1
|
Sanz J, Eraso A, Ibáñez R, Williams R, Algara M. Tumor Bed Boost Radiotherapy in the Conservative Treatment of Breast Cancer: A Review of Intra-Operative Techniques and Outcomes. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:4025. [PMID: 37627053 PMCID: PMC10452620 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15164025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Revised: 08/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Conservative surgery is the preferred treatment in the management of breast cancer followed by adjuvant whole-breast irradiation. Since the tumor bed is the main site of relapse, boost doses are conveniently administered according to risk factors for local relapse to increase the efficacy of the treatment. The benefit of a radiation boost is well established and it can be performed by several techniques like brachytherapy, external radiation or intraoperative radiotherapy. Greater precision in localizing the tumor cavity, immediacy and increased biological response are the main advantages of intraoperative boost irradiation. This modality of treatment can be performed by means of mobile electron accelerators or low-photon X-ray devices. There is a lot of research and some published series analyzing the results of the use of an intraoperative boost as an adjuvant treatment, after neoadjuvant systemic therapy and in combination with some reconstructive surgeries. This review discusses advantages of intraoperative radiotherapy and presents the main results of a boost in terms of local control, survival, tolerance and cosmesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Javier Sanz
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Facultat de Medicina, Campus del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| | - Arantxa Eraso
- Radiation Oncology Department, Institut Català d’Oncologia, Hospital Trueta, 17007 Girona, Spain;
- Facultat de Medicina, Campus Centre, Universitat de Girona, 17004 Girona, Spain
| | - Reyes Ibáñez
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, 50009 Zaragoza, Spain;
| | - Rachel Williams
- College of Liberal Arts, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA;
| | - Manuel Algara
- Radiation Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar Barcelona, 08003 Barcelona, Spain
- Facultat de Medicina, Campus del Mar, Universitat Pompeu Fabra, 08002 Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Montero A, Ciérvide R, Cañadillas C, Álvarez B, García-Aranda M, Alonso R, López M, Chen-Zhao X, Alonso L, Valero J, Sánchez E, Hernando O, García de Acilu P, Fernandez-Letón P, Rubio C. Acute skin toxicity of ultra-hypofractionated whole breast radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost for early breast cancer. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2023; 41:100651. [PMID: 37388711 PMCID: PMC10300060 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2023] [Revised: 05/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Whole-breast irradiation (WBI) after breast conserving surgery (BCS) is indicated to improve loco-regional control and survival. Former studies showed that addition of tumor bed boost in all age groups significantly improved local control although no apparent impact on overall survival but with an increased risk of worse cosmetic outcome. Even though shortened regimens in 3 weeks are considered the standard, recent studies have shown the non-inferiority of a treatment regimen of 5 fractions in one-week in both locoregional control and toxicity profile, although simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in this setting has been scarcely studied. Materials and Methods From March-2020 to March-2022, 383 patients with early breast cancer diagnosis and a median age of 56 years-old (range 30-99)were included in a prospective registry of ultra-hypofractionated WBI up to a total dose of 26 Gy in 5.2 Gy/fraction with a SIB of 29 Gy in 5.8 Gy/fraction in 272 patients (71%), 30-31 Gy in 6-6.2 Gy/fraction in 111 patients (29%) with close/focally affected margins. Radiation treatment was delivered by conformal 3-D technique in 366 patients (95%), VMAT in 16patients (4%) and conformal 3-D with deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) in 4patients (1%). Ninety-three per cent of patients received endocrine therapy and 43% systemic or targeted chemotherapy. Development of acute skin complications was retrospectively reviewed. Results With a median follow-up of 18 months (range 7-31), all patients are alive without evidence of local, regional or distant relapse. Acute tolerance was acceptable, with null o mild toxicity: 182 (48%) and 15 (4%) patients developed skin toxicity grade 1 and 2 respectively; 9 (2%) and 2 (0.5%) patients breast edema grade 1and 2 respectively. No other acute toxicities were observed. We also evaluated development of early delayed complications and observed grade 1 breast edema in 6 patients (2%); grade 1 hyperpigmentation in 20 patients (5%); and grade 1 and 2 breast induration underneath boost region in 10(3%) and 2 patients (0.5%) respectively. We found a statistically significant correlation between the median PTVWBI and presence of skin toxicity (p = 0.028) as well as a significant correlation between late hyperpigmentation with the median PTVBOOST (p = 0.007) and the ratio PTVBOOST/PTVWBI (p = 0.042). Conclusion Ultra-hypofractionated WBI + SIB in 5 fractions over one-week is feasible and well tolerated, although longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angel Montero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
- Facultad de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Camilo José Cela, Madrid, Spain
| | - Raquel Ciérvide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Beatriz Álvarez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosa Alonso
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Mercedes López
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Xin Chen-Zhao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Leyre Alonso
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jeannete Valero
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Emilio Sánchez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | - Ovidio Hernando
- Department of Radiation Oncology, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Carmen Rubio
- Department of Medical Physics, HM Hospitales, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
As Easy as 1, 2, 3? How to Determine CBCT Frequency in Adjuvant Breast Radiotherapy. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14174164. [PMID: 36077701 PMCID: PMC9454766 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14174164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2022] [Revised: 08/25/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The current study aims to assess the suitability of setup errors during the first three treatment fractions to determine cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) frequency in adjuvant breast radiotherapy. For this, 45 breast cancer patients receiving non-hypofractionated radiotherapy after lumpectomy, including a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) to the tumor bed and daily CBCT imaging, were retrospectively selected. In a first step, mean and maximum setup errors on treatment days 1–3 were correlated with the mean setup errors during subsequent treatment days. In a second step, dose distribution was estimated using a dose accumulation workflow based on deformable image registration, and setup errors on treatment days 1–3 were correlated with dose deviations in the clinical target volumes (CTV) and organs at risk (OAR). No significant correlation was found between mean and maximum setup errors on treatment days 1–3 and mean setup errors during subsequent treatment days. In addition, mean and maximum setup errors on treatment days 1–3 correlated poorly with dose coverage of the CTVs and dose to the OARs. Thus, CBCT frequency in adjuvant breast radiotherapy should not be determined solely based on the magnitude of setup errors during the first three treatment fractions.
