The burden of inhibitors in haemophilia patients

Changes in coagulation potential over time after administration of recombinant activated factor VII in an emicizumab-treated hemophilia A patient with inhibitors

We describe a 67-year-old patient with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHA-I) receiving emicizumab prophylaxis who underwent surgical treatment for pseudoaneurysm. He was treated with a bolus infusion of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; 79 μg/kg) immediately before surgery, and a second dose of rFVIIa after an initial treatment on day 1. A third rFVIIa bolus was infused 17 h after the second dose on day 2, and the treatment was continued every 24 h on day 3 and day 4. Treatment with rFVIIa was discontinued on day 4. No perioperative bleeding or thrombotic events were observed. Coagulation potentials at 8 h after rFVIIa administration determined by clot waveform analysis (CWA) and thrombin generation assay (TGA) were within near-normal ranges, and results at 17 h after rFVIIa administration showed coagulation function comparable to that in the patient without rFVIIa. Our experimental data suggest that the coagulation potential in FVIII-deficient plasma spiked with both 0.28 µg/mL (11.2 μg/kg) rFVIIa and emicizumab was equivalent to or greater than that spiked with 2.2 µg/mL (90 μg/kg) rFVIIa alone. Thus, administration of rFVIIa every 8 h may be feasible for managing perioperative treatment in emicizumab-treated PwHA-I.

Evaluating clinically translatable conditioning for platelet gene therapy in murine hemophilia A with inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Platelet gene therapy is effective in hemophilia A (HA) mice even with inhibitors. Fludarabine (Flu), along with busulfan (Bu) or melphalan (Mel), preconditioning has been shown to be highly effective for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in the clinic.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of Bu-Flu and Mel-Flu preconditioning in platelet gene therapy of HA with inhibitors.

METHODS

Bu-Flu and Mel-Flu were used to condition HA mice preimmunized with recombinant human factor (F)VIII. An optimal 660 centigray total body irradiation was used as a control regimen in parallel. Platelet-FVIII expression was introduced by transplantation of 2bF8 lentivirus (LV)-transduced hematopoietic stem cells. Animals were analyzed by fluorescence-activated cell sorting, quantitative polymerase chain reaction, FVIII assays, and tail bleeding tests.

RESULTS

Bu-Flu, but not Mel-Flu, enabled successful 2bF8 gene therapy. All recipients achieved >55% chimerism post hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in both Bu-Flu and 660 centigray groups, with comparable copy numbers of 2bF8 cassette and the platelet-FVIII levels. The bleeding phenotype was rescued in 2bF8LV-transduced recipients. FVIII inhibitor titers declined with time, with comparable disappearance time of inhibitors between the 2 groups. When animals were rechallenged with recombinant human FVIII after the titers dropped to undetectable levels, no inhibitors were detected in 2bF8LV-transduced recipients. In contrast, all untransduced transplanted control mice produced inhibitors. These data demonstrate that immune tolerance was established in 2bF8LV-transduced primed HA mice under Bu-Flu conditioning.

CONCLUSION

Bu-Flu preconditioning allows for successfully introducing platelet-FVIII expression to restore hemostasis and induce immune tolerance in primed HA mice, suggesting that this approach is a promising clinically translatable strategy for gene therapy of HA with inhibitors.

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in children: early steps in life's journey for people with severe hemophilia A

People with severe hemophilia A usually experience their first bleed early in life. In children with severe hemophilia A, primary prophylaxis is recommended to prevent recurrent and potentially life-threatening bleeds that significantly impact day-to-day life. Factor VIII (FVIII) prophylaxis is well-established in children and has been shown to reduce the development of hemophilic arthropathy. However, a major challenge of FVIII therapy is the development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (FVIII inhibitors). Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a human cell line-derived recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) whose immunogenicity, efficacy, and safety have been studied in 167 children with severe hemophilia A across two prospective clinical trials and their long-term extensions. In 105 previously untreated children, the inhibitor rate of 16.2% for high-titer inhibitors (26.7% for all inhibitors) was lower than published rates for hamster cell line-derived rFVIII products. There was no inhibitor development in previously untreated children with non-null F8 mutations and in previously treated children. In a case series of 10 inhibitor patients, 8 (80%) underwent successful immune tolerance induction with simoctocog alfa with a median time to undetectable inhibitor of 3.5 months. In an analysis of 96 children who enrolled in the extension studies and received long-term simoctocog alfa prophylaxis for up to 5 years, median spontaneous, joint, and total annualized bleeding rates were 0.3, 0.4, and 1.8, respectively. No thromboembolisms were reported in any of the 167 children, and there were no treatment-related deaths. Optimal care of children should consider several factors, including minimization of inhibitor development risk, maintaining tolerance to FVIII, highly effective bleed prevention and treatment, safety, and impact on long-term outcomes such as bone and joint health. In this context we review the pediatric clinical data and ongoing studies with simoctocog alfa.

The spectrum of neutralizing and non-neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies in a nationwide cohort of 788 persons with hemophilia A

Objectives

Anti-factor VIII (FVIII) antibodies have been reported to exhibit both neutralizing and non-neutralizing characteristics. This is the first study investigating the full spectrum of FVIII-specific antibodies, including non-neutralizing antibodies, very-low titer inhibitors, and inhibitors, in a large nationwide population of persons with hemophilia A of all severities.

Methods

All persons with hemophilia A (mild (FVIII > 5-40 IU/dL)/moderate [FVIII 1-5 IU/dL)/severe (FVIII < 1 IU/dL)] with an available plasma sample who participated in the sixth Hemophilia in the Netherlands study between 2018 and 2019 were included. The presence of anti-FVIII antibodies of the immunoglobulin A, M, and G isotypes and IgG subclasses, along with antibody titer levels, were assessed using direct-binding ELISAs. FVIII specificity was assessed using a competition-based ELISA approach. The inhibitor status was determined using the Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda assay (NusBA) and the Nijmegen Bethesda assay (NBA).

Results

In total, 788 persons with hemophilia A (336 (42.6%) mild, 123 (15.6%) moderate, 329 (41.8%) severe hemophilia) were included. The median age was 45 years (IQR 24-60), and the majority (50.9%) had over 150 exposure days to FVIII concentrates. Within our population, 144 (18.3%) individuals had non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies, 10 (1.3%) had very low-titer inhibitors (NusBA positive; NBA negative), and 13 (1.6%) had inhibitors (both NusBA and NBA positive). IgG1 was the most abundant FVIII-specific antibody subclass, and the highest titer levels were found for IgG4. In individuals without a reported history of inhibitor development, no clear differences were observed in antibody patterns between those who were minimally or highly exposed to FVIII concentrates. IgG4 subclass antibodies were only observed in persons with a reported history of FVIII inhibitor or in those with a currently detected (very low-titer) inhibitor.

Conclusion

In this cross-sectional study, we identified non-neutralizing antibodies in a relatively large proportion of persons with hemophilia A. In contrast, in our population, consisting of persons highly exposed to FVIII concentrates, (very low-titer) inhibitors were detected only in a small proportion of persons, reflecting a well-tolerized population. Hence, our findings suggest that only a small subpopulation of non-neutralizing FVIII-specific antibodies is associated with clinically relevant inhibitors.

Exploring Female Relatives of Patients with Hemophilia' Awareness, Attitudes, and Understanding Towards Genetic Testing

Purpose

A better understanding of the factors that influence engagement is needed to provide a reference for conducting genetic testing in female relatives of patients with hemophilia (PWH). We therefore determined the perceptions and understanding of genetic testing among female relatives of PWH in China.

