Propranolol in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Effect on myocardial oxygenation and hemodynamics

Through the Decades: β-Blocker Use and Outcomes in Acute Coronary Syndromes

Beta-adrenergic receptor antagonists, or β-blockers, have been a cornerstone of treatment in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) for more than 4 decades. First studied in the 1960s, β-blockers in ACS have been shown to decrease the risk of death, recurrent ischemic events, and arrhythmias by reducing catecholamine-mediated effects and reducing myocardial oxygen demand. Through the decades, the β-blocker of choice, timing of initiation, duration of therapy, and dosing have evolved considerably. Despite having clear benefits in certain patient populations (eg, patients with systolic dysfunction who are hemodynamically stable), the benefit of β-blockers in other populations (ie, in patients at low risk for complications receiving modern revascularization therapies and optimal medical management) remains unclear. This article provides a review of the landmark clinical trials of β-blockers in ACS and highlights the chronology and evolution of guideline recommendations through the decades.

Diagnostic performance of initial salivary alpha-amylase activity for acute myocardial infarction in patients with acute chest pain

BACKGROUND

To rule out acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in chest pain patients constitutes a diagnostic challenge to emergency department (ED) physicians.

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the diagnostic value of measuring salivary alpha-amylase (sAA) activity for detecting AMI in patients presenting to the ED with acute chest pain.

METHODS

sAA activity was measured in a prospective cohort of 473 consecutive adult patients within 4 h of onset of chest pain. Comparisons were made between patients with a final diagnosis of AMI and those with non-AMI. Univariate analysis and multiple logistic regression model were used to identify independent clinical predictors of AMI.

RESULTS

Initial sAA activity in the AMI group (n = 85; 266 ± 127.6 U/mL) was significantly higher than in the non-AMI group (n = 388; 130 ± 92.8 U/mL, p < 0.001). sAA activity levels were also significantly higher in patients with ST elevation AMI (n = 53) compared to in those with non-ST elevation AMI (n = 32) (300 ± 141.1 vs. 210 ± 74.1 U/mL, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of sAA activity for predicting AMI in patients with acute chest pain was 0.826 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.782-0.869), with diagnostic odds ratio 10.87 (95% CI 6.16-19.18). With a best cutoff value of 197.7 U/mL, the sAA activity revealed moderate sensitivity and specificity as an independent predictor of AMI (78.8% and 74.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

High initial sAA activity is an independent predictor of AMI in patients presenting to the ED with chest pain.

Acute intervention with metoprolol in myocardial infarction

Studies in experimental and clinical myocardial infarction support the idea that sympathetic activity and myocardial noradrenaline release play a significant role in the development of myocardial ischemic damage. Betablockade has been shown to limit infarct size and lower the incidence of ventricular fibrillation in experimental models. Betablockade to patients (pts) with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) has been shown to reduce ischemia reflected as reduction of ischemic chest pain, decrease ST-segment elevation and increase lactate extraction. Whether this treatment in the clinical situation can prevent development of infarction, reduce infarct size and early mortality in man remains to be proven. In Gøteborg a double-blind study on metoprolol and placebo was started four and a half years ago. Inclusion of pts. in the study has been terminated and survival data will be available on May 1, 1981. 1395 pts. were included of whom 800 developed AMI. Metoprolol 15 mg was given IV followed by a total daily dose of 200 mg/day. The tolerance for betablockade was generally good. Analysis of serum enzyme estimations of maximal LD I + II showed a significant reduction by metoprolol when the treatment was given within 12 hours of onset of pain. In a subgroup consisting of 103 pts. with AMI metoprolol had no clearcut effects on the ventricular arrhythmias during the first 24 hours in hospital. The betablockade resulted in a 15% reduction in heart rate. The main objective of this study, the mortality during three months of blind treatment will be published late in 1981.

Tolerability to treatment with metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction in relation to age

A double-blind trial with the beta 1-selective blocker metoprolol in suspected acute myocardial infarction and during 3 months' follow-up included 1395 patients, aged 40-74 years, 698 on metoprolol and 697 on placebo. In order to further evaluate the tolerability to beta-blockade in the elderly, the total series was divided into 2 groups according to median age (61 years) and into quartiles, the lowest quartile (40-57 years) being compared with the highest (67-74 years). The decrease in heart rate and systolic blood pressure after intravenous metoprolol in the acute phase was similar in the elderly and the younger patients. Hypotension was observed more often in the metoprolol-treated than in the placebo-treated younger patients, while no difference was observed in the elderly. Bradycardia was observed more often in the metoprolol group in both age groups, while there was no difference regarding the incidence of congestive heart failure in either the younger or in the elderly patients. The effect on mortality, serious ventricular arrhythmias and chest pain seemed to be similar in different age groups. From the present series we conclude that hemodynamic reactions and tolerability to beta-blockade can be expected to be similar in elderly and younger patients.

Effects of metabolic and pharmacologic interventions on myocardial infarct size following coronary occlusion

A number of hemodynamic, pharmacologic and metabolic interventions were found to change the extent of acute ischemic injury of the myocardium and subsequent necrosis following experimental coronary artery occlusion. Reduction in myocardial damage occurred by decreasing myocardial oxygen demands (beta-adrenergic blocking agents, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, external counterpulsation, nitroglycerin, decreasing afterload in hypertensive patients, inhibition of lipolysis, and digitalis in the failing heart); by increasing myocardial oxygen supply either directly (coronary artery reperfusion or elevating arterial pO2), or through collateral vessels (elevation of coronary perfusion pressure by alpha-adrenergic agonists, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation); or by increasing plasma osmolality (mannitol, hypertonic glucose); presumably by augmenting anaerobic metabolism (glucose-insulin-potassium, hypertonic glucose); by enhancing transport to the ischemic zone of substrates utilized in energy production (hyaluronidase); by protecting against autolytic and heterolytic damage (hydrocortisone, cobra venom factor, aprotinin). Augmentation of myocardial ischemic damage occurred as a consequence of increasing myocardial oxygen requirements (isoproterenol, glucagon, ouabain, bretylium tosylate, tachycardia); by decreasing myocardial oxygen supply either directly (hypoxia, anemia) or through reduction of collateral flow (hemorrhagic hypotension, minoxidil) or by decreasing substrate availability glycemia). Pilot studies have been carried out in patients with hyaluronidase, nitroglycerin, intra-aortic balloon counterpulsation, beta-blocking agents and Arfonad and have shown that these interventions may also reduce myocardial damage, suggesting that the concept of reduction in infarct size following coronary occlusion is applicable clinically.

Double-blind study of the effect of cardioselective beta-blockade on chest pain in acute myocardial infarction

A double-blind study including three different cardioselective beta-blockers, practolol, H 87/07 and metoprolol, was performed in 54 patients with acute myocardial infarction and chest pain shortly after onset of symptoms. Transmural infarctions were found in 42 patients while 12 patients had nontransmural infarctions. Chest pain and the product of heart rate and systolic blood pressure were significantly reduced in the beta-blocker groups whereas no changes were seen after saline. All patients with nontransmural infarctions and 14 out of 29 with transmural infarctions got pain relief lasting for at least 30 min. None of the patients developed signs of left ventricular backward failure, shock, or bradycardia. A decrease in ST segment elevation was observed in all the transmural infarctions after beta-blockade. No changes in ST segment elevation were found after analgesics when given after saline, but in some cases an increase was seen in this parameter when analgesics were given due to insufficient pain relief after beta-blockers or due to return of chest pain. It is suggested that pain relief by beta-blockers indicates decrease of myocardial ischemia.