Collapse
|
4
|
Ciabattoni A, Gregucci F, D’Ermo G, Dolfi A, Cucciarelli F, Palumbo I, Borghesi S, Gava A, Cesaro GM, Baldissera A, Giammarino D, Daidone A, Maurizi F, Mignogna M, Mazzuoli L, Ravo V, Falivene S, Pedretti S, Ippolito E, Barbarino R, di Cristino D, Fiorentino A, Aristei C, Ramella S, D’Angelillo RM, Meattini I, Iotti C, Donato V, Formenti SC. Patterns of Care for Breast Radiotherapy in Italy: Breast IRRadiATA (Italian Repository of Radiotherapy dATA) Feasibility Study. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14163927. [PMID: 36010920 PMCID: PMC9405796 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14163927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Breast cancer is the most common cancer in women worldwide, with a high prevalence and incidence, configuring an important issue in cancer epidemiology. Over the years, the combination of primary and secondary prevention programs and multidisciplinary treatment approaches has improved the overall survival (OS) and quality of life (QoL) of patients. However, although treatment pathways should be standardized in evidence-based medicine, clinical practice (real-world evidence) may differ from expected. To improve OS and QoL, having a clear picture of the Patterns of Care actually applied is essential. To this aim, Breast IRRADIATA (Italian Repository of RADIotherapy dATA), a collaborative nationwide project, was developed as a simple tool to probe the current pattern of radiotherapy care in Italy and tested in a feasibility study. This pilot feasibility of IRRADIATA encourages a larger application of this tool nationwide and opens the way to the assessment of pattern of care radiotherapy directed to other cancers. Abstract Aim. Breast IRRADIATA (Italian Repository of RADIotherapy dATA) is a collaborative nationwide project supported by the Italian Society of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Italian League Against Cancer (LILT). It focuses on breast cancer (BC) patients treated with radiotherapy (RT) and was developed to create a national registry and define the patterns of care in Italy. A dedicated tool for data collection was created and pilot tested. The results of this feasibility study are reported here. Methods. To validate the applicability of a user-friendly data collection tool, a feasibility study involving 17 Italian Radiation Oncology Centers was conducted from July to October 2021, generating a data repository of 335 BC patients treated between January and March 2020, with a minimum follow-up time of 6 months. A snapshot of the clinical presentation, treatment modalities and radiotherapy toxicity in these patients was obtained. A Data Entry Survey and a Satisfaction Questionnaire were also sent to all participants. Results. All institutions completed the pilot study. Regarding the Data Entry survey, all questions achieved 100% of responses and no participant reported spending more than 10 min time for either the first data entry or for the updating of follow-up. Results from the Satisfaction Questionnaire revealed that the project was described as excellent by 14 centers (82.3%) and good by 3 (17.7%). Conclusion. Current knowledge for the treatment of high-prevalence diseases, such as BC, has evolved toward patient-centered medicine, evidence-based care and real-world evidence (RWE), which means evidence obtained from real-world data (RWD). To this aim, Breast IRRADIATA was developed as a simple tool to probe the current pattern of RT care in Italy. The pilot feasibility of IRRADIATA encourages a larger application of this tool nationwide and opens the way to the assessment of the pattern of care radiotherapy directed to other cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonella Ciabattoni
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, 00135 Roma, Italy
| | - Fabiana Gregucci
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Generale Regionale “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy
- Correspondence: or
| | - Giuseppe D’Ermo
- Department of Surgery, “Pietro Valdoni”, Universitá di Roma “La Sapienza”, 00185 Roma, Italy
- LILT, Lega Italiana Contro i Tumori, Sede Centrale Via A. Torlonia, 15, 00161 Roma, Italy
| | - Alessandro Dolfi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, 00135 Roma, Italy
| | - Francesca Cucciarelli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, 61029 Ancona, Italy
| | - Isabella Palumbo
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Simona Borghesi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda USL Toscana Sud Est, Sede Operativa Valdarno, 52100 Arezzo Valdarno, Italy
| | - Alessandro Gava
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ULSS 9, 31100 Treviso, Italy
| | | | | | - Daniela Giammarino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, 00152 Roma, Italy
| | - Antonino Daidone
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Centro San Gaetano, Sede di Bagheria e Sede di Mazzara del Vallo, 35121 Palermo e Trapani, Italy
| | - Francesca Maurizi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, 61029 Pesaro, Italy
| | - Marcello Mignogna
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera USL Toscana Nord Ovest, 56121 Lucca, Italy
| | - Lidia Mazzuoli
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera ASL Viterbo, 01100 Viterbo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Ravo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Sara Falivene
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale, 80131 Napoli, Italy
| | - Sara Pedretti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, ASST Spedali Civili Brescia, 25123 Brescia, Italy
| | - Edy Ippolito
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico e Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | - Rosaria Barbarino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione PTV, Policlinico Tor Vergata, 75013 Roma, Italy
| | - Daniela di Cristino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale San Filippo Neri, ASL Roma 1, 00135 Roma, Italy
| | - Alba Fiorentino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ospedale Generale Regionale “F. Miulli”, Acquaviva delle Fonti, 70021 Bari, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, 06123 Perugia, Italy
| | - Sara Ramella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Università Campus Bio-Medico e Fondazione Campus Bio-Medico, 00128 Roma, Italy
| | | | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences “M. Serio”, Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology Unit, Ospedale Universitario Careggi, Universitá di Firenze, 50134 Firenze, Italy
| | - Cinzia Iotti
- Radiation Therapy Unit, Azienda USL—IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, 42122 Reggio Emilia, Italy
- AIRO President, AIRO-Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia ed Oncologia Clinica, Piazza della Repubblica 32, 20124 Milano, Italy
| | - Vittorio Donato
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini, 00152 Roma, Italy
- AIRO Past President, AIRO-Associazione Italiana di Radioterapia ed Oncologia Clinica, Piazza della Repubblica 32, 20124 Milano, Italy
| | - Silvia Chiara Formenti
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Weill Cornell Medicine—New York Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10065, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hypofractionation and Concomitant Boost in Ductal Carcinoma In Situ (DCIS): Analysis of a Prospective Case Series with Long-Term Follow-Up. LIFE (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 12:life12060889. [PMID: 35743920 PMCID: PMC9225308 DOI: 10.3390/life12060889] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2022] [Revised: 06/05/2022] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
We previously reported on a cohort of breast cancer patients affected with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) that were treated with breast conservative surgery and hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to the lumpectomy cavity. We now report on the long-term results of the oncological and toxicity outcomes, at a median follow-up of 11.2 years. We also include an analysis of the predictive factors for local recurrence (LR). Eighty-two patients with long-term observation were considered for this report. All received hypofractionated post-operative radiotherapy with a concomitant boost (45 Gy/20 fractions to the whole breast and 50 Gy/20 fractions to the lumpectomy cavity). We report on LC rates at 5 and 10 years, overall survival (OS), and breast-cancer-specific survival (BCSS), employing the Kaplan–Meier method. Cox proportional regression analysis was used to determine the role of selected clinical parameters on the risk of local recurrence, by the univariate and multivariate models. After a median follow-up of 11.2 years (range 5–15 years), 9 pts (11%) developed LR. The LR rates at 5 years and 10 years were 2.4% and 8.2%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year overall survival rates were 98.8% and 91.6%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year breast-cancer-specific survival rates were 100.0% and 99.0%. Late skin and subcutaneous toxicities were generally mild, and cosmetic results were good–excellent for most patients. For the univariate regression analysis, ER positive status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.021), PgR positive status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.012), and the aggregate data of positive hormonal status (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.021) were inversely correlated to LR risk. Conversely, a high tumor grade (G3) was directly correlated with the risk of LR (HR; 95% CI, p = 0.048). For the multivariate regression analysis, a high tumor grade (G3) confirmed its negative impact on LR (HR 0.40; 95% CI 0.19–0.75, p = 0.047). Our long-term data demonstrate hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy with a concomitant boost to be feasable, effective, and tolerable. Our experience suggests positive hormonal status to be protective with respect to LR risk. A high tumor grade is a risk factor for LR.