Methods

We carried out a qualitative study using in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 11 female relatives of PWH in Shanxi Province, China. The resulting data were analyzed using thematic analyses.

Results

This study extracted four topics: uncertainty about carrier genetic status; limited understanding of genetic testing; coexistence of positive and negative coping; and multi-aspect demands.

Conclusion

Healthcare professionals should provide personalized and multidimensional health education and comprehensive decision-making support to female relatives of PWH, to enhance their motivation and willingness to undergo genetic testing. It is also important to actively improve relevant policies, strengthen the genetic testing service system, and promote the popularization of genetic testing in female relatives of PWH.

Emicizumab-mediated hemostatic function assessed by thrombin generation assay in an in vitro model of factor VIII-depleted thrombophilia plasma

Patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) may have concurrent deficiency of representative anticoagulant proteins, protein (P)C, PS, and antithrombin (AT), which reduces bleeding frequency. However, emicizumab-driven hemostasis in PwHA with such thrombophilic potential remains unclarified. This study investigated the influence of natural anticoagulants on emicizumab-driven coagulation in HA model plasma. Various concentrations of PS and AT were added to PS-deficient plasma and AT-deficient plasma in the presence of anti-FVIII antibody (FVIIIAb; 10BU/mL). PC-deficient plasma was mixed with normal plasma at various concentrations in the presence of FVIIIAb. Emicizumab (50 µg/mL) was added to these thrombophilic HA model plasmas, prior to tissue factor/ellagic acid-triggered thrombin generation assays. Co-presence of emicizumab increased peak thrombin values (PeakTh) dependent on PS, AT, and PC concentrations. Maximum coagulation potentials in the PS-reduced HA model plasmas remained normal in the presence of emicizumab. PeakTh were close to normal in the presence of 50%AT irrespective of emicizumab, but were higher than normal in the presence of 25%AT. Addition of recombinant FVIIa (corresponding to an administered dose of 90 μg/kg) enhanced coagulation potential to normal levels. Our findings provide novel information on hemostatic regulation in emicizumab-treated PwHA with a possible thrombophilic disposition.

Safety, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of a subcutaneous recombinant FVIII (OCTA101) in adult patients with severe haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Regular, prophylactic intravenous (i.v.) FVIII can be challenging for some patients with haemophilia A. Subcutaneous (s.c.) FVIII administration could provide an alternative treatment option with greater convenience and without the complications associated with venous access.

AIM

To assess the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), bioavailability and efficacy of s.c. OCTA101, a recombinant FVIII with a recombinant von Willebrand factor fragment dimer.

METHODS

This was a single-centre, prospective, open-label, phase I/II study (NCT04046848). Previously treated male patients (≥18 years) with severe haemophilia A were eligible for the study. The primary objective of the study was to assess the safety (including immunogenicity) of OCTA101. Secondary objectives included assessments of PK, bioavailability, and the efficacy of prophylaxis.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were treated with OCTA101. FVIII inhibitors developed in five (16.7%) patients during daily prophylaxis with 40-60 IU/kg (three cases) and 12.5 IU/kg (two cases) OCTA101. The trial was therefore terminated. OCTA101 had a 2.5-fold longer terminal half-life compared with i.v. rFVIII, and bioavailability was 16.6%. Efficacy data at study termination indicated that daily prophylaxis with 40-60 IU/kg OCTA101 was efficacious in the absence of FVIII inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite promising PK and efficacy results, the trial was terminated due to the incidence of FVIII inhibitors. The occurrence of inhibitors at two dose levels suggests that their development may be related to the subcutaneous route of administration.

The Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda Assay detects very low-titer factor VIII inhibitors in patients with congenital and acquired hemophilia A

BACKGROUND

An inhibitor can develop in congenital hemophilia A (HA) patients against exogenous infused factor (F)VIII, whereas in acquired HA (AHA) inhibitors initially develop against endogenous FVIII. Inhibitors can be detected with the Nijmegen Bethesda Assay (NBA), which has an international cut-off level of 0.60 Nijmegen Bethesda Units/mL (NBU/mL). Thereby, very low-titer inhibitors may remain undetected.

AIM

To describe the design and validation of the Nijmegen ultra-sensitive Bethesda Assay (NusBA) for the detection of very low-titer inhibitors.

METHODS

The NusBA is a modification of the NBA in which the ratio of patient plasma to normal pooled plasma is changed from 1:1 to 9:1. Analytical validation was performed according to the CLSI EP10 guideline in order to determine trueness and reproducibility. Clinical validation was performed in two cohorts of congenital HA patients (82 adults) with pharmacokinetic data and four AHA patients. The limit of quantitation (LOQ) was determined by measuring plasma samples spiked with inhibitor levels in the low range (0.05-0.80 NBU/mL).

RESULTS

The LOQ for the NusBA was 0.10 NusBU/mL, with a coefficient of variation of 24.2 %. Seven (8.5 %) congenital HA patients had a positive NusBA result, of which only one was detected with the NBA. There was no correlation between NusBA and FVIII half-life. In three of the AHA patients the NusBA remained positive, when the NBA became negative.

DISCUSSION

The NusBA is able to detect very low-titer FVIII inhibitors of ≥0.10 NBU/mL. Thereby, it may have added value in early inhibitor detection and therapy adjustments in patients with congenital HA and AHA.

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) in previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A-Final efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study

INTRODUCTION

Simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq®) is a 4th generation recombinant FVIII with proven efficacy for the prevention and treatment of bleeding episodes (BEs) in previously treated patients with severe haemophilia A. The NuProtect study assessed the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety of simoctocog alfa in 108 previously untreated patients (PUPs). The incidence of high-titre inhibitors was 16.2% and no patients with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors.

AIM

To report the efficacy and safety results from the NuProtect study.

METHODS

PUPs received simoctocog alfa for prophylaxis, treatment of BEs, or as surgical prophylaxis. The efficacy of prophylaxis (during inhibitor-free periods) was assessed using annualised bleeding rates (ABRs). The efficacy in treating BEs and in surgical prophylaxis was assessed using a 4-point scale. Adverse events were recorded throughout the study.

RESULTS

Of 108 PUPs treated with simoctocog alfa, 103 received at least one prophylactic dose and 50 received continuous prophylaxis for at least 24 weeks. In patients on continuous prophylaxis, the median ABR was 0 (mean 0.5) for spontaneous BEs and 2.5 (mean 3.6) for all BEs. In 85 patients who had BEs, efficacy of BE treatment was excellent or good for 92.9% (747/804) of rated BEs; 92.3% of BEs were treated with 1 or 2 infusions. The efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent or good for 94.7% (18/19) of rated procedures. There were no safety concerns and no thromboembolic events.

CONCLUSION

Simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well tolerated as prophylaxis, surgical prophylaxis and for the treatment of BEs in PUPs with severe haemophilia A.

Long-term immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa in patients with severe haemophilia A who had completed the NuProtect study in previously untreated patients

BACKGROUND

The NuProtect study reported data on the immunogenicity, efficacy and tolerability of simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq^® ) in 108 previously untreated patients with severe haemophilia A planned to be treated for ≥100 exposure days or up to 5 years. The NuProtect-Extension study collected long-term prophylaxis data in children with severe haemophilia A.

METHODS

Patients who completed the NuProtect study according to the protocol were eligible for the NuProtect-Extension study, a prospective, multinational, non-controlled, Phase 3b study.

