1
|
Larsson A, Miniscalco C, Mark H, Jönsson R, Persson C. Persisting speech difficulties at 7-8 years of age - a longitudinal study of speech production in internationally adopted children with cleft lip and palate. LOGOP PHONIATR VOCO 2024; 49:1-10. [PMID: 35833222 DOI: 10.1080/14015439.2022.2083673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 05/18/2022] [Accepted: 05/24/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
AIM To longitudinally investigate speech production (consonant proficiency, consonant errors and perceived velopharyngeal competence) in 17 internationally adopted (IA) children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) at three time points. METHOD Consonant proficiency (percent consonants correct, consonant inventory) and number and type of consonant errors were calculated based on blind phonetic transcriptions of words from the Swedish Test of Articulation and Nasality (SVANTE). Velopharyngeal competence was perceptually rated by three blinded experienced speech-language pathologists at the ages of 3, 5 and 7-8 years. RESULTS A significant positive development of speech production was found, although most children still scored very low for consonant proficiency at the age of 7-8 compared with normative values: the median for percent consonants correct was 79.7 and many children still had persisting cleft-related and developmental consonant errors. At the age of 7-8, almost half of the children were rated as having a competent velopharyngeal function and only three as having an incompetent velopharyngeal function. CONCLUSION Persisting speech difficulties at school age in IA children with UCLP were found in the present study, which is one of the very few longitudinal studies. Our results highlight the need for detailed follow-up of speech production in clinical settings. Speech disorders may have a severe impact on a child's intelligibility and participation with peers, and there is a need for more studies investigating the actual everyday effect of the difficulties found.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AnnaKarin Larsson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Child Health Unit Gothenburg & Södra Bohuslän, Regionhälsan, Region Västra Götaland, Göteborg, Sweden
| | - Carmela Miniscalco
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Department of Child Neuropsychiatry and Paediatric Speech and Language Pathology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hans Mark
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Radoslava Jönsson
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christina Persson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Region Västra Götaland, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Klintö K, Hagberg E, Havstam C, Nelli C, Okhiria Å, Brunnegård K. Reliability of data on percent consonants correct and its associated quality indicator in the Swedish cleft lip and palate registry. LOGOP PHONIATR VOCO 2024; 49:27-33. [PMID: 35786207 DOI: 10.1080/14015439.2022.2095017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2021] [Revised: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 06/21/2022] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Data in national health care quality registries must be valid and reliable in order to enable open comparisons of results. AIM To assess the reliability of data on percent consonants correct (PCC) and its associated quality indicator ≥86% correct consonants in the Swedish quality registry for patients born with cleft lip and palate (CLP) registry. METHODS Six independent speech-language pathologists re-assessed the audio recordings of 96 five-year-olds with PCC data in the CLP registry. Target consonants of a single-word picture-naming test were phonetically transcribed, and PCC was calculated. The reliability of PCC data was assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The reliability of the quality indicator ≥86% correct consonants was assessed with point-by-point percentage agreement and Cohen's kappa. RESULTS Intra- and inter-judge agreement for PCC was excellent with ICCs above 0.9, and so was the agreement of data from the CLP registry and the six judges' re-assessments. The percentage agreement between all judges and the CLP registry for the quality indicator ≥86% correct consonants was poor (67%). However, in 88% of the cases, results from four judges and the CLP registry agreed, corresponding to good agreement. The mean of all kappa values for six judges and the CLP registry corresponded to good agreement (0.72). CONCLUSIONS The results indicate the PCC data in the CLP registry and the quality indicator ≥86% correct consonants to be reliable. When differences in outcome between treatment centres are detected, the raw data collected should always be re-examined before drawing definitive conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kristina Klintö
- Department of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden
| | - Emilie Hagberg
- Medical Unit Speech Therapy and Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Christina Havstam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Nelli
- Speech and Language Therapy Unit, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åsa Okhiria
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin Brunnegård
- Department of Clinical Sciences/Speech and Language Pathology, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ombashi S, Kurniawan MS, Allori A, Sharif-Askary B, Rogers-Vizena C, Koudstaal M, Franken MC, Mink van der Molen AB, Mathijssen I, Klassen A, Versnel SL. What is the optimal assessment of speech? A multicentre, international evaluation of speech assessment in 2500 patients with a cleft. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e071571. [PMID: 38154881 PMCID: PMC10759067 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Speech problems in patients with a cleft palate are often complex and multifactorial. Finding the optimal way of monitoring these problems is challenging. The International Consortium of Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM) has developed a set of standardised outcome measures at specific ages for patients with a cleft lip and/or palate, including measures of speech assessment. This study evaluates the type and timing of speech outcome measures currently included in this ICHOM Standard Set. Additionally, speech assessments in other cleft protocols and initiatives are discussed. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS An international, multicentre study was set up including centres from the USA and the Netherlands. Outcomes of clinical measures and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) were collected retrospectively according to the ICHOM set. PROM data from a field test of the CLEFT-Q, a questionnaire developed and validated for patients with a cleft, were collected, including participants from countries with all sorts of income statuses, to examine the value of additional moments of measurement that are used in other cleft initiatives.Data from 2500 patients were included. Measured outcomes contained univariate regression analyses, trend analyses, t-tests, correlations and floor and ceiling effects. RESULTS PROMs correlated low to moderate with clinical outcome measures. Clinical outcome measures correlated low to moderate with each other too. In contrast, two CLEFT-Q Scales correlated strongly with each other. All PROMs and the Percent Consonants Correct (PCC) showed an effect of age. In patients with an isolated cleft palate, a ceiling effect was found in the Intelligibility in Context Scale. CONCLUSION Recommendations for an optimal speech outcome assessment in cleft patients are made. Measurement moments of different cleft protocols and initiatives are considered in this proposition. Concerning the type of measures, adjustment of the current PCC score outcome seems appropriate. For centres with adequate resources and specific interest in research, translation and validation of an upcoming tool, the Cleft Audit Protocol for Speech Augmented, is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saranda Ombashi
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Alexander Allori
- Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital and Children's Health Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Banafsheh Sharif-Askary
- Plastic, Maxillofacial and Oral Surgery, Duke University Hospital and Children's Health Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Maarten Koudstaal
- Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Irene Mathijssen
- Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Anne Klassen
- Pediatrics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| | - Sarah Lisa Versnel
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Erasmus MC Sophia Children Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Havstam C, Brunnegård K, Hagberg E, Nelli C, Okhiria Å, Klintö K. Speech in 7- and 10-year-olds born with a unilateral cleft lip and palate: a continued prospective Swedish intercentre study. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2023; 58:149-154. [PMID: 38108470 DOI: 10.2340/jphs.v58.15766] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/10/2023] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
The aim of this study was to report longitudinal speech results in consecutively selected children from each of the six cleft centres in Sweden and to compare the results between centres. The children were born with a non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate, and results from the same cohort at 5 years of age have previously been reported. Background data on medical care in terms of surgery, speech therapy, and hearing between 5 and 10 years of age were collected. Speech recordings of 56 children at 7 years and 54 at 10 years of age were blindly and independently assessed by four speech-language pathologists experienced in cleft palate speech. This resulted in measures of percent consonant correct (PCC) and perceived velopharyngeal competence rated on a three-tier scale. No statistically significant differences were found between centres. PCC scores at 7 years of age ranged from 44-100% (median 97.5) and at 10 years of age from 86-100% (median 100). Competent or marginally incompetent velopharyngeal function was found in 95% of the 7-year-olds and 98% of the 10-year-olds. Speech results were slightly better than previous reports of speech in children born with a unilateral cleft lip and palate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Havstam
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Speech and Language Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden; Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Department of Health and Rehabilitation, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
| | - Karin Brunnegård
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Speech and Language Pathology, Umeå University, Sweden
| | - Emilie Hagberg
- Medical Unit Speech and Language Pathology and Stockholm Craniofacial Team, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden; Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Cecilia Nelli
- Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Otorhinolaryngology Clinic, University Hospital Linköping, Sweden
| | - Åsa Okhiria
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Kristina Klintö
- Division of Speech Language Pathology, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden; Division of Speech Language Pathology, Phoniatrics and Audiology, Department of Clinical Sciences in Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Van der Straeten C, Verbeke J, Alighieri C, Bettens K, Van Beveren E, Bruneel L, Van Lierde K. Treatment Outcomes of Interdisciplinary Care on Speech and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes in Adults With Cleft Palate. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 32:2654-2675. [PMID: 37844623 DOI: 10.1044/2023_ajslp-23-00024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Individuals born with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip (CP ± L) often experience functional, aesthetic, and psychosocial consequences well into adulthood. This study aimed to investigate outcomes of speech and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in adults with a CP ± L who received interdisciplinary cleft care at the Ghent University Hospital using valid, reliable, and condition-specific instruments. METHOD Thirteen Belgian Dutch-speaking participants with a CP ± L with a mean age of 25.4 years (SD = 5.1, range: 20-33 years) and an age- and gender-matched control group of 13 participants without a CP ± L with a mean age of 25.2 years (SD = 4.8, range: 20-32 years) were included in this study. Speech characteristics were evaluated perceptually and instrumentally. HRQoL was assessed through standardized patient-reported outcome measures. Outcomes were compared with those of the control group and to normative data where available. RESULTS Participants with a CP ± L in this sample demonstrated significantly lower speech acceptability (p < .001) and higher rates of hypernasality (p = .015) and nasal turbulence (p = .005) than the control group. They showed significantly higher satisfaction with appearance of the cleft scar compared with norms of adults with a CP ± L (p = .047). No other differences in speech characteristics, sociodemographics, or HRQoL were found between participants with and without a CP ± L. CONCLUSIONS The reduced speech acceptability and the presence of resonance and nasal airflow disorders may indicate the need for standardized long-term outcome measurement and interdisciplinary follow-up for speech characteristics and velopharyngeal insufficiency in young and middle adulthood in future clinical practice. Additional research is necessary to further substantiate these findings and to determine predictors for these continuing complications in adults with a CP ± L. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.24243901.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charis Van der Straeten
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Jolien Verbeke
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Cassandra Alighieri
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Kim Bettens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Ellen Van Beveren
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Laura Bruneel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Kristiane Van Lierde
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre for Speech and Language Sciences (CESLAS), Ghent University, Belgium
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Okhiria Å, Persson C, Johansson MB, Hakelius M, Nowinski D. Longitudinal data on speech outcomes in internationally adopted children compared with non-adopted children with cleft lip and palate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023; 58:1440-1453. [PMID: 36929536 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12869] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At the beginning of the 21st century, international adoptions of children with cleft lip and/or palate increased dramatically in Sweden. Many children arrived partially or totally unoperated, despite being at an age when palatoplasty has usually been performed. To date, the speech development of internationally adopted (IA) children has been described up to age 7-8 years, but later development remains unstudied. AIMS To investigate speech development between ages 5 and 10 years in children born with cleft lip and palate (CLP) adopted from China and to compare them with non-adopted (NA) children with CLP. A secondary aim was to compare the frequencies of secondary palatal surgery and number of visits to a speech and language pathologist (SLP) between the groups. METHODS & PROCEDURES In a longitudinal study, 23 IA children from China were included and matched with 23 NA children born in Sweden. Experienced SLPs blindly reassessed audio recordings from routine follow-ups at ages 5 and 10 years. Velopharyngeal function (VPF) was assessed with the composite score for velopharyngeal competence (VPC-Sum) for single words and rated on a three-point scale (VPC-Rate) in sentence repetition. Target sounds in words and sentences were phonetically transcribed. Per cent correct consonants (PCC) were calculated at word and sentence levels. For in-depth analyses, articulation errors were divided into cleft speech characteristics (CSCs), developmental speech characteristics (DSCs) and s-errors. Information on secondary palatal surgery and number of visits to an SLP was collected. OUTCOMES & RESULTS VPF differed significantly between the groups at both ages when assessed with VPC-Sum, but not with VPC-Rate. Regardless of the method for assessing VPF, a similar proportion in both groups had incompetent VPF but fewer IA than NA children had competent VPF at both ages. IA children had lower PCC at both ages at both word and sentence levels. More IA children had CSCs, DSCs and s-errors at age 5 years, and CSCs and s-errors at age 10. The development of PCC was significant in both groups between ages 5 and 10 years. The proportion of children receiving secondary palatal surgery did not differ significantly between the groups, nor did number of SLP visits. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS CSCs were more persistent in IA children than in NA children at age 10 years. Interventions should target both cleft and DSCs, be comprehensive and continue past the pre-school years. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject At the beginning of the 21st century, IA children with cleft lip and/or palate arrived in Sweden partially or totally unoperated, despite being at an age when palatoplasty has usually been performed. Studies up to age 7-8 years show that adopted children, compared with NA peers, have poorer articulation skills, demonstrate both cleft-related and developmental articulation errors, and are more likely to have velopharyngeal incompetence. Several studies also report that adopted children more often require secondary palatal surgery due to fistulas, dehiscence or velopharyngeal incompetence compared with NA peers. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This longitudinal study provides additional knowledge based on longer follow-ups than previous studies. It shows that the proportion of children assessed to have incompetent VPF was similar among IA and NA children. It was no significant difference between the groups regarding the proportion that received secondary palatal surgery. However, fewer IA children were assessed to have a competent VPF. Developmental articulation errors have ceased in most IA and all NA children at age 10 years, but significantly more adopted children than NA children still have cleft-related articulation errors. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? Speech and language therapy should target both cleft-related and developmental articulation errors. When needed, treatment must be initiated early, comprehensive, and continued past the pre-school years, not least for adopted children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Åsa Okhiria
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Christina Persson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
- Region Västra Götaland, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Monica Blom Johansson
- Department of Public Health and Caring Sciences, Speech and Language Pathology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Malin Hakelius
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Daniel Nowinski