Adjunctive therapy after reperfusion therapy in acute myocardial infarction

The current era has witnessed dramatic improvement in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, due in large part to the more widespread use of thrombolytic therapy aimed at quickly restoring perfusion in the infarct-related artery. This review addresses the role of adjunctive pharmacologic therapy in the thrombolytic era, recognizing that much of the available clinical trial data supporting the role of adjunctive pharmacologic treatment strategies was conducted in patient populations not widely exposed to reperfusion therapy. This review, therefore, explores the data supporting the incremental benefit of therapy with beta blockers, nitrates, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, or magnesium in addition to thrombolytic therapy. Heparin and aspirin will not be discussed.

β1-Adrenergic blockade during cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves survival

OBJECTIVE

The short-acting beta1-selective adrenergic blocking agent, esmolol, was administrated during cardiopulmonary resuscitation with the hypothesis that initial resuscitation and postresuscitation survival would be improved.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled study.

SETTING

Animal research laboratory.

SUBJECTS

Male Sprague-Dawley rats.

INTERVENTIONS

Ventricular fibrillation was induced in 18 male Sprague-Dawley rats, which were then left untreated for 6 mins before attempted resuscitation with precordial compression, mechanical ventilation, and electrical defibrillation. Animals were randomized to receive 300 microg/kg esmolol in a volume of 200 microL or an equivalent volume of saline placebo during cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Electrical defibrillation was attempted after 12 mins of ventricular fibrillation.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Esmolol-treated animals required a significantly smaller number of electrical shocks before resuscitation. Each of the esmolol-treated but only five of nine placebo-treated animals were successfully resuscitated. Postresuscitation contractile and left ventricular diastolic functions of resuscitated animals were significantly better after esmolol administration and duration of survival was significantly increased.

CONCLUSIONS

A short-acting beta1-selective adrenergic blocking agent, when administered during cardiopulmonary resuscitation, significantly improved initial cardiac resuscitation, minimized postresuscitation myocardial dysfunction, and increased the duration of postresuscitation survival.

Beta-adrenergic blockade during severe ischemia

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of acebutolol, a beta-adrenergic-receptor blocker, on severe regional myocardial ischemia, specifically the effects on regional myocardial function and metabolism.

DESIGN

Randomized study.

SETTING

Animal laboratory of the Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University of Stellenbosch Medical School.

PARTICIPANTS

Anesthetized open-chest pig model (n = 18).

INTERVENTIONS

Regional left ventricular function and metabolism were evaluated. Severe stenosis was applied to the left anterior descending coronary artery. After establishing regional myocardial ischemia, acebutolol was administered intravenously, and results were compared with controls who did not receive acebutolol. Animals were prospectively randomized to 1 of the groups.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Regional myocardial function and metabolism were assessed by end-systolic pressure relationship, regional systolic shortening, postsystolic shortening, regional myocardial oxygen consumption, and lactate dynamics. Coronary blood flow was determined with a Doppler flow probe. Results indicated that acebutolol increased regional myocardial blood flow, and this resulted in less severe regional myocardial ischemia, improved function, and an increase in regional myocardial oxygen consumption.

CONCLUSION

The beta-Adrenergic-receptor antagonist was successful in reducing regional myocardial ischemia in this model. This reduction was achieved by an increase in coronary blood flow, which resulted in an improvement in regional mechanical function and an increase in oxygen consumption.

Effects of early use of atenolol or captopril on infarct size and ventricular volume: A double-blind comparison in patients with anterior acute myocardial infarction

BACKGROUND

beta-Blockers and ACE inhibitors reduce early mortality when either one is started in the first hours after myocardial infarction (MI). Considering the close correlation between morphological changes and prognosis, we aimed to investigate whether the benefit of both beta-blockers and ACE inhibitors might reside in a similar protective effect on infarct size or ventricular volume.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In a randomized, double-blind comparison between early treatment with captopril or atenolol in 121 patients with acute anterior MI, both drugs showed a similar reduction in mean blood pressure. However, only the atenolol-treated patients showed a significant early reduction in heart rate. Infarct size, obtained from the perfusion defect in resting single photon emission imaging, was higher in captopril-treated patients than in atenolol-treated patients: 29.8+/-12% versus 20.8+/-12% (P:<0.01) by polar map and 28.3+/-13% versus 20.0+/-13% (P:<0.01) by tomography. Changes from baseline to 1 week and to 3 months in ventricular end-diastolic volume, assessed by echocardiography, were as follows: 58+/-14 versus 64+/-19 (P<0.05) and 65+/-21 mL/m(2) (P<0.05), respectively, with captopril, and 58+/-18 versus 64+/-18 (P<0.05) and 69+/-30 mL/m(2) (P<0.05), respectively, with atenolol. Neither group showed significant changes in end-systolic volume. Among patients with perfusion defect >18% (n=51), those treated with atenolol showed a significant increase of end-systolic and end-diastolic ventricular volumes, whereas captopril-treated patients did not.

CONCLUSIONS

Although early treatment with atenolol or captopril results in similar overall short- and medium-term preservation of ventricular function and volumes, in patients with larger infarctions, a beta-blocker alone does not adequately protect myocardium from ventricular dilatation.

Lipolysis is an important determinant of isoproterenol-induced myocardial necrosis

The cardiotoxic effect of isoproterenol (ISO) is associated with, and possibly due to, calcium overload. Prior work suggests that calcium entry into cardiac myocytes after ISO administration occurs in two phases: an early rapid phase, followed by a slow phase beginning about 1 hour after ISO injection, leading to a peak myocardial calcium level after about 4 hours. We have tested the relationship of these phases to myocardial necrosis (MN) by determining the time after ISO administration at which the commitment to MN occurs. This was done by administration of propranolol at various times before and after ISO. In addition, since ISO induces lipolysis, and lipids can be toxic, experiments were conducted to determine if adrenergically-activated lipolysis could play a significant role in ISO-MN. We found that propranolol protected the myocardium equally well when administered anytime within 2 hours of ISO injection, but had no effect when given 4 hours after ISO. This showed that metabolic events taking place more than two hours after ISO injection are required for ISO-MN. As expected from prior work, there was a small and consistent amount of propranolol-resistant ISO-MN. Lipolysis, assessed by measuring serum glycerol levels, increased to tenfold above base line at one hour after ISO administration and returned to near basal levels at 4 hours. Potentiation of lipolysis by intravenous injections of phospholipase A2 (PLA2) or lipoprotein lipase (LPL) to rats treated with ISO substantially augmented MN. Propranolol completely blocked the increase in necrosis produced by PLA2 when given with ISO. Lipases induced only minimal necrosis in the absence of ISO. Administration of adenosine (an anti-lipolytic agent), oxfenicine (an inhibitor of mitochondrial palmitoyl carnitine transferase), or vitamin C (an anti-oxidant) resulted in a 55-60% reduction in MN. These results suggest that critical necrosis-determining events occur between 2 and 4 hours after ISO administration and imply a relationship between ISO-induced lipolysis, calcium influx, and ISO-MN. We hypothesize that importance of lipolysis as a determinant of ISO-MN is related to the generation of free fatty acids, their oxidized/metabolic products, or direct damage to plasma membrane.

Electrophysiologic, cardiohemodynamic and beta-blocking actions of a new ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, ONO-1101, assessed by the in vivo canine model in comparison with esmolol

The purpose of this study was to assess the cardiovascular effects of an ultra-short-acting beta-blocker, ONO-1101, by using halothane-anesthetized beagle dogs in comparison with esmolol. ONO-1101 (n = 6) or esmolol (n = 6) was administered at four infusion rates of 0.3, 3, 30, and 300 microg/ kg/min. Each infusion was performed over a 30-min period, and the parameters were measured at 20-30 min after the start of each infusion. ONO-1101 significantly decreased the heart rate, rate-pressure product, left ventricular contraction, cardiac output, and relative refractory period of the right ventricle, suppressed the AV nodal conduction, and increased the effective refractory period of the right ventricle, whereas no significant change was observed in the preload and afterload of the left ventricle, intrinsic sinus nodal automaticity, His-Purkinje-ventricular conduction, and the monophasic action-potential duration of the right ventricle. The cardiovascular effects of esmolol were comparable to those of ONO-1101, except that the preload of the left ventricle was significantly increased, and the ventricular repolarization phase was shortened by 300 microg/kg/min of esmolol infusion. Meanwhile, ONO-1101 as well as esmolol significantly reduced the isoproterenol-induced increase in heart rate and ventricular contraction, but the inhibitory action of ONO-1101 was 6-8 times greater than that of esmolol. These results suggest that the suppressive effects of ONO-1101 on cardiovascular performance are significantly less potent than those of esmolol at equipotent beta-blocking doses.

