Evaluating the role of ivabradine in acute decompensated heart failure: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) presents a significant global health challenge, with high morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. The current therapeutic options for ADHF are limited. Ivabradine, a selective inhibitor of hyperpolarization-activated cyclic nucleotide-gated (HCN) channels, has emerged as a potential therapy for ADHF by reducing the heart rate (HR) without negatively affecting myocardial contractility. However, the evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of ivabradine in patients with ADHF is limited and inconsistent. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ivabradine for ADHF based on observational studies.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines to identify relevant observational studies comparing ivabradine with placebo in adult patients with ADHF. Data were pooled using a random-effects model, and heterogeneity was assessed. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale.

RESULTS

Four observational studies comprising a total of 12034 patients. Meta-analysis revealed that ivabradine significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR: 0.66, 95 % CI: 0.49-0.89, p < 0.01) and resting HR (MD: -12.54, 95 % CI: -21.66-3.42, p < 0.01) compared to placebo. However, no significant differences were observed in cardiovascular mortality, hospital readmission for all causes, changes in LVEF, or changes in LVEDD. Sensitivity and publication bias assessments were conducted for each outcome.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine may be beneficial for reducing mortality and HR in patients with ADHF. However, its impact on other clinical outcomes such as cardiovascular mortality, hospital readmission, and cardiac function remains inconclusive. Further research, particularly well-designed RCTs with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up durations, are warranted.

A randomized controlled trial of ivabradine in patients with acute myocardial infarction related cardiogenic shock

Objective

. Acute myocardial infarction-related cardiogenic shock (AMI-CS) is often accompanied by tachycardia, which, in turn, increases myocardial oxygen consumption and hinders the use of ventricular assist devices, such as intra-aortic balloon pump. Evidence suggests that ivabradine may reduce heart rate (HR) without affecting other hemodynamic parameters. The aim of the present study was to determine the effect of ivabradine on reducing HR and changes in other hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac index (CI), in patients with AMI-CS and tachycardia.

Materials and methods

. A single-center, open label, randomized clinical trial included patients diagnosed with AMI-CS and tachycardia with >100 beats per minute (BPM). Heart rate, cardiac index, and other hemodynamic parameters measured by pulmonary flotation catheter were compared at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 hours after randomization.

Results

. A total of 12 patients were randomized; 6 received standard therapy, and 6 received ivabradine in addition to standard therapy. Baseline clinical characteristics were similar at randomization. A statistically significant lower heart rate was found at 12 hours (p=0.003) and 48 hours (p=0.029) after randomization, with differences of -23.3 (-8.2 to -38.4) BPM and -12.6 (-0.5 to -25.9) BPM, respectively. No differences in cardiac index, or any other evaluated hemodynamic parameters, length of hospital stay, nor mortality rate were noted between both groups.

Conclusions

. The use of ivabradine in patients with AMI-CS was associated with a significant reduction in heart rate at 12 and 48 h, without affecting other hemodynamic parameters.

Evaluating the applicability of ivabradine in acute heart failure

BACKGROUND

While ivabradine has demonstrated benefits in heart rate control and prognosis for chronic heart failure patients, its application in acute decompensated heart failure remains underexplored.

HYPOTHESIS

For patients with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who are intolerant to β-blockers or unable to further titrate their dosage, the use of ivabradine is hypothesized to be effective and safe is improving outcomes.

METHODS

This retrospective, multicenter database analysis included patients with hospitalized decompensated heart failure with a left ventricular ejection fraction of ≤40% from June 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. The exclusion criteria were a baseline heart rate of <70 bpm, previous use of ivabradine, mortality during admission, existing atrial fibrillation, or atrial flutter. The primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death and hospitalization for heart failure.

RESULTS

Of the 4163 HFrEF patients analyzed, 684 (16.4%) were administered ivabradine during their index admission. After matching, there were 617 patients in either group. The results indicated that ivabradine use was not significantly associated with the risk of the primary composite outcome (hazard ratio: 1.10; 95% confidence interval: 0.94-1.29). Similarly, the risk of secondary outcomes and adverse renal events did not significantly differ between the ivabradine and non-ivabradine cohorts (all p > .05).

CONCLUSION

For hospitalized acute decompensated heart failure patients who are intolerant to β-blockers or cannot further titrate them, ivabradine offers a consistent therapeutic effect. No significant disparities were noted between the ivabradine and non-ivabradine groups in heart failure hospitalization and cardiovascular death.

