1
|
Kubsad S, Collins AP, Dasari SP, Chansky HA, Fernando ND, Hernandez NM. Impact of Extended Prophylactic Antibiotics on Risk of Prosthetic Joint Infection in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Matched Cohort Analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2024:00124635-990000000-01094. [PMID: 39254971 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-24-00290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/29/2024] [Indexed: 09/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Extended oral prophylactic antibiotics have been increasingly used in arthroplasty with the goal of reducing the risk of prosthetic joint infection (PJI). While a reduction in the rate of PJI has been noted with extended oral antibiotic regimens in high-risk patients, no large database study has assessed infection risk after primary total hip arthroplasty among well-balanced cohorts receiving and not receiving postoperative extended oral antibiotics. METHODS A retrospective cohort study was conducted using a national database, TriNetX, to identify patients who underwent primary total hip arthroplasty. This cohort was stratified by oral antibiotic prescription within one day of procedure. A one-to-one propensity score matching based on age, sex, class of obesity, and medical comorbidities was conducted. Outcomes explored in this study were 90-day risk of PJI, superficial skin infection, deep skin infection, and all-cause revision. RESULTS 90-day postoperative infection complications of PJI were higher in the group receiving antibiotics (hazard ratio: 1.83, P -value = 0.012). Other complications such as superficial skin infection, deep skin infection, and all-cause revision showed no statistically significant differences. CONCLUSION This database analysis of 5,476 patients demonstrated no decrease in complications of PJI, superficial or deep skin infection, or revision at 90 days. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to evaluate the efficacy of extended oral antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanjay Kubsad
- From the Department of Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Long DR, Cifu A, Salipante SJ, Sawyer RG, Machutta K, Alverdy JC. Preventing Surgical Site Infections in the Era of Escalating Antibiotic Resistance and Antibiotic Stewardship. JAMA Surg 2024; 159:949-956. [PMID: 38922606 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2024.0429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/27/2024]
Abstract
Importance According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and governing bodies within the American College of Surgeons, the administration of antibiotics as prophylaxis against infection prior to a planned elective procedure is, with rare exception, routinely recommended. The goal of "getting to zero" infections remains a high priority for policymakers, practitioners, and certainly for patients. Observations Despite the many advances in surgical technique, skin decontamination, sterile procedure, and enhanced recovery programs, surgical site infections continue to adversely affect procedures as diverse as dental implant surgery, joint arthroplasty, and major abdominal surgery. Although surgical site infection rates are at historically low levels, progress has stalled in recent reporting periods and such infections remain disabling, costly, and occasionally lethal. Stakeholders in the field, including surgeons, infectious diseases specialists, and industry, advocate for strategies emphasizing greater levels of intraoperative sterility or broader-spectrum antibiotic coverage as the most appropriate path forward. Conclusions and Relevance The current emphasis on ever-increasing levels of intraoperative sterility and extended-spectrum antibiotic use are not sustainable long-term solutions. Continuing to escalate these approaches may contribute to unintended consequences including antimicrobial resistance. Principles of antimicrobial stewardship and microbiome sciences can be applied to inform a more effective and sustainable approach to infection prevention in the field of surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dustin R Long
- Division of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology & Pain Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Adam Cifu
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stephen J Salipante
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Washington, Seattle
| | - Robert G Sawyer
- Department of Surgery, Western Michigan University Homer Stryker School of Medicine, Kalamazoo
| | | | - John C Alverdy
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Chalif J, Chambers LM, Yao M, Kuznicki M, DeBernardo R, Rose PG, Michener CM, Vargas R. Extended-duration antibiotics are not associated with a reduction in surgical site infection in patients with ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery with large bowel resection. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 186:161-169. [PMID: 38691986 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2024.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2024] [Revised: 03/26/2024] [Accepted: 04/05/2024] [Indexed: 05/03/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE(S) To evaluate whether extended dosing of antibiotics (ABX) after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with large bowel resection for advanced ovarian cancer is associated with reduced incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) compared to standard intra-operative dosing and evaluate predictors of SSI. METHODS A retrospective single-institution cohort study was performed in patients with stage III/IV ovarian cancer who underwent CRS from 2009 to 2017. Patients were divided into two cohorts: 1) standard intra-operative dosing ABX and 2) extended post-operative ABX. All ABX dosing was at the surgeon's discretion. The impact of antibiotic duration on SSI and other postoperative outcomes was assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox regression models. RESULTS In total, 277 patients underwent cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with large bowel resection between 2009 and 2017. Forty-nine percent (n = 137) received standard intra-operative ABX and 50.5% (n = 140) received extended post-operative ABX. Rectosigmoid resection was the most common large bowel resection in the standard ABX (89.9%, n = 124) and extended ABX groups (90.0%, n = 126), respectively. No significant differences existed between age, BMI, hereditary predisposition, or medical comorbidities (p > 0.05). No difference was appreciated in the development of superficial incisional SSI between the standard ABX and extended ABX cohorts (10.9% vs. 12.9%, p = 0.62). Of patients who underwent a transverse colectomy, a larger percentage of patients developed a superficial SSI versus no SSI (21% vs. 6%, p = 0.004). CONCLUSION(S) In this retrospective study of patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing CRS with LBR, extended post-operative ABX was not associated with reduced SSI, and prolonged administration of antibiotics should be avoided unless clinically indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Chalif
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America.
| | - Laura M Chambers
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, The Ohio State University Medical Center, Columbus, OH 43210, United States of America
| | - Meng Yao
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America
| | - Michelle Kuznicki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America
| | - Robert DeBernardo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America
| | - Peter G Rose
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America
| | - Chad M Michener
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America
| | - Roberto Vargas
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Desk A81, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jamaluddin NAH, Periyasamy P, Lau CL, Ponnampalavanar S, Lai PSM, Loong LS, Tg Abu Bakar Sidik TMI, Ramli R, Tan TL, Kori N, Yin MK, Azman NJ, James R, Thursky K, Naina Mohamed I. Assessment of antimicrobial prescribing patterns, guidelines compliance, and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in surgical-practice units: point prevalence survey in Malaysian teaching hospitals. Front Pharmacol 2024; 15:1381843. [PMID: 38720771 PMCID: PMC11076853 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2024.1381843] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 03/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Objectives: This study sought to investigate the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among adult surgical inpatients besides exploring the determinants of non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing to inform stewardship activities. Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study employing Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS) was conducted in April 2019 at two teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Results: Among 566 surgical inpatients, 44.2% were receiving at least one antimicrobial, for a total of 339 prescriptions. Antimicrobials belonging to the World Health Organization's Watch group were observed in 57.8% of cases. Both hospitals exhibited similar types of antimicrobial treatments prescribed and administration routes. A significant difference in antimicrobial choice was observed between hospitals (p < 0.001). Hospital with electronic prescribing demonstrated better documentation practice (p < 0.001). Guidelines compliance, 32.8% (p = 0.952) and appropriateness, 55.2% (p = 0.561) did not significantly differ. The major contributors of inappropriateness were incorrect duration, (15%) and unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage, (15.6%). Non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing were found to be 2 to 4 times significantly higher with antimicrobial prophylaxis prescription compared to empirical therapy. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve appropriate surgical prescribing are essential. These initiatives should prioritize surgical prophylaxis prescribing, focusing on reducing unnecessarily prolonged use and broad-spectrum antimicrobials, raising awareness among prescribers and promoting proper documentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nurul Adilla Hayat Jamaluddin
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Department of Hospital and Clinical Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Cyberjaya, Cyberjaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Petrick Periyasamy
- Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Chee Lan Lau
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | | | - Pauline Siew Mei Lai
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
- School of Medical and Life Sciences, Sunway University, Petaling Jaya, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Ly Sia Loong
- Department of Primary Care Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Tg Mohd Ikhwan Tg Abu Bakar Sidik
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Ramliza Ramli
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Toh Leong Tan
- Emergency Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Najma Kori
- Medical Department, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Mei Kuen Yin
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Nur Jannah Azman
- Pharmacy Department, Hospital Canselor Tuanku Muhriz, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Rodney James
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Karin Thursky
- The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Australia
- National Centre for Antimicrobial Stewardship, Department of Infectious Diseases, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Isa Naina Mohamed
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety Unit, Department of Pharmacology, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kourbeti I, Kamiliou A, Samarkos M. Antibiotic Stewardship in Surgical Departments. Antibiotics (Basel) 2024; 13:329. [PMID: 38667005 PMCID: PMC11047567 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics13040329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2024] [Revised: 03/31/2024] [Accepted: 03/31/2024] [Indexed: 04/29/2024] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) has emerged as one of the leading public health threats of the 21st century. New evidence underscores its significance in patients' morbidity and mortality, length of stay, as well as healthcare costs. Globally, the factors that contribute to antimicrobial resistance include social and economic determinants, healthcare governance, and environmental interactions with impact on humans, plants, and animals. Antimicrobial stewardship (AS) programs have historically overlooked surgical teams as they considered them more difficult to engage. This review aims to summarize the evolution and significance of AS in surgical wards, including the surgical intensive care unit (SICU) and the role of diagnostic stewardship (DS). The contribution of AS team members is presented. The new diagnostic modalities and the new technologies including artificial intelligence (AI) are also reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irene Kourbeti
- Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian, University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece; (A.K.); (M.S.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sergesketter AR, Langdell HC, Shammas RL, Geng Y, Atia AN, Rezak K, Sisk GC, Hollenbeck ST, Phillips BT. Efficacy of Prophylactic Postoperative Antibiotics in Tissue Expander-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg 2024; 153:496e-504e. [PMID: 37335554 DOI: 10.1097/prs.0000000000010825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Conflicting evidence exists regarding the utility of prophylactic postoperative antibiotics in tissue expander (TE)-based breast reconstruction. This study evaluated the risk of surgical-site infection between patients receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone versus prolonged postoperative antibiotics within a propensity score-matched cohort. METHODS Patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction receiving 24 hours of perioperative antibiotics alone were propensity score-matched 1:3 to patients receiving postoperative antibiotics based on demographics, comorbidities, and treatment factors. Incidence of surgical-site infection was compared based on duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. RESULTS Of a total of 431 patients undergoing TE-based breast reconstruction, postoperative antibiotics were prescribed in 77.2%. Within this cohort, 348 were included for propensity matching (no antibiotics, 87 patients; antibiotics, 261 patients). After propensity score matching, there was no significant difference in incidence of infection requiring intravenous (no antibiotics, 6.9%; antibiotics, 4.6%; P = 0.35) or oral antibiotics (no antibiotics, 11.5%; antibiotics, 16.1%; P = 0.16). In addition, rates of unplanned reoperation ( P = 0.88) and 30-day readmission ( P = 0.19) were similar. After multivariate adjustment, prescription of postoperative antibiotics was not associated with a reduction in surgical-site infection (OR, 0.5; 95% CI, -0.3 to 1.3; P = 0.23). CONCLUSIONS Within a propensity score-matched cohort accounting for patient comorbidities and receipt of adjuvant therapies, prescription of postoperative antibiotics after TE-based breast reconstruction conferred no improvement in rates of TE infection, reoperation, or unplanned health care use. These data underscore the need for multicenter randomized trials on the utility of antibiotic prophylaxis in TE-based breast reconstruction. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Therapeutic, III.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Hannah C Langdell
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| | - Ronnie L Shammas
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| | | | - Andrew N Atia
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| | - Kristen Rezak
