1
|
Krückel A, Brückner L, Psilopatis I, Fasching PA, Beckmann MW, Emons J. Evaluation of ChatGPT's Potential in Tailoring Gynecological Cancer Therapies. In Vivo 2024; 38:1649-1659. [PMID: 38936938 PMCID: PMC11215587 DOI: 10.21873/invivo.13614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Revised: 03/03/2024] [Accepted: 03/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Demographic change and increasing complexity of therapy decisions lead to a growing burden on the healthcare system, necessitating efforts to simplify and enhance the efficiency of patient care. The present study evaluates ChatGPT's ability to provide therapy recommendations for gynecological malignancies that are both in line with the local guidelines and individually tailored to the patient. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixteen patients with endometrial, cervical, and ovarian cancer who were treated in the gynecological clinic of the University Hospital Erlangen from January 2022 to August 2023 were included in the analysis. Data collected within clinical routine care were communicated to the chat-based AI model ChatGPT (version 3.5). ChatGPT's performance generating treatment plans were evaluated using an answer scoring system and descriptive analysis. RESULTS According to the answer scoring system [range: -1 point (minimum) to 2 points (maximum)], ChatGPT demonstrated a good potential in generating therapy recommendations with an average score of 0.75 points for patients with ovarian cancer, 0.7 points for cervical and 1.5 points for endometrial cancer patients. The most common deductions in points were about incomplete therapy recommendations, whereas contraindicated treatment modalities were rarely suggested. Individual patient characteristics were regularly considered by ChatGPT. ChatGPT reliably indicated aftercare and provided detailed information on preventive measures as well as supportive treatment. CONCLUSION ChatGPT is a promising tool for the generation of therapy suggestions for gynecological carcinomas with high flexibility in response to individual patient differences. At the current state, however, ChatGPT is not suitable for replacing expert panels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annika Krückel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Lena Brückner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Iason Psilopatis
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Julius Emons
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nürnberg, Erlangen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Herold N, Bredow K, Ernst C, Tüchler A, Blümcke B, Waha A, Keser E, Hauke J, Wappenschmidt B, Hahnen E, Schmutzler RK, Rhiem K. Implementing mainstream genetic counseling within the area-wide network of the German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC): Satisfaction of primary care providers with the provided state-of-the-art training by the Cologne Center. J Genet Couns 2024; 33:206-215. [PMID: 38351721 DOI: 10.1002/jgc4.1870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2022] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
The German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft DKG) has published a position paper to address the challenges of cancer patient care in the era of genomic medicine. The German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) has implemented this recommendation in its care concept for families at risk. Core elements are the outcome-oriented evaluation of structured and standardized clinical measures and reporting recommendations derived therefrom to primary care providers and patients. A cross-sector network with certified breast cancer and gynecological cancer centers was founded in 2015, starting from the Cologne Center of the GC-HBOC. To guarantee the knowledge transfer for mainstream genetic counseling, the Cologne center has established an educational program for physicians and specialized nurses in order to pilot trans-sectoral knowledge transfer on risk assessment and risk-stratified care. It consists of face-to-face lectures with written knowledge test, attending a genetic case conference and genetic counseling sessions with the opportunity to counsel under supervision. The lectures were accompanied by a structured evaluation of the participants' satisfaction and feedback of the needs in mainstream genetic counseling. Thereby, the network ensures that genetic counseling and testing is provided according to state-of-the-art knowledge and allows physicians to participate in knowledge-generating care outside the university setting and patients to receive care close to home. After multiple feedback cycles to improve the educational program, the GC-HBOC, in cooperation with the German Cancer Society, has now adopted this concept and developed a common and uniform online curriculum funded by the Federal Ministry of Health. https://www.krebsgesellschaft.de/fortbildung-familiaerer-krebs.html.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Herold
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kathrin Bredow
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Corinna Ernst
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anja Tüchler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Britta Blümcke
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Anke Waha
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ebru Keser
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Hauke
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Barbara Wappenschmidt
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eric Hahnen
