Comparative survival of dialysis patients in the United States after coronary angioplasty, coronary artery stenting, and coronary artery bypass surgery and impact of diabetes

Coronary artery bypass grafting in dialysis patients: a propensity score-matched analysis

BACKGROUND

Patients undergoing dialysis treatment have long been recognized as having an elevated risk of developing coronary artery disease necessitating coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). However, the prognostic implications of CABG in dialysis-dependent patients remain underexplored. This study aimed to comprehensively assess both short- and long-term outcomes in dialysis-dependent patients undergoing CABG.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we meticulously matched 55 dialysis-dependent patients with 55 non-dialysis patients, controlling for baseline characteristics including age, sex, etiology, and date of surgery. All patients underwent CABG treatment at our institution between January 2014 and June 2022. We conducted a comparative analysis of postoperative complications and survival rates between the two groups.

RESULTS

Our findings revealed that the dialysis-dependent group exhibited a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications compared to the non-dialysis group (92.7% vs. 61.8%; p < 0.001). Furthermore, the 5-year survival rates were notably diminished among dialysis patients relative to their non-dialysis counterparts (46.2 ± 7.9% vs. 58.2 ± 12.1%, p = 0.045). Consistently, dialysis patients exhibited decreased 5-year cardiac-event-free rates in contrast to non-dialysis patients (31.6 ± 7.6% vs. 58.8 ± 11.3%, p = 0.041). Predictably, several baseline parameters were identified as significant risk factors contributing to adverse outcomes among dialysis patients, including a history of smoking, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure upon admission, and the requirement for intraoperative concomitant surgery (p = 0.006, p = 0.043, p = 0.017, p = 0.003, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

This study underscores the poorer prognosis associated with CABG treatment in dialysis-dependent patients. Notably, baseline factors such as a smoking history, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure upon admission, and the need for intraoperative concomitant surgery were all independently linked to increased mortality in this patient population.

Impact of coronary-subclavian steal after surgical myocardial revascularization with internal thoracic artery in chronic hemodialysis patients: A meta-analysis

Patients in hemodialysis with an arm arteriovenous fistula undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) with an internal thoracic artery have been reported to suffer from coronary-subclavian steal (CSS) during dialysis session. However, its occurrence is still debated. A systematic literature review was performed to identify all studies investigating the occurrence of a CSS event in this subset of patients. The primary endpoint was the analysis of CSS and the following early and late survival outcomes. Independent determinants of CSS and the impact of the distance between the arteriovenous fistula (upper arm vs forearm) and the ipsilateral internal thoracic artery graft on CSS events and mortality were studied. Early and late survival outcomes were analyzed by comparing ipsilateral versus contralateral arteriovenous fistula. Of the 1,383 retrieved articles, 10 were included (n = 643 patients). The pooled event rate of CSS was 6.46% [95%CI=2.10-18.15], while of symptomatic CSS incidence was 3.99% [95%CI=0.95-15.25]. No survival differences were noted when comparing ipsilateral to contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combinations. On meta-regression, the upper arm was associated with more CSS events, while the forearm to lower late mortality rates. Independently from arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination, CSS was not associated to higher mortality rates. Particular attention is warranted when selecting the type of conduits for CABG in patients with an arteriovenous fistula or if highly expected to need one in the near future after surgery. A contralateral arteriovenous fistula-internal thoracic artery combination is preferable. If this is not possible, a forearm arteriovenous fistula position should be preferred.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With a Drug-Eluting Stent Versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients Receiving Dialysis: A National Study From Taiwan

Rationale & Objective

We aimed to study the comparative effectiveness of percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent and coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving dialysis.

Study Design

This was a retrospective observational cohort study.

Setting & Participants

This population-based study identified patients receiving dialysis hospitalized for coronary revascularization between January 1, 2009 and December 31, 2015, in the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.

Exposures

Patients received percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent versus coronary artery bypass grafting.

Outcomes

The study outcomes were all-cause mortality, in-hospital mortality, and repeat revascularization.

Analytical Approach

Propensity scores were used to match patients. Cox proportional hazards models and logistic regression models were constructed to examine associations between revascularization strategies and mortality. Interval Cox models were fitted to estimate time-varying hazards during different periods.

Results

A total of 1,840 propensity score-matched patients receiving dialysis were analyzed. Coronary artery bypass grafting was associated with higher in-hospital mortality (coronary artery bypass grafting vs percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent; crude mortality rate 12.5% vs 3.3%; adjusted OR, 5.22; 95% CI, 3.42-7.97; P < 0.001) and longer hospitalization duration (median [IQR], 20 [14-30] days vs 3 [2-8] days; P < 0.001). After discharge, repeat revascularization, acute coronary syndrome, and repeat hospitalization all occurred more frequently in the percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent group. Importantly, with a median follow-up of 2.8 years, coronary artery bypass grafting was significantly associated with a higher risk of all-cause overall mortality (adjusted HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 1.05-1.35; P = 0.006) in the multivariable Cox proportional hazard model. Sensitivity and subgroup analyses yielded consistent results.

Limitations

This was an observational study with mainly Asian ethnicity.

Conclusions

Percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent may be associated with better survival than coronary artery bypass grafting in patients receiving dialysis. Future studies are warranted to confirm this finding.

Comparison of revascularization with conservative medical treatment in maintenance dialysis patient with coronary artery disease: a systemic review and meta-analysis

Background

The primary cause of death among maintenance dialysis patients is coronary artery disease (CAD). However, the best treatment plan has not yet been identified.

Methods

The relevant articles were retrieved from various online databases and references from their inception to October 12, 2022. The studies that compared revascularization [percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG)] with medical treatment (MT) among maintenance dialysis patients with CAD were selected. The outcomes evaluated were long-term (with a follow-up of at least 1 year) all-cause mortality, long-term cardiac mortality, and the incidence rate of bleeding events. Bleeding events are defined according to TIMI hemorrhage criteria: (1) major hemorrhage, intracranial hemorrhage or clinically visible hemorrhage (including imaging diagnosis) with decrease of hemoglobin concentration ≥5 g/dl; (2) minor hemorrhage, clinically visible bleeding (including imaging diagnosis) with a drop in hemoglobin of 3-5 g/dl; (3) minimal hemorrhage, clinically visible bleeding with hemoglobin drop <3 g/dl. In addition, revascularization strategy, CAD type, and the number of diseased vessels were considered in subgroup analyses.

