The World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology

Pulmonary Cytopathology: Current and Future Impact of Microscopy and Immunohistochemistry

With the advancement of tissue procurement techniques, in-depth knowledge of morphology is crucial for cytopathologists to diagnose neoplastic and nonneoplastic lung diseases optimally. Cytopathologists must also be well versed in immunohistochemistry/immunocytochemistry markers and their interpretation for an accurate diagnosis.

Pulmonary Cytopathology: Current and Future Impact on Patient Care

Small biopsies of lung are routinely obtained by many methods, including several that result in cytologic specimens. Because lung cancer is often diagnosed at a stage for which primary resection is not an option, it is critical that all diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic information be derived from such small biopsy specimens. As the number of available diagnostic and predictive markers expands, cytopathologists must familiarize themselves with current requirements for specimen acquisition, handling, results reporting, and molecular and other ancillary testing, all of which are reviewed here.

Risks of malignancy in the major nongynecologic cytopathology reporting systems: Critiques and discussions

The ever-increasing popularity of standardized systems for reporting cytopathology has led in part to much attention to and importance of the risk stratification schemes, especially the risks of malignancy (ROMs), which are associated with the different diagnostic categories and upon which recommendations for clinical management are based. However, it is well known that the ROM calculations are based on retrospective reviews of the existing literature, representing a heterogeneous patient population, and are plagued by significant biases and variations. Statistically, the ROM represents the post-test probability of malignancy, which changes with the test result and with the prevalence of malignancy (or pretest probability) in an individual practice setting and individual patient presentation. Therefore, the clinical utility of the ROM is questioned and likely needs a second look in the nongynecologic cytopathology reporting systems. In this communication, the authors discuss the status of the ROM estimates according to the most commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems, including for thyroid, salivary glands, and others, highlighting similarities and differences with a focus on the limitations of ROM estimates and their application in clinical practice.

Practical issues related to immunocytochemistry on cytological smears: Tips and recommendations

OBJECTIVE

Immunocytochemistry (ICC) is essential for enhancing diagnostic accuracy and identifying markers for diagnosis, prognosis and targeted therapies. While cell blocks (CBs) are preferred for standardization and optimized staining, cytological smears are an alternative when CBs are unavailable. However, the literature on ICC protocols for smears is sparse. This review addresses preparation, fixation and protocols for nuclear and cytoplasmic antibodies on smears, drawing from our laboratory's experience.

METHODS

We reviewed procedures for ICC on cytological smears using existing literature and practical insights from our laboratory.

RESULTS

Commercially available antibodies were found to be reliable for ICC on smears if specimens are properly prepared and fixed. Protocols developed in our laboratory maintained antigenicity and provided clear staining results.

CONCLUSIONS

Although ICC on CBs is the gold standard for standardization, cytological smears are a viable alternative when CBs are unavailable. Success in ICC on smears depends on proper preparation and fixation. This review offers practical protocols and insights to help laboratories optimize ICC on cytological smears. Further research and standardization are necessary to enhance reproducibility and reliability of ICC on smears. The practical information provided is based on personal experience in our laboratory.

Challenging the concept of "risk of malignancy" in cytology

Several standardized systems for nongynecological cytopathology have been published following the successful implementation of The Bethesda System for Reporting Cervical Cytology. Each of these systems comprises a set of reporting categories accompanied by a risk of malignancy. However, in most cases, these risk of malignancy estimates have not been based on high-quality evidence and often may not be consider proper "risks" (because they have been estimated based on cross-sectional studies). This commentary discusses the problems related to the data used to generate these risks. To make nongynecological cytopathology reporting more evidence-based, large-scale prospective cohort studies and randomized trials, in addition to high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses, should be performed.