RESULTS

Of 48 patients who entered the extension study, 47 (median age 2.8 years) received prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa for a median of 24 months, with 82%-88% on a twice-weekly or less regimen. No patient developed FVIII inhibitors during the extension study. The median (IQR) annualized bleeding rate (ABR) during prophylaxis was 0 (0-0.5) for spontaneous bleeding episodes (BEs) and 1.00 (0-1.95) for all BEs. ABRs estimated using a negative binomial model were .28 (95% CI: .15, .53) for spontaneous and 1.62 (95% CI: 1.09, 2.42) for all BEs. During the median follow-up of 24 months, 34 (72%) patients had zero spontaneous BEs and 46 (98%) had zero spontaneous joint BEs. Efficacy in treating BEs was excellent or good for 78.2% of rated BEs, and efficacy of surgical prophylaxis was excellent for two rated surgeries. No treatment-related adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSION

No FVIII inhibitors developed during long-term prophylaxis in the NuProtect-Extension study. Prophylaxis with simoctocog alfa was efficacious and well-tolerated, and is therefore an attractive long-term option for children with severe haemophilia A.

Association between interleukin-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism and FVIII inhibitor development in Indonesian patients with severe hemophilia A

BACKGROUND Factor VIII (FVIII) inhibitors in hemophilia A (HA) patients render FVIII replacement therapy ineffective. Although its development cause is unclear, it has been classified into therapeutic and genetic-related etiologies. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in several cytokine genes, including interleukin (IL)-2, could increase the risk of FVIII inhibitor development. This study aimed to evaluate the association between IL-2 (rs2069762) gene SNP and FVIII inhibitor development in Indonesian patients with severe HA. METHODS The IL-2 (rs2069762) gene SNP was examined in 119 HA patients. The presence of FVIII inhibitors was quantified using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, with a titer of <0.28 ng/ml considered negative. Patients were divided into two groups: 59 with FVIII inhibitors (positive group) and 60 without inhibitors (negative group). The genotype of the subjects was determined using peripheral blood mononuclear cells and tetra-primer amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction. RESULTS There was no association between IL-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism and FVIII inhibitor development on genotypes (p = 0.138) and allele frequencies (p = 0.780). CONCLUSIONS IL-2 (rs2069762) gene polymorphism is not a risk factor in the development of FVIII inhibitors in Indonesian patients with severe HA. Thus, further polymorphism studies in other cytokine genes are required to gain a comprehensive understanding of the FVIII inhibitor development.

Decrease in in vivo coagulant potential of emicizumab in a patient with hemophilia A and inhibitor complicated with infectious mononucleosis

Emicizumab prophylaxis significantly reduces bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia A (PwHA). There is little information on coagulant potentials in emicizumab-treated PwHA with infection, however. We encountered an emicizumab-treated PwHA with inhibitor, complicated with Epstein-Barr virus-associated infectious mononucleosis (IM) in phase 1/2 study (ACE001JP/ACE002JP). Although it was a typical clinical course of IM, activated partial thromboplastin time was mildly prolonged but rotational thromboelastometry revealed severely impaired coagulant potential. The blood concentration of emicizumab decreased moderately in the low concentration range, resulting in an increased risk of bleeding and possibly leading to severe ileocecal bleeds requiring coil embolization. The blood concentrations of factors IX/X little decreased and antiemicizumab antibodies did not develop, however. After the influence by IM resolved, his coagulant potentials gradually recovered with the recovery of emicizumab concentration, and parameters by global coagulation assays improved. An IM case for emicizumab-treated PwHA may need to monitor using global coagulation assays.

Anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies against emicizumab enable accurate procoagulant and anticoagulant assays, irrespective of the test base, in the presence of emicizumab

INTRODUCTION

Emicizumab markedly shortens the activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), resulting in inaccurate measurements of procoagulant and anticoagulant factor activities. We have recently reported that mixtures of two different anti-idiotype monoclonal antibodies against emicizumab (anti-emicizumab-mAbs) allow measurement of factor (F)VIII activity (FVIII:C) and FVIII inhibitor in emicizumab-containing plasmas. It is unknown whether anti-emicizumab mAbs can work for other aPTT-based procoagulant and anticoagulant assays.

AIM

To investigate whether anti-emicizumab mAbs were measured by all of the aPTT-based assays tested.

METHODS

Two anti-emicizumab-mAbs (300 μg/mL each) were preincubated with emicizumab (200 μg/mL)-spiked FVIII-deficient plasma; we then measured FVIII:C, FIX:C, FXI:C, FXII:C, protein (P)C:C, PS:C, global PC-FV (aPTT-based), and prothrombin time (PT), diluted Russel's viper venom time (dRVVT), chromogenic-based FVIII:C, FIX:C and PC:C (non-aPTT-based). Emicizumab (100 μg/mL)-spiked haemophilia (H)A plasmas from patients (n = 23) were also measured.

RESULTS

Emicizumab shortened the clotting time in all aPTT-based assays, resulting in high levels of FVIII:C, FIX:C, FXI:C and FXII:C; low levels of PC:C and PS:C; and false-positive results for activated PC resistance. The addition of anti-emicizumab-mAbs to emicizumab-added plasma restored all factors to the initial levels without emicizumab. Chromogenic FVIII:C measurement by human FIXa/FX was affected by emicizumab, but anti-emicizumab mAbs cancelled this effect. PT-based assays and dRVVT, chromogenic FIX:C and PC:C assays showed no effect with emicizumab. Twenty-three plasma samples from HA patients also showed similar patterns.

CONCLUSION

Anti-emicizumab mAbs in vitro could cancel the effect of emicizumab, irrespective of the test base, resulting in accurate measurements of procoagulant and anticoagulant factor activity.

Management of haemophilia A with inhibitors: A regional cross-talk

INTRODUCTION

The development of inhibitors with factor VIII (FVIII) replacement therapy is one of the most common and challenging complications of haemophilia A (HA) treatment, jeopardising treatment efficacy and predisposing patients to high risks of morbidity and mortality. The management of patients with inhibitors is particularly challenging in countries where resources are limited.

AIM

To provide a comprehensive summary of the management of HA with inhibitors while focusing on differences in practice between Western and non-Western countries and how resource scarcity can impact HA management, leading to suboptimal outcomes in patients with inhibitors.

METHODS

Summary of key evidence and regional expert opinion.

RESULTS

We address, particularly, the diagnosis of and testing for inhibitors, as well as the epidemiology of inhibitors, including incidence, prevalence and disease burden. Secondly, we provide an overview of the current treatment landscape in HA with inhibitors regarding the eradication of inhibitors with immune tolerance induction and the treatment and prevention of bleeding with bypassing agents, non-factor replacement agents and other experimental therapies. This is complemented with insights from the authors around the applicability of, and challenges associated with, such therapies in their settings of practice.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude by proposing some key steps towards bridging the gaps in the management of HA with inhibitors in resource-limited countries, including: (1) the collection of quality data that can inform healthcare reforms and policies; (2) improving disease knowledge among healthcare practitioners and patients with the aim of standardising disease management across centres and (3) working towards promoting equal access to HA care and therapies for everyone.

Immune Tolerance Induction (ITI) with a pdFVIII/VWF Concentrate (octanate) in 100 Patients in the Observational ITI (ObsITI) Study

Background  Immune tolerance induction (ITI) with repeated factor VIII (FVIII) administration is the only strategy proven to eradicate inhibitors. The observational ITI study is evaluating ITI with a range of FVIII products.

