Detrimental ventricular remodeling in patients with congenital complete heart block and chronic right ventricular apical pacing

Risk of Pacemaker Implantation After Aortic Root Replacement With and Without Valve Preservation

BACKGROUND

We compared the outcomes of aortic root replacement by composite valve grafts (CVG) and valve-sparing root replacement (VSRR) operations, with an emphasis on postoperative conduction block and the need for permanent pacemaker implantation (PPM).

METHODS

From 1997 to 2023, 1712 consecutive patients underwent ARR by VSRR (501 [29%]) or CVG (1211 [71%]) at a high-volume aortic center.

RESULTS

Patients undergoing CVG were older (59 ± 14 vs 49 ± 14 years, P < .001), with more cardiovascular comorbidities. Compared with CVG, there were more women undergoing VSRR (17% vs. 13%, P = .042) and more patients with connective tissue disease (22% vs 7.3%, P < .001). Multivariable analysis found that the risk for PPM was higher after CVG compared with VSRR (6.5% vs 1.2%; odds ratio [OR], 2.83; 95% CI, 1.23-7.69; P = .024). Other variables associated with PPM include older age (OR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.01-1.05; P = .006) preoperative renal impairment (OR, 2.69; 95% CI, 1.24-5.6; P = .010), previous operation (OR, 2.76; 95% CI, 1.29-5.62; P = .007), and bicuspid aortic valve (OR, 3.63; 95% CI, 2.13-6.33; P < .001). Among the CVG population, patients who are at increased risk are especially those with some degree of aortic stenosis (OR, 2.06; 95% CI, 1.18-3.61; P = .011). Patients who required PPM had no additive risk for long-term mortality (hazard ratio, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.47-2.17; P = .986); however, they were more likely to have reduced ejection fraction (29.3% vs 16%, P = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of PPM after ARR is low, but rates were higher after CVG compared with VSRR.

Congenital Complete Heart Block-To Stimulate (When?) or Not to Stimulate?

This article presents the case of a 27-year-old female patient with idiopathic congenital complete heart block who does not consent to the implantation of a cardiac pacemaker but was referred by her primary care physician for cardiological evaluation. The conduction disturbance was recognized at the age of 6 and was asymptomatic. The professional disqualification from pacemaker implantation included a detailed history of a patient's symptoms, an echocardiographic assessment of the heart, exercise testing and ECG Holter monitoring. The aid of salbutamol administered orally was also useful.

Longitudinal echocardiographic parameters before and after pacemaker placement in congenital complete heart block

BACKGROUND

Congenital complete heart block (CCHB) is seen in 1:15,000-1:20,000 live births, with risk of left ventricular (LV) dysfunction or dilated cardiomyopathy in 7%-23% of subjects.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate serial changes in LV size and systolic function in paced CCHB subjects to examine the effect of time from pacemaker on echocardiographic parameters.

METHODS

Single-center retrospective cohort analysis of paced CCHB subjects was performed. Echocardiographic data were collected before and after pacemaker placement. Linear mixed effect regression of left ventricular end-diastolic dimension (LVEDD) z-score, left ventricular shortening fraction (LVSF), and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was performed, with slopes compared before and after pacemaker placement.

RESULTS

Of 114 CCHB subjects, 52 had echocardiographic data before and after pacemaker placement. Median age at CCHB diagnosis was 0.6 [interquartile range 0.0-3.5] years; age at pacemaker placement 3.4 [0.5-9.0] years; and pacing duration 10.8 [5.2-13.7] years. Estimated LVEDD z-score was 1.4 at pacemaker placement and decreased -0.08 per year (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.12 to -0.04; P = .002) to 0.2 (95% CI -0.3 to +0.3) 15 years postplacement. Estimated LVSF decreased -1.1% per year (95% CI -1.7% to -0.6%; P <.001) from 6 months prepacemaker placement to 34% (95% CI 32%-37%) 4 years postplacement. There was no significant change in LVSF between 4 and 15 years postplacement. Estimated LVEF did not change significantly after pacemaker placement, with estimated LVEF 59% (95% CI 55%-62%) 15 years postplacement.

CONCLUSION

In 52 paced CCHB subjects, estimated LVEDD z-score decreased significantly after pacemaker placement, and estimated LVSF and LVEF remained within normal limits at 15 years postpacemaker placement.

Pacemaker lead insertion sites contribute to abnormalities of myocardial function and histopathology

BACKGROUND

Ventricular pacing can cause myocardial dysfunction, but how lead anchoring to the myocardium affects function has not been studied.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate patterns of regional and global ventricular function in patients with a ventricular lead using cine cardiac computed tomography (CCT) and histology.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study with 2 groups of patients with a ventricular lead: (1) those who underwent cine CCT from September 2020 to June 2021 and (2) those whose cardiac specimen was analyzed histologically. Regional wall motion abnormalities on CCT were assessed in relation to lead characteristics.

RESULTS

For the CCT group, 122 ventricular lead insertion sites were analyzed in 43 patients (47% female; median age 19 years; range 3-57 years). Regional wall motion abnormalities were present at 51 of 122 lead insertion sites (42%) in 23 of 43 patients (53%). The prevalence of a lead insertion-associated regional wall motion abnormality was higher with active pacing (55% vs 18%; P < .001). Patients with lead insertion-associated regional wall motion abnormalities had a lower systemic ventricular ejection fraction (median 38% vs 53%; P < .001) than did those without regional wall motion abnormalities. For the histology group, 3 patients with 10 epicardial lead insertion sites were studied. Myocardial compression, fibrosis, and calcifications were commonly present directly under active leads.

CONCLUSION

Lead insertion site-associated regional wall motion abnormalities are common and associated with systemic ventricular dysfunction. Histopathological alterations including myocardial compression, fibrosis, and calcifications beneath active leads may explain this finding.

