Intravenous Thrombolysis after Reversal of Dabigatran by Idarucizumab: A Case Report

Intravenous Thrombolysis After Dabigatran Reversal by Idarucizumab: A Systematic Review of the Literature

Background and Purpose: Idarucizumab achieves instant reversal of anticoagulation and enables intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) in dabigatran-treated acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients. AIS in dabigatran-treated patients is a rare event, therefore the experience is limited. A review of all published cases was performed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of this therapeutic strategy. Methods: We searched PubMed and Scopus for all published cases of IVT after reversal with idarucizumab in dabigatran-treated AIS patients. The outcomes were safety assessed by hemorhagic transformation (HT), symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH) and death, and efficacy assessed by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) reduction. Results: We identified 251 AIS patients (39,9% females) with an average age of 74 years. HT, SICH, and death were reported in 19 (7.6%), 9 (3.6%), and 21 (8.4%) patients, respectively. Patients experiencing HT presented with more severe strokes (median NIHSS on admission: 21 vs. 8, p < 0.001; OR: 1.12, 95% CI: 1.05-1.20). After IVT there was a significant NIHSS reduction of 6 points (IQR:3-10, p < 0.001) post-stroke and linear regression revealed a correlation of admission NIHSS to NIHSS reduction (p < 0.001). Conclusions: In this systematic review of all published cases of IVT in dabigatran-treated AIS patients after reversal with idarucizumab the rates of HT, SICH and mortality, as well as NIHSS reduction, were comparable with previous studies in non-anticoagulated patients. This provides reassuring evidence about the safety and efficacy of this therapeutic strategy.

Idarucizumab Reversal of Dabigatran in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke and Intracranial Hemorrhage: Comparison with Non-idarucizumab-Treated Patients

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab reverses the anticoagulant dabigatran; it is recommended during intravenous thrombolysis treatment of dabigatran-treated patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) and in dabigatran-treated patients with intracranial hemorrhage (ICH).

METHODS

Outcomes of consecutive idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with intravenous thrombolysis-treated AIS (n = 22) were compared with consecutive similar intravenous thrombolysis-treated patients with AIS who were not anticoagulated (n = 182) [primary aim]; idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with ICH (n = 13) were compared with patients with ICH who received the anticoagulants rivaroxaban or apixaban (n = 24) [secondary aim]. Efficacy was estimated by National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score changes between admission and discharge and by the modified Rankin score after 3 months; safety was assessed by symptomatic ICH and mortality.

RESULTS

Basal neurological impairment was similar in both idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated and control groups of patients with AIS and ICH. The idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated patients with AIS with subsequent intravenous thrombolysis showed a mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement of 84% vs 68% in the control group (p < 0.05). A favorable outcome (modified Rankin score ≤ 2 after 3 months) was achieved significantly more frequently than in the control group (86% vs 57%; p < 0.05). The complication rate was similar in both groups. In patients with ICH, a positive functional outcome (modified Rankin score ≤ 3 after 3 months) was achieved more often in the idarucizumab/dabigatran-treated group than in the control group (70% vs 42%; p = 0.109). The complication rate was similar.

CONCLUSIONS

Idarucizumab use in dabigatran-treated patients with AIS resulted in significantly more efficacious intravenous thrombolysis treatment and a non-significantly better outcome in dabigatran-treated patients with ICH compared with controls. There was no difference regarding complications.

Intravenous thrombolysis for the management of acute ischemic stroke in patients therapeutically anticoagulated with heparin: A review

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) with alteplase is effective in acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, its use rate remains low due to the many exclusion criteria. Recent guidelines recommend excluding patients suffering AIS with an elevated aPTT secondary to heparin exposure from receiving IVT. The purpose of this review is to explore the safety and efficacy of IVT in patients therapeutically anticoagulated with heparin. We also propose a treatment algorithm for IVT in patients with AIS that are therapeutically anticoagulated with heparin.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of PubMed and Embase through March 2020 to identify the literature regarding AIS in patients exposed to heparin, followed by IVT treatment, emphasizing safety, efficacy, and clinical outcome using PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

We included thirteen articles in the final analysis, including three retrospective studies, two observational studies, one randomized trial, five case reports, and two case series.

