique under exoscope surgery: patient series

BACKGROUND

Robotic technology is increasingly used in neurosurgery. The authors reported a new technique for fence-post tube placement using robot-guided frameless stereotaxic technology with neuronavigation in patients with glioma.

OBSERVATIONS

Surgery was performed using the StealthStation S8 linked to the Stealth Autoguide cranial robotic guidance platform and a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) surgical microscope. A surgical plan was created to determine the removal area using fence-post tube placement at the tumor and normal brain tissue boundary. Using this surgical plan, the robotic system allowed quick and accurate fence-post tube positioning, automatic alignment of the needle insertion and measurement positions in the brain, and quick and accurate puncture needle insertion into the brain tumor. Use of a ventricular drainage tube for the outer needle cylinder allowed placement of the puncture needle in a single operation. Furthermore, use of a high-resolution 3D exoscope allowed the surgeon to simultaneously view the surgical field image and the navigation screen with minimal line-of-sight movement, which improved operative safety. The position memory function of the 3D exoscope allowed easy switching between the exoscope and the microscope and optimal field of view adjustment.

LESSONS

Fence-post tube placement using robot-guided frameless stereotaxic technology, neuronavigation, and an exoscope allows precise glioma resection.

Neurosurgical robot-assistant stereoelectroencephalography system: Operability and accuracy

BACKGROUND

Fine operation has been an eternal topic in neurosurgery. There were many problems in functional neurosurgery field with high precision requirements. Our study aims to explore the operability, accuracy and postoperative effect of robot-assisted stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) in neurosurgery.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with epilepsy who underwent electrode implantation in our hospital. From 2016 to 2019, the epilepsy center of Hebei people's hospital implanted electrodes in neurosurgery on 24 patients, including 20 with SINO robot-assisted SEEG system and eight with frame-SEEG technology.

RESULT

Robot-assisted SEEG neurosurgery had higher accuracy, and the mean error of entry and target point was smaller than that of frame SEEG surgery. No bleeding or infection occurred postoperatively, and two patients who underwent robot-assisted SEEG neurosurgery had electrode displacement. Electrode displacement was observed in two patients, both the entry points were orbital frontal, one in the frame system and one in the robot assistant system. The average placement time of each electrode in robot assisted system surgery was less than that in frame system surgery.

CONCLUSION

The SINO SEEG electrode implantation assisted by surgical robot-assistant system manufactured in China is safe, accurate and mature.

Cranial neurosurgical robotics

OBJECT

The purpose of this review is to highlight the major factors limiting the progress of robotics development in the field of cranial neurosurgery.

METHODS

A literature search was performed focused on published reports of any Neurosurgical technology developed for use in cranial neurosurgery. Technology was reviewed and assessed for strengths and weaknesses, use in patients and whether or not the project was active or closed.

RESULTS

Published reports of 24 robots are discussed going back to 1985. In total, there were 9 robots used in patients (PUMA, Robot Hand, EXPERT, Neuromate, Evolution 1, ROSA, iSYS1, NeuroArm and NeuRobot) and only 2 active today (ROSA, NeuroArm). Of all clinically active systems, only three were used in more than 30 patients (ROSA, iSYS1 & NeuroArm). Projects were limited by cost, technology adoption, and clinical utility to actually improve workflow. The most common use of developed robots is for Stereotaxis.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a clear void in the area of cranial neurosurgery regarding robotics technology despite success in other fields of surgery. Significant factors such as cost, technology limitations, market size and regulatory pathway all contribute to a steep gradient for success.

Two Hundred Twenty-Six Consecutive Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Placed Using an "Asleep" Technique and the Neuro|MateTM Robot for the Treatment of Movement Disorders

BACKGROUND

Robotics in neurosurgery has demonstrated widening indications and rapid growth in recent years. Robotic precision and reproducibility are especially pertinent to the field of functional neurosurgery. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) requires accurate placement of electrodes in order to maximize efficacy and minimize side effects. In addition, asleep techniques demand clear target visualization and immediate on-table verification of accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the surgical technique of asleep DBS surgery using the Neuro|MateTM Robot (Renishaw plc, Wotton-under-Edge, United Kingdom) and examine the accuracy of DBS lead placement in the subthalamic nucleus (STN) for the treatment of movement disorders.

METHODS

A single-center retrospective review of 113 patients who underwent bilateral STN/Zona Incerta electrode placement was performed. Accuracy of implantation was assessed using 5 measurements, Euclidian distance, radial error, depth error, angular error, and shift error.

RESULTS

A total of 226 planned vs actual electrode placements were analyzed. The mean 3-dimensional vector error calculated for 226 trajectories was 0.78 +/- 0.37 mm. The mean radial displacement off planned trajectory was 0.6 +/- 0.33 mm. The mean depth error, angular error, and shift error was 0.4 +/- 0.35 mm, 0.4 degrees, and 0.3 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This report details our institution's method for DBS lead placement in patients under general anaesthesia using anatomical targeting without microelectrode recordings or intraoperative test stimulation for the treatment of movement disorders. This is the largest reported dataset of accuracy results in DBS surgery performed asleep. This novel robot-assisted operative technique results in sub-millimeter accuracy in DBS electrode placement.

Robotic-Assisted Stereotaxy for Deep Brain Stimulation Lead Implantation in Awake Patients

BACKGROUND

Robotic-assisted stereotaxy has been increasingly adopted for lead implantation in stereoelectroencephalography based on its efficiency, accuracy, and precision. Despite initially being developed for use in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery, adoption for this indication has not been widespread.

OBJECTIVE

To describe a recent robotic-assisted stereotaxy experience and workflow for DBS lead implantation in awake patients with and without microelectrode recording (MER), including considerations for intraoperative research using electrocorticography (ECoG).

METHODS

A retrospective review of 20 consecutive patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral DBS lead implantation using robotic-assisted stereotaxy was performed. Radial error was determined by comparing the preoperative target with the DBS lead position in the targeting plane on postoperative computed tomography. Information regarding any postoperative complications was obtained by chart review.