Evaluating Diagnostic Clarity: The Comparative Efficacy of BlueStain in Serous Effusion Cytology under the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology Reporting Framework

Serous effusion cytology is a pivotal diagnostic and staging tool in clinical pathology, valued for its simplicity and cost-effectiveness. Staining techniques such as Giemsa and Papanicolaou are foundational, yet the search for rapid and efficient alternatives continues. Our study assesses the efficacy of an in-house-developed BlueStain, a toluidine blue variant, within the International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytopathology (TIS), aiming to optimize diagnostic clarity and resource use.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This section provides details on the cohort of 237 patients with serous effusions, the ethical approval process, sample collection, and staining procedures with BlueStain, Papanicolaou, and Giemsa. It also describes the microscopic evaluation criteria, scoring system, and statistical methods used to compare the stains.

RESULTS

BlueStain demonstrated notable performance, particularly in identifying malignant cells, presenting a competitive alternative to the Papanicolaou stain, which, despite higher quality indices in other categories, requires more resources and time. The study revealed that BlueStain might offer a valuable balance between quality and efficiency, especially in cases where rapid diagnostic turnaround is essential.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that BlueStain is a viable staining method in the context of serous effusions, capable of providing detailed cytomorphological analysis. While traditional stains hold their place for their established diagnostic clarity, BlueStain offers a rapid and resource-optimized alternative. The absence of definitive diagnostic criteria in the atypical category and the inherent sample heterogeneity underscores the necessity for adaptable staining methods like BlueStain. The study highlights the potential trade-offs between detail and practicality in staining techniques, advocating for further research into innovative methods that do not compromise diagnostic precision for cost and time efficiency.

Evaluating the Risk of Malignancies of the Diagnostic Categories Proposed by the World Health Organization System for Reporting Lung Cytopathology: A 2-Year Single Institutional Experience

INTRODUCTION

The WHO System of Reporting Lung Cytopathology proposed a 5-tiered system in 2023. We report the risk of malignancies (ROMs) of bronchial washing/lavage and percutaneous fine-needle aspiration (FNA) specimens. We also evaluated the change of ROMs when image correlation is required.

METHODS

Lung cytology cases in 2021 and 2022 with histologic follow-up were included. CT reports were reviewed to identify cases with a solid nodule/tumor but benign cytological findings. These were reassigned from the "benign" to "non-diagnostic" category, and the ROMs were re-estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 1,031 bronchial washing/lavage and 206 FNAs were identified. The ROMs of bronchial washing/lavage were "non-diagnostic" 56.5% (13/23), "benign" 41.9% (320/764), "atypical" 71.7% (71/99), "suspicious for malignancy" 94.7% (72/76), and "malignant" 100% (70/70). The ROMs of FNAs were "non-diagnostic" 66% (33/50), "benign" 58.2% (39/67), "atypical" 70% (28/40), "suspicious for malignancy" 96.2% (25/26), and "malignant" 100% (70/70). When image finding was considered, cases initially assigned as "benign" were re-classified to "non-diagnostic" with decreases in ROMs for the "benign" category.

CONCLUSIONS

Malignancy risks associated with the WHO System of Reporting Lung Cytopathology diagnostic groups were reported. Image correlation for the "benign" category led to a decrease in case number and ROM.

Insufficient endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration specimens. When and why? The analysis of criteria and reasons behind the insufficient specimens

BACKGROUND

The classification terminology systems for pulmonary cytology specimens have recently emerged. Inadequate samples, classified as "nondiagnostic," raise challenges in determining the threshold of cell numbers and the risk of malignancy (ROM).

METHODS

The study retrospectively reviewed 248 endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) samples: 46 insufficient samples, 60 low cellularity samples, and 142 adequate samples. Characteristics as cellularity, number of benign and malignant cells, and background features were assessed. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to establish cell sufficiency thresholds for the diagnosis.

RESULTS

Out of the 248 samples analyzed, 108 were classified as benign, 94 as malignant, and 46 as insufficient. The study found that the cellularity thresholds for diagnosis in cell blocks and cytological samples were ≥50 cells and ≥100 cells, respectively. The thresholds for tumor cell counts were ≥1 - 10 cells for both types of cells, respectively. Considerably, some low cellularity samples were initially classified as insufficient despite meeting the diagnostic thresholds upon revision. The ROM varied across sample categories, with insufficient samples having a ROM of 10.9%, benign samples 15.7%, suspicious samples 92.0%, and malignant samples 100%.

