Canadian implantable defibrillator study (CIDS) : a randomized trial of the implantable cardioverter defibrillator against amiodarone

Reassessing the need for primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in contemporary patients with heart failure

The main function of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is to protect against sudden cardiac death (SCD) due to ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA). Current guidelines provide a recommendation to implant a prophylactic ICD for the primary prevention of SCD in individuals having heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) who never experienced a previous sustained VTA. However, these recommendations are based on clinical trials conducted more than 20 years ago and may not be applicable to contemporary patients with HFrEF who have a lower arrhythmic risk as a result of advances in heart failure medical therapies. Thus, there is an unmet need for more appropriate selection of contemporary patients with HFrEF for a primary prevention ICD. In this article, we review data underlying the current clinical equipoise on the need for routine implantation of a primary prevention ICD in patients with HFrEF and the rationale for conducting clinical trials that aim to reassess the role of the ICD in this population.

Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices in Ischemic Cardiomyopathy

This review discusses the range of device therapy for ischemic cardiomyopathy (ICM). This article will review the primary data supporting guideline indications for cardiac implantable electronic devices in patients with ICM, with a focus on primary/secondary prevention transvenous implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs), cardiac resynchronization therapy, and subcutaneous/extravascular ICDs. In addition, this review discusses emerging device therapy for ICM including left bundle area pacing/defibrillation, cardiac contractility modulation and baroflex activation therapy. Device therapy for ICM continues to evolve to incorporate diverse modalities across the spectrum from prevention of sudden cardiac death to modifying cardiac remodeling and recovery.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Apparently Healthy, Young Adults

Importance

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence in apparently healthy adults younger than 40 years ranges from 4 to 14 per 100 000 person-years worldwide. Of an estimated 350 000 to 450 000 total annual out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the US, approximately 10% survive.

Observations

Among young adults who have had cardiac arrest outside of a hospital, approximately 60% die before reaching a hospital (presumed sudden cardiac death), approximately 40% survive to hospitalization (resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest), and 9% to 16% survive to hospital discharge (sudden cardiac arrest survivor), of whom approximately 90% have a good neurological status (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2). Autopsy-based studies demonstrate that 55% to 69% of young adults with presumed sudden cardiac death have underlying cardiac causes, including sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (normal heart by autopsy, most common in athletes) and structural heart disease such as coronary artery disease. Among young adults, noncardiac causes of cardiac arrest outside of a hospital may include drug overdose, pulmonary embolism, subarachnoid hemorrhage, seizure, anaphylaxis, and infection. More than half of young adults with presumed sudden cardiac death had identifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Genetic cardiac disease such as long QT syndrome or dilated cardiomyopathy may be found in 2% to 22% of young adult survivors of cardiac arrest outside of the hospital, which is a lower yield than for nonsurvivors (13%-34%) with autopsy-confirmed sudden cardiac death. Persons resuscitated from sudden cardiac arrest should undergo evaluation with a basic metabolic profile and serum troponin; urine toxicology test; electrocardiogram; chest x-ray; head-to-pelvis computed tomography; and bedside ultrasound to assess for pericardial tamponade, aortic dissection, or hemorrhage. Underlying reversible causes, such as ST elevation myocardial infarction, coronary anomaly, and illicit drug or medication overdose (including QT-prolonging medicines) should be treated. If an initial evaluation does not reveal the cause of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, transthoracic echocardiography should be performed to screen for structural heart disease (eg, unsuspected cardiomyopathy) or valvular disease (eg, mitral valve prolapse) that can precipitate sudden cardiac death. Defibrillator implant is indicated for young adult sudden cardiac arrest survivors with nonreversible cardiac causes including structural heart disease and arrhythmia syndromes.

Conclusions and Relevance

Cardiac arrest in apparently healthy adults younger than 40 years may be due to inherited or acquired cardiac disease or noncardiac causes. Among young adults who have had cardiac arrest outside of a hospital, only 9% to 16% survive to hospital discharge. Sudden cardiac arrest survivors require comprehensive evaluation for underlying causes of cardiac arrest and cardiac defibrillator should be implanted in those with nonreversible cardiac causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Long term outcomes post-ICD in Chagas cardiomyopathy and non-ischemic cardiomyopathy: A comparative analysis

BACKGROUND

Chagas cardiomyopathy (CCM) is a significant cause of ventricular arrhythmias and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Although, implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) have been used for all forms of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (NICM), studies on ICD efficacy in CCM are scarce.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to compare the long-term outcomes, mortality rates, and the occurrence of tachycardia therapies after ICD implantation in patients with CCM and NICM.

METHODS

The study was conducted over an 18-year period beginning in 2003. The primary outcome of this study was the difference in appropriate ICD therapies and mortality among patients in a single center receiving implant for CCM or NICM management. As a secondary outcome, we compared inappropriate shocks, presence of incessant ventricular tachycardia/electrical storm, and SCD.

RESULTS

The study included 207 patients (117 with CCM and 90 with NICM). The median follow-up time was 61 months [25-121] in the CCM group and 56.5 months [23-119] in the NICD group. During follow up, 39.3 % (46 patients) died in the CCM group and 5.6 % (5 patients) in the NICM group. Appropriate shocks, appropriate therapies, ATP, electrical storm and inappropriate shocks were all more frequent in patients with CCM.

CONCLUSION

CCM patients experienced higher mortality and more frequent appropriate ICD interventions compared to patients with NICM. ICDs appear effective and safe for long-term management in CCM.

Risk factors for non-benefit of implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy

Studies have demonstrated overall prognostic benefits of ICD implantation in patients at increased risk of sudden cardiac death. However, results are inconsistent in certain subgroups. This study aims to evaluate the prognostic implications of comorbidities on ICD outcomes and compare trends in patient selection and outcomes over a decade-long inclusion period. This study analysed 422 patients undergoing ICD implantation between 2011 and 2020. The study endpoint "no-benefit" was characterized by death from any cause occurring without prior appropriate ICD therapy. Benefit of ICD implantation was defined as either receiving appropriate ICD therapy before death or surviving until the end of the observation period. During a mean follow-up of 4.2 ± 3.0 years, no-benefit of ICD implantation was observed in 84 patients (20%). Independent risk factors for no-benefit were age ≥ 68 years (HR 4.599, p < 0.001), anemia (HR 2.549, p < 0.001), peripheral artery disease (HR 2.066, p = 0.007), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR 1.939, p = 0.014). Subgroup analysis by age < 68 years and ≥ 68 years demonstrated that the risk of no-benefit increases with age and comorbidities. When comparing patients with ICD implantation in 2011-2015 with those in 2016-2020, there were no significant differences in one-, two- and three-year-no-benefit rates. Different comorbidities were associated with no-benefit in the early and late implantation groups. Risk factors such as older age and specific comorbidities are associated with a higher likelihood of no-benefit from ICD implantation. A careful patient selection and consideration of individual risk factors besides advanced age is important.

Amiodarone or Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator in Chagas Cardiomyopathy: The CHAGASICS Randomized Clinical Trial

Importance

Over 10 000 people with Chagas disease experience sudden cardiac death (SCD) annually, mostly caused by ventricular fibrillation. Amiodarone hydrochloride and the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) have been empirically used to prevent SCD in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy.

Objective

To test the hypothesis that ICD is more effective than amiodarone therapy for primary prevention of all-cause mortality in patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy and moderate to high mortality risk, assessed by the Rassi score.