CONCLUSION

There is limited information about the off-label use of IVT in patients with elevated aPTT. Patients with AIS are excluded from IVT if they have recent exposure to heparin. Our review indicates that this population of patients may benefit from IVT as the cases of active bleeding after IVT are few, and functional outcomes are favorable in the long term suggesting that IVT in therapeutically anticoagulated patients may be safe and efficacious.

Revascularization outcomes following acute ischemic stroke in patients taking direct oral anticoagulants: a single hospital cohort study

Successful revascularization therapy is of paramount importance in patients suffering acute ischemic stroke (AIS). However, there is currently only limited evidence on revascularization outcomes for patients suffering AIS while treated with direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). The aim of our study was to determine the efficacy and safety of intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) and mechanical reperfusion (MeR) in AIS patients taking DOACs, and compare them to randomized clinical trials (RCTs), which included patients without DOAC treatment. In an observational cohort study, we analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes following AIS for all consecutive patients on DOAC therapy treated by IVT or MeR, between 2013 and 2019, at the University Medical Center Ljubljana. Patients in the IVT group were on dabigatran treatment and have received idarucizumab as a reversal agent prior to IVT. Patients in the MeR group had a large vessel occlusion. The primary outcome of the study was efficiency, defined as significant improvement after recanalization (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score improvement of ≥8 points after 24 h and modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2 after 3 months) and safety, defined as occurrence of symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) and mortality. Fifty-one DOAC-treated patients with AIS were included. Nineteen dabigatran-treated patients received IVT after reversal by idarucizumab. Thirty-two patients with a large vessel occlusion (12 on dabigatran, 12 on rivaroxaban, and 8 on apixaban) received MeR. Median NIHSS at admission was 9 in the IVT group and 17 in the MeR group. A significant clinical improvement, 24 h after revascularization (median improvement of NIHSS ≥8), occurred in 84% of patients treated with IVT and 25% of patients treated with MeR. A favorable functional outcome after 3 months (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) ≤2) occurred in 84 % of patients treated with IVT and 44% of patients treated with MeR. SICH occurred in one patient (5%) in the IVT group, and in two patients (6%) in the MeR group. In summary, in our observational study of DOAC-treated AIS patients, the level of IVT efficiency was substantially better than in the RCTs. At the same time, the results of MeR treatment were on the same level as in non-DOAC AIS patients included in the RCTs. The observed safety of IVT and MeR treatment was similar to the RCTs. We propose that thrombi in patients on dabigatran may have increased susceptibility to IVT, thereby allowing for better clinical results.

Antagonizing dabigatran by idarucizumab in cases of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in Germany-Updated series of 120 cases

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment with high affinity for dabigatran reversing its anticoagulant effects within minutes. Thereby, patients with acute ischemic stroke who are on dabigatran treatment may become eligible for thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA). In patients on dabigatran with intracerebral hemorrhage idarucizumab could prevent lesion growth.

AIMS

To provide insights into the clinical use of idarucizumab in patients under effective dabigatran anticoagulation presenting with signs of acute ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

METHODS

Retrospective data collected from German neurological/neurosurgical departments administering idarucizumab following product launch from January 2016 to August 2018 were used.

RESULTS

One-hundred and twenty stroke patients received idarucizumab in 61 stroke centers. Eighty patients treated with dabigatran presented with ischemic stroke and 40 patients suffered intracranial bleeding (intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) in n = 27). In patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis with rt-PA following idarucizumab, 78% showed a median improvement of 7 points in National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale. No bleeding complications were reported. Hematoma growth was observed in 3 out of 27 patients with ICH. Outcome was favorable with a median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale improvement of 4 points and modified Rankin score 0-3 in 61%. Six out of 40 individuals (15%) with intracranial bleeding died during hospital stay.