CONCLUSION

Insufficient EBUS-TBNA samples raise challenges in diagnosis and management. This study identified the root cause of insufficient samples, including factors related to humans, diagnostic methods, sampling, and laboratory processing. By understanding the root causes, diagnostic recommendations can be developed to improve the diagnostic process. The findings emphasize the importance of standardized classification and terminology systems for clear communication among healthcare professionals and institutions, ultimately improving patient care and enabling quality assurance measures.

Retrospective application of WHO reporting system for lung cytopathology with assessment of risk of malignancy

INTRODUCTION

The recently introduced World Health Organization (WHO) Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology presents 5 diagnostic categories with corresponding risk of malignancy (ROM) and management protocols. This study uses the system to categorize our institutional respiratory tract cytology specimens, evaluating ROM and diagnostic accuracy for each category.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In a retrospective analysis (May 2020 to August 2021), the following respiratory cytology specimens were classified based on the WHO categories: bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), bronchial wash/bronchial brushings (BB/BW), endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA), fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), sputum, biopsy imprint (BI), and endotracheal wash. Exclusions comprised pleural effusions and EBUS-TBNA from mediastinal and hilar lymph nodes. Correlation of cytologic and histopathologic diagnoses was performed to assess ROM collectively and individually.

RESULTS

A total of 1518 respiratory samples (BAL [968], BW/BB [380], EBUS-TBNA [42], FNAC [32], sputum [80], BI [11] and endotracheal wash [5]) of 1410 patients were screened, of which 522 cases (34.3%) had histopathologic correlation. One hundred forty-one cases (9.3%) were Insufficient/Inadequate/Non-Diagnostic (ND), 1221 (80.4%) were Benign (B), 3 (0.2%) were Atypical (A), 32 (2.1%) were Suspicious for malignancy (SM) and 121 (8.0%) were Malignant (M). The estimated ROM for each category was 49.2% for ND, 13.3% for B, 66.6% for A, 81.5% for SM and 92.7% for M. FNAC and EBUS-TBNA exhibited the highest sensitivity (100%) compared with BW/BB (66.3%). Specificity ranged from 96.8% to 100% across the samples, while diagnostic accuracy varied from 58.8% to 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

Application of the WHO reporting system enhances standardized terminology, aiding clinicians in informed decision-making and improving patient care through accurate risk assessment of malignancy.

The Implementation of Nongynecologic Reporting Systems in Cytopathology Laboratories Is Highly Variable: Analysis of Data From a 2020 Supplemental Survey of Participants in the College of American Pathologists Interlaboratory Comparison Program in Nongynecologic Cytology

CONTEXT

In recent years, several reporting systems have been developed by national and international cytopathology organizations to standardize the evaluation of specific cytopathology specimen types.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the current implementation rates, implementation methods, and barriers to implementation of commonly used nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories.

DESIGN

Data were analyzed from a survey developed by the College of American Pathologists Cytopathology Committee and distributed to participants in the College of American Pathologists Nongynecologic Cytopathology Education Program mailing.

RESULTS

Nongynecologic reporting systems with the highest rate of adoption were the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology, 2nd edition (74.1%; 552 of 745); the Paris System for Reporting Urinary Cytology (53.9%; 397 of 736); and the Milan System for Reporting Salivary Gland Cytopathology (29.1%; 200 of 688). The most common reason given for not adopting a reporting system was satisfaction with a laboratory's current system. Implementation varied among laboratories with regard to which stakeholders were involved in deciding to implement a system and the amount of education provided during the implementation process.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of nongynecologic reporting systems in cytopathology laboratories was highly variable.

