A pilot study of selective lipopolysaccharide adsorption and coupled plasma filtration and adsorption in adult patients with severe sepsis

Sequential Extracorporeal Blood Purification Is Associated with Prolonged Survival among ICU Patients with COVID-19 and Confirmed Bacterial Superinfection

INTRODUCTION

This study investigates the impact of sequential extracorporeal treatments with oXiris® or CytoSorb® plus Seraph-100® on the clinical and laboratory parameters of critically ill COVID-19 patients with bacterial superinfection.

METHODS

Patients admitted to the intensive care unit with COVID-19, bacterial superinfection, and undergoing blood purification (BP) were enrolled in this prospective, single-center, observational study. "standard BP" with oXiris® or CytoSorb® were used in 35 COVID-19 patients with bacterial infection. Seraph-100® was added in 33 patients when available serially in the same oXiris® circuit or as sequential treatment with CytoSorb® as a sequential BP.

RESULTS

A significant reduction in SOFA score 3 days after treatment was observed in patients undergoing sequential BP (11.3 vs. 8.17, p < 0.01) compared to those undergoing "standard BP" (11.0 vs. 10.3, p > 0.05). The difference between the observed and expected mortality rate based on APACHE IV was greater in the sequential BP group (42.4% vs. 81.7%, p < 0.001) than the "standard BP" (74.2% vs. 81.7%, p > 0.05). Patients treated with sequential BP had a longer survival than those treated with "standard BP" (22.4 vs. 18.7 months; p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The sequential approach may enhance the positive effect of BP on organ dysfunction among critically ill patients with COVID-19 and bacterial superinfection.

Blood purification in sepsis and COVID-19: what´s new in cytokine and endotoxin hemoadsorption

Sepsis and COVID-19 are two clinical conditions that can lead to a dysregulated inflammatory state causing multiorgan dysfunction, hypercytokinemia, and a high risk of death. Specific subgroups of critically ill patients with particular characteristics could benefit from rescue treatment with hemoadsorption. There is a lack of adequately designed randomized controlled trials evaluating the potential benefits of cytokine or endotoxin hemoadsorption. Critically ill COVID-19 patients with severe acute respiratory failure poorly responsive to conventional treatment could be candidates to receive cytokine hemoadsorption in the presence of high levels of interleukin 6. This treatment can also be suitable for patients with refractory septic shock and hypercytokinemia. In the context of high endotoxin activity, hemoadsorption with polymyxin B could improve clinical parameters and the prognosis of patients with refractory septic shock. Predictive enrichment, using biomarkers or other individual features, identifies potential responders to cytokine, endotoxin, or sequential hemoadsorption. Besides, recognizing the particular subsets of patients likely to respond to one or both types of hemoadsorption will aid the design of future studies that accurately validate the effectiveness of these therapies.

Evaluation of volemic status during combined extracorporeal detoxification in patients with severe acute pancreatitis: a retrospective observational study

INTRODUCTION: The morbidity and mortality of severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) remains high. Intensive therapy aimed at stopping hypovolemia, systemic endotoxicosis is a debatable problem. OBJECTIVE: Improving treatment results in patients with SAP by assessing the dynamics of volumetric criteria and the degree of fluid therapy (FT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 25 patients. First, study group of 9 patient, used standard therapy in conjunction with selective hemoperfusion and continuous veno-venous hemofiltration. Second, control group of 16 patients, who received standard intensive care. FT in the groups was 2.5–3.5 ml/kg/h. Volemic parameters were measured by transpulmonary thermodilution. The central venous pressure and the diameter of the vena cava inferior were assessed. Comparative analysis was performed between two groups. RESULTS: FT in the amount of 58.7 (52.4–59.4) ml/kg/day in group 1, and 58.3 (54.2–61.4) ml/kg/day in group 2 in the first day, up to 83.9 (72.4–86.1) and 79.3 (72.4–84.1) ml/kg/day, was observed by day 3 (p < 0.05), according to the results of transpulmonary thermodilution. From the 1st to the 3rd day, Global end-diastolic volume index increased from 345 (328–412) to 648 (590–690) ml/m2 in group 1, and from 375 (348–413) to 654 (599–701) ml/m2 in group 2 (p < 0.05). Intrathoracic blood volume index increased from 440 (420–510) to 780 (750–40) ml/m2 in group 1 and 430 (417.5–465) to 750 (665–780) ml/m2 in group 2 (p < 0.05). Extravascular lung water index and pulmonary vascular permeability index by 5 days in group 2 increased by 1.8 — 11 (10.5–11.8) and 2.2 times — 6.5 (5.75–7), respectively (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FT 3.5 ml/kg/h, reaches isovolemia by the 3rd day of therapy. The use of extracorporeal detoxification methods in complex therapy is accompanied by an improvement in clinical and laboratory parameters.