The effect of acute vs chronic treatment with beta-adrenoceptor blockade on exercise performance, haemodynamic and metabolic parameters in healthy men and women

1. Variable results have been reported on the effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockers on maximal oxygen uptake (VO2 max) and exercise endurance. This may in part be due to different subject populations, but it could also be due to an adaption of metabolic and haemodynamic responses to exercise during chronic treatment with beta-adrenoceptor blockers. The present study was therefore carried out to examine the effect of acute and chronic administration of the non-selective beta-adrenoceptor blocker propranolol on both peak VO2 and exercise performance in the same subjects. Since the effect of beta-adrenoceptor blockade has not been properly investigated in women, eight healthy women were compared with seven men. Progressive bicycle exercise to exhaustion was performed after propranolol 0.15 mg kg-1 i.v. (acute) or 80 mg three times daily for 2 weeks (chronic) or placebo given according to a double-blind crossover design. 2. Mean (s.e. mean) peak VO2, was significantly reduced from 42.3 (1.6) ml min-1 kg-1 during placebo to 40.3 (1.2, P < 0.05) ml min-1 kg-1 after acute and 39.1 (1.2, P < 0.001) ml min-1 kg-1 after chronic propranolol treatment. No significant difference in peak VO2 between the two propranolol treatment regimens was observed (mean difference 1.2, 95% CI -0.1 to 2.4 ml min-1 kg-1). There was no treatment interaction with gender. 3. Cumulative work, 163 (9.3) kJ, was significantly reduced by acute, 148 (7.7, P < 0.001) kJ, and chronic, 147 (7.6, P < 0.001) kJ, administration of propranolol since the time to exhaustion was reduced by 5.3% and 5.3%, respectively. There was no significant difference between the two regimens of propranolol (mean difference 0.2, 95% CI -6.7 to 7.0 kJ) or between the sexes. Maximal knee extensor and handgrip strengths were not affected by propranolol. 4. Whereas sex did not influence ventilatory, haemodynamic or metabolic parameters, some differences were observed between acute and chronic propranolol treatment. During submaximal exercise oxygen uptake was reduced by approximately 2% and RER values increased by 0.04-0.05 after chronic treatment in contrast to no effect of acute propranolol treatment. Heart rate and systolic blood pressure were reduced significantly more after chronic compared with acute propranolol treatment; peak heart rate being 186 (2.2), 147 (2.3) and 134 (2.3) beats min-1, and peak systolic blood pressure being 189 (7), 171 (4) and 161 (4) mmHg after placebo, acute and chronic propranolol administration, respectively. Also the exercise induced rise in potassium and lactate levels were modified differentially; the rise in potassium concentration was less after chronic compared with acute propranolol treatment and lactate levels were reduced only after chronic administration of propranolol. In contrast, ventilation, which was unchanged after propranolol during submaximal exercise, was reduced to similar extent at exhaustion from 108 (6.4) to 97 (7.2) and 96 (5.9) l min-1 after acute and chronic propranolol administration, respectively. Diastolic blood pressure and subjective perception of fatigue were similar across the treatment regimens. 5. The study has demonstrated that acute and chronic administration of propranolol result in different haemodynamic and metabolic response to exercise, although endurance and peak oxygen consumption were reduced to the same extent. The response to propranolol was not significantly different between men and women.

Beta-blocker infusion did not improve left ventricular diastolic function in myocardial infarction: a Doppler echocardiography and cardiac catheterization study

Left ventricular (LV) diastolic function changes after myocardial infarction. It has been suggested that beta blockers may improve diastolic function in hypertensive and heart failure patients. Doppler echocardiographic filling patterns and invasive hemodynamic indices have been used to analyze LV diastolic function. To determine the effect of beta blockers on LV diastolic function, we studied 32 patients with anterior wall myocardial infarction with a mean age of 53 years. Peak early and late flow velocities, peak early-to-late flow velocities ratio, pressure half time, diastolic filling period, isovolumic relaxation time, cardiac index, mean arterial pressure, wedge pressure, and systemic and pulmonary vascular resistance indices were obtained simultaneously before and after an intravenous infusion of 10 mg of atenolol. Cardiac index decreased from 4.27 +/- 0.97 to 3.19 +/- 0.91 l/min/m2 (p = 0.0001); mean arterial pressure decreased from 85 +/- 10 to 80 +/- 11 mmHg (p = 0.004); wedge pressure increased from 11 +/- 5 to 13 +/- 4 mmHg (p = 0.002); systemic vascular resistance index increased from 1586 +/- 409 to 1980 +/- 634 dyn.m2.s/cm5 (p = 0.0002); pulmonary vascular resistance index increased from 115 +/- 58 to 163 +/- 72 dyn.m2.s/cm5 (p = 0.0004); peak late flow velocity decreased from 64 +/- 15 to 49 +/- 14 cm/s (p = 0.0001); early-to-late ratio increased from 0.95 +/- 0.35 to 1.29 +/- 0.36 (p = 0.0001); diastolic filling period increased from 300 +/- 108 to 400 +/- 110 ms (p = 0.0001) and isovolumic relaxation time increased from 133 +/- 29 to 143 +/- 29 ms (p = 0.009). No significant changes were observed for peak early flow velocity and pressure half-time.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

How should physicians view heart failure? The philosophical and physiological evolution of three conceptual models of the disease

During the last 50 years, physicians have developed three distinct conceptual models of heart failure that have provided a rational basis for the treatment of the disease. In the 1940s through the 1960s, physicians regarded heart failure principally as an edematous disorder and formulated a cardiorenal model of the disease in an attempt to explain the sodium retention of these patients. This model led to the widespread use of digitalis and diuretics. In the 1970s and 1980s, physicians viewed heart failure principally as a hemodynamic disorder and formulated a cardiocirculatory model of the disease in an attempt to explain patients' symptoms and disability. This model led to the widespread use of peripheral vasodilators and the development of novel positive inotropic agents. Now, in the 1990s, physicians are beginning to think about heart failure as a neurohormonal disorder in an attempt to explain the progression of the disease and its poor long-term survival. This new conceptual framework has led to the widespread use of converting-enzyme inhibitors and the development of beta blockers for the treatment of heart failure. Which conceptual model most accurately describes the syndrome of heart failure and leads physicians to utilize the most effective treatment? This paper critically reviews the available evidence supporting and refuting the validity of all three models of heart failure. We conclude that, to varying degrees, all three approaches provide useful, but incomplete, insights into this physiologically complex and therapeutically challenging disease.

