Apolipoprotein (a) alleles determine lipoprotein (a) particle density and concentration in plasma

Lipoprotein(a) as a Risk Factor for Cardiovascular Diseases: Pathophysiology and Treatment Perspectives

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is still a leading cause of morbidity and mortality, despite all the progress achieved as regards to both prevention and treatment. Having high levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease that operates independently. It can increase the risk of developing cardiovascular disease even when LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) levels are within the recommended range, which is referred to as residual cardiovascular risk. Lp(a) is an LDL-like particle present in human plasma, in which a large plasminogen-like glycoprotein, apolipoprotein(a) [Apo(a)], is covalently bound to Apo B100 via one disulfide bridge. Apo(a) contains one plasminogen-like kringle V structure, a variable number of plasminogen-like kringle IV structures (types 1-10), and one inactive protease region. There is a large inter-individual variation of plasma concentrations of Lp(a), mainly ascribable to genetic variants in the Lp(a) gene: in the general po-pulation, Lp(a) levels can range from <1 mg/dL to >1000 mg/dL. Concentrations also vary between different ethnicities. Lp(a) has been established as one of the risk factors that play an important role in the development of atherosclerotic plaque. Indeed, high concentrations of Lp(a) have been related to a greater risk of ischemic CVD, aortic valve stenosis, and heart failure. The threshold value has been set at 50 mg/dL, but the risk may increase already at levels above 30 mg/dL. Although there is a well-established and strong link between high Lp(a) levels and coronary as well as cerebrovascular disease, the evidence regarding incident peripheral arterial disease and carotid atherosclerosis is not as conclusive. Because lifestyle changes and standard lipid-lowering treatments, such as statins, niacin, and cholesteryl ester transfer protein inhibitors, are not highly effective in reducing Lp(a) levels, there is increased interest in developing new drugs that can address this issue. PCSK9 inhibitors seem to be capable of reducing Lp(a) levels by 25-30%. Mipomersen decreases Lp(a) levels by 25-40%, but its use is burdened with important side effects. At the current time, the most effective and tolerated treatment for patients with a high Lp(a) plasma level is apheresis, while antisense oligonucleotides, small interfering RNAs, and microRNAs, which reduce Lp(a) levels by targeting RNA molecules and regulating gene expression as well as protein production levels, are the most widely explored and promising perspectives. The aim of this review is to provide an update on the current state of the art with regard to Lp(a) pathophysiological mechanisms, focusing on the most effective strategies for lowering Lp(a), including new emerging alternative therapies. The purpose of this manuscript is to improve the management of hyperlipoproteinemia(a) in order to achieve better control of the residual cardiovascular risk, which remains unacceptably high.

Supporting evidence for lipoprotein(a) measurements in clinical practice

High levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are causal for development of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease and highly regulated by genetics. Levels are higher in Blacks compared to Whites, and in women compared to men. Lp(a)'s main protein components are apolipoprotein (apo) (a) and apoB100, the latter being the main component of Low-Density Lipoprotein (LDL) particles. Studies have identified Lp(a) to be associated with inflammatory, coagulation and wound healing pathways. Lack of validated and accepted assays to measure Lp(a), risk cutoff values, guidelines for diagnosis, and targeted therapies have added challenges to the field. Scientific efforts are ongoing to address these, including studies evaluating the cardiovascular benefits of decreasing Lp(a) levels with targeted apo(a) lowering treatments. This review will provide a synopsis of evidence-based effects of high Lp(a) on disease presentation, highlight available guidelines and discuss promising therapies in development. We will conclude with current clinical information and future research needs in the field.

Relationship of apolipoprotein(a) isoform size with clearance and production of lipoprotein(a) in a diverse cohort

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] has two main proteins, apoB100 and apo(a). High levels of Lp(a) confer an increased risk for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Most people have two circulating isoforms of apo(a) differing in their molecular mass, determined by the number of Kringle IV Type 2 repeats. Previous studies report a strong inverse relationship between Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoform sizes. The roles of Lp(a) production and fractional clearance and how ancestry affects this relationship remain incompletely defined. We therefore examined the relationships of apo(a) size with Lp(a) levels and both apo(a) fractional clearance rates (FCR) and production rates (PR) in 32 individuals not on lipid-lowering treatment. We determined plasma Lp(a) levels and apo(a) isoform sizes, and used the relative expression of the two isoforms to calculate a "weighted isoform size" (wIS). Stable isotope studies were performed, using D3-leucine, to determine the apo(a) FCR and PR. As expected, plasma Lp(a) concentrations were inversely correlated with wIS (R2 = 0.27; P = 0.002). The wIS had a modest positive correlation with apo(a) FCR (R2 = 0.10, P = 0.08), and a negative correlation with apo(a) PR (R2 = 0.11; P = 0.06). The relationship between wIS and PR became significant when we controlled for self-reported race and ethnicity (SRRE) (R2 = 0.24, P = 0.03); controlling for SRRE did not affect the relationship between wIS and FCR. Apo(a) wIS plays a role in both FCR and PR; however, adjusting for SRRE strengthens the correlation between wIS and PR, suggesting an effect of ancestry.