Early administration of ivabradine in patients admitted for acute decompensated heart failure

BACKGROUND

Heart rate (HR) control is important in heart failure (HF) patients with reduced ejection fraction, and ivabradine is indicated for patients with chronic HF and sinus rhythm. However, ivabradine is limited in initiation of ivabradine at acute stage of HF.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This multi-institutional retrospective study enrolled 30,639 patients who were admitted for HF from January 01, 2013 to December 31, 2018 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals. After applying selection criteria, the eligible patients were divided into ivabradine and non-ivabradine groups according to the initiation of ivabradine at the index hospitalization. HR, clinical outcomes including HF hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, mortality, the composite of cardiovascular (CV) death or HF hospitalization and newly developed atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and left atrium size were compared between the ivabradine and non-ivabradine groups after inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) analysis after 12 months.

RESULTS

The HR at admission in the ivabradine group (n = 433) was 99.04 ± 20.69/min, compared to 86.99 ± 20.34/min in the non-ivabradine group (n = 9,601). After IPTW, HR was lower in the ivabradine group than that in the non-ivabradine group after 12 months (74.14 ± 8.53 vs. 81.23 ± 16.79 bpm, p = 0.079). However, there were no significant differences in HF hospitalization (HR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.38-2.79), all-cause hospitalization (HR = 0.95; 95% CI, 0.54-1.68), mortality (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08), the composite of CV death or HF hospitalization (HR = 0.87; 95% CI, 0.69-1.08) and newly developed AF between the two groups. In addition, LVEF increased with time in both groups, but there were no significant differences during the observation period.

CONCLUSION

Ivabradine was beneficial in controlling HR when initiated in patients with acute stage of HF, but it did not seem to provide any benefits in reducing HF hospitalization, all-cause hospitalization, and mortality in 1 year after discharge.

Ivabradine as an Adjuvant Agent for Severe Heart Failure Occurring in the Early Phase after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation

Cardiotoxicity is a critical complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (allo-HCT). In particular, management of severe cardiotoxicity occurring in the early phases of allo-HCT is challenging. We encountered a case of severe cardiotoxicity resulting from AHF six days after allo-HCT, which resisted catecholamines and diuretics. The patient was treated with anthracycline-containing regimens and underwent myeloablative conditioning, including high-dose cyclophosphamide. As invasive circulatory assisting devices were contraindicated because of his immunocompromised status and bleeding tendency, we successfully treated the patient with ivabradine-containing medications. Ivabradine may therefore be considered an alternative drug for the treatment of severe cardiotoxicity induced by cytotoxic agents.

Acute-phase administration of ivabradine supported by intra-aortic balloon pump induces myocardial recovery without significant haemodynamic worsening in a patient with acute fulminant myocarditis: a case report

Background

Ivabradine can reduce the heart rate without affecting myocardial contractility or vascular tone. Current guidelines recommend its use for treating patients with chronic heart failure who have a high heart rate (≥75 b.p.m.) and persistent symptoms despite guideline-directed therapy. Nonetheless, little is known about its efficacy in patients with acute cardiogenic shock. We report a case of successful treatment of cardiogenic shock

Case summary

A 53-year-old previously healthy man was admitted due to cardiogenic shock with acute fulminant myocarditis. The patient was placed on intra-aortic balloon pump support and was given guideline-directed therapy including inotropic agents and furosemide. However, no improvement was seen in haemodynamics and the patient was in sinus tachycardia (116 b.p.m.). On Day 2, ivabradine therapy was initiated to reduce the myocardial workload and stabilize the haemodynamic parameters. As heart rate decreased, his symptoms improved and urine output increased without affecting the blood pressure. Subsequently, the patient recovered from cardiogenic shock. The intra-aortic balloon pumping was discontinued on Day 7, and the patient was discharged on Day 22.

Discussion

Ivabradine has the potential to induce rapid cardiac recovery and haemodynamic improvement in the acute phase of heart failure if supported by intra-aortic balloon pump.

Effectiveness of enteral ivabradine for heart rate control in septic shock: A randomised controlled trial

Persistent tachycardia in patients with septic shock predicts poor outcome. This study sought to investigate the effect of the cardiac pacemaker current inhibitor ivabradine on heart rate and cardio-circulatory function in patients with septic shock. After informed consent, 60 patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia (heart rate >95 /minute) were prospectively randomly assigned to receive either standard therapy for septic shock (group S) or standard therapy along with enteral ivabradine (group I) for the initial 96 hours after enrolment. Primary outcome was the difference in heart rate between the two groups during the first 96 hours. Secondary outcomes included the effect of ivabradine on haemodynamic, oxygenation, myocardial function and organ function parameters, incidence of adverse events and 30-day overall survival. Heart rate was lower in group I compared to group S (median difference in area under the curve -25.6 (95% confidence intervals -31.4 to -15.9) /minute; P <0.001). Vasopressor requirements, blood lactate levels, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment scores and E/e' ratio were lower in group I compared to group S. Stroke volume index and ejection fraction were higher in group I while cardiac index and oxygen delivery parameters were maintained similar to group S. There was no difference in 30-day mortality or in the incidence of serious adverse events. Enteral ivabradine is effective in reducing heart rate, and improving haemodynamic parameters and cardiac function in patients with septic shock and persistent tachycardia, without increasing the incidence of adverse events.

