Ticlopidine pretreatment before coronary stenting is associated with sustained decrease in adverse cardiac events: data from the Evaluation of Platelet IIb/IIIa Inhibitor for Stenting (EPISTENT) Trial

Efficacy of single high-dose statin prior to percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The impacts of single high-dose statin preloading in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have not been fully examined. This study aims to evaluate post-procedure impacts of single high-dose statin pretreatment with acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

METHODS

The meta-analysis reviewed Cochrane, PubMed, and Medline databases for studies comparing single high-dose atorvastatin or rosuvastatin to placebo in ACS patients undergoing PCI. The primary endpoints included major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), myocardial infarction (MI), all-cause mortality, and target vessel revascularization (TVR) at three months. Secondary endpoints examined were the TIMI flow grade 3 and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).

RESULTS

Comprehensive analysis was conducted on fifteen RCTs, encompassing a total of 6,207 patients (3090 vs 3117 patients). The pooled results demonstrated that a single high-dose of statin administered prior to PCI led to a significant decrease in the incidence of MACE at three months post-PCI compared to the control group (OR 0.50, 95%CI 0.35-0.71, p = 0.0001). The occurrence of MI (OR 0.57, 95%CI 0.42-0.77, p = 0.0002), all-cause mortality (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.39-0.81, p = 0.0002), and TVR (OR 0.56, 95%CI 0.35-0.92, p = 0.02) was significantly lower in the statin single high-dose group compared to the control group. No significant effects on TIMI flow grade 3 (OR 1.20, 95%CI 0.94-1.53, p = 0.14) or left ventricular ejection fraction (OR 2.19, 95%CI - 0.97 to 5.34, p = 0.17) were observed. Subgroup analysis demonstrated reduced incidence of MACE with a single dose of 80 mg atorvastatin (OR 0.66, 95%CI 0.54-0.81, p < 0.0001) and 40 mg rosuvastatin (OR 0.19, 95%CI 0.07-0.54, p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Single high-dose statin before PCI in patients with ACS significantly reduces MACE, MI, all-cause mortality, and TVR three months post-PCI.

Antiplatelet agents for chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Antiplatelet agents are widely used to prevent cardiovascular events. The risks and benefits of antiplatelet agents may be different in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD) for whom occlusive atherosclerotic events are less prevalent, and bleeding hazards might be increased. This is an update of a review first published in 2013.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the benefits and harms of antiplatelet agents in people with any form of CKD, including those with CKD not receiving renal replacement therapy, patients receiving any form of dialysis, and kidney transplant recipients.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Kidney and Transplant Register of Studies up to 13 July 2021 through contact with the Information Specialist using search terms relevant to this review. Studies in the Register are identified through searches of CENTRAL, MEDLINE, and EMBASE, conference proceedings, the International Clinical Trials Register (ICTRP) Search Portal and ClinicalTrials.gov.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected randomised controlled trials of any antiplatelet agents versus placebo or no treatment, or direct head-to-head antiplatelet agent studies in people with CKD. Studies were included if they enrolled participants with CKD, or included people in broader at-risk populations in which data for subgroups with CKD could be disaggregated.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Four authors independently extracted data from primary study reports and any available supplementary information for study population, interventions, outcomes, and risks of bias. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated from numbers of events and numbers of participants at risk which were extracted from each included study. The reported RRs were extracted where crude event rates were not provided. Data were pooled using the random-effects model. Confidence in the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 113 studies, enrolling 51,959 participants; 90 studies (40,597 CKD participants) compared an antiplatelet agent with placebo or no treatment, and 29 studies (11,805 CKD participants) directly compared one antiplatelet agent with another. Fifty-six new studies were added to this 2021 update. Seven studies originally excluded from the 2013 review were included, although they had a follow-up lower than two months. Random sequence generation and allocation concealment were at low risk of bias in 16 and 22 studies, respectively. Sixty-four studies reported low-risk methods for blinding of participants and investigators; outcome assessment was blinded in 41 studies. Forty-one studies were at low risk of attrition bias, 50 studies were at low risk of selective reporting bias, and 57 studies were at low risk of other potential sources of bias. Compared to placebo or no treatment, antiplatelet agents probably reduces myocardial infarction (18 studies, 15,289 participants: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.79 to 0.99, I² = 0%; moderate certainty). Antiplatelet agents has uncertain effects on fatal or nonfatal stroke (12 studies, 10.382 participants: RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.59, I² = 37%; very low certainty) and may have little or no effect on death from any cause (35 studies, 18,241 participants: RR 0.94, 95 % CI 0.84 to 1.06, I² = 14%; low certainty). Antiplatelet therapy probably increases major bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with haemodialysis (HD) (29 studies, 16,194 participants: RR 1.35, 95% CI 1.10 to 1.65, I² = 12%; moderate certainty). In addition, antiplatelet therapy may increase minor bleeding in people with CKD and those treated with HD (21 studies, 13,218 participants: RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.27 to 1.90, I² = 58%; low certainty). Antiplatelet treatment may reduce early dialysis vascular access thrombosis (8 studies, 1525 participants) RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.38 to 0.70; low certainty). Antiplatelet agents may reduce doubling of serum creatinine in CKD (3 studies, 217 participants: RR 0.39, 95% CI 0.17 to 0.86, I² = 8%; low certainty). The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents on stroke, cardiovascular death, kidney failure, kidney transplant graft loss, transplant rejection, creatinine clearance, proteinuria, dialysis access failure, loss of primary unassisted patency, failure to attain suitability for dialysis, need of intervention and cardiovascular hospitalisation were uncertain. Limited data were available for direct head-to-head comparisons of antiplatelet drugs, including prasugrel, ticagrelor, different doses of clopidogrel, abciximab, defibrotide, sarpogrelate and beraprost.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Antiplatelet agents probably reduced myocardial infarction and increased major bleeding, but do not appear to reduce all-cause and cardiovascular death among people with CKD and those treated with dialysis. The treatment effects of antiplatelet agents compared with each other are uncertain.