Genetics of Lipoprotein(a): Cardiovascular Disease and Future Therapy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Lipoprotein(a) levels are determined 80-90% by genetics and differ by up to 1000-fold between individuals. This review discusses the most recent literature on lipoprotein(a) as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, as well as future lipoprotein(a)lowering therapies.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past few decades, numerous studies have observed that high lipoprotein(a) levels are associated observationally and causally through human genetics with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Also, the development of safe and effective therapies to lower lipoprotein(a) is ongoing, most importantly using antisense oligonucleotides to prevent production of lipoprotein(a). Finally, both observational and genetic studies have estimated the extent to which lowering of lipoprotein(a) is needed to obtain a clinically meaningful reduction in the risk of cardiovascular disease. Lipoprotein(a) is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, currently no approved safe and effective therapy is available to lower lipoprotein(a) levels. That said, promising randomized studies using antisense oligonucleotides show up to 80% reductions in lipoprotein(a), reductions that hopefully will result in lowering the risk of cardiovascular disease as presently tested in the ongoing HORIZON phase 3 trial.

Investigation of a nonsense mutation located in the complex KIV-2 copy number variation region of apolipoprotein(a) in 10,910 individuals

Background

The concentrations of the highly atherogenic lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] are mainly genetically determined by the LPA gene locus. However, up to 70% of the coding sequence is located in the complex so-called kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) copy number variation, a region hardly accessible by common genotyping and sequencing technologies. Despite its size, little is known about genetic variants in this complex region. The R21X variant is a functional variant located in this region, but it has never been analyzed in large cohorts.

Methods

We typed R21X in 10,910 individuals from three European populations using a newly developed high-throughput allele-specific qPCR assay. R21X allelic location was determined by separating the LPA alleles using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) and typing them separately. Using GWAS data, we identified a proxy SNP located outside of the KIV-2. Linkage disequilibrium was determined both statistically and by long-range haplotyping using PFGE. Worldwide frequencies were determined by reanalyzing the sequencing data of the 1000 Genomes Project with a dedicated pipeline.

Results

R21X carriers (frequency 0.016–0.021) showed significantly lower mean Lp(a) concentrations (− 11.7 mg/dL [− 15.5; − 7.82], p = 3.39e−32). The variant is located mostly on medium-sized LPA alleles. In the 1000 Genome data, R21X mostly occurs in Europeans and South Asians, is absent in Africans, and shows varying frequencies in South American populations (0 to 0.022). Of note, the best proxy SNP was another LPA null mutation (rs41272114, D′ = 0.958, R² = 0.281). D′ was very high in all 1000G populations (0.986–0.996), although rs41272114 frequency varies considerably (0–0.182). Co-localization of both null mutations on the same allele was confirmed by PFGE-based long-range haplotyping.

Conclusions

We performed the largest epidemiological study on an LPA KIV-2 variant so far, showing that it is possible to assess LPA KIV-2 mutations on a large scale. Surprisingly, in all analyzed populations, R21X was located on the same haplotype as the splice mutation rs41272114, creating “double-null” LPA alleles. Despite being a nonsense variant, the R21X status does not provide additional information beyond the rs41272114 genotype. This has important implications for studies using LPA loss-of-function mutations as genetic instruments and emphasizes the complexity of LPA genetics.

Effects of mipomersen, an apolipoprotein B100 antisense, on lipoprotein (a) metabolism in healthy subjects

Elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels increase the risk for CVD. Novel treatments that decrease LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) have also shown promise for reducing Lp(a) levels. Mipomersen, an antisense oligonucleotide that inhibits apoB synthesis, is approved for the treatment of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia. It decreases plasma levels of LDL-C by 25% to 39% and lowers levels of Lp(a) by 21% to 39%. We examined the mechanisms for Lp(a) lowering during mipomersen treatment. We enrolled 14 healthy volunteers who received weekly placebo injections for 3 weeks followed by weekly injections of mipomersen for 7 weeks. Stable isotope kinetic studies were performed using deuterated leucine at the end of the placebo and mipomersen treatment periods. The fractional catabolic rate (FCR) of Lp(a) was determined from the enrichment of a leucine-containing peptide specific to apo(a) by LC/MS. The production rate (PR) of Lp(a) was calculated from the product of Lp(a) FCR and Lp(a) concentration (converted to pool size). In a diverse population, mipomersen reduced plasma Lp(a) levels by 21%. In the overall study group, mipomersen treatment resulted in a 27% increase in the FCR of Lp(a) with no significant change in PR. However, there was heterogeneity in the response to mipomersen therapy, and changes in both FCRs and PRs affected the degree of change in Lp(a) concentrations. Mipomersen treatment decreases Lp(a) plasma levels mainly by increasing the FCR of Lp(a), although changes in Lp(a) PR were significant predictors of reductions in Lp(a) levels in some subjects.

CETP (Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein) Inhibition With Anacetrapib Decreases Production of Lipoprotein(a) in Mildly Hypercholesterolemic Subjects

OBJECTIVE

Lp(a) [lipoprotein (a)] is composed of apoB (apolipoprotein B) and apo(a) [apolipoprotein (a)] and is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and aortic stenosis. In clinical trials, anacetrapib, a CETP (cholesteryl ester transfer protein) inhibitor, causes significant reductions in plasma Lp(a) levels. We conducted an exploratory study to examine the mechanism for Lp(a) lowering by anacetrapib.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

We enrolled 39 participants in a fixed-sequence, double-blind study of the effects of anacetrapib on the metabolism of apoB and high-density lipoproteins. Twenty-nine patients were randomized to atorvastatin 20 mg/d, plus placebo for 4 weeks, and then atorvastatin plus anacetrapib (100 mg/d) for 8 weeks. The other 10 subjects were randomized to double placebo for 4 weeks followed by placebo plus anacetrapib for 8 weeks. We examined the mechanisms of Lp(a) lowering in a subset of 12 subjects having both Lp(a) levels >20 nmol/L and more than a 15% reduction in Lp(a) by the end of anacetrapib treatment. We performed stable isotope kinetic studies using ²H₃-leucine at the end of each treatment to measure apo(a) fractional catabolic rate and production rate. Median baseline Lp(a) levels were 21.5 nmol/L (interquartile range, 9.9-108.1 nmol/L) in the complete cohort (39 subjects) and 52.9 nmol/L (interquartile range, 38.4-121.3 nmol/L) in the subset selected for kinetic studies. Anacetrapib treatment lowered Lp(a) by 34.1% (P≤0.001) and 39.6% in the complete and subset cohort, respectively. The decreases in Lp(a) levels were because of a 41% reduction in the apo(a) production rate, with no effects on apo(a) fractional catabolic rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Anacetrapib reduces Lp(a) levels by decreasing its production.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT00990808.