RESULTS

A novel method for robot coregistration was developed. We describe a standard workflow that allows for MER and/or ECoG research, and a streamlined workflow for cases in which MER is not required. The overall radial error for lead placement across all 20 patients was 1.14 ± 0.11 mm. A significant difference (P = .006) existed between the radial error of the first 10 patients (1.46 ± 0.19 mm) as compared with the second 10 patients (0.86 ± 0.09 mm). No complications were encountered.

CONCLUSION

Robotic-assisted stereotaxy has the potential to increase precision and reduce human error, compared to traditional frame-based DBS surgery, without negatively impacting patient safety or the ability to perform awake neurophysiology research.

Patient-to-robot registration: The fate of robot-assisted stereotaxy

BACKGROUND

Robot-assisted stereotaxy (RAS) promises higher stereotactic accuracy (SA) and time efficiency (TE) than frame-based stereotaxy. However, both aspects are attributed to the problem of patient-to-robot registration.

OBJECTIVE

To examine different registration techniques regarding their SA and TE.

METHODS

This study enrolled 57 patients undergoing RAS with bone fiducial registration (BFR) or laser surface registration (LSR). SA was measured by the entry point error (EPE). Additionally, predictors of SA (registration error [RegE], distance-to-registration plane [DTC]) and TE (imaging, skin-to-skin) were assessed.

RESULTS

The mean SA was 1.0 ± 0.8 mm. BFR increased SA by reducing RegE and DTC. In LSR, EPE depended on DTC (face and forehead) with highest accuracy for DTC ≤100 mm. CT-based LSR exerted a higher SA than MR-based LSR. In BFR, TE was confined by the additional imaging.

CONCLUSION

Every registration technique counteracts one of the promises of RAS. New solutions are needed to increase the acceptance of RAS in neurosurgery.

Framed and non-framed robotics in neurosurgery: A 10-year single-center experience

BACKGROUND

Safety, efficacy and efficiency of neurosurgical robots are defined by their design (i.e., framed and non-framed) and procedural workflow (PW) (from image to surgery). The present study describes the quality indicators of three different robots in brain and spine surgery.

METHODS

This single-centre study enrolled 252 patients over a 10-year period. Safety (complication rate) and efficacy (diagnostic yield, pedicle screw placement) were determined. Predictors of workflow efficiency (e.g., skin-to-skin) were evaluated and compared to conventional techniques (neuronavigation, stereotaxy).

RESULTS

All robots showed excellent reliability (97.5%-100%) with low complication rates (4.5%-5.3%) and high efficacy (94.7%-97.7%). Robotics demonstrated a better time-efficiency than neuronavigation. However, there was no shortening of surgery time compared to conventional stereotaxy. Time-efficiency differed significantly between framed and non-framed workflows.

CONCLUSION

While all neurosurgical robots were reliable, safe and efficacious, there were significant differences in time-efficiency. PWs should be improved to increase the acceptance of robotics in neurosurgery.

Targeting accuracy of robot-assisted deep brain stimulation surgery in childhood-onset dystonia: a single-center prospective cohort analysis of 45 consecutive cases

OBJECTIVE

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an established treatment for pediatric dystonia. The accuracy of electrode implantation is multifactorial and remains a challenge in this age group, mainly due to smaller anatomical targets in very young patients compared to adults, and also due to anatomical abnormalities frequently associated with some etiologies of dystonia. Data on the accuracy of robot-assisted DBS surgery in children are limited. The aim of the current paper was to assess the accuracy of robot-assisted implantation of DBS leads in a series of patients with childhood-onset dystonia.

METHODS

Forty-five children with dystonia undergoing implantation of DBS leads under general anesthesia between 2017 and 2019 were included. Robot-assisted stereotactic implantation of the DBS leads was performed. The final position of the electrodes was verified with an intraoperative 3D scanner (O-arm). Coordinates of the planned electrode target and actual electrode position were obtained and compared, looking at the radial error, depth error, absolute error, and directional error, as well as the euclidean distance. Functional assessment data prospectively collected by a multidisciplinary pediatric complex motor disorders team were analyzed with regard to motor skills, individualized goal achievement, and patients' and caregivers' expectations.

RESULTS

A total of 90 DBS electrodes were implanted and 48.5% of the patients were female. The mean age was 11.0 ± 0.6 years (range 3-18 years). All patients received bilateral DBS electrodes into the globus pallidus internus. The median absolute errors in x-, y-, and z-axes were 0.85 mm (range 0.00-3.25 mm), 0.75 mm (range 0.05-2.45 mm), and 0.75 mm (range 0.00-3.50 mm), respectively. The median euclidean distance from the target to the actual electrode position was 1.69 ± 0.92 mm, and the median radial error was 1.21 ± 0.79. The robot-assisted technique was easily integrated into the authors' surgical practice, improving accuracy and efficiency, and reducing surgical time significantly along the learning curve. No major perioperative complications occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Robot-assisted stereotactic implantation of DBS electrodes in the pediatric age group is a safe and accurate surgical method. Greater accuracy was present in this cohort in comparison to previous studies in which conventional stereotactic frame-based techniques were used. Robotic DBS surgery and neuroradiological advances may result in further improvement in surgical targeting and, consequently, in better clinical outcome in the pediatric population.

Robot-Assisted Stereotaxy Reduces Target Error: A Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of 6056 Trajectories

BACKGROUND

The pursuit of improved accuracy for localization and electrode implantation in deep brain stimulation (DBS) and stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) has fostered an abundance of disparate surgical/stereotactic practices. Specific practices/technologies directly modify implantation accuracy; however, no study has described their respective influence in multivariable context.

OBJECTIVE

To synthesize the known literature to statistically quantify factors affecting implantation accuracy.

METHODS

A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted to determine the inverse-variance weighted pooled mean target error (MTE) of implanted electrodes among patients undergoing DBS or sEEG. MTE was defined as Euclidean distance between planned and final electrode tip. Meta-regression identified moderators of MTE in a multivariable-adjusted model.

