Hearing Preservation with the Slim Modiolar Electrode Nucleus CI532® Cochlear Implant: A Preliminary Experience

Preservation of Residual Hearing: Long-Term Results With a Mid-Scala Electrode

OBJECTIVE

The long-term preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implantation has become a major goal over the past few years. The aim of the present study was to evaluate residual hearing in the long-term follow-up using mid-scala electrodes.

METHODS

In this retrospective, single-center study, we collected data from 27 patients who were implanted between 2014 and 2015 with residual hearing in the low-frequency range using a mid-scala electrode. Measurements of the hearing thresholds were carried out directly postoperatively (day 1 after surgery) and in the long-term follow-up 43.7 ± 6.9 months. The calculation of the extent of audiological hearing preservation was determined using the HEARRING group formula by Skarsynski.

RESULTS

Postoperative preservation of residual hearing was achieved in 69.2% of the cases in the low-frequency range between 250 Hz and 1 kHz, of which 89.5% of the patients had frequencies that suggested using electroacoustic stimulation (EAS). In the long-term follow-up, 30.8% of the patients showed residual hearing; however, 57.1% had apparently benefited from EAS.

CONCLUSION

Preservation of residual hearing is feasible in the long term using mid-scala electrodes. Postoperatively, there is over the half of patients who benefit from an EAS strategy. The long-term follow-up shows a certain decrease in residual hearing. However, these results are comparable to studies relating to other types of electrodes. Further research should be conducted in future to better evaluate hearing loss in long-term follow-up, compared to direct postoperative audiological results.

Intraoperative Measured Electrocochleography and Fluoroscopy Video to Detect Cochlea Trauma

HYPOTHESIS

Gross electrode movements detected with intraoperative, real-time X-ray fluoroscopy will correlate with fluctuations in cochlear output, as measured with intraoperative electrocochleography (ECochG).

BACKGROUND

Indications for cochlear implantation (CI) are expanding to include patients with residual hearing; however, implant recipients often lose residual hearing after CI. The objective of this study was to identify probable traumatic events during implantation by combining electrophysiological monitoring of cochlear function with simultaneous X-ray monitoring. The surgical timing of these apparently traumatic events was then investigated.

METHODS

For 19 adult patients (21 surgeries, 2 bilateral), the ECochG responses were measured during implantation of a cochlear nucleus slim modiolar electrode (CI532/CI632, Cochlear Ltd Australia Nucleus slim modiolar). Simultaneous fluoroscopy was performed, as well as a postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CT) scan. For all patients, pre- and postoperative audiograms were recorded up to 1 year after surgery to record the loss of residual hearing.

RESULTS

Electrode insertions for 21 surgeries were successfully monitored. A drop in ECochG response was significantly correlated with reduced hearing preservation compared with patients with preserved responses throughout. Drops in the ECochG response were measured to occur during insertion, because of movement of the array after insertion was complete, including while sealing of the electrode array at the round window or coiling of the array lead within the mastoid cavity. In some patients, a reduction in cochlear output, resulting in poor ECochG response, was inferred to occur before the beginning of implantation.

CONCLUSION

The combination of perioperative ECochG measurements, microscope video, fluoroscopy, and postoperative CT scan may inform on what causes the loss of residual hearing after implantation. These findings will be used to improve the surgical procedure in future.

Electrically evoked compound action potentials in cochlear implant users with preoperative residual hearing

Introduction

Residual hearing in cochlear implant (CI) candidates requires the functional integrity of the nerve in particular regions of the cochlea. Nerve activity can be elicited as electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) after cochlear implantation. We hypothesize that ECAP thresholds depend on preoperative residual hearing ability.

Materials and methods

In a retrospective study, we analyzed 84 adult cochlear implant users who had received a Nucleus® CI632 Slim Modiolar Electrode and who preoperatively had had residual hearing. Inclusion criteria were severe to profound hearing loss with preoperative measurable hearing in the ear to receive the implant, postlingual hearing loss, German as native language and correct placement of the electrode, inserted completely into the scala tympani. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) was recorded intraoperatively. The angular insertion was measured for each electrode contact from postoperative computed tomography to estimate the corresponding spiral ganglion frequency. Pure-tone audiometry and allocated ECAP thresholds were tested to investigate possible correlation.

Results

The average of hearing thresholds, tested at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (4FPTA) was 82 ± 18 (range 47-129) dB HL. The success rate for recording ECAP thresholds was 96.9%. For all comparable pure-tone frequencies (1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz), there was significant correlation between preoperative hearing levels and intraoperative ECAP thresholds (p < 0.001). Higher hearing thresholds are associated with increased ECAP thresholds.

Conclusion

In CI candidates with adequate residual hearing, intraoperative electrophysiological measurement records lower thresholds. This outcome may be explained by the neural survival density of the peripheral system, with less neural degeneration.

Residual low-frequency hearing after early device activation in cochlear implantation

PURPOSE

The cochlear implant (CI) is a standard treatment for patients with severe to profound hearing loss. In recent years, early device activation of the sound processor after 2-3 days following surgery has been established. The aim of this study is to evaluate the residual hearing of CI patients with substantial preoperative low-frequency hearing after early device activation over a period of 12 months.

METHODS

Results were compared between an early fitted group (EF) with device activation to less than 15 days after CI surgery and a control group (CG) with device activation after 3-6 weeks. In total, 57 patients were divided into EF group (n = 32), and CG (n = 25). Low-frequency residual hearing and speech recognition in quiet and in noise were compared over an observation period of 12 months.

RESULTS

No significant difference (p > 0.05) in the residual low-frequency hearing PTAlow between EF and CG was found, neither preoperatively (EF 33.2 dB HL/CG 35.0 dB HL), nor postoperatively (EF 46.8 dB HL/CG 46.2 dB HL). In both groups, postoperative residual hearing decreased compared to preoperative and remained stable within the first year after CI surgery. Furthermore, both groups showed no significant differences (p > 0.05) in speech recognition in quiet and in noise within the first year.