Local beta-adrenergic blockade does not reduce infarct size after coronary occlusion and reperfusion: a study of coronary venous retroinfusion of metoprolol

Previous studies have demonstrated pronounced ischemic zone myocardial concentrations of metoprolol following coronary venous retroinfusion in pigs with coronary artery ligation. The effect of coronary venous retroinfusion of metroprolol on myocardial infarct size was studied in 16 pentobarbital-anesthetized open-chest pigs undergoing 60-minute occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery followed by 3 hours of reperfusion. Pigs in the experimental group (n = 8) were given 0.4 mg/kg (1.0 mg/ml) of metroprolol via the anterior interventricular vein over a period of 5 minutes, beginning immediately after coronary occlusion followed by 0.2 mg/kg/hr intravenously. Control pigs (n = 8) received the same volume of saline as the treated group. The risk area and the necrotic area were assessed by monastral blue dye and triphenyl tetrazolium chloride staining, respectively. Metoprolol did not influence hemodynamics. Plasma concentrations of metoprolol were within therapeutic levels. The administration of the beta-blocker resulted in a trend toward reduced norepinephrine concentrations, both in the aorta and coronary vein after coronary occlusion, but it did not prevent norepinephrine overflow following reperfusion. Infarct size expressed as a percentage of the risk area was 77 +/- 11% in the control group and 75 +/- 12% (mean +/- SD; NS) in the treated group. Thus, metoprolol retroinfusion did not reduce infarct size and did not prevent catecholamine overflow after reperfusion. It is concluded that the beneficial effects of metroprolol in acute infarction are probably unrelated to local beta-adrenergic blockade, at least in the pig, an animal with a paucity of coronary collateral blood flow.

Can intravenous beta blockade predict long-term haemodynamic benefit in chronic congestive heart failure secondary to ischaemic heart disease? A comparison between intravenous and oral carvedilol

Several studies in the past have shown the long-term beneficial effects of beta-blockers in congestive heart failure. Despite the interest in this mode of therapy, their clinical application has been limited due to their negative inotropic effect. A subset of the heart failure patients do not show any improvements with standard beta-blocker therapy. Carvedilol, a new, non-selective beta-blocking agent with concurrent alpha-blocking properties, was evaluated in 17 patients with chronic heart failure secondary to ischaemic heart disease. All had resting left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 45% and were maintained on diuretic therapy. Acute haemodynamic measurements were made after intravenous carvedilol (2.5-7.5 mg) and also after chronic therapy for 8 weeks (carvedilol 12.5-50 mg b.d.). Radionuclide ventriculography, ambulatory intra-arterial blood pressure monitoring and right heart catheterization were performed before and after 8 weeks of chronic therapy. Twelve patients completed the study and 5 were withdrawn. Symptomatic and haemodynamic improvement was demonstrated in 11 of the 12 patients after 8 weeks of therapy.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Impaired endothelium-dependent relaxation of dog coronary arteries after myocardial ischaemia and reperfusion: prevention by amlodipine, propranolol and allopurinol

1. Anaesthetized, open-chest dogs were subjected to 60 min of left circumflex coronary artery occlusion followed by 90 min of reperfusion. Endothelium-dependent and -independent relaxant responses of the isolated coronary arterial rings were then investigated. 2. The endothelium-dependent, acetylcholine-induced relaxation of ischaemic/reperfused arterial rings was significantly attenuated in comparison to control rings (1.9 fold rightward shift, ischaemic/reperfused maximum relaxation = 57 +/- 13% of control maximum relaxation; P less than 0.05). In contrast, glyceryl trinitrate produced similar relaxant responses in control and ischaemic rings. 3. Pretreatment of dogs with either amlodipine (3 micrograms kg-1 min-1, i.v.) or propranolol (1 mg kg-1, i.v.) completely prevented the postischaemic impairment of endothelium-dependent relaxant responses (100 +/- 3% and 90 +/- 5% of control maximum relaxation, respectively). 4. Allopurinol pretreatment (25 mg kg-1, p.o. 24 h previously, plus 50 mg kg-1 i.v. 5 min before arterial occlusion) partially protected against endothelial dysfunction by preventing the ischaemia-induced rightward shift of the acetylcholine relaxation curve and increasing the maximum relaxation response (83 +/- 7% of control rings). 5. These results confirm that endothelium-dependent coronary vascular relaxation is impaired by ischaemia and reperfusion, and that the ischaemia-induced impairment is reduced by pretreatment with amlodipine, propranolol or allopurinol.

Acute effects of parenteral beta-blockade on regional ventricular function of infarct and noninfarct zones after reperfusion therapy in humans

Although the mechanism is unknown, clinical trials have suggested that intravenous beta-adrenergic blockade may prevent early cardiac rupture after myocardial infarction. Previous studies have examined effects of beta-blockers on global left ventricular function after myocardial infarction; however, few data exist regarding their immediate effects on regional function or in patients after successful reperfusion. Therefore, 65 patients in whom thrombolysis with or without coronary angioplasty achieved reperfusion at 4.6 +/- 1.7 h from symptom onset were studied. Low osmolarity contrast ventriculograms were obtained immediately before and after administration of 15 mg of intravenous metoprolol (n = 54) or placebo (n = 11). Intravenous metoprolol immediately decreased heart rate (from 92 to 76 beats/min, p less than 0.0001), increased left ventricular diastolic volume (from 150 to 163 ml, p less than 0.001) and systolic volume (from 72 to 77 ml, p less than 0.0005) but did not change systolic and diastolic pressures. Although there was no difference in ejection fraction after metoprolol, centerline chord analysis revealed reduced noninfarct zone motion (from 0.41 to 0.12 SD/chord, p less than 0.05), improved infarct zone motion (from -3.1 to -2.9 SD/chord, p less than 0.01) and smaller circumferential extent of hypokinesia (from 30 to 27 chords, p less than 0.05). Patients with dyskinesia of the infarct zone had the most striking improvement in infarct zone wall motion. Because these changes occurred immediately after beta-blockade, they could not be attributed to myocardial salvage. No significant changes in heart rate, left ventricular volumes or regional wall motion were apparent in the control group.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Heart rate and beta-adrenergic mechanisms in acute myocardial infarction

Increased heart rate is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Elevated heart rate is due to increased sympathetic activity and/or decreased parasympathetic activity. In placebo-controlled trials beta-blockers are known to reduce mortality as well as morbidity and these effects are most evident among patients with elevated heart rate. Studies on circadian variation have demonstrated that there is an increased sympathetic activity in the morning as well as a more frequent onset of ischemic attacked including acute myocardial infarction and sudden death. There seems to be a close relationship between increased sympathetic activity and the onset of ischemic events which can be prevented by prophylactic institution of a beta-blocker.

Value of carvedilol in congestive heart failure secondary to coronary artery disease

Despite considerable interest in the use of beta-blocking agents in congestive heart failure (CHF), their clinical application is limited because of their negative inotropic effects. Beta blockers with vasodilating properties may have the advantage of overcoming this, however. Carvedilol, a beta-blocking agent with vasodilating properties, was evaluated in 17 patients with chronic CHF secondary to ischemic heart disease with a resting left ventricular ejection fraction less than or equal to 45%, who were being maintained on diuretics. Exercise testing, radionuclide ventriculography, and right-sided cardiac catheterization were performed and intraarterial blood pressure measured before and after 8 weeks of carvedilol therapy in a dosage of 12.5 to 50.0 mg twice a day. Twelve patients completed the study and 5 withdrew. Symptomatic and hemodynamic improvement was demonstrated in 11 of the 12 patients. Heart rate and intraarterial blood pressure were both reduced by chronic therapy. Mean +/- standard deviation exercise time improved from 4.3 +/- 1.6 to 7.1 +/- 2.7 minutes (p less than 0.0001), as did resting left ventricular ejection fraction, from 27 +/- 9 to 31 +/- 11% (p less than 0.02). Pulmonary arterial wedge pressure fell from 19 +/- 7 mm Hg to 12 +/- 5 mm Hg (p less than 0.001) and total systemic vascular resistance from 1,752 +/- 403 to 1,497 +/- 310 dynes/s/cm-5/m2 (p less than 0.02). Stroke volume index improved also, from 31 +/- 6 ml to 40 +/- 6 ml (p less than 0.0005). These hemodynamic changes were mediated partly by vasodilation, diminished myocardial oxygen demand and reduction of sympathetic overactivity in the failing heart. These data suggest that carvedilol may have beneficial effects in patients with chronic CHF secondary to coronary artery disease.