RESULTS

A total of 37 eligible studies were identified from a search return of 2,901 potential articles (2002-2018) - 27 DBS and 10 sEEG. Random-effects pooled MTE = 1.91 mm (95% CI: 1.7-2.1) for DBS and 2.34 mm (95% CI: 2.1-2.6) for sEEG. Meta-regression identified study year, robot use, frame/frameless technique, and intraoperative electrophysiologic testing (iEPT) as significant multivariable-adjusted moderators of MTE (P < .0001, R2 = 0.63). Study year was associated with a 0.92-mm MTE reduction over the 16-yr study period (P = .0035), and robot use with a 0.79-mm decrease (P = .0019). Frameless technique was associated with a mean 0.50-mm (95% CI: 0.17-0.84) increase, and iEPT use with a 0.45-mm (95% CI: 0.10-0.80) increase in MTE. Registration method, imaging type, intraoperative imaging, target, and demographics were not significantly associated with MTE on multivariable analysis.

CONCLUSION

Robot assistance for stereotactic electrode implantation is independently associated with improved accuracy and reduced target error. This remains true regardless of other procedural factors, including frame-based vs frameless technique.

Accuracy and Feasibility Analysis of SEEG Electrode Implantation using the VarioGuide Frameless Navigation System in Patients with Drug-Resistant Epilepsy

OBJECTIVE

 The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of frameless stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy using the VarioGuide system.

METHODS

 The VarioGuide frameless navigation system was used to implant SEEG electrodes in patients with medically drug-resistant epilepsy. Demographic data, surgery duration, number of electrodes, and complications were retrospectively analyzed. Accuracy was compared by measuring the distance between the planned and actual electrode positions as determined by postoperative computed tomography images.

RESULTS

 A total of 141 SEEG electrodes were implanted in 19 patients from May 2015 to December 2018 with an average of 7.42 (range: 4-10) leads per patient. The average entry point localization error (EPLE) was 1.96 ± 0.47 mm (range: 0.32-3.29) and average target point localization error (TPLE) was 2.47 ± 0.79 mm (range: 0.72-4.83). The average operating time per lead (OTPL) was 14.16 ± 2.68 minutes (range: 8.64-21.58). No complications occurred.

CONCLUSION

 The VarioGuide frameless navigation system can be an effective method for SEEG electrode implantation in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy, particularly when the electrodes are concentrated in a relatively small region and the number of implanted electrodes is small.

Pseudoprogression versus true progression in glioblastoma patients: A multiapproach literature review. Part 2 - Radiological features and metric markers

After chemoradiotherapy for glioblastoma, pseudoprogression can occur and must be distinguished from true progression to correctly manage glioblastoma treatment and follow-up. Conventional treatment response assessment is evaluated via conventional MRI (contrast-enhanced T1-weighted and T2/FLAIR), which is unreliable. The emergence of advanced MRI techniques, MR spectroscopy, and PET tracers has improved pseudoprogression diagnostic accuracy. This review presents a literature review of the different imaging techniques and potential imaging biomarkers to differentiate pseudoprogression from true progression.

Cortical hemodynamic mapping of subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation in Parkinsonian patients, using high-density functional near-infrared spectroscopy

Subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) is an effective treatment for idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Despite recent progress, the mechanisms responsible for the technique's effectiveness have yet to be fully elucidated. The purpose of the present study was to gain new insights into the interactions between STN-DBS and cortical network activity. We therefore combined high-resolution functional near-infrared spectroscopy with low-resolution electroencephalography in seven Parkinsonian patients on STN-DBS, and measured cortical haemodynamic changes at rest and during hand movement in the presence and absence of stimulation (the ON-stim and OFF-stim conditions, respectively) in the off-drug condition. The relative changes in oxyhaemoglobin [HbO], deoxyhaemoglobin [HbR], and total haemoglobin [HbT] levels were analyzed continuously. At rest, the [HbO], [HbR], and [HbT] over the bilateral sensorimotor (SM), premotor (PM) and dorsolateral prefrontal (DLPF) cortices decreased steadily throughout the duration of stimulation, relative to the OFF-stim condition. During hand movement in the OFF-stim condition, [HbO] increased and [HbR] decreased concomitantly over the contralateral SM cortex (as a result of neurovascular coupling), and [HbO], [HbR], and [HbT] increased concomitantly in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC)-suggesting an increase in blood volume in this brain area. During hand movement with STN-DBS, the increase in [HbO] was over the contralateral SM and PM cortices was significantly lower than in the OFF-stim condition, as was the decrease in [HbO] and [HbT] in the DLPFC. Our results indicate that STN-DBS is associated with a reduction in blood volume over the SM, PM and DLPF cortices, regardless of whether or not the patient is performing a task. This particular effect on cortical networks might explain not only STN-DBS's clinical effectiveness but also some of the associated adverse effects.

Contributions of Robotics to the Safety and Efficacy of Invasive Monitoring With Stereoelectroencephalography

The purpose of this review is to provide a discussion of the history and utility of robotics in invasive monitoring for epilepsy surgery using stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG). The authors conducted a literature review of available sources to describe how the advent of surgical robotics has improved the efficacy and ease of performing sEEG surgery. The sEEG method integrates anatomic, electrographic, and clinical information to test hypotheses regarding the localization of the epileptogenic zone (EZ) and has been used in Europe since the 1950s. One of the primary benefits of robot-assisted sEEG implantation techniques is the ability to seamlessly transition between both orthogonal and oblique trajectory types using a single technique. Based on available information, it is our view that, when applied appropriately, robotic sEEG can have a low rate of complications and many advantages over both non-robotic sEEG implantation and traditional craniotomy-based invasive monitoring methods.

O-Arm Stereotactic Imaging in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Workflow: A Utility and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery is an established treatment for movement disorders. Advances in neuroimaging techniques have resulted in improved targeting accuracy that may improve clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of using the Medtronic O-arm device for the acquisition of intraoperative stereotactic imaging, targeting, and localization of DBS electrodes compared with standard stereotactic MRI or computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Patients were recruited prospectively into the study. Routine frame-based stereotactic DBS surgery was performed. Intraoperative imaging was used to facilitate and verify the accurate placement of the intracranial electrodes. The acquisition of coordinates and verification of the position of the electrodes using the O-arm were evaluated and compared with conventional stereotactic MRI or CT. Additionally, a systematic review of the literature on the use of intraoperative imaging in DBS surgery was performed.

