Idarucizumab does not have procoagulant effects: Assessment of thrombosis biomarkers in healthy volunteers

Is there a role for the laboratory monitoring in the management of specific antidotes of direct oral anticoagulants?

Given the growing number of patients receiving direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC), patients requiring rapid neutralization is also increasing in case of major bleedings or urgent surgery/procedures. Idarucizumab is commercialized as a specific antidote to dabigatran while andexanet alfa has gained the Food and Drug Administration and the European Medicines Agency approval as an oral anti-factor Xa inhibitors antidote. Other antidotes or hemostatic agents are still under preclinical or clinical development, the most advanced being ciraparantag. DOAC plasma levels measurement allows to appropriately select patient for antidote administration and may prevent unnecessary prescription of expensive molecules in some acute clinical settings. However, these tests might be inconclusive after some antidote administration, namely andexanet alfa and ciraparantag. The benefit of laboratory monitoring following DOAC reversal remains unclear. Here, we sought to provide an overview of the key studies evaluating the safety and efficacy of DOAC reversal using the most developed/commercialized specific antidotes, to discuss the potential role of the laboratory monitoring in the management of patients receiving DOAC specific antidotes and to highlight the areas that deserve further investigations in order to establish the exact role of laboratory monitoring in the appropriate management of DOAC specific antidotes.

Oral Anticoagulants Beyond Warfarin

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have largely replaced vitamin K antagonists, mostly warfarin, for the main indications for oral anticoagulation, prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism, and prevention of embolic stroke in atrial fibrillation. While DOACs offer practical, fixed-dose anticoagulation in many patients, specific restrictions or contraindications may apply. DOACs are not sufficiently effective in high-thrombotic risk conditions such as antiphospholipid syndrome and mechanical heart valves. Patients with cancer-associated thrombosis may benefit from DOACs, but the bleeding risk, particularly in those with gastrointestinal or urogenital tumors, must be carefully weighed. In patients with frailty, excess body weight, and/or moderate-to-severe chronic kidney disease, DOACs must be cautiously administered and may require laboratory monitoring. Reversal agents have been developed and approved for life-threatening bleeding. In addition, the clinical testing of potentially safer anticoagulants such as factor XI(a) inhibitors is important to further optimize anticoagulant therapy in an increasingly elderly and frail population worldwide.

DOAC-associated bleeding, hemostatic strategies, and thrombin generation assays - a review of the literature

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) account for most oral anticoagulant use. DOAC-associated bleeding events are commonly encountered in clinical practice and are associated with substantial morbidity and mortality. Both specific reversal agents and nonspecific hemostatic therapies, such as prothrombin complex concentrates, are used in the management of DOAC-associated bleeding. Measuring hemostatic efficacy and demonstrating a clinical impact from these therapies among studies of bleeding patients is challenging. Thrombin generation assays provide information on the total hemostatic potential of plasma, and have emerged as a promising modality to both measure the impact of DOACs on coagulation and to evaluate the effects of hemostatic therapies among patients with DOAC-associated bleeding. The mechanisms by which nonspecific hemostatic agents impact coagulation and thrombin generation in the context of DOAC therapy are unclear. As a result, we undertook a review of the literature using a systematic search strategy with the goal of summarizing the effects of DOACs on thrombin generation and the effects of both specific reversal agents and nonspecific hemostatic therapies on DOAC-altered thrombin generation parameters. We sought to identify clinical studies focusing on whether altered thrombin generation is associated with clinical bleeding and whether correction of altered thrombin generation parameters predicts improvements in clinical hemostasis. Lastly, we sought to outline future directions for the application of thrombin generation assays toward anticoagulation therapies and the question of anticoagulation reversal.

Retrospective analysis of the effectiveness of a reduced dose of idarucizumab in dabigatran reversal

BACKGROUND

The recommended dose of idarucizumab, the specific reversal agent for dabigatran etexilate, is 5g. However, published data showed biochemical reversal after an initial 2.5g dose.

OBJECTIVES

This study aims to retrospectively compare the clinical effectiveness of 2.5g and 5g doses of idarucizumab used in dabigatran reversal in three hospitals in Auckland, New Zealand.