The effects of propranolol on regional cardiac metabolism during ischemia and reperfusion assessed by magnetic resonance spectroscopy

Sixteen anesthetized New Zealand white rabbits were subjected to thoracotomy, and a reversible snare occluder was attached around a large branch of the left circumflex coronary artery. A 1.3 cm. diameter nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) surface coil was placed adjacent to the myocardium perfused by this vessel. The animals were divided into two groups of eight animals each, treatment and control. The rabbits were studied using a 2.0 T magnetic resonance (MR) spectrometer, and baseline spectra were acquired. The treatment animals then received intravenous propranolol (1.5 mg/kg) and the control animals received an equal volume of saline. Spectra were then acquired during a 20-minute occlusion period and during subsequent reperfusion. Animals in both groups showed expected decreases in phosphocreatine and adenosine triphosphate and an increase in inorganic phosphate during occlusion; these changes reverted toward baseline values with reperfusion. There were no significant differences between the two groups. The myocardium became acidotic during occlusion in both groups, but significantly more so in the control animals: during the first 10 minutes of occlusion pH was 7.30 +/- 0.41 in the treatment group versus 6.55 +/- 0.24 for controls (p = 0.0005). During the second 10 minutes of occlusion pH was 7.05 +/- 0.65 in the treatment group versus 6.24 +/- 0.25 in controls (p = 0.0053). We conclude that attenuation of intracellular acidosis by propranolol during myocardial ischemia was evident by MR spectroscopy in this animal model.

Influence of carvedilol and propranolol on coronary blood flow

A total of 17 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease and at least one stenosis blocking greater than or equal to 70% of the left anterior descending or circumflex artery were included in a double-blind, randomized study. They received either 5 mg carvedilol or 6 mg propranolol intravenously. Heart rate, aortic pressure, mean coronary sinus pressure and coronary flow (thermodilution) were measured and coronary resistance and the rate-pressure product were calculated before and 25 min after injection. Carvedilol significantly (P less than 0.05) lowered the heart rate (mean, 76 to 69 beats/min), aortic pressure (mean, 153/80-135/72 mm Hg), rate-pressure product (mean, 117-93 mm Hg/min), and coronary flow (mean, 114-94 ml/min). Coronary resistance (mean, 0.97-1.07 mm Hg x min/ml) and coronary flow related to the rate-pressure product (mean, 1.0-1.02 ml/mm Hg) showed no significant change after carvedilol treatment. Propranolol lowered the heart rate (mean, 76-64/min; P less than 0.05) and rate-pressure product (mean, 109-96 mm Hg/min; not significant). Aortic pressure (mean, 145/72-147/74 mm Hg), coronary flow (mean 109-101 ml/min), coronary resistance (mean, 1.1-1.2 mm Hg x min/ml), and coronary flow related to the rate-pressure product (mean, 1.12-1.19 ml/mm Hg) showed no significant change after propranolol administration. Following single application, carvedilol lowered the rate-pressure product more markedly than did propranolol on account of its acute blood-pressure-lowering effect. No differences in the hemodynamic effects of carvedilol and propranolol were found. Neither drug seems to influence the adaption of coronary flow to myocardial oxygen demand.

[Beta blockers and anesthesia]

Beta-adrenoceptor antagonists (BB) demonstrate a competitive antagonism with endogenous catecholamines. Beta-1 receptor blockade mediates the depressive action on contractility, heart rate and atrio-ventricular conduction. Beta-2 receptor blockade mediates vascular, bronchial and uterine smooth muscle constriction. BB with beta-1 selective and intrinsec sympathomimetic activity do not increase systemic vascular resistance. BB are mostly used to treat ischaemic heart disease, hypertension and arrhythmias. Bradycardia, hypotension and bronchospasm are the main hazards in BB treated patients undergoing anaesthesia. However giving BB with premedication to patients taking usely this treatment allows better perioperative haemodynamic stability and avoids rebound effect. Experimentally, oxprenolol reverses regional dysfunction in ischaemic myocardium under halothane anaesthesia. During and after anaesthesia, intravenous (i.v.) BB must be used with caution to treat hypertension associated with tachycardia. In controlled hypotension, i.v. BB potentialise other agents. In phaechromocytoma surgery, alpha-blocking drugs are essential but additional BB can control tachycardia successfully. In coronary artery bypass surgery, giving BB prior to induction decreases cardiac enzymes serum levels. Esmolol, a new ultra-short-acting BB, would control perioperative tachycardia and hypertension without risk of prolonged cardiac depression.

Nonthrombolytic intervention in acute myocardial infarction

Alternative interventions are available for patients in whom thrombolytic therapy is inappropriate after an acute myocardial infarction. Administration of a beta blocker within the first 24 hours of the patient's admission to the coronary care unit can reduce overall morbidity and mortality within the first 7 days by about 15%. Maintenance therapy with an oral beta blocker can reduce mortality within the succeeding 3 years by about 25%. Esmolol, a unique cardioselective beta 1-adrenergic receptor blocker with a half-life of 9 minutes, can enable some patients with relative contraindications to beta blockers to nevertheless benefit from early beta-blocking therapy. It also is useful in screening patients for subsequent therapy with beta blockers. Those who tolerate the esmolol infusion can be given a long-acting beta blocker. For patients who exhibit intolerance to esmolol, the infusion can be terminated with rapid return to baseline hemodynamics.

Cardioprotective and antiarrhythmic effects of beta-blockers, propranolol, bisoprolol, and nipradilol in a canine model of regional ischemia

Cardioprotective and antiarrhythmic effects of three beta-blockers with different pharmacological properties were investigated in 33 anesthetized dogs with a 2-h coronary occlusion. Dogs were divided into 4 groups and received physiological saline or one of the following drugs using a 10-min infusion at 25 min before the occlusion: saline or control (n = 12), propranolol (0.3 mg/kg, n = 7), bisoprolol (0.05 mg/kg, n = 7), and nipradilol (0.2 mg/kg, n = 7) groups. Blood pressure did not significantly differ among the 4 experimental groups throughout the entire observation period. On the contrary, the postocclusion change (fall) in heart rate from the preocclusion value was significantly (P less than 0.05-0.01) greater in the drug-treated groups than in the control group. Each of the beta-blockers effectively prevented the development of ventricular arrhythmias associated with the 2-h coronary occlusion. In terms of assessing a cardioprotective effect, the respiratory control index and rate of oxygen consumption in State III in mitochondria, and lysosomal enzyme activities (N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase or beta-glucuronidase) in myocardial tissues, all prepared from both ischemic and non-ischemic areas, were measured using the respective, established methods. The 2-h coronary occlusion induced a mitochondrial dysfunction and leakage of lysosomal enzymes in the control group, whereas each beta-blocker significantly (P less than 0.05-0.01) protected mitochondria against ischemia and prevented the lysosomal enzyme leakage. The results indicate that the antiarrhythmic effects of beta-blockers on ischemic myocardium are, at least in part, due to their cardioprotective action, and these effects appear to be unrelated to the ancillary pharmacological properties of these drugs.