RESULTS

Eighty patients were included. The indications for DBS surgery were dystonia, Parkinson's disease, essential tremor, and epilepsy. The globus pallidus internus was the most commonly targeted region (43.7%), followed by the subthalamic nucleus (35%). Stereotactic O-arm imaging reduced the overall surgical time by 68 min, reduced the length of time of acquisition of stereotactic images by 77%, reduced patient exposure to ionizing radiation by 24.2%, significantly reduced operating room (OR) costs per procedure by 31%, and increased the OR and neuroradiology suite availability.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the O-arm in DBS surgery workflow significantly reduced the duration of image acquisition, the exposure to ionizing radiation, and costs when compared with standard stereotactic MRI or CT, without reducing accuracy.

Stereotactic Neuro-Navigation Phantom Designs: A Systematic Review

Diverse stereotactic neuro-navigation systems are used daily in neurosurgery and novel systems are continuously being developed. Prior to clinical implementation of new surgical tools, methods or instruments, in vitro experiments on phantoms should be conducted. A stereotactic neuro-navigation phantom denotes a rigid or deformable structure resembling the cranium with the intracranial area. The use of phantoms is essential for the testing of complete procedures and their workflows, as well as for the final validation of the application accuracy. The aim of this study is to provide a systematic review of stereotactic neuro-navigation phantom designs, to identify their most relevant features, and to identify methodologies for measuring the target point error, the entry point error, and the angular error (α). The literature on phantom designs used for evaluating the accuracy of stereotactic neuro-navigation systems, i.e., robotic navigation systems, stereotactic frames, frameless navigation systems, and aiming devices, was searched. Eligible articles among the articles written in English in the period 2000–2020 were identified through the electronic databases PubMed, IEEE, Web of Science, and Scopus. The majority of phantom designs presented in those articles provide a suitable methodology for measuring the target point error, while there is a lack of objective measurements of the entry point error and angular error. We identified the need for a universal phantom design, which would be compatible with most common imaging techniques (e.g., computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) and suitable for simultaneous measurement of the target point, entry point, and angular errors.

Time Efficiency in Stereotactic Robot-Assisted Surgery: An Appraisal of the Surgical Procedure and Surgeon's Learning Curve

BACKGROUND

Frame-based stereotactic procedures are still the gold standard in neurosurgery. However, there is an increasing interest in robot-assisted technologies. Introducing these increasingly complex tools in the clinical setting raises the question about the time efficiency of the system and the essential learning curve of the surgeon.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled a consecutive series of patients undergoing a robot-assisted procedure after first system installation at one institution. All procedures were performed by the same neurosurgeon to capture the learning curve. The objective read-out were the surgical procedure time (SPT), the skin-to-skin time, and the intraoperative registration time (IRT) after laser surface registration (LSR), bone fiducial registration (BFR), and skin fiducial registration (SFR), as well as the quality of the registration (as measured by the fiducial registration error [FRE]). The time measures were compared to those for a patient group undergoing classic frame-based stereotaxy.

RESULTS

In the first 7 months, we performed 31 robot-assisted surgeries (26 biopsies, 3 stereotactic electroencephalography [SEEG] implantations, and 2 endoscopic procedures). The SPT was depending on the actual type of surgery (biopsies: 85.0 ± 36.1 min; SEEG: 154.9 ± 75.9 min; endoscopy: 105.5 ± 1.1 min; p = 0.036). For the robot-assisted biopsies, there was a significant reduction in SPT within the evaluation period, reaching the level of frame-based surgeries (58.1 ± 17.9 min; p < 0.001). The IRT was depending on the applied registration method (LSR: 16.7 ± 2.3 min; BFR: 3.5 ± 1.1 min; SFR: 3.5 ± 1.6 min; p < 0.001). In contrast to BFR and SFR, there was a significant reduction in LSR time during that period (p = 0.038). The FRE differed between the applied registration methods (LSR: 0.60 ± 0.17 mm; BFR: 0.42 ± 0.15 mm; SFR: 2.17 ± 0.78 mm; p < 0.001). There was a significant improvement in LSR quality during the evaluation period (p = 0.035).

CONCLUSION

Introducing stereotactic, robot-assisted surgery in an established clinical setting initially necessitates a prolonged intraoperative preparation time. However, there is a steep learning curve during the first cases, reaching the time level of classic frame-based stereotaxy. Thus, a stereotactic robot can be integrated into daily routine within a decent period of time, thereby expanding the neurosurgeons' armamentarium, especially for procedures with multiple trajectories.

Oblique trajectory angles in robotic stereo-electroencephalography

OBJECTIVE

Traditional stereo-electroencephalography (sEEG) entails the use of orthogonal trajectories guided by seizure semiology and arteriography. Advances in robotic stereotaxy and computerized neuronavigation have made oblique trajectories more feasible and easier to implement without formal arteriography. Such trajectories provide access to components of seizure networks not readily sampled using orthogonal trajectories. However, the dogma regarding the relative safety and predictability of orthogonal and azimuth-based trajectories persists, given the absence of data regarding the safety and efficacy of oblique sEEG trajectories. In this study, the authors evaluated the relative accuracy and efficacy of both orthogonal and oblique trajectories during robotic implantation of sEEG electrodes to sample seizure networks.

METHODS

The authors performed a retrospective analysis of 150 consecutive procedures in 134 patients, accounting for 2040 electrode implantations. Of these, 837 (41%) were implanted via oblique trajectories (defined as an entry angle > 30°). Accuracy was calculated by comparing the deviation of each electrode at the entry and the target point from the planned trajectory using postimplantation imaging.