Design, Setting, and Participants

CHAGASICS is an open-label, randomized clinical trial. The study enrolled patients from 13 centers in Brazil from May 30, 2014, to August 13, 2021, with the last follow-up November 8, 2021. Patients with serological findings positive for Chagas disease, a Rassi risk score of at least 10 points (intermediate to high risk), and at least 1 episode of nonsustained ventricular tachycardia were eligible to participate. Data were analyzed from May 3, 2022, to June 16, 2023.

Interventions

Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ICD or amiodarone (with a loading dose of 600 mg after randomization).

Main Outcomes and Measures

The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, and secondary outcomes included SCD, hospitalization for heart failure, and necessity of a pacemaker during the entire follow-up.

Results

The study was stopped prematurely for administrative reasons, with 323 patients randomized (166 in the amiodarone group and 157 in the ICD group), rather than the intended 1100 patients. Analysis was by intention to treat at a median follow-up of 3.6 (IQR, 1.8-4.4) years. Mean (SD) age was 57.4 (9.8) years, 185 patients (57.3%) were male, and the mean (SD) left ventricular ejection fraction was 37.0% (11.6%). There were 60 deaths (38.2%) in the ICD arm and 64 (38.6%) in the amiodarone group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.86 [95% CI, 0.60-1.22]; P = .40). The rates of SCD (6 [3.8%] vs 23 [13.9%]; HR, 0.25 [95% CI, 0.10-0.61]; P = .001), bradycardia requiring pacing (3 [1.9%] vs 27 [16.3%]; HR, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.03-0.34]; P < .001), and heart failure hospitalization (14 [8.9%] vs 28 [16.9%]; HR, 0.46 [95% CI, 0.24-0.87]; P = .01) were lower in the ICD group compared with the amiodarone arm.

Conclusions and Relevance

In patients with chronic Chagas cardiomyopathy at moderate to high risk of mortality, ICD did not reduce the risk of all-cause mortality. However, ICD significantly reduced the risk of SCD, pacing need, and heart failure hospitalization compared with amiodarone therapy. Further studies are warranted to confirm the evidence generated by this trial.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01722942.

Risk of recurrent ventricular tachyarrhythmia following the occurrence of a first ventricular arrhythmic event in patients with a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

BACKGROUND

There are limited data on clinical and arrhythmic outcomes after a first ventricular tachyarrhythmia (VTA) in heart failure (HF) patients who receive a primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

OBJECTIVE

This study was designed to quantify the burden of and to identify risk factors for recurrent VTA in this population and to evaluate the risk of all-cause mortality associated with recurrent VTA.

METHODS

The study comprised 789 patients who experienced VTA following primary prevention ICD implantation in 5 ICD trials (MADIT-II, MADIT-RISK, MADIT-CRT, MADIT-RIT, RAID). Landmark analysis was used to quantify the burden and to identify predictors of recurrent VTA. Time-dependent analysis was used to evaluate the association of VTA recurrence with subsequent mortality.

RESULTS

The mean age of the study patients was 63 years, and 17% were women. The cumulative probability of experiencing at least 1 recurrent VTA episode at 3 years after a first VTA episode was 60%; the recurrent VTA burden after a first event during 3 years was 2.8 episodes per patient. The risk of recurrent VTA remained ≥56% at 3 years regardless of baseline clinical and echocardiographic risk factors. VTA recurrence was associated with a significant 2-fold increased risk of subsequent all-cause mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with a primary prevention ICD who experience an episode of VTA are at high risk of recurrent VTA, regardless of baseline risk factors. Recurrent VTA is associated with a pronounced increase in the risk of death. These findings suggest a need for early intervention after a first VTA in patients who receive a primary prevention ICD.

Incidence, Risk Factors and Predictors of Phantom Shocks in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillators: State-of-the-art Review

Background

Extensive research has been devoted to ICDs, but there is still a significant gap in the literature regarding phantom shocks (PSs). Understanding the frequency, predictors, risk factors, management and health implications of PSs is essential. This review aimed to comprehensively investigate PSs in patients with ICDs up to the present day. Specifically, the review explores the incidence of PSs, identifies risk factors that may increase their likelihood and determines predictive factors to help anticipate their occurrence. By addressing these points, the study aimed to enhance the understanding and management of PSs in ICD patients.

Methods

This study reviewed central databases from their inception up to March 2024. The primary objective was to examine the occurrence of PSs in patients with ICDs. Data were gathered on patient demographics, incidence rates, and various risk factors and predictors that might affect the occurrence of PSs. Then, a detailed analysis of the collected data was conducted to identify significant associations between these risk factors, predictors and the incidence of PSs.

Results

This review identified a significant association between prior ICD shocks, defibrillation threshold testing, the presence of depression and anxiety for the occurrence of PS in patients with ICDs. This underscores the importance of thoroughly evaluating and managing these factors to improve the care of individuals with ICDs.

Conclusion

PSs are often associated with various factors, such as previous shock therapy, defibrillation threshold testing, depression, anxiety and higher levels of education. It is crucial for healthcare providers to acknowledge these correlations and provide personalised care to patients experiencing PSs.

Excellent Outcomes After First-Line Ablation in Post-MI Patients With Tolerated VT and LVEF >35

BACKGROUND

Post-myocardial infarction (MI) patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) are considered at risk for VT recurrence and sudden cardiac death (SCD). Recent guidelines indicate that in selected patients catheter ablation should be considered instead of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD).

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to analyze outcomes of patients referred for VT ablation according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), tolerance of VT, and acute ablation outcome.

METHODS

Post-MI patients without prior ICD undergoing VT ablation at a single center between 2009 and 2022 were included. Patients who presented with tolerated VT and who had an LVEF >35% were offered catheter ablation as first-line therapy. ICD implantation was offered to all patients but was subject to shared decision according to clinical presentation, LVEF, and ablation outcome.

RESULTS

Eighty-six patients (mean age 69 ± 9 years, 84% male, mean LVEF 41 ± 9%) underwent VT ablation. In 66 patients, LVEF was >35%, of whom 51 had tolerated VT. Of these 51 patients, 37 (73%) were rendered noninducible. In 5 of 37 noninducible and in 11 of 14 inducible patients, an ICD was implanted. During a median follow-up of 40 months (Q1-Q3: 24-70 months), 10 of 86 patients had VT recurrence. The overall mortality was 27%, and 1 patient with ICD died suddenly. Among the 37 patients (none on antiarrhythmic drugs) with LVEF >35%, tolerated VT, and noninducibility, no SCD or VT recurrence occurred. Among the 14 patients with LVEF >35%, tolerated VT, and inducibility after ablation, no SCD occurred, but VT recurred in 29%.

CONCLUSIONS

Post-MI patients with LVEF >35%, tolerated VT, and noninducibility after ablation have an excellent prognosis. Deferring ICD implantation seems to be safe in these patients.

Machine learning for prediction of ventricular arrhythmia episodes from intracardiac electrograms of automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillators

BACKGROUND

Despite effectiveness of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in saving patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias (VAs), the temporal occurrence of VA after ICD implantation is unpredictable.

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to apply machine learning (ML) to intracardiac electrograms (IEGMs) recorded by ICDs as a unique biomarker for predicting impending VAs.

METHODS

The study included 13,516 patients who received Biotronik ICDs and enrolled in the CERTITUDE registry between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2020. Database extraction included IEGMs from standard quarterly transmissions and VA event episodes. The processed IEGM data were pulled from device transmissions stored in a centralized Home Monitoring Service Center and reformatted into an analyzable format. Long-range (baseline or first scheduled remote recording), mid-range (scheduled remote recording every 90 days), or short-range predictions (IEGM within 5 seconds before the VA onset) were used to determine whether ML-processed IEGMs predicted impending VA events. Convolutional neural network classifiers using ResNet architecture were employed.

