Society of Vascular and Interventional Neurology (SVIN) Stroke Interventional Laboratory Consensus (SILC) Criteria: A 7M Management Approach to Developing a Stroke Interventional Laboratory in the Era of Stroke Thrombectomy for Large Vessel Occlusions

Cost Comparison: Evaluating Transfemoral and Transradial Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography

BACKGROUND

Modern medicine necessitates the delivery of increasingly complex health care while minimizing cost. Transradial access (TRA) for neuroendovascular procedures is becoming more common as accumulating data demonstrate fewer complications, improved patient satisfaction, and high rates of treatment success compared with the transfemoral access (TFA) approach; however, disparities in cost between these approaches remain unclear. We compared supply and equipment costs between TRA and TFA for diagnostic cerebral angiography and evaluate the specific items that account for these differences.

METHODS

We reviewed all adult patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography from July 1, 2019 to December 31, 2019. Data related to patient demographics, vascular access site, catheters used, cost of catheters, arterial access sheath use, cost of sheaths, closure devices used, and cost of closure devices were collected.

RESULTS

The transradial approach resulted in higher price of radial access sheath; however, the overall cost of closure devices was much lower in TRA group than in the TFA cohort. There was no significant difference in the cost of catheters. Overall, the total supply costs for TRA cerebral angiography were significantly lower than those of TFA cerebral angiography. The relative materials cost difference of using TRA was 20.9%.

CONCLUSION

This study is the first itemized materials cost analysis of TRA versus TFA cerebral angiography. TRA necessitates the use of a more expensive access sheath device; however, this cost is offset by the increased cost of devices used for femoral arteriotomy closure. Overall, the supply and equipment costs were significantly lower for TRA than TFA.

Association of Iatrogenic Infarcts With Clinical and Cognitive Outcomes in the Evaluating Neuroprotection in Aneurysm Coiling Therapy Trial

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Small iatrogenic brain infarcts are often seen on diffusion-weighted MRI (DWI) following surgical or endovascular procedures, but there are few data on their clinical effects. We examined the association of iatrogenic infarcts with outcomes in the ENACT (Evaluating Neuroprotection in Aneurysm Coiling Therapy) randomized controlled trial of nerinetide in patients undergoing endovascular repair of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

In this post hoc analysis, we used multivariable models to evaluate the association of the presence and number of iatrogenic infarcts on DWI with neurologic impairment (NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS]), functional status (modified Rankin Scale [mRS]), and cognitive and neuropsychiatric outcomes (30-minute test battery) at 1-4 days and 30 days postprocedure. We also related infarct number to a z score-derived composite outcome score using quantile regression.

RESULTS

Among 184 patients (median age 56 years [interquartile range (IQR) 50-64]), 124 (67.4%) had postprocedural DWI lesions (median 4, IQR 2-10.5). Nerinetide treatment was associated with fewer iatrogenic infarcts but no overall significant clinical treatment effects. Patients with infarcts had lower Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) scores at 2-4 days (median 28 vs 29, adjusted coefficient [acoef] -1.11, 95% CI -1.88 to -0.34, p = 0.005). Higher lesion counts were associated with worse day 1 NIHSS (adjusted odds ratio for NIHSS ≥1: 1.07, 1.02-1.12, p = 0.009), day 2-4 mRS (adjusted common odds ratio [acOR] 1.05, 1.01-1.09, p = 0.005), and day 2-4 MMSE (acoef -0.07, -0.13 to -0.003, p = 0.040) scores. At 30 days, infarct number remained associated with worse mRS (acOR 1.04, 1.01-1.07, p = 0.016) and Hopkins Verbal Learning Test (HVLT) delayed recall scores (acoef -0.21, -0.39 to -0.03, p = 0.020). Patients with infarcts trended towards lower 30-day Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) scores (acoef -3.73, -7.36 to -0.10, p = 0.044). Higher lesion count was associated with worse composite outcome scores at both 1-4 days and 30 days (30-day acoef -0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to -0.03, p = 0.008). Among those with infarcts, day 1 NIHSS and day 2-4 mRS correlated with 30-day NIHSS, DSST, HVLT, and mRS scores, whereas day 2-4 MMSE correlated with 30-day NIHSS and DSST scores (Spearman ρ 0.47, p = 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Iatrogenic brain infarcts were associated with subtle differences in postprocedural (1-4 days) and 30-day outcomes on different measures in this middle-aged cohort, with earlier dysfunction correlating with later differences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

Clinical trials registration NCT00728182.

Cyclical aspiration using a novel mechanical thrombectomy device is associated with a high TICI 3 first pass effect in large-vessel strokes

Background and Purpose

Complete reperfusion (TICI 3) after the first thrombectomy attempt or first pass effect (FPE) is associated with best clinical outcomes in large‐vessel occlusion (LVO) acute ischemic stroke. While endovascular therapy techniques have improved substantially, FPE remains low (24–30%), and new methods to improve reperfusion efficiency are needed.