CONCLUSION

Early device activation is feasible in CI patients with preoperative low-frequency residual hearing, without an additional effect on postoperative hearing preservation.

One-Year Hearing Preservation and Speech Outcomes Comparing Slim Modiolar and Lateral Wall Arrays

OBJECTIVE

Compare postoperative speech outcomes in hearing preservation (HP) cochlear implantation (CI) patients with a low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤ 60 dB using 2 electrode array designs.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Large academic cochlear implant referral center.

METHODS

We reviewed adult HP CI cases using either the slim modiolar electrode (SME) (CI 532/CI 632) or th slim lateral wall electrode (SLWE) (CI 624). One-year speech outcomes and HP status were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 132 implanted ears were analyzed (mean age 73.1 years, standard deviation [SD] 12.6), with 72% (N = 95) with CI 532/632 and 28% (N = 37) with CI 624. The mean preoperative LFPTA was 44.8 dB, SD 11.8. One-year functional HP was 27.2% (mean LFPTA shift 46.1 dB, SD 22.1) and was as follows: SME 23.9% and SLWE 36.4%, p = .168. The mean age at implantation was significantly younger only in SLWE patients with preserved hearing (66.9 vs 80.3 years, p = .008). At 6 months, speech measures were significantly better in all outcomes in HP patients with an SLWE than nonpreserved SLWE patients; this effect abated at 1 year as performance among nonpreserved SLWE patients became equivalent to the remaining cohort. Speech outcomes in SME patients were similar regardless of HP status. Age at implantation and datalogging was correlated with speech outcomes.

CONCLUSION

In this cohort of HP patients, a 1-year functional HP rate of 23.9% (SME) and 36.4% (SLWE) was observed (p = 0.168). This was initially 57.1% (SME) and 70.3% (SLWE) at activation, p = .172. Datalogging and age at implantation were correlated with postoperative speech outcomes.

A new paradigm of hearing loss and preservation with cochlear implants: Learnings from fundamental studies and clinical research

In 2010 Cochlear initiated a coordinated preclinical research program to identify the factors and underlying mechanisms of acoustic hearing loss following cochlear implantation and device use. At its inception the program was structured around several major hypotheses implicated in the loss of acoustic hearing. The understanding of causes evolved over the course of the program, leading to an increased appreciation of the role of the biological response in post-implant hearing loss. A systematic approach was developed which mapped the cochlear implant journey along a timeline that considers all events in an individual's hearing history. By evaluating the available data in this context, rather than by discrete hypothesis testing, causative and associated factors may be more readily detected. This approach presents opportunities for more effective research management and may aid in identifying new prospects for intervention. Many of the outcomes of the research program apply beyond preservation of acoustic hearing to factors important to overall cochlear health and considerations for future therapies.

Slim Modiolar Electrode Placement in Candidates for Electroacoustic Stimulation

OBJECTIVES

To determine rates of hearing preservation and performance in patients who met candidacy for electroacoustic stimulation (EAS) and were implanted with a slim modiolar electrode (CI532 or CI632).

DESIGN

Adult patients meeting Food and Drug Administration criteria for electroacoustic stimulation (preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average [LFPTA] less than 60 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz and monosyllabic word scores between 10% and 60% in the ear to be implanted), who received a slim modiolar electrode were included. Main outcome measures included rates of hearing preservation, defined as a LFPTA ≤80 dB at 125, 250, and 500 Hz, as well as postoperative low-frequency pure-tone threshold shifts, consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word scores and AzBio sentences in noise scores.

RESULTS

Forty-six patients met inclusion criteria during a 4-year period. Mean (standard deviation) preoperative LFPTA was 34.5 (13.0) dB, and 71.7% had preserved hearing at initial activation. The mean LFPTA shift in patients who preserved hearing at initial activation was 19.7 (14.6) dB, compared with 62.6 (17.7) dB in patients who did not preserve hearing as per our definition. Perioperative steroid use was not different in patients with and without preserved hearing (X 2 (1, N = 46) = 0.19, p = .67, V = 0.06). One year after surgery, 57% of patients had a decline in LFPTA >80 dB and were no longer considered candidates for EAS, with 34.7% still retaining low-frequency thresholds ≤80 dB. CNC word scores at 1 year were 69.9% and 61.4% among individuals with and without preserved low-frequency hearing respectively, measured in their CI ear alone, in their regular listening condition of EAS or electric only ( t (32) = 1.13, p = 0.27, d = 0.39, 95% CI = -6.51, 22.86). Device use time did not differ between groups. Among adults with preserved residual hearing at 1 year (n = 16), 44% used EAS, although there was no significant difference in performance between EAS users and nonusers with preserved hearing. Loss of residual hearing over time did not result in a decline in speech perception performance.

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrated favorable early rates of hearing preservation with a slim modiolar array. Performance was not significantly different in individuals with and without preserved low-frequency acoustic hearing, independent of EAS use. Compared with reports of short electrode use, the loss of residual hearing in patients implanted with this array did not impact speech perception performance.

Variations in microanatomy of the human modiolus require individualized cochlear implantation

Cochlear variability is of key importance for the clinical use of cochlear implants, the most successful neuroprosthetic device that is surgically placed into the cochlear scala tympani. Despite extensive literature on human cochlear variability, few information is available on the variability of the modiolar wall. In the present study, we analyzed 108 corrosion casts, 95 clinical cone beam computer tomographies (CTs) and 15 µCTs of human cochleae and observed modiolar variability of similar and larger extent than the lateral wall variability. Lateral wall measures correlated with modiolar wall measures significantly. ~ 49% of the variability had a common cause. Based on these data we developed a model of the modiolar wall variations and related the model to the design of cochlear implants aimed for perimodiolar locations. The data demonstrate that both the insertion limits relevant for lateral wall damage (approximate range of 4–9 mm) as well as the dimensions required for optimal perimodiolar placement of the electrode (the point of release from the straightener; approximate range of 2–5mm) are highly interindividually variable. The data demonstrate that tip fold-overs of preformed implants likely result from the morphology of the modiolus (with radius changing from base to apex), and that optimal cochlear implantation of perimodiolar arrays cannot be guaranteed without an individualized surgical technique.