Evidence Based Coagulation Monitors: Heparin Monitoring, Thromboelastography, and Platelet Function

The hemostatic management of patients undergoing cardiac surgery is a unique challenge. Since its inception, cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) has required meticulous attention to maintaining adequate anticoagulation. New anticoagulants and alternative monitoring techniques present an opportunity to investigate potential advances in the area of anticoagulation for CPB. Hemostasis after CPB is still a vexing problem, and the addition of antiplatelet medication to the platelet defect already incurred during CPB has led to hemorrhagic complications in cardiac surgery. The two opposing processes of anticoagulation and hemostasis must be managed carefully and modified with respect to the patient's hematologic status and desired hemostatic outcome. Cardiac surgical patients consume a much larger fraction of perioperative blood transfusions than the percentage of the surgical population they represent. Thus, during CPB, careful attention must be paid to optimal anticoagulation, platelet quiescence, biocompatible circuitry and interventions, and to monitoring hemostasis. The multifactorial etiology of the CPB-induced hemostatic defect requires a multimodal approach to blood conservation and hemostasis monitoring, including heparin maintenance and sophisticated point-of-care hemostasis monitoring. Each technology has its own attributes and each may be suitable for different populations based upon the expected defects being measured. This article reviews the evidence supporting the use of point-of-care monitors in coagulation and hemostasis management in cardiac surgical patients.

Thrombin-Induced Platelet-Fibrin Clot Strength Identified by Thrombelastography: A Novel Prothrombotic Marker of Coronary Artery Stent Restenosis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In-stent restenosis (ISR) is a limitation of percutaneous coronary intervention and has been linked to specific clinical and angiographic variables. We aimed to simultaneously assess thrombosis biomarkers and lipid levels in patients with and without ISR.

METHODS

Consecutive patients (n = 170) with a history of coronary stenting undergoing elective angiography were studied. Blood samples for thrombelastography, light transmittance aggregometry, and lipid levels were obtained prior to cardiac catheterization.

RESULTS

Sixty-nine patients (41%) had ISR (>50% luminal diameter stenosis). Among patients with ISR, 40 (58%) had ISR in more than one stent bed. Patients with ISR were more often female (37.7% vs. 21.8%, P = 0.04), had higher thrombin-induced platelet-fibrin clot strength (TIP-FCS) (69.9 mm vs. 65.6 mm, P < 0.001), and a higher ApoB/A1 ratio (0.65 vs. 0.59, P = 0.03). In patients on dual antiplatelet therapy (n = 86), there were no differences in ADP-, arachidonic acid-, and collagen-induced platelet aggregation between groups. The frequency of patients with ISR increased with TIP-FCS quartiles and by ROC analysis, TIP-FCS = 67.0 mm was the cutpoint for identification of ISR (AUC = 0.80 (95%CI 0.73-0.87, P < 0.0001). By multivariate analysis, TIP-FCS ≥67.0 mm strongly associated with ISR (OR = 7.3, P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Patients with ISR identified at the time of cardiac catheterization have a prothrombotic phenotype indicated by high TIP-FCS, a novel marker. Studies to confirm the prognostic utility of high TIP-FCS for the development of ISR are ongoing.

Effectiveness of Pretreatment With Dual Oral Antiplatelet Therapy

Several observational studies, randomized controlled trials, and meta-analyses suggested that pretreatment with clopidogrel in addition to aspirin could reduce the rate of ischemic events, especially in the setting of acute coronary syndromes. Newer P2Y12 inhibitors like prasugrel and ticagrelor, which provide faster and stronger platelet inhibition compared with clopidogrel, would enhance the benefits of pretreatment. However, 2 recent randomized trials, A Comparison of Prasugrel at PCI or Time of Diagnosis of Non-ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction and the Administration of Ticagrelor in the Cath Lab or in the Ambulance for New ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction to Open the Coronary Artery studies, aimed at assessing the effects of the timing of administration of novel P2Y12 inhibitors in acute coronary syndromes, failed to meet their primary end points. In this report, we review clinical data on pretreatment with dual oral antiplatelet therapy and comment on some criticisms raised from recent trials.

Reappraisal of thienopyridine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effect of pretreatment with P2Y12 receptor inhibitors compared with no pretreatment on efficacy and safety of treatment of non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (ACS).

DATA SOURCES

Two reviewers independently searched Medline, Embase, Cochrane Controlled Trials, and BioMed Central databases for randomized placebo controlled trials and observational studies from August 2001 to March 2014.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY

Studies must have reported both all-cause mortality (primary efficacy endpoint) and major bleeding (safety endpoint) outcomes.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data on sample size, characteristics, drug dose and delay of administration, and outcomes were independently extracted and analyzed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

A random-effect model was applied. The analysis was performed (i) in all patients independently of the management strategy and (ii) only in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention.

RESULTS

Of the 393 titles identified, seven (four randomized controlled trials, one observational analysis from a randomized controlled trial, and three observational studies) met the inclusion criteria. No study was identified for ticagrelor or cangrelor, and analyses were thus limited to thienopyridines. A total of 32,383 non-ST elevation ACS patients were included, 18,711 coming from randomized controlled trials. Of these, 55% underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Pretreatment was not associated with a significant lower risk of mortality in all patients (odds ratio 0.90 (95% confidence interval 0.75 to 1.07), P=0.24), in particular when considering only the randomized controlled trials (odds ratio 0.90 (0.71 to 1.14), P=0.39). Similar results were observed in the cohort of patients undergoing PCI. A significant 30-45% excess of major bleeding was consistently observed in all patients (odds ratio 1.32 (1.16 to 1.49), P<0.0001) and in those undergoing PCI, as well as in the subset analyses of randomized controlled trials of these two cohorts of patients. There was a reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events in the analysis of all patients (odds ratio 0.84 (0.72 to 0.98), P=0.02), driven by the old clopidogrel studies (CURE and CREDO), but the difference was not significant for the cohort of patients undergoing PCI. Stent thrombosis, stroke, and urgent revascularization did not differ between groups (pretreatment v no pretreatment). The results were consistent for both thienopyridines and confirmed in sensitivity analyses.

LIMITATIONS

Analysis was not performed on individual patient's data.

CONCLUSION

In patients presenting with non-ST elevation ACS, pretreatment with thienopyridines is associated with no significant reduction of mortality but with a significant excess of major bleeding no matter the strategy adopted, invasive or not. Our results do not support a strategy of routine pretreatment in patients with non-ST elevation ACS.

Clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide in coronary stenting

Platelet adhesion and aggregation at the site of coronary stenting can have catastrophic clinical and economic consequences. Therefore, effective platelet inhibition is vital during and after percutaneous coronary intervention. Eptifibatide is an intravenous antiplatelet agent that blocks the final common pathway of platelet aggregation and thrombus formation by binding to glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptors on the surface of platelets. In clinical studies, eptifibatide was associated with a significant reduction of mortality, myocardial infarction, or target vessel revascularization in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. However, recent trials conducted in the era of dual antiplatelet therapy and newer anticoagulants failed to demonstrate similar results. The previously seen favorable benefit of eptifibatide was mainly offset by the increased risk of bleeding. Current American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association guidelines recommend its use as an adjunct in high-risk patients who are undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention with traditional anticoagulants (heparin or enoxaparin), who are not otherwise at high risk of bleeding. In patients receiving bivalirudin (a newer safer anticoagulant), routine use of eptifibatide is discouraged except in select situations (eg, angiographic complications). Although older pharmacoeconomic studies favor eptifibatide, in the current era of P2Y12 inhibitors and newer safer anticoagulants, the increased costs associated with bleeding make the routine use of eptifibatide an economically nonviable option. The cost-effectiveness of eptifibatide with the use of strategies that decrease the bleeding risk (eg, transradial access) is unknown. This review provides an overview of key clinical and economic studies of eptifibatide well into the current era of potent antiplatelet agents, novel safer anticoagulants, and contemporary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Aspirin and platelet adenosine diphosphate receptor antagonists in acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: role in therapy and strategies to overcome resistance

Platelet activation and aggregation are key components in the cascade of events causing thrombosis following plaque rupture. Antiplatelet therapy is essential in the treatment of patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) and for those requiring percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) is a well established antiplatelet therapy and is mandated for secondary prevention of cardiovascular events following ACS. In patients with ACS, the addition of clopidogrel to aspirin is more effective than aspirin alone. For patients undergoing PCI, dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and clopidogrel is warranted. Aspirin should be continued indefinitely after PCI. Pretreatment of patients with clopidogrel prior to PCI lowers the incidence of cardiovascular events, yet the optimum timing of drug administration and dose are still being investigated, as is the duration of therapy following PCI. Late-stent thrombosis with drug-eluting stents has pushed the recommendation for duration of clopidogrel therapy up to 1 year and perhaps beyond, in patients without risks for bleeding. The concepts of aspirin and clopidogrel resistance are important clinical questions. No uniform definition exists for aspirin or clopidogrel resistance. Measurements of resistance are often highly variable and do not necessarily correlate with clinical resistance. Noncompliance remains the most prominent mode of resistance. Screening of selected patient populations for resistance or pharmacologic intervention of those patients termed 'resistant' warrants further study.

Thienopyridines and other ADP-receptor antagonists

Platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibition plays a pivotal role in preventing thrombotic vascular events in patients with ACS and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Among the P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, the group of thienopyridines include ticlopidine, clopidogrel and prasugrel, all of which are orally administered prodrugs leading to irreversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition. Non-thienopyridine derivatives including ticagrelor, cangrelor and elinogrel do not require metabolic activation and lead to a reversible P2Y12 receptor inhibition in contrast to thienopyridines. The extend of platelet inhibition is subject to the administered antiplatelet agent and influenced by individual genetic and clinical factors. Insufficient platelet inhibition, termed high platelet reactivity (HPR) is associated with an increased risk for ischemic events after PCI whereas exceeding platelet inhibition results in an increased bleeding risk. Pharmacologic properties and clinical outcome data differ substantially between the existing P2Y12 receptor inhibitors. Whether individualized antiplatelet treatment incorporating different P2Y12 receptor inhibitors improves patients' clinical outcomes warrants further investigation.

Antiplatelet therapy and vascular disease: an update

Atherosclerosis is a diffuse, systemic disorder of the large and medium-sized arterial vessels, affecting the coronary, cerebral and peripheral circulation. Chronic inflammatory processes are the central pathophysiological mechanism largely driven by lipid accumulation, and provide the substrate for occlusive thrombus formation. The clinical sequelae of acute arterial thrombosis, heart attack and stroke, are the most common causes of morbidity and mortality in the industrialized world. Such acute events are characterized by rupture or erosion of the atherosclerotic plaque leading to acute thrombosis. The atherosclerotic process and associated thrombotic complications are collectively termed atherothrombosis. The platelet is a pivotal mediator of various endothelial, immune, thrombotic and inflammatory responses and therefore a key player in the initiation and progression of atherothrombosis. A robust evidence base supports the clear clinical benefits of antiplatelet agents in the primary and secondary therapy of atherothrombotic disorders. Percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventions have an established central role in the management of atherothrombotic disease and demand a greater understanding of platelet biology. In this article, we provide a clinically orientated overview of the pathophysiology of arterial thrombosis and the evidence supporting the use of the various established antiplatelet therapies, and discuss new and future agents.

Impact of thienopyridine administration prior to primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction

The impact of thienopyridine administration prior to primary stenting in acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has not been well studied. We therefore examined the database from the prospective, multicenter, controlled CADILLAC trial in which 1,036 patients were randomized to bare metal stenting with or without abciximab to determine whether patients who received a thienopyridine prior to bare metal stenting in AMI had superior clinical outcomes. Per operator discretion, 659 patients (63.6%; Th+) received either a 500 mg ticlopidine loading dose (n = 623) or a 300 mg clopidogrel loading dose (n = 40), while 377 patients (36.4%; Th-) received no thienopyridine prior to stent implantation. Baseline and procedural characteristics of the two groups, including abciximab use (52.5% vs 52.8%, P = 0.93) were well matched. Th+ compared to Th- patients had lower rates of core lab assessed TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure (0.8% vs 2.7%, P = 0.01). Th+ compared to Th- patients also had significantly reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic target vessel revascularization (TVR) (1.1% vs 3.2%, P = 0.01 and 1.5% vs 3.8%, P = 0.02, respectively) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) (2.7% vs 5.8%, P = 0.01 and 4.0% vs 6.9%, P = 0.03, respectively), results that remained significant after covariate adjustment. In conclusion, in this large prospective, controlled trial, patients receiving a thienopyridine prior to primary stenting in AMI were less likely to have TIMI 0/1 flow postprocedure and experienced reduced in-hospital and 30-day rates of ischemic TVR and MACE compared to those not administered a thienopyridine prior to stent implantation.

Management of patients with unstable angina / non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a critical review of the 2007 ACC /AHA guidelines

BACKGROUND

In 2007, the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) published new guidelines for the diagnosis and management of patients with unstable angina/non-ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (UA/NSTEMI). These guidelines include some important updates on the use of clopidogrel, fondaparinux, bivalirudin and low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) all of which have published landmark clinical trials in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) since the publication of the 2002 guidelines. While these 2007 guidelines are more comprehensive and up-to-date compared with the recommendations published in 2002, they also raise many questions for practising emergency physicians and cardiologists.