METHODS

All patients receiving idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal between 1st April 2016 and 31st December 2018 were included. The primary outcome was the likelihood of receiving a second dose of idarucizumab during the same admission. Secondary outcomes included normalisation of coagulation profiles; and 30-day thrombotic, bleeding and mortality rates.

RESULTS

Of 329 patients included, 206 received an upfront 2.5g dose and 123 received a 5g dose. The median age was 78 years and median creatinine clearance was 50mL/min. Most patients (62.6%) required idarucizumab for an urgent procedure, while 37.4% presented with bleeding. A 2.5g dose was not associated with an increased rate of receiving a second dose (OR 0.686, 95% CI 0.225-2.090). A similar proportion of patients in each group achieved a normal APTT (73.8% vs 80.0%, p=0.464) and dTCT (95.9% vs 91.4%, p=0.379) following idarucizumab infusion. There was no increase in the rate of death (OR 0.602, 95% CI 0.292-1.239), thrombosis (OR 0.386, 95% CI 0.107-1.396) or bleeding (OR 0.96, 95% CI 0.27-3.33) in the 2.5g dose group compared to the 5g dose group.

CONCLUSIONS

An initial 2.5g dose of idarucizumab appears effective for dabigatran reversal in the real-world setting.

Dabigatran Reversal With Idarucizumab Preceding Thrombolysis in an Octogenarian Patient with Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Stroke: A Case Report

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Reversing the effect of dabigatran among patients with atrial fibrillation is important to normalize coagulation profile among patients who develop serious hemorrhage from any source. However, such intervention always has the potential to cause a prothrombotic state. Among patients suspected of ischemic stroke, Idarucizumab, may be administered preceding thrombolysis. This is a considerable option when given during the critical phase of revascularization.

METHODS

We report the case of an 84-year old, male, banker, known hypertensive with chronic renal disease. He has non valvular atrial fibrillation receiving Dabigatran at 75 mg twice daily and presented with symptoms of right-sided weakness, right hemisensory loss, facial asymmetry, and slurring of speech equating to National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) of 5. After coming into the hospital for a suspected stroke, 3 hours and 25 minutes after symptoms, complete reversal of Dabigatran with Idarucizumab was administered and intravenous thrombolysis was initiated 271 minutes post ictus. There was immediate improvement of the right upper extremity weakness and dysarthria 30 minutes post infusion. At 13 days post ictus, the patient was discharged with minimal right central facial palsy and right arm drift (NIHSS 2). Brain CT scan post revascularization did not reveal any hemorrhage and anticoagulant Apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily was started and maintained thereafter. Brain Magnetic Resonance Angiogram (MRA) showed complete recanalization of the left proximal MCA after 52 days.

CONCLUSION

Our case showed the effectiveness and safety of giving Idarucizumab followed by thrombolysis in Dabigatran-treated atrial fibrillation with ischemic stroke. Based on this case, the procedure can be performed in an elderly population with chronic kidney disease when administered close to the limit of threshold for thrombolysis.

Idarucizumab for Emergency Reversal of Anticoagulant Effects of Dabigatran: Interim Results of a Japanese Post-Marketing Surveillance Study

INTRODUCTION

Idarucizumab, a monoclonal antibody fragment, was developed to reverse the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran, and it was approved in Japan in September 2016. An all-case post-marketing surveillance is ongoing to collect data in Japanese patients treated with idarucizumab who had serious bleeding (Group A) or required an urgent procedure (Group B).

METHODS

The primary endpoint was the incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs). The secondary endpoint was the maximum extent of reversal of the anticoagulant effect of dabigatran based on activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) within 4 h after idarucizumab administration.

RESULTS

This interim analysis included 262 patients who received idarucizumab. Eighteen patients (6.9%) experienced ADRs within 4 weeks. The reversal effect of idarucizumab based on aPTT within 4 h after idarucizumab administration was assessed in 30 patients and the median maximum percentage reversal was 100%. In Group A, the median time to bleeding cessation in patients without intracranial bleeding was 3.3 h. In Group B, normal intraoperative hemostasis was reported in 63 patients (72.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this interim analysis suggest that idarucizumab is safe and effective for the reversal of dabigatran in Japanese patients in a real-world setting, and support the continued use of idarucizumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier, NCT02946931.