Effect of intravenous metoprolol on left ventricular performance in Q-wave acute myocardial infarction

To determine the effects of intravenous metoprolol on left ventricular (LV) function in acute myocardial infarction (AMI), 16 patients were studied within 48 hours of Q-wave AMI (mean ejection fraction 47 +/- 6%, mean pulmonary artery wedge pressure 22 +/- 6 mm Hg) with high fidelity pressure and biplane cineventriculography before and after intravenous metoprolol (dose 12 +/- 4 mg). Heart rate decreased from 90 +/- 13 to 74 +/- 11 beats/min (p less than 0.001), pulmonary arterial wedge pressure and LV end-diastolic pressure were unchanged (22 +/- 6 to 21 +/- 6 and 27 +/- 8 to 26 +/- 8 mm Hg, respectively), despite impaired LV relaxation (P = Poe-t/T) after intravenous metoprolol (T from 59 +/- 13 to 72 +/- 12 ms, p less than 0.001). Peak systolic circumferential LV wall stress decreased after beta-adrenergic blockade (330 +/- 93 to 268 +/- 89 g/cm2, p less than 0.05) and LV contractility decreased (dP/dtmax from 1,480 +/- 450 to 1,061 +/- 340 mm Hg/s, p less than 0.001). The ejection fraction decreased (48 +/- 7 to 43 +/- 7%, p less than 0.05) due to an increase in LV end-systolic volume (85 +/- 19 to 93 +/- 19 ml, p less than 0.05) since LV end-diastolic volume was unchanged (161 +/- 30 to 163 +/- 30 ml, difference not significant). In patients with Q-wave AMI, intravenous metoprolol reduces the major determinants of myocardial oxygen demand including heart rate, contractility and peak systolic wall stress. Further, despite decreased heart rate, (+)dP/dtmax, ejection fraction, isovolumic relaxation, LV end-diastolic pressure and end-diastolic volume remain unchanged.

Use of an ultrashort-acting beta-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with acute myocardial ischemia and relative contraindications to beta-blockade therapy

The hemodynamic responses to esmolol, an ultrashort-acting (t1/2 = 9 min) beta 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in 16 patients with myocardial ischemia and compromised left ventricular function as evidenced by a mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 15 to 25 mm Hg. Esmolol was infused intravenously to a maximal dose of 300 micrograms/kg body weight per min for less than or equal to 48 h in 16 patients: 9 with acute myocardial infarction, 6 with periinfarction angina and 1 with acute unstable angina. The sinus rate and systolic arterial pressure declined rapidly in all patients from baseline values of 99 +/- 12 beats/min and 126 +/- 19 mm Hg to 80 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.05) and 107 +/- 20 mm Hg (p less than or equal to 0.05) during esmolol treatment. Rate-pressure product decreased by 33% and cardiac index by 14% during esmolol treatment, but pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not significantly altered by drug infusion (19 +/- 3 mm Hg at baseline versus 19 +/- 5 during treatment, p = NS). In all patients there was a rapid return toward baseline hemodynamic measurements within 15 min of stopping administration of esmolol, and virtually complete resolution of drug effect was evident within approximately 30 min. During infusion of esmolol, four of nine patients receiving intravenous nitroglycerin required downward adjustment of nitroglycerin infusion rate to maintain systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of the effects of acute and chronic beta-blockade on infarct size in the dog after circumflex occlusion

In order to compare the effects of acute and chronic beta-blockade on infact size, the left circumflex coronary artery was occluded for 6 hours in 33 anesthetized dogs. The dogs (18 to 22 kg) were divided into three groups; group 1 (N = 10) served as controls, group 2 received intravenous nadolol (average dose 1.25 mg/kg) just prior to coronary occlusion, and group 3 received oral nadolol (80 mg) twice daily for 16 days prior to coronary occlusion. To ensure equivalent degrees of beta-blockade at the time of occlusion, group 2 and 3 dogs were given incremental doses of intravenous nadolol to abolish the chronotropic response to isoproterenol (2 mu/kg IV). Left ventricular pressure, its first derivative (dP/dt), and heart rate were monitored. The anatomic risk region was determined antemortem by Evan's blue staining while the infarct zone was delineated postmortem by tetrazolium staining. Compared to Group 1, heart rate was 22% lower in group 2 and 15% lower in group 3 dogs 6 hours after occlusion (p less than 0.05). There were no differences among groups in peak left ventricular systolic pressure or mean arterial pressure. Infarct size as a function of the area at risk was 68 +/- 3% in group 1, 52 +/- 7% in group 2, and 44 +/- 8% in group 3. A significant difference was found only between groups 3 and 1. The data suggest that chronic beta-blockade provides greater protection against ischemic-induced necrosis than does acute beta-blockade. The greater protective effect of chronic beta-blockade may be due to chronic adaptive changes in either blood flow or metabolism.

Hemodynamic effects of intravenous metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction: the role of anatomic subsets in predicting patient response

The acute effects of intravenous metoprolol were evaluated in 30 patients with myocardial infarction by means of serial hemodynamic and radionuclide measurements of left ventricular function. Within 1 hour of completion of the metoprolol dosing, 90% of the patients underwent cardiac catheterization to define anatomy and to assess patients for interventional therapy; the remainder had catheterization by 72 hours. All patients tolerated intravenous metoprolol without significant side effects. Patient responses to therapy were divided into two groups based on the angiographic findings. At catheterization, all group 1 patients had visible collaterals to or a patent vessel supplying the vascular distribution of the infarction. All group 2 patients had occluded coronary arteries without evidence of collaterals to the infarct zone. Group 1 (n = 13) improved both systolic and diastolic left ventricular function (mean ejection fraction [EF] = 46% to 55%, peak filling rate [PFR] = 2.1 to 3.2 Edv/sec), while group 2 (n = 17) patients were unchanged (EF = 43% to 42%, PFR = 2.0 to 1.9). Patient characteristics and time to treatment were similar in both groups, as were the hemodynamic effects of metoprolol. Heart rate decreased 20% in group 1 and 22% in group 2 and cardiac output fell 22% in group 1 and 32% in group 2. Acute improvement in ventricular function in these patients appears to be closely related to the coronary anatomy, and in those with flow to the infarct zone, intravenous metoprolol may be effective in preserving left ventricular function.

Secondary prevention after myocardial infarction: effects of beta blocking agents and calcium antagonists

Therapeutic interventions in patients with myocardial infarction, whether during the first hours after coronary occlusion or several days later, aim to reduce mortality and morbidity by several mechanisms: Prevention of fatal ventricular fibrillation, limitation of infarct size, and inhibition of platelet aggregation are some examples of such mechanisms. Results from early intervention trials with beta blocking agents, particularly from ISIS-I, suggest that 1-year mortality is significantly lower in selected patients randomized to active treatment. Late intervention studies also suggest a significant reduction in coronary mortality and morbidity with beta blockade, particularly when data are pooled. Studies with the calcium channel blockers nifedipine and verapamil were unable to demonstrate any beneficial effects of these drugs on mortality or reinfarction. In this review article, attention will be directed to the most recent information about the preventive value of beta adrenergic blocking drugs and slow calcium channel inhibitors.

Effects of beta-adrenergic blockade on nitroglycerin-induced augmentation of regional coronary blood flow in patients

Although beta-adrenergic blockade may increase coronary vascular resistance in some patients with severe ischemic heart disease, the effects of beta blockade on the nitroglycerin (NTG)-induced augmentation of coronary blood flow have not been elucidated. Therefore, systemic hemodynamic and anterior left ventricular regional coronary blood-flow (thermodilution) data were measured during administration of NTG into the left coronary artery, before and 10 min after intravenous propranolol (0.1 mg/kg) in 22 patients. Six patients (Group 1) had normal left coronary arteries and nine (Group 2) had severe coronary artery disease with at least greater than 70% narrowing of the left anterior descending artery. In seven additional patients (three without and four with greater than 70% left anterior descending coronary artery disease), measurements were obtained with constant-paced heart rates (Group 3). Before beta blockade, NTG (200 mcg) significantly increased anterior regional great-vein flow [for Group 1, 84 +/- 38% (81 +/- 20 to 140 +/- 60 ml/min); Group 2, 39 +/- 41% (61 +/- 26 to 83 +/- 38 ml/min); and Group 3, 87 +/- 55% (75 +/- 36 to 144 +/- 86 ml/min)]. In Groups 1 and 2, beta-adrenergic blockade reduced heart rate 10% (p less than 0.01) but did not affect mean arterial or pulmonary artery pressures.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Reduction in infarct size and enhanced recovery of systolic function after coronary thrombolysis with tissue-type plasminogen activator combined with beta-adrenergic blockade with metoprolol

The effect of beta-adrenergic blockade on the salvage and functional recovery of reperfused myocardium was investigated in anesthetized dogs. Immediately after thrombotic occlusion of the left anterior descending coronary artery, the cardioselective beta-blocking agent metoprolol was given intravenously at a dose of 0.5 mg/kg infused over 10 min. One hour after the onset of occlusion, recanalization was initiated by intravenous infusion of recombinant human tissue-type plasminogen activator (rt-PA, 10 micrograms/kg/min for 30 min). Anatomic infarct size expressed as percent of the left ventricular mass (I/LV), global ejection fraction, and mean systolic shortening of the segmental radii (SS) of the infarcted area were measured either after 24 hr or 1 week in six groups of six dogs each: group I (rt-PA + metoprolol, evaluated at 24 hr), group II (rt-PA + metoprolol, evaluated at 1 week, group III (rt-PA alone, evaluated at 24 hr), group IV (rt-PA alone, evaluated at 1 week), group V (persistent occlusion, evaluated at 24 hr), and group VI (persistent occlusion, evaluated at 1 week). The smallest infarcts were found in reperfused dogs given metoprolol, but the differences from dogs receiving rt-PA alone were not statistically significant (I/LV, expressed as mean +/- SEM: 5.5 +/- 0.9% in group I, 6.7 +/- 1.9% in group II, 15.4 +/- 5.0% in group III, 11.4 +/- 3.5% in group IV, 23.6 +/- 2.5% in group V, and 26.9 +/- 2.3% in group VI).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Salvage of ischemic myocardium by CLS 2210 in the dog: a preliminary double-blind study

To assess whether a cardiac lymphagogue, CLS 2210, would reduce myocardial infarct size after coronary artery ligation, studies were performed in 14 dogs. The left anterior descending coronary artery was ligated in each dog, and the dogs were randomized to either placebo or CLS 2210 treatment, which was carried on for seven days. After seven days the animals were sacrificed and the volume of infarcted myocardium was determined macroscopically on a double-blind basis, supported by histologic examination. CLS 2210 treatment resulted in a highly significant reduction in the volume of infarcted myocardium (p less than 0.001). Since CLS 2210 is chemically and pharmacologically unrelated to hyaluronidase but shares an action with hyaluronidase as a cardiac lymphagogue, the results offer further support for a role of myocardial lymphatics in the evolution of myocardial necrosis following coronary artery occlusion and provide an explanation for the mechanism by which these agents reduce myocardial infarction size.

Infarct size--can it be measured or modified in humans?

Despite more than 15 years of intensive experimental and clinical research in the general area of limiting infarct size, no treatment has been shown to be so efficacious and relatively free of side effects that its routine use can be recommended. In addition, there is no ideal means of measuring infarct size as yet. However, considerable progress has been made in understanding mechanisms responsible for irreversible cellular injury and in identifying factors and anatomic alterations responsible for or contributing to the development of transmural (Q wave) and non-transmural (non-Q wave) myocardial infarcts. Interventions are available that are capable of causing rapid coronary thrombolysis, and techniques are becoming available tht have increasing power to size myocardial infarcts and estimate both segmental and ventricular function. Experimental studies have also suggested a potential benefit from a combination of reperfusion therapy with selected pharmacologic intervention in reducing infarct size and preserving ventricular function. It seems likely that this general area will remain an intensive area of clinical research in the immediate future.

Calcium antagonists and left ventricular function: effects of nitrendipine in congestive heart failure

Calcium antagonists can affect the arterial vasculature, the venous capacitance vessels and the myocardium. The net effect of these agents on left ventricular (LV) performance depends on the interaction of effects on these 3 vascular components, and the state of LV function at the time that the drugs are administered. A calcium antagonist with profound arterial vasodilator effect might favorably influence LV performance even if it had negative inotropic properties. To demonstrate the direct effect of nitrendipine, a 1,4 dihydropyridine, on LV performance, the acute hemodynamic response to oral nitrendipine was studied in 8 patients with congestive heart failure. Administration of 10 to 20 mg of nitrendipine reduced preload, caused a decrease in both pulmonary wedge pressure and systemic vascular resistance, produced a modest decrease in blood pressure and an increase in stroke volume. In addition, plasma norepinephrine levels were significantly decreased. Plasma renin activity also tended to decrease. These data confirm that the drug can favorably alter performance of the failing left ventricle and further suggest that the vasodilator effect is not accompanied by reflex neurohumoral stimulation.

Changes in myocardial metabolism during therapy in patients with chronic stable angina: a comparison of long-term dosing with propranolol and nicardipine

The long-term effects of antianginal therapy on coronary blood flow and myocardial metabolism were studied in 35 patients with chronic stable angina. Arterial and coronary sinus blood samples and coronary blood flow measurements were obtained before and after 1 month of oral administration of propranolol or of the calcium antagonist nicardipine. When the data obtained at a fixed heart rate (10% to 15% above the pretreatment sinus rhythm) were compared, no significant differences were evidenced between the propranolol and the nicardipine groups. Coronary blood flow and myocardial oxygen uptake were unchanged with both drugs. Myocardial lactate uptake increased in 11 patients of the propranolol group (from -2 +/- 42 to 66 +/- 47 mumol/min, p less than .001) and in 11 patients of the nicardipine group (from 0 +/- 36 to 31 +/- 29 mumol/min, p less than .001). In these 22 patients, the increase in lactate uptake was accompanied by reductions in uptake of free fatty acids and by a decrease in the coronary sinus concentration of thromboxane B2 from 131 +/- 87 to 61 +/- 32 pg/ml (p less than .01), whereas the transcardiac release of prostacyclin increased. None of these changes in free fatty acids or in prostanoid handling were observed in the nine patients (five in the propranolol and four in the nicardipine group) in whom lactate uptake was not augmented. During pacing-induced tachycardia, the metabolic effects of the two drugs appeared different. Myocardial lactate uptake decreased more in the patients receiving propranolol than in those receiving nicardipine and the combined productions of alanine and glutamine rose by 3.2 +/- 5.8 mumol/min in the propranolol group while it decreased by 3.1 +/- 8.2 mumol/min in the nicardipine group (p less than .025 propranolol vs nicardipine). In conclusion, long-term antianginal therapy with propranolol or nicardipine improved several markers of myocardial ischemia in approximately two-thirds of the patients. Although the changes observed at low heart rates were similar with the two drugs, the data also suggest that better metabolic protection is provided by the calcium antagonist during pacing-induced tachycardia.

Abrupt withdrawal of beta-blockade therapy in patients with myocardial infarction: effects on infarct size, left ventricular function, and hospital course

The effects of abrupt withdrawal or continuation of beta-blockade therapy during acute myocardial infarction were evaluated in 326 patients participating in the Multicenter Investigation of the Limitation of Infarct Size (MILIS). Thirty-nine patients previously receiving a beta-blocker and randomly selected for withdrawal of beta-blockers and placebo treatment during infarction (group 1) were compared with 272 patients previously untreated with beta-blockers who were also randomly assigned to placebo therapy (group 2). There were no significant differences between the two groups in MB creatine kinase isoenzyme (15.8 +/- 10.9 vs 18.2 +/- 14.4 g-eq/m2, respectively) estimates of infarct size, radionuclide-determined left ventricular ejection fractions within 18 hr of infarction (0.44 +/- 0.15 vs 0.47 +/- 0.16) or 10 days later (0.42 +/- 0.14 vs 0.47 +/- 0.16), creatine kinase-determined incidence of infarct extension (13% vs 6%), congestive heart failure (43% vs 37%), nonfatal ventricular fibrillation (5% vs 7%), or in-hospital mortality (13% vs 9%). Patients in group 1 had more recurrent ischemic chest pain (p = .002) within the first 24 hr after infarction, but not thereafter. However, this did not appear to be related to a rebound increase in systolic blood pressure, heart rate, or double product. In a separate analysis, 20 propranolol-eligible group 1 patients randomly selected for withdrawal of beta-blockade (group 3) were compared with 15 patients randomly selected for continuation of prior beta-blockade therapy (group 4). This comparison yielded similar results. These data indicate that the beta-blockade withdrawal phenomenon is not a major clinical problem in patients with acute myocardial infarction. beta-Blockade therapy can be discontinued abruptly during acute myocardial infarction if clinically indicated.