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| | - Geoffroy C Sisk
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| | - Scott T Hollenbeck
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| | - Brett T Phillips
- From the Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial, and Oral Surgery, Duke University
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Madran B, Keske Ş, Tanju S, Cesur EE, Pala S, Dilege Ş, Ergönül Ö. The Practice of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Thoracic Surgery and its Effectiveness. INFECTIOUS DISEASES & CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY 2024; 6:60-65. [PMID: 38633440 PMCID: PMC11019725 DOI: 10.36519/idcm.2024.301] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
This study examines the effects of the bundle of antimicrobial stewardship measures for prophylactic antibiotics among thoracic surgery patients. A local protocol, based on current guidelines starting from December 2014, was developed by the Infection Control and Thoracic Surgery Teams. The effects of this protocol were assessed by monitoring a total of 1380 patients before and after its implementation from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2022.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bahar Madran
- Department of Public Health, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
- Koç University İşbank Research Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Şiran Keske
- Koç University İşbank Research Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), İstanbul, Türkiye
- Infection Control Department, American Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Serhan Tanju
- The Thoracic Surgery Department, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Ekin Ezgi Cesur
- The Thoracic Surgery Department, VKV American Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Selin Pala
- The Thoracic Surgery Department, VKV American Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Şükrü Dilege
- The Thoracic Surgery Department, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
- The Thoracic Surgery Department, VKV American Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
| | - Önder Ergönül
- Koç University İşbank Research Center for Infectious Diseases (KUISCID), İstanbul, Türkiye
- Infection Control Department, American Hospital, İstanbul, Türkiye
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Koç University School of Medicine, İstanbul, Türkiye
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Dellinger EP. What Is the Ideal Duration for Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis? Surg Infect (Larchmt) 2024; 25:1-6. [PMID: 38150526 DOI: 10.1089/sur.2023.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis practice became common in the 1970s and has since become almost universal. The earliest articles used three doses over 12 hours with the first being administered before the start of the operation. Conclusions: The duration of prophylaxis has varied widely in practice over time, but an increasing body of evidence has supported shorter durations, most recently with recommendations in influential guidelines to avoid administration after the incision is closed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Patchen Dellinger
- Department of Surgery, Division of General Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ayhan M, Coşkun B, Kayaaslan B, Hasanoğlu İ, Kalem AK, Eser F, Bilir YA, Ünlü S, Güner R. Point prevalence of antibiotic usage in major referral hospital in Turkey. PLoS One 2024; 19:e0296900. [PMID: 38295065 PMCID: PMC10830045 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0296900] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The most important and undesirable consequence of inappropriate antibiotic use is the spread of antibiotic resistance, increased adverse effects, increased mortality and healthcare costs. We aimed to assess antibiotic usage characteristics in inpatient setting in our center. MATERIALS AND METHODS A one-day, single center point-prevalence study was carried out on June 9th 2021, in Ankara City Hospital in Turkey. Data of antibiotic consumption, appropriateness of usage and predictors of inappropriate use in adult patients were evaluated. RESULTS Out of 2640 adult patients, 893 (33.8%) were receiving at least one antibiotic. A total of 1212 antibiotic prescriptions with an average of 1.44±0.64 were found. Antibiotics were most commonly used for therapeutic purpose (84.7%), followed by surgical prophylaxis (11.6%). Majority of therapeutically used antibiotics were empirical (67.9%). Infectious diseases consultation was present in 68.3% with a compliance rate of 95.7%. Rate of inappropriate use was 20%. The most frequent cause of inappropriateness was unnecessary use (52.5%). Most commonly and most inappropriately used antibiotics were carbapenems (17.5%) and first generation cephalosporins (38.7%), respectively. Most of the inappropriateness observed in first-generation cephalosporins was due to inappropriate longer surgical prophylaxis. While age is an independent risk factor for inappropriate antibiotic use (p = 0.042), COVID-19 unit admission, use for therapeutic purpose and infectious diseases consultation were protective factors (p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001). CONCLUSION Rate of inappropriate use was low, but inappropriate surgical prophylaxis remains an important problem in surgical units. There is a considerable need to implement an antimicrobial stewardship program that focuses on surgical prophylaxis practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Müge Ayhan
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Belgin Coşkun
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Bircan Kayaaslan
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - İmran Hasanoğlu
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ayşe Kaya Kalem
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Fatma Eser
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Yeşim Aybar Bilir
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Serpil Ünlü
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Rahmet Güner
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara City Hospital, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Weiner TR, El-Najjar DB, Herndon CL, Wyles CC, Cooper HJ. How are Oral Antibiotics Being Used in Total Joint Arthroplasty? A Review of the Literature. Orthop Rev (Pavia) 2024; 16:92287. [PMID: 38283138 PMCID: PMC10821814 DOI: 10.52965/001c.92287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/17/2023] [Indexed: 01/30/2024] Open
Abstract
While the role and benefit of perioperative intravenous (IV) antibiotics in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is well-established, oral antibiotic use in TJA remains a controversial topic with wide variations in practice patterns. With this review, we aimed to better educate the orthopedic surgeon on when and how oral antibiotics may be used most effectively in TJA patients, and to identify gaps in the literature that could be clarified with targeted research. Extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) use in high-risk primary, aseptic revision, and exchange TJA for infection may be useful in decreasing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) rates. When prescribing oral antibiotics either as EOAP or for draining wounds, patient factors, type of surgery, and type of infectious organisms should be considered in order to optimally prevent and treat PJI. It is important to maintain antibiotic stewardship by administering the proper duration, dose, and type of antibiotics and by consulting infectious disease when necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - H John Cooper
- Orthopedic Surgery Columbia University Medical Center
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Uçkay I, Bomberg H, Risch M, Müller D, Betz M, Farshad M. Broad-spectrum antibiotic prophylaxis in tumor and infected orthopedic surgery-the prospective-randomized, microbiologist-blinded, stratified, superiority trials: BAPTIST Trials. Trials 2024; 25:69. [PMID: 38243311 PMCID: PMC10799415 DOI: 10.1186/s13063-023-07605-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2022] [Accepted: 08/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis with 1st or 2nd generation cephalosporins is evidence-based in orthopedic surgery. There are, however, situations with a high risk of prophylaxis-resistant surgical site infections (SSI). METHODS We perform a superiority randomized controlled trial with a 10% margin and a power of 90% in favor of the broad-spectrum prophylaxis. We will randomize orthopedic interventions with a high risk for SSI due to selection of resistant pathogens (open fractures, surgery under therapeutic antibiotics, orthopedic tumor surgery, spine surgery with American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score ≥ 3 points) in a prospective-alternating scheme (1:1, standard prophylaxis with cefuroxime versus a broad-spectrum prophylaxis of a combined single-shot of vancomycin 1 g and gentamicin 5 mg/kg parenterally). The primary outcome is "remission" at 6 weeks for most orthopedic surgeries or at 1 year for surgeries with implant. Secondary outcomes are the risk for prophylaxis-resistant SSI pathogens, revision surgery for any reason, change of antibiotic therapy during the treatment of infection, adverse events, and the postoperative healthcare-associated infections other than SSI within 6 weeks (e.g., urine infections or pneumonia). With event-free surgeries to 95% in the broad-spectrum versus 85% in the standard prophylaxis arm, we need 2 × 207 orthopedic surgeries. DISCUSSION In selected patients with a high risk for infections due to selection of prophylaxis-resistant SSI, a broad-spectrum combination with vancomycin and gentamycin might prevent SSIs (and other postoperative infections) better than the prophylaxis with cefuroxime. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrial.gov NCT05502380. Registered on 12 August 2022. Protocol version: 2 (3 June 2022).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilker Uçkay
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Unit for Clinical and Applied Research, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
- Infection Control, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland.
| | - Hagen Bomberg
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Markus Risch
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Müller
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Betz
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Mazda Farshad
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
- Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Forchstrasse 340, 8008, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahmed NJ, Haseeb A, AlQarni A, AlGethamy M, Mahrous AJ, Alshehri AM, Alahmari AK, Almarzoky Abuhussain SS, Mohammed Ashraf Bashawri A, Khan AH. Antibiotics for preventing infection at the surgical site: Single dose vs. multiple doses. Saudi Pharm J 2023; 31:101800. [PMID: 38028220 PMCID: PMC10661588 DOI: 10.1016/j.jsps.2023.101800] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/20/2023] [Accepted: 09/21/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections are common and expensive infections that can cause fatalities or poor patient outcomes. To prevent these infections, antibiotic prophylaxis is used. However, excessive antibiotic use is related to higher costs and the emergence of antimicrobial resistance. Objectives The present meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of a single dosage versus several doses of antibiotics in preventing the development of surgical site infections. Methods PubMed was used to find clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of a single dosage versus several doses of antibiotics in avoiding the development of surgical site infections. The study included trials that were published between 1984 and 2022. Seventy-four clinical trials were included in the analysis. Odds ratios were used to compare groups with 95% confidence intervals. The data were displayed using OR to generate a forest plot. Review Manager (RevMan version 5.4) was used to do the meta-analysis. Results Regarding clean operations, there were 389 surgical site infections out of 5,634 patients in a single dose group (6.90%) and 349 surgical site infections out of 5,621 patients in multiple doses group (6.21%) (OR = 1.11, lower CI = 0.95, upper CI = 1.30). Regarding clean-contaminated operations, there were 137 surgical site infections out of 2,715 patients in a single dose group (5.05%) and 137 surgical site infections out of 2,355 patients in multiple doses group (5.82%) (OR = 0.87, lower CI = 0.68, upper CI = 1.11). Regarding contaminated operations, there were 302 surgical site infections out of 3,262 patients in a single dose group (9.26%) and 276 surgical site infections out of 3,212 patients in multiple doses group (8.59%) (OR = 1.11, lower CI = 0.84, upper CI = 1.47). In general, there were 828 surgical site infections out of 11,611 patients in a single dose group (7.13%) and 762 surgical site infections out of 11,188 patients in multiple doses group (6.81%) (OR = 1.05, lower CI = 0.93, upper CI = 1.20). The difference between groups was not significant. Conclusion The present study showed that using a single-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis was equally effective as using multiple doses of antibiotics in decreasing surgical site infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nehad J. Ahmed
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| | - Abdul Haseeb
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullmoin AlQarni
- Infectious Diseases Department, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Manal AlGethamy
- Department of Infection Prevention & Control Program, Alnoor Specialist Hospital Makkah, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmad J. Mahrous
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed M. Alshehri
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdullah K Alahmari
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Amer H. Khan
- Discipline of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Pulau Pinang, Malaysia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Friedel M, Thompson IAP, Kasting G, Polsky R, Cunningham D, Soh HT, Heikenfeld J. Opportunities and challenges in the diagnostic utility of dermal interstitial fluid. Nat Biomed Eng 2023; 7:1541-1555. [PMID: 36658344 DOI: 10.1038/s41551-022-00998-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
The volume of interstitial fluid (ISF) in the human body is three times that of blood. Yet, collecting diagnostically useful ISF is more challenging than collecting blood because the extraction of dermal ISF disrupts the delicate balance of pressure between ISF, blood and lymph, and because the triggered local inflammation further skews the concentrations of many analytes in the extracted fluid. In this Perspective, we overview the most meaningful differences in the make-up of ISF and blood, and discuss why ISF cannot be viewed generally as a diagnostically useful proxy for blood. We also argue that continuous sensing of small-molecule analytes in dermal ISF via rapid assays compatible with nanolitre sample volumes or via miniaturized sensors inserted into the dermis can offer clinically advantageous utility, particularly for the monitoring of therapeutic drugs and of the status of the immune system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Friedel
- Novel Device Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ian A P Thompson
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA
| | - Gerald Kasting
- The James L. Winkle College of Pharmacy, University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, OH, USA
| | - Ronen Polsky
- Nano and Micro Sensors, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, USA
| | - David Cunningham
- Department of Chemistry and Physics, Southeast Missouri State University, Cape Girardeau, MO, USA
| | - Hyongsok Tom Soh
- Department of Electrical Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.