CONCLUSION

Administration of rt-PA after reversal of dabigatran activity with idarucizumab in case of acute ischemic stroke seems feasible, effective, and safe. In dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage, idarucizumab appears to prevent hematoma growth and to improve outcome.

Two Dabigatran Fast Reversals in a 4-month Period - a Case Report

Introduction

Idarucizumab is available for immediate reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation in life-threatening bleeding or urgent surgery in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (nvAF).

Case description

We report a case of an 85-year-old female treated with dabigatran for nvAF, submitted to two fast reversal procedures with idarucizumab in a 4-month period. In the first emergency episode, the patient was admitted due to a fall-related cerebral haemorrhage and subdural haematoma. There was a fast reversal of the effects of dabigatran after idarucizumab administration, which allowed stoppage of the bleeding and a decrease in intracranial pressure, with full patient recovery. Four months later, the patient revisited the hospital complaining of diffuse abdominal pain while on the same antithrombotic therapy. Physical examination showed signs of peritoneal irritation and the use of idarucizumab to reverse the effects of dabigatran was decided upon to secure normal bleeding conditions before surgery.

Discussion

Idarucizumab is an efficient, safe and feasible option for dabigatran-treated nvAF patients, when urgent anticoagulant effect reversal is needed.

LEARNING POINTS

Successful thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in ischemic stroke after idarucizumab administration for reversal of dabigatran: a case report

Background

Idarucizumab is a specific antidote for the anticoagulant dabigatran. Although its efficacy has been recently reported, the drug is still in postmarketing surveillance and requires case data in different emergency settings. A newer intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator has been proposed after injection of idarucizumab in patients receiving dabigatran; however, the safety and efficacy of this therapy are equivocal because of the limited number of reported cases. We describe a case of a patient with acute lacunar stroke causing dysarthria and hemiparesis successfully treated with intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator after reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab.

Case presentation

A 67-year-old Asian woman was transferred to our emergency center 200 minutes after sudden onset of dysarthria and right-sided hemiparesis. She had been taking dabigatran for prevention of stroke recurrence caused by atrial fibrillation. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging revealed a new lacunar infarction near old putamen infarctions. We treated her with intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator after administering idarucizumab. The time to recombinant tissue plasminogen activator administration was 5 minutes from idarucizumab injection and 269 minutes from symptom onset. The patient’s activated partial thromboplastin times were 68.0 and 43.2 seconds before and after the therapy, respectively. The patient’s neurological symptoms improved significantly after the treatment, and she experienced no adverse events.

Conclusions

Intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator after reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab may be safe and feasible in patients with acute ischemic stroke with lacunar infarct. Furthermore, intravenous thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator could be used in patients in emergency settings until just before the end of the recommended time limit within which it needs to be administered because of the immediate effect of idarucizumab.

Idarucizumab for Reversal of Dabigatran in Early/Emergency Surgeries: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab is a humanized, monoclonal antibody fragment used specifically to reverse the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran.

CASE REPORTS

We discuss 4 cases of patients who were treated with idarucizumab to reverse dabigatran before early/emergency surgery. Two of the patients had subdural hematomas, 1 had a splenic laceration, and 1 had Fournier gangrene. All patients received 5 g of idarucizumab before surgery. Intraoperative blood loss in all patients was normal, no adverse events were reported, and the patients recovered normally. WHY SHOULD AN EMERGENCY PHYSICIAN BE AWARE OF THIS?: The case reports presented provide detailed, practical, real-world experience beyond that reported in other case reports and the Reversal Effects of Idarucizumab on Active Dabigatran study. This can help guide clinicians on how idarucizumab can reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran in emergency situations, including patients with subdural hematoma. Our experience suggests that idarucizumab may be a safe and effective antidote to the effects of dabigatran in real-life bleeding situations involving early or emergency surgeries.