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Katharina Schmutzler
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Speiser D, Bick U. Primary Prevention and Early Detection of Hereditary Breast Cancer. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:448-454. [PMID: 38125920 PMCID: PMC10730103 DOI: 10.1159/000533391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Primary prevention and early detection of hereditary breast cancer has been one of the main topics of breast cancer research in recent decades. The knowledge of risk factors for breast cancer has been increasing continuously just like the recommendations for risk management. Pathogenic germline variants (mutations, class 4/5) of risk genes are significant susceptibility factors in healthy individuals. At the same time, germline mutations serve as biomarkers for targeted therapy in breast cancer treatment. Therefore, management of healthy mutation carriers to enable primary prevention is in the focus as much as the consideration of pathogenic germline variants for therapeutic decisions. Since 1996, the German Consortium has provided quality-assured care for counselees and patients with familial burden of breast and ovarian cancer. Summary Currently, there are 23 university centers with over 100 cooperating DKG-certified breast and gynecological cancer centers. These centers provide standardized, evidence-based, and knowledge-generating care, which includes aspects of primary as well as secondary and tertiary prevention. An important aspect of quality assurance and development was the inclusion of the HBOC centers in the certification system of the German Cancer Society (GCS). Since 2020, the centers have been regularly audited and their quality standards continuously reviewed according to quality indicators adapted to the current state of research. The standard of care at GC-HBOC' centers involves the evaluation as well as evolution of various aspects of care like inclusion criteria, identification of new risk genes, management of variants of unknown significance (class 3), evaluation of risk-reducing options, intensified surveillance, and communication of risks. Among these, the possibility of intensified surveillance in the GC-HBOC for early detection of breast cancer is an important component of individual risk management for many counselees. As has been shown in recent years, in carriers of pathogenic variants in high-risk genes, this approach enables the detection of breast cancer at very early, more favorable stages although no reduction of mortality has been demonstrated yet. The key component of the intensified surveillance is annual contrast-enhanced breast MRI, supplemented by up to biannual breast ultrasound and mammography usually starting at age 40. Key Messages Apart from early detection, the central goal of care is the prevention of cancer. By utilizing individualized risk calculation, the optimal timeframe for risk-reducing surgery can be estimated, and counselees can be supported in reaching preference-sensitive decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dorothee Speiser
- HBOC-Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology with Breast Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrich Bick
- HBOC-Center, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Radiology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gremke N, Wagner U, Kalder M, Kostev K. Changes in the incidence of early-onset breast cancer in Germany between 2010 and 2022. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 202:167-172. [PMID: 37518826 PMCID: PMC10504108 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-07048-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study was to identify the mean age at which breast cancer (BC) was first diagnosed in 2010 or 2022, and to evaluate whether there were any changes in age groups at first BC diagnosis. METHODS This retrospective cross-sectional study included adult women (18 years or older) who were diagnosed with BC (ICD-10: C50) for the first time in 2010 or 2022 in office-based practices in Germany (in 300 general practices or 95 gynecological practices). We examined the mean age at diagnosis and the percentage of patients in three age groups (18-49, 50-65, and > 65) for both 2010 and 2022. The average age difference between 2010 and 2022 was analyzed using Wilcoxon rank tests, and the proportions of the three age groups were analyzed using chi-squared tests. These analyses were performed separately for patients in general and gynecological practices. RESULTS The mean age at which BC was initially diagnosed in 2022 was found to be significantly greater than that in 2010 for both general practices (66.9 years vs. 64.0 years p < 0.001) and gynecological practices (62.2 years vs. 60.3 years, p < 0.001). Early-onset BC decreased from 15.6 to 12.0% in general practices and from 23.2 to 18.2% in gynecological practices between 2010 and 2022. The proportion of new BC diagnoses in the age group 50-65 increased from 36.6 to 40.9% in gynecological practices, but did not increase in general practices. CONCLUSION The study found that BC was diagnosed at an older age in 2022 than in 2010. In addition, the proportion of early-onset BC cases decreased, while the proportion of cases in the age group 50-65 increased in gynecological practices in Germany.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Niklas Gremke
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
- Institute of Molecular Oncology, Philipps-University Marburg, Hans-Meerwein-Straße 3, 35043, Marburg, Germany.