| | - Jason Heikenfeld
- Novel Device Laboratory, Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sefah IA, Nyamadi D, Kurdi A, Bugri AA, Kerr F, Yamoah P, Pichierri G, Godman B. Assessment of the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among hospitalized patients in a teaching hospital in Ghana: findings and implications. Hosp Pract (1995) 2023; 51:223-232. [PMID: 37489811 DOI: 10.1080/21548331.2023.2241344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE There is a need to assess the quality of antimicrobial prescribing in hospitals as a first step toward improving future prescribing to reduce antimicrobial resistance (AMR). This is in line with Ghana's National Action Plan. METHODS A point prevalence survey of antimicrobial use was undertaken at the adult medical, surgical, and pediatric wards of Tamale Teaching Hospital using the standardized Global Point Prevalence Survey (GPPS) tool. Key target areas include adherence to current guidelines, limiting the prescribing of 'Watch' antibiotics with their greater resistance potential, and limiting the prescribing of antibiotics post-operatively to prevent surgical site infections (SSIs). RESULTS Out of 217 patients' medical records assessed, 155 (71.4%) patients were prescribed antimicrobials. The rates were similar among children (73.9%) and adults (70.3%). Most of the antibiotics prescribed were in the WHO 'Watch' group (71.0%) followed by those in the 'Access' group (29%). Out of the 23 cases indicated for surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis to prevent SSIs, the majority (69.6%) were given doses for more than 1 day, with none receiving a single dose. This needs addressing to reduce AMR and costs. Guideline compliance with the current Ghanaian Standard Treatment Guidelines (GSTG) for managing infections was also low (28.7%). The type of indication was the only independent predictor of guideline compliance (aOR = 0.013 CI 0.001-0.127, p-value = 0.001). CONCLUSION Given current concerns with antimicrobial prescribing in this hospital, deliberate efforts must be made to improve the appropriateness of prescribing to reduce AMR via targeted antimicrobial stewardship programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel Abebrese Sefah
- Pharmacy Practice Department, School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - David Nyamadi
- The School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Garankuwa, Pretoria, South Africa
- Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
- Center of Research and Strategic Studies, Lebanese French University, Erbil, Iraq
| | | | - Frances Kerr
- Scottish Antimicrobial Prescribing Group, Healthcare Improvement Scotland, Delta House, Glasgow, UK
| | - Peter Yamoah
- Pharmacy Practice Department, School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Ghana
| | - Giuseppe Pichierri
- Microbiology Department, Torbay and South Devon Foundation Trust, Lawes Bridge Torbay Hospital, Torquay, UK
| | - Brian Godman
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, UK
- Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Garankuwa, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Pathan SR, Bhende VV, Sharma TS, Kumar A, Patel VA, Sharma KB, Pandya SB. Antibiotic Utilization and Prophylaxis in Paediatric Cardiac Surgery: A Retrospective Observational Study at a Rural Tertiary Care Hospital in India. Cureus 2023; 15:e45107. [PMID: 37842391 PMCID: PMC10569353 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.45107] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Antimicrobial prophylaxis, involving short antibiotic courses preceding surgical procedures, is recommended to minimize postoperative infections. Paediatric cardiac surgeries are classified as clean procedures, though infection challenges persist due to illness severity and extended ICU stays. Antimicrobial prophylaxis varies, ranging from single doses to extended administration until catheters are removed. Typically lasting 24 to 48 hours, it has proven infection-reduction benefits. Despite these practices, uncertainties surround the optimal nature, timing, and duration of administration. This concern is amplified by escalating antimicrobial resistance driven by antibiotic overuse. Vulnerable paediatric populations bear heightened consequences of irrational antimicrobial use, contributing to global resistance trends. Yet, a defined optimal prophylaxis schedule for paediatric cardiac surgery is lacking. Importing adult guidelines may be inadequate due to paediatric research complexities and population diversity. Developing effective prophylaxis protocols is crucial for children undergoing cardiac surgery, given global antibiotic overuse and evolving drug resistance. Establishing an optimal prophylactic strategy remains a challenge, necessitating further research for evidence-based protocols to mitigate infections in this vulnerable patient cohort. Methods This study investigates antibiotic use in paediatric cardiac surgery. A retrospective analysis of 100 patients from a rural Indian hospital (2017-2018) assesses antibiotic patterns, including type, dose, duration, and adherence to prophylaxis protocols. Results In the studied cohort of paediatric cardiac surgery patients, complete compliance (100%) with antibiotic prophylaxis was observed. However, deviations were identified: 30% received antibiotics prematurely, and 30% did not align with institutional protocol criteria. Concerning antibiotic selection, 87% followed hospital policy with the recommended cefoperazone and sulbactam combination plus amikacin, while 9% received piperacillin/tazobactam + amikacin due to sepsis. Irregular use (22%) based on clinical records occurred. Furthermore, 4% received piperacillin/tazobactam + teicoplanin, with one instance of inappropriate higher antibiotic use. Regarding prophylaxis duration, only 27% adhered to the appropriate timeline, with 40% exceeding 48 hours, indicating extended use. Upon discharge, a notable proportion (45 patients) received antibiotic prescriptions. Among them, 73% were prescribed rationally, while 27% exhibited irrational antibiotic use. Conclusion The findings of this study shed a significant light on the issue of antibiotic misuse within the context of paediatric cardiac surgery. It underscores the pressing need for more stringent measures to regulate and address this concerning trend. The study underscores the pivotal importance of adhering rigorously to established protocols and guidelines for antibiotic prophylaxis. This adherence not only holds the potential to elevate the overall quality of patient care but also plays a critical role in combating the escalating challenge of antibiotic resistance. Through a concerted effort to optimize antibiotic usage, we can simultaneously enhance patient outcomes and contribute to the ongoing fight against the emergence of antibiotic-resistant strains, thus preserving the efficacy of these vital medications for future generations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sohilkhan R Pathan
- Clinical Research Services (CRS), Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| | - Vishal V Bhende
- Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| | - Tanishq S Sharma
- Pediatric Cardiac Surgery, Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| | - Amit Kumar
- Pediatric Cardiac Intensive Care, Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| | - Vishal A Patel
- Clinical Research Services (CRS), Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| | - Kruti B Sharma
- Clinical Research Services (CRS), Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| | - Shivangi B Pandya
- Clinical Research Services (CRS), Bhanubhai and Madhuben Patel Cardiac Centre, Bhaikaka University, Karamsad, IND
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Mendoza MA, Ranganath N, Garcia BB, Stevens RW, Lahr B, O’Horo J, Stulak J, Shah A. Left Ventricular Assist Device: Review of Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Strategies and Incidence of Infections at a Tertiary Care Center 12-Year Experience. Open Forum Infect Dis 2023; 10:ofad465. [PMID: 37732167 PMCID: PMC10508979 DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofad465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Left ventricular assist devices (LVAD) have an associated infection rate of 13%-80% postimplant. An optimal strategy for surgical infection prophylaxis (SIP) at the time of implantation has not been well defined. We aimed to evaluate the different LVAD implantation antibiotic prophylaxis regimens as well as the incidence of LVAD infection at our institution. Methods We performed a single-center, retrospective study of patients who underwent LVAD implantation between February 2007 and June 2019. The primary outcome was the incidence of LVAD infection (LVADI), within 3 months and 1 year of placement, between patients who received expanded or narrow-spectrum regimens for SIP. We assessed outcomes using Kaplan-Meier, time-to-first event. We used a noninferiority analysis, which was established if the narrow-spectrum event rate was no more than 5% greater than the expanded-spectrum event rate. Results We included 399 patients, 305 (76.4%) patients received narrow-spectrum SIP, whereas the remaining 94 (23.6%) patients received the expanded-spectrum regimen. Statistical noninferiority of the narrow spectrum to the multiple drug regimen was demonstrated at both time points, and statistical superiority of the narrow-spectrum group across 12-month follow up was further evident (P = .037). Conclusions We report evidence supporting noninferiority, or even superiority, of the narrow-spectrum over expanded-spectrum antimicrobial prophylaxis strategy with respect to LVADI. These findings support data-driven antimicrobial prophylaxis strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Alejandra Mendoza
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine News, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nischal Ranganath
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine News, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Bismarck Bisono Garcia
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine News, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Ryan W Stevens
- Department of Pharmacy Services, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Brian Lahr
- Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John O’Horo
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine News, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - John Stulak
- Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Aditya Shah
- Division of Public Health, Infectious Diseases, and Occupational Medicine News, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Abukhodair A, Alqarni MS, Alzahrani A, Bukhari ZM, Kadi A, Baabbad FM, Algarni A, Jamalallail S, Almohammadi M, Bennett SR. Risk Factors for Postoperative Infections in Cardiac Surgery Patients: A Retrospective Study. Cureus 2023; 15:e43614. [PMID: 37719533 PMCID: PMC10504570 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.43614] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/16/2023] [Indexed: 09/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background and objective Cardiac surgery is one of the most common surgical procedures globally; its incidence has been on the rise due to the faster pace of population aging thanks to technological and epidemiological advances. Patients who undergo cardiac surgeries may face various postoperative complications that might affect their survival, and one of these major complications is infection. Nosocomial pneumonia, surgical site infection (SSI), mediastinitis, bacteremia, and sepsis are common infections encountered after surgeries. In this study, we aimed to determine the common risk factors related to postoperative infections at the King Faisal Cardiac Center from January 2014 to September 2020. Materials and methods Records from 364 patients who underwent cardiac surgery and were aged above 18 years were assessed for postoperative infections in this retrospective cohort study. Patients who were immunosuppressed or had active systemic infections were excluded. Consent was waived by the Institutional Review Board. All procedures were performed at the King Faisal Cardiac Center, National Guard Hospital, Jeddah. Results Of the total 364 patients, 105 were women and 259 were men. The mean age of the cohort was 59 years (SD = 13) and the mean BMI was 29.1 kg/m2 (SD = 5.3). The study population showed a high prevalence of cardiac risk factors and diseases: diabetes (n = 244, 67%), hypertension (n = 230, 63%), dyslipidemia (n = 144, 40%), smoking (n = 80, 22%), heart failure (n = 41, 11%), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 6, 1.6%). The overall rate of postoperative infection was 32.7% (n = 120), and 17 (14%) of these infected patients underwent reoperations for infection. Conclusion Based on a thorough analysis of 364 patients undergoing various cardiac surgical procedures, including a multivariate analysis accounting for preoperative factors, there was a significant association between postoperative infections and hypertension, diabetes, increased preoperative activated partial thromboplastin time, and elevated HbA1c.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Mohammed S Alqarni
- Internal Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
- Internal Medicine, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, SAU
| | | | - Ziad M Bukhari
- Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
- College of Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Ammar Kadi
- Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
- Medicine, King Saud Bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences College of Medicine, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Faisal M Baabbad
- Emergency Medicine, Ministry of National Guard Health Affairs, Riyadh, SAU
| | - Abdullah Algarni
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, SAU
- Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Sahal Jamalallail
- Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, SAU
- Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Mohammed Almohammadi
- Hematopathology and Transfusion Medicine, National Guard Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Jeddah, SAU
- Medicine, King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, Jeddah, SAU
| | - Sean R Bennett
- Anesthesiology/Cardiac and Intensive Care, University Hospital Southampton NHS Foundation Trust, Southampton, GBR
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Baker AL, McElrath A, Giancola SE, Schumaker AL, Barsoumian AE. A Multidisciplinary Approach to Improvements in Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis at a Military Treatment Facility. Mil Med 2023; 188:e1854-e1858. [PMID: 36762987 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usad016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgical site infections complicate 2%-5% of surgeries. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, half of all surgical site infections are preventable. Adherence to published recommendations regarding perioperative antibiotic administration decreases the incidence of surgical site infections. Members of the Department of Anesthesia noticed casual observations of inaccurate prescribing of antibiotics at our institution, Brooke Army Medical Center, and approached the Antimicrobial Stewardship Program to collaborate on this issue. MATERIALS AND METHODS A team of anesthesiologists, clinical pharmacists, and infectious disease specialists collaborated with the Department of Surgery to improve this effort as part of a multiyear project from 2018 to 2021. We first assessed adherence to recommended perioperative antibiotic use to establish a baseline and next, noticing gaps, created a project with the goal to improve compliance to >90% across surveyed measures. Our key interventions included educational initiatives, creation of facility-specific guidelines, peer benchmarking, updating order sets, interdisciplinary collaboration, creation of intraoperative reminders and visual aids, and tailored presentations to selected services. RESULTS Of 292 charts (2.3% of cases from January to October 2018) reviewed pre-intervention, compliance rates were 84% for antibiotic choice, 92% for dose, 65% for redosing, and 71% for postoperative administration. Of doses, 100% were timed correctly, and thus, this variable was not targeted. Post-intervention, our review of 387 charts (10% of cases from May to November 2020) showed no change in correct antibiotic choice (84%) and statistical improvement to 96% for correct dose, 95% for correct redosing, and 85% for correct postoperative administration (P < .05 for all). CONCLUSIONS Our multidisciplinary approach of collaboration with multiple departments, creating guidelines and providing feedback, improved compliance with perioperative antibiotic administration recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amelia L Baker
- Department of Anesthesiology, Eglin Air Force Base Hospital, Eglin AFB, FL 32542, USA
| | - Angela McElrath
- Department of Anesthesiology, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA
| | - Stephanie E Giancola
- Patient Safety Program, Clinical Support Division, Defense Health Agency, San Antonio, TX 78205, USA
| | - Annabel L Schumaker
- Department of Pharmacy, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78219, USA
| | - Alice E Barsoumian
- Infectious Disease Service, Department of Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, TX 78234, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kostourou S, Samiotis I, Dedeilias P, Charitos C, Papastamopoulos V, Mantas D, Psichogiou M, Samarkos M. Effect of an E-Prescription Intervention on the Adherence to Surgical Chemoprophylaxis Duration in Cardiac Surgery: A Single Centre Experience. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:1182. [PMID: 37508278 PMCID: PMC10376074 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12071182] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2023] [Revised: 07/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/10/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
In our hospital, adherence to the guidelines for peri-operative antimicrobial prophylaxis (PAP) is suboptimal, with overly long courses being common. This practice does not offer any incremental benefit, and it only adds to the burden of antimicrobial consumption, promotes the emergence of antimicrobial resistance, and it is associated with adverse events. Our objective was to study the effect of an electronic reminder on the adherence to each element of PAP after cardiac surgery. We conducted a single center, before and after intervention, prospective cohort study from 1 June 2014 to 30 September 2017. The intervention consisted of a reminder of the hospital guidelines when ordering PAP through the hospital information system. The primary outcome was adherence to the suggested duration of PAP, while secondary outcomes included adherence to the other elements of PAP and incidence of surgical site infections (SSI). We have studied 1080 operations (400 pre-intervention and 680 post-intervention). Adherence to the appropriate duration of PAP increased significantly after the intervention [PRE 4.0% (16/399) vs. POST 15.4% (105/680), chi-square p < 0.001]; however, it remained inappropriately low. Factors associated with inappropriate duration of PAP were pre-operative hospitalization for <3 days, and duration of operation >4 h, while there were significant differences between the chief surgeons. Unexpectedly, the rate of SSIs increased significantly during the study (PRE 2.8% (11/400) vs. POST 5.9% (40/680), chi-square p < 0.019). The implemented intervention achieved a relative increase in adherence to the guideline-recommended PAP duration; however, adherence was still unacceptably low and further efforts to improve adherence are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sofia Kostourou