METHODS

This article presents a critical review of the 2007 ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI guidelines, highlighting some of the areas of controversy, with the aim of providing some further guidance to practising physicians.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite recent updates to the ACC/AHA UA/NSTEMI guidelines, additional factors need to be taken into consideration in the management of UA/NSTEMI patients. Integrating initial responses with early or selectively invasive strategies and the risks of complications in subsequent procedures require careful consideration. Protocol development within an institution is required to risk-stratify patients rapidly, provide optimum precatheterisation medical management and allow seamless and rapid transitions to the catheterisation laboratory in patients at risk for adverse events.

Bolus-only versus bolus + infusion of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention

BACKGROUND

The present study was done to analyze if glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPI) bolus-only will reduce vascular/bleeding complications and cost with similar major adverse cardiac events (MACE) when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. Evidence-based therapy of GPI inhibitors during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) incorporates intravenous bolus followed by 12 to 18 hours of infusion. However, GPI bolus + infusion may increase vascular/bleeding complications and may not reduce MACE when compared with GPI bolus-only.

METHODS

From January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2004, 2,629 consecutive patients received GPI during PCI at a single center. Of these, 1,064 patients received GPI bolus + infusion in 2003 and were compared with 1,565 patients that received GPI bolus-only in 2004. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups.

RESULTS

Patients receiving GPI bolus-only had reduced vascular/bleeding complications when compared with bolus + infusion (4.9% vs 7%, P < .05, odds ratio 0.62, 95% confidence interval 0.45-0.89). Furthermore, ischemic complications were similar in both groups, including periprocedural creatine kinase-MB enzyme release (12.8% vs 15.3%, P = NS), MACE at 30 days (3.2% vs 3%, P = NS), and death and myocardial infarction at 1 year (7.1% vs 7.8%, P = NS). In addition, GPI bolus-only reduced cost in US dollars ($323 vs $706, P < .001) and increased ambulatory PCI (13.1% vs 3.2%, P < .01), with reduced length of stay (1.1 vs 1.6 days, P < .01), when compared with GPI bolus + infusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Glycoprotein inhibitor bolus-only reduces vascular/bleeding complications with similar MACE and reduced cost when compared with GPI bolus + infusion. In addition, GPI bolus-only improved ambulatory PCI and reduced length of stay. These results are consistent with a safer and cost-effective strategy for bolus-only when GPI therapy is considered during PCI.

[Effectiveness and safety of triple antiaggregation in patients undergoing coronary intervention]

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors (GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors) effectiveness and safety in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTEACS) or stable coronary disease referred for percutaneous coronary revascularization pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines by means of a systematic review.

SOURCE OF DATA

Electronic search using Medline, Embase, Pascal, Cochrane Library and ISI Proceedings and manual review of the articles found.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomized controlled trials that assessed the clinical efficacy (risk of death or infarction) and safety (bleeding and thrombocytopenia) of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors in patients pretreated with thienopyridines.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were obtained by duplicate.

RESULTS

Nine randomized controlled trials (8,604 patients) were included. Addition of GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors reduced the risk of death or myo-cardial infarction at 30 days in those trials that included patients with NSTEACS (RR 0.67; 95%CI 0.56-0.80) but not in studies that excluded NSTEACS patients (RR 1.07; 95%CI 0.75-1.53) (p test of interaction 0.0175), As a counterpart, GPIIb/ IIIa inhibitors increased the risk of bleeding and thrombocytopenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Use of GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors reduces the risk of adverse cardiac events in NSTEACS patients pre-treated with aspirin and thienopyridines but increases the risk of severe bleeding and thrombocytopenia. Its utilization in stable coronary patients does not seem justified.

The impact of oral antiplatelet responsiveness on the long-term prognosis after coronary stenting

BACKGROUND

Decreased responsiveness to oral antiplatelet drug therapy has been associated with an adverse outcome after coronary stenting (CS), but more studies are needed. The purpose of the present study was to prospectively evaluate this issue.

METHODS

A total of 612 consecutive patients with stable or unstable coronary artery disease who underwent CS after at least 12 hours of aspirin and clopidogrel loading were studied. The study population was divided into responders and nonresponders to oral antiplatelet therapy, according to the values of preprocedural Platelet Function Analyzer-100 (Dade Behring, Marburg, Germany) collagen epinephrine closure time (CEPI-CT). In particular, responders were considered as patients with a CEPI-CT > 193 seconds and nonresponders as those with a CEPI-CT < or = 193 seconds. The 1-year incidence of the composite of cardiac death and rehospitalization for nonfatal myocardial infarction was the prespecified primary study end point.

RESULTS

At 1 year, 9.1% of patients reached the primary end point. Nonresponders to oral antiplatelet therapy were at significantly higher risk for the primary end point (18.7% vs 7.6%) than responders. Nonresponsiveness to oral antiplatelet therapy was a predictor of the primary end point by both univariate (hazard ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.6-4.5, P < .001) and multivariate (hazard ratio 2.5, 95% CI 1.6-3.8, P < .001) Cox regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Based on the present data, preprocedural responsiveness to oral antiplatelet therapy, assessed by Platelet Function Analyzer-100 CEPI-CT, is an independent predictor of long-term outcome after CS.

Platelet inhibitors in non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes and percutaneous coronary intervention: glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors, clopidogrel, or both?