Efficacy of Coronary Sinus Pacing for Cardiogenic Shock Due to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention-induced Sick Sinus Syndrome: Two Case Reports

We herein report two cases of atrial pacing with coronary sinus (CS) pacing performed to improve hemodynamic instability in cardiogenic shock due to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-induced sick sinus syndrome (SSS). Ventricular pacing alone made it difficult to stabilize hemodynamics due to SSS, which had been caused by the lack of reflow and slow flow of the sinus node artery (SNA) jailed with a stent. Adding atrial pacing with CS pacing may be useful, as in our two cases, where ventricular pacing alone was unable to stabilize hemodynamics.

Advancing the science of management of arrhythmic disease in children and adult congenital heart disease patients within the last 25 years

This review article reflects how publications in EP Europace have contributed to advancing the science of management of arrhythmic disease in children and adult patients with congenital heart disease within the last 25 years. A special focus is directed to congenital atrioventricular (AV) block, the use of pacemakers, cardiac resynchronization therapy devices, and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in the young with and without congenital heart disease, Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, mapping and ablation technology, and understanding of cardiac genomics to untangle arrhythmic sudden death in the young.

miR Profile of Chronic Right Ventricular Pacing: a Pilot Study in Children with Congenital Complete Atrioventricular Block

Chronic ventricular pacing can lead to pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM). Clinical data alone is insufficient to predict who will develop PICM. Our study aimed to evaluate the circulating miR profile associated with chronic right ventricular pacing in children with congenital complete AV block (CCAVB) and to identify candidate miRs for longitudinal monitoring. Clinical data and blood were collected from chronically paced children (N = 9) and compared with non-paced controls (N = 13). miR microarrays from the buffy coat revealed 488 differentially regulated miRs between groups. Pathway analysis predicted both adaptive and maladaptive miR signaling associated with chronic pacing despite preserved ventricular function. Greater profibrotic signaling (miRs-92a, 130, 27, 29) and sodium and calcium channel dysregulation (let-7) were seen in those paced > 10 years with the most dyregulation seen in a patient with sudden death vs. those paced < 10 years. These miRs may help to identify early adverse remodeling in this population.

Adverse effects of right ventricular pacing on cardiac function: prevalence, prevention and treatment with physiologic pacing

Right ventricular (RV) pacing is the main treatment modality for patients with advanced atrioventricular (AV) block. Chronic RV pacing can cause cardiac systolic dysfunction and heart failure (HF). In this review, we discuss studies that have shown deleterious effects of chronic RV pacing on systolic cardiac function causing pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PiCM), heart failure (HF), HF hospitalization, atrial fibrillation (AF) and cardiac mortality. RV apical pacing is the most widely used and studied. Adverse effects of RV pacing appear to be directly related to pacing burden and are worse in patients with pre-existing left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Chronic RV pacing is also associated with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). Mechanisms, risk factors, clinical and echocardiographic features, and strategies to minimize RV pacing-induced cardiac dysfunction are discussed in light of the latest data. Studies on biventricular (Bi-V) pacing upgrade in patients who develop RV PiCM, use of alternate RV pacing sites, de novo Bi-V pacing, and physiologic pacing using HIS bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle area (LBBA) pacing in patients with an anticipated high RV pacing burden are discussed.

Outcomes in patients with electrocardiographic left ventricular dyssynchrony following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BACKGROUND

Left bundle branch block (LBBB) and atrioventricular (AV) conduction abnormalities requiring permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation occur frequently following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). The resultant left ventricular (LV) dyssynchrony may be associated with adverse clinical events.

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the adverse outcomes associated with LV dyssynchrony due to high-burden right ventricular (RV) pacing or permanent LBBB following TAVR in patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

METHODS

Consecutive TAVR patients at the University of Michigan from January 2012 to June 2017 were included. Pre-existing cardiac implantable electronic device, previous LBBB, LVEF <50%, or follow-up period <1 year were excluded. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes included cardiomyopathy (defined as LVEF ≤45%), a composite endpoint of cardiomyopathy or all-cause mortality, and the change in LVEF at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 362 patients were analyzed (mean age 77 years). LV dyssynchrony group (n = 91 [25.1%]) included 56 permanent LBBB patients, 12 permanent LBBB patients with PPM, and 23 non-LBBB patients with PPM and high-burden RV pacing. Remaining patients served as control (n = 271 [74.9%]). After adjusted analysis, LV dyssynchrony had significantly higher all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-4.37) and cardiomyopathy (adjusted HR 14.80; 95% CI 6.31-14.69). The LV dyssynchrony group had mean LVEF decline of 10.5% ± 10.2% compared to a small increase (0.5% ± 7.7%) in control.

CONCLUSION

Among TAVR patients with preserved LVEF and normal AV conduction, development of postprocedural LV dyssynchrony secondary to high-burden RV pacing or permanent LBBB was associated with significantly higher risk of death and cardiomyopathy at 1-year follow-up.

Individualised left anterior oblique projection for lead implantation into interventricular septum

Objective

We sought to investigate whether it is possible to obtain individualised left anterior oblique (LAO) by preprocedural electrocardiographic parameters and, if so, whether these parameters can help to improve the success rate of right ventricular (RV) lead implantation into the interventricular septum.

Methods

In this observational study, we assessed the relationship between preoperative electrocardiographic parameters and the angle of the interventricular septum obtained using thoracic CT. The participants were divided into two groups: a retrospective derivation cohort to derive the optimal formula for the individual septum axis, and a prospective internal validation cohort to which we applied the optimal formula and implanted using the new method.

Results

In the retrospective derivation cohort (n=39), the mean angle of individualised LAO assessed by thoracic CT was 53.1°±8.9°, and the preoperative ECG QRS axis was strongly correlated with the interventricular septum axis (R²=0.490). LAO projection derived from the preoperative ECG QRS axis confirmed that the RV lead was placed in the interventricular septum during the pacemaker procedure in the prospective internal validation group (n=30). The success rate for placing the RV lead into the interventricular septum was significantly improved in the internal validation cohort (93% vs 64%, p<0.05). In addition, the N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide level decreased significantly after surgery in the interventricular septal indwelling group.