- Infection Prevention Unit, Evaggelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Ilias Samiotis
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Panagiotis Dedeilias
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | - Christos Charitos
- Department of Cardiac Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, Evaggelismos Hospital, 10676 Athens, Greece
| | | | - Dimitrios Mantas
- 2nd Propaedeutic Department of Surgery, Laikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Mina Psichogiou
- 1st Department of Medicine, Laikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Michael Samarkos
- 1st Department of Medicine, Laikon Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abul A, Karam M, Al-Shammari S, Giannoudis P, Pandit H, Nisar S. Peri-operative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in K-Wire Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Indian J Orthop 2023; 57:1000-1007. [PMID: 37384006 PMCID: PMC10293142 DOI: 10.1007/s43465-023-00879-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2022] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Introduction There are currently no standardised guidelines on whether antibiotic prophylaxis is required for Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation to minimise the risk of surgical site infection when used in patients undergoing clean orthopaedic surgery. Purpose To compare the outcomes of antibiotic prophylaxis versus no antibiotic in K-wire fixation when used in either in trauma or elective orthopaedics. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) Guidelines and a search of electronic information was conducted to identify all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and non-randomised studies comparing the outcomes of antibiotic prophylaxis group versus those without antibiotic in patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery in which K-wire fixation was used. Incidence of surgical site infection (SSI) was the primary outcome. Random effects modelling was used for the analysis. Results Four retrospective cohort studies and one RCT were identified with a total of 2316 patients. There was no significant difference between the prophylactic antibiotic and no antibiotic groups in terms of incidence of SSI (odds ratio [OR] = 0.72, P = 0.18). Conclusions There is no significant difference in administering peri-operative antibiotics for patients undergoing orthopaedic surgery using K-wire.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Abul
- Division of Surgical and Interventional Sciences, University College London, Gower Street, London, WC1E 6BT UK
| | - Mohammad Karam
- Department of Surgery, Farwaniya Hospital, Kuwait City, Kuwait
| | | | - Peter Giannoudis
- Leeds Orthopaedic Trauma Sciences, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Hermant Pandit
- Leeds Orthopaedic Trauma Sciences, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
| | - Sohail Nisar
- Leeds Orthopaedic Trauma Sciences, Leeds University, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Beckett Street, Leeds, LS9 7TF UK
- Leeds Institute of Rheumatic and Muskuloskeletal Medicine, Chapel Allerton, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Sartelli M, Boermeester MA, Cainzos M, Coccolini F, de Jonge SW, Rasa K, Dellinger EP, McNamara DA, Fry DE, Cui Y, Delibegovic S, Demetrashvili Z, De Simone B, Gkiokas G, Hardcastle TC, Itani KMF, Isik A, Labricciosa FM, Lohsiriwat V, Marwah S, Pintar T, Rickard J, Shelat VG, Catena F, Barie PS. Six Long-Standing Questions about Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Surgery. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:908. [PMID: 37237811 PMCID: PMC10215114 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12050908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infections (SSIs) are the most common adverse event occurring in surgical patients. Optimal prevention of SSIs requires the bundled integration of a variety of measures before, during, and after surgery. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is an effective measure for preventing SSIs. It aims to counteract the inevitable introduction of bacteria that colonize skin or mucosa into the surgical site during the intervention. This document aims to guide surgeons in appropriate administration of SAP by addressing six key questions. The expert panel identifies a list of principles in response to these questions that every surgeon around the world should always respect in administering SAP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marja A. Boermeester
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Miguel Cainzos
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Clínico Universitario, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, University of Pisa, 55126 Pisa, Italy
| | - Stijn W. de Jonge
- Department of Surgery, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center, 41200 Kocaeli, Turkey
| | | | - Deborah A. McNamara
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, Beaumont Hospital, D09V2N0 Dublin, Ireland
| | - Donald E. Fry
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL 60208, USA
| | - Yunfeng Cui
- Department of Surgery, Tianjin Nankai Hospital, Nankai Clinical School of Medicine, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300100, China
| | - Samir Delibegovic
- Department of Surgery, University Clinical Center of Tuzla, 75000 Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina
| | - Zaza Demetrashvili
- Department General Surgery, Kipshidze Central University Hospital, Tbilisi 0162, Georgia
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency and Metabolic Minimally Invasive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Poissy/Saint Germain en Laye, 78300 Poissy CEDEX, France
| | - George Gkiokas
- Second Department of Surgery, Aretaieion University Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 10679 Athens, Greece
| | - Timothy C. Hardcastle
- Department of Surgery, Nelson R. Mandela School of Clinical Medicine, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Mayville 4058, South Africa
| | - Kamal M. F. Itani
- Department of Surgery, VA Boston Health Care System, Boston University and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02118, USA
| | - Arda Isik
- Division of General Surgery, School of Medicine, Istanbul Medeniyet University, 34700 Istanbul, Turkey
| | | | - Varut Lohsiriwat
- Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10700, Thailand
| | - Sanjay Marwah
- Department of Surgery, BDS Post-Graduate Institute of Medical Sciences, Rohtak 124001, India
| | - Tadeja Pintar
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jennifer Rickard
- Department of Surgery, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
| | - Vishal G. Shelat
- Department of Hepato-Pancreatic-Biliary Surgery, Tan Tok Seng Hospital, Singapore 308433, Singapore
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of Surgery, “Bufalini” Hospital, 47023 Cesena, Italy
| | - Philip S. Barie
- Department of Surgery, Weill Cornell Medicine, E. Northport, New York, NY 11731, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Gul ZG, Yu M, Sharbaugh DR, Pekala KR, Lin JY, Sharbaugh AJ, Zhu TS, Worku H, Armann KM, Hudson CN, Hay JM, Grajales V, Yabes JG, Davies BJ, Jacobs BL. Utilizing a Questionnaire to Implement a Risk-based Antibiotic Prophylaxis Protocol for Transrectal Prostate Biopsy. Urology 2023; 175:18-24. [PMID: 36868411 PMCID: PMC11231993 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2022.11.058] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/06/2022] [Indexed: 03/05/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To develop and evaluate a risk-based antibiotic prophylaxis protocol for patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsy. METHODS We created a risk-based protocol for antibiotic prophylaxis before transrectal prostate biopsy. Patients were screened for infection risk-factors with a self-administered questionnaire. The protocol was implemented from January 1, 2020 to March 31, 2020. We compared patient risk-factors, antibiotic regimens, and 30-day infection rates for patients undergoing transrectal prostate biopsies during the intervention and for a 3-month period before the intervention. RESULTS There were 116 prostate biopsies in the preintervention group and 104 in the intervention group. Although there was no significant difference in the number of high-risk patients between the 2 groups (48% vs 55%; P = .33), the percentage of patients treated with augmented prophylaxis decreased from 74% to 45% (P = 0.03). The duration of antibiotic administration and the median number of doses prescribed also decreased significantly. Despite significant decreases in antibiotic use, there were no differences in infection rates (5% vs 5%; P = .90) or sepsis rates (1% vs 2%; P = .60). CONCLUSION We developed a risk-based protocol for prophylactic antibiotics before prostate biopsy. The protocol was associated with less antibiotic use but did not lead to an increase in infectious complications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeynep G Gul
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Michelle Yu
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Kelly R Pekala
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Jonathan Y Lin
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Toby S Zhu
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Hermoon Worku
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Kody M Armann
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Jordan M Hay
- School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Jonathan G Yabes
- Department of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA
| | | | - Bruce L Jacobs
- Department of Urology, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Calderwood MS, Anderson DJ, Bratzler DW, Dellinger EP, Garcia-Houchins S, Maragakis LL, Nyquist AC, Perkins KM, Preas MA, Saiman L, Schaffzin JK, Schweizer M, Yokoe DS, Kaye KS. Strategies to prevent surgical site infections in acute-care hospitals: 2022 Update. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2023; 44:695-720. [PMID: 37137483 PMCID: PMC10867741 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2023.67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 42] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The intent of this document is to highlight practical recommendations in a concise format designed to assist acute-care hospitals in implementing and prioritizing their surgical-site infection (SSI) prevention efforts. This document updates the Strategies to Prevent Surgical Site Infections in Acute Care Hospitals published in 2014. This expert guidance document is sponsored by the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). It is the product of a collaborative effort led by SHEA, the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology (APIC), the American Hospital Association (AHA), and The Joint Commission, with major contributions from representatives of a number of organizations and societies with content expertise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Deverick J. Anderson
- Duke Center for Antimicrobial Stewardship and Infection Prevention, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, United States
| | - Dale W. Bratzler
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
| | | | | | - Lisa L. Maragakis
- Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Ann-Christine Nyquist
- Children’s Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, United States
| | - Kiran M. Perkins
- Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, United States
| | - Michael Anne Preas
- University of Maryland Medical System, Baltimore, Maryland, United States
| | - Lisa Saiman
- Columbia University Irving Medical Center and NewYork–Presbyterian Hospital, New York, New York, United States
| | - Joshua K. Schaffzin
- Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Marin Schweizer
- Center for Access and Delivery Research and Evaluation, Iowa City VA Health Care System, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
| | - Deborah S. Yokoe
- University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, California, United States
| | - Keith S. Kaye
- Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Korytárová N, Kramer S, Schnepf A, Kreienbrock L, Volk HA. Rate of surgical site and urinary tract infections in dogs after cessation of antibiotics following spinal surgery. Vet Rec 2023; 192:e2340. [PMID: 36382900 DOI: 10.1002/vetr.2340] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Excessive use of antimicrobials and the increasing occurrence of antimicrobial resistance are major challenges in both human and veterinary medicine. The role of prophylactic antimicrobial therapy in orthopaedic and neurosurgeries in dogs can be questioned. The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of surgical site infections (SSI) and urinary tract infections (UTI) in dogs after cessation of antibiotics following spinal surgery. METHODS Electronic patient records from January 2018 to December 2019 were retrospectively reviewed to identify dogs that underwent spinal surgery (n = 158). Antimicrobial drug use and the presence of SSI and UTI were recorded. RESULTS Overall, SSI developed in 1.3% of dogs that underwent spinal surgery, while UTI developed in 8.2%. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria were detected in 5.1% of dogs. The rates of SSI, UTI and MDR did not differ significantly between dogs that received postoperative antimicrobial therapy and those that did not. LIMITATIONS The main limitation of this study was its retrospective design. CONCLUSION Overall, the SSI rate in this study was low. Cessation of postoperative antimicrobial use in dogs following spinal surgery did not have a negative effect on either SSI development or the occurrence of UTI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natália Korytárová
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Sabine Kramer
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Anne Schnepf
- Department of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Lothar Kreienbrock
- Department of Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Holger A Volk
- Department of Small Animal Medicine and Surgery, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Allel K, Day L, Hamilton A, Lin L, Furuya-Kanamori L, Moore CE, Van Boeckel T, Laxminarayan R, Yakob L. Global antimicrobial-resistance drivers: an ecological country-level study at the human-animal interface. Lancet Planet Health 2023; 7:e291-e303. [PMID: 37019570 DOI: 10.1016/s2542-5196(23)00026-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 48.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2022] [Revised: 01/20/2023] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a pressing, holistic, and multisectoral challenge facing contemporary global health. In this study we assessed the associations between socioeconomic, anthropogenic, and environmental indicators and country-level rates of AMR in humans and food-producing animals. METHODS In this modelling study, we obtained data on Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, third generation cephalosporins-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae, oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium AMR in humans and food-producing animals from publicly available sources, including WHO, World Bank, and Center for Disease Dynamics Economics and Policy. AMR in food-producing animals presented a combined prevalence of AMR exposure in cattle, pigs, and chickens. We used multivariable β regression models to determine the adjusted association between human and food-producing animal AMR rates and an array of ecological country-level indicators. Human AMR rates were classified according to the WHO priority pathogens list and antibiotic-bacterium pairs. FINDINGS Significant associations were identified between animal antimicrobial consumption and AMR in food-producing animals (OR 1·05 [95% CI 1·01-1·10]; p=0·013), and between human antimicrobial consumption and AMR specifically in WHO critical priority (1·06 [1·00-1·12]; p=0·035) and high priority (1·22 [1·09-1·37]; p<0·0001) pathogens. Bidirectional associations were also found: animal antibiotic consumption was positively linked with resistance in critical priority human pathogens (1·07 [1·01-1·13]; p=0·020) and human antibiotic consumption was positively linked with animal AMR (1·05 [1·01-1·09]; p=0·010). Carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanii, third generation cephalosporins-resistant Escherichia coli, and oxacillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus all had significant associations with animal antibiotic consumption. Analyses also suggested significant roles of socioeconomics, including governance on AMR rates in humans and animals. INTERPRETATION Reduced rates of antibiotic consumption alone will not be sufficient to combat the rising worldwide prevalence of AMR. Control methods should focus on poverty reduction and aim to prevent AMR transmission across different One Health domains while accounting for domain-specific risk factors. The levelling up of livestock surveillance systems to better match those reporting on human AMR, and, strengthening all surveillance efforts, particularly in low-income and middle-income countries, are pressing priorities. FUNDING None.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasim Allel
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Antimicrobial Resistance Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Institute for Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
| | - Lucy Day
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | | | - Leesa Lin
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health, Hong Kong Science Park, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Luis Furuya-Kanamori
- Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia
| | - Catrin E Moore
- The Centre for Neonatal and Paediatric Infection, Infection and Immunity Institute, St George's, University of London, UK
| | - Thomas Van Boeckel
- Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule, Zurich, Health Geography and Policy Group, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Ramanan Laxminarayan
- The One Health Trust, Washington DC, USA; The High Meadows Environmental Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Laith Yakob
- Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Infectious & Tropical Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK; Antimicrobial Resistance Centre, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Saleem Z, Ahsan U, Haseeb A, Altaf U, Batool N, Rani H, Jaffer J, Shahid F, Hussain M, Amir A, Rehman IU, Saleh U, Shabbir S, Qamar MU, Altowayan WM, Raees F, Azmat A, Imam MT, Skosana PP, Godman B. Antibiotic Utilization Patterns for Different Wound Types among Surgical Patients: Findings and Implications. Antibiotics (Basel) 2023; 12:678. [PMID: 37107040 PMCID: PMC10135394 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics12040678] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs) post-operatively. However, there are concerns with the extent of prophylaxis post-operatively, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). This increases antimicrobial resistance (AMR), which is a key issue in Pakistan. Consequently, we conducted an observational cross-sectional study on 583 patients undergoing surgery at a leading teaching hospital in Pakistan with respect to the choice, time and duration of antimicrobials to prevent SSIs. The identified variables included post-operative prophylactic antimicrobials given to all patients for all surgical procedures. In addition, cephalosporins were frequently used for all surgical procedures, and among these, the use of third-generation cephalosporins was common. The duration of post-operative prophylaxis was 3-4 days, appreciably longer than the suggestions of the guidelines, with most patients prescribed antimicrobials until discharge. The inappropriate choice of antimicrobials combined with prolonged post-operative antibiotic administration need to be addressed. This includes appropriate interventions, such as antimicrobial stewardship programs, which have been successful in other LMICs to improve antibiotic utilization associated with SSIs and to reduce AMR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zikria Saleem
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Faculty of Pharmacy, Bahuddin Zakaria University, Multan 60800, Pakistan
| | - Umar Ahsan
- Department of Infection Prevention and Control, Alnoor Specialist Hospital, Ministry of Health, Makkah 24241, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abdul Haseeb
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ummara Altaf
- Department of Pharmacy, Ghurki Trust Teaching Hospital, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Narjis Batool
- Center of Health Systems and Safety Research, Faculty of Medicine, Health and Human Sciences, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney 2109, Australia
| | - Hira Rani
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Javeria Jaffer
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Fatima Shahid
- Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Lahore, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Mujahid Hussain
- Department of Pharmacy, Indus Hospital and Health Network, Karachi 75190, Pakistan
| | - Afreenish Amir
- Department of Microbiology, Armed Forces Institute of Pathology, National University of Medical Sciences, Rawalpindi 46000, Pakistan
| | - Inaam Ur Rehman
- Punjab University College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Umar Saleh
- Punjab University College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Sana Shabbir
- Punjab University College of Pharmacy, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of the Punjab, Lahore 54000, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Usman Qamar
- Institute of Microbiology, Faculty of Life Sciences, Government College University Faisalabad, Faisalabad 38000, Pakistan
| | - Waleed Mohammad Altowayan
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Pharmacy, Qassim University, Buraydah 52571, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fahad Raees
- Department of Medical Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aisha Azmat
- Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine, Umm Al-Qura University, Makkah 24382, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mohammad Tarique Imam
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, College of Pharmacy, Prince Sattam Bin Abdul Aziz University, Al Kharj 11942, Saudi Arabia
| | - Phumzile P. Skosana
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Molotlegi Street, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria 0208, South Africa
| | - Brian Godman
- School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Ga-Rankuwa, Pretoria 0208, South Africa
- Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, Strathclyde University, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK
- Centre of Medical and Bio-Allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman 346, United Arab Emirates
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Viola GM, Szvalb AD, Malek AE, Chaftari AM, Hachem R, Raad II. Prevention of device-related infections in patients with cancer: Current practice and future horizons. CA Cancer J Clin 2023; 73:147-163. [PMID: 36149820 PMCID: PMC9992006 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21756] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2022] [Revised: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the past several years, multifaceted advances in the management of cancer have led to a significant improvement in survival rates. Throughout patients' oncological journeys, they will likely receive one or more implantable devices for the administration of fluids and medications as well as management of various comorbidities and complications related to cancer therapy. Infections associated with these devices are frequent and complex, often necessitating device removal, increasing health care costs, negatively affecting quality of life, and complicating oncological care, usually leading to delays in further life-saving cancer therapy. Herein, the authors comprehensively review multiple evidence-based recommendations along with best practices, expert opinions, and novel approaches for the prevention of diverse device-related infections. The authors present many general principles for the prevention of these infections followed by specific device-related recommendations in a systematic manner. The continuous involvement and meaningful cooperation between regulatory entities, industry, specialty medical societies, hospitals, and infection control-targeted interventions, along with primary care and consulting health care providers, are all vital for the sustained reduction in the incidence of these preventable infections.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- George M Viola
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ariel D Szvalb
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexandre E Malek
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Anne-Marie Chaftari
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Ray Hachem
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Issam I Raad
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Righi E, Mutters NT, Guirao X, Del Toro MD, Eckmann C, Friedrich AW, Giannella M, Kluytmans J, Presterl E, Christaki E, Cross ELA, Visentin A, Sganga G, Tsioutis C, Tacconelli E. ESCMID/EUCIC clinical practice guidelines on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis in patients colonized by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria before surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 2022; 29:463-479. [PMID: 36566836 DOI: 10.1016/j.cmi.2022.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2022] [Revised: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
SCOPE The aim of the guidelines is to provide recommendations on perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis (PAP) in adult inpatients who are carriers of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (MDR-GNB) before surgery. METHODS These evidence-based guidelines were developed after a systematic review of published studies on PAP targeting the following MDR-GNB: extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacterales, fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales, cotrimoxazole-resistant Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB), extremely drug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa, colistin-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, and pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. The critical outcomes were the occurrence of surgical site infections (SSIs) caused by any bacteria and/or by the colonizing MDR-GNB, and SSI-attributable mortality. Important outcomes included the occurrence of any type of postsurgical infectious complication, all-cause mortality, and adverse events of PAP, including development of resistance to targeted (culture-based) PAP after surgery and incidence of Clostridioides difficile infections. The last search of all databases was performed until April 30, 2022. The level of evidence and strength of each recommendation were defined according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach. Consensus of a multidisciplinary expert panel was reached for the final list of recommendations. Antimicrobial stewardship considerations were included in the recommendation development. RECOMMENDATIONS The guideline panel reviewed the evidence, per bacteria, of the risk of SSIs in patients colonized with MDR-GNB before surgery and critically appraised the existing studies. Significant knowledge gaps were identified, and most questions were addressed by observational studies. Moderate to high risk of bias was identified in the retrieved studies, and the majority of the recommendations were supported by low level of evidence. The panel conditionally recommends rectal screening and targeted PAP for fluoroquinolone-resistant Enterobacterales before transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy and for extended-spectrum cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales in patients undergoing colorectal surgery and solid organ transplantation. Screening for CRE and CRAB is suggested before transplant surgery after assessment of the local epidemiology. Careful consideration of the laboratory workload and involvement of antimicrobial stewardship teams before implementing the screening procedures or performing changes in PAP are warranted. High-quality prospective studies to assess the impact of PAP among CRE and CRAB carriers performing high-risk surgeries are advocated. Future well-designed clinical trials should assess the effectiveness of targeted PAP, including the monitoring of MDR-GNB colonization through postoperative cultures using European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing clinical breakpoints.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elda Righi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Nico T Mutters
- University Hospital Bonn, Institute for Hygiene and Public Health, Bonn, Germany
| | - Xavier Guirao
- Surgical Endocrine Unit, Department of General Surgery, Surgical Site Prevention Unit, Parc Tauli, Hospital Universitari Sabadell, Spain
| | - Maria Dolores Del Toro
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Microbiology, University Hospital Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain; Department of Medicine, University of Sevilla. Biomedicine Institute of Sevilla, Seville, Spain; Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red en Enfermedades Infecciosas, Spain
| | - Christian Eckmann
- Klinikum Hannoversch-Muenden, Academic Hospital of Goettingen University, Germany
| | - Alex W Friedrich
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Groningen, the Netherlands; Institute for European Prevention Networks in Infection Control, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Maddalena Giannella
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Jan Kluytmans
- Department of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, the Netherlands
| | - Elisabeth Presterl
- Department of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Eirini Christaki
- Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Ioannina, Ioannina, Greece
| | - Elizabeth L A Cross
- Department of Global Health and Infection, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, United Kingdom
| | - Alessandro Visentin
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
| | - Gabriele Sganga
- Emergency Surgery and Trauma, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Evelina Tacconelli
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
He K, Nayak RB, Allori AC, Brighton BK, Cina RA, Ellison JS, Goretsky MJ, Jatana KR, Proctor MR, Grant C, Thompson VM, Iwaniuk M, Cohen ME, Saito JM, Hall BL, Newland JG, Ko CY, Rangel SJ. Correlation Between Postoperative Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Use and Surgical Site Infection in Children Undergoing Nonemergent Surgery. JAMA Surg 2022; 157:1142-1151. [PMID: 36260310 PMCID: PMC9582965 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2022.4729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2022] [Accepted: 07/24/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Importance Use of postoperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is common in pediatric surgery despite consensus guidelines recommending discontinuation following incision closure. The association between postoperative prophylaxis use and surgical site infection (SSI) in children undergoing surgical procedures remains poorly characterized. Objective To evaluate whether use of postoperative surgical prophylaxis is correlated with SSI rates in children undergoing nonemergent surgery. Design, Setting, and Participants This is a multicenter cohort study using 30-day postoperative SSI data from the American College of Surgeons' Pediatric National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP-Pediatric) augmented with antibiotic-use data obtained through supplemental medical record review from June 2019 to June 2021. This study took place at 93 hospitals participating in the ACS NSQIP-Pediatric Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Stewardship Collaborative. Participants were children (<18 years of age) undergoing nonemergent surgical procedures. Exclusion criteria included antibiotic allergies, conditions associated with impaired immune function, and preexisting infections requiring intravenous antibiotics at time of surgery. Exposures Continuation of antimicrobial prophylaxis beyond time of incision closure. Main Outcomes and Measures Thirty-day postoperative rate of incisional or organ space SSI. Hierarchical regression was used to estimate hospital-level odds ratios (ORs) for SSI rates and postoperative prophylaxis use. SSI measures were adjusted for differences in procedure mix, patient characteristics, and comorbidity profiles, while use measures were adjusted for clinically related procedure groups. Pearson correlations were used to examine the associations between hospital-level postoperative prophylaxis use and SSI measures. Results Forty thousand six hundred eleven patients (47.3% female; median age, 7 years) were included, of which 41.6% received postoperative prophylaxis (hospital range, 0%-71.2%). Odds ratios (ORs) for postoperative prophylaxis use ranged 190-fold across hospitals (OR, 0.10-19.30) and ORs for SSI rates ranged 4-fold (OR, 0.55-1.90). No correlation was found between use of postoperative prophylaxis and SSI rates overall (r = 0.13; P = .20), and when stratified by SSI type (incisional SSI, r = 0.08; P = .43 and organ space SSI, r = 0.13; P = .23), and surgical specialty (general surgery, r = 0.02; P = .83; urology, r = 0.05; P = .64; plastic surgery, r = 0.11; P = .35; otolaryngology, r = -0.13; P = .25; orthopedic surgery, r = 0.05; P = .61; and neurosurgery, r = 0.02; P = .85). Conclusions and Relevance Use of postoperative surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis was not correlated with SSI rates at the hospital level after adjusting for differences in procedure mix and patient characteristics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine He
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Alexander C. Allori
- Division of Plastic, Maxillofacial & Oral Surgery, Department of Surgery, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Brian K. Brighton
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Levine Children's Hospital/Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | | | - Jonathan S. Ellison
- Department of Urology, Medical College of Wisconsin & Children’s Wisconsin, Milwaukee
| | | | - Kris R. Jatana
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Nationwide Children’s Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Mark R. Proctor
- Department of Neurosurgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | | | - Jacqueline M. Saito
- Department of Surgery, Washington University St Louis School of Medicine, and BJC Healthcare, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Bruce L. Hall
- American College of Surgeons, Chicago, Illinois
- Department of Surgery, Washington University St Louis School of Medicine, and BJC Healthcare, St Louis, Missouri
| | - Jason G. Newland
- Department of Pediatrics, Washington University St Louis School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri
| | | | - Shawn J. Rangel
- Department of Surgery, Boston Children’s Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Weber J, Kalash Z, Simunovic F, Bonaventura B. Prolonged postoperative antibiotic administration reduces complications after medial thigh lift. J Plast Surg Hand Surg 2022; 56:361-368. [PMID: 34928776 DOI: 10.1080/2000656x.2021.2010738] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
There is widespread consensus that there is no indication for postoperative antibiotic administration after elective surgery. However, medial thigh lift (MTL) remains a procedure with a notoriously high rate of wound-healing disorders and infections. This study investigates the correlation between prolonged antibiotic administration and complications after MTL in massive weight loss patients. We performed a single-institution retrospective review of 121 patients undergoing MTL between 2009 and 2020. Data on postoperative outcome, demography, surgery and comorbidities were collected. All patients received intravenous antibiotics preoperatively. One group was continued on oral antibiotics for two weeks postoperatively. Complications and surgical site infections were observed and evaluated. There was no difference between the groups regarding age, BMI, or presence of obesity-associated risk factors. We observed complications in 76 patients (71%), with 60 (56%) minor and 16 (15%) major complications. The group without prolonged antibiotic administration had a higher number of total complications (OR 3.5; p = 0.0037), major complications (OR 4; p = 0.01), and wound infections (OR 6.8; p = 0.0004). Logistical regression analysis showed that this effect was independent of type of weight loss, resection volume, and age. Reduction of major infections by prolonged antibiotics was, however, dependent on BMI Δ. No side-effects associated with antibiotics were registered in this series. This study suggests that prolonged antibiotic administration may decrease complications in MTL. We thus continue to use prolonged antibiotic administration after MTL. Further research is needed to determine the optimal duration of antibiotic treatment. Level of Evidence: Level IV: therapeutic study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Weber
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Z Kalash
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - F Simunovic
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - B Bonaventura
- Department of Plastic and Hand Surgery, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Chung WTG, Shafi H, Seah J, Purnima P, Patun T, Kam KQ, Seah VXF, Ong RYL, Lin L, Choo RSM, Lingegowda P, Lim CLL, Chung JS, Chua NGSY, Lee TH, Yap MY, Ng TM, Somani J. National surgical antibiotic prophylaxis guideline in Singapore. ANNALS OF THE ACADEMY OF MEDICINE, SINGAPORE 2022. [DOI: 10.47102/annals-acadmedsg.2022273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: Institutional surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) guidelines are in place at all public hospitals in Singapore, but variations exist and adherence to guidelines is not tracked consistently. A national point prevalence survey carried out in 2020 showed that about 60% of surgical prophylactic antibiotics were administered for more than 24 hours. This guideline aims to align best practices nationally and provides a framework for audit and surveillance.
