Aspirin plus coumarin versus aspirin alone in the prevention of reocclusion after fibrinolysis for acute myocardial infarction: results of the Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In Coronary Thrombolysis (APRICOT)-2 Trial

Risk of bleeding with concomitant use of oral anticoagulants and aspirin: A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Oral anticoagulants (OACs) and aspirin can trigger bleeding events when used alone or in combination. The purpose of this study was to compare the risk of any type of bleeding in individuals exposed to a combination of OAC and aspirin with the risk in those taking an OAC or aspirin alone.

METHODS

MEDLINE and Web of Science were queried in January 2021 for eligible articles. Studies were included if they were either randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or observational studies and evaluated the number of any bleeding events in two groups, one with exposure to both OAC and aspirin and one with exposure to OAC alone or aspirin alone. Pooled odds ratios were calculated using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Forty-two studies were included. In an analysis of 15 RCTs and 19 observational studies evaluating OAC plus aspirin versus OAC alone, a significant difference in the risk of bleeding was observed in the combination groups, with an odds ratio [OR] of, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.15-1.59) for RCTs and an OR of 1.42 (95% CI-, 1.09-1.87) for observational studies. When OAC plus aspirin was compared to aspirin alone, a higher rate of bleeding was found in the combination group (OR, 2.36; 95%CI, 1.91-2.92) in the analysis of 15 RCTs, but no significant difference was found among 10 observational studies (OR, 1.93; 95% Cl, 0.99-3.75).

CONCLUSION

The risk of any type of bleeding was significantly increased among patients taking aspirin plus OAC compared to those taking OAC alone in both RCTs and observational studies. Evaluation of RCTs comparing OAC plus aspirin to aspirin alone suggests increased bleeding risk as well.

Skimmin ameliorates cardiac function via the regulation of M2 macrophages in a myocardial infarction mouse model

PURPOSE

Myocardial infarction (MI) is a coronary artery disorder with several complications, such as inflammation, oxidative stress, and cardiac fibrosis. The current study is aimed to explore the protective effect of skimmin (SKI) on impaired heart tissues in MI.

METHODS

A mouse model of MI was induced by ligation of the left anterior descending artery. SKI was intragastric administration for 7 days after MI. Masson staining was then conducted to measure the area of fibrosis in the myocardium. The expression levels of collagen I and collagen III were analyzed using Western blot. The levels of glutathione (GSH), malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), and inflammatory factor were also detected. The expression of M1 polarization markers and M2 polarization markers in mice and LPS-induced RAW264.7 cells were detected using RT-qPCR and Western blot, respectively. Finally, the migration and proliferation of vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) in vitro were analyzed using transwell and EDU, respectively.

RESULTS

SKI improved cardiac function and cardiac fibrosis in mice with MI. SKI also decreased collagen I and collagen III expression, and inhibited inflammatory factor TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels. SKI decreased the levels of MDA and increased the levels of GSH and SOD. Meanwhile, SKI could promote M2 macrophage polarization in vivo and in vitro. SKI could also repress the migration and proliferation of VSMCs.

CONCLUSIONS

SKI may ameliorate inflammation, oxidative stress, and cardiac fibrosis of MI by promoting M2 polarization.

Anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory activity of sulodexide compared to aspirin in the rat model

BACKGROUND

Although the number of vascular surgeries performed is increasing, the incidence of complications associated with this surgery has not improved and re-operations are frequently required. Thrombosis in a vessel is the most hazardous postoperative complication.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anti-thrombotic and anti-inflammatory effects of sulodexide compared to aspirin in a rat model.

METHODS

We divided the animals into three groups (sham (saline), aspirin, and sulodexide). The abdominal aorta was surgically opened and closed, primarily with 8/0 Prolene sutures. Postoperatively, saline, aspirin, or sulodexide was administered by oral gavage for 14 days to the rats. The degree of neovascularization, thrombus, calcification, inflammatory infiltrates, and fibrosis were analyzed histopathologically by hematoxylin and eosin staining.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in the incidence of postoperative thrombogenesis, but less calcification and inflammatory infiltrates were observed in the sulodexide group compared to the aspirin group. Histopathologic score revealed less infiltration of inflammatory cells and mild calcification for the sulodexide group (0.17±0.41 and 1.33±0.52, respectively) compared to the aspirin group (0.67±0.52 and 1.67±0.52, respectively) at days 14.

CONCLUSIONS

This study offers the possibility that sulodexide could be used as an aspirin substitute for the postoperative management of vascular patients, with low gastrointestinal discomfort. In addition, it may also offer reduced postoperative calcification and inflammation.

The 2020 Canadian Cardiovascular Society/Canadian Heart Rhythm Society Comprehensive Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) atrial fibrillation (AF) guidelines program was developed to aid clinicians in the management of these complex patients, as well as to provide direction to policy makers and health care systems regarding related issues. The most recent comprehensive CCS AF guidelines update was published in 2010. Since then, periodic updates were published dealing with rapidly changing areas. However, since 2010 a large number of developments had accumulated in a wide range of areas, motivating the committee to complete a thorough guideline review. The 2020 iteration of the CCS AF guidelines represents a comprehensive renewal that integrates, updates, and replaces the past decade of guidelines, recommendations, and practical tips. It is intended to be used by practicing clinicians across all disciplines who care for patients with AF. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE) system was used to evaluate recommendation strength and the quality of evidence. Areas of focus include: AF classification and definitions, epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical evaluation, screening and opportunistic AF detection, detection and management of modifiable risk factors, integrated approach to AF management, stroke prevention, arrhythmia management, sex differences, and AF in special populations. Extensive use is made of tables and figures to synthesize important material and present key concepts. This document should be an important aid for knowledge translation and a tool to help improve clinical management of this important and challenging arrhythmia.