Methods

In a prospective observational cohort study, 40 consecutive patients underwent cyclical aspiration thrombectomy using CLEAR^TM Aspiration System (Insera Therapeutics Inc., Dallas, TX). Primary outcome included FPE with complete/near‐complete reperfusion (TICI 2c/3 FPE). Secondary outcomes included early neurological improvement measured by the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), safety outcomes, and functional outcomes using modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Outcomes were compared against published historical controls.

Results

Among 38 patients who met criteria for LVO, median age was 75 (range 31–96). FPE was high (TICI 3: 26/38 [68%], TICI 2c/3: 29/38 [76%]). Among anterior circulation strokes, core lab‐adjudicated FPE remained high (TICI 3: 17/29 [59%], TICI 2c/3: 20/29 [69%]), with excellent final successful revascularization results (Final TICI 3: 24/29 [83%], Final TICI 2c/3: 27/29 [93%]). FPE in the CLEAR‐1 cohort was significantly higher compared to FPE using existing devices (meta‐analysis) from historical controls (TICI 2c/3: 76% vs. 28%, p = 0.0001). High rates of early neurological improvement were observed (delta NIHSS≥4: 35/38 [92.1%]; delta NIHSS≥10: 27/38 [71%]). Similarly, high rates of good functional outcomes (mRS 0–2: 32/38 [84%]) and low mortality (2/38 [5%]) were observed.

Conclusion

Cyclical aspiration using the CLEAR^TM Aspiration System is safe, effective, and achieved a high TICI 3 FPE for large‐vessel strokes.

Radiation exposure per thrombectomy attempt in modern endovascular stroke treatment in the anterior circulation

OBJECTIVE

To quantify radiation exposure (RE) of endovascular stroke treatment (EST) in the anterior circulation per thrombectomy attempt and determine causes for interventions associated with high RE.

METHODS

A retrospective single-center study of an institutional review board-approved stroke database of patients receiving EST for large vessel occlusions in the anterior circulation between January 2013 and April 2018 to evaluate reference levels (RL) per thrombectomy attempt. ESTs with RE above the RL were analyzed to determine causes for high RE.

RESULTS

Overall, n = 544 patients (occlusion location, M1 and M2 segments of the middle cerebral artery 53.5% and 27.2%, carotid artery 17.6%; successful recanalization rate 85.7%) were analyzed. In the overall population, DAP (in Gy cm2, median (IQR)) was 113.7 (68.9-181.7) with a median fluoroscopy time of 31 min (IQR, 17-53) and a median of 2 (IQR, 1-4) thrombectomy attempts. RE increased significantly with every thrombectomy attempt (DAP1, 68.7 (51.2-106.8); DAP2, 106.4 (84.8-115.6); p value1vs2, < 0.001; DAP3, 130.2 (89.1-183.6); p value2vs3, 0.044; DAP4, 169.9 (128.4-224.1); p value3vs4, 0.001; and DAP5, 227.6 (146.3-294.6); p value4vs5, 0.019). Procedures exceeding the 90th percentile of the attempt-dependent radiation exposure level were associated with procedural complications (n = 17/52, 29.8%) or a difficult vascular access (n = 8/52, 14%).

CONCLUSIONS

Radiation exposure in endovascular stroke treatment is depending on the number of thrombectomy attempts. Radiation exposure doubles when three attempts and triples when five attempts are necessary compared with single-maneuver interventions. Procedural complications and difficult vascular access were associated with a high radiation exposure in this collective.

KEY POINTS

• Radiation exposure of endovascular stroke treatment (EST) is dependent on the number of thrombectomy attempts. • Reference levels as means for quality control in hospitals performing endovascular stroke treatment should be defined by the number of thrombectomy attempts-we suggest 107 Gy cm2, 156 Gy cm2, 184 Gy cm2, 244 Gy cm2, and 295 Gy cm2 for 1 to 5 maneuvers, respectively, for EST of the anterior circulation • Cases with high rates of radiation exposure are associated with periprocedural complications and difficult anatomical access as a probable cause for a high radiation exposure.

COVID-19 as a Blood Clotting Disorder Masquerading as a Respiratory Illness: A Cerebrovascular Perspective and Therapeutic Implications for Stroke Thrombectomy

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS‐CoV‐2) as the name suggests was initially thought to only cause a respiratory illness. However, several reports have been published of patients with ischemic strokes in the setting of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). The mechanisms of how SARS‐CoV‐2 results in blood clots and large vessel strokes need to be defined as it has therapeutic implications. SARS‐CoV‐2 enters the blood stream by breaching the blood‐air barrier via the lung capillary adjacent to the alveolus, and then attaches to the angiotensin‐converting enzyme II receptors on the endothelial cells. Once SARS‐CoV‐2 enters the blood stream, a cascade of events (Steps 1‐8) unfolds including accumulation of angiotensin II, reactive oxygen species, endothelial dysfunction, oxidation of beta 2 glycoprotein 1, formation of antiphospholipid antibody complexes promoting platelet aggregation, coagulation cascade, and formation of cross‐linked fibrin blood clots, leading to pulmonary emboli (PE) and large vessel strokes seen on angiographic imaging studies. There is emerging evidence for COVID‐19 being a blood clotting disorder and SARS‐CoV‐2 using the respiratory route to enter the blood stream. As the blood‐air barrier is breached, varying degrees of collateral damage occur. Although antiviral and immune therapies are studied, the role of blood thinners in the prevention, and management of blood clots in Covid‐19 need evaluation. In addition to ventilators and blood thinners, continuous aspiration and clot retrieval devices (approved in Europe, cleared in the United States) or cyclical aspiration devices (approved in Europe) need to be considered for the emergent management of life‐threatening clots including PE and large vessel strokes.