Results

A total of eight studies with 1,685 patients were selected for this meta-analysis. The current findings suggested that revascularization was associated with low long-term all-cause mortality and long-term cardiac mortality but a similar incidence rate of bleeding events compared to MT. However, subgroup analyses indicated that PCI is linked to decreased long-term all-cause mortality compared to MT but CABG did not significantly differ from MT in terms of long-term all-cause mortality. Revascularization also showed lower long-term all-cause mortality compared to MT among patients with stable CAD, single-vessel disease, and multivessel disease but did not reduce long-term all-cause mortality among patients with ACS.

Conclusion

Long-term all-cause mortality and long-term cardiac mortality were reduced by revascularization in comparison to MT alone in patients undergoing dialysis. Larger randomized studies are needed to confirm the conclusion of this meta-analysis.

Percutaneous coronary intervention versus coronary artery bypass graft surgery in dialysis-dependent patients: A pooled meta-analysis of reconstructed time-to-event data

OBJECTIVE

Το perform a systematic review with meta-analysis of published data comparing outcomes between a percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in dialysis-dependent patients.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases for studies including dialysis-dependent patients who underwent either CABG or PCI. This meta-analysis follows the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. We conducted one-stage and two-stage meta-analysis with Kaplan-Meier-derived individual patient data for overall survival and meta-analysis with the random-effects model for the in-hospital mortality and repeat revascularization.

RESULTS

Twelve studies met our eligibility criteria, including 13,651 and 28,493 patients were identified in the CABG and PCI arms, respectively. Patients who underwent CABG had overall improved survival compared with those who underwent PCI at the one-stage meta-analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.12, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.16, p < .0001) and the two-stage meta-analysis (HR: 1.15, 95% CI: 1.08-1.23, p < .001, I²  = 30.0%). Landmark analysis suggested that PCI offers better survival before the 8.5 months of follow-up (HR: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.92-0.99, p = .043), while CABG offers an advantage after this timepoint (HR: 1.3, 95% CI: 1.22-1.32, p < .001). CABG was associated with increased odds for in-hospital mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 1.70, 95% CI: 1.50-1.92, p < .001, I²  = 0.0%) and decreased odds for repeat revascularization (OR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.14-0.34, p < .001, I²  = 58.08%).

CONCLUSIONS

In dialysis-dependent patients, CABG was associated with long-term survival but a higher risk for early mortality. The risk for repeat revascularization was higher with PCI.

Coronary revascularisation in patients with chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease: A meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To compare coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for revascularising coronary arteries in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and end-stage renal disease (ESRD). CKD is described as a continuous decrease in the glomerular filtration rate or abnormalities in kidney structure or function.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library and Embase databases were searched for studies on the revascularisation of coronary arteries in patients with CKD and ESRD.

RESULTS

Since no randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have addressed this issue so far, 31 observational studies involving 74 805 patients were included in this meta-analysis. Compared with PCI, patients undergoing CABG have significantly higher early mortality (CKD: RR = 1.62, 95% CI: 1.17-2.25, pheterogeneity = 0.476, I²  = 0; ESRD: RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.46-2.71, pheterogeneity = 0.001, I²  = 66.9%). Patients with ESRD undergoing CABG have significantly lower all-cause mortality (RR = 0.95, 95% CI: 0.93-0.96, pheterogeneity < 0.001, I²  = 82.9%) and cardiac mortality (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.58-0.92, pheterogeneity = 0.908, I²  = 0). The long-term risk of repeat revascularisation (CKD: RR = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.19-0.30, pheterogeneity = 0.489, I²  = 0; ESRD: RR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.15-0.34, pheterogeneity = 0.012, I²  = 54.4%) and myocardial infarction (CKD: RR = .57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.85, pheterogeneity = 0.025, I²  = 49.9%; ESRD: RR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.40-0.44, pheterogeneity = 0.49, I²  = 0) remained significantly higher in the PCI group.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with ESRD, but not CKD, who underwent CABG had significantly lower all-cause mortality and cardiac mortality. However, CABG was associated with an increased risk of early mortality in patients with CKD or ESRD. Adequately powered, contemporary, prospective RCTs are needed to define the optimal revascularisation strategy for patients with CKD and ESRD.

Hemodialysis vascular access affects heart function and outcomes: Tips for choosing the right access for the individual patient

Chronic kidney disease is associated with increased cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. A well-functioning vascular access is associated with improved survival and among the available types of vascular access the arterio-venous (AV) fistula is the one associated with the best outcomes. However, AV access may affect heart function and, in some patients, could worsen the clinical status. This review article focuses on the specific cardiovascular hemodynamics of dialysis patients and how it is affected by the AV access; the effects of an excessive increase in AV access flow, leading to high-output heart failure; congestive heart failure in CKD patients and the contraindications to AV access; pulmonary hypertension. In severe heart failure, peritoneal dialysis (PD) might be the better choice for cardiac health, but if contraindicated suggestions for vascular access selection are provided based on the individual clinical presentation. Management of the AV access after kidney transplantation is also addressed, considering the cardiovascular benefit of AV access ligation compared to the advantage of having a functioning AVF as backup in case of allograft failure. In PD patients, who need to switch to hemodialysis, vascular access should be created timely. The influence of AV access in patients undergoing cardiac surgery for valvular or ischemic heart disease is also addressed. Cardiovascular implantable electronic devices are increasingly implanted in dialysis patients, but when doing so, the type and location of vascular access should be considered.

Optimal treatment strategies for coronary artery disease in patients with advanced kidney disease: a meta-analysis

Background:

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in advanced kidney disease. However, its best treatment has not been determined.

Methods:

We searched PubMed and Cochrane databases and scanned references to related articles. Studies comparing the different treatments for patients with CAD and advanced CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <30 ml/min/1.73 m² or dialysis) were selected. The primary result was all-cause death, classified according to the follow-up time: short-term (<1 month), medium-term (1 month-1 year), and long-term (>1 year).

Results:

A total of 32 studies were selected to enroll 84,498 patients with advanced kidney disease. Compared with medical therapy (MT) alone, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) was associated with low risk of short-, medium-term and long-term all-cause death (more than 3 years). For AMI patients, compared with MT, PCI was not associated with low risk of short- and medium-term all-cause death. For non-AMI patients, compared with MT, PCI was associated with low risk of long-term mortality (more than 3 years). Compared with MT, coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) had no significant advantages in each follow-up period of all-cause death. Compared with PCI, CABG was associated with a high risk of short-term death, but low risk of long-term death: 1–3 years; more than 3 years. CABG could also reduce the risk of long-term risk of cardiac death, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization.