New Hemostatic Agents: Perioperative Anesthetic Considerations

AIM

Pharmacologic agents with procoagulant effects and antidotes against antithrombotic drugs play an important role in the prevention and management of perioperative coagulopathic bleeding. The aim of this narrative review is knowledge transfer from new and renewed hemostatic agents to anesthesiologists and other physicians involved in perioperative medicine.

METHODS

The literature search was performed on PubMed and the Summaries of Product Characteristics of 6 pharmacologic agents of interest: fibrinogen concentrate, vonicog alfa, susoctocog alfa, idarucizumab, andexanet alfa, and argatroban.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This review highlights renewed interest in fibrinogen concentrate, an old prohemostatic drug, in correcting hypofibrinogenemia which is a leading pathomechanism of perioperative bleeding. This review describes clinically relevant aspects for brand new recombinant prohemostatic drugs for their use in critical clinical situations: vonicog alfa for the prevention and correction of bleeding in von Willebrand syndrome, and susoctocog alfa in acquired hemophilia A. Clinical experience and increasing evidence broadened the field of applications of the old antithrombotic drug argatroban to heparin resistance. New antidotes against new antithrombotic agents revolutionized the safety of chronic antithrombotic therapy in the emergency situations of acute and trauma surgery. Information on dosing and handling of new hemostatic drugs is summarized.

CONCLUSION

New and potent hemostatic agents exist for perioperative use and may enrich the armamentarium of anesthesiologists. Implementation into clinical practice requires their availability and user knowledge. Sustainability of these new drugs depends on post-licensing research, cost-effectiveness, and clinical experience.

Reversing Direct Oral Anticoagulants in Acute Intracranial Hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhage is a major source of morbidity and mortality, accounting for 10% of all strokes. Oral anticoagulation therapy, while necessary to prevent thromboembolic complications, increases the risk of intracerebral hemorrhage and can potentially worsen bleeding in cases of acute hemorrhage. Before the introduction of direct oral anticoagulant agents in 2010, warfarin was the only option for oral anticoagulation. These new agents have an improved safety profile compared with warfarin but require different reversal strategies. Anticoagulation reversal in the setting of acute intracerebral hemorrhage is an evolving field. This article covers the most common direct oral anticoagulant medications, various available anticoagulant reversal strategies, and the latest guidelines for anticoagulation reversal in patients with acute intracranial hemorrhage.

Perioperative management of patients with atrial fibrillation receiving anticoagulant therapy

The number of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and the number of patients indicated for anticoagulant therapy have been increasing because AF would affect patient survival due to thromboembolism. Once AF develops, following the disappearance of pulsation, the circumstances within the atrium become prothrombotic and thrombus formation within the left atrium occurs in patients with AF. In recent years, not only warfarin but also new oral anticoagulants were introduced clinically and have become used as oral anticoagulants. In the perioperative period, the risk of major hemorrhage needs to be reduced. On the other hand, the suspension of anticoagulant therapy and neutralization of anticoagulant effects elevate the risk of thrombosis. The perioperative management of patients receiving anticoagulant therapy is different from that of scheduled surgery and emergency surgery. In addition, knowledge of the characteristics of each oral anticoagulant is required at drug cessation and resumption. Unlike warfarin, which has been used in the past five decades, direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) do not have sensitive indicators such as prothrombin time-international normalized ratio. To avoid major hemorrhages and thromboembolism, quantitative assays can be implemented for DOAC monitoring and for reversal therapies in perioperative settings.

Volume replacement strategies do not impair the binding of dabigatran to idarucizumab: Porcine model of hemodilution

Background

Idarucizumab is a humanized Fab fragment that specifically reverses dabigatran anticoagulation. In trauma, volume expanders are used for resuscitation to compensate for blood loss and hemorrhagic shock, but it is unknown whether volume expanders influence the binding of dabigatran to its antidote. Using a porcine dilutional coagulopathy model, this study investigated whether volume replacement strategies affect binding of dabigatran to idarucizumab.