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Plastic Surgery, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alighieri C, Bettens K, Perry J, Hens G, Roche N, Van Lierde K. Achieving the next level in cleft speech intervention: A protocol of a randomized sham-controlled trial to provide guidelines for a personalized approach in children with cleft palate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2023. [PMID: 36721996 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12853] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/10/2023] [Indexed: 06/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Compensatory cleft speech disorders can severely impact speech understandability and speech acceptability. Speech intervention is necessary to eliminate these disorders. There is, however, currently no consensus on the most effective speech therapy approach to eliminate the different subtypes of compensatory cleft speech disorders. AIMS To compare the immediate, short- and long-term effects of three well-defined speech intervention approaches (i.e., a motor-phonetic approach, a linguistic-phonological approach and a combined phonetic-phonological approach) on the speech and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) and different subtypes of compensatory speech disorders (i.e., anterior oral cleft speech characteristics (CSCs), posterior oral CSCs or non-oral CSCs). Besides, the perceived acceptability of these three speech intervention approaches will be investigated from the perspectives of caregivers and children with a CP±L. METHODS & PROCEDURES A two-centre longitudinal randomized sham-controlled trial was used. Children were randomly assigned to one of the three intervention programmes and received 10 h of speech intervention divided over 2 weeks. Block randomization was used, stratified by age and gender. Primary outcome measures included perceptual speech outcomes. Secondary outcome measures included patient-reported outcomes. OUTCOMES & RESULTS The results of this trial will provide speech-language pathologists evidence-based guidelines to better tailor intervention approaches to the specific needs of a child with a defined compensatory speech disorder. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on this subject Speech therapy approaches to address cleft palate speech disorders are broadly divided into two categories: motor-phonetic interventions and linguistic-phonological interventions. Some limited evidence demonstrated the positive effects of these approaches in eliminating compensatory cleft speech disorders. Different studies have reported inter-individual variation, suggesting that one child may benefit more from a particular intervention approach than the other child. Perhaps this variation can be attributed to the specific subtype of compensatory speech disorder (i.e., anterior oral CSC, posterior oral CSC or non-oral CSC). What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper describes a randomized sham-controlled trial that compared the immediate, short- and long-term effects of three well-defined speech intervention approaches (i.e., a motor-phonetic approach, a linguistic-phonological approach and a combined phonetic-phonological approach) on the speech and HRQoL in Belgian Dutch-speaking children with CP±L and different subtypes of compensatory cleft speech disorders (i.e., anterior oral CSCs, posterior oral CSCs or non-oral CSCs) measured by perceptual and psychosocial outcome measures. Besides, the experienced acceptability of these three speech intervention approaches were investigated from the perspectives of caregivers and children. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? This project provides evidence-based knowledge on patient-tailored cleft speech intervention considering both scientific evidence and the perspectives of caregivers and children. The results aid SLPs in better tailoring intervention approaches to the needs of a child with a specific type of compensatory cleft speech disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cassandra Alighieri
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre of Speech and Language Sciences Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Kim Bettens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre of Speech and Language Sciences Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| | - Jamie Perry
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA
| | - Greet Hens
- Department Neurosciences, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | | | - Kristiane Van Lierde
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Centre of Speech and Language Sciences Ghent University, Gent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Corrêa CDC, Maximino LP, Abramides DVM, Weber SAT. Oral language skills in Brazilian children with obstructive sleep apnea. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2022; 128:104300. [PMID: 35810542 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2022.104300] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2022] [Revised: 05/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/28/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with a negative impact on neurocognitive development in children. Receptive/expressive oral language is a complex process, with limited investigations on the repercussion of OSA. This study aimed to analyze receptive and expressive oral language skills in children with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODOLOGY This study included 52 children (27 females, 51.92 %) with a mean age of 7 ± 2 years (age range of 4-11 years), which underwent type 3 polysomnography (PSG). The participants were divided into N-OSA (n = 16) and OSA (n = 36) groups based on the apnea-hypopnea index. The speech-language therapist evaluated hearing and oral language for phonology, expressive semantics, syntax, receptive semantics (Peabody Image Vocabulary Test), pragmatics, and understanding of verbal instructions (Token Test). RESULTS Oral language assessments showed a difference in the pragmatics subsystem (p = 0.047), with positive correlation between OSA severity and oral language functions such as pragmatics and syntax (desaturation index, p = 0.045). CONCLUSION Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) had a negative impact on oral language skills, including the syntax and pragmatics subsystems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Luciana Paula Maximino
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology at Dentistry School of Bauru (FOB-USP), Bauru, SP, Brazil.