RESULTS

The mean entry and target deviations were 1.57 mm and 1.89 mm for oblique trajectories compared with 1.38 mm and 1.69 mm for orthogonal trajectories, respectively. Entry point deviation was significantly associated with entry angle, but the impact of this relationship was negligible (-0.015-mm deviation per degree). Deviation at the target point was not significantly affected by the entry angle. No hemorrhagic or infectious complications were observed in the entire cohort, further suggesting that these differences were not meaningful in a clinical context. Of the patients who then underwent definitive procedures after sEEG, 69 patients had a minimum of 12 months of follow-up, of whom 58 (84%) achieved an Engel class I or II outcome during a median follow-up of 27 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The magnitude of stereotactic errors in this study falls squarely within the range reported in the sEEG literature, which primarily features orthogonal trajectories. The patient outcomes reported in this study suggest that seizure foci are well localized using oblique trajectories. Thus, the selective use of oblique trajectories in the authors' cohort was associated with excellent safety and efficacy, with no patient incidents, and the findings support the use of oblique trajectories as an effective and safe means of investigating seizure networks.

Frameless stereotaxy in subthalamic deep brain stimulation: 3-year clinical outcome

Background

In most centers, the surgery of deep brain stimulation (DBS) is performed using a stereotactic frame. Compared with frame-based technique, frameless stereotaxy reduces the duration of surgical procedure and patient’s discomfort, with lead placing accuracy equivalent after the learning curve. Although several studies have investigated the targeting accuracy of this technique, only a few studies reported clinical outcomes, with data of short-term follow-up.

Objective

To assess clinical efficacy and safety of frameless bilateral subthalamic nucleus (STN) DBS in Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients at 1- and 3-year follow-up.

Methods

Consecutive PD patients who underwent bilateral STN-DBS with a manual adjustable frameless system were included in the study. The data were collected retrospectively.

Results

Eighteen PD patients underwent bilateral STN-DBS implant and were included in the study. All patients completed 1-year observation and ten of them completed 3-year observation. At 1-year follow-up, motor efficacy of STN stimulation in off-med condition was of 30.1% (P = 0.003) and at 3-year follow-up was of 36.3%, compared with off-stim condition at 3-year follow-up (P = 0.005). Dopaminergic drugs were significantly reduced by 31.2% 1 year after the intervention (P = 0.003) and 31.7% 3 years after the intervention (P = 0.04). No serious adverse events occurred during surgery.

Conclusions

Frameless stereotaxy is an effective and safe technique for DBS surgery at 1- and 3-year follow-up, with great advantages for patients’ discomfort during surgery.

Frameless Stereotactic Brain Biopsies: Comparison of Minimally Invasive Robot-Guided and Manual Arm-Based Technique

BACKGROUND

Most brain biopsies are still performed with the aid of a navigation-guided mechanical arm. Due to the manual trajectory alignment without rigid skull contact, frameless aiming devices are prone to considerably lower accuracy.

OBJECTIVE

To compare a novel minimally invasive robot-guided biopsy technique with rigid skull fixation to a standard frameless manual arm biopsy procedure.

METHODS

Accuracy, procedural duration, diagnostic yield, complication rate, and cosmetic result were retrospectively assessed in 40 consecutive cases of frameless stereotactic biopsies and compared between a minimally invasive robotic technique using the iSYS1 guidance device (iSYS Medizintechnik GmbH) (robot-guided group [ROB], n = 20) and a manual arm-based technique (group MAN, n = 20).

RESULTS

Application of the robotic technique resulted in significantly higher accuracy at entry point (group ROB median 1.5 mm [0.4-3.2 mm] vs manual arm-based group (MAN) 2.2 mm [0.2-5.2 mm], P = .019) and at target point (group ROB 1.5 mm [0.4-2.8 mm] vs group MAN 2.8 mm [1.4-4.9 mm], P = .001), without increasing incision to suture time (group ROB 30.0 min [20-45 min vs group MAN 32.5 min [range 20-60 min], P = .09) and significantly shorter skin incision length (group ROB 16.3 mm [12.7-23.4 mm] vs group MAN 24.2 mm [18.0-37.0 mm], P = .008).

CONCLUSION

According to our data, the proposed technique of minimally invasive robot-guided brain biopsies can improve accuracy without increasing operating time while being equally safe and effective compared to a standard frameless arm-based manual biopsy technique.

How technology is driving the landscape of epilepsy surgery

This article emphasizes the role of the technological progress in changing the landscape of epilepsy surgery and provides a critical appraisal of robotic applications, laser interstitial thermal therapy, intraoperative imaging, wireless recording, new neuromodulation techniques, and high-intensity focused ultrasound. Specifically, (a) it relativizes the current hype in using robots for stereo-electroencephalography (SEEG) to increase the accuracy of depth electrode placement and save operating time; (b) discusses the drawback of laser interstitial thermal therapy (LITT) when it comes to the need for adequate histopathologic specimen and the fact that the concept of stereotactic disconnection is not new; (c) addresses the ratio between the benefits and expenditure of using intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), that is, the high technical and personnel expertise needed that might restrict its use to centers with a high case load, including those unrelated to epilepsy; (d) soberly reviews the advantages, disadvantages, and future potentials of neuromodulation techniques with special emphasis on the differences between closed and open-loop systems; and (e) provides a critical outlook on the clinical implications of focused ultrasound, wireless recording, and multipurpose electrodes that are already on the horizon. This outlook shows that although current ultrasonic systems do have some limitations in delivering the acoustic energy, further advance of this technique may lead to novel treatment paradigms. Furthermore, it highlights that new data streams from multipurpose electrodes and wireless transmission of intracranial recordings will become available soon once some critical developments will be achieved such as electrode fidelity, data processing and storage, heat conduction as well as rechargeable technology. A better understanding of modern epilepsy surgery will help to demystify epilepsy surgery for the patients and the treating physicians and thereby reduce the surgical treatment gap.

Accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-based 3D printed stereotactic brain biopsy device in dogs

BACKGROUND

Brain biopsy of intracranial lesions is often necessary to determine specific therapy. The cost of the currently used stereotactic rigid frame and optical tracking systems for brain biopsy in dogs is often prohibitive or accuracy is not sufficient for all types of lesion.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the application accuracy of an inexpensive magnetic resonance imaging-based personalized, 3D printed brain biopsy device.

ANIMALS

Twenty-two dog heads from cadavers were separated into 2 groups according to body weight (<15 kg, >20 kg).

METHODS

Experimental study. Two target points in each cadaver head were used (target point 1: caudate nucleus, target point 2: piriform lobe). Comparison between groups was performed using the independent Student's t test or the nonparametric Mann-Whitney U Test.