Lipoprotein (a) as a cause of cardiovascular disease: insights from epidemiology, genetics, and biology

Human epidemiologic and genetic evidence using the Mendelian randomization approach in large-scale studies now strongly supports that elevated lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is a causal risk factor for cardiovascular disease, that is, for myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis. The Mendelian randomization approach used to infer causality is generally not affected by confounding and reverse causation, the major problems of observational epidemiology. This approach is particularly valuable to study causality of Lp(a), as single genetic variants exist that explain 27-28% of all variation in plasma Lp(a). The most important genetic variant likely is the kringle IV type 2 (KIV-2) copy number variant, as the apo(a) product of this variant influences fibrinolysis and thereby thrombosis, as opposed to the Lp(a) particle per se. We speculate that the physiological role of KIV-2 in Lp(a) could be through wound healing during childbirth, infections, and injury, a role that, in addition, could lead to more blood clots promoting stenosis of arteries and the aortic valve, and myocardial infarction. Randomized placebo-controlled trials of Lp(a) reduction in individuals with very high concentrations to reduce cardiovascular disease are awaited. Recent genetic evidence documents elevated Lp(a) as a cause of myocardial infarction, atherosclerotic stenosis, and aortic valve stenosis.

Structure, function, and genetics of lipoprotein (a)

Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] has attracted the interest of researchers and physicians due to its intriguing properties, including an intragenic multiallelic copy number variation in the LPA gene and the strong association with coronary heart disease (CHD). This review summarizes present knowledge of the structure, function, and genetics of Lp(a) with emphasis on the molecular and population genetics of the Lp(a)/LPA trait, as well as aspects of genetic epidemiology. It highlights the role of genetics in establishing Lp(a) as a risk factor for CHD, but also discusses uncertainties, controversies, and lack of knowledge on several aspects of the genetic Lp(a) trait, not least its function.

Population and assay thresholds for the predictive value of lipoprotein (a) for coronary artery disease: the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study

Variable agreement exists between different lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] measurement methods, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. The predictive value of Lp(a) measured by two different assays [Randox and University of California, San Diego (UCSD)] was determined in 623 coronary artery disease (CAD) cases and 948 controls in a case-control study within the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. Participants were divided into sex-specific quintiles, and by Lp(a) <50 versus ∼50 mg/dl, which represents the 80th percentile in northern European subjects. Randox and UCSD Lp(a) levels were strongly correlated; Spearman's correlation coefficients for men, women, and sexes combined were 0.905, 0.915, and 0.909, respectively (P< 0.001 for each). The >80th percentile cutoff values, however, were 36 mg/dl and 24 mg/dl for the Randox and UCSD assays, respectively. Despite this, Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with CAD risk, with odds ratios of 2.18 (1.58-3.01) and 2.35 (1.70-3.26) for people in the top versus bottom Lp(a) quintile for the Randox and UCSD assays, respectively. This study demonstrates that CAD risk is present at lower Lp(a) levels than the currently suggested optimal Lp(a) level of <50 mg/dl. Appropriate thresholds may need to be population and assay specific until Lp(a) assays are standardized and Lp(a) thresholds are evaluated broadly across all populations at risk for CVD and aortic stenosis.

Lipoprotein(a): resurrected by genetics

Plasma lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is a quantitative genetic trait with a very broad and skewed distribution, which is largely controlled by genetic variants at the LPA locus on chromosome 6q27. Based on genetic evidence provided by studies conducted over the last two decades, Lp(a) is currently considered to be the strongest genetic risk factor for coronary heart disease (CHD). The copy number variation of kringle IV in the LPA gene has been strongly associated with both Lp(a) levels in plasma and risk of CHD, thereby fulfilling the main criterion for causality in a Mendelian randomization approach. Alleles with a low kringle IV copy number that together have a population frequency of 25-35% are associated with a doubling of the relative risk for outcomes, which is exceptional in the field of complex genetic phenotypes. The recently identified binding of oxidized phospholipids to Lp(a) is considered as one of the possible mechanisms that may explain the pathogenicity of Lp(a). Drugs that have been shown to lower Lp(a) have pleiotropic effects on other CHD risk factors, and an improvement of cardiovascular endpoints is up to now lacking. However, it has been established in a proof of principle study that lowering of very high Lp(a) by apheresis in high-risk patients with already maximally reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels can dramatically reduce major coronary events.