Epinephrine-induced hypokalemia: the role of beta adrenoceptors

Epinephrine was infused intravenously in 9 normal volunteers to plasma concentrations similar to those found after acute myocardial infarction. This study was undertaken on 3 occasions after 5 days of treatment with placebo or the beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, atenolol, which is relatively beta 1 selective, or timolol, which blocks both beta 1 and beta 2 receptors. Epinephrine increased the systolic blood pressure (BP), decreased the diastolic BP and increased the heart rate modestly. These changes were prevented by atenolol. However, after timolol the diastolic BP rose by +19 mm Hg and heart rate fell by -8 beats/min. Epinephrine caused the corrected QT interval to lengthen (0.36 +/- 0.02 to 0.41 +/- 0.06 second). No significant changes were found in the corrected QT interval when subjects were pretreated with atenolol or timolol. The serum potassium decreased from 4.06 to 3.22 mmol/liter after epinephrine. Serum potassium decreased to a lesser extent to 3.67 mmol/liter after atenolol and actually increased to 4.25 mmol/liter after timolol. In a further study with a similar design another nonselective beta blocker propranolol also increased potassium after epinephrine. While atenolol also prevented hypokalemia in this study, it did not block the beta 2-receptor mediated decrease in diastolic BP. Epinephrine-induced hypokalemia results from stimulation of a beta-adrenoceptor linked to membrane sodium/potassium adenosine triphosphatase causing potassium influx. This appears to be predominantly mediated by beta 2 receptors although beta 1 receptors may also play a part.

Importance of heart rate in determining beta-blocker efficacy in acute and long-term acute myocardial infarction intervention trials

Heart rate after an acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is an index of late mortality. The hypothesis--that the potential beneficial effect of beta-blocking drugs after an AMI is quantitatively dependent on the reduction of heart rate obtained by such treatment--was examined by reviewing available data from acute and long-term intervention trials. Only properly randomized and double-blind trials were considered. In acute intervention trials only patients who received treatment within 12 hours after onset of pain were included. In early intervention trials there was a close relation between the reduction in heart rate and infarct size as determined by accumulated creatine kinase release (r = 0.97, p less than 0.001). A reduction in heart rate of at least 15 beats/min during infarct evolution was associated with a reduction of infarct size between 25 and 30%. The data suggest that a reduction in heart rate less than 8 beats/min has no effect or may actually increase infarct size. Comparison of post-AMI trials indicated a relation between the actual reduction of resting heart rate and percentage of reduction in mortality obtained in each trial (r = 0.60, p less than 0.05). An almost similar relation was demonstrated between the reduction in resting heart rate and nonfatal reinfarctions (r = 0.59, p less than 0.05). Confounding properties of a beta blocker, such as intrinsic sympathomimetic activity or prolongation of the QT interval, may reduce its efficacy. These results strongly suggest that the beneficial effect of beta blockers is related to a quantitative reduction in heart rate, probably indicating an antiischemic effect. However, the data do not exclude the possibility that other protective mechanisms may be operative.

Effect of propranolol after acute myocardial infarction in patients with congestive heart failure

The incidence of congestive heart failure was studied in the Beta Blocker Heart Attack Trial in which postmyocardial infarction patients between the ages of 30 and 69 years, with no contraindication to propranolol, were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 1921) or propranolol 180 or 240 mg daily (n = 1916) 5 to 21 days after admission to the hospital for the event. Survivors of acute myocardial infarction with compensated or mild congestive heart failure, including those on digitalis and diuretics, were included in the study. A history of congestive heart failure before randomization characterized 710 (18.5%) patients: 345 (18.0%) in the propranolol group and 365 (19.0%) in the placebo group. The incidence of definite congestive heart failure after randomization and during the study was 6.7% in both groups. In patients with a history of congestive heart failure before randomization, 51 of 345 (14.8%) in the propranolol group and 46 of 365 (12.6%) in the placebo group developed congestive heart failure during an average 25 month follow-up. In the patients with no history of congestive heart failure, 5% in the propranolol group developed congestive heart failure and 5.3% in the placebo group developed congestive heart failure. Baseline characteristics predictive of the occurrence of congestive heart failure by multivariate analyses included an increased cardiothoracic ratio, diabetes, increased heart rate, low baseline weight, prior myocardial infarction, age, and more than 10 ventricular premature beats per hour.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic effects of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction. A randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter study

The central hemodynamic effects of metoprolol in acute myocardial infarction have been studied in a multicenter, double-blind, randomized trial. One hundred and ninety patients with acute myocardial infarction not previously on beta blockers with heart rate greater than 65 beats/min and blood pressure greater than 105 mm Hg and without clinical signs of serious heart failure were included. After insertion of a pulmonary artery catheter, patients were randomized to metoprolol, 15 mg intravenously, and 50 mg 4 times a day orally (n = 95) or placebo (n = 95) with a mean delay of 7.2 hours. Hemodynamic measurements were made at baseline and repeatedly during 24 hours. Heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac index were all immediately reduced by 10 to 20% in the metoprolol group and the difference compared with placebo was maintained throughout the 24 hours (p less than 0.001). Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) in the metoprolol group increased from 13.7 +/- 6.7 to a peak of 15.5 +/- 5.5 mm Hg 30 minutes after injection. The difference compared with placebo was maintained for 8 hours (p less than 0.01). This increase was seen only in the patient group with initial PCWP below the median of 13 mm Hg. In patients with initial PCWP above the median a continuous decrease was observed in both the placebo and metoprolol groups. Thus high initial PCWP was not associated with intolerance to metoprolol. Based on hemodynamic measurements tolerance to metoprolol was good.

Effects of esmolol on cardiac function: evaluation by noninvasive techniques

In a double-blind, randomized, crossover study, the effects of esmolol and propranolol were examined at rest and during peak upright exercise in 15 patients. At rest, both esmolol and propranolol significantly decreased heart rate, systolic blood pressure, rate-pressure product, left ventricular ejection fraction, cardiac index and right ventricular ejection fraction. During exercise, significant decreases were also found in heart rate, systolic blood pressure and cardiac index in both treatment groups. No significant differences were found between mean esmolol and mean propranolol measurements at rest and during exercise, except for the exercise systolic blood pressure, which was lower during esmolol infusion. Blood levels of esmolol decreased markedly by 30 minutes postinfusion, as did its beta-blocking action. Esmolol was well tolerated with no important local, systemic or laboratory abnormalities. Thus, the effects of esmolol on cardiovascular performance at rest and during exercise are similar to those of propranolol.

Basic pharmacology of esmolol

Preclinical studies show that esmolol is an ultrashortacting, cardioselective beta blocker that possesses minimal partial agonist action or membrane-depressant properties. The electrophysiologic and hemodynamic actions of esmolol are the result of beta blockade. No direct, beta receptor-independent cardiovascular actions have been identified with beta-blocking doses in laboratory experiments. Because esmolol slows atrioventricular conduction, increases atrioventricular refractoriness and decreases the determinants of myocardial oxygen demand, it should have use in the treatment of supraventricular tachycardias and acute myocardial ischemia. Esmolol, because of its ultrashort duration of action, should be safe for the induction of beta blockade in patients who are critically ill and is ideally suited for rapidly changing levels of beta blockade in this clinical situation.