Collapse
|
6
|
Xie Y, Wang Q, Hu T, Chen R, Wang J, Chang H, Cheng J. Risk Factors Related to Acute Radiation Dermatitis in Breast Cancer Patients After Radiotherapy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:738851. [PMID: 34912704 PMCID: PMC8667470 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.738851] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Acute radiation dermatitis (ARD) is the most common acute response after adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer patients and negatively affects patients’ quality of life. Some studies have reported several risk factors that can predict breast cancer patients who are at a high risk of ARD. This study aimed to identify patient- and treatment-related risk factors associated with ARD. Methods PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang literature databases were searched for studies exploring the risk factors in breast cancer patients. The pooled effect sizes, relative risks (RRs), and 95% CIs were calculated using the random-effects model. Potential heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses by study design, ARD evaluation scale, and regions were also performed. Results A total of 38 studies composed of 15,623 breast cancer patients were included in the analysis. Of the seven available patient-related risk factors, four factors were significantly associated with ARD: body mass index (BMI) ≥25 kg/m2 (RR = 1.11, 95% CI = 1.06–1.16, I2 = 57.1%), large breast volume (RR = 1.02, 95% CI = 1.01–1.03, I2 = 93.2%), smoking habits (RR = 1.70, 95% CI = 1.24–2.34, I2 = 50.7%), and diabetes (RR = 2.24, 95% CI = 1.53–3.27, I2 = 0%). Of the seven treatment-related risk factors, we found that hypofractionated radiotherapy reduced the risk of ARD in patients with breast cancer compared with that in conventional fractionated radiotherapy (RR = 0.28, 95% CI = 0.19–0.43, I2 = 84.5%). Sequential boost and bolus use was significantly associated with ARD (boost, RR = 1.91, 95% CI = 1.34–2.72, I2 = 92.5%; bolus, RR = 1.94, 95% CI = 1.82–4.76, I2 = 23.8%). However, chemotherapy regimen (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.95–1.45, I2 = 57.2%), hormone therapy (RR = 1.35, 95% CI = 0.94–1.93, I2 = 77.1%), trastuzumab therapy (RR = 1.56, 95% CI = 0.18–1.76, I2 = 91.9%), and nodal irradiation (RR = 1.57, 95% CI = 0.98–2.53, I2 = 72.5%) were not correlated with ARD. Sensitivity analysis results showed that BMI was consistently associated with ARD, while smoking, breast volume, and boost administration were associated with ARD depending on study design, country of study, and toxicity evaluation scale used. Hypofractionation was consistently shown as protective. The differences between study design, toxicity evaluation scale, and regions might explain a little of the sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis indicated that BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2 was a significant predictor of ARD and that hypofractionation was consistently protective. Depending on country of study, study design, and toxicity scale used, breast volume, smoking habit, diabetes, and sequential boost and bolus use were also predictive of ARD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuxiu Xie
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Qiong Wang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Ting Hu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Renwang Chen
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jue Wang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Haiyan Chang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| | - Jing Cheng
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Borm KJ, Junker Y, Düsberg M, Devečka M, Münch S, Dapper H, Oechsner M, Combs SE. Impact of CBCT frequency on target coverage and dose to the organs at risk in adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy. Sci Rep 2021; 11:17378. [PMID: 34462489 PMCID: PMC8405651 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-96836-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 08/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The current study aims to assess the effect of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) frequency during adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) on target volume coverage and dose to the organs at risk (OAR). 50 breast cancer patients receiving either non-hypofractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy after lumpectomy including a SIB to the tumor bed were selected for this study. All patients were treated in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique and underwent daily CBCT imaging. In order to estimate the delivered dose during the treatment, the applied fraction doses were recalculated on daily CBCT scans and accumulated using deformable image registration. Based on a total of 2440 dose recalculations, dose coverage in the clinical target volumes (CTV) and OAR was compared depending on the CBCT frequency. The estimated delivered dose (V95%) for breast-CTV and SIB-CTV was significantly lower than the planned dose distribution, irrespective of the CBCT-frequency. Between daily CBCT and CBCT on alternate days, no significant dose differences were found regarding V95% for both, breast-CTV and SIB-CTV. Dose distribution in the OAR was similar for both imaging protocols. Weekly CBCT though led to a significant decrease in dose coverage compared to daily CBCT and a small but significant dose increase in most OAR. Daily CBCT imaging might not be necessary to ensure adequate dose coverage in the target volumes while efficiently sparing the OAR during adjuvant breast cancer radiotherapy with SIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kai J Borm
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.
| | - Yannis Junker
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Mathias Düsberg
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Michal Devečka
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stefan Münch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Hendrik Dapper
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Markus Oechsner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Klinikum Rechts Der Isar, Medical School, Technical University Munich, Ismaningerstraße 22, 81675, Munich, Germany.,Deutsches Konsortium Für Translationale Krebsforschung (DKTK)-Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtzzentrum München, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Breast boost vector: a new metric proposed to optimise isocentre location in an fIMRT–VMAT hybrid technique for a simultaneous integrated boost in breast radiotherapy. JOURNAL OF RADIOTHERAPY IN PRACTICE 2021. [DOI: 10.1017/s1460396920000242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AbstractPurpose:Evaluating the improvements of placing the treatment isocentre at the boost centre of mass (CoM) in a hybrid treatment for breast cancer radiotherapy.Material and methods:Twenty-two patients were planned in two isocentre locations with two forward intensity-modulated radiation therapy (fIMRT) tangentials to the breast and a volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to the boost. A simultaneous integrated boost technique was used. Breast Boost (BB) Vector was investigated as a criterion for selecting an appropriate isocentre placement. Various metrics for boost, breast and hybrid plans were analysed using analysis of variance statistics.Results:Comparing hybrid plans at the boost CoM vs. hybrid plans at the breast CoM, no significant differences were found. Analysis of relative variations of planning target volume (PTV) boost coverage vs. BB Vector indicated an upgrade in boost CoM isocentre strategy. Dose to organs at risk was comparable: V5Gy (26·24 vs. 25·69%, p = 0·8), V20Gy (14·66 vs. 14·58%, p = 0·959) and the mean dose (7·37 Gy vs. 7·26 Gy, p = 0·879) to ipsilateral lung; V5Gy (15·60 vs. 15·22%, p = 0·903), and the mean dose (4·91 Gy vs. 4·86 Gy, p = 0·950) to heart and dose to free breast of boost (46·71 Gy vs. 46·62 Gy, p = 0·408).Findings:The hybrid fIMRT–VMAT technique centred at the boost CoM resulted equivalent to plans centred at the breast CoM, while benefiting from an enhancement in PTV boost coverage for patients with BB Vector superior to 5.