A common nonsense mutation in the repetitive Kringle IV-2 domain of human apolipoprotein(a) results in a truncated protein and low plasma Lp(a)

LPA, the gene coding for apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)], is the major determinant of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] plasma levels, which are associated with risk for coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke. It is not completely understood how variation in LPA relates to Lp(a) concentrations. One type of variation related to Lp(a) levels is the number of Kringle (K) IV-2 (g.61C>T; GenBank L14005.1) repeats in LPA, but sequence variation may also contribute. Human apo(a) contains from two to >40 nearly identical K IV-2 repeats of genomic size 5.5 kb, which makes it difficult to detect mutations. To elucidate the genetic variation of the apo(a) K IV-2 domain, we isolated a single "nonexpressing" apo(a) allele with 26 K IV-2 repeats, followed by PCR, cloning and sequencing of 96 clones, resulting in an average coverage of each K IV-2 repeat of approximately four-fold. The previously described K IV types 2A and 2B (K IV-2A and K IV-2B) were detected in 74% of the clones. In addition, a new type designated 2C (K IV-2C) was present. A nonsense mutation in the first exon of K IV-2 (g.61C>T) predicted to result in a truncated protein (p.R21X) was found in nine clones on a K IV-2A background. The presence of this mutation was confirmed by analysis of genomic DNA and was shown to represent the rare allele (frequency 0.02) of a SNP. Immunoblot analysis of apo(a) from plasma confirmed the presence of a truncated apo(a) isoform in the index individual and family members. Our data show that SNPs affecting Lp(a) plasma concentrations also exist in the apo(a) K IV-2 domain.

Lipoprotein(a) and the atherothrombotic process: mechanistic insights and clinical implications

Although many epidemiologic studies have pointed at an association between plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) and cardiovascular risk, the data obtained have been conflicting because of a number of factors, particularly those dealing with plasma storage, lack of assay standardization, population sample size, age, gender, ethnic variations, and variable disease endpoints. Moreover, the attention has been primarily focused on whole Lp(a), with relatively less emphasis on its constituent apolipoprotein(a) and on the apolipoprotein B100-containing lipoprotein, mainly low-density lipoprotein (LDL), to which apolipoprotein(a) is linked. According to recent studies, small-size apolipoprotein(a) isoforms may represent a cardiovascular risk factor either by themselves or synergistically with plasma Lp(a) concentration. Moreover, the density properties of the LDL moiety may have an impact on Lp(a) pathogenicity. It has also become apparent that Lp(a) can be modified by oxidative events and by the action of lipolytic and proteolytic enzymes with the generation of products that exhibit atherothrombogenic potential. The role of the O-glycans linked to the inter-kringle linkers of apolipoprotein(a) is also emerging. This information is raising the awareness of the pleiotropic functions of Lp(a) and is opening new vistas on pathogenetic mechanisms whose knowledge is essential for developing rational therapies against this complex cardiovascular pathogen.

Differences between Genotyping and Phenotyping Methods for Assessing Apolipoprotein(a) Size Polymorphisms

The aim of the present study was to analyze, on a double-blind basis, the relationships between the apolipoprotein(a) (apo(a)) gene and protein size polymorphisms in healthy volunteers (n = 99) and patients with premature myocardial infarction (n = 91). Apo(a) genotypes were determined by pulse-field electrophoresis and phenotypes were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-agarose gel electrophoresis. Results showed that phenotyping overestimated apo(a) size with respect to genotyping (mean (SD) = 3.7 (3.4) kringle units; p < 0.001) in subjects with a double-band genotype, although both measurements were highly correlated (r = 0.83; p < 0.001). We also observed that the protein band in subjects with a single-band phenotype was related more closely to the smallest allele than to the largest allele band. The correlation of plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) concentration was stronger with the phenotype than with the genotype. We hypothesize that post-translational modifications in the apo(a) molecule may be the most plausible explanation for the discrepancies observed. In conclusion, the present study highlights the dissimilarities between phenotyping and genotyping methods for the measurement of apo(a) size and suggests that laboratories should carefully consider these relationships and the transfer of results between such methodologies.

Are lipid-dependent indicators of cardiovascular risk affected by renal transplantation?

Hyperlipoproteinemia has been reported to frequently occur in kidney transplanted patients, thus possibly explaining, at least in part, the increased incidence of cardiovascular disease in this population. To evaluate the impact of renal transplantation (Tx), and related immunosuppressive therapy, on plasma lipoprotein and Lp(a) profile, we selected a cohort of kidney transplanted patients (36 M/14 F; age 33.8 + 12.0 yr, range 13-62) lacking significant causes of hyperlipidemia. All patients received a triple immunosuppressive regimen and showed a stable renal function after Tx (plasma creatinine: 1.36 +/- 0.35 mg/dL). One year after Tx, we found a significant increase of total cholesterol (TC), LDL, HDL, ApoB and ApoA-I (p < 0.005), while plasma triglyceride levels remained unmodified. Lp(a) plasma levels after Tx were within the normal range and displayed a significant inverse relationship with apo(a) size. Noteworthy, LDL/HDL ratio and ApoB/ ApoA-I ratio in kidney transplanted patients were almost superimposable with those of normal controls. Specifically, LDL/HDL ratio significantly decreased in 64% of patients after Tx, due to a prevalent increase of HDL, and was associated with a moderate amelioration of plasma TG. In a multiple linear regression model, post-Tx HDL level was significantly related to recipient's age, gender, BMI and cyclosporine (CyA) trough levels (Adj-R2 = 0.35, p = 0.0002), with gender and CyA trough levels being the better predictors of HDL. In conclusion, immunosuppressive regimens, in themselves, do not appear to significantly increase the atherogenic risk related to lipoproteins. Rather, other factors can affect the lipoprotein profile and its vascular effects in renal transplant recipients.

The seventh myth of lipoprotein(a): where and how is it assembled?