Coupled plasma filtration adsorption for the treatment of sepsis or septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) for the treatment of sepsis or septic shock is controversial. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the impact of CPFA on all-cause mortality in patients with sepsis or septic shock.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies from inception to the 1st of May 2022. We included studies involving patients (˃ 14 years) with sepsis or septic shock. All authors reported our primary outcome of all-cause mortality (hospital mortality, 28-day mortality or 30-day mortality). Results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with accompanying 95% confidence interval (CI).

RESULTS

Six studies including 537 patients were included. The primary outcome of this meta-analysis showed that the all-cause mortality was about 54.2% (119/243 in the CPFA group and 172/294 in the control group). There was no statistically significant difference in the all-cause mortality between two groups (odds ratio [OR] = 0.75; 95% CI 0.53 to 1.06; P = 0.11; Chi² = 14.04; I² = 64%).

CONCLUSIONS

The treatment of CPFA failed to decrease all-cause mortality of sepsis or septic shock patients. Further large-scale randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the ability of this therapy to improve clinical outcomes are still required to confirm these results.

Renal Replacement Techniques in Septic Shock

Sepsis is defined as a life-threatening organ dysfunction caused by a dysregulated host response to an infection; it carries a risk for mortality, considerably exceeding that of a mere infection. Sepsis is the leading cause for acute kidney injury (AKI) and the requirement for renal replacement therapy (RRT) in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Almost every second critically ill patient with sepsis will develop AKI. In septic shock, the dysregulated host response to infectious pathogens leads to a cytokine storm with uncontrolled production and release of humoral proinflammatory mediators that evoke cellular toxicity and promote the development of organ dysfunction and increased mortality. In addition to treating AKI, RRT techniques can be employed for extracorporeal adsorption of inflammatory mediators using specifically developed adsorption membranes, hemoperfusion sorbent cartridges or columns; these techniques are intended to decrease the level and early deleterious effects of circulating proinflammatory cytokines and endotoxins during the first hours and days of septic shock treatment, in order to improve patient outcomes. Several methods and devices, such as high cut-off membranes, the Oxiris®-AN69 membrane, CytoSorb® and HA380 cytokine hemoadsorption, polymyxin B endotoxin adsorption, and plasmapheresis have been examined in small study series or are under evaluation as ways of improving patient outcomes in septic shock. However, to date, the data on actual outcome benefits have remained controversial, as discussed in this review.

Endotoxin and Cytokine Sequential Hemoadsorption in Septic Shock and Multi-Organ Failure

The mortality of septic shock remains high [Ann Intensive Care. 2017;7:19], so apart from usual therapy based on source control and antibiotics, some patients may need rescue therapies. Blood purification systems may play a role by facilitating the nonspecific removal of inflammatory mediators and microbiological toxins. There are different hemoadsorption systems, we describe in this case report the sequential use of Polymyxin B (PMX) endotoxin-adsorbing column (Toraymixin PMX-20R; Toray, Tokyo, Japan) and Cytosorb® (Cytosorbents Corp., New Jersey, USA).