| | | | - Silke Anna Theresa Weber
- Department of Ophthalmology and Otorhinolaryngology, Botucatu Medical School, UNESP, Botucatu, SP, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alighieri C, Bettens K, Bruneel L, Perry J, Hens G, Van Lierde K. One Size Doesn't Fit All: A Pilot Study Toward Performance-Specific Speech Intervention in Children With a Cleft (Lip and) Palate. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2022; 65:469-486. [PMID: 35021015 DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00405] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Speech-language pathologists usually apply a "one size fits all" approach to eliminate compensatory cleft speech characteristics (CSCs). It is necessary to investigate what intervention works best for a particular patient. This pilot study compared the effectiveness of two therapy approaches (a motor-phonetic approach and a linguistic-phonological approach) on different subtypes of compensatory CSCs in Dutch-speaking children with a cleft (lip and) palate (CP ± L). METHOD Fourteen children with a CP ± L (M age = 7.71 years) were divided into two groups using block randomization stratified by age, gender, and type of compensatory CSC. Six children received intervention to eliminate anterior oral CSCs (n = 3 motor-phonetic intervention, n = 3 linguistic-phonological intervention). Eight children received intervention to eliminate non-oral CSCs (n = 4 motor-phonetic intervention, n = 4 linguistic-phonological intervention). Each child received 10 hr of speech intervention divided over 2 weeks. Perceptual and psychosocial outcome measures were used to determine intervention effects. RESULTS Children who received linguistic-phonological intervention to eliminate anterior oral CSCs had significantly higher correctly produced consonant scores and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) scores compared to children who received motor-phonetic intervention to eliminate anterior oral CSCs. In the group of children who received intervention to eliminate non-oral CSCs, no significant differences were found in the correctly produced consonant scores nor in the HRQoL scores between the two intervention approaches. CONCLUSIONS Linguistic-phonological intervention seems to be more appropriate to eliminate anterior oral CSCs. The beneficial effects of linguistic-phonological intervention were less pronounced in children with non-oral CSCs. Perhaps, children with non-oral CSCs benefit more from a hybrid phonetic-phonological approach. This study is a step forward in the provision of performance-specific intervention in children with a CP ± L. Replication in larger samples is needed and will aid to tailor treatment plans to the needs of our patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim Bettens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Laura Bruneel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Jamie Perry
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC
| | - Greet Hens
- Department of Neurosciences, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lane H, Harding S, Wren Y. A systematic review of early speech interventions for children with cleft palate. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF LANGUAGE & COMMUNICATION DISORDERS 2022; 57:226-245. [PMID: 34767284 DOI: 10.1111/1460-6984.12683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2020] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 10/05/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Children with cleft palate with or without cleft lip (CP±L) are at high risk of problems with early speech sound production, and these difficulties can persist into later childhood. Early intervention could help to reduce the number of children whose problems become persistent. However, much research in the field to date has focused on older children. There is a need to determine if providing intervention during the phase of early typical speech development leads to better outcomes. AIMS To review the evidence for the effectiveness of interventions targeting speech, delivered in the first 3 years of life for children with CP±L, and discuss factors such as intervention type, facilitator, dosage, outcome measures and the age of the child. METHODS & PROCEDURES The systematic review was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019121964). Eight bibliographic databases including CINAHL and MEDLINE were searched in August 2018. Studies were included if participants received speech and language interventions before 37 months and if they reported outcomes for speech. Two reviewers independently completed inclusion reviews, quality analysis and data extraction. OUTCOME & RESULTS The review included seven papers: one pilot randomized controlled trial, one controlled trial, four cohort studies and one case series report. Interventions largely took a naturalistic approach, namely focused stimulation and milieu teaching. The findings provide preliminary support for naturalistic interventions and suggest that these interventions can be delivered by parents with suitable training. Studies included in the review provided low-strength evidence with variation in both the type of intervention, the manner of delivery and in the risk of bias in the designs used. CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS The papers included in this review suggest that early naturalistic interventions can have positive impacts on the speech development of children with CP±L. However, the reported methodological quality of the publications overall was weak, and the current evidence lacks clarity and specificity in terms of therapy technique, delivery and optimum age of delivery. Future research should use more robust methodological designs to determine whether early speech interventions are beneficial for children born with CP±L. WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS What is already known on the subject Children with CP±L show difficulties with early speech development and often have restricted speech sound inventories. They may reach the canonical babbling stage later than children without CP±L and studies have shown that 20% of children with CP±L have speech which is considered unintelligible or barely intelligible at age 5. It has been proposed that early intervention can lessen the impact of CP±L on speech development. However, currently, the evidence for early interventions for children with CP±L is limited, with the majority of studies focusing on children aged 3 years and older. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper reviews the evidence for different types of early interventions for speech provided to children born with CP±L and whether these interventions are effective in supporting speech sound development. In this review, early intervention is defined as intervention provided to children in the first 3 years of life. This review describes intervention approaches and how they are delivered for this population. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? In the UK, children born with CP±L and their families are supported by National Health Service (NHS) services over a 20-year period and speech and language therapy sessions may take place over many weeks and months. If providing early intervention in the first 3 years of life is effective, there is the potential for improved speech outcomes in early childhood and a reduced burden of care on children, families and services. This review considers the evidence for early speech intervention for children with CP±L in the first 3 years of life and identifies areas for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Lane
- Speech and Language Therapy, Doncaster and Bassetlaw Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Doncaster, UK
| | - Sam Harding
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Yvonne Wren
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Alighieri C, Van Lierde K, De Caesemaeker AS, Demuynck K, Bruneel L, D'haeseleer E, Bettens K. Is High-Intensity Speech Intervention Better? A Comparison of High-Intensity Intervention Versus Low-Intensity Intervention in Children With a Cleft Palate. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2021; 64:3398-3415. [PMID: 34433000 DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-21-00189] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of speech intervention provided with a low intensity with speech intervention provided with a high intensity on the speech and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip (CP ± L) between 4 and 12 years. Method A longitudinal, prospective, randomized controlled trial with a multiple baseline design was used. Twelve children with a CP ± L (M age = 8.0 years, SD = 1.54) were divided into two groups using block randomization stratified by age and gender: One group received low-intensity speech intervention (LISI; n = 6) and one group received high-intensity speech intervention (HISI; n = 6). Children in the LISI group received intervention with a session duration of 1 hr, a dose frequency of 1 session per week, and a total intervention duration of 10 weeks. Children in the HISI group received intervention with a session duration of 1 hr, a dose frequency of 5 sessions per week, and a total intervention duration of 2 weeks. The cumulative intervention intensity was kept constant. Both groups received identical therapy programs provided by the same experienced speech therapist. Perceptual speech assessments were performed on baseline and posttreatment data points. Changes in HRQoL were assessed using the Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes (VELO) questionnaire. Both groups were compared over time using (generalized) linear mixed models. Results No significant Time × Group interactions were observed for the percentage of correctly produced consonants at the word and sentence levels, indicating no differences in evolution over time among the two groups. The variables speech understandability, speech acceptability, and the total VELO scores significantly improved following HISI, but not following LISI. Conclusions Children in the HISI group made equal and, for some variables, even superior progress in only 2 weeks of therapy compared to children in the LISI group who received 10 weeks of therapy. HISI is a promising strategy to improve speech outcomes and HRQoL in a shorter time period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kristiane Van Lierde
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
- Faculty of Humanities, Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| | | | - Kris Demuynck
- Department of Electronics and information systems, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Laura Bruneel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | | - Kim Bettens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hardin-Jones MA, Chapman KL. Non-Oral Compensatory Misarticulations Revisited. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2021; 59:976-983. [PMID: 34184568 DOI: 10.1177/10556656211026488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Non-oral compensatory misarticulation patterns are often associated with the speech of children with cleft palate. Despite their saliency, the etiology, frequency, and treatment of these misarticulations have not been studied extensively. The purpose of this commentary is to review what we know about these atypical patterns of articulation and address clinical assumptions regarding their etiology and treatment.
