Hemodynamics and antianginal effects of high dose oral isosorbide dinitrate after chronic use

Challenges with nitrate therapy and nitrate tolerance: prevalence, prevention, and clinical relevance

Nitrate therapy has been an effective treatment for ischemic heart disease for over 100 years. The anti-ischemic and exercise-promoting benefits of sublingually administered nitrates are well established. Nitroglycerin is indicated for the relief of an established attack of angina and for prophylactic use, but its effects are short lived. In an effort to increase the duration of beneficial effects, long-acting orally administered and topical applications of nitrates have been developed; however, following their continued or frequent daily use, patients soon develop tolerance to these long-acting nitrate preparations. Once tolerance develops, patients begin losing the protective effects of the long-acting nitrate therapy. By providing a nitrate-free interval, or declining nitrate levels at night, one can overcome or reduce the development of tolerance, but cannot provide 24-h anti-anginal and anti-ischemic protection. In addition, patients may be vulnerable to occurrence of rebound angina and myocardial ischemia during periods of absent nitrate levels at night and early hours of the morning, and worsening of exercise capacity prior to the morning dose of the medication. This has been a concern with nitroglycerin patches but not with oral formulations of isosorbide-5 mononitrates, and has not been adequately studied with isosorbide dinitrate. This paper describes problems associated with nitrate tolerance, reviews mechanisms by which nitrate tolerance and loss of efficacy develop, and presents strategies to avoid nitrate tolerance and maintain efficacy when using long-acting nitrate formulations.

Evaluating symptoms to improve quality of life in patients with chronic stable angina

Chronic stable angina (CSA) is a significant problem in the United States that can negatively impact patient quality of life (QoL). An accurate assessment of the severity of a patient's angina, the impact on their functional status, and their risk of cardiovascular complications is key to successful treatment of CSA. Active communication between the patient and their healthcare provider is necessary to ensure that patients receive optimal therapy. Healthcare providers should be aware of atypical symptoms of CSA in their patients, as patients may continue to suffer from angina despite the availability of multiple therapies. Patient questionnaires and symptom checklists can help patients communicate proactively with their healthcare providers. This paper discusses the prevalence of CSA, its impact on QoL, and the tools that healthcare providers can use to assess the severity of their patients' angina and the impact on QoL.

Treatment of stable angina pectoris

Management of stable angina pectoris includes antianginal medications, medications to prevent progression of atherosclerosis, and aggressive treatment of causative risk factors. Antianginal medications commonly used include nitrates, beta-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and ranolazine. Antiplatelet agents, statins, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors are used in patients with these problems to prevent progression of atherosclerosis and/or premature cardiovascular death. Aggressive risk factor control with diet; exercise; treatment of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia; and strategies to stop smoking and reduce weight should be a part of treatment strategy in all patients. Patients with stable angina who have symptoms refractory to medical treatment usually require coronary angiography, followed by either percutaneous or surgical revascularization. Recent mechanical techniques for the treatment of refractory angina include transmyocardial laser revascularization, enhanced external counterpulsation, and spinal cord stimulation.

Cardiovascular drug therapy in the elderly: benefits and challenges

Increasing life expectancy in industrialized societies has resulted in a huge population of older adults with cardiovascular disease. Despite advances in device therapy and surgery, the mainstay of treatment for these disorders remains pharmacological. Hypertension affects two-thirds of older adults and remains a potent risk factor for coronary artery disease, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and stroke in this age group. Numerous trials have demonstrated reduction in these adverse outcomes with antihypertensive drugs. After acute myocardial infarction, β-adrenergic blockers reduce mortality regardless of patient age. Statins and antiplatelet drugs have proven beneficial in both primary and, especially, secondary prevention of coronary events in older adults. In elders with chronic heart failure, loop diuretics must be used cautiously, owing to their higher potential for adverse effects, whereas angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitors and β-blockers reduce symptoms and prolong survival. The high risk of stroke in elderly patients with atrial fibrillation is markedly reduced with warfarin, although bleeding risk is increased. The high prevalence of polypharmacy among older adults with cardiovascular disease, coupled with age-associated physiological changes and comorbidities, provides major challenges in adherence and avoidance of drug-related adverse events.

Inhibition of nitrate tolerance without reducing vascular response during eccentric dosing of nitrates

It has been reported that the nitrate tolerance related to continuous dosing of nitrates reduces drug efficacy, and therefore eccentric dosing of nitrates is recommended. In this study, we investigated the appearance of nitrate tolerance related to continuous dosing of nitrates and prevention of nitrate tolerance during eccentric dosing by comparing the grade of coronary dilatation after sublingual nitroglycerin. Of 26 patients with ischemic heart disease who underwent elective cardiac catheterization, 8 patients were continuously administered nitrates, 8 patients were eccentrically administered nitrates, and 10 patients were not treated. We compared the coronary response to sublingual nitroglycerin among the 3 groups. In a coronary vessel without significant stenosis, the coronary vessel area, coronary lumen area, and mean coronary blood flow velocity after sublingual nitroglycerin were measured using intravascular ultrasound (IVUS). In the continuous dosing group, the maximal rate of change in the vessel area after sublingual nitroglycerin was 105 +/- 1 (mean +/- SEM) %, significantly lower than those in the untreated group and the eccentric dosing group (114 +/- 2%, 114 +/- 2%) (p < 0.01, respectively). In conclusion, eccentric dosing of nitrates inhibited the appearance of nitrate tolerance without reducing vascular response.

Management of the Elderly Person After Myocardial Infarction

Elderly persons after myocardial infarction should have their modifiable coronary artery risk factors intensively treated. Hypertension should be treated with beta blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. The blood pressure should be reduced to &lt;140/85 mmHg and to ≥130/80 mmHg in persons with diabetes or renal insufficiency. The serum low-density lipoprotein cholesterol should be reduced to &lt;100 mg/dl with statins if necessary. Aspirin or clopidogrel, beta blockers, and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be given indefinitely unless contraindications exist to the use of these drugs. Long-acting nitrates are effective antianginal and antiischemic drugs. There are no Class I indications for the use of calcium channel blockers after myocardial infarction. Postinfarction patients should not receive Class I antiarrhythmic drugs, sotalol, or amiodarone. An automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator should be implanted in postinfarction patients at very high risk for sudden cardiac death. Hormonal therapy should not be used in postmenopausal women after myocardial infarction. The two indications for coronary revascularization are prolongation of life and relief of unacceptable symptoms despite optimal medical management.