Method: This guideline was developed by the National Antimicrobial Stewardship Expert Panel’s National Surgical Antibiotic Prophylaxis Guideline Development Workgroup Panel, which comprises infectious diseases physicians, pharmacists, surgeons and anaesthesiologists. The Workgroup adopted the ADAPTE methodology framework with modifications for the development of the guideline. The recommended duration of antibiotic prophylaxis was graded according to the strength of consolidated evidence based on the scoring system of the Singapore Ministry of Health Clinical Practice Guidelines.
Results: This National SAP Guideline provides evidence-based recommendations for the rational use of antibiotic prophylaxis. These include recommended agents, dose, timing and duration for patients undergoing common surgeries based on surgical disciplines. The Workgroup also provides antibiotic recommendations for special patient population groups (such as patients with β-lactam allergy and patients colonised with methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus), as well as for monitoring and surveillance of SAP.
Conclusion: This evidence-based National SAP Guideline for hospitals in Singapore aims to align practices and optimise the use of antibiotics for surgical prophylaxis for the prevention of surgical site infections while reducing adverse events from prolonged durations of SAP.
Keywords: Antibiotic prophylaxis duration, antimicrobial resistance, antimicrobial stewardship, hospital-acquired infection, surgical site infections
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Li Lin
- Ng Teng Fong General Hospital, Singapore
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Effects of implementing a clinical pathway on antibiotic prophylaxis for patients who underwent an elective surgery. Sci Rep 2022; 12:20176. [PMID: 36418406 PMCID: PMC9684115 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-24145-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 11/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
A reduction in the unnecessary use of antibiotic prophylaxis can prevent antibiotic resistance and adverse drug events. We aimed to evaluate the effects of implementing clinical pathways (CPs) on adherence to a systematic and appropriate duration of antibiotic prophylaxis. We identified 61 eligible CPs and a total of 44,062 patients who underwent elective surgeries associated with CPs. The Poisson mixed model with an interrupted time-series analysis frame was applied to the patient-level data. This enabled a comparison of the adherence rate before and after CP implementation. Furthermore, we examined the effect of application or completion of CP on the adherence rate after implementation. Adherence to the antibiotic prophylaxis guideline substantially increased (incident rate ratio [IRR] 8.05; 95 confidence interval [CI] 2.64-24.55), compared with that before implementation. Following the implementation into the electronic entry system, we observed an improved adherence not only in CP completion but also in attempted CP execution (IRR of the executed but not completed cases 1.54; 95% CI 1.17-2.04; IRR of the executed and competed cases, 1.94; 95% CI 1.4-2.69). The implementation of CP into the electronic prescribing system was associated with a significant increase in the appropriate use of antibiotic prophylaxis among patients who underwent elective surgeries. The results suggest that a computer-assisted CP system for electronic health records could improve antibiotic adherence without significant expense.
Collapse
|
33
|
International Survey of Practice for Prophylactic Systemic Antibiotic Therapy in Hip and Knee Arthroplasty. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:antibiotics11111669. [DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11111669] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2022] [Revised: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: Prophylactic systemic antibiotics are acknowledged to be an important part of mitigating prosthetic joint infections. Controversy persists regarding optimal antibiotic regimes. We sought to evaluate current international antibiotics guidelines for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) of the hip and knee. (2) Methods: 42 arthroplasty societies across 6 continents were contacted and their published literature reviewed. (3) Results: 17 societies had guidelines; of which 11 recommended an antibiotic agent or antibiotic class (10—cephalosporin; 1—cloxacillin); 15 recommended antibiotic infusion within an hour of incision and 10 advised for post-operative doses (8—up to 24 h; 1—up to 36 h; 1—up to 48 h). (4) Conclusions: Prophylactic antibiotic guidelines for TJA are often absent or heterogenous in their advice.
Collapse
|
34
|
Chua WC, Rahman SA, Deris ZZ. Prevalence, Risk Factors and Microbiological Profile of Orthopaedic Surgical Site Infection in North-Eastern Peninsular Malaysia. Malays Orthop J 2022; 16:94-103. [PMID: 36589372 PMCID: PMC9791909 DOI: 10.5704/moj.2211.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction The devastating outcome of orthopaedic surgical site infections (SSI) are largely preventable if its risk factors, causative organisms and antimicrobial susceptibility patterns in the regional area are known. Materials and methods We conducted a retrospective study to address the lack of epidemiological and microbiological data on orthopaedic SSI in Malaysia. All the 80 patients diagnosed and treated for microbiologically proven orthopaedic SSIs in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia from April 2015 to March 2019 were included in a 1:2 case control study. Results The prevalence of SSI in clean and clean-contaminated surgeries was 1.243%, which is consistent with most of the studies worldwide, but is low compared to other studies done in Malaysia. The most common type of orthopaedics SSI were internal fixation infections (46.25%), superficial SSIs (25.2%) and Prosthetic joint infections (18.75%). Obesity and tobacco use were found to be significant risk factors of orthopaedic SSI. The most common perioperative prophylaxis used was IV cefuroxime. Majority of the cases (86.5%) received prolonged prophylactic antibiotics. The most common causative agent was Staphylococcus aureus (31.25%), followed by Pseudomonas aeruginosa (26.25%) and Enterobacter spp (7.5%). Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) accounted for 20% of the S. aureus infections. Up to 19.4% of the Gram-negative organisms are multidrug resistant. The higher rate of isolation of organisms resistant to the prophylactic antibiotics being used may be related to the prolonged use of prophylactic antibiotics, which exerted selective pressure for the acquisition of resistant organisms. Conclusion Despite its relatively low prevalence in our local institution and worldwide, the prevention of SSI in orthopaedic practice is crucial to avoid morbidity, mortality and high healthcare cost. This may be achieved by control of modifiable risk factors such as obesity and tobacco use, appropriate use of prophylactic antibiotics and implementation of good surgical and infection control practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- WC Chua
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - SA Rahman
- Department of Orthopaedics, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia
| | - ZZ Deris
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia,Corresponding Author: Zakuan Zainy Deris, Department Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Malaysia ;
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Carender CN, Sekar P, Prasidthrathsint K, DeMik DE, Brown TS, Bedard NA. Rates of Antimicrobial Resistance With Extended Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis After Total Joint Arthroplasty. Arthroplast Today 2022; 18:112-118. [PMID: 36312888 PMCID: PMC9615136 DOI: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.09.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is increased interest and utilization of extended oral antibiotic prophylaxis (EOAP) following primary and revision total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). The purpose of this study was to look for potential associations between EOAP and differential rates of antimicrobial resistance or epidemiology of organisms causing periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) following primary and aseptic revision THAs/TKAs. Methods Patients who developed PJI following a primary or aseptic revision TKA/THA at a single institution from 2009 to 2020 were retrospectively identified. Patients who received at least 7 days of EOAP following the surgery were noted. Rates of antimicrobial resistance were compared between standard antibiotic prophylaxis and EOAP cohorts using the Fisher's exact test. Results One hundred twenty-eight cultures were obtained from 119 patients with PJI. Fourty-four cases (37%) developed PJI after EOAP. Staphylococcus aureus was the most frequently isolated organism (30% of all cultures; 78% were methicillin-sensitive). Rates of antimicrobial resistance were similar between standard antibiotic prophylaxis and EOAP cohorts in all but 2 instances: Increased resistance to erythromycin and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole was observed in coagulase-negative Staphylococci isolates in the EOAP cohort (89% vs 21%, P < .01; 44% vs 0%, P = .02). An increased frequency of gram-negative organisms was observed in the EOAP group (22% vs 8%, P = .03). Conclusions Rates of antimicrobial resistance were not significantly different between EOAP and standard antibiotic prophylaxis cohorts except in coagulase-negative Staphylococci. The increased frequency of gram-negative infections was present in the EOAP cohort. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to better understand the impact of EOAP on antimicrobial resistance and PJI epidemiology. Level of Evidence Level III; retrospective cohort study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher N. Carender
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Poorani Sekar
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Kunatum Prasidthrathsint
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA,Department of Pathology and Clinical Microbiology, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - David E. DeMik
- Department of Orthopedics and Rehabilitation, University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics, Iowa City, IA, USA
| | - Timothy S. Brown
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Houston Methodist, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Nicholas A. Bedard
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hip and Knee Reconstruction, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA,Corresponding author. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Division of Hip and Knee Reconstruction, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MD 55905, USA. Tel.: +1 507 284 4896.
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Polisetty RS, Borkowski J, Georges D, Mowers S, Bolch C, Quiñones-Boex A, Murray M. Antibiotic Stewardship Attitudes and Beliefs Among Frontline Staff Nurses: Impact of Virtual Education. EMJ MICROBIOLOGY & INFECTIOUS DISEASES 2022. [DOI: 10.33590/emjmicrobiolinfectdis/10151610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
Background: Nurses are vital healthcare team members and are often underutilised in antimicrobial stewardship (AS) activities. Several nursing responsibilities, such as taking allergy history and obtaining cultures, already overlap with AS activities. Nurses can play a crucial role in promoting AS in resource-limited settings. This study was conducted to assess frontline staff nurses’ baseline attitudes and beliefs towards AS, and see if a virtual education campaign consisting of newsletters and tip sheets would affect those attitudes and beliefs.
