Efficacy of Carboplatin/Paclitaxel-Based Radiochemotherapy in Locally Advanced Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Comparison of anti-cancer effects of platinum ribavirin and ribavirin via telomerase and Bcl-2 gene expression

Among the common treatments for cancers, chemotherapy is widely used. One of the ways to evaluate the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs is by checking the expression of tumor markers. Hence, this study aimed to evaluate the anti-cancer effects of the newly synthesized platinum ribavirin (Pt-Rb) compared to ribavirin (Rb) through biomarkers. In this study, cell lines were divided into four groups: groups A and B as healthy negative control group and untreated cancer group respectively. Group C and D were treated with, Rb and Pt-Rb, a novel anti-cancer drug, respectively. After evaluating LC50 for the drugs by MTT test, the expression of telomerase and Bcl-2 (B cell lymphoma-2) genes was evaluated using real-time PCR (RT-qPCR). The results showed a significant decrease in telomerase (0.020 ± 0.007) and Bcl-2(0.120 ± 0.005) gene expression in cancer cells treated with Pt-Rb (group D) compared to telomerase (0.040 ± 0.014) and Bcl-2(0.220 ± 0.014) treated with Rb (group C) and also between group D and telomerase (70.76 ± 0.330) and Bcl-2 (99.52 ± 0.670) in group B. The majority of the groups under investigation showed a significant difference (p < 0.05), suggesting that Pt-Rb had stronger anti-cancer effects than Rb and untreated cancer cells. Additionally, Pt-Rb treatment results demonstrated more increased apoptosis than Rb. Our results demonstrated that Pt-Rb is an effective medication in cancer treatment by lowering anti-apoptotic indicators. Therefore, this chemical has the potential to be an effective anti-cancer therapy, pending further research on animal models and then human volunteers.

Review of recent advances in managing periocular skin malignancies

Management of cutaneous malignancies can be particularly challenging when they are located in the periocular region. The standard of care for localized disease is complete surgical excision, but this may not be possible without significant disruption to visual structures and facial appearance. Definitive radiation may be an option for some patients who cannot or do not wish to undergo surgery. Advances in systemic treatment options for locally advanced and metastatic skin cancers in the past 10 years have prompted investigation into neoadjuvant treatment of periocular cancers. The use of chemotherapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and targeted therapies have all been reported with varying degrees of success. For many patients, targeted therapies or immune checkpoint inhibitors should be considered depending on the cancer type, symptoms, and goals with the input of a multidisciplinary cancer care team. In this article, we systematically review the latest updates in surgical, radiotherapeutic, and medical management of periocular malignancies.

Outcomes of 3-year follow up with induction vs first line chemotherapy in oral cancer patients: An observational hospital-based study

OBJECTIVE

Our study aims to analyse and compare the efficacy, adverse effect profile and survival among the Paclitaxel/Cisplatin/5-Flurouracil (TPF) induction chemotherapy and Paclitaxel/carboplatin (PC) first line or cisplatin chemotherapy in a high-volume tertiary care cancer centre.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

215 patients with oral cavity cancer were recruited in this study. Patients with stages I-IIc underwent surgical resection or radiation therapy 66-74 GY/fraction. Patients of Stages III-IV were administered with either induction chemotherapy TPF or PC or cisplatin regimen. Treatment responses were assessed by CT and MRI. Response rates, survival and adverse effects data were tabulated and analysed.

RESULTS

The mean age was 49.2 ± 11.68 years. Symptoms were ulceration (33.5%), growth (20.5%), pain (13%), ulcer-proliferative growth (8.4%) and swelling (13, 6%). The tumour site was found at the base of the tongue, C01 (42.2%) followed by C06 (35.8%), C08 (6.5%), C07 (5.2%) and C05 (4.6%). There were no significant differences (P > 0.05) in efficacy and survival outcomes between the different groups of treatment. Median survival was achieved within 36 months. The major side effect observed were anaemia (15.81%), diarrhoea (36.2%), dyspepsia (28.8%), fever (33.95%), mucositis (28.85%), myalgia (33.95%) and nausea (7.9%). Survival among the responder categories (CR, PR and NR) was significantly different as per Log-rank analysis (P = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

TPF induction therapy and PC first line chemotherapy showed similar efficacy, safety profile and survival whereas cisplatin shows poor efficacy and safety and survival in Indian oral cancer patients.

FTY720 increases paclitaxel efficacy in cisplatin-resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Oral squamous cell carcinoma has high recurrence and cisplatin resistance. As cancer stem cells, autophagy, and sphingolipids have been appointed as associated with chemotherapy resistance, we tested combined treatments targeting autophagy and/or sphingolipid metabolism with paclitaxel using cisplatin-resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma cells.

METHODS

Cisplatin-resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma cells were maintained under exposition to FTY720 and chloroquine combined with paclitaxel and submitted to viability, clonogenicity, and spheres formation assays. The xenograft tumor model using cisplatin-resistant CAL27 cells was adopted to examine the drug combinations' potential antitumoral efficacy. Using an animal model, sphingolipids profiles from plasma and tissue samples were obtained by liquid chromatography coupled to mass spectrometry to identify potential lipids associated with drug response.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Our results showed higher autophagic flux in cisplatin-resistant Ooral squamous cell carcinoma (CAL27 and SCC9) cells than in parental cells. The combinations of an autophagy inhibitor (chloroquine) or an autophagy inducer/sphingosine kinase 1 antagonist (FTY720) with paclitaxel (PTX) had a synergistic antitumor effect. Treated CisR cells lost clonogenicity and tumor sphere abilities and reduced proteins associated with proliferation, survival, and cancer stem cells. FTY720 plus PTX had higher antitumor efficacy than PTX against CAL27 CisR xenograft tumor formation. Additionally, increases in glucosylceramide, dehydroglucosylceramide, and sphingomyelin were presented in responsive tumors.