Drug treatment of elderly patients with acute myocardial infarction: practical recommendations

Aspirin (acetylsalicylic acid) should be administered to patients on day 1 of an acute myocardial infarction (MI) and continued indefinitely. Early intravenous beta-blockade should be used during acute MI. beta-blockers should be continued indefinitely. Angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors should be used in patients with acute MI with ST-segment elevation in two or more anterior precordial leads. ACE inhibitors should be used during and after acute MI in patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) or with a left ventricular ejection fraction < or =40%. There are no class I indications for using calcium channel antagonists during and after acute MI. Intravenous heparin should be used in patients with acute MI undergoing coronary revascularisation and in patients at high risk for systemic embolisation. Enoxaparin should be used in patients with non-Q-wave MI. Thrombolytic therapy should be considered in patients with acute MI with ST-segment elevation in contiguous leads of a 12-lead electrocardiogram or with left bundle branch block. Platelet glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors should be administered intravenously as an adjunct to heparin and aspirin in patients with non-Q-wave MI. Intravenous nitroglycerin should be used: (i) for the first 24 to 48 hours in patients with acute MI and CHF, large anterior MI, persistent ischaemia or hypertension; and (ii) continued beyond 48 hours in patients with recurrent angina pectoris or persistent pulmonary congestion. Long-acting nitrates should be given after MI, along with beta-blockers, to patients with angina pectoris. There are no class I indications for using intravenous magnesium during acute MI. The routine use of antiarrhythmic drugs other than beta-blockers during and after acute MI is not recommended.

Treatment of the elderly post-myocardial infarction patient

Coronary risk factors should be modified in older persons after myocardial infarction (MI). Aspirin 160-325 mg daily and beta blockers should be administered indefinitely. Anticoagulants should be administered post-MI to patients unable to tolerate daily aspirin, to those with persistent atrial fibrillation, and to those with left ventricular thrombus. Nitrates, along with beta blockers, should be used to treat angina pectoris. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be administered after MI to patients who have congestive heart failure, an anterior MI, or a left ventricular ejection fraction of at or below 40%. There are no class I indications for the use of calcium channel blockers after MI. Complex ventricular arrhythmias should be treated with beta blockers. Persons with life-threatening ventricular tachycardia or ventricular fibrillation or who are at very high risk for sudden cardiac death after MI should receive an automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator. There are no class I indications for the use of hormonal therapy in postmenopausal women after MI. Indications for coronary revascularization after MI in older individuals are prolongation of life and relief of unacceptable symptoms despite optimal medical management.

Management of older persons after myocardial infarction

OBJECTIVE

To review the management of the older person after myocardial infarction (MI).

DATA SOURCES

A computer-assisted search of the English language literature (MEDLINE database) followed by a manual search of the bibliographies of pertinent articles.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies on the management of persons after MI were screened for review. Studies in persons older than 60 years and recent studies were emphasized.

DATA EXTRACTION

Pertinent data were extracted from the reviewed articles. Emphasis was on studies involving older persons. Relevant articles were reviewed in depth.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Available data about therapy of persons after MI, including control of risk factors, use of aspirin and beta-blockers, and indications for use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, long-term anticoagulant therapy, nitrates, calcium channel blockers, hormone replacement therapy, antiarrhythmic drugs, the automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator, and revascularization, with emphasis on studies involving older persons, were summarized.

CONCLUSIONS

Risk factors for coronary artery disease should be controlled after MI in older persons. A serum low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol >125 mg/dL after MI should be treated with lipid-lowering drug therapy to decrease the serum LDL cholesterol to <100 mg/dL. Aspirin in a dose of 160 mg to 325 mg daily should be given indefinitely. Indications for long-term anticoagulant therapy with warfarin after MI to maintain an international normalized ratio between 2.0 and 3.0 include secondary prevention of MI in persons unable to tolerate daily aspirin, persistent atrial fibrillation, and left ventricular thrombus. Beta-blockers should be given indefinitely. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors should be given to persons who have congestive heart failure, an anterior MI, or a left ventricular ejection fraction < or = 40%. Calcium channel blockers should not be used unless there is persistent angina pectoris despite beta-blockers and nitrates. Antiarrhythmic drugs other than beta-blockers should not be used. An automatic implantable cardioverter-defibrillator should be used in persons who have a history of ventricular fibrillation or serious sustained ventricular tachycardia or who are at very high risk for developing sudden cardiac death. Until data from the Heart Estrogen/ Progestin Replacement Study are available, use of an estrogen/progestin regimen is recommended in the treatment of postmenopausal women after MI unless they are at increased risk for developing breast cancer. The two indications for revascularization in older persons after MI are prolongation of life and relief of unacceptable symptoms despite optimal medical management.

Short and long-acting oral nitrates for stable angina pectoris

Nitroglycerin (NTG) spray and sublingual tablets rapidly relieve an established attack of angina, and their infrequent use is not associated with the development of tolerance. Although, following a suitable nitrate-free interval, the first dose of oral, long-acting nitrates produces significant hemodynamic effects, increases angina free walking, and decreases exercise-induced ischemia, during continued long-term therapy tolerance limits their usefulness. Appropriate dosing regimens of controlled-release formulations of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and controlled-release NTG during long-term therapy have not been established. Use of immediate-release formulation of 15-120 mg of ISDN in a qid regimen lead to a marked reduction in the size and duration of antianginal effects compared to the initial dose. Asymmetric tid therapy with 30 mg of ISDN (7 a.m., 1 p.m., and 6 p.m.) is also associated with the development of partial tolerance and appears to provide antianginal prophylaxis for only a period of 6 hours each day. Asymmetric bid therapy with ISDN at 7 a.m. and noon may give sustained effect but is supported by only a single, small study that did not examine effectiveness after the noon dose in long-term use. Isosorbide-5-mononitrate (IS-5-MN) has been the subject of more recent studies than other nitrates because of attempts to bring a number of products into the U.S. market. IS-5-MN in qid, tid, and standard bid (8 a.m. and 8 p.m.) dosing regimens produce tolerance. Asymmetric regimens of immediate-release IS-5-MN (10 and 20 mg) given bid (once in the morning and again 7 hours later) decrease the development of tolerance compared to symmetric regimens and produce an increased exercise duration after each dose of the day; the 20 mg bid dosing is more effective. Similarly, once-daily 120 and 240 mg controlled-release IS-5-MN does not produce tolerance and gives a sustained increase in daytime exercise duration. Both asymmetric bid immediate-release and once-daily controlled-release IS-5-MN preparations do not produce deterioration in exercise performance prior to the administration of the medication in the morning (i.e., no zero-hour effect). Further studies are needed to establish useful dosing regimens for ISDN, for controlled-release ISDN, and for controlled-release nitroglycerin. None of the dosing regimens of any oral, long-acting nitrate (including IS-5-MN) provide 24 hour antianginal and antiischemic effects.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Nitrates and angina pectoris