Collapse
|
9
|
Meduri B, De Rose F, Cabula C, Castellano I, Da Ros L, Grassi MM, Orrù S, Puglisi F, Trimboli RM, Ciabattoni A. Hypofractionated breast irradiation: a multidisciplinary review of the Senonetwork study group. Med Oncol 2021; 38:67. [PMID: 33970358 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-021-01514-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2021] [Accepted: 04/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
The multidisciplinary management represents a crucial part of the care for cancer patients, resulting in better clinical and process outcomes, with evidence of improved survival among different cancer primary sites, including breast. According with international recommendations established by the European Society of Breast Cancer Specialists (EUSOMA), all breast-cancer patients have to be evaluated by a multidisciplinary team including radiologist, pathologist, surgeon, medical oncologist and radiation oncologist. Thus, variations in clinical practice of each specialty should be discussed and shared with all team members to guarantee a fruitful cooperation among the involved specialists. During the last decades, radiation treatment was deeply changed by the evidence-based adoption of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) as standard of treatment in patients with early-stage breast cancer undergoing conservative surgery. Moreover, mature randomized data have showed that partial breast irradiation (PBI) is an effective and safe alternative to whole breast irradiation in selected patients with low-risk early-stage breast cancer. Based on this background, we reviewed indications and critical issues of HFRT and PBI analyzing impact of their adoption from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiation Oncology Unit, Santa Chiara Hospital, Largo Medaglie d'oro 9, 38123, Trento, Italy.
| | - Carlo Cabula
- Oncologic Surgery, A. Businco Oncologic Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Isabella Castellano
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, "City of Health and Science University Hospital", University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Lucia Da Ros
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy
| | | | - Sandra Orrù
- Pathology Unit, P.O. Businco, Azienda Ospedaliera Brotzu, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Fabio Puglisi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano (CRO), IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.,Department of Medicine, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Rubina Manuela Trimboli
- Unit of Radiology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Via Morandi 30 San Donato Milanese, 20097, Milan, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kayali M, Jaoude JA, Ramia P, Assi H, Geara F, Poortmans P, Zeidan YH. Post-lumpectomy radiation therapy boost in breast cancer patients: evidence revisited. Ecancermedicalscience 2021; 15:1194. [PMID: 33889203 PMCID: PMC8043677 DOI: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.1194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation therapy is an integral part in the management of breast cancer after breast conservative surgery. In selected patients at high risk for local recurrence (LR), a boost radiation dose is commonly applied to the tumour bed. Methods We performed a review of the English literature using PubMed, Medline and Google Scholar for published manuscripts addressing the effect of boost radiation in breast cancer patients, focusing mainly on LR and overall survival (OS). Results A total of seven studies were included in our review. Most studies (6/7, 85.7%) showed a significant improvement in local control independent of age (hazard ratios ranging between 0.34 and 0.73), with the largest absolute benefit in younger patients. None of the studies, however, was able to demonstrate an improvement in OS. Conclusions With lack of sufficient studies addressing the role of boost radiation, individualised treatment decisions are recommended, taking into account the risk factors for LR, including tumour biology. Real-life data are sorely needed to better assess the role of tumour bed boost in the contemporary era.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majd Kayali
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon.,Co-first authors with equal contribution
| | - Joseph Abi Jaoude
- Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon.,Co-first authors with equal contribution
| | - Paul Ramia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Hazem Assi
- Department of Internal Medicine, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Fady Geara
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| | - Philip Poortmans
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris Sciences & Lettres, PSL University, Paris, France
| | - Youssef H Zeidan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, American University of Beirut Medical Center, Beirut, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Macchia G, Cilla S, Buwenge M, Zamagni A, Ammendolia I, Zamagni C, Frezza GP, Valentini V, Deodato F, Morganti AG. Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy with Concomitant Boost After Breast Conserving Surgery: A Phase I-II Trial. BREAST CANCER-TARGETS AND THERAPY 2020; 12:243-249. [PMID: 33209058 PMCID: PMC7670173 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s261587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose A concomitant boost (CB) in patients treated with postoperative radiotherapy after conservative surgery of invasive breast cancer (BC) has been suggested for treatment time reduction and therapy intensification. The aim of this analysis was to assess long-term tolerability of a CB in patients treated with postoperative intensity Modulated Accelerated RAdiotherapy (MARA). Patients and Methods In this phase I–II trial, 321 patients with intermediate-high risk BC (pT1-4 with at least one of the following characteristics: pre or perimenopausal status, pN2-3, positive or close margins) were enrolled. Patients were treated with forward-planned intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and CB. A total dose of 50 Gy (2 Gy/fraction) and 60 Gy (2.4 Gy/fraction) was prescribed to the whole breast and the tumor bed, respectively. The potential impact of hypertension, diabetes, smoking habit, alcohol consumption, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy on both skin and subcutaneous late toxicity-free survival (LTFS) was evaluated. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Median follow-up was 52 months (range: 3–115). Regional node irradiation, adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal therapy were prescribed to 29.3%, 65.4% and 81.0% of patients, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 skin LTFS were 95.6% and 100.0%, respectively. Five-year G2 and G3 subcutaneous LTFS were 80.0% and 98.6%, respectively. Only diabetes showed a significant correlation with worse G3 subcutaneous LTFS (p: 0.024). Five-year loco-regional control, metastasis-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival were 98.0%, 91.8%, 89.7% and 96.3%, respectively. Conclusion IMRT combined with CB was associated with a low risk of > G2 late toxicities (0.0% and 1.4% for skin and subcutaneous tissue, respectively). The cumulative actuarial incidence of local recurrences was 2.0% despite the exclusion of low-risk patients. Our results suggest that CB is safe and effective in patients with intermediate-high risk BC. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03471741.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabriella Macchia