Conclusions

Individualised LAO angle derived from the preoperative ECG QRS axis is a new useful and simple method for RV lead implantation into the interventricular septum.

Trial registration number

UMIN000045741.

Long-Term Implications of Pacemaker Insertion in Younger Adults: A Single Centre Experience

BACKGROUND

The long-term implications of pacemaker insertion in younger adults are poorly described in the literature.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of consecutive younger adult patients (18-50 yrs) undergoing pacemaker implantation at a quaternary hospital between 1986-2020. Defibrillators and cardiac resynchronisation therapy devices were excluded. All clinical records, pacemaker checks and echocardiograms were reviewed.

RESULTS

Eighty-one (81) patients (median age 41.0 yrs IQR=35-47.0, 53% male) underwent pacemaker implantation. Indications were complete heart block (41%), sinus node dysfunction (33%), high grade AV block (11%) and tachycardia-bradycardia syndrome (7%). During a median 7.9 (IQR=1.1-14.9) years follow-up, nine patients (11%) developed 13 late device-related complications (generator or lead malfunction requiring reoperation [n=11], device infection [n=1] and pocket revision [n=1]). Five (5) of these patients were <40 years old at time of pacemaker insertion. At long-term follow-up, a further nine patients (11%) experienced pacemaker-related morbidity from inadequate lead performance managed with device reprogramming. Sustained ventricular tachycardia was detected in two patients (2%). Deterioration in ventricular function (LVEF decline >10%) was observed in 14 patients (17%) and seven of these patients required subsequent biventricular upgrade. Furthermore, four patients (5%) developed new tricuspid regurgitation (>moderate-severe). Of 69 patients with available long-term pacing data, minimal pacemaker utilisation (pacing <5% at all checks) was observed in 13 (19%) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Pacemaker insertion in younger adults has significant long-term implications. Clinicians should carefully consider pacemaker insertion in this cohort given risk of device-related complications, potential for device under-utilisation and issues related to lead longevity. In addition, patients require close follow-up for development of structural abnormalities and arrhythmias.

Left ventricular systolic motion pattern differs among patients with left bundle branch block patterns

The study aimed to investigate left ventricular (LV) motion pattern in patients with LBBB patterns including patients with pacemaker rhythm (PM), type B Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome (B-WPW), premature ventricular complexes originating from the right ventricular outflow tract (RVOT-PVC), and complete left bundle branch block (CLBBB). Two-dimensional speckle tracking was used to evaluate peak value and time to peak value of the LV twist, LV apex rotation, and LV base rotation in patients with PM, B-WPW, RVOT-PVC, and CLBBB with normal LV ejection fraction, and in age-matched control subjects. The LV motion patterns were altered in all patients compared to the control groups. Patients with PM and CLBBB had a similar LV motion pattern with a reduced peak value of LV apex rotation and LV twist. Patients with B-WPW demonstrated the opposite trend in the reduction of LV rotation peak value, which was more dominant in the basal layer. The most impairment in the LV twist/rotation peak value was identified in patients with RVOT-PVC. Compared to the control group, the apical-basal rotation delay was prolonged in patients with CLBBB, followed by those with B-WPW, PM, and RVOT-PVC. The LV motion patterns were different among patients with different patterns of LBBB. CLBBB and PM demonstrated a reduction in LV twist/rotation that was pronounced in the apical layer, B-WPW showed a reduction in the basal layer, and RVOT-PVC in both layers. CLBBB had the most pronounced LV apical-basal rotation dyssynchrony.

Permanent epicardial pacing in neonates and infants less than 1 year old: 12-year experience at a single center

BACKGROUND

Permanent epicardial pacing is the primary choice for neonates and infants with bradyarrhythmia. We reviewed mid-term outcomes after epicardial permanent pacemaker (EPPM) implantation in this age group.

METHODS

From Dec 1, 2008 to Dec 1, 2019, children who underwent EPPM implantation within the first year of life were included in our study. Patients were followed up for as long as 12 years, until Jun 11, 2021, for all-cause mortality and pacemaker reoperation. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank tests were used for analysis.

RESULTS

Of 31 consecutive patients [18 boys (58.1%) and 2 neonates (6.5%)] included in this study, 30 (96.8%) were discharged alive and assessed at a median follow-up of 3.9 years [interquartile range (IQR) 4.7]. The median age and weight of the patients were 156 days (IQR 217) and 5.3 kg (IQR 3.5), respectively, at the time of their operation. Twenty-five (80.6%) patients had congenital heart disease, and the main indication for pacing was postoperative atrioventricular block (AVB) in 21 (67.7%) patients. During follow-up, 3 (9.7%) patients died and there were a total of 9 pacing lead failures in 7 (22.6%) patients. The median longevity of leads (unipolar steroid-eluting) was 2.9 years (IQR 3.6). Freedom from lead reoperation was 90.3%, 72.0%, 65.5% and 49.1% at 1, 3, 5, and 8 years, respectively. The median longevity of the pacing generators was 3.3 years (IQR 2.8). Freedom from generator reoperation was 90.3%, 75.6%, 52.4% and 43.6% at 1, 3, 5 and 6 years, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The mid-term outcome of EPPM implantation in neonates and infants was acceptable. Neonates and infants with EPPM implants face the risk of repeated reoperations and all-cause death. A patient's prognosis can depend on regular follow-up, type of pacing lead and the presence of congenital heart malformations, especially complex congenital heart disease.