Immediate Reversal of Dabigatran by Idarucizumab Prior to Laboratory and Imaging Results in Acute Stroke

We report a case of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke of anterior choroidal artery following the antagonization of dabigatran with idarucizumab. No secondary complication, like hemorrhagic or thrombotic/thrombembolic event, of neither idarucizumab nor subsequent intravenous thrombolysis emerged. The recent approval of idarucizumab enables intravenous thrombolysis despite preexisiting oral anticoagulation with dabigatran, but raises the question of the optimal management and work flow of patients under medication with dabigatran and with acute neurological deficit, highly suspicious for an acute cerebrovascular event. In contrast to hitherto case reports and series, here, we explicitly refrained from awaiting the results of the thrombin time, as a marker for present anticoagulation by dabigatran, as well as the results of cerebral imaging before administration of idarucizumab. Based on the presented case we propose this approach to minimize door-to-needle time of intravenous thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke and thus to enhance the chance for a good outcome.

Acute reversal of dabigatran with Idarucizumab for intravenous thrombolysis as acute stroke treatment

Intravenous thrombolysis with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is contraindicated in patient taking either Factor Xa inhibitors or direct thrombin inhibitors. Idarucizumab completely reverses the biologic effect of dabigatran within minutes. Intravenous rt-PA treatment results in a significant benefit in functional outcome when administered 3-4.5 h after stroke onset or last seen normal time. There is little reported data and no large-scale studies of the reversal of dabigatran with Idarucizumab for the purpose of treating AIS with IV rt-PA. We describe the case of a 73 year old male with AIS and active dabigatran use. Idarucizumab was administered per an approved medical center protocol and the patient was subsequently treated with IV rt-PA. The patient had a severe stroke with no other contraindications to IV rt-PA other than dabigatran use. The patient was administered Idarucizumab and IV rt-PA was given. Within 24 h of treatment, the patient had minimal stroke deficits. Imaging revealed a right middle cerebral artery patchy infarct. The patient was restarted on dabigatran therapy for his atrial fibrillation and was discharged to a skilled nursing facility for rehabilitation. The patient did not experience any symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage after treatment or through day 90. Though no randomized evidence exists for the risk of IV rt-PA after dabigatran reversal with Idarucizumab, the case experiences are mounting. This case of successful stroke treatment after reversal adds to the anecdotal literature and supports the study of dabigatran reversal with Idarucizumab for thrombolysis in AIS.

Consensus Guides on Stroke Thrombolysis for Anticoagulated Patients from Japan: Application to Other Populations

Development of direct oral anticoagulants and their antidotes has led to the need to reconsider the eligibility of acute stroke patients who have been taking oral anticoagulants for intravenous thrombolysis. Officially authorized Japanese guidelines on this issue were revised twice at the time of approval for clinical use of direct oral anticoagulants and idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. A unique recommendation in the latest Japanese clinical guides was that thrombolysis can be recommended if the time of the last dose of direct oral anticoagulants exceeds 4 hours and if commonly available anticoagulation markers are normal or subnormal, i.e., international normalized ratio of prothrombin time <1.7 and activated partial thromboplastin time <1.5 times the baseline value (≤40 seconds only as a guide). These criteria are partly supported by the findings of domestic multicenter and single-center surveys that symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following thrombolysis was rare under the conditions of the criteria. Even for dabigatran users, stroke thrombolysis can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab if patients meet the above criteria. If not, direct mechanical thrombectomy can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab or thrombolysis, and use of idarucizumab, followed immediately by thrombolysis, can be considered only when thrombectomy cannot be quickly performed. These clinical guides are practical and to some extent economical, but they have some limitations, including lack of corroborating information from sufficient numbers of relevant cases. The guides will be further modified based on the results of future research.