Methods  This subgroup analysis reports prospective interim data for patients treated with a plasma-derived, von Willebrand factor-stabilized FVIII concentrate (pdFVIII/VWF, octanate). Complete success (CS) of ITI required achievement of three criteria: inhibitor titer < 0.6 BU/mL; FVIII recovery ≥ 66%; FVIII half-life ≥6 hours. Partial success (PS) required achievement of two criteria and partial response (PR) one. ITI success was defined as CS or PS. Data were analyzed for patients who achieved CS, had 36 months' observation, or failed ITI.

Results  One-hundred prospectively enrolled patients were included in the analysis; 91 had poor prognosis factors for ITI success. The mean (standard deviation) daily ITI dose was 116.4 (61.1) IU FVIII/kg in 14 low responders (< 5 BU/mL) and 173.7 (112.0) IU FVIII/kg in 86 high responders (≥ 5 BU/mL). Inhibitor titers < 0.6 BU/mL were achieved in 71% of patients in a median of 4.01 months, accompanied by a 93% reduction in bleeding rate. ITI success was achieved by 70% of patients and 56 of 72 (78%) primary (first-line) ITI patients. PR was achieved by 5 patients; ITI failed in 25 patients. PS and CS were achieved in a median of 5.55 and 11.25 months, respectively.

Conclusions  ITI with pdFVIII/VWF led to rapid eradication of FVIII inhibitors, normalization of FVIII pharmacokinetics in the majority of patients, and a significant reduction in bleeding rates.

Eptacog beta efficacy and safety in the treatment and control of bleeding in paediatric subjects (<12 years) with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors

Introduction

Eptacog beta is a new recombinant activated human factor VII bypassing agent approved in the United States for the treatment and control of bleeding in patients with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors 12 years of age or older.

Aim

To prospectively assess in a phase 3 clinical trial (PERSEPT 2) eptacog beta efficacy and safety for treatment of bleeding in children <12 years of age with haemophilia A or B with inhibitors.

Methods

Using a randomised crossover design, subjects received initial doses of 75 or 225 μg/kg eptacog beta followed by 75 μg/kg dosing at predefined intervals (as determined by clinical response) to treat bleeding episodes (BEs). Treatment success criteria included a haemostasis evaluation of ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ without use of additional eptacog beta, alternative haemostatic agent or blood product, and no increase in pain following the first ‘excellent’ or ‘good’ assessment.

Results

Treatment success proportions in 25 subjects (1–11 years) who experienced 546 mild or moderate BEs were 65% in the 75 μg/kg initial dose regimen (IDR) and 60% in the 225 μg/kg IDR 12 h following initial eptacog beta infusion. By 24 h, the treatment success proportions were 97% for the 75 μg/kg IDR and 98% for the 225 μg/kg IDR. No thrombotic events, allergic reactions, neutralising antibodies or treatment‐related adverse events were reported.

Conclusion

Both 75 and 225 μg/kg eptacog beta IDRs provided safe and effective treatment and control of bleeding in children <12 years of age.

Design of an international investigator-initiated study on MOdern Treatment of Inhibitor-positiVe pATiEnts with haemophilia A (MOTIVATE)

Background:

Inhibitor development is the most serious treatment-related complication of replacement coagulation factor VIII (FVIII) therapy for patients with haemophilia A. Immune tolerance induction (ITI), which involves intensive and prolonged treatment with plasma-derived or recombinant FVIII, is the only clinically proven strategy for eradication of inhibitors. The bispecific antibody emicizumab is approved for use in patients with and without inhibitors to prevent bleeding but does not eliminate inhibitors. MOTIVATE (www.motivate-study.com) aims to capture different approaches to the treatment and management of patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, document current ITI approaches from real-world clinical experience, and evaluate the efficacy and safety of ITI, emicizumab prophylaxis and ITI with emicizumab prophylaxis.

Methods:

The investigator-initiated MOTIVATE study [ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04023019; EudraCT 2019-003427-38] will investigate in real-life clinical practice the management of patients with haemophilia A of any severity who have developed inhibitors to FVIII. All treatment is at the investigator’s discretion. The following treatment approaches will be evaluated: Group 1 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat bleeding episodes (BEs) or during surgery or for prophylaxis; Group 2 – ITI with Nuwiq^®, octanate^® or wilate^® and emicizumab prophylaxis and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery; Group 3 – routine prophylaxis with emicizumab, aPCC or rFVIIa without ITI and aPCC/rFVIIa if needed to treat BEs or during surgery. Patients will not be randomised to a treatment group and may change groups during the study.

Conclusions:

It is planned to enrol 120 patients who will be followed for up to 5 years. Optional sub-studies will explore factors that may influence ITI results as well as the impact of different treatment approaches on important aspects of patient health, including joint and bone health and the risk of thrombotic events.

Predictors of the outcome of immune tolerance induction in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors: The Brazilian Immune Tolerance (BrazIT) Study protocol

The development of inhibitors is the main complication of haemophilia A (HA) treatment. Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the treatment of choice for inhibitor eradication. We describe the methodology of the Brazilian Immune Tolerance Induction (BrazIT) Study, aimed to identify clinical, genetic, and immune biomarkers associated with response to ITI and inhibitor recurrence. This cohort study includes people with HA (PwHA) and inhibitors (a) who require bypassing agents to treat and/or prevent bleeding, and (b) who are at any stage of ITI treatment. Patients are included in each haemophilia treatment centre (HTC). Factor VIII (FVIII) and inhibitor assessments are performed at local laboratories of each HTC. The ITI regimen followed the national protocol of the Brazilian Ministry of Health. All PwHA starts with low-dose ITI (50 IU/kg three times weekly); high-dose regimen (100 IU/kg daily) is used if there is lack of response to the low-dose ITI. Outcomes are classified as total or partial success, and failure. Standardized case report forms with clinical, laboratory, and treatment data are collected from medical files and interviews. Blood samples are collected for genetic and immune biomarkers at the time of inclusion in the study and at the end of ITI. The study is ongoing and, currently, 202/250 (80.8%) PwHA from 15 HTCs have been included. BrazIT Study is the largest cohort of PwHA and inhibitor under treatment with the same ITI regimen reported to date. This study is likely to contribute with novel predictors of ITI response.

Concomitant use of bypassing agents with emicizumab for people with haemophilia A and inhibitors undergoing surgery

INTRODUCTION

Surgery in people with haemophilia and factor VIII inhibitors is typically managed with perioperative administration of haemostatic agents to prevent or control the occurrence of bleeding events. Practical experience of surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving treatment with emicizumab is growing; however, the novelty of the situation means that standardised guidelines are lacking with regard to the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents, including dose and laboratory monitoring.

AIM

To review approaches to haemostatic management during major and minor invasive procedures in patients with haemophilia A and inhibitors, and to provide recommendations for controlling bleeding events.

METHODS

A search was conducted, limited to the past 4 years (January 2016-April 2020), pertaining to published evidence of surgery for patients receiving emicizumab. Publications identified from the search were manually reviewed to determine studies and case reports relevant for inclusion.

RESULTS

Identified literature and practical experience of the authors were used to build a consensus of practical recommendations for the concomitant administration of haemostatic agents during the perioperative period for elective surgery in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab.

CONCLUSIONS

The current evidence base indicates that surgery can be successfully performed in patients with inhibitors who are receiving emicizumab and that bypassing agents can be used concomitantly. Data from prospective studies are required to further support recommendations for haemostatic management of surgery in patients receiving emicizumab.