Natural course of residual hearing preservation with a slim, modiolar cochlear implant electrode array

PURPOSE

Understanding residual hearing preservation and its natural course following cochlear implantation is important for developing rehabilitation strategies for hearing loss. However, non-uniform evaluation criteria and varying surgical skills pose challenges in fair comparison of the effect of different electrodes on residual hearing preservation. We compared the effect of a slim modiolar electrode (SME) and a slim straight electrode (SSE), implanted by a single surgeon, on progression of residual hearing using different parameters, based on cross-sectional and longitudinal audiological analyses.

METHODS

Patients with preoperative low-frequency pure-tone average (LFPTA) ≤85 dB at 250 and 500 Hz and who underwent minimally traumatic surgical techniques were included. The progression of residual hearing using threshold shifts, hearing preservation rate according to the HEARRING classification, and maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing potentially qualifying for a hybrid stimulation was analyzed up to five time points throughout the 1-year follow-up period.

RESULTS

Threshold shifts and hearing preservation rates according to the HEARRING classification of the electrodes were comparable from 3 months through 12 months postoperatively. Maintenance of functional low-frequency hearing, required for the usage of a hybrid stimulation, was similar for both electrodes. A substantial proportion of implantees with SME use a hybrid stimulation, resulting in long-term use. However, a difference in the pattern of postoperative residual hearing preservation between the two electrodes is possible, probably due to differences in their physical characteristics and location. Specifically, correlation analysis exhibited that significantly less tight modiolar proximity negatively affect the residual hearing preservation, albeit only at 3 months postoperatively, among patients with the SME.

CONCLUSION

Collectively, both SME and SSE implantation showed favorable residual hearing preservation. Our findings further refine the recently proposed hearing preservation with the SME and suggest that the physical characteristics and location of electrodes, in terms of electrode-to-modiolus distance, could affect loss of acoustic hearing in various ways.

Intracochlear electrode array position and cochlear implant outcomes using the nucleus slim modiolar electrode and the extended round window approach: a follow-up study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the intracochlear position of the Slim Modiolar Electrode (SME) after insertion via the extended Round Window (eRW) approach, and to correlate this with residual hearing preservation and speech perception outcomes.

METHODS

Twenty-three adult participants, consecutively implanted with the SME via the eRW approach, were included in this prospective, single-center, observational study. Electrode position was evaluated intra-operatively using X-ray fluoroscopy and TIM measurement, and post-operatively using ultra-high resolution CT. Residual hearing [threshold shift in PTA between pre- and post-operative measurement, relative hearing preservation (RHP%)] and speech perception were evaluated at 2 and 12 months after surgery.

RESULTS

In each of the 23 participants, complete scala tympani positioning of the electrode array could be achieved. In one participant, an initial tip fold-over was corrected during surgery. Average age at implantation was 63.3 years (SD 13.3, range 28-76) and mean preoperative residual hearing was 81.5 dB. The average post-operative PTA threshold shift was 16.2 dB (SD 10.8) at 2 months post-operatively, corresponding with a RHP% score of 44% (SD 34.9). At 12 months, the average RHP% score decreased to 37%. Postoperative phoneme scores improved from 27.1% preoperatively, to 72.1% and 82.1% at 2 and 12 months after surgery, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Use of the eRW approach results in an increased likelihood of complete scala tympani insertion when inserting the SME, with subsequent excellent levels of speech perception. However, residual hearing preservation was found to be moderate, possibly as a result of the extended round window approach, emphasizing that it is not an all-purpose approach for inserting this particular electrode array.

Effects of in vivo repositioning of slim modiolar electrodes on electrical thresholds and speech perception

The slim modiolar electrode has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than previous conventional perimodiolar electrodes and consistently high scala tympani localization. Nonetheless, variability in modiolar proximity exists even among slim modiolar electrodes, still leaving room for further improvement of modiolar proximity, which may positively affect functional outcomes. Given this, the pull-back maneuver was reported to increase the modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes in a cadaveric study, but in vivo repositioning effects remain to be established. Here we identified that the pull-back maneuver led to better modiolar proximity than conventional insertion while maintaining a similar angular insertion depth. Notably, the reduced electrode-modiolus distance from the pull-back maneuver was associated with significantly lower impedances across electrodes postoperatively as well as reduced intraoperative electrophysiological thresholds than conventional insertion. Among adult cochlear implant recipients, this maneuver resulted in significantly better sentence recognition scores at three months postoperatively when compared to those with a conventional insertion; however, this benefit was not observed at later intervals. Collectively, slim modiolar electrodes with the pull-back maneuver further enhance the modiolar proximity, possibly leading to better open-set sentence recognition, at least in the early postoperative stage.

Unilateral Cochlear Implants for Severe, Profound, or Moderate Sloping to Profound Bilateral Sensorineural Hearing Loss: A Systematic Review and Consensus Statements

Importance

Cochlear implants are a treatment option for individuals with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) who receive little or no benefit from hearing aids; however, cochlear implantation in adults is still not routine.

Objective

To develop consensus statements regarding the use of unilateral cochlear implants in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This study was a modified Delphi consensus process that was informed by a systematic review of the literature and clinical expertise. Searches were conducted in the following databases: (1) MEDLINE In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Ovid MEDLINE, (2) Embase, and (3) the Cochrane Library. Consensus statements on cochlear implantation were developed using the evidence identified. This consensus process was relevant for the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with severe, profound, or moderate sloping to profound bilateral SNHL. The literature searches were conducted on July 18, 2018, and the 3-step Delphi consensus method took place over the subsequent 9-month period up to March 30, 2019.