Lipase-Catalyzed Kinetic Resolution of Alcohols as Intermediates for the Synthesis of Heart Rate Reducing Agent Ivabradine

Ivabradine (Corlanor®), is a chiral benzocycloalkane currently employed and commercialized for the treatment of chronic stable angina pectoris and for the reduction in sinus tachycardia. The eutomer (S)-ivabradine is usually produced via chiral resolution of intermediates, by employing enantiopure auxiliary molecules or through preparative chiral HPLC separations. Recently, more sustainable biocatalytic approaches have been reported in literature for the preparation of the chiral amine precursor. In this work, we report on a novel biocatalyzed pathway, via a resolution study of a key alcohol intermediate used as a precursor of the chiral amine. After screening several enzymatic reaction conditions, employing different lipases and esterases both for the esterification and hydrolysis reactions, the best result was achieved with Pseudomonas cepacia Lipase and the final product was obtained in up to 96:4 enantiomeric ratio (e.r.) of an ivabradine alcohol precursor. This enantiomer was then efficiently converted into the desired amine in a facile three step synthetic sequence.

Ivabradine for the Treatment of Acute Mitral-Regurgitation-Related Decompensated Heart Failure

Ivabradine is used as a second-line medication for chronic heart failure (HF) but is still off-label for acute HF. We report the case of a 50-year-old man who experienced infectious endocarditis-related acute severe mitral regurgitation (MR) and acute decompensated HF and showed quick improvement of clinical symptoms after ivabradine use. An unstable hemodynamic status does not allow titration of a β-blocker dose, and a β-agonist might be needed to overcome a critical condition. Ivabradine appears to solve this issue and protect the myocardium owing to prolongation of the diastolic perfusion time. Ivabradine might be useful for the treatment of acute severe MR-related acute decompensated HF due to the improvement of diastolic function by decreasing the heart rate.

Early short-term ivabradine treatment in new-onset acute systolic heart failure and sinus tachycardia patients with inflammatory rheumatic disease

Acute heart failure (AHF) is a common complication of inflammatory rheumatic disease (IRD) and usually coexists with tachycardia. Ivabradine, a direct sinus node inhibitor, which was proven to have favorable effects in patients with chronic HF (CHF), has not been sufficiently evaluated in AHF patients regarding its efficacy and safety. The present study sought to explore the effectiveness of early short-term ivabradine treatment in new-onset AHF and concurrent sinus tachycardia in patients with IRD. A total of 12 consecutive patients with IRD, who had new-onset AHF and concurrent sinus tachycardia, were prescribed ivabradine and were retrospectively recruited. Standard medication therapy for AHF was also administered. The heart rate (HR), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), biomarkers of HF and New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification score were compared prior to and after ivabradine treatment. After 48 h of treatment with ivabradine, the mean resting HR decreased from 118.0±13.8 to 83.3±7.3 bpm (P<0.001). Transthoracic echocardiography indicated a significant improvement in the LVEF on an average of 2 weeks after ivabradine prescription when compared with the baseline evaluation (51.2±8.4 vs. 38.0±9.0%; P<0.001). In addition, ivabradine treatment resulted in significantly decreased N-terminal proB-type natriuretic peptide (4,900±3,672 vs. 16,806±16,130 pg/ml; P=0.045) and improvement of the NYHA classification score (2.3±0.6 vs. 3.5±0.5; P<0.001) at 2 weeks when compared with the baseline. Overall, the results of the present study suggested that early use of ivabradine is safe in IRD patients with new-onset AHF and enhances the sinus rate reduction, which may improve heart function.

Treating Patients Following Hospitalisation for Acute Decompensated Heart Failure: An Insight into Reducing Early Rehospitalisations

Heart failure (HF) is a pandemic syndrome characterised by raised morbidity and mortality. An acute HF event requiring hospitalisation is associated with a poor prognosis, in both the short and the long term. Moreover, early rehospitalisation after discharge negatively affects HF management and survival rates. Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular conditions combine to increase rates of HF hospital readmission at 30 days. A tailored approach for HF pharmacotherapy while the patient is in hospital and immediately after discharge could be useful in reducing early adverse events that cause rehospitalisation and, consequently, prevent worsening HF and readmission during the vulnerable phase after discharge.