RESULTS

Of 13,516 patients (male, 72%; age, 67.5 ± 11.9 years), 301,647 IEGM recordings were collected; 27,845 episodes of sustained ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation were observed in 4467 patients (33.0%). Neural networks based on convolutional neural networks using ResNet-like architectures on far-field IEGMs yielded an area under the curve of 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval of 0.79-0.87 in the short term, whereas the long-range and mid-range analyses had minimal predictive value for VA events.

CONCLUSION

In this study, applying ML to ICD-acquired IEGMs predicted impending ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation events seconds before they occurred, whereas midterm to long-term predictions were not successful. This could have important implications for future device therapies.

The Utility of Baseline Characteristics and [123I]MIBG Cardiac Adrenergic System Scintigraphy in Qualifying Patients with Post-Infarction Heart Failure for Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator (ICD) Placement

Background: Post-infarction heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) patients often face persistent risks of sudden cardiac arrest leading to sudden cardiac death. While implanting a cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) can enhance prognosis, complications and costs limit its widespread use. Current patient qualification criteria, relying on imperfect parameters, require refinement. The impairment of the cardiac adrenergic system in heart failure is associated with ventricular arrhythmias. The goal of the study was to assess the utility of cardiac adrenergic system scintigraphy in qualifying patients for ICD placement. Methods: In this prospective study of 85 post-infarction HFrEF patients at a single center, clinical assessments, laboratory tests, echocardiography, [123I]MIBG scintigraphy, and ICD implantation were performed. Scintigraphy involved planar chest images and evaluating the heart-to-mediastinum ratio (H/M) and washout rate (WO). SPECT imaging assessed [123I]MIBG uptake in 17 left ventricular segments to calculate the summed difference score (SDS). Results: During a median of 4-year follow-up, 22% of patients experienced appropriate ICD interventions, and 25% of patients died or underwent heart transplantation. The mean values of analyzed parameters did not significantly differ between groups. In the univariate analysis, younger age and moderately impaired left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) were correlated with more frequent ICD interventions. In comparison, older age and elevated NT-proBNP levels were associated with death or heart transplantation. Additionally, the univariate analysis identified SDS-15' as a prognostic factor for death/heart transplant. The multivariate analysis identified predictors for ICD interventions, including younger age, an EF of 30% or greater, and a larger left ventricular end-diastolic diameter. In contrast, older age and an LVEF of less than 25% were significant predictors of death or heart transplantation. Conclusions: Scintigraphic parameters did not effectively predict ICD interventions or death/heart transplantation, though the summed difference score demonstrated potential as a prognostic factor. Younger age with moderately impaired EF correlated with frequent ICD interventions, while in older age, EF < 25% predicted death or transplantation. Further investigation is needed for patients with borderline EF values.

European Society of Cardiology: the 2023 Atlas of Cardiovascular Disease Statistics

This report from the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Atlas Project updates and expands upon the 2021 report in presenting cardiovascular disease (CVD) statistics for the ESC member countries. This paper examines inequalities in cardiovascular healthcare and outcomes in ESC member countries utilizing mortality and risk factor data from the World Health Organization and the Global Burden of Disease study with additional economic data from the World Bank. Cardiovascular healthcare data were collected by questionnaire circulated to the national cardiac societies of ESC member countries. Statistics pertaining to 2022, or latest available year, are presented. New material in this report includes contemporary estimates of the economic burden of CVD and mortality statistics for a range of CVD phenotypes. CVD accounts for 11% of the EU's total healthcare expenditure. It remains the most common cause of death in ESC member countries with over 3 million deaths per year. Proportionately more deaths from CVD occur in middle-income compared with high-income countries in both females (53% vs. 34%) and males (46% vs. 30%). Between 1990 and 2021, median age-standardized mortality rates (ASMRs) for CVD decreased by median >50% in high-income ESC member countries but in middle-income countries the median decrease was <12%. These inequalities between middle- and high-income ESC member countries likely reflect heterogeneous exposures to a range of environmental, socioeconomic, and clinical risk factors. The 2023 survey suggests that treatment factors may also contribute with middle-income countries reporting lower rates per million of percutaneous coronary intervention (1355 vs. 2330), transcatheter aortic valve implantation (4.0 vs. 153.4) and pacemaker implantation (147.0 vs. 831.9) compared with high-income countries. The ESC Atlas 2023 report shows continuing inequalities in the epidemiology and management of CVD between middle-income and high-income ESC member countries. These inequalities are exemplified by the changes in CVD ASMRs during the last 30 years. In the high-income ESC member countries, ASMRs have been in steep decline during this period but in the middle-income countries declines have been very small. There is now an important need for targeted action to reduce the burden of CVD, particularly in those countries where the burden is greatest.

2024 HRS expert consensus statement on arrhythmias in the athlete: Evaluation, treatment, and return to play

Youth and adult participation in sports continues to increase, and athletes may be diagnosed with potentially arrhythmogenic cardiac conditions. This international multidisciplinary document is intended to guide electrophysiologists, sports cardiologists, and associated health care team members in the diagnosis, treatment, and management of arrhythmic conditions in the athlete with the goal of facilitating return to sport and avoiding the harm caused by restriction. Expert, disease-specific risk assessment in the context of athlete symptoms and diagnoses is emphasized throughout the document. After appropriate risk assessment, management of arrhythmias geared toward return to play when possible is addressed. Other topics include shared decision-making and emergency action planning. The goal of this document is to provide evidence-based recommendations impacting all areas in the care of athletes with arrhythmic conditions. Areas in need of further study are also discussed.

Disparities in the implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator in the United States

BACKGROUND

The annual incidence of sudden cardiac death is over 300,000 in the United States (US). Historically, inpatient implantation of secondary prevention implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) has been variable and subject to healthcare disparities.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate contemporary practice trends of inpatient secondary prevention ICD implants within the US on the basis of race, sex, and socioeconomic status (SES).

METHODS

The study is a retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample from 2016 to 2020 of adult discharges with a primary diagnosis of ventricular tachycardia (VT), ventricular flutter, and fibrillation (VF). Adjusted ICD implantation rates based on race, sex, and SES and associated temporal trends were calculated using multivariate regression.

RESULTS

A total of 193,600 primary VT/VF discharges in the NIS were included in the cohort, of which 57,895 (29.9%) had ICD placement. There was a significant racial and ethnic disparity in ICD placement for Black, Hispanic, Asian, and Native American patients as compared to White patients; adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.86 [p < .01], 0.90 [p  =  .03], 0.81[p < .01], 0.45 [p < .01], respectively. Female patients were also less likely to receive an ICD compared to male patients (aOR: 0.75, p < .01). Disparities in ICD placement remained stable over the study period (ptrend ≥ .05 in all races, both sexes and income categories).

CONCLUSION

Racial, sex, and SES disparities persisted for secondary prevention ICD implants in the US. An investigation into contributing factors and subsequent approaches are needed to address the modifiable causes of disparities in ICD implantation as these trends have not improved compared to historic data.