Collapse
|
13
|
Alighieri C, Bettens K, Bruneel L, D'haeseleer E, Van Gaever E, Van Lierde K. Reliability of Outcome Measures to Assess Consonant Proficiency Following Cleft Palate Speech Intervention: The Percentage of Consonants Correct Metric and the Probe Scoring System. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2021; 64:1811-1828. [PMID: 33970671 DOI: 10.1044/2021_jslhr-20-00628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose This study compared the inter- and intrarater reliability of the percentage of consonants correct (PCC) metrics and the probe scoring system between an experienced and a less experienced rater and between two experienced raters. In addition, these outcome measures' ability to reflect changes following speech intervention was measured. Method During Phase 1, two raters (Rater 1 with 5 years of experience in cleft-related speech disorders and Rater 2 with limited experience in cleft-related speech disorders) independently assessed 134 speech samples at the word and sentence levels, which were collected on different data points before, during, and following a cleft palate speech intervention. During Phase 2, a third rater (with 8 years of experience) analyzed 34 speech samples. The percentage of consonants correct-revised, the percentage of correct places and manners, and probe scores at the word and sentence levels were measured. Results Poor-to-moderate interreliability between Raters 1 and 2 was found due to differences in error classification. Interrater reliability between Raters 1 and 3 was very good for both the PCC metrics and the probe scores. The interrater reliability for the amount of targets elicited was lower compared to the interrater reliability for the amount of targets correct. The probe scoring system demonstrated a greater ability to detect changes toward the correct production of the target consonant compared to the PCC metrics. Conclusions Having an experience with the assessment of cleft-related speech disorders is a crucial factor to gain reliable results. The interrater reliability for the PCC metrics and the probe scoring system between two experienced raters did not differ, suggesting that both outcome measures can be used in cleft palate speech intervention studies. Despite the ability of the probe scoring system to detect changes, further research should provide insight in the benefits of this system both for research and clinical purposes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim Bettens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Laura Bruneel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | | - Ellen Van Gaever
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Kristiane Van Lierde
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
- Department of Speech-Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Alighieri C, Bettens K, Bruneel L, D'haeseleer E, Van Gaever E, Van Lierde K. Effectiveness of Speech Intervention in Patients With a Cleft Palate: Comparison of Motor-Phonetic Versus Linguistic-Phonological Speech Approaches. JOURNAL OF SPEECH, LANGUAGE, AND HEARING RESEARCH : JSLHR 2020; 63:3909-3933. [PMID: 33253622 DOI: 10.1044/2020_jslhr-20-00129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Purpose The purpose of this study was to compare the effect of two different speech therapy approaches, a traditional motor-phonetic approach and a linguistic-phonological approach, on the speech and health-related quality of life in Dutch-speaking children with a cleft palate with or without a cleft lip (CP ± L) between 4 and 12 years old. Method A block-randomized, sham-controlled design was used. Fourteen children with a CP ± L (M age = 7.71 years) were divided into two groups using block randomization stratified by age and gender: one receiving motor-phonetic intervention (n = 7) and one receiving linguistic-phonological intervention (n = 7). Each group received 10 hr of speech therapy divided over 2 weeks. Perceptual speech assessments were performed on several baseline and posttreatment data points. The psychosocial effects of the intervention were assessed using the patient-reported Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes questionnaire. Both groups were compared over time using (generalized) linear mixed models. Within-group effects of time were determined using pairwise comparisons with post hoc Bonferroni correction. Results Significant Time × Group interactions with large effect sizes were revealed in terms of consonant proficiency, indicating significant differences in evolution over time among the two groups. Only in the group receiving linguistic-phonological intervention, percentage of correctly produced consonants and places significantly improved after the treatment. Total Velopharyngeal Insufficiency Effects on Life Outcomes scores of the parents significantly improved in both groups after the intervention. Conclusions Both motor-phonetic and linguistic-phonological speech interventions can have a positive impact on the occurrence of cleft speech characteristics and consonant proficiency in children with a CP ± L. A linguistic-phonological approach, however, was observed to be more effective in terms of improving these speech outcomes compared with a motor-phonetic approach. Speech intervention, irrespective of the used approach, significantly improved the participant's health-related quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kim Bettens
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | - Laura Bruneel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | | - Ellen Van Gaever