The severe spontaneous bleeding phenotype in a novel hemophilia A rat model is rescued by platelet FVIII expression

Previous studies have shown that platelet-specific factor VIII (FVIII) expression (2bF8) restores hemostasis and induces immune tolerance in hemophilia A (HA) mice even with preexisting inhibitors. Here we investigated for the first time whether platelet FVIII expression can prevent severe spontaneous bleeding in rat HA, a model mimicking the frequent spontaneous bleeding in patients with severe HA. A novel FVIII-/- rat model in a Dahl inbred background (Dahl-FVIII-/-) with nearly the entire rat FVIII gene inverted was created by using a CRISPR/Cas9 strategy. There was no detectable FVIII in plasma. Spontaneous bleeding in the soft tissue, muscles, or joints occurred in 100% of FVIII-/- rats. Sixty-one percent developed anti-FVIII inhibitors after ≥2 doses of recombinant human FVIII infusion. However, when 2bF8 transgene was crossed into the FVIII-/- background, none of the resulting 2bF8tg+FVIII-/- rats (with platelet FVIII levels of 28.26 ± 7.69 mU/108 platelets and undetectable plasma FVIII) ever had spontaneous bleeding. When 2bF8tg bone marrow (BM) was transplanted into FVIII-/- rats, only 1 of 7 recipients had a bruise at the early stage of BM reconstitution, but no other spontaneous bleeding was observed during the study period. To confirm that the bleeding diathesis in FVIII-/- rats was ameliorated after platelet FVIII expression, rotational thromboelastometry and whole-blood thrombin generation assay were performed. All parameters in 2bF8tg BM transplantation recipients were significantly improved compared with FVIII-/- control rats. Of note, neither detectable levels of plasma FVIII nor anti-FVIII inhibitors were detected in 2bF8tg BM transplantation recipients. Thus, platelet-specific FVIII expression can efficiently prevent severe spontaneous bleeding in FVIII-/- rats with no anti-FVIII antibody development.

Role of Regulatory Cells in Immune Tolerance Induction in Hemophilia A

The main complication of hemophilia A treatment is the development of neutralizing antibodies (inhibitors) against factor VIII (FVIII). Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the prescribed treatment for inhibitor eradication, although its working mechanism remains unresolved. To clarify this mechanism, we compared blood samples of hemophilia A patients with and without inhibitors for presence of immunoregulatory cells and markers, including regulatory B-cells (Bregs), regulatory T-cells (Tregs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), and expression of regulatory markers on T-cells (programmed cell death protein 1 [PD1], inducable T-cell costimulator, cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 [CTLA4]), by use of flow cytometry. By cross-sectional analysis inhibitor patients (N = 20) were compared with inhibitor-negative (N = 28) and ex-inhibitor (N = 17) patients. In another longitudinal study, changes in immunoregulatory parameters were evaluated during ITI (N = 12) and compared with inhibitor-negative hemophilia A patients (N = 36). The frequency of Bregs, but not of Tregs nor MDSCs, was significantly reduced in inhibitor patients (3.2%) compared with inhibitor-negative (5.9%) and ex-inhibitor patients (8.9%; P < 0.01). CTLA4 expression on T-cells was also reduced (mean fluorescence intensity 133 in inhibitor versus 537 in inhibitor-negative patients; P < 0.01). Fittingly, in patients followed during ITI, inhibitor eradication associated with increased Bregs, increased Tregs, and increased expression of CTLA4 and PD1 on CD4+ T-cells. In conclusion, inhibitor patients express significantly lower frequency of Bregs and Tregs marker expression, which are restored by successful ITI. Our findings suggest that an existing anti-FVIII immune response is associated with deficits in peripheral tolerance mechanisms and that Bregs and changes in immunoregulatory properties of CD4+ T-cells likely contribute to ITI in hemophilia A patients with inhibitors.

Predicted coagulation potential using an in vitro simulated model of emicizumab prophylaxis and immune tolerance induction therapy in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor

Emicizumab reduces bleeding in hemophilia A patients with inhibitor (HA-inh). A combination of immune tolerance induction therapy (ITI) and emicizumab prophylaxis may provide additional benefits, but coagulation potential during this treatment remains unknown. We assessed coagulation potentials in simulated ITI models in vitro using modified-clot waveform analysis. Factor (F)VIII-deficient plasma preincubated with anti-A2 and anti-C2 monoclonal antibodies was reacted with emicizumab (50 µg/mL) (emicizumab-HA-plasma), then spiking bypassing agents (BPAs): activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC 1.3 IU/mL; 50 IU/kg), recombinant factor (rF)VIIa (2.2 µg/mL; 90 µg/kg), and FVIIa/FX (1.5 µg/mL; 60 µg/kg), and/or FVIII (100, 200 IU/dL). Coagulation potentials in emicizumab-HA-plasma (10 BU/mL) remained within the normal range when BPA and FVIII were both present. In emicizumab-HA-plasma (1 BU/mL) with BPA and FVIII (200 IU/dL), they were near or beyond the normal range, but those with a half concentration of rFVIIa based on the half-life in blood were within the normal range. In samples without inhibitor, coagulation potentials with combined BPA and FVIII were far beyond the normal range but with FVIII (100 IU/dL) and rFVIIa at half concentration they remained within the normal range. These results may provide information on the feasibility of concurrent ITI under emicizumab prophylaxis.

Simoctocog Alfa (Nuwiq) in Previously Untreated Patients with Severe Haemophilia A: Final Results of the NuProtect Study

Introduction  FVIII inhibitor development is the most serious contemporary treatment complication in haemophilia A, particularly in previously untreated patients (PUPs). No inhibitors developed in clinical trials in previously treated patients treated with simoctocog alfa (Nuwiq), a fourth-generation recombinant FVIII produced in a human cell line.

Methods  The NuProtect study investigated the immunogenicity of simoctocog alfa in PUPs. NuProtect was a prospective, multinational, open-label, non-controlled, phase III study. PUPs with severe haemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%) of any age and ethnicity were treated with simoctocog alfa for 100 exposure days or a maximum of 5 years. Patients were true PUPs without prior exposure to FVIII concentrates or blood components. Inhibitor titres were measured with the Nijmegen-modified Bethesda assay; cut-off for positivity was 0.6 BU mL ⁻¹ (≥0.6 to <5 low-titre, ≥5 high titre).

Results  A total of 108 PUPs with a median age at first treatment of 12.0 months (interquartile range: 8.0–23.5) were treated with simoctocog alfa. F8 mutation type was known for 102 patients (94.4%) of whom 90 (88.2%) had null F8 mutations and 12 (11.8%) had non-null mutations. Of 105 PUPs evaluable for inhibitor development, 28 (26.7%) developed inhibitors; 17 high titre (16.2%) and 11 low titre (10.5%). No PUPs with non-null F8 mutations developed inhibitors.

Conclusion  In the NuProtect study, the rate of inhibitor development in PUPs with severe haemophilia A treated with simoctocog alfa was lower than the rate reported for hamster-cell-derived recombinant factor VIII products in other recent clinical trials. No inhibitors were reported in PUPs with non-null F8 mutations.