This review discusses the mechanisms of action of the organic nitrates, nitrate tolerance, and the effects of nitrates in patients with stable angina pectoris. The nitrates are prodrugs that enter the vascular smooth muscle, where they are denitrated to form the active agent nitric oxide (NO). NO activates guanylate cyclase, which results in cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP) production and vasodilation as a result of reuptake of calcium by the sarcoplasmic reticulum. NO is identical to endothelium-derived relaxing factor (EDRF), which induces vasodilation, inhibits platelet aggregation, reduces endothelium adhesion, and has anticoagulant and fibrinolytic effects. Thus, the nitrates may be more than vasodilators and, in addition to reducing ischemia, may affect the process of atherosclerosis. The vascular effects of nitrates are attenuated during sustained therapy. Although the basis for the phenomenon of nitrate tolerance is not completely understood, sulfhydryl depletion as well as neurohormonal activation and increased plasma volume may be involved. The administration of N-acetylcysteine, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors, or diuretics do not consistently prevent nitrate tolerance. At present, intermittent nitrate therapy is the only way to avoid nitrate tolerance. The intermittent administration of nitrates, however, cannot provide continuous therapeutic benefits, and thus monotherapy with nitrates is not suitable for many patients with stable angina pectoris.

Possible mechanisms of nitrate tolerance

Prolonged exposure to organic nitrates has been shown to lead to the rapid development of tolerance to the peripheral and coronary vasodilatory effects of these drugs. As a result of this phenomenon, the hemodynamic and anti-ischemic effects of nitrates may be rapidly attenuated in patients with ischemic heart disease, congestive heart failure, or both. This nitrate tolerance appears to be both dose- and time-dependent. Likely mechanisms proposed for its development are multifactorial and include depletion of sulfhydryl groups, a nitrate-mediated increase in blood volume, and neurohormonal stimulation with activation of vasoconstrictive mechanisms.

Update on nitrate tolerance

1. It is now recognised that nitrate therapy designed to provide effects throughout 24 h each day induces tolerance. Such tolerance may be partial or complete and is associated with diminished haemodynamic and clinical effects. 2. The mechanism of tolerance is not completely understood but it seems to be related to the depletion of reduced sulphydryl groups in vascular smooth muscle and to the activation of counter-regulatory forces. These include elevated plasma catecholamines, arginine vasopressin and plasma renin activity. Activity of the renin-angiotensin system is associated with sodium and water retention and plasma volume expansion. The increase in vasoconstrictor influences and augmented plasma volume could modulate the effect of nitrate-induced vasodilatation.

Avoidance of tolerance and lack of rebound with intermittent dose titrated transdermal glyceryl trinitrate. The Transdermal Nitrate Investigators

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the efficacy of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate given continuously and with a nocturnal nitrate free period.

DESIGN

Double blind placebo controlled study with two parallel limbs.

SETTING

Multicentre trial.

PATIENTS

52 patients randomised to receive either continuous treatment (23 patients) or intermittent treatment with an individually titrated dose (29 patients) for 14 days: both treatments were compared with placebo in a cross-over fashion.

INTERVENTION

Continuous treatment with 10 mg per 24 hours of transdermal glyceryl trinitrate or intermittent transdermal glyceryl trinitrate titrated to give an arbitrary 10 mm Hg drop in systolic blood pressure (mean dose 18.2 mg) given over approximately 16 hours.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

Treadmill exercise stress testing and ambulatory monitoring of the ST segment after 14 days' treatment.

RESULTS

After 14 days' intermittent treatment resting supine and standing systolic blood pressure fell by 7.5 mm Hg (95% confidence interval 2.7 to 12.2) and 9.0 mm Hg (95% CI 3.4 to 14.5) respectively (p less than 0.01); resting heart rate was unchanged. Mean heart rate at 1 mm ST segment depression rose by 11.9 beats/min (CI 1.1 to 23.7) (p less than 0.05), mean time to onset of angina increased by 59 seconds (CI 10.8 to 108) (p less than 0.05), and total exercise duration increased by 40 seconds (p less than 0.05). These changes were not seen after continuous treatment. The frequency of ischaemic episodes was not reduced with either regimen nor was the circadian distribution of these episodes altered, in particular nocturnal episodes did not increase during intermittent treatment.

CONCLUSION

Tolerance to glyceryl trinitrate was avoided by the use of individually titrated doses administered with a nocturnal nitrate free period. There was no evidence of "rebound" on ambulatory monitoring during this treatment.

Comparison of the effect of isosorbide-5-mononitrate and isosorbide dinitrate in a slow-release form on exercise-induced myocardial ischemia

A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled crossover study on 20 patients with exercise-induced angina pectoris and reproducible ST-segment depression during exercise-stress test was performed to compare the effect of a single dose of 120 mg of isosorbide dinitrate in a slow-release form with that of a twice-daily application of 20 mg of isosorbide-5-mononitrate. Symptom-limited exercise tests were done, and nitrate plasma levels were measured in the subjects 6, 10, and 24 hours after the first administration of the drug. Both drugs produced a highly significant reduction in the size of exercise-induced ST-depressions (P less than .001) 6 and 10 hours after the first administration of isosorbide dinitrate as well as 6 hours after the first and 4 hours after the second dose of isosorbide-5-mononitrate. The effect was still significant (P less than .05) 24 hours after the administration of isosorbide dinitrate in a slow-release form and 18 hours after the second dose of isosorbide-5-mononitrate. In the case of the drug isosorbide dinitrate, nitrate plasma levels for its metabolite, isosorbide-5-mononitrate, were highest 10 hours after first application. In the case of the drug isosorbide-5-mononitrate, nitrate plasma levels were highest 4 hours after the second dose. Two 20 mg doses of isosorbide-5-mononitrate and a single dose of 120 mg isosorbide dinitrate in a slow release form have a comparable effect on the reduction of exercise-induced ST-segment depressions.