Hemofiltration in Patients with Severe Acute Pancreatitis (Review)

Questions regarding the application of extracorporeal detoxification to patients with severe acute pancreatitis have been considered. Hemodialysis, the historically first method of extracorporeal detoxification for such patients, has been also described in the review. Appropriateness of using renal replacement therapy methods and among them continued renal replacement therapy has been shown. Hemofiltration and hemodiafiltration technologies are described in detail including different modes of their application and the possibility of using various types of filters. Available data on hemofiltration for patients with severe acute pancreatitis have been analyzed. Great attention is paid to the unsolved aspects of hemofiltration in severe acute pancreatitis such as determining renal and extrarenal indices; time of starting hemofiltration; selection of volume replacement modes and a buffer system; procedure duration; anticoagulation measures, defining criteria to assess the adequacy of hemofiltration, state severity, and organ dysfunction degree. Further multicenter investigations are necessary to be able to assess the efficacy of the hemofiltration procedures on the basis of the thoroughly worked out and pathogenically grounded protocol using adequate control methods taking into consideration endogenic intoxication phases and intensity of the multiple organ failure syndrome.

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion as a feasible therapy after source control in abdominal septic shock

BACKGROUND

Polymyxin B hemoperfusion (PMX-HP) has been used as a treatment for intra-abdominal septic shock by absorbing and removing endotoxins of gram-negative bacilli.

AIM

To investigate the clinical efficacy of PMX-HP in patients with gram-negative septic shock who underwent abdominal surgery.

METHODS

From January 2012 to December 2018, patients who had septic shock secondary to peritonitis were enrolled. They were classified into PMX-HP treated and control groups based on postopreative intervention using PMX-HP. The clinical outcomes were compared using 1:1 propensity score matching methods to balance the overall distribution between the two groups.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 40 patients were analyzed (20 patients in the PMX group and 20 patients in the control group). The scores of total Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score, renal SOFA and coagulation SOFA were significantly improved in the PMX group but not in the control group. (from 11.2 ± 5.8 to 4.7 ± 3.5 in PMX group vs 10.0 ± 4.0 to 8.7 ± 7.3 in control group, P = 0.047 from 2.6 ± 1.0 to 0.7 ± 1.0 in PMX group vs 2.6 ± 1.5 to 2.8 ± 1.6 in control group, P = 0.000, from 1.6 ± 1.5 to 1.3 ± 1.3 in PMX group vs 1.2 ± 1.2 to 2.8 ± 1.8 in control group, P = 0.014, respectively). Further, the length of intensive care unit (ICU) stay was significantly shorter in PMX group. However, no statistically significant difference was found in ICU mortality (50% in PMX group vs 50% in control group).

CONCLUSION

PMX-HP is a feasible adjunct treatment for peritonitis in ICU patients with peritonitis for improved organ impairment and to stabilize hemodynamics. It would be helpful to enhance clinical outcomes especially in patients with complete elimination of the source of gram-negative bacilli infection by surgical procedure accompanied with conventional treatment of sepsis.

Coupled plasma filtration adsorption improves hemodynamics in septic shock

PURPOSE

Septic shock involves a dysregulation of the immune response to an infection. This may lead to hemodynamic dysfunction and multiple-organ failure. The main aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of coupled plasma filtration adsorption (CPFA) on the hemodynamic profile in patients with septic shock.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 21 adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit with a diagnosis of septic shock, comparing data between pre-CPFA and post-CPFA treatment. They received a maximum of 5 cycles of treatment.

RESULTS

Coupled plasma filtration adsorption treatment was associated with a significant increase of mean arterial pressure (P < .001), reduction of the vasoactive/inotropic requirement (P = .007), and renal improvement. In patients with leukocytosis or leucopenia, the leukocyte count was restored to a reference range of values.

CONCLUSION

Treatment with CPFA improves hemodynamic parameters in septic shock patients, ameliorating organ failure.