The role of glycoprotein (Gp) IIb/IIIa receptor antagonists remains controversial and these agents are infrequently utilized during non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes (NSTE-ACS) despite American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology guidelines. Despite recommendations, the NRMI-4 (National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4) and CRUSADE (Can rapid risk stratification of unstable angina patients suppress adverse outcomes with early implementation of the ACC/AHA guidelines?) registries observed that only 25%-32% of eligible patients received early Gp IIb/IIIa therapy, despite a 6.3% absolute mortality reduction in NRMI-4 and a 2% absolute mortality reduction in CRUSADE. A pooled analysis of Gp IIb/IIIa data from these registries suggest a major reduction in mortality (Odds Ratio = 0.43, 95% Confidence Index 0.25-0.74, p = 0.002) with early Gp IIb/IIIa therapy, yet clinicians fail to utilize this option in NSTE-ACS. The evidence-based approach to NSTE-ACS involves aspirin, clopidogrel, low-molecular weight heparins, or unfractionated heparin in concert with Gp IIb/Ila receptor antagonists, however, newer percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-based trials challenge current recommendations. Novel strategies emerging in NSTE-ACS include omitting Gp IIb/Ila inhibitors altogether or using Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors with higher doses of clopidogrel in selected patients. The ISAR-REACT (Intracoronary stenting and antithrombotic regimen-Rapid early action for coronary treatment) and ISAR-SWEET (ISAR-Is abciximab a superior way to eliminate elevated thrombotic risk in diabetics) trials question the value of abciximab when 600 mg of clopidogrel concurrently administered during PCI. The CLEAR-PLATELETS (Clopidogrel loading with eptifibatide to arrest the reactivity of platelets) and PEACE (Platelet activity extinction in non-Q-wave MI with ASA, clopidogrel, and eptifibatide) trials suggest more durable platelet inhibition when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors are used with higher doses clopidogrel. The ISAR-COOL (ISAR: Cooling off strategy) trial found no difference in ischemic outcomes when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors were excluded and ARMYDA-2 (Antiplatelet therapy for reduction of myocardial damage during angioplasty) suggested higher doses of clopidogrel are more appropriate during PCI when Gp IIb/IIIa inhibitors are not utilized. This constellation of new trials forces reconsideration of current recommendations in regards to patient risk stratification, choice of antithrombotic therapy, doses, and timing. These new data will impact emerging guidelines and updates are currently in progress.

Platelet-neutrophil-interactions: Linking hemostasis and inflammation

Platelets are essential for primary hemostasis, but they also play an important pro-inflammatory role. Platelets normally circulate in a quiescent state. Upon activation, platelets can secrete and present various molecules, change their shape as well as the expression pattern of adhesion molecules. These changes are associated with the adhesion of platelets to leukocytes and the vessel wall. The interaction of platelets with neutrophils promotes the recruitment of neutrophils into inflammatory tissue and thus participates in host defense. This interaction of neutrophils with platelets is mainly mediated through P-selectin and beta(2) and beta(3) integrins (CD11b/CD18, CD41/CD61). Platelets can also interact with endothelial cells and monocytes. Adherent platelets promote the 'secondary capture' of neutrophils and other leukocytes. In addition, platelets secrete neutrophil and endothelial activators inducing production of inflammatory cytokines. Thus, platelets are important amplifiers of acute inflammation.

Complementary effects of thienopyridine pretreatment and platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa integrin blockade with eptifibatide in coronary stent intervention; Results from the ESPRIT trial

OBJECTIVES

This analysis sought to investigate the complementary effect of thienopyridine pretreatment and platelet glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa integrin blockade in coronary stent intervention.

BACKGROUND

Definitive evidence supporting combined antiplatelet therapy consisting of thienopyridine pretreatment and GP IIb/IIIa receptor blockade in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation is limited.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes by thienopyridine use in the 2,040 patients randomized to eptifibatide or placebo who underwent PCI in the ESPRIT trial.

RESULTS

A total of 901 patients received a loading dose of thienopyridine before PCI (group 1), 123 received thienopyridine pretreatment without a loading dose (group 2), and 1,016 were not treated with thienopyridine before PCI (group 3). The composite incidence of death or myocardial infarction at 30 days was significantly lower in group 1 than in groups 2 and 3 combined (OR, 0.71 [95%CI, 0.52-0.99]; P = 0.0417). A similar trend was seen for the composite of death, myocardial infarction, or urgent target vessel revascularization (unadjusted OR, 0.77 [0.57-1.05]; P = 0.1025). After adjusting for baseline characteristics, these differences were no longer significant. No interactions were identified with eptifibatide assignment for any of the group comparisons.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with a loading dose of thienopyridine lowers the rate of ischemic complications regardless of treatment with a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor. Conversely, the efficacy of eptifibatide is maintained whether or not a loading dose of a thienopyridine is administered. Optimal outcomes are achieved in patients receiving thienopyridine pretreatment along with platelet GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy.

Oral antiplatelet therapy for percutaneous coronary revascularization

Great strides in interventional pharmacotherapy have been made over the past few decades, virtually all focused on optimizing peri-PCI antithrombotic therapy in order to reduce thrombotic complications. Our understanding of the role of platelets and of antiplatelet therapies in this process continues to evolve. Today, dual or even triple antiplatelet therapy has become standard of care at the time of PCI followed by dual therapy long-term in the majority of patients. However, currently available oral regimens are hampered by limitations including the need to initiate treatment at least a few hours before the procedure to achieve maximum benefit and the safety issues surrounding irreversible platelet inhibition in the uncommon, but not rare situations when a patient requires surgical revascularization. These limitations have led to the suboptimal "real-world" utilization of these proven agents and have fostered the development of a wide variety of alternative platelet inhibitors with theoretical, but still unproven clinical benefits. There are ample clinical data that strongly support the use of aspirin and clopidogrel in virtually all patients undergoing a PCI today. This review will highlight these data as well as emphasize the gaps in our understanding. (c) 2007 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Coagulation Monitoring

Monitoring hemostasis is now possible by different modalities, of which the point of care devices seem most helpful to the clinician in the operating room. Most of these monitors are being used in the cardiac population, and their significance in other fields remains to be assessed.

Newer Pharmacotherapy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Interventions: A Guide for Pharmacists and Other Health Care Professionals

Significant advances in pharmacotherapy for patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) have occurred during the past decade, including the introduction and approval of new antithrombin and antiplatelet therapies, as well as modifications in dosing, administration, and/or duration of older pharmacotherapy regimens. Also, off-label (i.e., not approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration) use of certain agents has become common. Given the novel nature of these agents and the nuances of therapy, the pharmacist and other health care professionals should play an integral role in collaboration with interventional cardiologists in development of hospital protocols, determination of appropriate agent selection, assessment of patient renal function and hematologic status, dosing, and monitoring for adverse effects. In this guide, the newer antiplatelet and antithrombin drugs that may be used during PCI are reviewed, and recommendations regarding the proper administration of these agents are provided.