Nitrates: why and how should they be used today? Current status of the clinical usefulness of nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate and isosorbide-5-mononitrate

Nitrates are highly effective both in terminating acute attacks of angina pectoris and in the prophylaxis of symptomatic and asymptomatic myocardial ischemia. Preload reduction by venodilatation is the prevailing mechanism of nitrates in patients with chronic stable angina and is the unique feature distinguishing them from beta and calcium-channel blockers. Nitrates dilate coronary arteries not only in pre- and poststenotic vessels, but also in eccentric lesions. In patients with endothelial dysfunction, nitrates seem to be the physiological substitute for endothelium-derived relaxing factor. During the past decade, however, there has been substantial evidence of a clinically relevant loss of the anti-ischemic effects ("nitrate tolerance"). Many studies with oral dosing of isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide-5-mononitrate at least three times daily have proven nitrate tolerance in patients with coronary artery disease and/or congestive heart failure. Complete loss of anti-ischemic effects after repetitive, continuous patch attachments has also been found. As we first showed in 1983, intermittent therapy with once-daily ingestion of high-dose sustained-release isosorbide dinitrate was successful in preventing the development of tolerance. Similarly, tolerance to isosorbide-5-mononitrate also does not develop when it is ingested once daily. It is now generally accepted that a daily low-nitrate interval is required to prevent tolerance development. Although the minimal patch-free interval required to prevent tolerance needs further investigation, a 12-h patch-free interval should prevent tolerance in most patients. The prolonged duration of action of once-daily high-dosage administration of sustained-release formulations, the improved patient compliance with a single daily administration, and the increased likelihood of maximal anti-ischemic effects are important reasons for recommending high single daily doses of isosorbide dinitrate or isosorbide-5-mononitrate.

Nitrate tolerance in angina pectoris

Tolerance to the hemodynamic and antianginal effects of the organic nitrates develops rapidly during therapy. This has been documented with a variety of nitrate preparations and with different routes of administration. Dosing strategies designed to provide therapeutic plasma nitrate concentrations throughout the 24 hours of the day are regularly associated with the development of tolerance. Recent information indicates that dosing schedules providing a nitrate-free period will permit continued efficacy of the organic nitrates without tolerance development. This can be accomplished in several ways. With oral preparations of isosorbide dinitrate, medication can be given 3 times daily, omitting the evening dose. Buccal nitroglycerin is usually given 3 times daily after meals, and this has been shown not to be associated with tolerance. Likewise, preliminary studies suggest that removal of the nitroglycerin patches for a period of several hours each day will prevent the development of tolerance. Much needs to be learned about the nitrate-free period. With oral isosorbide dinitrate, it appears that 12 hours is required, but this could be substantially less with nitroglycerin preparations. It is also possible that several short periods with low nitrate levels each day would suffice. Thus, simply increasing the interval between dosing of oral preparations may provide an adequate, low, nitrate-free period.

Recent developments in the use of nitrates for treatment of angina pectoris

Organic nitrates are effective in the treatment and prophylaxis of angina pectoris. The major clinical problem of tolerance may be avoided if the daily plasma concentrations of the active metabolite, isosorbide-5-mononitrate are maintained at 100-300 ng/ml. The most promising development in achieving this is the use of sustained release preparations.

Nitrates

Nitroglycerin and the long-acting nitrates are playing an increasingly important role in cardiovascular medicine. These agents are recommended in all of the various anginal syndromes and are as effective as the beta-blockers and calcium channel antagonists. There is a definite place for nitrate therapy in treating the complications of acute myocardial infarction. These drugs are also highly effective as unloading therapy in congestive heart failure. The mechanisms of action of the nitrates are reviewed in this article. Information is provided regarding nitrate efficacy in all the major clinical syndromes in which these drugs are used. Finally, appropriate dosing strategies are suggested that should eliminate the potential problem of nitrate tolerance.

Nitrate tolerance

The organic nitrates are the most widely used agents in the management of patients with angina pectoris. When initially administered by the oral route, the nitrates produce profound changes in systemic hemodynamics and significant and prolonged improvement in exercise duration. It has been shown that during short periods of regular oral nitrate administration, the hemodynamic, antiischemic and antianginal effects of the nitrates are greatly reduced. Thus, when initially administered, oral isosorbide dinitrate prolongs exercise duration for a period of several hours, but during sustained 4-times-daily therapy, exercise tolerance is improved for only 2 hours after administration. Studies with transdermal preparations of isosorbide dinitrate and nitroglycerin also show improvement during short-term administration for up to 8 hours, but after several days of once-daily therapy, the effects of these agents are similar to placebo. It is apparent that nitrate tolerance is a clinically relevant problem. Although tolerance develops rapidly during nitrate therapy, it is reversed promptly during nitrate-free periods. Oral nitrates maintain their antianginal effects when given 2 or 3 times daily with provision of a nitrate-free period. Studies are currently underway to investigate the effects of intermittent administration schedules with transdermal nitrate preparations.

Induction and circumvention of nitrate tolerance applying different dosage intervals

There is increasing evidence that constant nitrate plasma levels, as induced by at least three-times-daily ingestions of isosorbide dinitrate in sustained-release form, lead to an attenuation or even complete loss of the anti-ischemic effects (nitrate tolerance). Therefore, the dependence of tolerance development on dosage intervals according to once-daily and twice-daily ingestions was assessed. Tablets of isosorbide dinitrate (80 mg) in sustained-release form were administered once-daily at 8 A.M. (dosage interval 24 hours) or twice-daily at 8 A.M. and 8 P.M. (dosage interval 12 hours), as well as at 8 A.M. and 2 P.M., respectively (maximal dosage interval 18 hours). A total of 34 patients with angiographically proven coronary artery disease, a history of stable, exercise-dependent angina pectoris, and a reproducible, exercise-induced ST-segment depression of at least 0.15 mV (1.5 mm), who initially showed a response to 80 mg of isosorbide dinitrate, were enrolled. The anti-ischemic effects of isosorbide dinitrate on exercise-induced ischemia were objectively determined by the measurement of exercise-induced ST-segment depression before as well as two, six, and 12 hours after the ingestion at the first and the 15th day of the studies. Since the dosage interval of 12 hours resulted in constant plasma levels, the initially beneficial anti-ischemic effects of isosorbide dinitrate were considerably attenuated after two weeks of treatment. In contrast, the once-daily regimen with its intermittent peaks and valleys of nitrate plasma levels showed identical anti-ischemic effects at the 15th day as compared with the first day. Ingestions at 8 A.M. and 2 P.M. also circumvented the development of nitrate tolerance, however, combined with an even more pronounced anti-ischemic effect after 12 hours as compared with the once-daily regimen. Thus, the circumvention of nitrate tolerance requires a daily "nitrate-poor" interval. The best compromise between a maximal possible anti-ischemic effect and the circumvention of tolerance development was found for the "eccentric" dosage regimen in which the tablets were ingested in the morning and early afternoon.