Our understanding of the genetics, metabolism and pathophysiology of the atherogenic plasma lipoprotein Lp(a) has considerably increased over past years. Nevertheless, the precise mechanisms regulating the biosynthesis and assembly of Lp(a) are poorly understood and controversially discussed. Lp(a) plasma concentrations are determined by synthesis and not by degradation. Transcriptional and post-translational mechanisms have been identified as regulating Lp(a) production in primary hepatocytes and transfected cell lines. Assembly of Lp(a) occurs extracellularly from newly synthesized apolipoprotein(a) and circulating LDL. This view has recently been challenged by in-vivo kinetic studies in humans which are compatible with an intracellular assembly event. Lp(a) assembly is a complex two-step process of multiple non-covalent interactions between apolipoprotein(a) and apolipoprotein B-100 of LDL followed by covalent disulfide linkage of two free cysteine residues on both proteins.

Oestrogen replacement therapy and coronary heart disease

This review highlights recent progress in our understanding of the beneficial effects of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in cardiovascular disease (CVD). The fact that HRT is increasingly advocated has raised concern about possible adverse effects weighed against the potential benefits of HRT regimens. Both favourable and unfavourable effects of oestrogens and HRT regimens on CVD risk factors are increasingly recognized. Consequently, the picture on cardiovascular effects of oestrogen and HRT has become more complicated, and research in this field has extended to novel areas.

Effect of thyroid hormones on Lp(a) and lipid metabolism

The effect of thyroid hormones on lipoprotein(a) plasma concentrations and the other parameters of lipoprotein metabolism was studied in 158 patients with thyroid dysfunction and in 37 euthyroid controls (cross-sectional study). Multiple regression analysis revealed that 65.5% of the variability in lipoprotein(a) levels were predicted by changes in lipoprotein(a) phenotypes (60.5%), thyrotropin (3.5%), and age (0.8%). The lipid parameters, however, showed no significant effect on lipoprotein(a). A subgroup analysis on samples from patients with large lipoprotein(a) isoforms showed that 28% of the variability in lipoprotein(a) concentrations could be explained by changes in thyroid function (19.1%), age (6.5%) and triglycerides (3.5%). Much stronger correlations were found between thyrotropin and total cholesterol, low density lipoprotein cholesterol or apolipoprotein B respectively (R2=0.951 for low density lipoprotein cholesterol, R2=0.801 for apolipoprotein B). Our data suggest that thyroid hormone is a significant modulator of lipoprotein(a) metabolism. However, different mechanisms are responsible for the change in lipoprotein(a) levels and for the decrease in total- and low density lipoprotein cholesterol levels.

Chimpanzee lipoprotein(A): Relationship between apolipoprotein(A) isoform size and the density profile of lipoprotein(A) in animals with different heterozygous apo(A) phenotypes

In a previous study [C. Doucet et al., J. Lipid Res 35:263-270, 1994], we have shown that plasma lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] levels were significantly elevated in a population of unrelated chimpanzees as compared to those in normolipidemic human subjects. Nonetheless, the inverse correlation between Lp(a) levels and apolipoprotein (a) [apo(a)] isoforms typical of man was maintained in the chimpanzee. In the present study, we describe the density profiles of apo B- and apo A1-containing lipoproteins and of Lp(a) in chimpanzee plasmas heterozygous for apo(a) isoforms after fractionation by single spin ultracentrifugation in an isopycnic gradient. The distribution of apo(a) isoforms in the density gradient was also examined by SDS-agarose gel electrophoresis and immunoblotting using chemiluminescence detection. In all double-band phenotypes examined, the smallest isoform was present along the entire length of the density gradient. The density distribution of the second isoform varied according to the size difference between the respective isoforms. Two isoforms close in size (difference in apparent molecular mass = 60 kDa) were present together in every gradient subfraction. On the contrary, when the two isoforms displayed distinct molecular mass (maximal difference in apparent molecular mass = 340 kDa), then the largest was principally present in the densest fractions of the gradient (d > 1.1 mg/ml). These observations suggest that Lp(a) particles with small apo(a) isoforms are more susceptible to interact with other lipoproteins than are Lp(a) particles with large isoforms.

Standardization of Lp(a) measurements

The standardization of immunoassays for Lp(a) is a major challenge to clinical chemists. In order to establish a reference material acknowledged by the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry, the Center of Disease Control and possibly the World Health Organization, a working group with participants from four continents was put together. With the aid of 34 companies, eight proposed reference materials have been tested in the last 3 years and two of them have been selected for value assignment. A reference method based on dissociation-enhanced lanthanide fluorescence immunoassays was therefore developed which gives linear and parallel response curves by assaying freshly prepared primary reference standards, fresh plasma or serum as well as lyophilized or frozen proposed reference material. For value assignment, four laboratories simultaneously prepare primary reference standards with known isoforms and molecular weights. By assaying the amino acid composition of these primary reference standards, the molar concentration which is the basis of value transfer to the lyophilized proposed reference material can be calculated. In a final step, harmonization of all commercially available Lp(a) kits is to be tested by assaying 50 Lp(a) samples with increasing Lp(a) concentrations and varying isoforms. We hope to be able in the near future to create a basis for comparable results in epidemiological studies in different laboratories and also to help to improve future long-term precision in clinical chemical laboratories.

Metabolism of Lp(a): assembly and excretion

Lp(a) is one of the most atherogenic lipoproteins, and we know much more about the pathophysiology of Lp(a) than about its physiological function and metabolism. From our previous investigations and the new results reported here, we propose the following model of Lp(a) metabolism: apo(a) is biosynthesized in liver cells and the size of the isoform determines its rate of synthesis and excretion. Specific kringle-4 domains in apo(a), mainly T-6 and T-7, bind in a first step to circulating LDL, followed by the stabilization of the newly formed Lp(a) complex by a disulfide bridge. Circulating Lp(a) interacts specifically with kidney cells, or possibly other tissues, causing cleavage of 2/3-3/4 of the N-terminal part of apo(a) by a collagenase-type protease. Part of the apo(a) fragments is found in the urine, but there are indications that they in fact represent the biologically active form of apo(a). The core portion of Lp(a) in turn is cleared by the LDL-receptor or another specific binding system of the liver. Strategies for reducing plasma Lp(a) levels with medication should aim at interfering with the assembly of Lp(a) on one hand and the stimulation of apo(a) fragmentation on the other hand.