Rivaroxaban With or Without Aspirin for the Secondary Prevention of Cardiovascular Disease: Clinical Implications of the COMPASS Trial

The COMPASS trial compared the impact of the selective direct factor Xa inhibitor, rivaroxaban, as monotherapy or in combination with aspirin on major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) in patients with stable atherosclerotic disease. Patients treated with rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily in combination with aspirin experienced fewer cardiovascular events but more bleeding complications than those who received aspirin monotherapy. In contrast, a higher dose of rivaroxaban (5 mg twice daily) and aspirin produced no clinical benefit and continued to be associated with greater bleeding rates than aspirin. Examining this study in the context of other trials of anticoagulant therapy in atherosclerotic vascular disease, this review attempts to place the role of very low-dose rivaroxaban in clinical context and highlights areas for future research.

2018 Focused Update of the Canadian Cardiovascular Society Guidelines for the Management of Atrial Fibrillation

The Canadian Cardiovascular Society (CCS) Atrial Fibrillation Guidelines Committee provides periodic reviews of new data to produce focused updates that address clinically important advances in atrial fibrillation (AF) management. This 2018 Focused Update addresses: (1) anticoagulation in the context of cardioversion of AF; (2) the management of antithrombotic therapy for patients with AF in the context of coronary artery disease; (3) investigation and management of subclinical AF; (4) the use of antidotes for the reversal of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants; (5) acute pharmacological cardioversion of AF; (6) catheter ablation for AF, including patients with concomitant AF and heart failure; and (7) an integrated approach to the patient with AF and modifiable cardiovascular risk factors. The recommendations were developed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) standards. Individual studies and literature were reviewed for quality and bias; the literature review process and evidence tables are included as Supplementary Material and are available on the CCS Web site. Details of the updated recommendations are presented, along with their background and rationale. This document is linked to an updated summary of all CCS AF guidelines recommendations, from 2010 to the present 2018 Focused Update, which is provided in the Supplementary Material.

Pleiotropic effects of the hemostatic system

Atherothrombosis is characterized by the inflammatory process of atherosclerosis combined with a hypercoagulable state leading to superimposed thrombus formation. In atherosclerotic plaques, cell signaling can occur via protease-activated receptors (PARs), four of which have been identified so far (PAR1-PAR4). Proteases that are able to activate PARs can be produced systemically, but also at the sites of lesions, and they include thrombin and activated factor X. After PAR activation, downstream signaling can lead to both proinflammatory effects and a hypercoagulable state. Which specific effect occurs depends on the type of protease and activated PAR, and the site of activation. Hypercoagulable effects are mainly exerted through PAR1 and PAR4, whereas proinflammatory responses are mostly seen after PAR1 and PAR2 activation. PAR signaling pathways contribute to atherothrombosis, suggesting that inhibition of these pathways possibly prevents cardiovascular events based on this pathophysiological mechanism. In this review, we highlight the pathways by which PAR activation leads to proinflammatory responses and a hypercoagulable state. Furthermore, we give an overview of potential pharmacological treatment targets that promote vascular protection.

High platelet reactivity – the challenge of prolonged anticoagulation therapy after ACSI

Despite dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT), one-year event rates after acute coronary syndrome (ACS) vary from 9–12%. The development of novel oral anticoagulants (NOAC) without a need for monitoring has initiated renewed interest for prolonged adjunctive anticoagulation. Importantly, the cornerstone of treatment after ACS consists of long-term DAPT. In that context, the NOACs have only been tested as adjunctive therapy. Of all new agents, only rivaroxaban –in a substantially lower dose than used for atrial fibrillation– has been demonstrated to improve outcome, albeit at the cost of bleeding. In selected cases, adjunctive therapy with dose-adjusted vitamin-K antagonists (international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0–3.0) can be considered as well. These two strategies of prolonged anticoagulation can be considered in case of ‘high platelet reactivity’, i.e. in patients at high risk of recurrent thrombotic events despite DAPT. Both during admission and after discharge for ACS, the use of NOACs in doses indicated for atrial fibrillation is strictly contra-indicated in patients on DAPT. In case of post-discharge anticoagulation therapy for atrial fibrillation, patients should preferably receive vitamin-K antagonists (INR 2.0–3.0), with discontinuation of one antiplatelet agent as soon as clinically justifiable. Importantly, the impact of prolonged anticoagulation (low-dose rivaroxaban, vitamin-K antagonists) as adjunctive to DAPT after ACS has not been addressed with the most potent antiplatelet agents (prasugrel, ticagrelor) and merits further study. Despite the potential indication of prolonged oral anticoagulation as adjunctive treatment, it remains to be established whether anticoagulation therapy could also be an alternative for either aspirin or thienopyridine treatment in selected ACS patients on DAPT.

Cardioprotective effect of Malva sylvestris L. in myocardial ischemic/reprefused rats

PURPOSE

The present investigation evaluated the cardioprotective effect of Malva sylvestris L. (MS) on myocardial ischemic/reperfusion (MI/R) in rats.