RESULTS

The total median target point deviation was 0.83 mm (range 0.09-2.76 mm). The separate median target point deviations for target points 1 and 2 in all dogs were 0.57 mm (range: 0.09-1.25 mm) and 0.85 mm (range: 0.14-2.76 mm), respectively.

CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE

This magnetic resonance imaging-based 3D printed stereotactic brain biopsy device achieved an application accuracy that was better than the accuracy of most brain biopsy systems that are currently used in veterinary medicine. The device can be applied to every size and shape of skull and allows precise positioning of brain biopsy needles in dogs.

Analysis of Morbidity and Outcomes Associated With Use of Subdural Grids vs Stereoelectroencephalography in Patients With Intractable Epilepsy

Importance

A major change has occurred in the evaluation of epilepsy with the availability of robotic stereoelectroencephalography (SEEG) for seizure localization. However, the comparative morbidity and outcomes of this minimally invasive procedure relative to traditional subdural electrode (SDE) implantation are unknown.

Objective

To perform a comparative analysis of the relative efficacy, procedural morbidity, and epilepsy outcomes consequent to SEEG and SDE in similar patient populations and performed by a single surgeon at 1 center.

Design, Setting and Participants

Overall, 239 patients with medically intractable epilepsy underwent 260 consecutive intracranial electroencephalographic procedures to localize their epilepsy. Procedures were performed from November 1, 2004, through June 30, 2017, and data were analyzed in June 2017 and August 2018.

Interventions

Implantation of SDE using standard techniques vs SEEG using a stereotactic robot, followed by resection or laser ablation of the seizure focus.

Main Outcomes and Measures

Length of surgical procedure, surgical complications, opiate use, and seizure outcomes using the Engel Epilepsy Surgery Outcome Scale.

Results

Of the 260 cases included in the study (54.6% female; mean [SD] age at evaluation, 30.3 [13.1] years), the SEEG (n = 121) and SDE (n = 139) groups were similar in age (mean [SD], 30.1 [12.2] vs 30.6 [13.8] years), sex (47.1% vs 43.9% male), numbers of failed anticonvulsants (mean [SD], 5.7 [2.5] vs 5.6 [2.5]), and duration of epilepsy (mean [SD], 16.4 [12.0] vs17.2 [12.1] years). A much greater proportion of SDE vs SEEG cases were lesional (99 [71.2%] vs 53 [43.8%]; P < .001). Seven symptomatic hemorrhagic sequelae (1 with permanent neurological deficit) and 3 infections occurred in the SDE cohort with no clinically relevant complications in the SEEG cohort, a marked difference in complication rates (P = .003). A greater proportion of SDE cases resulted in resection or ablation compared with SEEG cases (127 [91.4%] vs 90 [74.4%]; P < .001). Favorable epilepsy outcomes (Engel class I [free of disabling seizures] or II [rare disabling seizures]) were observed in 57 of 75 SEEG cases (76.0%) and 59 of 108 SDE cases (54.6%; P = .003) amongst patients undergoing resection or ablation, at 1 year. An analysis of only nonlesional cases revealed good outcomes in 27 of 39 cases (69.2%) vs 9 of 26 cases (34.6%) at 12 months in SEEG and SDE cohorts, respectively (P = .006). When considering all patients undergoing evaluation, not just those undergoing definitive procedures, favorable outcomes (Engel class I or II) for SEEG compared with SDE were similar (57 of 121 [47.1%] vs 59 of 139 [42.4%] at 1 year; P = .45).

Conclusions and Relevance

This direct comparison of large matched cohorts undergoing SEEG and SDE implantation reveals distinctly better procedural morbidity favoring SEEG. These modalities intrinsically evaluate somewhat different populations, with SEEG being more versatile and applicable to a range of scenarios, including nonlesional and bilateral cases, than SDE. The significantly favorable adverse effect profile of SEEG should factor into decision making when patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy are considered for intracranial evaluations.

Frameless ROSA® Robot-Assisted Lead Implantation for Deep Brain Stimulation: Technique and Accuracy

BACKGROUND

Frameless robotic-assisted surgery is an innovative technique for deep brain stimulation (DBS) that has not been assessed in a large cohort of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate accuracy of DBS lead placement using the ROSA® robot (Zimmer Biomet) and a frameless registration.

METHODS

All patients undergoing DBS surgery in our institution between 2012 and 2016 were prospectively included in an open label single-center study. Accuracy was evaluated by measuring the radial error (RE) of the first stylet implanted on each side and the RE of the final lead position at the target level. RE was measured on intraoperative telemetric X-rays (group 1), on intraoperative O-Arm® (Medtronic) computed tomography (CT) scans (group 2), and on postoperative CT scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in both groups.

RESULTS

Of 144 consecutive patients, 119 were eligible for final analysis (123 DBS; 186 stylets; 192 leads). In group 1 (76 patients), the mean RE of the stylet was 0.57 ± 0.02 mm, 0.72 ± 0.03 mm for DBS lead measured intraoperatively, and 0.88 ± 0.04 mm for DBS lead measured postoperatively on CT scans. In group 2 (43 patients), the mean RE of the stylet was 0.68 ± 0.05 mm, 0.75 ± 0.04 mm for DBS lead measured intraoperatively; 0.86 ± 0.05 mm and 1.10 ± 0.08 mm for lead measured postoperatively on CT scans and on MRI, respectively No statistical difference regarding the RE of the final lead position was found between the different intraoperative imaging modalities and postoperative CT scans in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Frameless ROSA® robot-assisted technique for DBS reached submillimeter accuracy. Intraoperative CT scans appeared to be reliable and sufficient to evaluate the final lead position.

Robotic Stereotaxy in Cranial Neurosurgery: A Qualitative Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Modern-day stereotactic techniques have evolved to tackle the neurosurgical challenge of accurately and reproducibly accessing specific brain targets. Neurosurgical advances have been made in synergy with sophisticated technological developments and engineering innovations such as automated robotic platforms. Robotic systems offer a unique combination of dexterity, durability, indefatigability, and precision.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of robotic integration for cranial stereotactic guidance in neurosurgery. Specifically, we comprehensively analyze the strengths and weaknesses of a spectrum of robotic technologies, past and present, including details pertaining to each system's kinematic specifications and targeting accuracy profiles.