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Savino Cilla
- Medical Physics Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Ilario Ammendolia
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudio Zamagni
- Addarii Medical Oncology Unit, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento di Scienze Radiologiche, Radioterapiche ed Ematologiche, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radioterapia, Rome, Italy.,Istituto di Radiologia, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Università Cattolica Del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology Center, Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine ‑ DIMES, University of Bologna, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ratosa I, Chirilă ME, Steinacher M, Kozma E, Vojtíšek R, Franco P, Poortmans P. Hypofractionated radiation therapy for breast cancer: Preferences amongst radiation oncologists in Europe - Results from an international survey. Radiother Oncol 2020; 155:17-26. [PMID: 33065187 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2020.10.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2020] [Revised: 09/24/2020] [Accepted: 10/05/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE We aimed to assess the prescription preference about hypofractionated radiation therapy (HFRT) for breast cancer (BC) patients amongst radiation oncologists (ROs) practicing in Europe and to identify restraints on HFRT utilisation. MATERIALS AND METHODS An online survey was circulated amongst ROs in Europe through personal, RO and BC societies' networks, from October 2019 to March 2020. The statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, chi-squared testing, and logistic regression analysis. RESULTS We received 412 responses from 44 countries. HFRT was chosen as the preferred schedule for whole breast irradiation (WBI) by 54.7% and for WBI with regional nodes irradiation (RNI) by 28.7% of the responding ROs. In the case of postmastectomy RT with or without reconstruction, HFRT was preferred by 21.1% and 29.6%, respectively. Overall, 69.2% of the responding ROs selected at least one factor influencing the decision to utilise HFRT, the most frequent of which included age (51.4%), RNI (46.9%), internal mammary lymph nodes irradiation (39.7%), BC stage (33.5%) and implant-based breast reconstruction (31.6%). ROs working in academic centres (odds ratio, (OR), 1.7; 95% confidence interval, (CI); 1.1-2.6, p = 0.019), practicing in Western Europe (OR, 4.2; 95%CI; 2.7-6.6, p < 0.0005) and/or dedicating >50% of clinical time to BC patients (OR, 2.5; 95%CI; 1.5-4.2, p = 0.001) more likely preferred HFRT. CONCLUSION Although HFRT is recognised as a new standard, its implementation in routine RT clinical practice across Europe varies for numerous reasons. Better dissemination of evidence-based recommendations is advised to improve the level of awareness about this clinical indication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivica Ratosa
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Slovenia; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia.
| | | | | | - Elvisa Kozma
- Oncology Service, University Hospital, Tirana, Albania
| | - Radovan Vojtíšek
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, University Hospital in Pilsen, Czech Republic
| | | | - Philip Poortmans
- Iridium Kankernetwerk, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium; University of Antwerp, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Wilrijk-Antwerp, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Lee HH, Chen CH, Luo KH, Chuang HY, Huang CJ, Cheng YK, Chen F, Kuo SH, Huang MY. Five-year survival outcomes of intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) using forward IMRT or Tomotherapy for breast cancer. Sci Rep 2020; 10:4342. [PMID: 32152428 PMCID: PMC7063050 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-61403-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 02/24/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Intensity-modulated radiotherapy with simultaneous integrated boost (IMRT-SIB) reduces overall treatment duration and results in less radiotherapy (RT)-induced dermatitis. However, the use of traditional sequential approach or IMRT-SIB is still under debate since there is not enough evidence of long-term clinical outcomes. The present study investigated 216 patients who underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) between 2010 and 2013. The median age was 51 years (range, 21-81 years). All patients received IMRT-SIB, 50.4 Gy at 1.8 Gy per fraction to the whole breast and 60.2 Gy at 2.15 Gy per fraction to the tumor bed by integral boost. Among 216 patients, 175 patients received post-operative RT with forward IMRT and 41 patients had Tomotherapy. The median follow-up was 6.4 years. Forty patients (97.6%) in the Tomotherapy arm and 147 patients (84%) in the IMRT arm developed grade 0-1 skin toxicity (P = 0.021). For the entire cohort, the 5-year and 7-year overall survival (OS) rates were 94.4% and 93.1% respectively. The 7-year distant metastasis-free survival rates were 100% vs 89.1% in the Tomotherapy and IMRT arm respectively (P = 0.028). In conclusion, Tomotherapy improved acute skin toxicity compared with forward IMRT-SIB. Chronic skin complication was 1.9%. IMRT-SIB resulted in good long-term survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hsin-Hua Lee
- Ph.D. Program in Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University and National Health Research Institutes, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hung Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Kuei-Hau Luo
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Hung-Yi Chuang
- Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Jen Huang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Yuan-Kai Cheng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Frank Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Shih-Hsun Kuo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yii Huang
- Ph.D. Program in Environmental and Occupational Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University and National Health Research Institutes, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Graduate Institute of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Center for Biomarkers and Biotech Drugs, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan. .,Center for Cancer Research, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Franco P, De Rose F, De Santis MC, Pasinetti N, Lancellotta V, Meduri B, Meattini I. Omission of postoperative radiation after breast conserving surgery: A progressive paradigm shift towards precision medicine. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2020; 21:112-119. [PMID: 32090175 PMCID: PMC7025960 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2020.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2019] [Revised: 02/02/2020] [Accepted: 02/02/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Post-operative radiotherapy is standard after breast conservation in early breast cancer. To de-escalate the treatment burden, indentifying a subset at very low risk of relapse is crucial. Clinical and pathological factors are important, but can be integrated with genomic signatures. Ongoing trials will provide evidence on patients at low risk for radiotherapy omission.