METHODS

All animals were divided into four groups: the sham operated group, ischemia/reperfusion group (MI/R), and the MS (250 and 500mg/kg) treated groups, who received MS 250 and 500mg/kg intragastrically for 15 consecutive days, respectively. At the end of the protocol, concentrations of aspartate transaminase (AST), creatine kinase-MB fraction (CK-MB) and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) were estimated in serum and the concentrations of other parameters, such as C-reactive protein, macrophage inflammatory protein 1 alpha (MIP-1α), and nitric oxide (NO) were also estimated in the blood. Tissue homogenate concentrations of inflammatory cytokines, such as tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interlukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-10 and IL-6 as well as oxidative stress parameters, such as lipid peroxidation, catalase, and superoxide dismutase were estimated in MI/R rats.

RESULT

Significant decreases (p<0.01) in AST, LDH, and CK-MB levels were observed in the MS-treated group compared with those in the MI/R group. C-reactive protein and MIP-1α levels decreased in the MS-treated group compared with those in the MI/R group. Plasma NO level was significantly enhanced in the MS-treated group than in the MI/R group. Moreover, treatment with MS significantly reduced TNF-α, IL-1β, and IL-6 levels and increased IL-10 levels in the MS group compared with the MI/R group. Treatment with MS also attenuated the altered oxidative stress parameters in MI/R rats.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicate the cardioprotective effects of MS of reducing oxidative stress and the inflammatory response in MI/R rats.

Efficacy and safety of aspirin combined with warfarin after acute coronary syndrome : A meta-analysis

A comprehensive meta-analysis was performed to investigate whether the combination of high-/low-dose of aspirin and various intensities of warfarin (W) offer greater benefit than aspirin (ASA) alone. A total of 14 randomized clinical trials (RCTs) having 26,916 patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) met inclusion criteria. The efficacy and safety of all outcomes which included myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause death, stroke, and bleeding were calculated. The overall outcomes analysis showed there was no significant difference in the risk of MI (relative ratio [RR] 0.959, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.78-1.04, P = 0.308), stroke (RR 0.789, 95 % CI 0.57-1.09, P = 0.145), and all-cause death (RR 1.007, 95 % CI 0.93-1.09, P = 0.87) between the combination group and ASA group. The subgroup analysis suggested that ASA (≤100 mg/day) plus W (mean international normalized ratio [INR] 2.0-3.0) decreased the risk rate of stroke (RR 0.660, 95 % CI 0.50-0.87, P = 0.003). There was a lower risk of MI (RR 0.605, 95 % CI 0.47-0.77, P < 0.0001) as well as stroke (RR 0.594, 95 % CI 0.45-0.79, P < 0.0001) between W (INR 2.0-3.0) combined with ASA (mean dose ≥100 mg/day) and ASA. However, the risk of major bleeding (RR 1.738, 95 % CI 1.45-2.08, P < 0.0001) and minor bleeding (RR 2.767, 95 % CI 2.12-3.61, P < 0.0001) was almost doubled in the combined groups. Compared with ASA, high-dose aspirin with moderate-intensity warfarin (INR 2.0-3.0) may better reduce the risk of MI and stroke but confer an increased risk of bleeding.

Dabigatran for the Treatment and Secondary Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism; A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis for the Netherlands

Background

Dabigatran was proven to have similar effect on the prevention of recurrence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) and a lower risk of bleeding compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The aim of this study is to assess the cost-effectiveness (CE) of dabigatran for the treatment and secondary prevention in patients with VTE compared to VKAs in the Dutch setting.

Methods

Previously published Markov model was modified and updated to assess the CE of dabigatran and VKAs for the treatment and secondary prevention in patients with VTE from a societal perspective in the base-case analysis. The model was populated with efficacy and safety data from major dabigatran trials (i.e. RE-COVER, RECOVER II, RE-MEDY and RE-SONATE), Dutch specific costs, and utilities derived from dabigatran trials or other published literature. Univariate, probabilistic sensitivity and a number of scenario analyses evaluating various decision-analytic settings (e.g. the perspective of analysis, use of anticoagulants only for treatment or only for secondary prevention, or comparison to no treatment) were tested on the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER).

Results

In the base-case scenario, patients on dabigatran gained an additional 0.034 quality adjusted life year (QALY) while saving €1,598. Results of univariate sensitivity analysis were quite robust. The probability that dabigatran is cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €20,000/QALY was 98.1%. From the perspective of healthcare provider, extended anticoagulation with dabigatran compared to VKAs was estimated at €2,158 per QALY gained. The ICER for anticoagulation versus no treatment in patients with equipoise risk of recurrent VTE was estimated at €33,379 per QALY gained. Other scenarios showed dabigatran was cost-saving.

Conclusion

From a societal perspective, dabigatran is likely to be a cost-effective or even cost-saving strategy for treatment and secondary prevention of VTE compared to VKAs in the Netherlands.

Antithrombotic Approaches in Acute Coronary Syndromes: Optimizing Benefit vs Bleeding Risks

It is estimated that in the United States, each year, approximately 620,000 persons will experience an acute coronary syndrome and approximately 70% of these will have non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular disease still accounts for 1 of every 3 deaths in the United States, and there is an urgent need to improve the prognosis of patients presenting with acute coronary syndrome. Cardiovascular mortality and ischemic complications are common after acute coronary syndrome, and the advent of newer antithrombotic therapies has reduced ischemic complications, but at the expense of greater bleeding. The new antithrombotic agents also raise the challenge of choosing between multiple potential therapeutic combinations to minimize recurrent ischemia without a concomitant increase in bleeding, a decision that often varies according to an individual patient's relative propensity for ischemia versus hemorrhage. In this review, we will synthesize the available information to arm health care providers with the contemporary knowledge on antithrombotic therapy and individualize treatment decisions.