Main Outcomes and Measures

A Delphi consensus panel of 30 international specialists voted on consensus statements about cochlear implantation, informed by an SR of the literature and clinical expertise. This vote resulted in 20 evidence-based consensus statements that are in line with clinical experience. A modified 3-step Delphi consensus method was used to vote on and refine the consensus statements. This method consisted of 2 rounds of email questionnaires and a face-to-face meeting of panel members at the final round. All consensus statements were reviewed, discussed, and finalized at the face-to-face meeting.

Results

In total, 6492 articles were identified in the searches of the electronic databases. After removal of duplicate articles, 74 articles fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria and were used to create the 20 evidence-based consensus statements. These 20 consensus statements on the use of unilateral cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL were relevant to the following 7 key areas of interest: level of awareness of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement); best practice clinical pathway from diagnosis to surgery (3 consensus statements); best practice guidelines for surgery (2 consensus statements); clinical effectiveness of cochlear implantation (4 consensus statements); factors associated with postimplantation outcomes (4 consensus statements); association between hearing loss and depression, cognition, and dementia (5 consensus statements); and cost implications of cochlear implantation (1 consensus statement).

Conclusions and Relevance

These consensus statements represent the first step toward the development of international guidelines on best practices for cochlear implantation in adults with SNHL. Further research to develop consensus statements for unilateral cochlear implantation in children, bilateral cochlear implantation, combined electric-acoustic stimulation, unilateral cochlear implantation for single-sided deafness, and asymmetrical hearing loss in children and adults may be beneficial for optimizing hearing and quality of life for these patients.

Cochlear implantation for tinnitus in adults with bilateral hearing loss: protocol of a randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Tinnitus is the perception of sound without an external stimulus, often experienced as a ringing or buzzing sound. Subjective tinnitus is assumed to origin from changes in neural activity caused by reduced or lack of auditory input, for instance due to hearing loss. Since auditory deprivation is thought to be one of the causes of tinnitus, increasing the auditory input by cochlear implantation might be a possible treatment. In studies assessing cochlear implantation for patients with hearing loss, tinnitus relief was seen as a secondary outcome. Therefore, we will assess the effect of cochlear implantation in patients with primarily tinnitus complaints.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

In this randomised controlled trial starting in January 2021 at the ENT department of the UMC Utrecht (the Netherlands), patients with a primary complaint of tinnitus will be included. Fifty patients (Tinnitus Functional Index (TFI) >32, Beck's Depression Index <19, pure tone average at 0.5, 1, 2 and 4 kHz: bilateral threshold between 50 and ≤75 dB) will be randomised towards cochlear implantation or no intervention. Primary outcome of the study is tinnitus burden as measured by the TFI. Outcomes of interest are tinnitus severity, hearing performances (tinnitus pitch and loudness, speech perception), quality of life, depression and patient-related changes. Outcomes will be evaluated prior to implantation and at 3 and 6 months after the surgery. The control group will receive questionnaires at 3 and 6 months after randomisation. We expect a significant difference between the cochlear implant recipients and the control group for tinnitus burden.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This research protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University Medical Center (UMC) Utrecht (NL70319.041.19, V5.0, January 2021). The trial results will be made accessible to the public in a peer-review journal.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Trial registration number NL8693; Pre-results.

Slim, Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode: Melbourne Experience and Comparison With the Contour Perimodiolar Electrode

OBJECTIVE

To describe the tip fold over rate, scalar localization, and speech perception outcomes of the CI532 Slim Modiolar Electrode.

PATIENTS AND INTERVENTION

All patients receiving the CI532 implant before June 2018.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcome measures for adults patients include pre- and postoperative speech perception, operative report details, electrode position as determined by X-ray and cone beam computed tomography. Comparison made with previous experience with the Contour perimodiolar electrode (CI512). In the pediatric population tip fold-over rate, measured by intraoperative X-ray, was the exclusive outcome.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-five CI532 devices were implanted in adults and 69 in children. Electrode tip fold-over occurred in eight adults cases and none among children (4.1%). Cone beam CT scans of 120 out of 125 adult patients confirmed scala tympani (ST) position in all but one case where the electrode had been placed into scala vestibuli. There were no translocations from ST to scala vestibuli. This compares favorably with the CI512 translocation rate of 17%. Speech perception outcomes demonstrated good performance with mean preop phoneme scores of 16.2% (±13) increasing to 64.2% (±14) and 71.6 (±16) 3 and 12-months postop, respectively. Compared with a matched group of CI512 recipients, CI532 recipient phoneme scores were significantly higher 3 and 12-months postop by 4 and 7%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The slim modiolar, CI532 electrode has provided very reliable ST position with a low rate of tip fold over. A trend toward better speech perception scores in CI532 compared with CI512 was observed.

Transimpedance Matrix (TIM) Measurement for the Detection of Intraoperative Electrode Tip Foldover Using the Slim Modiolar Electrode: A Proof of Concept Study

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study is to report on our preliminary experience with Transimpedance Matrix (TIM)-measurement for the detection of cochlear implant electrode tip foldovers compared with intraoperative imaging in patients implanted with the slim modiolar electrode (SME).

STUDY DESIGN

Proof of concept study.

SETTING

Tertiary university referral center.

PATIENTS

Twenty five ears (in 22 patients) implanted consecutively with the SME.

INTERVENTIONS

Following cochlear implantation, intraoperative TIM-measurement and fluoroscopy were performed. One week postoperatively, the electrode position was evaluated using Computed Tomography (CT)-imaging.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Electrode array tip foldover.

RESULTS

Electrode array tip foldover occurred in three of the 25 cochlear implantations performed (12%). In each case, the foldover was detected by both TIM and fluoroscopy, leading to reposition and correct intracochlear placement of the array.

CONCLUSIONS

TIM-measurement is a promising method for the intraoperative detection of an electrode array tip foldover. The TIM-tool with intuitive heatmap display is easy to use, fast, and readily available to clinics using TIM-software in the operating theatre.