Conclusions:

In patients with advanced kidney disease and CAD, PCI reduced the risk of short-, medium- and long- term (more than 3 years) all-cause death compared with MT. Compared with PCI, CABG was associated with a high risk of short-term death and a low risk of long-term death and adverse events.

Age and diabetes mellitus associated with worse outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in a multi-ethnic Asian dialysis patient population

INTRODUCTION

There is limited literature on clinical outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in Asian dialysis patients. We evaluated the angiographic characteristics and clinical outcomes of dialysis patients treated with PCI in an Asian society.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed of 274 dialysis patients who underwent PCI in a tertiary care institution from January 2007 to December 2012. Data on clinical and angiographic characteristics was collected. The primary endpoint was major adverse cardiac events (MACE), defined as a composite of cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and stroke at two years.

RESULTS

274 patients (65.0% male, median age 62.0 years) with 336 lesions (81.8% Type B2) were treated. 431 stents (35.0% drug-eluting stents) with a mean diameter of 2.96 mm and mean length of 21.30 mm were implanted. The MACE rate was 55.8% (n = 153) at two years, from death (36.5%) and AMI (35.0%). In multivariable analysis, age and diabetes mellitus were significant predictors of both mortality (odds ratio [OR] 1.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.05-1.12, p < 0.001; OR 2.65, 95% CI 1.46-4.82, p = 0.001, respectively) and MACE (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.03-1.08, p < 0.001; OR 1.84, 95% CI 1.07-3.15, p = 0.027, respectively). Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (OR 0.97, 95% CI 0.95-0.99, p = 0.006) was a significant predictor of mortality but not MACE.

CONCLUSION

Asian dialysis patients who underwent PCI had a two-year MACE rate of 55.8% due to death and AMI. Age, LVEF and diabetes mellitus were significant predictors of mortality at two years.

Internal thoracic artery graft ipsilateral to the arteriovenous fistula in haemodialysis patients

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of in situ internal thoracic artery (ITA) grafting ipsilateral to the arteriovenous fistula (AVF) on postoperative outcomes in haemodialysis patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

METHODS

We reviewed 132 haemodialysis patients who underwent isolated CABG between January 2002 and December 2019. With a difference between the left and right upper arms blood pressure measurement of ≥20 mmHg, we did not use the ITA on the lower value side. We categorized patients into 55 patients (41.7%, ipsilateral group) whose left anterior descending artery was revascularized using the in situ ITA ipsilateral to the AVF, and 77 patients (58.3%, contralateral group) whose left anterior descending artery was revascularized using the ITA opposite the AVF. We compared patients' postoperative outcomes after adjusting for their backgrounds using weighted logistic regression analysis and inverse probability of treatment weighting.

RESULTS

No patients developed coronary steal postoperatively, and there was no significant difference in 30-day mortality between the groups (P = 0.353). The adjusted 5-year estimated rates of freedom from all-cause and cardiac death in the ipsilateral vs contralateral groups were 52.3% vs 54.0% and 78.2% vs 88.6%, respectively; survival curves were not statistically significantly different (P = 0.762 and P = 0.229, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

In situ ITA grafting ipsilateral to the AVF was not associated with postoperative early and mid-term worse outcomes in haemodialysis patients undergoing isolated CABG.

Outcomes after drug-coated balloon interventions for de novo coronary lesions in the patients on chronic hemodialysis

The impact of drug-coated balloon (DCB) on hemodialysis (HD) patients with coronary lesions remains unclear. This study aimed to compare outcomes after DCB treatment between HD and non-HD patients with de novo coronary lesions. A total of 235 consecutive patients who electively underwent DCB treatment for de novo coronary lesions were included (HD group: n = 100; non-HD group: n = 135). Angiographic follow-up was performed 6 months after the procedure. Patients were clinically followed up for 2 years. The incidence rates of target lesion revascularization (TLR) and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were investigated. Diabetes and a history of coronary bypass grafting were more frequent in the HD group than in the non-HD group (69.0% vs. 50.7%, p = 0.007, and 24.0% vs 9.1%, p = 0.013, respectively). The reference diameter and pre-procedural diameter stenosis were greater in the HD group than in the non-HD group (2.49 mm vs. 2.24 mm, p = 0.007, and 65.9% vs. 59.6%, p = 0.015, respectively). Calcification was observed in 65.5% of all lesions, and rotational atherectomy was performed in 30.2% patients. The average diameter of the DCB was 2.51 mm (2.57 mm, HD group vs. 2.47 mm, non-HD group, p = 0.14). Although post-procedural diameter stenosis was similar between the groups, late lumen loss on follow-up angiography was larger in HD patients than in non-HD patients (0.27 mm vs. - 0.03 mm, p = 0.0009). The 2-year rates of freedom from TLR and MACE were lower in HD patients than in non-HD patients [79.3% vs. 91.7%, hazard ratio (HR) 2.76, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.23-6.77, p = 0.014; and 61.6% vs. 89.4%, HR 4.60, 95% CI 2.30-10.2, p < 0.001, respectively]. In conclusion, the rates of TLR and MACE after DCB treatment were higher in HD patients than in non-HD patients.

Low-molecular-weight dextran for optical coherence tomography may not be protective against kidney injury in patients with renal insufficiency

BACKGROUND

Low-molecular-weight dextran (LMWD) is considered a safe alternative to contrast media for blood displacement during optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging.

AIM

To investigate whether the use of LMWD for OCT is protective against kidney injury in patients with advanced renal insufficiency.

METHODS

In this retrospective cohort study, we identified 421 patients with advanced renal insufficiency (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 45 mL/min/1.73 m²) who underwent coronary angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention; 79 patients who used additional LMWD for OCT imaging (LMWD group) and 342 patients who used contrast medium exclusively (control group). We evaluated the differences between these two groups and performed a propensity score-matched subgroup comparison.