| | - Uwe Wagner
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Matthias Kalder
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Marburg, Philipps-University Marburg, Baldingerstraße, 35043, Marburg, Germany
| | - Karel Kostev
- Epidemiology, IQVIA, Main Airport Center, Unterschweinstiege 2-14, 60549, Frankfurt, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kolberg HC, Hartkopf AD, Fehm TN, Welslau M, Müller V, Schütz F, Fasching PA, Janni W, Witzel I, Thomssen C, Beierlein M, Belleville E, Untch M, Thill M, Tesch H, Ditsch N, Lux MP, Aktas B, Banys-Paluchowski M, Kolberg-Liedtke C, Wöckel A, Harbeck N, Stickeler E, Bartsch R, Schneeweiss A, Ettl J, Krug D, Taran FA, Lüftner D, Würstlein R. Update Breast Cancer 2023 Part 3 - Expert Opinions of Early Stage Breast Cancer Therapies. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2023; 83:1117-1126. [PMID: 37706055 PMCID: PMC10497347 DOI: 10.1055/a-2143-8125] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
The St. Gallen (SG) International Breast Cancer Conference is held every two years, previously in St. Gallen and now in Vienna. This year (2023) marks the eighteenth edition of this conference, which focuses on the treatment of patients with early-stage breast carcinoma. A panel discussion will be held at the end of this four-day event, during which a panel of experts will give their opinions on current controversial issues relating to the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients. To this end, questions are generally formulated in such a way that clinically realistic cases are presented - often including poignant hypothetical modifications. This review reports on the outcome of these discussions and summarises the data associated with individual questions raised.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreas D. Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Tanja N. Fehm
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
| | | | - Volkmar Müller
- Department of Gynecology, Hamburg-Eppendorf University Medical Center, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Florian Schütz
- Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Diakonissen-Stiftungs-Krankenhaus Speyer, Speyer, Germany
| | - Peter A. Fasching
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Isabell Witzel
- Universitätsspital Zürich, Klinik für Gynäkologie, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Thomssen
- Department of Gynaecology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Milena Beierlein
- Erlangen University Hospital, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen,
Germany
| | | | - Michael Untch
- Clinic for Gynecology and Obstetrics, Breast Cancer Center, Gynecologic Oncology Center, Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch, Berlin, Germany
| | - Marc Thill
- Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus, Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Hans Tesch
- Oncology Practice at Bethanien Hospital, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Nina Ditsch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Michael P. Lux
- Klinik für Gynäkologie und Geburtshilfe, Frauenklinik St. Louise, Paderborn, St. Josefs-Krankenhaus, Salzkotten, St. Vincenz Krankenhaus GmbH, Paderborn, Germany
| | - Bahriye Aktas
- Department of Gynecology, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Maggie Banys-Paluchowski
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | | | - Achim Wöckel
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Nadia Harbeck
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Elmar Stickeler
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO Aachen, Bonn, Cologne, Düsseldorf), University Hospital of RWTH Aachen, Aachen, Germany
| | - Rupert Bartsch
- Medical University of Vienna, Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreas Schneeweiss
- National Center for Tumor Diseases, University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Johannes Ettl
- Klinikum Kempten, Klinikverbund Allgäu, Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Gynäkologie, Kempten, Germany
| | - David Krug
- Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Klinik für Strahlentherapie, Kiel, Germany
| | - Florin-Andrei Taran
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Diana Lüftner
- Immanuel Hospital Märkische Schweiz, Buckow, Germany
- Medical University of Brandenburg Theodor-Fontane, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - Rachel Würstlein
- Breast Center, Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics and CCC Munich LMU, LMU University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Stiller S, Drukewitz S, Lehmann K, Hentschel J, Strehlow V. Clinical Impact of Polygenic Risk Score for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction in 382 Individuals with Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Syndrome. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3938. [PMID: 37568754 PMCID: PMC10417109 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153938] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Single nucleotide polymorphisms are currently not considered in breast cancer (BC) risk predictions used in daily practice of genetic counselling and clinical management of familial BC in Germany. This study aimed to assess the clinical value of incorporating a 313-variant-based polygenic risk score (PRS) into BC risk calculations in a cohort of German women with suspected hereditary breast and ovarian cancer syndrome (HBOC). Data from 382 individuals seeking counselling for HBOC were analysed. Risk calculations were performed using the Breast and Ovarian Analysis of Disease Incidence and Carrier Estimation Algorithm with and without the inclusion of the PRS. Changes in risk predictions and their impact on clinical management were evaluated. The PRS led to changes in risk stratification based on 10-year risk calculations in 13.6% of individuals. Furthermore, the inclusion of the PRS in BC risk predictions resulted in clinically significant changes in 12.0% of cases, impacting the prevention recommendations established by the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer. These findings support the implementation of the PRS in genetic counselling for personalized BC risk assessment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Stiller