Intravenous Thrombolysis in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke after a Reversal of Dabigatran Anticoagulation with Idarucizumab: A Real-World Clinical Experience

BACKGROUND

Intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is contraindicated in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) using oral anticoagulants. A specific human monoclonal antibody was introduced to reverse immediately the anticoagulation effect of the direct inhibitor of thrombin, dabigatran. Until now, mostly individual cases presenting with successful IVT after a reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation in patients with AIS were published. Thus, we aimed to report real-world data from clinical practice.

METHODS

Patients with AIS on dabigatran treated with IVT after antidote reversal were enrolled in the retrospective nationwide study. Neurological deficit was scored using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and 90-day clinical outcome using modified Rankin scale (mRS) with a score 0-2 for a good outcome. Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) was defined as a presence of any sign of bleeding on control imaging after IVT, and symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) was assessed according to the Safe Implementation of Thrombolysis in Stroke-Monitoring Study (SITS-MOST) criteria.

RESULTS

In total, 13 patients (7 men, mean age 70.0 ± 9.1 years) with a median NIHSS admission score of 7 points were analyzed. Of these patients, 61.5% used 2 × 150 mg of dabigatran daily. Antidote was administrated 427 ± 235 minutes after the last intake of dabigatran, with a mean activated prothrombin time of 38.1 ± 27.8 seconds and a mean thrombin time of 72.2 ± 56.1 seconds. Of the 13 patients, 2 had ICH and 1 had SICH, and no other bleeding complications were observed after IVT. Of the total number of patients, 76.9% had a good 3-month clinical outcome and 3 patients (23.1%) died. Recurrent ischemic stroke occurred in 2 patients (15.4%).

CONCLUSION

The data presented in the study support the safety and efficacy of IVT after the reversal of the anticoagulation effect of dabigatran with antidote in a real-world clinical practice.

Intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on direct oral anticoagulants

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Whereas intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) is allowed for acute ischaemic stroke in patients on vitamin K antagonists with international normalized ratio ≤1.7, there are no similar recommendations for patients on direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), notably due to the lack of coagulation tests to assess the therapeutic effects. Although the literature is scarce, consisting of small case series and retrospective studies, considering the frequency of this situation the French Vascular Neurology Society and the French Study Group on Haemostasis and Thrombosis have worked on a joint position paper to provide a practical position regarding the emergency management of ischaemic stroke in patients on DOACs.

METHOD

Based on a review of the literature, the authors wrote a first text that was submitted to a broad panel of members from the two societies. The text was then amended by the authors to address experts' comments and to reach a consensus.

RESULTS

In patients with normal renal function and who stopped the DOAC for at least 48 h, the management should not differ from that in patients without oral anticoagulant. In patients who are still on DOACs, mechanical thrombectomy is encouraged preferentially when applicable in first line. Otherwise, when specific tests are available, values <50 ng/ml indicate that IVT is allowed. In the absence of specific tests, standard tests (thrombin time, prothrombin time and activated partial thromboplastin time) can be used for dabigatran and rivaroxaban, although interpretation of these tests may be less reliable. In some patients on dabigatran, idarucizumab may be used before IVT.

CONCLUSIONS

In this expert opinion paper, it is suggested that IVT can be performed in patients selected according to the time elapsed since the drug was last taken, renal function, type of hospital where the patient is admitted and plasma concentration of DOAC.

Evidence for Idarucizumab (Praxbind) in the Reversal Of the Direct Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran: Review Following the RE-VERSE AD Full Cohort Analysis

Idarucizumab is the first reversal agent approved for the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran. The authors summarize the findings from the clinical trial series and describe case reports, post-marketing data, and ongoing studies.