Effectiveness and safety of glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel alone and in combination in non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (from the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction-4)

We investigated whether a combination of clopidogrel and glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa inhibitors safely decreases hospital mortality, reinfarction, and major bleeding beyond either therapy alone in patients with non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI). GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors and clopidogrel, separately, have been shown to decrease adverse outcomes in patients with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndromes, but the need for combination therapy is uncertain. Multivariate and propensity analyses compared the frequency of death, reinfarction, and major bleeding during hospitalization in 38,691 patients with NSTEMI who were enrolled in the National Registry of Myocardial Infarction 4 from July 2000 to December 2003. Of these, 65% received GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors only, 16.1% clopidogrel only, and 18.8% combination therapy. Among patients who did not undergo percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), the composite end point of death, reinfarction, and major bleeding was significantly lower with combination therapy than with GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors alone (odds ratio 0.77, 95% confidence interval 0.67 to 0.88). In contrast, this composite end point was significantly higher when combination therapy was employed rather than clopidogrel alone (odds ratio 1.55, 95% confidence interval 1.33 to 1.81). However, among patients who underwent PCI, the composite end point was similar between combination therapy and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor-only groups (odds ratio 1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.89 to 1.14). Further, there was a strong trend toward a higher composite end point among patients who received combination therapy rather than clopidogrel alone (odds ratio 1.31, 95% confidence interval 0.99 to 1.72). In conclusion, commonly employed strategies using a GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor alone or with the combination of clopidogrel plus GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor in NSTEMI may not be justified in comparison with a simpler strategy of clopidogrel used alone, especially in patients who have not undergone PCI.

Oral antiplatelet therapy and percutaneous coronary intervention

The benefit of oral antiplatelet therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with intracoronary stent implantation is well established. Combined aspirin with clopidogrel or ticlopidine therapy is superior to aspirin alone in reducing thrombotic events after stent placement. Clopidogrel is the drug of choice, given that its efficacy is comparable to ticlopidine and it has a superior safety profile. Despite dual antiplatelet therapy, patients remain at risk of recurrent vascular events. Optimal timing, duration and dosage of antiplatelet therapy remain controversial. Recent evidence suggests additional benefit with clopidogrel pretreatment, high clopidogrel loading dose and long-term dual antiplatelet therapy post-PCI in high-risk patients.

Dual Antiplatelet Regime Versus Acetyl-acetic Acid for Carotid Artery Stenting

Carotid artery stenting has been proposed as an option treatment of carotid artery stenosis. The aim of this single-institution study is to compare the dual-antiplatelet treatment and heparin combined with acetyl-acetic acid, in patients who underwent carotid artery stenting. We compared 2 groups of 50 patents each who underwent carotid artery stenting for primary atherosclerotic disease. Group A received heparin for 24 h combined with 325 mg acetyl-acetic acid and group B received 250 mg ticlopidine twice a day combined with 325 mg acetyl-acetic acid. Outcome measurements included 30-day bleeding and neurological complications and 30-day thrombosis/occlusion rates. The neurological complications were 16% in group A and 2% in group B (p < 0.05). Bleeding complications occurred in 4% in group A and 2% in group B (p > 0.05). The 30-day thrombosis/occlusion rate was 2% in group A and 0% in group B (p > 0.05). Dual antiplatelet treatment is recommended in all patients undergoing carotid artery stenting.

Initial experience with an intravenous P2Y12 platelet receptor antagonist in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: results from a 2-part, phase II, multicenter, randomized, placebo- and active-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Platelet-initiated acute thrombosis and coronary embolization are fundamental in the pathophysiology of complications during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Cangrelor (formerly AR-C69931MX) is a novel, rapidly acting, intravenous, specific antagonist of platelet aggregation via binding to the adenosine diphosphate (ADP) P2Y12 receptor subtype. The primary aims of this study were to assess the initial safety and pharmacodynamics of cangrelor in patients undergoing PCI.

METHODS

In part 1, patients undergoing PCI were randomized to an 18- to 24-hour of either placebo, 1-, 2-, or 4-microg/kg per minute cangrelor in addition to aspirin and heparin beginning before PCI. In part 2, patients were randomized to receive either cangrelor (4 microg/kg per minute) or abciximab before PCI. The primary end point was the composite incidence of major and minor bleeding through 7 days. Secondary end points included the occurrence of major adverse coronary events (death, MI, and unplanned repeat coronary intervention) through 30 days plus ex vivo platelet aggregation and bleeding times.

RESULTS

Two hundred patients (3 dosage groups and placebo) were studied in part 1, and 199 additional patients were then randomized in the second part, comparing 1 dose of cangrelor and abciximab. Combined major and minor bleeding occurred in 13% of those receiving cangrelor and in 8% in those randomized to placebo (P = non significant [NS]) during part 1 and in 7% receiving cangrelor compared with 10% randomized to abciximab (P = NS), during part 2. The 30-day composite incidence of adverse cardiac events was similar between those receiving cangrelor and those receiving abciximab during part 2 (7.6% vs 5.3%, respectively, P = NS). Mean inhibition of ex vivo platelet aggregation in response to 3 micromol/L ADP at steady state was 100% for both cangrelor 4 microg/kg per minute and abciximab groups in part 2. After termination of infusion, platelet aggregation returned to baseline response more rapidly with cangrelor compared with abciximab. There was a trend toward longer bleeding time prolongation and lower platelet count with abciximab compared with cangrelor.

CONCLUSIONS

This initial experience with intravenous cangrelor during PCI suggests an acceptable risk of bleeding and adverse cardiac events while achieving rapid, reversible inhibition of platelet aggregation via competitive binding to the ADP P2Y12 platelet receptor with less prolongation of bleeding time then the glycoprotein IIb/IIIa receptor antagonist abciximab.

Reduced thrombogenicity of nitinol stents--in vitro evaluation of different surface modifications and coatings

The material and the surface patterns of intravascular stents play a pivotal role in activating platelets and triggering adherence of inflammatory cells that consecutively leads to renarrowing caused by neointimal hyperplasia. To improve these features, besides mechanical and chemical modifications, ways of masking the stent by covering have been developed. In addition, polymer-coated stents are used as vehicle for local drug delivery. But as substances used for this application are described to possess an inflammatory potential, this aspect has to be evaluated. In the present study we compared different approaches to surface alterations applied to a nitinol stent design. Besides commonly used techniques like passivation and electropolishing, we evaluated coatings with heparin, aluminium and a polyurethane polymer regarding their thrombogenic and inflammatory characteristics. By weaving thin elastomer fibres a graft was generated. The previously described Chandler loop was used to simulate arterial flow conditions ex vivo using rotating PVC tubings filled with human blood. All stents received 120 min of blood contact. To determine thrombocyte activation and inflammatory reaction, the platelet count and levels of beta-TG, TAT and PMN-elastase were assessed. Scanning electron microscopy was used to visualize the reactions. Mechanical polishing and passivation did not improve the stent surface characteristics while sandblasting, electropolishing and aluminium covering decreased activation of the coagulation cascade. In terms of thrombogenicity, the heparin coating had no beneficial effect. The lowest thrombogenic potential was found in the Polyurethane-coated stent group. All stents showed similar levels of polymorph nuclear granulocyte elastase except for the membrane design. While mechanical and chemical modifications are able to reduce thrombogenicity, coating with this particular polyurethane polymer seems to be superior to these approaches regarding the parameters assessed in this experimental setting. The Chandler loop is a valuable tool to test polymeric coatings ex vivo since these modifications may reduce drug performance by inducing inflammatory reaction themselves.