Clot waveform analysis for perioperative hemostatic monitoring of arthroscopic synovectomy in a pediatric patient with hemophilia A and inhibitor receiving emicizumab prophylaxis

Emicizumab reduces bleeding in patients with hemophilia A and inhibitors (PwHA-I). Coagulation potential during the perioperative period in emicizumab-treated PwHA-I undergoing surgery remains to be evaluated. We describe a 14-year-old boy with HA-I receiving emicizumab prophylaxis who experienced arthroscopic synovectomy. He was treated with a bolus infusion of recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa; 80 μg/kg) immediately before surgery, and treatment continued at the same dose every 3 h on day 1, every 4 h on day 2, and every 6 h on day 3. Treatment with rFVIIa was discontinued on day 4. No perioperative bleeding or thrombotic events were observed. Coagulation potential throughout the perioperative period was retrospectively assessed with an easy-to-use clot waveform analysis (CWA). Measurements from CWA returned to within or near the normal range, suggesting successful hemostatic management. Coagulation potentials assessed by CWA showed a significant correspondence with those from a thrombin generation assay (TGA) that is already in use. CWA and TGA could both provide useful data for assessing coagulation potential in the perioperative hemostatic management of emicizumab-treated PwHA-I.

Induction of activated T follicular helper cells is critical for anti-FVIII inhibitor development in hemophilia A mice

The development of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies (inhibitors) is a major complication of FVIII protein replacement therapy in patients with hemophilia A (HA). Although multiple lines of evidence indicate that the immune response against FVIII is CD4 T-cell-dependent and many FVIII-derived CD4 epitopes have already been discovered, the role of T follicular helper (TFH) cells in FVIII inhibitor development is unknown. TFH cells, a newly identified subset of CD4 T cells, are characterized by expression of the B-cell follicle-homing receptor CXCR5 and PD-1. In this study, we show for the first time that IV FVIII immunization induces activation and accumulation and/or expansion of PD-1+CXCR5+ TFH cells in the spleen of FVIII-deficient (FVIIInull) mice. FVIII inhibitor-producing mice showed increased germinal center (GC) formation and increased GC TFH cells in response to FVIII immunization. Emergence of TFH cells correlated with titers of anti-FVIII inhibitors. Rechallenge with FVIII antigen elicited recall responses of TFH cells. In vitro FVIII restimulation resulted in antigen-specific proliferation of splenic CD4+ T cells from FVIII-primed FVIIInull mice, and the proliferating cells expressed the TFH hallmark transcription factor BCL6. CXCR5+/+ TFH-cell-specific deletion impaired anti-FVIII inhibitor production, confirming the essential role of CXCR5+/+ TFH cells for the generation of FVIII-neutralizing antibodies. Together, our results demonstrate that the induction of activated TFH cells in FVIIInull mice is critical for FVIII inhibitor development, suggesting that inhibition of FVIII-specific TFH-cell activation may be a promising strategy for preventing anti-FVIII inhibitor formation in patients with HA.

Predicting the Development of Anti-Drug Antibodies against Recombinant alpha-Galactosidase A in Male Patients with Classical Fabry Disease

Fabry Disease (FD) is a rare, X-linked, lysosomal storage disease that mainly causes renal, cardiac and cerebral complications. Enzyme replacement therapy (ERT) with recombinant alpha-galactosidase A is available, but approximately 50% of male patients with classical FD develop inhibiting anti-drug antibodies (iADAs) that lead to reduced biochemical responses and an accelerated loss of renal function. Once immunization has occurred, iADAs tend to persist and tolerization is hard to achieve. Here we developed a pre-treatment prediction model for iADA development in FD using existing data from 120 classical male FD patients from three European centers, treated with ERT. We found that nonsense and frameshift mutations in the α-galactosidase A gene (p = 0.05), higher plasma lysoGb3 at baseline (p < 0.001) and agalsidase beta as first treatment (p = 0.006) were significantly associated with iADA development. Prediction performance of a Random Forest model, using multiple variables (AUC-ROC: 0.77) was compared to a logistic regression (LR) model using the three significantly associated variables (AUC-ROC: 0.77). The LR model can be used to determine iADA risk in individual FD patients prior to treatment initiation. This helps to determine in which patients adjusted treatment and/or immunomodulatory regimes may be considered to minimize iADA development risk.

Tolerance to FVIII: Role of the Immune Metabolic Enzymes Indoleamine 2,3 Dyoxigenase-1 and Heme Oxygenase-1

The occurrence of neutralizing anti-FVIII antibodies is a major complication in the treatment of patients affected by hemophilia A. The immune response to FVIII is a complex, multi-factorial process that has been extensively studied for the past two decades. The reasons why only a proportion of hemophilic patients treated with FVIII concentrates develop a clinically significant immune response is incompletely understood. The "danger theory" has been proposed as a possible explanation to interpret the findings of some observational clinical studies highlighting the possible detrimental impact of inflammatory stimuli at the time of replacement therapy on inhibitor development. The host immune system is often challenged to react to FVIII under steady state or inflammatory conditions (e.g., bleeding, infections) although fine tuning of mechanisms of immune tolerance can control this reactivity and promote long-term unresponsiveness to the therapeutically administered factor. Recent studies have provided evidence that multiple interactions involving central and peripheral mechanisms of tolerance are integrated by the host immune system with the environmental conditions at the time of FVIII exposure and influence the balance between immunity and tolerance to FVIII. Here we review evidences showing the involvement of two key immunoregulatory oxygenase enzymes (IDO1, HO-1) that have been studied in hemophilia patients and pre-clinical models, showing that the ability of the host immune system to induce such regulatory proteins under inflammatory conditions can play important roles in the balance between immunity and tolerance to exogenous FVIII.

Prediction of the haemostatic effects of bypassing therapy using comprehensive coagulation assays in emicizumab prophylaxis-treated haemophilia A patients with inhibitors

In emicizumab prophylaxis, the concomitant therapy using bypassing agents (BPAs) is required for breakthrough bleeding and invasive procedures with attention to thrombotic complications. To predict coagulant effects of BPAs in emicizumab-treated patients with haemophilia A (PwHA) with inhibitor (PwHAwI), blood samples from emicizumab-treated PwHAwI (n = 8) and PwHA without inhibitor (n = 2) in phase 1/2 and HAVEN 1 study, spiked with activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) or recombinant factor VIIa (rFVIIa) ex vivo, and blood samples from emicizumab-treated PwHAwI-receiving BPAs were analysed by Ca²⁺ -triggered rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and ellagic acid/tissue factor-triggered clot waveform analysis (CWA). Spiked aPCC, corresponded to 10-100 U/kg, markedly shortened ROTEM parameters beyond the normal range, while spiked rFVIIa, corresponded to 90-270 μg/kg, shortened them within near-normal range. Each of the spiked BPA-improved adjusted maximum coagulation velocity of CWA to within or near the normal range. In blood samples at post-infusion of aPCC (44-73 U/kg) or rFVIIa (79-93 μg/kg), the parameters of both assays improved to approximately the normal range. Taken together, ex vivo results of spiking tests in ROTEM and CWA, except aPCC spiking test in ROTEM, were relatively consistent with in vivo ones, and could usefully predict the coagulant effects of concomitant bypassing therapy for emicizumab-treated PwHAwI.

Impact of the Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers (SIPPET) study and its post hoc analyses on clinical practice in the United States: A survey of Haemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society members

INTRODUCTION

A recent randomized trial, the Survey of Inhibitors in Plasma-Product Exposed Toddlers (SIPPET), confirmed that exposure to recombinant FVIII (rFVIII) products doubled the risk of inhibitor development compared to plasma-derived FVIII (pdFVIII) in previously untreated (or minimally treated) patients (PUPs) with severe haemophilia A. SIPPET post hoc analyses showed that early exposure to rFVIII was more immunogenic and that rFVIII could harm low-risk PUPs with non-null mutations. Clinical implications of SIPPET findings for the haemophilia community were unclear.