PAF-acetylhydrolase activity of Lp(a) before and during Cu(2+)-induced oxidative modification in vitro

In human plasma with no detectable lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) levels, platelet-activating factor acetylhydrolase (PAF-AH) is associated with low density lipoprotein (LDL) and high density lipoprotein (HDL) with a distribution of 70 and 30%, respectively. We used a density gradient ultracentrifugation procedure to study the distribution of PAF-AH among lipoproteins in plasma containing Lp(a). Lp(a) was migrated as a broad band in the density region of d = 1.050-1.100 g/ml, independently of its isoform size. In plasma with Lp(a) levels 30-40 mg/dl or 80-100 mg/dl the PAF-AH activity migrated in this density region was 4 or 9% higher as compared to plasma having Lp(a) levels < 8 mg/dl (P < 0.05 or P < 0.02, respectively). Enrichment of plasma with the dense LDL5 subfraction, significantly increased the enzyme activity distributed in this density region. The physicochemical properties of the Lp(a)-associated PAF-AH activity were similar to those reported for the LDL-associated enzyme. However, the kinetic constants in small Lp(a) isoforms were significantly higher compared to large ones. Isoform F had apparent Km = 117 +/- 9 mumol/l and Vmax = 94 +/- 5 nmol/mg protein per min, and isoform S2/S3 had apparent Km = 36 +/- 9 mumol/l and Vmax = 25 +/- 5 nmol/mg protein per min. Removal of apolipoprotein (a) (apo(a)) from Lp(a) by reductive cleavage with dithiothreitol, slightly affected the amount of PAF-AH existing on Lp(a) since, only 15 +/- 5% of the total enzyme activity dissociated from its particle after density gradient ultracentrifugation. During Cu(2+)-induced Lp(a) oxidation, the PAF-AH activity decreased from 10.90 +/- 2.30 nmol/mg per min to 2.57 +/- 0.56 nmol/mg per min 4 h after the initiation of the oxidation (P < 0.001). The apparent Km of the enzyme remained essentially unchanged during oxidation, whereas Vmax was significantly decreased from 58.6 +/- 7.8 nmol/mg protein per min to 38.2 +/- 8.7 nmol/mg protein per min (P < 0.03). An extensive hydrolysis of the endogenous phosphatidylcholine (PC) to lysophosphatidylcholine (lyso-PC) was observed during Lp(a) oxidation, since the Lyso-PC/sphingomyelin molar ratio at the end of oxidation (0.55 +/- 0.09) was significantly higher than that before oxidation (0.19 +/- 0.01, P < 0.001). Our results show that the existence of Lp(a) in plasma alters the distribution of PAF-AH among the other lipoproteins. Apo(a) seems to affect the association of the enzyme with Lp(a) but does not bind itself to PAF-AH. During Lp(a) oxidation, the PAF-AH activity decreases whereas an extensive hydrolysis of the endogenous PC to Lyso-PC is observed which is possibly due to the PAF-AH activity.

Very fast ultracentrifugation of serum lipoproteins: influence on lipoprotein separation and composition

A very short run time and small sample volumes in the separation of lipoproteins by preparative ultracentrifugation are needed for several investigations. Recently, a very fast sequential separation method was described that needs only 100 min for one run in a centrifugal field of 625,000 x g. We studied the influence of centrifugal fields of this dimension on lipoprotein separation and lipoprotein particle integrity using a Beckman Optima TLX ultracentrifuge with a TLA-120.2 rotor. Rotor speed (120/90/60/30.10(3) rev./min) and run time (100 min/3 h/6.7 h/27 h) were selected in such a way that the product of centrifugal field and run time remained constant. The first conditions correspond to the very fast ultracentrifugation (VFU) procedure with a centrifugal field of 625,000 x g. Thirty different plasma samples covering a wide range of lipid and protein concentrations were separated in the course of two centrifugal runs at densities of 1.006 and 1.063 kg/l which yielded very-low-density lipoproteins (VLDL), low-density lipoproteins (LDL), and the subnatant of low-density lipoproteins, including high-density lipoproteins (HDL) and concomitant sedimented plasma proteins. The major lipid components of the lipoproteins, triacylglycerols, free and esterified cholesterol, phospholipids and the apolipoproteins B and A-I, were estimated considering the masses of the tube contents after a slicing procedure. Measurements of lipids and proteins showed a very good recovery of better than 94% and 91%, respectively, and precision-within-series (coefficient of variation) of better than 4.2% and 6.5%, respectively. The effects of the rotor speed on the lipoprotein structure appeared to be weak. With increasing rotor speed, VLDL and LDL lipid constituents principally tended to decrease, whereas they increased in the subnatant of the LDL-run. The mean lipoprotein mass composition, considering the mass percentage of each measured particle constituent, did not show significant alterations. Total protein decreased in VLDL and in LDL and increased in the subnatant of the LDL-run. As checked by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and sodium dodecyl sulphate-polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE), the protein effects were due to nearly complete disappearance of contaminating plasma proteins, especially albumin as the major contamination of VLDL and LDL. The apolipoproteins (apo) B-100, A-I, E and C-I to C-III remained nearly unaffected. The main advantages of VFU were the very short run time (cumulative flotation time is 3.4 h) and the elemination of albumin without repeated runs. The procedure was suitable for the assessment of lipid and protein constituents in lipoproteins from very small plasma samples (500 microliters).