The Benefits of Combined Anti-platelet Treatment in Carotid Artery Stenting

OBJECTIVE

To assess the benefits of a combined anti-platelet regime of aspirin and clopidogrel in carotid artery stenting.

METHODS

A randomised controlled trial was performed comparing aspirin and 24-h heparin with aspirin and clopidogrel for patients undergoing carotid artery stenting. Outcome measures included 30-day bleeding and neurological complications and 30-day stenosis rates.

RESULTS

Bleeding complications (groin haematoma or excessive bleeding at the groin site) occurred in 17% of the heparin and 9% of the clopidogrel group (p=0.35; n.s). The neurological complication rate in the 24-h heparin group was 25% compared to 0% in the clopidogrel group (p=0.02). The 30-day 50-100% stenosis rates were 26% in the heparin group and 5% in the clopidogrel group (p=0.10; n.s).

CONCLUSIONS

The dual anti-platelet regime has a significant impact on reducing adverse neurological outcomes without an additional increase in bleeding complications. This study was terminated prematurely due to an unacceptable level of complications in the heparin arm of the trial.

Bisphosphonates as anti-inflammatory agents in ankylosing spondylitis and spondylarthropathies

NSAIDs remain the cornerstone of the treatment of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and spondylarthropathies (SpA), and have been successfully used for a long time in these diseases. However, some patients remain refractory or intolerant to NSAIDs and new effective treatments have recently emerged, namely TNF-alpha-blocker agents. Other therapeutic options targeting the bone, such as bisphosphonates, have also been tried in refractory AS or SpA patients. The anti-inflammatory properties of bisphosphonates give the rationale for the use of these compounds in AS and SpA, and include the inhibition of antigen presenting cells, the modulation of pro-inflammatory cytokine generation, and also a decreased bone mass in AS. Open trials using pamidronate gave favourable results, and one controlled study comparing the efficacy of pamidronate 10 versus 60mg showed that the 60mg dose was effective in AS. Further studies are required to confirm these preliminary data and to better determine the optimal regimen (dosage and rhythm) of administration.

Preoperative use of enoxaparin increases the risk of postoperative bleeding and re-exploration in cardiac surgery patients

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate if the preoperative use of new platelet inhibitors and low-molecular-weight heparins may contribute to bleeding after cardiac surgery.

DESIGN

Retrospective data review.

SETTING

University teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred eleven patients divided in 5 groups.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were grouped according to preoperative antithrombotic regimen: group 1, control, no agents (n=55); group 2, clopidogrel (n=9); group 3, enoxaparin (n=17); group 4, any GP IIb/IIIa inhibitor (n=14); and group 5, any drug combination (n=15). Data included cumulative mediastinal chest tube drainage, allogeneic blood transfusions, total blood donor exposures, and re-exploration.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Use of any drug (groups 2-5) resulted in greater total blood transfusions and donor exposure (p=0.0003) than control, especially red cells (p=0.002) and platelets (p=0.006). A greater percentage of patients on enoxaparin required mediastinal re-exploration for nonsurgical bleeding versus control (3/17 v 0/55, p=0.001). The use of enoxaparin was associated with significantly higher chest tube output after the first 24 hours postoperatively (p=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Newer antithrombotic agents were associated with greater transfusion rates and total donor exposures. Enoxaparin use was associated with greater overall blood loss and with higher incidence of mediastinal re-exploration. The relative risk-benefit ratio of reduced periprocedure morbidity versus increased bleeding complications has yet to be determined.

Association study of the I/D polymorphism and plasma angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) as risk factors for stent restenosis

The ID (insertion/deletion) polymorphism of the ACE (angiotensin-converting enzyme) gene controls plasma ACE levels. Both have been correlated with ISR (in-stent restenosis) in preliminary analyses, but not confirmed in larger studies. In the present study, baseline and 6-month quantitative coronary analysis were performed in 897 patients who had stent implantation and the ID polymorphism genotyped. Plasma ACE levels were measured in 848 patients (95%). Restenosis rates among genotypes were 31.2% DD, 25.5% ID and 28.8% II (not significant). Plasma ACE levels were significantly higher in restenotic patients compared with patients without restenosis (30.7+/-18.6 units/l compared with 22.8+/-12.8 units/l; P=0.0001) and a strong independent predictor of ISR [OR (odds ratio)=3.70; 95% CI (confidence interval), 2.40-5.71; P<0.0001], except in diabetics. In the subgroup of diabetics and patients with AMI (acute myocardial infarction), the DD genotypes actually had a lower risk of ISR than the II genotypes (diabetics, OR=0.16; 95% CI, 0.04-0.69; P=0.014; and patients with AMI, OR=0.21; 95% CI, 0.061-0.749; P=0.016). After exclusion of diabetics and patients with AMI, ISR rates for genotypes in 632 patients were 31.7% DD, 24.3% ID and 17.6% II (P=0.02; DD compared with non-DD OR=1.57; 95% CI, 1.09-2.25). The association between the D allele and ISR observed in selected populations does not hold with a larger sample size. Other than sample size, clinical variables can modulate the association between ID polymorphism and ISR. Plasma ACE level is a risk factor for ISR, independently of the ID genotype.