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in paediatric patients for primary vs. secondary prevention

AIMS

The decisions about placing an ICD in a child are more difficult than in an adult due to longer expected lifespan and the complication risk. Young patients gain the most years from ICDs, despite higher risk of device-related complications. The secondary prevention ICD indication is clear, and device is implanted regardless of potential complications. For primary prevention, risk of sudden cardiac death and complications need to be evaluated. We aimed to compare outcomes for primary and secondary prevention ICDs.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Retrospective nationwide cohort study including paediatric patients identified from the Danish ICD registry with ICD implanted at an age ≤ 15 from 1982-21. Demographics, complications (composite of device-related infections or lead-failure requiring re-operation, mortality because of arrhythmia, or unknown cause), and mortality were retrieved from medical charts. Endpoint was appropriate therapy (shock or anti-tachycardia pacing for ventricular tachycardia or fibrillation). Of 72 receiving an ICD, the majority had channelopathies (n = 34) or structural heart diseases (n = 28). ICDs were implanted in 23 patients for primary prevention and 49 for secondary prevention, at median ages of 13.8 and 11.6 years (P-value 0.01), respectively. Median follow-up was 9.0 (interquartile ranges: 4.7-13.5) years. The 10-year cumulative incidence of first appropriate therapy was 70%, with complication and inappropriate therapy rates at 41% and 15%, respectively. No difference was observed between prevention groups for all outcomes. Six patients died during follow-up.

CONCLUSION

In children, two-thirds are secondary prevention ICDs. Children have higher appropriate therapy and complication rates than adults, while the inappropriate therapy rate was low.

Predictors of Appropriate Therapies and Death in Patients with Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator and Chronic Chagas Heart Disease

BACKGROUND

There are few retrospective and prospective studies on implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) in primary and secondary prevention of sudden death in chronic Chagas heart disease (CCHD).

OBJECTIVES

To describe the long-term evolution of patients with CCHD and ICD and to identify and analyze predictors of mortality and appropriate device therapy in this population.

METHODS

This was a historical prospective study with 117 patients with ICD and CCHD. Devices were implanted from January 2003 to December 2021. Predictors of appropriate therapies and long-term mortality were identified and analyzed. The level of statistical significance was p < 0.05.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 117) had a median follow-up of 61 months (25 to 121 months); they were predominantly male (74%), with a median age of 55 years (48 to 64 years). There were 43.6% appropriate shocks, 26.5% antitachycardia pacing (ATP), and 51% appropriate therapies. During follow-up, 46 patients (39.7%) died. Mortality was 6.2% person-years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.6 to 8.3), with 2 sudden deaths during follow-up. Secondary prevention (hazard ratio [HR] 2.1; 95% CI: 1.1 to 4.3; p = 0.029) and ejection fraction less than 30% (HR 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1 to 3.1; p < 0.05) were predictors of appropriate therapies. Intermediate Rassi score showed a strong association with the occurrence of ATP alone (p = 0.015). Functional class IV (p = 0.007), left ventricular ejection fraction < 30 (p = 0.010), and age above 75 years (p = 0.042) were predictors of total mortality.

CONCLUSION

ICDs in CCHD showed a high incidence of appropriate activation, especially in patients with secondary prevention, low left ventricular ejection fraction, and intermediate Rassi score. Patients with congestive heart failure, elevated functional class, and age over 75 years showed elevated mortality. Survival function of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators and chronic Chagas heart disease. A - According to New York Heart Association functional class; B - According to left ventricular ejection fraction; C - According to Rassi score. D - According to age. CCHD: chronic Chagas heart disease; HR: hazard ratio; ICD: implantable cardioverter-defibrillator.

Catheter ablation as first-line treatment for ventricular tachycardia in patients with structural heart disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

In this systematic review and meta-analysis, we aim to evaluate the efficacy and safety of catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of ventricular tachycardia (VT) in patients with structural heart disease (SHD) and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Patients with SHD are particularly susceptible to VT, a condition that increases the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD). Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) can terminate VT and prevent SCD but do not prevent VT recurrence. The efficacy and safety of CA as a first-line treatment in SHD patients with preserved LVEF remain unclear. We searched PubMed/Medline, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane CENTRAL for studies reporting the outcomes of CA therapy in patients with VT and preserved LVEF, published up to January 19, 2023. The primary outcome was the incidence of SCD following catheter ablation as the first-line treatment of VT in patients with SHD and preserved LVEF. Secondary outcomes included all-cause mortality, VT recurrence, procedural complications, CA success rate, and ICD implantation after catheter ablation. We included seven studies in the meta-analysis, encompassing a total of 920 patients. The pooled success rate of catheter ablation was 84.6% (95% CI 67.2-93.6). Complications occurred in 6.4% (95% CI 4.0-9.9) of patients, and 13.9% (95% CI 10.1-18.8) required ICD implantation after ablation. VT recurrence was observed in 23.2% (95% CI 14.8-34.6) of patients, while the rate of sudden cardiac death (SCD) was 3.1% (95% CI 1.7-5.6). The overall prevalence of all-cause mortality in this population was 5% (95% CI 1.8-13). CA appears promising as a first-line VT treatment in patients with SHD and preserved LVEF, especially for monomorphic hemodynamically tolerated VT. However, due to the lack of direct comparisons with ICDs and anti-arrhythmic drugs, further research is needed to confirm these findings.

A comprehensive review on efficient artificial intelligence models for classification of abnormal cardiac rhythms using electrocardiograms

Deep learning has made many advances in data classification using electrocardiogram (ECG) waveforms. Over the past decade, data science research has focused on developing artificial intelligence (AI) based models that can analyze ECG waveforms to identify and classify abnormal cardiac rhythms accurately. However, the primary drawback of the current AI models is that most of these models are heavy, computationally intensive, and inefficient in terms of cost for real-time implementation. In this review, we first discuss the current state-of-the-art AI models utilized for ECG-based cardiac rhythm classification. Next, we present some of the upcoming modeling methodologies which have the potential to perform real-time implementation of AI-based heart rhythm diagnosis. These models hold significant promise in being lightweight and computationally efficient without compromising the accuracy. Contemporary models predominantly utilize 12-lead ECG for cardiac rhythm classification and cardiovascular status prediction, increasing the computational burden and making real-time implementation challenging. We also summarize research studies evaluating the potential of efficient data setups to reduce the number of ECG leads without affecting classification accuracy. Lastly, we present future perspectives on AI's utility in precision medicine by providing opportunities for accurate prediction and diagnostics of cardiovascular status in patients.

Devices and Athletics: Decision-Making Around Return to Play

Until recently, implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) were considered a contraindication to competitive athletics. Recent prospective observational registry data in athletes with ICDs who participated in sports against the societal recommendations at the time have demonstrated the safety of sports participation. While athletes did receive both appropriate and inappropriate shocks, these were not more frequent during sports participation than other activity, and there were no sports-related deaths or need for external resuscitation in the 440 athlete cohort (median followup 44 months). Optimization of medical therapies, device settings and having an emergency action plan allow many athletes to safely continue athletic activity.

Outcomes Following Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Insertion in Patients 80 Years of Age or Older: A Statewide Population Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Patients ≥ 80 years of age are underrepresented in major implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials, and real-world data are lacking. In this study, we sought to assess ICD utilisation, outcomes, and their predictors, in an unselected statewide population including patients ≥ 80 years old.

METHODS

We extracted details of ICDs implanted from 2009 to 2018 in New South Wales (NSW), Australia from the Centre for Health Record Linkage administrative data sets. Analysis was stratified into age groups of < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years.