Low-density lipoprotein activates the protease region of recombinant apo(a)

The interaction of recombinant apo(a) (r-apo(a)) with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) has been examined using ultracentrifugation and affinity chromatography. R-apo(a) forms a non-covalent complex with human LDL. This LDL-r-apo(a) complex, reconstituted Lp(a), r-Lp(a), which can be isolated by ultracentrifugation, has protease activity. The protease activity reached maximum at an equimolar ratio of r-apo(a) and LDL. Proline and epsilon aminocaproic acid (at a concentration of 50 mM) caused dissociation of r-Lp(a) and simultaneous loss of enzyme activity. Mouse LDL that did not form a complex with r-apo(a) did not activate the protease region of r-apo(a). Unlike plasma Lp(a), r-Lp(a) was dissociated during affinity chromatography on Lysine-Sepharose. This dissociation led to loss of enzyme activity. We conclude that the formation of a non-covalent complex between r-apo(a) and LDL leads to activation of the protease region of r-apo(a). The results suggest that non-covalent binding between r-apo(a) and LDL is a pre-requisite for the enzyme activity of the protease region of r-apo(a).

Subunit composition of lipoprotein(a) protein

We determined the molecular weight of four different apo(a) polymorphs by sedimentation equilibrium in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride in order to estimate the molar ratio of apo(a) to apoB in Lp(a). They had molecular weights of 289,000, 310,000, 341,000, and 488,000 and 15, 16, 18, and 27 kringle 4 domains, respectively. Their carbohydrate content was similar (23.2 wt %), as was their partial specific volume (0.682 mL/g). Knowing the mass of apo(a), we estimated the molar ratio of apo(a) to apoB from (1) the molecular weight of the protein moiety of the four respective parent Lp(a) particles as calculated from their mass and percentage composition and the mass of apoB, (2) the mass of apo(a) lost from Lp(a) upon its reduction and carboxymethylation, by determining the difference in mass between Lp(a) and Lp(a-), and (3) from the mass (measured by sedimentation equilibrium in 6 M guanidine hydrochloride) of the lipid-free apoB-apo(a) complex (1.06 x 10(6) daltons) of the Lp(a) particle with the smallest apo(a) polymorph by subtracting the mass of apoB. Our results obtained with each of the three different physicochemical methods indicated that the protein moiety of each of the four Lp(a) particles that was investigated consisted of a complex of two molecules of apo(a) and one molecule of apoB.

Tamoxifen and estrogen lower circulating lipoprotein(a) concentrations in healthy postmenopausal women

Data in the literature suggest that circulating levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] and insulinlike growth factor I (IGF-I) respond similarly to therapy with growth hormone, estrogen, or tamoxifen. To more clearly document these relations, we designed a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the effects of tamoxifen and continuous estrogen on circulating levels of Lp(a), IGF-I, and IGF binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3) in healthy postmenopausal women. Both estrogen and tamoxifen decreased serum levels of IGF-I to 30% below baseline during the 3 months of treatment, while IGFBP-3 levels were unchanged. Plasma Lp(a) levels decreased to 24% below baseline after 1 month of treatment with either estrogen or tamoxifen (P < .05 for estrogen only); after 3 months Lp(a) decreased to 34% below baseline with tamoxifen therapy (P < .05) but returned to only 16% below baseline with estrogen. The correlation between Lp(a) and IGF-I was highly significant (P < .0001). We conclude that (1) tamoxifen lowers plasma Lp(a) levels in healthy postmenopausal women, (2) the suppressive effects of tamoxifen and estrogen on circulating Lp(a) concentration diverge after the first month of therapy, and (3) circulating levels of Lp(a) and IGF-I are strongly correlated with each other, an indication that they may share regulatory influences.

Association of apolipoprotein(a) phenotypes in children with family history of premature coronary artery disease

Although blacks have higher plasma levels of lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] than whites, the Lp(a) levels are not associated with clinical coronary artery disease (CAD) or parental history of myocardial infarction in blacks. To explore whether ethnic differences in the pathogenicity of Lp(a) are related to the thrombogenic component of Lp(a), this study investigated in children the associations of apolipoprotein(a) [apo(a)] phenotypes and Lp(a) levels with family history of premature CAD. Subjects were 46 children aged 7 to 11 years divided according to family history of premature CAD and assessed for Lp(a), apo(a) phenotypes, and other lipids and lipoproteins. The prevalence of small isoforms was higher in children with positive family history of premature CAD than in children with negative family history of premature CAD (32% versus 10%). Large isoforms were more prevalent in whites (24% versus 6%), and medium-sized isoforms were more prevalent in blacks (75% versus 52%). The black/white difference was smaller (19% versus 24%) in regard to small isoforms. Lp(a) levels were inversely related to apo(a) size in both blacks and whites (P = .084 and P = .049, respectively). Single-banded small apo(a) isoforms predicted positive family history of premature CAD, independent of ethnicity and Lp(a) levels. Small apo(a) isoforms in children were independent predictors of family history of premature CAD. Unlike Lp(a), they appear to be equally pathogenic for blacks and whites.