Idarucizumab in Dabigatran-Treated Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke Receiving Alteplase: A Systematic Review of the Available Evidence

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Current guidelines do not recommend the use of intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator in patients with acute ischemic stroke who receive direct oral anticoagulants. While the humanized monoclonal antibody idarucizumab can quickly reverse the anticoagulant effects of the thrombin inhibitor dabigatran, safety data for subsequent tissue plasminogen activator treatment are sparse. Here, we review current knowledge about dabigatran reversal prior to systemic reperfusion treatment in acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of all published cases of intravenous tissue plasminogen activator treatment following the administration of a dabigatran antidote up to June 2017 and added five unpublished cases of our own. We analyzed clinical and radiological outcomes, symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage, and other serious systemic bleeding. Additional endpoints were allergic reaction to idarucizumab, and venous thrombosis in the post-acute phase.

RESULTS

We identified a total of 21 patients (71% male) with a median age of 76 years (interquartile range 70-84). The median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score at baseline was 10 (n = 20, interquartile range 5-11) and 18/20 patients (90%) had mild or moderate stroke severity. The time from symptom onset to start of tissue plasminogen activator was 155 min (n = 18, interquartile range 122-214). The outcome was unfavorable in 3/19 patients (16%). There was one fatality as a result of a symptomatic post-thrombolysis intracranial hemorrhage, and two patients experienced an increase in the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale compared with baseline. One patient had a recurrent stroke. No systemic bleeding, venous thrombosis, or allergic reactions were reported.

CONCLUSION

Experience with idarucizumab administration prior to tissue plasminogen activator treatment in acute ischemic stroke is limited. Initial clinical experience in less severe stroke syndromes and short time windows seems favorable. Larger cohorts are required to confirm safety, including bleeding complications and the risk of thrombosis.

Successful intravenous thrombolysis for ischemic stroke after reversal of dabigatran anticoagulation with idarucizumab: a case report

Background

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants, including dabigatran, are currently widely used for the prevention of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Recently, idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment for immediate reversal of dabigatran-induced anticoagulation, has been introduced into the market to be used in life-threatening bleeding or urgent surgery, allowing for rapid normalization of clotting parameters. The use of idarucizumab is not yet well established in patients presenting with acute ischemic stroke on dabigatran who are candidates for thrombolytic therapy.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 71-year-old hypertensive Caucasian woman with non-valvular atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily, who presented with acute ischemic stroke causing right-sided hemiparesis and aphasia. Two hours after presentation to the emergency department, a decision was made to administer idarucizumab for achieving complete reversal of any potential anticoagulant effect of dabigatran and, in the absence of any contraindications, our patient underwent successful thrombolysis. At discharge, our patient was able to walk unassisted and had only residual aphasia. Twenty days later, she had completely recovered motor function of her right side, with further progressive improvement of aphasia. Repeat cranial computed tomography confirmed the absence of hemorrhage, and anticoagulant therapy with dabigatran 150 mg twice daily was resumed.

Conclusions

Our case report adds to the evidence that idarucizumab administration is safe in the setting of patients with atrial fibrillation treated with dabigatran who develop acute ischemic stroke requiring thrombolysis.

Systemic Thrombolysis in Acute Ischemic Stroke after Dabigatran Etexilate Reversal with Idarucizumab-A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Idarucizumab is a reversal agent for dabigatran etexilate. By reversing the anticoagulating effect of dabigatran etexilate with idarucizumab (Praxbind), patients presenting with an acute ischemic stroke can now be eligible for thrombolysis.

PATIENT

We describe our experience with idarucizumab in a 71-year-old male patient pretreated with dabigatran etexilate. The patient arrived with a hemiparesis, central facial palsy, and dysarthria.

METHOD

Dabigatran etexilate was antagonized with idarucizumab, approximately 2.5 hours after the patient's last dose. Immediately after the infusion of idarucizumab, the patient received thrombolytic therapy.

RESULTS

The hemiparesis and the central facial palsy were fully remitted 3 days after the onset of symptoms, and the dysarthria was remitted 2 days afterwards.