Ivabradine in acute heart failure: Effects on heart rate and hemodynamic parameters in a randomized and controlled swine trial

BACKGROUND

Acute heart failure patients could benefit from heart rate reduction, as myocardial consumption and oxidative stress are related to tachycardia. Ivabradine could have a clinical role attenuating catecholamine-induced tachycardia. The aim of this study was to evaluate hemodynamic effects of ivabradine in a swine model of acute heart failure.

METHODS

Myocardial infarction was induced by 45 min left anterior descending artery balloon occlusion in 18 anesthetized pigs. An infusion of dobutamine and noradrenaline was maintained aiming to preserve adequate hemodynamic support, accompanied by fluid administration to obtain a pulmonary wedged pressure ≥ 18 mmHg. After reperfusion, rhythm and hemodynamic stabilization, the animals were randomized to 0.3 mg/kg ivabradine intravenously (n = 9) or placebo (n = 9). Hemodynamic parameters were observed over a 60 min period.

RESULTS

Ivabradine was associated with a significant reduction in heart rate (88.4 ± 12.0 bpm vs. 122.7 ± 17.3 bpm after 15 min of ivabradine/placebo infusion, p < 0.01) and an increase in stroke volume (68.8 ± 13.7 mL vs. 52.4 ± 11.5 mL after 15 min, p = 0.01). There were no significant differences in systemic or pulmonary arterial pressure, or significant changes in pulmonary capillary pressure. However, after 15 min, cardiac output was significantly reduced with ivabradine (-5.2% vs. +15.0% variation in ivabradine/placebo group, p = 0.03), and central venous pressure increased (+4.2% vs. -19.7% variation, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Ivabradine reduces heart rate and increases stroke volume without modifying systemic or left filling pressures in a swine model of acute heart failure. However, an excessive heart rate reduction could lead to a decrease in cardiac output and an increase in right filling pressures. Future studies with specific heart rate targets are needed.

Ivabradine: Evidence and current role in cardiovascular diseases and other emerging indications

Increased heart rate (HR) is associated with deleterious effects on several disease conditions. Chronic heart failure (CHF) is one of the cardiovascular diseases with recurrent hospitalization burden and an ongoing drain on health-care expenditure. Despite advancement in medicine, management of CHF remains a challenge to health-care providers. Ivabradine selectively and specifically inhibits the pacemaker I(f) ionic current which reduces the cardiac pacemaker activity. The main effect of ivabradine therapy is the substantial lowering of HR. It does not influence intracardiac conduction, contractility, or ventricular repolarization. As shown in numerous clinical studies, ivabradine improves clinical outcomes and quality of life and reduces the risk of death from heart failure (HF) or other cardiovascular causes. Recently updated HF guidelines recommend ivabradine as a class II indication for reduction of HF hospitalizations. Based on the principle of benefits of reduced HR, the ivabradine in patients with ischemic heart disease, sepsis, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome has also been studied. It can also be a useful agent for HR reduction in patients with contraindications to use beta-blockers or those who cannot tolerate them. In this review, we provide an overview of efficacy and safety of ivabradine and its combination with currently recommended pharmacological therapy in different conditions.

Usefulness of the thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk index in acute heart failure: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Risk stratification in acute heart failure (AHF) is vital for both physicians and paramedical personals. Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) risk index (TRI) and modified TRI (mTRI) are novel and simple predictive risk indices that have been examined in patients with acute coronary syndrome.

OBJECTIVE

In the current study, we evaluated the relationship among TRI, mTRI, and mortality in patients with AHF.

METHODS

A total of 293 patients with AHF were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into 2 groups: group 1 consisted of patients who survived and group 2 consisted of patients who died during a follow-up period of 120 days. Multivariate hierarchical logistic regression analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship among TRI, mTRI, and mortality.

RESULTS

All causes of death occurred in 84 patients (28.6%). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction risk index was significantly higher in patients who died during follow-up (20.2 ± 12.4 vs 14.8 ± 8.9). The new risk score showed good predictive value for 120-day mortality. Before laboratory analysis, in-multivariate hierarchical logistic regression analysis TRI remained as an independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio, 2.56; P < .001). After the laboratory analysis, despite the fact that TRI has lost its predictive value, mTRI remained an independent risk factor for mortality (odds ratio, 2.08; P = .01).

CONCLUSION

The TRI is a simple and strong predictor of all-cause mortality in patients who were admitted with AHF. The current study reveals for the first time the strong predictive value of TRI in patients with AHF.