Warfarin and Aspirin Versus Aspirin Alone in Patients with Acute Myocardial Infarction: A Pilot Study

The benefits of anticoagulant therapy and antiplatelet agents in secondary prevention of myocardial infarction (MI) are well known. Administration of combined warfarin and aspirin (ASA) has not been well studied. The objective of this study was to compare the effect of coadministration of warfarin and ASA with administration of ASA alone on outcome of patients after MI. One hundred forty age- and sex-matched survivors of MI were randomized to receive either 100 mg/day ASA plus enough warfarin to reach a target: international normalized ratio of 2.5 (range: 2-3) (group A, n = 70), or only 100 mg/day ASA (group B, n = 70). The patients were examined for several variables including development of hemorrhage, reinfarction, and rehospitalization for 1 year post MI. Of the variables studied, minor hemorrhagic episodes were observed significantly (p = 0.002) more in group A than in group B patients. Rehospitalization and reinfarction rates, although occurring with lower frequencies in group A than in group B, did not reach the statistical significance level. In postmyocardial infarction patients, warfarin plus ASA did not provide a clinical benefit beyond that achievable with aspirin monotherapy, and for the observed markedly higher incidence of minor hemorrhage in combination therapy, antiplatelet therapy alone seems to be a more reasonable approach.

The potential role of anticoagulant therapy for the secondary prevention of ischemic events post-acute coronary syndrome

Abstract The use of dual antiplatelet therapy has led to a substantial reduction in ischemic events post-acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Despite this, recurrent event rates remain high. Recent research has combined antiplatelet with anticoagulant therapy to reduce recurrent event rates further. Compared with standard medical therapy, rivaroxaban demonstrated improved efficacy outcomes and significantly reduced mortality after an ACS. Although clear benefits of novel oral anticoagulants post-ACS have been proven, concerns regarding bleeding are still a barrier to widespread use. This review explores key trials of dual antiplatelet therapy and examines the latest research in anticoagulation aiming to optimize clinical outcomes post-ACS.

The "dual-pathway" strategy after acute coronary syndrome: rivaroxaban and antiplatelet agents in the ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial

Acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is a medical emergency often associated with an occlusive coronary event with consequent myocardial underperfusion. Patients require immediate antiplatelet therapy and long-term antithrombotic prophylaxis to reduce the risk of recurrence. Acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) alone or in combination with a platelet P2Y12 inhibitor (dual antiplatelet therapy [DAPT]) has become the clinically accepted antithrombotic prophylaxis for patients post-ACS. Historically, studies assessing the utility of adding oral anticoagulants (OACs) have not demonstrated a clinical benefit with regard to acceptable bleeding risk. Studies with vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) such as warfarin demonstrated a potential to reduce the risk of subsequent death by reinfarction but this benefit was offset by increases in bleeding. Results from studies of two targeted non-VKA OACs also proved disappointing, with little or no apparent reduction in the rate of ischemic events seen. However, the recent ATLAS studies assessing rivaroxaban (an oral factor Xa inhibitor) in patients with ACS demonstrated a reduction in the composite endpoint of deaths from cardiovascular causes, myocardial infarction (MI), or stroke, and a reduction in the rate of stent thrombosis. This review provides an overview of the pivotal studies in which the addition of OACs to antiplatelet therapy (the so-called "dual-pathway" approach) has been investigated for the management of patients post-ACS and considers the results of the ATLAS studies and their potential impact on the management of patients after an acute event.

Anticoagulants for secondary prevention after acute myocardial infarction: lessons from the past decade

The impact of an acute coronary syndrome (ACS) event, such as an acute myocardial infarction (MI), is not limited to the acute management phase; patients face an elevated risk of residual atherothrombotic events that commonly requires chronic management for months or even years. Significant advances have been made in both the acute and chronic management of patients with acute MI over the past decade, resulting in improved prognoses. One of the hallmarks of modern treatment strategies is more aggressive antiplatelet treatment regimens. However, the risks of further ACS events, stroke and premature death remain elevated in these patients, and addressing this residual risk is challenging owing to interpatient variability, differences in management strategies between centres and countries, incomplete understanding of the specific pathophysiology of post-ACS thrombosis and limitations of current therapeutic approaches. The recent approval in Europe of the direct oral anticoagulant rivaroxaban for use in this setting in combination with clopidogrel and acetylsalicylic acid offers another strategy to consider in the management of these patients, and clinical strategies in this area continue to evolve. In this review, we chart the progress made over the past decade in reducing the burden of secondary thromboembolic events after acute MI and discuss the current position of and future perspectives on the inclusion of oral anticoagulants into care pathways in this setting.

Neurologic complications of myocardial infarction

Cardiac disease, in particular coronary artery disease, is the leading cause of mortality in developed nations. Strokes can complicate cardiac disease - either as result of left ventricular dysfunction and associated thrombus formation or of therapy for the cardiac disease. Antiplatelet drugs and anticoagulants routinely used to treat cardiac disease increase the risk for hemorrhagic stroke.