Radiation exposure in endovascular stroke treatment of acute basilar artery occlusions-a matched-pair analysis

Abstract

Purpose

To determine the radiation exposure in endovascular stroke treatment (EST) of acute basilar artery occlusions (BAO) and compare it with radiation exposure of EST for embolic middle cerebral artery occlusions (MCAO).

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of an institutional review board−approved prospective stroke database of a comprehensive stroke center, we focused on radiation exposure (as per dose area product in Gy × cm², median (IQR)), procedure time, and fluoroscopy time (in minutes, median [IQR]) in patients receiving EST for BAO. Patients who received EST for BAO were matched case by case with patients who received EST for MCAO according to number of thrombectomy attempts, target vessel reperfusion result, and thrombectomy technique.

Results

Overall 180 patients (n = 90 in each group) were included in this analysis. General anesthesia was conducted more often during EST of BAO (BAO: 75 (83.3%); MCAO: 18 (31.1%), p < 0.001). Procedure time (BAO: 31 (20–43); MCAO: 27 (18–38); p value 0.226) and fluoroscopy time (BAO: 29 (20–59); MCAO: 29 (17–49), p value 0.317) were comparable. Radiation exposure was significantly higher in patients receiving EST for BAO (BAO: 123.4 (78.7–204.2); MCAO: 94.3 (65.5–163.7), p value 0.046), which represents an increase by 23.7%.

Conclusion

Endovascular stroke treatment of basilar artery occlusions is associated with a higher radiation exposure compared with treatment of middle cerebral artery occlusions.

Expansion of the dimensions in the current management of acute ischemic stroke

Stroke is the fifth leading cause of death in the United States with a huge burden on health care. Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) accounts for 87% of all stroke. The use of thrombolytic agents in AIS treatment is well known since 1950 but no FDA approval until 1996, due to lack of strong evidence showing benefits outweigh the risk of intracranial hemorrhage. The NINDS trial led to the approval of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment (IV recombinant tPA) within 3 h of stroke. Due to this limitation of 3-4.5 h. window, evolution began in the development of effective endovascular therapy (EVT). Multiple trials were unsuccessful in establishing the strong evidence for effectiveness of EVT. In 2015, MR CLEAN trial made progress and showed improved outcomes with EVT in AIS patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO), with 6-h window period. In 2018, two major trials-DAWN and DEFUSE 3-along with few other trials had shown improved outcomes with EVT and stretched window period from 6 to 24 h. AHA Stroke Council is constantly working to provide focused guidelines and recommendations in AIS management since 2013. SVIN had started the initiative "Mission Thrombectomy-2020" to increase global EVT utilization rate 202,000 procedures by 2020. Physicians are using safer and easier approach like brachial and radial approach for EVT. TeleNeurology and artificial intelligence also played a significant role in increasing the availability of IV recombinant tPA in AIS treatment in remote hospitals and also in screening, triaging and identifying LVO patients for EVT. In this review article, we aim to describe the history of stroke management along with the new technological advancements in AIS treatment.

Meeting the evolving demands of neurointervention: Implementation and utilization of nurse practitioners

Growth in the neurointerventional field, as a result of the emergence of thrombectomy as the gold standard treatment for large vessel occlusions, has created complex challenges. In an effort to meet evolving demands and fill workflow gaps, nurse practitioners have taken on highly specialized roles. Neurointerventional care has rapidly evolved similarly to interventional cardiac care, in that nurse practitioners are successfully being incorporated as procedural assistants in catheterization laboratories. Similar utilization of nurse practitioners in interventional neuroradiology holds the capacity to decrease physician workload, mitigate stresses contributing to burn-out, and reallocate more physician time to procedures. Nurse practitioner practice faces procedural, clinical, legal and interpersonal barriers. Despite calls for expanded practice by the Institutes of Medicine, a paucity of nurse practitioner training opportunities exists. Fragmented privileging processes contribute to environments where nurse practitioners must navigate hurdles without established interventional neuroradiology-specific precedent. Increased nurse practitioner mentorship, fluoroscopy law standardization, physician support surrounding nurse practitioner autonomy, and role consistency is imperative for optimal nurse practitioner utilization. Nurse practitioners are uniquely equipped to bridge evolving gaps through the provision of safe, efficacious care, and generating revenue at lower costs. Discussion surrounding nurse practitioner use to bridge workflow gaps is an exciting opportunity for future practice development.