Second opinion for pulmonary and pleural cytology is valuable for patient care

INTRODUCTION

Thoracic cytology can be challenging due to limited procured material or overlapping morphology between benign and malignant entities. In such cases, expert consultation might be sought. This study aimed to characterize all pulmonary and pleural cytology consult cases submitted to our practice and provide recommendations on approaching difficult cases.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

All thoracic (pulmonary and pleural) cytology cases submitted for expert consultation to the University of Michigan (MLabs) from 2013 to mid-2022 were reviewed. Cases where cytology was only part of a hematopathology or surgical pathology consult were excluded. Patient demographics, specimen location, procedure performed, referring diagnosis, and our diagnoses were recorded for each case. Diagnoses were categorized according to the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology recommendations for pulmonary and effusion cytology. Discordant diagnoses were stratified as major or minor. Data was analyzed using chi-square analysis and logistic models.

RESULTS

We received 784 thoracic cytology consult cases, including 530 exfoliative samples and 307 fine-needle aspirations. The most common anatomic locations sampled were the bronchial wall (n = 194, 23%), lung nodule (n = 322, 38%), and pleura (n = 296, 35%). 413 cases had a diagnostic discrepancy (48.3%), with 274 (66%) minor and 139 (34%) major discrepancies. By location, pleural effusion specimens had the highest probability of a discrepant diagnosis (P = 0.003). By specimen type, fine-needle aspiration samples were significantly more likely to have a discrepant diagnosis (P = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Nearly half of the thoracic cytology cases submitted for expert second opinion had diagnostic discrepancies. Consequently, consulting a tertiary medical care center with cytopathology expertise for challenging thoracic cytology diagnoses is beneficial.

Minimally invasive biopsy-based diagnostics in support of precision cancer medicine

Precision cancer medicine (PCM) to support the treatment of solid tumors requires minimally invasive diagnostics. Here, we describe the development of fine-needle aspiration biopsy-based (FNA) molecular cytology which will be increasingly important in diagnostics and adaptive treatment. We provide support for FNA-based molecular cytology having a significant potential to replace core needle biopsy (CNB) as a patient-friendly potent technique for tumor sampling for various tumor types. This is not only because CNB is a more traumatic procedure and may be associated with more complications compared to FNA-based sampling, but also due to the recently developed molecular methods used with FNA. Recent studies show that image-guided FNA in combination with ultrasensitive molecular methods also offers opportunities for characterization of the tumor microenvironment which can aid therapeutic decisions. Here we provide arguments for an increased implementation of molecular FNA-based sampling as a patient-friendly diagnostic method, which may, due to its repeatability, facilitate regular sampling that is needed during different treatment lines, to provide tumor information, supporting treatment decisions, shortening lead times in healthcare, and benefit healthcare economics.

Pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma and lymphoepithelial carcinoma - morphology, molecular characteristics and differential diagnosis

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) comprises one of the major groups of non-small-cell carcinoma of the lung, and is subtyped into keratinising, non-keratinising and basaloid SCC. SCC can readily be diagnosed using histomorphology alone in keratinising SCC. Confirmatory immunohistochemical analyses should always be applied in non-keratinising and basaloid tumours to exclude differential diagnoses, most prominently adenocarcinoma and high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma, which may have important therapeutic consequences. According to the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification 2015, the diagnosis of SCC can be rendered in resections of morphologically ambiguous tumours with squamous immunophenotype. In biopsies and cytology preparations in the same setting the current guidelines propose a diagnosis of 'non-small-cell carcinoma, favour SCC' in TTF1-negative and p40-positive tumours to acknowledge a possible sampling bias and restrict extended immunohistochemical evaluation in order to preserve tissue for molecular testing. Most SCC feature a molecular 'tobacco-smoke signature' with enrichment in GG > TT mutations, in line with the strong epidemiological association of SCC with smoking. Targetable mutations are extremely rare but they do occur, in particular in younger and non- or light-smoking patients, warranting molecular investigations. Lymphoepithelial carcinoma (LEC) is a poorly differentiated SCC with a syncytial growth pattern and a usually prominent lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate and frequent Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) association. In this review, we describe the morphological and molecular characteristics of SCC and LEC and discuss the most pertinent differential diagnoses.