RESULTS

A total of 9304 patients (mean age 66.1 ± 13.1 years; 12.1% ≥ 80 years) had de novo ICD placement at an average rate of 1163 ± 122 patients per annum, with more implants in men in all age groups. After adjusting for NSW population size by sex, age group, and calendar year, mean implantation rates were 5.5 ± 0.6, 63.2 ± 8.6, and 52.7 ± 10.8 per 100,000 persons per annum in patients aged < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years, respectively. In-hospital mortality was 0.4% and did not differ among age groups. However, 1-year mortality was 2.1%, 5.9%, and 10.7%, in those < 60 years, 60-79 years, and ≥ 80 years of age, respectively (P < 0.001), with hazard ratios for those aged ≥ 80 years of 4.3 (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.1-6.0) and those aged 60-79 years of 2.6 (95% CI 1.9-3.5) relative to those aged < 60 years (both P < 0.001) after adjusting for ICD indications, sex, implantation year, referral source, and comorbidities. In those aged ≥ 80 years, age > 83 years, congestive cardiac failure, chronic renal failure, neurodegenerative disease, and a higher Charlson comorbidity index score were each independent predictors of 1-year mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

ICD use in patients aged ≥ 80 years and 60-79 years was 10-fold that in patients aged < 60 years, and perioperative outcomes were good in all ages, but there was substantially increased 1-year mortality in those aged ≥ 80 years. Careful selection based on age and comorbidity may further reduce 1-year mortality in patients ≥ 80 years old receiving ICDs.

Do Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators Prevent Sudden Cardiac Death in End-Stage Renal Disease Patients on Dialysis?

Chronic kidney disease patients appear to be predisposed to heart rhythm disorders, including atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter, ventricular arrhythmias, and supraventricular tachycardias, which increase the risk of sudden cardiac death. The pathophysiological factors underlying arrhythmia and sudden cardiac death in patients with end-stage renal disease are unique and include timing and frequency of dialysis and dialysate composition, vulnerable myocardium, and acute proarrhythmic factors triggering asystole. The high incidence of sudden cardiac deaths suggests that this population could benefit from implantable cardioverter-defibrillator therapy. The introduction of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators significantly decreased the rate of all-cause mortality; however, the benefits of this therapy among patients with chronic kidney disease remain controversial since the studies provide conflicting results. Electrolyte imbalances in haemodialysis patients may result in ineffective shock therapy or the appearance of non-shockable underlying arrhythmic sudden cardiac death. Moreover, the implantation of such devices is associated with a risk of infections and central venous stenosis. Therefore, in the population of patients with heart failure and severe renal impairment, periprocedural risk and life expectancy must be considered when deciding on potential device implantation. Harmonised management of rhythm disorders and renal disease can potentially minimise risks and improve patients' outcomes and prognosis.

Early ICD implantation following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a retrospective cohort study from the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is generally beneficial in survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA).

OBJECTIVE

We studied the association between ICD implantation prior to discharge and survival in patients with cardiac aetiology or initial shockable rhythm in OHCA.

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in the Swedish Registry for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation. Treatment associations were estimated using propensity scores. We used gradient boosting, Bayesian additive regression trees, neural networks, extreme gradient boosting and logistic regression to generate multiple propensity scores. We selected the model yielding maximum covariate balance to obtain weights, which were used in a Cox regression to calculate HRs for death or recurrent cardiac arrest.

PARTICIPANTS

All cases discharged alive during 2010 to 2020 with a cardiac aetiology or initial shockable rhythm were included. A total of 959 individuals were discharged with an ICD, and 2046 were discharged without one.

RESULTS

Among those experiencing events, 25% did so within 90 days in the ICD group, compared with 52% in the other group. All HRs favoured ICD implantation. The overall HR (95% CI) for ICD versus no ICD was 0.38 (0.26 to 0.56). The HR was 0.42 (0.28 to 0.63) in cases with initial shockable rhythm; 0.18 (0.06 to 0.58) in non-shockable rhythm; 0.32 (0.20 to 0.53) in cases with a history of coronary artery disease; 0.36 (0.22 to 0.61) in heart failure and 0.30 (0.13 to 0.69) in those with diabetes. Similar associations were noted in all subgroups.

CONCLUSION

Among survivors of OHCA, those discharged with an ICD had approximately 60% lower risk of death or recurrent cardiac arrest. A randomised trial is warranted to study this further.

The clinical and economic impact of extended battery longevity of a substernal extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator

INTRODUCTION

The extravascular implantable cardioverter defibrillator (EV ICD) has extended projected battery longevity compared to the subcutaneous implantable cardioverter defibrillator (S-ICD). This study used modeling to characterize the need for generator changes, long-term complications, and overall costs for both the EV ICD and S-ICD in healthcare systems of various countries.

METHODS

Battery longevity data were modeled using a Markov model from averages reported in device labeling for the S-ICD and with engineering estimates based on real life usage from EV ICD Pivotal Study patient data to introduce variability. Clinical demographic data were derived from published literature. The primary outcomes were defined as the number of generator replacement surgeries, complications, and total healthcare system costs due to battery depletion over the expected lifetime of patients receiving EV ICD or S-ICD therapy.

RESULTS

Average modeled battery longevity was determined to be 7.3 years for the S-ICD versus 11.8 years for the EV ICD. The probability of a complication after a replacement procedure was 1.4%, with an operative mortality rate of 0.02%. The use of EV ICD was associated with 1.4-1.6 fewer replacements on average over an expected patient lifetime as compared to S-ICD and a 24.3%-26.0% reduction in cost. A one-way sensitivity analysis of the model for the US healthcare system found that use of an EV ICD resulted in a reduction in replacement surgeries of greater than 1 (1.1-1.6) along with five-figure cost savings in all scenarios ($18 602-$40 948).

CONCLUSION

The longer projected battery life of the EV ICD has the potential to meaningfully reduce long-term morbidity and healthcare resources related to generator changes from the perspective of multiple diverse healthcare systems.

Antiarrhythmic Treatment in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Arrhythmias are common in patients with heart failure (HF) and are associated with a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. Optimal antiarrhythmic treatment is therefore essential. Here, we review current approaches to antiarrhythmic treatment in patients with HF.

RECENT FINDINGS

In atrial fibrillation, rhythm control and ventricular rate control are accepted therapeutic strategies. In recent years, clinical trials have demonstrated a prognostic benefit of early rhythm control strategies and AF catheter ablation, especially in patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction. Prevention of sudden cardiac death with ICD therapy is essential, but optimal risk stratification is challenging. For ventricular tachycardias, recent data support early consideration of catheter ablation. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy is an adjunctive therapy in symptomatic patients but has no prognostic benefit and well-recognized (proarrhythmic) adverse effects. Antiarrhythmic therapy in HF requires a systematic, multimodal approach, starting with guideline-directed medical therapy for HF and integrating pharmacological, device, and interventional therapy.

Benefit of primary and secondary prophylactic implantable cardioverter defibrillator in elderly patients

BACKGROUND

The benefit of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) in elderly patients has been questioned. In the present study, we aimed to analyse the outcome of patients of different age groups with ICD implantation.

METHODS

We included all patients who received an ICD in our hospital from 2011 to 2020. Primary endpoints were (1) death from any cause and (2) appropriate ICD therapy (antitachycardia pacing/shock). A "benefit of ICD implantation" was defined as appropriate ICD therapy before death from any cause/or survival. "No benefit of ICD implantation" was defined as death from any cause without prior appropriate ICD therapy.