Methods: An online survey (pre-survey) was conducted of all in-patient nurses employed in the authors’ hospital on their attitudes and beliefs regarding AS. The survey consisted of 24 questions divided into three domains: demographic and practice information, nursing roles, and beliefs and attitudes towards AS programmes (ASP). After obtaining the results of the pre-survey, the authors started distributing monthly newsletters on various AS topics via email and posting them on a resource page. Topics included how to obtain an accurate allergy history, how to use microbiology results to help guide decisions, and stop therapy in cases of colonisation. The authors also distributed the same survey as a follow-up 6-month survey (post-survey) in March 2021 to gauge the impact of their virtual education efforts.
Results: In total, 109 nurses working in the adult in-patient setting of the authors’ institution completed the pre-survey in September 2020, and 64 nurses completed the post-survey in March 2021. Overall, most nurses had a positive attitude towards AS tasks, and over 90% of those who responded in the pre-survey and post-survey agreed with the statement that nurses are antibiotic stewards, thought it was important or very important to obtain appropriate cultures, and understood the relationship between Clostridioides difficile and antibiotics. Most pre-survey respondents listed knowledge gaps in microbiology (47 out of 64 [86%]) and antibiotics (53 out of 64 [84%]) as well as scope of practice concerns (48 out of 64 [75%]) as barriers to nurse participation. The virtual education helped raise the familiarity with the ASP and more nurses in the post-survey said they were familiar with the stewardship programme compared with the pre-survey (48.4% versus 23.2%; p=0.001).
Conclusions: This study showed that most nurses consider themselves antibiotic stewards and want to participate in AS activities; however, barriers to nursing involvement, such as lack of knowledge, scope of practice concerns, and time constraints, persist. Virtual education may be an option to increase nursing awareness and participation on ASPs in resource-limited settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Radhika S. Polisetty
- Department of Pharmacy, Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois, USA; Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove Campus, Illinois, USA
| | - Jaime Borkowski
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Northwestern Medicine Delnor Hospital, Geneva, Illinois, USA
| | - Dorothy Georges
- Medical Care Center, Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois, USA; Department of Professional Practice, Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Stacy Mowers
- Department of Professional Practice, Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois, USA
| | - Charlotte Bolch
- Office of Research and Sponsored Programs, College of Graduate Studies, Midwestern University, Glendale, Arizona, USA
| | - Ana Quiñones-Boex
- Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove Campus, Illinois, USA
| | - Milena Murray
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, Midwestern University College of Pharmacy, Downers Grove Campus, Illinois, USA; Northwestern Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Sefah IA, Denoo EY, Bangalee V, Kurdi A, Sneddon J, Godman B. Appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a teaching hospital in Ghana: findings and implications. JAC Antimicrob Resist 2022; 4:dlac102. [PMID: 36226227 PMCID: PMC9549739 DOI: 10.1093/jacamr/dlac102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Surgical site infections (SSIs) are among the most common infections seen in hospitalized patients in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs), accounting for up to 60% of hospital-acquired infections. Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) has shown to be an effective intervention for reducing SSIs and their impact. There are concerns of inappropriate use of SAP in Ghana and therefore our audit in this teaching hospital. Methods A retrospective cross sectional clinical audit of medical records of patients undergoing surgery over a 5 month duration from January to May 2021 in Ho Teaching Hospital. A data collection form was designed to collect key information including the age and gender of patients, type and duration of surgery, choice and duration of SAP. The collected data was assessed for the proportion of SAP compliance with Ghana Standard Treatment Guidelines (STGs) and any association with various patient, surgical wound and drug characteristics. Results Of the 597 medical records assessed, the mean age of patients was 35.6 ± 12.2 years with 86.8% (n = 518) female. Overall SAP compliance with the STG was 2.5% (n = 15). SAP compliance due to appropriate choice of antimicrobials was 67.0% (n = 400) and duration at 8.7% (n = 52). SAP compliance was predicted by duration of SAP (P < 0.000) and postoperative hospitalization duration (P = 0.005). Conclusions SAP compliance rate was suboptimal, principally due to a longer duration of prescription. Quality improvement measures such as education of front-line staff on guideline compliance, coupled with clinical audit and regular updates, are urgently needed to combat inappropriate prescribing and rising resistance rates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Israel Abebrese Sefah
- Corresponding author. E-mail: @IsraelSefah, @BangaleeVarsha, @Amanjkurdi6, @jacquisneddons
| | - Edinam Yawo Denoo
- School of Pharmacy, University of Health and Allied Sciences, Ho, Volta Region, Ghana
| | - Varsha Bangalee
- Discipline of Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Health Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Durban, South Africa
| | - Amanj Kurdi
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK,Department of Pharmacology, College of Pharmacy, Hawler Medical University, Erbil, Iraq
| | | | - Brian Godman
- Department of Pharmacoepidemiology, Strathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow G4 0RE, UK,Centre of Medical and Bio-allied Health Sciences Research, Ajman University, Ajman, United Arab Emirates,Department of Public Health Pharmacy and Management, School of Pharmacy, Sefako Makgatho Health Sciences University, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Warren DK, Peacock KM, Nickel KB, Fraser VJ, Olsen MA. Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics following mastectomy with and without breast reconstruction. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2022; 43:1382-1388. [PMID: 34569458 PMCID: PMC8957624 DOI: 10.1017/ice.2021.400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prophylactic antibiotics are commonly prescribed at discharge for mastectomy, despite guidelines recommending against this practice. We investigated factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use after mastectomy with and without immediate reconstruction and the impact on surgical-site infection (SSI). STUDY DESIGN We studied a cohort of women aged 18-64 years undergoing mastectomy between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2015, using the MarketScan commercial database. Patients with nonsurgical perioperative infections were excluded. Postdischarge oral antibiotics were identified from outpatient drug claims. SSI was defined using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis codes. Generalized linear models were used to determine factors associated with postdischarge prophylactic antibiotic use and SSI. RESULTS The cohort included 38,793 procedures; 24,818 (64%) with immediate reconstruction. Prophylactic antibiotics were prescribed after discharge after 2,688 mastectomy-only procedures (19.2%) and 17,807 mastectomies with immediate reconstruction (71.8%). The 90-day incidence of SSI was 3.5% after mastectomy only and 8.8% after mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. Antibiotics with anti-methicillin-sensitive Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA) activity were associated with decreased SSI risk after mastectomy only (adjusted relative risk [aRR], 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.55-0.99) and mastectomy with immediate reconstruction (aRR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.73-0.88), respectively. The numbers needed to treat to prevent 1 additional SSI were 107 and 48, respectively. CONCLUSIONS Postdischarge prophylactic antibiotics were common after mastectomy. Anti-MSSA antibiotics were associated with decreased risk of SSI for patients who had mastectomy only and those who had mastectomy with immediate reconstruction. The high numbers needed to treat suggest that potential benefits of postdischarge antibiotics should be weighed against potential harms associated with antibiotic overuse.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David K. Warren
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kate M. Peacock
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katelin B. Nickel
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Victoria J. Fraser
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Margaret A. Olsen
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gahm J, Ljung Konstantinidou A, Lagergren J, Sandelin K, Glimåker M, Johansson H, Wickman M, de Boniface J, Frisell J. Effectiveness of Single vs Multiple Doses of Prophylactic Intravenous Antibiotics in Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2022; 5:e2231583. [PMID: 36112378 PMCID: PMC9482055 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.31583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Importance Multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is widely used to prevent infection after implant-based breast reconstruction despite the lack of high-level evidence regarding its clinical benefit. Objective To determine whether multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is superior to single-dose antibiotic prophylaxis in preventing surgical site infection (SSI) after implant-based breast reconstruction. Design, Setting, and Participants This prospective, multicenter, randomized clinical superiority trial was conducted at 7 hospitals (8 departments) in Sweden from April 25, 2013, to October 31, 2018. Eligible participants were women aged 18 years or older who were planned to undergo immediate or delayed implant-based breast reconstruction. Follow-up time was 12 months. Data analysis was performed from May to October 2021. Interventions Multiple-dose intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis extending over 24 hours following surgery, compared with single-dose intravenous antibiotic. The first-choice drug was cloxacillin (2 g per dose). Clindamycin was used (600 mg per dose) for patients with penicillin allergy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary outcome was SSI leading to surgical removal of the implant within 6 months after surgery. Secondary outcomes were the rate of SSIs necessitating readmission and administration of intravenous antibiotics, and clinically suspected SSIs not necessitating readmission but oral antibiotics. Results A total of 711 women were assessed for eligibility, and 698 were randomized (345 to single-dose and 353 to multiple-dose antibiotics). The median (range) age was 47 (19-78) years for those in the multiple-dose group and 46 (25-76) years for those in the single-dose group. The median (range) body mass index was 23 (18-38) for the single-dose group and 23 (17-37) for the multiple-dose group. Within 6 months of follow-up, 30 patients (4.3%) had their implant removed because of SSI. Readmission for intravenous antibiotics because of SSI occurred in 47 patients (7.0%), and 190 women (27.7%) received oral antibiotics because of clinically suspected SSI. There was no significant difference between the randomization groups for the primary outcome implant removal (odds ratio [OR], 1.26; 95% CI, 0.69-2.65; P = .53), or for the secondary outcomes readmission for intravenous antibiotics (OR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.65-2.15; P = .58) and prescription of oral antibiotics (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.51-1.02; P = .07). Adverse events associated with antibiotic treatment were more common in the multiple-dose group than in the single-dose group (16.4% [58 patients] vs 10.7% [37 patients]; OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.05-2.55; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance The findings of this randomized clinical trial suggest that multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis is not superior to a single-dose regimen in preventing SSI and implant removal after implant-based breast reconstruction but comes with a higher risk of adverse events associated with antibiotic treatment. Trial Registration EudraCT 2012-004878-26.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Gahm
- Department of Reconstructive Plastic Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Anna Ljung Konstantinidou
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jakob Lagergren
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Kerstin Sandelin
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Martin Glimåker
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Hemming Johansson
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marie Wickman
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Health Promotion Science, Sophiahemmet University, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jana de Boniface
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Surgery, Capio St Göran’s Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jan Frisell
- Department of Molecular Medicine and Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Johnson MD, Davis AP, Dyer AP, Jones TM, Spires SS, Ashley ED. Top Myths of Diagnosis and Management of Infectious Diseases in Hospital Medicine. Am J Med 2022; 135:828-835. [PMID: 35367180 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2022] [Revised: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/01/2022]
Abstract
Antimicrobial agents are among the most frequently prescribed medications during hospitalization. However, approximately 30% to 50% or more of inpatient antimicrobial use is unnecessary or suboptimal. Herein, we describe 10 common myths of diagnosis and management that often occur in the hospital setting. Further, we discuss supporting data to dispel each of these myths. This analysis will provide hospitalists and other clinicians with a foundation for rational decision-making about antimicrobial use and support antimicrobial stewardship efforts at both the patient and institutional levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa D Johnson
- Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.