RESULTS

The median total volume of contrast medium was 133.0 mL in the control group vs 140.0 mL in the LMWD group. Although baseline renal function was not statistically different between these two groups, the LMWD group demonstrated a strong trend toward the progression of renal insufficiency as indicated by the greater change in serum creatinine level during the 1-year follow-up compared with the control group. Patients in the LMWD group experienced worsening renal function more frequently than patients in the control group. Propensity score matching adjusted for total contrast media volume consistently indicated a trend toward worsening renal function in the LMWD group at the 1-year follow-up. Delta serum creatinine at 1-year follow-up was significantly greater in the LMWD group than that in the control group [0.06 (-0.06, 0.29) vs -0.04 (-0.23, 0.08) mg/dL, P = 0.001], despite using similar contrast volume.

CONCLUSION

OCT using LMWD may not be protective against worsening renal function in patients with advanced renal insufficiency.

Outcomes in Dialysis-Dependent Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery at Townsville University Hospital

PURPOSE

Dialysis-dependent patients have a high risk of cardiovascular death but also a high risk for perioperative mortality in cardiac surgery. Our study examined surgical complications and mortality in Indigenous and non-Indigenous dialysis-dependent patients undergoing cardiac surgery at a single centre.

METHODOLOGY

The retrospective study reviewed 72 consecutive dialysis-dependent patients who underwent cardiac surgery between 2008 and 2018. Data was prospectively collected, and follow-up was obtained from physicians and general practitioners. Multivariable analysis was performed to determine predictors of mortality.

RESULTS

The median age of Indigenous Australian patients was 60 years, compared with 65 years for non-Indigenous patients. Indigenous Australian patients had a significantly higher rate of return to theatre (43% versus 17%). The predominant reason for return to theatre for the whole cohort was postoperative bleeding (n=16, 22%). The overall early mortality rate was 10%. There were 35 late deaths (49%) and overall survival at 5 years was 40.92±6.8% (95% CI: 28-54%). History of arrhythmia (p=0.019) was a significant risk factor for mortality, whilst patients who underwent isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (p=0.004), and those who received internal mammary artery grafts (p=0.021) had a reduced hazard ratio for mortality. The median follow-up time was 29 months (IQR 10-52 mo).

CONCLUSION

Dialysis-dependent Indigenous Australian patients present younger for cardiac surgery, with a higher prevalence of co-morbid diabetes and more extensive coronary artery disease. There was no statistically significant difference in early or late mortality between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients. However, there was a higher rate of return to theatre amongst the Indigenous Australian cohort.

Management of acute intradialytic cardiovascular complications: Updated overview (Review)

An increasing number of patients require renal replacement therapy through dialysis and renal transplantation. Chronic kidney disease (CKD) affects a large percentage of the world's population and has evolved into a major public health concern. Diabetes mellitus, high blood pressure and a family history of kidney failure are all major risk factors for CKD. Patients in advanced stages of CKD have varying degrees of cardiovascular damage. Comorbidities of these patients, include, on the one hand, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia and, on the other hand, the presence of mineral-bone disorders associated with CKD and chronic inflammation, which contribute to cardiovascular involvement. Acute complications occur quite frequently during dialysis. Among these, the most important are cardiovascular complications, which influence the morbidity and mortality rates of this group of patients. Chronic hemodialysis patients manifest acute cardiovascular complications such as intradialytic hypotension, intradialytic hypertension, arrhythmias, acute coronary syndromes and sudden death. Thus, proper management is extremely important.

Coronary artery bypass grafting vs. drug-eluting stent implantation in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis

Objectives

To evaluate the optimal revascularization strategy for patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) and end stage renal disease (ESRD) in the drug-eluting stent (DES) era.

Methods

One hundred and twelve patients with ESRD treated with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were enrolled from 2007 to 2017. All patients were dialysis-dependent, of which 26 received CABG and 86 underwent PCI. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were major adverse cardiovascular events including myocardial infarction, stroke, repeat revascularization, and death.

Results

The CABG group had a higher prevalence of left main CAD (57.7% vs. 11.6%, p < .01) compared with PCI group. The short-term (within 30 days after the procedure) risk of death was higher in CABG group compared with PCI group (15.4% vs. 1.2%, p < .05). The two groups exhibited similar rate of primary endpoints (50.0% vs. 40.7%, p = .37) and secondary endpoints (65.4% vs. 60.5%, p = .97) in long-term observation. Multivariate Cox regression showed that patients older than 65 or underwent peritoneal dialysis (PD) had significant higher rate of mortality than those under 65 (HR 2.85; 95% CI 1.20–6.85; p < .05) or underwent hemodialysis (HD) (HR 6.69; 95% CI 2.35–19.05; p < .01).

Conclusions

Among patients with CAD and dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD), treatment with CABG or PCI with DES exhibited similar long-term outcomes. However, CABG was associated with higher short-term risk of death. Higher mortality was revealed in patients over 65 years and underwent PD.

Revascularization Strategies in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Acute Coronary Syndromes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is a highly prevalent condition that increases the incidence and complexity of acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The purpose of this review is to summarize current evidence, uncertainties, and opportunities in the management of patients with CKD and ACS, with a focus on revascularization.

RECENT FINDINGS

Patients with CKD have been systematically under-represented or excluded from clinical trials in ACS. Available data, however, demonstrates that although patients with CKD and ACS benefit from revascularization, they are also less likely to receive recommended medical and revascularization therapies when compared to patients with normal kidney function. Despite the increased short-term risk of major morbidity and mortality, patients with CKD and ACS should be considered for an early invasive strategy while also trying to mitigate the risks of procedural related complications. Until evidence emerges from randomized clinical trials, the decision about revascularization strategy should involve multi-disciplinary collaboration, heart team consensus, and patient shared decision-making.

Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Percutaneous Revascularization, and Surgical Coronary Revascularization in Cardiovascular Risk Subgroups of Patients With CKD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries

RATIONALE & OBJECTIVE

Prior studies suggesting that medical therapy is inferior to percutaneous (percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]) or surgical (coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) coronary revascularization in chronic kidney disease (CKD) have not adequately considered medication optimization or baseline cardiovascular risk and have infrequently evaluated progression to kidney failure. We compared, separately, the risks for kidney failure and death after treatment with PCI, CABG, or optimized medical therapy for coronary disease among patients with CKD stratified by cardiovascular disease risk.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING & PARTICIPANTS

34,385 individuals with CKD identified from a national 20% Medicare sample who underwent angiography or diagnostic stress testing without (low risk) or with (medium risk) prior cardiovascular disease or who presented with acute coronary syndrome (high risk).

EXPOSURES

PCI, CABG, or optimized medical therapy (defined by the addition of cardiovascular medications in the absence of coronary revascularization).