RESULTS

A total of 422 patients received an ICD (primary prophylaxis n = 323, secondary prophylaxis n = 99). At the time of implantation, 35 patients (8%) were >80 years and 106 patients were >75 years (25%). During the study period of 4.2 ± 3 years, benefit of ICD occurred in 89 patients (21%) and no benefit in 84 patients (20%). In primary prevention, the proportion of patients who had a benefit from ICD implantation decreased with increasing age, and there were no patients who benefited from ICD therapy in the group of patients >80 years. In secondary prophylaxis, the proportion of patients with a benefit from ICD implantation ranged from 20% to 30% in all age groups.

CONCLUSION

Our study suggests that the indication of primary prophylactic ICD in elderly and very old patients should be critically assessed. On the other hand, no patient should be denied secondary prophylactic ICD implantation because of age.

Predicting long-term survival after de novo cardioverter-defibrillator implantation for primary prevention: A population based study

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce the risk of sudden cardiac death in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. While short-term mortality benefit of ICD insertion has been established in landmark randomized controlled trials, little is known about the long-term outcomes of patients with ICDs in clinical practice. In this paper, we describe the long-term survival of patients following de novo ICD implantation for primary prevention in clinical practice and determine the factors which help predict survival after ICD implant.

Methods

Retrospective population-based study of all patients receiving a de novo ICD for primary prevention in Ontario, Canada from 2007 to 2011 using the Ontario ICD Database housed within ICES. Simple random selection was used to split the population into a derivation and internal validation cohort in a ratio of 2:1. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to determine predictors of interest and predict 10-year survival, model performance was assessed using calibration and validation.

Results

In the derivation cohort (n = 3399), mean age was 65.3 years (standard deviation [SD] = 11.0), 664 patients were female (19.5 %) and 2344 patients (69.0 %) had ischemic cardiomyopathy. Ten year survival was 45.7 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 44.0 %-47.4 %). The final prediction model included age, sex, disease factors (ischemic vs nonischemic cardiomyopathy, left ventricular ejection fraction) and patient factors (symptoms, comorbidities), and biomarkers at the time of ICD assessment. This model had good discrimination and calibration in derivation (0.79, 95 % CI 0.77, 0.81) and validation samples (0.78, 95 % CI 0.76, 0.79).

Conclusions

A combination of demographic and clinical factors determined at baseline can be used to predict 10-year survival in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators with good accuracy. Our findings help to identify individuals at risk of long-term mortality and may be useful in targeting future prevention strategies to enhance longevity in this high-risk population.

Machine learning-derived cycle length variability metrics predict spontaneously terminating ventricular tachycardia in implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients

Aims

Implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) therapies have been associated with increased mortality and should be minimized when safe to do so. We hypothesized that machine learning-derived ventricular tachycardia (VT) cycle length (CL) variability metrics could be used to discriminate between sustained and spontaneously terminating VT.

Methods and results

In this single-centre retrospective study, we analysed data from 69 VT episodes stored on ICDs from 27 patients (36 spontaneously terminating VT, 33 sustained VT). Several VT CL parameters including heart rate variability metrics were calculated. Additionally, a first order auto-regression model was fitted using the first 10 CLs. Using features derived from the first 10 CLs, a random forest classifier was used to predict VT termination. Sustained VT episodes had more stable CLs. Using data from the first 10 CLs only, there was greater CL variability in the spontaneously terminating episodes (mean of standard deviation of first 10 CLs: 20.1 ± 8.9 vs. 11.5 ± 7.8 ms, P < 0.0001). The auto-regression coefficient was significantly greater in spontaneously terminating episodes (mean auto-regression coefficient 0.39 ± 0.32 vs. 0.14 ± 0.39, P < 0.005). A random forest classifier with six features yielded an accuracy of 0.77 (95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.87) for prediction of VT termination.

Conclusion

Ventricular tachycardia CL variability and instability are associated with spontaneously terminating VT and can be used to predict spontaneous VT termination. Given the harmful effects of unnecessary ICD shocks, this machine learning model could be incorporated into ICD algorithms to defer therapies for episodes of VT that are likely to self-terminate.

Racial and Ethnic Disparities in Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Utilization: A Contemporary Review

Purpose of review

Sudden cardiac arrest is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Despite having a disproportionate burden of sudden cardiac death (SCD), rates of primary and secondary prevention of SCD with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy are lower among eligible racially minoritized patients. This review highlights the racial and ethnic disparities in ICD utilization, associated barriers to ICD care, and proposed interventions to improve equitable ICD uptake.

Recent findings

Racially minoritized populations are disproportionately eligible for ICD therapy but are less likely to see cardiac specialists, be counseled on ICD therapy, and ultimately undergo ICD implantation, fueling disparate outcomes. Racial disparities in ICD utilization are multifactorial, with contributions at the patient, provider, health system, and structural/societal level.

Summary

Racial and ethnic disparities have been demonstrated in preventing SCD with ICD use. Proposed strategies to mitigate these disparities must prioritize care delivery and access to care for racially minoritized patients, increase the diversification of clinical and implementation trial participants and the healthcare workforce, and center reparative justice frameworks to rectify a long history of racial injustice.

Disparities in Referral and Utilization of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) reduce mortality in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We investigated sex disparities in a contemporary Canadian population for utilization of primary prevention ICDs.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study on patients with reduced LVEF admitted to hospitals from 2010 to 2020 in Nova Scotia (population = 971,935).

RESULTS

There were 4406 patients eligible for ICDs: 3108 (71%) men and 1298 (29%) women. The mean follow-up time was 3.9 ± 3.0 years. Rates of coronary disease were similar between men and women (45.8% vs 44.0%; P = 0.28), but men had lower LVEF (26.6 ± 5.9% vs 27.2 ± 5.8%; P = 0.0017). The referral rate for ICD was 11% (n = 487), with 13% of men (n = 403) and 6.5% of women (n = 84) referred (P < 0.001). The ICD implantation rate in the population was 8% (n = 358), with 9.5% of men (n = 296) and 4.8% of women (n = 62) (P < 0.001) receiving the device. Men were more likely than women to receive an ICD (odds ratio 2.08, 95% confidence interval 1.61-2.70; P < 0.0001)). There was no significant difference in mortality between men and women (P = 0.2764). There was no significant difference in device therapies between men and women (43.8% vs 31.1%; P = 0.0685).

CONCLUSIONS

A significant disparity exists in the utilization of primary prevention ICDs between men and women in a contemporary Canadian population.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Cardiomyopathy in Asian Cohorts: Genetic and Epigenetic Insights

Previous studies on cardiomyopathies have been particularly valuable for clarifying pathological mechanisms in heart failure, an etiologically heterogeneous disease. In this review, we specifically focus on cardiomyopathies in Asia, where heart failure is particularly pertinent. There has been an increase in prevalence of cardiomyopathies in Asia, in sharp contrast with the decline observed in Western countries. Indeed, important disparities in cardiomyopathy incidence, clinical characteristics, and prognosis have been reported in Asian versus White cohorts. These have been accompanied by emerging descriptions of a distinct rare and common genetic basis for disease among Asian cardiomyopathy patients marked by an increased burden of variants with uncertain significance, reclassification of variants deemed pathogenic based on evidence from predominantly White cohorts, and the discovery of Asian-specific cardiomyopathy-associated loci with underappreciated pathogenicity under conventional classification criteria. Findings from epigenetic studies of heart failure, particularly DNA methylation studies, have complemented genetic findings in accounting for the phenotypic variability in cardiomyopathy. Though extremely limited, findings from Asian ancestry-focused DNA methylation studies of cardiomyopathy have shown potential to contribute to general understanding of cardiomyopathy pathophysiology by proposing disease and cause-relevant pathophysiological mechanisms. We discuss the value of multiomics study designs incorporating genetic, methylation, and transcriptomic information for future DNA methylation studies in Asian cardiomyopathy cohorts to yield Asian ancestry-specific insights that will improve risk stratification in the Asian population.