Initial hearing preservation outcomes of cochlear implantation with a slim perimodiolar electrode array

OBJECTIVE

To assess the slim modiolar array as a hearing preservation electrode.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of adult, post-lingual CI recipients implanted with slim modiolar array Sept 2016 to July 2017 in a tertiary referral center. Baseline audiograms were obtained within six months of initial CI evaluation. Patients with low frequency pure tone average (LFPTA) (125, 250, 500 Hz) <80 dB were considered HP candidates. Postoperative audiograms were obtained within 48 h before activation. Successful HP was considered as (1) retention of LFPTA threshold <80 dB and (2) change in threshold from pre- to post-operative.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients received the slim perimodiolar array and 42 were HP candidates. Post-operative audiograms were obtained for 39 of 42 patients an average of 28.92 days after surgery. 56.4% of HP candidates retainedLFPTA <80 dB. Mean ΔLFPTA was 24.15 dB (±16.14; p < 0.001). 56.4% of HP candidates experienced Δ LFPTA <20 dB; 69.2% <30 dB. Functional hearing preservation was more successful in lower frequencies where starting thresholds were better - 78% with LFPTA <50 dB retained serviceable hearing at activation. The postoperative change was similar in each low frequency (Δ125 Hz: mean 21.25 +/- 14.76 (N = 28); Δ250 Hz: 26.28 +/- 19.29 (N = 39); Δ500 Hz: 25.00 +/- 17.73 (N = 39)).

CONCLUSIONS

The slim perimodiolar array is moderately effective at immediate hearing preservation. In subjects with preoperative audiometric profiles similar to those in prior EAS trials, immediate HP is comparable.

Hearing preservation with a slim modiolar cochlear implant in a pediatric cohort

OBJECTIVES

Recent cochlear implant (CI) electrodes are designed to be atraumatic to inner ear structures. Studies in adults have demonstrated improved hearing preservation rates with the CI532/632 electrode, but none have examined this in children. Our objective is to describe the hearing preservation rate with CI532/632 in pediatric patients and determine factors that influence hearing preservation.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of children undergoing CI over a three-year period. Inclusion criteria were: CI with the 532/632 electrode, presence of pre-operative low frequency hearing defined by pure tone average (PTA) of ≤80 dB at 250 Hz or at the average of 250 and 500 Hz, and post-operative unaided audiometry. Other data collected included demographics, otologic history, imaging, and surgical details.

RESULTS

A total of 13 patients and 15 ears were included. Hearing was preserved in 10/15 (66%) ears at an average follow-up of 6 months, similar to that reported in the adult literature. Patients with preserved hearing post-operatively were more likely to have a positive family history of hearing loss. There was a trend towards patients with anatomic inner ear abnormalities being more likely to lose hearing after CI, but this was not statistically significant. Pre-operative thresholds were not predictive of hearing preservation. Patients with preserved hearing had a significantly smaller shift in thresholds after cochlear implantation. Therefore, hearing preserved and non-preserved groups differed more by the magnitude of change in threshold, rather than their preoperative threshold. Other factors such as age, sex, surgeon, and surgery duration were not associated with hearing preservation.

CONCLUSION

This study describes low frequency hearing preservation after pediatric CI532/632 implantation. The hearing preservation rate in our cohort was consistent with that reported in the adult literature. Our data suggest that preoperative thresholds do not solely determine which patients will go on to experience hearing preservation. We believe this will aid surgeons with patient-specific device selection and counseling potential pediatric CI recipients with preserved hearing.

Simpler and effective radiological evaluations for modiolar proximity of a slim modiolar cochlear implant electrode

A new slim modiolar electrode (CI532/632) has been reported to ensure better modiolar proximity than conventional electrodes. Better modiolar proximity has been proposed to yield better electrode discrimination capability and potentially better speech outcomes, necessitating its efficient measurement. Currently, intracochlear positional index (ICPI), the most reliable indicator for evaluating modiolar proximity, has been measured exclusively through ‘metal artifact-less’ cone beam CT. However, popular use of this index is precluded due to lack of cone beam CT in many institutions. Thus, eyes are now on elucidation of easy-to-measure indicators of modiolar proximity derived from conventional CT, which is accessible in all centers. We observed that enhanced tomographic resolution significantly reduces partial volume artifacts, providing better visualization of modiolus-electrode distance. Aided by ultra-high kernel specification with high-resolution index, we developed a novel and easy-to-measure, conventional CT-specific indicator, “modified ICPI”, for evaluation of modiolar proximity. Further, we showed that it closely correlates with the previously proposed parameter of modiolar proximity, the spiral diameter, measured from post-insertion radiograph, reiterating the value of X-ray-based spiral diameter. Through this study, we have taken a step toward the stage of immediate visual feedback regarding modiolar proximity and changes in insertion technique intraoperatively, ensuring optimal modiolar proximity.

Modiolar Proximity of Slim Modiolar Electrodes and Cochlear Duct Length: Correlation for Potential Basis of Customized Cochlear Implantation With Perimodiolar Electrodes

OBJECTIVES

Recent studies have shown that cochlear duct length (CDL) varies among individuals and could significantly influence the final position of the electrode and its trajectory in the cochlea. Given this, we hypothesized that the degree of modiolar proximity of novel slim modiolar electrodes, such as CI532 and CI632, can also be affected by CDL. To test this hypothesis, we retrospectively evaluated individual CDL to determine if there is any significant correlation of CDL with degree of modiolar proximity.

METHODS

Fifty-one ears from 38 subjects implanted with slim modiolar electrodes by a single surgeon through the round window approach using the pull-back technique were included. Our cohort was classified according to the deafness onset (congenital versus postlingual) and the degree of modiolar proximity (less versus tight) with reference to the spiral diameter made by the slim modiolar electrodes in situ on transorbital x ray. We then analyzed the CDL and its metrics using a readily available surgical preplanning tool (OTOPLAN) to obtain comparable data.