The inverse association of plasma lipoprotein(a) concentrations with apolipoprotein(a) isoform size is not due to differences in Lp(a) catabolism but to differences in production rate

Lipoprotein(a) (Lp[a]) is an atherogenic lipoprotein which is similar in structure to low density lipoproteins (LDL) but contains an additional protein called apolipoprotein(a) (apo[a]). Apo(a) is highly polymorphic in size, and there is a strong inverse association between the size of the apo(a) isoform and the plasma concentration of Lp(a). We directly compared the in vivo catabolism of Lp(a) particles containing different size apo(a) isoforms to establish whether there is an effect of apo(a) isoform size on the catabolic rate of Lp(a). In the first series of studies, four normal subjects were injected with radio-labeled S1-Lp(a) and S2-Lp(a) and another four subjects were injected with radiolabeled S2-Lp(a) and S4-Lp(a). No significant differences in fractional catabolic rate were found between Lp(a) particles containing different apo(a) isoforms. To confirm that apo(a) isoform size does not influence the rate of Lp(a) catabolism, three subjects heterozygous for apo(a) were selected for preparative isolation of both Lp(a) particles. The first was a B/S3-apo(a) subject, the second a S4/S6-apo(a) subject, and the third an F/S3-apo(a) subject. From each subject, both Lp(a) particles were preparatively isolated, radiolabeled, and injected into donor subjects and normal volunteers. In all cases, the catabolic rates of the two forms of Lp(a) were not significantly different. In contrast, the allele-specific apo(a) production rates were more than twice as great for the smaller apo(a) isoforms than for the larger apo(a) isoforms. In a total of 17 studies directly comparing Lp(a) particles of different apo(a) isoform size, the mean fractional catabolic rate of the Lp(a) with smaller size apo(a) was 0.329 +/- 0.090 day-1 and of the Lp(a) with the larger size apo(a) 0.306 +/- 0.079 day-1, not significantly different. In summary, the inverse association of plasma Lp(a) concentrations with apo(a) isoform size is not due to differences in the catabolic rates of Lp(a) but rather to differences in Lp(a) production rates.

Effects of age, sex, and menopausal status on plasma lipoprotein(a) levels. The Framingham Offspring Study

BACKGROUND

Lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] is an atherogenic particle that structurally resembles a low density lipoprotein (LDL) particle but contains a molecule of apolipoprotein(a) attached to apolipoprotein B-100 by a disulfide bond. Because elevated plasma levels of Lp(a) have been shown to be an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease, it is important to define normal ranges for this lipoprotein.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We have measured Lp(a) in 1,284 men (mean age, 48 +/- 10 years) and 1,394 women (mean age, 48 +/- 10 years) free of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease and not on medications known to affect lipids who were seen at the third examination cycle of the Framingham Offspring Study. Plasma Lp(a) levels were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, which uses a "capture" monoclonal anti-apo(a) antibody that does not cross-react with plasminogen, and a polyclonal anti-apo(a) antibody conjugated to horseradish peroxidase. The assay was calibrated to total Lp(a) mass. The Lp(a) frequency distribution was highly skewed to the right, with 56% of the values in the 0-10-mg/dL range. Mean plasma Lp(a) concentrations were 14 +/- 17 mg/dL in men and 15 +/- 17 mg/dL in women. Values of more than 38 mg/dL were above the 90th percentile and values of more than 22 mg/dL were above the 75th percentile in both men and women.

CONCLUSIONS

We have determined mean Lp(a) levels for men and women participating in the Framingham Offspring Study. In this population, there was an inverse association between plasma levels of Lp(a) and triglycerides for both sexes (p < 0.006), but triglycerides accounted for only approximately 0.5% of the variation in Lp(a) levels. Associations of Lp(a) levels with total and LDL cholesterol levels were not significant after correction for the estimated contribution of Lp(a) cholesterol to total and LDL cholesterol. After controlling for age, Lp(a) values were 8% greater in postmenopausal women than in premenopausal women, but this difference was not statistically significant. Body mass index, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, use of beta-blockers or cholesterol-lowering medications, and use of drugs for the treatment of diabetes and hypertension were not correlated with Lp(a) levels.

Distribution of apolipoprotein(a) in the plasma from patients with lipoprotein lipase deficiency and with type III hyperlipoproteinemia. No evidence for a triglyceride-rich precursor of lipoprotein(a)

Lipoprotein(a) consists of a low-density lipoprotein containing apolipoprotein (apo) B-100 and of the genetically polymorphic apo(a). It is not known where and how lipoprotein(a) is assembled and whether there exists a precursor for lipoprotein(a). We have determined the phenotype, concentration, and distribution of apo(a) in plasma from patients with lipoprotein lipase (LPL) deficiency (type I hyperlipoproteinemia, n = 14), in apo E 2/2 homozygotes with type III hyperlipoproteinemia (n = 12) and in controls (n = 16). In the two genetic conditions, there is grossly impaired catabolic conversion of apo B-100-containing precursor lipoproteins to low-density lipoproteins. Considering apo(a) type, the plasma concentration of apo(a) was normal in type III patients but significantly reduced in LPL deficiency. Despite the defects in the catabolism of other apo B-containing lipoproteins, the distribution of apo(a) was only moderately affected in both metabolic disorders, with 66.7% (type I) and 74.7% (type III) being present as the characteristic lipoprotein(a) in the density range of 1.05-1.125 g/ml (controls 81.6%). The remainder was distributed between the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins (type I 12.4%, type III 8.5%, controls 4.7%) and the lipid-poor bottom fraction (type I 19.3%, type III 15.3%, controls 12.6%). In all conditions most apo(a) (57-88%) dissociated from the triglyceride-rich lipoproteins upon recentrifugation and was recovered as lipoprotein(a). These data suggest that lipoprotein(a) is not generated from a triglyceride-rich precursor. Lipoprotein(a) may be secreted directly into plasma or may be formed by preferential binding of secreted apo(a) to existing low-density lipoprotein.