Revascularization and Left Ventricular Dysfunction for ICD Eligibility

Common triggers for sudden cardiac death (SCD) are transient ischemia, hemodynamic fluctuations, neurocardiovascular influences, and environmental factors. SCD occurs rapidly when sinus rhythm degenerates into ventricular tachycardia (VT) and/or ventricular fibrillation (VF), followed by asystole. Such progressive worsening of the cardiac rhythm is in most cases observed in the setting of ischemic heart disease and often associated with advanced left ventricular (LV) impairment. Revascularization prevents negative outcomes including SCD and heart failure (HF) due to LV dysfunction (LVD). The implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) on top of medical therapy is superior to antiarrhythmic drugs for patients with LVD and VT/VF. The beneficial effects of ICD have been demonstrated in primary prevention of SCD as well. However, yet debated is the temporal management for patients with LVD who are eligible to ICD prior to revascularization, either through percutaneous or surgical approach. Restoration of coronary blood flow has a dramatic impact on adverse LV remodeling, while it requires aggressive long-term antiplatelet therapy, which might increase complication for eventual ICD procedure when percutaneous strategy is pursued; on the other hand, when LV and/or multiorgan dysfunction is present and coronary artery bypass grafting is chosen, the overall risk is augmented, mostly in HF patients. The aims of this review are to describe the pathophysiologic benefits of revascularization, the studies addressing percutaneous, surgical or no revascularization and ICD implantation, as well as emerging defibrillation strategies for patients deemed at transient risk of SCD and/or at higher risk for transvenous ICD implantation.

Sex and Gender Differences in Ventricular Arrhythmias

Ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and VF, commonly occur in patients with underlying cardiomyopathy. Sex differences exist in almost every aspect of ventricular arrhythmia from epidemiology, anatomy, and physiology to management and response to therapy. Some of these may be attributed to variations in etiology, types, and rates of cardiomyopathy as well as biological differences between males and females, but the full explanation for these differences remains incomplete. Additionally, women have been underrepresented in many trials studying therapies for ventricular arrhythmias including ICD placement and ablation; thus, there remains a need for continued research in this population. This review will discuss the differences between the sexes as well as outline opportunities for future research in women with ventricular arrhythmias.

2023 HRS/APHRS/LAHRS guideline on cardiac physiologic pacing for the avoidance and mitigation of heart failure

Cardiac physiologic pacing (CPP), encompassing cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and conduction system pacing (CSP), has emerged as a pacing therapy strategy that may mitigate or prevent the development of heart failure (HF) in patients with ventricular dyssynchrony or pacing-induced cardiomyopathy. This clinical practice guideline is intended to provide guidance on indications for CRT for HF therapy and CPP in patients with pacemaker indications or HF, patient selection, pre-procedure evaluation and preparation, implant procedure management, follow-up evaluation and optimization of CPP response, and use in pediatric populations. Gaps in knowledge, pointing to new directions for future research, are also identified.

Management of Ventricular Arrhythmias in Heart Failure

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite substantial progress in medical and device-based heart failure (HF) therapy, ventricular arrhythmias (VA) and sudden cardiac death (SCD) remain a major challenge. Here we review contemporary management of VA in the context of HF with one particular focus on recent advances in imaging and catheter ablation.

RECENT FINDINGS

Besides limited efficacy of antiarrhythmic drugs (AADs), their potentially life-threatening side effects are increasingly acknowledged. On the other hand, with tremendous advances in catheter technology, electroanatomical mapping, imaging, and understanding of arrhythmia mechanisms, catheter ablation has evolved into a safe, efficacious therapy. In fact, recent randomized trials support early catheter ablation, demonstrating superiority over AAD. Importantly, CMR imaging with gadolinium contrast has emerged as a central tool for the management of VA complicating HF: CMR is not only essential for an accurate diagnosis of the underlying entity and subsequent treatment decisions, but also improves risk stratification for SCD prevention and patient selection for ICD therapy. Finally, 3-dimensional characterization of arrhythmogenic substrate by CMR and imaging-guided ablation approaches substantially enhance procedural safety and efficacy. VA management in HF patients is highly complex and should be addressed in a multidisciplinary approach, preferably at specialized centers. While recent evidence supports early catheter ablation of VA, an impact on mortality remains to be demonstrated. Moreover, risk stratification for ICD therapy may have to be reconsidered, taking into account imaging, genetic testing, and other parameters beyond left ventricular function.

Inter-American Society of Cardiology (CIFACAH-ELECTROSIAC) and Latin-American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS): multidisciplinary review on the appropriate use of implantable cardiodefibrillator in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

BACKGROUND

Our main objective was to present a multidisciplinary review on the epidemiology of sudden cardiac death (SCD) and the tools that could be used to identify malignant ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) and to perform risk stratification. In addition, indications and contraindications for the use of implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) in general and in special populations including the elderly and patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) are also given.

METHODS

An expert group from the Inter American Society of Cardiology (IASC), through their HF Council (CIFACAH) and Electrocardiology Council (ElectroSIAC), together with the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS), reviewed and discussed the literature regarding the appropriate use of an ICD in people with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFpEF). Indications and contraindications for the use of ICD are presented in this multidisciplinary review.

RESULTS

Numerous clinical studies have demonstrated the usefulness of ICD in both primary and secondary prevention of SCD in HFpEF. There are currently precise indications and contraindications for the use of these devices.

CONCLUSIONS

In some Latin American countries, a low rate of implantation is correlated with low incomes, but this is not the case for all Latin America. Determinants of the low rates of ICD implantation in many Latin American countries are still a matter of research. VA remains one of the most common causes of cardiovascular death associated with HFrEF and different tools are available for stratifying the risk of SCD in this population.

Cardiac Interventions in Patients With Active, Advanced Solid and Hematologic Malignancies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Invasive cardiac interventions are recommended to treat ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, multivessel coronary disease, severe symptomatic aortic stenosis, and cardiomyopathy. These recommendations are based on randomized controlled trials that historically included few individuals with active, advanced malignancies. Advanced malignancies represent a significant competing risk for mortality, and there is limited evidence to inform the risks and benefits of invasive cardiac interventions in affected patients. We review the benefit conferred by invasive cardiac interventions; the periprocedural considerations; the contemporary survival expectations of patients across several types of active, advanced malignancy; and the literature on cardiovascular interventions in these populations. Our objective is to develop a rational framework to guide clinical recommendations on the use of invasive cardiac interventions in patients with active, advanced cancer.

Development of the Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: JACC Historical Breakthroughs in Perspective

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) represent transformational technology, arguably the most significant advance in cardiovascular medicine in 50 years. The vision and determination of pioneers Mirowski and Mower was fundamental to this monumental achievement, working with limited resources and confronted by skepticism/criticism from medical establishment. The inventors were followed >35 years in which a multitude of innovative clinical scientists and engineers introduced technological advances leading to the sophisticated devices in practice today. A pivotal patient experiment with automated termination of ventricular fibrillation (1980) led to U.S. Food and Drug Administration approval. Transvenous lead systems converted ICDs from thoracotomy-based secondary prevention to primary prevention of sudden death devices in countless patients worldwide. ICD acceptance was solidified by prospective randomized controlled trials showing reduced mortality superior to antiarrhythmic drugs. ICDs eventually expanded from coronary disease to inherited arrhythmia conditions (eg, hypertrophic cardiomyopathy). The ICD breakthrough story demonstrates how significant progress is possible in medicine against all odds, given fearless imagination to pursue novel ideas that conflict with accepted wisdom.