Vitamin K antagonists in heart disease: current status and perspectives (Section III). Position paper of the ESC Working Group on Thrombosis--Task Force on Anticoagulants in Heart Disease

Oral anticoagulants are a mainstay of cardiovascular therapy, and for over 60 years vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) were the only available agents for long-term use. VKAs interfere with the cyclic inter-conversion of vitamin K and its 2,3 epoxide, thus inhibiting γ-carboxylation of glutamate residues at the amino-termini of vitamin K-dependent proteins, including the coagulation factors (F) II (prothrombin), VII, IX and X, as well as of the anticoagulant proteins C, S and Z. The overall effect of such interference is a dose-dependent anticoagulant effect, which has been therapeutically exploited in heart disease since the early 1950s. In this position paper, we review the mechanisms of action, pharmacological properties and side effects of VKAs, which are used in the management of cardiovascular diseases, including coronary heart disease (where their use is limited), stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, heart valves and/or chronic heart failure. Using an evidence-based approach, we describe the results of completed clinical trials, highlight areas of uncertainty, and recommend therapeutic options for specific disorders. Although VKAs are being increasingly replaced in most patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation by the new oral anticoagulants, which target either thrombin or FXa, the VKAs remain the agents of choice for patients with atrial fibrillation in the setting of rheumatic valvular disease and for those with mechanical heart valves.

Low-dose of oral factor Xa inhibitors in patients with a recent acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Recently, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that therapy with new oral activated factor X (Xa) inhibitors in acute coronary syndrome (ACS) yielded a reduction of ischemic events. However, this therapy was associated with a dose-related increase in major bleeding complications. We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to appraise the clinical efficacy and safety of the lowest doses of oral factor Xa inhibitors compared with placebo in patients after a recent ACS.

METHODS

The primary endpoint was cardiovascular mortality. The rate of new myocardial infarction (MI) was the secondary efficacy endpoint, whereas major bleeding complications were recorded as a safety endpoint. Five RCTs were included in the meta-analysis enrolling a total of 25,643 patients.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in mortality between patients treated with new antithrombotics compared with those receiving the standard therapy: odds ratio (OR), [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.97 [0.72-1.31], p = 0.86. Recurrent MI rates were decreased in the anti-Xa group: OR [95%CI] = 0.86 [0.76-0.98], p = 0.02, number needed to treat (NNT) = 189. The administration of new oral anticoagulants was associated with a strongly increased risk of major bleedings compared with the standard treatment: OR [95%CI] = 3.24 [2.29-4.59], p < 0.001, number needed to harm (NNH) = 104; similarly, intracranial bleeding rates were significantly higher in the anti-Xa arm.

CONCLUSIONS

The addition of the new oral anticoagulants on top of standard therapy in the setting of ACS results in an excessive risk of major bleedings without any clear evidence of outweighing clinical benefits.

Biphasic release of protein from polyethylene glycol and polyethylene glycol/modified dextran microspheres

Dextrans show great promise for delivery of therapeutic agents. Dextran acetates (DAs) were synthesized with increasing degrees of substitution (DA1 < DA2 < DA3) by the reaction of the polysaccharide dextran (70 kDa) with acetic anhydride. A series of polyethylene glycol (PEG)/DA microspheres were prepared and tested with bovine serum albumin (BSA) functioning as a model protein. Particle size (0.74-0.85 μm) and encapsulation efficiency (56-70%) increased with the degree of substitution along with a slower release rate of protein from PEG/DA microspheres. Time to release 90% of protein rose from 31 to 118 min. Percentage of BSA released from PEG and PEG/DA3 microspheres with time (min) was modeled mathematically [Y(PEG) = 100(1 - e(-0.12t)); Y(PEG/DA3) = 100(1 - e(-0.024t))] to predict cumulative delivery from mixtures in vitro over a period of hours when constrained to a target level at 30 min. The system is examined for potential application in thrombolytic therapy.

Interactions between cardiovascular and cerebrovascular disease

OPININION STATEMENT: All patients with ischemic stroke should undergo a comprehensive assessment of cardiovascular risk. Patients with carotid artery disease, symptoms of cerebral ischemia and high cardiovascular risk profiles should be considered for noninvasive testing for coronary artery disease (CAD). Routine testing for CAD before carotid endarterctomy is not recommended. Patients with coexisting coronary and carotid artery disease should be more aggressively treated for reducing their "very high" risk of cardiovascular events. In patients candidates to carotid revascularization, a preoperative coronary angiography and coronary revascularization are not recommended. Warfarin is recommended in all patients with moderate to high risk of stroke. Novel oral anticoagulants represent an attractive alternative to warfarin. However, their place in therapy in clinical practice is not yet established. Percutaneous closure of the left atrial appendage for stroke prophylaxis may be considered in selected patients with atrial fibrillation and contraindications for oral anticoagulant therapy. Warfarin is not indicated in patients with heart failure who are in sinus rhythm. Percutaneous closure of patent foramen does not seem to be superior to medical therapy for the prevention of recurrences in patients with cryptogenic stroke.

Potential role of rivaroxaban in patients with acute coronary syndrome

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) continue to be at risk for recurrent ischemic events, despite an early invasive strategy and the use of dual antiplatelet therapy. The anticoagulant pathway remains activated for a prolonged period after ACS and, consequently, has been a target for treatment. Early studies with warfarin indicated its benefit, but the risk of bleeding and the complexities of warfarin anticoagulation resulted in little use of this strategy. Rivaroxaban, apixaban, and dabigatran are new specific inhibitors of anticoagulant factors (Xa or IIa) currently available for the prevention of thrombosis and/or thromboembolism. Thus far, studies with dabigatran and apixaban in ACS have shown no clinical benefit and bleeding has been increased. The ATLAS ACS 2-TIMI 51 trial observed the impact of rivaroxaban 2.5 mg and 5 mg twice daily in patients with recent ACS receiving current management (both early invasive strategy and dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel) over a follow-up period of over 1 year. Rivaroxaban 2.5 mg twice daily reduced cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, or stroke by 16%, and both cardiovascular and all-cause mortality by approximately 20%. Although major bleeding increased from 0.6% to 2.1% and intracranial hemorrhage from 0.2% to 0.6%, there was no increase in fatal bleeding. The role of rivaroxaban in the management of ACS is discussed in this review. The reduction in mortality is the main finding that could lead to the use of rivaroxaban in the management of ACS in high-risk individuals with a low bleeding risk.