Radiation therapy is a standard therapeutic option in the post-operative setting for early breast cancer patients after breast conserving surgery, providing a substantial benefit in reducing the risk of local relapse with a consequent survival gain. Nevertheless, the reduction in the burden related to treatment is becoming crucial in modern oncology for both local and systemic therapies and investigational efforts are being put forward by radiations oncologists to identify a subset of women at very low risk to be potentially omitted from post-operative irradiation after breast conservation. Clinical factors, classical pathological parameters and new predictive scores derived from gene expression and next generation sequencing techniques are being integrated in the quest toward a reliable low-risk profile for breast cancer patients. We herein provide a comprehensive overview on the topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Italy.,Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Cancer Center and Research Hospital, Rozzano, Italy
| | | | - Nadia Pasinetti
- Radiation Oncology Department, University of Brescia and Spedali Civili, Brescia, Italy
| | - Valentina Lancellotta
- Radiation Oncology Department, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario 'A. Gemelli' IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Bruno Meduri
- Radiation Oncology Unit, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Icro Meattini
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Biomedical Sciences "M. Serio", University of Florence, Florence, Italy.,Radiation Oncology Unit - Oncology Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Franco P, Bartoncini S, Martini S, Iorio GC, Ricardi U. Do hypofraction and large breast size reciprocally fit in breast cancer radiotherapy? ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2019; 7:S146. [PMID: 31576353 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2019.06.26] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Bartoncini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Stefania Martini
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Turin School of Medicine, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy delivered with helical tomotherapy under daily image guidance for rectal cancer patients: efficacy and safety in a large, multi-institutional series. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2019; 145:1075-1084. [PMID: 30830296 PMCID: PMC6584215 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-019-02881-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2019] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Helical tomotherapy (HT) has been recently introduced in the neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced rectal cancer. Aim of this study is to report the toxicity and local control rates of a large series of locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HT under daily image guidance followed by surgery. Methods Data from 117 locally advanced rectal cancer patients treated at two Swiss Radiotherapy departments were collected and analyzed. Radiotherapy consisted of 45 Gy (1.8 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week delivered in 5 weeks) to the regional pelvic lymph nodes. Seventy patients also received a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) up to 50 Gy to the tumor and involved nodes (2 Gy/fraction, 5 fractions/week delivered in 5 weeks). Chemotherapy consisted of capecitabine 825 mg/m2, twice daily, during the irradiation days. After a median interval of 59 days [95% confidence interval (CI) 53–65 days), all patients underwent surgery. Results Median follow-up was 45 months (range 4–90 months). The overall rate of acute grade 2–4 toxicity was 18.8% (n = 22). Four patients (3.4%) presented a grade 3 dermatitis (n = 1) or diarrhea (n = 3), and 1 (0.8%) demonstrated grade 4 rectal toxicity. No patients presented with grade ≥ 3 hematologic toxicity. Six patients (5.1%) had late grade 3 gastrointestinal toxicity. The 4-year local control rate was 88.4% (95% CI 87.5–88.5%). Conclusions Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy delivered with HT under daily image guidance is well tolerated and shows a high 4-year local control rates.
Collapse
|
17
|
Dewan A, Chufal KS, Dewan AK, Pahuja A, Mehrotra K, Singh R, Chaudhary RL, Suresh T, Mishra M, Sundari AV, Bommera S, Narang R, Pathak P, Mitra S, Sharma SK, Gairola M. Simultaneous integrated boost by Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (SIB-IMRT) in patients undergoing breast conserving surgery – A clinical and dosimetric perspective. J Egypt Natl Canc Inst 2018; 30:165-171. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jnci.2018.10.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2018] [Revised: 10/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/17/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
|
18
|
Predictors for poor cosmetic outcome in patients with early stage breast cancer treated with breast conserving therapy: Results of the Young boost trial. Radiother Oncol 2018; 128:434-441. [DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2018.06.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2018] [Revised: 05/27/2018] [Accepted: 06/12/2018] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
|
19
|
Franco P, Iorio GC, Bartoncini S, Airoldi M, De Sanctis C, Castellano I, Ricardi U. De-escalation of breast radiotherapy after conserving surgery in low-risk early breast cancer patients. Med Oncol 2018; 35:62. [PMID: 29616366 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-018-1121-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2018] [Accepted: 03/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The reduction in the burden related to treatment is becoming more and more important in modern oncology. Radiation therapy is a mainstay option in the postoperative setting for early breast cancer patients after breast-conserving surgery. Nowadays, different options are available to de-escalate radiotherapy in this scenario such as the use of hypofractionated whole-breast radiation, the selective delivery of the boost dose to the lumpectomy cavity, the introduction of accelerated partial breast irradiation and the omission of treatment in appropriately selected patients with low-risk features. We herein provide a review article on this topic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierfrancesco Franco
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Giuseppe Carlo Iorio
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Sara Bartoncini
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Citta' della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Mario Airoldi
- Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Corrado De Sanctis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Unit, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Isabella Castellano
- Department of Oncology, Medical Oncology 2, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy
| | - Umberto Ricardi
- Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver nodal irradiation in breast cancer patients. Med Oncol 2017; 35:1. [PMID: 29209826 DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1061-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2017] [Accepted: 11/21/2017] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
To evaluate feasibility, safety, toxicity profile and dosimetric results of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) to deliver regional nodal irradiation (RNI) after either mastectomy or breast conservation (BCS) in high-risk breast cancer patients. Between January 2015 and January 2017, a total of 45 patients were treated with VMAT to deliver RNI together with whole breast or post-mastectomy radiotherapy. The fractionation schedule comprised 50 Gy in 25 fractions given to supraclavicular and axillary apex nodes and to whole breast (after BCS) or chest wall (after mastectomy). Two opposite 50°-60° width arcs were employed for breast ad chest wall irradiation, while a single VMAT arc was used for nodal treatment. Treatment was generally well tolerated. Acute skin toxicity was G2 in 13.3% of patients. Late skin toxicity consisted of G1 induration/fibrosis in six patients (13.3%) and G2 in 1 (2.2%). Dosimetric results were consistent in terms of both target coverage and normal tissue sparing. In conclusion, VMAT proved to be a feasible, safe and effective strategy to deliver RNI in breast cancer patients after either BCS or mastectomy with promising dosimetric results and a mild toxicity profile.