AIM

Study the impact of the SIPPET study and its post hoc analyses on clinical practice for PUPs with severe haemophilia A in the United States.

METHODS

Members of the North American Hemophilia and Thrombosis Research Society (HTRS) completed two online questionnaires related to SIPPET publications and PUP management (study period: 12/2016-8/2018).

RESULTS

Over 50% participated the study. Sixty per cent expressed methodological concerns about the SIPPET study, yet 55% shared the study with new families. During the study period, rFVIII selection fell from 43/61 (70%) to 15/54 (28%) while use of pdFVIII and shared decision-making increased from 5/61 (8%) to 9/54 (17%) and from 4/61 (7%) to 10/54 (19%), respectively. Based on post hoc analyses, 44/54 (82%) would change their clinical practice with 31/44 (70%) using pdFVIII for PUPs. Barriers to translation of SIPPET analyses included study design concerns, non-inclusion of novel therapies, inability to perform genetic testing at diagnosis and risk of plasma-derived infections.

CONCLUSION

Despite the methodological concerns about the SIPPET study, this Grade I evidence appears to have influenced the clinical practice of haemophilia providers in the United States.

Spotlight on emicizumab in the management of hemophilia A: patient selection and special considerations

Emicizumab is a factor (F)VIIIa-mimicking bispecific antibody recognizing FIXa and FX molecules. In the phase 1/2 clinical studies, once-weekly subcutaneous administration of emicizumab has shown a favorable safety profile with encouraging efficacy in the patients with hemophilia A (PwHA) irrespective of the presence of anti-FVIII inhibitors. Moreover, in the following phase 3 studies, emicizumab treatment by once-weekly, bi-weekly or tetra-weekly administration have been still well-tolerated, but some thromboembolic events or thrombotic microangiopathy were observed associated with the concomitant use of activated prothrombin complex concentrates (aPCC) for breakthrough bleeds. Since approved for routine prophylaxis in PwHA in the US, EU, and Japan, a compass on patient selection for emicizumab treatment and special considerations on the practical situations such as concomitant treatment by bypassing agents (BPAs) or clotting factor concentrates (CFCs) with less thrombotic risk, inhibitor eradication by immune tolerance induction (ITI) should be provided. There is no doubt that emicizumab is an alternate first-line therapy for any existing BPA as hemostatic treatment for PwHA with inhibitor, but we should be more cautious in combination with aPCC on breakthrough bleeds under emicizumab prophylaxis because of thrombotic risk. For severe PwHA without inhibitor, since most patients are under CFCs prophylaxis, switching from CFCs to emicizumab should be considered when the advantage of emicizumab prophylaxis surpasses that of CFCs prophylaxis from the viewpoint of hemostatic effect by treatment, physical activity according to the life stage, health condition of the joints, adherence and complication. There are pros and cons on the timing of introduction of emicizumab for cases scheduled to start ITI or cases of ongoing ITI. Introduction of emicizumab to previously untreated patients and nonsevere PwHA without inhibitor is also required to discuss in consideration of risk of inhibitor development and unforeseen safety issues.

Health-related quality of life and health status in persons with haemophilia A with inhibitors: A prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study (NIS)

INTRODUCTION

Real-world data (RWD) on health-related outcomes in persons with haemophilia A (PwHA) provide insights into patient needs and can guide clinical study design. A global, prospective, non-interventional study (NIS; NCT02476942) collected detailed RWD on bleeding outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and health status in PwHA treated per local routine clinical practice.

AIM

To report HRQoL and health status in the adult/adolescent PwHA with inhibitors cohort in the NIS.

METHODS

This cohort enrolled PwHA aged ≥12 years with high-titre factor VIII inhibitor history. Participants remained on their usual treatment (no protocol-specified interventions). Health-related outcomes: Haemophilia Quality of Life Questionnaire for Adults (Haem-A-QoL), Haemophilia-specific Quality of Life Questionnaire for Children Short Form (Haemo-QoL SF), EuroQol 5-Dimensions 5-Levels (EQ-5D-5L) index utility score (IUS) and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS).

RESULTS

One hundred three participants were enrolled on episodic (n = 75) or prophylactic treatment (n = 28); median (range) age, 31 (12-75) years; median (range) observation time, 26 (4-70) weeks. Haem-A-QoL scores indicated impairments in HRQoL aspects; comparable between episodic/prophylactic regimens and relatively consistent over time. Haemo-QoL SF scores with both regimens varied over time, and appeared poorer with episodic than prophylactic treatment. IUS and EQ-VAS were comparable between regimens, stable over time and lower on bleeding days. Mean proportions of missed work and school days were 16% and 23%, respectively; mean (standard deviation) number of days hospitalized was 3.2 (8.8) (comparable between groups).

CONCLUSIONS

These RWD demonstrate that PwHA with inhibitors have impaired HRQoL, despite standard treatment, and that more effective treatment options are needed.

Gene therapy for hemophilia: what does the future hold?

Recent phase I/II adeno-associated viral vector-mediated gene therapy clinical trials have reported remarkable success in ameliorating disease phenotype in hemophilia A and B. These trials, which highlight the challenges overcome through decades of preclinical and first in human clinical studies, have generated considerable excitement for patients and caregivers alike. Optimization of vector and transgene expression has significantly improved the ability to achieve therapeutic factor levels in these subjects. Long-term follow-up studies will guide standardization of the approach with respect to the combination of serotype, promoter, dose, and manufacturing processes and inform safety for inclusion of young patients. Certain limitations preclude universal applicability of gene therapy, including transient liver transaminase elevations due to the immune responses to vector capsids or as yet undefined mechanisms, underlying liver disease from iatrogenic viral hepatitis, and neutralizing antibodies to clotting factors. Integrating vectors show promising preclinical results, but manufacturing and safety concerns still remain. The prospect of gene editing for correction of the underlying mutation is on the horizon with considerable potential. Herein, we review the advances and limitations that have resulted in these recent successful clinical trials and outline avenues that will allow for broader applicability of gene therapy.

Novel therapeutics for hemophilia and other bleeding disorders

Hemophilia and von Willebrand disease are the most common congenital bleeding disorders. Treatment of these disorders has focused on replacement of the missing coagulation factor to prevent or treat bleeding. New technologies and insights into hemostasis have driven the development of many promising new therapies for hemophilia and von Willebrand disease. Emerging bypass agents including zymogen-like factor IXa and Xa molecules are in development and a bispecific antibody, emicizumab, demonstrated efficacy in a phase 3 trial in people with hemophilia A and inhibitors. Tissue factor pathway inhibitor, the protein C/S system, and antithrombin are targets of novel compounds in development to alter the hemostatic balance and new approaches using modified factor VIII molecules are being tested for prevention and eradication of inhibitor antibodies in hemophilia A. The first recombinant von Willebrand factor (VWF) product has been approved and has unique VWF multimer content and does not contain factor VIII. These new approaches may offer better routes of administration, improved dosing regimens, and better efficacy for prevention and treatment of bleeding in congenital bleeding disorders.

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein for immune tolerance induction in patients with severe haemophilia A with inhibitors-A retrospective analysis

INTRODUCTION

Immune tolerance induction (ITI) is the gold standard for eradication of factor VIII inhibitors in severe haemophilia A; however, it usually requires treatment for extended periods with associated high burden on patients and healthcare resources.

AIM

Review outcomes of ITI with recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein (rFVIIIFc) in patients with severe haemophilia A and high-titre inhibitors.