CONCLUSION

FTY720 sensitizes cisplatin-resistant oral squamous cell carcinoma cells for paclitaxel.

Concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel definitive radiation therapy for locally advanced head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

We report the outcomes of cisplatin-ineligible HNSCC patients treated with definitive chemoradiation and concurrent carboplatin and paclitaxel.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We included consecutive HNSCC patients treated from 2013 to 2021 that received definitive chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel. Locoregional recurrences (LRR) and distant metastases (DM) were estimated using cumulative incidence functions. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods.

RESULTS

Sixty-five patients were identified with median age of 71 years (range 44-85). Median radiation dose was 70 Gy and the median doses of carboplatin and paclitaxel were AUC 1 and 40 mg/m2 , respectively. At a median follow-up of 29 (range 5-91) months, the 2-year rates of LRR, DM, PFS, and OS were 8.8%, 9.4%, 72.2%, and 88.7%, respectively. In total, there were 5 LRR, 7 DM, and 12 deaths.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiation with carboplatin and paclitaxel is an excellent option for cisplatin-ineligible HNSCC patients.

Chemoradiation with Cisplatin vs. Carboplatin for Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Head and Neck (SCCHN)

Cisplatin is the standard for the chemoradiation of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (HNSCC). Many patients cannot receive cisplatin due to impaired renal function. This study investigated carboplatin as an alternative option. In total, 131 patients assigned to two courses of cisplatin (20 mg/m²/d1--5 or 25 mg/m²/d1-4) were matched to 45 patients not suitable for cisplatin and receiving carboplatin (AUC 1.0/d1-5 or AUC 1.5/d1-4). The endpoints included loco-regional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), overall survival (OS), toxicities, and the completion of chemotherapy. The patients in the carboplatin group were significantly older and had more G3 tumors. Otherwise, the baseline characteristics were balanced. The LRC rates at 2 and 3 years were 77% and 76% in the cisplatin group vs. 69% and 65% in the carboplatin group (p = 0.21). The MFS rates were 83% and 78% vs. 78% and 74% (p = 0.34) and the OS rates 83% and 79% vs. 83% and 75% (p = 0.64), respectively. The outcomes were not significantly different in the subgroups receiving definitive or adjuvant chemoradiation. No significant differences were found regarding toxicities. Non-significantly more patients in the carboplatin group completed their chemotherapy (78% vs. 66%, p = 0.15). Carboplatin was associated with similar outcomes and toxicities as cisplatin, although these patients had worse renal function, more aggressive tumors, and were older. Given the limitations of this study, carboplatin appears an option for patients not suitable for cisplatin.

Current Treatment Strategies and Risk Stratification for Oral Carcinoma

Management of oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) involves a multidisciplinary team approach. Surgery is ideally the primary treatment option for nonmetastatic OSCC, and less invasive curative surgical approaches are preferred in early-stage disease to minimize surgical-related morbidity. For patients at high risk of recurrence, adjuvant treatment using radiation therapy or chemoradiation is often used. Systemic therapy may also be used in the neoadjuvant setting (for advanced-stage disease with the intent of mandibular preservation) or in the palliative setting (for nonsalvageable locoregional recurrence and/or distant metastases). Patient involvement in treatment decision is the key for patient-driven management, particularly in clinical situation with poor prognosis, for example, early postoperative recurrence before planned adjuvant therapy.

NCCN Guidelines® Insights: Squamous Cell Skin Cancer, Version 1.2022

The NCCN Guidelines for Squamous Cell Skin Cancer provide recommendations for diagnostic workup, clinical stage, and treatment options for patients with cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma. The NCCN panel meets annually to discuss updates to the guidelines based on comments from panel members and the Institutional Review, as well as submissions from within NCCN and external organizations. These NCCN Guidelines Insights focus on the introduction of a new surgical recommendation terminology (peripheral and deep en face margin assessment), as well as recent updates on topical prophylaxis, immunotherapy for regional and metastatic disease, and radiation therapy.

Treating Advanced Head and Neck Cancer When Cisplatin Is Not an Option

The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.

Chemotherapy and dysphagia: the good, the bad, the ugly

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Dysphagia is a debilitating, depressing and potentially life-threatening complication in cancer patients that is likely underreported. The purpose of this review is to critically synthesize the current knowledge regarding the impact of chemotherapeutic regimens on swallowing function.

RECENT FINDINGS

Those patients with cancers involving the aerodigestive tract, head and neck cancer and oesophageal cancer are at highest risk of developing dysphagia. The most common dysphagia causing toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents is mucositis/stomatitis. The use of cisplatin is correlated with increased incidence of mucositis. Similarly, the addition of melphalan is also associated with worsening mucositis and dysphagia. In some cases of oesophageal cancer, thyroid cancer, metastatic lung or breast cancer the use of chemotherapy can improve swallow function as obstructive lesions are reduced.

SUMMARY

There is limited literature regarding the role of chemotherapy in the development or treatment of dysphagia. Most dysphagia that occurs during cancer treatment is attributable to radiation or the synergistic effect of radiation and chemotherapy. Patients with disordered swallowing prior to treatment have the greatest risk of developing posttreatment dysphagia. Studies are needed to determine whether acute inflammation associated with oropharyngeal mucositis predisposes for late dysphagia.