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Ghent University, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Kent RD, Rountrey C. What Acoustic Studies Tell Us About Vowels in Developing and Disordered Speech. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2020; 29:1749-1778. [PMID: 32631070 PMCID: PMC7893529 DOI: 10.1044/2020_ajslp-19-00178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2020] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Literature was reviewed on the development of vowels in children's speech and on vowel disorders in children and adults, with an emphasis on studies using acoustic methods. Method Searches were conducted with PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, CINAHL, HighWire Press, and legacy sources in retrieved articles. The primary search items included, but were not limited to, vowels, vowel development, vowel disorders, vowel formants, vowel therapy, vowel inherent spectral change, speech rhythm, and prosody. Results/Discussion The main conclusions reached in this review are that vowels are (a) important to speech intelligibility; (b) intrinsically dynamic; (c) refined in both perceptual and productive aspects beyond the age typically given for their phonetic mastery; (d) produced to compensate for articulatory and auditory perturbations; (e) influenced by language and dialect even in early childhood; (f) affected by a variety of speech, language, and hearing disorders in children and adults; (g) inadequately assessed by standardized articulation tests; and (h) characterized by at least three factors-articulatory configuration, extrinsic and intrinsic regulation of duration, and role in speech rhythm and prosody. Also discussed are stages in typical vowel ontogeny, acoustic characterization of rhotic vowels, a sensory-motor perspective on vowel production, and implications for clinical assessment of vowels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ray D. Kent
- Waisman Center, University of Wisconsin–Madison
| | - Carrie Rountrey
- Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of Cincinnati, OH
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Wren Y, McLeod S, Verdon S. Transcription of Children's Speech. Folia Phoniatr Logop 2020; 72:73-74. [PMID: 32155615 DOI: 10.1159/000506984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2020] [Accepted: 03/05/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Yvonne Wren
- Bristol Speech and Language Therapy Research Unit, North Bristol NHS Trust and University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom,
| | - Sharynne McLeod
- Charles Sturt University, Bathurst, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sarah Verdon
- Charles Sturt University, Albury, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Larsson A, Miniscalco C, Mark H, Schölin JS, Jönsson R, Persson C. Internationally Adopted Children With Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate-Consonant Proficiency and Perceived Velopharyngeal Competence at the Age of 5. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2020; 57:849-859. [PMID: 31950849 DOI: 10.1177/1055665619897233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare consonant proficiency, consonant errors, and the perceived velopharyngeal (VP) competence in internationally adopted (IA) children with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) and nonadopted (NA) children with the same cleft-palate type at age 5. DESIGN Case-control study based on phonetic transcriptions of standardized speech recordings of 5-year-olds at a tertiary hospital. PARTICIPANTS Twenty-five IA children were compared to 20 NA children. All consecutive patients at a cleft lip and palate center participated. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Consonant proficiency was measured using percentage consonants correct, percentage consonants correct-adjusted for age, percentage correct place, percentage correct manner, and consonant inventory. Cleft speech characteristics (CSCs), developmental speech characteristics (DSCs), and the perceived VP competence were also measured. RESULTS The IA children had significantly lower values for all consonant proficiency variables (p < .05) and a smaller consonant inventory (p = .001) compared to the NA children. The IA children had a higher frequency of CSCs (IA = 84%, NA = 50%, p < .05) and DSCs (IA = 92%, NA = 65%, p = .057), and twice as many IA children as NA children had perceived VP incompetence (IA = 52%, NA = 25%, p = .17). CONCLUSIONS Severe speech disorder was more common in IA children than in NA children at age 5. Most importantly, the speech disorders seem to be not only cleft-related. More detailed speech assessments with a broader focus are needed for IA children with UCLP. Longitudinal studies are recommended to further investigate the impact of speech difficulties in IA children's daily lives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- AnnaKarin Larsson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Child Health Unit Göteborg & Södra Bohuslän, Regionhälsan, Region Västra Götaland, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Carmela Miniscalco
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Gillberg Neuropsychiatry Centre, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Paediatric Speech and Language Pathology, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Hans Mark
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Johnna Sahlsten Schölin
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Plastic Surgery, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Radi Jönsson
- Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Audiology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christina Persson
- Institute of Neuroscience and Physiology, Speech and Language Pathology Unit, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden.,Division of Speech and Language Pathology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Sell D, Seselgyte R, Prendeville N, Sadri A, Pinkstone M. Letter comments on: Time course of improvement after re-repair procedure for VPI management. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 2019; 72:2064-2094. [PMID: 31607595 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2019.06.044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 06/29/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Debbie Sell
- Centre for Outcomes and Experience Research in Children's Health, Illness and Disability (ORCHID).
| | | | | | - Amir Sadri
- Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| | - Marie Pinkstone
- Great Ormond Street Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|