METHODS

Multicentre retrospective chart review of severe haemophilia A patients treated with rFVIIIFc for ITI.

RESULTS

Of 19 patients, 7 were first-time ITI and 12 were rescue ITI. Of 7 first-time patients, 6 had at least 1 high-risk feature for ITI failure. Four of 7 first-time patients were tolerized in a median of 7.8 months. The remaining 3 patients continue on rFVIIIFc ITI. Of 12 rescue patients, 7 initially achieved a negative Bethesda titre (≤0.6) in a median of 3.3 months, 1 had a decrease in Bethesda titre and continues on rFVIIIFc ITI and 4 have not demonstrated a decrease in Bethesda titre. Of these 4, 3 continue on rFVIIIFc ITI and 1 switched to bypass therapy alone. Two initially responsive patients transitioned to other factors due to recurrence. Overall, 16 of 19 patients remain on rFVIIIFc (prophylaxis or ITI). For those still undergoing ITI, longer follow-up is needed to determine final outcomes. No adverse events reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein demonstrated rapid time to tolerization in high-risk first-time ITI patients. For rescue ITI, rFVIIIFc showed therapeutic benefit in some patients who previously failed ITI with other products. These findings highlight the need to further evaluate the use of rFVIIIFc for ITI.

Gene therapy for hemophilia

Individuals with the inherited bleeding disorder hemophilia have achieved tremendous advances in clinical outcomes through widespread implementation of prophylactic replacement with safe and efficacious factor VIII and IX. However, despite this therapeutic approach, bleeds still occur, some with serious consequence, joint disease has not been eradicated, and patients have not yet been liberated from the need for regular intravenous infusions. The shift from protein replacement to gene replacement is offering great hope to achieve durable levels of plasma factor activity levels high enough to remove the risk for recurrent joint bleeding. For the first time, clinical trial results are showing promise for "curative" correction of the bleeding phenotype.

Novel alternate hemostatic agents for patients with inhibitors: beyond bypass therapy

Inhibitor formation is among the most severe complications of hemophilia treatment. With a cumulative incidence of ∼30% in those with severe hemophilia A and ∼3% in those with severe hemophilia B, inhibitors are caused by a T-cell response directed against infused coagulation factor; these inhibitors neutralize factor VIII or IX activity and disrupt normal hemostasis. Inhibitor patients become unresponsive to standard factor treatment and, as an alternative, use bypass treatment (eg, recombinant factor VIIa or factor VIII inhibitor bypass activity). However, response to bypass agents is poorer and the burden of disease is higher, with greater morbidity, hospitalization, cost, and mortality, than in noninhibitor patients. Furthermore, inhibitor formation interferes with prophylaxis to prevent bleeding episodes and is a contraindication to gene therapy. Thus, more effective therapies for inhibitor patients are greatly needed. In the last several years, there has been an explosion of novel alternative hemostatic agents for hemophilia patients with and without inhibitors. These agents take advantage of technologic manipulation of coagulation factors and natural anticoagulants to promote hemostasis. The approaches include the following: (1) mutants or mimics of coagulation factors, rendering them resistant to natural anticoagulants; or (2) knock-down or disruption of natural anticoagulants, preventing degradation of coagulation factors. The purpose of this article was to review these novel alternative hemostatic agents and their mechanisms of action, as well as the preliminary pharmacokinetic, safety, and efficacy data available from early-phase clinical trials.

Hemophilia Care in the Pediatric Age

Hemophilia is the most common of the severe bleeding disorders and if not properly managed since early infancy can lead to chronic disease and lifelong disabilities. However, it enjoys the most efficacious and safe treatment among the most prevalent monogenic disorders. Hemophilia should be considered in the neonatal period in the case of unusual bleeding or in the case of positive family history. Later, hemophilia should be suspected mainly in males because of abnormal bruising/bleeding or unusual bleeding following invasive procedures-for example, tonsillectomy or circumcision. Prophylactic treatment that is started early with clotting-factor concentrates has been shown to prevent hemophilic arthropathy and is, therefore, the gold standard of care for hemophilia A and B in most countries with adequate resources. Central venous access catheters and arterovenous fistulas play an important role in the management of hemophilia children requiring repeated and/or urgent administration of coagulation factor concentrates. During childhood and adolescence, personalized treatment strategies that suit the patient and his lifestyle are essential to ensure optimal outcomes. Physical activity is important and can contribute to better coordination, endurance, flexibility and strength. The present article focuses also on questions frequently posed to pediatric hematologists like vaccinations, day-care/school access and dental care.

Gene Delivery of Activated Factor VII Using Alternative Adeno-Associated Virus Serotype Improves Hemostasis in Hemophiliac Mice with FVIII Inhibitors and Adeno-Associated Virus Neutralizing Antibodies

While therapeutic expression of coagulation factors from adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors has been successfully achieved in patients with hemophilia, neutralizing antibodies to the vector and inhibitory antibodies to the transgene severely limit efficacy. Indeed, approximately 40% of mice transduced with human factor VIII using the AAV8 serotype developed inhibitory antibodies to factor VIII (FVIII inhibitor), as well as extremely high titers (≥1:500) of neutralizing antibodies to AAV8. To correct hemophilia in these mice, AAV9, a serotype with low in vitro cross-reactivity (≤1:5) to anti-AAV8, was used to deliver mouse-activated factor VII (mFVIIa). It was found that within 6 weeks of systemic administration of 2 × 10¹³ particles/kg of AAV9/mFVIIa, hemophiliac mice with FVIII inhibitors and neutralizing antibodies (NAb) to AAV8 achieved hemostasis comparable to that in wild-type mice, as measured by rotational thromboelastometry. A level of 737 ng/mL mFVIIa was achieved after AAV9/mFVIIa adminstration compared to around 150 ng/mL without vector treatment, and concomitantly prothrombin time was shortened. Tissues collected after intra-articular hemorrhage from FVIII-deficient mice and mice with FVIII inhibitors were scored 4.7 and 5.5, respectively, on a scale of 0-10, indicating significant pathological damage. However, transduction with AAV9/mFVIIa decreased pathology scores to 3.6 and eliminated hemosiderin iron deposition in the synovium in most mice. Collectively, these results suggest that application of alternative serotypes of AAV vector to deliver bypassing reagents has the potential to correct hemophilia and prevent hemoarthrosis, even in the presence of FVIII inhibitor and neutralizing antibodies to AAV.

Rare bleeding disorders-old diseases in the era of novel options for therapy

Rare diseases are defined as life-threatening or chronically debilitating diseases with a prevalence of less than one per 2000 according to the European Union or one per 1250 according to the USA. Congenital rare bleeding disorders RBD are reported in most populations, with incidence varying from 1 in 5000 (Hemophilia A), 1:30,000 (Hemophilia B) to much rarer (1:500,000 for FVII deficiency, 1-3 million for Prothrombin or FXIII deficiency). Acquired Hemophilia A is also a rare bleeding disorder with estimated frequency of 1 in million. Most RBDs are inherited as autosomal recessive (AR); however, heterozygous carriers with varying degrees of corresponding factor deficiency may render an unpredictable propensity for bleeding. In patients with bleeding symptoms, laboratory assessment and especially molecular techniques currently enable accurate diagnosis and may provide tools for prenatal and family counseling. Currently hemostasis control is mainly based upon replacement of the missing coagulation factors (unless presence of inhibitors renders it impossible), however future gene therapy and disruptive, non-replacement alternatives may be promising for patients with RBD.