RESULTS

Among 30 ears associated with congenital deafness, 9 ears (30%) showed less modiolar proximity, while none of the 21 ears from 19 subjects with postlingual deafness exhibited "less modiolar proximity" based on our criteria. In this study, CDL showed significant variation among subjects. Importantly, a significant inverse correlation between spiral diameter and CDL (ρ = -0.581, p < 0.001) was found, showing that shorter CDLs have longer spiral diameter and less modiolar proximity. Moreover, further pull-back technique characterized by pulling out the electrode a little bit more in cases with shorter CDL, if not always, exhibited tighter modiolar proximity.

CONCLUSION

A preponderance of less modiolar proximity of the electrode was observed exclusively among congenital deafness cases, demonstrated by a less tight spiral configuration even under the pull-back technique. Our data suggest that shorter CDL is associated with a less tight spiral configuration of slim modiolar electrodes postoperatively. Depending on the insertion technique, the differential degree of modiolar proximity of slim modiolar electrodes can be alleviated in cases with short CDL, which justifies cochlear duct length-based customized insertion of slim modiolar electrodes.

Comparison of Perimodiolar Electrodes: Imaging and Electrophysiological Outcomes

BACKGROUND

The perimodiolar CI532 Slim Modiolar electrode has been designed to bring the electrode contacts close to auditory nerve while reducing cochlear trauma during its insertion. It is currently unknown to what extent the electrode position and electrophysiological outcomes of the Slim Modiolar electrode differ from other perimodiolar electrodes.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to compare the electrode position and electrophysiological outcomes between the CI532 Slim Modiolar and CI512 Contour Advance electrode.

METHOD

Forty-six adult patients received a Slim Modiolar or Contour Advance electrode. Electrode types were compared using intraoperative electrode impedances, evoked compound action potential (ECAP) and stapedius reflex thresholds, as well as position parameters from postoperative computed tomography or digital volume tomography images (medial-lateral position, electrode-to-modiolus distance, insertion angle).

RESULTS

The medial-lateral position indicates a closer modiolar placement of the Slim Modiolar compared with the Contour Advance. Individual electrode contact measurements, however, showed significantly larger electrode-to-modiolus distances and higher ECAP thresholds for the Slim Modiolar in the basal region. On contacts E20-22 the Slim Modiolar is slightly closer to the modiolus compared with the Contour Advance, but this did not result in lower ECAP thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Perimodiolar electrodes can vary in their intracochlear position, leading to divergent electrophysiological outcomes. To detect these differences, investigations must be done for each electrode contact rather than using a global factor for the whole electrode array. While the electrode dislocation rate is lower with the Slim Modiolar than with the Contour Advance, electrode-to-modiolus proximity is smaller and ECAP thresholds are lower with the Contour Advance in the basal cochlear region.

Intraoperative Intracochlear Electrocochleography and Residual Hearing Preservation Outcomes When Using Two Types of Slim Electrode Arrays in Cochlear Implantation

OBJECTIVES

To report residual hearing preservation outcomes in patients with low frequency hearing, after cochlear implant (CI) electrode insertion with two types of electrode arrays: one straight and other perimodiolar, when using intraoperative intracochlear electrocochleography (ECochG) during (CI) electrode insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective, randomized study.

SETTING

Tertiary referral otology center.

PATIENTS

Fifteen patients ranging from 33 to 54 years old (mean 51.19). They had been diagnosed with a bilateral, profound sensorineural hearing loss and treated with a unilateral cochlear implant: eight of them with the CI532 and seven of them with the CI522 (Cochlear Ltd, Sydney, Australia).

INTERVENTION

Pure-tone audiometry was performed preoperatively and at 1 and 6 months postoperatively. Interoperatively, intracochlear ECochG was performed using the apical-most electrode. The amplitude of the first harmonic was plotted and monitored in real time by the audiologist-surgeon team during their CI electrode insertion. The different ECoch patterns of the insertion track were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

In 12 cases ECochG responses were successfully recorded. In three cases no ECochG responses could be recorded with no residual hearing observed postoperatively in two of them. With respect to the first harmonic amplitude changes, we found: four cases with an overall increase in amplitude measured from the beginning of insertion until completion, all of them showed residual hearing (<15 dB HL) at 6 months postoperation. Three cases with an increasing amplitude at the beginning of insertion, with a decrease in amplitude as insertion progressed to completion, in two cases dropping of residual hearing (15-30 dB HL) were observed after 6 months postoperation and, in one case, complete residual hearing was observed at 6 months postoperatively. And finally five cases presented amplitudes at the start of insertion with modifications of amplitude during the insertion dynamic, with increasing and descending in amplitude range during the whole insertion, two of them showed residual hearing at 6 months postoperation and three cases a drop of residual hearing (15-30 dB HL) was observed after 6 months postoperation. No statistical differences between CI532 and CI522 electrodes were found. Data of the ECochG responses are also presented (p value ≥ 0.05).

CONCLUSION

ECochG is a useful tool to evaluate the residual hearing in CI patients with straight and perimodiolar cochlear implant. More studies are needed to fully understand the relationship between ECochG and the presence of residual hearing, cochlear trauma, and functional outcomes.

Immediate and 1-Year Outcomes with a Slim Modiolar Cochlear Implant Electrode Array

OBJECTIVE

To explore the immediate and 1-year outcomes of patients who underwent implantation with the slim modiolar electrode (SME).

STUDY DESIGN

Consecutive case series with chart review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral academic center.

SUBJECT AND METHODS

Between May 2016 and August 2018, a total of 326 cochlear implantations (CIs) were performed. Intraoperative x-rays were performed in all cases to identify tip rollovers. Scalar location was identified for 76 CIs that had postoperative computed tomography reconstructions. Speech outcomes were measured at 3, 6, and 12 months with consonant-nucleus-consonant word and AzBio sentences in quiet and noise (+10-dB signal-to-noise ratio). Preservation of hearing was defined as maintaining a low-frequency pure tone average ≤80 dB at 250 and 500 Hz.