OUTCOMES

Death, kidney failure, composite outcome of death or kidney failure.

ANALYTICAL APPROACH

Adjusted relative rates of death, kidney failure, and the composite of death or kidney failure estimated from Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Among low-risk patients, 960 underwent PCI, 391 underwent CABG, and 6,426 received medical therapy alone; among medium-risk patients, 1,812 underwent PCI, 512 underwent CABG, and 9,984 received medical therapy alone; and among high-risk patients, 4,608 underwent PCI, 1,330 underwent CABG, and 8,362 received medical therapy alone. Among low- and medium-risk patients, neither CABG (HRs of 1.22 [95% CI, 0.96-1.53] and 1.08 [95% CI, 0.91-1.29] for low- and medium-risk patients, respectively) nor PCI (HRs of 1.14 [95% CI, 0.98-1.33] and 1.02 [95% CI, 0.93-1.12], respectively) were associated with reduced mortality compared with medical therapy, but in low-risk patients, CABG was associated with a higher rate of the composite, death or kidney failure (HR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.02-1.53). In high-risk patients, CABG and PCI were associated with lower mortality (HRs of 0.57 [95% CI, 0.51-0.63] and 0.70 [95% CI, 0.66-0.74], respectively). Also, in high-risk patients, CABG was associated with a higher rate of kidney failure (HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16-1.69).

LIMITATIONS

Possible residual confounding; lack of data for coronary angiography or left ventricular ejection fraction; possible differences in decreased kidney function severity between therapy groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes associated with cardiovascular therapies among patients with CKD differed by baseline cardiovascular risk. Coronary revascularization was not associated with improved survival in low-risk patients, but was associated with improved survival in high-risk patients despite a greater observed rate of kidney failure. These findings may inform clinical decision making in the care of patients with both CKD and cardiovascular disease.

Influence of Prior Coronary Stenting on the Immediate and Mid-term Outcome of Isolated Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery

Background

There has been little emphasis on the possible consequences of prior stent placement on the outcome of coronary bypass surgery (CABG). We compared the results of isolated CABG patients who had prior stents with those who had not with respect to preoperative status, operative procedure, and postoperative immediate and long-term outcome.

Methods

Records of 1471 patients undergoing isolated CABG at our institution between January 1, 2000, and March 31, 2005, were reviewed. Patients were divided into three groups. Group I had no stents (n = 1317). Group II had one to three stents (n = 137). Group III had more than three stents (n = 17). Groups were compared with respect to preoperative risk factors, operative procedures, and postoperative results. Long-term survival data were obtained on 97.6% of patients with a mean follow-up, 4.1 ± 2.3 years.

Results

Stented patients were younger (66.1 ± 10.8 vs. 69.1 ± 10.8 years, P = 0.006), had more unstable angina (68.2% vs. 58.9%, P = 0.02), hypercholesterolemia (83.8% vs. 61.2%, P = 0.00), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (13.6% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.03), peripheral vascular disease (15.2% vs. 8.4%, P = 0.00), and previous CABG (10.1% vs. 4.2%, P = 0.00), fewer low ejection fractions (1.3% vs. 5.2%, P = 0.02), left main disease (25.3% vs. 32.6%, P = 0.04), diabetes (31.2% vs. 40.8%, P = 0.01), or diffuse disease (19.5 ± 10.5 vs. 22.5 ± 10.9, P = 0.00), had more off pump procedures (53.2% vs. 45.3%, P = 0.03), fewer internal thoracic artery grafts (80.5% vs. 86.6%, P = 0.03), fewer grafts placed (>3: 52.6% vs. 61.8%, P = 0.02), more complications (76.5% vs. 42.6%, P = 0.005), atrial fibrillation (47.1% vs. 19.7%, P = 0.011), longer hospital stays (12.2 vs. 8.3 days, P = 0.019). Percentage survival for groups I, II, and III at 60 months was 82.1%, 84.7%, and 72.6%, respectively.

Conclusions

Stents placed before surgery in isolated CABG patients may be associated with higher preoperative risk, altered operative procedures, more postoperative complications, longer hospitalizations, and more readmissions. Overall, stented patients experienced more preoperative hospitalizations, catheterizations, and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) than nonstented patients. Survival for those with more than three stents may be diminished.

Safety evaluation and cardiovascular effect of additional use of spironolactone in hemodialysis patients: a meta-analysis

Objective: To evaluate the safety and cardiovascular effect of low-dose spironolactone administration in end-stage renal failure patients undergoing hemodialysis coupled with conventional treatment.

Methods: We conducted a systematic search for clinical trials on the safety and cardiovascular effect of additional low-dose spironolactone in hemodialysis patients. The search was performed on PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and CBM databases. Relevant references (up to February 2016) were retrieved and subsequent results analyzed with a random-effects model or a fixed-effects model.

Results: We identified nine trials with a total sample size of 765 patients. The results did not indicate significant differences regarding safety and serum potassium levels (mean difference [MD]=0.23, P=0.09) between the two treatment options. However, patients receiving low-dose spironolactone exhibited improvements in left venticular mass index (LVMI) (standardized mean difference= –0.58, P<0.00001) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) (MD=4.91, P<0.0001) with an additional decrease in systolic blood pressure (MD= –6.97, P=0.0001) and diastolic blood pressure (MD= –4.01, P=0.007). Furthermore, the clinical (OR=0.4, P=0.0003) or cardiovascular and cerebrovascular-related (OR=0.4, P=0.002) mortality was significantly lower among those patients.

Conclusion: These results indicated that additional use of low-dose spironolactone associated with conventional treatment does not have a significant impact on serum potassium levels in hemodialysis patients. What’s more, it might exert a protective effect on the cardiovascular system by optimizing LVMI, improving LVEF, decreasing arterial blood pressure and reducing events-related mortality. Further large sample size studies are needed to support these findings.

Survival Rate and Predictors of Mortality among Hemodialysis Patients in West of Iran, 1996-2015

Background:

Hemodialysis (HD) is one of the treatments provided to end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. A few studies have investigated the survival rate of HD patients in Iran. Hence, we decided to investigate the survival rate and it is predictors among Iranian ESRD patients.

Methods:

This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in 165 HD patients in Tuyserkan city (Hamadan province) during 20 years from 1996 to 2015. The checklist used to gather information was comprised of patients’ demographic and clinical information. The analysis was performed using Kaplan–Meier curves, log-rank test, and cox regression model.