Methods

Twenty-five male pigs were treated orally with dabigatran etexilate (30 mg/kg bid) for 3 days. The following day, animals were anesthetized, infused with dabigatran (total dose 0.645 mg/kg) to achieve supratherapeutic concentrations, and randomized 1:1:1:1:1 (n = 5 per group) to control (no hemodilution) or hemodilution where ~50% of blood volume was substituted with Ringer’s solution, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4, 6% hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 or 4% gelatin. Idarucizumab was then administered intravenously (30 mg/kg) and serial blood samples were taken for up to 24 hours to measure diluted thrombin time (corresponding with dabigatran activity), total dabigatran (bound to antidote and free drug) and a panel of coagulation parameters.

Results

Mean plasma dabigatran levels were 617 ± 16 ng/mL after infusion and 600 ± 114 ng/mL after ~50% hemodilution with no significant differences between groups. Following treatment with idarucizumab, plasma concentrations of unbound dabigatran decreased markedly, with similar reductions in all groups. Dabigatran-induced prolongation of coagulation parameters was rapidly reversed in all groups.

Conclusion

This study indicates that several volume expanders used for resuscitation in trauma do not interfere with the binding of idarucizumab to dabigatran.

Consensus Guides on Stroke Thrombolysis for Anticoagulated Patients from Japan: Application to Other Populations

Development of direct oral anticoagulants and their antidotes has led to the need to reconsider the eligibility of acute stroke patients who have been taking oral anticoagulants for intravenous thrombolysis. Officially authorized Japanese guidelines on this issue were revised twice at the time of approval for clinical use of direct oral anticoagulants and idarucizumab, a specific reversal agent for dabigatran. A unique recommendation in the latest Japanese clinical guides was that thrombolysis can be recommended if the time of the last dose of direct oral anticoagulants exceeds 4 hours and if commonly available anticoagulation markers are normal or subnormal, i.e., international normalized ratio of prothrombin time <1.7 and activated partial thromboplastin time <1.5 times the baseline value (≤40 seconds only as a guide). These criteria are partly supported by the findings of domestic multicenter and single-center surveys that symptomatic or asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage following thrombolysis was rare under the conditions of the criteria. Even for dabigatran users, stroke thrombolysis can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab if patients meet the above criteria. If not, direct mechanical thrombectomy can be considered without pretreatment by idarucizumab or thrombolysis, and use of idarucizumab, followed immediately by thrombolysis, can be considered only when thrombectomy cannot be quickly performed. These clinical guides are practical and to some extent economical, but they have some limitations, including lack of corroborating information from sufficient numbers of relevant cases. The guides will be further modified based on the results of future research.

[Management of hemorrhage in patients treated with direct oral anticoagulants]

The introduction of nonvitamin K antagonistic, direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) made thromboembolic prophylaxis easier for patients. For many physicians, however, there is still uncertainty about monitoring, preoperative discontinuation, and restarting of DOAC therapy. Guidelines for the management of bleeding are provided, but require specific therapeutic skills in the management of diagnostics and therapy of acute hemorrhage. Small clinical studies and case reports indicate that unspecific therapy with prothrombin complex concentrates (PCC) and activated PCC (aPCC) concentrate may reverse DOAC-induced anticoagulation. However, PCC or aPCC at higher doses potentially provoke thromboembolic complications. However, idarucizumab, a specific, fast-acting, antidote for dabigatran, provides immediate and sustained reversal with no intrinsic or prohemostatic activity. This review article provides an overview of the pharmacology and potential risk of DOAC and the management in the perioperative period with a focus of current concepts in the treatment of DOAC-associated bleeding.

Thrombolytic Therapy in Severe Cardioembolic Stroke After Reversal of Dabigatran with Idarucizumab: Case Report and Literature Review

Whether idarucizumab, an antidote of dabigatran, can be used effectively and safely before thrombolytic therapy with recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) in patients with stroke undergoing treatment with dabigatran remains unknown. We herein describe a 57-year-old man who developed severe cardioembolic stroke with a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 22 in the left middle cerebral artery territory while undergoing treatment with dabigatran for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation and who was treated with rt-PA after the reversal of dabigatran with idarucizumab. The thrombolytic therapy following the use of idarucizumab significantly improved the patient's neurological symptoms without hemorrhagic complications, although acute arterial occlusion of the right lower limb was found during the clinical course.