METHODS

Eligible articles on human clinical applications of cranial robotic-guided stereotactic systems between 1985 and 2017 were extracted from several electronic databases, with a focus on stereotactic biopsy procedures, stereoelectroencephalography, and deep brain stimulation electrode insertion.

RESULTS

Cranial robotic stereotactic systems feature serial or parallel architectures with 4 to 7 degrees of freedom, and frame-based or frameless registration. Indications for robotic assistance are diversifying, and include stereotactic biopsy, deep brain stimulation and stereoelectroencephalography electrode placement, ventriculostomy, and ablation procedures. Complication rates are low, and mainly consist of hemorrhage. Newer systems benefit from increasing targeting accuracy, intraoperative imaging ability, improved safety profiles, and reduced operating times.

CONCLUSION

We highlight emerging future directions pertaining to the integration of robotic technologies into future neurosurgical procedures. Notably, a trend toward miniaturization, cost-effectiveness, frameless registration, and increasing safety and accuracy characterize successful stereotactic robotic technologies.

Accuracy of the robot-assisted procedure in deep brain stimulation

INTRODUCTION

The use of a robot-assisted technology becomes very competitive. The aim of this work was to define the accuracy of robotic assistance in deep brain stimulation surgery and to compare results with that in the literature.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the accuracy of lead implantation in 24 consecutive patients who had robot-assisted (ROSA, Zimmer-Biomet) surgery for the treatment of movement disorders. Intended stereotactic coordinates (x, y, z) of contact 0 (the most distal contact at the tip of the electrode) of each definitive lead were compared with actual coordinates obtained by a postoperative CT scan. For each lead, the euclidian 3D distance between the actual and intended location of contact 0 was calculated.

RESULTS

The euclidian 3D distances between the intended and actual location of the contact 0 were 0.81 mm on the right side and 1.12 mm on the left side.

DISCUSSION

Robot-assisted technology for stereotactic surgery is safe and accurate. The association with a 3D flat-panel CT scan is an optimized procedure for deep intracranial electrode implantation.

Deep Brain Stimulation Programming for Movement Disorders: Current Concepts and Evidence-Based Strategies

Deep brain stimulation (DBS) has become the treatment of choice for advanced stages of Parkinson's disease, medically intractable essential tremor, and complicated segmental and generalized dystonia. In addition to accurate electrode placement in the target area, effective programming of DBS devices is considered the most important factor for the individual outcome after DBS. Programming of the implanted pulse generator (IPG) is the only modifiable factor once DBS leads have been implanted and it becomes even more relevant in cases in which the electrodes are located at the border of the intended target structure and when side effects become challenging. At present, adjusting stimulation parameters depends to a large extent on personal experience. Based on a comprehensive literature search, we here summarize previous studies that examined the significance of distinct stimulation strategies for ameliorating disease signs and symptoms. We assess the effect of adjusting the stimulus amplitude (A), frequency (f), and pulse width (pw) on clinical symptoms and examine more recent techniques for modulating neuronal elements by electrical stimulation, such as interleaving (Medtronic®) or directional current steering (Boston Scientific®, Abbott®). We thus provide an evidence-based strategy for achieving the best clinical effect with different disorders and avoiding adverse effects in DBS of the subthalamic nucleus (STN), the ventro-intermedius nucleus (VIM), and the globus pallidus internus (GPi).

Position and Orientation Errors in a Neuronavigation Procedure: A Stepwise Protocol Using a Cranial Phantom

OBJECTIVE

Neuronavigation procedures demand high precision and accuracy. Despite this need, there are still few studies analyzing errors in such procedures. The aim of this study was to use a custom-built cranial phantom to measure target position and orientation errors in different phases of a simulated neuronavigation procedure.

METHODS

A cranial phantom with 10 target sites was designed and imaged with computed tomography and magnetic resonance. A segmentation of a cloud of points of the phantom (ground truth) was obtained using an optical tracking system and compared with the images (imaging phase). Targets and trajectories were then planned with neuronavigation software and compared with the ground truth (planning phase). The same plan was used to identify the points in real space after image-to-phantom registration and calculate the final error of the procedure by comparison with the ground truth (registration and execution phase).

RESULTS

The mean errors after the imaging phase were 1.11 ± 0.42 mm and 3.23° ± 1.69° for position and orientation, respectively. After planning the mean errors were 1.10 ± 0.39 mm and 5.55° ± 2.91°. The global errors after the registration and mechanical execution were 3.93 ± 1.70 mm and 3.65° ± 1.29°.

CONCLUSIONS

After a stepwise analysis, registration and mechanical execution were the main contributors to the global position error.

Stereotactic brain biopsy: evaluation of robot-assisted procedure in 60 patients

BACKGROUND

Frameless stereotactic biopsies, particularly robot-assisted procedures are increasing in neurosurgery centers. Results of these procedures should be at least equal to or greater than frame-based reference procedure. Evaluate robot-assisted technology is necessary in particular, when a team has chosen to switch from one to another method.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of our prospective work was (i) to evaluate the success rate of contributive robotic-assisted biopsy in 60 patients, to report the morbidity and mortality associated with the procedure and (ii) to compare it with literature data.

METHODS

We performed a prospective and descriptive study including 60 consecutive patients having had robotic-assisted stereotactic biopsy at the Rouen University Hospital, France. All patients had presurgical imaging before the procedure included Magnetic Resonance Imaging merged with Computed Tomography scan acquisition. Registration was mostly performed with a touch-free laser (57/60). A control Computed Tomography scan was always realized at day 0 or day 1 after surgery. Data collected were success rate, bleeding, clinical worsening, infection, and mortality.

RESULTS

All the biopsies were considered as contributive and lead to the final diagnosis. In 41/60 patients (68%), the lesion was glial. Six in 60 patients (10%) had visible bleeding without clinical worsening related, 5/60 patients (8.5%) showed clinical impairment following surgery, which was permanent in 2 patients, and 1/60 patient presented generalized seizures. We did not report any infection and mortality.