Results:

The most prevalent cause of ESRD was reported to be high blood pressure (32.7%). The probability of survival rate at the end of 1^st, 5^th, and 10^th year was 0.65, 0.16, and 0.05, respectively. Results of multivariate cox regression showed that old age, catheter vascular access, and high hemoglobin level have a negative significant effect on survival of HD patients (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

Overall, the survival of HD patients seems to be low in Tuyserkan as compared to other studies. Age, ESRD cause, vascular access, marital status, and hemoglobin level among other factors are proved to have a significant effect on survival probability.

Perioperative acute myocardial infarction rate in chronic renal disease patients undergoing orthopedic surgery: Is there any difference between dialyzed and nondialyzed patients?

Background

The incidence of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in healthy patients undergoing noncardiac surgery is <1%. When patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) undergo orthopedic surgery, AMI incidence can be expected to be relatively high. However, data on a population-wide scale is lacking.

Objective

To investigate AMI incidence in patients with CKD (with and without dialysis) undergoing orthopedic surgery.

Design

A population-based study covering the period from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2011.

Setting

Data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database.

Participants

Participants were 219,195 patients with CKD who underwent surgery between January 1, 1997, and December 31, 2011.

Results

AMI occurred in 2,708 participants (1.24%). The AMI incidence rate in the dialyzed group was 1.52%, which was higher than that in the nondialyzed group after propensity score matching. Dialysis (odds ratio [OR]: 1.79; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.62–1.98), male (OR: 1.42; 95% CI: 1.28–1.57), diabetes mellitus (OR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.44–1.80), hyperlipidemia (OR: 1.88; 95% CI: 1.68–2.11), old myocardial infarction (OR: 18.87; 95% CI: 16.26–1.21.90), and cerebral vascular disease (CVA) (OR: 1.29; 95% CI: 1.30–1.47) were all associated with AMI in the patients with CKD.

Conclusions

The AMI risk was higher in the patients with CKD undergoing orthopedic surgery than in the general population, and the dialyzed group had a higher risk of AMI than did the nondialyzed group.

Comparison of Limus-Eluting and Paclitaxel-Eluting Stents for Coronary Intervention in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients have worse adverse cardiovascular outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Clinical outcomes comparing a limus-eluting stent (LES) to a paclitaxel-eluting stent (PES) in patients with CKD remain controversial.A systematic search was conducted using PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library. A pooled odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to calculate original data. We conducted heterogeneity, quality assessment, and publication bias analyses.A total of 17 trials involving 10,724 patients were included. No significant differences were found regarding target vessel revascularization, target lesion revascularization (TLR), stent thrombosis (ST), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and major adverse cardiac events (MACE) between first-generation LES implantation and PES implantation. Second-generation LES implantation was associated with lower rates of all-cause mortality (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.39-0.82; P = 0.003), MACE (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.38-0.97; P = 0.04), and ST (OR, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.77; P = 0.004) compared with PES implantation. In all, the long-term all-cause mortality rate was significantly lower after LES implantation than after PES implantation in patients with CKD (OR, 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66-0.93; P = 0.004). However, second-generation LES implantation resulted in a higher rate of TLR (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.53-3.25; P < 0.001) than PES implantation in dialysis patients.In patients with CKD, first-generation LES and PES implantation had comparable mortality and morbidity. Second-generation LES implantation was superior to PES in reducing long-term mortality, MACE, and ST. However, PES may be more effective than LES in dialysis patients.

Two-dimensional speckle tracking to image ventricular-arterial coupling in uremia

Objective

To study ventricular‐arterial coupling(VAC) in uremic patients by application of two‐dimensional speckle tracing imaging (2DSTI).

Methods

One hundred uremic patients were divided into two groups based on left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): group 1 with LVEF ≥ 5%, and group 2 with LVEF < 55%. Forty healthy subjects were recruited as a control group. Conventional echocardiography was performed; VAC components and myocardial performance index were calculated. Longitudinal strain (LS) of 17 segments was measured using 2DSTI. Mean base (LS_BA), papillary muscle (LS_PM), and apex values (LS_AP) were calculated.

Results

Compared to subjects in the control group and group 1, subjects in group 2 exhibited decreased LV end‐diastolic volume (EDV), end‐systolic volume (ESV), LV mass index (LVMI), and VAC (P < 0.05). EF, fractional shortening (FS), end‐systolic elastance (Ees) were significantly higher in group 2 (P < 0.05). SL_BA, SL_PM, and SL_AP differed significantly among the groups (all P < 0.05). SL_BA, SL_PM, and SL_AP correlated positively with Ees, EF, and FS (all P < 0.05) but negatively with arterial elastance (Ea), VAC, systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), and rate‐pressure product (RPP) (all P < 0.05). Multiple regression analysis revealed that relative wall thickness (RWT), LVMI, LS_AP, and stroke works (SW) were independent predictors of VAC (b′ = −0.443, 0.537, −0.470, and −0.491, all P < 0.05).

Conclusions

In patients with uremia, LV myocardial LS gradually decreased as LV systolic dysfunction decreased. VAC correlated negatively with left ventricular LS, and LS_AP was an independent predictor for VAC.

Risk analysis of dialysis-dependent patients who underwent coronary artery bypass grafting: Effects of dialysis modes on outcomes

Cardiovascular disease is the major morbidity and leading cause of mortality for dialysis-dependent patients. This study aimed to stratify the risk factors and effects of dialysis modes in relation to coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery among dialysis-dependent patients.This retrospective study enrolled dialysis-dependent patients who underwent CABG from October 2005 to January 2015. All data of demographics, medical history, surgical details, postoperative complications, and in-hospital mortality were analyzed, and patients were categorized as those with or without in-hospital mortality and those with preoperative hemodialysis (HD) or peritoneal dialysis (PD).Of 134 enrolled patients, 25 (18.7%) had in-hospital mortality. Multivariate analyses identified that older age [odds ratio (OR): 1.110, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.030-1.197, P = .006], previous stroke history (OR: 5.772, 95% CI: 1.643-20.275, P = .006), PD (OR: 19.607, 95% CI: 3.676-104.589, P < .001), and emergent operation (OR: 8.788, 95% CI: 2.697-28.636, P < .001) were statistically significant risk factors for in-hospital mortality among dialysis-dependent patients with CABG surgery. Patients with PD had a higher in-hospital mortality rate (58.3% vs 14.8%, P < .001) and lower 1-year overall survival (33.3% vs 56.6%, P = .031) than did HD patients. The major in-hospital mortality cause was cardiac events among HD patients and septic shock among PD patients.Among dialysis patients who received CABG, those with older age, previous stroke history, PD, and emergent operation had higher risks. Those with PD were prone to poorer in-hospital outcomes after CABG surgery.