DISCUSSION

Non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are widely used for the prevention of embolic stroke in patients with atrial fibrillation. Dabigatran etexilate is an oral thrombin inhibitor that can be reversed by idarucizumab. Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment, directly binds dabigatran etexilate and neutralizes its activity.

CONCLUSION

Reversal of dabigatran etexilate using idarucizumab was safe and successful with no recombinant tissue plasminogen activator interactions.

Antagonizing dabigatran by idarucizumab in cases of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage in Germany – A national case collection

Background

Idarucizumab is a monoclonal antibody fragment with high affinity for dabigatran that reverses its anticoagulant effects within minutes. It may exhibit the potential for patients under dabigatran therapy suffering ischemic stroke to regain eligibility for thrombolysis with rt-PA and may inhibit lesion growth in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage on dabigatran.

Aims

To provide insights into the clinical use of idarucizumab in patients under effective dabigatran anticoagulation presenting with signs of ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

Methods

Retrospective data collected from German neurological/neurosurgical departments administering idarucizumab following product launch from January to August 2016 were used.

Results

Thirty-one patients presenting with signs of stroke received idarucizumab in 22 stroke centers. Nineteen patients treated with dabigatran presented with ischemic stroke and 12 patients suffered from intracranial bleeding. In patients receiving rt-PA thrombolysis following idarucizumab, 79% benefitted from i.v. thrombolysis with a median improvement of five points in NIHSS. No bleeding complications occurred. Hematoma growth was observed in 2 out of 12 patients with intracranial hemorrhage. The outcome was favorable with a median NIHSS improvement of 5.5 points and mRS 0–3 in 67%. Overall, mortality was low with 6.5% (one patient in each group).

Conclusion

Administration of rt-PA after reversing dabigatran activity with idarucizumab in case of ischemic stroke is feasible, easy to manage, effective, and appears to be safe. In dabigatran-associated intracranial hemorrhage, idarucizumab has the potential to prevent hematoma growth and improve outcome. Idarucizumab represents a new therapeutic option for patients under dabigatran treatment presenting with ischemic stroke or intracranial hemorrhage.

[Direct oral anticoagulants and acute stroke : Insights into translational research studies]

In recent years a considerable number of translational research studies on intracerebral hemorrhage and ischemic stroke have been published, which are characterized by a particular proximity to practical clinical questions. Animal research has provided insights into the pathophysiological processes and therapy effects, which have so far only been insufficiently investigated in clinical studies. This includes the effectiveness of a rapid reversal of anticoagulation in cases of anticoagulation-associated intracerebral hemorrhage and the safety of thrombolytic treatment in ischemic stroke occurring during treatment with anticoagulants. With the approval of the direct oral anticoagulants these problems have become of particular contemporary relevance. Of course, results from experimental translational studies on stroke cannot be directly translated into clinical routine. Nevertheless, these investigations help to understand the underlying processes and mechanisms and provide proof of concept data for new treatment strategies. This review summarizes the most relevant results in this field of research with a particular focus on practical clinical questions.

New frontiers in anticoagulation: non vitamin-K oral anticoagulants in stroke prevention

INTRODUCTION

Non vitamin-K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) are direct and specific inhibitors of the coagulation factors IIa (dabigatran) and Xa (apixaban, rivaroxaban, edoxaban) which share many pharmacokinetic properties. However, indications are lacking regarding the use of NOACs during thrombolysis, surgery and bleeding events. Areas covered: In this paper, the authors retrospectively analyzed the relevant literature on the NOACs using the PubMed and Google Scholar databases. Expert commentary: Although warfarin is effective in cardioembolic stroke prevention, easier handling and more favorable risk-benefit profile often render NOACs a more preferable therapy choice for neurologists. New evidences have suggested their use in treatment of elderly people, in patients with renal insufficiency or with antiphospholipid antibody syndrome. In addition, the use of antidotes, which rapidly reverse the anticoagulant effect of the NOACs, could be useful in bleeding, during emergency procedures, or in case of overdose.