Effects of tirofiban on acute systemic inflammatory response in elective percutaneous coronary interventions

OBJECTIVE

In this study the effect of a specific glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor, tirofiban [which also has antiplatelet activity on acute systemic inflammatory responses (IR) during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)] was evaluated.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with stable angina pectoris and similar baseline characteristics who angiographically had a single lesion in their coronary arteries with a PCI performed on that lesion were enrolled in the study. One group of patients (control group, n = 52) received 0.9% NaCl (15 mL/h for 24 h) and the other group (tirofiban group, n = 55) had tirofiban (10 microg/kg bolus infusion in 3 min and 0.15 microg/kg/min for 24 h) in addition to stenting without pre-dilatation. The effect of interventional procedure on levels of cardiac troponin T (cTnT) and several parameters of acute IR (leukocytes, fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, interleukin-1, interleukin-6, interleukin-8 and tumor necrotizing factor-alpha) was assessed on blood samples obtained from all patients before PCI and at pre-specified time points after PCI.

RESULTS

During the follow-up after PCI, the number of patients becoming cTnT-positive (> 0.1 ng/mL) was greater in the control group [12 (23%) patients vs. 3 (5%) patients, p = 0.01]. However, both groups had changes (generally observed as elevations) in their levels of all inflammatory parameters during the study and C-reactive protein, interleukin-6 and tumor necrotizing factor-alpha levels were elevated significantly. Yet, no significant difference occurred between groups due to these changes in any phase of the study (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings of this study, it was concluded that although tirofiban limits development of myocardial necrosis during elective PCI, it does not directly affect the acute systemic inflammatory responses.

A randomized trial comparing phosphorylcholine-coated stenting with balloon angioplasty as well as abciximab with placebo for restenosis reduction in small coronary arteries

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this randomized trial was to assess the antirestenotic effects of phosphorylcholine (PC)-coated stents as well as of abciximab in small coronary arteries when compared with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) and placebo respectively.

BACKGROUND

Stent coating with PC has been shown to reduce protein absorption and platelet activation which may reduce the risk of restenosis. Furthermore, on the basis of nondedicated studies abciximab is believed to reduce the risk of restenosis after coronary interventions.

METHODS

A total of 502 patients with lesions situated in small coronary arteries (vessel diameter </=2.5 mm) were randomly assigned to be treated with either PC-coated stents (n = 253) or PTCA (n = 249) and with either abciximab (n = 251) or placebo (n = 251) with the use of a 2 x 2 factorial design. All patients were pretreated with 600 mg clopidogrel. The primary end-point was the incidence of angiographic restenosis (>/=50% diameter stenosis) at follow-up; death or myocardial infarction, and target vessel revascularization (TVR), were assessed as secondary end-points.

RESULTS

Angiographic restenosis did not differ between patients treated with PC-coated stents or with PTCA (39.0% vs. 34.2%; P = 0.30) and between patients receiving abciximab or placebo (39.3% vs. 34.3%; P = 0.29). Similarly, the need for TVR at 1-year follow-up did not differ between patients receiving PC-coated stents or PTCA (20.2% vs. 20.5%; P = 0.98) as well as between patients treated with abciximab or placebo (18.7% vs. 21.9%; P = 0.44).

CONCLUSIONS

PC-coated stents and abciximab failed to reduce the incidence of angiographic restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention of small coronary arteries. These data strengthen the belief that future studies on prevention of restenosis in small coronary arteries should focus on drug-eluting stents.

Preclinical restenosis models and drug-eluting stents: still important, still much to learn

Percutaneous coronary intervention continues to revolutionize the treatment of coronary atherosclerosis. Restenosis remains a significant problem but may at last be yielding to technologic advances. The examination of neointimal hyperplasia in injured animal artery models has helped in our understanding of angioplasty and stenting mechanisms, and as drug-eluting stent (DES) technologies have arrived, they too have been advanced through the study of animal models. These models are useful for predicting adverse clinical outcomes in patients with DESs because suboptimal animal model studies typically lead to problematic human trials. Similarly, stent thrombosis in animal models suggests stent thrombogenicity in human patients. Equivocal animal model results at six or nine months occasionally have been mirrored by excellent clinical outcomes in patients. The causes of such disparities are unclear but may result from differing methods, including less injury severity than originally described in the models. Ongoing research into animal models will reconcile apparent differences with clinical trials and advance our understanding of how to apply animal models to clinical stenting in the era of DESs.

Lack of clopidogrel pretreatment effect on the relative efficacy of bivalirudin with provisional glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade compared to heparin with routine glycoprotein IIb/IIIa blockade: a REPLACE-2 substudy

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess if clopidogrel pretreatment affects the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with glycoprotein (GP) IIb/IIIa blockade for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI).

BACKGROUND

Although thienopyridine pretreatment may improve clinical outcomes with PCI, it is unknown if bivalirudin's efficacy compared with heparin is dependent upon such pretreatment.

METHODS

The Randomized Evaluation in Percutaneous coronary intervention Linking Angiomax to reduced Clinical Events (REPLACE-2) trial was a double-blind, triple-dummy, randomized-controlled trial comparing heparin plus routine GP IIb/IIIa blockade (heparin group) with bivalirudin plus provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade (bivalirudin group) during PCI. The primary end point was a composite of death, myocardial infarction (MI), urgent revascularization at 30 days, and major in-hospital bleeding. The secondary end point was a 30-day composite of death, MI, and urgent revascularization. Clopidogrel pretreatment was encouraged (300 mg loading, 75 mg/day).

RESULTS

Of 6,010 patients enrolled, 5,893 received clopidogrel, with 85.8% in the bivalirudin and 84.6% in the heparin group receiving clopidogrel pretreatment. Bivalirudin (provisional GP IIb/IIIa blockade 7.2%) was noninferior to the heparin group for both primary and secondary end points. Clopidogrel pretreatment did not affect the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin with GP IIb/IIIa blockade, irrespective of pretreatment duration. Pretreatment was associated with significantly lower primary end point with bivalirudin (8.7% pretreatment vs. 12.9% no pretreatment, p = 0.007), and nonsignificantly with heparin (9.7% vs. 11.7%, respectively, p = 0.20). Multivariable models showed a trend toward lower primary and secondary end points with clopidogrel pretreatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Clopidogrel pretreatment at the doses and time administered in this trial did not influence the relative efficacy of bivalirudin versus heparin plus GP IIb/IIIa blockade for PCI. However, pretreatment was associated with a trend towards lower clinical events after PCI.

Effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on periprocedural rise in C-reactive protein after percutaneous coronary intervention

This study sought to determine the effect of clopidogrel pretreatment on the increase in C-reactive protein (CRP) after percutaneous coronary intervention. Clopidogrel pretreatment attenuated the periprocedural increase in CRP by 65% and was independently associated with an attenuation in the CRP increase in a multivariate model.