Overview of Cardiac Arrhythmias and Treatment Strategies

Maintenance of normal cardiac rhythm requires coordinated activity of ion channels and transporters that allow well-ordered propagation of electrical impulses across the myocardium. Disruptions in this orderly process provoke cardiac arrhythmias that may be lethal in some patients. Risk of common acquired arrhythmias is increased markedly when structural heart disease caused by myocardial infarction (due to fibrotic scar formation) or left ventricular dysfunction is present. Genetic polymorphisms influence structure or excitability of the myocardial substrate, which increases vulnerability or risk of arrhythmias in patients. Similarly, genetic polymorphisms of drug-metabolizing enzymes give rise to distinct subgroups within the population that affect specific drug biotransformation reactions. Nonetheless, identification of triggers involved in initiation or maintenance of cardiac arrhythmias remains a major challenge. Herein, we provide an overview of knowledge regarding physiopathology of inherited and acquired cardiac arrhythmias along with a summary of treatments (pharmacologic or non-pharmacologic) used to limit their effect on morbidity and potential mortality. Improved understanding of molecular and cellular aspects of arrhythmogenesis and more epidemiologic studies (for a more accurate portrait of incidence and prevalence) are crucial for development of novel treatments and for management of cardiac arrhythmias and their consequences in patients, as their incidence is increasing worldwide.

Defibrillator exchange in the elderly

Background

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) therapy in elderly patients is controversial because survival benefits might be attenuated by nonarrhythmic causes of death.

Objective

The purpose of this study was to investigate the outcome of septuagenarians and octogenarians after ICD generator exchange (GE).

Methods

A total of 506 patients undergoing elective GE were analyzed to determine the incidence of ICD shocks and/or survival after GE. Patients were divided into a septuagenarian group (age 70-79 years) and an octogenarian group (age ≥80 years). The primary endpoint was death from any cause. Secondary endpoints were survival after appropriate ICD shock and death without experiencing ICD shocks after GE ("prior death").

Results

The association of the ICD with all-cause mortality and arrhythmic death was determined for septuagenarians and octogenarians. Comparing both groups, similar left ventricular ejection fraction (35.6% ± 11.2% vs 32.4% ± 8.9%) and baseline prevalence of New York Heart Association functional class III or IV heart failure (17.1% vs 14.7%) were found. During the entire follow-up period of the study, 42.5% of patients in the septuagenarian group died compared to 79% in the octogenarian group (P <.01). Prior death was significantly more frequent in both age groups than were appropriate ICD shocks. Predictors of mortality were common in both groups and included advanced heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, and renal failure.

Conclusion

In clinical practice, decision-making for ICD GE among the elderly should be considered carefully for individual patients.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator for Primary Prevention in Asia

In a contemporary setting, where the risk of sudden cardiac death (SCD) is low, heart failure management is improved, and technology is advanced, identifying the patients who would benefit the most from an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) treatment for primary prevention remains a challenge. The prevalence of SCD is lower in Asia when compared with the United States/Europe (35-45 per 100,000 person-years vs 55-100 per 100,000 person-years, respectively). Nevertheless, this should not explain the enormous gap in ICD's utilization among eligible candidates (∼12% in Asia vs ∼45% in the United States/Europe). The disparity between Asia and Western countries, together with significant variation among the Asian population and the previously mentioned challenges, requires an individualized approach and specific regional recommendation, especially in countries with limited resources where ICDs are being extremely underutilized This review focuses on the current knowledge of ICD therapy for SCD prevention and how to improve patient and device selection.

Use of Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators for Primary Prevention of Sudden Cardiac Death in Asia

The effectiveness of primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) is well established. However, there are several unsolved problems related to ICD use for primary prevention in Asia, including ICD underuse, population differences in underlying heart disease, and the rate of appropriate ICD therapy compared with Western countries. Although the prevalence of ischemic cardiomyopathy in Asia is lower than in Europe and the United States, the mortality rate of Asian patients with ischemic heart disease has been increasing recently. As for the use of ICDs for primary prevention, there have been no randomized clinical trials, and limited data are available in Asia. This review focuses on the unmet needs related to ICD use for primary prevention in Asia.

Seemingly Unrelated Regression Analysis of the Cost and Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes of the REVAMP Randomized Clinical Trial

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the 9-month cost and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) outcomes of resistance versus viral load testing strategies to manage virological failure in low-middle income countries.

METHODS

We analyzed secondary outcomes from the REVAMP clinical trial: a pragmatic, open label, parallel-arm randomized trial investigating resistance versus viral load testing for individuals failing first-line treatment in South Africa and Uganda. We collected resource data, valued according to local cost data and used the 3-level version of EQ-5D to measure HRQOL at baseline and 9 months. We applied seemingly unrelated regression equations to account for the correlation between cost and HRQOL. We conducted intention-to-treat analyses with multiple imputation using chained equations for missing data and performed sensitivity analyses using complete cases.

RESULTS

For South Africa, resistance testing and opportunistic infections were associated with statistically significantly higher total costs, and virological suppression was associated with lower total cost. Higher baseline utility, higher cluster of differentiation 4 (CD4) count, and virological suppression were associated with better HRQOL. For Uganda, resistance testing and switching to second-line treatment were associated with higher total cost, and higher CD4 was associated with lower total cost. Higher baseline utility, higher CD4 count, and virological suppression were associated with better HRQOL. Sensitivity analyses of the complete-case analysis confirmed the overall results.

CONCLUSION

Resistance testing showed no cost or HRQOL advantage in South Africa or Uganda over the 9-month REVAMP clinical trial.

Catheter Ablation of Ventricular Arrhythmia in Patients With an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) shocks are associated with higher rates of mortality and reduced quality of life. In this study we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of catheter ablation (CA) of ventricular tachycardia in patients with an ICD.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted to identify randomized controlled trials that compared CA vs control. The primary outcomes were recurrence of ventricular arrhythmia (ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation) and mortality. Kaplan-Meier curves for these outcomes were digitized to obtain individual patient data, which were pooled in a 1-stage meta-analysis to determine hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Secondary outcomes included cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, syncope, appropriate ICD therapies, appropriate ICD shocks, and inappropriate shocks. For these, study-level HRs or risk ratios were obtained and pooled in random effects meta-analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed for trials that investigated prophylactic CA (before or during ICD implantation).

RESULTS

Data on 9 studies and 1103 patients were retrieved. CA significantly reduced ventricular tachycardia/ventricular fibrillation recurrence compared with control (shared frailty HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81; P < 0.001) but not mortality (shared frailty HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.57-1.23; P = 0.361). CA was associated with significantly lower rates of cardiac hospitalization, electrical storm, appropriate ICD therapies and shocks, but not syncope or inappropriate shocks. Subgroup analysis showed similar results for prophylactic CA except that no significant difference was observed for cardiac hospitalizations.

CONCLUSIONS

CA is associated with reduced ventricular arrhythmia recurrence, appropriate ICD therapies/shocks, electrical storm, and cardiac hospitalization, and might be effective in preventing future morbidity. Future trials are needed to support the continued benefit of these promising results, and to investigate the optimal timing of ablation.