Low doses of acetylsalicylic acid increase risk of gastrointestinal bleeding in a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

We performed a meta-analysis of data from randomized trials to estimate the risk of all-cause mortality and bleeding (and especially gastrointestinal [GI] bleeding) in patients treated with low doses of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) (75-325 mg/d), alone or in combination with other medications.

METHODS

We searched 10 electronic databases (until October 2010) and collected data on adverse events in randomized controlled studies that evaluated low doses of ASA, alone (35 trials) or in combination with anticoagulants (18 trials), clopidogrel (5 trials), or proton pump inhibitors (PPIs; 3 trials). We analyzed data using random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression, applying Peto's odds ratio (OR) for adverse events.

RESULTS

Low doses of ASA alone decreased the risk for all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.93, 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-0.99), largely because of effects in secondary prevention populations. The risk of major GI bleeding increased with low doses of ASA alone (OR, 1.55; 95% CI, 1.27-1.90), compared with inert control reagents. The risk increased when ASA was combined with clopidogrel, compared with aspirin alone (OR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.49-2.31), anticoagulants vs low doses of ASA alone (OR, 1.93; 95% CI, 1.42-2.61), or in studies that included patients with a history of GI bleeding or of longer duration. Importantly, PPI use reduced the risk for major GI bleeding in patients given low doses of ASA (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.21-0.57).

CONCLUSIONS

In a meta-analysis, low doses of ASA increased the risk for GI bleeding; risk increased with accompanying use of clopidogrel and anticoagulant therapies, but decreased in patients who took PPIs.

Scintigraphic parameters with emphasis on perfusion appraisal in rest 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT in the recovery of myocardial function after thrombolytic therapy in patients with ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI)

Introduction: This study was performed to determine the clinical application of rest 99mTc-sestamibi in the assessment of viability and functional improvement of the left ventricle (LV) myocardium in the post-thrombolytic therapy of acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Material and methods: In 37 patients with AMI who received thrombolytic therapy, 2-dimensional (2D) echocardiography, as well as the resting redistribution of 99mTc-sestamibi, was investigated, both within 1 week and 3–5 months after AMI. The predictive capacity of the perfusion percentage for myocardial function recovery was evaluated. Also, the capacities of the possible variables in the prediction of recovery of myocardial function resulting from a change in LV ejection fraction (EF) were evaluated using stepwise multiple regression analysis. Results: Thirty-seven patients (30 men and 7 women; mean age: 58±14 years) with AMI were enrolled in the study. Redistribution was observed in 35 and 50 segments of the initial and follow-up scans, respectively. In addition, 146 segments with reverse redistribution (RR), both in the initial scan (118 segments) and the follow-up scan (86 segments), were also observed. An apparent difference in wall motion scores was seen between the initial and follow-up echocardiographs (p<0.001). Furthermore, using the optimal cut-off point of perfusion percentage in each image set, sensitivity as well as specificity and likelihood ratio (LR) for the improvement of regional wall motion after 3–5 months were defined. Conclusion: These data showed that redistribution and reverse redistribution of 99mTc-sestamibi post thrombolytic therapy can be used as a marker of viability to predict the recovery of segmental wall motion abnormality (stunning), as well as the improvement of segmental perfusion uptake. This study also demonstrates that the resting 99mTc-sestamibi SPECT can be used for an approximate assessment of LV function status and can predict the recovery of jeopardized myocardium function after thrombolytic therapy.

Combined oral anticoagulants and antiplatelets: benefits and risks

Combined antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy has been suggested for those clinical conditions in which conventional antithrombotic regimens have shown suboptimal efficacy, and in patients with indication for both: antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapy. Clinical trials aimed at assessing the clinical benefit of the association with respect to mono-therapy have been conducted in patients with atrial fibrillation, in patients with recent myocardial infarction, and in patients with prosthetic heart valves. Overall, a favorable benefit-risk profile of combined therapy in comparison to anticoagulant alone has been observed in patients with mechanical prosthetic heart valves and in those with coronary artery disease while no clear advantage has been shown in patients with atrial fibrillation. In almost all these studies, however, a higher risk of major bleeding has been observed in patients receiving combined therapy in comparison to patients receiving warfarin alone. Thus, a combined regimen of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy should be reserved for selected patients at high risk of thromboembolic events who have a low risk of bleeding.

Timing of angiography after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite its limited efficacy in opening occluded coronary arteries in ST-elevation myocardial infarction, fibrinolysis remains the major reperfusion strategy used worldwide. Apart from bleeding, early reocclusion of the culprit artery is a common complication of the therapy and usually leads to a worse prognosis.

RECENT FINDINGS

During the last 7 years routine percutaneous coronary intervention after fibrinolysis has been shown to improve early and long-term outcome in six large randomized trials.