RESULTS

Among 326 CIs, 23 (7%) had tip rollovers. Postoperative reconstructions revealed 5 of 76 (6.6%) scalar translocations. A subset of 177 cases met criteria for evaluation of speech perception scores. The marginal mean differences between presurgery and 12 months for speech tests were as follows: consonant-nucleus-consonant, 43.7 (95% CI, 39.8-47.6); AzBio in quiet, 49.7 (95% CI, 44.9-54.4); and AzBio in noise, 29.9 (95% CI, 25.2-34.7). Sixty-one patients were identified with preservable hearing (low-frequency pure tone average ≤80 dB), and 12 of 61 (20%) preserved hearing at 1 year.

CONCLUSION

CI with SME provides reliable scala tympani insertion in a consistent perimodiolar position. An initially increased tip rollover rate improved with case volume and sheath design improvement. For long-term outcomes, speech performance was comparable to that of other cochlear implants. While hearing preservation for the SME may be better than prior perimodiolar electrodes, consistent outcomes are unlikely.

Outcomes for a clinically representative cohort of hearing-impaired adults using the Nucleus® CI532 cochlear implant

PURPOSE

Hearing performance data was collected from a large heterogeneous group of subjects implanted with the Cochlear™ Nucleus® CI532 with Slim Modiolar Electrode, for the purposes of postmarket clinical follow-up. Data was analysed for factors which may predict postoperative speech recognition scores.

METHODS

Data was collected retrospectively from five German clinics for 159 subjects from March 2017 to August 2018. Hearing thresholds and recognition scores for monosyllabic words in quiet and sentences in noise were measured preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

There was a mean gain of 44% points (95% CI 39-49%) at 6 months in monosyllable scores in quiet for implanted ears. Preoperative hearing thresholds in implant ears increased systematically with decreasing age; however, younger subjects had better baseline monosyllable scores with hearing aids compared with older subjects. Baseline performance alone explained 14% of the variation in postoperative scores. Residual hearing was preserved on average to within 22 dB at 250 Hz and 30 dB at 500 Hz of preoperative levels.

CONCLUSIONS

In a large and varied cohort of routinely treated hearing-impaired adults, speech recognition with the CI532 for German monosyllabic words in quiet at 6 months was equivalent to performance reported at one year or more in other published studies. Although younger subjects had poorer preoperative pure-tone thresholds, they had better preoperative word recognition scores compared with older subjects, and also had higher post implant scores. Further research is required to identify if this phenomenon is just applicable to German health system assessment and referral practices.

Potential insertion complications with cochlear implant electrodes

Objectives: The aim of this discussion paper and literature review was to estimate the incidence of a variety of complications associated with the surgical placement of cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays and to discuss the implications and management of sub-optimal electrode placement. Results: A review of the peer-reviewed literature suggests that the incidence of incomplete electrode insertion and kinking is more prevalent in straight arrays and not more than about 2% in CI recipients with normal cochlear anatomy/patency. Incidence of tip fold-over is greater with perimodiolar arrays but also occurs with straight arrays and is typically less than 5%. Conversely, electrode migration is more common with straight arrays, and high rates (up to 46%) have been reported in some studies. Scalar translocations have also been reported for both perimodiolar and straight arrays. Higher rates have been reported for stylet-based perimodiolar electrodes inserted via cochleostomy (up to 56%), but with much lower rates (<10%) with both sheath-based perimodiolar arrays and lateral wall arrays. Electrode positioning complications represent a significant proportion of perioperative CI complications and compromise the level of benefit from the device. Careful surgical planning and appropriate pre- and intraoperative imaging can reduce the likelihood and impact of electrode positioning complications. There is also evidence that newer array designs are less prone to certain complications, particularly scalar translocation. Conclusions: It is important that implanting surgeons are aware of the impact of sub-optimal electrode placement and the steps that can be taken to avoid, identify and manage such complications.

Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials

INTRODUCTION

Precurved cochlear implant (CI) electrode arrays were developed in an attempt to improve the auditory outcome of cochlear implantation, which varies greatly. The recent CI532 (Cochlear Corp., Sydney, Australia) may offer further advantages as its electrode array is thinner than previous precurved CI electrode arrays. The aims here were to investigate 1-year postoperative speech recognition, intraoperative electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAPs), and their possible relation in patients implanted with a CI532 or its predecessor CI512.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data from 63 patients subjected to cochlear implantation at the Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden, was performed. Speech recognition of the implanted ear was evaluated using phonemically balanced monosyllabic Swedish words at 65 dB SPL. ECAPs were evaluated using the intraoperative ECAP threshold across ≥8 electrodes generated by the automated neural response telemetry of the CI.

RESULTS

The median aided speech recognition score (SRS) 1 year after implantation was 52% (quartile 1 = 40%, quartile 3 = 60%, n = 63) and did not differ statistically significantly between patients with CI512 (n = 38) and CI532 (n = 25). The mean ECAP threshold was 188 CL (current level; SD = 15 CL, n = 54) intraoperatively and did not differ statistically significantly between patients with CI512 (n = 32) and CI532 (n = 22), but the threshold for each electrode varied more between patients with a CI512 (p < 0.0001). A higher mean ECAP threshold was associated with a worse SRS (Spearman's ρ = -0.46, p = 0.0004, n = 54). The association remained among those with a CI512 (Spearman's ρ = -0.62, p = 0.0001, n = 32) when stratified by CI electrode array.

CONCLUSION

No statistically significant difference in speech recognition 1 year after cochlear implantation or in mean threshold of ECAP intraoperatively was found between patients with a CI512 and the more recent, slim CI532, but the ECAP thresholds varied more between those with a CI512. A statistically significant association between SRS and mean ECAP threshold was found, but stratified analysis suggests that the association may be true only for patients with a CI512.

Preservation of residual hearing after cochlear implant surgery with slim modiolar electrode

Purpose

To evaluate the insertion results and hearing preservation of a novel slim modiolar electrode (SME) in patients with residual hearing.