Collapse
|
21
|
Cante D, Petrucci E, Sciacero P, Piva C, Ferrario S, Bagnera S, Patania S, Mondini G, Pasquino M, Casanova Borca V, Vellani G, La Porta MR, Franco P. Ten-year results of accelerated hypofractionated adjuvant whole-breast radiation with concomitant boost to the lumpectomy cavity after conserving surgery for early breast cancer. Med Oncol 2017; 34:152. [DOI: 10.1007/s12032-017-1020-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2017] [Accepted: 07/31/2017] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
22
|
Abstract
Breast cancer is one of the three most common cancers worldwide. Early breast cancer is considered potentially curable. Therapy has progressed substantially over the past years with a reduction in therapy intensity, both for locoregional and systemic therapy; avoiding overtreatment but also undertreatment has become a major focus. Therapy concepts follow a curative intent and need to be decided in a multidisciplinary setting, taking molecular subtype and locoregional tumour load into account. Primary conventional surgery is not the optimal choice for all patients any more. In triple-negative and HER2-positive early breast cancer, neoadjuvant therapy has become a commonly used option. Depending on clinical tumour subtype, therapeutic backbones include endocrine therapy, anti-HER2 targeting, and chemotherapy. In metastatic breast cancer, therapy goals are prolongation of survival and maintaining quality of life. Advances in endocrine therapies and combinations, as well as targeting of HER2, and the promise of newer targeted therapies make the prospect of long-term disease control in metastatic breast cancer an increasing reality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
| | - Michael Gnant
- Department of Surgery and Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
De Rose F, Fogliata A, Franceschini D, Navarria P, Villa E, Iftode C, D'Agostino G, Cozzi L, Lobefalo F, Mancosu P, Tomatis S, Scorsetti M. Phase II trial of hypofractionated VMAT-based treatment for early stage breast cancer: 2-year toxicity and clinical results. Radiat Oncol 2016; 11:120. [PMID: 27639373 PMCID: PMC5027088 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-016-0701-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2016] [Accepted: 09/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Background To report toxicity and early clinical outcomes of hypofractionated simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) as adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery. Methods Patients presenting early-stage breast cancer were enrolled in a phase II trial. Eligibility criteria: age > 18 years old, invasive cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), Stage I-II (T < 3 cm and N ≤ 3), breast-conserving surgery without oncoplastic reconstruction. Any systemic therapy was allowed in neoadjuvant or adjuvant setting. All patients underwent VMAT-SIB technique to irradiate the whole breast and the tumor bed. Doses to whole breast and surgical bed were 40.5 Gy and 48 Gy, respectively, delivered in 15 fractions over 3 weeks. Acute and late skin toxicities were recorded. Cosmetic outcome was assessed as excellent/good or fair/poor. Results The present study focused on results of a cohort of 144 patients with a minimum follow-up of 24 months (median 37, range 24–55 months). Median age was 62 years old (range 30–88). All patients had an invasive carcinoma (no patients with DCIS were present in this subset). At one year, the highest reported skin toxicity was G1, in 14 % of the patients; this data dropped to 4 % at the last follow-up, after more than 2 years. Breast pain was recorded in 21.6 % of the patients 6 months after treatment, while it was present in 3.5 % of the patients at the last follow-up, showing a significant improvement with time. Correlation between liponecrosis and boost target volume was found not significant. Breast pain was correlated with breast volume. No pulmonary or cardiological toxicities were recorded. After an early evaluation of clinical outcomes, only one case presented disease relapse, as liver metastases. Conclusions The 3-week VMAT-SIB course as adjuvant treatment after breast-conserving surgery showed to be well tolerated and was associated with optimal local control. Long-term follow-up data are needed to assess late toxicity and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fiorenza De Rose
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Antonella Fogliata
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.
| | - Davide Franceschini
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Piera Navarria
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Elisa Villa
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Cristina Iftode
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe D'Agostino
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Luca Cozzi
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Francesca Lobefalo
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Pietro Mancosu
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Stefano Tomatis
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan-Rozzano, Italy.,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan-Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Arcadipane F, Franco P, De Colle C, Rondi N, Di Muzio J, Pelle E, Martini S, Ala A, Airoldi M, Donadio M, De Sanctis C, Castellano I, Ragona R, Ricardi U. Hypofractionation with no boost after breast conservation in early-stage breast cancer patients. Med Oncol 2016; 33:108. [DOI: 10.1007/s12032-016-0821-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2016] [Accepted: 08/13/2016] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
|
25
|
Hamilton DG, Bale R, Jones C, Fitzgerald E, Khor R, Knight K, Wasiak J. Impact of tumour bed boost integration on acute and late toxicity in patients with breast cancer: A systematic review. Breast 2016; 27:126-35. [PMID: 27113229 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2016.03.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2015] [Revised: 02/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/11/2016] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The purpose of this systematic review was to summarise the evidence from studies investigating the integration of tumour bed boosts into whole breast irradiation for patients with Stage 0-III breast cancer, with a focus on its impact on acute and late toxicities. A comprehensive systematic electronic search through the Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE and PubMed databases from January 2000 to January 2015 was conducted. Studies were considered eligible if they investigated the efficacy of hypo- or normofractionated whole breast irradiation with the inclusion of a daily concurrent boost. The primary outcomes of interest were the degree of observed acute and late toxicity following radiotherapy treatment. Methodological quality assessment was performed on all included studies using either the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale or a previously published investigator-derived quality instrument. The search identified 35 articles, of which 17 satisfied our eligibility criteria. Thirteen and eleven studies reported on acute and late toxicities respectively. Grade 3 acute skin toxicity ranged from 1 to 7% whilst moderate to severe fibrosis and telangiectasia were both limited to 9%. Reported toxicity profiles were comparable to historical data at similar time-points. Studies investigating the delivery of concurrent boosts with whole breast radiotherapy courses report safe short to medium-term toxicity profiles and cosmesis rates. Whilst the quality of evidence and length of follow-up supporting these findings is low, sufficient evidence has been generated to consider concurrent boost techniques as an alternative to conventional sequential techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel George Hamilton
- Epworth Radiation Oncology Research Centre, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia; Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia.
| | | | - Claire Jones
- Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Emma Fitzgerald
- Epworth Radiation Oncology, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Richard Khor
- Austin Health, Austin Hospital, 145 Studley Road, Heidelberg VIC 3121, Australia
| | - Kellie Knight
- Department of Medical Imaging & Radiation Sciences, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Jason Wasiak
- Epworth Radiation Oncology Research Centre, Epworth Richmond, 32 Erin St, Richmond VIC 3121, Australia; School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy and Concomitant Boost after Breast Conservation in Elderly Patients. TUMORI JOURNAL 2015; 102:196-202. [DOI: 10.5301/tj.5000402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/29/2015] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Aims To report the 5- and 10-year results of accelerated hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy (WBRT) with concomitant boost to the tumor bed in 83 consecutive patients with early breast cancer aged >70 years. Methods All patients were treated with breast conservation and hypofractionated WBRT. The prescription dose to the whole breast was 45 Gy (2.25 Gy/20 fractions) with an additional daily concomitant boost of 0.25 Gy to the surgical cavity (2.5 Gy/20 fractions up to 50 Gy). The maximum detected toxicity was scored according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 3.0. We considered as skin toxicity: erythema, edema, desquamation, ulceration, hemorrhage, necrosis, telangiectasia, fibrosis-induration, hyperpigmentation, retraction and atrophy. Cosmetic results were assessed as set by the Harvard criteria. Results With a median follow-up of 60 months (range 36-88), no local recurrence was observed. The maximum detected acute skin toxicity was G0 in 57% of patients, G1 in 40% and G2 in 3%. Late skin and subcutaneous toxicity was generally mild with no ≥G3 events. The cosmetic results were excellent in 69% of patients, good in 22%, fair in 5%, and poor in 4%. Conclusions The present results support the use of hypofractionation employing a concomitant boost to the lumpectomy cavity in women aged >70 years. This is a convenient treatment option for both this type of population and health-care providers.