Comparison of coronary artery bypass grafting and drug-eluting stents in patients with chronic kidney disease and multivessel disease: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The optimal revascularization strategy of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) versus percutaneous coronary intervention with drug-eluting stent (PCI-DES) in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and multivessel disease (MVD) remains unclear.

METHODS

Pubmed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library electronic databases were searched from inception until June 2016. Studies that evaluate the comparative benefits of DES versus CABG in CKD patients with multi-vessel disease were considered for inclusion. We pooled the odds ratios from individual studies and conducted heterogeneity, quality assessment and publication bias analyses.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies with 29,246 patients were included (17,928 DES patients; 11,318 CABG). Compared with CABG, pooled analysis of studies showed DES had higher long-term all-cause mortality (OR, 1.22; p<0.00001), cardiac mortality (OR, 1.29; p<0.00001), myocardial infarction (OR, 1.89; p=0.02), repeat revascularization (OR, 3.47; p<0.00001) and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (OR, 2.00; p=0.002), but lower short-term all-cause mortality (OR, 0.33; p<0.00001) and cerebrovascular accident (OR, 0.64; p=0.0001). Subgroup analysis restricted to patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) yielded similar results, but no significant differences were found regarding CVA and MACCE.

CONCLUSIONS

CABG for patients with CKD and MVD had advantages over PCI-DES in long-term all-cause mortality, MI, repeat revascularization and MACCE, but the substantial disadvantage in short-term mortality and CVA. Future large randomized controlled trials are certainly needed to confirm these findings.

Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients

The number of patients requiring hemodialysis is continuously increasing around the world. Hemodialysis affects patient quality of life and it is also associated with a higher risk for cardiovascular events. In addition to traditional risk factors for cardiovascular events such as hypertension, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes, hemodialysis is associated with hyperphosphatemia, chronic inflammation, vascular calcification, and anemia which accelerate atherosclerosis, vascular stiffness, and cardiac ischemia. Treatment strategy for coronary revascularization in this progressive disease remains controversial. However, a systematic treatment including medical therapy and complete revascularization through a less invasive strategy should be considered in addressing this problem. This review discusses the epidemiology, vascular pathology and current treatment options in patients with end-stage renal disease requiring coronary revascularization.

Comparative Efficacy of Coronary Revascularization Procedures for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease in Patients With Chronic Kidney Disease

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at increased risk of cardiovascular disease and death, yet little data exist regarding the comparative efficacy of coronary revascularization procedures in CKD patients with multivessel disease. We created a cohort of 4,687 adults who underwent cardiac catheterization, had a serum creatinine value measured within 30 days, and had more than one vessel with ≥50% stenosis. We used Cox proportional hazard regression modeling weighted by the inverse probability of treatment to examine the association between 4 treatment strategies (medical management, percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI] with bare metal stent, PCI with drug-eluting stent, and coronary artery bypass grafting [CABG]) and mortality among patients across categories of estimated glomerular filtration rate; secondary outcome was a composite of mortality, myocardial infarction, or revascularization. Compared with medical management, CABG was associated with a reduced risk of death for patients of any nondialysis CKD severity (hazard ratio [HR] range 0.43 to 0.59). There were no significant mortality differences between CABG and PCI, except a decreased death risk in CABG-treated CKD patients (HR range 0.54 to 0.55). Compared with medical management and PCI, CABG was associated with a lower risk of death, myocardial infarction, or revascularization in nondialysis CKD patients (HR range 0.41 to 0.64). There were similar associations between decreased estimated glomerular filtration rate and increased mortality across all multivessel coronary artery disease patient treatment groups. When accounting for treatment propensity, surgical revascularization was associated with improved outcomes in patients of all CKD severities. A prospective randomized trial in CKD patients is required to confirm our findings.

Effect of hemodialysis access blood flow on cardiac events after coronary artery bypass grafting using an internal thoracic artery

Background

The possibility of coronary steal through an arteriovenous fistula (AVF) in hemodialysis (HD) patients with coronary artery bypass grafts (CABGs) using an ipsilateral internal thoracic artery (ITA) has been suggested. In order to define the significance of such a possibility, we analyzed cardiac events and mortality risk in patients in relation to AVF flow.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed on prevalent HD patients from a single center. The outcomes included a first cardiac event, cardiac death and death from any cause.

Results

The group consisted of 23 chronic HD patients having ITA CABG and upper extremity AV access, 12 patients had an ipsilateral and 11 patients had a contralateral location of ITA CABG and an upper extremity AV access. The mean follow-up period was for 37.0 months. Multivariable Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis of risk of death from any cause in relation to AV access flow showed no increased risk, neither in the group with ipsilateral location of ITA grafts and dialysis accesses (adjusted HR, 3.047 [95% CI, 0.996 to 1.000], p = 0.081), nor in the group with contralateral location of both shunts (adjusted HR, 0.173 [95% CI, 0.997 to 1.002], p = 0.678). There was no significant correlation between AV access blood flow and the risk of first cardiac event as well as cardiac death in either study group.

Conclusions

In this study on HD patients having ipsilateral ITA CABG and AVF, fistula flow rate was not found to be associated with mortality or cardiac risk.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients with Diabetic Nephropathy and Left Main Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Patients with diabetic nephropathy and unprotected left main (LM) coronary artery disease suffer from high cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Although surgical revascularization is currently recommended in this special patient population, the optimal revascularization method for this distinct patient group has remained unclear.

METHODS

We collected 99 consecutive patients with unprotected LM disease and diabetic nephropathy, including 46 patients who had undergone percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and 53 who had coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), with a mean age of 72 ± 10; with 80.8% male. Diabetic nephropathy was defined as overt proteinuria (proteinuria > 500 mg/day) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) by the modified Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) equation of less than 60 mL/min/1.73 m². The baseline characteristics, angiographic results and long-term clinical outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

The baseline characteristic of all patients were similar except for smokers, low density lipoprotein (LDL) level and extension of coronary artery disease involvement. The median follow-up period was 3.8 years. There were 73 patients (74%) considered as high risk with additive European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) ≥ 6. During follow-up period, the long term rate of all-cause death (PCI vs. CABG: 45.7% vs. 58.5%, p = 0.20) and all-cause death/myocardial infarction (MI)/stroke (PCI vs. CABG: 52.2% vs. 60.4%, p = 0.41) were comparable between the PCI and CABG group, whereas the repeat revascularization rate was significantly higher in the PCI group (PCI vs. CABG: 32.6% vs. 9.4%, p < 0.01). eGFR remained an independent predictor for all-cause death [hazard ratio: 0.97, 95% confidence interval: 0.96 to 0.99; p = 0.002] in multivariate logistic regression.