SUMMARY

The optimal time window to perform percutaneous coronary intervention is between 3 and 24 h after fibrinolysis.

Long-term effect of chronic oral anticoagulation with warfarin after acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet therapy is the principal component of the antithrombotic regimen after acute myocardial infarction. It remains unclear whether additional chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) improves outcomes. We set out to evaluate the risk and benefit of long-term OAC after myocardial infarction.

METHODS

We pooled 10 randomized clinical trials comparing warfarin-containing regimens (OAC) with or without aspirin with non-OAC regimens with or without aspirin (No OAC) for patients with recent infarction. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Other endpoints included recurrent infarction, stroke, and major bleeding. We calculated the odds ratio (OR) (fixed effect, OR <1 indicates benefit for OAC) for death and other ischemic and hemorrhagic complications at the longest interval of follow-up available.

RESULTS

Among 24,542 patients, 14,062 were assigned to OAC and 10,480 to no OAC. The patients were followed for 3-63 months, for 89,562 patient-years. Death occurred in 2424 patients (9.9%), 1279 OAC patients, and 1145 in the no OAC group, OR 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-1.05), P=.43. Similarly, there was no effect on recurrent infarction. Stroke occurred in 578 patients (2.4%), 271 in the OAC group and 307 in the no OAC group, OR 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63-0.89), P=.001. There was substantially more major bleeding (OR 1.83 [95% CI, 1.50-2.23], P <.001) in the OAC group. Separate analyses, performed for patients (n=11,920) randomized to aspirin versus aspirin and OAC yielded very similar results.

CONCLUSION

As compared with placebo or aspirin, OAC with or without aspirin does not reduce mortality or reinfarction, reduces stroke, but is associated with significantly more major bleeding.

Anti-t-PA antibodies in acute myocardial infarction after thrombolysis with rt-PA

BACKGROUND

Thrombolysis with recombinant tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is successfully used in acute myocardial infarction with ST elevation (STEMI). Reocclusions follow rt-PA treatment in up to 30% of patients within one year. The infusion of rt-PA may induce the production of anti-t-PA antibodies which could interfere with the function of the native t-PA molecule.

METHODS

In order to detect and characterise anti-t-PA antibodies, plasma samples were collected from 30 STEMI patients (20 treated and 10 not treated with rt-PA) at baseline before rt-PA infusion and then 15, 30, 90 and 180 days after STEMI and from 40 healthy subjects at baseline only. Immunoenzymatic, chromatographic and chromogenic methods were employed.

RESULTS

An increase of anti-t-PA antibodies was observed 15 days (IgM, p=0.0001) and 30 days (IgG, p=0.0001) after rt-PA infusion. Six patients had large increases of anti-t-PA IgG which bound the catalytic domain of t-PA (two cases) or kringle 2 domain (four cases), were of IgG1 or IgG3 subclasses and interacted with the t-PA molecule in fluid phase.

CONCLUSION

The infusion of rt-PA may induce the production of specific antibodies that bind active sites of t-PA, thus potentially reducing its in vivo function.

The current role of anticoagulants in cardiovascular medicine

Thrombotic events in cardiovascular disease are a huge burden to healthcare budgets. Anticoagulant use is recommended for thrombotic event prevention in many cardiovascular diseases, including stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation, treatment and secondary prevention of acute coronary syndrome. Current parenteral anticoagulants include unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) and fondaparinux. Patients with acute coronary syndrome usually receive unfractionated heparin or a LMWH on hospital admission, both exhibit similar efficacy in reducing mortality and myocardial infarction rates; however, LMWHs may have a better safety profile and do not require routine coagulation monitoring. In acute coronary syndrome, fondaparinux use results in significantly lower mortality compared with LMWHs or unfractionated heparin. However, parenteral drugs are inconvenient for long-term outpatient use. Vitamin K antagonists are currently the only oral anticoagulants available for long-term use, but multiple drawbacks hinder their use. A large unmet need exists for new convenient and well-tolerated oral anticoagulants that do not require routine monitoring.

Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric patients with late-onset portal vein stenosis after living donor liver transplantation

Portal vein stenosis (PVS) after living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a serious complication that can lead to graft failure. Few studies of the diagnosis and treatment of late-onset (> or = 3 months after liver transplantation) PVS have been reported. One hundred thirty-three pediatric (median age 7.6 years, range 1.3-26.8 years) LDLT recipients were studied. The patients were followed by Doppler ultrasound (every 3 months) and multidetector helical computed tomography (once a year). Twelve patients were diagnosed with late-onset PVS 0.5-6.9 years after LDLT. All cases were successfully treated with balloon dilatation. Five cases required multiple treatments. Early diagnosis of late-onset PVS and interventional radiology therapy treatment may prevent graft loss.

Combining antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies

Antiplatelet therapy is the cornerstone for both primary and secondary prevention therapies for ischemic events resulting from coronary atherosclerotic disease. Dual antiplatelet therapy (aspirin plus a thienopyridine, usually clopidogrel) has assumed a central role in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes and after coronary stent deployment. In addition to antiplatelet therapy, anticoagulant therapy might be indicated for stroke prevention in a variety of conditions that include atrial fibrillation, profound left ventricular dysfunction, and after mechanical prosthetic heart valve replacement. For this reason, the use of triple antithrombotic therapy (a dual antiplatelet regimen plus warfarin) is expected to become more prominent, given an aging patient population. But although triple therapy can prevent both thromboembolism and stent thrombosis, it is also associated with significant bleeding hazards. Furthermore, when bleeding events do occur, the challenge of balancing the risk of stent thrombosis or stroke and the need for hemostasis requires considerable expertise. It is both prudent and timely to review treatment strategies that employ combinations of antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies as well as strategies aimed at reducing bleeding risk in patients treated with these therapies.