Review of the impact of the International System for Serous Fluid Cytopathology

The International System for Reporting Serous Fluid Cytology (TIS) has been proposed by an expert working team composed of the International Academy of Cytology and the American Society of Cytopathology, following an international survey. Since its introduction, the TIS has gained worldwide acceptance, and this review aims to assess its global impact. A literature search revealed 25 studies which have presented data on the impact of the TIS. Most of them provide data, including risk of malignancy (ROM) for each diagnostic category, separately for pleural, peritoneal and pericardial effusions, while a few do not separate them. A few studies focus on specific diagnoses like mesothelioma on specific types of fluids or more specific issues like the optimal fluid volume for cytology or interobserver variability. A synopsis of the data from the literature search is presented in four tables. The ROM assessment is discussed, as well as interobserver variability and the use of ancillary diagnostic immunochemistry. In conclusion, our review of the published data suggests that the TIS is a valid classification scheme that has been widely accepted by pathologists globally, is highly reproducible and makes a valuable contribution to clinical therapeutic management.

Risk of malignancy assessment of the different cytologic categories in respiratory cytology samples according to the new guidelines of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology

BACKGROUND

Cytology is extremely important for diagnosis of lung carcinoma and the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology (PSC) had proposed a new classification system for respiratory cytology for better communication between physicians and better patient management. The objective of this study is to analyze our samples in accordance with this classification and to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of various cytologic techniques and to assess the risk of malignancy.

METHODS

Eight hundred and twenty respiratory cytology specimens (FNA, BAL, washing, brushing, sputum) collected between 2019 and 2022 were classified according to the PSC system and the risk of malignancy was assessed for each category using follow-up surgical samples. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy rates were determined based on a categorial approach, according to a similar study.

RESULTS

The data of 820 respiratory cytology specimens from 576 patients were analyzed. 2.6% of these were non-diagnostic, 64.1% were NM, 5% were AC, 0.4% were N-B-LG, 4% were SM and 23.9% were ML. The risk of malignancy for each diagnostic category were: 42.8% for non-diagnostic, 31.2% for NM, 43.9% for AC, 87.9% for SM, 94.3% for ML. Sensitivity and specificity was calculated using only the malignant cases considered as positive tests and was 45.57% and 97.34% respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our results correlated with the PSC system, and it was considered useful in clinical practice. However, more studies should be performed to evaluate the usefulness of this system. The ROMs of each category and the impact of different techniques should be further studied.

The rationale for the development and publication of the World Health Organization reporting systems for cytopathology and a brief overview of the first editions of the lung and pancreaticobiliary systems

The International Academy of Cytology has joined with the International Agency for Research on Cancer and the World Health Organization (WHO) to develop international systems for reporting the cytopathology of lung, pancreas and biliary tract, lymph nodes, soft tissue, liver, breast, and kidney and adrenal gland. The WHO recently published the reporting systems for lung and pancreaticobiliary cytopathology. The objectives of this collaboration are to standardize the reporting of cytopathology; improve the quality of reporting by establishing the key diagnostic cytopathological features of entities and neoplasms; provide detailed best-practice guidelines in sampling techniques, specimen handling and processing, and the use of ancillary techniques; and facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians to improve patient care. Each WHO system has defined specific categories and terminology for reporting cytopathology, and each category has an estimated risk of malignancy as far as the current literature allows and a suggested diagnostic management algorithm to assist clinicians. The WHO systems recognize that local medical and pathology infrastructure will vary, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries, and the WHO systems and their diagnostic management recommendations have been developed to allow them to be applied worldwide in all resource settings. The process of the selection of editors and authors and the writing and editing responsibilities has used the same model as that used for the fifth edition WHO Classification of Tumours, to which the WHO cytopathology systems are directly linked. This review provides the rationale and history of this joint International Academy of Cytology, International Agency for Research on Cancer, and WHO cytopathology project and a brief overview of the WHO reporting systems for lung and pancreaticobiliary cytopathology.