Collapse
|
27
|
Rovea P, Fozza A, Franco P, De Colle C, Cannizzaro A, Di Dio A, De Monte F, Rosmino C, Filippi AR, Ragona R, Ricardi U. Once-Weekly Hypofractionated Whole-Breast Radiotherapy After Breast-Conserving Surgery in Older Patients: A Potential Alternative Treatment Schedule to Daily 3-Week Hypofractionation. Clin Breast Cancer 2015; 15:270-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clbc.2014.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2014] [Revised: 12/30/2014] [Accepted: 12/31/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
28
|
Fiorentino A, Mazzola R, Ricchetti F, Giaj Levra N, Fersino S, Naccarato S, Sicignano G, Ruggieri R, Di Paola G, Massocco A, Gori S, Alongi F. Intensity modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost in early breast cancer irradiation. Report of feasibility and preliminary toxicity. Cancer Radiother 2015. [PMID: 26206732 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2015.02.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the feasibility and tolerance in the use of adjuvant intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) and simultaneous integrated boost in patients with a diagnosis of breast cancer after breast-conserving surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between September 2011 to February 2013, 112 women with a diagnosis of early breast cancer (T1-2, N0-1, M0) were treated with IMRT and simultaneous integrated boost after breast-conserving surgery in our institution. A dose of 50Gy in 25 fractions was prescribed to the whole breast and an additional dose of radiation was prescribed on the tumour bed. A dose prescription of 60Gy in 25 fractions to the tumour bed was used in patients with negative margins after surgery, whereas if the margins were close (<1mm) or positive (without a new surgical resection) a dose of 64Gy was prescribed. All patients were followed with periodic clinical evaluation. Acute and late toxicity were scored using the EORTC/RTOG radiation morbidity score system. Both patient and physician recorded cosmetic outcome evaluation with a subjective judgment scale at the time of scheduled follow-up. RESULTS The median follow-up was 28 months (range 24-40 months). The acute skin grade toxicity during the treatment was grade 0 in 8 patients (7%), grade 1 in 80 (72%), grade 2 in 24 cases (21%). No grade 3 or higher acute skin toxicity was observed. At 12 months, skin toxicity was grade 0 in 78 patients (70%), grade 1 in 34 patients (30%). No toxicity grade 2 or higher was registered. At 24 months, skin toxicity was grade 0 in 79 patients (71%), grade 1 in 33 patients (29%). No case of grade 2 toxicity or higher was registered. The pretreatment variables correlated with skin grade 2 acute toxicity were adjuvant chemotherapy (P=0.01) and breast volume ≥700cm(3) (P=0.001). Patients with an acute skin toxicity grade 2 had a higher probability to develop late skin toxicity (P<0.0001). In the 98% of cases, patients were judged to have a good or excellent cosmetic outcome. The 2-year-overall survival and 2-year-local control were 100%. CONCLUSION These data support the feasibility and safety of IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost in patients with a diagnosis of early breast cancer following breast-conserving surgery with acceptable acute and late treatment-related toxicity. A longer follow-up is needed to define the efficacy on outcomes.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Adult
- Aged
- Aged, 80 and over
- Breast Neoplasms/mortality
- Breast Neoplasms/pathology
- Breast Neoplasms/therapy
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/mortality
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/pathology
- Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast/therapy
- Carcinoma, Lobular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Lobular/pathology
- Carcinoma, Lobular/therapy
- Esthetics
- Feasibility Studies
- Female
- Follow-Up Studies
- Humans
- Mastectomy, Segmental
- Middle Aged
- Radiodermatitis/etiology
- Radiotherapy Dosage
- Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
- Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
- Severity of Illness Index
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Fiorentino
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - R Mazzola
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy; Radiation oncology school, university of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.
| | - F Ricchetti
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - N Giaj Levra
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - S Fersino
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - S Naccarato
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - G Sicignano
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - R Ruggieri
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - G Di Paola
- Statistic science faculty, university of Palermo, Palermo, Italy
| | - A Massocco
- Breast surgery, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - S Gori
- Medical oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| | - F Alongi
- Radiation oncology, Sacro Cuore-Don Calabria hospital, Negrar, Verona, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Franco P, Mistrangelo M, Arcadipane F, Munoz F, Sciacero P, Spadi R, Migliaccio F, Angelini V, Bombaci S, Rondi N, Numico G, Ragona R, Cassoni P, Morino M, Racca P, Ricardi U. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with simultaneous integrated boost combined with concurrent chemotherapy for the treatment of anal cancer patients: 4-year results of a consecutive case series. Cancer Invest 2015; 33:259-66. [PMID: 25950188 DOI: 10.3109/07357907.2015.1028586] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To report the 4-year outcomes of a consecutive series of anal cancer patients treated with concurrent chemo-radiation delivered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), employing a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) approach. METHODS A consecutive series of 54 patients was enrolled between 2007 and 2013. Treatment schedule consisted of 50.4 Gy/28 fractions (1.8 Gy daily) to the gross tumor volume, while the elective nodal volumes were prescribed 42 Gy/28 fractions (1.5 Gy/daily) for patients having a cT2N0 disease. Patients with cT3-T4/N0-N3 tumors were prescribed 54 (T3) or 60 (T4) Gy/30 fractions (1.8-2 Gy daily) to the gross tumor volume; gross nodal volumes were prescribed 50.4 Gy/30 fr (1.68 Gy daily) if sized ≤ 3 cm or 54 Gy/30 fr (1.8 Gy daily) if > 3 cm; elective nodal regions were given 45 Gy/30 fractions (1.5 Gy daily). Chemotherapy was administered concurrently according to the Nigro's regimen. Primary endpoint was colostomy-free survival (CFS). Secondary endpoints were local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity profile. RESULTS Median follow up was 32.6 months (range 12-84). The actuarial probability of being alive at 4 years without a colostomy (CFS) was 68.9% (95% CI: 50.3%-84.7%). Actuarial 4-year OS, CSS, DFS, and LC were 77.7% (95% CI: 60.7-88.1%), 81.5% (95% CI: 64%-91%), 65.5% (95% CI: 47.7%-78.5%), and 84.6% (95% CI: 71.6%-92%). Actuarial 4-year metastasis-free survival was 74.4% (95% CI: 55.5%-86.2%). Maximum detected acute toxicities were as follows: dermatologic -G3: 13%; GI-G3: 8%; GU-G3: 2%; anemia-G3: 2%; neutropenia-G3:11%; G4: 2%; thrombocytopenia- G3:2%. Four-year G2 chronic toxicity rates were 2.5% (95% CI: 3.6-16.4) for GU, 14.4% (95% CI: 7.1-28) for GI, 3.9% (95% CI: 1%-14.5%) for skin, and 4.2% (95% CI: 1.1-15.9) for genitalia. CONCLUSIONS Our study shows the feasibility of IMRT in the combined modality treatment of anal cancer, with comparable results to the literature with respect to LC, sphincter preservation and survival. Acute toxicity is lower if compared to series employing standard techniques. Our results support the use of IMRT on a routine basis for the treatment of anal cancer.
Collapse
|