Reversal of dabigatran by intraosseous or intravenous idarucizumab in a porcine polytrauma model

BACKGROUND

Idarucizumab is licensed to reverse dabigatran in life-threatening haemorrhage. Establishment of venous access can be challenging, and the intraosseous (IO) route is a potentially life-saving alternative. In this study, we compared the efficacy and safety of IO or intravenous (i.v.) idarucizumab for dabigatran reversal in a porcine polytrauma model.

METHODS

Male pigs (n=21) received oral dabigatran etexilate (30 mg kg^-1 bid) for 3 days. On the 4th day, animals received dabigatran infusion and were randomised 1:1:1 to receive IO saline (control), i.v. idarucizumab (60 mg kg^-1), or IO idarucizumab (60 mg kg^-1), or animals were included in a sham group (n=7). Study treatment was administered after polytrauma and the animals were monitored for 240 min, or until death. Coagulation status was monitored by thromboelastometry, thromboelastography, and thrombin measurements.

RESULTS

Total blood loss was lowest in sham animals [521 (52) ml, P<0.01 vs all other groups], and comparable in the two idarucizumab groups [IO: 1085 (102) ml vs i.v.: 1142 (125) ml], and highest in the control group [4065 (557) ml, P<0.001 vs all other groups]. Survival to 240 min was 100% in the sham group and both idarucizumab groups, and 14% in the control group. IO and i.v. idarucizumab promptly normalised global coagulation assays and thrombin generation. Thromboelastography showed a strong correlation between dabigatran concentrations and R-time (R²=0.90 and 0.89) in idarucizumab-treated animals.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravenous and intraosseous idarucizumab were comparable for reversing dabigatran in a porcine trauma model. Dabigatran reversal could be monitored using fully automated thromboelastography.

Pharmacologic Reversal of Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants are becoming increasingly popular in outpatient use. These medications have lacked specific reversal agents. However, this is changing. The Federal Food and Drug Administration approved idarucizumab for reversal of dabigatran in 2016, and another agent, andexanet alfa, is currently in clinical trials for reversal of rivaroxaban and apixaban. This article examines the efficacy and safety of these emerging reversal agents, as well as other historical agents for reversal of direct oral anticoagulants.

Rationale and design of a phase III safety trial of idarucizumab in children receiving dabigatran etexilate for venous thromboembolism

BACKGROUND

The incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in children has been increasing. Anticoagulants are the mainstay of treatment but are associated with bleeding events that may be life-threatening. Idarucizumab is a fragment antigen-binding (fab) that provides immediate, complete, and sustained reversal of dabigatran's anticoagulant effects in adults.

OBJECTIVE AND METHODS

This phase III, open-label, single-arm, multicenter, multinational trial will assess the safety of idarucizumab in children participating in two ongoing trials investigating dabigatran etexilate. Eligible patients will be children with VTE (aged 0-≤18 years; n = ~5) with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding (group A), and children who require emergency surgery/urgent procedures for a condition other than bleeding (group B). Patients will receive idarucizumab up to 5 g as two consecutive intravenous infusions over 5-10 minutes each, as two 10-15-minute drips or as two bolus injections (15 minutes apart) and will be monitored for 30 days. The primary endpoint will be the safety of idarucizumab assessed by the occurrence of drug-related adverse events (including immune reactions) and all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints will be the reversal of dabigatran anticoagulant effects assessed by changes in diluted thrombin time and ecarin clotting time, time to achieve complete reversal and the duration of the reversal and bleeding severity (group A). The formation of antidrug antibodies at 30 days post-dose and cessation of bleeding will also be assessed.

CONCLUSION

This study will report the safety of idarucizumab in children with VTE who require rapid reversal of the anticoagulant effects of dabigatran. Clinical trial registration: NCT02815670.

Emergency care of patients receiving non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants

Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), which inhibit thrombin (dabigatran) and factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, edoxaban) have been introduced in several clinical indications. Although NOACs have a favourable benefit-risk profile and can be used without routine laboratory monitoring, they are associated-as any anticoagulant-with a risk of bleeding. In addition, treatment may need to be interrupted in patients who need surgery or other procedures. The objective of this article, developed by a multidisciplinary panel of experts in thrombosis and haemostasis, is to provide an update on the management of NOAC-treated patients who experience a bleeding episode or require an urgent procedure. Recent advances in the development of targeted reversal agents are expected to help streamline the management of NOAC-treated patients in whom rapid reversal of anticoagulation is required.