CONCLUSIONS

In the real-world practice of high-risk patients with unprotected LM disease and diabetic nephropathy, we found that PCI was a comparable alternative to CABG in terms of long-term risks of all-cause death/MI/stroke, with significantly higher repeat revascularization rate. Given the small patient number and retrospective nature, our findings should be validated by larger-scale randomized studies.

Effect of Pretreatment with Omega-3 Supplement on Cardiac Necrosis Markers in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients Undergoing Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Objective:

Studies have demonstrated the direct relation between elevation in cardiac necrosis markers and increased risk of cardiovascular complications after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. In this study, we sought to evaluate the effect of omega-3 on creatine kinase-MB (CK-MB) and troponin-I in CKD patients undergoing elective PCI.

Methods:

Eighty CKD patients, candidate for elective PCI, were randomly assigned into two groups: Group A – receiving omega-3 (2.5 g, 12 h before PCI) plus standard treatment (n = 37) and Group B – control group, receiving only standard therapy (aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 600 mg loading dose and weight-adjusted intravenous heparin) (n = 43). Blood samples were collected before and 24 h after PCI for measuring CK-MB and troponin-I. The primary endpoint was considered to be postprocedural variations of CK-MB and troponin-I levels in both groups. The secondary endpoint was the percentage of pre-procedural myocardial infarction (PMI) occurrence, defined as the elevation of post-PCI troponin-I, between study groups.

Findings:

Both the baseline and 24-h CK-MB were significantly higher in omega-3 group. Although 24-h troponin-I increased less in omega-3-treated arm compared to the control group, no statistically significant variation was observed between the two groups. With regard to PMI occurrence, no significant difference was detected among study groups.

Conclusion:

Despite the beneficial but nonsignificant effects of omega-3 on decreasing post-PCI elevation of troponin-I and PMI occurrence, further investigations with bigger study population, higher doses of omega-3 and longer duration of treatment, and long-term follow-up of patients are required to better test the potential effects of omega-3 in improving clinical outcomes in CKD patients undergoing PCI.

Analysis of the Use of Extracorporeal Circulation on the In-Hospital Outcomes of Dialytic Patients Who Underwent Myocardial Revascularization Surgery

BACKGROUND

Myocardial revascularization surgery is the best treatment for dyalitic patients with multivessel coronary disease. However, the procedure still has high morbidity and mortality. The use of extracorporeal circulation (ECC) can have a negative impact on the in-hospital outcomes of these patients.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the differences between the techniques with ECC and without ECC during the in-hospital course of dialytic patients who underwent surgical myocardial revascularization.

METHODS

Unicentric study on 102 consecutive, unselected dialytic patients, who underwent myocardial revascularization surgery in a tertiary university hospital from 2007 to 2014.

RESULTS

Sixty-three patients underwent surgery with ECC and 39 without ECC. A high prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors was found in both groups, without statistically significant difference between them. The group "without ECC" had greater number of revascularizations (2.4 vs. 1.7; p <0.0001) and increased need for blood components (77.7% vs. 25.6%; p <0.0001) and inotropic support (82.5% vs 35.8%; p <0.0001). In the postoperative course, the group "without ECC" required less vasoactive drugs, (61.5% vs. 82.5%; p = 0.0340) and shorter time of mechanical ventilation (13.0 hours vs. 36,3 hours, p = 0.0217), had higher extubation rates in the operating room (58.9% vs. 23.8%, p = 0.0006), lower infection rates (7.6% vs. 28.5%; p = 0.0120), and shorter ICU stay (5.2 days vs. 8.1 days; p = 0.0054) as compared with the group with ECC surgery. No difference in mortality was found between the groups.

CONCLUSION

Myocardial revascularization with ECC in patients on dialysis resulted in higher morbidity in the perioperative period in comparison with the procedure without ECC, with no difference in mortality though.

Optimal Treatment Strategies in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Coronary Artery Disease

BACKGROUND

Chronic kidney disease is an independent risk factor for coronary artery disease and is associated with an increase in adverse outcomes. However, the optimal treatment strategies for patients with chronic kidney disease and coronary artery disease are yet to be defined.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were searched for studies including at least 100 patients with chronic kidney disease (defined as estimated glomerular filtration rate ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m² or on dialysis) and coronary artery disease treated with medical therapy, percutaneous coronary intervention, or coronary artery bypass surgery and followed for at least 1 month and reporting outcomes. The outcome evaluated was all-cause mortality. Meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the outcomes with revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) when compared with medical therapy alone. In addition, outcomes with percutaneous coronary intervention vs coronary artery bypass surgery were evaluated.

RESULTS

The search yielded 38 nonrandomized studies that enrolled 85,731 patients. Revascularization (percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass surgery) was associated with lower long-term mortality (mean 4.0 years) when compared with medical therapy alone (relative risk [RR] 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62-0.87), driven by lower mortality with percutaneous coronary intervention vs medical therapy and coronary artery bypass surgery vs medical therapy. Coronary artery bypass surgery was associated with a higher upfront risk of death (RR 1.81; 95% CI, 1.47-2.24) but a lower long-term risk of death (RR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.89-0.98) when compared with percutaneous coronary intervention.

CONCLUSIONS

In chronic kidney disease patients with coronary artery disease, the current data from nonrandomized studies indicate lower mortality with revascularization, via either coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention, when compared with medical therapy. These associations should be tested in future randomized trials.

Impact of Chronic Kidney Insufficiency on Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients that Undergo Coronary Revascularization: A Historical Review

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with poorer short and long-term cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. Even after the commencement of haemodialysis in end stage renal failure patients, mortality exceeds 20% in the first year¹. More than 50% of these deaths are contributed by cardiovascular diseases (CVD), of which 20% are caused by acute myocardial infarction². Consequent to these findings, the degree and impact of coronary revascularization on CKD patients represents a clinical challenge, especially in the setting of advanced stages of CKD.