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Stephan Drukewitz
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
- Core Unit for Molecular Tumor Diagnostics (CMTD), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Kathleen Lehmann
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Julia Hentschel
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Vincent Strehlow
- Institute of Human Genetics, University of Leipzig Medical Center, 04103 Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Dannehl D, Engler T, Volmer LL, Tegeler CM, Fusshoeller J, Gabrysch E, Eissler K, Seller A, Grischke EM, Hahn M, Gruber I, Schochter F, Pfister K, Veselinovic K, Leinert E, Rack B, Fink V, Janni W, Brucker SY, Hartkopf AD, Schäffler H. Which Patients Do We Need to Test for BRCA1/2 Mutation? Feasibility of Adjuvant Olaparib Treatment in Early Breast Cancer-Real-World Data from Two Large German Breast Centers. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:3847. [PMID: 37568663 PMCID: PMC10417328 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15153847] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2023] [Revised: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 07/22/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Approximately 6% of women with breast cancer carry pathogenic germline variants in predisposition genes such as BRCA1 and BRCA2. Depending on personal and family cancer history, it is therefore recommended to test for hereditary breast cancer. Moreover, as shown by the phase III OlympiA trial, olaparib significantly improves overall survival in patients with HER2 negative (HER2-) early breast cancer who (1) carry a BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline mutation (gBRCA1/2-positive), (2) have received (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy and (3) are at high clinical risk. The objective of the current analysis was to determine the number of patients with early HER2- breast cancer who are at high clinical risk, according to the inclusion criteria of OlympiA, and to estimate how many of these patients would meet the criteria for hereditary cancer testing in a real-world analysis. METHODS All patients included in this retrospective analysis were treated for early breast cancer (eBC) at the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Ulm University Hospital, Germany, and the Department of Women's Health at Tuebingen University Hospital, Germany, between January 2018 and December 2020. Patients were identified as high risk, in line with the clinicopathological determiners used in the OlympiA trial. The criteria of the German Consortium for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer were used to identify patients who qualify for hereditary cancer testing. RESULTS Of 2384 eligible patients, 1738 patients (72.9%) showed a hormone receptor positive (HR+)/HER2- tumor biology, 345 patients (14.5%) displayed HER2+ breast cancer and 301 patients (12.6%) suffered from HR-/HER2- breast cancer (TNBC). Of 2039 HER2- breast cancer patients, 271 patients (13.3%) were at high clinical risk. This cohort encompassed 130 of the 1738 patients with HR+/HER2- breast cancer (7.5%) and 141 of 301 patients with TNBC (46.8%). A total of 121 of 271 patients (44.6%) with high clinical risk met the criteria for hereditary cancer testing (34 of 130 (26.2%) HR+/HER2- patients and 87 of 141 (61.7%) patients with TNBC). CONCLUSION Approximately one in ten patients with HR+/HER2-, and half of the patients with TNBC, meet the high-risk criteria according to OlympiA. Half of these patients do not meet the criteria for hereditary cancer testing and should therefore be tested for the presence of gBRCA1/2 mutations, irrespective of their own or family cancer history. The overall number of patients with early breast cancer benefiting from olaparib needs to be investigated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dominik Dannehl
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Tobias Engler
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Léa Louise Volmer
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | | | - Julia Fusshoeller
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Emma Gabrysch
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Kenneth Eissler
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Anna Seller
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Grischke
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Markus Hahn
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Ines Gruber
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Fabienne Schochter
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Kerstin Pfister
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Kristina Veselinovic
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Elena Leinert
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Brigitte Rack
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Visnja Fink
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Wolfgang Janni
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Sara Yvonne Brucker
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Andreas Daniel Hartkopf
- Department of Women’s Health, Tuebingen University, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| | - Henning Schäffler