Grey zones in respiratory cytology: Atypical or suspicious for malignancy and neoplasms of unknown malignant potential

The purpose of pulmonary cytology is two-fold. First, to establish whether a pulmonary nodule is benign or malignant. Second, pulmonary cytology should classify the type of pathologic process present. When a pulmonary nodule is characterized as malignant, it is of high importance to further classify the malignancy as to type, with non-small cell carcinomas being sub-divided into adenocarcinomas, squamous cell carcinomas, and other types of non-small cell carcinoma. The World Health Organization Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHORSLC) provides an important framework for reporting and classifying material obtained by cytologic techniques, including sputum analysis, bronchial brushings, bronchial washings, and fine-needle aspiration. The system contains five categories for specimen reporting. Clinicians prefer definitive diagnoses separating specimens into definitively benign or definitively malignant categories. The WHORSLC recognizes that it is not invariably possible for cytopathologists to separate specimens into definitively benign or definitively malignant categories. The five categories of the WHORSLC recognize the spectrum of cytologic changes running from clearly benign to clearly malignant, which cytopathologists must place into diagnostically useful and reproduceable categories. The intermediate categories of "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" provide structured categories with stringent definitions, estimated malignancy risks, and suggested management and follow-up recommendations. In this way, the categories "atypical" and "suspicious for malignancy" aid in maintaining the high diagnostic accuracy of the "benign" and "malignant" categories.

A Comprehensive Review of the Newest World Health Organization (WHO) Cytopathology Reporting Systems

World Health Organization cytopathology reporting system systems have proposed for the pancreatobiliary tract, lung, lymph node, and soft tissue aligned with the updates in the World Health Organization classification of Tumor series. Among them, the pancreatobiliary tract and lung specimen reporting system have been published recently and are now a 7-tier and 5-tier category system, respectively, without any subcategorization. World Health Organization reporting systems also encourage the application of ancillary diagnostic tests like cell block preparation, immunocytochemistry, and rapid on-site evaluation for better categorization of specimens and further management, especially in indeterminate (atypical and suspicious for malignancy) and malignant cytology categories. In this brief review, we aim to provide a brief outline of both the systems and their clinical risk-based management strategies.

A brief review of the WHO reporting system for lung cytopathology

The International Academy of Cytology has joined with the International Agency for Research on Cancer to bring together a group of experts in lung cytopathology to develop a WHO Reporting System for Lung Cytopathology (WHO System). This System aims to improve and standardize the reporting of cytopathology, facilitate communication between cytopathologists and clinicians, and improve patient care. The WHO System describes 5 categories for reporting lung cytopathology: 'Insufficient/Inadequate/Nondiagnostic', 'Benign', 'Atypical', 'Suspicious for malignancy', and 'Malignant', each one with a clear descriptive term, a definition, a risk of malignancy, and a suggested management algorithm. The key diagnostic cytopathologic features of each of the lesions within each category have been established by consensus through an Expert Editorial Board, who are also the authors of this review and selected for each reporting system and chosen based on their expertise in the field and/or diversity of geographical representation. Many other co-authors from around the world also contributed. The assignment of writing and editing responsibilities used the same model as that used for the WHO Classification of Tumours (https://whobluebooks.iarc.fr/about/faq/). The WHO System provides the best practice application of ancillary testing, including immunocytochemistry and molecular pathology, and guides in sampling and processing techniques to optimize the handling and preparation of specimens. The WHO System was created by the authors to be applicable globally and is based on cytomorphology with possibilities for additional diagnostic management of the patient. The authors are aware that local medical and pathology resources would differ, especially in low- and middle-income countries. The WHO Tumour Classification for Thoracic Tumors, Fifth Edition, is directly accessible through the online WHO System.