The Use of Idarucizumab for Dabigatran Reversal in Clinical Practice: A Case Series

PURPOSE

To describe the use of idarucizumab (Praxbind, Boehringer Ingelheim) in routine clinical practice at a large urban academic medical center.

SUMMARY

Seven total doses of idarucizumab were administered to six unique patients from October 31, 2015, to October 31, 2016. The reversal agent was used in conjunction with local bleeding control measures, blood product transfusions, and acid-suppressive therapy. In 86% of cases, idarucizumab administration resulted in a successful cessation of bleeding by clinical assessment. Two patients expired due to coexisting conditions. Idarucizumab was administered to patients with normal baseline coagulation tests in 43% of cases. No adverse reactions related to idarucizumab were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

Idarucizumab administration resulted in successful resolution of bleeding by clinical assessment. The therapy for acute bleeding with use of dabigatran (Pradaxa, Boehringer Ingelheim) remains supportive care, in addition to idarucizumab in cases of severe or uncontrolled bleeding. Development of institution-specific protocols and better guidance for using baseline coagulation tests are needed.

Direct oral anticoagulant reversal: how, when and issues faced

INTRODUCTION

The number of atrial fibrillation (AF) patients requiring thrombo-prophylaxis with oral anticoagulation is greatly increasing. The introduction of non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in addition to standard therapy with dose-adjusted warfarin has increased the therapeutic options for AF patients. Despite a generally better safety profile of the NOACs, the risk of major bleedings still persists, and the management of serious bleeding is a clinical challenge. Areas covered: In the current review, risk of major bleeding in patients taking NOACs and general approaches to manage bleeding depending on severity, with a particular focus on specific reversal agents, are discussed. Expert commentary: Due to short half-life of NOACs compared to warfarin, discontinuation of drug, mechanical compression, and volume substitution are considered to be sufficient measures in most of bleeding cases. In case of life-threatening bleeding or urgent surgery, hemostasis can be achieved with non-specific reversal agents (prothrombin complex concentrates) in patients treated with factor Xa inhibitor until specific antidotes (andexanet α and ciraparantag) will receive approval. Thus far, idarucizumab has been the only reversal agent approved for dabigatran.

[State of the art: Direct oral anticoagulants and transfusion]

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) are indicated for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation and for the prevention and treatment of venous thromboembolism. As any anticoagulant, they are associated with a bleeding risk. Management of DOAC-induced bleeding is challenging. Idarucizumab, antidote for dabigatran, is currently available and is part of the therapeutic strategy, whereas antidotes for anti-Xa agents are under development. Activated or non-activated prothrombin concentrates are proposed, although their efficacy to reverse DOAC is uncertain. We propose an update on DOAC-associated bleeding management, integrating the availability of idarucizumab and the critical place of DOAC concentration measurements.

Perioperative management of patients on direct oral anticoagulants

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been licensed worldwide for several years for various indications. Each year, 10-15% of patients on oral anticoagulants will undergo an invasive procedure and expert groups have issued several guidelines on perioperative management in such situations. The perioperative guidelines have undergone numerous updates as clinical experience of emergency management has increased and perioperative studies including measurement of residual anticoagulant levels have been published. The high inter-patient variability of DOAC plasma levels has challenged the traditional recommendation that perioperative DOAC interruption should be based only on the elimination half-life of DOACs, especially before invasive procedures carrying a high risk of bleeding. Furthermore, recent publications have highlighted the potential danger of heparin bridging use when DOACs are stopped before an invasive procedure. As antidotes are progressively becoming available to manage severe bleeding or urgent procedures in patients on DOACs, accurate laboratory tests have become the standard to guide their administration and their actions need to be well understood by clinicians. This review aims to provide a systematic approach to managing patients on DOACs, based on recent updates of various perioperative guidance, and highlighting the advantages and limits of recommendations based on pharmacokinetic properties and laboratory tests.