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital, 89075 Ulm, Germany (H.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Roggia C, Armeanu-Ebinger S, Gschwind A, Seibel-Kelemen O, Hertler S, Faust U, Liebmann A, Haack TB, Neumann M, Bonzheim I, Forschner A, Kopp HG, Herster F, Hartkopf A, Bitzer M, Malek NP, Brecht IB, Ruhm K, Möller Y, Löwenheim H, Ossowski S, Rieß OH, Schroeder C. Germline findings in patients with advanced malignancies screened with paired blood-tumour testing for personalised treatment approaches. Eur J Cancer 2023; 179:48-55. [PMID: 36495689 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sequencing of tumour tissue with comprehensive gene panels is increasingly used to guide treatment in precision oncology. Analysis of tumour-normal pairs allows in contrast to tumour-only assessment direct discrimination between somatic and germline alterations, which might have important implications not only for the patients but also their families. METHODS We performed tumour normal sequencing with a large gene panel in 1048 patients with advanced cancer to support treatment decision. Sequencing results were correlated with clinical and family data. RESULTS We identified 156 likely pathogenic or pathogenic (LP/P) germline variants in cancer predisposition genes (CPGs) in 144 cases (13.7%). Of all patients, 8.8% had a LP/P variant in autosomal-dominant cancer predisposition genes (AD-CPGs), most of them being genes with high or moderate penetrance (ATM, BRCA2, CHEK2 and BRCA1). In 48 cases, the P/LP variant matched the expected tumour spectrum. A second variant in tumour tissue was found in 31 patients with AD-CPG variants. Low frequency mutations in either TP53, ATM or DNMT3A in the normal sample indicated clonal haematopoiesis in five cases. CONCLUSIONS Tumour-normal testing for personalised treatment identifies germline LP/P variants in a relevant proportion of patients with cancer. The majority of them would not have been referred to genetic counselling based on family history. Indirect functional readouts of tumour-normal sequencing can provide novel links between CPGs and unexpected cancers. The interpretation of increasingly complex datasets in precision oncology is challenging and concepts of interdisciplinary personalised cancer prevention are needed to support patients and their families.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristiana Roggia
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| | - Sorin Armeanu-Ebinger
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Axel Gschwind
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Olga Seibel-Kelemen
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Sonja Hertler
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ulrike Faust
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Alexandra Liebmann
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Tobias B Haack
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Manuela Neumann
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Irina Bonzheim
- Institute of Pathology and Neuropathology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Andrea Forschner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hans-Georg Kopp
- Robert Bosch Center for Tumor Diseases (RBCT) Robert Bosch Cancer Center, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Franziska Herster
- Robert Bosch Center for Tumor Diseases (RBCT) Robert Bosch Cancer Center, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Andreas Hartkopf
- Department of Gynecology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Michael Bitzer
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Nisar P Malek
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Ines B Brecht
- Department of General Pediatrics, Pediatric Hematology and Oncology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Kristina Ruhm
- Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Yvonne Möller
- Center for Personalized Medicine, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Hubert Löwenheim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Ossowski
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Olaf H Rieß
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Christopher Schroeder
- Institute of Medical Genetics and Applied Genomics, University Hospital and Medical Faculty Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Management of men with high genetic risk of breast cancer. Is there a place for screening or risk-reducing surgery? Case report and review. CURRENT PROBLEMS IN CANCER: CASE REPORTS 2023. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpccr.2023.100220] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
|
10
|
Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Service in Sparsely Populated Western Pomerania. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10102021. [PMID: 36292468 PMCID: PMC9601587 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10102021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/25/2022] [Revised: 10/05/2022] [Accepted: 10/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The German Consortium Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer (GC-HBOC) consists of 23 academic centers striving to provide high-quality regional care for affected individuals and healthy at-risk family members. According to the standard operating procedures defined by the GC-HBOC, a Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer Center was implemented at the University Medicine Greifswald over a four-year period from 2018 to 2021, despite the COVID-19 pandemic. Genetic analyses were performed in a total of 658 individuals, including 41 males, which paved the way to local annual risk-adapted breast cancer surveillance for 91 women and prophylactic surgery for 34 women in 2021. Our experience in the North Eastern part of Germany demonstrates that it is possible to establish a high-risk breast and ovarian cancer service even in a sparsely populated region. Major facilitators are the interdisciplinary collaboration of dedicated local experts, the support of the GC-HBOC, fruitful clinical and scientific cooperations and the use of technical improvements. As a blueprint, our project report may help to further expand the network of specialized and knowledge-generating care for HBOC families.