Methods

We retrospectively collected the data from the medical files of 17 patients (18 ears) implanted with a SME. All patients had functional low frequency hearing (PTA _{(0.125–0.5 kHz)} ≤ 80 dB HL). The insertion results were re-examined from the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography scans. Postoperative thresholds were obtained at the time of switch-on of the sound processors (mean 43 days) and at latest follow-up (mean 582 days). The speech recognition in noise was measured with the Finnish matrix sentence test preoperatively and at follow-up.

Results

The mean insertion depth angle (IDA) was 395°. Neither scala dislocations nor tip fold over were detected. There were no total hearing losses. Functional low-frequency hearing was preserved in 15/18 (83%) ears at switch-on and in 14/17 (82%) ears at follow-up. According to HEARRING classification, 55% (10/18) had complete HP at switch-on and 41% (7/17) still at follow-up. Thirteen patients (14 ears) were initially fitted with electric–acoustic stimulation and seven patients (8 ears) continued to use it after follow-up.

Conclusions

The preliminary hearing preservation results with the SME were more favorable than reported for other perimodiolar electrodes. The results show that the array may also be feasible for electro-acoustic stimulation; it is beneficial in that it provides adequate cochlear coverage for pure electrical stimulation in the event of postoperative or progressive hearing loss.

The evaluation of a slim perimodiolar electrode: surgical technique in relation to intracochlear position and cochlear implant outcomes

Purpose

In cochlear implantation (CI), the two factors that are determined by the surgeon with a potential significant impact on the position of the electrode within the cochlea and the potential outcome, are the surgical technique and electrode type. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the position of the slim, perimodiolar electrode (SPE), and to study the influence of the SPE position on CI outcome.

Methods

Twenty-three consecutively implanted, adult SPE candidates were included in this prospective cohort study conducted between December 2016 and April 2019. Mean age at surgery was 59.5 years. Mean preoperative residual hearing was 92.2 dB. Intra-operative fluoroscopy and high-resolution computed tomography scans were performed to evaluate electrode position after insertion using a cochleostomy (CS) approach. Follow-up was 12 months after implantation; residual hearing (6–8 weeks) and speech perception (6–8 weeks and 12 months) were evaluated in relation to the intracochlear SPE position.

Results

In most patients in whom the SPE was positioned in the scala tympani residual hearing was preserved [mean absolute increase in PTA of 4.4 dB and 77.2% relative hearing preservation (RHP%)]. Translocation into the scala vestibuli occurred in 36% of the insertions, resulting in a mean absolute increase in PTA of 17.9 dB, and a RHP% of 19.2%. Participants with a translocation had poorer speech perception scores at 12-month follow-up.

Conclusion

Given the incidence of CS-associated translocations with the SPE and the negative effect on outcome, it is advised to insert the SPE using the (extended) round window approach.

Initial surgical and clinical experience with the Nucleus CI532 slim modiolar electrode in the UK

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this work is to describe the first experience in the UK with the slim pre-curved perimodiolar electrode Nucleus CI532 in a continuous series of patients in terms of surgical and clinical reliability and early performance outcomes.

METHOD

In this retrospective review we describe the complication rate (including electrode array tip fold-over), NRT thresholds, hearing preservation, power efficiency and CI performance outcomes in a continuous series of 40 cochlear implants CI532 performed between October 2016 and November 2017 in 17 adults and 13 children with severe to profound hearing loss.

RESULTS

Preliminary data from these groups reveals some low-frequency hearing preservation in the CI532 group although none of the patients were conventional hearing preservation candidates. NRT thresholds, power efficiency, and BKB sentences in quiet were measured at 3 and 6 months post activation. There were no significant differences in these results. The average BKB score in quiet increases from 22% pre-operatively to 58% at 3 months and 70% at 6 months. In addition, although hearing preservation was not an objective, low-frequency thresholds were preserved in 20% of cases at 3 and 6 months post-operatively. Complications were observed in 5 cases, one case with non-device related aerocoele and four related to the device array: two cases of tip roll over, one case of the electrode array being placed extra-cochlea, and one case with the electrode buckling into the middle ear. The last 2 cases were dealt with per-operatively.

DISCUSSION

Our preliminary results with the CI532 implant indicate that it may be reliably placed with standard surgical techniques but care is needed during the deployment of the electrode. Further initial data suggest that switch on and early electrophysiological measures are comparable to the existing CI 512 device. However whilst preliminary, our data suggest that it may be possible to use this electrode for hearing preservation. However, further studies are required to determine its definitive advantage over other electrode designs.

CONCLUSION

CI532 is a reliable device offering good initial results and could be an option for hearing preservation although further studies are required.

Considerations and Rationale for Cochlear Implant Electrode Design - Past, Present and Future

The electrode array of a cochlear implant forms a permanent, often lifelong interface between the implanted electronics and neural structures of the cochlea. A cochlear implant is primarily prescribed to restore hearing via electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve. As with any neural stimulator intended to either deliver electrical stimulus or record a neural response, the aim is to place the electrodes in close proximity to the target neural structures. The broadening of indications and the concept of preservation of low-frequency residual hearing over the last two decades has resulted in an increased understanding of the mechanisms and implications of intracochlear trauma for both the hearing preservation surgery and electrical stimulation outcomes with cochlear implantation, as well as the influence of many biographic and audiological patient factors correlated with achieving better hearing outcomes. These two goals, the proximity to the cochlear nerve for electrical stimulation and the preservation of cochlear structures, have typically been viewed as mutually exclusive, with perimodiolar electrode arrays being preferred for the former, and lateral wall electrode arrays for the latter. The design evolution of both the lateral wall and perimodiolar electrodes is presented, considering the cochlea anatomy and continued understanding of the mechanics and dynamics of electrode insertion, along with the influence of the ongoing changes to the intracochlear environment to provide a rationale for the electrode design with the intent to provide the greatest patient benefit over their implanted lifetime.