Tolerance to organic nitrates in ischemic heart disease

The development of tolerance to organic nitrates in patients with ischemic heart disease is reviewed, with particular interest in alterations to both the hemodynamic and antiischemic effects over time. The article primarily focuses on how tolerance is defined, what biochemical mechanisms are involved when this condition occurs, which agents have been associated with the development of tolerance, and what can be done to prevent or reverse the condition in patients taking nitrates for ischemic heart disease. From a historical perspective, tolerance to organic nitrates has been a recognized phenomenon since the last century. The role that blood-level determinations and nitroglycerin pharmacokinetics have in the development of tolerance is discussed, and an extensive overview of currently marketed organic nitrate preparations and a few others available only through approved investigational protocols is presented. The role of cross-tolerance is discussed as is the role that nitrate-free intervals play in partially or completely reversing the effects of tolerance during chronic nitrate therapy. Additionally, a discussion of which specific nitrate formulation are least likely to have tolerance associated with their use is included, such as short-acting nitrate formulations with the exception of the intravenous dosage form. Finally, buccal nitroglycerin is presented as another new formulation that appears to be associated with minimal tolerance in studies already completed.

In vivo induction and reversal of nitroglycerin tolerance in human coronary arteries

The mechanism by which tolerance to the clinical effects of organic nitrates develops has not been elucidated. This study was done to determine whether an intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin induces tolerance in the coronary vascular bed and whether such tolerance is reversed by the sulfhydryl-group donor N-acetylcysteine. We studied 19 subjects--17 with coronary artery disease and 2 without it--who had a mean age (+/- SD) of 54 +/- 9 years. Coronary sinus blood flow, which approximates blood flow to the left ventricle, was measured before and during intracoronary injections of nitroglycerin (10, 25, 50, and 100 micrograms). The patients then received a 24-hour intravenous infusion of saline (n = 7) or of nitroglycerin, 45 +/- 13 micrograms per minute (n = 12), after which the responses of coronary sinus flow to the same doses of intracoronary nitroglycerin used earlier were measured. In the seven patients given saline, the four doses of intracoronary nitroglycerin caused similar percentage increases in coronary sinus flow before and after the saline infusion. In the 12 patients given intravenous nitroglycerin, the four intracoronary doses caused percentage increases in coronary flow before the infusion of 30 +/- 9, 35 +/- 14, 41 +/- 12, and 52 +/- 15, respectively. After the infusion, the same doses of nitroglycerin caused smaller (P less than 0.05) percentage increases (16 +/- 6, 21 +/- 11, 23 +/- 12, and 27 +/- 11, respectively), indicating the development of partial tolerance. Subsequently, 7 of the 12 patients received N-acetylcysteine, after which intracoronary nitroglycerin caused percentage increases in coronary sinus flow similar to the values measured before the intravenous nitroglycerin was given (34 +/- 13, 32 +/- 8, 38 +/- 11, and 44 +/- 16, respectively). We conclude that the coronary vasodilator effect of nitroglycerin is attenuated by an intravenous infusion of nitroglycerin (that is, partial tolerance develops) and that tolerance to the agent can be reversed by administration of the sulfhydryl-group donor N-acetylcysteine. The mechanism by which N-acetylcysteine reverses tolerance will require further investigation.

The haemodynamic and anti-ischaemic effects of a single tablet of 80 mg isosorbide dinitrate in slow-release formulation and a review of nitrate tolerance

There is increasing evidence that relatively constant plasma nitrate concentrations induced by 3-times-daily administration of isosorbide dinitrate can lead to an attenuation or even complete loss of the drug's anti-ischaemic effects (nitrate tolerance). We therefore assessed the dependence of nitrate tolerance development from the haemodynamic and anti-ischaemic effects of a slow-release tablet formulation of isosorbide dinitrate 80 mg, administered according to different daily dosage regimens in patients with angina. It was found that a once-daily regimen, with its consequent peak and trough plasma nitrate concentrations, is capable of protecting against exercise-induced myocardial ischaemia for about 12 hours with the circumvention of nitrate tolerance.

Determination of isosorbide dinitrate biotransformation in various tissues of the rabbit by capillary column gas-liquid chromatography

A selective and sensitive capillary column gas-liquid chromatographic procedure has been developed for the simultaneous determination of isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and its mononitrate metabolites in rabbit blood and tissue homogenates. The method has a limit of detection of 0.1 ng ml-1 for ISDN, 1 ng ml-1 for isosorbide 5-mononitrate (5-ISMN), and 2 ng ml-1 for isosorbide 2-mononitrate (2-ISMN). The day-to-day coefficients of variation were 2.5, 6.8, and 11.3 per cent for ISDN, 5-ISMN, and 2-ISMN, respectively. The within-day coefficients of variation were 2.7, 4.9 and 6.5 per cent for ISDN, 5-ISMN, and 2-ISMN, respectively. The procedure was used to determine the biotransformation of ISDN (2 X 10(-7) M) to 5-ISMN and 2-ISMN by various rabbit tissue homogenates. The relative rate of biotransformation of ISDN was liver greater than lung approximately equal to intestine greater than kidney greater than blood approximately equal to skeletal muscle, with the lung and intestine homogenates being about two-thirds as active as liver homogenates. These results indicate that extrahepatic biotransformation of ISDN, especially by lung and intestine, may contribute to the systemic clearance of ISDN in the rabbit.

Isosorbide-5-mononitrate and isosorbide dinitrate retard in the treatment of coronary heart disease: a multi-centre study

A multi-centre study was carried out in 200 coronary patients to compare the efficacy and tolerance of isosorbide dinitrate retard (40 mg) and isosorbide-5-mononitrate (20 mg) with regard to the frequency of anginal attacks and consumption of sub-lingual (short acting) nitrates. After receiving treatment for 2 weeks with isosorbide dinitrate retard at a dosage of 2 or 3 tablets per day, only those patients continued the study who had a weekly average of 4 or more anginal attacks during this basal period. The selected patients were divided in 4 groups of 50 patients and received treatment for a further 4 weeks with either isosorbide dinitrate retard at a dosage of 2 tablets (Group D2) or 3 tablets (D3) per day or isosorbide-5-mononitrate at a dosage of 2 tablets (Group M2) or 3 tablets (Group M3) per day. A progressive improvement in symptoms was seen at the end of 2 and 4 weeks with both drugs. The greater therapeutic benefits were obtained in patients in Group M2; the greater difference was observed between Group M2 and D2 (p less than 0.01) and there were also significant differences (p less than 0.05) between Groups M2 and D3 and between Groups M3 and D3. Analysis of the results showed that the more frequently angina attacks had occurred during the basal period, the greater was therapeutic benefit obtained with isosorbide-5-mononitrate compared to isosorbide dinitrate retard at the end of the study. Heart rate at the end of the study showed a slight tendency to increase over initial levels in all groups. In contrast, systolic blood pressure decreased very significantly in all groups (p less than 0.001). Diastolic blood pressure also decreased in all groups but only to a highly significant degree in patients treated with isosorbide-5-mononitrate (p less than 0.001) and the two sub-groups M2 and M3 (p less than 0.005). In patients treated with isosorbide dinitrate retard, the reduction in diastolic pressure was only statistically significant when the 100 patients in the group were considered as a whole (p less than 0.05), while this was not the case for the two sub-groups D2 and D3. The most frequent side-effect was headache, which improved gradually. During treatment there was a progressive dissociation between reduction in the intensity and frequency of this adverse effect and the increasing anti-anginal action of the nitrates.

Nitrate tolerance

Nitrates are widely used in anginal prophylaxis. In spite of the fact that the concept of nitrate tolerance was first put forward many years ago, the question of tolerance has remained controversial. There is widespread agreement that tolerance does occur to the effects of nitrates on arterial pressure. In contrast, tolerance to the venous and pulmonary effects is disputed. Similarly, the possibility of tolerance to the antianginal effects remains at issue. In this review, I discuss the factors which may have contributed to conflicting results in different studies, in particular recent findings on the rapidity of onset and reversal of tolerance. Tolerance develops rapidly on initiation of treatment and disappears equally rapidly on its discontinuation. In addition, tolerance appears to be a function of plasma nitrate profile. It is most likely to occur when plasma nitrate levels are constant and least likely when nitrate levels fluctuate. Furthermore, the provision of a daily nitrate free interval may protect against the development of tolerance. I then discuss the implications of these findings for patient management. They suggest that nitrate prophylaxis should not be used continuously, if this can be avoided. Rather, prophylaxis should be tailored to the individual to provide protection at times of maximum susceptibility, while allowing nitrate levels to fall at other times. The adequacy of antianginal protection with drug regimens incorporating a nitrate free interval requires further assessment. Similarly, the possibility that a nitrate free interval might lead to withdrawal effects and exacerbation of angina needs to be excluded.

Attenuation by isosorbide dinitrate of coronary occlusion-induced acidosis in the dog myocardium

In dogs anaesthetized with pentobarbitone, the thorax was opened and myocardial pH measured continuously by the use of a glass pH electrode inserted in the left ventricular wall. The left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) was partially occluded so that the LAD flow could be reduced to a half or one-third of the original flow (partial occlusion). LAD partial occlusion was continued for 90 min, drug or saline being infused for the last 60 min of this period. LAD occlusion decreased myocardial pH significantly by 0.41 to 0.67 pH units, and increased ST segment of the surface electrocardiogram from 11.7 to 12.1 mV. In dogs with non-ischaemic normal hearts, isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN; 1 mg kg-1) did not change markedly either the LAD flow, myocardial pH or heart rate, whereas it decreased myocardial contractile force (determined by a strain gauge arch) slightly and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressure markedly. In dogs with partial LAD occlusion, ISDN (1 mg kg-1) increased myocardial pH significantly and decreased blood pressure, but did not change ST segment elevation in an epicardial lead. These results indicate that ISDN attenuates ischaemia-induced acidosis without attenuating ischaemia-induced ST elevation in the dog myocardium.

Comparison of buccal nitroglycerin and oral isosorbide dinitrate for nitrate tolerance in stable angina pectoris

Sixteen patients with chronic stable angina pectoris were studied to compare the hemodynamic and antianginal effects of buccal nitroglycerin (GTN) in a dose of 3 mg administered 3 times daily and oral isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in a dose of 30 mg administered 4 times daily. Compared with placebo, both oral ISDN and buccal GTN treatment induced a decrease in systolic blood pressure at rest over a 5-hour period during acute but not during sustained therapy. Neither buccal GTN nor oral ISDN modified the changes in systolic blood pressure during exercise. Both treatment programs were associated with a higher exercise heart rate during acute therapy. During sustained treatment with buccal GTN, the heart rate during exercise remained greater than that during placebo throughout the 5-hour test period, but during treatment with oral ISDN, only the exercise heart rate at 1 hour was greater than that seen with placebo. Treadmill walking time to the onset of angina and to the development of moderate angina increased significantly during acute therapy with both buccal GTN and oral ISDN. The clinical efficacy of buccal GTN was maintained after 2 weeks of 3-times-daily therapy. In contrast, during 4-times-daily therapy with oral ISDN, treadmill walking time was prolonged for only 1 hour after drug administration. This investigation indicates that tolerance develops during 4-times-daily therapy with oral ISDN, but 3 times daily therapy with buccal GTN is not associated with diminished antianginal effects.

Physician choices in the treatment of angina pectoris

Uncertainty about optimal treatment for many diseases results in heterogeneous management by definition. It was hypothesized that identifiable characteristics in a physician's background would influence the management of any such condition and thereby explain some of this heterogeneity. A vignette describing a patient with new-onset angina and a questionnaire ascertaining individual physician characteristics and management preferences were sent to attending physicians and house staff in the Department of Medicine at New York University School of Medicine. Although physicians believed very strongly that the patient had angina on the basis of the history, there was no consensus about managing the hypothetic patient. The age of the physician was the single most important predictor of management, with the younger half of the sample more likely to hospitalize (p less than 0.001), less likely to prescribe nitroglycerin as a sole therapy (p less than 0.005), and more likely to prescribe beta blockers (p less than 0.005). The era in which a physician trains may determine practices that persist for a lifetime. These findings may have important implications for medical education and the quality and cost of medical care.

Nitrate tolerance

The nitrate group of drugs is one of the most commonly used therapeutic modalities. The application of the nitrates is generally directed at ameliorating the symptoms of occlusive coronary artery disease (angina) and/or congestive heart failure. Although studies are available that attempt to refute the concept of nitrate-induced tolerance in angina pectoris, well-designed and well-controlled reports are appearing that convincingly establish the occurrence of one or more expressions of tolerance (e.g., shorter duration of action, loss of intensity of effect) with long-term dosing in this clinical setting. The type and degree of tolerance to nitrate therapy in angina pectoris depend on a number of pharmaceutic-pharmacokinetic considerations, including route of administration, dose strength, dosing frequency, and magnitude and duration of drug delivery. Reports concerning the development of tolerance to nitrates in congestive heart failure are also somewhat conflicting. However, one form and dose of nitrate therapy has been studied rather extensively: isosorbide dinitrate at 40 mg orally every 6 hours. The administration of this preparation over 3 months to a population with heart failure resulted in the development of tolerance to the systemic arterial-arteriolar effects, whereas the pulmonary vascular and venous dilative effects were maintained throughout the long-term dosing period. Exercise tolerance improved for the long-term isosorbide dinitrate group compared to the group receiving long-term placebo therapy. The mechanism(s) of tolerance to the nitrates is not known; altered disposition of reduced sulfhydryl groups at receptor and intracellular sites is the leading hypothesis.

Comparison of antianginal efficacy of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate in chronic stable angina: a long-term, randomized, double-blind, crossover study

Using a double-blind, crossover design, the comparative efficacy and safety of nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate in the treatment of stable angina were studied in 34 patients. The study included a 2-week placebo washout period and two 6-week periods during which patients were randomized to either nifedipine or isosorbide dinitrate. The doses were titrated for each patient, and mean doses of the 2 drugs were comparable. A time-limited thallium treadmill test was performed at the end of each phase. Ischemic zone count rates were normalized to those of the nonischemic zone, and the change in this ratio with redistribution was calculated as reversible thallium defect. Two patients were discontinued from the study within 1 week after initiation of isosorbide dinitrate because of severe, intolerable headache. Two patients were withdrawn while receiving nifedipine: one had new congestive heart failure and the other had increasing angina. Of the remaining 30 patients who tolerated both drugs for at least 1 week, 4 patients from the isosorbide dinitrate group were either prematurely crossed over or discontinued from the study because of headache. One patient suffered headache from both drugs and was discontinued from the study. In the 30 patients, only nifedipine significantly reduced resting arterial pressure compared with baseline. Further, only nifedipine therapy resulted in significant decreases in the rate-pressure product and systolic pressure at a given workload. However, significant decreases in angina frequency, nitroglycerin consumption and exercise-induced maximum ST-segment depression and reversible thallium perfusion defect were produced by both nifedipine and isosorbide dinitrate.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Hemodynamic effects of molsidomine, isosorbide dinitrate, and nifedipine at rest and during exercise

In the first study the hemodynamic effects of standard doses of molsidomine (2 mg intravenously), isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) (5 mg sublingually), and nifedipine (20 mg sublingually) were assessed at rest and under exercise conditions in a group of 30 patients with coronary heart disease. With the patients at rest both molsidomine and ISDN were associated with prompt reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure, whereas nifedipine was associated with slight reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure and mean pulmonary artery pressure that did not attain statistical significance. Nifedipine and ISDN caused a decrease in mean aortic blood pressure, which resulted in a reactive increase in heart rate that was only significant with nifedipine. After administration of molsidomine, there was no significant change in mean aortic pressure at rest. There were reductions in stroke volume index and cardiac index after administration of molsidomine and ISDN. Nifedipine, however, was associated with significant increases in stroke volume index and cardiac index. None of the three test substances caused changes of contractility parameters. Under exercise conditions reductions in left ventricular end-diastolic pressure, mean pulmonary pressure, and mean aortic pressure were documented following administration of molsidomine, ISDN, and nifedipine. There were no major changes in maximum heart rate or stroke volume index during exercise with any of the three drugs. However, nifedipine was associated with a significant increase in cardiac index, whereas molsidomine and ISDN produced no major changes.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Nitrate cross-tolerance: effect of sublingual isosorbide dinitrate and nitroglycerin during sustained nitrate therapy

In a randomized, single-blind, crossover study, 10 patients with stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris were studied during sustained therapy with oral isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN). Circulatory changes and exercise performance were evaluated before and 6 hours after therapy with oral ISDN. One-half hour after this therapy, sublingual ISDN or nitroglycerin (NTG) was administered and exercise testing repeated. Treadmill walking time 6 hours after oral ISDN was similar to the control value. Subsequent administration of sublingual ISDN improved walking time from 429 +/- 156 to 513 +/- 166 seconds (p less than 0.005), whereas after NTG improved from 411 +/- 159 to 480 +/- 158 second (p less than 0.005). The improvement in walking time with ISDN (23%) and NTG (18%) and the absolute walking times were not different. The standing systolic blood pressure decreased from 124 +/- 23 to 112 +/- 22 mm Hg (p less than 0.02) after therapy with sublingual ISDN and 122 +/- 23 to 110 +/- 24 mm Hg (p less than 0.005) after administration of NTG. This study demonstrates that (1) during sustained ISDN therapy, walking time returns to control values by 6 hours; (2) administration of either sublingual ISDN or NTG results in significant circulatory changes and improvement in walking time; and (3) the changes in circulatory and exercise variables after administration of NTG in patients taking sustained ISDN therapy cannot be taken as evidence of an absence of cross-tolerance between these agents.

Clinical studies with transdermal nitroglycerin

The short- and long-term effects of various Nitro-Dur formulations on performance and hemodynamics were studied in 15 men with stable angina pectoris who also had a positive treadmill exercise test. A treadmill exercise score (TES) was used that quantified the "ischemic" ST segment response to exercise. The score incorporated information that reflected the rapidity of evolution of ST segment depression during exercise and the time required for it to resolve after cessation of exercise. In early tests (n = 10) Nitro-Dur improved both the TES (by 31%: p less than 0.0001) and the time required for 1 mm ST segment depression (by 33%: p less than 0.0001). At all dosage levels, Nitro-Dur also decreased resting systolic blood pressure and increased resting heart rate. No dose-response patterns emerged. Changes in TES and time to ST segment depression were greater with sublingual nitroglycerin than they were with Nitro-Dur. In tests conducted after prolonged dosage (n = 5), the effects of Nitro-Dur on blood pressure and heart rate became attenuated at weeks 2 and 4, although cardiac responsiveness was preserved, as reflected in the increased time required before the occurrence of 1 mm ST segment depression. The latter effect was also observed with sublingual nitroglycerin. The clinical relevance of these data to the design of individual patient therapy is discussed.

Transdermal isosorbide dinitrate in angina pectoris: effect of acute and sustained therapy

Twelve patients with chronic, stable angina pectoris underwent hemodynamic investigations and treadmill exercise testing before and during a 24-hour period after the application of 100 mg of transdermal isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) and matching placebo. Compared with placebo, there were no changes in systolic blood pressure or heart rate at rest or during exercise; but treadmill walking time to the onset of angina and to the development of moderate angina was significantly prolonged at 2, 4 and 8 hours, but not at 24 hours, after drug application. Patients subsequently received these same treatment regimens for 7 to 10 days and underwent repeat exercise testing. During this sustained phase of the investigation, treadmill walking time to the onset of angina and to the development of moderate angina was similar 4, 8 and 24 hours after application of ISDN and placebo. Thus, transdermal ISDN in a dose of 100 mg is effective for 8 hours during acute therapy, but during sustained therapy tolerance developed and no antianginal effects of ISDN persisted.

Nitrate delivery systems in perspective. A decade of progress

In recent years the use of nitroglycerin and long-acting nitrate compounds in clinical practice has been increasing. Only 10 to 15 years ago these drugs, at least in oral formulation, were felt to have no clinical utility because of concern that potent hepatic enzyme activity would degrade sufficient amounts of the nitrate compounds from reaching the systemic circulation. However, it is now recognized that oral nitrate administration when given in sufficient amounts achieves therapeutic plasma concentrations and desired clinical effects. Nitrates are routinely used for the treatment of stable and unstable angina and also play a role in therapy for complications of myocardial infarction. Nitrates are very effective agents for preload reduction in vasodilator therapy of congestive heart failure. A wide variety of nitrate delivery systems, including the standard oral and sublingual formulations, and as well as the new transdermal nitroglycerin discs and buccal nitroglycerin, are now available. Sublingual nitroglycerin, isosorbide dinitrate, and buccal nitroglycerin are used for acute treatment of attacks of ischemic chest pain. For ambulatory patients, long-acting therapy can be administered by oral, topical ointment, transdermal disc, and buccal nitroglycerin formulations. Each compound has a slightly different onset and duration of action, which is in part dose-dependent. The relative merits and problems with each of the formulations are reviewed. Intravenous nitroglycerin is now commercially available and plays an increasing role in the intensive care units. It is an ideal drug for acute chest pain syndromes, including acute myocardial infarction. Specialized tubing does not need to be employed. The wide variety of nitrate delivery systems available to physicians makes use of this tried and true therapy practical and easy to carry out for clinicians.

Dose-response relation of antianginal activity of isosorbide dinitrate

Eleven men with angiographic evidence of coronary heart disease and stable, exercise-induced angina pectoris were given placebo (P) or isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) in a daily dose of 30, 120, 240 or 480 mg, in a randomized single-blind trial. The daily doses were administered 6 times a day as single oral doses of 5, 20, 40 and 80 mg. Each dose or placebo was given for 7 days. Before therapy was begun, and on the seventh day of each treatment period, an exercise ECG with standardized level and duration of exercise was recorded. Subsequently, a 4-week treatment period with 480 mg/day was carried out at the end of which another stress test was performed. The was followed by a final 2-week placebo period. The frequency of anginal attacks per week tended to decrease with increasing nitrate doses, but decreased significantly only after the highest dose (480 mg/day) compared with placebo. Continuation of therapy with 480 mg/day maintained the reduced rate of anginal attacks. The ischemic response, expressed as the sum of ST-segment depressions in the exercise ECG, revealed a dose-dependent reduction of 26% (30 mg/day), 39% (120 mg/day) (p less than 0.01), 63% (240 mg/day) (p less than 0.01) and 72% (480 mg/day) (p less than 0.01), respectively. At the end of the 4-week treatment period with 480 mg/day, antianginal efficacy was found to be moderately reduced, showing a 56% reduction of ischemic response compared to the placebo trial. The time of onset of angina during exercise testing was also delayed in relation to the dosage given.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Haemodynamics and plasma concentrations following sublingual GTN and intravenous, or inhaled, isosorbide dinitrate

We measured plasma nitrate levels and haemodynamics following sublingual glyceryl trinitrate (GTN) (0.5 mg), or isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN) administered intravenously (0.5 mg) or by inhalation (1.25 mg) in 23 patients undergoing cardiac catheterisation for investigation of chest pain. Peak levels were detected at 90 s and 5 min following intravenous and inhaled ISDN respectively and at 3 min following sublingual GTN. Intravenous and inhaled ISDN produced similar plasma levels at 30 s and both were significantly greater than following sublingual GTN. Plasma levels were maintained for longer following inhaled ISDN than intravenous ISDN or sublingual GTN. Haemodynamic responses were qualitatively similar following each treatment; reduction in pulmonary vascular resistance and pressure and left ventricular end diastolic pressure occurred in each group. Heart rate, cardiac output and LV dP/dt.P-1 remained unchanged. Maximal haemodynamic responses were greater following ISDN than GTN, with little difference between the two preparations of ISDN. Haemodynamic responses were more sustained following inhaled ISDN than following sublingual GTN or intravenous ISDN, the latter two being similar in this respect. These findings suggest that inhaled ISDN may provide more rapid and sustained relief from angina than sublingual GTN.