Influence of the right ventricular septum/free-wall boundary (hinge) on differentiation of the ventricular lead implantation site

BACKGROUND

The prognosis associated with right ventricular (RV) free-wall pacing is worse than that of septal pacing. Identification of the pacing site using a 12‑lead electrocardiogram (ECG) is controversial and may be influenced by ECG changes within the same septal or free-wall area. The relationship between the diagnostic capabilities of ECG and pacing sites has previously been qualitatively evaluated. However, in this study, this relationship was analyzed quantitatively, and accurate evaluation of the pacing site was determined using computed tomography (CT).

METHODS

Of 779 consecutive outpatients, 65 who underwent pacemaker implantation and thoracic CT were prospectively included and classified into the following groups according to the lead tip position: free-wall, septal, or septum/free-wall boundary (hinge) group. The hinge was used as an anatomical marker, and the distance from the hinge to the lead tip was measured. Under RV pacing, a 12‑lead ECG was obtained. ECG findings were evaluated using three criteria (including lead I, II, and aV_L and precordial leads V₅ and V₆) previously reported to be useful in differentiating pacing sites.

RESULTS

The lead tips were anchored at the free-wall in 10 patients, the septal wall in 19 patients, and the hinge in 32 patients. Paced QRS duration correlated with the distance from the hinge to the lead tip for the free-wall and septum (r = 0.47 and - 0.68, respectively). Estimation of the lead tip implantation site using the ECG algorithm was useful; however, the algorithm's accuracy decreased around the hinge.

CONCLUSIONS

ECG is useful in differentiating pacing sites but is less accurate around the hinge, which may be the reason that the identification of the RV pacing site using ECG remains controversial.

Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients with Atrioventricular Conduction Disease: A Prospective Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The reported success rate of His bundle pacing (HBP) in patients with infranodal atrioventricular (AV) conduction disease is only 52-76%. The success rate of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in this cohort is not well studied.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and electrophysiological characteristics of LBBAP in patients with AV conduction disease.

METHODS

Patients with AV conduction disease referred for pacemaker implantation at two centers between 02/2019 and 6/2021 were considered for LBBAP. Baseline demographic characteristics, procedural success rates, electrophysiological parameters and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

LBBAP was successful in 340/364 (93%) patients. Mean age was 72±13 years and mean follow-up was 331±244 days. Pacing indications were Mobitz I in 27 patients (7%), Mobitz II or 2:1 AV block or high-grade AV block in 94 patients (26%), complete heart block in 199 patients (55%) and sick sinus syndrome with isolated bundle branch block in 44 patients (12%). LBBB and RBBB were present in 57 patients (16%) and 140 patients (38%) respectively. Procedural success rates did not differ between indications (92.6%, 93.6%, 92.9% and 95% respectively) or between patients with narrow (<120ms) versus wide QRS (≥120ms). Mean LBBAP threshold was 0.77±0.34V at 0.4ms at implant and remained stable during follow-up. There were 4 (1.2%) acute LBBAP lead dislodgements.

CONCLUSIONS

LBBAP is safe and feasible with high success rates for patients with AV conduction disease. Contrary to HBP, LBBAP success rates remain high over the entire spectrum of AV conduction disease and lead parameters remain stable during follow-up.

Preliminary study on left bundle branch area pacing in children:clinical observation of 12 cases

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and feasibility of left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in children.

METHODS

This study observed 12 children attempted LBBAP from January 2019 to January 2021 in the department of pediatric cardiology of Anzhen Hospital prospectively.Clinical data, pacing parameters, electrocardiograms, intracardiac electrograms, echocardiographic measurements and complications were recorded at implant and during follow-up.

RESULTS

The 12 patients aged between 3 and 14 years old and weighted from 13 to 48kg. Eleven patients were diagnosed with third-degree atrioventricular block and 1 patient (case 4) suffered from cardiac dysfunction due to right ventricular apical pacing (RVAP). Left bundle branch area pacing was successfully achieved in all patients with narrow QRS complexes and V₁ lead showed changes like right bundle branch block in the pacing electrocardiogram. Left ventricular ejection fraction in case 4 recovered on the 3rd day after LBBAP. The median of left ventricular end diastolic diameter Z score of the 12 patients decreased from 1.75 to1.05 3 months after implantation (p<0.05). The median of paced QRS duration was 103ms. The median of pacing threshold, R-wave amplitude and impedance were 0.85V, 15mV and 717Ω respectively and remained stable during follow-up. No complications such as loss of capture, lead dislodgement or septal perforation occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Left bundle branch area pacing can be performed safely in children with narrow QRS duration and stable pacing parameters. Cardiac dysfunction caused by long-term RVAP can be corrected by LBBAP quickly. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Clinical Outcomes of Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Comparison with Right Ventricular Septal Pacing in Patients with High Ventricular Pacing Ratio ≥40%

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

The Physiologic Mechanisms of Paced QRS Narrowing During Left Bundle Branch Pacing in Right Bundle Branch Block Patients

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a physiological pacing technique that captures the left bundle branch (LBB) directly, causing the left ventricle (LV) to be excited earlier than the right ventricle (RV), resulting in a “iatrogenic” right bundle branch block (RBBB) pacing pattern. Several studies have recently shown that permanent LBBP can completely or partially narrow the wide QRS duration of the intrinsic RBBB in most patients with bradycardia, although the mechanisms by which this occurs has not been thoroughly investigated. This article presents a review of the LBBP in patients with intrinsic RBBB mentioned in current case reports and clinical studies, discussing the technique, possible mechanisms, future clinical explorations, and the feasibility of eliminating the interventricular dyssynchronization accompanied with LBBP.

His Bundle pacing for congenital complete AV block: An attempt to fix a broken heart?

Congenital complete atrioventricular block (CCAVB) is usually due to failure of atrioventricular nodal conduction with preservation of the His‐Purkinje system. Most patients with CCAVB ultimately require pacemaker therapy to restore physiologic heart rates, dealing with the detrimental effects of chronic right ventricular (RV) pacing on cardiac structure and function. The ideal stimulation pattern aims to mimic the normal conduction to restore electromechanical coupling, preventing the harmful effects of lack of atrioventricular and inter‐intraventricular synchrony. This can be done through conduction system pacing. Using His bundle pacing (HBP) for cardiac resynchronization therapy in two complete congenital atrioventricular block patients, we have reported better exercise tolerance and echocardiographic improvements related to reversible left ventricular dysfunction that can be corrected by restoration of the normal activation pathway via the His‐Purkinje network.

Incidence of Morbidity and Mortality in a Cohort of Congenital Complete Heart Block Patients Followed Over 40 Years

BACKGROUND

Congenital Complete Heart Block (CCHB), seen in 1:15,000-20,000 births, commonly requires pacemaker placement by young adulthood. There is limited understanding of cardiac morbidity and mortality.

OBJECTIVE

Determine long-term incidence of cardiac morbidity and mortality in subjects with CCHB and identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

Retrospective cohort analysis of subjects with CCHB at Children's Hospital of Philadelphia between 1976-2018. The primary outcome is a composite of death, left ventricular systolic dysfunction, heart failure, cardiomyopathy, or cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). Cox proportional hazard models assessed independent risk factors for the primary outcome and its components (death, heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy, CRT).

RESULTS

One-hundred-fourteen subjects (58% female, median age at last visit 15.2 years) were included. Eighty-eight (77%) underwent pacemaker implantation, with median age at placement 1.9 years (IQR, 0.1-8.0 years). Twenty-six subjects (23%) reached the primary outcome - 7 (6%) died and 14 (12%) were diagnosed with heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy. Median time from diagnosis to primary outcome was 3.1 years (IQR, 0.0-10.8 years). There were no significant associations between age at diagnosis less than 1-year (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.5, 95% CI 0.6-3.9), fetal diagnosis (HR: 2.3, 0.96-5.6), or maternal antibody positivity (HR: 2.4, 0.9-6.6) and the primary outcome. Fetal diagnosis had a higher associated hazard of heart failure and/or cardiomyopathy (HR: 4.5, 1.3-15.0).

CONCLUSION

In 114 subjects with CCHB, 23% reached the composite outcome of cardiac morbidity and mortality, with no significant association between age at diagnosis, fetal diagnosis, and maternal antibody status with composite cardiac morbidity and mortality.

Angiography-guided mid/high septal implantation of ventricular leads in patients with congenital heart disease

BACKGROUND

Conduction system pacing prevents pacing-induced cardiomyopathy, but it can be challenging to perform in patients with congenital heart disease (CHD), and mid/high septal lead implantation is an alternative. This study aimed to assess intraprocedural angiography's utility as a guide for mid/high-septal lead implantation in CHD patients.

METHODS

The study subjects were CHD patients with Class I/IIa indications for permanent pacemaker implantation. To guide septal lead implantation, we performed an intraprocedural right ventricular angiogram in anteroposterior, 40° left anterior oblique, and 30° right anterior oblique. The primary endpoint was the lead tip in the mid/high septum on computed tomography (CT). The secondary endpoints were complications and systemic ventricular function on follow-up.

RESULTS

From January 2008 to December 2018, we enrolled 27 patients (mean age: 30 ± 20 years; M:F 17:10) with CHD (unoperated: 20, operated: 7). The mean paced QRS duration was 131.7 ± 5.8 ms, and CT done in 22/27 patients confirmed the lead tip in the mid-septum in 16, high septum in 5, and apical septum in 1 patient. There were no procedural complications, and during a mean follow-up of 58 ± 35.2 months, there was no significant change in the systemic ventricular ejection fraction (56.4 ± 8.3% vs 53.9 + 5.9%, P = .08). Two patients with Eisenmenger syndrome died because of refractory heart failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraprocedural angiography is safe and useful to guide mid/high-septal lead implantation in CHD patients. Mid/high septal lead position preserves systemic ventricular function in patients with CHD during medium-term follow-up.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients: Developed in collaboration with and endorsed by the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC) Endorsed by the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS)

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

2021 PACES expert consensus statement on the indications and management of cardiovascular implantable electronic devices in pediatric patients

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consensus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology (ACC), and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate CIED follow-up in pediatric patients.

Impact of conduction disturbances on left ventricular mass regression and geometry change following transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Our study aimed to compare the difference of LV mass regression and remodeling in regard of conduction disturbances (CD) following transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). A prospective analysis of 152 consecutive TAVR patients was performed. 53 patients (34.9%) had CD following TAVR, including 30 (19.7%) permanent pacemaker implantation and 23 (15.2%) new left bundle branch block. In 123 patients with 1-year follow-up, significant improvement of LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (baseline vs 12-month: 65.1 ± 13.2 vs 68.7 ± 9.1, P = 0.017) and reduced LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) (39.8 ± 25.8 vs 34.3 ± 17.1, P = 0.011) was found in non-CD group (N = 85), but not in CD group (N = 38). Both groups had significant decrease in LV mass index (baseline vs 12-month: 148.6 ± 36.9 vs. 136.4 ± 34.7 in CD group, p = 0.023; 153.0 ± 50.5 vs. 125.6 ± 35.1 in non-CD group, p < 0.0001). In 46 patients with 3-year follow-up, only non-CD patients (N = 28) had statistically significant decrease in LV mass index (Baseline vs 36-month: 180.8 ± 58.8 vs 129.8 ± 39.1, p = 0.0001). Our study showed the improvement of LV systolic function, reduced LVESV and LV mass regression at 1 year could be observed in patients without CD after TAVR. Sustained LV mass regression within 3-year was found only in patients without CD.

2021 PACES Expert Consensus Statement on the Indications and Management of Cardiovascular Implantable Electronic Devices in Pediatric Patients

In view of the increasing complexity of both cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) and patients in the current era, practice guidelines, by necessity, have become increasingly specific. This document is an expert consensus statement that has been developed to update and further delineate indications and management of CIEDs in pediatric patients, defined as ≤21 years of age, and is intended to focus primarily on the indications for CIEDs in the setting of specific disease categories. The document also highlights variations between previously published adult and pediatric CIED recommendations and provides rationale for underlying important differences. The document addresses some of the deterrents to CIED access in low- and middle-income countries and strategies to circumvent them. The document sections were divided up and drafted by the writing committee members according to their expertise. The recommendations represent the consensus opinion of the entire writing committee, graded by class of recommendation and level of evidence. Several questions addressed in this document either do not lend themselves to clinical trials or are rare disease entities, and in these instances recommendations are based on consenus expert opinion. Furthermore, specific recommendations, even when supported by substantial data, do not replace the need for clinical judgment and patient-specific decision-making. The recommendations were opened for public comment to Pediatric and Congenital Electrophysiology Society (PACES) members and underwent external review by the scientific and clinical document committee of the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the science advisory and coordinating committee of the American Heart Association (AHA), the American College of Cardiology, (ACC) and the Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC). The document received endorsement by all the collaborators and the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), the Indian Heart Rhythm Society (IHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS). This document is expected to provide support for clinicians and patients to allow for appropriate CIED use, appropriate CIED management, and appropriate follow-up in pediatric patients.

The electrocardiogram characteristics and pacing parameters of permanent left bundle branch pacing: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Recent advances in conduction system pacing have led to the use of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP), which has potential advantages over His bundle pacing (HBP). For example, LBBP engages the electrical activation through the left bundle branch, produces ventricular electrical synchrony, and avoids the weakness of HBP such as lead instability, higher threshold, and early battery depletion. This pacing modality has been considered an attractive mode to achieve normal physiological pacing. However, as a new technology, LBBP is still in the stage of clinical exploration and lacks adequate evaluation. This study aims to investigate the electrocardiogram characteristics, pacing parameters, the safety, and the effectiveness of LBBP.

METHODS

A computerized search of PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library for the effects of LBBP was done. The baseline characteristics of patients, successful rate of implantation, capture threshold, R-wave amplitude, pacing impedance, QRS duration, and follow-up date were extracted and summarized.

RESULTS

Thirteen studies including 712 patients were included in this analysis. The overall successful rate for implantation was 92.9%. The main indications for LBBP were atrioventricular block (AVB), sinus node dysfunction (SND), atrial fibrillation (AF) with slow ventricular rate, and cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) candidates. For patients with QRS duration>120 ms, permanent LBBP resulted in narrower QRS duration compared to that before implantation (P = 0.05). QRS duration and capture threshold of LBBP remained stable during follow-up. Moreover, there was higher R-wave amplitude and lower pacing impedance at follow-up compared to those at implantation (P = 0.01 and P < 0.00001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Permanent LBBP has shown promising results for pacemaker-indicated patients in small observational studies. Good electrical synchronization, high success rates, and stable pacemaker lead parameters suggested significant advantages of LBBP in physiological pacing. Randomized controlled trials are needed to assess the efficacy of LBBP in patients.

The feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing vs. right ventricular pacing after mid-long-term follow-up: a single-centre experience

AIMS

The aim of this study is to prospectively assess the feasibility and safety of left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) when compared with right ventricular pacing (RVP) during mid-long-term follow-up in a large cohort.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Patients (n = 554) indicated for pacemaker implantation were prospectively and consecutively enrolled and were non-randomized divided into LBBP group and RVP group. The levels of cTnT and N-terminal pro-B type natriuretic peptide were measured and compared within 2 days post-procedure between two groups. Implant characteristics, procedure-related complications, and clinical outcomes were also compared. Pacing thresholds, sensing, and impedance were assessed during procedure and follow-up. Left bundle branch pacing was feasible with a success rate of 94.8% with high incidence of LBB potential (89.9%), selective LBBP (57.8%), and left deviation of paced QRS axis (79.7%) with mean Sti-LVAT of 65.07 ± 8.58 ms. Paced QRS duration was significantly narrower in LBBP when compared with RVP (132.02 ± 7.93 vs. 177.68 ± 15.58 ms, P < 0.0001) and the pacing parameters remained stable in two groups during 18 months follow-up. cTnT elevation was more significant in LBBP when compared with RVP within 2 days post-procedure (baseline: 0.03 ± 0.03 vs. 0.02 ± 0.03 ng/mL, P = 0.002; 1 day post-procedure: 0.13 ± 0.09 vs. 0.04 ± 0.03 ng/mL, P < 0.001; 2 days post-procedure: 0.10 ± 0.08 vs. 0.03 ± 0.08 ng/mL, P < 0.001). The complications and cardiac outcomes were not significantly different between two groups.

CONCLUSION

Left bundle branch pacing was feasible in bradycardia patients associated with stable pacing parameters during 18 months follow-up. Paced QRS duration was significantly narrower than that of RVP. Though cTnT elevation was more significant in LBBP within 2 days post-procedure, the complications, and cardiac outcomes were not significantly different between two groups.

Chronology of cardiac dysfunction after permanent pacemaker implantation: an observational 2 year prospective study in North India

Background

The purpose of this study is to evaluate cardiac functions using transthoracic echocardiography, change in lead parameters and electrocardiogram (ECG) morphology in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation over a follow-up period of 6 months.

Methods

This is a prospective study in patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation in a tertiary care hospital. Patients undergoing permanent pacemaker implantation were enrolled for up to one year and Echocardiographic parameters (by 2 blind operators) and ECG parameters were recorded at admission (within 24 h), before discharge (within 7 days of pacemaker implantation), after 1 month (± 7 days) and after 6 months (± 7 days) of follow-up.

Results

A total of 96 patients (60.4% males and 39.6% female, mean age 66.65 years) were implanted with permanent pacemaker. The mean QRS duration was 133.18 ms and increased significantly to 146.03 ms by 6 months despite septal lead placement in majority (92%) of patients. The mean baseline ejection fraction of 51.47 decreased significantly to 47.83 by 6 months. Diastolic parameters like left atrial volume index, early to late diastolic transmitral flow velocity (E/A) and early diastolic mitral annular tissue velocity (E/e′) showed a significant increase (> 5%) from baseline by the end of first week. By the end of first month, systolic dysfunction of RV sets in with significant (> 5%) change from baseline in parameters like Right ventricle myocardial performance index, transannular plane systolic excursion and right ventricle systolic excursion velocity (RVS′).

Conclusion

We have observed that pacemaker recipients with baseline reduced left ventricle (LV) systolic functions perform significantly worse compared to those with baseline normal cardiac functions and had a higher rate of deterioration of LV function. RV dysfunction is the first abnormality that occurs, by 1 week followed by LV dysfunction which starts by 1 month and the diastolic dysfunctions precede the systolic dysfunction. QRS duration also showed a gradual increase despite septal lead placement in majority (92%) and lead parameters showed no significant change over 6 months.

Permanent His Bundle Pacing in Patients With Congenital Complete Heart Block: A Multicenter Experience

OBJECTIVES

This study retrospectively assessed the safety and efficacy of permanent His bundle pacing (HBP) in patients with congenital complete heart block (CCHB).

BACKGROUND

HBP has become an accepted form of pacing in adults. Its role in CCHB is not known.

METHODS

Seventeen patients with CCHB who underwent successful HBP were analyzed at 6 academic centers between 2016 and 2019. Nine patients had de novo implants, and 8 patients had previous right ventricular (RV) leads. Three RV paced patients had reduced left ventricular ejection fractions at the time of HBP. Implant/follow-up device parameters, New York Heart Association functional class, QRS duration, and left ventricular ejection fraction data were analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients' mean age was 27.4 ± 11.3 years, 59% were women, and mean follow-up was 385 ± 279 days. The following parameters were found to be statistically significant between implant and follow-up, respectively: impedance, 602 ± 173 Ω versus 460 ± 80 Ω (p < 0.001); and New York Heart Association functional class, 1.7 ± 0.9 versus 1.1 ± 0.3 (p = 0.014). In patients with previous RV pacing, HBP resulted in a significant decrease in QRS duration: 167.1 ± 14.3 ms versus 118.3 ± 13.9 ms (p < 0.0001). In de novo implants, HBP resulted in increases in QRS duration compared with baseline: 111.1 ± 19.4 ms versus 91.0 ± 4.8 ms (p = 0.016). Other parameters exhibited no statistically significant differences. During follow-up, 2 patients required lead revision due to elevated pacing thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

HBP seems to be safe and effective, with improvement in clinical outcomes in patients with CCHB. Larger studies with longer follow-up periods are required to confirm our findings.

Cardiac resynchronization therapy improves the ventricular function of patients with Fontan physiology

Past studies have not detected consistent improvement in ventricular function (VFxn) following initiation of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) in Fontan patients. However, these studies used qualitative assessments of VFxn and/or quantitative assessments of VFxn that rely upon anatomic and/or geometric assumptions that may not be valid in patients with single ventricles. To address this, we used quantitative indices of global VFxn (dP/dt_ic and the Tei index) that are not encumbered by the limitations associated with the indices used in previous studies of CRT in Fontan patients.

METHODS

Patients with Fontan physiology who had received CRT therapy from 2004 to 2019 were included in the study. They were compared to a concurrent group of Fontan patients who had received standard dual-chamber pacemakers (DCPMs).

RESULTS

VFxn was assessed at 3 time points: prior to, shortly after, and late after initiation of pacemaker therapy. Prior to initiation of pacemaker therapy, VFxn of the CRT patients tended to be worse than that of the DCPM patients. For both groups, VFxn appeared to be stable or slightly improved shortly after initiation of pacemaker therapy. In the CRT group, VFxn improved significantly between early and late follow-up. In contrast, VFxn in DCPM patients tended to decline during this period. Changes in VFxn correlated with concurrent changes in New York Heart Association classification.

CONCLUSIONS

Quantitative assessments of VFxn using indices not confounded by complex cardiac anatomy, segmental wall motions abnormalities, or inappropriate geometric assumptions revealed that CRT in Fontan patients is associated with preservation or improvement VFxn compared to standard DCPM. Changes in VFxn correlate with concurrent changes in New York Heart Association classification.

Cardiac Conduction Defects in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

Systemic autoimmune conditions may cause morbidity and mortality. Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a prominent example of such diseases. It can result in conduction abnormalities due to accelerated atherosclerosis, vasculitis, or autoantibodies-induced myocarditis. Cardiac conduction abnormalities may produce sinus tachycardia, sinus bradycardia, prolonged QT intervals, atrial fibrillation, or atrioventricular (AV) nodal blocks. Neonatal lupus is sometimes associated with anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies, but their role remains a matter of controversy in adults.

Right ventricular septal pacing via transmural approach for resynchronization in a child with postoperative heart block

An infant with transposition of the great arteries was paced for postoperative heart block (single-site, right ventricular [RV] epicardial). She developed severe left ventricular (LV) dysfunction and septal dyskinesis. Resynchronization was performed at the age of 4 with an LV epicardial lead and an RV septal endocardial lead. The endocardial lead was affixed to the interventricular septum, then tunneled through the RV free wall and attached to an abdominal pulse generator. QRS duration decreased (176 to 122 ms) and LV ejection fraction improved (26 to 61%) and remained stable for 8 years. We present a case of successful resynchronization in congenital heart disease using a transmural RV septal lead.

Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in a typical outpatient pacemaker cohort

Background

Right ventricular (RV) pacing is the standard treatment for symptomatic bradycardia. RV pacing is known to cause dyssyncrony. New treatment options like His bundle pacing enhance the focus on left ventricular dysfunction in patients with pacemakers.

Objectives

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to obtain a real-life picture of the patients in a representative cohort of outpatients with permanent pacemakers. The prevalence and causes of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) were explored.

Methods

In total, 1869 patients of a pacemaker outpatient clinic were screened for left ventricular systolic dysfunction by transthoracic echocardiography. All patients were interviewed for symptoms and cardiologist care. Percentages of RV pacing and underlying cardiac disease were recorded.

Results

A left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) under 45% was found in 207 (11.1%) of all patients. Predictive factors for a reduced LVEF were a high pacing rate and long-term pacing. LVD due to RV pacing was diagnosed in 3.4% of all patients. Only 845 patients (45%) reported that they regularly visited a cardiologist.

Conclusion

There is a high prevalence of unknown LVD in a typical pacemaker cohort. Therefore, regular echocardiographic examinations should be performed in outpatients of pacemaker clinics.

Short-term and intermediate-term performance and safety of left bundle branch pacing

Introduction

Left bundle branch pacing (LBBP) is a promising new method for patients with pacing indications. This study aims to evaluate the safety and feasibility of LBBP in a relatively longer time span.

Methods and Results

A total of 164 patients were recruited for LBBP in this study. Among these patients, 148 patients had pacing indications due to symptomatic bradycardia while the other 16 patients had indications for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT). LBBP was successful in 89.0% (146/164) of all recruited patients. Intracardiac and surface electrographic parameters and image data were documented during the LBBP procedure. The mean paced QRS duration (pQRSD) and the mean stimulus to left ventricular activation time (stim‐LVAT) was 106.0 ± 12.9 ms and 64.4 ± 13.7 ms respectively. Left bundle branch (LBB) potentials were recorded in 89 patients. Forty‐three of whom had sick sinus syndrome (SSS), and 46 had atrioventricular block (AVB). The presence of LBB potential was more common in patients with SSS (82.7% vs 57.5%, P = .002). No significant differences in pQRSD, stim‐LVAT, or capture threshold were detected between patient groups with or without LBB potential. Patients were followed up at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year after the procedure. Pacing parameters and the echocardiographic data remained stable within a mean follow‐up period of 8.6 ± 4.3 months. No serious complication caused by this procedure was found in this study.

Conclusions

Successful LBBP carried an aspect of short pQRSD and stim‐LVAT while the LBB potential was not the prerequisite and necessary feature. The LBBP procedure had a high success rate with satisfied and stable lead parameters during short and intermediate‐term observations.

Evolution of ventricular function in children with permanent right ventricular pacing after tetralogy of Fallot repair: A midterm follow-up

OBJECTIVE

We aim to evaluate the midterm effect of chronic apical right ventricular (RV) pacing on right and left ventricular (LV) function using different modalities of echocardiography including conventional echocardiography, tissue Doppler imaging and two-dimension speckle tracking echocardiography.

METHODS

This case-control study enrolled 49 patients divided into two groups: a paced group and a nonpaced group. The paced group included 23 patients that underwent tetralogy of Fallot (TOF) repair and required permanent pacemaker insertion for postoperative complete heart block. The nonpaced group included 26 patients that had TOF repair at the same period.

RESULTS

The median age for the paced and nonpaced groups was 6 and 8 years, respectively (P = .169). The follow-up duration after TOF surgical repair was 4 years for the paced patients and 5 years for nonpaced patients (P = .411). In the nonpaced group, the QRS duration increased and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) decreased significantly with increasing duration after TOF repair, P value was .006 and .042, respectively. In the paced group, tricuspid annular systolic plane excursion (TAPSE) was significantly correlated with age (r = .578; P = .004) and duration following TOF correction (r = .724; P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Chronic RV apical pacing in children after TOF repair was associated with better clinical status, preservation of RV systolic function, and prevention of progressive QRS prolongation. RV pacing was not associated with progressive deterioration of LV systolic function with increasing the time interval following TOF repair. Therefore, RV pacing can be beneficial in corrected TOF patients presenting with RV failure.

Antegrade Conduction Rescues Right Ventricular Pacing-Induced Cardiomyopathy in Complete Heart Block

BACKGROUND

Right ventricular (RV) pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) occurs in ∼30% of patients with RV leads. This study evaluated the long-term effects of restoring antegrade conduction with a biological pacemaker in a porcine model of RV PICM.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this study was to determine if antegrade biological pacing can attenuate RV PICM.

METHODS

In pigs with complete atrioventricular (AV) block, transcription factor T-box 18 (TBX18) was injected into the His bundle region in either of 2 experimental protocols: protocol A sought to prevent PICM, and protocol B sought to reverse PICM. In protocol A, we injected adenoviral vectors expressing TBX18 (or the reporter construct green fluorescent protein) after AV node ablation, and observed the animals for 8 weeks. In protocol B, PICM was established by using AV node ablation and 4 weeks of electronic RV pacing, at which point TBX18 was injected into the His bundle region.

RESULTS

In protocol A, TBX18 biological pacing led to superior chronotropic support (62.4 ± 3 beats/min vs. 50.4 ± 0.4 beats/min; p = 0.01), lower backup pacemaker utilization (45 ± 2.6% vs. 94.6 ± 1.4%; p = 0.001), and greater ejection fraction (58.5 ± 1.3% vs. 46.7 ± 2%; p = 0.001). In protocol B, full-blown RV PICM was evident 4 weeks after complete AV block in both groups; subsequent intervention led to higher mean heart rate (56 ± 2 beats/min vs. 50.1 ± 0.4 beats/min; p = 0.05), less backup pacemaker utilization (53 ± 8.2% vs. 95 ± 1.6%; p = 0.003), and a greater ejection fraction (61.7 ± 1.3% vs. 49 ± 1.6%; p = 0.0003) in TBX18-injected animals versus control animals.

CONCLUSIONS

In a preclinical model, pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy can be prevented, and reversed, by restoring antegrade conduction with TBX18 biological pacing.