| | - Angelina P Davis
- Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - April P Dyer
- Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Travis M Jones
- Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - S Shaefer Spires
- Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Elizabeth Dodds Ashley
- Duke Antimicrobial Stewardship Outreach Network (DASON), Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kusne S, Irish W, Arabia F. Extended systemic antibiotic prophylaxis in ventricular assist device recipients, an infectious disease perspective. J Card Surg 2022; 37:1819-1823. [PMID: 35655403 DOI: 10.1111/jocs.16487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To evaluate whether mediastinitis/deep sternal wound infection (Med/DSWI) is more common in ventricular assist device (VAD) with delayed sternal closure (DSC) compared to VAD with primary sternal closure (PSC). METHODS A literature search was done over the last four decades for studies that addressed this comparison. RESULTS Two studies met our inclusion criteria, and their results are contradictory. The first study compared 184 VAD recipients with PSC to 180 VAD recipients with DSC. There was no difference in VAD-related infections between DSC and PSC (15% vs. 16%, respectively; odds ratio = 0.965, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.525-1.635). The second study compared 464 VAD recipients with PSC to 94 VAD recipients with DSC. The rate of surgical site infection was higher in the DSC patients (12.5% vs. 1.4%, respectively; odds ratio = 10.1; 95% CI = 3.8-27.0). DSC was identified as an independent risk factor for postoperative mortality, but no detailed infection information was given. CONCLUSIONS There is no clear evidence of the association between DSC, compared to PSC, and Med/DSWI. Therefore, DSC is not an absolute indication for extended systemic antibiotic prophylaxis. The decision to extend the duration of systemic antibiotic prophylaxis should be made on a case-by-case basis, in collaboration with an infectious disease specialist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shimon Kusne
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - William Irish
- Department of Surgery, The Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, North Carolina, USA
| | - Francisco Arabia
- Departments of Surgery and Medicine, Banner-University Medical Center Phoenix, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yakkanti RR, Vanden Berge D, Summers SH, Mansour KL, Lavin AC, Hernandez VH. Extended Postoperative Prophylactic Antibiotics for Primary and Aseptic Revision Total Joint Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2022; 30:e822-e832. [PMID: 35245256 DOI: 10.5435/jaaos-d-21-00977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Limited literature is available about the effects of extended (>24 hours) antibiotic use after primary and aseptic revision total joint arthroplasty (TJA) on rates of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). The purpose of this study was to systematically review the outcomes of extended prophylactic antibiotic use. METHODS A systematic search on PubMed and EMBASE databases was done in August 2021 following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Articles that met inclusion criteria were screened by two separate authors. Basic patient demographics, route of delivery, type, dose, frequency of the antibiotic, rates of PJI, and length of stay were extracted. RESULTS A total of 11 articles published from 1979 to 2021 were included in the final analysis. Two studies evaluated aseptic revisions, seven evaluated primary TJA, and two studies evaluated both. Five studies were randomized controlled trials, one multicenter nonrandomized trial, and five retrospective cohort studies. All 11 studies used a cephalosporin or a penicillin antibiotic in both the control and cohort groups. Five studies used intravenous (IV) antibiotics, one study used oral (PO) antibiotics, and the other five studies used both IV and PO antibiotics. Length of stay was reported in three studies, all using IV antibiotics. All 11 studies evaluated rates of PJI, while four studies evaluated included rates of superficial surgical site infections. Four studies showed a statistically significant decrease in PJI when compared with a control group, while seven studies showed no statistically significant difference. CONCLUSION There is conflicting evidence regarding the benefit of extended (>24 hours) antibiotics, IV or PO, after TJA. As of now, current guidelines do not support the use of extended antibiotics; future prospective clinical trials are needed to help support these claims.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramakanth R Yakkanti
- From the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Hospital, Miami, FL (Yakkanti, Vanden Berge, Mansour, Lavin, and Hernandez), and the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Washington University, St. Louis, MO (Summers)
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Use of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis and the prevalence and risk factors associated with surgical site infection in a tertiary hospital in Malaysia. DRUGS & THERAPY PERSPECTIVES 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s40267-022-00914-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
44
|
Olsen MA, Greenberg JK, Peacock K, Nickel KB, Fraser VJ, Warren DK. Lack of association of post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics with decreased risk of surgical site infection following spinal fusion. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:1178-1184. [PMID: 35040936 PMCID: PMC9126069 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/24/2021] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To determine the prevalence and factors associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use after spinal fusion and whether use was associated with decreased risk of surgical site infection (SSI). METHODS Persons aged 10-64 years undergoing spinal fusion between 1 January 2010 and 30 June 2015 were identified in the MarketScan Commercial Database. Complicated patients and those coded for infection from 30 days before to 2 days after the surgical admission were excluded. Outpatient oral antibiotics were identified within 2 days of surgical discharge. SSI was defined using ICD-9-CM diagnosis codes within 90 days of surgery. Generalized linear models were used to determine factors associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use and with SSI. RESULTS The cohort included 156 446 fusion procedures, with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics used in 9223 (5.9%) surgeries. SSIs occurred after 2557 (1.6%) procedures. Factors significantly associated with post-discharge prophylactic antibiotics included history of lymphoma, diabetes, 3-7 versus 1-2 vertebral levels fused, and non-infectious postoperative complications. In multivariable analysis, post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with SSI risk after spinal fusion (relative risk 0.98; 95% CI 0.84-1.14). CONCLUSIONS Post-discharge prophylactic oral antibiotics after spinal fusion were used more commonly in patients with major medical comorbidities, more complex surgeries and those with postoperative complications during the surgical admission. After adjusting for surgical complexity and infection risk factors, post-discharge prophylactic antibiotic use was not associated with decreased SSI risk. These results suggest that prolonged prophylactic antibiotic use should be avoided after spine surgery, given the lack of benefit and potential for harm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margaret A. Olsen
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
- Division of Public Health Sciences, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jacob K. Greenberg
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Kate Peacock
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katelin B. Nickel
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Victoria J. Fraser
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - David K. Warren
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Implementing an Antimicrobial Stewardship Programme to Improve Adherence to a Perioperative Prophylaxis Guideline. Healthcare (Basel) 2022; 10:healthcare10030464. [PMID: 35326942 PMCID: PMC8953150 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare10030464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis is effective in reducing the rate of surgical site infections (SSIs); however, non-adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis protocols can lead to several negative outcomes. We performed a before-and-after intervention study with the aim of improving the process outcome, including adherence to guidelines. Another objective of this study was to investigate improvement in patient outcomes as a result of adherence to a surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis programme. The indicators of improved patient outcomes were a reduction in overall SSI rate and the decreased cost of antibiotics. SSI rate was calculated as a percentage by dividing the number of SSIs by the total number of surgeries and then multiplying the value obtained by 100%. The interventions implemented in the surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis programme included establishment of a guideline, educational sessions, and a monthly revision of prescriptions. Our findings show that implementation of the interventions resulted in reduced antibiotic consumption, a considerable decrease in the cost of prophylaxis, and a decrease in the incidence of SSIs.
Collapse
|
46
|
Marano L, Carbone L, Poto GE, Calomino N, Neri A, Piagnerelli R, Fontani A, Verre L, Savelli V, Roviello F, Marrelli D. Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Reduces the Rate of Surgical Site Infection in Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery: A Systematic Review. Antibiotics (Basel) 2022; 11:230. [PMID: 35203832 PMCID: PMC8868284 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics11020230] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infection occurs with high frequency in gastrointestinal surgery, contributing to the high incidence of morbidity and mortality. The accepted practice worldwide for the prevention of surgical site infection is providing single- or multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis. However, most suitable antibiotic and optimal duration of prophylaxis are still debated. The aim of the systematic review is to assess the efficacy of antimicrobial prophylaxis in controlling surgical site infection rate following esophagogastric surgery. PubMed and Cochrane databases were systematically searched until 31 October 2021, for randomized controlled trials comparing different antimicrobial regimens in prevention surgical site infections. Risk of bias of studies was assessed with standard methods. Overall, eight studies concerning gastric surgery and one study about esophageal surgery met inclusion criteria. No significant differences were detected between single- and multiple-dose antibiotic prophylaxis. Most trials assessed the performance of cephalosporins or inhibitor of bacterial beta-lactamase. Antimicrobial prophylaxis (AMP) is effective in reducing the incidence of surgical site infection. Multiple-dose antimicrobial prophylaxis is not recommended for patients undergoing gastric surgery. Further randomized controlled trials are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of antimicrobial prophylaxis in esophageal cancer patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Daniele Marrelli
- Surgical Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences, University of Siena, 53100 Siena, Italy; (L.M.); (L.C.); (G.E.P.); (N.C.); (A.N.); (R.P.); (A.F.); (L.V.); (V.S.); (F.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Salas A, Williams MC, Van Etten E, Lewis L, MacBrayne CE, Parker SK. Prolonged Perioperative Antibiotics: A Hidden Problem. Hosp Pediatr 2022; 12:125-132. [PMID: 35039819 DOI: 10.1542/hpeds.2021-006204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES National guidelines generally recommend 24 hours or less of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis. In a freestanding, regional children's hospital, we evaluated the duration of antibiotic surgical prophylaxis to identify targets for standardization of practice. METHODS All procedures performed in 2017 were extracted from our local data warehouse; those involving an incision were considered a surgical procedure and correlated to antibiotic data. Antibiotic courses were reviewed if administered for >24 hours, or if the duration or indication for prophylaxis was uncertain. Total duration of prophylaxis (including discharge prescriptions) was calculated in hours for all procedures and categorized by department and by the quantity of prophylaxis received: none, single dose, multiple doses within 24 hours, and >24 hours. Percentage of procedures and total days of potential excess were calculated. RESULTS A total of 15 651 procedures were included; 5009 met criteria for chart review, and after further exclusions, 12 895 procedures were included in the analysis. In total, 55% of all 12 895 procedures received prophylaxis. A single dose was given in 30%. Over 24 hours was administered in 11%, and 14% received multiple doses <24 hours (both potential excess). Results were evaluated by surgical subspecialty and procedure type. There were 5733 cumulative days of surgical prophylaxis administered after 24 hours (potential excess). CONCLUSION In 2017, up to 25% of procedures received potentially unnecessary perioperative prophylaxis, indicating that national guidance specific to pediatrics would have high impact on antibiotic overuse in the pediatric surgical population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Lauren Lewis
- Sections of Pediatric General Surgery and.,Paul and Carol David Foundation Burn Institute, Akron Children's Hospital, Akron, Ohio
| | | | - Sarah K Parker
- Pediatric Infectious Diseases and.,Infection Control and Epidemiology, Children's Hospital Colorado, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado and
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Hu QL, Ko CY. Prevention of Perioperative Surgical Site Infection. Perioper Med (Lond) 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-323-56724-4.00028-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
|
49
|
M. Magdy A, A. Seksaka M, F. Balata G. Antibiotic overuse in obstetric and gynecologic procedures at Zagazig university hospitals: A prospective observational study. PHARMACIA 2021. [DOI: 10.3897/pharmacia.68.e71923] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical site infection (SSI) constitutes a major problem in healthcare in terms of healthcare cost, morbidity and mortality. Surgical antibiotic prophylaxis (SAP) is one of the effective strategies for SSI prevention. Poor adherence to SAP guidelines across different countries has been observed. Misuse of prophylactic antibiotics threatens patient safety and leads to an increase in the acquisition of antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to assess the utilization of SAP in obstetric and gynecologic procedures in terms of indication for prophylaxis, antibiotic selection, timing of administration and prophylaxis duration. A prospective observational study was conducted at the obstetrics and gynecology department of Zagazig University Hospital during the period from January 2020 to June 2020. Medical records of 264 women were recorded and evaluated. The American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) therapeutic guidelines, World Health Organization (WHO) recommendations and The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) practice bulletin were used for data evaluation and hence women were stratified into two groups. For women who underwent procedures in which guidelines recommended the use of SAP (200 patients; 75.75%), 198 women (99%) received preoperative prophylaxis. None of women (0%) received the recommended first line antibiotic by guidelines while the most commonly used prophylactic antibiotics were Cefotaxime (86 patients; 43.43%) and Ampicillin-sulbactam (62 patients; 31.31%). Preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis timing was 0-60 minutes before skin incision. All women received postoperative prophylaxis that extended to an average of 7 days. Regarding the other group who underwent procedures in which prophylactic antibiotics weren’t recommended by guidelines (64 patients; 24.24%), 37 women (57.81%) followed the guidelines and didn’t receive SAP while 27 women (42.18%) received SAP. Poor adherence to guidelines recommendations regarding prophylactic antibiotic selection and prophylaxis duration was observed. High utilization rate of prophylactic antibiotics in procedures that didn’t require their use was reported..
Collapse
|
50
|
Bhatt E, Ridley TJ, Kruckeberg B, Quanbeck Z, Quanbeck DS, Schiffern A. Efficacy of Antibiotics in Supracondylar Fractures. J Pediatr Orthop 2021; 41:e750-e754. [PMID: 34334694 DOI: 10.1097/bpo.0000000000001901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Controversy exists surrounding antibiotic use in the setting of pediatric supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and percutaneous Kirschner wire (K-wire) fixation. While the reported incidence of infection in the literature is low, surgeons frequently administer preoperative antibiotics. The purpose of this study was to retrospectively review preoperative antibiotic use and incidence of infection in children with supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and K-wire fixation. It was hypothesized that antibiotic administration will not affect the incidence of infection following this procedure. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of 1053 patients with supracondylar humerus fractures treated with closed reduction and K-wire fixation at 3 institutions between 2006 and 2016. Patient demographics, antibiotic administration and follow-up data were reviewed in 905 patients. RESULTS Of 905 patients, 755 patients received preoperative antibiotics and 150 patients did not. The incidence of infection was 2.5% (n=22) in the group that received preoperative antibiotics and 2.0% in the group that did not receive antibiotics with an overall incidence of infection of 2.4%. The difference between groups did not reach significance (P>0.5). The majority of infections were treated with oral antibiotics with or without early pin removal. Four patients, all in the preoperative antibiotic group, required surgical debridement and intravenous antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS Retrospective review of the incidence of infection in closed reduction and percutaneous pinning of supracondylar humerus fractures found no difference between patients who received preoperative antibiotics and those who did not receive preoperative antibiotics. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE Level III-therapeutic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Etasha Bhatt
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota
| | | | | | | | - Deborah S Quanbeck
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota
- Minneapolis Children's Hospital, Minneapolis
- Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Saint Paul, MN
| | - Alison Schiffern
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Minnesota
- Minneapolis Children's Hospital, Minneapolis
- Gillette Children's Specialty Healthcare, Saint Paul, MN
| |
Collapse
|