Rivaroxaban versus placebo in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ATLAS ACS-TIMI 46): a randomised, double-blind, phase II trial

BACKGROUND

Rivaroxaban is an oral direct factor Xa inhibitor that has been effective in prevention of venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing elective orthopaedic surgery. However, its use after acute coronary syndromes has not been investigated. In this setting, we assessed the safety and efficacy of rivaroxaban and aimed to select the most favourable dose and dosing regimen.

METHODS

In this double-blind, dose-escalation, phase II study, undertaken at 297 sites in 27 countries, 3491 patients stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome were stratified on the basis of investigator decision to use aspirin only (stratum 1, n=761) or aspirin plus a thienopyridine (stratum 2, n=2730). Participants were randomised within each strata and dose tier with a block randomisation method at 1:1:1 to receive either placebo or rivaroxaban (at doses 5-20 mg) given once daily or the same total daily dose given twice daily. The primary safety endpoint was clinically significant bleeding (TIMI major, TIMI minor, or requiring medical attention); the primary efficacy endpoint was death, myocardial infarction, stroke, or severe recurrent ischaemia requiring revascularisation during 6 months. Safety analyses included all participants who received at least one dose of study drug; efficacy analyses were by intention to treat. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00402597.

FINDINGS

Three patients in stratum 1 and 26 in stratum 2 never received the study drug. The risk of clinically significant bleeding with rivaroxaban versus placebo increased in a dose-dependent manner (hazard ratios [HRs] 2.21 [95% CI 1.25-3.91] for 5 mg, 3.35 [2.31-4.87] for 10 mg, 3.60 [2.32-5.58] for 15 mg, and 5.06 [3.45-7.42] for 20 mg doses; p<0.0001). Rates of the primary efficacy endpoint were 5.6% (126/2331) for rivaroxaban versus 7.0% (79/1160) for placebo (HR 0.79 [0.60-1.05], p=0.10). Rivaroxaban reduced the main secondary efficacy endpoint of death, myocardial infarction, or stroke compared with placebo (87/2331 [3.9%] vs 62/1160 [5.5%]; HR 0.69, [95% CI 0.50-0.96], p=0.0270). The most common adverse event in both groups was chest pain (248/2309 [10.7%] vs 118/1153 [10.2%]).

INTERPRETATION

The use of an oral factor Xa inhibitor in patients stabilised after an acute coronary syndrome increases bleeding in a dose-dependent manner and might reduce major ischaemic outcomes. On the basis of these observations, a phase III study of low-dose rivaroxaban as adjunctive therapy in these patients is underway.

FUNDING

Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development and Bayer Healthcare AG.

Prolonged anticoagulation therapy adjunctive to aspirin after successful fibrinolysis: from early reduction in reocclusion to improved long-term clinical outcome

BACKGROUND

Long-term addition of antithrombotics (clopidogrel, anticoagulants) to aspirin has improved outcome after acute coronary syndromes. Data on the impact after fibrinolysis are scarce. In Antithrombotics in the Prevention of Reocclusion In COronary Thrombolysis-2 (APRICOT-2), adjunctive moderate-intensity coumarin (median international normalized ratio 2.6) conferred a marked reduction in 3-month reocclusion and ischemic events. Given the association between reocclusion and long-term outcome, we performed long-term clinical follow-up.

METHODS

Patients with thrombolysis in myocardial infarction (TIMI) 3 flow <48 hours after fibrinolysis for ST-elevation myocardial infarction were randomized to aspirin plus coumarin, with prolonged heparinization until the target international normalized ratio (2-3) was reached, or aspirin with standard heparinization. Three-month follow-up angiography (reocclusion rates 15% vs 28%) and long-term clinical follow-up (median 7.3 years, interquartile range 5.9-8.6 years) were performed.

RESULTS

Patients randomized to adjunctive anticoagulation (n = 123) received coumarin for a median of 280 days (113-387 days). Survival was 94% versus 88% in patients on aspirin alone (n = 128, P = .12). Infarct-free survival was 86% versus 71% (P = .01). Thrombolysis in myocardial infarction bleeding was 4% in both groups. Patients with reocclusion had impaired survival: 80% versus 94% (P < .01). In a multivariable model without reocclusion, combination therapy independently predicted survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.13-1.00) and infarct-free survival (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.28-0.95). When adjusted for reocclusion, combination therapy did not predict outcome. Reocclusion independently predicted death (HR 2.56, 95% CI 1.02-6.43) and reinfarction.

CONCLUSIONS

Moderate-intensity oral anticoagulation added to aspirin improved 8-year clinical outcome after successful fibrinolysis. The beneficial effect was largely attributed to a reduction in reocclusion, which independently predicted death and reinfarction. This study provides a mechanistic rationale for prolonged adjunctive anticoagulation after fibrinolysis.

Anticoagulants in coronary artery disease

Anticoagulant therapy for acute coronary syndromes is becoming more complex as newer agents are added to unfractionated heparin and warfarin. The anticoagulants used in current clinical practice are low molecular weight heparins, direct thrombin inhibitors, and heparinoids. Properties of and recent clinical trial data regarding these newer anticoagulants are reviewed in reference to current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines.