Generation of anti-hirudin antibodies in heparin-induced thrombocytopenic patients treated with r-hirudin

ErpY-like Protein Interaction with Host Thrombin and Fibrinogen Intervenes the Plasma Coagulation through Extrinsic and Intrinsic Pathways

The survival and proliferation of pathogenic Leptospira within a host are complex phenomena that require careful consideration. The ErpY-like lipoprotein, found on the outer membrane surface of Leptospira, plays a crucial role in enhancing the bacterium's pathogenicity. The rErpY-like protein, in its recombinant form, contributes significantly to spirochete virulence by interacting with various host factors, including host complement regulators. This interaction facilitates the bacterium's evasion of the host complement system, thereby augmenting its overall pathogenicity. The rErpY-like protein exhibits a robust binding affinity to soluble fibrinogen, a vital component of the host coagulation system. In this study, we demonstrate that the rErpY-like protein intervenes in the clotting process of the platelet-poor citrated plasma of bovines and humans in a concentration-dependent manner. It significantly reduces clot density, alters the viscoelastic properties of the clot, and diminishes the average clotting rate in plasma. Furthermore, the ErpY-like protein inhibits thrombin-catalyzed fibrin formation in a dose-dependent manner and exhibits saturable binding to thrombin, suggesting its significant role in leptospiral infection. These findings provide compelling evidence for the anticoagulant effect of the ErpY-like lipoprotein and its significant role in leptospiral infection.

Robo4 is constitutively shed by ADAMs from endothelial cells and the shed Robo4 functions to inhibit Slit3-induced angiogenesis

Roundabout 4 (Robo4) is a transmembrane receptor that expresses specifically in endothelial cells. Soluble Robo4 was reported in the human plasma and mouse serum and is inhibitory towards FGF- and VEGF-induced angiogenesis. It remains unknown how soluble Robo4 is generated and if soluble Robo4 regulates additional angiogenic signaling. Here, we report soluble Robo4 is the product of constitutive ectodomain shedding of endothelial cell surface Robo4 by disintegrin metalloproteinases ADAM10 and ADAM17 and acts to inhibit angiogenic Slit3 signaling. Meanwhile, the ligand Slit3 induces cell surface receptor Robo4 endocytosis to shield Robo4 from shedding, showing Slit3 inhibits Robo4 shedding to enhance Robo4 signaling. Our study delineated ADAM10 and ADAM17 are Robo4 sheddases, and ectodomain shedding, including negative regulation by its ligand Slit3, represents a novel control mechanism of Robo4 signaling in angiogenesis.

Management of Patients with Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia During Cardiac Surgery

The role of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia and its possibly severe complications in patients undergoing cardiac surgery is increasingly appreciated. Increasing evidence indicates that in patients without the presence of antibodies, unfractionated heparins can be safely used during cardiopulmonary bypass, if their employment is restricted to this short period. This strategy is the first choice in patients with a current negative status of antibodies and in patients in whom surgery can be delayed until antibodies cannot be detected by laboratory tests. To date, however, no alternative anticoagulant to heparin during cardiopulmonary bypass has been approved. With the introduction of the class of direct thrombin inhibitors, effective anticoagulants have become available; however, they have no antidote and require specific monitoring. The availability of direct thrombin inhibitors is currently restricted. The administration of unfractionated heparin with anti-platelet agents such as prostaglandins or the short-acting platelet glycoprotein llb/Illa antagonist tirofiban is another option. Despite successful use of these strategies in fairly large numbers of patients, recent information suggests that in the case of tirofiban, renal failure may cause persistence of the agent with subsequent severe hemorrhage. If surgery is restricted to coronary artery bypass grafting, recent data show that off-pump strategies with use of the direct thrombin inhibitor bivalirudin appear to be a promising option. Therefore, if surgery cannot be postponed, the anticoagulation protocol and the surgical strategy must be adjusted to the condition of the patient and the experience of the center in order to reduce the risk of these “offlabel” strategies.

Argatroban for Suspected Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia: Contemporary Experience at a Large Teaching Hospital

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia requires immediate alternative anticoagulation to prevent or treat thromboembolic complications. Argatroban was approved based on multiple-center studies from the 1990s, but subsequent changes in prevailing awareness, diagnostic testing and therapeutic strategies for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia might affect results of argatroban therapy. Charts were retrospectively reviewed from patients administered argatroban for suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia over 22 months at a single large university hospital. Twenty-seven patients, most in intensive care units, received a median 0.5 µg/kg/min argatroban over a median 5.5 days. Patients had isolated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (n = 10), had heparin-induced thrombocytopenia with thrombosis (n = 9), or lacked active heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (n = 8) on final analysis. New thromboses (14.8%), progression of preexisting thromboses (0%), amputation secondary to heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (0%), death (22.2%), bleeding requiring transfusion (3.7%), and any bleeding (22.2%) compared favorably with older multiple-center reports. Deaths occurred mainly with preexisting multiple-organ failure. In contemporary “real world” use, argatroban provides safe and effective anticoagulation, strengthening the mandate to initiate alternative anticoagulation whenever heparin-induced thrombocytopenia appears likely.

Therapy and Monitoring of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia Type II in Critically Ill Patients During Continuous Venovenous Hemodiafiltration: Comparison of aPTT and Ecarin Clotting Time for Monitoring of r-Hirudin Therapy

We conducted a survey of therapy, complications, and monitoring of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II in critically ill patients during continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration (CVVHDF). We also compared activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and ecarin clotting time (ECT) for monitoring recombinant (r)-hirudin therapy. Six patients with HIT type II were treated with r-hirudin and were on CVVHDF due to acute renal failure (blood flow rate 90 ml/hr, dialysate flow rate 1 L/hr, substitution 1 L/hr predilution, acrylonitrile membrane 0.9 m2). The mean duration of CVVHDF was 6.2 ± 3.6 days (range 3-17 days). Diagnosis of HIT was established 5.0 ± 1.5 days (range 3-8 days) after a decrease in the platelet count. Three of six patients had other possible reasons for thrombocytopenia apart from HIT, such as massive transfusion, sepsis, or liver cirrhosis. Three thromboembolic events occurred before the diagnosis of HIT was established, none of them during treatment of HIT with r-hirudin. In all patients the platelet count doubled or increased up to 100/nl within 2.5 ± 0.5 days. The dose-response relationship of r-hirudin and aPTT was not satisfactory ( r = 0.371). In patients receiving CVVHDF with one of two different doses of r-hirudin (1 mg/hr versus 2 mg/hr), there was no difference in aPTT ( p < 0.77) but a significant difference in ECT ( p < 0.001). The correlation between r-hirudin dose and ECT was r = 0.654 ( p < 0.0001). r-Hirudin was safe and effective in the treatment of HIT type II in critically ill patients during CVVHDF. ECT seems to be superior to aPTT for monitoring r-hirudin therapy because it correlates better with the concentrations of r-hirudin.

Thrombocytopenia in Critical Care Patients

Thrombocytopenia is a common laboratory finding in the intensive care unit (ICU) patient. Because the causes can range from laboratory artifact to life-threatening processes such as thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP), identifying the cause of thrombocytopenia is important. In the evaluation of the thrombocytopenia patient, one should incorporate all clinical clues such as why the patient is in the hospital, medications the patient is on, and other abnormal laboratory findings. One should ensure that the patient does not suffer from heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) or one of the thrombotic microangiopathies (TMs). HIT can present in any patient on heparin and requires specific testing and antithrombotic therapy. TMs cover a spectrum of disease ranging from TTP to pregnancy complications and can have a variety of presentations. Management of disseminated intravascular coagulation depends on the patient’s condition and complication. Other causes of ICU thrombocytopenia include sepsis, medication side effects, post-transfusion purpura, catastrophic anti phospholipid antibody disease, and immune thrombocytopenia.

Argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban is a direct thrombin inhibitor approved for anticoagulation in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT; in several countries) and in patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI; in the USA). HIT is a relatively common extreme prothrombotic condition. When HIT is reasonably suspected, an alternative anticoagulant should be promptly initiated. In historical controlled studies, argatroban reduced new thrombosis, mortality from thrombosis and the composite of death, amputation or thrombosis, without increasing bleeding. With intravenous infusion, advantages include short half-life, easy monitoring and elimination primarily by hepatobiliary (rather than renal) means. In patients undergoing PCI, argatroban with or without glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition leads to high rates of procedural success with low bleeding risk. Herein we review argatroban therapy for HIT and for PCI.

Treatment and prevention of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated adverse drug reaction that can lead to devastating thromboembolic complications, including pulmonary embolism, ischemic limb necrosis necessitating limb amputation, acute myocardial infarction, and stroke.

METHODS

The methods of this guideline follow the Methodology for the Development of Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis Guidelines: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines in this supplement.

RESULTS

Among the key recommendations for this article are the following: For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be > 1%, we suggest that platelet count monitoring be performed every 2 or 3 days from day 4 to day 14 (or until heparin is stopped, whichever occurs first) (Grade 2C). For patients receiving heparin in whom clinicians consider the risk of HIT to be < 1%, we suggest that platelet counts not be monitored (Grade 2C). In patients with HIT with thrombosis (HITT) or isolated HIT who have normal renal function, we suggest the use of argatroban or lepirudin or danaparoid over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with HITT and renal insufficiency, we suggest the use of argatroban over other nonheparin anticoagulants (Grade 2C). In patients with acute HIT or subacute HIT who require urgent cardiac surgery, we suggest the use of bivalirudin over other nonheparin anticoagulants or heparin plus antiplatelet agents (Grade 2C).

CONCLUSIONS

Further studies evaluating the role of fondaparinux and the new oral anticoagulants in the treatment of HIT are needed.

Desirudin: a review of the pharmacology and clinical application for the prevention of deep vein thrombosis

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTIs) are an emerging class of anticoagulants in routine clinical practice, although they have been under investigation for quite some time. Desirudin (Iprivask®, Canyon Pharmaceuticals™) is a recombinant hirudin derivative that directly inhibits free and fibrin-bound thrombin. Desirudin was the first DTI approved for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis in Europe (Revasc®) and is the newest injectable DTI commercially available in the USA. Desirudin is one of the few nonheparin subcutaneous drugs that has demonstrable efficacy for DVT prophylaxis. Subcutaneous desirudin has been shown to be more effective than both subcutaneous unfractionated heparin and enoxaparin, with comparable bleeding rates in the prevention of DVT in patients undergoing elective hip replacement. Desirudin also offers the advantage of a fixed dosing regimen while being less immunogenic than unfractionated heparin. However, owing to its pharmacokinetic properties, patients with renal dysfunction require dosing modifications. The favorable profile shown with desirudin thus far will allow its clinical use to grow and will promote further investigation into broadening its clinical applications.

How I treat heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a prothrombotic adverse drug effect induced by platelet-activating antibodies against multimolecular complexes of platelet factor 4 and heparin. Diagnosis rests on a clinical assessment of disease probability and laboratory testing. Management involves immediate discontinuation of heparin and initiation of an alternative anticoagulant. Because of the frequency of thrombocytopenia among heparinized patients, the limited specificity of widely available immunoassays, the limited availability of more specific functional assays, and clinicians' fears of missing a case of true disease, overtesting, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment have become common. As a result, a substantial number of thrombocytopenic patients are unnecessarily exposed to costly alternative anticoagulants and their attendant risk of bleeding. In this review, we describe not only our approach to the evaluation and management of patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, but also the measures we use to minimize misdiagnosis and unnecessary treatment of patients without the disease. In addition, we propose areas of investigation for improvement of the diagnosis and management of this potentially fatal disorder.

Lepirudin as an alternative to "heparin allergy" during cardiopulmonary bypass

A treatment strategy of a difficult and unusual problem is presented. We are reporting a case of a patient who had a documented allergy to heparin and required Cardiac surgery for an ASD closure. The anticoagulation regime used during cardiopulmonary bypass was lepirudin based. This report indicates that r-hirudin provides effective anticoagulation, however unless ECT is monitoring, post operative hemorrhage is encountered. Therefore this case is unique not only because of its rarity but also by the fact that it presents the caveats encountered when ECT is not available.

Reducing harm associated with anticoagulation: practical considerations of argatroban therapy in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Argatroban is a hepatically metabolized, direct thrombin inhibitor used for prophylaxis or treatment of thrombosis in heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) and for patients with or at risk of HIT undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The objective of this review is to summarize practical considerations of argatroban therapy in HIT. The US FDA-recommended argatroban dose in HIT is 2 microg/kg/min (reduced in patients with hepatic impairment and in paediatric patients), adjusted to achieve activated partial thromboplastin times (aPTTs) 1.5-3 times baseline (not >100 seconds). Contemporary experiences indicate that reduced doses are also needed in patients with conditions associated with hepatic hypoperfusion, e.g. heart failure, yet are unnecessary for renal dysfunction, adult age, sex, race/ethnicity or obesity. Argatroban 0.5-1.2 microg/kg/min typically supports therapeutic aPTTs. The FDA-recommended dose during PCI is 25 microg/kg/min (350 microg/kg initial bolus), adjusted to achieve activated clotting times (ACTs) of 300-450 sec. For PCI, argatroban has not been investigated in hepatically impaired patients; dose adjustment is unnecessary for adult age, sex, race/ethnicity or obesity, and lesser doses may be adequate with concurrent glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibition. Argatroban prolongs the International Normalized Ratio, and published approaches for monitoring the argatroban-to-warfarin transition should be followed. Major bleeding with argatroban is 0-10% in the non-interventional setting and 0-5.8% periprocedurally. Argatroban has no specific antidote, and if excessive anticoagulation occurs, argatroban infusion should be stopped or reduced. Improved familiarity of healthcare professionals with argatroban therapy in HIT, including in special populations and during PCI, may facilitate reduction of harm associated with HIT (e.g. fewer thromboses) or its treatment (e.g. fewer argatroban medication errors).

Direct thrombin inhibitors: alternatives to heparin

After more than 70 years of effective clinical use, heparin remains the most common anticoagulant in use and one of the most commonly prescribed drugs to hospitalized patients. However, the biologic variability and immunogenicity limit its utility. With increasing volumes of vascular intervention and an aging population, an increase in the need for anticoagulation can be anticipated. This article reviews current viable options and barriers to the use of heparin.

Proteomic analysis of active multiple sclerosis lesions reveals therapeutic targets

Understanding the neuropathology of multiple sclerosis (MS) is essential for improved therapies. Therefore, identification of targets specific to pathological types of MS may have therapeutic benefits. Here we identify, by laser-capture microdissection and proteomics, proteins unique to three major types of MS lesions: acute plaque, chronic active plaque and chronic plaque. Comparative proteomic profiles identified tissue factor and protein C inhibitor within chronic active plaque samples, suggesting dysregulation of molecules associated with coagulation. In vivo administration of hirudin or recombinant activated protein C reduced disease severity in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis and suppressed Th1 and Th17 cytokines in astrocytes and immune cells. Administration of mutant forms of recombinant activated protein C showed that both its anticoagulant and its signalling functions were essential for optimal amelioration of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis. A proteomic approach illuminated potential therapeutic targets selective for specific pathological stages of MS and implicated participation of the coagulation cascade.

Reducing thrombotic complications in the perioperative setting: an update on heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparins are widely used in the perioperative setting. Immune heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious, antibody-mediated complication of heparin therapy that occurs in approximately 0.5%-5% of patients treated with heparin for at least 5 days. An extremely prothrombotic disorder, HIT confers significant risks of thrombosis and devastating consequences on affected patients: approximately 38%-76% develop thrombosis, approximately 10% with thrombosis require limb amputation, and approximately 20%-30% die within a month. HIT antibodies are transient and typically disappear within 3 mo. In patients with lingering antibodies, however, re-exposure to heparin can be catastrophic. In the perioperative setting, heightened awareness is important for the prompt recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of HIT. HIT should be considered if the platelet count decreases 50% and/or thrombosis occurs 5-14 days after starting heparin, with other diagnoses excluded. On strong clinical suspicion of HIT, heparin should be discontinued and a parenteral alternative anticoagulant initiated, even before laboratory confirmation of HIT is obtained. Subsequent laboratory test results may help with the decision to continue with nonheparin therapy or switch back to heparin. Heparin avoidance in patients with current or previous HIT is feasible in most clinical situations, except perhaps in cardiovascular surgery. If the surgery cannot be delayed until HIT antibodies have disappeared, intraoperative alternative anticoagulation is recommended.

Mitigation of Coagulation by Removing Clotting Factors Part 1: In Vitro Feasibility Study

Heparin is associated with adverse effects in some patients during extracorporeal circulation. A potential alternate anticoagulation strategy explored in this investigation involved mitigation of coagulation by removing clotting factors from blood by adsorption on a protamine-immobilized Sepharose matrix (PSM). Human or porcine plasmas treated with PSM in vitro were tested for clotting factors I (fibrinogen), II (prothrombin), VIII, and X, and proteins C and S, and for prothrombin time (PT), activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT), and total protein concentration. Bovine blood treated with PSM was also perfused through a hollow-fiber cartridge to assess thrombogenic potential in a shear flow system. PT increased with increasing protamine-Sepharose-to-plasma ratios and with increasing mixing time. When the PT and APTT of treated plasma were prolonged three to six times the baseline, Factors II and X were significantly removed (>90%), Factors I and VIII were partly removed (<35%), and total protein concentration remained >80% of the initial value. When blood depleted of clotting factors was perfused through hollow-fiber cartridges without an anticoagulant, cartridge patency was prolonged compared with cartridges perfused with untreated blood. This investigation demonstrated that inhibition of blood coagulation by removal of key clotting proteins is feasible.

Severe anaphylactic reaction after repeated intermittent exposure to lepirudin

Lepirudin, a recombinant DNA derivative of hirudin, is used to prevent thromboembolic complications caused by heparin-induced thrombocytopenia type II. Anaphylactic and anaphylactoid reactions have been reported with its use in patients both with and without known previous exposure to lepirudin. We describe the case of a 57-year-old woman who received five uneventful courses of lepirudin therapy before having a severe anaphylactic reaction during administration of the intravenous bolus dose that began her sixth course. The patient experienced cardiorespiratory arrest but recovered from the reaction. The decision to administer lepirudin to a patient who has previously received it should be reached with due consideration of the risk:benefit ratio and strategies to manage risk resulting from readministration. Risk factors for an anaphylactic reaction to lepirudin may include use of an initial bolus dose, intravenous rather than subcutaneous administration, length of any single course of therapy beyond 3 days, and repeat administration of lepirudin within 100 days.

Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia, a Prothrombotic Disease

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious, yet treatable prothrombotic disease that develops in approximately 0.5% to 5% of heparin-treated patients and dramatically increases their risk of thrombosis (odds ratio, 37). The antibodies that mediate HIT (ie, heparin-platelet factor 4 antibodies) occur more frequently than the overt disease itself, and, even in the absence of thrombocytopenia, are associated with increased thrombotic morbidity and mortality. HIT should be suspected whenever the platelet count drops more than 50% from baseline (or to <150 x 10(9)/L) beginning 5 to 14 days after starting heparin (or sooner if there was prior heparin exposure) or new thrombosis occurs during, or soon after heparin treatment, with other causes excluded. When HIT is strongly suspected, with or without complicating thrombosis, heparins should be discontinued, and a fast-acting, nonheparin alternative anticoagulant such as argatroban should be initiated immediately. With prompt recognition, diagnosis, and treatment of HIT, the clinical outcomes and health economic burdens of this prothrombotic disease are improved significantly.

HEMATOLOGY: ISSUES IN THE DIALYSIS PATIENT: When Heparin Causes Thrombosis: Significance, Recognition, and Management of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Dialysis Patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is characterized by thrombocytopenia and paradoxical hypercoagulability. HIT occurs when an antibody ("HIT antibody") produced against the complex of heparin and platelet factor 4 (PF4) causes systemic platelet consumption and activation. Nephrologists encounter HIT in the care of end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients because heparin is a routine anticoagulant in hemodialysis. The incidence of HIT in ESRD appears to be lower than in other clinical settings. However, HIT is equally life threatening in ESRD patients and therefore demands the same prompt recognition and aggressive treatment. Diagnosing HIT requires the detection of HIT antibodies. A functional assay (e.g., [(14)C] serotonin release assay) relies on the patient's HIT antibodies to activate donor platelets at pharmacologic heparin concentrations. The more common antigen assay (e.g., enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]) detects the binding of the patient's HIT antibodies to antigens (e.g., heparin-PF4 complex) in a microtiter well and does not involve platelets. The moment HIT is suspected, heparin should be stopped and an alternative anticoagulant initiated immediately, even before the result of a serologic test becomes available. The advent of several new anticoagulants in the last decade, especially argatroban and bivalirudin, has expanded treatment options for HIT in dialysis patients. This review discusses the epidemiology, pathogenesis, clinical features, diagnosis, and treatment of HIT, with special emphasis on concepts relevant to the care of dialysis patients.

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in cardiovascular patients

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an antibody-mediated syndrome associated with heparin exposure, a falling platelet count and a high risk of thrombosis. Cardiovascular patients are at increased risk of HIT due to wide use of heparin in this population. Should HIT be suspected, heparin must be avoided in most situations, and anticoagulation with an alternative anticoagulant should be instituted. Preferred agents include the direct thrombin inhibitors argatroban and lepirudin, whilst bivalirudin or desirudin (other direct thrombin inhibitors) can be used in some situations. The indirect thrombin inhibitors, danaparoid and fondaparinux, can also be considered at times. These agents and their use in cardiac patients, including patients with acute coronary syndrome, percutaneous coronary interventions, acute ST elevation myocardial infarction or cardiac surgery, will be reviewed.

New anticoagulants: a pediatric perspective

Unfractionated heparin and vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin have been used as the anticoagulants of choice for over five decades. Subsequently, low molecular weight heparins (LMWHs) became widely available and have provided several advantages, especially in infants and children. The field of anticoagulation, however, has undergone a major revolution with better understanding of the structure of coagulation proteins and the development of a host of new drugs with highly specific actions. Many of these drugs have undergone extensive clinical testing in adults and have been approved for specific indications in adults. Unfortunately, clinical data and the reported use of these drugs in children are extremely limited. A lack of familiarity with the actions and pharmacokinetic properties of these drugs could be a major contributing factor. This review focuses on several of the new anticoagulants, with a special emphasis on those that could be potentially beneficial in pediatric patients with thromboembolic disorders. The need for well-designed trials with large-scale participation by pediatric hematologists in order to improve the antithrombotic care of young infants and children is also emphasized.

Critical care clotting catastrophies

Coagulation problems are very common in intensive care patients. It is important to recognize potential problems, perform a rapid assessment, and start therapy. The author reviews general clinical and laboratory approaches to diagnosis and treatment of the bleeding patient and to correction of coagulopathies. This review outlines a set of often catastrophic coagulation problems, which may present both thrombotic and bleeding challenges. These include heparin induced thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura, and disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Heparin in interventional radiology: a therapy in evolution

Interventional radiology techniques made possible by the antithrombotic properties of heparin have revolutionized treatment for a myriad of disorders. Newer low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) offer several advantages over unfractionated heparin (UFH), especially in chronic settings. They are increasing in popularity for use during vascular procedures. However, LMWH shares limitations with UFH such as heterogeneity, nonspecificity, and induction of thrombocytopenia. These drawbacks have led to a search for the next generation of antithrombotic agents. Homogeneous drugs targeting specific coagulation cascade molecules are now available. The number of alternative anticoagulant drug combinations presents clinicians with a confusing array of choices. The strengths and weaknesses of UFH, LMWH, and direct antithrombin agents are presented. The promising future of LMWH and hirudins is discussed.

Direct thrombin inhibitor use during percutaneous coronary intervention

Direct thrombin inhibitors (DTI) are emerging as alternative anticoagulants to unfractionated heparin and indirect thrombin inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We review the pharmacological properties of these newer antithrombotic agents and evaluate the clinical data demonstrating their use in patients undergoing PCI.

Treatment of Patients with a History of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia and Anti-Lepirudin Antibodies with Argatroban

Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II require anticoagulation with non-heparin immediate acting anticoagulants. Danaparoid may cross react with HIT-antibodies and lepirudin may generate anti-lepirudin antibodies influencing anticoagulation. We hypothesised, that the synthetic small molecular thrombin inhibitor argatroban does not induce immunoglobulins reacting towards lepirudin in patients with anti-lepirudin antibodies in the history and that titration of the anticoagulation may be easier with argatroban. We report on the treatment of four patients of a study, which was terminated prematurely due to official warnings for a repeated use of lepirudin. Two patients each received argatroban and lepirudin intravenously. A blinded assessor adjusted the doses of the anticoagulants to 1.5-3.0 fold prolongation of the aPTT. Ecarin clotting time (ECT), concentrations of lepirudin (ELISA) and of argatroban (gas-chromatography with mass spectrometry), and the generation of lepirudin antibodies (ELISA) were measured. APTT-adjusted dosages for argatroban was 2.0-2.6 microg/kg.min and for lepirudin 48-149 microg/kg.h. ECT was prolonged 2.1 to 4.5-fold with lepirudin and 4 to 7-fold with argatroban. The concentration of lepirudin ranged between 750 and 1500 ng/ml and of argatroban between 400 and 1100 ng/ml. Patients on argatroban did not generate immunoglobulin IgG reacting towards lepirudin in contrast to both patients on lepirudin who developed anti-lepirudin antibodies. Both treatments were well tolerated. Despite the low number of patients argatroban seems to lead to a more stable anticoagulant response than lepirudin resulting in a lower variability of the dosage for prophylaxis or treatment of thromboembolism of patients with a history of HIT and lepirudin antibodies.

The Direct Thrombin Inhibitors: Their Role and Use for Rational Anticoagulation

Major clinical advantages are achieved when direct thrombin inhibitors are used in venous thromboembolism. These agents provide more reliable anticoagulant response patterns because they are not significantly bound to plasma proteins and few, if any, drug-drug interactions are seen. The studies to date confirm that not all direct thrombin inhibitors are the same. The new reversible, short-acting catalytic site-specific drugs provide an excellent safety profile and high degree of efficacy for the prophylaxis and treatment of venous thromboembolism and pulmonary embolic states. The availability of the oral prodrug ximelagatran allows reproducible, effective, and safe direct thrombin inhibition without the requirement for coagulation laboratory monitoring; it appears destined to be the oral anticoagulant of the future.

Anticoagulation strategies for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: unfractionated heparin, low-molecular-weight heparins, and direct thrombin inhibitors

Low-molecular-weight heparins and direct thrombin inhibitors are emerging as alternative anticoagulants to unfractionated heparin in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This paper reviews the pharmacologic properties of these newer antithrombotic agents and evaluates the clinical data demonstrating their use in patients undergoing PCI.

Antibodies against lepirudin are polyspecific and recognize epitopes on bivalirudin

Bivalirudin is a synthetic antithrombin sharing a sequence of 11 amino acids with the recombinant hirudin lepirudin. We investigated whether antilepirudin antibodies recognize epitopes on bivalirudin. Antilepirudin antibody–positive sera of 43 patients, treated with lepirudin for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, were analyzed. Lepirudin- and bivalirudin-coated microtiter plates were used for antibody testing in an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) system. Of the 43 sera-containing antibodies binding to lepirudin, 22 (51.2%) contained antibodies that also recognized bivalirudin. Binding of these antibodies to bivalirudin was inhibited by more than 70% by preincubation with high doses of bivalirudin. However, if lepirudin-coated microtiter plates were used, high concentrations of bivalirudin inhibited only 2 of the 43 positive sera by more than 30%. Therefore antihirudin antibodies must be polyspecific. The clinical consequences of this cross-reactivity are unknown but bivalirudin, targeted by antibodies of patients treated with lepirudin previously, could potentially boost antibody titers in such patients or even trigger an immune response by itself. Clinically significant antibody formation in response to bivalirudin monotherapy has not been observed, however. Yet, as lepirudin and antilepirudin antibodies have recently been implicated in severe anaphylactic reactions, caution is warranted when using bivalirudin in patients previously treated with lepirudin.

The Role of Recombinant Hirudins in the Management of Thrombotic Disorders

Native hirudin is the most potent natural direct thrombin inhibitor currently known; it is capable of inhibiting not only fluid phase, but also clot-bound thrombin. Recombinant technology now allows production of recombinant hirudins (r-hirudins), which are available in sufficient purity and quantity with essentially unaltered thrombin-inhibitory potency. As thrombin is known to play a key role in a number of thrombotic disorders, numerous studies focused on the impact of r-hirudins on the clinical course in these diseases. R-hirudins provided significantly more stable anticoagulation than standard heparin, but demonstrated a relatively narrow therapeutic range with relevant bleeding risk even at clinically effective doses. In doses that are not associated with an increased bleeding risk, r-hirudins often failed to demonstrate significant superiority to heparin. To date, r-hirudins have a definite role in the treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, where they markedly reduce the high risk of thrombosis. For prophylaxis of deep vein thrombosis, r-hirudins have been shown to be superior to both unfractionated and low molecular weight heparin, but are not extensively used in this indication. In acute coronary syndromes, a definite role of r-hirudins has not yet been firmly established. When applied in an appropriate dose as adjunct to thrombolysis in patients with acute myocardial infarction, randomized, controlled trials did not show a consistent benefit of r-hirudins, especially in the long-term. In patients undergoing coronary balloon angioplasty for acute coronary syndromes, promising effects in the early postprocedural phase did not translate to an improved outcome after 6 months. In patients with unstable angina pectoris, efficacy and safety of r-hirudins as primary antithrombotic therapy are still under debate. In the future, r-hirudins are to be compared with alternative or additional potent antithrombotic agents or treatment strategies. This comparison will ultimately lead to their final placement in the management of thrombotic disorders.

Benefit-risk assessment of treatments for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) are at high risk of thrombosis and should be treated with alternative anticoagulant therapy to reduce complications. The current treatment of choice is one of the approved direct thrombin inhibitors, argatroban or lepirudin. These drugs have been proven to be safe and effective in multicentre clinical trials where dosage regimens have been established for prophylaxis and treatment of thrombosis. Argatroban has also been tested and approved for use in invasive cardiology procedures in the HIT patient. Dosage regimens for other clinical uses, such as cardiac surgery, have not yet been established for either drug. The safety and effectiveness of the thrombin inhibitors is dependent on their use according to established guidelines. Other treatment options that may be effective for the patient with HIT include dextran, plasmapheresis, intravenous gammaglobulin and aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid). Although used historically, these options have not been tested in rigorous clinical trials. For life- and limb-threatening thrombosis, thrombolytic agents and/or surgery may provide benefit. Because the risk of bleeding is high from these procedures, they should be performed only by an experienced practitioner. Several studies have shown that patients with HIT requiring continued anticoagulation are best managed with a warfarin derivative initiated while under full anticoagulation with a thrombin inhibitor. There is a risk of skin necrosis and bleeding if guidelines for dose administration and monitoring of warfarin are not followed. Subsequent use of heparin or a low molecular weight heparin after resolution of the clinical episode of HIT can be hazardous, particularly within the first 3 months. If laboratory testing is negative, heparin may be cautiously reinstituted for short-term use (1-2 hours) with monitoring for platelet count decrease and thromboembolism. The pregnant patient with HIT requiring anticoagulation represents a particular challenge, where there is no drug of choice at present. Although today there are realistic treatment options for the patient with HIT, the morbidity and mortality associated with this disease have not been eliminated. Awareness and early treatment of HIT remain important components of the clinical care for patients exposed to heparins. Future therapeutic developments based on a better understanding of the pathophysiology of HIT may further improve clinical outcomes. Despite some limitations, the current treatment options for patients with HIT provide unparalleled benefit compared with the treatment options available only a few years ago.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

This review deals with a newly-developed category of antithrombotic drugs - the direct thrombin inhibitors. These agents interact with thrombin and block its catalytic activity on fibrinogen, platelets and other substrates. Heparin and its derivatives (low molecular weight heparins and the active pentasaccharide) inhibit thrombin and/or other coagulation serine proteases indirectly via antithrombin, and the warfarin-type drugs interfere with the synthesis of the precursors of the coagulation serine proteases. The direct thrombin inhibitors approved for clinical use at present (lepirudin, desirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) and another in the advanced clinical testing stage (melagatran/ximelagatran), are the subject of this review. The chemical structure; kinetics of thrombin inhibition; pharmacokinetics and clinical use of each of these is discussed.

Antihirudin antibodies following low-dose subcutaneous treatment with desirudin for thrombosis prophylaxis after hip-replacement surgery: incidence and clinical relevance

Recombinant hirudin has been found to be immunogenic in patients treated with lepirudin following heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). We assessed the incidence of immunoglobulin G (IgG) antihirudin antibodies by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 112 patients enrolled in a dose-finding study with desirudin. Patients received desirudin subcutaneously following orthopedic hip surgery at 10 mg twice a day (n = 17), 15 mg twice a day (n = 75), and 20 mg twice a day (n = 20). Of 112 patients, 11 (9.8%) developed antihirudin antibodies independently of the dose. The rate of immunization did not differ from that observed in HIT patients treated with lepirudin (P =.113). Plasma concentrations of desirudin did not differ between antihirudin antibody-positive and -negative patients. Antihirudin antibodies had no impact on incidences of deep vein thrombosis and/or pulmonary embolism, allergic reactions, and hemorrhage. However, the total number of immunized patients observed was low and so infrequent (but severe) effects of antihirudin antibodies cannot be excluded.

Alternative methods of anticoagulation for dialysis-dependent patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Dialysis patients who are continually exposed to heparin are at risk for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT). Heparin-induced antibodies have been reported to occur in 0-12% of hemodialysis (HD) patients. The diagnosis or suspicion of HIT in this patient population requires careful confirmation of the diagnosis and substitution of heparin with an alternate anticoagulant for dialysis. Alternate agents such as the direct thrombin inhibitors (hirudin and argatroban) are available, but careful dosing and monitoring of the anticoagulant effect are required. Despite careful dosing, hemorrhagic complications have occurred with these agents. Unfortunately there are limited options for treatment of hemorrhagic complications and no specific antidotes are available for the direct thrombin inhibitors. In this report the currently available alternatives to heparin for dialysis, including dosing and monitoring recommendations, are reviewed.

Consultations on Patients with Venous or Arterial Diseases

Advances in vascular biology and drug development, as well as improved interventional techniques, are yielding multiple new treatments for patients with venous and/or arterial thrombosis. Hematologists who are providing consultations for these patients often participate in a multidisciplinary approach to provide optimal care. New anticoagulants, simplified and validated tests for detecting vascular disease, and improved interventional procedures can all reduce the morbidity and mortality that result from venous and arterial thrombosis. In this chapter, different aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of these disorders are addressed by a hematologist, an expert in vascular medicine, and a vascular surgeon.

The key to the prevention and treatment of venous and arterial thrombosis is anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy. In Section I, Dr. Charles Francis, a hematologist with expertise in thrombosis and hemostasis, describes the clinical trials that have resulted in the approval of newer anticoagulants such as fondaparinux and the thrombin- specific inhibitors. He also reviews the clinical trials that have shown the efficacy of the new oral anticoagulant ximelagatran. Although currently under study primarily for the prevention and treatment of venous thrombosis, these anticoagulants are likely to undergo evaluation for use in arterial thrombosis.

Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), which affects as many as 12% of individuals over the age of 65 years, provides a diagnostic and therapeutic challenge to physicians across multiple subspecialties. Dr. William Hiatt, a specialist in vascular medicine, discusses in Section II the epidemiology and manifestations of PAD, the best ways in which to diagnose this disorder and determine its severity, and the most appropriate pharmacologic treatment.

In Section III, Dr. Mark Jackson, a vascular surgeon, describes interventional procedures that have been developed or are under development to treat arterial thrombosis. He also reviews the status of inferior vena caval filters that are retrievable.

Anticoagulation for patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia using recombinant hirudin during cardiopulmonary bypass

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a common complication of heparin therapy. There are three types of HIT. In the majority of patients, thrombocytopenia is modest and resolves without sequelae (HIT I). In a smaller number of patients, the thrombocytopenia is severe (HIT II), and in still others, the thrombocytopenia is also associated with thrombosis (HITT). Administration of heparin to this latter group of patients causes platelet aggregation, thromboembolism, and thrombocytopenia. It is advisable that heparin not be administered in any form to patients with documented or suspected HIT II or HITT. This situation, of course, poses a problem for those patients requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) surgery. In this report, we summarize our experience with Lepirudin (Hoechst, Frankfurt Ammain, Germany), which is a recombinant hirudin (r-hirudin), as an alternative to heparin for systemic anticoagulation, as well as the use of the ecarine clotting time (ECT) for monitoring anticoagulation status during CPB.

Direct thrombin inhibitors

Direct thrombin inhibitors interact with thrombin and block its catalytic activity on a wide range of substrates. Their action is in contrast to heparin and its derivatives, which inhibit thrombin and other coagulation serine proteases via antithrombin, and to the warfarin-type drugs that interfere with synthesis of the precursors of the coagulation serine proteases. There are three direct thrombin inhibitors approved for clinical use at present (lepirudin, bivalirudin, argatroban) and another in advanced clinical testing (melagatran/ximelagatran). The chemical structure, kinetics of thrombin inhibition, pharmacokinetics, and clinical use of each of these agents are discussed.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: pathophysiology and management

Immune-mediated heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well-defined syndrome. Clinical criteria (thrombocytopenia, resistance to heparin anticoagulation, or thromboses during heparin therapy) are defined, and serologic diagnostic tests are available. Earlier recognition of HIT syndrome has allowed for significant advances in therapy, leading to marked reductions in morbidity and mortality from HIT syndrome. This review addresses the epidemiology, pathobiology, and management of HIT syndrome

Treatment of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

OBJECTIVE

To describe heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT or HIT-2), an immune-mediated adverse reaction to heparin or low-molecular-weight heparin. Available treatment options and considerations in developing a therapy approach are discussed.

DATA SOURCES

A search of the National Library of Medicine (1992-June 2001) was done to identify pertinent literature. Additional references were reviewed from selected articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Articles related to laboratory recognition and treatment options of HIT, including the use of agents in selected clinical conditions, were reviewed and included.

CONCLUSIONS

HIT is a rare but potentially severe adverse reaction to heparin that was, until recently, poorly understood and had limited treatment options. Recent advances describing the recognition and clinical manifestations of immune-mediated HIT, including recently available antithrombotic treatment options, have dramatically changed outcomes for patients having this syndrome.

Argatroban therapy does not generate antibodies that alter its anticoagulant activity in patients with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an immune-mediated syndrome that can lead to limb- and life-threatening thrombosis. Argatroban, a small synthetic molecule (Argatroban; GlaxoSmithKline, Philadelphia, PA), and lepirudin, a protein of non-human origin (Refludan; Aventis, Bridgewater, NJ), are direct thrombin inhibitors that have been used successfully for anticoagulant therapy in HIT patients. It has been reported that between 44-74% of lepirudin-treated HIT patients develop drug-specific antibodies that either enhance or suppress the anticoagulant activity of lepirudin. By contrast, there have been no reported patient experiences suggestive of unexpected loss or enhancement of argatroban's anticoagulant effect in clinical trials, including those in HIT patients, or in postmarketing safety surveillance of over 4,800 patients treated in Japan. To confirm the lack of antibodies in argatroban-treated patients with HIT, we examined plasma for anticoagulant-altering activity and reviewed dosing patterns of re-exposed patients. Paired, pre-therapy and post-therapy (> or =7 days) plasma pools exhibited comparable in vitro anticoagulant responses (aPTT and antithrombin activity) to argatroban supplementation. Argatroban at 5 microg/mL similarly prolonged aPTTs of normal plasma pretreated with IgG isolated from pre-therapy versus post-therapy plasma (P>0.6). In trials, mean argatroban doses during initial therapy versus re-exposure were not different among individuals anticoagulated for the treatment or prophylaxis of thrombosis (P=0.60) or during percutaneous coronary interventions (P=0.79), with no discernable pattern of suppression or enhancement of argatroban anticoagulation. Consistent with the lack of reported patient experiences suggestive of unexpected loss or enhancement of argatroban's anticoagulant effect across clinical trials and post-marketing safety surveillance, these data support the lack of anti-argatroban antibodies that affect drug activity in argatroban-treated HIT patients.

Management of heparin allergy in pregnancy

Thromboembolic disease during pregnancy has traditionally been treated with heparin. If heparin cannot be used, then treatment options remain limited. Despite the recent availability of new anticoagulation agents, data relating to their use during pregnancy is lacking. Hirudin, a relatively new anti-thrombotic agent, through animal models has been shown to have a very low transplacental transfer, thus making it a candidate drug to be used during pregnancy in case of heparin allergy. This report describes a case of heparin allergy in a pregnant patient with recurrent DVT that was successfully managed with hirudin and coumadin.

Lepirudin as a safe alternative for effective anticoagulation in patients with known heparin-induced thrombocytopenia undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: case reports

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a well-documented complication of heparin anticoagulation therapy. Heparin's frequent use in the cardiovascular population poses a significant challenge for managing patients with HIT in need of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). We describe four patients with HIT who successfully underwent PCI without thrombotic or hemorrhagic complications while on lepirudin.