CONCLUSION

Robot-assisted frameless surgery is efficient and provides a reasonable alternative to frame-based procedure. The operating time can be reduced, without increasing morbidity and mortality rates.

Electrode placement accuracy in robot-assisted epilepsy surgery: A comparison of different referencing techniques including frame-based CT versus facial laser scan based on CT or MRI

BACKGROUND

Precise robotic or stereotactic implantation of stereoelectroencephalography (sEEG) electrodes relies on the exact referencing of the planning images in order to match the patient's anatomy to the stereotactic device or robot. We compared the accuracy of sEEG electrode implantation with stereotactic frame versus laser scanning of the face based on computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets for referencing.

METHODS

The accuracy was determined by calculating the Euclidian distance between the planned trajectory and the postoperative position of the sEEG electrode, defining the entry point error (EPE) and the target point error (TPE). The sEEG electrodes (n = 171) were implanted with the robotic surgery assistant (ROSA) in 19 patients. Preoperative trajectory planning was performed on three-dimensional (3D) MRI datasets. Referencing was accomplished either by performing (A) 1.25-mm slice CT with the patient's head fixed in a Leksell stereotactic frame (CT-frame, n = 49), fused with a 3D-T1-weighted, contrast enhanced- and T2-weighted 1.5 Tesla (T) MRI; (B) 1.25 mm CT (CT-laser, n = 60), fused with 3D-3.0-T MRI; (C) 3.0-T MRI T1-based laser scan (3.0-T MRI-laser, n = 56) or (D) in one single patient, because of a pacemaker, 3D-1.5-T MRI T1-based laser scan (1.5-T MRI-laser, n = 6).

RESULTS

In (A) CT-frame referencing, the mean EPE amounted to 0.86 mm and the mean TPE amounted to 2.28 mm (n = 49). In (B) CT-laser referencing, the EPE amounted to 1.85 mm and the TPE to 2.41 mm (n = 60). In (C) 3.0-T MRI-laser referencing, the mean EPE amounted to 3.02 mm and the mean TPE to 3.51 mm (n = 56). In (D) 1.5-T MRI, surprisingly the mean EPE amounted only to 0.97 mm and the TPE to 1.71 mm (n = 6). In 3 cases using CT-laser and 1 case using 3.0 T MRI-laser for referencing, small asymptomatic intracerebral hemorrhages were detected. No further complications were observed.

CONCLUSION

Robot-guided sEEG electrode implantation using CT-frame referencing and CT-laser-based referencing is most accurate and can serve for high precision placement of electrodes. In contrast, 3.0-T MRI-laser-based referencing is less accurate, but saves radiation. Most trajectories can be reached if alternative routes over less vascularized brain areas are used. This article is part of the Special Issue "Individualized Epilepsy Management: Medicines, Surgery and Beyond".

Image-Guided Biopsy of Intracranial Lesions with a Small Robotic Device (iSYS1): A Prospective, Exploratory Pilot Study

BACKGROUND

Robotic technologies have been used in the neurosurgical operating rooms for the last 30 yr. They have been adopted for several stereotactic applications and, particularly, image-guided biopsy of intracranial lesions which are not amenable for open surgical resection.

OBJECTIVE

To assess feasibility, safety, accuracy, and diagnostic yield of robot-assisted frameless stereotactic brain biopsy with a recently introduced miniaturized device (iSYS1; Interventional Systems Medizintechnik GmbH, Kitzbühel, Austria), fixed to the Mayfield headholder by a jointed arm.

METHODS

Clinical and surgical data of all patients undergoing frameless stereotactic biopsies using the iSYS1 robotized system from October 2016 to December 2017 have been prospectively collected and analyzed. Facial surface registration has been adopted for optical neuronavigation.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine patients were included in the study. Neither mortality nor morbidity related to the surgical procedure performed with the robot was recorded. Diagnostic tissue samples were obtained in 38 out of 39 procedures (diagnostic yield per procedure was 97.4%). All patients received a definitive histological diagnosis. Mean target error was 1.06 mm (median 1 mm, range 0.1-4 mm).

CONCLUSION

The frameless robotic iSYS1-assisted biopsy technique was determined to be feasible, safe, and accurate procedure; moreover, the diagnostic yield was high. The surface matching registration method with computed tomography as the reference image set did not negatively affect the accuracy of the procedure.

A novel robot-guided minimally invasive technique for brain tumor biopsies

OBJECTIVE

As decisions regarding tumor diagnosis and subsequent treatment are increasingly based on molecular pathology, the frequency of brain biopsies is increasing. Robotic devices overcome limitations of frame-based and frameless techniques in terms of accuracy and usability. The aim of the present study was to present a novel, minimally invasive, robot-guided biopsy technique and compare the results with those of standard burr hole biopsy.

METHODS

A tubular minimally invasive instrument set was custom-designed for the iSYS-1 robot-guided biopsies. Feasibility, accuracy, duration, and outcome were compared in a consecutive series of 66 cases of robot-guided stereotactic biopsies between the minimally invasive (32 patients) and standard (34 patients) procedures.

RESULTS

Application of the minimally invasive instrument set was feasible in all patients. Compared with the standard burr hole technique, accuracy was significantly higher both at entry (median 1.5 mm [range 0.2-3.2 mm] vs 1.7 mm [range 0.8-5.1 mm], p = 0.008) and at target (median 1.5 mm [range 0.4-3.4 mm] vs 2.0 mm [range 0.8-3.9 mm], p = 0.019). The incision-to-suture time was significantly shorter (median 30 minutes [range 15-50 minutes] vs 37.5 minutes [range 25-105 minutes], p < 0.001). The skin incision was significantly shorter (median 16.3 mm [range 12.7-23.4 mm] vs 28.4 mm [range 20-42.2 mm], p = 0.002). A diagnostic tissue sample was obtained in all cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the novel instrument set was feasible in all patients. According to the authors' data, the minimally invasive robot-guidance procedure can significantly improve accuracy, reduce operating time, and improve the cosmetic result of stereotactic biopsies.