Collapse
|
11
|
Simões Corrêa Galendi J, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S, Müller D. Uptake Rates of Risk-Reducing Surgeries for Women at Increased Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Applied to Cost-Effectiveness Analyses: A Scoping Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:1786. [PMID: 35406563 PMCID: PMC8997187 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071786] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2021] [Revised: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/26/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
The cost-effectiveness of genetic screen-and-treat strategies for women at increased risk for breast and ovarian cancer often depends on the women's willingness to make use of risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM) or salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO). To explore the uptake rates of RRM and RRSO applied in health economic modeling studies and the impact of uptake rates on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER), we conducted a scoping literature review. In addition, using our own model, we conducted a value of information (VOI) analysis. Among the 19 models included in the review, the uptake rates of RRM ranged from 6% to 47% (RRSO: 10% to 88%). Fifty-seven percent of the models applied retrospective data obtained from registries, hospital records, or questionnaires. According to the models' deterministic sensitivity analyses, there is a clear trend that a lower uptake rate increased the ICER and vice versa. Our VOI analysis showed high decision uncertainty associated with the uptake rates. In the future, uptake rates should be given more attention in the conceptualization of health economic modeling studies. Prospective studies are recommended to reflect regional and national variations in women's preferences for preventive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Simões Corrêa Galendi
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| | | | | | - Dirk Müller
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany; (S.K.-F.); (S.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Stracke C, Lemmen C, Rhiem K, Schmutzler R, Kautz-Freimuth S, Stock S. "You Always Have It in the Back of Your Mind"-Feelings, Coping, and Support Needs of Women with Pathogenic Variants in Moderate-Risk Genes for Hereditary Breast Cancer Attending Genetic Counseling in Germany: A Qualitative Interview Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:3525. [PMID: 35329227 PMCID: PMC8951351 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19063525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Hereditary breast cancer accounts for approximately 30% of newly diagnosed breast cancer (BC) cases. Pathogenic variants in moderate-risk BC genes (MBCG) differ from those in high-risk genes in terms of associated cancer risks, affected organs, and available preventive options. Little is known about how MBCG pathogenic variant carriers who have attended post-test genetic counseling perceive their situation, how they cope with their situation, and which support needs they might have. Problem-centered, guided, individual interviews were conducted with twelve women carrying pathogenic variants in MBCG. The interview analysis was based on Mayring's qualitative content analysis. The women were between 29 and 59 years old and carried pathogenic variants in the risk genes CHEK2 (n = 8), ATM (n = 1), or PALB2 (n = 3). Women reported a wide range of feelings, both positive (relief, calmness) and negative (overwhelm, fear, grief, guilt). All women applied strategies of emotion-focused coping to deal with this lifelong situation. Appraisal and evaluation of the affected mother's coping might influence the patient's own behavior and coping style. These results could be used during and after post-test genetic counseling to provide more needs-oriented counseling, and to help women in adjusting to and coping with being a pathogenic variant carrier.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Stracke
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Clarissa Lemmen
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Kerstin Rhiem
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Rita Schmutzler
- Center for Familial Breast and Ovarian Cancer, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50937 Cologne, Germany
| | - Sibylle Kautz-Freimuth
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| | - Stephanie Stock
- Institute of Health Economics and Clinical Epidemiology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, 50935 Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|